The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDSD-2023-222 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2023-IV-008 - 97 Victoria Street North Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: June 6, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Deeksha Choudhry, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 PREPARED BY: Garett Stevenson, Interim Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: May 9, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD-2023-222 SUBJECT: HPA-2022-IV-008 97 Victoria Street North Proposed Third-storey Addition and Existing Building Alterations RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 30 (2) and Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2023-IV-008 be approved to permit building alterations, a third storey addition and a one-storey rear addition to the subject property municipally addressed as 97 Victoria Street North, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the final building permit be reviewed and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning Staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. That the proposed window replacements for original front facade windows of the existing building be approved by Heritage Planning staff prior to installation. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to present the proposed alterations a third storey addition, and a one-storey rear addition to 97 Victoria Street North. The key finding of this report is that the proposed work will not have an adverse negative impact on the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and is in keeping with provincial standards and guidelines. There are no financial implications associated with this report. Community engagement included posting this report and associated agenda in advance of the meeting and consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee. This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2023-IV-008 proposes alterations to the existing building at 97 Victoria Street North, as well as a third storey addition and a one-storey rear addition. The existing property is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The alterations include window replacements of all the windows of the existing building in order to meet net-zero building requirements. Only the front façade windows have been identified as a heritage attribute for the building. The third storey will accommodate residential units and the one-storey addition will have a dining hall and outreach area. These modifications are necessary to adaptively re-use the building as affordable housing by The Working Centre. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning staff note that the proposed alterations will not have an adverse negative impact on the heritage attributes of the building and that the additions will be compatible but distinguishable from the existing building. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2023-IV-008 (Attachment A) seeking permission for the alterations and adding a third storey to the subject property municipally addressed as 97 Victoria Street North (Fig. 1). The subject property is currently listed as a non-designated property of cultural heritage interest or value and is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the OHA. Figure 1: Location Map of 97 Victoria Street North. The submission and approval of a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was made a requirement of a proposed Site Plan, Severance of Land, and Minor Variance applications that were submitted to the City in 2022 for 83-97 Victoria Street North. Since 83 Victoria Street North has no heritage status, only 97 Victoria Street North was assessed in the HIA. The HIA dated December 2, 2022, prepared by LHC Heritage Planning and Archaeology was submitted to the City in support of these applications and was presented to the Heritage Kitchener Committee at its January 3, 2023 meeting. These applications related to the retention of the existing structures at 83 and 97 Victoria Street North, adding a third storey to the to the existing structure at 97 Victoria Street North, and also a one-storey addition attached towards the rear of the existing building. The proposed development includes 44 affordable rental housing units and relocating the -storey dining hall and community clinic on-site for counselling and recreation. A severance application to divide the site for financing purposed was approved by the Committee of Adjustment on January 17, 2023. The development proposal has received conditional site plan approval, subject to several conditions, including final approval of the Heritage Impact Assessment by the Director of Planning, and that 97 Victoria Street North be designated under Part IV of the OHA. Since the building will be designated under Part IV of the OHA, Section 30 (2) of the OHA gives municipalities interim control over alteration, demolition or removal. This heritage permit application and report accompanies the Notice of Intention to Designate 97 Victoria Street North under Part IV of the OHA, also on the Heritage Kitchener Agenda. REPORT: The subject property is located on the south side of Victoria Street North near the intersection of Victoria Street North. It was built c. 1927 in the Industrial Vernacular style of architecture (Fig.2 & 3). It is presently listed as a non-designated property of cultural heritage Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL). The subject property is also located adjacent to 70 Francis Street South, which is also listed as a non-designated property of This building has been identified for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. Figure 2: Front façade of 97 Victoria Street North. Figure 3: Front and East façade of 97 Victoria Street North. According to the draft HIA, the heritage attributes of this building include: All elements related the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, including: o Two-storey height; o Symmetrical northwest (primary) façade; o Flat roof with shaped parapet on the northwest (primary) façade; o Shallow buttresses that define distinct bays along each of the building elevations; o Brick construction comprising of red, yellow and beige brick; o Original window openings with soldier course brick headers and concrete sills; o Six-over-six windows on the northwest (primary) façade; and o Chimney set in stretcher bonded, yellow brick with concrete banding. All elements related to the contextual value, including: o Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity and character of the Victoria Street streetscape and Warehouse District; and o The link to the surrounding Warehouse District. Site Plan Application for the Proposed Development As mentioned above, a Site Plan application was submitted for the proposed development in November 2022, along with an HIA in support of this application (Fig. 4). The site plan application received condition approval on February 9, 2023. As part of the final approval for the site, a number of heritage conditions have been included, with the designation of this property and obtaining a heritage permit for the proposed development being two of them. Figure 4: Proposed Site Plan for 83-97 Victoria Street North. Draft Heritage Impact Assessment for 97 Victoria Street North The draft HIA (Attachment B) that was submitted in support of this application makes the following conclusions and recommendations: - That the building meets criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 ( amended by 569/22) for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. - That the project team, in consultation with the City of Kitchener, review alternatives for replacement of the original windows on the front façade. - That a Conservation Plan (CP) be prepared by a qualified heritage professional to minimize the potential for unintended impacts resulting from project consultation. - The proposed development will not have an impact on either 70 Francis Street North or the Warehouse District CHL. The HIA is still in its draft stage and has not yet been approved by the Director of Planning. Proposed Window Alterations for the Building Several alterations are proposed for the building, including replacing all the existing windows with new metal windows (Fig 5 & 6). Apart from the six-over-six windows on the front façade, none of the windows are original, and are also not listed as heritage attributes of the building. The windows are being replaced for two reasons: 1. In order to meet net-zero building standards. 2. To allow for maximum capacity per residential units. Also, an additional consideration was the ceiling height within the building. In order to update accommodate the proposed residential units, the ceiling must be dropped. After considering several window alternatives, it was ultimately decided to divide the extant windows into two bays. Figure 5: Architect drawing detailing window specifications with respect to building ceiling height. Figure 6: Rendering showing the proposed window replacement. However, it should be noted that although the configuration of the windows is changing, these windows will be inset into the existing window openings found along each elevation. The applicant is also proposing to replace the original front façade buildings and is still considering alternatives that would be an appropriate replacement for these windows in terms of style and material while still achieving net-zero requirements. Proposed Third Storey Addition A third storey addition is also being proposed for the existing building (Fig. 7). The proposed addition will be similar in size and height (3.8 m) to the existing two-storeys (height of the first storey is 3.7m and 4.1m of the second storey). This addition is proposed to be clad in metal panelling and will have a similar fenestration pattern as the two other storeys. In order setback. According to the HIA, to create a visual budder between the existing building and the new third storey, a narrow metal band circumnavigates the connection between the second and third storeys. Lastly, this addition will wrap around the existing chimney. Figure 7: Rendering of the proposed third storey addition. Proposed One-Storey Addition on the Southwest Corner The current outreach wing located on the southwest corner of the building towards the rear of the property is proposed to be demolished. It will be replaced with a newer, larger southwest wing to be used as a dining hall and outreach area. This primary façade of this addition will include a curtain wall with metal panelling with exposed mass timber framing on the interior. The rear façade of this addition will be clad in masonry. Figure 8: Rendering showing the proposed one-storey addition towards the rear of the building. Respect for original location do not move buildings unless there is no other means to save them. Site is an integral component of a building or structure. Change in site diminishes cultural heritage value considerably. Respect for historical material repair/conserve rather than replace building materials and finishes except where absolutely necessary. Minimal intervention maintains the heritage content of the built heritage resource. Respect for original fabric repair to return the resource to its prior condition, without altering its integrity. Legibility new work should be distinguished from old. Buildings should be recognized as products of their own time, and new additions should not blur the distinction between old and new. Maintenance with continuous care, future restoration will not be necessary. With regular upkeep, major conservation projects and their high costs can be avoided. The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historical Places in Canada, especially: Conserve the heritage value of an historic place. Do not remove, replace, or substantially alter its intact or repairable character defining elements. Do not move a part of a historic place if its current location is a character-defining elements. Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for minimal intervention. Find a use for an historic place that requires minimal or no change to its character- defining elements. Make any intervention needed to preserve character-defining elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place identifiable on close inspection. Document any intervention for future reference. Create any new additions or related new construction so that the essential form and integrity of an historic place will not impaired if the new work is removed in the future. Heritage Planning Comments In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning staff note the following: The subject property municipally addressed as 97 Victoria Street North is currently listed as a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or interest. The building is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the OHA. The proposed development includes the replacement of all windows to meet net-zero building standards, as well as the addition of a third storey and a one-storey addition towards the rear of the building. These changes are necessary to adaptively re-use the building as an affordable housing project. The windows on the front façade have been identified as heritage attributes and are proposed to be replaced. Staff are currently working with the applicant to review alternatives so the final windows are appropriate replacements in design and style. The additions are distinguishable but compatible with the existing building. The proposed alteration and additions will not have an adverse negative impact on the character defining elements of the building. The Standards and Guidelines for Historical Places in Canada. The proposed alteration and additions will not adversely impact the reasons for designation of the property not the Victoria Street streetscape and the Warehouse District CHL. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit will be needed for the proposed alterations and addition. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM the Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting. CONSULT Heritage Kitchener will be consulted regarding the subject Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Notice of Intention to Designate 97 Victoria Street North under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act DSD-2023-223 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 83-97 Victoria Street North DSD-2023-049 Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Heritage Permit Application HPA-2023-IV-008 Attachment B Draft Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria St. N 2023 Page 1 of 10 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS th Planning Division – 200 King Street West, 6Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planning@kitchener.ca PART A: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The following requirements are designed to assist applicants in submitting sufficient information in order that their Heritage Permit Application may be deemed complete and processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. If further assistance or explanation is required please contact heritage planning staff at heritage@kitchener.ca. 1.WHAT IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage Act, has enacted legislation to assist its citizens with the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources. Once properties are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, the City is enabled to manage physical change to the cultural heritage resources as a means of protection. The principal mechanism of management is the Heritage Permit Application process, which allows the municipality to review site-specific applications and determine if proposed changes will beneficially or detrimentally affect the reasons for designation and heritage attributes. As a general rule, the preferred alterations to heritage properties are those that repair rather than replace original heritage attributes, and those that do not permanently damage cultural heritage resources and their heritage attributes. Where replacement of materials or new construction is necessary, these should be compatible with the original. Reversibility is also preferable as this allows for the future reinstatement of heritage attributes. According to the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of designated property shall alter the property or permit the alteration of the property if the alteration is likely to affect the property’s heritage attributes, unless the owner applies to the council of the municipality and receives written consent. This consent is obtained through the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Permit Applications are applicable for all individually designated properties (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) and all properties located within the boundaries of Heritage Conservation Districts (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act). 2.WHEN IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED? Under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, any new construction or “alteration” to a property designated under Part IV of the Act (individually designated property) or a property designated under Part V of the Act (within a Heritage Conservation District) requires a Heritage Permit Application. “Alteration” is defined as: “to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb.” In addition, the approval of a Heritage Permit Application is required for any demolition of a property designated under Part IV or V of the Act. Please contact Heritage Planning staff directly to confirm if your specific project requires the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Below are some examples of typical Part IV alterations that may require a Heritage Permit Application: Addition and/or alteration to an existing building or accessory building Replacement of windows or doors, or a change in window or door openings Change in siding, soffit, fascia or roofing material Removal and/or installation of porches, verandahs and canopies Removal and/or installation of cladding and chimneys Changes in trim, cladding, or the painting of masonry Repointing of brick 2023 Page 2 of 10 Note:Heritage Permit Application requirements differ between Part V designations depending on the policies and guidelines of the respective Heritage Conservation District Plans. Please refer to the City of Kitchener’s website at www.kitchener.ca/heritage to download a copy of the relevant Heritage Conservation District Plan (Civic Centre Neighbourhood, St. Mary’s, Upper Doon, and Victoria Park Area). 3. WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WITH A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The information required varies with each application. The intent of the application is to ensure that Heritage Planning staff and, where required, the Heritage Kitchener committee understand the specific details of any proposed changes in order to be sufficiently informed so they may offer advice to the applicant and, where required, to City Council. An incomplete application cannot be processed and the official notice of receipt (as required under the Ontario Heritage Act) will not be issued until all of the documents have been submitted. Failure to provide a complete application may result in deferral by Heritage Planning staff or the Heritage Kitchener committee in order to secure additional information, which will delay final approval. At minimum, the following information is required: Heritage Permit Application Form The applicant must provide a complete original copy, including signature of the owner, of the Heritage Permit Application Form. Written Description The applicant must provide a complete written description of all proposed work. The description should complement drawings, detailed construction plans, photos and any other sketches or supporting information submitted with the application. The written description must include a list and the details of all proposed work including, but not limited to, proposed colours, materials, sizes, etc. Construction and Elevation Drawings Along with construction elevation drawings (drawn to scale) the applicant may also, but not in lieu of, submit a sketch of the proposed work made over a photograph. Drawings must be drawn to scale and include: a) Overall dimensions b) Site plan depicting the location of existing buildings and the location of any proposed new building or addition to a building c) Elevation plan for each elevation of the building d) Specific sizes of building elements of interest (signs, windows, awnings, etc.) e) Detailed information including trim, siding, mouldings, etc., including sizes and profiles f) Building materials to be used (must also be included in the written description) g) Construction methods and means of attachment (must also be included in the written description) Some of the above components may be scoped or waived at the discretion of Heritage Planning staff following discussion with the applicant. Photographs Photographs of the building including general photos of the property, the streetscape in which the property is located, facing streetscape and, if the property is located at an intersection, all four corners. Photos of the specific areas that may be affected by the proposed alteration, new construction, or demolition must be included. Electronic copies of construction and elevation drawings, sketches, and photographs, along with hard copies submitted with the application, are encouraged. 2023 Page 3 of 10 Samples It is recommended that applicants bring samples of the materials to be used to the Heritage Kitchener meeting when their application is to be considered. This may include a sample of the windows, brick, siding, roofing material, as well as paint chips to identify proposed paint colours. Other Required Information In some circumstances Heritage Planning staff may require additional information, such as a Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan, to support the Heritage Permit Application. The requirement for additional information will be identified as early on in the Heritage Permit Application process as possible. Pre- consultation with Heritage Planning staff before formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application is strongly encouraged. 4. WHAT CAN I DO IF MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION IS DENIED? City of Kitchener Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Kitchener committee endeavour to come to solutions for every Heritage Permit Application submitted. Discussions with the applicant and revisions usually result in successful applications. However, if the municipality refuses your application and you choose not to resolve the issue with a revised application, you have the option of appealing the decision to the Conservation Review Board (for alterations to designated properties under Part IV) or the Ontario Municipal Board (for demolition of property designated under Part IV or for any work to designated property under Part V). 5. IMPORTANT NOTES Professional Assistance Although it is not a requirement to obtain professional assistance in the preparation of this information, the applicant may wish to seek such assistance from an architect, architectural technologist, draftsperson or others familiar with the assessment of buildings and the gathering together of building documents. Building Codes and Other By-laws It is the applicant’s responsibility to ensure compliance with all other applicable legislation, regulations and by-laws. These items include the Ontario Building and Fire Codes, and the City’s zoning and property standards by-laws. 2023Heritage Permit Application 2023 Heritage Kitchener Meeting Dates Submission Deadlines November 25, 2022 January 3, 2023 December 30, 2022 February 7, 2023 January 27, 2023 March 7, 2023 February 24, 2023 April 4, 2023 March 24, 2023 May 2, 2023 April 28, 2023 June 6, 2023 - No July Meeting June 23, 2023 August 1, 2023 July 28, 2023 September 5, 2023 August 25, 2023 October 3, 2023 September 29, 2023 November 7, 2023 - No December Meeting 2023 Page 4 of 10 6.HOW DO I PROCEED WITH SUBMITTING MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? a) Heritage Planning Staff are available to meet with applicants and review all documentation prior to formal submission. Often Heritage Planning staff can assist you with historical and architectural information that might help with your proposed changes. b) Formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application with all supporting documentation (written description, construction drawings, sketch plans, scale drawing, photographs) to Heritage Planning staff are due approximately five (5) weeks prior to a Heritage Kitchener meeting (see schedule for submission deadlines and committee meeting dates). c) Upon confirmation of the submission of a complete application, including the owner’s signature and all supporting documentation, Heritage Planning staff will issue a Notice of Receipt, as required by the Ontario Heritage Act, to the Applicant. d) Heritage Planning staff determine whether the Heritage Permit Application may be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and/or Council. Where Heritage Permit Applications can be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and Council, Heritage Planning staff will endeavour to process the application within 10 business days. e) Where Heritage Permit Applications are required to go to Heritage Kitchener, Heritage Planning staff prepare a staff Report based on good conservation practice and the designating by-law, or the guidelines and policies in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. Preparation of the staff Report may require a site inspection. f) Heritage Kitchener Meeting Agenda, including staff Report, circulated to Committee members prior to Heritage Kitchener meeting. Staff Report circulated to applicant prior to meeting. g) Heritage Permit Application is considered at Heritage Kitchener meeting. Heritage Planning staff present staff Report and Recommendations to Heritage Kitchener. Applicants are encouraged to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting in order to provide clarification and answer questions as required. Failure to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting may result in a deferral in order to secure additional information, which would delay consideration of the Heritage Permit Application. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff, and Heritage Kitchener support the Heritage Permit Application, the application may be processed under delegated authority and approved by the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff and/or Heritage Kitchener do not support the Heritage Permit Application, the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final decision. h) Where the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation are forward to Council for final decision, Council may: 1. Approve the Heritage Permit Application; 2. Approve the Heritage Permit Application on Terms and Conditions; or, 3. Refuse the Heritage Permit Application. i) Within 30 days of receiving Notice of Council’s Decision, the applicant may appeal the decision and/or terms and conditions to the Conservation Review Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). 7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED PROPERTY Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should indicate an understanding of the reasons for designation and heritage attributes of the designated property and, if applicable, the surrounding area, including the following: 2023 Page 5 of 10 Setting 1. Positioning of the heritage building or structure on the property 2. Lot size related to building size 3. Streetscape (relationship to other properties and structures on the street) Building Details 1. Proportion and massing 2. Roof type and shape 3. Materials and detailing 4. Windows and doors: Style Proportions Frequency or placement 5. Relationship of the heritage building to other buildings on the lot and to the streetscape Heritage Attributes The following applies where a Heritage Permit Application includes work on heritage attributes: Windows and Doors The applicant should consider in order of priority: 1. Repairing or retrofitting the existing units (information on how to make older windows more energy efficient is available from Heritage Planning staff) 2. Replacing the units with new units matching the originals in material, design, proportion and colour 3. Replacing the units with new units that are generally in keeping with the original units If historic window units are proposed to be replaced the application should include the following: Description of the condition of the existing units Reasons for replacing the units Description of the proposed new units If approval to replace historic window units is given, the following action should be considered: A sample of a window removed should be stored on site in case a future owner wishes to construct a replica of the original The masonry opening and/or door framing should not be disturbed Exterior trim should match the original Roofing The application should include: Description of proposed roofing material to be applied If there is a request to install a different roofing material, the applicant may wish to investigate what the original material might have been 2023 Page 6 of 10 Masonry Work The application should include: A description of the proposed work, materials (type/style of brick, type of mortar mix, etc.) and methods of repair and application Outline the reasons for the work Signage The application should include: A general written description of the proposed signage to be installed A scale drawing of the signage with dimensions, materials, methods of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between historic masonry units or into wood building elements) Type of illumination, if applicable Awnings The application should include: A sketch view of the proposed awning – perhaps over a photo A scale drawing of the awning on the building with dimensions, materials, operating mechanism, method of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between masonry units or into wooden building elements) Type of illumination, if applicable. 8.SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should describe the existing conditions, including the existing setting and existing heritage attributes, of the designated property and the surrounding area, specifically as they relate to the building proposed for demolition. The Heritage Permit Application should provide a detailed rationale for the demolition, including an assessment of the current condition of the building, and a cost comparison identifying the difference in cost to repair and restore the building versus cost to demolish and construct a new building. 9.HERITAGE CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES The Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work (e.g., alteration, new construction or demolition) is consistent with the designating by-law for individual properties (Part IV) or the Heritage Conservation District Plan for properties within a Heritage Conservation District (Part V designation). In addition, the Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work is consistent with the Parks Canada’s Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx). For more information on Heritage Planning in the City of Kitchener please contact our heritage planning staff at heritage@kitchener.ca. 2023 Page 7 of 10 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS th Planning Division –200 King Street West, 6Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2426; planning@kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: HPA- PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1.NATURE OF APPLICATION ExteriorInteriorSignage DemolitionNew ConstructionAlterationRelocation 2.SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: Legal Description (if know): CommercialIndustrialInstitutional Building/Structure Type: Residential Heritage Designation: Part IV (Individual) Part V (Heritage Conservation District) YesNo Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? 3.PROPERTY OWNER Name: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 4.AGENT (if applicable) Name: Company: Address: City/Province/Postal Code: Phone: Email: 2023 Page 8 of 10 5.WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. 6.REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada’s Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): 7.PROPOSED WORKS July 1, 2023July 2024 a)Expected start date:Expected completion date: b)Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff?YesNo -If yes, who did you speak to? c)Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff?YesNo Garett Stevenson -If yes, who did you speak to? d)Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work?YesNo Site Plan in process e)Other related Building or Planning applications:Application number 2023 Page 9 of 10 8.ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a ‘complete’ application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issueswith the application assubmitted. Once the applicationisdeemed to be fullycomplete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person isauthorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. April 26, 2023 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 9.AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I / We, , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize to act on my / our behalf in this regard. April 26, 2023 Signature of Owner/Agent:Date: Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). 2023 Page 10 of 10 STAFF USE ONLY Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90-Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: Heritage Planning Staff: Heritage Kitchener: Council: D RAFT R EPORT: Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario TTTT FFFF LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology AAAA Kingston | Toronto Ottawa | Huntsville 837 Princess Street, Suite 400 RRRR Kingston, ON K7L 1G8 Phone: 613-507-7817 Toll Free: 1-833-210-7817 If using Archival Image, Cite Here (YEAR) E-mail: info@lhcheritage.com DDDD 2December2022 Project # LHC0333 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 T F A R D This page has been left blank deliberately ii December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Report prepared for: Nikita Thompson Perimeter Development 119 King Street West, Suite 220 Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1A7 Report prepared by: Ben Daub, MA, BAT Graphicsprepared by:Jordan Greene, BA Reviewed by:Christienne Uchiyama, MA, CAHPChristienne Uchiyama, MA, CAHPChristienne Uchiyama, MA, CAHP Benjamin Holthof, MPl, MMA, jamin Holthof, MPl, MMA, jamin Holthof, MPl, MMA, CAHP, MCIP, RPPCAHP, MCIP, RPPCAHP, MCIP, RPP T Marcus Létourneau, PhD, MCIP, RPP, CAHPMarcus Létourneau, PhD, MCIP, RPP, CAHPMarcus Létourneau, PhD, MCIP, RPP, CAHP F A R D iii December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 RIGHT OF USE The information, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report are for the sole benefit of ‘Owners’. Any other use of this report by others without permission is prohibited andis without responsibility to LHC. The report, all plans, data, drawings and other documents as well as all electronic media preparedby LHC are considered its professional work product and shall by LHC are considered its professional work product and shall by LHC are considered its professional work product and shall remain the copyright property of LHC, who authorizes only the Owners and approved users remain the copyright property of LHC, who authorizes only the Owners and approved users remain the copyright property of LHC, who authorizes only the Owners and approved users (including municipal review and approval bodies) to make copies of the report, but only in such (including municipal review and approval bodies) to make copies of the report, but only in such (including municipal review and approval bodies) to make copies of the report, but only in such quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the report by those parties. Unless quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the report by those parties. Unless quantities as are reasonably necessary for the use of the report by those parties. Unless otherwise stated, the suggestions, recommendations and opinions given in this report are otherwise stated, the suggestions, recommendations and opinions given in this report are otherwise stated, the suggestions, recommendations and opinions given in this report are intended only for the guidance of Owners and approved users. REPORT LIMITATIONS The qualifications of the heritage consultants who authored this report are provided inThe qualifications of the heritage consultants who authored this report are provided inThe qualifications of the heritage consultants who authored this report are provided inAppendix Appendix Appendix A. Allcomments regarding the condition of any buildings on the Property are based on a comments regarding the condition of any buildings on the Property are based on a comments regarding the condition of any buildings on the Property are based on a superficial visual inspection and are not a structural engineering assessment of the buildings superficial visual inspection and are not a structural engineering assessment of the buildings superficial visual inspection and are not a structural engineering assessment of the buildings T unless directly quoted from an engineering report. The findings of this report do not address any unless directly quoted from an engineering report. The findings of this report do not address any unless directly quoted from an engineering report. The findings of this report do not address any structural or physical condition related issues associated with any buildings on the property or structural or physical condition related issues associated with any buildings on the property or structural or physical condition related issues associated with any buildings on the property or the condition of any heritage attributes. Concerning historical research, the purpose of this report is to evaluate the property for culturConcerning historical research, the purpose of this report is to evaluate the property for culturConcerning historical research, the purpose of this report is to evaluate the property for cultural heritage value or interest. The authors are fully aware that there may be additional historical heritage value or interest. The authors are fully aware that there may be additional historical heritage value or interest. The authors are fully aware that there may be additional historical F information that has not been included. Nevertheless, the information collected, reviewed, and information that has not been included. Nevertheless, the information collected, reviewed, and information that has not been included. Nevertheless, the information collected, reviewed, and analyzed is sufficient to conduct an evaluation using analyzed is sufficient to conduct an evaluation using analyzed is sufficient to conduct an evaluation using Ontario Ontario Ontario Regulation 9/06Regulation 9/06Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or InterestDetermining Cultural Heritage Value or InterestDetermining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. This report reflects the professional opinion of . This report reflects the professional opinion of . This report reflects the professional opinion of the authors and the requirements of their membership in various professional and licensing the authors and the requirements of their membership in various professional and licensing the authors and the requirements of their membership in various professional and licensing bodies. A The review of policy and legislation was limited to that information directly related to cultural The review of policy and legislation was limited to that information directly related to cultural The review of policy and legislation was limited to that information directly related to cultural heritage management and is not a comprehensive planning review. Additionally, soundscapes, heritage management and is not a comprehensive planning review. Additionally, soundscapes, heritage management and is not a comprehensive planning review. Additionally, soundscapes, cultural identity, and sense of place analyses were not integrated into this report.cultural identity, and sense of place analyses were not integrated into this report.cultural identity, and sense of place analyses were not integrated into this report. Due to the Due to the Due to the ongoing COVIDongoing COVIDongoing COVID--19 pandemic, access to archives were limited.19 pandemic, access to archives were limited.19 pandemic, access to archives were limited. Archaeological potential has not been assessed as part of this Archaeological potential has not been assessed as part of this Archaeological potential has not been assessed as part of this HIA. A separate archaeological R assessment may be required as part of a complete application.assessment may be required as part of a complete application.assessment may be required as part of a complete application. D iv December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TheExecutive Summary only provides key points from the report. The reader should examine the complete report including background, results as well as limitations. LHC was retained in August 2022 by Perimeter Development, on behalf of The Working Centre, LHC was retained in August 2022 by Perimeter Development, on behalf of The Working Centre, LHC was retained in August 2022 by Perimeter Development, on behalf of The Working Centre, to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the redevelopment of the property located at 97 to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the redevelopment of the property located at 97 to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the redevelopment of the property located at 97 Victoria Street North in the City of Kitchener, in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The Victoria Street North in the City of Kitchener, in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The Victoria Street North in the City of Kitchener, in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The properties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; properties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; properties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; however, they are not listed on the City’s municipal heritage register nor have they been flagged however, they are not listed on the City’s municipal heritage register nor have they been flagged however, they are not listed on the City’s municipal heritage register nor have they been flagged by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA focusses by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA focusses by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA focusses on the Property municipally known as97 Victoria Street North.97 Victoria Street North.97 Victoria Street North. The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property are provided in Section 6of this HIA. This HIA was prepared tooutline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse impacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Property and its surrounding impacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Property and its surrounding impacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Property and its surrounding area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIAarea, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIAarea, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIAwas undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the MCM’s undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the MCM’s undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the MCM’s Ontario Heritage ToolkitOntario Heritage ToolkitOntario Heritage Toolkitand the City of Kitchener’s and the City of Kitchener’s and the City of Kitchener’s Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference. In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97Victoria Street North meetscriteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of criteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of criteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06for its design and physical, historical and for its design and physical, historical and for its design and physical, historical and associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s two storey height and sixtwo storey height and sixtwo storey height and six--overoverover---sixsixsixwindows on the northwest (primary)windows on the northwest (primary)façade. Alternatives and mitigation measuresAlternatives and mitigation measuresAlternatives and mitigation measuresto lessen or avoid these potential impacts were explored. to lessen or avoid these potential impacts were explored. It was determined that Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed It was determined that Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed It was determined that Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the alterationalterationalterationof the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre while of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre while of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre while conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the adjacent Warehouse District CHL.adjacent Warehouse District CHL.adjacent Warehouse District CHL. TheCity of Kitchener may rCity of Kitchener may rCity of Kitchener may requirea Conservation Plan (CP) to guide project work. A CP is a document that details how a heritage resource will be conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes descriptions of all repairs, stabilization, and preservation activities that are proposed to occur on a known heritage resource as well as long-range conservation, monitoring, and maintenance plans. In order to inform a more detailed CP, a comprehensive condition survey of the existing building should be undertaken. The City of Kitchener has a Conservation Plan Terms of Reference (2018). v December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TABLE OF CONTENTS Right of Use...............................................................................................................................iv Report Limitations......................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction to the Property......................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1Property Location................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2Property Owner...................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3Property Description................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................ 1 1 1.4Property Heritage Status............................................................................................................................................................................ .............................................................................................................. 2 2 2 Study Approach....................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference (2020)City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference (2020)City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference (2020).................................. 6 2.2Legislative/Policy Review........................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................ 9 T 2.3Historic Research................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2.4Site Visit.......................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................10 2.5Impact Assessment................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................10 3 Policy Framework..................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................................................12 F 3.1Provincial Planning ContextProvincial Planning ContextProvincial Planning Context................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................................................12 The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13........................................................................................... ......................................12 Provincial Policy Statement (2020)Provincial Policy Statement (2020)Provincial Policy Statement (2020)................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................12 Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18...........................................................13 A Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005...................................................................14 A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020)A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020)A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020)............15 Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25...................................................................16 Provincial Planning Context SummaryProvincial Planning Context SummaryProvincial Planning Context Summary.................................................................16 3.23.23.2RRegional Planning Contextegional Planning Contextegional Planning Context..........................................................................................16 R Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)..................................... ....16 Region of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master Plan (2002)Region of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master Plan (2002)Region of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master Plan (2002)....................20 Regional Planning Context SummaryRegional Planning Context SummaryRegional Planning Context Summary..................................................................21 3.3Local Planning Contextal Planning Contextal Planning Context...............................................................................................21 D City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014)...................................................................21 City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 and 2019-051 (2019).................................26 City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual...............................................................29 City of Kitchener Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape......................30 vi December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Local Planning Context Summary........................................................................31 4 Research and Analysis......................................................................................................33 4.1Early Indigenous History.............................................................................................33 Paleo Period (9500-8000 BCE)........................................................................................................................................................................... .........................................................33 Archaic Period (8000-1000 BCE)......................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................33 Woodland Period (1000 BCE – CE 1650)................................................................................................................................................................... .................33 4.2Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Historic Context..........................................................................................................................................34 4.3Region of Waterloo.................................................................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................3737 4.4City of Kitchener................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................3737 4.5Property History.................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........................................................................................................................................38 Pre-1900............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................................................................................................................................38 1901-1950.............................................................................................................................................................................................. .........................................................................................................................................................................................39 T 1951-2000.............................................................................................................................................................................................. .........................................................................................................................................................................................40 2001-present........................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................40 97 Victoria Street North Property OwnershipNorth Property OwnershipNorth Property Ownership............................................................................................................ ............................................................40 97 Victoria Street North Property Tenancy and Land Use97 Victoria Street North Property Tenancy and Land Use97 Victoria Street North Property Tenancy and Land Use....................................4 2 F The Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centre................................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................43 5 Assessment of Existing Conditionssessment of Existing Conditionssessment of Existing Conditions...................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................53 5.197 Victoria Street North Exterior97 Victoria Street North Exterior97 Victoria Street North Exterior................................................................................................. .....................................................................................................................................................53 5.297 Victoria Street North Interior97 Victoria Street North Interior97 Victoria Street North Interior................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................................................57 A Worth a Second Look (First Storey)Worth a Second Look (First Storey)Worth a Second Look (First Storey).....................................................................57 St. John’s Kitchen and Safe Supply Clinic (Second Storey)St. John’s Kitchen and Safe Supply Clinic (Second Storey)St. John’s Kitchen and Safe Supply Clinic (Second Storey)............................ .....61 Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition)Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition)Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition).........................................................64 5.35.35.3SSurrounding Contexturrounding Contexturrounding Context...................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................64 R 5.45.45.4Adjacent Heritage PropertiesAdjacent Heritage PropertiesAdjacent Heritage Properties......................................................................................65 6 EvaluationEvaluationEvaluation....................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 6.1Ontario Regulation 9/06 EvaluationOntario Regulation 9/06 EvaluationOntario Regulation 9/06 Evaluation.............................................................................67 6.2Additional ConsiderationsAdditional ConsiderationsAdditional Considerations...........................................................................................69 6.3Summary of EvaluationSummary of EvaluationSummary of Evaluation...............................................................................................74 D 6.4Proposed Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest.........................................74 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest..................................................74 Heritage Attributes...............................................................................................74 7 Description of the Proposed Development.........................................................................76 vii December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 7.1Massing, Access, and Setbacks..................................................................................76 7.2Architectural Design....................................................................................................78 7.3Description of Alteration to Heritage Resources..........................................................84 8 Impact of Development on Heritage Attributes......................................................................................................................................................... ................................................85 8.1Potential Impacts to 97 Victoria Street North....................................................................................................................................................... ......................................85 8.2Potential Impacts to Adjacent Property at 70 Francis Street NorthFrancis Street NorthFrancis Street North..........................................................................................8 8 8.3Potential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscaPotential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscaPotential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscapepepe....................................90 8.4Summary of Applicable Heritage Conservation PrinciplesSummary of Applicable Heritage Conservation PrinciplesSummary of Applicable Heritage Conservation Principles.................................. ...............................................................................................9292 Standard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada..............9292 Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic PropertiesEight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic PropertiesEight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic Properties..................................................................95 8.5Summary of Potential Impacts........................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................96 9 Considered Mitigation and Conservation StrategiesConsidered Mitigation and Conservation StrategiesConsidered Mitigation and Conservation Strategies.................................................. ...............................................................................................................................97 T 9.1Considered Options.................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................................................................................................................97 Option 1: On-site Retention in Current Usesite Retention in Current Usesite Retention in Current Use................................................................................................... ...........................................................................97 Option 2: On-site Retention in Alternate Usesite Retention in Alternate Usesite Retention in Alternate Use............................................................................................. ........................................................................97 Option 3: Retention of Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed DevelopmentOption 3: Retention of Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed DevelopmentOption 3: Retention of Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed Development F 97 Option 4: Demolish Existing Structure and RedevelopOption 4: Demolish Existing Structure and RedevelopOption 4: Demolish Existing Structure and Redevelop.........................................97 9.2Preferred Optionreferred Optionreferred Option...................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................................................................98 9.3Mitigation MeasuresMitigation MeasuresMitigation Measures........................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................98 A 10Conclusion and RecommendationsConclusion and RecommendationsConclusion and Recommendations........................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................100 11 Signatures11 Signatures11 Signatures................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......101 ReferencesReferencesReferences......................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......102 Policy and Legislation ResourcesPolicy and Legislation ResourcesPolicy and Legislation Resources....................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................102 Mapping ResourcesMapping ResourcesMapping Resources.................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................104 R Archival ResourcesArchival ResourcesArchival Resources................................................................................................................................................. .........................................................................................................................................................................................108 Additional ResourcesAdditional ResourcesAdditional Resources........................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................108 Appendix A Project PersonnelAppendix A Project PersonnelAppendix A Project Personnel................................................................................................. 111 Appendix B GlossaryAppendix B GlossaryAppendix B Glossary...............................................................................................................113 D Appendix C City Directory Records.........................................................................................118 Appendix D Land Registry Records........................................................................................129 viii December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Property Location........................................................................................................ 4 Figure 2: Current Conditions...................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3: Cultural Heritage Landscapes, Warehouse District....................................................32 Figure 4: Surveyor Thomas Ridout’s map of the Haldimand Proclamation in 1821Figure 4: Surveyor Thomas Ridout’s map of the Haldimand Proclamation in 1821Figure 4: Surveyor Thomas Ridout’s map of the Haldimand Proclamation in 1821.........................................................35 Figure 5: Haldimand Tract.............................................................................................................................................................................. .............................................................................................................................................36 Figure 6: 1853-1854, 1856, 1861, 1879, and 1912 historic maps showing the Property1854, 1856, 1861, 1879, and 1912 historic maps showing the Property1854, 1856, 1861, 1879, and 1912 historic maps showing the Property........................47 Figure 7: 1875 birds eye view showing the Property..................................................................................................................................................... ............................................48 Figure 8: 1904, 1925, and 1947 fire insurance plans showing the PropertyFigure 8: 1904, 1925, and 1947 fire insurance plans showing the PropertyFigure 8: 1904, 1925, and 1947 fire insurance plans showing the Property.............................................................................................4949 Figure 9: 1916, 1923, 1929, 1936, 1938, 1956 topographic maps showing the PropertyFigure 9: 1916, 1923, 1929, 1936, 1938, 1956 topographic maps showing the PropertyFigure 9: 1916, 1923, 1929, 1936, 1938, 1956 topographic maps showing the Property......................5050 Figure 10: 1930, 1945, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2017, 2021 aerial photographs showing the Figure 10: 1930, 1945, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2017, 2021 aerial photographs showing the Figure 10: 1930, 1945, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2017, 2021 aerial photographs showing the Property............................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......5151 Figure 11: 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, 1998 topographic maps showing the PropertyFigure 11: 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, 1998 topographic maps showing the PropertyFigure 11: 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, 1998 topographic maps showing the Property...........................52 Figure 12: Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor)Figure 12: Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor)Figure 12: Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor)......................................................................................................................................................58 Figure 13: Current St. John's Kitchen floor plan (second floor)Figure 13: Current St. John's Kitchen floor plan (second floor)Figure 13: Current St. John's Kitchen floor plan (second floor)......................................................................................................................................................62 T Figure 14: Rendering looking east showing the thirdFigure 14: Rendering looking east showing the third--storey addition to the Propertystorey addition to the Propertystorey addition to the Property.................77 Figure 15: Rendering looking east showing the singleFigure 15: Rendering looking east showing the singleFigure 15: Rendering looking east showing the single--storey southwest wing addition to the storey southwest wing addition to the storey southwest wing addition to the Property............................