The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDSD-2022-334 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-018 - 137-147 King Street EastStaff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: August 2, 2022 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7041 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: July 12, 2022 REPORT NO.: DSD -2022-334 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-018 137-147 King Street East Repair and Restoration to Cornice and Brick Parapet RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-018 to permit the repair and restoration of the cornice and brick parapet of the property municipally addressed as 137-147 King Street East, BE APPROVED, in accordance with the supplementary information submitted with the application and subject to the following condition: 1. That final building permit drawings be reviewed, and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to present the proposed cornice and brick parapet restoration and replacement detailed in HPA-2022-IV-018, attached in Appendix A. • The key finding of this report is that the proposed work will not negatively impact the cultural heritage value or interest of the property as it maintains the original appearance and is in keeping with provincial standards and guidelines. • There are no financial implications associated with this report. • Community engagement included posting this report and associated agenda in advance of the meeting and consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-018 proposes to restore the upper portion of the front elevation of the subject property municipally addressed as 137-147 King Street East, through the reconstruction of the wall above the third -storey windows, installation of a new *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 309 of 379 heavy cornice with dentil blocks and metal capping, and reconstruction of the parapet. The building has been designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act through designating By-law No. 2012-025. A structural assessment undertaken in April determined that the upper portion of the front elevation was deteriorated as a result of extensive water infiltration and in unsafe condition. Immediate removal was recommended, and a building permit issued in May of this year. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning Staff note that the proposed work meets Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada, and that it will not adversely affect the identified heritage attributes of the building. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2022-IV-018, which seeks permission to install a new fiberglass cornice and pre -finished metal flashing in addition to reconstructing a parapet on the property municipally addressed as 137-147 King Street East (Figure 1). A structural assessment of the building was undertaken by Witzel Dyce Engineering Incorporated on April 29, 2022. The assessment determined that the condition of the brick below the soffit was unsafe and immediate removal of the deterioration portions was recommended. A building permit was issued on May 19, 2022 to remove the deteriorated parapet detail, exterior, and Ioadbearing brick above the third -floor windows. REPORT: h i (- CITY COMMERCIAL. CORE \,200 � 206 2701/ 37 2202 236 \✓ X2Arvato5mI50"-25 ices : 6, 256a /(§ *� G] 12707 Figure 1: Location Map of Subject Property The subject property is located on the south side of King Street East between Benton Street and Scott Street, within the City Commercial Core Planning Community. It contains a multi- unit three-storey building constructed c. 1922. The building is a hybrid of both the Renaissance Revival and Art Deco architectural styles (Figure 2). Page 310 of 379 Figure 3: Front Fagade Prior to Partial Demolition — Flashing Removed for Structural Assessment The building addressed as 137-147 King Street East possesses design and physical value, being a representative example of early 20th century main street commercial architecture and a rare survivor of the vernacular style south-east of Frederick and Benton Street. It also features a high degree of craftmanship and detail. The subject property possesses historical and associative value through previous notable tenants who made significant contributions to the community. The building was the location of the Kitchener Conservatory of Music at a time when the organization's President was George Henry Ziegler, a member of the Waterloo Region Hall of Fame. Further, it has association with various trade and labour unions from the 1950s through to 2010. As a result of its design/physical and historical/associative values, the property was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating By-law No. 2012-025 (Attachment C). The exterior physical heritage attributes on the front and side elevations of the building identified in the designating by-law include: • The square plan; • The stone foundation; • Rugged brick construction; • Decorative brickwork and masonry detailing; • Date stone that reads "1922"; • Precast masonry storefront; • Window and door openings; • Masonry sills; • Wood windows with multiple light transoms; • Heavy cornice with dentil blocks and metal capping; • Wood doors with semi -circular transom; • Roofline; and • Painted signage band on the north (west) elevation reading "Conservatory Sales Room" Page 311 of 379 As a result of water infiltration and freeze and thaw cycles, brick, mortar joints, and wood rafters on the subject property were found to be in a severely deteriorated condition (Figures 3-6). A structural assessment conducted by Witzel Dyce Engineering Incorporated concluded that the wall above the third -storey windows, cornice, and parapet were in unsafe condition and recommended immediate removal. A building permit was issued for the partial demolition on May 19, 2022. A$O OF Figure 3: Damaged Original Metal Cornice and Capping LLLJ-4' 777. 7;i Figure 4: Rotted Cantilevered Rafters Figure 5: Deteriorated Brick on Wall Work Proposed w , 'o� rw- ._� Figure 6: Original Cornice/Parapet with Deteriorated Brick and Metal The work proposed in this application includes reconstructing the removed portion of the wall above the third -storey windows, installing a new cornice, and reconstructing the parapet above the cornice. The roofline and elevations of the building will be maintained to match the original in appearance (Figure 7). Page 312 of 379 r AR -1, OF R'1,11R I IoM DN MMEMO 111 tl MMM 666000 MM MM�� 111 �� 111 ■�■■ 1 �7Am-mm�� M1 �......�� 114 Em—mm 111 tl ��.�� 111 ■t1 IIR M■I E■� 1 1■■� iii iii iii iii ■■■■ 1 -1■■I I■■I � I■■L SICIVAJE .:Jdr�a4 Figure 7: Proposed Final Front Elevation (Attachment B) Reconstruction of Wall Above Third -Storey Windows A wood frame structure will be used in reconstructing the wall above the third -storey windows, and will then be covered with the replicated heavy cornice detailing. As such the wood frame will not be visible and the appearance of the subject property will be maintained. The wood frame construction provides for a more durable approach which provides the cantilever required to support the cornice, without impacting the existing roof structure. Installation of New Cornice The new cornice assembly will be fiberglass in lieu of the original sheet metal sculpture. It will be formed with the original metal sculpture as a template, with the finish and colour matched. As such the overall appearance will be maintained. Pre -finished metal flashing colour -matched to the original colour will be installed and extend over the cornice detail. The cornice is to be installed with a two -degree slope towards the parapet, to improve drainage through reinstated scuppers in the upper parapet and prevent future water infiltration into the masonry construction below the new elements. This change is minimal and will not have any notable visual impact to the subject property. Reconstruction of Parapet As with the wall, the parapet is proposed to be constructed with wood framing. Roof membrane is proposed to wrap up and over the parapet as well as down the face of the cornice framing, and a Tyvek Air Barrier, and DensGlass Sheathing will also be installed. Page 313 of 379 The exterior is proposed to be covered with pre -finished metal flashing cut with drip -edges. This will provide further water drainage. The use of wood covered by metal flashing as opposed to the masonry originally used was recommended through the structural assessment completed for the building. This material change will provide for a more durable and water-resistant parapet. Further, the parapet is not visible from the street line, and the original height and width of the parapet will be maintained (Figure 8). PARAPET tLYIERAICTH PREFINaHM METAL FLMHNO tM DRP EDGES. RCOFM WERNETOW LPMOMERPARAPET MO DOM TTE FACE OF CORNICE FRAMNO. _ lri'Ek IR fl•R�A DEM O A8& BHEATHN1101A 3B VAOO ,&rM FRAWIN3 TCI MO.0 3iVeOOC&RPV FRAIYk3 TC W4TCH E%IBTIN3 PIJWI'ET WGTH 1 PREF?{ —D HETA1 FL•HIIRk1 To SE{TEWQ-0LTJ]bWWICE DETiIL CAYQRIP - EOCE CVL.00R TO HATCH EEIBTT CORHIGE QRANN3E PROWIOE YbC aM AMIM WCORwICE 1[111! FRAuIltl rbCA EATEAYIM 2e BLOPE - EACHTCSTHEPARAPETAEME_REFERTC KLFM L ECANMN& Fd[ N W BOtPPER uOr}.T1f5NB TO ARAN WATER EACH TOTHE ERIBTH6 PoJOF TYP i J24r _ 'fl! 5x AOPE YIN E%. ROOFRAFrER6 IY ii • -. MEFERRED -i MFpi-OGRNEEQET% •' � : ^ i,.. + PROWOE A F,BER' CORNICE F" TORE4 OCTHAN3P1.MRTG LL C- EAIBnI FAER�CCRNI ETC -BE ?ERI-hTEQ FROM Et87N3 S4 t'aFd,• •�^:Y hW�18 OG. P1mV6Elfy ary'�' gCJ1'TO EOE WaTERu'� RE�MMDM OR GH `!