HomeMy WebLinkAboutFCS Agenda - 2022-02-071
KiTc�ivER
Finance and Corporate Services
Committee
Agenda
Monday, February 7, 2022, 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Electronic Meeting
Due to COVID-19 and recommendations by Waterloo Region Public Health to exercise physical
distancing, City Hall is open for select services. Members of the public are invited to participate in this
meeting electronically by accessing the meeting live -stream video at kitchener. ca/watch now.
While in-person delegation requests are not feasible at this time, members of the public are invited to
submit written comments or participate electronically in the meeting by contacting
delegation@kitchener.ca. Please refer to the delegations section on the agenda below for registration
deadlines. Written comments will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public
record.
Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance
to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994.
Chair: Councillor K. Galloway-Sealock
Vice -Chair: Councillor S. Davey
Pages
1. Commencement
2. Consent Items
The following matters are considered not to require debate and should be
approved by one motion in accordance with the recommendation contained in
each staff report. A majority vote is required to discuss any report listed as
under this section.
2.1. Sidewalk Infill through Street Reconstructions in 2022, DSD -2022-053 3
2.2. All -Way Stop Control Installations, DSD -2022-057 15
3. Delegations
Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address
the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. Delegates must register by
2:00 p.m. on February 7, 2022, in order to participate electronically.
3.1. None at this time.
4. Discussion Items
4.1. 2022 Development Charge Study Initiation, 20 m 21
FIN -2022-066
(Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.)
4.2. Proposed Use of 2 King Street West, DSD- 30 m 24
2022-058
(Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.)
5. Information Items
5.1. None
6. Adjournment
Sarah Goldrup
Committee Administrator
Page 2 of 51
Staffeeport
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: February 7, 2022
SUBMITTED BY: Barry Cronkite, Director, Transportation Services,
519-741-2200 x7738
PREPARED BY: Darren Kropf, Active Transportation Planning Project Manager,
519-741-2200 ext. 7314
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Wards 1 and 9
DATE OF REPORT: January 27, 2022
REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-053
SUBJECT: Sidewalk infill through street reconstructions in 2022
RECOMMENDATION:
That sidewalks be installed on both sides of Ann Street; and,
That sidewalk be installed on both sides of Becker Street; and,
That sidewalk be installed on the east side of Southdale Avenue and a boulevard
multi -use trail be installed on the west side; and further,
That Council receive, for information purposes only, other sidewalk infill locations in
2022 that are pre -approved, as per the Sidewalk Infill Policy MUN-STR-2004.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
• The purpose of this report is to request City Council approval for the installation of
sidewalks and/or boulevard multi -use trails through street reconstructions in 2022.
• The key findings of this report are that:
o Staff recommend the installation of sidewalks on both sides of Ann Street and
Becker Street, which both score as Priority 2 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy.
o Staff recommend the installation of sidewalk on one side of Southdale Avenue
and a boulevard multi -use trail in lieu of sidewalk on the other side to provide
continuity with the future trail network along Shoemaker Creek. Southdale
scores as a Priority 1 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy.
o Stewart Street is pre -approved in the Sidewalk Infill Policy and staff are
planning the installation of a boulevard multi -use trail on Stewart Street in lieu
of sidewalk, to provide continuity with the Transit Hub Trail between the Iron
Horse Trail and future King Victoria Transit Hub.
o Joseph Street is pre -approved in the Sidewalk Infill Policy and staff are
planning the installation of sidewalk on one side and a boulevard multi -use
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Page 3 of 51
trail in lieu of sidewalk on the other side on to provide continuity with the Transit
Hub Trail and separated bike lanes on the remainder of Joseph Street.
• Sidewalks and boulevard multi -use trails are funded through the street reconstruction
capital budget (Water Infrastructure Program). Operating costs for the new multi -use
trails will be approximately $4,500.
• Community engagement included surveys to residents within 400 m of each street that
was not pre -approved and a presentation to the Active Transportation & Trails Advisory
Committee.
• This report supports People -friendly Transportation.
BACKGROUND:
On June 1, 2015, Council approved MUN-STR-2004 Sidewalk Infill Policy. The Sidewalk
Infill Policy defines the framework around the installation of new sidewalk locations where
sidewalk currently does not exist. The policy confirms the City's commitment to an improved
sidewalk network on existing roadways to support a more pedestrian friendly environment.
It also defines priority levels for sidewalk infill locations and provides a framework for
community and Council input on proposed installations when sidewalk infill is not pre -
approved through the policy.
The policy requires Council approval for some sidewalk infill locations. This report outlines
locations of sidewalk that are recommended to be built in conjunction with upcoming road
reconstruction projects in 2022 and provides recommendations for the application of the
policy in these areas.
REPORT:
Staff has reviewed five locations for sidewalk infill through full street reconstructions
scheduled for 2022.
Ann Street (Frederick St to end)
This street reconstruction was initiated by the Province of Ontario's Ministry of
Transportation (MTO), as part of the MTO's on-going work for Highway 7 expansion.
Current conditions of Ann Street
• Local Street serving direct property access
• Low-rise residential on the north side and institutional with parking lots on the south
side
• Between Frederick Street and Ephraim Street, sidewalk exists on the south side only,
leaving a gap of 130 m on the north side
Page 4 of 51
Study area
- Proposed sidewalk infill
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Ann Street scores a 55 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it a Priority 2 location.
Ann Street Point Summary
Points
Within 200 m from a bus stop (Route #20)
10
-oc
20
t
i
r�
•
� y
4-i
a er 0 I� t
Lf
Completion of a link along the same roadway
5
Within 400 m of a health care facility (KW Dentistry on Frederick Street)
�
q}
r.
� �
f
�...
*■ ■■..}:....:
■f
■
Y Y... a .. ■ .. Y
Y
R k
f f
f k
■ i
i f .
nn3
n 11
f i
■ •
Legend:
Study area
- Proposed sidewalk infill
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Ann Street scores a 55 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it a Priority 2 location.
Ann Street Point Summary
Points
Within 200 m from a bus stop (Route #20)
10
Within 400 m from a mixed-use corridor (Frederick Street)
20
Within 400 m from a commercial zone (Frederick Street)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Weber Park)
10
Completion of a link along the same roadway
5
Within 400 m of a health care facility (KW Dentistry on Frederick Street)
5
A Priority 2 location (36 - 62 points) means sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the
roadway-, however, an exemption may only be authorized by Council should staff not be able
to reasonably mitigate constraints such as, but not limited to-, cultural heritage impacts, site
specific impacts, environmentally sensitive impacts and maintenance impacts.
Community input on proposed sidewalk infill for Ann Street
Staff surveyed residents within 400 m of the proposed sidewalk infill and received 69
responses.
Page 5 of 51
Directiv affected residents on Ann Street:
Position
Percentage
In favour
0 of 3 (0%)
Opposed
3 of 3 (100%)
Indifferent
0 of 3 (0%)
Area residents:
Position
Percentage
In favour
44 of 66 (67%)
Opposed
15 of 66 (23%)
Indifferent
7 of 66 (11 %)
Total residents (directly affected + area residents):
Position
Percentage
In favour
44 of 69 (64%)
Opposed
18 of 69 (26%)
Indifferent
7 of 69 (10%)
Reasons cited in favour of sidewalk infill included increased walkability, equity for all and
safety for vulnerable users (including people with disabilities, children and older adults).
Reasons cited against the sidewalk infill included lack of foot traffic, one sidewalk is
sufficient, waste of tax dollars, tree impacts, grade changes, winter snow clearing, and
reduction in front lawn space.
Staff recommendation for Ann Street
Staff propose the installation of sidewalk on both sides of Ann Street. To minimize site
specific impacts, the roadway can be narrowed from 8 m to 7 m, in accordance with
Kitchener's Complete Streets guidelines. To avoid tree impacts closest to Frederick Street,
the roadway and boulevard will be narrowed further.
Becker Street (Fife Avenue to end)
This street reconstruction was initiated by the Province of Ontario's Ministry of
Transportation (MTO), as part of the MTO's on-going work for Highway 7 expansion.
Current conditions of Becker Street
• Local Street serving direct property access
• Residential on the north side and parking lots for nearby funeral home on the south
side
• Sidewalk exists on the south side only, which currently connects past the dead end
to provide a direct pedestrian connection to Frederick Street
• There are no sidewalks on the north side of Becker Street, leaving a gap of 150 m
Page 6 of 51
or
m�t � t J � l � ■
a
t. • r` ■■
0 a a a
■ ■ [ ■
■
OF
t r■■it Kip a■■/r}■■■■■r
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a a
r
JI ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
ice■■■■■■r■ i
_- ii ■
■
S • a1 ■ ■ ■ a ■ a ■ ■ /� i
! i i
y a • Ri
5 a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a I i
i i
a all ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ am ■ i
a a i i
ii■■■■■■■■■i■
■ i■
ii
KRUG ST
Study area
- Proposed sidewalk infill
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
BERICK ST
Z t= p0 c
Becker Street scores a 55 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it a Priority 2 location.