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......77 Figure 16: Site plan showing the proposed redevelopmentFigure 16: Site plan showing the proposed redevelopmentFigure 16: Site plan showing the proposed redevelopment.................................. ...................................................................................................................................78 Figure 17: Architect's window draftsFigure 17: Architect's window drafts............................................................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................................80 F Figure 18: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windowsFigure 18: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windowsFigure 18: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windows ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................81 Figure 19: Rendering of the northwest and southwest elevations showing the proposed windowsFigure 19: Rendering of the northwest and southwest elevations showing the proposed windowsFigure 19: Rendering of the northwest and southwest elevations showing the proposed windows ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................81 Figure 20: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wingFigure 20: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wingFigure 20: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wing........................................... .................................................................................82 Figure 21: Axonometric rendering of the proposed development showing the southwest wing’s Figure 21: Axonometric rendering of the proposed development showing the southwest wing’s Figure 21: Axonometric rendering of the proposed development showing the southwest wing’s A sloped roof............................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................82 Figure 22: Internal rendering looking northeast within the proposed southwest wingFigure 22: Internal rendering looking northeast within the proposed southwest wingFigure 22: Internal rendering looking northeast within the proposed southwest wing................83 Figure 23: Internal rendering looking west within the proposed southwest wingFigure 23: Internal rendering looking west within the proposed southwest wingFigure 23: Internal rendering looking west within the proposed southwest wing........................83 Figure 24: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevationFigure 24: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevationFigure 24: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevation......................................84 R D ix December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 LIST OF PHOTOS Photo 1: Water Street House at 115 Water Street North...........................................................45 Photo 2: Detail showing transition between original building at 115 Water Street North (right) and two-storey addition (left) constructed in 2020............................................................................46 Photo 3: Detail of materials, original yellow brick (left) and faux yellow brick finish (left). The result Photo 3: Detail of materials, original yellow brick (left) and faux yellow brick finish (left). The result Photo 3: Detail of materials, original yellow brick (left) and faux yellow brick finish (left). The result is an addition that is compatible with the earlier structure, and distinguishable as a modern is an addition that is compatible with the earlier structure, and distinguishable as a modern is an addition that is compatible with the earlier structure, and distinguishable as a modern addition............................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .........46 Photo 4: View south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevationsPhoto 4: View south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevationsPhoto 4: View south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevations..............54 Photo 5: View west showing the Property’s northeast elevation.......................................................................................................................................... ......5555 Photo 6: Panoramic view northwest showing the Property's southeast elevationPhoto 6: Panoramic view northwest showing the Property's southeast elevationPhoto 6: Panoramic view northwest showing the Property's southeast elevation..................................................................5555 Photo 7: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevationPhoto 7: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevationPhoto 7: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevation........................................................................................................................5656 Photo 8: View northwest of the Property's southeast elevation. The addition on the right Photo 8: View northwest of the Property's southeast elevation. The addition on the right Photo 8: View northwest of the Property's southeast elevation. The addition on the right follows follows follows the same rhythm of bays and buttresses found along the other elevations. The addition to the left the same rhythm of bays and buttresses found along the other elevations. The addition to the left the same rhythm of bays and buttresses found along the other elevations. The addition to the left is void of buttresses and is a distinctly different colouris void of buttresses and is a distinctly different colouris void of buttresses and is a distinctly different colour......................... .................................................................................................................................................................56 Photo 9: View north showing the single storey addition that branches off the southwest elevation Photo 9: View north showing the single storey addition that branches off the southwest elevation Photo 9: View north showing the single storey addition that branches off the southwest elevation T of the previous addition............................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................57 Photo 10: View north upon entering the first storey of the buildingPhoto 10: View north upon entering the first storey of the buildingPhoto 10: View north upon entering the first storey of the building....................................................................................................................................58 Photo 11: View southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing Photo 11: View southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing Photo 11: View southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems................................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........59 Photo 12: View southwest showing material use towards the rear of the first floorPhoto 12: View southwest showing material use towards the rear of the first floorPhoto 12: View southwest showing material use towards the rear of the first floor....................59 F Photo 13: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floorPhoto 13: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floorPhoto 13: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floor...............................60 Photo 14: View showing a tiled floor areaPhoto 14: View showing a tiled floor areaPhoto 14: View showing a tiled floor area............................................................................ ..........................................................................................................................................................................60 Photo 15: View showing painted brick wallsPhoto 15: View showing painted brick wallsPhoto 15: View showing painted brick walls......................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................61 Photo 16: View southeast showing the foyer and stairsPhoto 16: View southeast showing the foyer and stairsPhoto 16: View southeast showing the foyer and stairs........................................ ..................................................................................62 Photo 17: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor accessPhoto 17: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor accessPhoto 17: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor access.......................63 Photo 18: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the buildingPhoto 18: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the buildingPhoto 18: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the building..........................................63 A Photo 19: View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left)Photo 19: View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left)Photo 19: View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left)............................64 Photo 20: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevationPhoto 20: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevationPhoto 20: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevation...............................66 Photo 21: View northwest showing 70 Francis Street North's southeast and northeast elevationsPhoto 21: View northwest showing 70 Francis Street North's southeast and northeast elevationsPhoto 21: View northwest showing 70 Francis Street North's southeast and northeast elevations ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................66 R D x December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: City of Kitchener's Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference Requirements... 6 Table 2: Relevant Policies in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s Official Plan...................17 Table 3: Relevant Policies in the City of Kitchener’s Official Plan..............................................21 Table 4: Zoning By-law 85-1 Permitted Uses............................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................27 Table 5: Additional By-law Provisions that Apply to the Property....................................................................................................................................... ......28 Table 6: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design ManualTable 6: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design ManualTable 6: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual............................29 Table 7: Pertinent guidelines from Section 5.2.7, 5.3.1, and 5.4.4 of Kitchener's Urban Design Table 7: Pertinent guidelines from Section 5.2.7, 5.3.1, and 5.4.4 of Kitchener's Urban Design Table 7: Pertinent guidelines from Section 5.2.7, 5.3.1, and 5.4.4 of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..........3030 Table 8: Warehouse District Values..................................................................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................3030 Table 9: O. Reg. 9/06Evaluation for 97 Victoria Street NorthEvaluation for 97 Victoria Street NorthEvaluation for 97 Victoria Street North............................................................. ...............................................................................................6767 Table 10: Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Warehouse Table 10: Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Warehouse Table 10: Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Warehouse District............................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...............70 Table 11: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street NorthTable 11: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street NorthTable 11: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street North..85 Table 12: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street NorthTable 12: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street NorthTable 12: Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street North..88 T Table 13: Impact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapeTable 13: Impact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapeTable 13: Impact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape.........90 Table 14: Compliance with the Standards and GuidelinesTable 14: Compliance with the Standards and GuidelinesTable 14: Compliance with the Standards and Guidelines..................................... ...................................................................................................................................93 Table 15: Compliance with the Eight Guiding PrinciplesTable 15: Compliance with the Eight Guiding PrinciplesTable 15: Compliance with the Eight Guiding Principles..................................... ...............................................................................................................................................95 F A R D xi December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 1INTRODUCTION TO THE PROPERTY LHC was retained in August 2022 by Perimeter Development, on behalf of the The Working Centre (the “Proponent”), to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the redevelopment of the property located at 97 Victoria Street North (the “Property”) in the City of Kitchener (the “City”), in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo (the “Region”). The properties ). The properties ). The properties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; however, they located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; however, they located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; however, they are not listed on the City’s municipal heritage register nor have they been flagged by the City for have they been flagged by the City for have they been flagged by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA focusses onfocusses onfocusses onthe the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North. The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The 97 Victoria Street North. The 97 Victoria Street North. The proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane.southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane.southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. T This HIA is being prepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse This HIA is being prepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse This HIA is being prepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse impacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertimpacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertimpacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertyyand surrounding and surrounding area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIA area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIA area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIA was undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within theundertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within theundertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within theMinistry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism’s (MMCMCM) ) Ontario Heritage ToolkitOntario Heritage ToolkitOntario Heritage Toolkitand the and the and the City of Kitchener’s Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of ReferenceHeritage Impact Assessment Terms of ReferenceHeritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference.. F 1.1Property Location The Property is located at the address municipally known as 97 Victoria Street NorthThe Property is located at the address municipally known as 97 Victoria Street NorthThe Property is located at the address municipally known as 97 Victoria Street Northand legally described as Plan 374 Lot 71. The Property is situated along the south edge of Victoria Street described as Plan 374 Lot 71. The Property is situated along the south edge of Victoria Street described as Plan 374 Lot 71. The Property is situated along the south edge of Victoria Street North and is located to the southwest of the Victoria Street North and Weber Street West North and is located to the southwest of the Victoria Street North and Weber Street West North and is located to the southwest of the Victoria Street North and Weber Street West junction, which is the junction, which is the junction, which is the intersectionintersectionintersectionof two major arterial thorougof two major arterial thorougof two major arterial thoroughfareswithin the City. A 1.2Property OwnerProperty OwnerProperty Owner TheProperty isProperty isProperty isowned byowned byowned byThe Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centrelocated at 58 Queen Street South, Kitchener, Ontario Ontario Ontario N2G 1V6N2G 1V6N2G 1V6,,(519) 743(519) 743(519) 743--115111511151. . . 1.31.31.3Property DescriptionProperty DescriptionProperty Description R The Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North is located in Ward 10 in the City of The Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North is located in Ward 10 in the City of The Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North is located in Ward 10 in the City of Kitchener, in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario. The Property’s legal description is Plan 374Kitchener, in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario. The Property’s legal description is Plan 374Kitchener, in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario. The Property’s legal description is Plan 374, Lot 71. The Property is located on the south side of Victoria Street North, south of Breithaupt Street, . The Property is located on the south side of Victoria Street North, south of Breithaupt Street, . The Property is located on the south side of Victoria Street North, south of Breithaupt Street, west of Weber Street Westwest of Weber Street Westwest of Weber Street West,north of Heit Lane, and east of Duke Street West (Figure 1). The section of Victoria Street North that the Property is situated alongside comprises a twosection of Victoria Street North that the Property is situated alongside comprises a twosection of Victoria Street North that the Property is situated alongside comprises a two-way streetconsisting of two eastbound and two southbound lanes. The Property is situated within consisting of two eastbound and two southbound lanes. The Property is situated within consisting of two eastbound and two southbound lanes. The Property is situated within D the Innovation District of Kitchener’s Urban Growth Centre (Figure 2). 2 The Property follows an “L” shaped plan and is approximately 1,215.5 m(0.12ha/0.30 acres) in 1 The site is currently occupied by a two-storey brick buildingfrontingonto Victoria Street size. 1 Information taken from City of Kitchener Interactive Map, 2017. 1 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 North. The building is generally rectangular in plan; however, there is a small, one-storey concrete block rear wing that branches off the southmost corner of the structure’s southwest elevation. The Property’s northwest (primary) and southeast elevations are narrowly setback from their respective property lines. The northeast and southwest side elevations are moderately setback, allowing for pedestrian traffic to access the building. The property is covered by engineered surfaces and has no landscaping. The property is zoned Dcovered by engineered surfaces and has no landscaping. The property is zoned Dcovered by engineered surfaces and has no landscaping. The property is zoned D-6 Arterial Commercial Zoneandhas two Special Use Provisions for Specific Lands (116U and 403U), one (116U and 403U), one (116U and 403U), one Special Regulation Provision\[s\] for Specific Lands(105R), and one Holding ProvisionHolding ProvisionHolding Provision\[s\] \[s\] for Specific Lands(10H)under the City’s By-law. See Section 3.3.2for the definition and permitted for the definition and permitted for the definition and permitted uses associated with D-6 Zoning. 1.4Property Heritage Status 97 VictoriaStreetNorthis listedas a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or designated property of cultural heritage value or designated property of cultural heritage value or 22 A Statement A Statement A Statement interest on the Municipal Heritage Register; the property was added ; the property was added ; the property was added 66MayMayMay20142014.. of Significance (SOS) was created for 97 VictoriaStreetStreetStreetNorth North North at the time. The SOS notes that at the time. The SOS notes that at the time. The SOS notes that the building was built c. 1927and originally served as an industrial building housing the Mitchell and originally served as an industrial building housing the Mitchell and originally served as an industrial building housing the Mitchell T Button Company. The document titled Statement of Significance Statement of Significance Statement of Significance 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North includes a description of the Property, a statement of heritage value or interest, heritage includes a description of the Property, a statement of heritage value or interest, heritage includes a description of the Property, a statement of heritage value or interest, heritage attributes, photographs, and the City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Evaluation Form. The attributes, photographs, and the City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Evaluation Form. The attributes, photographs, and the City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Evaluation Form. The statement of heritage value or interest and heritage attributes states, verbatim:statement of heritage value or interest and heritage attributes states, verbatim:statement of heritage value or interest and heritage attributes states, verbatim: Heritage Value or InterestHeritage Value or Interest F The design value relates to the architecture of the building. The house is a The design value relates to the architecture of the building. The house is a The design value relates to the architecture of the building. The house is a unique example of the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The building is in unique example of the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The building is in unique example of the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The building is in good condition. The building is two storeys in height and features: flat roof with good condition. The building is two storeys in height and features: flat roof with good condition. The building is two storeys in height and features: flat roof with shaped parapet on the front façade; 3 by 9 bays; red, yellow and beige brick; shaped parapet on the front façade; 3 by 9 bays; red, yellow and beige brick; shaped parapet on the front façade; 3 by 9 bays; red, yellow and beige brick; shallow buttressing betweenshallow buttressing betweenshallow buttressing betweenthe windows; original window openings with brick the windows; original window openings with brick the windows; original window openings with brick A headers and concrete sills; headers and concrete sills; headers and concrete sills; andandandgroups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front façade groups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front façade groups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front façade with brick headers and concrete sills. with brick headers and concrete sills. with brick headers and concrete sills. The contextual values relate to the contribution that the building makes to the The contextual values relate to the contribution that the building makes to the The contextual values relate to the contribution that the building makes to the conticonticontinuity and character of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the nuity and character of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the nuity and character of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the warehouse district. The building is historically linked to its surroundings within the warehouse district. The building is historically linked to its surroundings within the warehouse district. The building is historically linked to its surroundings within the warehouse district. warehouse district. warehouse district. R The historic and associative value relate to the original owner, original use aThe historic and associative value relate to the original owner, original use aThe historic and associative value relate to the original owner, original use and present owner. Walter Mitchell began manufacturing ivory buttons in 1914 present owner. Walter Mitchell began manufacturing ivory buttons in 1914 present owner. Walter Mitchell began manufacturing ivory buttons in 1914 (Moyer, 1979). W.E. Mitchell, Walter's son, took over the company in 1915 (Moyer, 1979). W.E. Mitchell, Walter's son, took over the company in 1915 (Moyer, 1979). W.E. Mitchell, Walter's son, took over the company in 1915 (Moyer, 1979). The company was known as the Mitchell Button Company. (Moyer, 1979). The company was known as the Mitchell Button Company. (Moyer, 1979). The company was known as the Mitchell Button Company. Dwindling supplies and foreign competition shifted the business from ivory to Dwindling supplies and foreign competition shifted the business from ivory to Dwindling supplies and foreign competition shifted the business from ivory to plastic under the direction of Lloyd G. E. Mitchell in 1945 (Moyer, 1979). The plastic under the direction of Lloyd G. E. Mitchell in 1945 (Moyer, 1979). The plastic under the direction of Lloyd G. E. Mitchell in 1945 (Moyer, 1979). The D company started on Frederick Street in 1915, moved to Gaukel Street for a short period and then to the Victoria Street site around 1921 for 50 years (KW Record, 1958; KW Record, 1970). The company name changed to Mitchell Plastics. 2 The City of Kitchener Municipal Heritage Registerwas last updated 24 October 2017. 2 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Marshall Ariss joined the company in 1955 and lead the change from plastic buttons to plastic components for industries including IBM, Otis Elevator, International Harvester, Greb and Leigh (Moyer, 1979). Ariss is associated with the early plastics industry and has been honoured with membership in the Plastic Pioneers Club of Canada (Moyer, 1979). The existing use of the building is for The Working Centre' s Worth a Second The existing use of the building is for The Working Centre' s Worth a Second The existing use of the building is for The Working Centre' s Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares store and St. John' s Kitchen. According to The Look Furniture and Housewares store and St. John' s Kitchen. According to The Look Furniture and Housewares store and St. John' s Kitchen. According to The Working Centre' s website: " The Working Centre was established in the spring of Working Centre' s website: " The Working Centre was established in the spring of Working Centre' s website: " The Working Centre was established in the spring of 1982 as a response to unemployment and poverty in downtown Kitchener. The 1982 as a response to unemployment and poverty in downtown Kitchener. The 1982 as a response to unemployment and poverty in downtown Kitchener. The Centre grewroots in the Kitchener downtown through the dedication of Joe and roots in the Kitchener downtown through the dedication of Joe and roots in the Kitchener downtown through the dedication of Joe and Stephanie Mancini, a young married couple who had just graduated from St. Stephanie Mancini, a young married couple who had just graduated from St. Stephanie Mancini, a young married couple who had just graduated from St. Jerome' s College at the University of Waterloo. They saw the potential for Jerome' s College at the University of Waterloo. They saw the potential for Jerome' s College at the University of Waterloo. They saw the potential for building a community of interest aroundresponding to unemployment and responding to unemployment and responding to unemployment and poverty, developing social analysis and engaging in creative action."poverty, developing social analysis and engaging in creative action."poverty, developing social analysis and engaging in creative action." Heritage Attributes: T The heritage value of 97 Victoria Street North resides in the following heritage The heritage value of 97 Victoria Street North resides in the following heritage The heritage value of 97 Victoria Street North resides in the following heritage attributes: All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, including: F Two storey height; wo storey height; Flat roof with shaped parapet on the front lat roof with shaped parapet on the front lat roof with shaped parapet on the front façadefaçade;; 3by 9 bays; by 9 bays; by 9 bays; Red, yellow and beige brick; ed, yellow and beige brick; ed, yellow and beige brick; A S Shallow buttressing between the windows; hallow buttressing between the windows; hallow buttressing between the windows; O Original window openings with brick headers and concrete sills; riginal window openings with brick headers and concrete sills; riginal window openings with brick headers and concrete sills; andandandgroups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front groups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front groups of three 6/ 6 windows on the front façadewith brick headers and concrete sills. and concrete sills. and concrete sills. All elements related to the contextual value, including: All elements related to the contextual value, including: All elements related to the contextual value, including: R Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity andandcharacter of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the warehouse character of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the warehouse character of the Victoria Street North streetscape and the warehouse district; and, district; and, district; and, 3 The link to the surrounding warehouse district.The link to the surrounding warehouse district.The link to the surrounding warehouse district. D 3 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Listing of Non-Designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” May 6, 2014, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1313095&searchid=1776bd81-ecfc-4b97-a973-cc6bcb1cf560&dbid=0,2- 136– 2-137 3 KEY MAP ¯ ¯ ¯ SCALE1:3,000,000 TTTTT FFFFF AAAAA RRRRR 012KilometersKilometers DDDDD TITLE Legend Location Plan CLIENT Property Perimeter Development PROJECTPROJECT NO. LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD2022-10-07 NOTE(S) 1. All locations are approximate. PREPAREDLHC REFERENCE(S) 1. Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, DESIGNEDJG NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS Community Portions of this document include intellectual property of Esri and its licensors and are used under license. FIGURE # Copyright (c) Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. 1 ¯ TTT FFF AAA RRR 02040MetersMeters DDD TITLE Mfhfoe Dvssfou!Dpoejujpot CLIENT Property Perimeter Development PROJECTPROJECT NO. LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD2022-10-07 OPUF)T* PREPAREDLHC 1. All locations are approximate. SFGFSFODF)T* DESIGNEDJG 1.Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Portions of this document include intellectual property of Esri and its licensors and are used under license. FIGURE # 2 Copyright (c) Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 2STUDY APPROACH LHC follows a three-step approach to understanding and planning for cultural heritage resources based on the understanding, planning and intervening guidance from the Canada’s Historic Places Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada and 4 Understanding the cultural heritage resource involves:Understanding the cultural heritage resource involves:Understanding the cultural heritage resource involves: MCM’sOntario Heritage Tool Kit. 1)Understanding the significance of the cultural heritage resource (known andUnderstanding the significance of the cultural heritage resource (known andUnderstanding the significance of the cultural heritage resource (known andpotential) potential) through research, consultation, and evaluation–when necessary.en necessary.en necessary. 2)Understanding the setting, context, and condition of thecultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourcethrough through research, site visit and analysis. 3)Understanding the heritage planning regulatoryframework around the cultural heritage framework around the cultural heritage framework around the cultural heritage resource. The impact assessment is guided by the Ontario Heritage Tool KitOntario Heritage Tool KitOntario Heritage Tool Kit,,Heritage Resources in the Heritage Resources in the Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, Information Sheet #5, Heritage Impact Assessments and Land Use Planning Process, Information Sheet #5, Heritage Impact Assessments and Land Use Planning Process, Information Sheet #5, Heritage Impact Assessments and TTTTTTTTTT Conservation Plans. A description of the proposed development or site alteration, m. A description of the proposed development or site alteration, m. A description of the proposed development or site alteration, measurement easurement of development or site impact and consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation of development or site impact and consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation of development or site impact and consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation 55 methods are included as part of planning for the cultural heritage resource.methods are included as part of planning for the cultural heritage resource.methods are included as part of planning for the cultural heritage resource.The HIA includes The HIA includes recommendations for design and heritage conservation to guide interventions to the Propertrecommendations for design and heritage conservation to guide interventions to the Propertrecommendations for design and heritage conservation to guide interventions to the Property. 2.1City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of ReferenceCity of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of ReferenceCity of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference(2020) FFFFFFFFFF The City’s HIA ToR require an assessment to determine potential impacts to cultural heritage The City’s HIA ToR require an assessment to determine potential impacts to cultural heritage The City’s HIA ToR require an assessment to determine potential impacts to cultural heritage resources by proposed development. An HIA prepared forresources by proposed development. An HIA prepared forresources by proposed development. An HIA prepared forthe City: the City: …shall include an inventory of…shall include an inventory of…shall include an inventory ofall cultural heritage resources within the planning all cultural heritage resources within the planning all cultural heritage resources within the planning application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural heritage resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and makes heritage resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and makes heritage resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and makes AAAAAAAAAA recommendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative commendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative commendations toward mitigative measures that would minimize negative impacts to those resources.impacts to those resources.impacts to those resources. Requirements of an HIA submitted to the City include the followingRequirements of an HIA submitted to the City include the followingRequirements of an HIA submitted to the City include the followingitems listed in Table 1. Table Table Table 111::City of Kitchener's Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference RequirementsCity of Kitchener's Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference RequirementsCity of Kitchener's Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference Requirements Requirement Requirement Location RRRRRRRRRR Present owner contact information for properties proposed Present owner contact information for properties proposed Found in Section 1.2of this HIA. for development and/or site for development and/or site alteration. A detailed site history to include a listing of owners from A detailed site history to include a listing of owners from A detailed site history to include a listing of owners from Found in Section 4of this HIA. the Land Registry Office, and a history of the site use(s).the Land Registry Office, and a history of the site use(s).the Land Registry Office, and a history of the site use(s). DDDDDDDDDD A written description of the buildings, structures and Found in Section 5of this HIA. landscape features on the subject properties including: 4 Canada’s Historic Places, “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada”, 2010, 3; MCM, “Heritage Property Evaluation” Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, 2006, 18. 5 MCM, “Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process” Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, 2006 6 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Requirement Location building elements, building materials, architectural and interior finishes, natural heritage elements, and landscaping. The description will also include a chronological history of the buildings’ development, such as additions and demolitions. The report shall include a clear statement of the Found in Section Found in Section Found in Section 66of this HIAof this HIA conclusions regarding the cultural heritage value and interest of the subject property as well as a bullet point list of heritage attributes. If applicable, the statement shall also address the value and significance of adjacent protected heritage property. Found in Section Found in Section 5of this HIA.of this HIA. Documentation of the subject properties to include: current Documentation of the subject properties to include: current photographs of each elevation of the buildings, photographs of identified heritage attributes and a site plan photographs of identified heritage attributes and a site plan TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT drawn at an appropriate scale to understand the context of nderstand the context of the buildings and site details. Documentation shall also the buildings and site details. Documentation shall also include where available, current floor plans, and historical include where available, current floor plans, and historical photos, drawings or other available and relevant archival photos, drawings or other available and relevant archival material. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF An outline of the proposed repair, alteration or An outline of the proposed repair, alteration or An outline of the proposed repair, alteration or Found in Section Found in Section Found in Section 7andSection 88of this HIA. development, its context, and how it will impact the development, its context, and how it will impact the development, its context, and how it will impact the properties (subject property and if applicable adjacent properties (subject property and if applicable adjacent properties (subject property and if applicable adjacent protected heritage properties) including buildings, rotected heritage properties) including buildings, rotected heritage properties) including buildings, structures, and site details including landscaping. In structures, and site details including landscaping. In structures, and site details including landscaping. In AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA particular, the potential visual and physical impact of the particular, the potential visual and physical impact of the particular, the potential visual and physical impact of the proposed work on the identified heritage attributes of the proposed work on the identified heritage attributes of the proposed work on the identified heritage attributes of the properties, shall be assessed. properties, shall be assessed. properties, shall be assessed. The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential negative impacts as identified in the Ministry of Tourism, negative impacts as identified in the Ministry of Tourism, negative impacts as identified in the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport’s Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative Culture and Sport’s Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative Culture and Sport’s Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR impacts may include but are not limited to: impacts may include but are not limited to: impacts may include but are not limited to: repair/alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible repair/alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible repair/alterations that are not sympathetic or compatible with the cultural heritage resource; demolition of all or part with the cultural heritage resource; demolition of all or part with the cultural heritage resource; demolition of all or part of a cultural heritage resource; etc. The outline should also of a cultural heritage resource; etc. The outline should also of a cultural heritage resource; etc. The outline should also address the influence and potential impact of the address the influence and potential impact of the address the influence and potential impact of the development on the setting and character of the subjectdevelopment on the setting and character of the subjectdevelopment on the setting and character of the subject DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD properties and adjacent protected heritage property. Options shall be provided that explain how the significant Found in Section 9of this HIA. cultural heritage resources may be conserved. Methods of mitigation may include, but are not limited to, preservation/conservation in situ, adaptive re-use, 7 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Requirement Location integration of all or part of the heritage resource, relocation. Each mitigative measure should create a sympathetic context for the heritage resource. A summary of applicable heritage conservation principles Found in Section Found in Section Found in Section 888of this HIA.of this HIA.of this HIA. and how they will be used must be included. Conservation principles may be found in online publications such as: the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada); Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport); andthe Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport). Proposed repairs, alterations and demolitions must be Proposed repairs, alterations and demolitions must be Found in Section Found in Section 9of this HIA. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT justified and explainedas to any loss of cultural heritage as to any loss of cultural heritage value and impact on the streetscape/neighbourhood context. Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, Found in Section Found in Section Found in Section 9of this HIA. describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF landscaping, etc. The qualifications and background of the person(s) The qualifications and background of the person(s) Found in Appendix Aof this HIA. completing the Heritage Impact Assessment shall be completing the Heritage Impact Assessment shall be included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a level of professional understanding and competence in the level of professional understanding and competence in the AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA heritage conservation field of study.heritage conservation field of study. The report will also include a referenceThe report will also include a referenceThe report will also include a referencefor any literature for any literature Found in theReferences cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and Section of this HIA referenced in the report.referenced in the report.referenced in the report. The summary statement should provide a full description The summary statement should provide a full description Found in Section 10of this HIA. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR of: of: The significance and heritage attributes of the The significance and heritage attributes of the subject properties. subject properties. The identification of any impact the proThe identification of any impact the proposed repair, alteration or development will have on the repair, alteration or development will have on the DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD heritage attributes of the subject properties, including adjacent protected heritage property. 8 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Requirement Location An explanation of what conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development, or site alteration approaches are recommended. Clarification as to why specific conservation or mitigative measures, or alternative development or site alteration approaches are not appropriate. The consultant must write a recommendation as to Found in Section Found in Section Found in Section 666of this HIA.of this HIA. whether the subject properties are worthy of listing or designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Should the consultant not support heritage designation then it must be consultant not support heritage designation then it must be consultant not support heritage designation then it must be clearly stated as to why the subjectproperty does not meet the criteria as stated in Regulation 9/06. The following questions must be answered in the The following questions must be answered in the TTTTTTTT mandatory recommendation of the report: 1.Do the properties meet the criteria for listing on the Do the properties meet the criteria for listing on the Do the properties meet the criteria for listing on the Municipal Heritage Register as a NonMunicipal Heritage Register as a NonMunicipal Heritage Register as a Non---DesignatDesignatDesignated ed Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest? Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest? Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest? FFFFFFFF 2.Do the properties meet the criteria for heritage Do the properties meet the criteria for heritage Do the properties meet the criteria for heritage designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act? Why or why not? Ontario Heritage Act? Why or why not? Ontario Heritage Act? Why or why not? 3.If the subject properties do not meet the criteria for If the subject properties do not meet the criteria for If the subject properties do not meet the criteria for heritage listing or designation then it must be heritage listing or designation then it must be heritage listing or designation then it must be AAAAAAAA clearly stated as to why they do not. clearly stated as to why they do not. clearly stated as to why they do not. 4.Regardless of the failure to meet criteria for Regardless of the failure to meet criteria for Regardless of the failure to meet criteria for heritage listing or designation, do the properties heritage listing or designation, do the properties heritage listing or designation, do the properties warrant conservation as per the definition in the warrant conservation as per the definition in the warrant conservation as per the definition in the Provincial Policy Statement? WhyProvincial Policy Statement? WhyProvincial Policy Statement? Whyor why not? RRRRRRRR 2.2Legislative/Policy ReviewLegislative/Policy ReviewLegislative/Policy Review The HIA includes a review of provincial legislation, plans and cultural heritage guidance, and The HIA includes a review of provincial legislation, plans and cultural heritage guidance, and The HIA includes a review of provincial legislation, plans and cultural heritage guidance, and relevant municipal policy and plans. This review outlines the cultural heritage legislative and relevant municipal policy and plans. This review outlines the cultural heritage legislative and relevant municipal policy and plans. This review outlines the cultural heritage legislative and policy framework that applies to the Property.policy framework that applies to the Property.policy framework that applies to the Property.The impact assessment considers the proposed project against this framework. DDDDDDDD 2.3Historic Research Historical research was undertaken to outline the history and development of the Property and its broader community context. Primary historic material, including air photos and mapping, were obtained from: 9 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Library and Archives Canada; Department of National Defence; Ancestry; Waterloo Open Data; University of Waterloo's Geospatial Centre's Historical Map Collection; and,Waterloo's Geospatial Centre's Historical Map Collection; and,Waterloo's Geospatial Centre's Historical Map Collection; and, Kitchener Public Library. Secondary research was compiled from sources such as:historical atlases, local histories, historical atlases, local histories, historical atlases, local histories, architectural reference texts, available online sources, and previous assessarchitectural reference texts, available online sources, and previous assessarchitectural reference texts, available online sources, and previous assessmentsmentsments. All . All . All sources sources and persons contacted in the preparation of this report are listed as footnotes and in the report's and persons contacted in the preparation of this report are listed as footnotes and in the report's and persons contacted in the preparation of this report are listed as footnotes and in the report's reference list. 2.4Site Visit A site visit was undertaken on 28 September 2022A site visit was undertaken on 28 September 2022by Lisa Coles and Christienne Uchiyama. by Lisa Coles and Christienne Uchiyama. by Lisa Coles and Christienne Uchiyama. T The primary objectiveof the site visit was to document and gain an understanding of the of the site visit was to document and gain an understanding of the of the site visit was to document and gain an understanding of the Property and its surrounding context. The site visit included a documentation of the surrounding Property and its surrounding context. The site visit included a documentation of the surrounding Property and its surrounding context. The site visit included a documentation of the surrounding area, exterior views of the structure, and the structure’s interior.exterior views of the structure, and the structure’s interior.exterior views of the structure, and the structure’s interior. 2.5Impact Assessment F 6 TheMCM’s InformationSheet #Sheet #55: Heritage Impact Assessments : Heritage Impact Assessments : Heritage Impact Assessments andandandConservation Plans outlinesseven potential negative impacts to be considered withseven potential negative impacts to be considered withseven potential negative impacts to be considered withany proposed development or any proposed development or any proposed development or property alteration. The impacts include, but are not limited to:property alteration. The impacts include, but are not limited to:property alteration. The impacts include, but are not limited to: 1)DestructionDestructionDestructionof any part of any significant heritage attribute or features;of any part of any significant heritage attribute or features;of any part of any significant heritage attribute or features; 2)AlterationAlterationAlterationthat is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and that is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and that is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and A appearance; appearance; appearance; 3)3)3)ShadowsShadowsShadowscreated that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viabviabviability of a natural feature or planting, such as a garden;ility of a natural feature or planting, such as a garden;ility of a natural feature or planting, such as a garden; 4)4)IsolationIsolationIsolationof a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a significant relationship;significant relationship;significant relationship; R 5)5)5)Direct or indirect obstructionDirect or indirect obstructionDirect or indirect obstructionof significant views or vistas within, from, or built and nnnatural features;atural features;atural features; 6)A change in land useA change in land useA change in land usesuch as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; and D 6 MCM,“Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans, Info Sheet #5”in Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process: Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Policies of the Ontario Provincial Policy Statement, 2005(Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2006) 10 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 7)Land disturbancessuch as a change in grade that alters soils, drainage patterns that adversely affect an archaeological resource. The HIAincludesa consideration of direct and indirect adverse impacts on adjacent properties with known or potential cultural heritage value or interestin Section 8. T F A R D 11 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 3 POLICY FRAMEWORK 3.1Provincial Planning Context In Ontario, cultural heritage is considered a matter of provincial interest and cultural heritage resources are managed under Provincial legislation, policy, regulations,and guidelines. Cultural heritage is established as a key provincial interest directly through the provisions of the heritage is established as a key provincial interest directly through the provisions of the heritage is established as a key provincial interest directly through the provisions of the Planning Act, the OHA, and the PPS. Other provincial legislation deals with cultural heritage indirectly or . Other provincial legislation deals with cultural heritage indirectly or . Other provincial legislation deals with cultural heritage indirectly or in specific cases. These various acts and the policies under these acts indicate broad support in specific cases. These various acts and the policies under these acts indicate broad support in specific cases. These various acts and the policies under these acts indicate broad support for the protection of cultural heritage by the Province. They also provide a legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage by the Province. They also provide a legal framework for the protection of cultural heritage by the Province. They also provide a legal framework through which minimum standards for heritage evaluation are established. What follows is an through which minimum standards for heritage evaluation are established. What follows is an through which minimum standards for heritage evaluation are established. What follows is an analysis of the applicable legislation and policy regarding the identification and evaluation of analysis of the applicable legislation and policy regarding the identification and evaluation of analysis of the applicable legislation and policy regarding the identification and evaluation of cultural heritage. The Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 The Planning Actis the primary document for municipal and provincial land use planning in is the primary document for municipal and provincial land use planning in is the primary document for municipal and provincial land use planning in Ontario. This Act sets the context for provincial interest in heritage. It states under Part I (2, d): Ontario. This Act sets the context for provincial interest in heritage. It states under Part I (2, d): Ontario. This Act sets the context for provincial interest in heritage. It states under Part I (2, d): T The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Municipal Board, in carrying out their the Municipal Board, in carrying out their the Municipal Board, in carrying out their responsibilitiesresponsibilitiesresponsibilitiesunder this Act, shall under this Act, shall under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as…the have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as…the have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as…the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, 777 archaeological or scientific interestarchaeological or scientific interest.. F Under Section 1 of The Planning ActThe Planning Act: : A decision of the council of a A decision of the council of a A decision of the council of a municipalitymunicipalitymunicipality, a local board, a planning board, a , a local board, a planning board, a , a local board, a planning board, a minister of the Crown and a ministry, board, commission or agency of the minister of the Crown and a ministry, board, commission or agency of the minister of the Crown and a ministry, board, commission or agency of the government, including the Tribunal, in respect of the exercise of any authority government, including the Tribunal, in respect of the exercise of any authority government, including the Tribunal, in respect of the exercise of any authority 8 that affects a planning matter...shall be consistent with \[the that affects a planning matter...shall be consistent with \[the that affects a planning matter...shall be consistent with \[the PPS\]. A Details about provincial interest as it relates to land use planning and development in the Details about provincial interest as it relates to land use planning and development in the Details about provincial interest as it relates to land use planning and development in the province are outlined in the province are outlined in the province are outlined in the PPSPPSPPSwhichwhichmakes the consideration of cultural heritage equal to all makes the consideration of cultural heritage equal to all other considerations concerning planning and development within the province.other considerations concerning planning and development within the province.other considerations concerning planning and development within the province. Provincial Policy Statement (2020)Provincial Policy Statement (2020)Provincial Policy Statement (2020) TheTheThePPSPPSPPSprovides further direction for municipalities regarding provincial requirementsprovides further direction for municipalities regarding provincial requirementsprovides further direction for municipalities regarding provincial requirementsand sets R the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land in Ontario. Land use the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land in Ontario. Land use the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land in Ontario. Land use planning decisions made by municipalities, planning boards, the Province, or a commissioplanning decisions made by municipalities, planning boards, the Province, or a commissioplanning decisions made by municipalities, planning boards, the Province, or a commission or agency of the government must be consistent with the agency of the government must be consistent with the agency of the government must be consistent with the PPS.The Province deems cultural heritage and archaeological resources to provide important environmental, economic, and social heritage and archaeological resources to provide important environmental, economic, and social heritage and archaeological resources to provide important environmental, economic, and social benefits, and benefits, and PPSPPSPPSdirectly addresses cultural heritage in Section 1.7.1e and Section 2.6.directly addresses cultural heritage in Section 1.7.1e and Section 2.6.directly addresses cultural heritage in Section 1.7.1e and Section 2.6. D 7 Province of Ontario, “Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13,” July 1, 2022, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p13, Part I (2, d). 8 Province of Ontario, “Planning Act,” Part I S.5. 12 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Section 1.7 of the PPSregards long-term economic prosperity and promotes cultural heritage as a tool for economic prosperity. The relevant subsection states that long-term economic prosperity should be supported by: 1.7.1e encouraginga sense of place, by promoting well-designed built form and cultural planning, and by conserving features that help define character, including cultural planning, and by conserving features that help define character, including cultural planning, and by conserving features that help define character, including built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. Section 2.6 of the PPSarticulates provincial policy regarding cultural heritage and archaeology. articulates provincial policy regarding cultural heritage and archaeology. articulates provincial policy regarding cultural heritage and archaeology. Subsection’s state: 2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. 2.6.2Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands Development and site alteration shall not be permitted on lands containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential unless containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential unless containing archaeological resources or areas of archaeological potential unless significant archaeological resources have been conserved.significant archaeological resources have been conserved.significant archaeological resources have been conserved. 2.6.3Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on T adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed protected heritage property except where the proposed protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will heritage property will heritage property will be conserved. 2.6.4 Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological F management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources.archaeological resources.archaeological resources. 2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural 99 heritage and archaeological resources.heritage and archaeological resources.heritage and archaeological resources. A The definition of significance in the The definition of significance in the The definition of significance in the PPSPPSPPSstates that criteria for determining significance for states that criteria for determining significance for states that criteria for determining significance for 10 cultural heritage resources are determined by the Province under the authority of the cultural heritage resources are determined by the Province under the authority of the cultural heritage resources are determined by the Province under the authority of the OHA. ThePPSPPSPPSmakes the consideration of cultural heritage equal to all other considerations makes the consideration of cultural heritage equal to all other considerations makes the consideration of cultural heritage equal to all other considerations and recognizes that there are complex interrelationships among environmental, economic and social recognizes that there are complex interrelationships among environmental, economic and social recognizes that there are complex interrelationships among environmental, economic and social factors in land use planning. It is intended to be read in its entirefactors in land use planning. It is intended to be read in its entirefactors in land use planning. It is intended to be read in its entirety and relevant policies applied in each situation.in each situation.in each situation. R AHIAHIAHIAmay be required by a municipality in response to Section 2.6.1 and 2.6.3 to conserve built may be required by a municipality in response to Section 2.6.1 and 2.6.3 to conserve built may be required by a municipality in response to Section 2.6.1 and 2.6.3 to conserve built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapesheritage resources, cultural heritage landscapesheritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes, and the heritage attributes of a protected heritage propertyheritage propertyheritage property. . Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18 TheOHA and associated regulations establish the protection of cultural heritage resources as a and associated regulations establish the protection of cultural heritage resources as a D key consideration in the land-use planning process, set minimum standards for the evaluation of 9 Province of Ontario, “Provincial Policy Statement,” 2020, 29. 10 Ibid.51. 