Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DSD-2022-151 - Heritage Permit ApplicationHPA-2022-IV-005 - 122 Frederick Street (County of Waterloo Registry Office)
Staff Report r NJ :R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: April 5, 2022 SUBMITTED BY: Bustamante, Rosa, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Choudhry, Deeksha, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: March 14, 2022 REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-151 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-005 122 Frederick Street (County of Waterloo Registry Office) Roof Replacement RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-005 be approved to permit the installation of a new roof system on the property municipally addressed as 122 Frederick Street, in accordance with the supporting information submitted with the application. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to present the proposed roof replacement detailed in HPA-2022-IV-005. • The key finding of this report is that the proposed roof replacement will not negatively impact the cultural heritage value or interest of the property. • There are no financial implications associated with this report. • Community engagement included consultation with the Heritage Kitchener committee. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-005 proposes to install a new modified bituminous roofing system on the subject property municipally addressed as 122 Frederick Street. This building is also known as the County of Waterloo Registry Office and has been designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating by-law 91-115. The replacement of the current roofing system has been proposed because of the complete saturation of the insulation layer of the roof due to water infiltration. Some parts of the limestone parapet have also been damaged. The roofline will not be affected through the installation of the new roofing system, and the affected areas of the parapet will be repaired. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning Staff note that the proposed roof replacement meets Parks Canada's The Standards and Guidelines for the *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 3 of 52 Conservation of Historical Places in Canada and that it will not adversely affect the heritage - defining attributes of the building. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2022-IV-005 seeking permission to install a new modified bituminous roof system and repair the damaged parts of the limestone parapet on the property municipally addressed as 122 Frederick Street (Fig. 1). Figure 1: Location Map- 122 Frederick Street Waterloo Regional Police Services - Central 6NKion r' \ s REPORT: The subject property is municipally addressed as 122 Frederick Street, also known as the Country of Waterloo Registry Office, and is located on the north side of Frederick Street between Weber Street East and Frederick Street (Fig. 2). The subject property contains a one -storey building designed by architect Ray M. Hall in the Art Deco Style, constructed from 1938 to 1939. The Registry Office has historical, architectural, and contextual value. The Registry Office is historically significant for its association with Dunker Construction, a well-known and respected local building company in the City of Kitchener. It is architecturally significant as it is one of the few remaining Art Deco buildings in Kitchener and the building exemplifies many characteristics of the Art Deco style. The building also has contextual value as it is surrounded by many buildings of historical and architectural significance. To the southwest of the building is the County Court House (c. 1960), the Waterloo Regional Police Department is located to the north (1950) and the to the immediate west is the Italian Villa - style Governor's House (c. 1878) and the Georgian style Gaol (c.1852). It's location within the historical neighborhood contributes greatly to its contextual value. The property was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating by-law 91-115 (Attachment C) for its design/physical, and historical/associative values. Page 4 of 52 The exterior physical heritage attributes of the building identified in the designating by-law include: • All elevations; • Roofline and limestone parapet; • All window openings; • Limestone spandrels, lintels, sills, and metal muntins; • Main entrance including limestone steps; • Light standards, double leaf bronze, and glass doors; • Limestone architrave; and • Mosaic with County of Waterloo, City of Kitchener, and City of Galt crests/seals The interior heritage attributes of the building identified in the designating by-law include: • Lobby walls of grey and green marble; • High plaster ceilings accentuated with geometric designs; • Two original hanging fixtures; • Terrazzo floors; • Grey marble steps; • Nickel plated heating grates and handrails; Figure 2: The Registry Office — Front Fagade Proposed Roof Replacement The building at 122 Frederick Street currently has a built-up roof system. This application proposes to replace the current roofing system with a modified bituminous roofing system to improve the roof functionality and insulation (Attachment A). Page 5 of 52 The current built-up roof system consists of the following: • Existing concrete deck • 2 ply vapour barrier • 1.5" fibreglass insulation • 1/" fibreboard • 4 ply glass reinforced felt, tar, and pea grade gravel. Due to the past water infiltration, the underlying insulation layer within the entire roof system has been saturated. Some repairs have been performed in the past to stop the leakage, but a complete roof replacement is necessary. There has also been some damage to the limestone parapet due to the water leakage (Fig. 3-6). MEI Figure 3: Damaged Section of the limestone parapet Figure 4: Deteriorated and missing caulking sir Figure 5: Caulking applied above the metal sheet (brick Figure 6: Copious amounts of caulking to stop water is hidden underneath the sheet and not visible) infiltration Page 6 of 52 The replacement of the current roofing system is proposed to be completed by repairing the parts of the damaged limestone parapet as required, and the installation of a new modified bituminous roof system. The roofline and any elevations of the building will not be affected. Additionally, the existing exterior materials of the roof will remain the same i.e., the existing concrete deck will be repaired as required and the pea grade gravel will be replaced in kind to match the existing. Installation of New Modified Bituminous Roof System The new modified bituminous roof system (Fig. 7) will consist of the following: • Existing concrete deck • 1 -ply modified bitumen vapour retarder • 1.5" polyisocyanurate insulation • 2" tapered polyisocyanurate insulation • 1/" gypsum board • 2 ply modified bitumen base sheet membrane • New pea grade gravel Figure 7: New Roof System (Attachment B) Repairing Portions of the Damaged Parapet and Including it in the New Roofing System The roof membrane is situated against the interior wall of the parapet, with a layer of brick underneath a layer of sheet metal. The roof membrane has separated from the brick, Page 7 of 52 LEGEND ,,.•Y .�.. ,.. A wrlEw. on a ir 11 avo�orP p wrrtir �i � awss aw uon ©O rNc swP«r �t --�—mnNOU x«r a�P.Nwrs � HAw � sllRwne omr --- EiPRHlAtlr axrt � xamr nN•1✓< Tw an rnuz Q sw c +rlxr v wm cx wRa I J • �� W9141TCN 9YW .�=gFL2 _ ,.. fibs ESE iaa� m Hauac« vm¢t 1 rri�.i�ir Imm k ^I '0'o �e �Gwr�ii �uwrc i`r.i 4.5' IRC HIIILOING 5C3ENCE5 GROUP E`GSTirN R IIL6F 1.1 - aRl+.lm tsos RI HEN NbOF MWV4N Rr� - - c•ROOF nne PLAN," wQR: CITY OF KITCHENER cc mlr DECK (IW LONE LUT TAM4) PEA M+ DRAYEL TOTN. - IAft m FT. E1 rnHo .2ort CEi,K HEW 1 I PLY MOD. 07. YN-OUR RETWO HEM W P.-RA.xsuunDH. NEVI T—I F0.T90LVNRIRATE IH911UnU% MIH. IV HEN O.5' OEHS OEL% ROOF REPLACEMENT TIE WN''IMY R�ATRE 122 HRMERIGK Sr. KITGHDIET NCR �8fl26 �� x[rtA� NEW 4 PLY MDD. 91T. 90.'