Becker Street Point Summary
Points
Within 200 m from a bus stop (Route #20)
10
Within 400 m from a mixed-use corridor (Frederick Street)
20
Within 400 m from a commercial zone (Frederick Street)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Weber Park)
10
Completion of a link along the same roadway
5
Within 400 m of a health care facility (KW Dentistry on Frederick Street)
5
A Priority 2 location (36 - 62 points) means sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the
roadway; however, an exemption may only be authorized by Council should staff not be able
to reasonably mitigate constraints such as, but not limited to; cultural heritage impacts, site
specific impacts, environmentally sensitive impacts and maintenance impacts.
Page 7 of 51
Community input on proposed sidewalk infill for Becker Street
Staff surveyed residents within 400 m of the proposed sidewalk infill and received 69
responses.
Directly affected residents on Becker Street:
Position
Percentage
In favour
1 of 2 (50%)
Opposed
1 of 2 (50%)
Indifferent
0
Area residents:
Position
Percentage
In favour
43 of 67 (64%)
Opposed
17 of 67 (25%)
Indifferent
7 of 67 (10%)
Total residents (directly affected + area residents):
Position
Percentage
In favour
44 of 69 (64%)
Opposed
18 of 69 (26%)
Indifferent
7 of 69 (10%)
Reasons cited in favour of the sidewalk infill included increased walkability, equity for all and
safety for vulnerable users (people with disabilities, children and older adults). Reasons
cited against the sidewalk infill included the lack of connection with a dead-end street and
waste of tax dollars.
Staff recommendation for Becker Street
City staff recommend sidewalks on both sides. To minimize site specific impacts, the
roadway can be narrowed from 10 m to 7 m, in accordance with Kitchener's Complete
Streets guidelines. No tree loss is expected.
The MTO is not planning to reinstate the sidewalk pathway that connects the end of Becker
Street to Frederick Street in its Highway 7 work, due to space limitations in the highway
right-of-way. Without this sidewalk, residents will be required to use Ann Street to access
Frederick Street. Nonetheless, city staff will work with the MTO to explore any possible
solutions to maintaining this pedestrian access, and sidewalks on both sides of Becker
Street would facilitate this connection. If sidewalk access to Frederick Street is not provided
by the MTO, a sidewalk on the west side is not recommended by staff since it will not serve
any properties or connect to the wider pedestrian network.
Southdale Avenue (Kehl Street to bend in road)
Southdale Avenue is a full city -led street reconstruction to replace and/or upgrade
underground services.
Current conditions of Southdale Avenue
• Local Street serving direct property access
• Residential properties on both sides
Page 8 of 51
• Sidewalks exist on both sides of Southdale Avenue between the bend in road and
Hoffman Street, leaving a gap of 115 m on both sides between the bend in road and
Kehl Street
r
++ •= r'00■ ■ ■
r + ■ R r r r
R• + ! R r • r ■
+ ! ■ ■ r r r
R � ■ r a R !
r ■ P r ■ ! r
» � r P ■■
R~
SyO` � r Pr` ■■
* per. � ■ ;#!�. ■.
R
{ • r'r ■•■
• r
■
Legend:
Study area
=—I Proposed sidewalk infill
W Proposed boulevard multi -use trail
Shoemaker Creek multi -use trail
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Southdale Avenue scores an 80 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it a Priority 1 location.
Southdale Avenue Point Summary
Points
Within 200 m from a bus stop (Route #16)
10
Within 400 m from a mixed-use corridor (Highland Road)
20
Within 800 m of an elementary school (Queen Elizabeth Public School)
25
Within 400 m from a commercial zone (Mill Street)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Shoemaker Park)
10
Completion of a link along the same roadway
5
Within 400 m of a Type 1 trail (Shoemaker Greenway)
5
Page 9 of 51
Priority 1 (greater than 62 points) means sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the
roadway as they connect to a significant number of pedestrian origins and destinations. The
policy does not stipulate grounds for exemptions.
Community input on proposed sidewalk infill for Southdale Avenue
Staff surveyed residents within 400 m of the proposed sidewalk infill and received 47
responses.
Directiv affected residents on Southdale Avenue:
Position Percentage
In favour 1 of 1 (100%)
Opposed 0
Indifferent 0
Area residents:
Position
Percentage
In favour
43 of 68 63%
Opposed
18 of 68 (26%)
Indifferent
7 of 68 (10%)
Total residents (directly affected + area residents):
Position
Percentage
In favour
44 of 69 (64%)
Opposed
18 of 69 (26%)
Indifferent
7 of 69 (10%)
Reasons cited in favour of the sidewalk infill included safety for children walking to school,
improving connectivity to existing trails and health benefits by going for walks or walking
dogs. Reasons cited against the sidewalk infill included the perspective that a trail on one
side is sufficient and also adding sidewalks is a waste of tax dollars.
Staff recommendation for Southdale Avenue
Staff propose installing sidewalk on the east side of Southdale Avenue and a boulevard
multi -use trail on the west side. To minimize site specific impacts, the roadway can be
narrowed from 9 m to 7 m, in accordance with Kitchener's Complete Streets guidelines. No
tree loss is expected due to sidewalk installation.
The boulevard multi -use trail is proposed in lieu of sidewalk to provide consistency with the
new multi -use trail being built as part of the Shoemaker Creek Naturalization Project. When
all portions of construction are complete, this will create a continuous trail along the creek
between Homer Watson Boulevard and Shoemaker Park.
Stewart Street (Park Street to end)
Stewart Street is a full city -led street reconstruction to replace and/or upgrade underground
services.
Current conditions of Stewart Street
• Local Street serving direct property access
Page 10 of 51
• Residential properties on one side and Home Hardware on the other side
• Sidewalks exist on the residential side only, leaving a gap of 180 m on one side
l ��� � 111 1 ., •
• A
a� O
Proposed sidewalk infill
Proposed boulevard multi -use trail
Transit Hub multi -use trail
Separated bike lanes
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Stewart Street scores 100 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it pre -approved.
Stewart Street Point Summary
Q ♦ • ♦
♦
25
„
25
Within 800 m of an elementary school (St. John's Catholic School)
25
Within 400 m from a commercial zone (downtown)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Cherry Park)
10
Within 400 m of a Type 1 trail (Transit Hub Trail)
10
l ��� � 111 1 ., •
• A
a� O
Proposed sidewalk infill
Proposed boulevard multi -use trail
Transit Hub multi -use trail
Separated bike lanes
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Stewart Street scores 100 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it pre -approved.
Stewart Street Point Summary
Points
Within 800 m of multi -modal hub and rapid transit stations (Central Station)
25
Within 800 m of downtown
25
Within 800 m of an elementary school (St. John's Catholic School)
25
Within 400 m from a commercial zone (downtown)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Cherry Park)
10
Within 400 m of a Type 1 trail (Transit Hub Trail)
10
Community engagement & staff recommendation
This location does not require neighbourhood surveys, nor does it require Council approval,
due to preapproved point totals (90+). The proposed cross-section was presented to the
surrounding neighbourhood through the roadway reconstruction public information centres
Page 11 of 51
(PTCs) held by the Engineering Division and to the Active Transportation and Trails Advisory
Committee.
Staff will install a boulevard multi -use trail in lieu of sidewalk, to provide continuity with the
Transit Hub Trail that connects the Iron Horse Trail with the future Transit Hub at King and
Victoria.
Joseph Street (Victoria Street to end)
Joseph Street is a full city -led street reconstruction to replace and/or upgrade underground
services.
Current conditions of Joseph Street
• Local Street serving direct property access
• Institutional and/or commercial land use on both sides
• Sidewalk exists on a short section only, leaving a gap of 150 m on one side and 240
m on the other side
W Proposed sidewalk infill
Proposed boulevard multi -use trail
Transit Hub multi -use trail
Separated bike lanes
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Page 12 of 51
Arm ..
•1 -
W Proposed sidewalk infill
Proposed boulevard multi -use trail
Transit Hub multi -use trail
Separated bike lanes
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Existing sidewalk
Page 12 of 51
Joseph Street scores 95 in the Sidewalk Infill Policy, making it pre -approved (anything above
90 points).
Joseph Street Point Summary
Points
Within 800 m of multi -modal hub and rapid transit
stations (Central Station)
25
Within 800 m of downtown
25
Within 800 m of a post -secondary school
(University of Waterloo)
15
Within 400 m from a commercial zone
(downtown)
5
Within 400 m of a health care facility (Centre for
Family Medicine)
5
Within 400 m of a park (Cherry Park)
10
Within 400 m of a Type 1 trail (Transit Hub Trail)
10
Community engagement & staff recommendation
This location did not require neighbourhood surveys, nor does it require Council approval,
due to preapproved point totals (90+). The proposed cross-section was presented to the
surrounding neighbourhood through the roadway reconstruction public information centres
(PTCs) held by the Engineering Division and to the Active Transportation and Trails Advisory
Committee.
Staff will install sidewalk on the south side and a boulevard multi -use trail in lieu of sidewalk
on the north side, to provide continuity with the Transit Hub Trail and separated bike lanes
on the remainder of Joseph Street.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports People -friendly Transportation.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget — The cost of sidewalk and boulevard multi -use trail installation is funded
through the Water Infrastructure Program (WIP) in the 2022 capital budget for these
projects.