13 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 heritage resources in the province, and give municipalities power to identify and conserve 11 individual properties, districts, or landscapes of cultural heritage value or interest. Part I (2) of the OHAenables the Minister to determine policies, priorities, and programs for the conservation, protection, and preservation of the heritage of Ontario. TheOHA and associated regulations establish the protection of cultural heritage resources as a key consideregulations establish the protection of cultural heritage resources as a key consideregulations establish the protection of cultural heritage resources as a key consideration in the land-use planning process, set minimum standards for the evaluation of heritage resources in use planning process, set minimum standards for the evaluation of heritage resources in use planning process, set minimum standards for the evaluation of heritage resources in the province, and give municipalities power to identify and conserve individual properties, the province, and give municipalities power to identify and conserve individual properties, the province, and give municipalities power to identify and conserve individual properties, 12 O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06andandandOntario Ontario districts, or landscapes of cultural heritage value or interest. Regulation 10/06 (O. Reg. 10/06) outline criteria for determining cultural heritage value or ) outline criteria for determining cultural heritage value or ) outline criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest of provincial significance.interest and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest of provincial significance.interest and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest of provincial significance. Individual heritage properties are designated by municipalities under Section 29, Part IV of the Individual heritage properties are designated by municipalities under Section 29, Part IV of the Individual heritage properties are designated by municipalities under Section 29, Part IV of the OHA.A municipality may list a property on a municipal heritage register under Section 27, Part A municipality may list a property on a municipal heritage register under Section 27, Part A municipality may list a property on a municipal heritage register under Section 27, Part IV of the OHA.A municipality may designate heritage conservation districts under SectionA municipality may designate heritage conservation districts under SectionA municipality may designate heritage conservation districts under Section41, 41, 41, Part V of the OHA. An OHAdesignation applies to real property rather than individual designation applies to real property rather than individual designation applies to real property rather than individual structures. T Amendments to the OHAwere announced by the Province under Bill 108: were announced by the Province under Bill 108: were announced by the Province under Bill 108: More Homes, More More Homes, More Choices Act and came into effect on July 1, 2021. Previously, municipal council’s decision to and came into effect on July 1, 2021. Previously, municipal council’s decision to and came into effect on July 1, 2021. Previously, municipal council’s decision to protect a property determined to be significant under the protect a property determined to be significant under the protect a property determined to be significant under the OHA OHA was final with appeals being was final with appeals being was final with appeals being taken to the Conservation Review Board, who played an advisory roletaken to the Conservation Review Board, who played an advisory roletaken to the Conservation Review Board, who played an advisory role...With Bill 108 With Bill 108 With Bill 108 proclaimed, decisions are appealable to the Ontario Land Tribunal for adjudication.decisions are appealable to the Ontario Land Tribunal for adjudication.decisions are appealable to the Ontario Land Tribunal for adjudication. F Sections 33 and 34 Part IV and Section 42 Part V of the Sections 33 and 34 Part IV and Section 42 Part V of the Sections 33 and 34 Part IV and Section 42 Part V of the OHA OHA require owners of designated require owners of designated require owners of designated heritage properties to obtain a permit or approval in writing from a municipality/municipal council heritage properties to obtain a permit or approval in writing from a municipality/municipal council heritage properties to obtain a permit or approval in writing from a municipality/municipal council to alter, demolish or remove a structure from a designated heritage property. These sections to alter, demolish or remove a structure from a designated heritage property. These sections to alter, demolish or remove a structure from a designated heritage property. These sections also enable a municipality to require an applicant to provide information or material that council also enable a municipality to require an applicant to provide information or material that council also enable a municipality to require an applicant to provide information or material that council considers it may need to decide which may include a HIA.considers it may need to decide which may include a HIA.considers it may need to decide which may include a HIA. A Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005 ThePlaces to Grow ActPlaces to Grow ActPlaces to Grow Actguides growth in the province and was consolidated 1 June 2021.guides growth in the province and was consolidated 1 June 2021.guides growth in the province and was consolidated 1 June 2021.It is intended:intended:intended: a)a)to enable decisions about growth to be made in ways that sustain a robust to enable decisions about growth to be made in ways that sustain a robust to enable decisions about growth to be made in ways that sustain a robust economy, build strong communitieseconomy, build strong communitieseconomy, build strong communitiesand promote a healthy environment and R a culture of conservation;a culture of conservation;a culture of conservation; b)b)b)to promote a rational and balanced approach to decisions about growth that to promote a rational and balanced approach to decisions about growth that to promote a rational and balanced approach to decisions about growth that builds on community priorities, strengths and opportunities and makes builds on community priorities, strengths and opportunities and makes builds on community priorities, strengths and opportunities and makes efficient use of infrastructure;efficient use of infrastructure;efficient use of infrastructure; c) to enable planning for growth in a manner that reflects a broad geographical to enable planning for growth in a manner that reflects a broad geographical to enable planning for growth in a manner that reflects a broad geographical D perspective and is integrated across natural and municipal boundaries; 11 Province of Ontario, “Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18,” last modifiedOctober19, 2021, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o18 12 Ibid. 14 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 d)to ensure that a long-term vision and long-term goals guide decision-making about growth and provide for the co-ordination of growth policies among all 13 levels of government. This act is administered by theMinistryof Infrastructure and enables decision making across municipal and regional boundaries for more efficient governance in the Greater Golden municipal and regional boundaries for more efficient governance in the Greater Golden municipal and regional boundaries for more efficient governance in the Greater Golden Horseshoe area. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020)ace to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020)ace to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) TheProperty islocated within the area regulated by A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (the Growth Plan) which came into effect on 16 May) which came into effect on 16 May) which came into effect on 16 May201920192019and was and was consolidated on 28 August 2020. InSection 1.2.1, theGrowth Planstates that itspolicies are based on key principlespolicies are based on key principlespolicies are based on key principles, which , which , which includes: Conserve and promote cultural heritage resources to support the social, Conserve and promote cultural heritage resources to support the social, Conserve and promote cultural heritage resources to support the social, economic, and cultural well-being of all communities, including First being of all communities, including First being of all communities, including First T 14 Nations and Métis communities. Section 4.1 Context, in the Growth Plandescribesdescribesdescribesthe area it coversthe area it coversthe area it coversas containing:as containing: …a broad array of important hydrologic and natural heritage features and areas, a broad array of important hydrologic and natural heritage features and areas, a broad array of important hydrologic and natural heritage features and areas, a vibrant and diverse agricultural land base, irreplaceable cultural heritage a vibrant and diverse agricultural land base, irreplaceable cultural heritage a vibrant and diverse agricultural land base, irreplaceable cultural heritage F 15 resources, and valuable renewable and nonresources, and valuable renewable and nonresources, and valuable renewable and non---renewable resourcesrenewable resourcesrenewable resources. It describes cultural heritage resources asdescribes cultural heritage resources asdescribes cultural heritage resources as:: TheGGH also contains important cultural heritage resources that contribute to a sense of also contains important cultural heritage resources that contribute to a sense of also contains important cultural heritage resources that contribute to a sense of identity, support a vibrant tourism industry, and attract investment based on cultural amenities. ntity, support a vibrant tourism industry, and attract investment based on cultural amenities. ntity, support a vibrant tourism industry, and attract investment based on cultural amenities. Accommodating growth can put pressure on these resources through development and site Accommodating growth can put pressure on these resources through development and site Accommodating growth can put pressure on these resources through development and site A alteration. It is necessary to plan in a way that protects and maximizes the benefits of these alteration. It is necessary to plan in a way that protects and maximizes the benefits of these alteration. It is necessary to plan in a way that protects and maximizes the benefits of these 16 resources that make our communities unique and attractive places to liveresources that make our communities unique and attractive places to liveresources that make our communities unique and attractive places to live. Policies specific to cultural heritage resources are outlined in Section 4.2.7, as follows:Policies specific to cultural heritage resources are outlined in Section 4.2.7, as follows:Policies specific to cultural heritage resources are outlined in Section 4.2.7, as follows: 1.1.1.Cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and Cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and Cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and benefit communities, particularly in strategic growth areas;benefit communities, particularly in strategic growth areas;benefit communities, particularly in strategic growth areas; R 2.2.2.Municipalities will work with stakeholders, as well as First Nations and Métis Municipalities will work with stakeholders, as well as First Nations and Métis Municipalities will work with stakeholders, as well as First Nations and Métis communities, in developing and implementing official plan policies and communities, in developing and implementing official plan policies and communities, in developing and implementing official plan policies and strategies for the identification, wise use and management of cultural heridentification, wise use and management of cultural heridentification, wise use and management of cultural heritage resources; and, D 13 Province of Ontario, “Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005, c. 13,” last modified April 19, 2021, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/05p13, 1. 14 Province of Ontario, “A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe,” last modified 2020,https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-place-to-grow-office-consolidation-en-2020-08-28.pdf, 6. 15 Ibid.39. 16 Ibid.39. 15 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 3.Municipalities are encouraged to prepare archaeological management plans and 17 municipal cultural plans and consider them in their decision-making. Amendment 1 to A Place to Growaligns the definitions of A Place to Growwith PPS 2020. Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25 TheMunicipal Actwas consolidated on 11 April 2022and enables municipalities to be and enables municipalities to be and enables municipalities to be 18 TheMunicipal ActMunicipal ActMunicipal Actauthorizes authorizes responsible and accountable governments with their jurisdiction. powers and duties for providing good governmentandis administered by the Ministris administered by the Ministris administered by the Ministry of y of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Amongst the many powers enabled by the Municipal Actis the power to create Byis the power to create Byis the power to create By---laws within laws within laws within 19 the municipalities sphere of jurisdiction.Under Section 11 (3)Under Section 11 (3)Under Section 11 (3)lowerlowerlowerand upper and upper tier tier tier 2020 municipalities are given the power to pass by-lawson matters including culture and heritage.on matters including culture and heritage.on matters including culture and heritage. Enabling municipalities to adopt a by-law or a resolution by Council to protect heritage, which law or a resolution by Council to protect heritage, which law or a resolution by Council to protect heritage, which may include requirements for an HIA. Provincial Planning Context SummaryProvincial Planning Context Summary TT In summary, cultural heritage resources are considered an essential part of the land use In summary, cultural heritage resources are considered an essential part of the land use In summary, cultural heritage resources are considered an essential part of the land use planning process with their own unique considerations. As the province, these policies and planning process with their own unique considerations. As the province, these policies and planning process with their own unique considerations. As the province, these policies and guidelines must be considered by the local planning context.guidelines must be considered by the local planning context.guidelines must be considered by the local planning context.In general, the province requires In general, the province requires In general, the province requires significant cultural heritage resources to be conserved. significant cultural heritage resources to be conserved. significant cultural heritage resources to be conserved. FF Multiple layers of municipal legislation enable a municipality to require a HIA for alterations, Multiple layers of municipal legislation enable a municipality to require a HIA for alterations, Multiple layers of municipal legislation enable a municipality to require a HIA for alterations, demolition or removal of a building or structure from a listed or designated heritage property. demolition or removal of a building or structure from a listed or designated heritage property. demolition or removal of a building or structure from a listed or designated heritage property. These requirements support the conservation of cultural heritage resources in Ontario following These requirements support the conservation of cultural heritage resources in Ontario following These requirements support the conservation of cultural heritage resources in Ontario following provincial policy direction.provincial policy direction.provincial policy direction. 3.2Regional Planning ContextRegional Planning ContextRegional Planning Context AA Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (2015) TheRegional Municipality of Waterloo Official PlanRegional Municipality of Waterloo Official PlanRegional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan(WROP) was approved with modifications by 21 the Ontario Municipal Board on 18 June 2015 and is currently under review.the Ontario Municipal Board on 18 June 2015 and is currently under review.the Ontario Municipal Board on 18 June 2015 and is currently under review.TheROP sets out policies to guide growth and land use within the Region in keeping with provincial policy.policies to guide growth and land use within the Region in keeping with provincial policy.policies to guide growth and land use within the Region in keeping with provincial policy. Chapter 3 addresses cultural heritage policies, writing that:Chapter 3 addresses cultural heritage policies, writing that:Chapter 3 addresses cultural heritage policies, writing that: RR These resources provide an important means of defining and confirming a These resources provide an important means of defining and confirming a These resources provide an important means of defining and confirming a regional identity, enhancing the quality of life of the community, supporting social regional identity, enhancing the quality of life of the community, supporting social regional identity, enhancing the quality of life of the community, supporting social development and promoting economic prosperity. The Region is committed to development and promoting economic prosperity. The Region is committed to development and promoting economic prosperity. The Region is committed to the conservation of its cultural heritage. This responsibility is shared with the the conservation of its cultural heritage. This responsibility is shared with the the conservation of its cultural heritage. This responsibility is shared with the 17 DD Province of Ontario, “A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe,”2020, 47. 18 Province of Ontario, “Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25,” last modified April 11, 2022, https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25. 19 Ibid.11. 20 Ibid.11(3). 21 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, “Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan,” last modified June 18, 2015,https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regional-government/land-use-planning.aspx 16 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Federal and Provincial governments, Area Municipalities, other government 22 agencies, the private sector, property owners and the community. Policies related to the Identification of Cultural Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Landscapes, Archaeology, Heritage Planning Advisory Committees, Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment,Conservation, Promotion and Research, and Scenic Roadsare outlined by the are outlined by the are outlined by the WROP. Policies most relevant to the Property and proposed development have been included and proposed development have been included and proposed development have been included below in Table 2. Table 2:Relevant Policies in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s Official PlanRelevant Policies in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s Official PlanRelevant Policies in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo’s Official Plan PolicyPolicy Text Identification of Cultural Heritage Resources 3.G.1 The Region and Area Municipalities will ensure that The Region and Area Municipalities will ensure that The Region and Area Municipalities will ensure that cultural heritage resourcescultural heritage resourcescultural heritage resourcesare are are conservedusing the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Heritage Act, the Heritage Act, the Planning ActPlanning ActPlanning Act, the , the Environmental Assessment Act, the Cemeteries ActCemeteries ActCemeteries Actand the Municipal Actand the Municipal Actand the Municipal Act. . TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 3.G.3Area Municipalitieswill identify cultural heritage resources by establishing and will identify cultural heritage resources by establishing and maintaining a register of properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest. maintaining a register of properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest. Area Municipalities will include on their register properties designated under Part IV, Area Municipalities will include on their register properties designated under Part IV, V or VI of the Heritage Act, and will consider including, but not beV or VI of the Heritage Act, and will consider including, but not be limited to, the following additional cultural heritage resources of cultural heritagelimited to, the following additional cultural heritage resources of cultural heritage FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF value or interest: a)properties that have heritage conservation easements or covenants registered properties that have heritage conservation easements or covenants registered against title;against title; b)cultural heritage resources of Regional interest; andcultural heritage resources of Regional interest; and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA c) cultural heritage resources identified by the Grand River Conservation Authority cultural heritage resources identified by the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Federal or Provincial governments.and the Federal or Provincial governments. Cultural Heritage LandscapesCultural Heritage Landscapes 3.G.53.G.5The Region will prepareThe Region will prepareand updateand updatea Regional Implementation Guideline for RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation. This guideline will outline the framework Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation. This guideline will outline the framework for identifying Cultural Heritage Landscapes, including Cultural Heritage Landscapes for identifying Cultural Heritage Landscapes, including Cultural Heritage Landscapes of Regional interest, and for documenting each individual landscape through a of Regional interest, and for documenting each individual landscape through a Cultural Heritage Conservation Landscape Plan that includes:Cultural Heritage Conservation Landscape Plan that includes: (a)(a)a statement of significance;a statement of significance; DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD (b)a listing of the cultural heritage resources and attributes being conserved withinthe Cultural Heritage Landscape through the use of existingplanning 22 Regional Municipality of Waterloo, “Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan,” 2015, 48. 17 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text tools, such as Heritage Act designations, listings on theMunicipal Register, official plan policies, secondary plans and zoning bylaws; and (c) recommendations for additional conservation measures. 3.G.6Area Municipalities will designate Cultural Heritage Landscapes in their official plans Municipalities will designate Cultural Heritage Landscapes in their official plans and establish associated policies to conserve these areas. The purpose of this and establish associated policies to conserve these areas. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of cultural heritage resources that together designation is to conserve groupings of cultural heritage resources that together have greaterheritage significance than their constituent elements or parts.heritage significance than their constituent elements or parts. 3.G.7The Region will assist Area Municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage The Region will assist Area Municipalities with the preparation of Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation Plans for Cultural Heritage Landscapes of Regional Landscape Conservation Plans for Cultural Heritage Landscapes of Regional interest. Archaeology 3.G.8The Region will prepare and update a Regional Archaeological Master Plan, an The Region will prepare and update a Regional Archaeological Master Plan, an TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT associated Regional Archaeological Implementation Guideline, and maps identifying associated Regional Archaeological Implementation Guideline, and maps identifying archaeological resourcesandareasareasof archaeological potentialarchaeological potential. The Master Plan will provide detailed information on the variables used to determine areas of de detailed information on the variables used to determine areas of archaeological potentialand define the archaeological review process.and define the archaeological review process. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 3.G.9During the review of development applicationsdevelopment applicationsdevelopment applicationsand/or and/or and/or site planssite planssite plans, the Region and/or Area Municipalities will require the owner/applicant to submit an archaeological Area Municipalities will require the owner/applicant to submit an archaeological Area Municipalities will require the owner/applicant to submit an archaeological assessment conducted by a licensed archaeologist in accordance with the assessment conducted by a licensed archaeologist in accordance with the assessment conducted by a licensed archaeologist in accordance with the provisions of the Regional Archaeological Implementation Guideline following the provisions of the Regional Archaeological Implementation Guideline following the provisions of the Regional Archaeological Implementation Guideline following the Ministry of Tourism and Culture’s Standards and Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the nistry of Tourism and Culture’s Standards and Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the nistry of Tourism and Culture’s Standards and Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Province, where Province, where Province, where archaeological resourcesarchaeological resourcesarchaeological resourcesand/or and/or and/or areas of archaeological potential AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA have been identified in the Archaeological Master Plan.have been identified in the Archaeological Master Plan.have been identified in the Archaeological Master Plan. 3.G.10Where an Where an archaeological assessmentarchaeological assessmentidentifies a significant archaeological resourceresource, the Region or Area Municipality will require the owner/applicant to , the Region or Area Municipality will require the owner/applicant to conserve the conserve the significant archaeological resourcesignificant archaeological resourceby: a)ensuring the site remains undeveloped and, wherever appropriate, designated ensuring the site remains undeveloped and, wherever appropriate, designated RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR as open space by the Area Municipality; oras open space by the Area Municipality; or b)b)removing the removing the significant archaeological resourcefrom the site by a licensed archaeologist, prior to site grading or construction.archaeologist, prior to site grading or construction. Cultural Heritage Impact AssessmentCultural Heritage Impact Assessment 3.G.13Area Municipalities will establish policies in their official plans to require the DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD submission of a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessmentin support of a proposed developmentthat includes or is adjacent to a designated property orincludes a non- designated resource of cultural heritage value or interest listed on the Municipal Heritage Register. 18 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text 3.G.14Where a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessmentrequired under Policy 3.G.13 relates to a cultural heritage resourceof Regional interest, the Area Municipality will ensure that a copy of the assessment is circulated to the Region for review. In this situation, the Cultural Heritage Impact Assessmentsubmitted by the owner/applicant will be submitted by the owner/applicant will be submitted by the owner/applicant will be completed to the satisfaction of both the Region and the Area Municipalitycompleted to the satisfaction of both the Region and the Area Municipalitycompleted to the satisfaction of both the Region and the Area Municipality. 3.G.15 Where a development applicationincludes, or is adjacent to, a includes, or is adjacent to, a cultural heritage cultural heritage resourceof Regional interest which is not listed on a Municipal Heritage Register, of Regional interest which is not listed on a Municipal Heritage Register, the owner/applicant will be required to submit a Cultural Heritage Impact Cultural Heritage Impact Assessmentto the satisfaction of the Region. 3.G.16The Region will undertake a Cultural Heritage ImpactCultural Heritage ImpactCultural Heritage ImpactCultural Heritage ImpactCultural Heritage Impact Assessment Assessment Assessmentand consult with and consult with and consult with the affected Area Municipality and the Regional Heritage Planning Advisory the affected Area Municipality and the Regional Heritage Planning Advisory the affected Area Municipality and the Regional Heritage Planning Advisory Committee prior to planning, designing or altering Regional buildings or Committee prior to planning, designing or altering Regional buildings or Committee prior to planning, designing or altering Regional buildings or infrastructurethat may affect a cultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourcelisted on the regiolisted on the regiolisted on the region-n-wide TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT inventory described in Policy 3.G.4. The inventory described in Policy 3.G.4. The Cultural Heritage Impact AssessmentCultural Heritage Impact AssessmentCultural Heritage Impact Assessmentwill be reviewed and approved in accordance with the policies in this Plan. reviewed and approved in accordance with the policies in this Plan. reviewed and approved in accordance with the policies in this Plan. 3.G.17Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment will include, but not be limited to the following: Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment will include, but not be limited to the following: a)historical research, site analysis and evaluation; historical research, site analysis and evaluation; FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF b)identification of the significance and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage identification of the significance and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage resource; c) description of the proposed development or site alteration; description of the proposed development or site alteration; d)assessment of development or site alteration impacts; assessment of development or site alteration impacts; AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA e)consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation methods; consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation methods; f)f)schedule and reporting structure for implementation and monitoring; and schedule and reporting structure for implementation and monitoring; and g)g)a summary statement and conservation recommendations. a summary statement and conservation recommendations. 3.G.183.G.183.G.18Where a Where a Cultural Heritage Impact AssessmentCultural Heritage Impact AssessmentCultural Heritage Impact Assessmentrequired in this Plan relates to a RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR cultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourcecultural heritage resourceof Regional interest, the conservation recommendations will, wherever feasible, aim to will, wherever feasible, aim to will, wherever feasible, aim to conserve cultural heritage resourcesintact by: a)a)a)recognizing and incorporating heritage resources and their surrounding context recognizing and incorporating heritage resources and their surrounding context recognizing and incorporating heritage resources and their surrounding context into the proposed development in a manner that does notinto the proposed development in a manner that does notinto the proposed development in a manner that does notcompromise or destroy the heritage resource; the heritage resource; the heritage resource; b)protecting and stabilizing built heritage resources that may be underutilized, DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD derelict, or vacant; and c) designing development to be physically and visually compatible with, and distinguishable from, the heritage resource. 19 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text 3.G.19Where it is not feasible to conserve a cultural heritage resourceintact in accordance with Policy 3.G.18, the conservation recommendations will: a)promote the reuse or adaptive reuse of the resource, building, or building promote the reuse or adaptive reuse of the resource, building, or building elements to preserve the resource and the handiwork of past artisans; and elements to preserve the resource and the handiwork of past artisans; and b)require the owner/applicant to provide measured drawings, a land use history, require the owner/applicant to provide measured drawings, a land use history, photographs and other available documentation of the cultural heritage resource photographs and other available documentation of the cultural heritage resource in its surrounding context. 3.G.20Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments may be scoped or waived by the Region or Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments may be scoped or waived by the Region or Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments may be scoped or waived by the Region or the Area Municipality as applicable. Region of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage MastRegion of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage MastRegion of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master Plan (2002)er Plan (2002)er Plan (2002) TheRegion of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master PlanRegion of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master PlanRegion of Waterloo Arts, Culture, and Heritage Master Plan ( ( (Master Master Master PlanPlan) includes ) includes TTTTTTTT recommendations and implementation strategies for identification, protection, promotion, and recommendations and implementation strategies for identification, protection, promotion, and recommendations and implementation strategies for identification, protection, promotion, and investment culturalresources in the region. The resources in the region. The Master PlanMaster PlanMaster Plan w w was created as created as created becausebecause: Arts, culture, and heritage initiatives make a significant contribution to the wellArts, culture, and heritage initiatives make a significant contribution to the wellArts, culture, and heritage initiatives make a significant contribution to the well- being and quality of life of the residents of Waterloo Region. They reflect and being and quality of life of the residents of Waterloo Region. They reflect and being and quality of life of the residents of Waterloo Region. They reflect and enhance the community’s unique identity and diversity, enhance the community’s unique identity and diversity, enhance the community’s unique identity and diversity, contribute to economic contribute to economic contribute to economic FFFFFFFF vitality, and shape future growth. Accordingly, the Region of Waterloo, alone or in vitality, and shape future growth. Accordingly, the Region of Waterloo, alone or in vitality, and shape future growth. Accordingly, the Region of Waterloo, alone or in partnership, will identify, protect, promote, and invest in existing resources; partnership, will identify, protect, promote, and invest in existing resources; partnership, will identify, protect, promote, and invest in existing resources; implement strategies to support existing and additional arts, culture, and heritage implement strategies to support existing and additional arts, culture, and heritage implement strategies to support existing and additional arts, culture, and heritage 23 initiatives; and ensure their longinitiatives; and ensure their longinitiatives; and ensure their long--term prosperity and sustainability.term prosperity and sustainability.term prosperity and sustainability. 24 The goals of the Master PlanMaster PlanMaster Planare to achieve the following:are to achieve the following:are to achieve the following: AAAAAAAA 1.Community Identity and CharacterCommunity Identity and CharacterCommunity Identity and Character Develop a stronger cultural heritage identity for the region, one that celebrates its Develop a stronger cultural heritage identity for the region, one that celebrates its Develop a stronger cultural heritage identity for the region, one that celebrates its diversity, the character of its multiple towns and cities and the differing traditions diversity, the character of its multiple towns and cities and the differing traditions diversity, the character of its multiple towns and cities and the differing traditions of their founders; its natural features; and the of their founders; its natural features; and the of their founders; its natural features; and the richness of its arts, culture and heritage assets.heritage assets.heritage assets. RRRRRRRR 2.2.Education and AwarenessEducation and AwarenessEducation and Awareness Build a stronger foundation for arts, culture, and heritage within the community.Build a stronger foundation for arts, culture, and heritage within the community.Build a stronger foundation for arts, culture, and heritage within the community. 3.3.3.Coordination and Partnership FormationCoordination and Partnership FormationCoordination and Partnership Formation Encourage a greater degree of collaboration across all sectors and disciplines.Encourage a greater degree of collaboration across all sectors and disciplines.Encourage a greater degree of collaboration across all sectors and disciplines. 4.ResourcesResourcesResources DDDDDDDD 23 Region of Waterloo, “Arts, Culture and Heritage Master Plan,” last modified October 2002, https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploring-the-region/resources/Documents/artsmasterplan.pdf, I. 24 Ibid.IV. 20 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Support opportunities for the development and sustainability of existing arts, culture, and heritage organizations. 5.Accessibility Maximize accessibility to arts, culture, and heritage opportunities and information. TheMaster Plan providesguidance and direction for the region for protecting, identifying, and guidance and direction for the region for protecting, identifying, and guidance and direction for the region for protecting, identifying, and enhancing cultural heritage aspects for communities, and in serving as a primary document to enhancing cultural heritage aspects for communities, and in serving as a primary document to enhancing cultural heritage aspects for communities, and in serving as a primary document to help develop new policies and implementation strategies. Regional Planning Context Summary The Region has acknowledged the identification and conservation of cultural heritage resources The Region has acknowledged the identification and conservation of cultural heritage resources The Region has acknowledged the identification and conservation of cultural heritage resources is animportant element of the land use planning process. Cultural heritage resources are element of the land use planning process. Cultural heritage resources are element of the land use planning process. Cultural heritage resources are viewed as important drivers for the Region’s cultural and economic growth. The Region requiviewed as important drivers for the Region’s cultural and economic growth. The Region requiviewed as important drivers for the Region’s cultural and economic growth. The Region requires the completion of an HIA for proposed work on a listed property and assessment of the completion of an HIA for proposed work on a listed property and assessment of the completion of an HIA for proposed work on a listed property and assessment of archaeological potential. If the property is of Regional interest, a copy of the HIA must be archaeological potential. If the property is of Regional interest, a copy of the HIA must be archaeological potential. If the property is of Regional interest, a copy of the HIA must be TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT submitted to the Region for review. 3.3Local Planning Context City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014)City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014)City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) TheCity of Kitchener Official PlanCity of Kitchener Official Plan ( (OPOP) was approved with modifications by the Region on 19 ) was approved with modifications by the Region on 19 ) was approved with modifications by the Region on 19 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 2525 TheTheTheOP OP OP guides growth, land use, and guides growth, land use, and guides growth, land use, and November 2014 and was consolidated to 2019.November 2014 and was consolidated to 2019.November 2014 and was consolidated to 2019. 262626 environmental protection for the City to 2031.environmental protection for the City to 2031.environmental protection for the City to 2031. Section 12 addresses cultural heritage policies which are of Section 12 addresses cultural heritage policies which are of Section 12 addresses cultural heritage policies which are of historicalhistorical, cultural,social, economic, 272727 Policies relevant to the Property and Policies relevant to the Property and Policies relevant to the Property and environmental, and educational valueand educational valueand educational valueto the Cityto the Cityto the City.. proposed development have been included below in proposed development have been included below in proposed development have been included below in Table Table Table 3. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Table 3:Relevant Policies in the City of Kitchener’s Official PlanRelevant Policies in the City of Kitchener’s Official PlanRelevant Policies in the City of Kitchener’s Official Plan PolicyPolicy TextPolicy Text ObjectivesObjectives 12.1.1.12.1.1.12.1.1. ToToconserve conserve conserve the the city’s cultural heritage resources city’s cultural heritage resources city’s cultural heritage resources through their identification, RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. attributes and integrity are retained. attributes and integrity are retained. 12.1.22.To ensure that all development or redevelopment and site alteration is sensitive To ensure that all development or redevelopment and site alteration is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources are conserved. are conserved. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 25 City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener Official Plan,” last modified October 29, 2019, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_City_of_Kitchener_Official_Plan_2014.pdf, cover. 26 Ibid. 1-1. 27 Ibid.12-1. 21 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text 12.1.3. To increase public awareness and appreciation for cultural heritage resources through educational, promotional and incentive programs. 12.1.4. To lead the community by example with the identification, protection, use and/or To lead the community by example with the identification, protection, use and/or management of cultural heritage resources owned and/or leased by the owned and/or leased by the City. Policies 12.C.1.1.TheCity will ensure that cultural heritage resources are are conserved conserved using the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Planning ActPlanning Act, the , the Environmental Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services ActFuneral, Burial and Cremation Services Actand the and the Municipal Act. 12.C.1.3. TheCity will develop, prioritize and maintain a list of will develop, prioritize and maintain a list of will develop, prioritize and maintain a list of cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources which will include the following: a)properties listed as non-designated properties of cultural heritage value or designated properties of cultural heritage value or designated properties of cultural heritage value or TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT interest on the Municipal Heritage RegisterMunicipal Heritage RegisterMunicipal Heritage Register;;; b)properties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Actproperties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Actproperties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act; c) cultural heritage landscapes; and, cultural heritage landscapes; and, cultural heritage landscapes; and, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF d)heritage corridors. heritage corridors. Thelist may also include list may also include list may also include cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources identified in Federal, Provincial Provincial Provincial andandandRegional Regional Regional inventories and properties listed on the Heritage inventories and properties listed on the Heritage inventories and properties listed on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings until such time as these properties are Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings until such time as these properties are Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings until such time as these properties are re-evaluated and consideredevaluated and consideredevaluated and consideredfor listing on the for listing on the for listing on the Municipal Heritage Register. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 12.C.1.4.TheCity City acknowledges that not all of the acknowledges that not all of the city’s cultural heritage resources have been identified as a been identified as a cultural heritage resource as in Policy 12.C.1.3. Accordingly, a property does not have to bea property does not have to belisted or designated to be considered as having cultural heritage value or interest. cultural heritage value or interest. 12.C.1.12.C.1.12.C.1.55.. Through the processing of applications submitted under the Through the processing of applications submitted under the Through the processing of applications submitted under the Planning Act, RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR resources of potential cultural heritage value or interest will be identified, resources of potential cultural heritage value or interest will be identified, resources of potential cultural heritage value or interest will be identified, evaluated and considered for listing as a nonevaluated and considered for listing as a nonevaluated and considered for listing as a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the heritage value or interest on the heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register and/or designation under the under the under the OntariOntariOntario Heritage Act. 12.C.1.7. Properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest will be considered for Properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest will be considered for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. The cultural heritage value or designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. The cultural heritage value or DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD interest associated with the cultural heritage resource will be evaluated based on the regulation in the Ontario Heritage Actwhich provides criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest. Archaeology 22 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text 12.C.1.17.During the review of development applications or applications for site alteration, TheCity and/or the Region will require an owner/applicant to submit an archaeological assessment conducted by a licensed archaeologist in accordance with any applicable Regional or Provincial Standards and Guidelines, to the with any applicable Regional or Provincial Standards and Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the Province, where archaeological resources and/or areas of and/or areas of archaeological potential have been identified in the Regional Archaeological archaeological potential have been identified in the Regional Archaeological Master Plan. 12.C.1.18.Where an archaeological assessment identifies a significant archaeological significant archaeological significant archaeological resource, the City and/or the Region and the Province Province Province will require the will require the will require the owner/applicant to conserve the significant archaeological resource significant archaeological resource significant archaeological resource in in in accordance with Ministry approvals by: a)ensuring the site remains undeveloped and, wherever appropriate, ensuring the site remains undeveloped and, wherever appropriate, ensuring the site remains undeveloped and, wherever appropriate, designated as open space by the designated as open space by the CityCityCity; or, ; or, ; or, TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT b)removing thesignificant archaeological resource significant archaeological resource significant archaeological resource from the site by a licensed from the site by a licensed archaeologist, prior to site grading or construction. archaeologist, prior to site grading or construction. archaeologist, prior to site grading or construction. Conservation Measures 12.C.1.19. In addition to listing and designating properties under the In addition to listing and designating properties under the In addition to listing and designating properties under the Ontario Heritage Act, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF the City may use and adopt further measures to encourage the protection, may use and adopt further measures to encourage the protection, may use and adopt further measures to encourage the protection, maintenance and conservation of the maintenance and conservation of the maintenance and conservation of the city’s cultural heritage resources city’s cultural heritage resources city’s cultural heritage resources including built heritage and sbuilt heritage and sbuilt heritage and significant ignificant ignificant cultural heritage landscapes cultural heritage landscapes cultural heritage landscapes and implement Cultural Heritage Resource Conservation Measures Policies in this Plan. These may Heritage Resource Conservation Measures Policies in this Plan. These may Heritage Resource Conservation Measures Policies in this Plan. These may include butinclude butinclude butare not limited to covenants and easements pursuant to are not limited to covenants and easements pursuant to are not limited to covenants and easements pursuant to the Ontario Heritage ActHeritage ActHeritage Act; by; by--laws and agreements pursuant to the Planning Actlaws and agreements pursuant to the Planning Actlaws and agreements pursuant to the Planning Act (Zoning By- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA lawlaw, demolition control, site plan control, , demolition control, site plan control, , demolition control, site plan control, community improvement provisions, provisions in a subdivision agreement); and byprovisions in a subdivision agreement); and byprovisions in a subdivision agreement); and by-laws and agreements pursuant to the the the Municipal ActMunicipal ActMunicipal Act ( ( (Property Standards ByProperty Standards By-law, tree by-law, signby-law). 12.C.1.12.C.1.20.TheCity City will make decisions with respect to will make decisions with respect to cultural heritage resources that are consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, which require the consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, which require the RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR conservation conservation of significant cultural heritage resources. In addition, such decisions will be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the will be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada.rvation of Historic Places in Canada. 12.C.1.212121... All development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use All development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use All development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use designations and other policies of this Plan will conserve Kitchener’s significant designations and other policies of this Plan will conserve Kitchener’s significant designations and other policies of this Plan will conserve Kitchener’s significant cultural heritage resources. The conservation of significant cultural heritage cultural heritage resources. The conservation of significant cultural heritage cultural heritage resources. The conservation of significant cultural heritage DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD resources will bea requirement and/or condition in the processing and approval of applications submitted under the Planning Act. 12.C.1.22. TheCity may require financial securities from the owner/applicant of an application submitted under the Planning Act, including applications for consent, 23 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text site plan, draft plan of vacant land condominium and draft plan of subdivision, to ensure the conservation of the city’s cultural heritage resources both during and after the development process. Heritage Impact Assessments and Heritage Conservation PlansHeritage Conservation Plans 12.C.1.23.The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or a The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or a The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or a Heritage Conservation Plan for development, redevelopment and site alteration Heritage Conservation Plan for development, redevelopment and site alteration that has the potential to impact a cultural heritage resource and is proposed: that has the potential to impact a cultural heritage resource and is proposed: a)on or adjacent to a protected heritage property; protected heritage property; b)on or adjacent to a to a heritage corridor heritage corridor in accordance with in accordance with Policies 13.C.4.6 through 13.C.4.18 inclusive; Policies 13.C.4.6 through 13.C.4.18 inclusive; c) on properties listed as nonon properties listed as non--designated properties of designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Heritage Register; d)on properties listed on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory on properties listed on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings; and/or, of Historic Buildings; and/or, 1.e) on or adjacent to an identified cultural heritage landscape. e) on or adjacent to an identified cultural heritage landscape. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 12.C.1.24. Where a Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment required under Policy 12.C.1.23 relates to required under Policy 12.C.1.23 relates to required under Policy 12.C.1.23 relates to acultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource of of RegionalRegionalRegionalinterest, the interest, the City will ensure that a copy of the assessment is circulated to the of the assessment is circulated to the of the assessment is circulated to the Region Region for review prior to final for review prior to final consideration by the consideration by the consideration by the CityCityCity.. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 12.C.1.25.AHeritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment andandHeritage Conservation Plan Heritage Conservation Plan required by the City must be prepared by a must be prepared by a qualified person qualified person in accordance with the minimum requirements as outlined in the City of Kitchener’s Terms of Reference for requirements as outlined in the City of Kitchener’s Terms of Reference for Heritage Impact AssessmentHeritage Impact Assessments and Heritage Conservation Plans. 12.C.1.12.C.1.12.C.1.2626..The contents of a The contents of a The contents of a Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment will be outlined in a Terms of Reference. In general, the contents of a Reference. In general, the contents of a Reference. In general, the contents of a Heritage Impact Assessment will RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR include, but not be limited to, the following: include, but not be limited to, the following: include, but not be limited to, the following: a)a)historical research, site analysis and evaluation;historical research, site analysis and evaluation;historical research, site analysis and evaluation; b)b)b)identification of the significance and identification of the significance and identification of the significance and heritage attributes of the cultural heritage resourceresourceresource; c) description of the proposed development or site alteration; DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD d)assessment of development or site alteration impact or potential adverse impacts; e)consideration of alternatives, mitigation and conservation methods; 24 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text f)implementation and monitoring; and, 1.g) summary statement and conservation recommendations. 12.C.1.27.Any conclusions and recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment Heritage Impact Assessment and Heritage Conservation Plan approved by the City will be incorporated as will be incorporated as mitigative and/or conservation measures into the plans for development development or redevelopment and into the requirements and conditions of approval of any and into the requirements and conditions of approval of any application submitted under the Planning Act. 12.C.1.28.Heritage Impact Assessments and Heritage Conservation Plans Heritage Conservation Plans Heritage Conservation Plans required by the required by the required by the City may be scoped or waived by the City, as deemed appropriate. , as deemed appropriate. , as deemed appropriate. Demolition/Damage of Cultural Heritage ResourcesDemolition/Damage of Cultural Heritage Resources 12.C.1.32. Where a cultural heritage resource is proposed to be demolished, the e is proposed to be demolished, the e is proposed to be demolished, the City City may require all or any part of the demolished require all or any part of the demolished cultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource to be given to to be given to TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT the City for re-use, archival, display or commemorative purposes, at no cost to use, archival, display or commemorative purposes, at no cost to use, archival, display or commemorative purposes, at no cost to the City. 12.C.1.33. In the event that demolition, salvage, dismantling, relocation or irrevocable In the event that demolition, salvage, dismantling, relocation or irrevocable damage to a significant cultural heritage resource significant cultural heritage resource is proposed and permitted, the is proposed and permitted, the FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF owner/applicant will be required to prepare and submit a thorough archival owner/applicant will be required to prepare and submit a thorough archival documentation, to the satisfaction of the documentation, to the satisfaction of the CityCity, prior to the issuance of an approval , prior to the issuance of an approval and/or permit. and/or permit. 12.C.1.34. Where archival documentation is required to support the demolition, salvage, Where archival documentation is required to support the demolition, salvage, Where archival documentation is required to support the demolition, salvage, dismantling, relocation or irrevocable damage to a dismantling, relocation or irrevocable damage to a dismantling, relocation or irrevocable damage to a significant cultural heritage AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA resourceresourceresource, such documentation must be prepared by a , such documentation must be prepared by a , such documentation must be prepared by a qualified person and must include the following: include the following: include the following: a)a)a)architectural measured drawings; architectural measured drawings; architectural measured drawings; b)b)a land use history; and, a land use history; and, a land use history; and, c) c) photographs, maps and other available material about the photographs, maps and other available material about the photographs, maps and other available material about the cultural heritage RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR resource resource resource in its surrounding context. in its surrounding context. in its surrounding context. Archival documentation may be scoped or waived by the Archival documentation may be scoped or waived by the Archival documentation may be scoped or waived by the City, as deemed appropriate.appropriate.appropriate. 12.C.1.35. In the event that demoIn the event that demolition is proposed to a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or interest listed on the heritage value or interest listed on the Municipal Heritage Register, the DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD owner/applicant will be required to provide written notice to the City of the intent to demolish, 60 days prior to the date demolition is proposed. The significance of the cultural heritage resource will be evaluated and Council may use the 60 days 25 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 PolicyPolicy Text to pursue designation of the cultural heritage resource under the Ontario Heritage Act. 12.C.1.36. TheCity may give due consideration to designate under the Ontario Heritage ActOntario Heritage ActOntario Heritage Act any cultural heritage resource if that resource is threatened with demolition, if that resource is threatened with demolition, if that resource is threatened with demolition, significant alterations or other potentially adverse impacts. Design/Integration 12.C.1.46. TheCity will prepare guidelines as part of the Urban Design Manual Urban Design Manual Urban Design Manual to address to address to address the conservation of cultural heritage resources in the in the in the city city city and to recognize the and to recognize the and to recognize the importance of the context in which the cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources cultural heritage resources are located. are located. are located. 12.C.1.47. TheCitymay require architectural design guidelines to guide may require architectural design guidelines to guide developmentdevelopment,, redevelopment and site alteration on, adjacent adjacent to, or in close proximity to to, or in close proximity to properties designated under the Ontario Heritage ActOntario Heritage Actor other or other cultural heritage TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT resources. 12.C.1.48.Signage onprotected heritage properties protected heritage properties protected heritage properties will be will be will be compatible compatible compatible and complementary and complementary to the heritage attributes heritage attributes of the of the of the protected heritage property protected heritage property protected heritage property and in accordance and in accordance with and consistent with good with and consistent with good with and consistent with good conservation conservation conservation practice. practice. practice. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF City of Kitchener Zoning ByCity of Kitchener Zoning By--law 85law 85law 85---1 and 20191 and 20191 and 2019--051 (051 (051 (2019)2019)2019) The City is currently reviewing its zoning and has two zoning bycurrently reviewing its zoning and has two zoning bycurrently reviewing its zoning and has two zoning by-lawsin force:Zoning By-law 85-1and Zoning By-law 2019law 2019law 2019--051.051.051.Zoning ByZoning ByZoning ByZoning By--law law law 858585--11is consolidated to 29 March 2004 and is consolidated to 29 March 2004 and 282828 applies to all properties in the City.applies to all properties in the City.applies to all properties in the City.Zoning ByZoning ByZoning ByZoning By--law law law 201920192019-051was approved by City Council on 2929 29 April 2019 and is currently under appeal.29 April 2019 and is currently under appeal.29 April 2019 and is currently under appeal.It is stage 1 of the City’s zoning review and It is stage 1 of the City’s zoning review and It is stage 1 of the City’s zoning review and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA includes the …framework of the document, definitions, general regulations, parking framework of the document, definitions, general regulations, parking framework of the document, definitions, general regulations, parking requirements and every zoning section with the exception of residential and requirements and every zoning section with the exception of residential and requirements and every zoning section with the exception of residential and 3030 urban growth centre (downtown)urban growth centre (downtown)urban growth centre (downtown).. The Property is not yet subject to The Property is not yet subject to The Property is not yet subject to Zoning ByZoning ByZoning By-law 2019-051andiscurrently subject to Zoning By- law law law 858585--1. 1. The Property is zoned DThe Property is zoned DThe Property is zoned D RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR-6,which is known as Arterial Commercial Zone, which supports the uses identified in supports the uses identified in supports the uses identified in Table Table 4below. This zoning classification does not have accompanying cultural heritage regulations. The Property is also subjecaccompanying cultural heritage regulations. The Property is also subjecaccompanying cultural heritage regulations. The Property is also subject to two Special Use Provisions for Specific Lands Provisions for Specific Lands Provisions for Specific Lands (116U and 403U), one Special Regulation Provision\[s\] for Specific 28 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1,” last modified March 29, 2004, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Sections//Section%201%20-%20General%20Scope.pdf, 1. 29 City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 2019-051,” last modified April 29, 2019, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CROZBY_Consolidated_Zoning_Bylaw_Council_Approv ed.pdf. 30 City of Kitchener, “Zoning bylaw,” Development and construction, last modified 2021, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/development-and-construction/zoning-bylaw.aspx. 26 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Lands(105R), and one Holding Provision\[s\] for Specific Lands(10H). These additional provisions are defined in Table 5below. 31 Table 4:Zoning By-law 85-1 Permitted Uses Permitted UsePermitted UsePermitted Use Audio-Visual or Medical Beverage and Beverage-Building Material and Building Material and LaboratoryMaking Equipment SalesDecorating Supply SalesDecorating Supply Sales Canine or Feline Grooming CarwashCommercial Parking FacilityCommercial Parking FacilityCommercial Parking Facility or Training (By-law 93-129, S.9) Commercial RecreationConvenience RetailCraftsman Shop Day Care FacilityEducational EstablishmentEducational EstablishmentEducational EstablishmentFinancial EstablishmentFinancial EstablishmentFinancial Establishment Funeral HomeGarden Centre and NurseryGarden Centre and NurseryGas StationGas Station TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Health ClinicHealth OfficeHealth OfficeHotelHotelHotel OfficePersonal ServicesPersonal ServicesPrinting EstablishmentPrinting Establishment Private Club or Lodge and Religious InstitutionReligious InstitutionReligious InstitutionRepair ServiceRepair ServiceRepair Service Union Hall FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF RestaurantSale of Pets and Pet Sale of Pets and Pet Sale of Sporting Goods (By- Supplies (BySupplies (By--law 96law 96-58, S.2)law 98-136, S.1) Sale or Rental of Furniture Sale or Rental of Furniture Sale or Rental of Furniture Sale, Rental or Service of Sale, Rental or Service of Sale, Rental or Service of Sale, Rental, Service, and Electric or Electronic and Electric or Electronic and Electric or Electronic Business Machines and Business Machines and Business Machines and Storage or Repair of Motor AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Office SuppliesOffice SuppliesOffice Supplies Appliances or Electric or Appliances or Electric or Appliances or Electric or Vehicles, Major Recreational Electronic EquipmentElectronic EquipmentElectronic EquipmentEquipment and Parts and Accessories for Motor Vehicles or Major Recreational Equipment Sale, Rental, Storage or Sale, Rental, Storage or StudioStudioSurveying, Planning, RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Service of Tools and Service of Tools and Engineering or Design IndusIndustrial or Farm trial or Farm Business (By-law 87-145, EquipmentEquipmentS.1) Tradesman or Contractor's Tradesman or Contractor's Tradesman or Contractor's Transportation Depot (By-law Veterinary Services EstablishmentEstablishmentEstablishment93-129, S.9) DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD WarehouseWholesaling 31 City of Kitchener, “Section 17 Warehouse District Zone (D-6) Zoning By-law 85-1,” last modified March 5, 2012,https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Sections//Section%2017%20- %20Warehouse%20District%20Zone%20(D-6).pdf, 1-2. 