Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2022-048 - A 2022-008 - 210 Waterloo Street Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: January 18, 2022 SUBMITTED BY: Bateman, Brian, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7869 PREPARED BY: Vieira, Jessica, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7074 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: January 7, 2022 REPORT NO.: DSD-2022-048 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2022-008 210 Waterloo Street Owner Thomas & Kaitlin Redekopp Applicant Dale Stewart RECOMMENDATION: That application A2022-008 for 2010 Waterloo Street, requesting relief from: a) Section 5.6A.4 d) to allow a deck exceeding 0.6 metres in height to have a side yard setback of 0.7 metres, whereas 1.2 metres is required; b) Section 40.2.2 to allow a side yard setback of 0.6 metres whereas 1.2 metres is required; c) Section 6.1.1.1 b) ii) e) to allow a driveway to have a side yard setback of 0 metres whereas 0.6 metres is required; to facilitate the construction of a proposed two-storey rear yard addition and deck, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner applies for a building permit prior to construction, to the satisfaction 2. That in light of the treed nature of the property and the proximity of trees in shared ownership, the owner shall prepare a Tree Preservation Plan for the lands in Director of Planning and where necessary, implemented prior to any demolition, tree removal, grading or the issuance of building permits. Such plans shall include, among other matters, the identification of a proposed building envelope/work zone, building elevation drawings, landscaped area and vegetation to be removed and/or preserved. The owner further agrees to implement the approved plan. No changes to the said plan ; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. 3. That the Owner submit a grading plan and agrees to implement the approved plan, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning in consultation with the Director of Engineering; and 4. That all conditions be completed by January 18, 2023. Any request for a time extension must be approved in writing by the Manager of Development Review (or designate) prior to the completion date set out in this decision. Failure to complete the conditions will result in this approval becoming null and void. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to recommend conditional approval of a minor variance application requesting relief from side yard setbacks. This application is to facilitate the construction of a two- storey, rear yard addition with a new carport, deck, and widened driveway. The applicant is requesting relief to allow for a deck exceeding 0.6 metres in height to have a side yard setback of 0.6 metres whereas 1.2 metres is required. Relief to allow a dwelling to have a side yard setback of 0.6 metres whereas 1.2 metres is required is also being requested. Finally, the applicant is requesting to legalize an existing driveway with a side yard setback of 0.0 metres, whereas 0.6 metres is required. Figure 1: Location Map BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the east side of Waterloo Street, within the Mt. Hope Huron Park Planning Community. It is also within a Residential Intensification in Establish Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS) Area (Appendix H of Zoning By-law 85-1). The surrounding area is characterized predominately by low-density residential uses in the form of single-detached housing and low-rise multiple dwellings. To the rear of the subject land there is open space land use in the form of Uniroyal Goodrich Park and the Spur-line trail, as well as employment lands. The subject land is currently developed with a two-storey, single-detached residential dwelling. The property is designated as Low Rise Residential a Major Transit Station Area Map. It is zoned as Residential Six Zone (R-6)in Zoning By-law 85-1; at present the lot is not subject to Zoning By-law 85-1. The applicant is proposing to construct a two-storey rear yard addition, along with a new rear deck, a carport in the side yard and a widened driveway. To facilitate construction, the applicant is requesting relief to permit reduced side yard setbacks for the deck, carport, and driveway. City Planning staff conducted a site inspection of the property on January 4, 2022. Figure 2: Front Elevation View of the Subject Property Figure 3: Rear Elevation View of Subject Property REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O., 1990 Chap. P. 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan -Rise Residential land use designation is to permit a variety of low-density residential uses, including single-detached dwellings. The proposed addition is an extension of the existing residential use. Regarding additions which require minor variances specifically, Policy 4.C.1.8 c) encourages such projects to be directed to the rear yard except where it can be demonstrated that the modification is compatible in scale, massing, design, and character of adjacent properties and the streetscape. Most of the proposed addition is to be in the rear yard and will not be visible from the street. The only section of the proposed project which will be visible is the new carport, which will replace an existing car tent and is more in line with the character of the street. With respect to the third requested variance concerning driveway setback, the intent of the Official Plan is to permit appropriate and functional residential properties that do not adversely impact adjacent properties through the provision of adequate on-site facilities which support residential uses. In this case, the supporting facility being considered is an adequately sized driveway. The 0.0 metre setback is an existing condition. Furthermore, appropriate driveway configurations which permit the required 2.6 metre width for adequate ingress and egress are limited due to the narrow shape of the subject lot. It is anticipated that impact to the adjacent southern property is limited, particularly due to the existence of a retaining wall on 206 Waterloo Street. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law requiring a 1.2 metre side yard setback is to ensure access to the rear yard, that there is adequate buffering between buildings, and to provide adequate space for the owner to maintain their property and dwelling. Access to the rear yard can still be provided with the reduced side yard setback, particularly as the external side of the carport is open beyond the necessary structural supports to the ground. This would provide opportunity to transport maintenance equipment where required. The existing buffering distance between the adjacent dwelling to the north and the subject dwelling will not change. The buffering distance between the adjacent dwelling to the south and the proposed addition is sufficient to provide adequate separation. The decreased side yard setback for the dwelling to permit the construction of a carport will also legalize an existing condition, as the side yard setback to the north is 0.7 metres. The sawtooth configuration of the existing house and proposed addition means that this 0.7 metre setback is not consistent, and space is still available for the placement of AC units (Figure 4). Some consideration to the lots narrow width should be given. The size, setbacks, and other design standards associated with driveways in Zoning By-law 85-1 are intended to support off-street parking facilities with adequate means of ingress and egress that do not interfere with neither surrounding properties or the normal public use of a street or lane. The 0.0 metre setback is an existing condition. Further, the narrow shape of the subject property limits appropriate driveway configurations which would support the standard movement of a vehicle. Impacts to the adjacent southern property as a result of this requested variance are not anticipated, as the two properties are partially separated along the driveway by an existing retaining wall on 206 Waterloo Street. Figure 4: Section of the Proposed Site Plan, Displaying Sawtooth Configuration Is the Variance Minor? The requested variances can be considered minor, being less than a metre difference each from what is required. Appropriate access to the rear yard, adequate buffering, and safe ingress and egress of vehicles can still be accommodated without impact to adjacent properties or the surrounding area. As such, staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor in nature. Is the Variance Appropriate? The proposed variances are appropriate for the development and use of the land. They will facilitate the construction of an addition which is an extension of the existing and permitted use of the property and are not expected to impact the character of the subject property or the surrounding area as the majority of the proposed project will not be visible from the street. Building Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance. Application has been made to for the addition to the single detached dwelling is currently under review Transportation Comments: Given the existing operation of the driveway, Transportation Services does not have any concerns with the proposed application. Heritage Comments: Heritage Planning staff has no concerns with the minor variance application. The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (CHLS) dated December 2014 and prepared by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd. was approved by Council in 2015. The CHLS serves to establish an inventory and was the first step of a phased Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL) process. The property municipally addressed as 210 Waterloo Street is located within the Mt Hope/Breithaupt Neighbourhood CHL. The owner and the public will be consulted as the City considers listing CHLs on the Municipal Heritage Register, identifying CHLs in the Official Plan, and preparing action plans for each CHL with specific conservation options. Engineering Comments: Engineering has no comments. Environmental Planning Comments: any grading, tree removal or the issuance of building permits. Such plans shall include, among other matters, the identification of a proposed building envelope/work zone, landscaped area, and vegetation to be preserved. Region of Waterloo Comments: The Region of Waterloo has no concerns with the application. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital BudgetThe recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice signed was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises interested parties to find application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. CONSULT Planning staff were contacted by neighbours to inquire about what is being proposed and express some concerns. Concerns included encroachment onto neighbouring properties, impact to character of the area, grading, and stormwater management. The proposed addition and carport are entirely within the property boundaries of the subject lot and do not exceed maximum coverage permitted. Further, as the addition is proposed to be in the rear and not visible to the street and the carport is in line with the character of the area, there is no impact anticipated to the streetscape. Concerns about grading and water were passed to the building division as part of their review of the building permit application. This was communicated to those who contacted the planning division. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Building Permit application 2021 133097 is currently under review. January 05, 2022 Kristen Hilborn City of Kitchener File No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 (1) / VAR KIT, DESTARON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 21-41PIONEER DRIVE 85 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE ONTARIO INCORPORATED (2) /08 WEBER KIT, 82 WEBER STREET WEST INTER BUILDING INVESTMENTS LIMITED (7)/69, 110 MANITOU DRIVE SCOTT PATTERSON Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting January 18, 2022, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have following comments: 1) A 2022 - 001 85 Green Valley Drive No Concerns. 