The Region of Waterloo is paying for the costs of the boulevard multi -use trails on Stewart
Street and Joseph Street, as part of the Transit Hub Trail project.
Operating Budget — The boulevard multi -use trails on Joseph Street, Stewart Street and
Southdale Avenue will have a combined operating cost of approximately $4,500.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of
the council / committee meeting. Residents within 400 m of the streets were notified through
mail of city staff's recommendation to install sidewalks.
Page 13 of 51
CONSULT — A survey was mailed to all residents within 400 m of the streets proposed for
sidewalk infill. For Ann Street and Becker Street, 69 residents responded, while 47 residents
responded to the survey for Southdale Avenue.
On October 12, 2021, the Active Transportation and Trails Advisory Committee passed the
unanimous motion: "That the committee support proposed sidewalks on Southdale, Ann and
Becker streets."
The Engineering Division leads public engagement for roadway reconstruction projects.
Transportation Planning staff support these engagement efforts to discuss and answer
questions regarding sidewalk infill, and other transportation impacts.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
Sidewalk Infill Policy MUN-STR-2004
Complete Streets Guidelines DSD -19-235
APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department
Page 14 of 51
Staffeeport
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: February 7, 2022
SUBMITTED BY: Barry Cronkite, Director, Transportation Services, 519-741-2200 ext.
7738
PREPARED BY: Ivan J Balaban, Active Transportation Planning Project Manager,
519-741-2200 ext. 7302
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Wards 1 and 10
DATE OF REPORT: January 14, 2022
REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-057
SUBJECT: All Way Stop Control Installations
RECOMMENDATION:
That an all -way stop control be installed at the intersection of Halifax Drive and
Natchez Road; and,
That an all -way stop control be installed at the intersection of Duke Street West and
Shanley Street; and further,
That the Uniform Traffic Bylaw be amended accordingly.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
• The purpose of this report is to amend the Uniform Traffic By -Law 2019-113 to include
an all -way stop control at Halifax Drive and Natchez Road (Ward 1) and at Duke Street
West and Shanley Street (Ward 10)
• The key finding of this report is that safety and operations will be improved through the
installation of the traffic control devices listed in the report
• The financial implications are approximately $1000 per intersection and will be taken
from the existing sign maintenance budget
• Community engagement included posting this report to the City's website with the
agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting
• This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
Transportation Services received a request to review the existing traffic control at the
intersection of Halifax Drive and Natchez Road. This request came as a result of a
Neighbourhood Information Meeting (NIM) held in the area for a proposed residential
development at 210 Heritage Drive. Transportation Services also received a request to
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Page 15 of 51
review the existing traffic control at the intersection of Duke Street West and Shanley Street
through a NIM held in the area for a proposed residential development at 152 Shanley
Street. The requests cited concerns regarding pedestrian safety and general operation of
the intersections. It was requested that all -way stops be considered to control traffic.
REPORT:
Halifax Drive and Natchez Road (Ward 1)
According to the City of Kitchener's Official Plan, one approach of Natchez Road is
designated a Minor Community Collector Street and a portion of Halifax Drive is designated
as a Local Road. Currently, traffic on Natchez Road stops and yields right of way to traffic
on Halifax Drive.
In response to the identified concerns, a traffic study was conducted for the intersection on
July 21, 2021. The results of the study were compared to the City of Kitchener's all -way stop
warrant requirements. These requirements are a set of guidelines based on the all -way stop
warrants established by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and the Institute of
Transportation Engineers. The results are as follows:
Warrant — Local/Minor Road
All -Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Halifax Drive at Natchez Road — July 21, 2021
Warrant Factors - "3 -Leg" Intersection
Results
Warrant Met
The total vehicle volume on all
intersection approaches averages at
249
NO
least 250 vehicles per hour for each of
any eight hours of the day,
and
The volume split does not exceed 75% /
25% for a three-way control on the major
50%/50%
YES
road,
or
Average of at least 4 collisions per year
over a three-year period (susceptible to
0.00 per year
NO
correction by an All Way Stop)
All -Way Stop Warranted NO
As the results above indicate, the intersection of Halifax Drive at Natchez Road did not meet
the warrant criteria. However, the warrant fails on the volume justification by only 1 vehicle
per hour and is considered to be close enough to justification that Transportation Services
is recommending that an all -way stop be installed. Further, this intersection was studied in
July, which doesn't account for any school related traffic.
Duke Street West and Shanley Street (Ward 10)
According to the City of Kitchener's Official Plan, Duke Street West is designated a Local
Street, and Shanley Street is also designated a Local Street. Currently, traffic on Shanley
Street and traffic on the west approach of Duke Street West, stop and yield right of way to
traffic on the north approach of Duke Street West. This is a T -intersection with
unconventional stop control.
Page 16 of 51
In response to the identified concerns, a traffic study was conducted for the intersection on
July 21, 2021. The results of the study were compared to the City of Kitchener's all -way stop
warrant requirements. These requirements are a set of guidelines based on the all -way stop
warrants established by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and the Institute of
Transportation Engineers. The results are as follows:
Warrant — Local/Minor Road
All -Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Duke Street West at Shanley Street — July 21, 2021
Warrant Factors - "3 -Leg" Intersection
Results
Warrant Met
The total vehicle volume on all
intersection approaches averages at
46
NO
least 250 vehicles per hour for each of
any eight hours of the day,
and
The volume split does not exceed 75% /
25% for a three-way control on the major
73%/27%
YES
road,
or
Average of at least 4 collisions per year
over a three-year period (susceptible to
0.00 per year
NO
correction by an All Way Stop)
All -Way Stop Warranted NO
As the results above indicate, the intersection of Duke Street West at Shanley Street does
not meet the warrant criteria. However, the stop control at this intersection is unconventional,
and can be confusing to street users unfamiliar with the area — including drivers, cyclists,
and pedestrians. This intersection is also located near downtown, in an area that is expected
to have increased pedestrian activity. due to the future transit terminal/mobility hub. Duke
Street West is also identified as a Neighbourhood Bikeway in the City's Cycling and Trail
Master Plan and is anticipated to see an increase in active transportation users. Lastly, the
proposed residential development has the potential to attract new residents to the area.
Based on these conditions, Transportation Services is recommending that an all -way stop
be installed to address the unconventional and potentially confusing intersection layout.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget — The recommendation has a total estimated budget impact of $2,000 on
the Operating Budget. These costs can be absorbed in the existing Sign Maintenance
budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of
the council / committee meeting.
Page 17 of 51
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
• City of Kitchener Uniform Traffic By-law No. 2019-113
APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager of Development Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A — Key Map — Halifax Drive and Natchez Road All Way Stop
Attachment B — Key Map — Duke Street West and Shanley Street All Way Stop
Page 18 of 51
N
5.k ,y1
yTs
0 r
rte-.
r
of
57
53
Not to Scale
Existing Ra -1 Stop Sign
Proposed Ra -1 Stop Signs
Page 19 of 51
152
Tr
W7
X414
5
404
400
394
3 qV
395'
.5 149
14r
Not to kale
Existing Ra -1 Stop Signs
Proposed Ra -1 Stop Sign
Page 20 of 51
Staffeeport
IST` �; Ni,R
Financia( Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: February 7, 2022
SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning, 519-741-2200 x 7353
PREPARED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning, 519-741-2200 x 7353
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards
DATE OF REPORT: October 26, 2021
REPORT NO.: FIN -2022-066
SUBJECT: 2022 Development Charges Study Initiation
RECOMMENDATION:
That staff be directed to publish a development charges background study and hold a
required statutory public meeting prior to passing a bylaw to authorize the collection of
development charges as required under section 12 of the Development Charges Act
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
• The purpose of this report is to gain direction to publish a development charges (DC)
background study and hold the required public meeting.
• Community engagement will include the mandatory public meeting, as well as meeting with
industry experts such as the Kitchener Development Liaison Committee (KDLC).
• Passing of the updated DC bylaw is planned for May 2022.
• A review of whether the creation of a Community Benefits Charge (CBC) makes sense for
Kitchener will be delayed until after other municipalities have proceeded with their CBC
implementations in 2022.
• This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
The Province of Ontario made a series of changes to development charges (DCs) legislation in
2019/2020. In the midst of these changes, Council approved the hiring of Hemson Consulting
to navigate the new legislative landscape. Kitchener's current DC bylaw was passed in 2019
and expires on June 30, 2024, but is being updated early due to the legislative changes. The
changes have been covered by previous reports and presentations to Council and include:
• The removal of the mandatory 10% reduction for non -engineering services. For indoor
and outdoor recreation projects, this change totals nearly $9M and means that once the
bylaw is updated these costs will be borne by development instead of existing rate payers.
• The removal of some services from DC legislation (e.g. cemetery, parking), which comes
into effect in September 2022. DC funds allocated for these services in the 2022 capital
budget total just over $12M.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Page 21 of 51
The Development Charges Act (DCA) and its associated regulation allow municipalities to
impose DCs to pay for growth -related capital costs to service new development.
In order to do so, under the terms of the DCA, municipalities must prepare a development charge
background study and pass a bylaw to determine the development charges, taking the following
into account:
• A forecast of the amount, type and location of development anticipated in the municipality
for which development charges can be imposed.