- ,.. qF �516W..L Fpeyg{O {9 ROi'b C CRt'.i'E. CF 9M'lllM 11AFW1YIRl3 N� � PLwwbob BHEATHRn `� OP`+Vl i2FORLL Nr EDETAIL PFKW'CE PREFIMExIEC WETAL BULPTLRE 2A BL9C19HO AT aF 1GGfl [d7 �'f ,' C CRMOE, GClr TO NMTGH EDtBITlO METALFLAEHIWTOMREPLI MDFROM I �i06'9RMWO06 BORE Tb EHQ CF ERMTMR RAFTER& E%IBTIMGEF VA3EDR TERIALREMOVED FROM ORfs31s1 OORRICE 'MI90PPON 19 QEF WMT ON CRA WENS AVAIIABIUTY 4YJlLb3N8TRLCTTOk1. TO PERFCNM THE'AiDRHTTVEH ..` FIBER11"It MEEDE— AR &NkREN,R O ;� DENS 3 -AES SmEAT1Y413 ON : .. �J'SJ MY dillZ` FRAYN[3 1C D C • E%�4 ROOF 8HORIFk31Wu. N4 RCGF &Hcwlwa PaV.l '-*�'.,.::' za BIACHNO Ar.r-ar rrru p7 - ___. I 'HO�BNVKWQ BCRENB T6 LtB CONTNLt]LIB BLOCJ[N4 � w ffi K&.4'rdC. E[. MOLTIWYRE gil M E[. GEIM JOISTS Figure 8: Structural Detailing of Work (Attachment B) The proposed alterations are in accordance with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada. In particular, the following are met: • Evaluate the existing condition of character -defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed — use the gentlest means possible for any intervention, respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention-, Page 314 of 379 • Make any intervention needed to preserve character -defining elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place and identifiable on close inspection. • Replacing in kind an entire element of the roof that is too deteriorated to repair — if the overall form and detailing are still evident — using the physical evidence as a model to reproduce the element. This can include a large section of roofing, a dormer, or a chimney. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. • Improving the detailing of roof elements, following recognized conservation methods, to correct faulty details. For example, adjusting the slope of a cornice to prevent ponding, or introducing a new drip edge at the eave to better direct water runoff away from a masonry wall. Such improvements should be physically and visually compatible. Heritage Planning Comments In reviewing the merits of the application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The subject property municipally addressed as 137-147 King Street East is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by way of designating By-law No. 2012-025; • The roofline and heavy cornice with dentil blocks and metal capping have been identified as heritage attributes contributing to the cultural heritage value or interest of the subject property; • Due to water infiltration and weather cycles over a period of years, elements of the property above the third -storey window, including the wall, cornice, and parapet, have deteriorated to an unsafe condition; • The structurally unsound portions of the property have been removed for public safety; • Replacement and restoration work with complementary materials that maintain the original appearance of the removed elements is proposed; • Appropriate installation and construction methods will ensure a long life for the new elements; • The proposed work is consistent with Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada with respect to reproducing the elements using the original physical structures as a template and making appropriate and unobtrusive adjustments to correct faulty details; • The appearance of the identified heritage attributes affected will be maintained, and any notable changes in appearance to other elements are not visible from the street line; and • The proposed work will not adversely impact the reasons for designation of the subject property, nor will it adversely impact the King Street East streetscape of adjacent properties. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget – The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget – The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. Page 315 of 379 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. CONSULT — The Heritage Kitchener Committee will be consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act • Designating By-law No. 2012-025 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2022-IV-018 Attachment B —Associated Application Package Attachment C — By-law No. 2012-025 Page 316 of 379 2022 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor .jR P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planningCu)-kitchener.ca PART A: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 10 The following requirements are designed to assist applicants in submitting sufficient information in order that their Heritage Permit Application may be deemed complete and processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. If further assistance or explanation is required please contact heritage planning staff at heritage(ukitchener.ca. 1. WHAT IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage Act, has enacted legislation to assist its citizens with the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources. Once properties are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, the City is enabled to manage physical change to the cultural heritage resources as a means of protection. The principal mechanism of management is the Heritage Permit Application process, which allows the municipality to review site-specific applications and determine if proposed changes will beneficially or detrimentally affect the reasons for designation and heritage attributes. As a general rule, the preferred alterations to heritage properties are those that repair rather than replace original heritage attributes, and those that do not permanently damage cultural heritage resources and their heritage attributes. Where replacement of materials or new construction is necessary, these should be compatible with the original. Reversibility is also preferable as this allows for the future reinstatement of heritage attributes. According to the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of designated property shall alter the property or permit the alteration of the property if the alteration is likely to affect the property's heritage attributes, unless the owner applies to the council of the municipality and receives written consent. This consent is obtained through the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Permit Applications are applicable for all individually designated properties (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) and all properties located within the boundaries of Heritage Conservation Districts (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act). 2. WHEN IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED? Under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, any new construction or "alteration" to a property designated under Part IV of the Act (individually designated property) or a property designated under Part V of the Act (within a Heritage Conservation District) requires a Heritage Permit Application. "Alteration" is defined as: "to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb." In addition, the approval of a Heritage Permit Application is required for any demolition of a property designated under Part IV or V of the Act. Please contact Heritage Planning staff directly to confirm if your specific project requires the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Below are some examples of typical Part IV alterations that may require a Heritage Permit Application: • Addition and/or alteration to an existing building or accessory building • Replacement of windows or doors, or a change in window or door openings • Change in siding, soffit, fascia or roofing material • Removal and/or installation of porches, verandahs and canopies • Removal and/or installation of cladding and chimneys • Changes in trim, cladding, or the painting of masonry • Repointing of brick Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 2 of 10 Note: Heritage Permit Application requirements differ between Part V designations depending on the policies and guidelines of the respective Heritage Conservation District Plans. Please refer to the City of Kitchener's website at www.kitchener.ca/heritage to download a copy of the relevant Heritage Conservation District Plan (Civic Centre Neighbourhood, St. Mary's, Upper Doon, and Victoria Park Area). 3. WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WITH A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The information required varies with each application. The intent of the application is to ensure that Heritage Planning staff and, where required, the Heritage Kitchener committee understand the specific details of any proposed changes in order to be sufficiently informed so they may offer advice to the applicant and, where required, to City Council. An incomplete application cannot be processed and the official notice of receipt (as required under the Ontario Heritage Act) will not be issued until all of the documents have been submitted. Failure to provide a complete application may result in deferral by Heritage Planning staff or the Heritage Kitchener committee in order to secure additional information, which will delay final approval. At minimum, the following information is required: Heritage Permit Application Form The applicant must provide a complete original copy, including signature of the owner, of the Heritage Permit Application Form. Written Description The applicant must provide a complete written description of all proposed work. The description should complement drawings, detailed construction plans, photos and any other sketches or supporting information submitted with the application. The written description must include a list and the details of all proposed work including, but not limited to, proposed colours, materials, sizes, etc. Construction and Elevation Drawings Along with construction elevation drawings (drawn to scale) the applicant may also, but not in lieu of, submit a sketch of the proposed work made over a photograph. Drawings must be drawn to scale and include: a) Overall dimensions b) Site plan depicting the location of existing buildings and the location of any proposed new building or addition to a building c) Elevation plan for each elevation of the building d) Specific sizes of building elements of interest (signs, windows, awnings, etc.) e) Detailed information including trim, siding, mouldings, etc., including sizes and profiles f) Building materials to be used (must also be included in the written description) g) Construction methods and means of attachment (must also be included in the written description) Some of the above components may be scoped or waived at the discretion of Heritage Planning staff following discussion with the applicant. Photographs Photographs of the building including general photos of the property, the streetscape in which the property is located, facing streetscape and, if the property is located at an intersection, all four corners. Photos of the specific areas that may be affected by the proposed alteration, new construction, or demolition must be included. Electronic copies of construction and elevation drawings, sketches, and photographs, along with hard copies submitted with the application, are encouraged. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Samples Page 3 of 10 It is recommended that applicants bring samples of the materials to be used to the Heritage Kitchener meeting when their application is to be considered. This may include a sample of the windows, brick, siding, roofing material, as well as paint chips to identify proposed paint colours. Other Required Information In some circumstances Heritage Planning staff may require additional information, such as a Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan, to support the Heritage Permit Application. The requirement for additional information will be identified as early on in the Heritage Permit Application process as possible. Pre - consultation with Heritage Planning staff before formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application is strongly encouraged. 4. WHAT CAN I DO IF MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION IS DENIED? City of Kitchener Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Kitchener committee endeavour to come to solutions for every Heritage Permit Application submitted. Discussions with the applicant and revisions usually result in successful applications. However, if the municipality refuses your application and you choose not to resolve the issue with a revised application, you have the option of appealing the decision to the Conservation Review Board (for alterations to designated properties under Part IV) or the Ontario Municipal Board (for demolition of property designated under Part IV or for any work to designated property under Part V). 5. IMPORTANT NOTES Professional Assistance Although it is not a requirement to obtain professional assistance in the preparation of this information, the applicant may wish to seek such assistance from an architect, architectural technologist, draftsperson or others familiar with the assessment of buildings and the gathering together of building documents. Building Codes and Other By-laws It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure compliance with all other applicable legislation, regulations and by-laws. These items include the Ontario Building and Fire Codes, and the City's zoning and property standards by-laws. 2022 Heritage Permit Application Submission Deadlines 2022 Heritage Kitchener Meeting Dates November 26, 2021 January 4, 2022 December 17, 2021 February 1, 2022 January 21, 2022 March 1, 2022 February 25, 2022 April 5, 2022 March 25, 2022 May 3, 2022 April 29, 2022 June 7, 2022 - No July Meeting June 24, 2022 August 2, 2022 July 29, 2022 September 6, 2022 - No October Meeting September 23, 2022 November 1, 2022 - No December Meeting Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 4 of 10 6. HOW DO I PROCEED WITH SUBMITTING MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? a) Heritage Planning Staff are available to meet with applicants and review all documentation prior to formal submission. Often Heritage Planning staff can assist you with historical and architectural information that might help with your proposed changes. b) Formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application with all supporting documentation (written description, construction drawings, sketch plans, scale drawing, photographs) to Heritage Planning staff are due approximately five (5) weeks prior to a Heritage Kitchener meeting (see schedule for submission deadlines and committee meeting dates). c) Upon confirmation of the submission of a complete application, including the owner's signature and all supporting documentation, Heritage Planning staff will issue a Notice of Receipt, as required by the Ontario Heritage Act, to the Applicant. d) Heritage Planning staff determine whether the Heritage Permit Application may be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and/or Council. Where Heritage Permit Applications can be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and Council, Heritage Planning staff will endeavour to process the application within 10 business days. e) Where Heritage Permit Applications are required to go to Heritage Kitchener, Heritage Planning staff prepare a staff Report based on good conservation practice and the designating by-law, or the guidelines and policies in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. Preparation of the staff Report may require a site inspection. f) Heritage Kitchener Meeting Agenda, including staff Report, circulated to Committee members prior to Heritage Kitchener meeting. Staff Report circulated to applicant prior to meeting. g) Heritage Permit Application is considered at Heritage Kitchener meeting. Heritage Planning staff present staff Report and Recommendations to Heritage Kitchener. Applicants are encouraged to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting in order to provide clarification and answer questions as required. Failure to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting may result in a deferral in order to secure additional information, which would delay consideration of the Heritage Permit Application. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff, and Heritage Kitchener support the Heritage Permit Application, the application may be processed under delegated authority and approved by the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff and/or Heritage Kitchener do not support the Heritage Permit Application, the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final decision. h) Where the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation are forward to Council for final decision, Council may: 1. Approve the Heritage Permit Application; 2. Approve the Heritage Permit Application on Terms and Conditions; or, 3. Refuse the Heritage Permit Application. i) Within 30 days of receiving Notice of Council's Decision, the applicant may appeal the decision and/or terms and conditions to the Conservation Review Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). 7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED PROPERTY Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should indicate an understanding of the reasons for designation and heritage attributes of the designated property and, if applicable, the surrounding area, including the following: Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 5 of 10 Setting 1. Positioning of the heritage building or structure on the property 2. Lot size related to building size 3. Streetscape (relationship to other properties and structures on the street) Building Details 1. Proportion and massing 2. Roof type and shape 3. Materials and detailing 4. Windows and doors: • Style • Proportions • Frequency or placement 5. Relationship of the heritage building to other buildings on the lot and to the streetscape Heritage Attributes The following applies where a Heritage Permit Application includes work on heritage attributes: Windows and Doors The applicant should consider in order of priority: 1. Repairing or retrofitting the existing units (information on how to make older windows more energy efficient is available from Heritage Planning staff) 2. Replacing the units with new units matching the originals in material, design, proportion and colour 3. Replacing the units with new units that are generally in keeping with the original units If historic window units are proposed to be replaced the application should include the following: • Description of the condition of the existing units • Reasons for replacing the units • Description of the proposed new units If approval to replace historic window units is given, the following action should be considered: • A sample of a window removed should be stored on site in case a future owner wishes to construct a replica of the original • The masonry opening and/or door framing should not be disturbed • Exterior trim should match the original Roofing The application should include: • Description of proposed roofing material to be applied • If there is a request to install a different roofing material, the applicant may wish to investigate what the original material might have been Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 6 of 10 Masonry Work The application should include: A description of the proposed work, materials (type/style of brick, type of mortar mix, etc.) and methods of repair and application • Outline the reasons for the work Signage The application should include: • A general written description of the proposed signage to be installed A scale drawing of the signage with dimensions, materials, methods of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between historic masonry units or into wood building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable Awnings The application should include: • A sketch view of the proposed awning — perhaps over a photo A scale drawing of the awning on the building with dimensions, materials, operating mechanism, method of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between masonry units or into wooden building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable. 8. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should describe the existing conditions, including the existing setting and existing heritage attributes, of the designated property and the surrounding area, specifically as they relate to the building proposed for demolition. The Heritage Permit Application should provide a detailed rationale for the demolition, including an assessment of the current condition of the building, and a cost comparison identifying the difference in cost to repair and restore the building versus cost to demolish and construct a new building. 9. HERITAGE CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES The Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work (e.g., alteration, new construction or demolition) is consistent with the designating by-law for individual properties (Part IV) or the Heritage Conservation District Plan for properties within a Heritage Conservation District (Part V designation). In addition, the Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work is consistent with the Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx). For more information on Heritage Planning in the City of Kitchener please contact our heritage planning staff at heritage(o-)-kitchener.ca. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Planning Division — 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor .jR P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planningCu)-kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Page 7 of 10 Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION X Exterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ Demolition ❑ New Construction ❑ Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 137-147 King Street East PT LT S/S KING ST, 6 S/SKING ST PL 364 KITCHEN ERAS IN 302404&A14451 T/W A124451; S/T & T/W Legal Description (if know): 'Mdnd- K1T('.HFNFR Building/Structure Type: ❑ ResidentialXlCommercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: 171 Part IV (Individual) ❑ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes F-1 No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Hamidreza Pouramin Address: 10 Yongeview Ave City/Province/Postal Code: Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 7A4 Phone: 416 999 5021 Email: pouramin(a)_sympatico.ca 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Joe Somfay Company: IBI Group Architects (Canada) Inc. Address: 410 Albert Street, Suite 101 City/Province/Postal Code: Waterloo, Ontario, N21- 3V3 Phone: 519 585 2255 ext 63219 Email: joe.somfay(a)_ibig roup.com Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 8 of 10 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Refer to the attached written proposal and documentation of proposed work. 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: The proposed work is necessary as there was a safety concern with the existing building condition. Please refer to the attached written proposal and documentation of proposed work for additional details. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Refer to the attached written proposal and documentation of proposed work. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): Refer to the attached written proposal and documentation of proposed work. 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: As soon as possible Expected completion date: As soon as possible b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? x I Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Jessica Vieira c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? ❑ Yes x❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ❑ Yes x No e) Other related Building or Planning applications Application number, Heritage Permit #: HPA-2021-IV-008 Building Permit #: 21 136119 Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2022 Page 9 of 10 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a 'complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning! By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 9. AUTHORIZATION if this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I / We, Hannidreza Pouramin , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize IBI Group Architects (Canada) Inc. to act on my 1 our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 2022/06/23 The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. if you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). Working together w Growing thoughtfully • Building community Page 325 of 379 2022 Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: STAFF USE ONLY Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage Page 10 of 10 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com 137-147 King Street East — Kitchener Repair and Restoration of Heavy Cornice with Dentil Blocks and Metal Capping Written Proposal and Documentation of Proposed Work. Prepared for: Hamidreza Pouramin 2508601 ontario ltd 10 Yongeview Ave, Richmond Hill, Ontario L4C 7A4 Prepared by: IBI Architect (Canada) Inc Joe Somfay, OAA Associate Director I Senior Architect 1 Page 327 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Table of Contents Contents Table of Contents ......................................... Owners Contact Information ......................... Heritage Value and Images .......................... Repair and Maintenance Recommendations Cost Estimate ............................................... Appendix A (coloured elevations) ................. Appendix B (Section Detail) .......................... Appendix C (Structural Assessment) ........... Appendix D (Structural Assessment) ........... Appendix E (Fiberglass References)............ .2 .3 .3 .6 .7 .8 .9 10 11 12 051 Page 328 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Owners Contact Information Mr. Hamidreza Pouramin 2508601 ontario ltd. 10 Yongeview Ave, Richmond hill, ON, L4C 7A4 pouramin@sympatico.ca 1-416-999-5021 Heritage Value and Images The following is an excerpt from the by-law number 2012-025 of the corporation of the city of Kitchener and Schedule "B" the statement of cultural heritage value or interest. The design and physical values relate to the vernacular architecture of the building which features many intact original elements. The building is a representative example of early 20th century main street commercial architecture and a rare survivor of this style of building south (east) of Fredrick/Benton streets in downtown Kitchener. It features a high degree of detail and craftmanship including a pre -cast storefront, brick and masonry detailing, heavy cornice, and multiple light transoms. The historical and associative values relate to previous and notable tenants associated with individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to the community. From the 1940's through to the 1970's, the building was the locations of the Kitchener Conservatory of Music at a time when the organization's President was founder George Henry Ziegler, a member of the Waterloo Region Hall of Fame. In 1911, George H. Ziegler founded the Ziegler Associated Studios, which later became the Kitchener Conservatory of Music. Instruction was offered in piano, orchestra and band instruments, voice, guitar, theory, and elocution. George was a flautist with the 29th Regiment Band, the Toronto Philharmonic Orchestra and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. In addition, he was an organist and choir master at St. Peter's Church, St. Andrew's Church, and Trinity United from 1917-1950. He also organized the Kitchener -Waterloo branch of the Ontario Registered Music Teachers' Association, the Berlin Symphony Orchestra, the Kitchener Ladies' band, and the first Kitchener Boys' Band. He was leader of the 29th Regiment Band of the Scots Fusiliers of Canada, and of the Kitchener Musical Society Band. The Property also has a long time association with various trade union and labour associations from 1950's through to 2010. It served as headquarters of the K -W Labour Association which included local unions from the Canadian Association of Public Employees, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, the United Packing House Workers of America, the United Rubber Workers of America, and the United Steel Workers of America. There is designated as being of cultural heritage value or interest the following key attributes of the building where it stands, on the front and side elevations that embody the heritage value of 137-147 King Street East as a representative example of vernacular commercial building: • The square plan; • The stone foundation; • Rugged brick construction; • Decorative brickwork and masonry detailing; • Date stone that reads "1922",- • 1922';• Precast masonry storefront; Page 329 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com • Window and door openings; • Masonry sills; • Wood windows with multiple light transoms; • Heavy cornice with dentil blocks and metal capping; • Wood doors with semi -circular transom; • Roofline; and • Painted signage band on the north (west) elevation reading "Conservatory Sales Room" Images: -�� "� ..