Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DSD-2022-332 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 - 38 Shirk Place
Staff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: August 2, 2022 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: July 12, 2022 REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-332 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 to permit the construction of a new detached garage in the rear yard of the property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place, BE APPROVED, in accordance with the supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: 1. That final building permit drawings be reviewed, and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to present the proposal of the construction of a new detached garage on the property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place, as detailed in Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 and in Appendix A. • The key finding of this report is that the proposed work will not negatively impact the cultural heritage value or interest of the property as it maintains the original appearance of the primary dwelling and is in keeping with provincial standards and guidelines. • There are no financial implications associated with this report. • Community engagement includes posting this report and associated agenda in advance of the meeting and consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 proposes the construction of a detached two - car garage in the rear yard of the subject property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place. The building has been designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act through *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 234 of 379 designating By-law No. 84-28. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning Staff note that the proposed work meets Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada, and that it will not adversely affect the identified heritage attributes of the building. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2022-IV-017, which seeks permission to construct a new detached two -car garage with a partial second storey in the rear yard of the property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place (Figure 1). The property had fallen into disrepair prior to its purchase by the current owners, who have been working on its restoration. Figure 1: Location Map of Subject Property REPORT: 2s 6 The subject property is located on the south side of Shirk Place, between Lancaster Street West and Woolwich Street within the Bridgeport West Planning Community. It contains a two-storey single -detached dwelling converted to contain four dwelling -units. The building is known as the Joseph Shoemaker House (Figure 2). It was constructed c. 1840 to serve as the residence of Jacob Shoemaker, who was one of the founders of the Village of Bridgeport. Page 235 of 379 Figure 2: Front Fagade of Subject Property with Completed Roof Repairs and Added Dormers 38 Shirk Place was designated as it was determined to possess both historic / associative and physical / architectural value. As mentioned previously, the house was constructed for and served as the residence of Jacob Shoemaker, a prominent community member who helped to establish the Village of Bridgeport. In terms of architecture, the dwelling exhibits several significant details and elements. As a result of its historic and architectural significance, the subject property was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating By-law No. 84-28 (Attachment B). The following physical attributes are identified by the designating by-law: • The whole of the exterior of the single detached dwelling • 12 over 12 and 8 over 12 paned windows; • Transomed second storey doorway; • Cornice mouldings; • Six bay Georgian principle fagade; and • Secondary facades that are triple brick laid in Flemish bond and covered by lightly lined stucco wash. Designating By-law No. 84-28 concludes that the dwelling is a rare example of a substantial merchants dwelling from 1840. Page 236 of 379 Work Proposed The work proposed in this application includes the construction of a detached two -car garage, one -and -a -half storeys in height and 30 feet by 30 feet in width and depth (Figure 3). White vinyl horizontal siding is to be used, in addition to vinyl windows with internal grilles. The shape of the windows is representative of those found in the single -detached dwelling, with differences in size and proportions. A gable roof with symmetrical dormers constructed from black steel is also proposed. This is the same material used for the new roof recently installed on the designated heritage home. Figure 3: Front and Side Fagade of Proposed Detached Garage The new construction is proposed to be in the rear of the property (Figure 4). Due to its setback from the property lines and the existing sloped topography of the area, the new garage will not be visible from either Lancaster Street West or the laneway the subject property is on (see photographs in Attachment A). It will be located approximately 7.6 metres (25 feet) to the east of the designated heritage home. The detached garage is proposed to be partially built into the slope at the rear of the property, though some grading will be required (Figure 5-6). Page 237 of 379 Figure 4: Location of New Construction Outlined in Red Figure 5: Rear Yard of Subject Property — View from Heritage Home Figure 6: Rear Yard of Subject Property The purpose of the proposed work is to increase the storage capacity of the subject property. Specifically, the owners are seeking to construct a place capable of storing outdoor maintenance equipment in addition to vehicles. The proposed work is in accordance with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada. In particular, the following are met: • Conserve the heritage value and character -defining elements when creating any new additions to an historic place or any related new construction Page 238 of 379 • Make the new work physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the historic place. • Create any new additions or related new construction so that the essential form and integrity of an historic place will not be impaired if the new work is removed in the future. • Achieve compatibility with the insertion of a new element through form, material, and detailing, or through proportion, scale, or massing. Heritage Planning Comments In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The