27 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Table 5:Additional By-law Provisions that Apply to the Property ProvisionDescription Provision 116U,Special Notwithstanding Section 17.1 of this by-law, within the lands law, within the lands Use Provisions for Specific zoned D-6, described in the clauses listed below, commercial 6, described in the clauses listed below, commercial Landsentertainment excluding amusement arcade, retail and entertainment excluding amusement arcade, retail and multiple dwellings shall also be permitted only in the buildings multiple dwellings shall also be permitted only in the buildings existing on the day of the passing of Byexisting on the day of the passing of By--law Number 92law Number 92-232, 32 and having a minimum facade height of 6.0 metand having a minimum facade height of 6.0 metresres. Provision 403U,Special Notwithstanding Section 17.1 and Schedule 105 of Appendix Notwithstanding Section 17.1 and Schedule 105 of Appendix Notwithstanding Section 17.1 and Schedule 105 of Appendix Use Provisions for Specific D, subsection iii) of this ByD, subsection iii) of this ByD, subsection iii) of this By---law, within the lands zoned Dlaw, within the lands zoned Dlaw, within the lands zoned D--6 on 6 on LandsSchedule 84 of Appendix “A”, described as Part Lot 69, Lot Schedule 84 of Appendix “A”, described as Part Lot 69, Lot Schedule 84 of Appendix “A”, described as Part Lot 69, Lot 70and Lot 71, Plan 374, a residential care facility shall be a and Lot 71, Plan 374, a residential care facility shall be a and Lot 71, Plan 374, a residential care facility shall be a 33 permitted use and may be located on the ground floor.permitted use and may be located on the ground floor.permitted use and may be located on the ground floor. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Provision 105R, Special Notwithstanding Sections 6.1.2(c) or 17.3 of this byNotwithstanding Sections 6.1.2(c) or 17.3 of this by-law, Regulation Provisions for within the lands zoned Dwithin the lands zoned D-6, described in clause (iv) below, 6, described in clause (iv) below, Specific Landsthe following special regulations shall apply: the following special regulations shall apply: i)The maximum gross leasable commercial space for retail The maximum gross leasable commercial space for retail FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF shall be 7,000 square metres with no single outlet exceeding shall be 7,000 square metres with no single outlet exceeding 1,000 square metres. 1,000 square metres. ii) The maximum gross floor area for office located within a ii) The maximum gross floor area for office located within a building existing on the day of passing of Bybuilding existing on the day of passing of By-law Number 92- 232, which building has a minimum facade height of 6.0 232, which building has a minimum facade height of 6.0 metres, shall be 100 percent of the floor area of the building. metres, shall be 100 percent of the floor area of the building. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA iii) Residentiaiii) Residential use shall not be located on the ground floor, l use shall not be located on the ground floor, except for access. iv) Parking spaces shall be provided for uses located within iv) Parking spaces shall be provided for uses located within buildings existing on the day of passing of Bybuildings existing on the day of passing of By-law Number 92- 232 in accordance with the requirements of Section 6.1.2(c) 232 in accordance with the requirements of Section 6.1.2(c) RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR of this by-law or in the following quantities, whichever is the 34 lesser: 32 City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener, “SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDSSPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDSSPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 116,” last modified June 14, 2010, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs /Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20- DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD %20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//116U.pdf,1. 33 City of Kitchener, “SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 403,” last modified June 14, 2010, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20- %20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//403U.pdf, 1 34 City of Kitchener, “SPECIAL REGULATION PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS 105,” last modified December 12, 2016,https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20D%20- %20Special%20Regulation%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//105R.pdf, 1. 28 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 ProvisionDescription Provision redacted for Plan 374, Lot 71. Provision 10H, Holding Multiple dwellings shall not be permitted until such time as the Provisions for Specific City is presented with documentation from the Ministry of the documentation from the Ministry of the documentation from the Ministry of the LandsEnvironment advising that the Ministry is satisfied with Environment advising that the Ministry is satisfied with Environment advising that the Ministry is satisfied with respect to the potential adverse environmental conditions or respect to the potential adverse environmental conditions or respect to the potential adverse environmental conditions or constraints caused by adjacent industrial uses, transportation constraints caused by adjacent industrial uses, transportation constraints caused by adjacent industrial uses, transportation corridors and site decommissioning rcorridors and site decommissioning rcorridors and site decommissioning requirements; and the equirements; and the equirements; and the holding symbol affecting the particular lands affected has holding symbol affecting the particular lands affected has holding symbol affecting the particular lands affected has 35 been removed by By-law. City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual The City of Kitchener’s Urban Design Manual was The City of Kitchener’s Urban Design Manual was approvedapprovedapprovedin 2019 for the purposes of in 2019 for the purposes of in 2019 for the purposes of TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT establishing expectations, guiding, and deriving a vision for the City’s design througestablishing expectations, guiding, and deriving a vision for the City’s design througestablishing expectations, guiding, and deriving a vision for the City’s design through h considerations of city building, economic development, and sustainability. Section 1.8.2 entitled considerations of city building, economic development, and sustainability. Section 1.8.2 entitled considerations of city building, economic development, and sustainability. Section 1.8.2 entitled Cultural Heritage Resources contains several pertinent guidelines, as identified in Cultural Heritage Resources contains several pertinent guidelines, as identified in Cultural Heritage Resources contains several pertinent guidelines, as identified in Table 6 below: Table 6: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual: Pertinent guidelines from Section 1.2.8 of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Guideline #Guideline 1.2.8 Conserve cultural heritage resources including buildings, views and vistas, Conserve cultural heritage resources including buildings, views and vistas, paragraph structures, districts, streetscape and landscapes using the following strategies;structures, districts, streetscape and landscapes using the following strategies; 1, 3 Rehabilitation: repair or replace heritage attributes, construct compatible and Rehabilitation: repair or replace heritage attributes, construct compatible and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA reversible additions, integrate the cultural heritage resource or components of reversible additions, integrate the cultural heritage resource or components of the cultural heritage resource into a new development, or adaptively reuse the the cultural heritage resource into a new development, or adaptively reuse the 36 cultural heritage resources.cultural heritage resources. 1.2.8 1.2.8 1.2.8 New development on a site with a cultural heritage New development on a site with a cultural heritage New development on a site with a cultural heritage resource and additions to paragraph paragraph paragraph cultural heritage resources should integrate new, contrasting building materials cultural heritage resources should integrate new, contrasting building materials cultural heritage resources should integrate new, contrasting building materials 5 5 5 in ways which respect the integrity of the cultural heritage resource. Conserve in ways which respect the integrity of the cultural heritage resource. Conserve in ways which respect the integrity of the cultural heritage resource. Conserve RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR heritage value by being physically and visually compatible with, suboheritage value by being physically and visually compatible with, suboheritage value by being physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to, and distinguishable from the cultural heritage resource.and distinguishable from the cultural heritage resource.and distinguishable from the cultural heritage resource. Section 5 of the City’s Urban Design Manual provides additional guidelines relative to the Section 5 of the City’s Urban Design Manual provides additional guidelines relative to the Section 5 of the City’s Urban Design Manual provides additional guidelines relative to the downtown. Several Guideline sections including 5.2.7 Heritage Resources, 5.3.1 Built Form, downtown. Several Guideline sections including 5.2.7 Heritage Resources, 5.3.1 Built Form, downtown. Several Guideline sections including 5.2.7 Heritage Resources, 5.3.1 Built Form, DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 35 City of Kitchener, “HOLDING PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 10,” last modified June 14, 2010, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20F%20- %20Holding%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//10H.pdf, 1. 36 City of Kitchener, “Urban Design Manual: Part A Urban Structure & Built Form, City-Wide,” last modified 2019, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_01_City_Wide_Design.pdf,18 29 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 and5.4.4 UGC3 Innovation District – a specific guideline area – each contain pertinent guidance, as identified in Table 7below. Table 7:Pertinent guidelines from Section 5.2.7, 5.3.1, and 5.4.4of Kitchener's Urban Design Manual Guideline #Guideline 5.2.7 Conserving cultural and natural heritage resources within Kitchener’s Conserving cultural and natural heritage resources within Kitchener’s Downtown is of critical importance, as doing so gives variety to the Downtown is of critical importance, as doing so gives variety to the urban fabric, perpetuates the cultural history of DTK and encourages exploration, fabric, perpetuates the cultural history of DTK and encourages exploration, 37 sustainability, and a sense of living history. 5.3.1 Adaptive reuse of--and additions to--existing buildings should respect and existing buildings should respect and existing buildings should respect and paragraph enhance the established character of the building, its streetscape, and any enhance the established character of the building, its streetscape, and any enhance the established character of the building, its streetscape, and any 4 surrounding open areas. This is the case regardless of a building’s cultural surrounding open areas. This is the case regardless of a building’s cultural surrounding open areas. This is the case regardless of a building’s cultural 38 heritage status. 5.4.4 The continued preservation and adaptive reuse of remaining historical The continued preservation and adaptive reuse of remaining historical TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT paragraph buildings is critical to maintaining the character of the Innovation District, as is gs is critical to maintaining the character of the Innovation District, as is 2 streetscape design and pedestrian and midstreetscape design and pedestrian and mid-block connections that improve the block connections that improve the 39 pedestrian network between these assets.pedestrian network between these assets. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF City of Kitchener Warehouse District Cultural Heritage City of Kitchener Warehouse District Cultural Heritage City of Kitchener Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LLLandscape The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape StudyThe Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape StudyThe Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study(CHLS)(CHLS)(CHLS), published in December 2014, , published in December 2014, identifies that the Property resides immediately adjacent to the City’s that the Property resides immediately adjacent to the City’s that the Property resides immediately adjacent to the City’s Warehouse District. Albeit not within the district, the Property’s SOS acknowledges its connection and describes it as being not within the district, the Property’s SOS acknowledges its connection and describes it as being not within the district, the Property’s SOS acknowledges its connection and describes it as being 404040 ThThe Warehousee Warehousee Warehouse D D District is bounded by Glasgow Street, Dominion Street, istrict is bounded by Glasgow Street, Dominion Street, istrict is bounded by Glasgow Street, Dominion Street, a contributing piecea contributing piecea contributing piece... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Breithaupt Street, Francis Street, Victoria Street, and Belmont Avenue and is recognized for its Breithaupt Street, Francis Street, Victoria Street, and Belmont Avenue and is recognized for its Breithaupt Street, Francis Street, Victoria Street, and Belmont Avenue and is recognized for its associations with Kitchener’s industrial, urban, and transportation developmentassociations with Kitchener’s industrial, urban, and transportation developmentassociations with Kitchener’s industrial, urban, and transportation development (Figure 3). The CHLS identified that the Warehouse District has maintained its historical integrity and rCHLS identified that the Warehouse District has maintained its historical integrity and rCHLS identified that the Warehouse District has maintained its historical integrity and retains both cultural and community value, as described in both cultural and community value, as described in both cultural and community value, as described in Table 8below. Table Table Table 888::Warehouse District ValuesWarehouse District ValuesWarehouse District Values RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ValueValueDescriptionDescription Historical Historical Has been used for the same purpose since the railway was originally Has been used for the same purpose since the railway was originally Has been used for the same purpose since the railway was originally IntegrityIntegrity established in 1856. Retains several factories and industrial buildings that date established in 1856. Retains several factories and industrial buildings that date prior to 1912, when Kitchener was officially incorporated as a city.prior to 1912, when Kitchener was officially incorporated as a city. 37 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD City of Kitchener, “Urban Design Manual: Part B Urban Structure & Built Form, Downtown,”last modified 2019,https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_05_Downtown.pdf,6 38 Ibid, 7 39 City of Kitchener, “Urban Design Manual: Part B Urban Structure & Built Form, Downtown,” last modified 2019,https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_05_Downtown.pdf,7 40 City of Kitchener, “Cultural Heritage Landscapes,” last modified December 2014, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Report.pdf 30 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 ValueDescription Cultural Explains the development history of Kitchener and is contextually important to Value surrounding neighbourhoods. Contains industrial buildings of the famous architect, Albert Kahn, and architectural design that will never be repeated again. Community A source of employment for many people living in Kitchener and the A source of employment for many people living in Kitchener and the Value surrounding area. Local Planning Context Summary The City considers cultural heritage resources to be of value to the community and values them The City considers cultural heritage resources to be of value to the community and values them The City considers cultural heritage resources to be of value to the community and values them in the land use planning process. Through its OP policies, the City has committed to identifying policies, the City has committed to identifying policies, the City has committed to identifying and conserving cultural heritage resources including archaeological resources. An HIA is and conserving cultural heritage resources including archaeological resources. An HIA is and conserving cultural heritage resources including archaeological resources. An HIA is required when a proposed development is on or adjacent to a recognized heritage property. The required when a proposed development is on or adjacent to a recognized heritage property. The required when a proposed development is on or adjacent to a recognized heritage property. The Cityhas adopted Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada and will reference them when assessing proposed developments.and will reference them when assessing proposed developments.and will reference them when assessing proposed developments. TTTTTT FFFFFF AAAAAA RRRRRR DDDDDD 31 ¯ TTT FFF AAA RRR 0265530530MetersMeters DDD TITLE Mfhfoe Dvmuvsbm!Ifsjuhf!Mboetdbqft-!Xbsfipvtf!Ejtusjdu CLIENT Property Perimeter Development PROJECTPROJECT NO. LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD2022-10-07 PREPAREDLHC OPUF)T* 1. All locations are approximate. DESIGNEDJG SFGFSFODF)T* 1. City of Kitchener, "Cultural Heritage Landscapes Appendix 6", December 2014. Portions of this document include intellectual property of Esri and its licensors and are used under license. FIGURE # 3 Copyright (c) Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 4RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS 4.1Early Indigenous History Paleo Period (9500-8000 BCE) The cultural history of southern Ontario began around 11,000 years ago following the retreat of The cultural history of southern Ontario began around 11,000 years ago following the retreat of The cultural history of southern Ontario began around 11,000 years ago following the retreat of 41 the Wisconsin glacier.During this archaeological period, known as the Paleo period (9500During this archaeological period, known as the Paleo period (9500During this archaeological period, known as the Paleo period (9500- 8000BCE), the climate was like the present-day sub-arctic and vegetation was dominated by arctic and vegetation was dominated by arctic and vegetation was dominated by 42 spruce and pine forests.The initial occupants of the provincehaddistinctive stone tooldistinctive stone tooldistinctive stone tools. They s. They werenomadic big-game hunters (i.e., caribou, mastodon, and mammoth) game hunters (i.e., caribou, mastodon, and mammoth) game hunters (i.e., caribou, mastodon, and mammoth) whwhwho livedo livedo livedin small in small groups and travelledover vast areas,possibly migrating hundreds of kilometres in a single possibly migrating hundreds of kilometres in a single possibly migrating hundreds of kilometres in a single 43 year. Archaic Period (8000-1000 BCE) During the Archaic archaeological period (8000-1000 BCE)1000 BCE)1000 BCE), , the occupants of southern Ontario the occupants of southern Ontario the occupants of southern Ontario continued their migratory lifestyles, although living in larger groups and transitioning towards a continued their migratory lifestyles, although living in larger groups and transitioning towards a continued their migratory lifestyles, although living in larger groups and transitioning towards a preference for smaller territories of land – possibly remaining within specific watersheds. possibly remaining within specific watersheds. possibly remaining within specific watersheds. People TT refined their stone toolsduring this period and during this period and developeddevelopeddevelopedpolished or ground stone tool polished or ground stone tool polished or ground stone tool technologies. Evidence of long-distance trade distance trade has beenhas beenfound found found on archaeological sites on archaeological sites on archaeological sites from the Middle and Later Archaic timesincludingincludingincludingitems such as items such as items such as copper from Lake Superior, and marine copper from Lake Superior, and marine copper from Lake Superior, and marine 44 shells from the Gulf of Mexico. Woodland Period (1000 BCE Woodland Period (1000 BCE – – CE 1650)CE 1650)CE 1650) FF The Woodland period in southern Ontario (1000 BCE The Woodland period in southern Ontario (1000 BCE The Woodland period in southern Ontario (1000 BCE – – – CE 1650) represents a marked change CE 1650) represents a marked change CE 1650) represents a marked change in subsistence patterns, burial customs, and tool technologies, as well as the introduction of in subsistence patterns, burial customs, and tool technologies, as well as the introduction of in subsistence patterns, burial customs, and tool technologies, as well as the introduction of pottery making. The Woodland period is subry making. The Woodland period is subry making. The Woodland period is sub--divided into the Early Woodland (1000divided into the Early Woodland (1000divided into the Early Woodland (1000–400 BCE), 45 Middle Woodland (400 BCE Middle Woodland (400 BCE Middle Woodland (400 BCE – – CE 500) and Late Woodland (CE 500 CE 500) and Late Woodland (CE 500 CE 500) and Late Woodland (CE 500 - 1650).The Early Woodland is defined by the introduction of clay pots which allowed for preservation and Woodland is defined by the introduction of clay pots which allowed for preservation and Woodland is defined by the introduction of clay pots which allowed for preservation and easier AA 46 During the Early and Middle Woodland, communities grew and were organized at a During the Early and Middle Woodland, communities grew and were organized at a During the Early and Middle Woodland, communities grew and were organized at a cooking. band level. Peoples continued to follow subsistence patterns focused on foraging and hunting. band level. Peoples continued to follow subsistence patterns focused on foraging and hunting. band level. Peoples continued to follow subsistence patterns focused on foraging and hunting. Woodland populations transitioned from a foraging subsistence strategy towards a preference Woodland populations transitioned from a foraging subsistence strategy towards a preference Woodland populations transitioned from a foraging subsistence strategy towards a preference for agricultural villagefor agricultural villagefor agricultural village---based communities during the Late Woodland. based communities during the Late Woodland. based communities during the Late Woodland. During this period people began cultivatingbegan cultivatingbegan cultivatingmaize maize maize inininsouthern Ontario. The Late Woodland period is divided into three southern Ontario. The Late Woodland period is divided into three southern Ontario. The Late Woodland period is divided into three 47 distinct stages: Early (CE 1000distinct stages: Early (CE 1000distinct stages: Early (CE 1000––1300); Mi1300); Mi1300); Middle (CE 1300–1400); and Late (CE 1400–1650). RR The Late Woodland is generally characterised by an increased reliance on cultivation of The Late Woodland is generally characterised by an increased reliance on cultivation of The Late Woodland is generally characterised by an increased reliance on cultivation of domesticated crop plants, such as corn, squash, and beans, and a development of palisaded domesticated crop plants, such as corn, squash, and beans, and a development of palisaded domesticated crop plants, such as corn, squash, and beans, and a development of palisaded 41 Christopher Ellis and D. Brian Deller, “PaleoChristopher Ellis and D. Brian Deller, “PaleoChristopher Ellis and D. Brian Deller, “Paleo-Indians,” in The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, ed. Christopher Ellis and, ed. Christopher Ellis and, ed. Christopher Ellis andNeal Ferris (London, ON: Ontario Archaeological Society, London Chapter, 1990), 37. Chapter, 1990), 37. Chapter, 1990), 37. 42 DD EMCWTF, “Chapter 3: The First Nations,” in Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks (Toronto: TRCA, 2002). http://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/37523.pdf. 43 Ibid. 44 Ibid. 45 Ibid. 46 Ibid. 47 Ibid. 33 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 village sites which included more and larger longhouses. By the 1500s, Iroquoian communities in southern Ontario – andmore widely across northeastern North America –organized themselves politically into tribal confederacies. Communities south of Lake Ontarioat this time included the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, made up ofthe Mohawks, Oneidas, Cayugas, Senecas,Onondagas,and Tuscarora,and groups including the Anishinaabe and Neutral 48 (Attiwandaron). 4.2Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Historic Context French explorers and missionaries began arriving in southern Ontario during the first half of the French explorers and missionaries began arriving in southern Ontario during the first half of the French explorers and missionaries began arriving in southern Ontario during the first half of the 17th century, bringing with them diseases for which the Indigenous peoples had no immunity.17th century, bringing with them diseases for which the Indigenous peoples had no immunity.17th century, bringing with them diseases for which the Indigenous peoples had no immunity. Also contributing to the collapse and eventual dispersal of the Huron, Petun, and AttiwAlso contributing to the collapse and eventual dispersal of the Huron, Petun, and AttiwAlso contributing to the collapse and eventual dispersal of the Huron, Petun, and Attiwandaron, andaron, was the movement of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy from south of Lake Ontario. Between was the movement of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy from south of Lake Ontario. Between was the movement of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy from south of Lake Ontario. Between 1649 and 1655, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy waged military warfare on the Huron, Petun, 1649 and 1655, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy waged military warfare on the Huron, Petun, 1649 and 1655, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy waged military warfare on the Huron, Petun, 4949 and Attiwandaron, pushing them out of their villages and the general areand Attiwandaron, pushing them out of their villages and the general areand Attiwandaron, pushing them out of their villages and the general area.a. As the Haudenosaunee Confederacy moved across a large hunting territory in southern Ontario, As the Haudenosaunee Confederacy moved across a large hunting territory in southern Ontario, As the Haudenosaunee Confederacy moved across a large hunting territory in southern Ontario, they began to threaten communities further from Lake Ontario, specifically the Anishinaabe. The they began to threaten communities further from Lake Ontario, specifically the Anishinaabe. The they began to threaten communities further from Lake Ontario, specifically the Anishinaabe. The TTTTT Anishinaabe had occasionally engaged in military conflict withAnishinaabe had occasionally engaged in military conflict withAnishinaabe had occasionally engaged in military conflict withthe Haudenosaunee Confederacy the Haudenosaunee Confederacy the Haudenosaunee Confederacy over territories rich in resources and furs, as well as access to fur trade routes; but in the early over territories rich in resources and furs, as well as access to fur trade routes; but in the early over territories rich in resources and furs, as well as access to fur trade routes; but in the early 1690s, the Ojibway, Odawa and PotawatomiPotawatomiPotawatomi, , , allied as the Three Fires, initiated a series of allied as the Three Fires, initiated a series of allied as the Three Fires, initiated a series of offensive attacks on the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, eventually forcing them back to the aunee Confederacy, eventually forcing them back to the aunee Confederacy, eventually forcing them back to the 50 south of Lake Ontario. FFFFF Most of the Haudenosaunee ConfederacyMost of the Haudenosaunee ConfederacyMost of the Haudenosaunee Confederacyallied with the British during the American Revolution allied with the British during the American Revolution allied with the British during the American Revolution 51 (1765– 1783) with the promise that their land would be protected.) with the promise that their land would be protected.) with the promise that their land would be protected.This promise was not kept, and Haudenosaunee ConfederacyConfederacyConfederacyterritory was ceded to the United States through the Treaty territory was ceded to the United States through the Treaty territory was ceded to the United States through the Treaty 52 In compensation, Captain General Fedrick Haldimand granted the In compensation, Captain General Fedrick Haldimand granted the In compensation, Captain General Fedrick Haldimand granted the of Paris in 1783. Haudenosaunee ConfederacyHaudenosaunee ConfederacyHaudenosaunee Confederacy950,000 acres950,000 acres950,000 acresthrough the Haldimand Proclamthrough the Haldimand Proclamthrough the Haldimand Proclamationdated25 AAAAA 535353 The land grant has been in debate ever since and has The land grant has been in debate ever since and has The land grant has been in debate ever since and has October 1784 ( (Figure Figure Figure 444andandandFigure Figure Figure 555).).). 545454 been steadily reduced to 46,000 acresbeen steadily reduced to 46,000 acresbeen steadily reduced to 46,000 acrestoday.today.today. RRRRR 484848 Six Nations Elected Council, “Community Profile,” Six Nations of the Grand River, last modified 2013, Six Nations Elected Council, “Community Profile,” Six Nations of the Grand River, last modified 2013, Six Nations Elected Council, “Community Profile,” Six Nations of the Grand River, last modified 2013, Waterloo, “Land acknowledgment,” Faculty http://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htm;University of Association, Association, Association, https://uwaterloo.ca/facultyhttps://uwaterloo.ca/facultyhttps://uwaterloo.ca/faculty-association/about/land-acknowledgement; Six Nations Tourism, “History,” https://www.sixnationstourism.ca/history/https://www.sixnationstourism.ca/history/https://www.sixnationstourism.ca/history/. 49 Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation,” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, last modified 2018,Nation,” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, last modified 2018,Nation,” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, last modified 2018,https://mncfn.ca/about- mncfn/community-profile/profile/profile/. 50 DDDDD Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, “History”, 3-4. 51 Cody Groat, “Six Nations of the Grand River,”The Canadian Encyclopedia, https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/six-nations-of-the-grand-river. 52 Ibid. 53 Six Nations of the Grand River Development Corporation, “History of Six Nations,”https://sndevcorp.ca /history-of-six-nations/. 54 Six Nations Elected Council, “Community Profile,” Six Nations of the Grand River, last modified 2013. 34 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT FF AA RR 55 Figure 4: Surveyor Thomas Ridout: Surveyor Thomas Ridout: Surveyor Thomas Ridout’smap of the Haldimand Proclamationin 1821 DD 55 Library and Archives Canada, “Plan shewing the Lands granted to the Six Nation Indians, situated on each side of the Grand River, or Ouse, commencing on Lake Erie, containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor General, survey Gen. Office York 2nd February 1821. \[cartographic material\],” 1821, Item ID Number 4129506. Library and Archives Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. 35 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT FF AA RR DD 56 Figure 5:Haldimand Tract 56 Six Nations, “The Haldimand Treaty of 1784,” Lands and Resources, last modified 2008, http://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/HaldProc.htm. 36 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 4.3Region of Waterloo The Haldimand Proclamation was divided into six blocks by the Government of Upper Canada 57 Block Two was sold to land speculator and sold to fund an annuity to the Six Nations people. 58 Colonel Richard Beasley in 1796 covering an area of94,012 acres.Beasley began to subdivide the land and sell plots to Pennsylvania Mennonites fleeing after the American subdivide the land and sell plots to Pennsylvania Mennonites fleeing after the American subdivide the land and sell plots to Pennsylvania Mennonites fleeing after the American 59 The Revolution, this portion numbering 63,000 acres and called the German Company Tract.Revolution, this portion numbering 63,000 acres and called the German Company Tract.Revolution, this portion numbering 63,000 acres and called the German Company Tract. 60 German Company Tract was surveyed by government surveyor Augustus Jones in 1805.German Company Tract was surveyed by government surveyor Augustus Jones in 1805.German Company Tract was surveyed by government surveyor Augustus Jones in 1805.The survey resulted in a closed Pennsylvania Mennonite community that did not include clergy, survey resulted in a closed Pennsylvania Mennonite community that did not include clergy, survey resulted in a closed Pennsylvania Mennonite community that did not include clergy, Crown, or Loyalist reserves and which was divided into equal 448-acre lots without lot and acre lots without lot and acre lots without lot and 61 concession numbers. The German Company Tract was incorporated into Wellington District in 1816 and renamed The German Company Tract was incorporated into Wellington District in 1816 and renamed The German Company Tract was incorporated into Wellington District in 1816 and renamed 62 Waterloo Township.The Township grew quickly as it began a centre of German settlement in The Township grew quickly as it began a centre of German settlement in The Township grew quickly as it began a centre of German settlement in 63 Boundaries were redrawn following the Boundaries were redrawn following the Boundaries were redrawn following the Baldwin Municipal Act Baldwin Municipal Act Baldwin Municipal Act of 1849 and the of 1849 and the of 1849 and the Upper Canada. 64 Hinks Act of 1852 creating the United Counties of Wellington, Waterloo, and Greyof 1852 creating the United Counties of Wellington, Waterloo, and Greyof 1852 creating the United Counties of Wellington, Waterloo, and Greyin 1849.in 1849. 656565 Waterloo County became independent in 1853 with Berlin as its seat.Waterloo County became independent in 1853 with Berlin as its seat.Waterloo County became independent in 1853 with Berlin as its seat.The Region of Waterloo The Region of Waterloo TTTT 66 was established in 1973. 4.4City of Kitchener A community began to form in the German Company Tract at what would become Kitchener, A community began to form in the German Company Tract at what would become Kitchener, A community began to form in the German Company Tract at what would become Kitchener, then known as Berlin, beginningwith the settlement of a group of Pennsylvania Mennonites in with the settlement of a group of Pennsylvania Mennonites in with the settlement of a group of Pennsylvania Mennonites in 676767 1807 including early families like the Schneiders and Ebys.1807 including early families like the Schneiders and Ebys.1807 including early families like the Schneiders and Ebys.The Village of Berlin was The Village of Berlin was The Village of Berlin was FFFF 68 A station on established in the 1850s with most of its population of 700 working in agriculture.established in the 1850s with most of its population of 700 working in agriculture.established in the 1850s with most of its population of 700 working in agriculture. the Grand Trunk Railway was established at Berlin in 1856, linking the village to the rest of nd Trunk Railway was established at Berlin in 1856, linking the village to the rest of nd Trunk Railway was established at Berlin in 1856, linking the village to the rest of 69 North America.This coupled with access to inexpensive power from Niagara Falls lead to This coupled with access to inexpensive power from Niagara Falls lead to This coupled with access to inexpensive power from Niagara Falls lead to Berlin’s industrial growth and nickname of “Busy Berlin” with a population of nBerlin’s industrial growth and nickname of “Busy Berlin” with a population of nBerlin’s industrial growth and nickname of “Busy Berlin” with a population of nearly 4,000 by AAAA 57 Kenneth McLaughlin, “KitchenerKenneth McLaughlin, “KitchenerKenneth McLaughlin, “Kitchener--Waterloo,” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, Waterloo,” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, Waterloo,” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, 2017, 2017, 2017, https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/kitchenerhttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/kitchenerhttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/kitchener-wat erloo. 58 Waterloo Region Museum, “History of Waterloo Township,” Waterloo Region Museum, “History of Waterloo Township,” Waterloo Region Museum, “History of Waterloo Township,” https://www.whttps://www.whttps://www.waterlooregionmuseum.ca/en/collectionsaterlooregionmuseum.ca/en/collectionsaterlooregionmuseum.ca/en/collections-and-research/waterloo-township.aspx#note1. 595959 Ezra Elby, Ezra Elby, Ezra Elby, A biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the countyA biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the countyA biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the county, Volume 1, RRRR (Berlin, ON: Ezra Elby, 1895), 1 and(Berlin, ON: Ezra Elby, 1895), 1 and(Berlin, ON: Ezra Elby, 1895), 1 and26. 60 John English and Kenneth McLaughlin, John English and Kenneth McLaughlin, John English and Kenneth McLaughlin, Kitchener: An Illustrated History, (Toronto: Robin Bross Studio,1996), 19Studio,1996), 19Studio,1996), 19--20.20. 61 English and McLaughlin, English and McLaughlin, English and McLaughlin, 19.19. 62 McLaughlin, “KitchenerMcLaughlin, “KitchenerMcLaughlin, “Kitchener-Waterloo,” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, 2017. 63 Ibid. 64 Ibid. 65 DDDD Ibid. 66 Ibid. 67 Bill Moyer, Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited An Illustrated History, (Burlington, ON: Windsor Publications Canada Ltd., 1979), 1. 68 McLaughlin, “Kitchener-Waterloo,” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, 2017; Rych Mills, Kitchener (Berlin) 1880 –1960, (Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2002), 7. 69 Mills, 7. 37 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 70 1890.Berlin received city status in 1912 and operated as a multi-lingual city, mixing German 71 and English. World War One brought change to Berlin with the city facing prejudice as Canada fought 7273 Germany.Berlin voted to change its name to Kitchener in 1916 in response.Despite slowed growth during the war years, Kitchener grew from 20,000 in 1920 to 30,000 in 1930 leading to a growth during the war years, Kitchener grew from 20,000 in 1920 to 30,000 in 1930 leading to a growth during the war years, Kitchener grew from 20,000 in 1920 to 30,000 in 1930 leading to a 74 housing and industry boom following the Great Depression.The city continued to grow The city continued to grow The city continued to grow 75 through the 1900s, becoming Canada’s fastest growing city in 1965.Kitchener experienced Kitchener experienced Kitchener experienced economic turmoil in the 1990s as the recession closed many long standing industries and lead economic turmoil in the 1990s as the recession closed many long standing industries and lead economic turmoil in the 1990s as the recession closed many long standing industries and lead 76 to a restricting of the city’s economy and workforce.Into the 2000s, the City has pushed for he 2000s, the City has pushed for he 2000s, the City has pushed for the reconstruction of Kitchener with increased post-secondary education and reuse of heritage secondary education and reuse of heritage secondary education and reuse of heritage 77 properties. 4.5Property History Pre-1900 A map that portrays the City’s road and land parcel layout entitled that portrays the City’s road and land parcel layout entitled that portrays the City’s road and land parcel layout entitled Map of Part of the Town of Map of Part of the Town of Map of Part of the Town of TT Berlin, Capital of the County of Waterloowasdrafted drafted in 1853in 1853in 1853---1854 1854 1854 by George John Grangeby George John Grangeby George John Grange. Although the map does not identify the presence of structures on every lot, it shows many of Although the map does not identify the presence of structures on every lot, it shows many of Although the map does not identify the presence of structures on every lot, it shows many of Berlin’s early commercial, civic, and institutional buildings including the railway station Berlin’s early commercial, civic, and institutional buildings including the railway station Berlin’s early commercial, civic, and institutional buildings including the railway station –which is located adjacent tothe Property on lot 71the Property on lot 71the Property on lot 71(also visible on the map)(also visible on the map)(also visible on the map) – – – as well as Town Hall, the as well as Town Hall, the as well as Town Hall, the Post Office, and the Courthouse and JailPost Office, and the Courthouse and Jail ( ( (Figure Figure Figure 666). ). ). FF A subsequent map produced in 1956 in 1956 entitled entitled entitled Plan and Lots Drawn from M. C. Scofield’s Map of Plan and Lots Drawn from M. C. Scofield’s Map of Plan and Lots Drawn from M. C. Scofield’s Map of the Town of Berlinreveals much of the same information as the 1853reveals much of the same information as the 1853reveals much of the same information as the 1853-1854 map identified above; however, there is evidence that several lots, specifically along the north side of Victoria above; however, there is evidence that several lots, specifically along the north side of Victoria above; however, there is evidence that several lots, specifically along the north side of Victoria Street, were subdividedStreet, were subdividedStreet, were subdivided ( ( (Figure Figure Figure 66). ). ). The 1861 Tremaine Map of WaterlooTremaine Map of WaterlooTremaine Map of WaterlooTownshipTownshipTownshipyields little additional information specifically yields little additional information specifically yields little additional information specifically AA about the development status of the Property or neighbouring properties; however, it does begin about the development status of the Property or neighbouring properties; however, it does begin about the development status of the Property or neighbouring properties; however, it does begin to display emergent development that was occurring along the City’s streets to display emergent development that was occurring along the City’s streets to display emergent development that was occurring along the City’s streets – most notably the downtown coredowntown coredowntown coreof the City along King Streetof the City along King Streetof the City along King Street..Notably, tNotably, the block that contains the Property has been given a shadow adjacent to the street, which may indicate the presence of buildings; been given a shadow adjacent to the street, which may indicate the presence of buildings; been given a shadow adjacent to the street, which may indicate the presence of buildings; howehowehowever, the shadowing is located along Francis Street North, not Victoria Streetver, the shadowing is located along Francis Street North, not Victoria Streetver, the shadowing is located along Francis Street North, not Victoria Street (Figure 6). Analysis from the 1861 Analysis from the 1861 Analysis from the 1861 Tremaine MapTremaine MapTremaine Mapis mirrored within an 1875artist rendering of Berlin that RR depicts a depicts a depicts a bird’sbird’seye view of the City’s Core. Although the map is to be understood as an eye view of the City’s Core. Although the map is to be understood as an eye view of the City’s Core. Although the map is to be understood as an interpretation, it shows that the Property had not yet been developed. The map does displayinterpretation, it shows that the Property had not yet been developed. The map does displayinterpretation, it shows that the Property had not yet been developed. The map does display 70 McLaughlin “KitchenerMcLaughlin “KitchenerMcLaughlin “Kitchener-Waterloo” The Canadian Encyclopedia, last modified February 24, 2017; Mills, 7 71 Ibid. 72 DD Mills, 7. 73 Moyer, 56. 74 Mills, 8. 75 Moyer,83. 76 City of Kitchener, Century Celebration: Kitchener marks 100 years as a city, (Kitchener, ON: City of Kitchener, 2012),97. 77 Ibid. 108-109 38 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 several buildings along Francis Street North, indicating the presence of development directly adjacent to the Property (Figure 7). The 1879 map entitled Berlindisplays additional development within City’s downtown area; however, additions solely display civic and institutional development. Notwithstanding, this map highlights that development concentric to the City’s core was beginning to occur. No evidence highlights that development concentric to the City’s core was beginning to occur. No evidence highlights that development concentric to the City’s core was beginning to occur. No evidence suggests that the Property had been developed; however, development on nearby lots is gests that the Property had been developed; however, development on nearby lots is gests that the Property had been developed; however, development on nearby lots is displayed, including St. Jerome’s College and a church located on Duke Street and Water church located on Duke Street and Water church located on Duke Street and Water Street, respectively. 1901-1950 By 1904, most properties in the vicinity of the Property had been developedBy 1904, most properties in the vicinity of the Property had been developedBy 1904, most properties in the vicinity of the Property had been developedaside from the aside from the aside from the Property itself. A Fire Insurance Plan identified that each property contiguous with 97 Victoria Property itself. A Fire Insurance Plan identified that each property contiguous with 97 Victoria Property itself. A Fire Insurance Plan identified that each property contiguous with 97 Victoria Street had been developed, typically with small one-and-a--a--a-half storey residences (barring the half storey residences (barring the half storey residences (barring the two-and-a-half storey structure located at 70 Francis Street North)ture located at 70 Francis Street North)ture located at 70 Francis Street North) ( (Figure Figure Figure 88). ). A map developed as part of the City Plan for Greater BerlinCity Plan for Greater BerlinCity Plan for Greater Berlinin 1912 continues to lack any direct in 1912 continues to lack any direct in 1912 continues to lack any direct T identification of development on the Property. The Property is identified as being within the f development on the Property. The Property is identified as being within the f development on the Property. The Property is identified as being within the ‘Union Station Plaza’, which comprised an area bound by the Grand Trunk Railway to the north, ‘Union Station Plaza’, which comprised an area bound by the Grand Trunk Railway to the north, ‘Union Station Plaza’, which comprised an area bound by the Grand Trunk Railway to the north, Weber Street to the east, Water Street and Francis Street to the south, and David Street (now Weber Street to the east, Water Street and Francis Street to the south, and David Street (now Weber Street to the east, Water Street and Francis Street to the south, and David Street (now Duke Street) to the west (Figure 6). The Union Station Plaza development does not appear to ever have been implemented, as The Union Station Plaza development does not appear to ever have been implemented, as The Union Station Plaza development does not appear to ever have been implemented, as F evidenced by the increased presence of development within the block where it was meant to be evidenced by the increased presence of development within the block where it was meant to be evidenced by the increased presence of development within the block where it was meant to be located.The 1916 topographic map of the area displays two buildings at the crux of Water The 1916 topographic map of the area displays two buildings at the crux of Water The 1916 topographic map of the area displays two buildings at the crux of Water Street and Francis Street, one building along Duke Street, and one building in the southwest Street and Francis Street, one building along Duke Street, and one building in the southwest Street and Francis Street, one building along Duke Street, and one building in the southwest corner oftheWeber Street and Victoria Street intersectionWeber Street and Victoria Street intersectionWeber Street and Victoria Street intersection (Figure 9). Despite its proximity to the Property, the building at the Weberthe Property, the building at the Weberthe Property, the building at the Weber--Victoria junction is more likely to have been developed Victoria junction is more likely to have been developed Victoria junction is more likely to have been developed on 111 WeberStreetStreetStreet...From the 1904 Fire Insurance Plan, it is known that most of the properties From the 1904 Fire Insurance Plan, it is known that most of the properties From the 1904 Fire Insurance Plan, it is known that most of the properties A in the vicinity were developed, including 111 Weber Streetin the vicinity were developed, including 111 Weber Streetin the vicinity were developed, including 111 Weber Street (Figure 8). Another topographic map from 1923 shows the same four buildings as the 1916 map. Another topographic map from 1923 shows the same four buildings as the 1916 map. Another topographic map from 1923 shows the same four buildings as the 1916 map. Although the Property remains to appear undeveloped, this map shows an increasing number of buildings the Property remains to appear undeveloped, this map shows an increasing number of buildings the Property remains to appear undeveloped, this map shows an increasing number of buildings in the vicinityin the vicinityin the vicinitywhich more closely aligns topographic mapping data with Fire Insurance Plan datawhich more closely aligns topographic mapping data with Fire Insurance Plan datawhich more closely aligns topographic mapping data with Fire Insurance Plan data (((Figure Figure Figure 99). ). R The first evidence of development on the Property is found on tThe first evidence of development on the Property is found on tThe first evidence of development on the Property is found on the Fire Insurance Plan for the area from 1925area from 1925area from 1925. This plan. This plan. This planidentifies the presence of two small singeidentifies the presence of two small singeidentifies the presence of two small singe-storey structures located in the Property’s southeast corner fronting onto Heit Lane.the Property’s southeast corner fronting onto Heit Lane.the Property’s southeast corner fronting onto Heit Lane.There is no indication that the industrial building hadbuilding hadbuilding hadyetyetyetbeen erectedbeen erectedbeen erected (Figure 8). Kitchener’s downtown intensification is further evident in the 1929 topographic map of the city, Kitchener’s downtown intensification is further evident in the 1929 topographic map of the city, Kitchener’s downtown intensification is further evident in the 1929 topographic map of the city, D which uses shading alongside roads to indicate the presence of development. This map shows that the stretch of the south edge of Victoria Street North between Duke Street to the west and Weber Street to the east is developed (Figure 9). The presence of the building on the Property is expected during this time, as city directories, along with a 1930 aerial photograph, suggest that the building was erected c. 1927 (Figure 10). 39 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Subsequent topographic maps produced in 1936and1938and an additional aerial photograph from 1945 depict much of the same information and offer no additional clues into the development of the Property (Figure 9and Figure 10). The first mapping resource that portrays the industrial building is the 1908 Fire Insurance Plan that was revised in 1947. This map depicts the Property directly abutting the property linedepicts the Property directly abutting the property linedepicts the Property directly abutting the property lines along Victoria Street North and Heit Lane (Figure 8). 1951-2000 Topographic maps developed in 1956, 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, and 1998 also do not Topographic maps developed in 1956, 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, and 1998 also do not Topographic maps developed in 1956, 1963, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, and 1998 also do not identify the presence of a building on the Property despite it being known that development had identify the presence of a building on the Property despite it being known that development had identify the presence of a building on the Property despite it being known that development had occurred. Notwithstanding the lack of specific evidence of development ofoccurred. Notwithstanding the lack of specific evidence of development ofoccurred. Notwithstanding the lack of specific evidence of development ofthe Property, clear the Property, clear the Property, clear alterations to Kitchener’s downtown core occurred throughout this 50alterations to Kitchener’s downtown core occurred throughout this 50alterations to Kitchener’s downtown core occurred throughout this 50--year spanyear span ( (Figure Figure Figure 999and and Figure 11). The most notable transformation that occurred is the locale of civic development. During the The most notable transformation that occurred is the locale of civic development. During the The most notable transformation that occurred is the locale of civic development. During the early phases of Kitchener’s development, civic infrastructure and development was centred , civic infrastructure and development was centred , civic infrastructure and development was centred T along King Street, typically between Young Street to the west and Lancaster Street to the east. along King Street, typically between Young Street to the west and Lancaster Street to the east. along King Street, typically between Young Street to the west and Lancaster Street to the east. th Throughoutthe mid-20century, new civic development was , new civic development was , new civic development was typically typically typically constructed along Weber constructed along Weber Street, such as Kitchener’s courthouse, developed in 1964 at 20 Weber Street East, such as Kitchener’s courthouse, developed in 1964 at 20 Weber Street East, such as Kitchener’s courthouse, developed in 1964 at 20 Weber Street East (Figure 11). 2001-present F Aerial photography of the PropertyAerial photography of the Propertyfromfrombetween 2001 and 2021 does not identify the presence between 2001 and 2021 does not identify the presence between 2001 and 2021 does not identify the presence of any evidentmodificationsto the siteto the site ( (Figure 10Figure 10Figure 10). ). ). 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthProperty OwnershipProperty OwnershipProperty Ownership The earliest indication of ownership of the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street The earliest indication of ownership of the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street The earliest indication of ownership of the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North and legally described as Plan 374 Lot 71 from Land Registry documentation is from North and legally described as Plan 374 Lot 71 from Land Registry documentation is from North and legally described as Plan 374 Lot 71 from Land Registry documentation is from 78,79 A August 1905, when Marian BrauerAugust 1905, when Marian BrauerAugust 1905, when Marian Brauer(n(n(nééée Dopp)e Dopp)e Dopp)sold the lot to Sophia Roehr for $1,050.sold the lot to Sophia Roehr for $1,050.sold the lot to Sophia Roehr for $1,050.It is possible that the Property was sold to Brauer by Duncan Fergusonpossible that the Property was sold to Brauer by Duncan Fergusonpossible that the Property was sold to Brauer by Duncan Fergusonin 1872. Land Registry documents indicate that Ferguson sold the neighbouring lot (legally described as Plan 374 Lot cuments indicate that Ferguson sold the neighbouring lot (legally described as Plan 374 Lot cuments indicate that Ferguson sold the neighbouring lot (legally described as Plan 374 Lot 80 72) to Brauer in 1872 who then, along with the Property, sold it to Roehr in August of 1905.to Brauer in 1872 who then, along with the Property, sold it to Roehr in August of 1905.to Brauer in 1872 who then, along with the Property, sold it to Roehr in August of 1905. Roehr, along with her husband Gustav who was later identified in registry documentRoehr, along with her husband Gustav who was later identified in registry documentRoehr, along with her husband Gustav who was later identified in registry documentation, received, and discharged several mortgages during their ownership of the Property and on 15 received, and discharged several mortgages during their ownership of the Property and on 15 received, and discharged several mortgages during their ownership of the Property and on 15 81 June 1916 sold it to Emanuel Hamel for $June 1916 sold it to Emanuel Hamel for $June 1916 sold it to Emanuel Hamel for $6,300.00.Shortly after acquiring the Property, Hamel R sold it again to Annie Duch on 16 June 1917 for $7,500.00 who in turn sold it to Lucinda sold it again to Annie Duch on 16 June 1917 for $7,500.00 who in turn sold it to Lucinda sold it again to Annie Duch on 16 June 1917 for $7,500.00 who in turn sold it to Lucinda 82 On 21 August 1918, Bauman sold the Property to Carl Bauman on 15 July 1918 for $8,000.00.Bauman on 15 July 1918 for $8,000.00.Bauman on 15 July 1918 for $8,000.00. 83 G. Pritschau, a real estate broker, for the consideration of $1.00.G. Pritschau, a real estate broker, for the consideration of $1.00.G. Pritschau, a real estate broker, for the consideration of $1.00.Shortly thereafter, Pritschau 84 sold the lot to the Ontario Glove Company Ltd. for $6,000.00.sold the lot to the Ontario Glove Company Ltd. for $6,000.00.sold the lot to the Ontario Glove Company Ltd. for $6,000.00.It is unclear as to if the Ontario 78 D Ancestry, “County of Waterloo, Division of Berlin Marriages,” 1906. 79 Land Registry Ontario, Waterloo (LRO 58), Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 19242 80 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 72, Instrument No. 19261. 