■rte �� 'GM Image 1: Overall Fagade Image 2: Existing Cornice/Parapet - A Image 3: Existing Metal Capping Image 4: Existing Metal Capping 4 Page 330 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Image 5: Brick Damage Image 7: Brick Damage Image 6: Brick Damage Image 8: Brick Damage Page 331 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410AIbert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com y Image 9: Existing Metal Capping Repair and Maintenance Recommendations The following repair and maintenance recommendations are based on the structural reviews carried out by Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc. refer to the attached appendices for reference materials from Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc and IBI Architects Inc. There was a structural assessment done by Witzel Dyce on April 29, 2022 outlining the severity of the deterirorating cornice and brick parapet. As such the recommendation was to remove the existing cornice and parapet as soon as possible from a life safety point of view (refer to attached appendix C & photos above). Please refer to the attached appendix D, outlining the structural implications of reinstating the masonry construction and metal cornice. We feel the detail section (refer to appendix B) provides a more durable approach with providing a wood frame construction that allows us to provide the cantilever required to recreate the same heavy cornice structure without having to affect the existing roof structure. We would also like to note that the wood frame structure will be covered with the heavy cornice detailing and will not be visible, therefore not effecting the historic elements of the building. This revised detail also provides a slope to the existing parapet to improve drainage through reinstated scuppers in the upper parapet to promote drainage and prevent against future failure and water penitrations into the masonry construction below the new framed elements. We feel this detail follows the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada section 4.3.3 Roofs guidline 15. 15. Improving — the detailing of roof elements, following recognized conservation methods, to correct faulty details. For example, adjusting the slope of a cornice to prevent ponding, or introducing a new drip edge at the eave to better direct water runoff away from a masonry wall. Such improvments should be physically and visually compatible. 6 Page 332 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com The existing metal sculpture replicates what would be a stone cornice assembly. The material proposed for the cornice assembly is fiberglass in lieu of the original sheet metal sculpture and will be formed from the metal sculpture as its template, maintaining the same overall look. We feel this is an improvement as it will provide the same overall look and is a good compatible subsitute material that will last longer and maintain the historical presence. Colour to match existing. Please refer to the attached appendix E, the following manufacturers materials demonstrates how such a fiberglass assembly can replicate these heritage cornice details. Cost Estimate. We feel in the professional opinion from Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc and IBI Architects Inc an overall budget amount for the work as outlined and detailed in the attached appendies A & B for the repair and restoration of the parapet/ cornice detail is in the amount of $200,000.00. Page 333 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410AIbert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Appendix A (coloured elevations) Page 334 of 379 517-1 '1 I I I I I � m I I � ■I O III D O Z i., �n �s I LI — — —_� aI AM&_ --J 13 I3 m O g m 03 co @Mn- o IBI GROUP 101—410AIbert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Appendix B (Section Detail) Page 337 of 379 PARAPET CONSTRUCTION. PRE-FINISHED METAL FLASHING CNVDRIP EDGES. ROOFS ABRADE TO WRAP UP ANDOVER PARAPET AND DOWN THE FACE OF CORNICE FRAMING. LOVED AIR BARRIER DENSGLASS SHEATHING ON, 2x8 WOOD STUD FRAMING @16" 0 C. 2x4 WOOD STUD FRAMING TO MATCH EXISTING PARAPET WIDTH PRE-FINISHED METAL FLASHING TO EXTEND OVER CORNICE DETAIL CNV DRIP EDGE. COLOUR TO MATCH EXISTING. CORN ICE DRAINAGE. PROVIDE WOOD BLOCKING ON CORNICE FRAMING TO CREATE A MIN. 2%SLOPE BACK TO THE PARAPET ABOVE. REFER TO COLOURED ELEVATIONS FOR NEW SCUPPER LOCATIONS TO DRAIN WATER 2 -$ BACK TO THE EXISTING ROOF TVP. �- 2% SLOPE MIN, if it EX ROOF RAFTERS ii PREFERRED OPTION #1 FOR CORNICE DETAIL. • HEA FIBERGLASS CORNICE,FINISH TO BE SMOOTH AND COLOUR TO MATCH EXISTING. FIBERGLASS CORNICE TO BE 2x10 @ 16" 0. PROVIDE (9) REPLICATED FROM EXISTING SAL VAGED #10;3 "WOOD SCREWS TO SIDE MATERIAL REMOVED FROM OR IG INAL OF 2x8 WALL FRAMING (3 ROWS CORNICE. OF 3). WRAP 2x10 FRAMING IN i PLYWOOD SHEATHING. OPTION#2 FOR CORM CE DETAIL. • PROVIDE PRE-FINISHED METAL SCULPTURE 2x6 BLOCKING AT +K 16 CASE (2) r'? CO ALICE, COLOUR TO MATCH EXISTING. I X6" GAS WOOD SCREWS TO END METAL FLASHING TO BE REPLICATED FROM OF EXISTING ROOF RAFTERS. EXISTING SALVAGED MATERIAL REMOVED FROM ORIGINAL CORNICE. THIS OPTION IS WALL CONSTRUCTION DEPENDANT ON CRAFTSMEN'S AVAILABILITY FIBERGLASS CORN ICE DETAIL, TO PERFORM THE WORK. LOVED AIR BARRIER ON, }" DENS GLASS SHEATHING ON, 2x8 WOOD STUD FRAMING @16" O.C. EX 2x4 ROOF SHORING WALL. EX. 2,4 ROOF SHORING WALL. 2x6 BLOCKING AT 1/ 48" CASE (2) g"X6" GRK WOOD SCREWS TO WOOD STUDS. 2x10 CONTINUOUS BLOCKING. � O) 2x8 SILL PLATE CNV(2)j ' TA CONS TO TOP OF EXISTING PC BRICKS @ 16" O.C. W EX. MULTI-YTHE BRICK WALL. EX CEILING JOISTS 1 CORNICE & WALL DETAIL AT PARAPET SKA-2 LATFT-T J 'Z NAOON 100127727 'P Jun 24, 202 O h�E OFISSUES ON�� !DESPRr� IBI GROUP AS SSCALEHOWN SKETCH No. ASSQ 3111.101-41O Am.rcSo..L PROJECT �\ c, I B I - R,1111 ON N2L 3V3 Ca - 125266 0 SKA-2 N 2022/06/239] [.15195852255 1 1 ibigro.p.00m DRAwN O MwsD p RCH ECT z PROJECT NAME SHEET NAME DO NOISBC4LETHIB DRAVNNGTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL RE PONBIBLEFORTANNG PNDAERIFYING PLLTHE 137 ENBIONS AND REPORTING ERRoas E/PARAPET OaE oMisslolvs RTO OCEEDING WTHTHE AY, CoRNNCOESREPAIR DETAIL. PRocEEDINcuNTH THEwoRu L":_. KITCHENER, oN. OP�Ge '�y,� 25R9 lea Gro79 IBI GROUP 101—410AIbert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Appendix C (Structural Assessment) 10 Page 339 of 379 Project: Location To Witzelayce ENGINEERING 137 King St. Renovations 137 King St. E., Kitchener, ON. Aubteen Pouramin Review and Comment: Structural Assessment WDE File No.: 13256-100 Date/Time: April 29, 2022 @ 11:00 Dennis Nadon, P.Eng Name: Hasan Basic, E.I.T A site review was conducted to assess the existing brick structure and cladding below the soffit on the front facing elevation at 137 King St. E. This assessment is a follow up from the assessment conducted April 12th in which WDE recommended the owner to remove the exterior metal flashing and siding in order to review the remaining structure and to confirm the extents and severity of the damaged areas. The existing condition of the upper portion of the wall can be seen in Photo #1. Observations: 1. Upon removal of the remaining tin flashing covering the parapet, the rest of the brick was visible for review. 2. The remaining uncovered brick was found to be in a severely deteriorating condition with mortar joints showing cracks. The wood nailer supporting the outermost wythe of brick was also found to be rotted along its length 3. It is likely that water has seeped in from the uppermost cladding and the brick and wood members have retained moisture. As a result, freeze and thaw cycles have caused the bricks to expand and contract. 4. The rafters which cantilever the soffit were also found to be in a deteriorating condition. In one location the rafter was found to be completely rotted through when picked at with a metal stake (Photo #2) Recommendations: 1. WDE has deemed the current condition of the brick below the soffit as unsafe. With deteriorating brick and wood elements in their current state, the likelihood of bricks and other structure falling off the building is high, posing a danger to the public below. The deteriorating structure is to be removed ASAP. The owner/contractor shall coordinate removals with the Municipal Heritage Department. The owner/contractor shall make arrangements for fencing to be placed around the base of the building along its entire length to ensure pedestrians are not at risk. See the attached detail for a demolition option with a list outlining the required works below: a. The existing roof structure should be shored from the inside providing a 2x4 wall on the innermost wythe of brick along the top of the existing sill plate. All remaining brick on the sill plate between ceiling joists should also be removed. The rafters should be supported by a jack and a king stud at each location. b. After shoring has been installed, the existing brick parapet wall, low roof and cantilevered rafters should be removed followed by the loadbearing brick down to the existing nailer plate at ceiling level. c. The existing wall that is to be demolished shall be replaced with a new wall. Details of the proposed wall assembly are to be confirmed later ` D. L. PIADON 100127727 aY 03, 202 O \may , %E OF ON p Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc. 1 of 2 www.witze0EFeA0 of 379 Witzelayce ENGINEERING Structural Assessment Photo #1: Removed flashing showing exposed brick above 1 Photo #2: Cantilevered rafters showing signs of severe deterioration ` D. d.. NADON 100127727 ay 03, 202 O NOE OF ONS Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc. 2 of 2 www.witze09JEFeA1 of 379 IBI GROUP 101—410AIbert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Appendix D (Structural Assessment) Page 342 of 379 witzelayce ENGINEERING June 23, 2022 WDE File No.: 13526-100 Aubteen Pouramin Building Owner RE: 137-147 King St E Existing Exterior Brick Wall Removal Dear Mr. Pouramin: Witzel Dyce has been involved in the review and demolition of the existing exterior siding and brick wall at the top of the King Street facing exterior wall since the original order to comply was issued in the fall of 2020. During the removal of the old steel siding and existing cornice detail, the extent of the damage to the existing brick wall and cantilevered wood rafters has become more evident, ultimately leading to the shoring of the roof structure and removal of the brick wall above the V floor ceiling level. It is our opinion that the majority of this damage was the result of long term water ingress into the brick wall above the cornice roof level. The water was absorbed by the soft clay bricks and wood members leading to rot and decay of the structural members over time. It is our opinion that the new parapet detail should not be built out of masonry above the ceiling level. A wood framed construction will allow the parapet/cornice to be fully waterproofed and allow a new cantilever detail that does not affect the integrity of the roof framing members. We trust this meets your current requirements. Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc. D. L NADON 100127727 ',5;Jun 23, 202 \aCEOF014 Dennis Nadon, P.Eng. Structural Engineer Witzel Dyce Engineering Inc. www. a@ay34. 3c@f 379 IBI GROUP 101—410Albert Street I I Waterloo ON N2L 3V3 Canada tel 519 585 2255 1 1 ibigroup.com Appendix E (Fiberglass References) Page 344 of 379 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 Bessemer Ave. * Cleveland, OH 44127-1839 * 216-641-8300 * Fax 216-641-8150 * www.fiberglass-afi.com Page 345 of 379 C-328 DEPTH: 11 1/2" HEIGHT. 1'-6 118- C-330 DEPTH: 2'-5" HEIGHT. J'-4 718- CORNICE /8" CORNICE SHEET NO. C-08 2020 PROFILES C—J29 DEPTH: 2'-5" HEIGHT. J'-4 7/8" C-331 DEPTH: 2'-5" HEIGHT. 3'-5 3/8" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 346 of 379 C-336 DEPTH: 1 '-1 7/8" HEIGHT. 2'-0' C-338 DEPTH: 2'-6' HEIGHT. 4'-1 1/2" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-10 2020 C-337 DEPTH: 2'-4 1/8" HEIGHT. 3'-9 5/8" C-339 DEPTH: l'-6 1/2" HEIGHT. 1'-10 1/8" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 347 of 379 C-368 DEPTH: Y-0" HEIGHT. 2'-10" C-370 DEPTH: C-7 1/16" HEIGHT. 1'-8 114- CORNICE /4" CORNICE SHEET NO. C-1 8 2020 PROFILES C-369 DEPTH: 2'-7 1/2" HEIGHT. 2'-7 114- C—J71 DEPTH: l'-7 1/16" HEIGHT. 1'-1 1/8" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 348 of 379 C-376 DEPTH: 7 3/4" HEIGHT. 7 J14 - C -178 DEPTH: C-3 1/4" HEIGHT. 1'-10 1/8" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-20 2020 C-377 DEPTH: 2'-3" HEIGHT. 2'-0 3/4" C-379 DEPTH: V-0" HEIGHT. 1'-9" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 349 of 379 C-392 DEPTH: 9 1/4" HEIGHT. 8 3/4" C-394 DEPTH: 11 1/8" HEIGHT. 2'-11 112- CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-24 2020 C-393 DEPTH: 8 1/2" HEIGHT. 10 5/8" C—J95 DEPTH: 2'-3 3/4" HEIGHT. 2'-10 1/2" AL BRACKET ,Hx8'Wx 1'-8"D OPTIONAL BRACKET 2'-3" H x 8" W x 2'-2 1/4" D ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 350 of 379 C-404 DEPTH: 1'-10 3/4" HEIGHT. 1'-5 J18 - C-406 DEPTH: 1'-1 1/4" HEIGHT. 1'-6 3/8" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-27 2020 C -405 DEPTH: l' -ll 1/2" HEIGHT. 1'-9" C-407 DEPTH: V-0 1/2" HEIGHT. 1'-6 3/8" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 351 of 379 C-412 DEPTH: 8" HEIGHT. 1'-10" C-414 DEPTH: 9 7/8" HEIGHT. 2'-3 11/16" CORN ICE SHEET NO. C-29 2020 PROFILES C-413 DEPTH: 3'-0 7/16" HEIGHT. 2'-5 5116- C-415 DEPTH: 3 9/16" HEIGHT. 2'-4 13/16" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 352 of 379 C-420 DEPTH: C-4.718" HEIGHT. 1'-6" C-422 DEPTH: 4" HEIGHT. 7 1/4" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-31 2020 C-421 DEPTH: V-9" HEIGHT. 4'-3 518- C-423 DEPTH: 9 5/8" HEIGHT. 2'-0 1/2" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 353 of 379 C-428 DEPTH: 1 '-6' HEIGHT. 1'-7 112- C-410 DEPTH: C-1' HEIGHT. 2'-0 1/2' CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-33 2020 C-429 DEPTH: 2'-2 7/8' HEIGHT. 3'-2 3/4' C-431 DEPTH: V-4" HEIGHT. 2'-10 1/4' ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 354 of 379 C-432 DEPTH: 1'-11 3/4" HEIGHT. 2'-0 112- C-414 DEPTH: 1 '-0' HEIGHT. 2'-1 3/4' CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-34 2020 C-40 DEPTH: 1'-3 3/4" HEIGHT. 2'-0 112- C-40 DEPTH: V-3" HEIGHT. 1'-7 1/4' ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 355 of 379 C-436 DEPTH: 2'-1 5/8" HEIGHT. 2'-6 112- C-418 DEPTH: 3'-5 13/16" HEIGHT. 2'-8 318- CORNICE /8" CORNICE SHEET NO. C-35 2020 PROFILES C-437 DEPTH: 10 1/2" HEIGHT. 10 112- C-42 DEPTH: 1'-4 7/16" HEIGHT. 2'-3" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 356 of 379 C-440 DEPTH: Y-7 1/2" HEIGHT. 3'-1 5116- C -442 DEPTH: Y-7 1/2" HEIGHT. 4'-5 114- 2 -PIECE ASSEMBLY.• C-440, C-441 CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-36 2020 C-441 DEPTH: V-1 3/4" HEIGHT. 1'-5 J116 - C-443 DEPTH: 3 3/4" HEIGHT. 1'-2 1/2" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 357 of 379 C-468 DEPTH: 1 '-2" HEIGHT. 1'-10 718- C-470 DEPTH: 10 1/2" HEIGHT. 8 3/4" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-43 2020 C-469 DEPTH: 2'-6" HEIGHT. J' -l" C-471 DEPTH: 9 3/4" HEIGHT. 1'-6 1/4" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 358 of 379 C-480 DEPTH: 9 5/8" HEIGHT. 1'-2 5/8" ■i■i■i■i■i■i■i■i■i ELEVATION C-482 DEPTH: 11" HEIGHT. 1'-0" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-46 2020 C-481 DEPTH: V-10" HEIGHT. 1'-7 1/4" OPTIONAL BRACKETS C-483 DEPTH: 2'-7 1/2" HEIGHT. 2'-6 1/2" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —8150 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 359 of 379 C-492 DEPTH: V-9" HEIGHT. 1'-4" -C-494 DEPTH: V-3 3/8" HEIGHT. 2'-10 1/2" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-49 2020 C-493 DEPTH: 4'-0" HEIGHT. 3'-6 J14- C-495 DEPTH: V-3 3/8" HEIGHT. 1'-3 1/4" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —8150 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 360 of 379 C-504 DEPTH: 1 '-10 3/4" HEIGHT. 2'-9 1/4" C-506 DEPTH: 1'-4 1/4" HEIGHT 2'-2 7/16" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-52 2020 C-505 DEPTH: 1'-7 114" HEIGHT. 1'-10 C-507 DEPTH: V-11 1/4" HEIGHT. 4'-0" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —8150 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 361 of 379 C-508 DEPTH: 2'-10 1/4" HEIGHT. 4'-0" C-510 DEPTH: 3,718- HEIGHT. 3" CORNICE I PROFILES SHEET NO. C-53 2020 C-509 DEPTH: 2'-5" HEIGHT. 1'-8 718 - BRACKETS. O'-4; VARIES, 2'-6" CIC TYP OPTIONAL C-511 DEPTH: V-4 1/8" HEIGHT. 1'-2 11/16" ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —8150 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 362 of 379 C-536 DEPTH: 1'-9 1/2" HEIGHT. 2'-3 1/2" OPTIONAL BRACKET CORNICE SHEET NO. C-60 2020 PROFILES ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —8150 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 363 of 379 WOOD BLOCKING CONNECTION DETAIL NOTE: DEEPER CORNICE PROFILES MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FRAMING CORNICE SHEET NO. SD -1 2020 CONNECTIONS FLASHING AS REQUIRED — BY OTHERS S.S. SCREWS ® ±16" O.C. PRE—DRILL OVERSIZED HOLES — BY OTHERS. ATTACHMENT BLOCKING/FRAMING — BY OTHERS CORNICE ATTACHMENT BLOCKING/FRAMING — BY OTHERS. S.S. SCREWS ® ±16" O.C. PRE—DRILL OVERSIZED HOLES — BY OTHERS PROIWIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA—LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) — BY OTHERS. ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 364 of 379 SUPPORT FRAMING CONNECTION DETAIL CORNICE I CONNECTIONS SHEET NO. SD -2 2020 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com 0 Page 365 of 379 TYPICAL CORNICE WITH GUTTER INSTALLATION CORNICE SHEET NO. SD -3 2020 INSTALLATION WITH GUTTERS FLASHING AND/OR ADDITIONAL ROOFING MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY OTHERS PRE -MANUFACTURED GUTTER OR SITE BUILT GUTTER BY OTHERS ATTACHMENT BLOCKING/FRAMING - BY OTHERS S.S. SCREWS 0 f 16" O.C. PRE -DRILL OVERSIZED HOLES - BY OTHERS. ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - Page 366 of 379 CORNICE SHEET NO. SD -4 2020 ALLOW MIN. 1/8" (NOT GREATER THAN 3/8) GAP BETWEEN SEGMENTS FOR EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL, FRAMING, BLOCKING, SHIMS, AND FASTENERS AS REQUIRED BY INSTALLER. SELF HEALING WATERPROOFING AS REQUIRED BY INSTALLER. BACKER ROD OR BOND BREAKER, AVOID THREE POINT BOND OF SEALANT TYP. NOTE. ALL FASTENERS TO BE 1/2"— STAINLESS STEEL (BY OTHERS) PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS. 1 1/2" SHIPLAP TYPICAL SHIPLAP DETAIL APPLY LOW MODULUS ADHESIVE/SEALANT BETWEEN CORNICE SECTIONS. Y �o PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS TYPICAL REVEAL DETAIL (SPECAL ORCER) BACKER ROD OR BOND t1/4" EXPANSION JOINT BREAKER, AVOID THREE POINT BOND OF SEALANT TYP. VARIES (FULL RETURN) TYPICAL JOINT DETAILS PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SII(ASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS. TYPICAL BUTT JOINT DETAIL ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 367 of 379 ATTACHMENT FRAMING TO BE RECESSED OR TRIM FLANGE j W AS REQUIRED - BY OTHERS. �+ 2 APPLY LOW MODULUS ADHESIVE/SEALANT BETWEEN CORNICE SECTIONS BACKER ROD OR BOND INSTALLING CONTRACTOR BREAKER, AVOID THREE MAYBE REQUIRED TO GRIND POINT BOND OF OR SAND BACKSIDE OF FRP SEALANT TYP. TO FIT SHIPLAP WHEN UNITS ARE FIELD CUT TO LENGTH. ALLOW MIN. 1/8" (NOT GREATER THAN 3/8) GAP BETWEEN SEGMENTS FOR EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL, FRAMING, BLOCKING, SHIMS, AND FASTENERS AS REQUIRED BY INSTALLER. SELF HEALING WATERPROOFING AS REQUIRED BY INSTALLER. BACKER ROD OR BOND BREAKER, AVOID THREE POINT BOND OF SEALANT