subject property municipally addressed as 38 Shirk Place is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating By-law No. 84-28; • The heritage attributes identified within the designating by-law relate only to the single -detached dwelling located on the property, and no other elements of the property itself. Further, no vistas or views are identified as being a heritage attribute; • The proposal is for the construction of a two -car garage, one -and -a -half storeys in height and 30 feet by 30 feet in size; • The materials proposed to be used are the most cost-effective option and make the project viable. Further, they are used in the design in a manner that respects and is compatible with the heritage attributes of the property; • The detached garage is to be located in the rear of the property and will not be visible from any street line or from the front of the subject land; • The detached garage is setback 7.6 metres (25 feet) from the heritage structure and will have a neutral impact on the existing dwelling; • The purpose of the project is to increase the storage capacity of the site for both vehicles and outdoor maintenance equipment, to improve site functionality while maintaining the integrity of the historic place; • The proposed work is consistent with Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada with respect to being compatible but distinct in design and visual appearance, and avoiding impact to the integrity of the historic place; and • The proposed work will not adversely impact the reasons for designation of the subject property, nor will it adversely impact the Shirk Place streetscape, Lancaster Street West streetscape, Woolwich Street streetscape, or adjacent properties. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. Page 239 of 379 CONSULT — The Heritage Kitchener Committee will be consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act • Designating By-law No. 84-28 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-017 Package Attachment B — By-law No. 84-28 Page 240 of 379 2022 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor .jR P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planningCu)-kitchener.ca PART A: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 10 The following requirements are designed to assist applicants in submitting sufficient information in order that their Heritage Permit Application may be deemed complete and processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. If further assistance or explanation is required please contact heritage planning staff at heritage(ukitchener.ca. 1. WHAT IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage Act, has enacted legislation to assist its citizens with the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources. Once properties are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, the City is enabled to manage physical change to the cultural heritage resources as a means of protection. The principal mechanism of management is the Heritage Permit Application process, which allows the municipality to review site-specific applications and determine if proposed changes will beneficially or detrimentally affect the reasons for designation and heritage attributes. As a general rule, the preferred alterations to heritage properties are those that repair rather than replace original heritage attributes, and those that do not permanently damage cultural heritage resources and their heritage attributes. Where replacement of materials or new construction is necessary, these should be compatible with the original. Reversibility is also preferable as this allows for the future reinstatement of heritage attributes. According to the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of designated property shall alter the property or permit the alteration of the property if the alteration is likely to affect the property's heritage attributes, unless the owner applies to the council of the municipality and receives written consent. This consent is obtained through the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Permit Applications are applicable for all individually designated properties (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) and all properties located within the boundaries of Heritage Conservation Districts (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act). 2. WHEN IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED? Under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, any new construction or "alteration" to a property designated under Part IV of the Act (individually designated property) or a property designated under Part V of the Act (within a Heritage Conservation District) requires a Heritage Permit Application. "Alteration" is defined as: "to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb." In addition, the approval of a Heritage Permit Application is required for any demolition of a property designated under Part IV or V of the Act. Please contact Heritage Planning staff directly to confirm if your specific project requires the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Below are some examples of typical Part IV alterations that may require a Heritage Permit Application: • Addition and/or alteration to an existing building or accessory building • Replacement of windows or doors, or a change in window or door openings • Change in siding, soffit, fascia or roofing material • Removal and/or installation of porches, verandahs and canopies • Removal and/or installation of cladding and chimneys • Changes in trim, cladding, or the painting of masonry • Repointing of brick Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 2 of 10 Note: Heritage Permit Application requirements differ between Part V designations depending on the policies and guidelines of the respective Heritage Conservation District Plans. Please refer to the City of Kitchener's website at www.kitchener.ca/heritage to download a copy of the relevant Heritage Conservation District Plan (Civic Centre Neighbourhood, St. Mary's, Upper Doon, and Victoria Park Area). 3. WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WITH A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The information required varies with each application. The intent of the application is to ensure that Heritage Planning staff and, where required, the Heritage Kitchener committee understand the specific details of any proposed changes in order to be sufficiently informed so they may offer advice to the applicant and, where required, to City Council. An incomplete application cannot be processed and the official notice of receipt (as required under the Ontario Heritage Act) will not be issued until all of the documents have been submitted. Failure to provide a complete application may result in deferral by Heritage Planning staff or the Heritage Kitchener committee in order to secure additional information, which will delay final approval. At minimum, the following information is required: Heritage Permit Application Form The applicant must provide a complete original copy, including signature of the owner, of the Heritage Permit Application Form. Written Description The applicant must provide a complete written description of all proposed work. The description should complement drawings, detailed construction plans, photos and any other sketches or supporting information submitted with the application. The written description must include a list and the details of all proposed work including, but not limited to, proposed colours, materials, sizes, etc. Construction and Elevation Drawings Along with construction elevation drawings (drawn to scale) the applicant may also, but not in lieu of, submit a sketch of the proposed work made over a photograph. Drawings must be drawn to scale and include: a) Overall dimensions b) Site plan depicting the location of existing buildings and the location of any proposed new building or addition to a building c) Elevation plan for each elevation of the building d) Specific sizes of building elements of interest (signs, windows, awnings, etc.) e) Detailed information including trim, siding, mouldings, etc., including sizes and profiles f) Building materials to be used (must also be included in the written description) g) Construction methods and means of attachment (must also be included in the written description) Some of the above components may be scoped or waived at the discretion of Heritage Planning staff following discussion with the applicant. Photographs Photographs of the building including general photos of the property, the streetscape in which the property is located, facing streetscape and, if the property is located at an intersection, all four corners. Photos of the specific areas that may be affected by the proposed alteration, new construction, or demolition must be included. Electronic copies of construction and elevation drawings, sketches, and photographs, along with hard copies submitted with the application, are encouraged. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Samples Page 3 of 10 It is recommended that applicants bring samples of the materials to be used to the Heritage Kitchener meeting when their application is to be considered. This may include a sample of the windows, brick, siding, roofing material, as well as paint chips to identify proposed paint colours. Other Required Information In some circumstances Heritage Planning staff may require additional information, such as a Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan, to support the Heritage Permit Application. The requirement for additional information will be identified as early on in the Heritage Permit Application process as possible. Pre - consultation with Heritage Planning staff before formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application is strongly encouraged. 4. WHAT CAN I DO IF MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION IS DENIED? City of Kitchener Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Kitchener committee endeavour to come to solutions for every Heritage Permit Application submitted. Discussions with the applicant and revisions usually result in successful applications. However, if the municipality refuses your application and you choose not to resolve the issue with a revised application, you have the option of appealing the decision to the Conservation Review Board (for alterations to designated properties under Part IV) or the Ontario Municipal Board (for demolition of property designated under Part IV or for any work to designated property under Part V). 5. IMPORTANT NOTES Professional Assistance Although it is not a requirement to obtain professional assistance in the preparation of this information, the applicant may wish to seek such assistance from an architect, architectural technologist, draftsperson or others familiar with the assessment of buildings and the gathering together of building documents. Building Codes and Other By-laws It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure compliance with all other applicable legislation, regulations and by-laws. These items include the Ontario Building and Fire Codes, and the City's zoning and property standards by-laws. 2022 Heritage Permit Application Submission Deadlines 2022 Heritage Kitchener Meeting Dates November 26, 2021 January 4, 2022 December 17, 2021 February 1, 2022 January 21, 2022 March 1, 2022 February 25, 2022 April 5, 2022 March 25, 2022 May 3, 2022 April 29, 2022 June 7, 2022 - No July Meeting June 24, 2022 August 2, 2022 July 29, 2022 September 6, 2022 - No October Meeting September 23, 2022 November 1, 2022 - No December Meeting Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 4 of 10 6. HOW DO I PROCEED WITH SUBMITTING MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? a) Heritage Planning Staff are available to meet with applicants and review all documentation prior to formal submission. Often Heritage Planning staff can assist you with historical and architectural information that might help with your proposed changes. b) Formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application with all supporting documentation (written description, construction drawings, sketch plans, scale drawing, photographs) to Heritage Planning staff are due approximately five (5) weeks prior to a Heritage Kitchener meeting (see schedule for submission deadlines and committee meeting dates). c) Upon confirmation of the submission of a complete application, including the owner's signature and all supporting documentation, Heritage Planning staff will issue a Notice of Receipt, as required by the Ontario Heritage Act, to the Applicant. d) Heritage Planning staff determine whether the Heritage Permit Application may be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and/or Council. Where Heritage Permit Applications can be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and Council, Heritage Planning staff will endeavour to process the application within 10 business days. e) Where Heritage