81 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 36216 82 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 36871, 38194 83 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 38388 84 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 38399 40 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Glove Company had plans to develop the site, as the company had already been operating from 38 Benton Street – a lot located approximately 750 metres southeast of the Property. Shortly after acquiring the Property, the Ontario Glove Companywould resell the Property back to 85 Pritschau on 19 April 1920 for $7,500.00. The Property would once again change hands several times during the 1920’s. On 2 September The Property would once again change hands several times during the 1920’s. On 2 September The Property would once again change hands several times during the 1920’s. On 2 September 86 1920, John H. Meyers purchased the Property from Pritschau for $10,000.Meyers Meyers Meyers subsequently grantedthe lot to Carl Huether, the president of the Huether Brewery located at the lot to Carl Huether, the president of the Huether Brewery located at the lot to Carl Huether, the president of the Huether Brewery located at 87 On 12 February 1923, Huether would On 12 February 1923, Huether would On 12 February 1923, Huether would 476 King Street West, for the consideration of $1.00. once again sell the Property, this time to Charles A. Kern who was a manager at L McLain once again sell the Property, this time to Charles A. Kern who was a manager at L McLain once again sell the Property, this time to Charles A. Kern who was a manager at L McLain 88 Company Limited, an aluminum ware manufacturer.Kern would Kern would grant the Property to two grant the Property to two grant the Property to two different parties, first on 29 July 1924 to Ernest Denton – a photographer, and second on 8 May a photographer, and second on 8 May a photographer, and second on 8 May 89 1925 to M. B. Shantz – a real estate broker.Denton would retain title until transferring Denton would retain title until transferring Denton would retain title until transferring 90 ownership to his spouse, Louisa, on 30 June 1932.Nearly 16Nearly 16Nearly 16--years later on 8 June 1948, years later on 8 June 1948, years later on 8 June 1948, Denton would grant ownership to Oliver E. Fries and Stanley Grundman, who owned Midtown on would grant ownership to Oliver E. Fries and Stanley Grundman, who owned Midtown on would grant ownership to Oliver E. Fries and Stanley Grundman, who owned Midtown 91 Motors Limited.Six-years later on 8 November 1954, Fries would grant the Property to the years later on 8 November 1954, Fries would grant the Property to the years later on 8 November 1954, Fries would grant the Property to the 9292 McCall Frontenac Oil Company for $27,000.00.On 11 October 1955, McCall FronteOn 11 October 1955, McCall FronteOn 11 October 1955, McCall Frontenac TT granted the lot to Highway Realties Limited for $55granted the lot to Highway Realties Limited for $55,,228.00 who then leased it back to McCall 228.00 who then leased it back to McCall 228.00 who then leased it back to McCall 93 Frontenacfor $110,388.44.On 13 January 1981, Highway Realties granted the Property to On 13 January 1981, Highway Realties granted the Property to On 13 January 1981, Highway Realties granted the Property to Texaco Canada Inc. who later granted it to Paul D. and Celeste M. Fackoury on 30 April 1987 Texaco Canada Inc. who later granted it to Paul D. and Celeste M. Fackoury on 30 April 1987 Texaco Canada Inc. who later granted it to Paul D. and Celeste M. Fackoury on 30 April 1987 9494 for the consideration of $186,400.00.for the consideration of $186,400.00. FF Akin to Denton, Shantz also granted his property to a new owneAkin to Denton, Shantz also granted his property to a new owneAkin to Denton, Shantz also granted his property to a new owner: William E. Mitchell of the r: William E. Mitchell of the r: William E. Mitchell of the Mitchell Button Company which had been operating at 21 Gaukel Street until the acquisition of Mitchell Button Company which had been operating at 21 Gaukel Street until the acquisition of Mitchell Button Company which had been operating at 21 Gaukel Street until the acquisition of 959595 the Property on 14 April 1927.the Property on 14 April 1927.the Property on 14 April 1927.PhotographicPhotographicPhotographicevidenceevidenceevidenceandandtenancy documentation found in tenancy documentation found in city directories suggests that Mitchell had the structure on the Property built shortly after taking city directories suggests that Mitchell had the structure on the Property built shortly after taking city directories suggests that Mitchell had the structure on the Property built shortly after taking lot ownership. Per the registry, it appears as though Mitchell, along with the Canada Permanent lot ownership. Per the registry, it appears as though Mitchell, along with the Canada Permanent lot ownership. Per the registry, it appears as though Mitchell, along with the Canada Permanent Trust Company, retained ownership of the Property and leased it to the Mitchell Button Trust Company, retained ownership of the Property and leased it to the Mitchell Button Trust Company, retained ownership of the Property and leased it to the Mitchell Button AA 969696 Company for $5$5,,400.00 yearly.400.00 yearly.400.00 yearly.In 1967, the Mitchell Button Company would retain ownership In 1967, the Mitchell Button Company would retain ownership In 1967, the Mitchell Button Company would retain ownership of the Property. The company would acquire several mortgages, most often from the Industrial of the Property. The company would acquire several mortgages, most often from the Industrial of the Property. The company would acquire several mortgages, most often from the Industrial Development Bank over the course of their ownership, including drafts for $19,000.00, Development Bank over the course of their ownership, including drafts for $19,000.00, Development Bank over the course of their ownership, including drafts for $19,000.00, $62,000.00, $90,000.00, and $70,000.00 in 1963, August 1967, February 1967, and 1969, $62,000.00, $90,000.00, and $70,000.00 in 1963, August 1967, February 1967, and 1969, $62,000.00, $90,000.00, and $70,000.00 in 1963, August 1967, February 1967, and 1969, RR 858585 Vernon’s Vernon’s Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous DirectoDirectoDirectory for the Year 1919, LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 42061ry for the Year 1919, LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 42061ry for the Year 1919, LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 42061 86 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43296LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43296LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43296 87 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43297LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43297LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 43297 88 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 48453LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 48453LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 48453 89 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument NLRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument NLRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 52432, 54120 90 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 68189LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 68189LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 68189 91 DD LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 96423 92 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 122695 93 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 131694, 131695 94 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 696474, 894005 95 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory for the Year 1926-1927, LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 58377 96 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 271598 41 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 97 respectively.It is unclear as to how the Mitchell Button Company’s tenure as property owner ended, as after adischarge of mortgage from 7 February 1973, no records are present on registry documentation. A transcribed history of the Property legally known as Plan 374 Lot 71 can be found in Appendix D. 97 Victoria Street North Property Tenancy and Land Use Contrasting Property ownership found on land registry documentation against Property tenancy Property ownership found on land registry documentation against Property tenancy Property ownership found on land registry documentation against Property tenancy found within City directories yields several discrepancies between who owned versus who found within City directories yields several discrepancies between who owned versus who found within City directories yields several discrepancies between who owned versus who occupied the site. In many cases, ownership of the Property directly aligned with ownership of the adjacent In many cases, ownership of the Property directly aligned with ownership of the adjacent In many cases, ownership of the Property directly aligned with ownership of the adjacent property legally described as Plan 374 Lot 72. Development of this property legally described as Plan 374 Lot 72. Development of this property legally described as Plan 374 Lot 72. Development of this adjacent adjacent lot occurred before lot occurred before lot occurred before the development of the Property. This is evidenced in the City’s 1907the development of the Property. This is evidenced in the City’s 1907the development of the Property. This is evidenced in the City’s 1907--1908 directory which 1908 directory which 1908 directory which identifiesthat‘Gustav Roehr’ occupiedthe property municipally known as 111 Weber Street the property municipally known as 111 Weber Street the property municipally known as 111 Weber Street 98 It is possible that Roehr operated the Property as a boarding house, as was his noted It is possible that Roehr operated the Property as a boarding house, as was his noted It is possible that Roehr operated the Property as a boarding house, as was his noted West. TT occupationin subsequent city directories.Under Ernest Denton’s ownership, 111 Weber Street Under Ernest Denton’s ownership, 111 Weber Street Under Ernest Denton’s ownership, 111 Weber Street West became known as ‘Denton Apts’, providing further evidence ofWest became known as ‘Denton Apts’, providing further evidence ofWest became known as ‘Denton Apts’, providing further evidence ofthe the adjacent adjacent lot’s 99 residential use. The earliest indication of development and occupation of 97 Victoria Street North is found in the The earliest indication of development and occupation of 97 Victoria Street North is found in the The earliest indication of development and occupation of 97 Victoria Street North is found in the 1928-1929 City directory, which indicates that the Mitchell Button Company occup1929 City directory, which indicates that the Mitchell Button Company occup1929 City directory, which indicates that the Mitchell Button Company occupiedthe FF 100 Property.Occupation of the Mitchell Button Company Occupation of the Mitchell Button Company Occupation of the Mitchell Button Company cancanbebebetriangulatedtriangulatedtriangulatedand confirmed usingboth land registry documents, which established that the owner of the company,both land registry documents, which established that the owner of the company,both land registry documents, which established that the owner of the company,W. E. Mitchell was granted the site in 1927, and topographic maps of the City, Mitchell was granted the site in 1927, and topographic maps of the City, Mitchell was granted the site in 1927, and topographic maps of the City, whereby no structure is located on the Property in 1923, but in 1929, the entire block is denoted as being developed. located on the Property in 1923, but in 1929, the entire block is denoted as being developed. located on the Property in 1923, but in 1929, the entire block is denoted as being developed. An aerial photograph of the City aerial photograph of the City aerial photograph of the City from 1930 from 1930 from 1930 also shows the also shows the also shows the Property along with the building that Property along with the building that currently occupies it. currently occupies it. currently occupies it. The Property is part of what the City of Kitchener’s The Property is part of what the City of Kitchener’s The Property is part of what the City of Kitchener’s Cultural Heritage AA Landscapereport defines as the ‘report defines as the ‘report defines as the ‘WWWarehouse arehouse arehouse DDDistrict’. The report makes note of Kitchener’s istrict’. The report makes note of Kitchener’s istrict’. The report makes note of Kitchener’s rapid uptake of industrial trade that was an outcome of its position along the Grand Trunk rapid uptake of industrial trade that was an outcome of its position along the Grand Trunk rapid uptake of industrial trade that was an outcome of its position along the Grand Trunk Railway. Driving the City’s emerging economy was a range of factories that were typically Railway. Driving the City’s emerging economy was a range of factories that were typically Railway. Driving the City’s emerging economy was a range of factories that were typically developed along the railway developed along the railway developed along the railway – – – the the the WWWarehouse arehouse District. Many of the buildings were erected between 1910 and 1920, with some having been developed between 1910 and 1920, with some having been developed between 1910 and 1920, with some having been developed earlier(such as the Kaufman Rubber Company in 1908) andRubber Company in 1908) andRubber Company in 1908) andsome having been developed later such assome having been developed later such assome having been developed later such asthe Mitchell Button RR 101101101 Company, built c. 1927.Company, built c. 1927.Company, built c. 1927.Accordingly, albeit contributory to its broader cultural landscape, the Accordingly, albeit contributory to its broader cultural landscape, the Accordingly, albeit contributory to its broader cultural landscape, the 97 LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 272496, 359575, 392093, 415094LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 272496, 359575, 392093, 415094LRO 58, Plan 374, Lot 71, Instrument No. 272496, 359575, 392093, 415094 98 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and MiscellaVernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and MiscellaVernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous DD Directory for the Year 1907-1908 99 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory for the Year 1924-1925 100 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory for the Year 1928-1929 101 City of Kitchener, “Cultural Heritage Landscapes.” December 2014. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Report.pdf 42 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 building located at 97 Victoria Street North was not an early rendition of Kitchener industrial vernacular building style. City directories inform that the Mitchell Button Company Limited retained tenancy on the Property until 1969, undergoing two name changesacross its 41-year tenure, first in 1964 when it was renamed ‘Mitchell Plastics and Buttons Limited’ and then again shortly thereafter in 1969 it was renamed ‘Mitchell Plastics and Buttons Limited’ and then again shortly thereafter in 1969 it was renamed ‘Mitchell Plastics and Buttons Limited’ and then again shortly thereafter in 1969 102 to ‘Mitchell Plastics Limited’.A second company called the ‘Woeller Upholstering Company’ A second company called the ‘Woeller Upholstering Company’ A second company called the ‘Woeller Upholstering Company’ 103 also took occupancy in the building between 1932 and 1940.By 1941, after renaming to By 1941, after renaming to By 1941, after renaming to ‘Woeller-Bowsfield Upholstering Co’ and moving to 27 Gaukel Street, Mitchell Button Company Bowsfield Upholstering Co’ and moving to 27 Gaukel Street, Mitchell Button Company Bowsfield Upholstering Co’ and moving to 27 Gaukel Street, Mitchell Button Company became the sole tenant once again.For the first 41-years of its developed existence, years of its developed existence, years of its developed existence, the the Property supported an industrial use as it housed manufacturing companies.Property supported an industrial use as it housed manufacturing companies.Property supported an industrial use as it housed manufacturing companies. Despite Mitchell Plastics and Buttonsretaining ownership of the Property as indicated on land retaining ownership of the Property as indicated on land retaining ownership of the Property as indicated on land registry documentation, the site remained vacant between 1970 and 1971registry documentation, the site remained vacant between 1970 and 1971registry documentation, the site remained vacant between 1970 and 1971when the cwhen the cwhen the company ompany ompany 104104104 moved to a new lot in 1970 located at 11 Hoffman Street.moved to a new lot in 1970 located at 11 Hoffman Street.moved to a new lot in 1970 located at 11 Hoffman Street. In 1972, a company called ‘Marian Household Centre’ took partial tenancy of the Property, with In 1972, a company called ‘Marian Household Centre’ took partial tenancy of the Property, with In 1972, a company called ‘Marian Household Centre’ took partial tenancy of the Property, with 105 TT Over the years, the Property supported as little as one andOver the years, the Property supported as little as one andOver the years, the Property supported as little as one and other sections remaining vacant. as many as seven tenants/uses. Some of the longest standing tenants were ‘Marian Household as many as seven tenants/uses. Some of the longest standing tenants were ‘Marian Household as many as seven tenants/uses. Some of the longest standing tenants were ‘Marian Household 106107107 Centre’ (1972-1980), ‘Dumont Press Graphix Limited’ (1973, ‘Dumont Press Graphix Limited’ (1973, ‘Dumont Press Graphix Limited’ (1973---1988)1988)1988), ‘Schattens Canada , ‘Schattens Canada 108109109 , ‘Elsworthy Cabinets’ (1977, ‘Elsworthy Cabinets’ (1977, ‘Elsworthy Cabinets’ (1977--1997)1997)1997), ‘, ‘St Vincent de Paul \[The Society St Vincent de Paul \[The Society St Vincent de Paul \[The Society Limited’ (1975-1981) 110111 of, later Thrift Store\]’ (1982-2009), and ‘Business Cards Tomorrow’ (1989, and ‘Business Cards Tomorrow’ (1989, and ‘Business Cards Tomorrow’ (1989-2009). The current tenants, ‘Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares’, ‘The Working Centre’, and current tenants, ‘Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares’, ‘The Working Centre’, and current tenants, ‘Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares’, ‘The Working Centre’, and FF ‘St. John’s Kitchen’ were first identified in the 2006, 2007, and 2010 city directories, ‘St. John’s Kitchen’ were first identified in the 2006, 2007, and 2010 city directories, ‘St. John’s Kitchen’ were first identified in the 2006, 2007, and 2010 city directories, 112 respectively.Tenancy since 1971 has therefore typically comprised commercial uses.Tenancy since 1971 has therefore typically comprised commercial uses.Tenancy since 1971 has therefore typically comprised commercial uses.For a complete, year-over-year listing of tenants for 97 Victoria Street North between 19year listing of tenants for 97 Victoria Street North between 19year listing of tenants for 97 Victoria Street North between 1926-1927 to 2014, refer to Appendix C.2014, refer to Appendix C.2014, refer to Appendix C. The Working CeThe Working CeThe Working Centrentre AA Currently, the Property is owned by The Working Centre. The Working Centre Currently, the Property is owned by The Working Centre. The Working Centre Currently, the Property is owned by The Working Centre. The Working Centre was first opened by Joe and Stephanie Manciniby Joe and Stephanie Manciniby Joe and Stephanie Manciniin 1982 in response to unemployment and poverty in downtown in 1982 in response to unemployment and poverty in downtown in 1982 in response to unemployment and poverty in downtown Kitchener.Kitchener.Kitchener.As As As TTThe he he Working CentreWorking CentreWorking Centregrew, with support from Margaret Nally and Patrice Rietzel of grew, with support from Margaret Nally and Patrice Rietzel of 102102102 KitchenerKitchenerKitchener--Waterloo City DirectoriesWaterloo City DirectoriesWaterloo City DirectoriesMiscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Street. Vernon Miscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Street. Vernon Miscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Street. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1964; Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1964; Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1964; Kitchener-Waterloo Directory.Vernon Directories RR Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1969Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1969Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1969 103 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory for the Year 1932 through 1940Directory for the Year 1932 through 1940Directory for the Year 1932 through 1940 104 Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory for the Year 1971Directory for the Year 1971Directory for the Year 1971 105 Kitchener-Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1972Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1972Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. for the Year 1972 106 Ibid. for the Year 1972Ibid. for the Year 1972Ibid. for the Year 1972-1980 107 DD Ibid. for the Year 1973-1988 108 Ibid. for the Year 1975-1981 109 Cities of Kitchener-Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On.for the year 1977- 1997 110 Ibid. for the Year 1982-2009 111 Ibid. for the year 1988-2009 112 Ibid. for the year 2006; 2007; 2010 43 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Global Community Centre, itarranged a board of directorsthat continue to guide its ongoing 113 development.Per The Working Centre’s website, their primary goal is to: …give people access to tools to create their own work combined with continuous ways of learning and co-operating. The Working Centre organizes its projects into six areas; the Job Search Resource Centre, St. John’s Kitchen, its projects into six areas; the Job Search Resource Centre, St. John’s Kitchen, its projects into six areas; the Job Search Resource Centre, St. John’s Kitchen, Community Tools, Access to Technology, Affordable Supportive Housing and Community Tools, Access to Technology, Affordable Supportive Housing and Community Tools, Access to Technology, Affordable Supportive Housing and 114 the Waterloo School for Community Development. Over the course of its 40-years existence, The Working Centre has been able to network years existence, The Working Centre has been able to network years existence, The Working Centre has been able to network with other not-for-profit organizations such as St. John’s Kitchen which opened in 1985. profit organizations such as St. John’s Kitchen which opened in 1985. profit organizations such as St. John’s Kitchen which opened in 1985. Since then, a primary care clinic, dental clinic, nurses, and outreach workers have all Since then, a primary care clinic, dental clinic, nurses, and outreach workers have all Since then, a primary care clinic, dental clinic, nurses, and outreach workers have all 115 joined The Working Centre’s ecosystem. For their work with The Working Centre, Joe and Stephanie Mancini were awarded with For their work with The Working Centre, Joe and Stephanie Mancini were awarded with For their work with The Working Centre, Joe and Stephanie Mancini were awarded with the Benemerenti Medal and Papal Honour in 2014, the Order of Canada in 2016, and the Benemerenti Medal and Papal Honour in 2014, the Order of Canada in 2016, and the Benemerenti Medal and Papal Honour in 2014, the Order of Canada in 2016, and 116116 honorary Doctorates from the University of Waterloo in 2019.ry Doctorates from the University of Waterloo in 2019.ry Doctorates from the University of Waterloo in 2019. T The Working Centre operates a number of properties in the City of Kitchener and has a The Working Centre operates a number of properties in the City of Kitchener and has a The Working Centre operates a number of properties in the City of Kitchener and has a history of managing and adapting existing and heritage buildings in a sympathetic history of managing and adapting existing and heritage buildings in a sympathetic history of managing and adapting existing and heritage buildings in a sympathetic manner, regularly applying the principle of minimum intervention as a pragmatic and manner, regularly applying the principle of minimum intervention as a pragmatic and manner, regularly applying the principle of minimum intervention as a pragmatic and sensitive approach to working with their properties. In addition to the listed property at 97 sensitive approach to working with their properties. In addition to the listed property at 97 sensitive approach to working with their properties. In addition to the listed property at 97 Victoria Street North, the group is headquartered in a listed property at 58 Queen Street Victoria Street North, the group is headquartered in a listed property at 58 Queen Street Victoria Street North, the group is headquartered in a listed property at 58 Queen Street F South and provides services out of a listed property at 115 Water Street North; the latter South and provides services out of a listed property at 115 Water Street North; the latter South and provides services out of a listed property at 115 Water Street North; the latter of property successfully underwent a sympathetic alteration in 2019of property successfully underwent a sympathetic alteration in 2019of property successfully underwent a sympathetic alteration in 2019-2020 to provide additional capacity for transitional housing, harm reduction, and health care services additional capacity for transitional housing, harm reduction, and health care services additional capacity for transitional housing, harm reduction, and health care services (Photo 1to Photo 3). A R D 113 The Working Centre, “About Us,” n.d. 114 The Working Centre, p. 4 115 University of Waterloo, “The Working Centre’s founders receive honorary doctorates,” 2019. 116 University of Waterloo 44 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT FF AA Photo Photo Photo 111: Water Street House at 115 Water Street North: Water Street House at 115 Water Street North: Water Street House at 115 Water Street North RR DD 45 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Photo 2: Detail showing transition between original building at 115 Water Street North (right) : Detail showing transition between original building at 115 Water Street North (right) : Detail showing transition between original building at 115 Water Street North (right) and two-storey addition (left) constructed in 2020storey addition (left) constructed in 2020storey addition (left) constructed in 2020 FFF AAA RRR DDD Photo 3: Detail of materials, original yellow brick (left) and faux yellow brick finish (left). The result is an addition that is compatible with the earlier structure, and distinguishable as a modern addition 46 TTT FFF AAA RRR DDD ¯ T F A R D TITLE Mfhfoe 2986!Cjset!Fzf!Wjfx!Tipxjoh!uif!Qspqfsuz Property CLIENT Perimeter Development PROJECTPROJECT NO. LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD2022-10-07 OPUF)T* 1. All locations are approximate. PREPAREDLHC SFGFSFODF)T* 1. Brosius M., "Berlin", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps-and-atlases/waterloo- region-historical-maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre, DESIGNEDJG Madison, Wis: J.J. Stoner, 1875. Portions of this document include intellectual property of Esri and its licensors and FIGURE # are used under license. Copyright (c) Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. 7 29:5!sfw/!2:15 2:36 TTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFF 02550Meters 025255050MetersMeters MfhfoeMfhfoeMfhfoe 2:58 PropertyProperty AAAAAAAAAAAAAA TITLE RRRRRRRRRRRRRR 2:15-!2:36-!boe!2:58!Gjsf!Jotvsbodf!Qmbot!Tipxjoh!uif!Qspqfsuz CLIENT Perimeter Development PROJECTPROJECT NO. LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment 97 Victoria Street North, Kitchener, Ontario OPUF)T* 1. All locations are approximate. SFGFSFODF)T* 1. Chas E. Goad, "Kitchener Berlin", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, scale 1:600, DDDDDDDDDDDDDD Toronto & Montreal: Chas E. Goad, 1894 rev. 1904. 2. Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ontario", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, 1925. 3. Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ont.", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, microfiche, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, 1947. Portions of this document include intellectual property of Esri and its licensors and are used under license. Copyright (c) Esri and its licensors. All rights reserved. CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD2022-10-07 PREPAREDLHC DESIGNEDJG 02550Meters FIGURE # 8 TTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDD TTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDD TTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDD December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 5ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 5.197 Victoria Street NorthExterior The property municipally known as97 Victoria Street North is a two-storey “L” shapedbuilding on a concrete foundationwith threeadditions (Photo 4through Photo 7).The main building is two-storeys in height and measures approximately 15.0metres (m) wide by 35.3by 35.3by 35.3m deep. The m deep. The m deep. The primary, northwest elevation is divided into three distinct bays by four shallow buttresses. Both primary, northwest elevation is divided into three distinct bays by four shallow buttresses. Both primary, northwest elevation is divided into three distinct bays by four shallow buttresses. Both the southwest and northeast elevation are divided into seven bays. A large chimney was the southwest and northeast elevation are divided into seven bays. A large chimney was the southwest and northeast elevation are divided into seven bays. A large chimney was erected in the main building’s southwest corner. The first addition was attached to the east erected in the main building’s southwest corner. The first addition was attached to the east erected in the main building’s southwest corner. The first addition was attached to the east section of the main building’s southeast(rear)elevation. This addition matched the twoelevation. This addition matched the twoelevation. This addition matched the two--storey storey height and general rhythm of the main structure, adding three bays along the building’s height and general rhythm of the main structure, adding three bays along the building’s height and general rhythm of the main structure, adding three bays along the building’s northeast elevation and two along the southeastelevation (Photo Photo Photo 888andandPhoto Photo 99))..Three distinct Three distinct Three distinct elements distinguish this building section as an addition. First, one of the three bays added elements distinguish this building section as an addition. First, one of the three bays added elements distinguish this building section as an addition. First, one of the three bays added along the northeast elevation does not match the width of the others; second, thalong the northeast elevation does not match the width of the others; second, thalong the northeast elevation does not match the width of the others; second, the roofing e roofing e roofing material is different from that of the main building and there is a distinctive parapet that is no material is different from that of the main building and there is a distinctive parapet that is no material is different from that of the main building and there is a distinctive parapet that is no longer situated along the roof’s edge; and third, the yellow brick is slightly different in colour longer situated along the roof’s edge; and third, the yellow brick is slightly different in colour longer situated along the roof’s edge; and third, the yellow brick is slightly different in colour T from the main building. Another addition was added to the building’s southeast elevation, this from the main building. Another addition was added to the building’s southeast elevation, this from the main building. Another addition was added to the building’s southeast elevation, this time situated towards the westmost section. time situated towards the westmost section. This addition is also twoThis addition is also twoThis addition is also two--storeys in height and storeys in height and shares thematching fenestration rhythm found along the main building; however, it comprises a matching fenestration rhythm found along the main building; however, it comprises a matching fenestration rhythm found along the main building; however, it comprises a different brick colourand is not arranged into bays using shallow buttressesand is not arranged into bays using shallow buttressesand is not arranged into bays using shallow buttresses (Photo 7).Athird, single storey addition was later added and branched off the southwest elevation of the single storey addition was later added and branched off the southwest elevation of the single storey addition was later added and branched off the southwest elevation of the previous F addition. This later addition is constructed of concrete block and gave the property its current ‘L’ addition. This later addition is constructed of concrete block and gave the property its current ‘L’ addition. This later addition is constructed of concrete block and gave the property its current ‘L’ shape (Photo 9).The first storey of the building serves a retail and community outreach use, The first storey of the building serves a retail and community outreach use, The first storey of the building serves a retail and community outreach use, and the second storey comprises a dining hall and St. John’s kitchen.and the second storey comprises a dining hall and St. John’s kitchen.and the second storey comprises a dining hall and St. John’s kitchen. The building has a flat roof and is constructed of stretcher bond brick that is red along the The building has a flat roof and is constructed of stretcher bond brick that is red along the The building has a flat roof and is constructed of stretcher bond brick that is red along the building’s primary, northwest elevation and yellow along all other elevations.building’s primary, northwest elevation and yellow along all other elevations.building’s primary, northwest elevation and yellow along all other elevations.Thebuilding is typically divided into distinct bays by shallow buttresses found along all elevations; however, this divided into distinct bays by shallow buttresses found along all elevations; however, this divided into distinct bays by shallow buttresses found along all elevations; however, this A rhythm is interrupted along the southmost portion of the southwest elevation because of the rhythm is interrupted along the southmost portion of the southwest elevation because of the rhythm is interrupted along the southmost portion of the southwest elevation because of the addition. The primary, northwest elevation is symmetrical, with buttressing located at the edges The primary, northwest elevation is symmetrical, with buttressing located at the edges The primary, northwest elevation is symmetrical, with buttressing located at the edges of the building as well as two additional buttresses that are evenly set along the façade which of the building as well as two additional buttresses that are evenly set along the façade which of the building as well as two additional buttresses that are evenly set along the façade which creates three bays. The middle bay comprises a large, centrecreates three bays. The middle bay comprises a large, centrecreates three bays. The middle bay comprises a large, centre-set entrance along the first storey, and aand aand aformer window bay that has been infilled and clad in former window bay that has been infilled and clad in former window bay that has been infilled and clad in painted vertical siding within the second storey. The bays that flank the centre both have three sidesecond storey. The bays that flank the centre both have three sidesecond storey. The bays that flank the centre both have three side-by-side double hung,six- R overoverover---six six six windows thatwindows thatalign with the door opening on the first storey and infilled window bay on align with the door opening on the first storey and infilled window bay on align with the door opening on the first storey and infilled window bay on the second storey. The primary elevation also has a decorativethe second storey. The primary elevation also has a decorativethe second storey. The primary elevation also has a decorativeparapet. The symmetrical pattern of buttresses and window openings continues along the building’s southwest and pattern of buttresses and window openings continues along the building’s southwest and pattern of buttresses and window openings continues along the building’s southwest and northeast elevations. Many of the window bays on secondary elevationsnortheast elevations. Many of the window bays on secondary elevationsnortheast elevations. Many of the window bays on secondary elevationshave been infilled and clad in vertical siding, with new windows having been installed in several clad in vertical siding, with new windows having been installed in several clad in vertical siding, with new windows having been installed in several locations. The rear, southeast elevation follows a similar architecturalsoutheast elevation follows a similar architecturalsoutheast elevation follows a similar architecturallanguage as the other elevations; however,it D is asymmetrical. It has two buttresses that are offset towards the east portion of the elevation and haswindows of various size. Thefirst storey of the building can be accessed from two locations along the Property’s southwest elevation. The first access point is located within the fourth bay and the second is located towards the south corner set within the Property’s second addition (Photo 7). The 53 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 second storey of the Property is accessed via a door located in theseventh bay alongnortheast elevation (Photo 5). The windows set within the northwest elevation have concrete sills along their bottom edges and flat-headed, soldier course brick along their top edges. The windows extend the entire width of the bays that are formed by the buttresses. As described, the general window pattern along of the bays that are formed by the buttresses. As described, the general window pattern along of the bays that are formed by the buttresses. As described, the general window pattern along the northeast and southwest elevations corresponds to that of the northwest elevation; the northeast and southwest elevations corresponds to that of the northwest elevation; the northeast and southwest elevations corresponds to that of the northwest elevation; however, the window selection varies. Fixed-pane, double-hung, and smaller side-bybyby---side doubleside doubleside double-hung windows were observed on both elevations. The Southeast elevation comprises three doublewindows were observed on both elevations. The Southeast elevation comprises three doublewindows were observed on both elevations. The Southeast elevation comprises three double- hung windows located along the building’s second storey. Neither natural heritage elements nor landscaped features are present on the Property.Neither natural heritage elements nor landscaped features are present on the Property.Neither natural heritage elements nor landscaped features are present on the Property. TT FF AA RR Photo Photo Photo 44::View south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevationsView south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevationsView south showing the Property's northwest (primary) and northeast elevations DD 54 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Photo 5: View west showing the Property’s northeast elevation: View west showing the Property’s northeast elevation: View west showing the Property’s northeast elevation AAA RRR DDD Photo 6: Panoramic view northwest showing the Property's southeast elevation 55 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Photo 7: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevation: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevation: View northeast showing the Property's southwest elevation AAA RRR DDD Photo 8: View northwest of the Property's southeast elevation. The addition on the right follows the same rhythm of bays and buttresses found along the other elevations. The addition to the left is void of buttresses and is a distinctly different colour 56 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT FF Photo 9: View north showing the single storey addition: View north showing the single storey addition: View north showing the single storey additionthat branches off the southwest elevation that branches off the southwest elevation of the previous addition 5.297 Victoria Street North Interior97 Victoria Street North Interior97 Victoria Street North Interior Worth a Second Look (First Storey)Worth a Second Look (First Storey)Worth a Second Look (First Storey) AA The first storey of the building is “L” shaped in plan and comprises The first storey of the building is “L” shaped in plan and comprises The first storey of the building is “L” shaped in plan and comprises Worth a Second Lookalong with supporting storage space (with supporting storage space (with supporting storage space (Figure 12Figure 12). ). Despite the building’s main entrance fronting onto Despite the building’s main entrance fronting onto Victoria Street North, access to the first storey is provided along the southwest elevation. Victoria Street North, access to the first storey is provided along the southwest elevation. Victoria Street North, access to the first storey is provided along the southwest elevation. Upon entrance, the first floor is a large, open room that has polished concrete floors, gypsum clad entrance, the first floor is a large, open room that has polished concrete floors, gypsum clad entrance, the first floor is a large, open room that has polished concrete floors, gypsum clad walls, and a gypsum clad ceilingwalls, and a gypsum clad ceilingwalls, and a gypsum clad ceiling ( ( (Photo 10Photo 10Photo 10). Typically, the wallboard has been painted white; however, the windowsills have been however, the windowsills have been however, the windowsills have been painted blue. Along the ceiling, the building’s structural RR beams are visible, but they have been covered in wallboard.beams are visible, but they have been covered in wallboard.beams are visible, but they have been covered in wallboard.Structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are all visible and are typically painted white to match the walls and and plumbing systems are all visible and are typically painted white to match the walls and and plumbing systems are all visible and are typically painted white to match the walls and ceiling ( ( (Photo 11Photo 11Photo 11). ). The materiality used in the mainThe materiality used in the mainThe materiality used in the main, Worth a Second Look,room typically remains congruent when moving towards the structure’s storage areas located at the rear of the building. In addition moving towards the structure’s storage areas located at the rear of the building. In addition moving towards the structure’s storage areas located at the rear of the building. In addition to the floor typically remaining polished concrete, the walls and ceilings are also typically clad in the floor typically remaining polished concrete, the walls and ceilings are also typically clad in DD painted gypsum wallboard (Photo 12andPhoto 13). In certain areas, the material use is changed. For instance, some walls comprisepainted brick and the flooring in several areasis composed of tile (Photo 14andPhoto 15). 57 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Figure 12: Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor): Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor): Current Worth a Second Look floor plan (first floor) FFF AAA RRR DDD Photo 10: View north upon entering the first storey of the building 58 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Photo 11: View southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing southeast showing the building's structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing FFF systems AAA RRR DDD Photo 12: View southwest showing material use towards the rear of the first floor 59 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Photo 13: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floor: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floor: View showing the material use towards the rear of the first floor AAA RRR DDD Photo 14: View showing a tiled floor area 60 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Photo 15: View showing painted brick walls: View showing painted brick walls: View showing painted brick walls St. John’s Kitchenand Safe Supply Clinicand Safe Supply Clinicand Safe Supply Clinic(Second Storey)(Second Storey)(Second Storey) The second storey of the building is rectangular in plan and comprises The second storey of the building is rectangular in plan and comprises The second storey of the building is rectangular in plan and comprises St. John’s Kitchenand the Safe Supply ClinicSafe Supply ClinicSafe Supply Clinic(((Figure 13Figure 13Figure 13). ). The second storey of the building is The second storey of the building is The second storey of the building is accessed from the building’s northeast elevation.building’s northeast elevation.building’s northeast elevation.The entrance provides access to a foyer area that has a tiled floorThe entrance provides access to a foyer area that has a tiled floorThe entrance provides access to a foyer area that has a tiled floor AAA andwalls that are typically clad in gypsum and painted yellow but with some exposed brickwalls that are typically clad in gypsum and painted yellow but with some exposed brickwalls that are typically clad in gypsum and painted yellow but with some exposed brick (Photo 16). A . A vinyl-vinyl-cladcladclad, metal staircase is located to the right upon entrance that provides , metal staircase is located to the right upon entrance that provides , metal staircase is located to the right upon entrance that provides access to the second floor.access to the second floor.access to the second floor.Akin to the foyer, the walls surrounding the staircase are yellowAkin to the foyer, the walls surrounding the staircase are yellowAkin to the foyer, the walls surrounding the staircase are yellow- painted gypsumpainted gypsumpainted gypsum ( ( (Photo Photo Photo 171717))). The second floor also has a tiled floor throughout and walls and . The second floor also has a tiled floor throughout and walls and . The second floor also has a tiled floor throughout and walls and ceiling that are clad completely in gypsum. The walls are typically painted yellow, green, ceiling that are clad completely in gypsum. The walls are typically painted yellow, green, ceiling that are clad completely in gypsum. The walls are typically painted yellow, green, blue, or red. Likered. Likered. Likethe first floor, Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are all visible and are the first floor, Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are all visible and are the first floor, Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems are all visible and are typically painted whitetypically painted whitetypically painted white ( ( (Photo 18Photo 18Photo 18). ). RRR Directly ahead of the Directly ahead of the Directly ahead of the top of the stairs is the top of the stairs is the top of the stairs is the Safe Supply Clinicwhich is a separate suite within the building. Aside from this suite, the rest of the floor is generally open space. A hallway that the building. Aside from this suite, the rest of the floor is generally open space. A hallway that the building. Aside from this suite, the rest of the floor is generally open space. A hallway that extends lengthwise through the building provides access to the different rooms, including St. extends lengthwise through the building provides access to the different rooms, including St. extends lengthwise through the building provides access to the different rooms, including St. John’s Kitchen located towards the northwest elevation of the buildingJohn’s Kitchen located towards the northwest elevation of the buildingJohn’s Kitchen located towards the northwest elevation of the building (Photo 19). The safe supply clinic was not accessed during the site visit.The safe supply clinic was not accessed during the site visit.The safe supply clinic was not accessed during the site visit. DDD 61 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Figure 13:CurrentSt. John's Kitchenfloor plan(second floor)(second floor)(second floor) TT FF AA RR Photo 16Photo 16Photo 16: View southeast showing the foyer and stairs: View southeast showing the foyer and stairs: View southeast showing the foyer and stairs DD 62 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Photo 17: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor access: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor access: View northwest showing the staircase providing second floor access FFF AAA RRR Photo 18Photo 18Photo 18: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the building: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the building: Panoramic view showing the second floor of the building DDD 63 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Photo 19: View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left): View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left): View showing St. John's kitchen (right) and an open hallway (left) AAA Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition)Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition)Community Outreach (Rear Wing Addition) The community outreach wing of the building was not accessed during the site visit.The community outreach wing of the building was not accessed during the site visit.The community outreach wing of the building was not accessed during the site visit. 5.3Surrounding ContextSurrounding ContextSurrounding Context The PropertyThe PropertyThe Propertyis located in the Innovation District of is located in the Innovation District of is located in the Innovation District of Kitchener’s Urban Growth Centre, which as described in Section 15 of Kitchener’s described in Section 15 of Kitchener’s described in Section 15 of Kitchener’s OP, is “…characterized by many large, old industrial RRR buildings which have already been converted or have the potential for conversion to loft style buildings which have already been converted or have the potential for conversion to loft style buildings which have already been converted or have the potential for conversion to loft style 117 The Property is located between two of the office and residential uses and other viable uses.office and residential uses and other viable uses.office and residential uses and other viable uses.” City’s Heritage Conservation DistrictsCity’s Heritage Conservation DistrictsCity’s Heritage Conservation Districts(HCD), namely the Victoria Park HCD designated under by-law 96law 96law 96---91 and the 91 and the 91 and the Civic Centre HCD Civic Centre HCD Civic Centre HCD designated under by-law 2008-039.The Property is located approximately 90 metres located approximately 90 metres located approximately 90 metres from the CN rail tracks and approximately 550 metres from Victoria Park. DDD 117 City of Kitchener, “City of Kitchener Official Plan,” 2019, 15-12. 64 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 The topography of the surrounding site is relatively flat with a slight downward slope towards Duke Street. Vegetation along the section of Victoria Street North that the Property is situatedis sparse, with few properties having grass, trees, or other landscaped features. Observed land uses in the surrounding area include a mixture of residential, commercial, and industrial. The buildings within the Property’s immediate vicinity are typically lowtypically lowtypically low---rise, rise, rise, and generally do not exceed two-storeys in height. Victoria Street North is a two-way street with four way street with four way street with four lanes of traffic, sidewalks, and streetlights on both sides of the street. Heit Lanelanes of traffic, sidewalks, and streetlights on both sides of the street. Heit Lanelanes of traffic, sidewalks, and streetlights on both sides of the street. Heit Lane, situated to the , situated to the rear of the Property,is a two-way, one lane street with no sidewalks or streetlights.way, one lane street with no sidewalks or streetlights.way, one lane street with no sidewalks or streetlights. The Property islocated within Kitchener’sWarehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL).Recognized as a regionally significant cultural heritage rrresource, the Warehouse District esource, the Warehouse District esource, the Warehouse District CHL (identified as L-COM-1) extends along the CN Rail line and is bounded by Glasgow1) extends along the CN Rail line and is bounded by Glasgow1) extends along the CN Rail line and is bounded by GlasgowStreetStreet,, 118118118,,,119119 DominionStreet, BreithauptStreet, FrancisStreet, Victoria, Victoria, VictoriaStreetStreetStreet, and Belmont Street., and Belmont Street., and Belmont Street. The Warehouse District is contextually important to the development history of Kitchener as an The Warehouse District is contextually important to the development history of Kitchener as an The Warehouse District is contextually important to the development history of Kitchener as an ththth industrial manufacturing centre during the late 19and early 20and early 20and early 20centuries. Supporting facilities centuries. Supporting facilities centuries. Supporting facilities including factories, warehouses for department stores, commercial enterprises, and residences including factories, warehouses for department stores, commercial enterprises, and residences including factories, warehouses for department stores, commercial enterprises, and residences T for workers were establishedin the district. Within the Warehouse District, factory complexes, . Within the Warehouse District, factory complexes, . Within the Warehouse District, factory complexes, including the Kaufman Rubber Company building designed in 1908 by Albert Kahn (1869including the Kaufman Rubber Company building designed in 1908 by Albert Kahn (1869including the Kaufman Rubber Company building designed in 1908 by Albert Kahn (1869-1942), still stand. Residential neighbourhoods, typically constructed of brick masonry, in the immediatestill stand. Residential neighbourhoods, typically constructed of brick masonry, in the immediatestill stand. Residential neighbourhoods, typically constructed of brick masonry, in the immediate 120120120 vicinity housed the workers of this industrial and commercial area.vicinity housed the workers of this industrial and commercial area.vicinity housed the workers of this industrial and commercial area. 5.4Adjacent Heritage PropertiesAdjacent Heritage Properties F The City defines adjacent as: The City defines adjacent as: …lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly …lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly …lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, municipal road or other rightmunicipal road or other rightmunicipal road or other right---ofofof--way.way. A Using this definition, the Property is adjacent to one heritage property located at 70 Francis Using this definition, the Property is adjacent to one heritage property located at 70 Francis Using this definition, the Property is adjacent to one heritage property located at 70 Francis ththth century Queen Anne style residence that is recogcentury Queen Anne style residence that is recogcentury Queen Anne style residence that is recognized for its Street North which is a late 19Street North which is a late 19Street North which is a late 19 design, physical, and contextual valuesdesign, physical, and contextual valuesdesign, physical, and contextual values ( (Photo Photo 20andPhoto 21). The City’s Statement of Significance Significance Significance for the property states:for the property states:for the property states: The building is an excellent example of the Queen Anne architectural style. The The building is an excellent example of the Queen Anne architectural style. The The building is an excellent example of the Queen Anne architectural style. The building is in good condition with many intact original elements. The building building is in good condition with many intact original elements. The building building is in good condition with many intact original elements. The building R features an asymmetrical plan; buffeatures an asymmetrical plan; buffeatures an asymmetrical plan; buff brick; rock-faced stone foundation; steeply pitched gable roof; projecting two storey bay with gambrel roof on south pitched gable roof; projecting two storey bay with gambrel roof on south pitched gable roof; projecting two storey bay with gambrel roof on south elevation; fan brackets with ornamental pendants; frieze board with simple elevation; fan brackets with ornamental pendants; frieze board with simple elevation; fan brackets with ornamental pendants; frieze board with simple dentillated trim; turret with steeply pitched polygonal roof; front door with raised dentillated trim; turret with steeply pitched polygonal roof; front door with raised dentillated trim; turret with steeply pitched polygonal roof; front door with raised panels, and a single light with beveled glass, three sidelights with beveled glass, panels, and a single light with beveled glass, three sidelights with beveled glass, panels, and a single light with beveled glass, three sidelights with beveled glass, and a transom with beveled glass; semi circular openings with radiating and a transom with beveled glass; semi circular openings with radiating and a transom with beveled glass; semi circular openings with radiating D 118 Region of Waterloo. “Regional Implementation Guideline Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resources”. 2018, 4. 119 City of Kitchener. “Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets”. 2014 December, 24. 120 Cityof Kitchener. “Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets”. 65 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 voussoirs and moulded brick trim; 1/1 double hung windows with concrete sills; 121 and, front porch. TTTT Photo 20: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevation: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevation: View north showing 70 Francis Street North's primary elevation FFFF AAAA RRRR Photo 21: View northwest showing 70 Francis Street North's southeast and northeast elevations: View northwest showing 70 Francis Street North's southeast and northeast elevations DDDD 121 City of Kitchener, “DTS-09-053,” 7 April 2009. https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/PDF/3wqyhqn1h3kw5yn2de11nzmt/3/DTS-09-053%20-%20Listing%20of%20Non- Designated%20Property%20of%20Cultural%20Heritage.pdf 66 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 6EVALUATION 6.1Ontario Regulation 9/06 Evaluation The Property located at 97 Victoria Street North was evaluated against O. Reg 9/06under the OHAusing research and analysis presented in Section 4and 5of this HIA.The results of the evaluation are presented in Table 9. Table 9:O. Reg. 9/06Evaluation for 97 Victoria Street North CriteriaCriteria Justification Met 1.The property has design value or physical value becauseit, i.is a rare, unique, representative, YesThe Property iThe Property iThe Property issa representative example of a representative example of a representative example of or early example of a style, type, a building developed using the industrial a building developed using the industrial a building developed using the industrial expression, material, or vernacular architectural style.vernacular architectural style.vernacular architectural style. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT construction method, The building on the Property was ereThe building on the Property was ereThe building on the Property was erected c. 1927 to serve an industrial purpose for the 1927 to serve an industrial purpose for the 1927 to serve an industrial purpose for the Mitchell Button Company who occupied the Mitchell Button Company who occupied the Mitchell Button Company who occupied the site for over four decades. Although the site for over four decades. Although the site for over four decades. Although the Property is a later addition to Kitchener’s Property is a later addition to Kitchener’s Property is a later addition to Kitchener’s FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF WWWarehouse arehouse arehouse DDDistrict CHListrict CHListrict CHL, it nonetheless is a representative example of representative example of representative example of Kitchener’s early thth century industrial core.century industrial core. 202020 The Property’s symmetry, decorative The Property’s symmetry, decorative The Property’s symmetry, decorative parapet over its primary façade, shallow parapet over its primary façade, shallow parapet over its primary façade, shallow AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA buttressing, and rectangular shape are buttressing, and rectangular shape are buttressing, and rectangular shape are representative aspects that reflect this building style. ii.displays a high degree of displays a high degree of displays a high degree of NoNoThe Property does not display a high degree craftsmanship or artistic merit, orcraftsmanship or artistic merit, orcraftsmanship or artistic merit, or of craftsmanship or artistic merit. Despite being a representative example of the RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR industrial architectural style that was th common in Kitchener in the early 20 century, the building exhibits vernacular and simple building methods common at the time of construction. iii.demonstrates a high degree of demonstrates a high degree of demonstrates a high degree of NoThe Property does not demonstrate a high DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD technical or scientific degree of technical or scientific achievement. achievement. It was constructed using common building methods at the time of construction. 67 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CriteriaCriteria Justification Met 2.The property has historical or associative value because it, i.has direct associations with a YesThe Property has direct associations with The Property has direct associations with The Property has direct associations with theme, event, belief, person, Walter Mitchell and his company called the Walter Mitchell and his company called the Walter Mitchell and his company called the activity, organization, or ‘Mitchell Button Company’ which operated ‘Mitchell Button Company’ which operated ‘Mitchell Button Company’ which operated institution that is significant to a within Kitchener for nearly 55 years. By within Kitchener for nearly 55 years. By within Kitchener for nearly 55 years. By direct extension of the Property’direct extension of the Property’direct extension of the Property’ss community, manufacturing use, the Property is directly manufacturing use, the Property is directly manufacturing use, the Property is directly connected with the connected with the connected with the theme of the theme of the theme of the City’s City’s City’s industrial expansion that occurred industrial expansion that occurred industrial expansion that occurred thth throughout the early 20throughout the early 20throughout the early 20century.century. ii.yields, or has the potential to NoThe Property does not yield, or have the The Property does not yield, or have the The Property does not yield, or have the yield, information that potential to yield, information that potential to yield, information that potential to yield, information that TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT contributes to an understanding contributes to an understanding of a contributes to an understanding of a contributes to an understanding of a community or culture.community or culture.community or culture. of a community or culture, or iii.demonstrates or reflects the NoNoNoThe Property does not demonstrate The Property does not demonstrate The Property does not demonstrate or work or ideas of an architect, reflect the work or ideas of an architect, reflect the work or ideas of an architect, reflect the work or ideas of an architect, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF artist, builder, designer or artist, builder, designer or theorist who is artist, builder, designer or theorist who is artist, builder, designer or theorist who is theorist who is significant to a theorist who is significant to a theorist who is significant to a significant to the community. The industrial significant to the community. The industrial significant to the community. The industrial vernacular vernacular vernacular building wasbuilding wasbuilt using common community. materials and methods at the time of materials and methods at the time of materials and methods at the time of construction. The Property’s architect and/or construction. The Property’s architect and/or construction. The Property’s architect and/or general contractor are unknown.general contractor are unknown.general contractor are unknown. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 3.The property has contextual The property has contextual value because it,value because it, i.is important in defining, is important in defining, is important in defining, The Property is important in defining, YesYes maintainingmaintainingmaintaining, , or supporting the or supporting the or supporting the maintaining, and supporting the character of character of an area,character of an area,character of an area, the area. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR The Property is a former industrial building that contributes to the City’s ‘Warehouse District’ CHL. This area is defined by its industrial commercial development that th occurred during the early 20centuryand the concurrently built industrial vernacular DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD structures. Because the Property was developed as an industrial building that was architecturally similar to other industrial properties within 68 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CriteriaCriteria Justification Met the Warehouse District, it helps to define its neighbourhood.In addition, the Property acts as a visual gateway into the Warehouse acts as a visual gateway into the Warehouse acts as a visual gateway into the Warehouse District because of its position at the edge of District because of its position at the edge of District because of its position at the edge of the district. ii.is physical, functionally, visually, YesThe Property is functionally and historically The Property is functionally and historically The Property is functionally and historically or historically linked to its linked to its immediate surroundings.linked to its immediate surroundings.linked to its immediate surroundings. surroundings, or In addition to its presence among the In addition to its presence among the In addition to its presence among the greater Warehouse District greater Warehouse District greater Warehouse District CHL CHL that createthat createthat creates s a link, the Property is directly adjacent to the a link, the Property is directly adjacent to the a link, the Property is directly adjacent to the City’s City’s City’s primary rail junction. This connection primary rail junction. This connection primary rail junction. This connection is important because the is important because the is important because the WWarehouse arehouse TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT DDistrict’s growth and development is istrict’s growth and development is istrict’s growth and development is connected to the ability for manufactured connected to the ability for manufactured connected to the ability for manufactured goods to be transported via the railway. goods to be transported via the railway. goods to be transported via the railway. Accordingly, the PropAccordingly, the PropAccordingly, the Property is directly erty is directly connected to the neighbouring railway.connected to the neighbouring railway.connected to the neighbouring railway. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF In addition, the Property is among the first In addition, the Property is among the first In addition, the Property is among the first within the within the within the WWarehouse arehouse arehouse District CHL that is seen by eastbound rail and vehicular traffic. seen by eastbound rail and vehicular traffic. seen by eastbound rail and vehicular traffic. Accordingly, it is a symbolic gateway into Accordingly, it is a symbolic gateway into Accordingly, it is a symbolic gateway into Kitchener’s Kitchener’s Kitchener’s Warehouse District. iii.is a landmark.is a landmark.is a landmark. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA NoNoNoThe Property is not a landmark. The MThe Property is not a landmark. The MThe Property is not a landmark. The MCM defines ‘landmark’ as …a recognizable natural or human-made feature used for a point of reference that helps orienting in a familiar or RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR unfamiliar environment; it may mark an event or development; it may be conspicuous… The Property does not meet this criterion. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 6.2Additional Considerations In order to understand the uniqueness and representative value of the physical features of 97 Victoria Street North as well as thematic associations outlined in the existing SOS, a comparative analysis of buildings of similar style, material, age, and massing within the Warehouse District was explored. Information was extracted from the City’s municipal heritage 69 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 register, existing SOS documents prepared by the City, and the 2014 Cultural Heritage Landscapes report.Table 10below displays other properties found within the ‘Warehouse District’ that have been described as being built in the industrial vernacular architectural style. Note that this comparison is not a comprehensive list of Kitchener’s industrial vernacular properties. Table 10: Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Comparative Examples of Industrial Vernacular Architecture in Kitchener’s Warehouse District Municipal AddressYear BuiltHeritage Attributes 1887 111 Ahrens Street All elements related to the construction and All elements related to the construction and 122 WestIndustrial Vernacular architectural style of the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, including:building, including: roof and roofline, including: flat roof; roof and roofline, including: flat roof; parapet wall;parapet wall; door openings;door openings; TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT window window openings, including: tripled 6/6 openings, including: tripled 6/6 double hung windows per bay; stone double hung windows per bay; stone headers and sills;headers and sills; yellow brick construction; yellow brick construction; FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF stone foundation (original building);stone foundation (original building); concrete foundation (later buildings); shallow buttressing between windows; AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA decorative cornice; o sign banding; and, chimney. 