£ SIE'xT MF1HrANE HEMI PEA OWEGIAYEL wuR LR20-0605P wm MAR. 1/22 l>Np4ml LK, ESN R1 oR�sr- J. C./M.H. Figure 7: New Roof System (Attachment B) Repairing Portions of the Damaged Parapet and Including it in the New Roofing System The roof membrane is situated against the interior wall of the parapet, with a layer of brick underneath a layer of sheet metal. The roof membrane has separated from the brick, Page 7 of 52 allowing water to leak past the membrane, which has also significantly deteriorated the bricks under the sheet metal (Attachment D). One area of the parapet was investigated, and it was determined that it could be safely assumed that the whole parapet is affected. In addition, substantial amounts of caulking have been applied over the years to the sheet metal, stone coping junctions, and mortar joint cracks on the interior wall of the parapet along all four sides of the building in order to relieve some of the water ingress. The parapet wall surrounding the roof is an integral part of the roof system and must be tied into the waterproofing system of the roof itself. The scope of the roof replacement involves placing the roof membrane over the interior wall of the parapet and terminating it under the stone coping to maintain watertight integrity. The stone coping will be temporarily removed to allow for the installation of the membrane and will be re -instated with premix Type N masonry in standard grey once the work is complete and no mortar will be exposed. A new metal drip flashing is also proposed to be installed for efficient water drainage from the roof. The new metal drip flashing will not have any visual impact on the elevations of the building. The first wythe of brick is currently concealed under a layer of brown sheet metal. The sheet metal will be removed and replaced with a steel sheet with the colour to match the existing. The deteriorated wythe of brick will be removed and replaced with a concrete solid block with Type S masonry. In addition to these works, the damaged parapet parts will also be repaired as required. Figure 8: Parapet Detailing of the New Roofing System (Attachment B) Page 8 of 52 . �• . - — — — REMOVE AND RE06TATE 1 ,• V d q d - EbSIIN. STONE COPING ' NEW2Y3A STAJNLE53 STM FLASHING • a ' d PEWTNRU-WALL FLA5NING NEW CONCRETE BLOCK xEW NURTAR JOINT PRptTSIONS - I NEW TfRWMAIICJ RAR P[R ORAINACE I NEW 220A PRPPINLNED METAL FLASHING TG WATCH EA"NG COLOUR A - -_ -- - j• SEQJRE EASE SHEET USING PLATES k C FASTENERS. INSTALL BASE SHEET PATCH OVER EACH FASTENER PRICK TO _ INSTWITION OF GR SHEET _ - - _ NEW HCG. BIT- CAR SHEET FLASHING NEN IR.R. HIT. RASE SHEET fLASNING e I I II _________________________ _ 5 ... E)9nNG CONCRETE PECK NEW NEW VAPOUR RETARDER _ _ ...::....:.'. _ ------ ':: VAPOUR NEW BASE W%LARON NEW ONEW .... .. ...... ..... .. ...... ...... ... ..... .....: .... ..... ...... .. ..... ... ...... ...... C VERW. FEA911NG NEW COYER BDARO FLASHING G NET/ 4O0. WIT, EAS 30BON a T .. ........ .. ...... ... - . ..msxal NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL PARAPET ET QsTAIL�G .caro rre 3' — p^ an'i+o uA,e 1 Al.IA2022 x� L. PMM424 Figure 8: Parapet Detailing of the New Roofing System (Attachment B) Page 8 of 52 Installation of New Roof Guard Rails As part of the new roofing system, new guard rails are proposed to be installed adjacent to the existing roof access hatch to conform to the current Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) regulations. Neither the roofline nor the limestone parapet will be negatively impacted through the installation of these guard rails. Installation of New Mechanical Equipment and Ductwork All the rooftop mechanical equipment will be temporarily disconnected, moved and reinstated with new ductwork and new duct insulation. Neither the roofline nor the limestone parapet will be negatively impacted through the installation of the mechanical equipment and the new ductwork. Benefits of the New Modified Bituminous Roof The new roof system will have the following benefits: • Better insulation for the building; • The modified bitumen roof system facilitates easier roof maintenance and the quicker detection of problems such as punctures or tears; • The installation of a modified bitumen roof system reduces the risk of fire greatly as it does not require the on-site presence of a gas-fired tar kettle; • The light-coloured modified bitumen membrane will increase solar reflectivity, thereby reducing the thermal load and environmental footprint of the building. The proposed alteration meets the "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties", especially: • Respect for original fabric — repair with like materials — return the resource to its prior condition, without altering its integrity; and • Maintenance — with continuous care, future restoration will not be necessary — with regular upkeep, major conservation projects and their high costs can be avoided. The proposed alteration meets Parks Canada's The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada, especially: • Evaluate the existing condition of character -defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed — use the gentlest means possible for any intervention, respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention; • Repair rather than replace character -defining elements. Where character -defining elements are too severely deteriorated to repair, and where sufficient physical evidence exists, replace them with new elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements; and • Make any intervention needed to preserve character -defining elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place and identifiable on close inspection. Heritage Planning Comments In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The subject property municipally addressed as 122 Frederick Street is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating by-law 91-115; Page 9 of 52 • The roofline and the limestone parapet have been identified as a heritage attribute contributing to the cultural heritage value or interest of the property; • Due to constant water infiltration, the insulation properties of the current roof have completely deteriorated, causing some damage to the limestone parapet as well; • The current roof system will be removed and replaced with a complementary roofing system that replicates the current roofing materials; • Appropriate installation method will ensure a long life for the new roof; • The proposed roofing system is consistent with Park Canada's The Standards and Guidelines for Historical Places in Canada with respect to the compatibility of the roof system in terms of materials and scale; • Original architectural features will remain; • Original materials of the existing roof system will remain with the concrete deck, and the replacement of the sheet metal and pea grade gravel in kind; • No interior character -defining elements of the building will be affected through the installation of the new roofing system; • Installation of roofing will not adversely impact the reasons for designation of the property nor the Frederick Street streetscape. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit is not required to install the new modified bituminous roof. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener will be consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson, Manager of Development Review APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Page 10 of 52 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-005 Attachment B — Drawing Set for 122 Frederick Street Roof Replacement Attachment C — 122 Frederick Steet - Designating By-law 91-115 Attachment D — Atlas Apex Report from September 4, 2020, for 122 Frederick Street Page 11 of 52 2022 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6` Floor iITC;HENER P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; plan ning(aD_kitchener.ca PART A: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 10 The following requirements are designed to assist applicants in submitting sufficient information in order that their Heritage Permit Application may be deemed complete and processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. If further assistance or explanation is required please contact heritage planning staff at heritage(cDkitchener.ca. 1. WHAT IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage Act, has enacted legislation to assist its citizens with the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources. Once properties are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, the City is enabled to manage physical change to the cultural heritage