Permit Applications are required to go to Heritage Kitchener, Heritage Planning staff prepare a staff Report based on good conservation practice and the designating by-law, or the guidelines and policies in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. Preparation of the staff Report may require a site inspection. f) Heritage Kitchener Meeting Agenda, including staff Report, circulated to Committee members prior to Heritage Kitchener meeting. Staff Report circulated to applicant prior to meeting. g) Heritage Permit Application is considered at Heritage Kitchener meeting. Heritage Planning staff present staff Report and Recommendations to Heritage Kitchener. Applicants are encouraged to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting in order to provide clarification and answer questions as required. Failure to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting may result in a deferral in order to secure additional information, which would delay consideration of the Heritage Permit Application. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff, and Heritage Kitchener support the Heritage Permit Application, the application may be processed under delegated authority and approved by the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff and/or Heritage Kitchener do not support the Heritage Permit Application, the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final decision. h) Where the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation are forward to Council for final decision, Council may: 1. Approve the Heritage Permit Application; 2. Approve the Heritage Permit Application on Terms and Conditions; or, 3. Refuse the Heritage Permit Application. i) Within 30 days of receiving Notice of Council's Decision, the applicant may appeal the decision and/or terms and conditions to the Conservation Review Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). 7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED PROPERTY Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should indicate an understanding of the reasons for designation and heritage attributes of the designated property and, if applicable, the surrounding area, including the following: Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 5 of 10 Setting 1. Positioning of the heritage building or structure on the property 2. Lot size related to building size 3. Streetscape (relationship to other properties and structures on the street) Building Details 1. Proportion and massing 2. Roof type and shape 3. Materials and detailing 4. Windows and doors: • Style • Proportions • Frequency or placement 5. Relationship of the heritage building to other buildings on the lot and to the streetscape Heritage Attributes The following applies where a Heritage Permit Application includes work on heritage attributes: Windows and Doors The applicant should consider in order of priority: 1. Repairing or retrofitting the existing units (information on how to make older windows more energy efficient is available from Heritage Planning staff) 2. Replacing the units with new units matching the originals in material, design, proportion and colour 3. Replacing the units with new units that are generally in keeping with the original units If historic window units are proposed to be replaced the application should include the following: • Description of the condition of the existing units • Reasons for replacing the units • Description of the proposed new units If approval to replace historic window units is given, the following action should be considered: • A sample of a window removed should be stored on site in case a future owner wishes to construct a replica of the original • The masonry opening and/or door framing should not be disturbed • Exterior trim should match the original Roofing The application should include: • Description of proposed roofing material to be applied • If there is a request to install a different roofing material, the applicant may wish to investigate what the original material might have been Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 6 of 10 Masonry Work The application should include: A description of the proposed work, materials (type/style of brick, type of mortar mix, etc.) and methods of repair and application • Outline the reasons for the work Signage The application should include: • A general written description of the proposed signage to be installed A scale drawing of the signage with dimensions, materials, methods of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between historic masonry units or into wood building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable Awnings The application should include: • A sketch view of the proposed awning — perhaps over a photo A scale drawing of the awning on the building with dimensions, materials, operating mechanism, method of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between masonry units or into wooden building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable. 8. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should describe the existing conditions, including the existing setting and existing heritage attributes, of the designated property and the surrounding area, specifically as they relate to the building proposed for demolition. The Heritage Permit Application should provide a detailed rationale for the demolition, including an assessment of the current condition of the building, and a cost comparison identifying the difference in cost to repair and restore the building versus cost to demolish and construct a new building. 9. HERITAGE CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES The Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work (e.g., alteration, new construction or demolition) is consistent with the designating by-law for individual properties (Part IV) or the Heritage Conservation District Plan for properties within a Heritage Conservation District (Part V designation). In addition, the Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work is consistent with the Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx). For more information on Heritage Planning in the City of Kitchener please contact our heritage planning staff at heritage(o-)-kitchener.ca. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 7 of 10 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor .jR P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planningCu)-kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION ❑ Exterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ® New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 38 Shirk PI. Kitchener, ON., N2K1R4 Legal Description (if know): PT LT 59 GERMAN COMPANY TRACT KITCHENER AS IN 450875 EXCEPTED FORCED RD; KITCHENER Building/Structure Type: 0 Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: 0 Part IV (Individual) ❑ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes 0 No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Brodie Barth Address: 38-D Shirk PI. City/Province/Postal Code: Kitchener/Ontario/1\121<1R4 Phone: (519) 500-0840 Email: baier.mgmt@gmail.com 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address City/Prop Phone: Email: Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Page 8 of 10 Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. To build a two -car detached garage at the rear of the property. Please see attached photo for visual representation of proposed garage style/colour. White vinyl horizontal siding, black steel roof (to match new roof already installed on heritage property), white garage doors, internal grilles in vinyl windows (4 over 4), white steel door with 3/4 lite (2 over 2 grilles in lite). 30' wide by 30' deep by —23' tall. Garage doors 9' tall by T wide. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: This project is required to improve the storage capacity for the property. The lot and structure is sizable and requires ongoing maintenance. Currently there exists no meaningful storage space for things like a riding lawnmower, a snow plow, hedge trimmer, tools for maintaining structure itself, and supplies required to maintain said property/structure. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: The designated by-law makes reference to the significance of the windows as such:, "...significant details including "some 12 over 12" and 8" over 12" paned windows", which we propose to mirror exactly in the proposed window design, albeit smaller given the size disparity between the existing windows and our proposed windows for the detached garage. The door will have a 3/4 lite which will have grilles which align with the Georgian style of this property. We also want to incorporate a gable roof and symmetrical dormers in keeping with the Georgian style, as well as mirroring the existing buildina itself. The proposed horizontal white sidina is in keepina with the aae of the oriainal structure as illustrated by existing siding on the Joseph Schneider Haus (1820) at 466 Queen St. S, Kitchener. Describe how the proposal Is consistent with ParksCanada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): We believe Standard 11 and Standard 12 are the most applicable for the proposed project as described in this permit application. The introduction of the proposed garage shall be "physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the historical place" in that the structure themselves will be visually compatible with classic Georgian -style architecture, while the fresh white siding will distinguish the proposed structures from the historic place itself. We believe our efforts strike an adequate and desirable balance between the objectives as outlined in Standard 11. Relating to Standard 12, the proposed detached garage will be located approximately 25' from the existing heritage building. Should its removal ever be deemed appropriate or reauired, it will in no way neaatively impact the existina heritaae desianated structure. 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: 10/01/2022 Expected completion date: 12/15/2022 b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? 0 Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Jessica Vieira c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? e) Other related Building or Planning applications ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Yes 0 No Application number. N/A Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Page 9 of 10 The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 06/21/2022 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 06/21/2022 9. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I / We, owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: STAFF USE ONLY Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage Page 10 of 10 Floor Plan Elevation Drawing 30' Width Site Plan 30' Depth s � 23' Height 30' Depth Proposed Door Style — -L Page 251 of 379 UP 30' Width Site Plan 30' Depth s � 23' Height 30' Depth Proposed Door Style — -L Page 251 of 379 ``kms °`� � �r � r •: • `; 4'1. �F .4' 94 g�'R• Sfl� r }..'. 'Ak r', a a Y rr ?" Yt r l* `i rP' 27 40"t ,Yt�-,ya?,� • 4 .{T,A:. .ea ' 4 ..,4' ti �!l MM�� C; k fie_ � ,t' 1 q r 4� �� ? 1 � ! . ,� r _ —• _ ,�'' j LLL, a: # c b� M - •. _, i :,s F "fit aaa � ^�� �r•.; _. �,� a . �� r T° 14 •�.. n - it i..- � S - Qjr St. s i � -T aw7llr'' ` 4%7m Bridge SAVOIt x { m,, WI ? �... i may, �, .;�ez,,tk�l�� ; PAf�py}r t'yr 9 4wLj AN �a �� �@ WI ? �... i may, �, .;�ez,,tk�l�� ; a � :• wla �'ti@at. .. •:ani u ,. Progress Pictures (Facade) September 2020 March 2022 Joseph Schneider Haus (White horizontal siding) Page 255 of 379 Cost Estimate: $80,000 Vinyl Windows Justification: As outlined in our previous Heritage Permit Application, the cost disparity between wooden windows and vinyl windows is sizable. It becomes prohibitive in nature when considering the overall scope of work and the cost associated with one component. In addition to the cost; the reliability, longevity, and efficiency of vinyl windows far outpaces that of wooden windows. Furthermore, vinyl windows were approved for the replacement of the existing, original wooden windows for the Heritage Building itself; 10 such windows have already been replaced in the rear unit which sits adjacent the proposed garage location. Vinyl Siding Justification: Vinyl siding is a modern, effective building material for protecting structures from the Canadian elements. Again, cost is a primary consideration when comparing the various cladding materials and vinyl siding, albeit not cheap, is considerably more cost-effective than any other cladding material currently available. Further, it closely resembles that of more traditional wood siding that was more common when this Heritage Building was constructed although it adequately distinguishes itself from wood, thus ensuring the distinction between 'original structure' and 'new buildings/additions' is achieved. In addition to these points, in our previous Heritage Permit Application vinyl siding was approved for a proposed second story addition on