• The average capital service levels provided by the municipality in the 10 -year period
immediately preceding the preparation of the background study.
• A review of future capital projects, including analysis of gross expenditures, funding
sources and net expenditures incurred or to be incurred by the municipality, to provide for
the expected development.
• An examination of the long-term capital and operating costs for capital infrastructure for
each service to which the development charges relate.
In order to update the bylaw, a background study must be published, and at least one public
meeting must be held. The purpose of this report is to seek formal Council authority to take the
required steps to update the DC bylaw. As noted earlier, the City has retained Hemson
Consulting to assist with the preparation of the DC background study and bylaw.
In addition to the changes to DCs, the updated provincial legislation also includes the ability for
a municipality to implement a Community Benefits Charge (CBC) which can be used to fund the
capital costs of any public service associated with new growth, including parkland, if those costs
are not already recovered from development charges and parkland provisions. Some
municipalities are moving forward to implement CBCs in 2022. City of Kitchener staff, with
advice from Hemson, believe it is prudent to observe the progress of these other
implementations before deciding on a course of action for Kitchener. Hemson has been retained
work on some of the CBC implementations happening in 2022 and will be able to advise
Kitchener better once the first round of bylaws are published, passed and potentially appealed.
Hemson will also have better availability to assist Kitchener once the first round of CBC
implementations are completed.
REPORT:
City staff have been gathering the necessary information for the DC background study and are
now at a point to seek direction from Council to publish the background study and hold a public
meeting as required under section 12 of the Development Charges Act. The 2022 DC study will
include an update of capital costs and will seek to maximize the DC charge, which is consistent
with the direction provided by Council during the 2019 DC study.
A summary schedule is provided below which outlines the relevant dates in the overall DC
update timeline. It should also be noted that the approval of the DC bylaw on May 30 is the
second last possible date before Council breaks for the summer.
Page 22 of 51
Proposed DC Meeting Timeline
Date Meeting
Subject
Feb 7 Committee
DC study initiation
Mar 14 N/A
DC background study and bylaw published on City website
Apr 4 Committee
Statutory public meeting
May 30 Council
Approval of DC background study and bylaw
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
There are no financial implications associated with this report. Impacts of updated DC rates will
be included as part of future reports.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the
council / committee meeting.
CONSULT —As noted in the report, a public meeting relating to development charges is required
by legislation. This meeting is tentatively planned to be held as part of a Committee meeting on
April 4, 2022.
In addition to the statutory public meeting required by the Development Charges Act, staff have
already provided a brief DC update to the Kitchener Development Liaison Committee (KDLC)
and committed to providing DC information to that group as it becomes available. Further, staff
will be engaging a broad cross-section of industry stakeholders to solicit their feedback in
advance of Council passing the DC bylaw.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
• Development Charges Act
APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lautenbach, Chief Financial Officer, Financial Services
Page 23 of 51
Staffeeport
IST` �; Ni,R
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: February 7, 2022
SUBMITTED BY: Cory Bluhm, Executive Director of Economic Development
519-741-220 ext. 7065
PREPARED BY: Naudia Banton Entrepreneurship and Technology Advisor
519-741-2200 ext. 7194
Chris Farrell, Manager, Waterloo Region Small Business Centre
519-751-2604
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All
DATE OF REPORT: January 28, 2022
REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-058
SUBJECT: Proposed Use of 2 King Street West
RECOMMENDATION:
That the development of a Sustainable Development Goals Lab "SDG Lab" at 2 King
Street West, as outlined in report DSD -22-058, be approved; and,
That $400,000 be allocated from the Economic Development Investment Fund 2.0
(EDIF 2.0) to support capital improvements to initiate the Sustainable Development
Goals Lab "SDG Lab" located at 2 King Street West, as outlined in report DSD -22-
058; and,
That $350,000 be allocated from the Economic Development Investment Fund 2.0
(EDIF 2.0) to support ongoing operations of the Sustainable Development Goals Lab
"SDG Lab" located at 2 King Street West, including an annual allocation of $100,000
as the partnership contribution of the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre, as
outlined in report DSD -22-058; and,
That the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre be permitted to add one full-time
and one part-time resource to support the ongoing operations of the Sustainable
Development Goals Lab "SDG Lab" for the duration of the pilot, to be funded
through the combined annual revenues of the "SDG Lab", in accordance with all
applicable Collective Bargaining Agreements; and,
That the General Manager, Development Services, or designate be authorized to
execute partnership and/or lease agreements with all major partners at 2 King St W,
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Page 24 of 51
in accordance with report DSD -22-058, with said agreements to be satisfactory to
the City Solicitor; and further,
That the Executive Director, Economic Development, or designate be authorized to
execute license agreements for a term of 3 years or less with SDG Lab licensees at
2 King St W, with said agreements to be satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
• The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to establish a new Sustainable
Development Goals (SDG) Lab at 2 King Street West, as a pilot, using a partnership
model.
• The financial implications include an initial capital cost of up to $400,000 and an annual
operating cost estimated at up to $450,000, with up to $350,000 being offset by
partnership contributions.
• Community engagement included a survey of Kitchener businesses involved in social
and environmental innovation, and a virtual round table discussion with local
stakeholders. The report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in
advance of the committee meeting.
• This report supports the implementation of an action item within the City's Corporate
Strategic Plan, supports the implementation of Make It Kitchener 2.0 and the City's
Economic Recovery Framework.
BACKGROUND:
In 2020 the City of Kitchener purchased a 21,000 sq ft commercial property at 2 King St W
(DSD 20- 041). The City will retain ownership of the building for up to 10 years to allow
THEMUSEUM to complete their business case and execute a fundraising campaign to
facilitate the proposed capital expansion of the adjacent building. In the interim period, the
City may utilize the building as it sees fit. Should THEMUSEUM not proceed with the
expansion within the 10 -year period, the City would be free to redeploy the asset for
another long-term purpose. Currently, 15% of the building is temporarily occupied by a
non-profit until May 2022.
Note — throughout this report, staff refer to the concept of an "SDG Lab". This is simply a
placeholder. If approved, the actual name of this concept may differ.
REPORT:
The Make it Kitchener 2.0 strategy is committed to an ambitious plan to support economic
recovery by investing in catalytic growth opportunities and creating a future where everyone
can make a difference. The building at 2 King St W could provide a space for purpose -driven
entrepreneurs and change -makers to launch new businesses, create local and global
impact, build an ecosystem and a sense of belonging, all focused on advancing the United
Nation's Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). As noted in the comprehensive
business case appended to this report:
"We believe entrepreneurs want to make a difference in the world. We believe our
community can help. 2 King Street West could be a purpose inspired space that
unites our region, empowering entrepreneurs to tackle society's greatest
challenges, while building a new ecosystem of difference makers."
Page 25 of 51
This report proposes that the City use of 2, King St. W, as a Sustainable Development Goals
Innovation Lab ("SDG Lab"). Utilizing a partnership model, the former bank building would
become home to 4 entrepreneurial program partners who would provide training, mentoring,
incubation and/or coworking space to their various start-up companies. In addition, a
community program partner and various supporting partners would add intangible value to
the ecosystem while supporting greater community collaboration. The SDG Lab space
would be an inclusive and welcoming space for entrepreneurs, academia, government,
community groups, citizens, students, and industry leaders working together to impact
people, the planet, and prosperity.
Conversion of the former bank building into a functioning incubation space will require up to
$400,000 in capital improvements for aesthetic upgrades, furnishings and technology
upgrades. Given the expectation that the building will be demolished or repurposed in
support of THEMUSEUM's expansion, and given the focus on the SDGs, staff would
maximize the reuse of the existing structure (offices, meeting rooms, materials, etc.) while
minimizing the amount of sunken costs. Furnishings and technology would be selected
based on City standards to ensure they could be repurposed at other City facilities.
Annual operating costs at 2 King St. W. at full occupancy are estimated at $400,000 -
$450,000. The proposed business model would be anchored by four partner
organizations/tenants sharing annual operating costs and space equally. Each partner
organization would deliver their own programs, events, advisory and mentoring services. All
partners would in some way, support purpose -driven businesses committed to impacting
the UN SDG's, such as:
Goal 3 (G3) good health and wellbeing
Goal 8 (G8) decent work and economic growth
Goal 10 (G10) reduced inequality
Goal 13 (G13) climate action and others.
Ideally, two of the partners would be focused on supporting racialized and equity -deserving
entrepreneurs while two of the partners would be focused on environmental sustainability
and social innovation. Entrepreneurs and community groups associated with the partners
would have access to offices, co -working desks, hot desks, meeting, and training rooms.
Annually the SDG Lab could assist more than 100 entrepreneurs to learn, launch, and grow
their companies.
The first of the four partners would be the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre
(WRSBC), a division of the City of Kitchener's Economic Development Department. WRSBC
will continue to offer small business information, advisory services, programs, and events
while overseeing the operations, building community relationships, and collaborating on
programming with the partners.
The SDG Lab would require two additional employees - a Community Activator and a
Program Assistant. These new roles will focus on activating the space, fostering
partnerships, supporting collaboration and creating other revenue streams through
sponsorships, rentals, event fees events and seeking other government funding.
