Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2023-256 - Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202 - OP18/006/B/GS - ZBA18/006/B/GS - 2079546 Ontario Ltd. (Mattamy Homes)Staff Report Develo n7ent Services Department REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: June 19, 2023 www. kitchener ca SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson — Interim Director, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Garett Stevenson — Interim Director, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 5 DATE OF REPORT: May 23, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-256 SUBJECT: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Official Plan Amendment Application OP18/006/B/GS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA18/007/B/GS 2079546 Ontario Limited (Mattamy Homes Can RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Kitchener, pursuant to Section 51 (31) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P 13 as amended, and delegation by-law 2002-64, grant draft approval to Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 in the City of Kitchener, for 2079546 Ontario Limited, subject to the conditions attached to Report DSD -2023-256 as Appendix `A'; and, That Official Plan Amendment Application OP18/006/B/GS for 2079546 Ontario Limited requesting a change to the Land Use Designation on the parcels of land specified and illustrated on Schedule `A', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023- 256 as Appendix'B', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and further, That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA18/007/B/GS to amend Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051 for 2079546 Ontario Limited be approved in the form shown in the "Proposed By-law" and "Map No. 1" attached to Report DSD -2022-366 as Appendix `C'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to provide a planning recommendation regarding a Draft Plan of Subdivision, an Official Plan Amendment, and a Zoning By-law Amendment to allow the subject lands to be developed with a residential subdivision which proposes up to 277 dwelling units, an urban green and open space blocks. Planning staff recommend approval of the applications subject to the conditions outlined in the report. The development proposal represents good planning and will allow for the completion of the western portion of the Rosenberg community. Community engagement included: o installation of a notice signs on the property; o a notice of application circulation letter to all property owners within 120 metres; o discussions with interested members of the public; o a notice of the statutory public meeting sent to all property owners within 240 metres; and *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 4 of 792 o notice of the public meeting was given in The Record on May 26, 2023. o This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: 2079546 Ontario Limited (Mattamy Homes Canada) have requested draft approval of a plan of subdivision approval, approval of an Official Plan Amendment, and approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment and bring the subject lands into the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. Mattamy Homes Canada also owns lands to the north which were drafted approved by Council in August 2022. Those lands include five parcels totaling 96.21 hectares. _ y Q R, lCDoe P T2 �t W �PE1 � _AES 93M� LAT ,u a�E F3L M5 RD 30T-18201 Draft Approved in August 2022 30T-182{2 WILMOT �p REPORT: The applications seek approval of additional lands which will be development with the adjacent lands to the north. A residential subdivision which includes up to 277 dwelling units, an urban green and open space blocks is proposed. This plan of subdivision is immediately south of the larger mixed use community which is centered along the future westerly extension of Rosenberg Way, which is a planned street that will extend from Fischer Hallman Road (partially built as part of other communities to the east) to Trussler Road. Non-residential uses, including schools and commercial blocks are within the plan to the north at the intersection of Rosenberg Way and Bandon Drive. The plan to north of the subject lands will feature both school blocks, the neighbourhood park, a large open space storm water management block, a mixed use block, and two of the multiple dwelling blocks. Page 5 of 792 Policy Conformity Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS sets out principles to achieve "healthy, liveable and safe communities". The PPS is supportive of efficient development patterns that optimize the use of land, resources, and public investment in infrastructure and public service facilities. Further, the PPS directs the development of new housing to locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs and promotes densities for new housing which efficiently uses land, resources, infrastructure, and public service facilities. Section 3(5) of the Planning Act requires that a decision of the council of a municipality shall be consistent with the policy statement that are in effect on the date of decision and shall conform with the provincial plans that are in effect on that date, or shall not conflict with them, as the case may be. The PPS focuses growth and development within urban and rural settlement areas while supporting the viability of rural areas. Land use must be carefully managed to accommodate appropriate development to meet the full range of current and future needs, while achieving efficient development patterns and avoiding significant or sensitive resources and areas which may pose a risk to public health and safety. Efficient development patterns optimize the use of land, resources and public investment in infrastructure and public service facilities. These land use patterns promote a mix of housing, Page 6 of 792 including affordable housing, employment, recreation, parks