the Heritage Building itself (rear, yellow brick addition to original red brick building). It certainly would seem odd for vinyl siding to be approved for a second -floor addition to the original structure and not for a detached structure. Regarding both the windows and siding material; the proposed garage location sits behind the main building and is shielded from road view by trees and foliage. Any Heritage Building enthusiasts would not actually be able to view the structure without trespassing on the property; or securing permission to tour it beforehand. Our goal from the outset with this project was to breathe life into the property in a way that respects its heritage significance to our region while ensuring it lasts for another century or more. Our objective for this garage is in keeping with that goal insofar as it aligns with the appropriate design features present at the time the original structure was built while utilizing contemporary building materials to guarantee longevity and cost -efficiency. Page 256 of 379 Previously Approved Heritage Permit Application Job Description for Rear Addition Written Description: To erect a partial second story on the right -rear structure of 38 Shirk PI. The addition would see full 8' walls erected on the left side of the second floor of the existing yellow brick rear addition on the property (as indicated in the elevation drawing provided). The addition would be constructed following modern Ontario Building Code materials and standards i.e. lumber, vapour barrier, appropriate R - Value insulation, etc. A gabled roof design will be used to mirror the existing structures. This addition would not be visible from the street nor would it be visible from the front of the home. There is no work being done to the property which affects the Heritage Attributes outlined in the Designating Bylaw for 38 Shirk PI. Windows: The proposed windows would mirror those outlined previously within this application with appropriate symmetrical grill patterns. They would be vinyl frame, interior grill, SDL cross member to delineate between upper and lower panes, and white in colour. Soffit: Soffit would be white, vented aluminum to ensure longevity of the material and adequate venting for roof longevity. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Frieze Board: Frieze board would be comprised of a square stepped detail to replicate the aesthetic detail found elsewhere on the home and be capped in black aluminum flashing to ensure longevity of the project. A picture of the intended profile for the Frieze Board can be located in this application. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Fascia: Fascia would be standard 2x6 capped in black aluminum flashing to ensure longevity of the project. Material specifications and installation guidelines can be located in the Gentek Brochure attached in this application. Eaves/Downspouts: Eaves would be white, 4", custom moulded aluminum while the downspouts would be black, custom moulded standard size. Material specifications can be located in the photo labelled "Metal Rain Water Systems" attached in this application. Roofing Material: Roofing material will match the proposed roofing material outlined previously in this application i.e. steel roof. Roofing material colour and specifications can be located in the photos attached to this application. Page 257 of 379 Siding: Siding material proposed will be Chesapeake Grey (colour), vinyl vertical board and batten to replicate historical siding methods present at the time the home was constructed while ensuring the building materials will improve the viable lifetime of the product itself, and the home as a result. Colour pallet and relevant material specifications can be found in the Siding Gentek Brochure attached to this application. Description of Necessity of Work This project is a necessary step in improving the liveability of this unit. In its current form, the unit does not allow for adequate living space on the main floor while ensuring all necessary components of a home are present. The mindset then is to accommodate for those required living features in the attic but ceiling heights are well below the necessary minimums for living space. This leaves the option of increasing the ceiling height above, thus allowing for the necessary features to be installed within the home. The goal for this unit is to ensure comfort, longevity, and appropriate aesthetics are established for many years and generations to come. Consistency with Designating Bylaw There is no specific reference to any important Heritage discerning features that influence this proposed new construction within the designating bylaw with the exception of the windows. However, the existing windows in the yellow brick addition do not reflect those detailed in the designating bylaw. We would like to update the windows in question with those that mirror the ones referenced in the designating bylaw (8 over 12, 12 over 12, or 6 over 6 pane style, depending on window openings). This should ensure that consistency with the window styles is in accordance with historical relevance. It will also ensure consistency in the window design in relation to the rest of the home. Standards and Guidelines As per our discussion with Victoria Grohn, please review previously referenced Standards in relation to our proposed new construction outlined above. Elevation Drawings Page 258 of 379 Siding Details Siding Size and Style LJOUMa 4" Clapboard 314' M (19) 2.4' Exposure per Pane! (101.6/200.2) 12-6' L.engtlts (3810) It (E321 24 pas. per t 2 s4s- per ctn. (18.8 rrr) Ship. w1, 112 b (50.8 kg) Siding Colour (Snow White) Features Specifications Colour CollectionLiterature Classic Colours 7 0 1 Snow White Linen Sandstone Maize Example r mi Page 259 of 379 GENTEK SIDING COLLECTION IT'S YOUR HOME. T �J m m 1 L GENTEK® GENTEK BUILDING PRODUCTS FM—'A f BEAUTIFULLY STRONG AND PROTECTIVL Featuring best -in -class materials and cutting-edge technology, Gentek siding is performance -engineered to shield your home from harsh outdoor elements, including pounding rain, high winds, intense heat and frigid cold. And thanks to fade -defying colour formulations, our darker sidings provide superior colour retention and resistance to weathering — ensuring your home's beautiful finish will stand the test of time. DESIGN INSPIRATION Instantly create a variety of exterior designs with options for siding, trim, roofing, front door paint, exterior window colours and more with the Gentek Visualizer web -based design tool. • Upload a photo of your home or simply enter the address and Google Street View will upload the photo for you. Use the design tools to apply Gentek products to your photo. • Save and print your preferred designs, products and colours for comparison. • Follow our mydesignhomestudio.com blog for renovation ideas and free design advice. 