Page 26 of 51
Economic Recovery Benefits of an SDG Lab
Major economic events, such as recessions, often result in increased entrepreneurship and
innovation. This due in part to individuals seeking new employment opportunities and/or
entrepreneurs advancing innovations in response to new economic opportunities.
Supporting entrepreneurial program partners will indirectly support the growth of new start-
up companies small businesses.
As a result of the pandemic, the Kitchener community has experienced increased office
vacancy rates. Recently CBRE reported office vacancy rate of 16.6% across the city,
including a 26.9% vacancy rate in Downtown Kitchener. Companies emerging from the
SDG Lab could potentially fill vacant office space in our community
Business Models
Staff assessed three different business models, and ultimately recommend Option 1 —
Partnership Model. A full overview of this model is contained in the business case appended
to this report. The options considered include:
Model and Description I
Pros
Cons
Option 1 — Partnership Model
• Four anchor partner •
Operating costs shared
•
Risk of not securing three
tenants providing
equally by four tenants
additional tenants within
entrepreneurial
($100K each), leveraging
the 1St year.
programming
the City's investment
•
City staff to manage
• Each tenant shares the •
Multiple program partners
multiple partnership
operating costs and space
attract a diversity of
agreements and licensee
equally
entrepreneurs and users
agreements with
• Waterloo Region Small •
Limits financial risk,
residents/entrepreneurs
Business Centre oversees
exposure to program
•
Deficits in operating costs
the facility and tenants
partners
to be covered by the City.
• Incubate purpose -driven •
Opportunity to support a
•
THEMUSEUM advances
businesses
variety of community
their construction sooner
• City of Kitchener funds the
partners, including equity-
than anticipated.
initial capital
deserving entrepreneurs,
improvements
thought leaders, youth,
• City of Kitchener covers
citizens
any annual operating •
Tenants collaborate to
deficits
support each other.
• If an annual operating •
Builds a more rich, diverse
surplus exists, partners
network of like-minded
determine use of funds
businesses, citizens, and
entrepreneurs
Page 27 of 51
Based on the above, Option 1 best supports the objectives of Make It Kitchener 2.0 and the
Economic Recovery Framework, while offering the most sustainable financial model.
Page 28 of 51
• Ability to support more
than ?? entrepreneurs
each year.
Model and Description
Pros
Cons
Option 2 — Lease to Singular
Private Sector Operator
• Lease to a one
• Building is occupied
• The City has ongoing
company/organization to
• Operating costs would be
maintenance costs.
operate as an incubation
covered by tenant
• Difficult to guarantee a
space
• City only requires one
lease term given the
agreement
uncertain timelines of
THEMUSEUM
• Leasee would need to
invest in improvements
• No obvious community
partner with capacity to
operate such a facility.
• Any tenant would likely
require government
assistance and would seek
a City contribution.
• Less likelihood of diverse
users/entrepreneurs if only
one operator.
• The high number of vacant
commercial properties
minimizes prospects.
Model and Description
Pros
Cons
Option 3 — City Leases all the
Spaces Individually
• City leases individual
• City could curate overall
• City would need to add a
offices to small businesses
tenant mix
sales role to actively seek
similar to the Creative Hub
out tenants.
model
• Occupancy would be
slower than Option 1.
• Revenue generation is
subject to tenant
acquisition.
• Revenues required to
cover operating expenses
would make it challenging
to offer affordable rents for
startups
• Less likelihood of diverse
users/entrepreneurs than
Option 1.
• Concerns from other co -
working operators/building
owners that the City is in
competition
Based on the above, Option 1 best supports the objectives of Make It Kitchener 2.0 and the
Economic Recovery Framework, while offering the most sustainable financial model.
Page 28 of 51
Timing
If approved, staff would look to add an initial partner to the space as early as March of 2022.
Design and renovations would occur in Q2 -Q3 with an anticipated opening of August -
September of 2022. Like 44 Gaukel, operations would continue until such time as the noted
operating allocation has been exhausted or THEMUSEUM is prepared to commence
construction. In advance of either instance, staff will return to Council with a report on the
success, challenges and opportunities around the future of the SDG Lab.
Long -Term Growth and Opportunities
Once launched, staff are confident that demand and interest in the SDG Lab concept could
outgrow the proposed space. If so, staff would pursue the following:
a) Exploring opportunities for entrepreneurial programming partnerships within other
City facilities; and,
b) In collaboration with local academic, business and community partners, explore the
potential for a more significant permanent facility, not unlike the current scale and
scope of the UW Innovation Arena.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports A Vibrant Economy by undertaking industry business cases.
A major area of focus within Make It Kitchener 2.0 is to support "A city-wide Startup Network
focused on Sustainable Development Goals" including a stated ambition to expand the
startup ecosystem including city -owned spaces and to develop a hub to support businesses
tackling the UN SDGs.
The Council approved Economic Recovery Framework identifies the need to accelerate a
new wave of entrepreneurship by expediting the launch of a city-wide startup network and
providing funding to support new entrepreneurial programs that address barriers related to
equity and anti -racism.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
For an overview of the estimated capital and operating costs, including a proposed operating
budget, see page 11 of the Business Case appended to this report.
The initial capital improvements required are estimated to be up to $400,000. The ongoing
operating costs are estimated to be $450,000. Should the City be successful in securing all
of the partners, the City's annual share of operating expenses would be $100,000
(representing the Small Business Centre's contribution to the partnership).
It should be noted that should the building remain largely vacant, the City will continue to
bearthe costs of utilities, taxes, maintenance, etc., with limited revenue to offset these costs.
Page 29 of 51
As part of the Economic Recovery Framework, Council allocated $5 million to support
initiatives such as this. Approximately $1.3 million of this funding has not been allocated.
Staff recommend allocating $750,000 of the recovery funding to support the launch of the
SDG Lab.
City staff would continuously seek out additional funding opportunities (ex: Federal grants,
private sponsorships) so support programing and offset costs.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of
the council / committee meeting.
CONSULT — The Small Business Centre facilitated community consultations with
stakeholders including academic institutions, funding institutions, innovation organizations,
small business leaders and local entrepreneurs. This included a virtual round table with
local stakeholders and a survey of local businesses. In addition, staff presented the SDG
Lab concept at multiple meetings of the Economic Development Advisory Committee, which
received broad support.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter.
APPROVED BY: Justin Read man, General Manager —Development Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A — Business Case: 2 King Street West — SDG Lab
Page 30 of 51
BUSI
SDG Lab
ESS CASE
1/2o/2er22
SDG LAB 01/2021
Table of Contents
2
Executive Summary—The Why.........................................3
TheHow................................................................................5
The Opportunity—The What.............................................6
Strategic Alignment............................................................10
Financial Plan and Risk Analysis........................................10
The Business Case..............................................................14
SWOT Analysis.....................................................................18
Local Ecosystem..................................................................19
Conclusions and Recommendations................................20
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854 --
SDG LAB 01/2021
"Curbside blue boxes dotted along city streets are a symbol of a recycling program that's largely
taken for granted these days. Surprisingly, the idea didn't arise from a government committee
wrestling with the challenge of waste management. It came from visionary thinker Nyle Ludolph,
a humble man with a passion to make a difference in Kitchener." Globe and Mail, 2012
We Believe Entrepreneurs Want to Make a Difference in the World
The world is in a difficult place. Environmentally. Socially. Economically. We all know it. But
most importantly, a new generation of entrepreneurs know it and believe they can make a
difference. What if the City could create a space that enables entrepreneurs to harness the
power of business as a force for good?
We Believe Our Community Can Help
The first Cityto implement the blue box program, Kitchener has always been a community willing
to lead in the face of crisis. With organizations like Sustainable Waterloo Region, St. Paul's
Greenhouse, REEP Solutions, The Working Centre, and countless others, our community has long
driven social and environmental innovation. Meanwhile, organizations like Communitech, the
Accelerator Centre, Velocity and MIX have shown how nurturing entrepreneurial communities
can lead to greater growth and impact. Today, the City has an opportunity to bring these two
worlds together, by creating the Region's first incubation space focused on the United Nation's
Sustainable Development Goals.
2 King Street West could be a purpose inspired space that unites our Region...
Waterloo Region is fortunate to be home to numerous organizations who support entrepreneurs
focused on social and environmental innovation. Recently, new organizations and programs have
emerged to support racialized and equity -deserving entrepreneurs. Currently, many of these
programs exist in isolation. Rather than create yet another isolated community, 2 King Street
West could provide a central convergence place for these organizations, bringing together
likeminded entrepreneurs.
...empowering entrepreneurs to tackle society's greatest challenges...
Foundational to the ethos of 2 King Street West would lie the principle of 'purpose driven
entrepreneurship'. A space where growth and profitability are not the objective but the vessels
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854---
SDG LAB 01/2021
al
to achieve existential aspirations focused on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. An
inclusive -thinking, forward -embracing community, from a range of backgrounds, who believe
collaboration is essential to tackling local and global crisis...