113-151 Charles 151 Charles 151 Charles c. 1896c. 1896c. 1896All elements related to the design and physical 123123123 StreetStreetStreet value, including: Complex of industrial vernacular RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR buildings spanning the turn- of-the-20th century; Breezeways interconnecting buildings; DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 122 City of Kitchener Development and Technical Services, “Listing of Non-Designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the MHR,” January 5, 2009, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=980089&searchid=3f27fa99-22c1-4b0e-b538-65db618b4c75&dbid=0,6-8 123 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Municipal Heritage Register Listings,” May 5, 2015, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1371069&page=66&searchid=77bd49d5-a435-41f5-af84- d4d89b5aadb2,1-66– 1-73 70 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Municipal AddressYear BuiltHeritage Attributes Painted signage on the exterior walls; Former administration and production buildings at the corner of Charles and Francis; Former beam and storage house; Former beam and storage house; Former beam and storage house; Former leach house along Joseph Former leach house along Joseph Former leach house along Joseph Street; Decorative brickwork; Lionhead tie Decorative brickwork; Lionhead tie Decorative brickwork; Lionhead tie roads; Segmentally arched windows with roads; Segmentally arched windows with roads; Segmentally arched windows with wood sashes and stone sills; wood sashes and stone sills; wood sashes and stone sills; Generous floor to ceiling heights;Generous floor to ceiling heights;Generous floor to ceiling heights; Wooden beams and flooring; Wooden Wooden beams and flooring; Wooden Wooden beams and flooring; Wooden TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT staircases; Exposed structural columns staircases; Exposed structural columns staircases; Exposed structural columns and mechanical systems; and mechanical systems; and mechanical systems; Freight Freight elevators with wooden gates; elevators with wooden gates; elevators with wooden gates; and,and,and, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Metal fire separation doors with original Metal fire separation doors with original Metal fire separation doors with original weights and pulleysweights and pulleysweights and pulleys 283 Duke Street 1896; 1896; 1936; 19391936; 1939All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular 124 Westarchitectural style of the buildings, including: architectural style of the buildings, including: varied rooflines, including flat roof and AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA low pitch side gable roof; off-white brick (now painted); original windows, including 6/ 6 windows paired in each bay and ribbon of three 6/ 6 windows in each bay; RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR original window openings, including flat head and segmentally arched openings with original wood sills or concrete sills; slight brick work under the eaves; shallow buttressing; andentrance on DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 124 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June 3, 2014, ,8- https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1320201&searchid=b55a70ee-6ee0-49c4-a1f9-a01bf0c04283&dbid=0 17 – 8-18 71 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Municipal AddressYear BuiltHeritage Attributes Duke Street West marked by simple projecting pilaster. All elements related to the contextual value, including: Location of the buildings and contribution he buildings and contribution they make to the continuity and character they make to the continuity and character of the Duke Street West and Breithaupt of the Duke Street West and Breithaupt Street streetscapes; Street streetscapes; Proximity to the rail line; and, Proximity to the rail line; and, Presence as a neighbourhood landmark.Presence as a neighbourhood landmark. 1903 72Victoria Street All elements related to the construction and All elements related to the construction and All elements related to the construction and 125 Southarchitectural style of the building, including: architectural style of the building, including: architectural style of the building, including: TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT all elevations of the building and all elevations of the building and all elevations of the building and additions; additions; additions; red and yellow brick walls; red and yellow brick walls; red and yellow brick walls; FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF brick pilasters that separate the bays; brick pilasters that separate the bays; brick pilasters that separate the bays; roof and roofline, including; flat roof; bricroof and roofline, including; flat roof; brick corbelling at the roofline;corbelling at the roofline; window openings; window openings; AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA concrete sills and lintels; brick voussoirs; main entrance portico, including: Doric columns; Brick voussoirs; Semi-elliptical opening; rounded concrete steps; RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR tie rods and anchors; yellow brick chimney; and chimney clean out. All elements relate to the interior of the building, DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD including: 125 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Listing on the Municipal Heritage Registe,” March 6, 2012,https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1180948&searchid=83d53c31-2c2b-418b-b60c- 021b037427de&dbid=0,3-17 – 3-20 72 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Municipal AddressYear BuiltHeritage Attributes exposed heavy timber (post and beam} construction with 4-way steel post caps and metal stirrups, timber capital and support members; original hardwood and concrete floors; original hardwood and concrete floors; original hardwood and concrete floors; concrete and bricconcrete and bricconcrete and brick walls; k walls; k walls; original wood ceilings; original wood ceilings; original wood ceilings; original window on interior wall located at original window on interior wall located at original window on interior wall located at the ground floor loading entrance; the ground floor loading entrance; the ground floor loading entrance; original freight elevator; original freight elevator; original freight elevator; column base with concrete casings in column base with concrete casings in column base with concrete casings in TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT basement; basement; basement; original metal door and hardware in original metal door and hardware in original metal door and hardware in basement leading to storage ubasement leading to storage ubasement leading to storage units; exposed cast iron sprinkler system; and, exposed cast iron sprinkler system; and, exposed cast iron sprinkler system; and, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF interior foundation wall in basement.interior foundation wall in basement.interior foundation wall in basement. 130 Weber Street c. 1919 (original), c. 1919 (original), All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular 126 West1946 (rebuild)1946 (rebuild) architectural style with subtle Art Deco architectural style with subtle Art Deco influences, including: influences, including: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA flat roof; concrete floral motifs and banding; original window openings either with concrete sill or concrete window RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR surround; angled corner with entrance facing intersection; and, concrete door surround. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 126 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Listing of Non-Designated Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June 3, 2014, ,9- https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1320202&searchid=fd7d7a9f-e842-4b9d-a46d-1cabecac0483&dbid=0 139 – 9-145 73 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Municipal AddressYear BuiltHeritage Attributes All elements related to the contextual value, including: Location of the house and contribution that it makes to the continuity and that it makes to the continuity and character of the Breithaupt Street and character of the Breithaupt Street and Weber Street West streetscapes.st streetscapes. thth When directly contrasting the structure located at 97 Victoria Street North with other early 20When directly contrasting the structure located at 97 Victoria Street North with other early 20When directly contrasting the structure located at 97 Victoria Street North with other early 20 century industrial vernacular buildings, it becomes clear that it is not an early or unique example century industrial vernacular buildings, it becomes clear that it is not an early or unique example century industrial vernacular buildings, it becomes clear that it is not an early or unique example of the architectural style. Other industrial vernacular buildings, including several identified of the architectural style. Other industrial vernacular buildings, including several identified of the architectural style. Other industrial vernacular buildings, including several identified above, where constructed approximately 30-years prior to thyears prior to thyears prior to the Property.e Property.e Property. 6.3Summaryof Evaluation TTTTTT In LHC’s professional opinion, the property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North meets In LHC’s professional opinion, the property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North meets In LHC’s professional opinion, the property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North meets criteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of O. Reg. 9/06for its design and physical, historical and associative, for its design and physical, historical and associative, for its design and physical, historical and associative, and contextual values. 6.4 Proposed Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interestroposed Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interestroposed Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest FFFFFF Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or InterestStatement of Cultural Heritage Value or InterestStatement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North has design and physical values The property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North has design and physical values The property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North has design and physical values because it is a representative example of an industrial building having been developed in the because it is a representative example of an industrial building having been developed in the because it is a representative example of an industrial building having been developed in the industrial vernacular architectural style; historical and associative value because it has industrial vernacular architectural style; historical and associative value because it has industrial vernacular architectural style; historical and associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organizationassociations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organizationassociations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization, or institution that is significant to a community; and contextual value because it is significant to a community; and contextual value because it is significant to a community; and contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining, AAAAAA or supporting the character of an areaor supporting the character of an areaor supporting the character of an areaand because it is physical, functionally, visuallyand because it is physical, functionally, visuallyand because it is physical, functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundingshistorically linked to its surroundingshistorically linked to its surroundings. . The building located at 97 Victoria Street North was built c. 1927 as an industrial The building located at 97 Victoria Street North was built c. 1927 as an industrial The building located at 97 Victoria Street North was built c. 1927 as an industrial warehousefor the Mitchell Button Company and has continued to serve as an industrial and/or commercial the Mitchell Button Company and has continued to serve as an industrial and/or commercial the Mitchell Button Company and has continued to serve as an industrial and/or commercial building until present day. The building is recognized as a contributing industrial property that building until present day. The building is recognized as a contributing industrial property that building until present day. The building is recognized as a contributing industrial property that RRRRRR supports the character ofsupports the character ofsupports the character ofthe City of Kitchener’s the City of Kitchener’s the City of Kitchener’s Warehouse Districtcultural heritage landscape. The building was erected in the industrial vernacular architectural style that was common in The building was erected in the industrial vernacular architectural style that was common in The building was erected in the industrial vernacular architectural style that was common in th Kitchener during the early 20Kitchener during the early 20Kitchener during the early 20 century. Architectural elements that define this style that are present on the property include present on the property include present on the property include its symmetry, flat roof with shaped parapet on the front façade, shallow buttressing, use of red, yellow, and beige bricks, and 6/6 windows.shallow buttressing, use of red, yellow, and beige bricks, and 6/6 windows.shallow buttressing, use of red, yellow, and beige bricks, and 6/6 windows. Heritage AttributesHeritage AttributesHeritage Attributes DDDDDD All elements related to the Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the building, including: Two storey height; Symmetrical northwest (primary) façade; 74 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Flat roof with shaped parapet on the northwest (primary)façade; Shallow buttresses that definedistinct bays along each of the building’s elevations. Brick construction comprising red, yellow, and beige brick; Original window openings withsoldier coursebrick headers and concrete sills;brick headers and concrete sills;brick headers and concrete sills; Six-over-sixwindows on the northwest (primary)façade; and,; and,; and, Chimney set in stretcher bonded, yellow brick with concrete banding.Chimney set in stretcher bonded, yellow brick with concrete banding.Chimney set in stretcher bonded, yellow brick with concrete banding. All elements related to the contextual value, including: Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity and Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity and Location of the building and contribution that it makes to the continuity and character of the Victoria Street Northstreetscape and the streetscape and the streetscape and the WWarehouse arehouse DDDistrict; and, istrict; and, istrict; and, The link to the surrounding Warehouse DDDistrict.istrict.istrict. T F A R D 75 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 7DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 7.1Massing, Access, and Setbacks The proposed new development seeks to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street North and retain and add two additions to the buildinglisted on the City’s municipal heritage register located at 97 Victoria Street North. The first proposed addition is the municipal heritage register located at 97 Victoria Street North. The first proposed addition is the municipal heritage register located at 97 Victoria Street North. The first proposed addition is the inclusion of a third storey that will increase the building’s height, and the second proposed , and the second proposed , and the second proposed addition is asingle storey wing that will attach to the extant building’s southwest elevation that single storey wing that will attach to the extant building’s southwest elevation that single storey wing that will attach to the extant building’s southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane (Figure 14Figure 14Figure 14and and and Figure 15Figure 15Figure 15)). The . The proposed development will permit the construction of a mixed use residential, commercial, and permit the construction of a mixed use residential, commercial, and permit the construction of a mixed use residential, commercial, and 2222 comprising comprising comprising 2,082 m2,082 m2,082 mof resiof resiof residential, dential, institutional building totallinga gross floor area of 2,639 m 2 support services, and common area space and 557 mof space dedicated to an updatedof space dedicated to an updatedof space dedicated to an updatedSt. St. John’s Kitchen. The overall massing of the site is expected to increase as a result of the proposed development, The overall massing of the site is expected to increase as a result of the proposed development, The overall massing of the site is expected to increase as a result of the proposed development, mostly because of the proposed alterations to the buildingbuildingbuildinglocated at 97 Victoria Street North. located at 97 Victoria Street North. located at 97 Victoria Street North. The addition of a third storey (plus a mechanical penthouse situated towards the southern edge The addition of a third storey (plus a mechanical penthouse situated towards the southern edge The addition of a third storey (plus a mechanical penthouse situated towards the southern edge of the roof) and the addition of a new southwest wing will increase the amount of land that is of the roof) and the addition of a new southwest wing will increase the amount of land that is of the roof) and the addition of a new southwest wing will increase the amount of land that is developed and increase the height of the Property. Notwithstanding, the proposed southwest developed and increase the height of the Property. Notwithstanding, the proposed southwest developed and increase the height of the Property. Notwithstanding, the proposed southwest wing will be largely obscured from view from Victoria Street North because it will be situated wing will be largely obscured from view from Victoria Street North because it will be situated wing will be largely obscured from view from Victoria Street North because it will be situated behind the extant buildingslocated at 87 and 83 Victoria Street North. The proposed changes located at 87 and 83 Victoria Street North. The proposed changes located at 87 and 83 Victoria Street North. The proposed changes willnot impactthe Property’sextantextantsetback distances.setback distances.setback distances.The front (northwest) and rear The front (northwest) and rear The front (northwest) and rear (southeast) elevations will have a shallow setback, and the northeast and southwest elevations (southeast) elevations will have a shallow setback, and the northeast and southwest elevations (southeast) elevations will have a shallow setback, and the northeast and southwest elevations will be deeper, allowing for pedestrian and vehicular access. For pedestrian traffic, the site will will be deeper, allowing for pedestrian and vehicular access. For pedestrian traffic, the site will will be deeper, allowing for pedestrian and vehicular access. For pedestrian traffic, the site will be accessible from the space betweenbe accessible from the space betweenbe accessible from the space between83 and 87 Victoria Street North, the space83 and 87 Victoria Street North, the space83 and 87 Victoria Street North, the spacebetween 91 and 97 Victoria Street North, and form the driveway situated in the Property’s southwest corner and 97 Victoria Street North, and form the driveway situated in the Property’s southwest corner and 97 Victoria Street North, and form the driveway situated in the Property’s southwest corner along Heit Lane. Vehicular access is provided via Heit Lane located to the Property’s rear. Two along Heit Lane. Vehicular access is provided via Heit Lane located to the Property’s rear. Two along Heit Lane. Vehicular access is provided via Heit Lane located to the Property’s rear. Two dedicated staff parking spaces, one standard and onededicated staff parking spaces, one standard and onededicated staff parking spaces, one standard and oneaccessible, are located adjacent to the proposed southwest wingproposed southwest wingproposed southwest wingand are accessed via an approximately 6.3 metre wide and 17.5 and are accessed via an approximately 6.3 metre wide and 17.5 and are accessed via an approximately 6.3 metre wide and 17.5 metre long driveway. Six metre long driveway. Six metre long driveway. Six additional parking spacesadditional parking spacesadditional parking spaces, five standard and one accessible,are located in a located in a located in a small small small parking lot on the south side of Heit Lane that is adjacent to 97 Victoria Street parking lot on the south side of Heit Lane that is adjacent to 97 Victoria Street parking lot on the south side of Heit Lane that is adjacent to 97 Victoria Street North. North. North. In addition to parking areas, an approximately In addition to parking areas, an approximately In addition to parking areas, an approximately 28.5-metre-longloading bay is situated along the proposed southwest addition and is accessible via Heit Lanealong the proposed southwest addition and is accessible via Heit Lanealong the proposed southwest addition and is accessible via Heit Lane (Figure 16). 76 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT FFF Figure 14: Rendering looking east showing the third: Rendering looking east showing the third: Rendering looking east showing the third---storey addition to the Propertystorey addition to the Propertystorey addition to the Property AAA RRR DDD Figure 15:Rendering looking east showing the single-storey southwest wing addition to the Property 77 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT FF AA RR Figure 16Figure 16Figure 16: Site plan showing : Site plan showing : Site plan showing the proposed redevelopmentthe proposed redevelopment 7.2Architectural DesignArchitectural DesignArchitectural Design Several alterations will be made the to the listed heritage property located at 97 Victoria Street Several alterations will be made the to the listed heritage property located at 97 Victoria Street Several alterations will be made the to the listed heritage property located at 97 Victoria Street North.First is the replacement of all extant windows with contemporary counterparts. The First is the replacement of all extant windows with contemporary counterparts. The First is the replacement of all extant windows with contemporary counterparts. The DD purpose for this proposed alteration is twofold. First, the Owner is seeking to create a net-zero building. Accordingly, the proposed windows reduce the total glazed area, increase opaque/insulated area, and minimize mullion thermal breaks. Second, to allow for the maximum capacity of residential units, two units per structural bay is optimal. At present, there is one window per structural bay. An additional consideration was the ceiling height within the 78 December2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 structure. To allow passage of the updated building systems, the ceiling must be dropped. The extant window openings are too tall and would conflict with this requirement. Due to theunit requirementsand building systems considerations, therefore, the extant window design requires alterations. The project architect, bnkc, considered several window alternatives for the proposed design (Figure 17). Ultimately, it was decided to divide the extant window bays in two. The proposed new windows comprise a metallic frame, inset into the existing window openings proposed new windows comprise a metallic frame, inset into the existing window openings proposed new windows comprise a metallic frame, inset into the existing window openings found along each elevation, with two individual windows (Figure 18and Figure 19Figure 19Figure 19)).. Second, the extant community outreach wing that branches off the Property’s southwest corner Second, the extant community outreach wing that branches off the Property’s southwest corner Second, the extant community outreach wing that branches off the Property’s southwest corner will be removed to allow for the construction of a new, largersouthwest wingsouthwest wingsouthwest wing. . . The proposed The proposed The proposed southwest wing will be clad in several materials. The primary, northwest elevation will comprsouthwest wing will be clad in several materials. The primary, northwest elevation will comprsouthwest wing will be clad in several materials. The primary, northwest elevation will comprise ise a 20.5 metre curtain wall with 2.3 metre curtain wall returns on either side.20.5 metre curtain wall with 2.3 metre curtain wall returns on either side.20.5 metre curtain wall with 2.3 metre curtain wall returns on either side.Flanking the curtain Flanking the curtain Flanking the curtain wall, and also on the northwest elevation, is an approximately 6.5 metre wall section to the west wall, and also on the northwest elevation, is an approximately 6.5 metre wall section to the west wall, and also on the northwest elevation, is an approximately 6.5 metre wall section to the west and approximately 8.5 metre wallto the east. Both of these wall sections will be hese wall sections will be hese wall sections will be clad in metal clad in metal clad in metal panelling (Figure 20). The southwest and southeast elevation will be clad in brick masonry. The southwest and southeast elevation will be clad in brick masonry. The southwest and southeast elevation will be clad in brick masonry. The roof of the proposed southwest wing is typically flat; however, a section of the roof is raised, The roof of the proposed southwest wing is typically flat; however, a section of the roof is raised, The roof of the proposed southwest wing is typically flat; however, a section of the roof is raised, T creating a clerestory, and sloped upwards at 12 degrees. The sloped roof follows the creating a clerestory, and sloped upwards at 12 degrees. The sloped roof follows the creating a clerestory, and sloped upwards at 12 degrees. The sloped roof follows the dimensions of the 20.5 metre curtain wall situated along the northwestdimensions of the 20.5 metre curtain wall situated along the northwestdimensions of the 20.5 metre curtain wall situated along the northwestelevation of the proposed elevation of the proposed southwest wing. The highest point of the sloped roof is at the terminus of the curtain wall, and southwest wing. The highest point of the sloped roof is at the terminus of the curtain wall, and southwest wing. The highest point of the sloped roof is at the terminus of the curtain wall, and the lowest point is near the centre of the southwest wing. The upper portion of the curtain wall is the lowest point is near the centre of the southwest wing. The upper portion of the curtain wall is the lowest point is near the centre of the southwest wing. The upper portion of the curtain wall is proposed to have horizontally strung wooden proposed to have horizontally strung wooden proposed to have horizontally strung wooden louvreslouvreslouvres ( ( (Figure 21Figure 21Figure 21)). Internally, the proposed . Internally, the proposed . Internally, the proposed F southwest addition comprisesexposed exposed mass timber framingmass timber framingmass timber framing ( ( (Figure 22Figure 22Figure 22and Figure 23). Third, a third-storey addition will be added to the extant storey addition will be added to the extant storey addition will be added to the extant buildingbuilding. The addition will be consistent . The addition will be consistent in shape and size to the first two in shape and size to the first two in shape and size to the first two storeys andstoreys andstoreys andwillwillwillremain similar in heightremain similar in heightremain similar in height(at 3.8 metres) to the 3.7 metre first storey and 4.1 metre second storey.3.7 metre first storey and 4.1 metre second storey.3.7 metre first storey and 4.1 metre second storey.The third storey addition is proposed to be The third storey addition is proposed to be The third storey addition is proposed to be clad in metal panelling and will have the same window style that has been proposed for the rest clad in metal panelling and will have the same window style that has been proposed for the rest clad in metal panelling and will have the same window style that has been proposed for the rest of the building.Along the building’s primary, northwest elevation, the decorative parapetAlong the building’s primary, northwest elevation, the decorative parapetAlong the building’s primary, northwest elevation, the decorative parapetwill A remain, and the northwest wall of the third storey will be narrowly setback to accommodate the , and the northwest wall of the third storey will be narrowly setback to accommodate the , and the northwest wall of the third storey will be narrowly setback to accommodate the attribute. In addition, the northwest facing section of the setback will have a raised attribute. In addition, the northwest facing section of the setback will have a raised attribute. In addition, the northwest facing section of the setback will have a raised parapet. To create a visual buffer between the two storey heritage resource and proposed third storey, a create a visual buffer between the two storey heritage resource and proposed third storey, a create a visual buffer between the two storey heritage resource and proposed third storey, a narrow metal band circumnavigates the connection between the second and third storeys. narrow metal band circumnavigates the connection between the second and third storeys. narrow metal band circumnavigates the connection between the second and third storeys. MoreoverMoreoverMoreover, the , the structurestructurestructure’s chimney will be incorporated into the addition, with the third storey ’s chimney will be incorporated into the addition, with the third storey ’s chimney will be incorporated into the addition, with the third storey addition wrapping around the detail. The roof of the third storey will typically be clad in addition wrapping around the detail. The roof of the third storey will typically be clad in addition wrapping around the detail. The roof of the third storey will typically be clad in R photovoltaic panels towards the northwest elevation and will have thphotovoltaic panels towards the northwest elevation and will have thphotovoltaic panels towards the northwest elevation and will have the building’s main mechanical penthouse situated towards the rear, southeast elevation. The mechanical mechanical penthouse situated towards the rear, southeast elevation. The mechanical mechanical penthouse situated towards the rear, southeast elevation. The mechanical penthouse will be clad in metal paneling and will add an addition 2.7 metres of height the penthouse will be clad in metal paneling and will add an addition 2.7 metres of height the penthouse will be clad in metal paneling and will add an addition 2.7 metres of height the structure. The structure will continue to have a flat roofThe structure will continue to have a flat roofThe structure will continue to have a flat roof (Figure 14). Fourth, the extant entrance centrally located along the Fourth, the extant entrance centrally located along the Fourth, the extant entrance centrally located along the building’ssouthwest elevation will be redesigned and will protrude from the face of the building by just over 1.0 metre. The D redesigned entrance will typically comprise glass, but metal panelling sections will be included between the first and second storey and at the top of the second storey (Figure 24). 79 Architect's window drafts : Figure 17 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Figure 18: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windows: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windows: Rendering of the northwest and northeast elevations showing the proposed windows FFF AAA RRR DDD Figure 19: Rendering of the northwest and southwest elevations showing the proposed windows 81 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTT Figure 20: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wing: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wing: Floor plan of the proposed southwest wing FFF AAA RRR DDD Figure 21: Axonometric rendering of the proposed development showing the southwest wing’s sloped roof 82 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TTTT Figure 22: Internal rendering looking northeast within: Internal rendering looking northeast within: Internal rendering looking northeast withinthe proposed the proposed the proposed southwest wingsouthwest wingsouthwest wing FFFF AAAA RRRR Figure 23:Internal rendering Internal rendering Internal rendering looking west withinthe proposed southwest wing DDDD 83 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 TT Figure 24: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevation: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevation: View of the proposed entrance on the southwest elevation FF 7.3Description of Alteration to Heritage ResourcesDescription of Alteration to Heritage ResourcesDescription of Alteration to Heritage Resources The proposed development will impact two of the Property’s heritage attributes identified in The proposed development will impact two of the Property’s heritage attributes identified in The proposed development will impact two of the Property’s heritage attributes identified in Section 6.4.2. First, adding a third storey to the . First, adding a third storey to the . First, adding a third storey to the buildingbuildingbuildingon the Property will change the on the Property will change the identified ‘two storey height’ attribute. Second, all extant windows will be removed from the identified ‘two storey height’ attribute. Second, all extant windows will be removed from the identified ‘two storey height’ attribute. Second, all extant windows will be removed from the buildingandwill bewill bewill bereplaced with contemporary counterparts. The replaced with contemporary counterparts. The replaced with contemporary counterparts. The proposed new windows are AA not the 6/6 style that is historically accuratenot the 6/6 style that is historically accuratenot the 6/6 style that is historically accuratefor the Property and the greater Warehouse District for the Property and the greater Warehouse District for the Property and the greater Warehouse District within which it is located.within which it is located.within which it is located. RR DD 84 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 8IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT ON HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES 8.1Potential Impacts to 97 Victoria Street North TheMCM’sInfo Sheet #5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plansoutlinesseven potential negative impacts to be considered with any proposed development or site alteration. The impacts include: 1.Destructionof any part of any significant heritage attribute or features;of any part of any significant heritage attribute or features;of any part of any significant heritage attribute or features; 2.Alterationthat is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and that is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and that is not sympathetic or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and appearance; 3.Shadowscreated that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability of a natural feature or planting, such as a garden; 4.Isolationof a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a significant relationship; 5.Direct or indirect obstructionof significant views or vistas within, from, or built and of significant views or vistas within, from, or built and of significant views or vistas within, from, or built and natural features; TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 6.A change in land usesuch as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; andallowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; andallowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; and 7.Land disturbancessuch as a change in grade that alters soils, drainage patterns that such as a change in grade that alters soils, drainage patterns that such as a change in grade that alters soils, drainage patterns that adversely affect an archaeological resource. adversely affect an archaeological resource. adversely affect an archaeological resource. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF The Property located at 97 Victoria Street North was found to meet The Property located at 97 Victoria Street North was found to meet The Property located at 97 Victoria Street North was found to meet O. Reg.O. Reg.O. Reg.9/06and a list of heritage attributes was prepared for the Property. heritage attributes was prepared for the Property. heritage attributes was prepared for the Property. Table 11Table 11Table 11below considerbelow considerbelow considerspotential negative impacts identified by the Mimpacts identified by the Mimpacts identified by the MCMCMCMin relation to the identified heritage attributes.in relation to the identified heritage attributes.in relation to the identified heritage attributes. Table 11:Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street NorthImpact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street NorthImpact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 97 Victoria Street North Heritage AttributesHeritage AttributesDiscussion Potential Potential Type of Type of AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ImpactImpactImpactImpact Two storey heightTwo storey heightYesYesAlterationThe proposed development proposes to add an additional storey to the extant two storey buildingwhich will make it three storeys in height. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR The proposed third storey will be 3.8 metres in height, which is consistent with the first storey (3.7 metres) and second storey (4.1 metres). In addition to the third storey addition, a mechanical penthouse will also be DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD added to the building. The mechanical penthouse will add an additional 2.7 metres of height to the Property; however, it is located 85 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Heritage AttributesDiscussion Potential Type of ImpactImpact towards the southmost section of the building’s roof. Symmetrical NoNoneAlthough the northwest (primary) northwest (primary) northwest (primary) northwest façade of the Property is being façade of the Property is being façade of the Property is being (primary) façadealtered through the addition of a altered through the addition of a altered through the addition of a third storeyand the replacement of its and the replacement of its and the replacement of its windowswindowswindows, the symmetry of the façade , the symmetry of the façade , the symmetry of the façade will remain unchanged.will remain unchanged.will remain unchanged. Flat roof with NoNoneAlthough Although Although the proposed third storey the proposed third storey shaped parapet on willwillalter the extant roof of the building alter the extant roof of the building the northwest on the Property, on the Property, it will continue to it will continue to (primary) façadehave a flat roof.have a flat roof. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT The shaped parapet will also remain The shaped parapet will also remain asas--is. The section of theis. The section of theproposed third storey that is located to the rear third storey that is located to the rear of the parapet is setback from the of the parapet is setback from the wall face of theface of theextant building, extant building, allowing FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF the parapetthe parapetto remain a prominent feature of the building.feature of the building. NoNoNoNoneNoneNone Shallow buttresses The proposed development The proposed development will not that define distinct that define distinct that define distinct impactthe bays that are divided by bays along each of bays along each of bays along each of the shallow buttressing along the AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA the buildings’the buildings’elevations. Modifications to the extant elevations.elevations. two-storey buildingare not anticipated to impact the arrangement and/or rhythm of the elevations. Brick construction Brick construction NoNoNoneThe brickmasonrythat currently comprising red, comprising red, comprises thebuilding’s cladding will RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR yellowyellow, and beige be largely unaffected as a resultof brickbrickthe proposed development. Original window Original window Original window NoNoNoNoneThe extant window openings along openings withopenings withopenings withwith theirsoldier course brick headers soldier course soldier course soldier course and concrete sills will be unaffected brick headers and as a result of theproposed DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD concrete sillsdevelopment. Six-over-sixYesAlterationAll extant windows, including former windows on the windows that have been coveredor infilled, will be removed and replaced 86 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Heritage AttributesDiscussion Potential Type of ImpactImpact northwest with contemporary counterparts (primary)façade including the six-over-six windows currently observed on the currently observed on the building’s northwest (primary) elevation.northwest (primary) elevation. Each extant window bay will be Each extant window bay will be infilled with two separate window infilled with two separate window sections. sections. BothBothwindow sections window sections comprise comprise two glazed sections divided two glazed sections divided by a metallic mullion.by a metallic mullion. The project architect, The project architect, considered considered several window alternatives for the several window alternatives for the proposed redevelopment. Ultimately, proposed redevelopment. Ultimately, TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT due to due to the the internal room layout, privacy and sustainability conprivacy and sustainability concerns, the the proposed window design was proposed window design was selected.selected. Chimney set in NoNoneNoneNoneThe chimney is currently obscured The chimney is currently obscured The chimney is currently obscured FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF stretcher bonded, from view from the public realmfrom view from the public realmfrom view from the public realmfrom yellow brick with most angles. Accordingly, despite the most angles. Accordingly, despite the most angles. Accordingly, despite the concrete banding third storey addition building around third storey addition building around the chimney, it will not have a the chimney, it will not have a significantimpacton the attribute. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA NoNoneNone Location of the The location of the building will not be building and impacted, and the building will contribution that it contribution that it continue to support the character of makes to the makes to the the Warehouse District. continuity and continuity and character of the character of the Victoria Street Victoria Street RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR North streNorth streetscape and the and the Warehouse arehouse Districtistrict The link to the The link to the The link to the NoNoneThe character of the building will be surrounding unaffected, and the building will DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Warehouse District continue to support the character of the Warehouse District. 87 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 8.2Potential Impacts to Adjacent Property at 70 Francis Street North The seven potential impacts identified within the MCM’sInfo Sheet #5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Planswere also considered for the adjacent property listed on the City’s municipal heritage register located at 70 Francis Street North (Table 12).The identified heritage attributes were taken from the City of Kitchener’s Statement of Significance identified heritage attributes were taken from the City of Kitchener’s Statement of Significance identified heritage attributes were taken from the City of Kitchener’s Statement of Significance 127 for the property. Table 12:Impact assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street Northct assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street Northct assessment for the identified heritage attributes on 70 Francis Street North Heritage AttributesPotential Type of DiscussionDiscussion ImpactImpact Irregular building NoNoneThe proposed development at 97 The proposed development at 97 planVictoria Street North is not Victoria Street North is not anticipated anticipated to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street North.North. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Buff brick laid in NoNoneNoneThe proposed development at 97 The proposed development at 97 The proposed development at 97 common bondVictoria Street North is not anticipated Victoria Street North is not anticipated Victoria Street North is not anticipated to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street North.North.North. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Rock-faced stone NoNoneNoneThe proposed development at 97 The proposed development at 97 foundationVictoria Street North is not anticipated to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street North. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Projecting two Projecting two NoNoNoNoneNoneNone The proposed development at 97 storey bay on storey bay on storey bay on Victoria Street North is not anticipated south elevation south elevation south elevation to have any negative impacts on the with gambrel roofwith gambrel roofwith gambrel roof property located at 70 Francis Street North. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Modified gable Modified gable NoNoNoneTheproposed development at 97 roofroof Victoria Street North is not anticipated to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street North. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 127 City of Kitchener, “DTS-09-053,” 7 April 2009. 20-%20Listing%20of%20Non- https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/PDF/3wqyhqn1h3kw5yn2de11nzmt/3/DTS-09-053% Designated%20Property%20of%20Cultural%20Heritage.pdf 88 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Heritage AttributesDiscussion Potential Type of ImpactImpact Octagonal tower NoNoneThe proposed development at 97 with an eight-sided Victoria Street North is not anticipated conical roofto have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street North. Plain fascia, NoNoneThe proposed development at 97 The proposed development at 97 moulded soffit, Victoria Street North is not Victoria Street North is not anticipated and frieze with to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the dentils and property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street mouldingsNorth.North. Windows and NoNoneThe proposed developThe proposed developThe proposed development at 97 ment at 97 ment at 97 window openings, Victoria Street North is not anticipated Victoria Street North is not anticipated Victoria Street North is not anticipated TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT such as the 1/1 to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the windows with flat property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street North.North.North. rusticated lintels, the large first floor windows with half- round transoms. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF The 1/1 round topped windows with decorative surrounds and keystone, the three keystone, the three keystone, the three AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA part oriel window; part oriel window; part oriel window; the three section the three section window with a two window with a two window with a two section ellipticalsection ellipticalsection elliptical--- arch transom and arch transom and arch transom and brick label and, the brick label and, the brick label and, the two storey bay two storey bay two storey bay RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR window with a window with a window with a bracketed bracketed bracketed pediment gable pediment gable pediment gable above Main entrance Main entrance NoNoneThe proposed development at 97 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD door with single Victoria Street North is not anticipated light, sidelights to have any negative impacts on the with and transom property located at 70 Francis Street with beveled glassNorth. 89 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Heritage AttributesDiscussion Potential Type of ImpactImpact VerandahNoNone The proposed development at 97 Victoria Street North is not anticipated to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the to have any negative impacts on the property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street property located at 70 Francis Street North. 8.3Potential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapePotential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapePotential Impacts to the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape Potential impacts to the City’s Warehouse District CHL are identified in ity’s Warehouse District CHL are identified in ity’s Warehouse District CHL are identified in Table 13Table 13, , below. Appendix below. Appendix below. Appendix sixof the CHLreportindicates that the Warehouse District has historical integrity andWarehouse District has historical integrity andWarehouse District has historical integrity andthat itthat itthat itretains retains retains both cultural and community value. The CHL report identifies several both cultural and community value. The CHL report identifies several both cultural and community value. The CHL report identifies several criteria for each of these criteria for each of these criteria for each of these three specific categories. The proposed alterations to the Property are measured against these three specific categories. The proposed alterations to the Property are measured against these three specific categories. The proposed alterations to the Property are measured against these criteria below. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Table 13:Impact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapeImpact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage LandscapeImpact assessment for city’s Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape CHL AttributeImpactImpactDiscussionDiscussion Historical Integrity FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Land Use –Continuity of NoNoThe proposed development will not alter The proposed development will not alter The proposed development will not alter Use the land use of the Property or any the land use of the Property or any the land use of the Property or any neighbouring properties within the neighbouring properties within the Warehouse District.Warehouse District. Built Elements – – Original Original NoNoThe proposed development will not alter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Groupings and Associated Associated the grouping of sites within the SitesWarehouse District. View that Reflects View that Reflects View that Reflects NoNoThe character of the Warehouse District Landscape Character from Landscape Character from Landscape Character from as it appears in historic photos will be Historic PhotosHistoric PhotosHistoric Photos minimally impacted because of the proposed alterations. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Designed Landscapes that Designed Landscapes that NoThe proposed development will not Have Restoration PotentialHave Restoration Potential impose or destroy landscapes that have restoration potential. Cultural ValueCultural Value DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Design Value –Rareness or NoThe proposed development will not Uniqueness impact the rareness or uniqueness of the Property. 90 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CHL AttributeImpactDiscussion Design Value –NoThe proposed development will have Aesthetic/Scenic Reasons minimal impact on the aesthetic and/or scenic value of the Warehouse District. Design Value –High Degree NoThe proposed development will have The proposed development will have Technical/Scientific Interestminimal impact on the technical and/or minimal impact on the technical and/or scientific interest of the Warehouse scientific interest of the Warehouse District. Historic Value –Historic NoThe proposed development will have e proposed development will have e proposed development will have Understanding of Areaminimal impact on the historic minimal impact on the historic minimal impact on the historic understanding and legibility of the understanding and legibility of the understanding and legibility of the Warehouse District.Warehouse District.Warehouse District. Historic Value –Direct NoThe proposed development will not The proposed development will not Association with a Theme impactimpactthe associative value that the the associative value that the TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Event or PersonProperty or Warehouse District has.Property or Warehouse District has. Historic Value – Work of NoThe architect of the building on the The architect of the building on the The architect of the building on the Landscape Architect, Property was not Property was not Property was not identified and the identified and the Architect or Other Designerarchitectural value of the building is architectural value of the building is architectural value of the building is FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF being largely retained.being largely retained.being largely retained. NoNo Contextual Value –The proposed development will not Important in Defining the Important in Defining the impact the Property’s ability to help Character of Areadefine the character of the Warehouse District. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Contextual Value Contextual Value Contextual Value – – – NoNoNo The proposed development will not alter Historically, Physically, Historically, Physically, Historically, Physically, the Property’s historical, physical, Functionally or Visually Functionally or Visually Functionally or Visually functional, or visual link to the Linked to SurroundingsLinked to SurroundingsLinked to SurroundingsWarehouse District. Community ValuCommunity Value RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR No Community Story Community Story Community Story – – Tells Tells Tells The proposed development will not Story of AreaStory of AreaStory of Area impact the Property’s ability to contribute to the story of the Warehouse District. Community Image Identified Community Image Identified NoThe proposed development will not with Kitchener’s Provincial/ with Kitchener’s Provincial/ impact the City’s reputation or any National ReputationNational Reputationcontributing elements thereof. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Genus Loci No The proposed development willnot impactthe sense of place that the Property contributes to the Warehouse District. 91 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CHL AttributeImpactDiscussion Planning –IdentifiedNoThe proposed development will help the Through Other Planning City achieve other planning objectives Initiativessuch as the provision of housing. 8.4 Summary of Applicable Heritage Conservation Principlesrinciplesrinciples Standard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandard and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada Per the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in CanadaStandards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada(S&G), the (S&G), the proposal is a rehabilitation project, which is defined as “the action or process of making possible proposal is a rehabilitation project, which is defined as “the action or process of making possible proposal is a rehabilitation project, which is defined as “the action or process of making possible a continuing or compatible contemporary use of an historic place, or an individual component, a continuing or compatible contemporary use of an historic place, or an individual component, a continuing or compatible contemporary use of an historic place, or an individual component, 128 while protecting its heritage value.”Rehabilitation should be considered as the primary Rehabilitation should be considered as the primary Rehabilitation should be considered as the primary treatment when: a)Repair or replacement of deteriorated features is necessary;Repair or replacement of deteriorated features is necessary;Repair or replacement of deteriorated features is necessary; TT b)Alterations oradditions to the historic place are planned for a new or continued use; and,additions to the historic place are planned for a new or continued use; and,additions to the historic place are planned for a new or continued use; and, c) Depiction during a particular period in its history is not appropriate.Depiction during a particular period in its history is not appropriate.Depiction during a particular period in its history is not appropriate. The S&Gs provide nine general standardsstandardsstandardsalong with three additional along with three additional along with three additional standardsstandardsstandardsspecific to rehabilitation projects.Table 14below reviews the proposalbelow reviews the proposalbelow reviews the proposal’’’s compliance with each pertinent s compliance with each pertinent s compliance with each pertinent FF standard. AA RR DD 128 Canada’s Historic Places. “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, 2nd Edition.” Canada’s Historic Places. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010.17 92 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Table 14: Compliance with the Standards and Guidelines CriteriaCriteria Justification Met Conserve the heritage value of an YesIn the context of this project, this criterion is historic place. Do not remove, met. The Property’s character defining met. The Property’s character defining replace or substantially alter its elements are proposed to be retained with elements are proposed to be retained with minor modifications. intact or repairable character defining elements. Do not move a part of an historic place if its current location is a character- defining element. Conserve changes to an historic In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is Yes place that, over time, have met. The defined heritage attributes took met. The defined heritage attributes took met. The defined heritage attributes took become character-defining into consideration the cultural heritage value into consideration the cultural heritage value into consideration the cultural heritage value or interest of the main building as well aor interest of the main building as well aor interest of the main building as well as its elements in their own right. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT two additions. All defined attributes are two additions. All defined attributes are two additions. All defined attributes are being proposed to be retained with minor being proposed to be retained with minor being proposed to be retained with minor modifications.modifications.modifications. Conserve heritage value by YesYesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is adopting an approach calling for met. met. Although changes that will alter the Although changes that will alter the FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF minimal intervention.Property’s scale and massing are proposed, Property’s scale and massing are proposed, the proposed changes are not anticipated to the proposed changes are not anticipated to reduce its cultural value or interest.reduce its cultural value or interest. Recognize each historic place as Recognize each historic place as Recognize each historic place as YesYesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is a physical record of its time, a physical record of its time, a physical record of its time, met. Both proposed additions to the met. Both proposed additions to the met. Both proposed additions to the AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA place and use. Do not create a place and use. Do not create a place and use. Do not create a Property are distinguishable from the extant Property are distinguishable from the extant Property are distinguishable from the extant false sense of historical false sense of historical false sense of historical building and are products of their time. development by adding elements development by adding elements development by adding elements from other historic places or from other historic places or from other historic places or other properties, or by combining other properties, or by combining other properties, or by combining features of the same property that features of the same property that features of the same property that RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR never coexisted.never coexisted.never coexisted. Find a use for an historic place Find a use for an historic place YesIn the context of this project, this criterion is that requires minimal or no that requires minimal or no met. The Property’s use will remain largely change to its characterchange to its character-defining the same, with the addition of residential elements.suites. The necessary alterations will have minimal overall impact on the Property’s DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD character defining elements. Protect and, if necessary, n/aThe management of archaeological stabilize an historic place until resources has not been consideredas part any subsequent intervention is of this HIA. 93 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CriteriaCriteria Justification Met undertaken. Protect and preserve archaeological resources in place. Where there is potential for disturbing archaeological resources, take mitigation measures to limit damage and loss of information. Evaluate the existing condition of YesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is character-defining elements to met. Interventions surrounding the met. Interventions surrounding the determine the appropriate Property’s character defining elements are Property’s character defining elements are intervention needed. Use the proposed to be cautiously applied.proposed to be cautiously applied. gentlest means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT value when undertaking an intervention. Maintain character-defining YesYesYesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is elements on an ongoing basis. met. Character defining elements that have met. Character defining elements that have met. Character defining elements that have Repair character-defining been altered, including the window bays, are been altered, including the window bays, are been altered, including the window bays, are FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF elements by reinforcing their elements by reinforcing their proposeproposeproposedddto be repaired and replaced as to be repaired and replaced as to be repaired and replaced as materials using recognized materials using recognized materials using recognized part ofpart ofpart ofthe project.the project.the project. conservation methods. Replace conservation methods. Replace conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively in kind any extensively in kind any extensively deteriorated or missing parts of deteriorated or missing parts of deteriorated or missing parts of character-defining elements, defining elements, defining elements, AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA where there are surviving where there are surviving where there are surviving prototypes.prototypes. Make any intervention needed to Make any intervention needed to YesIn the context of this project, this criterion is preserve characterpreserve character--defining defining met. Proposed interventions for character- elements physically and visually elements physically and visually defining elements will be compatible with the compatible with the historic place compatible with the historic place Property. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR and identifiable on close and identifiable on close inspection. Document any inspection. Document any intervention for future reference.intervention for future reference. Repair rather than replace Repair rather than replace Repair rather than replace YesIn the context of this project, this criterion is character-defining elements. defining elements. defining elements. met. Although replacement of certain DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Where character-defining character-defining elements is proposed, elements are too severely such interventions will be compatible with deteriorated to repair, and where the Property and will not impose negative sufficient physical evidence consequences on its heritage value. exists, replace them with new 94 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CriteriaCriteria Justification Met elements that match the forms, materials and detailing of sound versions of the same elements. Where there is insufficient physical evidence, make the form, material and detailing of the new elements compatible with the character of the historic place. Conserve the heritage value and YesIn the context of thIn the context of this project, this criterion is is project, this criterion is character-defining elements when met. Proposed additionsroposed additionsand alterationsand alterationsto creating any new additions to an the Property are compatible with, the Property are compatible with, historic place or any related new subordinate to, and distinguishable from the subordinate to, and distinguishable from the extant building.extant building. construction. Make the new work TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT physically and visually compatible with, subordinate to and distinguishable from the historic place Create any new additions or YesYesYesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF related new construction so that related new construction so that met. Alterations to the buildingmet. Alterations to the buildingmet. Alterations to the building’s identified the essential form and integrity of the essential form and integrity of the essential form and integrity of heritage attributes are reversible.heritage attributes are reversible.heritage attributes are reversible. an historic place will not be an historic place will not be an historic place will not be impaired if the new work is impaired if the new work is impaired if the new work is removed in the future.removed in the future.removed in the future. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA EightEightGuiding Principles Guiding Principles Guiding Principles ininthetheConservation of Historic PropertiesConservation of Historic PropertiesConservation of Historic Properties To help guide heritage conservation within Ontario, the To help guide heritage conservation within Ontario, the To help guide heritage conservation within Ontario, the MCMhasdefined eight principles to be considered when undertaking projects. considered when undertaking projects. considered when undertaking projects. Table 15Table 15below assesses the proposal’s compliance with all eight all eight all eight principlesprinciples. . RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Table 15Table 15Table 15: Compliance with the Eight Guiding Principles: Compliance with the Eight Guiding Principles: Compliance with the Eight Guiding Principles CriteriaCriteriaCriteria Justification Met Respect for Respect for documentary documentary n/aThe proponent is not proposing to restore evidencethe Property to a known former state. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Respect for the original locationYesThis criterion is met. The building on the Property will remain in situthrough redevelopment. 