and open spaces, and transportation choices that increase the use of active transportation and transit before other modes of travel. Policy 1.1.1 of the PPS states that, "Healthy, liveable and safe communities are sustained by: a) promoting efficient development and land use patterns which sustain the financial well-being of the Province and municipalities over the long term; b) accommodating an appropriate affordable and market-based range and mix of residential types (including single -detached, additional residential units, multi -unit housing, affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs; e) promoting the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs; g) ensuring that necessary infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to meet current and projected needs; h) promoting development and land use patterns that conserve biodiversity; and i) preparing for the regional and local impacts of a changing climate." Policy 1.1.2 requires that sufficient land shall be made available to accommodate an appropriate range and mix of land uses to meet projected needs for a time horizon of up to 25 years, informed by provincial guidelines. The PPS notes that settlement areas are urban areas and rural settlement areas, and include cities, towns, villages and hamlets, and policy 1.1.3.1 states that settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development. Policy 1.1.3.2 states that land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on densities and a mix of land uses which; a) efficiently use land and resources; and b) are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion. Further, policy 1.1.3.2 states that land use patterns within settlement areas shall also be based on a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3, where this can be accommodated. Policy 1.1.3.3 requires that Planning authorities (such as the City of Kitchener) shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for transit -supportive development, accommodating a significant supply and range of housing options through intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs. The proposed draft plan of subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment applications represent the final phase of a larger planned development that has been designed with a mix of housing types and densities and introducing new commercial and institutional uses. The proposal makes efficient use of the land through comprehensively planned development and that meet minimum density requirements, thus maximizing the recently constructed infrastructure which was installed to service this area. The plan provides for a range of low rise residential housing types and densities that are in close proximity to the planned Urban Green. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications are consistent with the PPS. Page 7 of 792 A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) Part of the Vision of the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) is to ensure municipalities have sufficient housing supply that reflects market demand and what is needed in local communities. Two of the guiding principles of the Growth Plan are to prioritize intensification and higher densities in strategic growth areas to make efficient use of land and infrastructure and support transit viability and to support a range and mix of housing options, including second units and affordable housing, to serve all sizes, incomes, and ages of households. The Growth Plan directs Planning authorities in the Region of Waterloo to plan for a population of 923,000 people and 470,000 jobs by 2051. This would mean a population increase of approximately 299,070 in comparison to the Region's 2020 population of 623,930.The forecasted growth to the 2051 horizon is allocated to each municipality in the Region based on the following considerations: the vast majority of growth will be directed to settlement areas that have a delineated built boundary, have existing or planned municipal water and wastewater systems, and can support the achievement of complete communities. As one of three cities in the Region, it can be expected that Kitchener will be allocated a significant amount of the additional population allocation. The development of the subject lands are within the City's delineated `Designated Greenfield Area'. New development taking place in designated greenfield areas must be planned, designated, and zoned in a manner that supports the achievement of complete communities, supports active transportation, and encourages the integration and sustained viability of transit services. The Growth Plan notes that complete communities should be designed to meet people's needs for daily living throughout an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs, local services, public service facilities, and a full range of housing to accommodate a range of incomes and household sizes. Complete communities support quality of life and human health by encouraging the use of active transportation and providing high quality public open space, adequate parkland, opportunities for recreation, and access to local and healthy food. Complete communities support climate change mitigation by increasing the modal share for transit and active transportation and by minimizing land consumption through building compact, mixed-use communities. The subject lands are located within the City's Designated Greenfield Area, an area within the Settlement Boundary that is designated for growth. Policy 2.2.7.1 states that new development taking place in designated greenfield areas will be planned, designated, zoned and designed in a manner that: a) supports the achievement of complete communities; b) supports active transportation; and c) encourages the integration and sustained viability of transit services. Policy 2.G.1.2 (Table 4) of the Regional Official Plan (approved as amended in April 2023) requires that the minimum density target