...while building a new ecosystem of difference makers
2 King West could act as a catalyst to build an entrepreneurial ecosystem of like-minded
individuals driven to localize the UN Sustainable Development Goals while solving global
problems. With capacity to accommodate 50+ companies, the SDG Lab could support as many
as 100 companies over 3 years. With the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre as an anchor
tenant and caretaker of the facility, other partners in the Lab would be able to focus on what
they do best — provide training and mentorship to their entrepreneurial clients.
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together." African Proverb
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
The Vision
The City of Kitchener has a unique opportunity to transform 2 King Street West over the next 3
years into an iconic hub and incubation space focused on supporting purpose driven businesses.
The 21,000 square foot building has the capacity to accommodate 50+ companies at any given
time. Meeting and event spaces would enable a multiplicity of community partners and
passionate residents to focused on social and environmental innovation.
SDG Lab
Rather than build a new ecosystem from the ground up, 2 King Street West would aim to bring 4
existing program partners together under one roof. Tentatively referred to as 'SDG Lab', 2 King
Street West would champion goal seventeen of the United Nation's Sustainable Development
Goals - "strengthening the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for
sustainable development". Together, the partners would support a'community of communities'
based on the following principles:
Pillar #1— Business as a Force for Good
A place for difference makers and entrepreneurs focused on social and environmental innovation
to access tailored business advisory supports to develop and launch a profit driven enterprise.
Pillar #2 — Dedicated to Leading Inclusivity & Belonging
A space for racialized and equity -deserving entrepreneurs, with a conscious and intentional effort
to eliminate systemic barriers for entrepreneurs.
Pillar #3 — Push forward on the UN Sustainable Development Goals
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in
2015, provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and
into the future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an
urgent call for action by all countries - developed and developing - in a global partnership. They
recognize that ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that
improve health and education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth — all while tackling
climate change and working to preserve our oceans and forests (UN, 2021).
Broader Impact
By creating the first SDG -focused social entrepreneurship hub in Waterloo Region, The SDG Lab
would enable connections into similar centres around the world, allowing stakeholders to
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854---
SDG LAB 01/2021 6
collaborate on broader social development projects. If successful, this model could become a
template for other municipalities looking to establish a similar centre in their community.
The central role of the SDG Lab (2 King Street West) would be to enable a sense of belonging,
facilitate connections and collaboration between and among entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial
support resources. A place where entrepreneurs and other members of the ecosystem belong,
convene, network, learn, create, and celebrate. It will be a microcosm of the regional
entrepreneurial community, a place to meet, learn, network, and grow.
The Model
As such, Sustian17 would be built on the following "community among communities" partnership
model.
Anchored by the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre
The Waterloo Region Small Business Centre (SBC) would oversee the building operations on
behalf of the City of Kitchener, manage costs and support any necessary licensing agreements
with tenants. In addition, the SBC would:
• hire a 'Community Activator/Partnership Development Coordinator and 'Program
Assistant';
• manage shared space bookings; and,
• provide a concierge service for visitors.
The Small Business Centre team would shift their main operations to 2 King Street West and
continue to deliver core services for small business, entrepreneurial programming, information,
advisory services and deliver workshops and events. The SDG Lab would enable the SBC to
provide incubation space to client entrepreneurs focused on social and environmental
innovation.
Entrepreneurial Program Partners
Three additional entrepreneurial program partners would join the SBC to form an inclusive, and
equal share, 4 -partner alliance. Each partner would occupy an equal percentage of the office
space having access to meeting rooms, training rooms, co -working spaces, and hot desks. Each
partner would share equally in up to $400,000 of the annual overhead costs (appendix A budget).
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021 7
Each of the four partners would deliver unique entrepreneurial programming, value added
resources, connecting entrepreneurs with industry experts, mentors, and business professionals
in the ecosystem. Ideally, the partners would equally support a) equity -deserving entrepreneurs;
and, b) entrepreneurs focused on environmental and social innovation.
Community Program Partner
Additionally, the space could accommodate a fifth partner focused on broad -reaching
community impact. Incorporating a community-based partner could enable entrepreneurs
greater access to additional networks, volunteer resources, funding opportunities, etc. This
partner would share in the remaining annual costs, estimated at $60,000.
Supporting Partners
The SDG Lab could also provide co -working space or "touchdown spaces" for visiting partners,
stakeholders, investors, community groups, etc. These would typically be an informal setting such
as a bookable meeting room, hot -desks, or a common area where "Lab" visitors could connect
with their primary office, do email, or perform other tasks.
Ideally, supporting partners would either be a) actively engaged in social or environmental
innovation; and/or b) provide entrepreneurial supports to tenants. This could include, for
example, funding bodies who support startups.
Collaboration Spaces
Meeting rooms and event spaces would be available for hourly or daily rental by entrepreneurs
and other members of the public. Similarly, event planners, including partners, would incur
nominal rental fees for the use of the meeting rooms, multi-purpose space and atrium. Making
these spaces available would enable even more community stakeholders and entrepreneurs to
become part of this community.
The Value of Collaboration
By bringing together multiple partners, The SDG Lab will hopefully reduce duplication of existing
resources, create new opportunities across the program partners and enhance the potential
reach for every entrepreneur referred to each program. Therefore, a strong partnership with
existing entrepreneurial service providers, funders, nonprofit membership organizations with an
interest in entrepreneurship, private sector providers (such as banks, lawyers, accountants), and
educational and research resources will enable our community to advance Goal 17 of the SDGs.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
The Space
!✓•]
2 King Street West provides 21,000 square feet of space across 3 floors. The City has engaged a
design consultant to maximize the usability of the building. In concept, Sustain 17 would offer
the following:
1. Main floor - 7,500 sq ft — could feature a reception area, atrium event space, 9 offices, a
meeting room, 12 co -working stations and up to 16 hot desks. An accessible entry with
an elevator or a choice of 3 stairways to access upper and lower levels
2. Second floor - 6,000 sq ft — could feature up to 11 offices, 1-2 large meeting rooms, up to
13 co-working/hot desks and a common area with kitchenette and washrooms
3. Basement - 7,500 sq ft- features 2 large board / training rooms, a maker space, 2
kitchenettes, a sound -proof room potentially useable for podcast/video production, 2
large lockable storge spaces and washrooms.
The building meets accessibility requirement for entry and elevator access to all levels.
Amenities essential to the successful operation of the "Hub" include high-speed internet (Wi-Fi),
secured entry access, mail service, AV equipment for event spaces, meeting/training rooms and
amenities common with modern office spaces (ex: kitchenettes, collaboration areas, bike
storage, etc.).
Parking is always an issue, and so access to parking for staff, partners, and visitors may be a
challenge. Fortunately, the central location is close to light rail transit, bike routes and walkability
allows for convenient access. The Duke & Ontario Parking Garage is nearby.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
Direct Programming — Community Activator
E
In 2021, the Small Business Centre surveyed Kitchener businesses to better understand how the
City can accelerate social and environmental innovation. Of 86 responses, 67% stated they are
looking to be connected with like-minded people and organizations. To achieve this, the
proposed partnership model contemplates the hiring of a full time 'Community Activator' role,
which would be central in fostering an ecosystem in the following ways:
1) TO INSPIRE the community to create a city that does the most good in the world, to challenge
mindsets, fostering creativity and support innovation. This could be accomplished through, for
example, speaker series, community round tables, pitch competitions, etc., where local and
national innovators can share their approach to social innovation.
2) TO CONNECT local entrepreneurs, researchers, organizations, etc., with like-minded
individuals, locally and abroad. This could include industry events, ecosystem mapping, resource
compilation, development of a mentor network, etc.
3) TO SUPPORT COLLABORATION by actively fostering collaborations among entrepreneurial,
academic, government, and social impact organizations that influence sustainable development
goals.
4) TO FOSTER BELONGING by cultivating relationships among entrepreneurs at any stage and
across all program partners. This could be accomplished through direct training, educational
awareness, forums, bootcamps, problem -solving labs, etc.
5) TO CELEBRATE A COMMUNITY OF DIFFERENCE MAKERS by amplifying the work of the
companies, organizations, partnerships and work already happening locally.
Core Functions & Staffing Implications
The SBC staff would provide primary oversight of the facility and, where possible, utilize their
existing core services to offset a number of the functions of the space. However, it will be
necessary to augment certain services to ensure the SBC can continue to deliver on its core
mandate. The proposed partnership model contemplates the hiring of an administrative role to
support basic functions (ex: reception, contracts, etc.).
In addition, the proposed annual operating budget anticipates costs associated with custodial
services, security and IT support.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
The SDG Lab aligns with the City's Make it Kitchener 2.0 Strategy in several ways. The overarching
premise of the strategy is "if you want to make a difference in the world, Kitchener is the place
to do it. Because this community will help. Our advantage is we make change together." This
strategy is embedded on a promise to solve major societal challenges such as affordable housing,
the elimination of systemic barriers, environmental sustainability, and giving social
entrepreneurs a platform.
This project would represent the first major investment in the area of focus "A City -Wide Startup
Network — Focused on Sustainable Development Goals". 2 King Street West could be a catalyst
for change and a platform for entrepreneurs to collaborate and work towards solving some of
the world's greatest challenges.