95 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 CriteriaCriteria Justification Met In the context of this project, this criterion is Respect for historical materialYes met. Minimal alterations are proposed to be made to the elevations of the existing made to the elevations of the existing structure. The proposed new windows are The proposed new windows are not historically accurate; however, given the not historically accurate; however, given the proposed internal layout of the structure and proposed internal layout of the structure and the owner’s desire to create an the owner’s desire to create an environmentally conscious product, the environmentally conscious product, the proposed alterations will have little overall proposed alterations will have little overall impact. Respect for original fabricYesIn the context of this project, this criterion in In the context of this project, this criterion in In the context of this project, this criterion in met. met. met. Repair work and alterations proposed Repair work and alterations proposed Repair work and alterations proposed for the existing building are proposed to be for the existing building are proposed to be for the existing building are proposed to be TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT completed with like materials that are completed with like materials that are completed with like materials that are compliantcompliantcompliant. . Respect for the building’s historyn/an/aThe proponent is not proposing to restore The proponent is not proposing to restore the Property to a known former statethe Property to a known former state. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is ReversibilityYesYesYes met. Alterations to the buildingmet. Alterations to the buildingmet. Alterations to the building’s identified heritage attributes are reversible.heritage attributes are reversible.heritage attributes are reversible. LegibilityYesIn the context of this project, this criterion is In the context of this project, this criterion is met. Both proposed additions to the met. Both proposed additions to the AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Property are distinguishable from the extant Property are distinguishable from the extant building and are products of their time. MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenancen/an/aThis criterion is beyond the scope of this HIA. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 8.58.58.5Summary of Potential ImpactsSummary of Potential ImpactsSummary of Potential Impacts Potential impacts related to the proposed development were explored above in Potential impacts related to the proposed development were explored above in Potential impacts related to the proposed development were explored above in Table 11. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the building’s two storey height and Potential adverse impacts were identified for the building’s two storey height and Potential adverse impacts were identified for the building’s two storey height and it’s six-over-six windows on the windows on the windows on the northwest (primary)northwest (primary)northwest (primary)façade.No adverse impacts were identified for the adjacent heritage property heritage property heritage property listed on listed on listed on Kitchener’smunicipal heritage register located at 70 Francis Street Northor the broader Warehouse District CHLor the broader Warehouse District CHLor the broader Warehouse District CHL.In addition, the proposed alterations to the DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Property are in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada(Table14)and the Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic Properties (Table 15).To help mitigate the potential impact to the identified heritage attributes, mitigation measures are outlinedin Section 9below. 96 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 9 CONSIDERED MITIGATION AND CONSERVATION STRATEGIES 9.1Considered Options The following range of possible development alternatives wasexplored. All options have been considered in relation to the applicable planning framework outlined in Section3of this HIA.The options have consideredexisting conditions. The preferred option is identified.existing conditions. The preferred option is identified.existing conditions. The preferred option is identified. Option 1: On-site Retention in Current Use This option would leave the Property as is and the existing building would remain This option would leave the Property as is and the existing building would remain This option would leave the Property as is and the existing building would remain in situin situ. As the . As the Propertyiscurrently being used for commercial purposes, either the same or currently being used for commercial purposes, either the same or currently being used for commercial purposes, either the same or another another another commercial enterprise would retain the current use of the building.commercial enterprise would retain the current use of the building.commercial enterprise would retain the current use of the building. The ‘do nothing’ option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the The ‘do nothing’ option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the The ‘do nothing’ option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the Property,or the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no changes made. However, in the context of the needsof this site, retenof this site, retenof this site, retention tion tion in situin situis not a viable is not a viable is not a viable option. T Option 2: On-site Retention in Alternate site Retention in Alternate UUsese This option would leave the existing building This option would leave the existing building This option would leave the existing building in situin situ; however, the building would be used in a ; however, the building would be used in a ; however, the building would be used in a different way. Based on the observed existing conditions, the building could support a variety of different way. Based on the observed existing conditions, the building could support a variety of different way. Based on the observed existing conditions, the building could support a variety of uses. This option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the Property uses. This option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the Property uses. This option would not result in any direct impacts on the heritage attributes of the Property or the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no changes or the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no changes or the adjacent heritage property located at 70 Francis Street as there would be no changes F made An alternate use could result in directAn alternate use could result in directAn alternate use could result in directimpacts to the Propertimpacts to the Propertimpacts to the Property y as renovations are undertaken to as renovations are undertaken to allow for the reuse. Because the building has had numerous owners and tenants throughout its Because the building has had numerous owners and tenants throughout its Because the building has had numerous owners and tenants throughout its commissioned life, modifications are likely to have already occurred to both internal and external commissioned life, modifications are likely to have already occurred to both internal and external commissioned life, modifications are likely to have already occurred to both internal and external elements of the building. At present, internal modifications pose little risk to the Property’s ts of the building. At present, internal modifications pose little risk to the Property’s ts of the building. At present, internal modifications pose little risk to the Property’s A heritage attributes because all attributes are external.heritage attributes because all attributes are external.heritage attributes because all attributes are external. In the context of proposed redevelopment of this site, In the context of proposed redevelopment of this site, In the context of proposed redevelopment of this site, on-site retention in alternate useis not a viable optviable optviable optionionionas it does not address the needs of this site related to housing and servicesas it does not address the needs of this site related to housing and servicesas it does not address the needs of this site related to housing and services. Option Option Option 33: Retention: Retention: Retentionof Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed Developmentof Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed Developmentof Entire Structure and Integration into Proposed Development This This This option would seeoption would seethe retention of thethe retention of thethe retention of thebuildinglocated at 97 Victoria Street North and its R integration into the new developmentintegration into the new developmentintegration into the new developmentper the proposal. During the design phase, architectural detailing and material selection can help mitigate During the design phase, architectural detailing and material selection can help mitigate During the design phase, architectural detailing and material selection can help mitigate potential adverse impacts. This option would not result in any significant adversepotential adverse impacts. This option would not result in any significant adversepotential adverse impacts. This option would not result in any significant adverseimpacts on the heritage attributes of the Property or adjacent heritage properties as the design and changes heritage attributes of the Property or adjacent heritage properties as the design and changes heritage attributes of the Property or adjacent heritage properties as the design and changes would be managed with heritage conservation in mind.would be managed with heritage conservation in mind.would be managed with heritage conservation in mind. D Option 4: Demolish Existing Structure and Redevelop This option would seek to demolish the existing building while being designed to avoid impacts on the adjacent heritage properties. 97 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Based on the foregoing research and analysis, 97Victoria Street Northmeetsthe criteria established inO. Reg. 9/06. Its removal would therefore result in an adverse impact on the cultural heritage value or interest of the Property and the loss ofall heritage attributes. Furthermore, the loss of the buildingat 97 Victoria Street North would have an adverse impact on the Warehouse District CHL. 9.2Preferred Option Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed development,, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed development,, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed development,is is tthe he preferredoption. This Option is preferred because it allows for the alteration of the Property to This Option is preferred because it allows for the alteration of the Property to This Option is preferred because it allows for the alteration of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre while conservconservconservingingingthe heritage the heritage the heritage attributesof the Property and mitigatingthe potential for adversethe potential for adversethe potential for adverseimpacts to affect the Propertyimpacts to affect the Propertyimpacts to affect the Property,, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North, and the adjacent Warehouse District and the adjacent Warehouse District and the adjacent Warehouse District CHL. 9.3Mitigation Measures As outlined inTable 11, potential adverse impacts were identified for the following heritage , potential adverse impacts were identified for the following heritage , potential adverse impacts were identified for the following heritage T attributes: Two storey height;and, Six-over-sixwindows on the northwest (primary)northwest (primary)northwest (primary)façadefaçade. . Mitigation measures are required to ensure the conservation of these heritage Mitigation measures are required to ensure the conservation of these heritage Mitigation measures are required to ensure the conservation of these heritage attributes. F Both proposed additions – the third storey and the new wing situated towards the south of the the third storey and the new wing situated towards the south of the the third storey and the new wing situated towards the south of the Property’s west elevation Property’s west elevation Property’s west elevation –––will connect directly to the structure’s extant masonry. Detailed will connect directly to the structure’s extant masonry. Detailed will connect directly to the structure’s extant masonry. Detailed design and construction of this addition should involve or be overseen by a qualified design and construction of this addition should involve or be overseen by a qualified design and construction of this addition should involve or be overseen by a qualified professionalwith experience working on with experience working on with experience working on brick brick masonry heritage buildingsmasonry heritage buildingsmasonry heritage buildings. A In addition, it is recommended that the project team, in consultation with the City of Kitchener,In addition, it is recommended that the project team, in consultation with the City of Kitchener,In addition, it is recommended that the project team, in consultation with the City of Kitchener, review alternatives to replacement of the sixreview alternatives to replacement of the sixreview alternatives to replacement of the six---overoverover-si-si-six windows on the northwest (primary) façade. Previous recommendations suggested that if retention of the windows on the primary façade. Previous recommendations suggested that if retention of the windows on the primary façade. Previous recommendations suggested that if retention of the windows on the primary façade façade façade is not feasible, replacement windows should mimic the existing windows to the extent is not feasible, replacement windows should mimic the existing windows to the extent is not feasible, replacement windows should mimic the existing windows to the extent possible. possible. possible. It is recommended that the replacements be planned and overseen by a qualifieIt is recommended that the replacements be planned and overseen by a qualifieIt is recommended that the replacements be planned and overseen by a qualified professional with experience working on masonry buildings to lessen potential for unanticipated professional with experience working on masonry buildings to lessen potential for unanticipated professional with experience working on masonry buildings to lessen potential for unanticipated impacts on the brick surrounding the openings.impacts on the brick surrounding the openings.impacts on the brick surrounding the openings. R To minimize the potential for unintended impacts resulting from project To minimize the potential for unintended impacts resulting from project To minimize the potential for unintended impacts resulting from project construction, a conservation plan (CP)conservation plan (CP)conservation plan (CP) – – – prepared by a qualified heritage professional prepared by a qualified heritage professional prepared by a qualified heritage professional – is recommended to be developed for this project.developed for this project.developed for this project.A CP is a document that details how a heritage resource will be conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes descriptions of all conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes descriptions of all conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes descriptions of all repairs, stabilization, and preservation activities that are proposed to occur on a known heritage lization, and preservation activities that are proposed to occur on a known heritage lization, and preservation activities that are proposed to occur on a known heritage D resource as well as long-range conservation, monitoring, and maintenance plan. In order to inform a more detailed CP, a comprehensive condition survey of the existing building should be undertaken. The CP should include guidance for any immediate interventions required prior to removals and construction, guidance for stabilization during removals and construction, and 98 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 guidance for repairs and long-term maintenance followingconstruction of the new development. The City of Kitchener has a Conservation Plan Terms of Reference(2018). 99 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 10CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS LHC was retained in August 2022 by Perimeter Development, on behalf of The Working Centre, to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the redevelopment of the property located at 97 Victoria Street North in the City of Kitchener, in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The properties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the projeproperties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the projeproperties located at 83 and 87 Victoria Street North are also being included in the project; however, they are not listed on the City’s municipal heritage register nor have they been flagged have they been flagged have they been flagged by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA by the City for having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Accordingly, this HIA focusses onthe Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North. The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street The Proponent is proposing to retain the extant structures located on 83 and 87 Victoria Street North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The North and retain and add two additions to the structure at 97 Victoria Street North. The proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three proposed additions include a one storey addition that will increase the building’s height to three storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s storeys, and a one storey addition that will attach to the southmost corner of the building’s southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A southwest elevation that will extend along the southeast Property line along Heit Lane. A Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and list of heritage attributes for the Property are provided in Section 6of this HIA. T This HIA wasprepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse prepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse prepared to outline heritage planning constraints, assess potential adverse impacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertimpacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertimpacts on the cultural heritage value and heritage attributes of the Propertyyandandits surrounding area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. area, and identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or lessen impacts. This HIA was undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the undertaken in accordance with the recommended methodology outlined within the MCM’s Ontario Heritage Toolkitand the City of Kitchener’s and the City of Kitchener’s and the City of Kitchener’s Heritage ImpHeritage ImpHeritage Impact Assessment Terms of act Assessment Terms of act Assessment Terms of F Reference. In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North In LHC’s professional opinion, the Property municipally known as 97 Victoria Street North meetscriteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of criteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of criteria 1i, 2i, 31, and 3ii of O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06O. Reg. 9/06for its design and physical, historical and for its design and physical, historical and for its design and physical, historical and associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s associative, and contextual values. Potential adverse impacts were identified for the Property’s two storey heighttwo storey heightandandandsixsixsix--overover--sixsixsixwindows on the northwest (primary)windows on the northwest (primary)windows on the northwest (primary)façade. A Alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen or avoid these potential impacts were explored. Alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen or avoid these potential impacts were explored. Alternatives and mitigation measures to lessen or avoid these potential impacts were explored. It was determined thatIt was determined thatIt was determined thatOption 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed Option 3, retention of entire structure and integration into proposed development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the development, is the preferred alternative. This Option is preferred because it allows for the alteration of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre whilalteration of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre whilalteration of the Property to meet the housing and service needs of The Working Centre while conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse conserving the heritage attributes of the Property and mitigating the potential for adverse impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the impacts to affect the Property, the adjacent property located at 70 Francis Street North and the R adjacent Warehouse District CHL.adjacent Warehouse District CHL.adjacent Warehouse District CHL. TheCityCityCitymay remay remay requirequirea Conservation Pa Conservation Pa Conservation Plan(CP)for this project.A CP is a document that details how a heritage resource will be conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes how a heritage resource will be conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes how a heritage resource will be conserved through site alteration. A CP typically includes descriptions of all repairdescriptions of all repairdescriptions of all repairs, stabilization, and preservation activities that are proposed to occur on a known heritage resource as well as longa known heritage resource as well as longa known heritage resource as well as long-range conservation, monitoring, and maintenance D plans. In order to inform a more detailed CP, a comprehensive condition survey of the existing building should be undertaken.The City of Kitchener has a Conservation PlanTerms of Reference (2018). 100 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 11 SIGNATURES Please contact the undersigned should you require any clarification or if additional information is identified that might have an influence on the findings of this report. Christienne Uchiyama, MA, CAHP Principal, Manager Heritage Consulting Services T F A R D 101 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 REFERENCES Policy and Legislation Resources Canada’s Historic Places. “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada’s Historic Places. “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada’s Historic Places. “Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, 2nd Edition.” Canada’s Historic Places. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2nd Edition.” Canada’s Historic Places. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2nd Edition.” Canada’s Historic Places. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2010. Accessed March 11, 2021, https://www.historicplaces.ca/media/18072/81468-parks-s+g-engengeng---web2.pdfweb2.pdfweb2.pdf. . City of Kitchener. “City of Kitchener Official Plan.” Last modified November 19, 2014. City of Kitchener. “City of Kitchener Official Plan.” Last modified November 19, 2014. City of Kitchener. “City of Kitchener Official Plan.” Last modified November 19, 2014. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_City_of_Kitchenhttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_City_of_Kitchenhttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGene ral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_City_of_Kitchen er_Official_Plan_2014.pdf. ---. “Community Services DepartmentReport No. CSD-141414---036: Listing of Non036: Listing of Non036: Listing of Non--designated designated designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last modified May 6, 2014. https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=813197&searchid=4c82bf5bhttps://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=813197&searchid=4c82bf5bhttps://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?i d=813197&searchid=4c82bf5b-2e5e- T 4893-b1e0-89f96864b850&dbid=0 ---. “Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets”. 2014 December, 24. . “Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets”. 2014 December, 24. . “Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets”. 2014 December, 24. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Aphttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Aphttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Do cuments/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Ap pendix_6_CHL_Data_Sheets.pdfpendix_6_CHL_Data_Sheets.pdf F ---. “Development and Technical Services Report No. DTS. “Development and Technical Services Report No. DTS. “Development and Technical Services Report No. DTS--090909--053: Listing of Non053: Listing of Non053: Listing of Non-designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.” Last modified April 7, 2009. modified April 7, 2009. modified April 7, 2009. https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=959017&searchid=9bb0d8a8https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=959017&searchid=9bb0d8a8https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?i d=959017&searchid=9bb0d8a8-f1db- 46d3-aa7a-4ebb0f73ec42&dbid=04ebb0f73ec42&dbid=04ebb0f73ec42&dbid=0 A ---. “Index of Non. “Index of Non--Designated Properties of Heritage Value or Interest.” Last modified Designated Properties of Heritage Value or Interest.” Last modified Designated Properties of Heritage Value or Interest.” Last modified October 24, 2017. 24, 2017. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/COR_LEG_Index_of_Nonhttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/COR_LEG_Index_of_Nonhttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Docu ments/COR_LEG_Index_of_Non- Designated_Properties.pdfDesignated_Properties.pdfDesignated_Properties.pdf ---------. . . “HOLDING PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 10,” last modified June 14, 2010, “HOLDING PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 10,” last modified June 14, 2010, “HOLDING PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 10,” last modified June 14, 2010, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20F%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20F%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zoneb ylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20F%20 R ---%20Holding%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//10H.pdf%20Holding%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//10H.pdf%20Holding%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//10H.pdf ---. “SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 116,” last modified June 14, 2010, “SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 116,” last modified June 14, 2010, “SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 116,” last modified June 14, 2010, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zoneb ylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20 -%20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//116U.pdf%20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//116U.pdf%20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//116U.pdf ---. “SPECIAL USE PR“SPECIAL USE PR“SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS: 403,” last modified June 14, 2010, D https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20C%20 -%20Special%20Use%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//403U.pdf 102 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 ---. “SPECIAL REGULATION PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC LANDS 105,” last modified December 12, 2016, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Appendix%20D%20 -%20Special%20Regulation%20Provisions%20for%20Specific%20Lands//105R.pdf ---. “Urban Design Manual: Part A Urban Structure & Built Form, City-Wide,” last modified 2019, Wide,” last modified 2019, Wide,” last modified 2019, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_01_City_https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_01_City_https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Do cuments/DSD_PLAN_UDM_01_City_ Wide_Design.pdf, ---. “Urban Design Manual: Part B Urban Structure & Built Form, Downtown,” last modified“Urban Design Manual: Part B Urban Structure & Built Form, Downtown,” last modified“Urban Design Manual: Part B Urban Structure & Built Form, Downtown,” last modified2019,2019, https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_05_Downthttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_UDM_05_Downthttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Do cuments/DSD_PLAN_UDM_05_Downt own.pdf ---. “Zoning By-law 85-1.” Last modified August 27, 201888... https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of%20Cohttps://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of%20Cohttps://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zon ebylaw/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of%20Co ntents.pdf T ---. “Zoning By-law 85-1: Section 17 Warehouse District Zone DSection 17 Warehouse District Zone DSection 17 Warehouse District Zone D-6-6-6,” Zoning By,” Zoning By,” Zoning By--law 85law 85-1, Last modified March12, 2012, https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Sections//Section%https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Sections//Section%https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs /Zonebylaw/PublishedCurrentText/Sections//Section% 2017%20-%20Warehouse%20District%20Zone%20(D%20Warehouse%20District%20Zone%20(D%20Warehouse%20District%20Zone%20(D--6).pdf6).pdf6).pdf ---. “Zoning By-law 2019-051.” Last modified December 24051.” Last modified December 24051.” Last modified December 24, 20, 20, 20212121... F https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw2019/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of%https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zonebylaw2019/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of%https://app2.kitchener.ca/appdocs/Zon ebylaw2019/PublishedCurrentText//Table%20of% 20Contents.pdf ---. “Zoning bylaw.” Development and construction. Last modified 2021. Accessed .” Development and construction. Last modified 2021. Accessed .” Development and construction. Last modified 2021. Accessed May 4, 2021. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/developmenthttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/developmenthttps://www.kitchener.ca/en/development--andand-construction/zoning- bylaw.aspx. A Ministry of Citizenship and MulticulturalismMinistry of Citizenship and MulticulturalismMinistry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism. “Heritage Conservation Principles for Land. “Heritage Conservation Principles for Land. “Heritage Conservation Principles for Landuse Planning.” Last modified 2007Planning.” Last modified 2007Planning.” Last modified 2007, , http://wwhttp://wwhttp://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/InfoSheet_Principles_LandUse_Planning.pdfw.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/InfoSheet_Principles_LandUse_Planning.pdfw.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publica tions/InfoSheet_Principles_LandUse_Planning.pdf ---. “Heritage Property Evaluation: A Guide to Listing, Researching and Evaluating Cultural . “Heritage Property Evaluation: A Guide to Listing, Researching and Evaluating Cultural . “Heritage Property Evaluation: A Guide to Listing, Researching and Evaluating Cultural Heritage Property in Ontario Communities.” The Queen’sHeritage Property in Ontario Communities.” The Queen’sHeritage Property in Ontario Communities.” The Queen’sPrinter for Ontario, 2006. Accessed February 3, 2021. Accessed February 3, 2021. Accessed February 3, 2021. R http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_HPE_Eng.pdfhttp://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_HPE_Eng.pdfhttp://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_ HPE_Eng.pdf. ---.“Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process” Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, 2006“Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process” Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, 2006“Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process” Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, 2006. http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_Heritage_PPS_infoSheet.phttp://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_Kit_Heritage_PPS_infoSheet.phttp://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publi cations/Heritage_Tool_Kit_Heritage_PPS_infoSheet.p df ---. Standards & Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial . Standards & Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial . Standards & Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties: Heritage D Identification & Evaluation Process. Last modified 2014. http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/heritage/MTCS_Heritage_IE_Process.pdf. 103 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Province of Ontario. “A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.” Last modified August 2020.https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-place- to-grow-office-consolidation- en-2020-08-28.pdf. ---.“Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25.” Last modified September 8, 2022. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/01m25. ---. “Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18.” Last modified October 19 19 19, 20, 20, 202121.. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90o18 ---. “O. Reg. 10/06:Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest of Provincial Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest of Provincial Criteria for Determining Cultural Heritage Value or Interest of Provincial Significance - Under OntarioHeritage Act,R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18.R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18.R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18.” Last modified January ” Last modified January ” Last modified January 25, 2006. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/060010https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/060010https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/060010.. ---. “Places to Grow Act, 2005, S.O. 2005,c. 13.” Last modified June 1, 2021.Last modified June 1, 2021.Last modified June 1, 2021. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/05p13. T ---. “Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13.” Last modified , R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13.” Last modified July 1July 1July 1, 202, 202, 202222.. https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p13https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p13. . ---. “Provincial Policy Statement 2020 –Under the Under the Under the Planning ActPlanning ActPlanning Act.” Last modified .” Last modified .” Last modified May 1, 2020. https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-provincialprovincialprovincial--policypolicypolicy---statementstatementstatement--202020202020-accessible--accessible--accessible-final-en-2020- 02-14.pdf. F Regional Municipalityof Waterloo. “Arts, Culture and Heritage Master Plan.” Last modified of Waterloo. “Arts, Culture and Heritage Master Plan.” Last modified of Waterloo. “Arts, Culture and Heritage Master Plan.” Last modified October 2002. https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploringhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploringhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploring-the- region/resources/Documents/artsmasterplan.pdfregion/resources/Documents/artsmasterplan.pdfregion/resources/Documents/artsmasterplan.pdf. . ---. “Regional Implementation Guideline Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage . “Regional Implementation Guideline Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage . “Regional Implementation Guideline Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resources”. 2018. Resources”. 2018. Resources”. 2018. https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploringhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploringhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploring-the- A region/resources/Documents/Guideline_for_Conserving_RSCHR.pdfregion/resources/Documents/Guideline_for_Conserving_RSCHR.pdfregion/resources/Documents/Guideline_for_Conserving_RSCHR.pdf ---. “Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan.” LastRegional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan.” LastRegional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan.” Lastmodified June 18, 2015. https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regionalhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regionalhttps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regional-government/land-use-planning.aspx. Mapping Mapping Mapping ResourcesResourcesResources R Army Survey Establishment, R.C.E. "Galt, Ontario", Army Survey Establishment, R.C.E. "Galt, Ontario", Army Survey Establishment, R.C.E. "Galt, Ontario", (((http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relevhttp://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relevhttp://geo2.scholarsportal .info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitledance&limit=entitledance&limit=entitled: : : accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map DigitDigitDigitization Project, sheet 40 P/8 west half, third edition, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: ization Project, sheet 40 P/8 west half, third edition, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: ization Project, sheet 40 P/8 west half, third edition, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1956.Department of National Defence, 1956.Department of National Defence, 1956. D Army Survey Establishment, R.C.E., "Galt, Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries(OCUL) Historical Topographic Map 104 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8 west half, edition 4, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Army Survey Establishment, 1963. Author unknown, "Berlin", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps-and- atlases/waterloo-region-historical-maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of : accessed September 27, 2022), University of : accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre, scale 1:11,880, 1879. Brosius M., "Berlin", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/mapshttps://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/mapshttps://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps---andan dand-- atlases/waterloo-region-historical-maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of : accessed September 27, 2022), University of : accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre, Madison, Wis: J.J. Stoner, 1875.Waterloo Geospatial Centre, Madison, Wis: J.J. Stoner, 1875.Waterloo Geospatial Centre, Madison, Wis: J.J. Stoner, 1875. City of Berlin, "City Plan for Greater Berlin Canada Showing Waterloo", er Berlin Canada Showing Waterloo", er Berlin Canada Showing Waterloo", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/mapshttps://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/mapshttps://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps---andandand--atlases/waterloo atlases/waterlooatlases/waterloo---regionregionregion-- historical-maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial : accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial : accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre, scale 1:800, Toronto: n.a., 1912 City of Kitchener, "Cultural Heritage Landscapes Appendix 6", December 2014hener, "Cultural Heritage Landscapes Appendix 6", December 2014hener, "Cultural Heritage Landscapes Appendix 6", December 2014 T Chas E. Goad, "Kitchener Berlin", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, scale 1:600, Chas E. Goad, "Kitchener Berlin", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, scale 1:600, Chas E. Goad, "Kitchener Berlin", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, scale 1:600, Toronto & Montreal: Chas E. Goad, 1894 rev. 1904.Toronto & Montreal: Chas E. Goad, 1894 rev. 1904.Toronto & Montreal: Chas E. Goad, 1894 rev. 1904. Kitchener OnPoint Map Viewer, "2003 Aerial ImageKitchener OnPoint Map Viewer, "2003 Aerial ImageKitchener OnPoint Map Viewer, "2003 Aerial Imagery", ry", ry", (https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx: accessed October 6, : accessed October 6, : accessed October 6, F 2022) ---, "2006 Aerial Imagery", (, "2006 Aerial Imagery", (, "2006 Aerial Imagery", (https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx: accessed October 6, 2022).accessed October 6, 2022).accessed October 6, 2022). ---, "2009 Aerial Imagery", (, "2009 Aerial Imagery", (, "2009 Aerial Imagery", (https://maps.kitchttps://maps.kitchttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhener.ca/OnPointExternal/ RMap/Default.aspxhener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx: accessed October 6, 2022).accessed October 6, 2022).accessed October 6, 2022). A ---, "2012 Aerial Imagery", (, "2012 Aerial Imagery", (, "2012 Aerial Imagery", (https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx: accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022) ---, "2017 Aerial Imagery", (, "2017 Aerial Imagery", (, "2017 Aerial Imagery", (https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspx: accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022) R ---------, "2021 Aerial Imagery", (, "2021 Aerial Imagery", (, "2021 Aerial Imagery", (https://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Default.aspxhttps://maps.kitchener.ca/OnPointExternal/RMap/Defaul t.aspx: accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022)accessed October 6, 2022) Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Cambridge Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Cambridge Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Cambridge Ontario", Ontario", Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relevhttp://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relevhttp://geo2.scholarsportal.i nfo/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled:ance&limit=entitled:ance&limit=entitled:accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part D of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 6, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1980 105 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Cambridge Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 7, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 7, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 7, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1984. Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Galt, Ontario", ources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Galt, Ontario", ources, Surveys and Mapping Branch, "Galt, Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal .info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map sity Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map sity Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 5, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 5, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 5, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1972 Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, The Canada Centre for Mapping, "Cambridge Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, The Canada Centre for Mapping, "Cambridge Department of Energy, Mines, and Resources, The Canada Centre for Mapping, "Cambridge T Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal .info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographicof the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographicof the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical TopographicMap Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 8, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 8, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 8, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Department of F Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1994Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1994Energy, Mines, and Resources, 1994 Natural Resources Canada, The Centre for Topographic Mapping, "Cambridge Ontario", Natural Resources Canada, The Centre for Topographic Mapping, "Cambridge Ontario", Natural Resources Canada, The Centre for Topographic Mapping, "Cambridge Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev(http://geo2.scholarsportal .info/#r/search/_queries@=topographic;&fields@=;&sort=relev ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part ance&limit=entitled: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 9, scalDigitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 9, scalDigitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, edition 9, scale 1:50,000, Ottawa: Natural Resources A Canada, 1998.Canada, 1998.Canada, 1998. Department of Militia and Defence, "Ontario, Galt Sheet", Department of Militia and Defence, "Ontario, Galt Sheet", Department of Militia and Defence, "Ontario, Galt Sheet", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/det ails/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the OntaSeptember 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the OntaSeptember 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 R P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of Militia and Defence, 1916.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of Militia and Defence, 1916.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of Militia and Defence, 1916. Department of National Defence, Geographical Section General Staff "Galt, Ontario", Department of National Defence, Geographical Section General Staff "Galt, Ontario", Department of National Defence, Geographical Section General Staff "Galt, Ontario", (((http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/det ails/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries(OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries(OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries(OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, scale P/8, scale P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1936. D Department of National Defence, Geographical Section General Staff "Galt, Ontario", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of 106 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 University Libraries(OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1938. Department of National Defence, Geographical Section General Staff "Ontario, Galt Sheet", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/det ails/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of September 27, 2022), scanned and georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1929.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1929.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1929. Department of National Defence, "Ontario, Galt Sheet", (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/details/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed (http://geo2.scholarsportal.info/#r/det ails/_uri@=564032357&_add:true: accessed September 27, 2022), scanned andgeoreferenced as part of the Ontario Council of georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of georeferenced as part of the Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 University Libraries (OCUL) Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project, sheet 40 P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1923.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1923.P/8, scale 1:63,360, Ottawa: Department of National Defence, 1923. Geo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, "Tremaine's Map of the CountyGeo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, "Tremaine's Map of the CountyGeo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, "Tremaine's Map of the Countyof Waterloo, Canada West", of Waterloo, Canada West", of Waterloo, Canada West", T (https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8cc6be34f6b54992b27da17(https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8cc6be34f6b54992b27da17(https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer /index.html?id=8cc6be34f6b54992b27da17 467492d2f: accessed September 27, 2022), Ontario Historical County Maps, scale 467492d2f: accessed September 27, 2022), Ontario Historical County Maps, scale 467492d2f: accessed September 27, 2022), Ontario Historical County Maps, scale 1:39,600, Toronto: Geo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, 1861.1:39,600, Toronto: Geo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, 1861.1:39,600, Toronto: Geo. R. & G.M. Tremaine, 1861. Schofield, M.C., "Map of part of the Town of Berlin, Capital of the County of Waterloo C.W.", p of part of the Town of Berlin, Capital of the County of Waterloo C.W.", p of part of the Town of Berlin, Capital of the County of Waterloo C.W.", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps(https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps(https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps--andand--atlases/waterlooat lases/waterlooatlases/waterloo-region- F historical-maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre, scale 1:6,336, Buffalo: Compton & Gibson, 1853Centre, scale 1:6,336, Buffalo: Compton & Gibson, 1853Centre, scale 1:6,336, Buffalo: Compton & Gibson, 1853--1854.1854.1854. Simpson, A.W., "Plan of Lots Drawn from M.C. Schofields Map of the Town of Berlin", Simpson, A.W., "Plan of Lots Drawn from M.C. Schofields Map of the Town of Berlin", Simpson, A.W., "Plan of Lots Drawn from M.C. Schofields Map of the Town of Berlin", (https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps(https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps(https://uwaterloo.ca/library/geospatial/collections/maps-and-atlases/waterloo-region - historical-maps: accessed September 27, maps: accessed September 27, maps: accessed September 27, 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial 2022), University of Waterloo Geospatial A Centre, scale 1:1,584, Toronto: Maclear & Co., 1856Centre, scale 1:1,584, Toronto: Maclear & Co., 1856Centre, scale 1:1,584, Toronto: Maclear & Co., 1856 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri JapUSGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri JapUSGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS CommunityMETI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS CommunityMETI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS Community Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User CommunityUSDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User CommunityUSDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community R Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ont.", Kitchener Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ont.", Kitchener Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ont.", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, microfiche, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, microfiche, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, microfiche, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, 1947.Survey Bureau Limited, 1947.Survey Bureau Limited, 1947. Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ontario", Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ontario", Underwriters Survey Bureau Limited, "Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener, Ontario", Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters Kitchener Public Library's Grace Schmidt Room, Toronto & Montreal: Underwriters D Survey Bureau Limited, 1925. 107 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 University of Toronto. 1954 Air Photos of Southern Ontario. Photo 434.803. https://mdl.library.utoronto.ca/collections/air-photos/1954-air-photos-southern- ontario/index. University of Waterloo, "Photo IM30, 1930 Photo", (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html: accessed September 27, (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html: accessed September 27, (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations /umd/project/IM30.html: accessed September 27, 2022), 1930 ---. Digital Historical Air Photos of Kitchener-Waterloo. Waterloo. Waterloo. Photo IM30. Photo IM30. 1945. https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html ---, "Photo IM30, 1945 Photo", (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html: , "Photo IM30, 1945 Photo", (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html: , "Photo IM30, 1945 Photo", (https://lib.uwaterloo.ca/locations/umd/project/IM30.html: accessed September 27, 2022), 1945 Archival Resources Ancestry, “County of Waterloo, Division of Berlin Marriages,” 1906. of Waterloo, Division of Berlin Marriages,” 1906. of Waterloo, Division of Berlin Marriages,” 1906. https://www.ancestry.ca/discoveryui-content/view/103668612:7921content/view/103668612:7921content/view/103668612:7921 TT Library and Archives Canada. “Plan shewing the Lands granted to the Six Nation Indians, Library and Archives Canada. “Plan shewing the Lands granted to the Six Nation Indians, Library and Archives Canada. “Plan shewing the Lands granted to the Six Nation Indians, situated on each side of the Grand River, or Ouse, coRiver, or Ouse, coRiver, or Ouse, commencing on Lake Erie, mmencing on Lake Erie, mmencing on Lake Erie, containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor General, survey Gen. Office containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor General, survey Gen. Office containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor General, survey Gen. Office York 2nd February 1821. \[cartographic material\]” 1821. Item ID Number 4129506. York 2nd February 1821. \[cartographic material\]” 1821. Item ID Number 4129506. York 2nd February 1821. \[cartographic material\]” 1821. Item ID Number 4129506. Library and Archives Canada: Ottawa. Library and Archives Canada: Ottawa. Library and Archives Canada: Ottawa. FF Ontario Land Registry. “WATERLOO (58), KITCHENER PLAN 374.” Historical BooksOntario Land Registry. “WATERLOO (58), KITCHENER PLAN 374.” Historical BooksOntario Land Registry. “WATERLOO (58), KITCHENER PLAN 374.” Historical Books https://www.onland.ca/ui/58/books/83201/viewer/589836728?page=1https://www.onland.ca/ui/58/books/83201/viewer/589836728?page=1https://www.onland.ca/ui/58/books/83201/viewer/589836728?page=1 Vernon Directories Limited. ed. ed. Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo DirectoryVernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo DirectoryVernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Directory. Hamilton, ON: Griffin & Richmond Co. Ltd.Hamilton, ON: Griffin & Richmond Co. Ltd.Hamilton, ON: Griffin & Richmond Co. Ltd.192619261926--1927 to 2014.1927 to 2014. Additional ResourcesAdditional ResourcesAdditional Resources AA City of Kitchener. City of Kitchener. Century Celebration: Kitchener marks 100 years as a city. Century Celebration: Kitchener marks 100 years as a city. Century Celebration: Kitchener marks 100 years as a city. Kitchener, ON: City of Kitchener,of Kitchener,201220122012. . . ---, “Listing on the Municipal Heritage Registe,” March 6, 2012, , “Listing on the Municipal Heritage Registe,” March 6, 2012, , “Listing on the Municipal Heritage Registe,” March 6, 2012, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1180948&searchid=83d53c31https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1180948&searchid=83d53c31https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx ?id=1180948&searchid=83d53c31- 2c2b2c2b--418b418b--b60cb60cb60c---021b037427de&dbid=021b037427de&dbid=021b037427de&dbid=0 RR ---, “Municipal Heritage Register Listings,” May 5, 2015, , “Municipal Heritage Register Listings,” May 5, 2015, , “Municipal Heritage Register Listings,” May 5, 2015, hhhttttps://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1371069&page=66&searchid=77bdtps://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1371069&page=66&searchid=77bdtps://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocV iew.aspx?id=1371069&page=66&searchid=77bd 49d549d549d5---a435a435a435--41f541f541f5---af84af84af84-d4d89b5aadb2 ---, “Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June “Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June “Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June 3, 2014, 3, 2014, 3, 2014, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1320201&searchid=b55a70ee- DD 6ee0-49c4-a1f9-a01bf0c04283&dbid=0 City of Kitchener Community Services Department, “Listing of Non-Designated Properties of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,” June 3, 2014, 108 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=1320202&searchid=fd7d7a9f-e842- 4b9d-a46d-1cabecac0483&dbid=0 City of Kitchener Development and Technical Services, “Listing of Non-Designated Property of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest on the MHR,” January 5, 2009, https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=980089&searchid=3f27fa99https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?id=980089&searchid=3f27fa99https://lf.kitchener.ca/WebLinkExt/DocView.aspx?i d=980089&searchid=3f27fa99-22c1- 4b0e-b538-65db618b4c75&dbid=0 Elby, Ezra. A biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the county. Elby, Ezra. A biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the county. Elby, Ezra. A biographical history of Waterloo township and other townships of the county. Volume 1. Berlin, ON: Ezra Elby, 1895. Ellis, Chris, and D. Brian Deller. “Paleo-Indians.” In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5, A.D. 1650, Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5, A.D. 1650, Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5, edited edited edited by Chris Ellis and Neil Ferris, 37-63. London: Ontario Archaeological Society, 1990.63. London: Ontario Archaeological Society, 1990.63. London: Ontario Archaeological Society, 1990. EMCWTF, “Chapter 3: The First Nations,” in Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization EMCWTF, “Chapter 3: The First Nations,” in Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization EMCWTF, “Chapter 3: The First Nations,” in Greening Our Watersheds: Revitalization Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks (Toronto: TRCA, 2002). Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks (Toronto: TRCA, 2002). Strategies for Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks (Toronto: TRCA, 2002). T http://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/37523.pdfhttp://www.trca.on.ca/dotAsset/37523.pdf. . English, John and Kenneth McLaughlin. Kitchener: An Illustrated History. Kitchener: An Illustrated History. Kitchener: An Illustrated History. Toronto: Robin Bross Toronto: Robin Bross Studio, 1996. Groat, Cody. “Six Nations of the Grand Six Nations of the Grand River.”River.”River.”The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified F February 18, 20202.https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/sixhttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/sixhttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/six-nations-of- the-grand-river. McLaughlin, Kenneth. “KitchenerMcLaughlin, Kenneth. “KitchenerMcLaughlin, Kenneth. “Kitchener--Waterloo.” The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified Waterloo.” The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified Waterloo.” The Canadian Encyclopedia. Last modified February 24, 2017.February 24, 2017.February 24, 2017.https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/kitchenerhttps://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/kitchenerhttps://www.thecanadianency clopedia.ca/en/article/kitchener- waterloo. A Mills, Rych. Kitchener (Berlin) 1880 Kitchener (Berlin) 1880 Kitchener (Berlin) 1880 – – 1960. 1960. 1960. Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2002.Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2002.Charleston, SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2002. Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation. “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation. “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation. “The History of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation.” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation. Last modified 2018. Nation.” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation. Last modified 2018. Nation.” Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation. Last modified 2018. http://mncfn.cahttp://mncfn.cahttp://mncfn.ca/wp/wp/wp--content/uploads/2018/04/Thecontent/uploads/2018/04/Thecontent/uploads/2018/04/The-History-of-MNCFN-FINAL.pdf. Moyer, Bill. Moyer, Bill. Moyer, Bill. Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited An Illustrated History. Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited An Illustrated History. Kitchener: Yesterday Revisited An Illustrated History. Burlington, ON: Windsor R Publications Canada Ltd., 1979.Publications Canada Ltd., 1979.Publications Canada Ltd., 1979. Six Nations. “The Haldimand Treaty ofSix Nations. “The Haldimand Treaty ofSix Nations. “The Haldimand Treaty of1784.” Lands and Resources. Last modified 2008, http://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/HaldProc.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/HaldProc.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/LandsResources/HaldProc.htm. Six Nations Elected Council. “Community Profile.” Six Nations of the Grand River. Last modified Six Nations Elected Council. “Community Profile.” Six Nations of the Grand River. Last modified Six Nations Elected Council. “Community Profile.” Six Nations of the Grand River. Last modified 2013.http://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htmhttp://www.sixnations.ca/CommunityProfile.htm. D Six Nations of the Grand River Development Corporation. “History of Six Nations.” Accessed https://sndevcorp.ca/history-of-six-nations/. Six Nations Tourism. “History.” https://www.sixnationstourism.ca/history/ 109 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 The Working Centre, “About Us,” n.d. https://www.theworkingcentre.org/about-us/82 University of Waterloo, “The Working Centre’s founders receive honorary doctorates,” 2019.https://uwaterloo.ca/arts/news/working-centres-founders-receive-honorary- doctorates Waterloo Region Museum. “History of Waterloo Township.”https://www.waterlooregionmuseum.ca/en/collections-andandand---research/waterlooresearch/waterlooresearch/waterloo- township.aspx#note1. T F A R D 110 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 APPENDIX A Project Personnel Christienne Uchiyama, MA CAHP – Principal, LHC Christienne Uchiyama MA CAHP is Principal and Manager - Heritage Consulting Services with Heritage Consulting Services with Heritage Consulting Services with LHC. She is a Heritage Consultant and Professional Archaeologist (P376) with two decades of LHC. She is a Heritage Consultant and Professional Archaeologist (P376) with two decades of LHC. She is a Heritage Consultant and Professional Archaeologist (P376) with two decades of experience working on heritage aspects of planning and development projects. She is currently experience working on heritage aspects of planning and development projects. She is currently experience working on heritage aspects of planning and development projects. She is currently President of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals and President of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals and President of the Board of Directors of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals and received her MA in Heritage Conservation from Carleton University School of Canadian Studies. received her MA in Heritage Conservation from Carleton University School of Canadian Studies. received her MA in Heritage Conservation from Carleton University School of Canadian Studies. Her thesis examined the identification and assessment of impacts on cultural heritage resources Her thesis examined the identification and assessment of impacts on cultural heritage resources Her thesis examined the identification and assessment of impacts on cultural heritage resources in the context of Environmental Assessment. Since 2003 Chris has provided archaeological and heritage conservation advice, support and Since 2003 Chris has provided archaeological and heritage conservation advice, support and Since 2003 Chris has provided archaeological and heritage conservation advice, support and expertise as a member of numerous multi-disciplinary project teams for projects across Ontario disciplinary project teams for projects across Ontario disciplinary project teams for projects across Ontario and New Brunswick, including such major projects as: all phases of archaeological assessment and New Brunswick, including such major projects as: all phases of archaeological assessment and New Brunswick, including such major projects as: all phases of archaeological assessment at the Canadian War Museum site at LeBreton Flats, Ottawa; renewable energy projects; at the Canadian War Museum site at LeBreton Flats, Ottawa; renewable energy projects; at the Canadian War Museum site at LeBreton Flats, Ottawa; renewable energy projects; T natural gas pipeline routes; railway lines; hydro powerline corridors; and highway/road al gas pipeline routes; railway lines; hydro powerline corridors; and highway/road al gas pipeline routes; railway lines; hydro powerline corridors; and highway/road realignments. She has completed more than realignments. She has completed more than realignments. She has completed more than 3300 cultural heritage technical reports for 00 cultural heritage technical reports for 00 cultural heritage technical reports for development proposals at all levels of government, including cultural heritage evaluatidevelopment proposals at all levels of government, including cultural heritage evaluatidevelopment proposals at all levels of government, including cultural heritage evaluation reports, heritage impact assessments, and archaeological licence reports. Her specialties reports, heritage impact assessments, and archaeological licence reports. Her specialties reports, heritage impact assessments, and archaeological licence reports. Her specialties include the development of Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports, under both O. Reg. 9/06 and include the development of Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports, under both O. Reg. 9/06 and include the development of Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports, under both O. Reg. 9/06 and F 10/06, and Heritage Impact Assessments. 