applicable to the designated greenfield area for Kitchener is not less than 65 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The minimum density for Kitchener's designated greenfield area, in Kitchener Official Plan policy 3.C.A.A14.a) is 55 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The proposed density range for this community is a minimum of 53 residents and jobs (not including work from home) combined per hectare based on the total build out of 166 single detached dwellings and a maximum of 62 residents and jobs (not including work from home) combined per hectare based on the total build out of 277 townhouse dwellings. Up to 277 dwelling units, in a combination of single detached and townhouse dwellings, are planned. The planned density of this development exceeds minimum density targets in the Rosenberg Page 8 of 792 Secondary Plan. The total density will be determined at the final build out of the lands, depending on the scale and density of the multiple dwelling sites. Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed applications conform to the Growth Plan. The lands have been designated to permit residential, open space blocks, and two Urban Greens. The applications propose a variety of low density dwelling types. The planned density is 53-62 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is currently consulting on proposed policies for an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not currently in effect. Minimum greenfield density targets are not contained within the draft PPS. Regional Official Plan The subject lands are within the `Urban Designated Greenfield Area' established in the Regional Official Plan. The build out of the lands will include a combination of single detached dwellings, duplexes, semi-detached dwellings, fronting and live -work townhouses dwellings and the density will be within the range required by the City of Kitchener Official Plan. In accordance with Regional Official Plan policy 2.G.1.4, Kitchener will establish policies in its Official Plan to ensure that new development within designated greenfield areas is phased in a manner that provides for the logical and orderly progression of development, ensures that the pace, scale and phasing of development is aligned with the delivery of infrastructure and public service facilities in a financially sustainable manner at the Regional and/or City level; and will not adversely affect the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets. The ROP policies require new communities to have sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide linkages within the neighbourhood and to other neighbourhoods, transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations, and community facilities. Regional Planning have provided comment on the proposed applications, including subdivision approval conditions, but overall have no objections to the proposed applications. This future neighbourhood will complete the western portion of the Rosenberg community. The City's Development Manual, coupled with the attached draft approval conditions, will ensure that the lands are appropriately developed to City and Regional standards. Official Plan The vision of the City's Official Plan states "Together we will build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community contributing to an exceptional quality of life." A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including a full range and mix of housing types. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. Housing Policy 4.1.1 states a housing objective of the City is to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing Page 9 of 792 needs of our community through all stages of life. Policy 4.C.1.12 notes the City favours a land use pattern which mixes and disperses a full range of housing types and styles both across the city as a whole and within neighbourhoods. Policy 4.C.1.1 states that the City will maintain at all times the ability to accommodate residential growth for a minimum of ten years through residential intensification and redevelopment and, if necessary, lands which are designated and available for residential development. The proposed land use designations and proposed zoning permit a range of housing options throughout the community. Designated Greenfield Area Policy 3.C.1.14.a) requires that a Designated Greenfield Area must be planned and developed to achieve a minimum average density of 55 residents and jobs combined per hectare on lands not subject to a plan of subdivision application as of June 16, 2006. As per policy 3.C.1.15, the achievement of the average density targets is planned through the development of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The proposed density of this community is a minimum of 53-62 residents and jobs combined per hectare based on the total build out of the lands. Rosenberg Secondary Plan Community structure elements and land use designations have not been approved for these lands in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, which is part of the City's Official Plan. Through this application, the subject lands are proposed to be added to the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. These lands are part of a planned complete community where people can walk or cycle to school, shop, and work. This neighbourhood follows the "five minute walk principle" design and has been designed to be connected to the surrounding area, including the communities to the east which are approved and under construction. Communitv Structure The proposed applications conform to the objectives of the community structure elements in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. In addition to the centrally located neighbourhood park, an Urban Green is proposed to ensure that public amenities are within a comfortable walk (around 5 minutes) for all residents. Parks and Open Space An Urban Green is planned and required