The creation of an SDG Lab supports the City's Strategic Plan actions of i) fostering a citywide
network of incubators, accelerators and co -working spaces; and ii) combating systemic barriers.
Equally important, the SDG Lab would build a platform for our local community to support the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Legal Framework
The SDG Lab would operate using the same legal framework as 44 Gaukel, where the City remains
the overall landlord. A written agreement would be established with each program partner to
document arrangements and obligations between the parties. Program partners would identify
and approve residents (entrepreneurs/startup companies of the program) to utilize their
allocated spaces. The City would then enter into a standard Licensing Agreement with each
resident/startup. Doing so ensures there is a legal agreement between the City and all occupants
of the building with proper insurance and risk mitigation measures in place for all.
Any subsequent tenants, such as Community Program and Supporting Partners, would be
established either through formal lease agreements or utilizing the standard Licensing
Agreement.
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854 --
SDG LAB 01/2021
Financial Structure
11
Capital - the City would cover all of the capital expenses including the initial capital buildout,
estimated at $350,000-$400,000. Capital construction would be limited to aesthetic
improvements and the acquisition of furniture/technology which can be redeployed to other City
facilities should The SDG Lab ever cease to exist. Given the potential for the building to be
redeveloped to support THEMUSEUM's expansion, staff would endeavor to minimize sunken
costs while reusing existing infrastructure and furniture left behind by the previous owner.
Operating - the four Entrepreneurial Program Partners would equally share in $400,000 of
operating expenses. This estimate includes the cost of utilities, internet, property taxes, and the
cost of hiring a Community Activator and a Program Assistant. Additional operating expenses
(estimated at $50,000) would be funded through lease payments of any Community Program and
Supporting Partners. The City would bare the risk and absorb any annual cost overruns. If there
are any annual surpluses, the partners would determine how to reallocate funds (ex: returned to
the program providers, invest in future services, etc.). The City would contribute $100,000
annually to fund the Small Business Centre's contribution to the partnership. If the City is unable
to land three additional partners, the City would contribute the balance of needed revenue.
Proposed Operating Budget
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Total
REVENUE
Partners
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
300,000
$
900,000
COK Contribution
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
100,000
$
300,000
Rentals
$
5,000
$
5,000
$
10,000
Leases/Partnerships
$
50,000
$
60,000
$
60,000
$
170,000
Other
Total Revenue
$
450,000
$
465,000
$
465,000
$
1,380,000
EXPENSES
Wages/Benefits
$
147,348
$
157,558
$
160,709
$
448,708
Overhead Expenses
$
252,652
$
253,410
$
254,170
$
760,232
Contingencies
$
40,000
$
40,000
Programming/Misc
$
10,000
Tbd
Tbd
$
10,000
Total Expenses
$
450,000
$
410,968
$
414,879
$
1,258,940
Net Surplus/deficit
$
-
$
45,032
$
50,121
$
121,060
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
Proposed Capital Costs
INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
Estimate
DEMOLITION - REMOVAL
15,000
SECURITY& IT
25,000
Painting
70,000
Carpentry, Millwork
25,000
Flooring
70,000
Electrical
50,000
Plumbing
25,000
CONTINGENCY
20,000
TOTAL INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS
300,000
16,000
FURNISHINGS & EQUIPMENT
Co -Working & Hot Desks
Event, Meeting, Training Rooms
20,000
Signs, Artwork
25,000
AV EQUIPMENT
24,000
CONTINGENCY
15,000
TOTAL FURNISHINGS & EQUIPMENT
100,000
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
400,000
Funding Opportunities
Given the global focus on combating climate change and inequities, it is anticipated that Federal,
Provincial and corporate funding will become more readily available. Such funding could support
programming resources, entrepreneurial training, seed funding/startup grants, etc. City staff will
continuously seek out funding sources to further leverage the municipal investment and to
support the various program partners of the SDG Lab.
Risk Assessment
The following identifies potential risks associated with this project:
Risk
Options for Mitigation
Following the pandemic, reluctance to utilize
If necessary, implement sound public health
coworking spaces.
policies and expectations.
Future mandates to close the facility in
Ensure program partners understand the
response to the pandemic.
potential for closure, support public health
expectations. May need to renegotiate
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854---
SDG LAB 01/2021
13
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
funding contributions should access be
limited for extensive time periods.
Failure to secure Program Partner or loss of
Under these scenarios, staff would seek to
partner mid -year.
mitigate expenses where possible; may
require additional funding from the Make It
Kitchener 2.0 Reserve; withhold recruitment
of Community Activator until all partners are
onboard.
Insurance requirements for individual
Explore group insurance options or
residents/entrepreneurs is cost -prohibitive
opportunities for Program Partner to provide
and deter users.
insurance on resident's behalf.
No additional funding (ex: private sector,
Programming expenses would be limited to
Federal grants) is secured.
align with available funding.
Significant after-hours use of the facility
Implement after hours protocols for all users
creates security concerns when City staff not
(ex: restricted access); introduce
onsite.
security/alarm access.
With increased use of the facility by multiple
Introduce partnership and license agreements
partners, residents, entrepreneurs, etc., the
for all who may reside in the facility which
City's risk exposure will increase (ex: future
ensure appropriate insurance coverage.
claims, damage, etc.)
Risk that when THEMUSEUM's project
Improvements will be limited primarily to
proceeds, capital investments will be lost.
cosmetic improvements. Any furnishings,
equipment and IT will be sourced using City
standards to ensure they can be repurposed
in other City facilities.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
14
"Social Innovation" is the development and implementation of solutions to challenge societal
and environmental issues in support of collective progress. "Social Entrepreneurship" is the use
of business practices and enterprise to develop, fund and implement solutions to social, cultural
and environmental issues. While social innovation and social entrepreneurship are not new, in
the face of societal and environmental crisis, the world is in the midst of a movement where
business practices are used as a force for good. Social ventures and innovation can span many,
if not all, industries. In 2019, social ventures were most commonly associated with the following
industries:
1. Professional, Scientific and Technical services (15%)
2. ICT and Artificial Intelligence (15%)
3. Arts, Media & Entertainment (5%)
4. Education (5%)
5. Environment and Cleantech (5%)
The following section provides an overview of local and global growth.
Global Growth
The growth of the social entrepreneurship sector continues to grow as businesses look for ways
to operate in a cleaner, more efficient way. According to Forbes, investment in renewable energy
is projected to grow to $3.4 trillion by 2030. The need for new ideas and methods to help
businesses modify to a socially forward way of operation and thinking, begins not just within the
business itself but with entrepreneurs. Social entrepreneurs are developing groundbreaking
technology and products to help push the social mindset in the way we live and work.
In a 2020 study done by the United Nations, it was found that 3.2% of working age individuals in
the 58 countries that were surveyed, were engaged in social entrepreneurship in the start-up
phase. In the UK, approximately 34% of all new startups are social enterprises, and 61% of all
social enterprises anticipate expanding their workforce in the next twelve months (Social
Enterprise UK, 2021).
Here in Canada, the potential for social entrepreneurship growth is substantial. In a 2019 Startup
Canada Census, more than 40% of Canadian entrepreneurs are interested in advancing UN
sustainable goals. In a Thomson Reuters Foundation study (2019), Canada was ranked as the #1
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
country in the world for social entrepreneurship. This study evaluates the global social
entrepreneurship landscape in six key areas: government support, attracting skilled staff, public
understanding, making a living, gaining momentum and access to investment. Since 2016,
Canada has improved and ranked the top three for every category except attracting skilled staff
and ease of selling to businesses.
Waterloo Region Demand
Below is a breakdown of the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre Entrepreneurial Training
and Programs Attendance.
Female
Male
Social
Equity -Deserving
Soc & Equity
64%
36%
39%
44%
9%
The table below highlights the need and demand for the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre
from 2020 and 2021.
WRSBC nitiative Performance Metrics
2020 - Total
2021 - Total
Businesses Started
345
193
Businesses Purchased
12
5
Businesses Expanded
78
111
Jobs Created
492
370
Inquiries
12683
9080
New Client Consultations (Starting a Business)
720
675
New Client Consultations (Existing Business)
649
742
Repeat Client Consultations
1297
656
French Language Consultations
0
0
Referrals to Public Sector
5064
2950
Referrals to Private Sector Professionals
5306
2999
Workshops/Seminars
180
230
Outreach Connections
7724
7577
Events Hosted
12
33
Events Attendance
2535
1264
Mentorship Matches
41
396
In a 2021 survey, the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre want to garner feedback from social
entrepreneurs in the Region to inform programming regarding the future SDG lab. Below are the
results after 36 survey responses.
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854 --
SDG LAB 01/2021
Gender
Female
72%
Male
22%
Non -binary
3%
Prefer not to say
3%
What type of organization are
you?
Non-profit
8%
For-profit
75%
Academia
3%
Community Group
6%
Other
8%
The Need for Access to Funding
16
Do you identify as a member of any of the following groups?
Person with a disability
12%
Indigenous person
5%
Visible minority
33%
Immigrant of Refugee
10%
LG BTQ2S
2%
Other
38%
What resources/supports do you need to advance your
sustainability goals/maximize your impact?