TYP. NOTE. ALL FASTENERS TO BE 1/2"— STAINLESS STEEL (BY OTHERS) PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS. 1 1/2" SHIPLAP TYPICAL SHIPLAP DETAIL APPLY LOW MODULUS ADHESIVE/SEALANT BETWEEN CORNICE SECTIONS. Y �o PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS TYPICAL REVEAL DETAIL (SPECAL ORCER) BACKER ROD OR BOND t1/4" EXPANSION JOINT BREAKER, AVOID THREE POINT BOND OF SEALANT TYP. VARIES (FULL RETURN) TYPICAL JOINT DETAILS PROVIDE COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SII(ASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS. TYPICAL BUTT JOINT DETAIL ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - 11 Page 367 of 379 TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR CORNICE WITH SHIP LAP JOINTS 1. ATTACH BLOCKING/FRAMING TO STRUCTURE. NOTCH BLOCKING 2" x 1/2" MIN TO ALLOW CLEARANCE FOR FLANGE, OR USE INTERMITTENT BLOCKING. NOTE: BLOCKING/FRAMING CAN BE CONSTRUCTED FROM WOOD, LIGHT GAUGE FRAMING, STRUCTURAL STEEL, OR MASONRY BACKUP J. APPLY ADHESIVE/SEALANT TO FLANGE. SEE DETAILS TO RIGHT. S S SCREWS ® f 16" 0. C. PRE -DRILL OVERSIZED HOLES. NOTE: SCUFF AND CLEAN ALL SURFACES WHERE ADHESIVE AND/OR SEALANTS ARE TO BE APPLIED. ALL FASTENERS, ADHESIVE AND SEALANTS BY OTHERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CORNICE TYPICAL SHEET NO. INSTALLATION 1 INSTRUCTIONS SD -5 2020 CURES. SHIP LAP FLANGE. SEE DETAILS BELOW. NOTCH IN BLOCKING FOR FLANGE CLEARANCE. ALLOW MIN. 1/8" (NOT GREATER THAN 3/8) GAP BETWEEN FRP AND BLOCKING FOR EXPANSION AND CONTRACTION SHIM AS REQUIRED TRIM FLANGE AS REQUIRED BOND BREAKER, AVOID THREE POINT BOND OF SEALANT 2. SCREW CORNICE TO BLOCKING AND/OR STRUCTURE 0 -416- O.C. (SEE ATTACHMENT DETAIL . PRE -DRILL OVERSIZED SCREW HOLE TO AVOID DAMAGING THE FRP AND FOR THERMAL MOVEMENT FILL WITH SEALANT TO MATCH. A. APPLY LOW MODULUS ADHESIVE/SEALANT (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT, SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290) BETWEEN CORNICE SECTIONS. B. USE TEMPORARY BLOCKING SCREWED INTO FLANGE TO ALIGN FACE OF CORNICE SEGMENTS WHILE ADHESNE CURES C. FILL THE JOINT WITH COLOR MATCHED LOW MODULUS SEALANT. (ULTRA-LOW MODULUS SEALANT SIMILAR TO SIKASIL WS -290 FPS) - BY OTHERS ARCHITECTURAL FIBERGLASS, INC. 8300 BESSEMER AVE., CLEVELAND, OHIO 44127-1839 (21 6) 641 —8300 — FAX:(21 6) 641 —81 50 www.fiberglass—afi.com - Page 368 of 379 FIBERGLASS CORNICE Royal Corinthian manufactures RoyaLite m fiberglass reinforced polymer "FRP" cornice and entablature using general purpose or Class A fire rated resins. This cornice is made with 35% to 40% fiberglass content which makes it pound for pound stronger than steel. It is made from the same material as fiberglass boat — hulls so when it comes to holding up to the elements, there is no better material to use. A typical cornice will come in 8' lengths and inside/outside corners as well as custom corners are available. All of our cornices can be adjusted by plugging our molds so if you like a particular cornice but need to make some alterations, it may be possible. Our in-house mold department makes custom cornice relatively inexpensive so please feel free to design your own and we will make it a reality. This product offers the greatest advantage over our other cornices when paint -grade or pre -finished cornice of intricate detail and of larger proportion that will last a lifetime is required. For more options, please see our polyurethane crown moldings. d CR101x10 CR102x10 CR103x10 CR104x8 CR105x8 CR106x8 CR107x8 27-1/16 P x 27 H x 120 L 25-15/16 P x 16-1/16 H x 120 L 12-5/16 P x 39-5/16 H x 120 L 7" P x 12" H x 96" L 23-3/16 P x 13 H x 96 L 10" P x 24" H x 96" L 9-15/16 P x 30 H x 96 L - o CR108x8 CR109x8 CR110x8 CR110FXx8 CR111x8 CR112x8 CR113x8 16-1/8 P x 16-3/8 H x 96 L 9-7/16 P x 16-13/16 H x 96 L 12-7/8" P x 13-3/4" H x 96" L 12-7/8" P x 26" H x 96" L 3" P x 10-11/16" H x 96" L 13" P x 15" H x 96" L 13" P x 26-1/2' H x 96" L I CR114x8 CR115x8 CR116x8 CR117x8 CR118x8 CR120x8 CR121x8 22-7/8" P x 29" H x 96" L 15-1/2" P x 16-11/16" H x 96" L 13-3/8" P x 22-1/4" H x 96" L 22-1/2" P x 23-1/2" H x 96" L 22-3/4" P x 26" H x 96 L 13" P x 35" H x 96" L 16-1/8" P x 17-1/2" H x 96" L mg0joT CR122x8 CR123x8 CR124x8 CR125x8 CR126x8 CR127x8 CR128x8 12" P x 16" H x 96" L 11-5/8" P x 21-5/8" H x 96" L 6-3/4" P x 7" H x 96" L 15-3/4" P x 13-7/16" H x 96" L 3-1/4" P x 34-1/4" H x 96" L 6-1/2' P x 50" H x 96" L T P x 12" H x 96" L CR129x8 CR130x4 CR131x12 CR132x8 CR133x8 49-1/8" P x 41-3/4" H x 96" L 17-7/16" P x 23-1/2" H x 48" L 17-1/2" P x 36-3/8" H x 144" L 24-1/2" P x 50-13/16" H x 96" L 26-3/16' P x 35" H x 96" L Toll Free: 888-265-8661 • Fax: 888-344-2937 • www.RoyalCorinthian.com • RoyalCor@RoyalCorinthian.COa369 of 379 n7ge 7 RoyaLiteTM FRP Cornice Fiberglass Cornice Architectural Specifications 1.0 General 1.1 Description: A. Cornice shall be Royal Corinthian, Inc. RoyaLite Fiberglass Reinforced Polymer "FRP" B. Standard cornice shall be (Item Number) or custom cornice based on submitted Architectural drawings. C. Inside and Outside corners shall be factory made (mitering onsite is an option). D. Cornice shall come with integrated lap joint for ease of installation. E. Select Resin: General purpose or ASTM E 84-01 Class A rated. 1.2 Submittals A. Submit Royal Corinthian, Inc. literature and shop drawings if required. B. Submit sample of standard cornice if required (specific cornice samples may not be available). C. Submit sample for color match if custom color is required. 1. Standard color is marine grade white gel coat which is considered paint -grade. 2. Many standard colors are available in addition to the standard white. 3. Custom colors require a sample to be submitted for color matching. 4. Standard texture is smooth but custom textures are available. 1.3 Warranty A. The cornice shall be guaranteed in writing against defects of materials or workmanship for a period of 25 years to the original owner. B. Cornice must be installed following Royal Corinthian, Inc. guidelines. 1.4 Verification of Design A. The components incorporated into the drawings show dimensions and styles chosen to accomplish the Architect's intended aesthetic result and to conform to the building's configuration in both form and function. The contractor shall verify that all components to be provided by Royal Corinthian for the work of this section will fit the building's structural elements and meet the visual design criteria on the drawings without materially altering profiles and alignments. B. Any additional support or backing components shall be provided by the installing contractor as part of the work of this section. 2.0 Products 2.1 Acceptable Manufacturer A. Royal Corinthian, Inc. 603 Fenton Lane West Chicago, IL 60185 T.888-265-8661 F.888-344-2937 royalcor@royalcorinthian.com www.royalcorinthian.com B. Substitutions: Not permitted. Page 370 of 379 2.2 Fiberglass, Resin, and Gel Coat Materials A. Fiberglass chop strand or mat shall be equal to the products of PPG -Owens Corning. B. Polyester resins shall be General Purpose or Class A. The Class A resin will be flame retardant polyester resin. This resin is formulated for use in applications that require an ASTM E 84-01 Class 1 flame spread and smoke suppression rating, without the use of fillers. C. Gel coat shall be high performance Marine Grade with ultra -violet inhibitors. D. Cornice thickness shall be a minimum of 3/16". D. Gel coat thickness shall be 0.015" minimum to 0.025" maximum. E. Allowable Tolerances 1. Dimensional Tolerances of Finished Units a. Dimensions 12' or under: +/- 1/4". 3.0 Execution 3.1 Delivery A. Deliver materials in original packages, containers, or bundles bearing brand name & identification of manufacturer or supplier. Customer to unload and store materials onsite under cover and in manner to keep them dry, protected from weather, direct sunlight, surface contamination, corrosion, and damage from construction traffic and other causes. B. Handle materials and products to prevent damages to edges, ends, or surfaces 3.2 Installation A. Coordinate required blocking for attachment of cornice panels to substructure. Provide additional, wood preservative treated or metal stud framing as may be required to attached and reinforce cornice panels for a solid installation. 1. Coordinate installation with any metal gutter lining work or flashing above and wood/metal substrates. B. Erect cornice panels plumb, square and true to line and level. Follow fiberglass panel manufacturer's recommendations with regard to installation clearances, notches, and formation of panel -to -panel joints. C. Install sealant and accessories as work progresses, so as to make the work weather tight. D. Provide each panel with joints such that adjacent panels mate to produce flush joints. Recess blocking or notch continuously behind each panel joint. Set panels to ensure a maximum joint thickness of 3/8". E. Prepare each cornice panel section for installation by carefully sanding joints and shrinkages where blocking occurs to assure a tight flush fit. F. Fill joints with a continuous bead of sealant. Tooling finished joints to a slightly concave profile ensuring complete filing and flush installation. G. Carefully monitor ambient temperatures at time of panel installation and observe all panels to panel clearances recommended by the fiberglass manufacturer. H. Do not cut or abrade finishes, which cannot be completely restored in the field. Installer to make small inconspicuous finish repairs using manufactures color matching gel fill finish. If too large of a repair is needed, return to fiberglass manufacturer for alterations or new units. I. Use only stainless steel connectors approved by the panel manufacturer and which will develop the strength