01GENu' TEK VISUALIZER DESIGN I T ' COLOUR MATCHING MADE SIMPL No need to settle for siding and trim that "almost match." Our Colour Clear Through` collection of customer -preferred colours ensures that all Gentek products — siding, soffit, fascia, trim and rainware — will beautifully match throughout our composite cladding and siding product lines. COLOUROLEARTMROUG„.. ADDED VALUE FOR YOUR HOME For most people, a home is a source of pleasure and pride, as well as a valuable investment. Gentek siding not only will create an attractive exterior, it will heighten your home's curb appeal as well. And in today's resale market, a beautiful, low -maintenance finish can enhance the value of your home. Page 261 of 379 3 w; ALIGN TM COMPOSITE CLADDING House shown in Majestic Brick and Hudson Slate. THE BEAUTY OF REAL WOOD, BUT WITHOUT THE UPKEEP! This innovative cladding has it all: high-end style, superior performance, enduring protection and excellent value. DESIGN -INSPIRED COLOURS 20 fade -resistant colours brimming with personality. REALISTIC CEDAR MILL TEXTURE You'll have to touch it to tell the difference. POWERFULLY PROTECTIVE Resists high winds, moisture, termites, impact damage and more. LIFETIME LIMITED WARRANTY For added peace of mind; see warranty for details. ural w000. Almond e e Science that Makes It Different Here you will find jgJJJJhL thing never seen before but destined to change the 1 Monterey Sand of exterior cladding. Our patented (GP)2 Technology® izes the performance and durability to ensure superb etics with exceptional quality and value. Pebble Hudson Home, Your Style — Exactly As You Want It Nothing does to impact a home's exterior design than colour. From bold tic Brick to refreshing Coastal Blue, Gentek has everything eed to create a virtually maintenance -free exterior that's a true tion of you. Rockport o� Discover the design possibilities! tool at gentekcanada.renoworks.com/ALIGNCladding 4 Rockwell Blue Midnight Surf Marine Dusk Meadow Fern Moonlit Moss Majestic Brick 8 Classic Colours Snow White Wicker Sandstone Canyon Clay Linen Pebble Almond Monterey Sand Maize Pearl Designer Colours Dover Gray 9W Stornw W ■Chesapeake Gray Sage Juniper Grove Double 4" Double 4-1/2" Double 5" Double 5" Clapboard Dutch Lap Clapboard Dutch Lap THE ULTRA -PREMIUM DISTINCTION Extra -Heavy Wall Thickness Heavy-duty .046" — thickness provides superior rigidity, ensuring straight, smooth walls. Full -Roll Nailing Hem Delivers double -strength wall attachment. Exclusive Advantage Lock System Securely connects panels, greatly enhancing rigidity and stability. Hurricane -Velocity Wind Resistance Built hurricane -tough! In laboratory tests simulating hurricane -force wind conditions, Sequoia Select withstood windloads up to 407 km/h (253 mph) Rich Cedargrain Emboss Beautiful low -gloss finish achieves natural appeal and excellent durability; requires minimal upkeep. Superior Lap Height Full 3/4" lap height creates a deeper dimension and enhanced shadow lines for a� true wood look. `Windload performance may vary by profile design. Double 5" Clapboard and Double 5 Dutch Lap not RaQee263Of 79 Colours in British Columbia and Alberta. 9 VINYL SOFFIT Classic Colours Snow White 8" Solid 8" Vented Wicker Sandstone Canyon Clay Linen Pebble Almond Monterey Sand Maize Pearl Designer Colours Dover Gray _ Storm-, Chesapeake GrayT Sage Juniper Grove [Available in Oxford Premium and Fairweather only. ttAvailable in Oxford Premium and EZ Lock only. Sequoia Select Ultra -Premium Beaded Premium 12" T-4 12" T-4 Vented 8" Solid 8" Vented Solid Soffit/ Beaded Premium is available in Snow White, Vertical Siding Linen, Wicker, Canyon Clay, Pebble, Monterey Sand and Juniper Grove only. Oxford Premium Fairweather 10" D-5 10" D-5 12" T-4 12" T-4 Solid Soffit/ Fully Vented Solid Soffit/ Fully Vented Vertical Siding Vertical Siding EZ Lock 10" D-5 solid and vented soffit also is available in Snow White, Linen, Wicker and Black. 26 ALUMINUM SOFFIT AND FASCIA Colour Palette 'i Bright White Metallic Gray Rainware White Dover Gray Chesapeake Gray Slate Hudson Slate Windswept Smoke Meadow Fern Moonlit Moss 1. off Ivy Green Forest Green Rockwell Blue Wedgewood Blue Midnight Surf Not all products and colours are available at all locations; see your Gentek representative for details. Fascia Available in economy, standard and heavy gauge profiles in plain and ribbed. 4" Fascia; Ribbed 6" Fascia; Ribbed 8" Fascia; Ribbed 10" Fascia; Ribbed Soffit 16" 2 -Panel 16" 2 -Panel 16" 4 -Panel 16" 4 -Panel 18" 3 -Panel 18" 3 -Panel Solid Vented Solid Vented Solid Vented Page 264 of 379 27 DECORATIVE TRIM AND ACCESSORIES Gentek offers an extensive selection of trim products, mounts, blocks and decorative accessories, as well as eavestrough and rainware components — everything you need to give your home the perfect finishing touch. VALUABLE WARRANTY PROTECTION All Gentek-brand products are backed by warranty coverage for added value and peace of mind. Gentek ALIGN Composite Cladding carries a lifetime limited, non -prorated, transferable warranty. Gentek vinyl siding carries a lifetime limited warranty with fade protection and hail coverage. Sierra Steel siding is backed by a lifetime limited warranty with 50 year hail and 35 year chalk and colour change protection. Gentek aluminum sidings are backed by a 40 year limited warranty. For complete warranty information, including limitations, ask your dealer for a copy of the Gentek-brand product warranties. Warranty information for specialty sidings and third -party products can be found on their respective websites. GEMMK® GENTEK BUILDING PRODUCTS 1001 Corporate Drive • Burlington, ON LK 5V5 gentek.ca Make us a part of your home. YD - Colours may not be exactly as shown due to lithographic process. Product Improvement Policy: Gentek Building Products is constantly improving product designs and manufacturing processes. We therefore must reserve the right to change specifications without notice. Please consult Gentek Building Products for current details. Trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of Gentek Building Products, its affiliates or their respective owners. Accessible formats and communication supports