resources as a means of protection. The principal mechanism of management is the Heritage Permit Application process, which allows the municipality to review site-specific applications and determine if proposed changes will beneficially or detrimentally affect the reasons for designation and heritage attributes. As a general rule, the preferred alterations to heritage properties are those that repair rather than replace original heritage attributes, and those that do not permanently damage cultural heritage resources and their heritage attributes. Where replacement of materials or new construction is necessary, these should be compatible with the original. Reversibility is also preferable as this allows for the future reinstatement of heritage attributes. According to the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of designated property shall alter the property or permit the alteration of the property if the alteration is likely to affect the property's heritage attributes, unless the owner applies to the council of the municipality and receives written consent. This consent is obtained through the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Permit Applications are applicable for all individually designated properties (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) and all properties located within the boundaries of Heritage Conservation Districts (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act). 2. WHEN IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED? Under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, any new construction or "alteration" to a property designated under Part IV of the Act (individually designated property) or a property designated under Part V of the Act (within a Heritage Conservation District) requires a Heritage Permit Application. "Alteration" is defined as: "to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb." In addition, the approval of a Heritage Permit Application is required for any demolition of a property designated under Part IV or V of the Act. Please contact Heritage Planning staff directly to confirm if your specific project requires the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Below are some examples of typical Part IV alterations that may require a Heritage Permit Application: • Addition and/or alteration to an existing building or accessory building • Replacement of windows or doors, or a change in window or door openings • Change in siding, soffit, fascia or roofing material • Removal and/or installation of porches, verandahs and canopies • Removal and/or installation of cladding and chimneys • Changes in trim, cladding, or the painting of masonry • Repointing of brick Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 Page 2 of 10 Note: Heritage Permit Application requirements differ between Part V designations depending on the policies and guidelines of the respective Heritage Conservation District Plans. Please refer to the City of Kitchener's website at www.kitchener.ca/heritage to download a copy of the relevant Heritage Conservation District Plan (Civic Centre Neighbourhood, St. Mary's, Upper Doon, and Victoria Park Area). 3. WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WITH A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The information required varies with each application. The intent of the application is to ensure that Heritage Planning staff and, where required, the Heritage Kitchener committee understand the specific details of any proposed changes in order to be sufficiently informed so they may offer advice to the applicant and, where required, to City Council. An incomplete application cannot be processed and the official notice of receipt (as required under the Ontario Heritage Act) will not be issued until all of the documents have been submitted. Failure to provide a complete application may result in deferral by Heritage Planning staff or the Heritage Kitchener committee in order to secure additional information, which will delay final approval. At minimum, the following information is required: Heritage Permit Application Form The applicant must provide a complete original copy, including signature of the owner, of the Heritage Permit Application Form. Written Description The applicant must provide a complete written description of all proposed work. The description should complement drawings, detailed construction plans, photos and any other sketches or supporting information submitted with the application. The written description must include a list and the details of all proposed work including, but not limited to, proposed colours, materials, sizes, etc. Construction and Elevation Drawings Along with construction elevation drawings (drawn to scale) the applicant may also, but not in lieu of, submit a sketch of the proposed work made over a photograph. Drawings must be drawn to scale and include: a) Overall dimensions b) Site plan depicting the location of existing buildings and the location of any proposed new building or addition to a building c) Elevation plan for each elevation of the building d) Specific sizes of building elements of interest (signs, windows, awnings, etc.) e) Detailed information including trim, siding, mouldings, etc., including sizes and profiles f) Building materials to be used (must also be included in the written description) g) Construction methods and means of attachment (must also be included in the written description) Some of the above components may be scoped or waived at the discretion of Heritage Planning staff following discussion with the applicant. Photographs Photographs of the building including general photos of the property, the streetscape in which the property is located, facing streetscape and, if the property is located at an intersection, all four corners. Photos of the specific areas that may be affected by the proposed alteration, new construction, or demolition must be included. Electronic copies of construction and elevation drawings, sketches, and photographs, along with hard copies submitted with the application, are encouraged. Working together • Growing thoughtfully * Building community rage 2022 Samples Page 3 of 10 It is recommended that applicants bring samples of the materials to be used to the Heritage Kitchener meeting when their application is to be considered. This may include a sample of the windows, brick, siding, roofing material, as well as paint chips to identify proposed paint colours. Other Required Information In some circumstances Heritage Planning staff may require additional information, such as a Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan, to support the Heritage Permit Application. The requirement for additional information will be identified as early on in the Heritage Permit Application process as possible. Pre - consultation with Heritage Planning staff before formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application is strongly encouraged. 4. WHAT CAN I DO IF MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION IS DENIED? City of Kitchener Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Kitchener committee endeavour to come to solutions for every Heritage Permit Application submitted. Discussions with the applicant and revisions usually result in successful applications. However, if the municipality refuses your application and you choose not to resolve the issue with a revised application, you have the option of appealing the decision to the Conservation Review Board (for alterations to designated properties under Part IV) or the Ontario Municipal Board (for demolition of property designated under Part IV or for any work to designated property under Part V). 