required by fiberglass panel manufacturer's calculations. The installer shall supply these connectors. Page 371 of 379 J. Countersink all exposed fasteners. Patch all attachment holes with gel fill finish supplied by the fiberglass panel manufacturer for field application. Finish attachment points so that there is no detectable difference in the completed panel surface. K. Clean installed panel to remove all dirt, smudges, and construction dirt. Use only those cleaning products and procedures recommended by the fiberglass manufacturer. Page 372 of 379 Registered as Instrument No. WR673937 on 2012-02-29 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to designate a portion of the property municipally known as 137-147 King Street East in the City of Kitchener as being of cultural heritage value or interest). WHEREAS section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0.18., authorizes the Council of a Municipality to enact by-laws to designate real property, including all buildings and structures thereon, to be of cultural heritage value or interest; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener has received and considered the recommendations of its municipal heritage committee pertaining to this by-law, arising from Heritage Kitchener's meeting held on May 3, 2011; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener resolved at its Council Meeting held the 9t" day of May, 2011 to publish a Notice of Intention to designate the land described as 137-147 King Street East, and which resolution was confirmed by By-law No. 2011-067 passed by the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener at its Council Meeting held the 9t' day of May, 2011; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener has caused to be served on the owner of the land and premises known municipally as 137-147 King Street East in the City of Kitchener, and upon the Ontario Heritage Trust, a Notice of Intention to designate as being of cultural heritage value or interest that part of the aforesaid real property more particularly hereinafter described, in the attached Schedule "A", and has caused such Notice of Intention to be published in a newspaper having general circulation in the municipality; AND WHEREAS a Notice of Objection was received by the Clerk of the Municipality but was withdrawn prior to a full hearing of the matter scheduled by the Conservation Review Board (File No: CRB1104); AND WHEREAS there are currently no other appeals with respect to the designation of the property; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. There is designated as being of cultural her"- ::c value ,, Interest foliowinc ':�y attributes of the building where it stands, on the front and side elevations ir,at Page 373 of 379 embody the heritage value of 137-147 King Street East as a representative example of a vernacular commercial building: • the square plan; • the stone foundation; • rugged brick construction; • decorative brickwork and masonry detailing; • date stone that reads "1922"; • precast masonry storefront; • window and door openings; • masonry sills; • wood windows with multiple light transoms; • heavy cornice with dentil blocks and metal capping; • wood doors with semi -circular transom; • roofline; and • painted signage band on the north (west) elevation reading "Conservatory Sales Room". 2. A statement of the property's cultural heritage value or interest is attached hereto as Schedule "A". 3. The City Solicitor is hereby authorized to cause a copy of this by-law to be registered against the portion of 137-147 King Street East described in Schedule "B" attached hereto in the proper land registry office. 4. The Clerk is hereby authorized to cause a copy of this by-law to be served on the owner of the aforesaid property and on the Ontario Heritage Trust and to cause notice of the passing of this by-law to be published in a newspaper having general circulation in the municipality. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this W) day of , A.D. 2012. Mayor Clerk Page 374 of 379 SCHEDULE "A" IN THE MATTER OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER 0.18, AS AMENDED, AND IN THE MATTER OF THE LANDS AND PREMISES AT THE FOLLOWING MUNICIPAL ADDRESS(ES) IN THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO NOTICE OF INTENTION TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener intends to designate the following municipal address as being of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 0.18, as amended. 137-147 King Street East The property municipally addressed as 137-147 King Street East is a representative example of early 20th century main street commercial architecture and is a rare survivor of this style of building south (east) of Frederick / Benton Streets in Downtown Kitchener. It features a high degree of detail and craftsmanship including a pre -cast storefront, brick and masonry detailing, heavy cornice, and multiple light transoms. The historical and associative values relates to previous and notable tenants who made significant contributions to the community. From the 1940s through to the 1970s, the building was the location of the Kitchener Conservatory of Music at a time when the organization's President was founder'George Henry Ziegler, a member of the Waterloo Region Hall of Fame. The property also has a long relationship with various trade unions and labour associations from the 1950s through to 2010, serving as the headquarters of the KW Labour Association. The full particulars identifying this property as being of cultural heritage value or interest are available for inspection during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.) in the Office of the City Clerk, 2nd Floor, Kitchener City Hall. Any person who objects to the proposed designation may send a Notice of Objection, together with a statement of the reasons for the objection and all relevant facts, to the Clerk of the City of Kitchener by no later than the 13th day of June, 2011. Please note that when a Notice of Objection has been received, the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener will refer the matter to the Conservation Review Board. Dated at Kitchener this 13th day of May, 2011. Randy Gosse Director of Legislated Services & City Clerk City Hall, P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kits,,.: ,:::r, Ontario N2G 4G7 Page 375 of 379 SCHEDULE "B" 137-147 King Street East Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The design and physical values relate to the vernacular architecture of the building which features many intact original elements. The building is a representative example of early 20th century main street commercial architecture and a rare survivor of this style of building south (east) of Frederick / Benton streets in downtown Kitchener. It features a high degree of detail and craftsmanship including a pre -cast storefront, brick and masonry detailing, heavy cornice, and multiple light transoms. The historical and associative values relate to previous and notable tenants associated with individuals and organizations that have made significant contributions to the community. From the 1940s through to the 1970s, the building was the location of the Kitchener Conservatory of Music at a time when the organization's President was founder George Henry Ziegler, a member of the Waterloo Region Hall of Fame. In 1911, George H. Ziegler founded the Ziegler Associated Studios, which later became the Kitchener Conservatory of Music. Instruction was offered in piano, orchestra and band instruments, voice, guitar, theory, and elocution. George was a flautist with the 29th Regiment Band, the Toronto Philharmonic Orchestra and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. In addition, he was an organist and choir master at St. Peter's Church, St. Andrew's Church, and Trinity United from 1917-1950. He also organized the Kitchener - Waterloo branch of the Ontario Registered Music Teachers' Association, the Berlin Symphony Orchestra, the Kitchener Ladies' band, and the first Kitchener Boys' Band. He was leader of the 29th Regiment Band of the Scots Fusiliers of Canada, and of the Kitchener Musical Society Band. The property also has a long time association with various trade union and labour associations from the 1950s through to 2010. It served as headquarters of the K -W Labour Association which included local unions from the Canadian Association of Public Employees, the United Food and Commercial Workers Union, the United Packing House Workers of America, the United Rubber Workers of America, and the United Steel Workers of America. Page 376 of 379 SCHEDULE"C" 137-147 King Street East Legal Description PT LT 5 S/S KING ST, 6 S/S KING ST PL 364 KITCHENER AS IN 302404 & A14451 T/W A124451; S/T & T/W 302404; KITCHENER. Being all of PIN 22501-0053 (LT). Page 377 of 379 LnN RECORD 1 Local 132 I,'1a.-ch 2 1 0 0 IiTcHE�R IN THE MATTER OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT, R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER 0.18, AS AMENDED, AND IN THE MATTER OFTHE LANDS AND PREMISES ATTHE.FQLLOWING MUNICIPALADDRESS(ES) INTHE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO ` NOTICE OF PASSING TAKE NOTICE that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener passed By-law No. 2012-025 designating the property municipally known as 137-147 King Street East as being of cultural heritage value or interest under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter 0.18, as amended. Dated at Kitchener the 2nd day of March, 2012 Randy Gosse . . Director of Legislated Services & City Clerk City Hall, P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West %Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 Page 378 of 379