Space to work (hot desk, co -work, office)
3%
Space to hold meetings & make calls
5%
Project funding and proposal writing
16%
Connections to like-minded people/orgs
16%
Mentors, Experts, Researchers
14%
Learning Opportunities
10%
Advisory Business Services
8%
Social Enterprise Accelerator
12%
Impact Measurement Roadmap
7%
Prototyping Workspace
5%
Other
3%
Access to early stage and venture capital funding is a critical challenge for social entrepreneurs.
44% say funding is not accessible. As a result, only 15% of social ventures have revenue in excess
of $100,000 and are primarily self-funded. Once established, a key effort of the City and the
partners of the SDG Lab will be to improve access to funding. Fortunately, most major banking
institutions in Ontario have established funds to support social and environmental challenges.
The Federal Government offers two funding programs (Investment Readiness Program and Social
Finance Fund) to increase access to funding, with a particular focus on equity -deserving
entrepreneurs. In addition to working with the KW Community Foundation, Small Business
Centre staff are also exploring partnership opportunities to support micro -loans to future users
of the Lab.
Growth in Equity Seeking Entrepreneurs
Today, a large percentage of social change being made in Canada is led by equity deserving
individuals. A Social Impact Report released in 2019, by Startup Canada, identified the following:
• 33% are visible minorities;
• 58% of social entrepreneurs are women;
• 13% are new to Canada within the last 5 years;
MAKE IT
KITCH ENER
SINCE 1854 --
SDG LAB 01/2021 17
• 10% are Indigenous, Inuit or Metis
• 7% identify as LGBTQ+
Within this breakdown, 52% of social entrepreneurs are created and led by a non -Canadian -born
entrepreneur. These stats suggest that individuals that often face the greatest systemic barriers
are at the forefront of an industry that's focused on change.
Our task as a City is now to push that boundary even further and develop a Hub that is free of
systemic barriers and inequities allowing marginalized groups to have access to a space where
they can be inspired. Indicate source for this information
Global Business Movement
Businesses are recognizing the need for sustainable practices to attract new employees, driven
largely by millennial employees. In an article released by Inc., it states that:
• by 2025, 75% of the U.S. workforce will be made up of millennials.
• 64% of these millennials will not take a job if the employer does not have a strong
Corporate Social Responsibility policy.
• 83% would be more loyal to a company that is actively seeking to be more socially
responsible.
Today, more than 4,490 companies across 77 countries have achieved 'B -Corp' status, a
designation that a business meets the high standards of a "beneficial" approach to their
operations (ex: high environmental standards, charitable givings, social performance, etc.).
Business Example:
Mary didn't set out to impact the Sustainable Development Goals with her food business idea,
she also didn't see herself as an entrepreneur. All Mary wanted to do was provide meaningful
work for people that are functionally illiterate, have learning challenges, and/or grew up in
families of abuse or neglect. Some live with physical limitations or mental illness and suffer from
social exclusion, poverty and a harm to dignity that accompanies a lack of participation in the
paid work force and community life. What she knew was "everyone has the desire to live a
purposeful life".
What started as a brainstorming session at her kitchen table in 2014, has grown to a business
with three locations and up to 30 employees. Customers can pick up, order online, or find the
product in grocery stores. This business, and others like this, impact not just one SDG, Goal #10
- reduce inequalities; but many more goals: Goal 1 - poverty, Goal 3 - good health and well-
being, Goal 8 - decent work and economic growth, Goal 12 - responsible consumption and G17 -
partnerships for the goals. Who knew a bowl of soup would have such a large impact.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
IV
The following identifies the region's various strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
that should be considered in evaluating the potential benefits and challenges of the SDG Lab:
Strengths
• The proposed partnership model builds on the Region's collaborative, barn -raising
approach to community development and growth.
• A growing regional focus on creating equity -deserving entrepreneurial programs and
services.
• Waterloo Region's diversity in startup activities across traditional / non -tech industry
sectors.
• Kitchener's Innovation District is anchored by startup organizations such as Communitech
and UW Velocity.
• Talent base of highly educated industry experts, professionals, and workers.
• A strong base of innovation companies in Downtown Kitchener.
• A network of local SDG leaders, entrepreneurs, non -profits, researchers, and resources
exist.
• Location in the heart of the region, with direct access to the ION corridor.
• An existing network of mentors that has been built up by the SBC.
• Potential for partnerships with local funding organizations to support startup activities.
Weaknesses
• Limited programming and support for equity -deserving, non -tech entrepreneurs during
start up and growth phases of business.
• Currently there is no clear 'hub', facility or focal point in our region for social innovators
and organizations.
• Lack of major employers to lead the social innovation ecosystem.
• Lack of available seed funding for social ventures.
• Lack of Provincial funding to support operations of such a facility.
Opportunities
• Social entrepreneurs are seeking a space where they feel like they belong.
• To provide physical space for program providers and startup companies of equity -serving
organizations.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
19
• Graduates from programs at post -secondary institutions are seeking a network and
landing spot to advance their ideas.
• Opportunity for social entrepreneurs and academia to interact for research and
development purposes.
• To inspire youth to be a part of positive change.
• Funding opportunities from the Federal Government, federal organizations and the
private sector.
• Non -profits organizations are increasingly looking for alternative ways of funding their
project, collaborate with like organizations to avoid duplication of services and physical
spaces to meet.
• To attract regional, national, and international Social Innovation, Social Finance and Social
Enterprise leaders to our community.
• Building partnerships and trust, find an entry point for entrepreneurs, partners and
stakeholders.
• To provide a way for citizens to participate in a positive local change.
Challenges
• Limited resources: such as staff, funding, technology, and databases to gather client
information, and impact measurement system.
• Finding the right mix of anchor tenants.
• Access to traditional funding/lending and government grants for entrepreneurs.
• Tracking impact data to demonstrate results.
• Localization of impacts to support/justify local investment.
• Curating a vibrant in-person network of entrepreneurs in post -pandemic environment.
In the Waterloo Region community, there are several organizations operating in the social and
environmental space. Local universities, colleges and other organizations have created
programming to support social entrepreneurs and the Sustainable Development Goals. These
institutions include, but are not limited to:
• Wilfrid Laurier University—The Social Entrepreneurship Option
o The first Canadian undergraduate social entrepreneurship program grounded in
liberal arts
• Wilfrid Laurier University — Women's Entrepreneurship Program
• Conestoga College — Business Sustainability Management & Entrepreneurship Collective
• University of Waterloo — UW Greenhouse
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
• Accelerator Centre — Sustainable Future Program
20
• Local Non -Profits - YWCA, Social Venture Partners, Capacity Canada, Immigration
Partnership, WR Community Foundation, Sustainable Waterloo, Tamarack Institute,
United Way, etc.
o May of the above organizations providing impact investments for community and
agency projects addressing poverty, food security, youth, social justice,
environment etc.
• Other institutions and organizations within and outside the Region include,
o Center for Social Innovation, Pillar Non -Profit, Circular Economy Accelerator,
Mars, Coil Activate Circular Accelerator, The Working Centre, etc.
The facilities listed above all primarily focus on social development goals. Outside of these
facilities there are several accelerators and incubators that focus on startup growth, primarily
focused on tech, Al and health innovation.
Based on the foregoing, staff conclude the following:
• Given the transformative economic and social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, a new
wave of innovation and entrepreneurship is anticipated, likely with a place greater focus
on advancing social and environmental good;
• Existing entrepreneurial programs within the region, including the Waterloo Region Small
Business Centre, have experienced significant growth in the number startup companies
and small businesses focused on social and environmental innovation;
• Within our region, the number of new companies lead by women, racialized individuals
and/or people of colour is increasing, as demonstrated by the Waterloo Region Small
Business Centre, CCAWR (program named LiftOff) and WLU's Women's Entrepreneurship
Centre;
• Many organizations in our region are tackling the UN SDGs, however there is no central
hub for the organizations and entrepreneurs in this ecosystem;
• 2 King Street West provides the City an opportunity to pilot an interim SDG Lab in advance
of THEMUSEUM's expansion plans,
• 2 King Street West provides an opportunity for our community to simultaneously support
entrepreneurs seeking to tackle the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals,
provide space for equity -deserving entrepreneurs to grow their companies, and provide
a central but for the local social innovation ecosystem;
• An SDG Lab would enable greater collaboration, innovation and a place for bright minds
to tackle global problems.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -
SDG LAB 01/2021
21
• Through a partnership model, the longevity, vibrancy and impact of 2 King Street West as
an SDG Lab can be maximized.
In turn, staff recommend the following:
• That 2 King Street West be utilized as an SDG Lab in advance of THEMUSEUM's future
expansion;
• That the Waterloo Region Small Business Centre provide oversight to the facility on behalf
of the City;
• That the City utilize a partnership model to bring multiple organizations into the space,
where partners are equally sharing in the space and operating costs; and,
• That an initial allocation of $750,000 be allocated to support an initial capital investment
of up to $400,000 with the balance to support annual operations.
With the location, the academia support, the available transit, the social impact and the wide
breadth of entrepreneurs in the social development space, it's time for Kitchener to do the most
good and make the biggest change for generations to come.
MAKE IT
K I T C H E N E R
- SINCE 1854 -