5. IMPORTANT NOTES Professional Assistance Although it is not a requirement to obtain professional assistance in the preparation of this information, the applicant may wish to seek such assistance from an architect, architectural technologist, draftsperson or others familiar with the assessment of buildings and the gathering together of building documents. Building Codes and Other By-laws It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure compliance with all other applicable legislation, regulations and by-laws. These items include the Ontario Building and Fire Codes, and the City's zoning and property standards by-laws. 2022 Heritage Permit Application Submission Deadlines 2022 Heritage Kitchener Meeting Dates November 26, 2021 January 4, 2022 December 17, 2021 February 1, 2022 January 21, 2022 March 1, 2022 February 25, 2022 April 5, 2022 March 25, 2022 May 3, 2022 April 29, 2022 June 7, 2022 - No July Meeting June 24, 2022 August 2, 2022 July 29, 2022 September 6, 2022 - No October Meeting September 23, 2022 November 1, 2022 - No December Meeting Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 Page 4 of 10 6. HOW DO I PROCEED WITH SUBMITTING MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? a) Heritage Planning Staff are available to meet with applicants and review all documentation prior to formal submission. Often Heritage Planning staff can assist you with historical and architectural information that might help with your proposed changes. b) Formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application with all supporting documentation (written description, construction drawings, sketch plans, scale drawing, photographs) to Heritage Planning staff are due approximately five (5) weeks prior to a Heritage Kitchener meeting (see schedule for submission deadlines and committee meeting dates). c) Upon confirmation of the submission of a complete application, including the owner's signature and all supporting documentation, Heritage Planning staff will issue a Notice of Receipt, as required by the Ontario Heritage Act, to the Applicant. d) Heritage Planning staff determine whether the Heritage Permit Application may be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and/or Council. Where Heritage Permit Applications can be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and Council, Heritage Planning staff will endeavour to process the application within 10 business days. e) Where Heritage Permit Applications are required to go to Heritage Kitchener, Heritage Planning staff prepare a staff Report based on good conservation practice and the designating by-law, or the guidelines and policies in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. Preparation of the staff Report may require a site inspection. f) Heritage Kitchener Meeting Agenda, including staff Report, circulated to Committee members prior to Heritage Kitchener meeting. Staff Report circulated to applicant prior to meeting. g) Heritage Permit Application is considered at Heritage Kitchener meeting. Heritage Planning staff present staff Report and Recommendations to Heritage Kitchener. Applicants are encouraged to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting in order to provide clarification and answer questions as required. Failure to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting may result in a deferral in order to secure additional information, which would delay consideration of the Heritage Permit Application. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff, and Heritage Kitchener support the Heritage Permit Application, the application may be processed under delegated authority and approved by the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff and/or Heritage Kitchener do not support the Heritage Permit Application, the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final decision. h) Where the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation are forward to Council for final decision, Council may: 1. Approve the Heritage Permit Application; 2. Approve the Heritage Permit Application on Terms and Conditions; or, 3. Refuse the Heritage Permit Application. i) Within 30 days of receiving Notice of Council's Decision, the applicant may appeal the decision and/or terms and conditions to the Conservation Review Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). 7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED PROPERTY Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should indicate an understanding of the reasons for designation and heritage attributes of the designated property and, if applicable, the surrounding area, including the following: Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 Setting 1. Positioning of the heritage building or structure on the property 2. Lot size related to building size 3. Streetscape (relationship to other properties and structures on the street) Building Details 1. Proportion and massing 2. Roof type and shape 3. Materials and detailing 4. Windows and doors: • Style • Proportions • Frequency or placement 5. Relationship of the heritage building to other buildings on the lot and to the streetscape Heritage Attributes The following applies where a Heritage Permit Application includes work on heritage attributes: Page 5 of 10 Windows and Doors The applicant should consider in order of priority: 1. Repairing or retrofitting the existing units (information on how to make older windows more energy efficient is available from Heritage Planning staff) 2. Replacing the units with new units matching the originals in material, design, proportion and colour 3. Replacing the units with new units that are generally in keeping with the original units If historic window units are proposed to be replaced the application should include the following: • Description of the condition of the existing units • Reasons for replacing the units • Description of the proposed new units If approval to replace historic window units is given, the following action should be considered: • A sample of a window removed should be stored on site in case a future owner wishes to construct a replica of the original • The masonry opening and/or door framing should not be disturbed • Exterior trim should match the original Roofing The application should include: • Description of proposed roofing material to be applied • If there is a request to install a different roofing material, the applicant may wish to investigate what the original material might have been Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 Page 6 of 10 Masonry Work The application should include: A description of the proposed work, materials (type/style of brick, type of mortar mix, etc.) and methods of repair and application • Outline the reasons for the work Signage The application should include: • A general written description of the proposed signage to be installed • A scale drawing of the signage with dimensions, materials, methods of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between historic masonry units or into wood building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable Awnings The application should include: • A sketch view of the proposed awning — perhaps over a photo A scale drawing of the awning on the building with dimensions, materials, operating mechanism, method of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between masonry units or into wooden building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable. 8. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should describe the existing conditions, including the existing setting and existing heritage attributes, of the designated property and the surrounding area, specifically as they relate to the building proposed for demolition. The Heritage Permit Application should provide a detailed rationale for the demolition, including an assessment of the current condition of the building, and a cost comparison identifying the difference in cost to repair and restore the building versus cost to demolish and construct a new building. 9. HERITAGE CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES The Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work (e.g., alteration, new construction or demolition) is consistent with the designating by-law for individual properties (Part IV) or the Heritage Conservation District Plan for properties within a Heritage Conservation District (Part V designation). In addition, the Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work is consistent with the Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.asp ). For more information on Heritage Planning in the City of Kitchener please contact our heritage planning staff at heritage(cDkitchener.ca. Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6th Floor iITC;HENER P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; plan ning(aD_kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Page 7 of 10 Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA -2021 - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION D Exterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ❑ New Construction Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 122 Frederick St Legal Description (if know): The Registry Theatre Building/Structure Type: ❑ Residential D Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ❑ Part IV (Individual) EJ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes LJ No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: The Corporation of the City of Kitchener Address: 200 King St.W. City/Province/Postal Code: Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4G7 Phone: .519-741-2345 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Page 8 of 10 Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Replacement of the existing built-up roof system with a modified bituminous roof system. The original roof system consists of the following materials: 2 ply vapour barrier, 1.5" fibreglass insulation, 1/2" fibreboard, 4 -ply glass reinforced felt, tar and gravel. I lie new root system will consist of Me following: 1 -ply moditied bitumen vapour retarder, po yisocyanura e t.on pg 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: A Sept 4/2020 report submitted by Atlas Apex Roofing (attached) indicates that due to past water infiltration, the underlying insulation layer within the entire roof system is saturated. Repairs were performed in March 2021 (see attached repair report) to stop leakage, however complete roof replacement is necessary. (cont. on page 11) Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: Expected completion date: b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? ❑ Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? ❑ Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ❑ Yes ❑ No e) Other related Building or Planning applications: Application number. Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage 2022 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Page 9 of 10 The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a 'complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. {ince the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed 7Lm\ prisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: 'J V'" Date: t J\j - Signature of Owner/Agent; Date; 9. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I I We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date; Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). 2022 Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: Page 10 of 10 STAFF USE ONLY Working together • Growing thoughtfully . Building community rage Page 11 5. Written Description (continued from page 8) All rooftop mechanical equipment (see photo page 17) will be temporarily disconnected, moved and reinstated with new ductwork and new duct insulation. A new guardrail adjacent to the roof hatch will be installed to conform to OHSA regulations The parapet wall surrounding the roof is an integral part of the roof system and must be tied into the waterproofing system of the roof itself. The roof membrane must carry up and over the parapet and be terminated under the stone coping to maintain watertight integrity. The stone coping must be temporarily removed to allow for membrane installation. Reinstatement of the stone coping will be accomplished with premix Type N masonry in standard grey which will be raked back to receive a colour match caulking — no mortar will be exposed. A new Steeper drip flashing is proposed in order to protect the exterior brick facing (see construction drawing PMM 424). The first wythe of brick within the parapet interior face is presently concealed by a layer of brown sheet metal (see photos on pages 15 - 17). The sheet metal will be removed and disposed to be replaced with colour matched sheet metal of similar gauge. The first wythe of brick will be removed and disposed and replaced with 90mm concrete solid block with Type S masonry. The rationale of the above -detailed work is explained in point 6. 6. Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work (continued from page 8) ROOF: The proposed change to a modified bitumen roof membrane is justified as follows: 1. Less environmental impact by not requiring molten asphalt and the associated odors and gases generated by a built-up roof system installation 2. Greatly reduced fire risk during installation 3. Increased solar reflectivity 4. A modified bitumen roof membrane more easily facilitates the investigation and location of breaches in the roof system (see page 18 for comparison photo — modified bitumen vs. built-up) PARAPET: Also noted in the roof leak investigation by Atlas Apex on Sept 4/2020 (attached), the roof membrane situated against the interior wall of the parapet and underneath a layer of sheet metal, has separated from the brick (photo 7 page 4 of Atlas Apex Report — attached) allowing water to leak past the membrane and to deteriorate the interior brick facing. One area was investigated and shows fractured brick. It can be safely assumed (without further destructive investigation) that the entire parapet is so affected. In addition to the deteriorated brick, it is noted that copious amounts of caulking have been applied over the years (see photos on pages 12, 13) to both the sheet metal and stone coping junctions as well as to mortar joint cracks in the stone coping along all four sides of the building, in an attempt to mitigate water ingress. Page 22 of 52 West Elevation Ap - ■.- M - Page 12 North Elevation -- Page 23 of 52 Ej Page 14 ... �i� k M --r � -c e -.-4r "y x4. ��� 4.,,+• , [."tu+-�"..+' L�•, ,�``.• p �*r.{, :. �- 5, Ir •— IF pn'q _.Ad Deteriorated/Missing caulking— source for water ingress (west face) Page 25 of 52 f Page 15 Page 26 of 52 Page 16 MEN Immm m Page 27 of 52 Page 17 RooftopMechanical Equipment Page 28 of 52 Roof Type Comparison Page 18 Page 29 of 52 — I'll "1 111-31 - asoso- 11 - easel - jai\orvwaoMZo\vin,-eo\w3w....... -oae.\,s ro,-- ca. '.......:.aisio3a gni scse \3nrwiazs»i ."\\ , LO i a r O> 100 z U>�q w �wr N o Q a s 00 w vQi 3 z� z z W OK¢ UN z a UrY 0) a o dd - EDEo®° --7)B�OJ.o®oMHEI �� y �© aoU)oz w Y Q ��Y zo„ o w�U N LLia 0 o'? O O www o o N = w - - Joon ° r O N O m ry f m O i O Q' J\ U -— L 0 a m o< O O O O o � 0 w w c� co coo z z z < 0000 tib •H _ o ♦\ \ ♦♦\ a� a o Qjz � w ` za 0w Y Q Q \ \♦\ cl7 O > O . Q 0 Y r �mcc' wmw v 0 0 o a o ♦♦v O o"a�o�� _ \ Q o Q or x gQ Co I I r--_ aI ~ z wzzzzzz <1 ---00 C O 0 --- I Ln a v }________ ____- a v / o 0 < 0 LIQ O O L O Q > / O O C Q Q O Q O U w � D U O Q O O U — I'll "1 111-31 - asoso- 11 - easel - jai\orvwaoMZo\vin,-eo\w3w....... -oae.\,s ro,-- ca. '.......:.aisio3a gni scse \3nrwiazs»i ."\\ , NEW PREFINISHED ALUMINUM FLASHING C/W COLORMATE FASTENERS NEW MOD. BIT. CAP SHEET FLASHING NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING 00 NEW 0.5" TORCHABLE INSULATION OR z PLYWOOD MECHANICALLY SECURED NEW POLYISOCYANU RATE INSULATION SECURED WITH FASTENERS & PLATES 2" . 4" 7— � O OOOo00oo000o000o000o00000000�O0000 EXISTING CONCRETE DECK NEW VAPOUR RETARDER NEW BASE INSULATION NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW COVER BOARD NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL TI TLE: NEW VAPOUR RETARDER FLASHING PREFABRICATED CURB NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: L.K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.C. Ivtvv WOOD BLOCKING AS REQUIRED PREFARICATED METAL CURB REINFORCED DECK OPENING TO CODE REQUIREMENTS SCALE: 3" = V — O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DWG. #: CMM595 Page 31 of 52 .'.'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.',..........' ...........:........................ .......................:. .'. 4...:':':' Q.. n .. ..... a ......:............................................................. A ....'.'.....' 4.'.'..'.'.'.'.'. '.'.'.............'.'.'.'.':': ' ''.:. a......................:......................................................................................................................................................... d.'.'.'.'.'.' ................ .......:.....:..... . d......................... .'.'.'.':'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .......................................... .................................. ...... ...:....................... d'.'