2) A 2022-002 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East and 12-29 Pearl Place No concerns. 3) A 2022 - 003 53 Margaret Avenue No Concerns. 4) A 2022 - 004 470 Blair Creek Drive No Concerns. 5) A 2022 - 005 86 Chestnut Street No Concerns. 6) A 2022 - 006 49 Lower Mercer Street No Concerns. 7) A 2022 - 007 110 Manitou Drive No Concerns to the proposed minor variance. The owners are made aware that a dedicated road widening of approximately 5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ bǒƒĬĻƩʹ ЌВЊЌЍЎЉ tğŭĻ Њ ƚŅ Ћ 2.13m will be required along entire property frontage along Manitou Drive for any future development application e.g. a Site Plan/Consent application stage. 8) A 2022 - 008 210 Waterloo Street No Concerns to the minor variance. 9) A 2022 - 009 764 Stirling Avenue South No Concerns. 10) A 2022 - 010 129 Max Becker Drive No Concerns. 11) A 2022 - 011 43 Maurice Street No Concerns. Please be advised that any development on the lands subject to the Applications noted above are subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 or any successor thereof and may require the payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed above. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decision on the above mentioned application to the undersigned. Yours Truly, Joginder Bhatia Transportation Planner C (226) 753-0368 CC: Sarah Goldrup CofA@Kitchener.ca 2 January 6, 2022 Sarah Goldrup Via email Committee Administrator City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 Dear Ms. Goldrup, Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting – January 18, 2022 ______________________________________________________________________ Applications for Minor Variance A 2022-001 85 Green Valley Drive A 2022-002 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East and 12-29 Pearl Place A 2022-003 53 Margaret Avenue A 2022-004 470 Blair Creek Drive A 2022-005 86 Chestnut Street A 2022-006 49 Lower Mercer Street A 2022-008 210 Waterloo Street A 2022-010 129 Max Becker Drive A 2022-011 43 Maurice Street Applications for Consent B 2022-001 26 Edgewood Drive B 2022-002 670 Fairway Road South B 2022-003 74 Rutherford Drive B 2022-004 to 006 32 Burgetz Avenue The above-noted applications are located outside the Grand River Conservation Authority areas of interest. As such, we will not undertake a review of the applications and plan review fees will not be required. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at jconroy@grandriver.ca or 519-621-2763 ext. 2230. Sincerely, Jessica Conroy, MES Pl. Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority *These comments are respectfully submitted as advice and reflect resource concerns within the scope and mandate of Page 1 of 1 the Grand River Conservation Authority. From: To:Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Re: **ACTION REQUIRED - Committee of Adjustment Meeting - Electronic Meeting January 18, 2022 Date:Friday, January 7, 2022 12:44:09 PM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png image008.png Good Morning Sarah Thank you for sending me this information regarding the Hearing for the Virtual meeting of the Committee of Adjustment for 210 Waterloo Street Kitchener Ontario., which is scheduled to begin at 10:00 am on January 18th, 2022. ***** Please include me in the virtual meeting Sarah..thank you.****** Sarah, my name is , I live at and I have studied the blueprints of the 210 Waterloo Street proposal to build. At present - they have not placed the notice sign where people can see it very well. They have placed it directly in front of their front porch, partially obscured by snow. The signis white with blacklettering but the lettering is not heavily defined.It was only a few days ago that I noticed it. These new neighbors haddrilledlarge anchors into my property by my retaining wall for their rubber car tent which effectively has blocked my access to the retaining wall and the drainage bed which keeps my basement from flooding and where my air conditioning unit is situated. I had explained to these new neighbors that I did not want anything built or placed on my property including my retaining wall or my part of the driveway which is clearly defined by the seam separating my side of the driveway from theirside...plain and simple - was easy to see but was ok with them parking there in the widened area. My air conditioning unit cannot be accessed at all now unless I hire someone to come and do the climbing to work in this area. My BIG objection to their proposed "Carport" is the space that they've requested and the drawings look like the supports for the carport and roofing system will be on my property and or flowing into the drainage area enclosed by my retaining wall and it looks like the roof will nearly reach my house wall. I am still in shock at the speed with which this proposal has come about in the middle of a Covid shutdown. My neighbors on the other side of 210 Waterloo Street are still reeling from the shock of what this monstrous addition will do to our respective property values and the complete removal of any privacy therein. It's important to mention that this entire area is sand based so the impact tremors alone will require all of us to remove pictures, mirrors etc. from crashing down from the walls.( This actually happened to me while the Spur Line was being built) I am hoping that as a homeownerand a loyal taxpayerthat our good committee representatives will do their best to protect us from the apparent cavalier disregard and ironic detachment that has presented itself in the actions of these new neighbors. Respectfully,