available upon request. Page 265 of 379 1k 628-1200E 1-21 © 2021, Gentek Building Products Please recycle. t-6 Fr. m ALUMINUM SOFFIT, FASCIA & RAINWARE INSTALLATION GUIDE % cod Zood& GENTEK® GENTEK BUILDINGPP&Uc2m66 Of 379 ze GET"%UEK, RAINWARE End Cap Gutter Bracket Plastic Downpipe Strap Outlet Ferrules Inside Mitre 67 x 67 mm (2 5/8" x 2 5/8") Downpipe 75x50 mm (3" x 2") and 100 x 75 mm (4" x 3") Downpipe Aluminum Outlet C•� 75° "A" Elbow 75° "B" Elbow ki 67 x67 mm (2 5/8" x 2 5/8") Square Elbow 5" K -Style Gutter 11roo 67 x 67 mm (2 5/8" x 2 5/8") Aluminum Outlet 75x50 mm (3" x 2") Aluminum Outlet , Page 267 of 379 41, Outside Mitre Aluminum Pop rivets Painted Coil Stock (for Gutter Machines) 0 Spray Bomb i t � Aluminum Strainer Crimping Tool Touch-up Paint 150&175 mm (6" & 7") Aluminum Spike 1 Gutter Sealant Page 268 of 379 SOFFIT & FASCIA INSTALLATION General: All Gentek Siding and Soffits comply with CAN/CGSB-93.2M91, Canadian Norms for Prefinished Aluminum Siding, Soffits and Fascia, for Residential use. Gentek Soffit is available in a variety of profiles. Vented panels are designed to allow air circulation into the attic areas to aid in the reduction of excessive heat build-up and water vapour condensation. Following are the free flowing ventilation areas for Gentek soffit products. PROFILE PER LINEAR FOOT PER PANEL 16" — 2 panel 4.02 sq. in. 48.7 sq. in. 26.0 cm2 314 cm2 18" — 3 panel 5.46 sq. in. 54.6 sq. in. 32.2 cm2 352.26 cm2 16" — 4 panel 4.12 sq. in. 51.25 sq. in. 26.0 cm2 330.64 cm2 VENTILATION: fully vented To meet the National Building Code requirements, attic spaces require a free flow vent area of 92,900 mm2(1 ft2) for 27.9 m2 (300 ft2) of insulated ceiling area. Gentek roll -formed fascia is supplied in 100 mm (4"), 152 mm (6") and 203 mm (8") widths, in 3 m (10') lengths. Soffit and fascia can be installed in new constructions as well as in re -siding projects. Soffit Installation In new residential construction the building contractor must prepare for Gentek soffit application by installing a 50 mm x 50 mm (2" x 2") nailing strip (see Fig. 1), on which will be installed a soffit "J" trim. This nailing strip is seldom necessary in renovation soffit applications because it is usually possible to nail a soffit "J" trim directly to existing wood surfaces. The bottom edge of this nailing strip and the fascia board must be at the same level. Measure from the bottom of the installed soffit "J" to the outer face of the fascia board and cut soffit panels 6 mm (1/4") shorter than this measurement, using a circular saw with suitable metal -cutting blade. Note: Because the distance from the building wall to the fascia board may vary by more than 6 mm (1/4") throughout the wall length, it is wise to check the measurement at several points before cutting fascia panels. To begin soffit installation, nail soffit "J" trim to nailing strip or to other wood surface at the corner where wall and soffit meet. Note: Nail on 400 mm (16") centres with 25 mm or 38 mm (1 " or 1 1/2") aluminum nails. 8 Page 269 of 379 Proposed Roof Material Page 271 of 379 � » (C) (D N) A N) k U A (D �LLfjCL� J 2 k / ) Q \ � / § \ 3 «R\7 § § \ / E CL / _\ 22 £E § 2 \ / &EJ \ \ 7 § \ no ® § / k// � c o g =r / 2 2 % 2 8 ° \ 2 ƒ M. CDCD / / (3 to D2 — \ / E n/% 7 R 7 u ] y r \ 3 %) q , 2 j / $ ] / ] R / ® 3 , / & 3 \ # ' :-4 CO & ] ] \ $ \ ' % m / / \ 41. / 0)a - (_;'-' � t' "7ttzi---.*tt.o -art o' -'-:e in ij c, a s 17:P, i_n V r � r i desimate rce� ,iropert-NI, t rw.n, n le of �iy C'r! 1 t -orwyni ow. .r oP �-ru h=.T, o,* ,ntarir -')rn.'ert. ore on�rtica,)rly :Entert ic.r, to r tl-tk- as !�ecr. -snrve.� .miz�r of -.ner onActs In t :Z:-. Y.C�j :t ra 1 teCtj vo tl'tet Ll rt 7f- tlas ac xterior of 1+0 , .._ ,.'..-.* i9�'? q Aviv C".';xrr of 1.;�'_�-Iaw r-" '71r�' ro ti,,p �,rorartv in 7a -'I 4s r i cma t eR rare.. fnrn s e -ar c ) in ..:re r r 3 z" , of f i c w . r -c' t E v - IE." tn `>e 0-1 t -Lc! voT)erty a"e. on -2 - the Ontario Feritare Foundation and to cause notice of the passina of this By-law to be published in the same newspaper having general circulation in the community once for each of three consecutive weeks. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this "9 day of . A.D. 1984. U. mayor Clerk SCHF?)Ul,h' "A" ALL AND SINGULAR that certain parcel or tract of land and premises situate, lying and being in the City of Kitchener, in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo (formerly in the pillage of Bridgeport, in the Township of Waterloo and in the County of Waterloo) and in the Province of Ontario I-eing composed of Part of Dot 59 German Company Tract containing by admeasurement eighty-one one -hundredths of an acre more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Westerly limit of Woolwich Street with. the Southerly limit of Bridge Street as shown on Registered Plan 577; T11F,NCR along the Northerly limit of Woolwich Street measured South 19 degrees and 14 minutes west, 118.8 feet to a point; THENCE continuing along the Northerly limit of Woolwich Street measured North 51 degrees and 9 minutes West, 152.0 feet .more or less to Vie Point of Commencement of the herein described parcel of land; THENCE North 44 degrees East, 202.0 feet to a points TRrNCE South 43 degrees and 19 minutes West, 108.5 feet to a point; THFFCB South 11 degrees East, 213.0 feet to the said Northerly limit of Woolwich Street; THENCE continuing along the same, Forth 51 degrees and 9 minutes Fast, 244.0 feet more or less to the Point of Commencement. x N- ct 0 4y (D rrr S m �e � ro m 0 p P- ti 0 0 r rt rrt 0 P) F° r- 0 CD c� r • m o � � O W `C O \\ � r � N N i ro Ks � n Al O (D O n as r- 4 r- m(D :30 m n w rt r- cr 0 z P' H n 0 0 14 � R r0 H ¢ Y O h] n 0 C p (� ct 0 w 0 p' �3 K (D iD O H W ti t3 H r w w (] 4� [o c cm t z F 0 irJi W (D F- A 1t to ^BAooTgs FOR DESIGNATION The designation described herein is reco-v"erded due to the historic and architectural significance of this property. The house was constructed in 1840 as the residence of Jacob Shoemaker, one of the founder of the viliaae of Bridgeport. 7n terns of architecture, the Shoemaker Nouse ex i?its several significant details includinq some 1112 over 12" and "8` over 12" paned windows, a transomed second storey roorwav, cornice moldings ane a six bay ;eorgian principa! facar3e as well as secondary racades that are triple brick laic' it Fl,�mishi bond and covered lightly by a rel stucco wash whict is carefully lined to emphasize the iarickwork. This house is a rare exampie of a substantial merchant's dweiiinq of 1840.