10/06, and Heritage Impact Assessments. Ben Daub,MA, BAT (Hons.), BAT (Hons.), BAT (Hons.) – – – Heritage PlannerHeritage PlannerHeritage Planner Ben Daub joined LHC in May 2022 as a junior heritage planner as he worked towards completing Ben Daub joined LHC in May 2022 as a junior heritage planner as he worked towards completing Ben Daub joined LHC in May 2022 as a junior heritage planner as he worked towards completing his master’s degree in urban planning at the University of Waterloo. In addition to his now his master’s degree in urban planning at the University of Waterloo. In addition to his now his master’s degree in urban planning at the University of Waterloo. In addition to his now completed master’s degree, Ben also holds a Bachelor of Applied Technology in Architecture completed master’s degree, Ben also holds a Bachelor of Applied Technology in Architecture completed master’s degree, Ben also holds a Bachelor of Applied Technology in Architecture – A Project and Facility Management from Conestoga College. Through his education, Ben has Project and Facility Management from Conestoga College. Through his education, Ben has Project and Facility Management from Conestoga College. Through his education, Ben has gained a detailed understanding of the built environment at a range of geographicgained a detailed understanding of the built environment at a range of geographicgained a detailed understanding of the built environment at a range of geographic- and site-based scales. Professionally, Ben has gained experience working in the heritage planning domain over scales. Professionally, Ben has gained experience working in the heritage planning domain over scales. Professionally, Ben has gained experience working in the heritage planning domain over his time with LHC where he has written heritage impact assessments, cultural heritage evaluation his time with LHC where he has written heritage impact assessments, cultural heritage evaluation his time with LHC where he has written heritage impact assessments, cultural heritage evaluation reports, and official plan amendments. In addition, Ben has previous experience working in real reports, and official plan amendments. In addition, Ben has previous experience working in real reports, and official plan amendments. In addition, Ben has previous experience working in real estate development and facility management. In academic settings, Ben has also held various estate development and facility management. In academic settings, Ben has also held various estate development and facility management. In academic settings, Ben has also held various R research and teaching assistant positions, enabling him to hone his research capacities.research and teaching assistant positions, enabling him to hone his research capacities.research and teaching assistant positions, enabling him to hone his research capacities. Lisa Coles, Lisa Coles, Lisa Coles, MPlMPl – – Heritage PlannerHeritage PlannerHeritage Planner Lisa ColesLisa ColesLisa Colesis a Heritage Planner with LHC. She holds a Master of Arts in Planning from the is a Heritage Planner with LHC. She holds a Master of Arts in Planning from the is a Heritage Planner with LHC. She holds a Master of Arts in Planning from the University of Waterloo, a Graduate Certificate in Museum Management & Curatorship from University of Waterloo, a Graduate Certificate in Museum Management & Curatorship from University of Waterloo, a Graduate Certificate in Museum Management & Curatorship from Fleming College, and a B.A. (Hons) in History and French from the University of Windsor. Lisa Fleming College, and a B.A. (Hons) in History and French from the University of Windsor. Lisa Fleming College, and a B.A. (Hons) in History and French from the University of Windsor. Lisa D has over five years of heritage sector experience through various positions in museums and public sector heritage planning. She is excited to have the opportunity to work in all aspects of the heritage field and to build on her previous experience as part of the LHC team. 111 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 JordanGreene, BA (Hons.) – Mapping Technician Jordan Greene is a mapping technician with LHC. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Geography with a Certificate in Geographic Information Science (GIS) and a Certificate in Urban Planning Studies from Queen’s University. Jordan joined the LHC team shortly after graduating and University. Jordan joined the LHC team shortly after graduating and University. Jordan joined the LHC team shortly after graduating and University. Jordan joined the LHC team shortly after graduating and during her time at the firm has contributed to over 100 technical studies. Jordan has completed during her time at the firm has contributed to over 100 technical studies. Jordan has completed mapping for projects including, but not limited to, cultural heritage assessments and mapping for projects including, but not limited to, cultural heritage assessments and evaluations, archaeological assessments, environmental assessments, hearings, and tions, archaeological assessments, environmental assessments, hearings, and conservation studies. In addition to project mapping Jordan has also begun to develop conservation studies. In addition to project mapping Jordan has also begun to develop interactive maps and tools that will contribute to LHC’s internal data management. She has alsinteractive maps and tools that will contribute to LHC’s internal data management. She has alsinteractive maps and tools that will contribute to LHC’s internal data management. She has alsinteractive maps and tools that will contribute to LHC’s internal data management. She has also taken on the role of Health and Safety representative for the firm. Between graduation and taken on the role of Health and Safety representative for the firm. Between graduation and taken on the role of Health and Safety representative for the firm. Between graduation and taken on the role of Health and Safety representative for the firm. Between graduation and beginning work with LHC her GIS experience allowed her the opportunity to briefly volunteer as beginning work with LHC her GIS experience allowed her the opportunity to briefly volunteer as a research assistant contributing to the study of the extent of the a research assistant contributing to the study of the extent of the suburban population in suburban population in America with Dr. David Gordon. Jordan is excited to continue her work with LHC to further America with Dr. David Gordon. Jordan is excited to continue her work with LHC to further America with Dr. David Gordon. Jordan is excited to continue her work with LHC to further America with Dr. David Gordon. Jordan is excited to continue her work with LHC to further develop her GIS skills and learn more about the fields of heritage and archaeology.develop her GIS skills and learn more about the fields of heritage and archaeology. TTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDD 112 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 APPENDIX B Glossary Definitions are based on the Ontario Heritage Act, (OHA), the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS),Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan (ROP), and the City of Kitchener Official City of Kitchener Official City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP). Adjacent Lands means those lands contiguous to a protectedheritage property or as otherwise heritage property or as otherwise heritage property or as otherwise defined in the municipal official plan. (PPS). Adjacent means lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly means lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly means lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, municipal municipal municipal road or other right-of-way. (OP). Altermeans to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair, or disturb and means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair, or disturb and means to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair, or disturb and “alteration” has a corresponding meaning (“transformer”, “transformation”) (“alteration” has a corresponding meaning (“transformer”, “transformation”) (“alteration” has a corresponding meaning (“transformer”, “transformation”) (OHAOHA).). T Archaeological assessment means the combined background research and field study ofmeans the combined background research and field study ofmeans the combined background research and field study ofa property evaluated as moderate to high on Archaeological Potential Maps approved by the property evaluated as moderate to high on Archaeological Potential Maps approved by the property evaluated as moderate to high on Archaeological Potential Maps approved by the Province that identify the presence of and interpretation of the that identify the presence of and interpretation of the that identify the presence of and interpretation of the archaeological resources archaeological resources archaeological resources on the property, and make recommendations for the mitigation of the impactsproperty, and make recommendations for the mitigation of the impactsproperty, and make recommendations for the mitigation of the impactson the resources. on the resources. Archaeological assessments must be undertaken by a Archaeological assessments must be undertaken by a Archaeological assessments must be undertaken by a Provincially licensedProvincially licensedProvincially licensedarchaeologist, in accordance with reporting guidelines established by the Provincial Government andaccordance with reporting guidelines established by the Provincial Government andaccordance with reporting guidelines established by the Provincial Government andmust F address the entire area of the development applicationdevelopment applicationdevelopment application. (. (. (ROROROPPP).).). Archaeological potential Archaeological potential Archaeological potential means the likelihood to contain means the likelihood to contain means the likelihood to contain archaeological resourcesarchaeological resources. Criteria for determining archaeological potential are established by the determining archaeological potential are established by the determining archaeological potential are established by the ProvinceProvince, but municipal approaches which achieve the same objectives may also be used. Archaeological potential is confirmed which achieve the same objectives may also be used. Archaeological potential is confirmed which achieve the same objectives may also be used. Archaeological potential is confirmed through archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. through archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. through archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. A (ROP). Archaeological resources Archaeological resources Archaeological resources includes includes includes artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological sites. The identification and evaluation of such resources are based upon archaeological sites. The identification and evaluation of such resources are based upon archaeological sites. The identification and evaluation of such resources are based upon archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act.fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act.fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act. (ROP). Archaeological Resources Archaeological Resources Archaeological Resources includes artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological includes artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological includes artifacts, archaeological sites and marine archaeological R sites, as defined under the Ontario Heritage Act. The identification and evaluation of such sites, as defined under the Ontario Heritage Act. The identification and evaluation of such sites, as defined under the Ontario Heritage Act. The identification and evaluation of such resources are based upon archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario resources are based upon archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario resources are based upon archaeological fieldwork undertaken in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act.Heritage Act.Heritage Act. ( (OPOP).). Built heritage resources Built heritage resources Built heritage resources means one or more significant buildings, structures, monuments, installations or remains associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic or allations or remains associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic or allations or remains associated with architectural, cultural, social, political, economic or military history and identified as being important to the community. These resources may be military history and identified as being important to the community. These resources may be military history and identified as being important to the community. These resources may be D identified through designation or heritage conservation easement under the Ontario Heritage Act, or listed by local, regional, provincial or federal jurisdictions. (ROP). 113 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Built Heritage Resource means a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property’s cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or listed by included on local, Regional,Provincial and/or Federal registers. (OP). Community Character refers to identifiable pockets of the urban fabric with distinctive physical refers to identifiable pockets of the urban fabric with distinctive physical refers to identifiable pockets of the urban fabric with distinctive physical attributes. These attributes include but are not limited to development patterns, scale of the built attributes. These attributes include but are not limited to development patterns, scale of the built attributes. These attributes include but are not limited to development patterns, scale of the built environment, architectural vernacular of existing buildings and structures, environment, architectural vernacular of existing buildings and structures, environment, architectural vernacular of existing buildings and structures, cucucultural heritage ltural heritage ltural heritage resources and community infrastructure. Community character is a reflection of community . Community character is a reflection of community . Community character is a reflection of community image, identity and sense of place and may also reflect cultural and social values. Cultivating and may also reflect cultural and social values. Cultivating and may also reflect cultural and social values. Cultivating community character is intended to foster community pride. ( ( (OPOPOP).).). Conserve/conserved means the identification, protection, use and/or management of cultural means the identification, protection, use and/or management of cultural means the identification, protection, use and/or management of cultural heritage and archaeological resources in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. This may be addressed through a conservation plan or heritage impact integrity are retained. This may be addressed through a conservation plan or heritage impact integrity are retained. This may be addressed through a conservation plan or heritage impact T assessment. (ROP). Conserve/Conserved/Conservation means the identification, protection, management and means the identification, protection, management and means the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources,cultural heritage landscapes cultural heritage landscapes cultural heritage landscapes and and and archaeological resources archaeological resources archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under Ontario Heritage manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under Ontario Heritage manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a heritage F conservation plan, archeological assessment, and/or archeological assessment, and/or archeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessmentheritage impact assessmentheritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and asures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and asures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments. (OP). Compatibility/Compatible Compatibility/Compatible Compatibility/Compatible means land uses and building forms that are mutually tolerant and means land uses and building forms that are mutually tolerant and means land uses and building forms that are mutually tolerant and capable of existing together in harmony within an area withoutcapable of existing together in harmony within an area withoutcapable of existing together in harmony within an area withoutcausing unacceptable adverse A effects,adverse environmental impacts adverse environmental impacts adverse environmental impacts or or or adverse impactsadverse impactsadverse impacts. Compatibility or compatible should not be narrowly interpreted to mean “the same as” or even as “being similar to”.not be narrowly interpreted to mean “the same as” or even as “being similar to”.not be narrowly interpreted to mean “the same as” or even as “being similar to”. (OP). Contiguous Contiguous Contiguous means lands that are situated in sufficiently close proximity such that means lands that are situated in sufficiently close proximity such that means lands that are situated in sufficiently close proximity such that development or site alteration site alteration site alteration could reasonably be expected to produce one or more of the following impacts: could reasonably be expected to produce one or more of the following impacts: could reasonably be expected to produce one or more of the following impacts: alterations to existing hydrological or hydrogeological regimes; clearing of existing vegetation; alterations to existing hydrological or hydrogeological regimes; clearing of existing vegetation; alterations to existing hydrological or hydrogeological regimes; clearing of existing vegetation; erosion anderosion anderosion andsedimentation; or producing a substantial disruption of existing natural sedimentation; or producing a substantial disruption of existing natural sedimentation; or producing a substantial disruption of existing natural linkages or R the habitat of a significant species. (the habitat of a significant species. (the habitat of a significant species. (ROP). Culture/Cultural Culture/Cultural Culture/Cultural is the whole complex of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and is the whole complex of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and is the whole complex of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features that characteriemotional features that characteriemotional features that characterize a society or social group. It includes not only arts and letters, but also modes of life, the fundamental rights of the human being, value systems, letters, but also modes of life, the fundamental rights of the human being, value systems, letters, but also modes of life, the fundamental rights of the human being, value systems, traditions and beliefs.traditions and beliefs.traditions and beliefs. (OP). D Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment means a study to determine if cultural heritage resources will be negatively impacted by a proposed development or site alteration. It can also demonstrate how the cultural heritage resource will be conserved in the context of 114 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 redevelopment or site alteration. Mitigative or avoidance measures or alternative development approaches may also be recommended. (ROP). Cultural heritage landscape means a defined geographical area of heritage significance which has been modified by human activities and is valued by a community. It involves a grouping(s) has been modified by human activities and is valued by a community. It involves a grouping(s) has been modified by human activities and is valued by a community. It involves a grouping(s) of individual heritage features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural of individual heritage features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural of individual heritage features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites and natural elements, which together form a significant type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its type of heritage form, distinctive from that of its constituent elements or parts. (ROP). Cultural Heritage Landscape means a defined geographical area that may have been means a defined geographical area that may have been means a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts heritage conservation districts heritage conservation districts designated under designated under designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, mainstreets and the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, mainstreets and the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, mainstreets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, viewsheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, viewsheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, viewsheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of T heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities.tage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities.tage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities. (OP). Cultural heritage resources are the physical remains and the intangible cultural traditions of are the physical remains and the intangible cultural traditions of are the physical remains and the intangible cultural traditions of past human activities. These include, but are not limited to: past human activities. These include, but are not limited to: past human activities. These include, but are not limited to: F buildings (residential, commercial, institutional, industrial and agricultural); buildings (residential, commercial, institutional, industrial and agricultural); buildings (residential, commercial, institutional, industrial and agricultural); cultural heritage landscapes (designed, organic/evolved); cultural heritage landscapes (designed, organic/evolved); cultural heritage landscapes (designed, organic/evolved); structures (water tower; bridge, fence and dam); structures (water tower; bridge, fence and dam); structures (water tower; bridge, fence and dam); monuments (cenotaph, statue and cairn); monuments (cenotaph, statue and cairn); monuments (cenotaph, statue and cairn); A archaeological resources; archaeological resources; archaeological resources; cemeteries; cemeteries; cemeteries; scenic roads; scenic roads; scenic roads; vistas/viewsheds; vistas/viewsheds; vistas/viewsheds; R culturally significant natural features (tree and landform); culturally significant natural features (tree and landform); culturally significant natural features (tree and landform); movable objects (archival records and artifacts); and movable objects (archival records and artifacts); and movable objects (archival records and artifacts); and cultural traditions (language, stories, music, dance, food, celebrations, art and crafts). cultural traditions (language, stories, music, dance, food, celebrations, art and crafts). cultural traditions (language, stories, music, dance, food, celebrations, art and crafts). (ROP).).). D Cultural Heritage Resources means includes buildings, structures and properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act or listed on the Municipal Heritage Register, properties on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings, built heritage resources andcultural heritage landscapes as defined in the Provincial Policy Statement. (OP). 115 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Development means the creation of a new lot, a change in land use, or the construction of buildings and structures, requiring approval under the Planning Act. (ROP). Development means the creation of a new lot, a change in land use, the construction of buildings and structures or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that substantially buildings and structures or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that substantially buildings and structures or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that substantially increases the size or usability of the site, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does increases the size or usability of the site, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does increases the size or usability of the site, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does not include: a)activities that create or maintain infrastructure authorized under an authorized under an authorized under an environmental environmental environmental assessment process; and, b)works subject to the Drainage Act. (OP). Heritage Attributesmeans the principal features or elements that contribute to a protected means the principal features or elements that contribute to a protected means the principal features or elements that contribute to a protected heritage property’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built, heritage property’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built, heritage property’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built, constructed, or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water constructed, or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water constructed, or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features,and its visual setting (e.g.,significant views or vistas to or from a protected heritage significant views or vistas to or from a protected heritage significant views or vistas to or from a protected heritage T property). (PPS). Heritage Corridors means streets or multimultimultimultimulti---use pathways use pathways use pathways which because of their unique which because of their unique which because of their unique structural, topographic and visual characteristics, as well as abutting vegetation, built structural, topographic and visual characteristics, as well as abutting vegetation, built structural, topographic and visual characteristics, as well as abutting vegetation, built environment and cultural landscape, historical significance or location within a environment and cultural landscape, historical significance or location within a environment and cultural landscape, historical significance or location within a Heritage Conservation District are recognized as a are recognized as a cultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource cultural heritage resource and are intended to be and are intended to be F conserved.(OP). Heritage Attributes means means means the principle features or elements that contribute to a the principle features or elements that contribute to a the principle features or elements that contribute to a cultural heritage resource’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built or ’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built or ’s cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property’s built or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual setting (including significant setting (including significant setting (including significant views or vistas views or vistas views or vistas to or from a to or from a to or from a cultural heritage resource.(OP). A Heritage Conservation District Heritage Conservation District Heritage Conservation District means means a geographic area primarily made up of a group of a geographic area primarily made up of a group of a geographic area primarily made up of a group of buildings, streets and open spaces which collectively contribute to the cultural heritage value or buildings, streets and open spaces which collectively contribute to the cultural heritage value or buildings, streets and open spaces which collectively contribute to the cultural heritage value or interest of the area. interest of the area. interest of the area. (((OPOPOP).). Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Conservation District Plan Heritage Conservation District Plan means a document that provides policies and guidelines to assist in the protection and enhancement of the cultural heritage values of the district. The to assist in the protection and enhancement of the cultural heritage values of the district. The to assist in the protection and enhancement of the cultural heritage values of the district. The R document includes a statement of objectives, a statement of the district’s cultural heritage value document includes a statement of objectives, a statement of the district’s cultural heritage value document includes a statement of objectives, a statement of the district’s cultural heritage value or interest, a description of the district’s or interest, a description of the district’s or interest, a description of the district’s heritage attributes, policies, guidelines and procedures for achieving stated objectives and managing future change, and a description of external for achieving stated objectives and managing future change, and a description of external for achieving stated objectives and managing future change, and a description of external alterations or classes of external alterations that are of minor nature that an owner can carry out alterations or classes of external alterations that are of minor nature that an owner can carry out alterations or classes of external alterations that are of minor nature that an owner can carry out without obtaining a permit.without obtaining a permit.without obtaining a permit. (OP). Heritage Conservation Plan Heritage Conservation Plan Heritage Conservation Plan means a document that details how a cultural heritage resource D can be conserved. The conservation plan may be supplemental to a heritage impact assessmentbutis typically a separate document. The recommendations of the plan should include descriptions of repairs, stabilization and preservation activities as well as long term conservation, monitoring and maintenance measures. (OP). 116 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 Heritage Impact Assessment means a document comprising text and graphic material including plans, drawings, photographs that contains the results of historical research, field work, survey, analysis, and description(s) of cultural heritage resources together with a description of the process and procedures in deriving potential effects and mitigation measures as required by official plan policies and any other applicable or pertinent guidelines. A heritage as required by official plan policies and any other applicable or pertinent guidelines. A heritage as required by official plan policies and any other applicable or pertinent guidelines. A heritage impact assessment may include an archaeological assessment where appropriate.impact assessment may include an archaeological assessment where appropriate.impact assessment may include an archaeological assessment where appropriate. ( (OPOP). Identify/Identified (in regard to cultural heritage landscapes) means designate for the means designate for the means designate for the purposes of the Regional Official Plan. (OP). Municipal Heritage Register means a register maintained by the City of Kitchener, in means a register maintained by the City of Kitchener, in means a register maintained by the City of Kitchener, in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, which includes protected heritage properties protected heritage properties protected heritage properties and and and properties listed as a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or interest.designated property of cultural heritage value or interest.designated property of cultural heritage value or interest. ( (OPOPOP).).). Propertymeans real property and includes all buildings and structures thereon. (means real property and includes all buildings and structures thereon. (means real property and includes all buildings and structures thereon. (OHAOHA).). Protected Heritage Property means property designated under Parts IV, V or VI of the Ontario means property designated under Parts IV, V or VI of the Ontario means property designated under Parts IV, V or VI of the Ontario T Heritage Act; heritage conservation easement under Parts II or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;. Heritage Act; heritage conservation easement under Parts II or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;. Heritage Act; heritage conservation easement under Parts II or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;. property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage propertand prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage propertand prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.(((OPOP). Qualified Person for the purposes of cultural heritage resources, means an individual including for the purposes of cultural heritage resources, means an individual including for the purposes of cultural heritage resources, means an individual including F a professional engineer, architect, archaeologist, etc., having relevant, recent experience in the a professional engineer, architect, archaeologist, etc., having relevant, recent experience in the a professional engineer, architect, archaeologist, etc., having relevant, recent experience in the conservation of cultural heritage resourcesconservation of cultural heritage resourcesconservation of cultural heritage resources. (. (OPOPOP).).). Significant means in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been means in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been means in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes and criteria for determining etermined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes and criteria for determining etermined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest are established by the Province under the authority of the cultural heritage value or interest are established by the Province under the authority of the cultural heritage value or interest are established by the Province under the authority of the A Ontario Heritage Act. (Ontario Heritage Act. (Ontario Heritage Act. (PPSPPSPPS). ). R D 117 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 APPENDIX C City Directory Records Sources: 1927-1929: Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and : Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and : Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory. Vernon and Sons Publishing. Hamilton, On. 1929-1938: Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Alph1938: Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Alph1938: Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Alphabetical, abetical, Street and Business Directory. Vernon and Sons Publishing. Hamilton, On.Street and Business Directory. Vernon and Sons Publishing. Hamilton, On.Street and Business Directory. Vernon and Sons Publishing. Hamilton, On. 1939-1947: Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Business, : Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Business, : Vernon’s City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo Miscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Street Directory. Vernon Directories LimitedAlphabetical and Street Directory. Vernon Directories LimitedAlphabetical and Street Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On.. Hamilton, On.. Hamilton, On. 1948-1966: Kitchener-Waterloo City DirectoriesMiscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Miscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Miscellaneous, Business, Alphabetical and Street. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. 1967-76: Kitchener-Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, ON.Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, ON.Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, ON. TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 1977-2014: Cities of Kitchener-Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On.Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On.Waterloo Directory. Vernon Directories Limited. Hamilton, On. AddressPeople People 1926-1927City Directory FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF N/AN/AN/AN/A 1928-1929City Directory 97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co Ltd 1929City DirectoryCity Directory 97 Victoria Street97 Victoria StreetMitchell Mitchell Mitchell Button Co LtdButton Co LtdButton Co Ltd AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1930City Directory 97 Victoria Street97 Victoria Street97 Victoria StreetMitchell, Button Co LtdMitchell, Button Co Ltd 1931 City Directory1931 City Directory 97 Victoria Street97 Victoria Street97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 1932 City Directory1932 City Directory 97 Victoria Street97 Victoria Street97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd Woeller Upholstering Co 1933 City DirectoryDirectory 97 Victoria Street97 Victoria Street97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Woeller Upholstering Co 1934 City Directory 97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd 118 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Woeller Upholstering Co 1935 City Directory 97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd Woeller Upholstering Co 1936 City Directory 97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, Ltd Woeller Upholstering CoWoeller Upholstering CoWoeller Upholstering Co 1938 City Directory 97 Victoria StreetMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, Ltd Woeller Upholstering CoWoeller Upholstering CoWoeller Upholstering Co 1940 City Directory TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, Ltd VacantVacantVacant 1941 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, Ltd FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF VacantVacantVacant 1942 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, Ltd 1943 City Directory1943 City Directory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, LtdMitchell Button Co, Ltd 1944 City Directory1944 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, Ltd 1945 City Directory1945 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, Ltd RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 1946 City Directory1946 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co, Ltd 1947 City Directory1947 City Directory 97Victoria Street NorthVictoria Street NorthVictoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co Ltd DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 1948 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co Ltd 1949 City Directory 119 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co Ltd 1950 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co Ltd 1951 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co Ltd 1955 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co Ltd 1960 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co Ltd 1963 City Directory TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co LtdMitchell Button Co Ltd 1964 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd 1965 City Directory FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd 1966 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd 1967 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1968 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics & Buttons LtdMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd 1969 City Directory1969 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthMitchell Plastics Ltd 1970 City 1970 City Directory RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthVacant 1971 City Directory1971 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthVacant 1972 City Directory1972 City Directory DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 97 Victoria Street NorthVacant Marian Household Centre 1973 City Directory 120 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople 97 Victoria Street NorthDumont Press Graphix Ltd Donut Man Marian Household Centre 1974 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthDumont Press Graphix Ltd Donut Man Marian Household CentreMarian Household CentreMarian Household Centre 1975-1976 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Donut ManDonut ManDonut Man Marian Household Marian Household Marian Household CentreCentreCentre TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Moir PressMoir Press Schattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada Ltd 1977 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthProject ReleaseProject ReleaseProject Release FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Project Coming TogetherProject Coming TogetherProject Coming Together Marian Household CentreMarian Household CentreMarian Household Centre Schattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada Ltd WarehouseWarehouseWarehouse AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA VacantVacantVacant Dumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets 1978 City 1978 City DirectoryDirectory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthVacant RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Marian Household Centre Schattens Canada Ltd Warehouse Resource Centre Dumont Press Graphix Ltd DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Elsworthy Cabinets 1979 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthEulenberg Audio Developments 121 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Marian Household Centre Schattens Canada Ltd Warehouse Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets 1980 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthVacant Marian Household CentreMarian Household CentreMarian Household Centre Schattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada Ltd Sound Audio Symposium Ont LtdSound Audio Symposium Ont LtdSound Audio Symposium Ont Ltd WarehouseWarehouseWarehouse TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Between the lines Between the lines Between the lines Publishing CoPublishing CoPublishing Co Dumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 1981 City Directory FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 97 Victoria Street NorthVacantVacantVacant VacantVacantVacant Schattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada LtdSchattens Canada Ltd Sound Audio Symposium Ont LtdSound Audio Symposium Ont LtdSound Audio Symposium Ont Ltd AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WarehouseWarehouseWarehouse Between the lines Publishing CoBetween the lines Publishing CoBetween the lines Publishing Co Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets 1982 City Directory1982 City Directory RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent de Paul Crown Acoustics Warehouse Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 1983 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent de Paul Crown Acoustics Ltd 122 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Warehouse Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets 1984 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de Paul Tandy Crown Ltd Dumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 129 1985 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de Society of St Vincent de Society of St Vincent de PaulPaulPaul Tannoy North American InkTannoy North American InkTannoy North American Ink TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Dumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 1986 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de Paul FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Tannoy North American InkTannoy North American InkTannoy North American Ink Dumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix LtdDumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 1987City DirectoryCity Directory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de PaulSociety of St Vincent de Paul Tannoy North American InkTannoy North American Ink Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets 1988 City Directory1988 City Directory RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de Paul Tannoy North American Ink Dumont Press Graphix Ltd Elsworthy Cabinets DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 129 An inventory of Kitchener’s industrial buildings entitled “AnInventory of Industrial Buildings of Architectural/Historical Significance in the City of Kitchener” compiled by James Campbell, Malcolm Horne, and Diane Kolaritsch identified that a company called A & G Mechanical Contractors Ltd. owned the Property; however, no evidence suggests that they occupied the lot. 123 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople 1989 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSociety of St Vincent de Paul Business Cards Tomorrow K W Community Media Project Elsworthy Cabinets 1990 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopVincent De Paul Thrift ShopVincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow K W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media Project Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 1991 City Directory TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow K W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media Project Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Sound on Sound Recording StudioSound on Sound Recording StudioSound on Sound Recording Studio 1992 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA K W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media ProjectK W Community Media Project Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets Sound on Sound Recording Studio 1993 City Directory1993 City Directory 97 Victoria 97 Victoria 97 Victoria Street NorthStreet NorthStreet NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Business Cards Tomorrow Dumont Group Photography Elsworthy Cabinets Sound on Sound Recording Studio 1994 City Directory1994 City Directory DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Dumont Group Photography 124 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Elsworthy Cabinets Sound on Sound Recording Studio 1995 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Dumont Group PhotographyDumont Group PhotographyDumont Group Photography Elsworthy Cabinets Sound on Sound Recording Sound on Sound Recording Sound on Sound Recording StudioStudio 1996 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Dumont Group PhotographyDumont Group PhotographyDumont Group Photography Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets 1997 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthEvans MEvans MEvans M FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF St Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow Aikido & Ki Aikido & Ki Aikido & Ki – – Kitchener Waterloo Kitchener Waterloo Elsworthy CabinetsElsworthy CabinetsElsworthy Cabinets AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 1998 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthEvans MEvans M St Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Aikido & Ki – Kitchener Waterloo RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 1999 City Directory1999 City Directory 97Victoria Street NorthVictoria Street NorthVictoria Street NorthEvans M St Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Aikido & Ki – Kitchener Waterloo DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2000 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthEvans M St Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop 125 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Business Cards Tomorrow Aikido & Ki – Kitchener Waterloo 2001 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthNo Return St Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow Aikido & Ki – Kitchener WaterlooKitchener WaterlooKitchener Waterloo 2002 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow Mode PhotographyMode PhotographyMode Photography TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 2003 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow Mode PhotographyMode PhotographyMode Photography FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 2004 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Business Business Cards TomorrowCards Tomorrow Mode PhotographyMode PhotographyMode Photography AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 2005 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Mode Photography 2006 City Directory2006 City Directory RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Mode Photography Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares 2007 City Directory2007 City Directory DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Mode Photography 126 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares The Working Centre 2008 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De Paul Thrift Shop Business Cards Tomorrow Mode Photography Worth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares The Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centre 2009 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthSt Vincent De St Vincent De St Vincent De Paul Thrift ShopPaul Thrift ShopPaul Thrift Shop Business Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards TomorrowBusiness Cards Tomorrow TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Mode PhotographyMode PhotographyMode Photography Worth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares The Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centre 2010 City Directory FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 97 Victoria Street NorthPsychiatric Outreach ProjectPsychiatric Outreach ProjectPsychiatric Outreach Project St John’s KitchenSt John’s KitchenSt John’s Kitchen The Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centre Worth a Second Worth a Second Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 2011 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthPsychiatric Outreach ProjectPsychiatric Outreach Project St John’s Kitchen The Working Centre Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 2012 City Directory2012 City Directory 97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street North97 Victoria Street NorthPsychiatric Outreach Project St John’s Kitchen The Working Centre Worth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2013 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMode Photography Psychiatric Outreach Project 127 December 2022LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeology Project #LHC0333 AddressPeople St John’s Kitchen The Working Centre Worth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresSecond Look Furniture and HousewaresSecond Look Furniture and Housewares 2014 City Directory 97 Victoria Street NorthMode Photography Psychiatric Outreach ProjectPsychiatric Outreach ProjectPsychiatric Outreach Project St John’s Kitchen The Working CentreThe Working CentreThe Working Centre Worth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and HousewaresWorth a Second Look Furniture and Housewares TTTTTTT FFFFFFF AAAAAAA RRRRRRR DDDDDDD 128 XX XXSubj. to mtge Subj. to mtge - - Remarks A3697 & 19273 22791 Lot no 71 et al recitalsLot et at Lot et alLot et alXX MortgageLot 333 00.00 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ConsiderationConsideration1050.001050.00200.00200.0026337.002500.00 XX Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Bauer M. Schneider GranteeGrantee 130 Sophia RoehrSophia RoehrMarian BrauerMarian BrauerMarian BrauerThe Lower Erie The Lower Erie HenryJohn Sophia & Gustav Roehr Sophia RoehrSophia RoehrSophia Roehr et viret viret vir AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 129 Grantor Marian Brauer WidowSophia Roehr Sophia Roehr Sophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrRoehrSophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrSophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrRoehrHenry Bauer Maria BrauerMaria BrauerMaria Brauer RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry August 1905 23 August 1905233 December 19053 February 3 February 1906190621 February 21 February 190825 November25 November25 November19121912191225 November 25 November 19121912 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol Land Registry Records DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D ITS Date 21 August 190522 August 190520November 19058December19057 February 7 February 190825NovemberNovember19121912191212November 1912 Inst. some cases data on LRO documentation is illegible. Items that were unable to be ascertained are marked with ‘XX’.some cases data on LRO documentation is illegible. Items that were unable to be ascertained are marked with ‘XX’.some cases data on LRO documentation is illegible. Items that were unable to be ascertained are marked with ‘XX’. B saleMortgageMortgageD of MMortgageMortgageD of MD of M ber 2022 No. Note that in 19242192431960819763227912916029161 Decem APPENDIX 130 Subj. to mtge X XXXXXX - Remarks XX XXXX 1960 Lot et alLot et al A54 Lot et al subj. to mtge A54 Lot et al subj. to mtge A54 Lot et al subj. to mtge Lot et al subj. to mtge XXLot et al Lot et al 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ConsiderationXX6300.007500.002300.008000.00 Project #LHC0 SnyderXX R. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Simon Simon Sophia RoehrSophia RoehrEmmanuel Hamel & Harvey Emmanuel HamelLucinda Bauman Sophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrRoehrRoehrSophia RoehrSophia RoehrSophia RoehrJohn M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderAnnie Duch XX AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy Duch Co 130 XX Grantor XX Sophia & Gustav RoehrSimon R. SnyderSimon R. SnyderSophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrRoehrAnnie Annie Duch The John M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderSophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav Sophia & Gustav RoehrRoehrRoehrEmmanuel HamelEmmanuel HamelEmmanuel Hamel RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 6 December 191230 May 19136 December19156 December 19156 December 6 December 19151915191513 December 13 December 191616 June 191716 June 191716 June 191716 June 191716 June 191715 July 191815 July 191815 July 1918 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 2December 191225 May 19134December19154December 19154December 191515 June 19162929December December December 19161916191629December 191612 July 12 July 12 July 191819181918 Inst. D of MMortgageD of MD of MMortgageXXB SaleMortgageMortgageB Sale ber 2022 No. 292103019634775347763477736216368713687238194 Decem 6872 Remarks XXXX A54 Lot et alLot et al subj to mtge 34777Lot et al subj to mtge 34777A56 A59 Lot et al subj to mtgeXXLot et alLot et alLot et al 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration1.001.001.006000.001500.001500.001500.007500.002500.00100001.001.00 Project #LHC0 DuchDuch FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF XXXX XXXX Grantee Annie The Ontario Glove The Ontario Glove Co. Ltd.Co. Ltd.John John The Ontario Glove Co. Ltd.John H. MeyersCarl HuetherCarl Huether Carl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. Pritschau xxxx AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 131 Grantor Emmanuel HamelCarl G. Pritschau Carl G. Pritschau Carl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauJohn H. MeyersThe Trusts & Guarantee Coy. Ltd. Committee Est. Carl G. Pritschau an absentee Lucinda BaumanThe Ontario Glove The Ontario Glove The Ontario Glove Co. Ltd.Co. Ltd.Co. Ltd.The Ontario Glove The Ontario Glove The Ontario Glove Co. Ltd.Co. Ltd.Co. Ltd.Carl G. PritschauCarl G. PritschauCarl G. Pritschau 1918 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry April 1920April 1920April 1920April 1920 21 August 191821 August 191821 August 191821 AugustXX19 19 19 2 September 2 September 2 September 1920192019202 September 2 September 1920192029 March 192229 March 192229 March 1922 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 19 August 191819 August 191819 August 191819 August1918XX17 April 192017 April 192014 April 1920192031 August 192019202424February February 19221922 Inst. D of MB SaleB SaleMortgageXXB SaleMortgageXXXXGrantGrantGrant ber 2022 No. 38387383883839938400384034206142062432964329746198 Decem XX XX to of way XX right Subj. to mtge - Remarks Right of way - Lot et alLot (See A64 No. 49244)Right of way et alLot et al & right of wayLot et al & Pt LotoverRight of way et alLot et al with right of wayRight of way et al Lot et al.Right of way et al 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration10500.001.001.001.001.002000.005400.001.001.001.00 4500.004500.004500.009250.00 ) Project #LHC0 XX S. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Charles A. KernCharles A. KernCharles A. KernCharles A. KernErnest DentonErnest DentonErnest DentonM. B. ShantzM. B. ShantzWilliam E. MitchellWilliam E. MitchellWilliam E. MitchellThe London Life Insurance CoLouisa DentonWilliam E. & Ethel Mitchell, joint tenantsOliver E. Fries (individual ½ John M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderOliver E. Fries & Stanley Grundman AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 132 Grantor Carl Huether et uxJohn M. SchneiderJohn M. SchneiderCharles A. Kern et Charles A. Kern et Charles A. Kern et uxuxuxCharles A. Kern et Charles A. Kern et uxuxM. B. Shantz et uxM. B. Shantz et uxM. B. Shantz et uxErnest Denton et uxErnest Denton et uxWilliam E. MitchellStanley Grundman Charles A. Kern et uxErnest Denton et uxErnest Denton et uxErnest Denton et uxLouisa Denton RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 19281928 Date of Registry 12 February 192325 May 192329 July 192429 July 19248 May 192514 April 192714 April 192723 May 23 May 30 June 193230 June 193230 June 19327 May 19487 May 19488 June 19488 June 19488 June 19488 June 19488 June 1948 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 7 February 19231 February 192312 June 192431 October 192317 October 19246 April 192721 May 192823 June 23 June 23 June 1932193227 April 27 April 1948194810 January 10 January 194619465 May 5 May 19471947 Inst. GrantMortgageP. D. of M.GrantGrantGrantMortgageGrantGrantGrantGrantGrantGrant ber 2022 No. 4845349244524315243254120583776057268189961169642396426 Decem XX Remarks 60572 Right of way et alRight of way et alFor lot et al.Right of way etc. vacate 77947Right of way etc. Right of way et alRight of way et alXXRight of way et al. Right of way etc. vacate 77948 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration4000.004000.0027000.00 6500.006500.001629.971.00 Project #LHC0 Ltd. FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF A. SchmalzA. Schmalz Grantee Herbert M. FriesHerbert M. FriesOliver E. & Herbert Oliver E. & Herbert M. FriesM. FriesOliver E. Fries, JohnMcCall Frontenac Oil Company John A. & Alfred John A. & Alfred John A. & Alfred SchmalzSchmalzSchmalzOliver E. & Herbert Oliver E. & Herbert Oliver E. & Herbert M. Fries, John A. & M. Fries, John A. & M. Fries, John A. & Alfred SchmalzAlfred SchmalzAlfred SchmalzJohnJohnJohnEleanor FriesOliver E. Fries & Herbert M. Fries XX AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 133 Grantor Oliver E. FriesEleanor FriesEleanor FriesBy Eleanor Fries By Eleanor Fries titleEleanor FriesOliver E. Fries Oliver E. FriesEleanor FriesEleanor FriesEleanor FriesThe London Life The London Life The London Life Insurance CoInsurance CoInsurance CoOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesEleanor Fries RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 10 June 194815 October 194830 November 194830 November 194825 May 195025 May 195025 May 195011 July 195011 July 195030 August 195030 August 195030 August 195020 August 195420 August 195420 August 195420 August 195420 August 19548 November 8 November 19541954 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 9 June 19487September 194830November 194811 July 195020 August 20 August 195422 July 22 July 19541954 30November 194815 May 195022 August 22 August 22 August 1950195020 August 20 August 19541954 mtge Inst. XXXX MortgageMortgageCertificate of Certificate of XXDepMortgageXXXXXXXXGrant ber 2022 No. 964489756897947979481029691138104044121635121636122695 Decem XX etc.etc.etc. 102969 - Remarks Lot 60572 Lot 97568Right of way covenants recitedRight of way covenants recited Lot 86448Lot 104044Right of way etc. 130802Right of way Dep lot re 96116 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ConsiderationADLR110388.44 1.0055228.00 Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Oliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesMcCall Frontenac Oil Co Ltd.McCall Frontenac Oil Co Ltd. Oliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesOliver E. FriesMontreal Trust CoMontreal Trust CoMontreal Trust CoHighway Realties Ltd. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy Ltd.Ltd.Ltd. 134 Grantor A. SchmalzA. Schmalz JohnHerbert M. FriesHerbert M. FriesMontreal Trust Co Montreal Trust Co TorontoHighway Realties Ltd. JohnEleanor F. BicketzEleanor F. BicketzEleanor F. BicketzMcCall Frontenac McCall Frontenac McCall Frontenac Oil Co Oil Co Oil Co McCall Frontenac McCall Frontenac McCall Frontenac Oil Co Ltd.Oil Co Ltd.Estate tax comment of estate of William E. Mitchell RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 8 November 19548 November 19548 November 19548 August 195420 September 20 September 195511 October 11 October 1955195511 October 11 October 11 October 19551955195511 October 11 October 195519552 August 19622 August 19622 August 1962 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 30September 195423 July 195428September September 19551 October 1 October 1955 30September 195425 October 195415September 19551 October 1 October 1955195519552 August 2 August 19621962 Inst. D of MD of MD of MD of M BondMtgeRelease and reconGrantLeaseDepositDepositDeposit ber 2022 No. 122696122697122698122699130802131693131694131695242391 Decem re 96116 comment etc. etc. Remarks Lot etc. Lot etc.Lot etc. comments re: 96116Dep. lot 272496Lot etc.Recitals with duty to XX G. R. lot 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ConsiderationYearly 5400.005400.001900062000.002.00 Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons LimitedButtons LimitedIndustrial Industrial Industrial Development BankDevelopment BankDevelopment BankMitchell Plastics & Buttons LimitedMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd. William E, MitchellIndustrial Development Bank AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 135 Grantor of William E. of William E. Canada Permanent Trust Co. (formerly Canada Permanent Toronto General Trust Company) & Trust Company) & Lloyd G. E. Mitchell Lloyd G. E. Mitchell exMitchellComment to transfer Comment to transfer of property of estate of property of estate of Sarah E. Mitchellof Sarah E. MitchellIndustrial Industrial Development BankDevelopment BankCanada Permanent Trust Company (formerly Canada Permanent Toronto General Trust Company) & Lloyd Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons LimitedButtons LimitedButtons LimitedTreasurer of OntarioTreasurer of OntarioTreasurer of OntarioMitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons LimitedButtons Limited RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 21 February 196411 March 196416 March 196421 May 196421 May 196421 May 196418 August 196718 August 19677 November 7 November 7 November 1967196730 November 30 November 19671967 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 6 February 196413 March 196411 August 11 August 196726September 1967 6December 196315 May 19648 August 8 August 8 August 19671967 of XX Inst. LeaseMtge DepositCommentDis of mtgeMtgeGrantGrant ber 2022 No. 271598272496272698276694353758359575361170 Decem Lot etc. Remarks XX Lot etc. With Postpone 357575 with359575 Lot etc. and r of way 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration2000.002000.002000.001.00 90000.0070000.00 ex Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Canada Permanent Trust Co. & Lloyd G. E. Mitchell ex of William E. MitchellMitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd. Canada Canada Permanent Trust Permanent Trust Permanent Trust Company (formerly Company (formerly Company (formerly Canada Canada Canada Permanent Permanent Permanent Toronto General Toronto General Toronto General Trust Company) Trust Company) Trust Company) of William E. of William E. of William E. MitchellMitchellMitchellIndustrial Development BankIndustrial Development Bank of ex AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy Plastics & 136 Grantor G. E. Mitchell William E. Mitchell & Bessie E. & William E. MitchellIndustrial Industrial Development BankDevelopment BankIndustrial Development Bank Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd.Mitchell Mitchell Buttons Ltd.Buttons Ltd.Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 20 November196715 December15 December1967196726 February 26 February 26 February 19671967196717 April 196917 April 196912 December 12 December 12 December 196919691969 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 17November196713 April 1968 2November19671818February February February 1967196719671616NovemberNovemberNovember196919691969 Inst. MtgeXXpostponing mtgeMtgeD of MD of MMtge ber 2022 No. 361171362460392093395544415094 Decem - g with - way over E’ly - recitals(#415074) of Remarks - way - etc. way of - - Mtge 392093Lot etc.Lots 72 & 73 Toa right5’ lot 71 Subj to rightof A lot etc. together with rtLot Discharge 415074Mtge 361171Pt. Lot Re: Right of Way, See Lot 72 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration2.001.00 1.001.001.00186400.00 Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd.Buttons Ltd.A & G Mechanical A & G Mechanical Contractors Ltd.Contractors Ltd.Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd.Texaco Canada Inc Julius Feder, In Julius Feder, In Julius Feder, In TrustTrustTrustMitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd.Buttons Ltd.Buttons Ltd.Mitchell Plastics & Buttons Ltd.Fackoury, Paul D.Fackoury, Celeste M. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy Plastics & 137 Grantor Industrial Development BankJulius Feder, In Julius Feder, In TrustIndustrial Industrial Development BankDevelopment BankHighway Realties Highway Realties Limited Mitchell Buttons Ltd.Industrial Industrial Industrial Development BankDevelopment BankDevelopment BankCanada Permanent Canada Permanent Canada Permanent Trust Co.Trust Co.Trust Co.Texaco Canada Inc. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry April 1987April 1987April 1987 10 February 19701 May 19703 June 19704 June 19708 September 8 September 1972197214 February 14 February 14 February 1973197313 January 13 January 19811981303030 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date 3 February 197023February 197025 August 1972 18February 197028 May 19707 February 7 February 7 February 1973 Inst. D of MGrantGrantD of MD of MD of MG GrantGrantGrant ber 2022 No. 418547423481425618425681477429487521696474894005 Decem Remarks Pt. Lot Re: Right of Way, See Lot 72 333 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Consideration60000.00 Project #LHC0 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Grantee Royal Trust Royal Trust Corporation of Corporation of CanadaCanada AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ogy 138 Grantor Fackoury, Paul D.Fackoury, Celeste M. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Date of Registry 30 April 1987 LHC | Heritage Planning and Archaeol DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ITS Date Inst. Mortgage ber 2022 No. 894006 Decem