.' '.' ............................ EXISTING CONCRETE DECK NEW VAPOUR RETARDER NEW BASE INSULATION NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW COVER BOARD NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL TI TLE: NEW VAPOUR RETARDER FLASHING PREFABRICATED CURB NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: L.K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.C. Ivtvv WOOD BLOCKING AS REQUIRED PREFARICATED METAL CURB REINFORCED DECK OPENING TO CODE REQUIREMENTS SCALE: 3" = V — O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DWG. #: CMM595 Page 31 of 52 I I I I I I I " t 4" HVAC/MECHANICAL UNIT, ROOF ACCESS HATCH, OR SKYLIGHT NEW EMSEAL TAPE, RUBBER GASKET, OR ISOLATION PAD NEW WOOD BLOCKING AS REQUIRED NEW COLORMATE FASTENERS NEW PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING NEW MOD. BIT. CAP SHEET FLASHING 00 NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING z REPLACE EXISTING WOOD CURB AS REQUIRED 2" NEW VAPOUR RETARDER FLASHING NEW WOOD BLOCKING TO SUIT TITLE: REVISED: BUILT—UP CURB DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY EXISTING CONCRETE DECK NEW VAPOUR RETARDER NEW BASE INSULATION NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW COVER BOARD NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL REV'N.#: DRN. BY: F. R. A.L.K. CHK. BY: J. C.M.H. SCALE: 3" = l' -Q" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 D WG. #: CMM596 Page 32 of 52 PEA GRADE GRAVEL NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW COVER BOARD NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW BASE INSULATION NEW VAPOUR RETARDER EXISTING CONCRETE DECK CAST ALUMINUM DOME WITH HINGED ACCESS GATE STAINLESS STEEL VANDAL PROOF RETAINING SCREW NEW THALER "RD -4C -FLAT" DRAIN CAST ALUMINUM CLAMPING RING BRONZE STABILIZER RING WITH WELDED STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS SET PRIMED DRAIN FLANGE IN LAYER OF SEALANT NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING 4 11 - - - - - .................. ........................................ ................... ................... ..................... - - - - - - - - .................... ................... 4 .................... - - - ......... . ..... ......... .. ....................... ...................................... ......... .................................... .................................. .................................. ....................................... ...................................... ........................................ ........................... ... ........................................ ............... <11 ........ I .............. 36" LTA I � NJ FlAllsm] w W, &I I NEW TAPERED INSULATION DRAIN SUMP NEW WOOD BLOCKING TO SUIT CAST ALUMINUM RING TYPE UNDER DECK CLAMP NEW DRAIN STEM NEW T-6 BRASS FERRULE NEW MECHANICAL CONNECTION TITLE - NEW DRAIN DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY REVISED REV'N.#: DRN. BY: F. R. A. /L. K. CHK. BY: M. H. /J. C. SCALE: S) = V -C DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DWG.#: DMM541 Page 33 of 52 NEW PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING NEW WOOD SLEEPER TO SUIT F NEW COLORMATE FASTENERS co NEW MOD. BIT. CAP SHEET FLASHING z NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING '5 I EXISTING CONCRETE DECK NEW VAPOUR RETARDER NEW BASE INSULATION NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW COVER BOARD NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL TITLE: NEW SLEEPER FLASHING DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY NEW VAPOUR RETARDER TIE—IN FLASHING REVISED: SCALE: 3" = l' -Q" REV'N.#: DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DRN. BY: L. K. DWG.//: EMM522 CHK. BY: M.H./J. C. Page 34 of 52 TI TLE: p �0_ W CD W J Z ul = ul :5 ZO- QO pQ YO [rte w > �00_ m Ocn 0 ZQ _ J O Y m w w 0 Y O J m I V O O m Y� O Z G D� 0 C Y z m W Y Z O IL O Z F 0 LLJ p O O Z G a X of (n g w O W LLJ O �W w �W >p� �Qma \� zp p cn� 00 om QOcn w Q _ �Q CD 0 J=Wcn z _ Q§ Z 00 D o Z O � w mQ� p un � Q w Lo F-0 ZW CDWZ �U1J0:e w O~ O Nva JwOW Q Z un C/) N 3: Lv 3: W W W z z Q E.P.D.M. DUCT WRAP DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT © 2021 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY REVISED: SCALE: N. T. S. REV'N.#: DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DRN. BY: D. R. N./F.R.A. DWG. #: MEN903 CHK. BY: M. H.J.C. -------------------- NEW MORTAR JOINT WITH PROVISIONS. FOR DRAINAGE v REMOVE AND REINSTATE EXISTING STONE COPING NEW 22GA STAINLESS STEEL FLASHING NEW THRU-WALL FLASHING NEW CONCRETE BLOCK NEW TERMINATION BAR NEW 22GA PREFIN|3HED METAL FLASHING TO MATCH EXISTING COLOUR SECURE BASE SHEET USING PLATES � FASTENERS.INSTALL BASE SHEET PATCH � ~ OVER EACH FASTENER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF CAP SHEET. NEW MOD. BIT. CAP SHEET FLASHING NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING NEW 0.5^ PLYWOOD 77 .............. ................... .................. ................... .................. ******* .......... . ................. .................. .................. ................. ................. ................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ................ .................. ...... .. ... NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET rppK#k&Kfi5m NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL� TI TILE: PARAPET DETAIL REVISED: SCALE: 3" = 1$-0" NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS DRN. BY: L. K. D WG. #: AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT PMM424 @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY CHK. BY: J. C. /M. H. Page 36 of 52 II -3■ f + + + + NEW 0.051" REMOVABLE ALUMINIUM CAP +++ +++ + + + + + + + + + NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL ++++� +�+ +++ NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET + + + NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET ++* ++++ NEW COVER BOARD + + + + N NEW OVERLAY INSULATION ++++* *+*+ NEW BASE INSULATION *+*+* *+*+ NEW VAPOUR RETARDER EXISTING CONCRETE DECK +++++ ++++ NEW CONTINUOUS SEALANT + + + +1 ++++ NEW MOD. BIT. BASE ++*++ *+* SHEET FLASHING + + , +++++ +++ PRIME BOTH SIDES OF DECK FLANGE AND EMBED IN LAYER OF COMPATIBLE SEALANT CUT BACK MEMBRANE 1" FROM EDGE AND SEAL WITH MOD. BIT. COMPATIBLE SEALANT TI TLE: PLUMBING STACK DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY NEW THALER "SJ -26" STACK JACK NEW SILICONE SEALANT 2 NEW STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS NEW 0.064" ALUMINUM SLEEVE NEW PREMOLDED URETHANE INSULATION ON INNER SIDE OF SLEEVE 4"1 4" REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: J. L. A. K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.0 SCALE: 3" _ V - O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 D WG. #: SMM327 Page 37 of 52 a:...:...........:. a ...................................... ..: A ::::.:::::::..:..........:...:...:... ..................... ....... ......... ......... .. ......... ...........v....... ............ Q..................................... PRIME BOTH SIDES OF DECK FLANGE AND EMBED IN LAYER OF COMPATIBLE SEALANT CUT BACK MEMBRANE 1" FROM EDGE AND SEAL WITH MOD. BIT. COMPATIBLE SEALANT TI TLE: PLUMBING STACK DETAIL NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY NEW THALER "SJ -26" STACK JACK NEW SILICONE SEALANT 2 NEW STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS NEW 0.064" ALUMINUM SLEEVE NEW PREMOLDED URETHANE INSULATION ON INNER SIDE OF SLEEVE 4"1 4" REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: J. L. A. K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.0 SCALE: 3" _ V - O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 D WG. #: SMM327 Page 37 of 52 r r r r \ � r \ �r DECK CLOSURE NEW ONE COMPONENT URETHANE FOAM NEW 24 OZ. 2 PIECE COPPER GOOSENECK ENCLOSURE CRIMPED AND JOINTS SOLDERED TOGETHER ON SITE EXSITING CONDUIT LINES NEW FIRERATED SEALANT ON TOP OR BELOW CLOSURE. USE GROMMET PROTECTION FOR CABLES TWO METAL PLATES WITH INTERLOCKING FINGERS TO FIT AROUND CONDUITS EDGE OF HOLE IN DECK CONSTRUCT EACH PART OF GOOSENECK FROM 24 OZ. COPPER SHEET METAL. FOLD, CRIMP AND SOLDER AS REQ'D CUT INTERLOCKING FINGERS TO SUIT EXISTING CONDUIT SIZES SOLDER BOTH PIECES TOGETHER IN FIELD SOLDER A SQUARE PIECE ON EACH CORNER TO MAKE FLANGE CONTINUOUS MIN. 2% SLOPE- NEW LOPE NEW PEA GRADE GRAVEL NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET NEW COVER BOARD NEW OVERLAY INSULATION NEW BASE INSULATION NEW VAPOUR RETARDER EXISTING CONCRETE DECK NEW MOD. BIT. BASE SHEET FLASHING USE POOL SOLDER AT 2 PIECE COPPER I CORNER JOINTS GOOSENECK + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + d ......................4 ............... ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ........ + ...... + + + + + + + + ..................... ...... .......................... ......... ........ + ....................................... + + + + + + + + MIN. 2" 2" 4 :................. Q.....:.............................................. + + + + + + + + + ++ ++ +++ +-FRICTION FIT MINERAL + + + + WOOL BATT INSULATION CO NEW CONTINUOUS SEALANT PRIME BOTH SIDES OF METAL FLANGE MIN. 4" TITLE: CONDUIT DETAIL: COPPER GOOSENECK NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT @2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY NEW VAPOUR RETARDER FLASHING SECURE NEW WOOD BLOCKING @ 6" O.C. NEW DECK CLOSURE REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: T. K. C.L.K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.C. SCALE: 3" = V - O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DWG. #: TM M 427 Page 38 of 52 I . I I I I I I L - -------------- d ......................4 ............... ..Q ...................... . ........ ........ ...... .. ... ..................... ...... .......................... ......... ........ .................................................. ....................................... 4.. . 4 :................. Q.....:.............................................. NEW VAPOUR RETARDER FLASHING SECURE NEW WOOD BLOCKING @ 6" O.C. NEW DECK CLOSURE REVISED: REV'N.#: DRN. BY: T. K. C.L.K. CHK. BY: M.H./J.C. SCALE: 3" = V - O" DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 DWG. #: TM M 427 Page 38 of 52 -1m NOTE: SOME ROOFING COMPONENTS OMITTED FOR CLARITY. MAXIMUM SUPPORT SPACING NOMINAL GAS PIPE SIZE DIAMETER MAXIMUM SPACING 13mm OR LESS 2.Om 19mm TO 25mm 2.5m 32mm TO 64mm 3.Om 76mm TO 102mm 5.Om 127mm TO 203mm 6.Om 254mm OR LARGER 8.Om NEW ALUMINUM OR STAINLESS STEEL SECUREMENT STRAP, LEAVE 0.5" GAP AROUND PIPE NEW PT 2x6 WOOD BLOCKING TO SUIT HEIGHT OF PIPE NEW 24"x24"x2.25" II II NEW PT 2x10 BASE WOOD CONCRETE PEDSLAB BLOCKING SECURED TO PAVER WITH FOUR 2.5" TAPCON SCREWS (.0 NEW 23"x23"x1" II II OR PL PREMIUM ADHESIVE z EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE II II INSULATION PADS n a as NEW SACRIFICIAL BASE SHEET PROTECTION MEMBRANE, MIN. 2" WIDER ON ALL SIDES v n IVA n NEW 2 PLY MOD. BIT. MEMBRANE TITLE: REVISED: SCALE: 3" _ 1'-O" GASLINE SUPPORT DETAIL REV N.#: DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS DRN. BY: T.K.C./L. K. DWG. # AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT VM N 247 ©2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY CHK. BY: J.C./M.H. Page 39 of 52 NOTE: SOME ROOFING COMPONENTS OMITTED FOR CLARITY. ENSURE 6" GAPS ARE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT WATER DAMMING NEW 24"x24"x2.25" CONCRETE PEDSLAB NEW 24"x18"x1" EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION PADS 6" -0L------------ I- -------I------------------------------------I----------------------�- 1000000000000 LL- -------------------------- 1'-6" 2" 2" 2" NEW SACRIFICIAL BASE SHEET PROTECTION MEMBRANE. MEMBRANE TO BE MINIMUM 2" WIDER ON ALL SIDES PAVER WALKWAY NEW 24"x24"x2.25" CONCRETE PEDSLAB NEW 23"x23"x1" EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE INSULATION PADS If I 000000---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------00000000 NEW SACRIFICIAL BASE SHEET PROTECTION MEMBRANE, MIN. 2" WIDER ON ALL SIDES NEW 2 PLY MOD. BIT. MEMBRANE SINGE PAVER • TITLE. WALKWAY/PAVER DETAIL REVISED SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" REV'N.#: DATE: 1 MAR. 2022 NOTE: NO REPRODUCTION OR USE OF THIS DRAWING IS DRN. BY: T.K.C./L. K. DWG.# • _ AUTHORIZED WITHOUT EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT VM N 248 CHK. BY: A.J.D./T.K.C. ©2022 IRC BUILDING SCIENCES GROUP, A RIMKUS COMPANY Page 40 of 52 ;361 'lady 1661 '09 4avo ( - '141 0 O �T 0 0 04T 301 alnpa4oS uo panu!luoo M �0 !J}SIQ �eivni C "3}a jewsslWWOO a `}su4a((5;;ey auuelp 'oda aauozsszluuio0 L`.717 OZN 'T66T 'Q•� X-Tpn.zgag jo Aup -75sf';-- sTgq aur azogaq uzoms INSONSOS 'ISVHOIW IUVO ;O .; M oizEquO `aauagDgT31 IaaziS xoTzapaz3 ZZ XO zaual;oTTA' 90 X:lTO ally uz laa-XIS '�ozzapaz3 ZZT 3o -3zEd $u?:jEuVzsap STT -T6 zagwr>N MEg-dg :usollol ss sapl" luawnoop s141 (g) ❑ Ja410 ❑ saWud ® uO!lduosaO 1. ❑ 401911S/ueld u!¢luoa M oz .zOTTJTTT t� Td �. .T S �.D 210` TTM Szwf O. °zaua O u0 Ll TEA -laaz:lS Naizapaz3 ZZT aa� uo4eals!6a!3 ao1 alnPa4aS (q) ; uo!lduosapab (e) slgl (L) 8uopnoax3 r ij ' 6+7}/T-2185 uETd aauaza;ag :6q paiedald luawn—a (SL1 I AVadOJd 10 —PPV lad[Olun W (41) xul Pue saa=l TEuo-E au °zauaLiO-ITN 30 kvro al(� uz laaz1S �otzapaz3 O :!euo!l!p&$ aapuas sol ssaipPV (El) w A ainleu6is to aleft (s)ainleu6!S (s)aweN jo X:Ii0 aqj jo znoAvj uz AVM DDId d HITM UMM001 n psajalul ao snlels lno laS) (sallied (LL) .30 '6"T-2185 uETd aouazajag 30 IT gauj sE pa�uu2lsap LD' 9ZN oizEIuO ` °-3a@NoTzapaz,I ZZ `8TTT KOg '0'd aolivaS,Oi Mou ooTzalEM 90 XITTEdiozurM TEuoz3ag `zaua-goiTm go �q?O 0 ssaipPV UO eT ZO: T66T `W7 uETd Paza�Si2ag °-SananS S,zagaM 'Cl 'T 1o'i 90 Ilea �OFTI'1dM SQL io iO. TOS .. .... ..... ..... ...... .................. ��i��l 2DN�10.LI31 30 �TZIO . . ................................. ....................i'�o 0W A cr-1 -� i •toy a3ETTzaH oZZEaLTO aLp zapun mET-Ag uozgEu2zsap y alnleu6!S to ale(] M (s)amleu6!S (s)eweN ;z - m ❑ hsaimul in snimc inn gaol I—Uun.. !m 1 1661 '09 4avo ( - `'aua4a}1){ ;o f4!a a4; ;o uoi;ejodloa (s)Aagwnu luawrulsul of solelaj ryawr ooO slu (6) 04T 301 alnpa4oS uo panu!luoo M �0 !J}SIQ �eivni C "3}a jewsslWWOO a `}su4a((5;;ey auuelp 'oda aauozsszluuio0 'T66T 'Q•� X-Tpn.zgag jo Aup -75sf';-- sTgq aur azogaq uzoms INSONSOS 'ISVHOIW IUVO ;O - '4TA'epT;.;e 9q4 O} .,D,,.-.TgTgxa ST S-CLj,T, -an1Eh TEzMoa-aTLPaV puE TEOT.Z0:19TH To Su-Eaq SE zaual;oTTA' 90 X:lTO ally uz laa-XIS '�ozzapaz3 ZZT 3o -3zEd $u?:jEuVzsap STT -T6 zagwr>N MEg-dg :usollol ss sapl" luawnoop s141 (g) ❑ Ja410 ❑ saWud ® uO!lduosaO 1. ❑ 401911S/ueld u!¢luoa ❑ al^Pagas aag euo! i I i,PPd luawase3 mON luawnood :IeuO0!ppv ao1 alnPa4aS (q) ; uo!lduosapab (e) slgl (L) 8uopnoax3 ' 6+7}/T-2185 uETd aauaza;ag ❑ alnpa4 30 T jIEd SE paEi]`TSap MOIi OOT3aqE[v] go fq?TEd?o?UL1(n] TEuo-E au °zauaLiO-ITN 30 kvro al(� uz laaz1S �otzapaz3 O :!euo!l!p&$ salt' puE �aaz�S zagaM go tlgzoN `TO*7 Ula -La pazzQST2ag `Xa—ns -0!1!luapl AYOdad NaN s,zagaM 'Q IT 10-I go laud uodn pue nano `u`dno-iqj zauaip Taj jo X:Ii0 aqj jo znoAvj uz AVM DDId d HITM UMM001 n .30 '6"T-2185 uETd aouazajag 30 IT gauj sE pa�uu2lsap T }' rl o Mou ooTzalEM 90 XITTEdiozurM TEuoz3ag `zaua-goiTm go �q?O 0 aLP uT :1aaz:lS � aTzaPa 3 �O aSaM PUL, laaz�S -I aM 3O g�-ToN ,-a .-r- `W7 uETd Paza�Si2ag °-SananS S,zagaM 'Cl 'T 1o'i 90 Ilea r � �_ n � 7 m uolldPosaa (9) ©• n :. r,0 N m0 $ slellop� x c� U011-OPlsuOO (5) cr-1 -� i •toy a3ETTzaH oZZEaLTO aLp zapun mET-Ag uozgEu2zsap y M luawnooa to ainlsN (4) ;z - m ❑ "s aeuog!PPtl (s AYadoid 400I9 4JOdOA d (E) saftcf S to ( abed (Z) Elsal1LL P -,--i- El ti q -w (l) e a 1661 3 N I i/� f 096L 1w uuoiau u0nuilsiBaa Pus'1 — V wa03 oueluo a jeaauaE) ivawnwa l M. 03�� 1 �Q�� iY� a,u!AO,d - -slluipuuq puu saluz$ Suiluaq paluld Iwlopu `sdals ajgzuui Xaj2 `sloop ozzi3nol `sarnlxg 5u►2?uug luui2uo oml `su&sop aulauiozJ glint palunluaoou s2ugtao ialsujd g2Tq `algrear uoax2 pue Si.TW Io spleno Xgqol :opnjour samleal sopralul •sjeas/slsaYo 1peg Io XlrD pue rauagol.X 3o f4pD `oolialeAk Io XZunoO gllm opusour puu auuiligoiu auolsaunl `lalurl palu.rooap puE padugs `sloop ssul2 PUL,azuolq 3ual algnop `spiupuuls ILII `sdals auolsaurp1 $uppnloup aouu.rlua uiuui aql :supunui lulour pue suis `slalupl `sl:Djpueds ouolsounl `s2uruado moputnn Ilu `sladund ouolsaunl :apnloui sainjroj oi3toads arl,I, •3p.ruuipuel A413 lusliodurr un se pazru2oaoi sr pue u2isop loraalur `amloollgon ooaQ lay ,lo aldruexa 3urpuelslno puu panrasaid Mann u sr ZI -japllnq Iuool Suppuulslno uv `uoplorulsuoo ia�lunQ Xq 6£6I ui llmq suns aorgp AilsiBag oolzaluM 3o f4unoo oql -aoualul oql Io Xgqol luoal aql puu ioualxa aql 3o sourooi put suotlenala Ilu of suiupod puu spunoA ju.rnloalpgoze puu ouolspq uo opuui uaaq seq upaiaq poquosap uopluul?psop aq,I, aorllp tilsr$ag oolraluM ;o KnunOD agy 1aailS 310110poi3 ZZI NOIIVNDIS21Q Hoa SNIOSVHN 766 L Anr �� Iq ; ° jO831W N LD O N V N O) (6 n N In O co V N O) (6 n •aOTJJO AagsTbaa puPT aadoad aqq uT (gaed P suzaog PaaP pagPubTSap ATPS aqq LIOT14M JO) ogaaag .V. alnpago5 uT pagTaosap Agaadoad aqq Jo alogm aqq gsuTPbP paaagsTbaa aq oq MPT -dg STgq Jo ddoo P asneO og pazTaoggnP dgaaag ST aogTOTTOS -KgTO aqy "Z •aoTaaquT aqq 3o AggOT quoad aqq PUP aOTaagxa aqq 90 sauTT300a PUP suoTgPnaTa TTP 90 pasTiduoo buTaq gaaagS NOTaapaad ZZT se umoux Agaadoad TPaa pTesaa0JP aqq go gaPd gPgg anTPn IPangoagrqoaP pup oTaogsiM go buTaq sP pageubTsap sT aaags •T :SMOTTOJ SP sgOPua aauagOgTX 90 dgTO aqq go uOT4eaodao0 aqj go ITaunOD aqq a-dOdd23SHs MON :Aq?TPdTOTunX aqq JO xaaTO aqq uodn panaaS uaaq sPq uoTgPubTsap pasodoad aqq og u0rg00EgO Jo aoTgoN ou SVaHgHM QNV !sxaam anTgnoasuoo aaagq 30 go29 a0J aouo A4TTPdT3Tunui aqq uT uoTgPTnoaTO TPaauab buTneq aadedsmau P uT pagSTTgnd aq oq uoTquaqul go aoTgoN guns pasnPO sPq pup 'pagTaosap aagjeuraaaq ATaPTnoTgaPd aaou dgaadoad TPaa pTPsaa0JP aqq go gaed gPgq anlPn IPangoagTqoaP PUP oTaogsTq go buTaq se agPubTsaa oq uoTquagul so aOTgoy, P 'U0T4Ppun0d 9bP4Ta9H otaPquO aqq uodn PUP 'aauagOgTN Jo AgTO aqq uT gaaagS NDTaapaad ZZT SP AIledloTunu umoux sasTuaad pup spuel aqq 30 aauMO aqq uo panaas aq oq pasnPo sPq aauagogTH 90 A4T3 aqq JO u0TgPa0da00 aqy go TTounoO aqq SVgHaHM QNK !gsaaaquT ao anlPn TPOT104slq ao TPangoagTgoaP go aq oq 'uoaaagq saangonags PUP sbuTPTTnq TTP buTpnTOuT JAgaadoad TPaa agPubTsap oq sMPT-,Tq goeua og A4TTPdTOTunK P go TTounoO aqq sazTaoggnP 'LZE aagdPgo '086T •O -S -U qOV a PgraaH oTaPguO aqq JO 6Z uoTgOaS SVHHUHM (anTPn TPangOagTgOaP Pup OTaogsTq 3o buTaq se aauagOgTH 30 -K4TO aqq uT gaaagS xOTaapaad ZZT sP uMoux ATTPdTOTunu dgaadoad aqq go gaed agPubTsep oq mPl-dq P buTaq) HHNdHJS IX dO XSIO alll dO NOTaXdOdUOD RHI 30 5>l-Y/2ldgWflN MFZI-Ag ��5 3Nflf H02 Kvw 'T66T 'Q'V Y 30 Cep sz144 jauegogTx 3o d-4zO aqq uT saagmvgo TTounoo aq-4 ge aass`dd • SNOaM 9AT4nOaSUOO aaaug 90 gDPa aOj aouo A4TUnUMOD aqg UT uoigeTnOaTO Teaauab buineq aadedsMau gazes aqg uz pagSTTgnd aq og MET -Fig sTilq go burssed aqg ;o aoTgou asneo oq pue uoz42punOd abegiaag OTaequo aqg uo pup Agaadoad pzgsaao;e a114 ;o aauMO aqg uo panaas aq og MST -AS srgq 3o Adoo e asneo og pazTaoggne Agaaaq sT xaaTo aqs •F - Z - / 7661 3Nnf S/ 03W HO80 IW N LD O V V N O) (6 n pagsTToutap sT 16VVT-H85 aaquinN upla aouaaajaH go T gapd su pagpubTsap 'aauagogTx Jo AgTO agq UT 'gaaagS xoraapaag 3O gsaM pup gaaagg aagaM 3o ugaotl 'TOD, aaquinN UPTd paaagsTbaH 'AananS s,aagaM •Q IT gOZ JO gapd UO agpngTS buTpTTnq buTgsTxa agq uagm ATagnTosqu aspaO TTpgs APM-30-41q5TH go?gM '9L6T 'aaquzanON 90 APP ggZT agq UO (85 'ON) ggaON OOlaegRM 3O UOTSTATQ AagsTbaH agg JOJ aOT,J;O Aa4srb9-d pueZ agq UT pagTsodap 6:�tT-ZI89 aaquinN upTd a0uaaaJaH 90 'Z gapd sp PagpubTsap 'aauagogTx Jo AgTO agg UT 'gaaagS N0Taap9aJ 90 gsaM pup 'gaaagS aagaM go ggaoN 'TOr aaquinN upTd paaagsTbaH 'Aanang s,aagaM 'Q IT goa go gjed pies uodn pup aano 'gbnoagg 'Subrsse PUP saogpagsTUTuzpe 'saossaoons S4T 'AgTO agq go an0Ap3 UT AVM 30 ZHOI-d K HlIM 2I9HSSOOI '9L6T 'aagUIaAON Jo App ggZT agq UO (89 'ON) ggAON OOjJagPM JO UOTSTATQ AagsTbaH aqq aoj aoT330 AagsTbaH pueq agq UT pagTsodap 617DT-USS aaquinN upld aouaaagaH 90 IT gapd se pagpubTsap 'aauagogTx Jo AgTO agq UT 'gaaagg xoTaepaa3 go gsaM pup gaaagg aagaM JO ggaON 'Tot aagMnN UPId paaagsTbaH 'AananS s,aagaM •Q IT qoq To gaed se pagTaosap ATapTnoTgapd aaouz buTaq pup 'OTaPgU0 Jo aouTAoad PUP 'OOTaagpM 90 A4TTpdT0TunN TPUOTbaH agg UT 'aauagogTx J0 AgTO agq UT buTaq pup buTAT 'agpngTS sasruzaad pup pupT 90 gOpag ao Taoaed urpgaao gegg UlfInONIS QNV 'I'IV aFZu 3`If1QSHOS `a66L 3Nnf �j� i�{JOH1w N LD O LD V N O) (6 n Emergency) Response SERVICE REPORT TO: Dean Hanby, Registry Theatre FROM: Kyle Longpre , Estimator DATE: 04 Sep 2020 RE: Registry Theatre 122 Frederick Street Kitchener J Ref Code: YOR PO#: 284133 Foreman: Ryan Elson Requested By: City of Kitchener Following our recent investigation for the reported leak at the above noted address, we are forwarding the following information. WORK PERFORMED: August 31, 2020 Service call to investigate a reported leak at the above noted address. The purpose of the service call was to complete test cuts around the location of the reported leak, in an attempt to trace the location of the leak. The service crew completed nine (9) test cuts around the perimeter of the HVAC unit and parapet flashing. All the test cuts were very wet. The test cuts were patched using premium materials compatible with the existing roof system. The service crew found openings at the top of the parapet flashings. These areas were sealed as required. They also noticed that the brick is deteriorating and it is very likely that this could be allowing water to enter into the building. It is recommended that a mason contractor inspect these areas if the leaks continue. Upon completion, the service crew removed and disposed of all related debris to an authorized waste facility. Please see the following photographs of the completed work. Please note that this roof is in poor condition and should be scheduled for roof replacement as soon as the budget permits. HEAD OFFICE • 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2 ® 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66e4A6 of 52 F1 Photos Taken Emergency) Res once Photo: J Kr-rc�ivER Front of Building: 122 Frederick St. Kitchener, Ontario Photo: 2 Overview of a test cut area: North east corner of the building Photo: 3 Sample test cut: Test cut in the northeast corner of roof. The test cut is very wet. HEAD OFFICE ® 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2 ® 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66.24 7 Of 52 111 Emergency J ,.• Response 'r Kr rc ivER Photos Taken a eil Photo: 4 Close up of test cut: Completed a core test of the roof system. The roof is a built up roof system consisting of; 2 ply vapour barrier, 1.5" of fiberglass insulation, 1/2" fiberboard, 1" inch tongue and groove 4 ply glass tar and gravel Photo: 5 Patch repair complete: Patch repair completed using premium membrane, mastic and reinforced mesh Photo: 6 Additional area of concern: The service crew pulled back this section of metal in the northeast corner HEAD OFFICE a 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2. 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66 AA Of 52 111 Emergency J ,.• Response 'r Kr rc ivER Photos Taken -•T. W . _. Photo: 7 Additional Photo: In behind, the roof membrane has released from the wall allowing water to leak past and deteriorate the brick Photo: 8 Additional Photo: Cracks in the masonry stone of the perimeter which can allow water to leak past the building envelope Photo: 9 Additional Photo HEAD OFFICE ® 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2 ® 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66 AA Of 52 F1 Photos Taken Emergency) Res once Photo: 10 J Kr-rc�ivER Overview of another test cut area Photo: 11 Patch repair in progress #1: Patch completed using premium membrane, mastic and reinforced mesh Photo: 12 Patch repair in progress #2: HEAD OFFICE ® 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2 ® 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66 AA Of 52 p Emergency% J Response Associated Videos: Click for Atlas -Apex Media Centre Recommended Work: N OTE: A comprehensive preventive maintenance and repair program, including annual or semi-annual inspections and any required maintenance work, is essential to maximizing the effective service life of any roof. The ATLAS GUARD program is specifically designed to monitor and maintain the many critical components of your roof, giving you peace of mind knowing it is in good hands. Be sure to speak with your Atlas -Apex Roofing representative to schedule your next inspection at a time that is most convenient for you. Thank you for the opportunity to serve your roofing needs. Sincerely, Kyle Longpre , Estimator Estimator HEAD OFFICE ® 65 DISCO ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ON M9W 1M2 ® 1 -877 -221 -ROOF (7663) • T: 416-4p66.24 1 Of 52