in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act and the City's Parkland Dedication Policy. The Urban Green will be centrally located generally within the 5 minute walk model. Built Form and Streetscaaes A variety of built form typologies are planned for this community, including single detached dwellings, duplexes, semi-detached dwellings, fronting and live -work townhouses. The Urban Green is planned for the gateway intersection and will feature a landscape design that is welcoming. Natural Environment The Rosenberg community is home to a natural heritage system of Core Areas and Non -Core Areas including Provincially Significant Wetlands, Regionally Significant Core Environmental Features, Significant Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species, Locally Significant Woodlands, Locally Significant Wetlands and Locally Significant Valleylands. Page 10 of 792 All development is required to implement the recommendations of the Alder Creek Watershed Study and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Plan Update (CH2MHILL, 2008), Strasburg Creek Master Watershed Plan (Paragon, 1991) and Implementation Report (City of Kitchener, 1996) and the Middle Strasburg Creek Environmental Implementation Statement (Stanley Consulting, 1997) as well as relevant documentation completed through the Southwest Urban Area Studies: Community Master Plan and Rosenberg Secondary Plan where appropriate. The Region has confirmed that correspondence from Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry (April 4, 2022) indicates the Ministry's acceptance of the status of the wetlands identified as W1, W2 and W4 in the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) as Provincially Significant Wetlands, and as such, these areas are now considered to meet the Regional Official Plan (ROP) criteria for designation as Core Environmental Features. Further, the Region's Environmental Planner confirmed that Wetland W4 is partially within the limits of Plan 30T-18201. The wetland (W4) is proposed to be protected and a 30 metre buffer has been applied to the wetland which is comprised of a 15 metre `no touch' area directly adjacent to the wetland, and a 15 metre enhancement area outside of the no touch area. The wetland and the associated buffer also incorporate components of the Blanding's Turtle mitigation plan, which has been approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). Notwithstanding the inclusion of a portion of wetland W4 and associated Blanding's Turtle enhancement within this plan, Regional environmental staff withdraw their objection to this plan proceeding to draft approval based on confirmation from MECP that there are no concerns and/or anticipated mitigation measures required which will impact the proposed draft plan (30T-18201). The wetland identified as "W4" and the associated 30 metre buffer ("Open Space Block 33") located in the northern portion of the subject lands are proposed to be zoned as `Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1)' which prohibits development activities. A portion of the lands within the Grand River Conservation Authority regulated limit. GRCA staff have undertaken a preliminary review of the applications and are supportive of draft approval and have provided draft approvals conditions which has been incorporated in Appendix `A'. Regional and City Environmental Planning staff have reviewed the proposed plan of subdivision and have no concerns with the proposed applications and have provided draft approval conditions for further review at different stages (prior to grading, prior to registration). Cultural Heritage Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202 has been modified to include lands which are part of a registered archaeological site of cultural heritage value or interest (the "Locus B" Archaeological Site Avoidance and Protection Area, a Portion of Site AiHd-160) for which a Stage 4 Mitigation of Development Impacts is required. The site is currently surrounded by active agricultural fields. Through the draft approval of Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202 and the related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, appropriate zoning will be applied that would prohibit any development on these lands, including limiting any activities that might alter the archaeological site in any way, either temporarily or permanently such as minor forms of soil disturbance, tree removal, minor landscaping, utilities installation, etc. As an interim measure, draft approval conditions are proposed to require fencing of the site to prevent any soil disturbance with earth moving associated with the subject lands. Transportation Choice Neighbourhoods in Rosenberg are planned to promote walkability, to create efficient and interconnected circulation routes, to achieve transit -supportive development, and to provide for a transportation network that is based on a modified grid pattern with short walkable blocks within 450 metres of transit service. Page 11 of 792 Rosenberg Way, Bandon Drive, and George Israel Street have (in the plan to the north) all been identified as potential transit routes. As such, all higher density and non-residential uses have been planned to front these streets to provide easy access to the public transportation system. Rosenberg Way is planned as a secondary bike route and primary priority street. Servicing and Utilities All lots will be serviced with municipal sanitary sewers and municipal water servicing in accordance with City standards. Engineering Services staff have confirmed that there is sufficient servicing capacity. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure that services are constructed at the appropriate timeframes. Comments from the appropriate utility and telecommunications companies are addressed through the draft approval conditions. Kitchener Growth Management Plan (KGMP) 2019-2021 The subject lands (Parcel 134 on the KGMP Map) are identified as Priority `B' which supports consideration of development applications and initiatives to be actively worked on with high priority in the coming 2-year timeframe. Priority B applications may require some additional infrastructure. Since the approval of the 2019-2021 KGMP, additional infrastructure has been developed to support the development of these lands including the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sewer and the Strasburg Creek Control Structure (Fisher Hallman Road). The applications were received in 2018 and have been under review and are now being recommended for approval. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Planning staff are recommending approval of the Official Plan Amendment to add land use designations and bring the subject lands into the Rosenberg Secondary Plan to implement the proposed draft plan of subdivision. No new land use designations are proposed as part of this application. Lands are proposed to be designated and Low Density Residential 1, Natural Conservation, and Open Space. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment The Zoning By-law Amendment proposes to implement the proposed revised land use designations noted above with corresponding zoning. Planning staff are recommending amending By-law 2019- 051 and By-law 85-1 be amended so that all lands are in Zoning By-law 2019-051 and to bring the additional lands into the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. As such, new residential (RES), Natural Conservation (NHC), and Open Space (OSR) zones are proposed. The proposed zoning would permit low rise residential uses, open spaces, and an Urban Green. Planning staff are recommending the following zoning for the subject lands as follows: Areas 1, 2, and 3 Zoned as Low Rise Residential Five Zone (RES-5) with Site Specific Provision (370) to permit low rise residential uses including single detached dwellings, duplexes, semi-detached dwellings, fronting and live -work townhouses, with a maximum height of 12.5 metres. Areas 4 and 5 Zoned Open Space: Recreation Zone (OSR-1) for the Urban Green and walkway blocks. Page 12 of 792 Areas 6, 7, and 8 Zoned Natural Conservation (NHC) with Site Specific Provision (370) to prohibit development and protect archaeological features. Areas 9 and 10 Zoned Natural Conservation (NHC) to prohibit development and protect natural features. Staff have considered the proposed zoning categories and are of the opinion that they are appropriate for the proposed subdivision. Department and Agency Comments All requirements have been addressed or are included as conditions of approval. The following Reports and studies were considered as part of this review: • Urban Design Brief, Sustainability Statement, Trail Corridor Plan Prepared By: NAK Design Strategies, May 17, 2018, updated August 16, 2021 • Planning Justification Report Prepared By: SGL Planning and Design Inc., July 2018 • Environmental Impact Study Prepared By: Natural Resource Solutions Inc., July 2018, updated August 2021 • Geotechnical Investigation Prepared By: DS Consultants Ltd., June 12, 2018 • Hydrogeological Assessment Prepared By: MTE Consultants Inc., July 6, 2018 • Functional Servicing Study and Plan, Existing Conditions Plan, Preliminary Grading Plan Prepared By: MTE Consultants Inc., August 31, 2018, revised November 29, 2019 • Preliminary Stormwater Management Plan, Chloride Impact Study Prepared By: MTE Consultants Inc., July 6, 2018, revised November 29, 2019, revised August 31, 2021 • Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment Prepared By: MTE Consultants Inc., July 6, 2018, revised November 19, 2019 • Transportation Impact Study Prepared By: Salvini Consulting, July 2018 • Final Materials Management Plan, Technical Memorandum Prepared By: MTE Consultants Inc., November 3, 2020 • Stage 3 Site -Specific Assessment Site Aihd-160 Prepared by ASI, August 21, 2007 • Stage 4 Archaeological Mitigation of Site AiHd-160 Prepared by ASI, March 18, 2021 Page 13 of 792 Community Input WHAT WE HEARD 192 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified 4 people/households/businesses provided written comment Staff received four comments on the proposed applications. A summary of the comments received are listed below along with Planning staff's response addressing each comment. Bleams Road Widening and Design Planning staff received comments and questions about the future design of Bleams Road. Planning staff connected these residents with the Project Manager, Region of Waterloo, for the Bleams Road reconstruction project to have their question addressed. Lands are being dedicated to the Region of Waterloo for the widening of the right-of-way with this application, and the design and reconstruction of Bleams Road is a regional project that is ongoing. Construction Timing A resident requested clarification of the timing of the construction of the development and Planning staff provided available information (back in 2018) and advised that construction would commence after the planning phase was nearing completion. Matters Relating to the Adjacent Plan of Subdivision Planning staff were advised of ongoing considerations between land developers with the Rosenberg Community with respect to cost sharing, infrastructure design and construction, and integration of different plans of subdivision. Planning staff have worked through applicable issues through the Ontario Land Tribunal approval of the adjacent plan of subdivision. Planning staff are also recommending draft approval conditions for this application which are consistent with the draft approval conditions of recently approved subdivisions within he vicinity. Planning Analysis and Conclusions: Planning staff are recommending approval of the attached Draft Plan of Subdivision, draft approval conditions, and the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. The proposed development completes this section of the Rosenberg Community and will result in a complete mixed-use community. Planning staff have worked to address technical and community concerns and all departmental and agency comments have been addressed or will be addressed through draft approval conditions. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. Page 14 of 792 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget - Upon registration, there will be ongoing operations costs for the maintenance of the park, walkways, streets, street trees, underground services, and other infrastructure which is being dedicated to the City. In the long term, there will be repair and replacement costs for streets, sidewalks and services. Also, following registration, there will be ongoing revenue in the form of residential property tax revenue. Development Charges will be paid to the City, the Region, and school boards at the time of building permit issuance. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. Notice signs were posted on the property and information regarding the application posted to the City's website in 2021. Notice of the Public Meeting was posted in The Record on May 26, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `D'). CONSULT — The applications were originally circulated to property owners within 120 metres of the subject lands on October 5, 2018. In response to this circulation, staff received four written responses and spoke with all residents who provided comments to address their concerns. Written comments are included in Appendix `F'. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Municipal Act, 2001 • Planning Act, R. S. O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • Regional Official Plan, 2010 • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • Kitchener Growth Management Strategy • Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2019-2021 • Zoning By-laws 85-1 & 2019-051 • City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual REVIEWED BY: Malone -Wright, Tina — Interim Manager of Development Review, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Appendix A - Draft Plan and Conditions of Draft Approval Appendix B - Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix C - Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix D - Newspaper Notice Appendix E - Department and Agency Comments Appendix F - Community Comments Page 15 of 792 Draft Approval Conditions Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Official Plan Amendment Application OP18/006/B/GS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA18/007/B/GS 2079546 Ontario Limited That this approval applies to Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202 for 2079546 Ontario Limited, as shown on the attached Plan of Subdivision prepared by the City of Kitchener dated May 23, 2023 which shows the following: Stage 1 Blocks 1-14, 16-22 Singles/Towns (166-277 units) Blocks 23, 24 Urban Green Blocks 25-27 Public Walkway Blocks 28-33 Open Space Blocks 15, 34 Access Block 35 Archaeological Site Total 166-277 units 2. CITY OF KITCHENER CONDITIONS: 2.1 That the Subdivider shall enter into a City Standard Residential Subdivision Agreement, as approved by CITY Council, respecting those lands shown outlined on the attached Plan of Subdivision dated May 23, 2023. Standard conditions 2.4, 4.9, and 4.12 shall be deleted from the City Standard Residential Subdivision Agreement. The following special conditions shall be added to the City Standard Residential Subdivision Agreement: Part 2 — General Conditions 2.11 Where the SUBDIVIDER has not completed servicing in accordance with any approved servicing plan and where the CITY'S Directors of Planning and Engineering Services consider it is in the public interest to provide such servicing within the subdivision to secure orderly development of the City, the CITY may, in its sole discretion, proceed with the engineering and construction of such services at the SUBDIVIDER'S expense and the cost thereof shall be a charge upon the subdivision and a debt payable by the SUBDIVIDER to the CITY upon receipt by the SUBDIVIDER of notice of the CITY'S decision. This provision shall extend to the servicing of adjacent privately held lands under usual circumstances. Part 2 — Prior to Area Grading of the subdivision 2.14 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to area grading, servicing or registration each stage, that the SUBDIVIDER shall complete a Record of Site Condition(s) (RSC) in accordance with Ontario Regulation 153/04 and the RSC shall be acknowledged by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). Prior to submitting the RSC and the commencement of area grading for the subdivision, site alteration, materials management, filling and preliminary grading will be permitted provided these activities comply with a materials management plan to be approved by the Region's Commissioner of Planning, Development and Page 16 of 792 Legislative Services and a preliminary grading plan to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry or any Provincial successor thereof. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees the preliminary grading plan and implementation of same will ensure drainage through lands to the east does not exceed pre -development drainage flows. 2.15 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the Erosion Threshold Analysis and specifically Model 4 prepared by Stantec Inc. dated April 7, 2015 including implementation of the unitary release rate of 1.1 litres per second per hectare which is assigned to Area 2 and 3 of the Rosenberg Secondary Planning Area on a proportionate gross area basis, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. 2.16 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to area grading, to retain a qualified Engineering Consultant who shall prepare a detailed area grading plan that addresses environmental and groundwater considerations identified through the Rosenberg Secondary Planning process. The area grading plan shall be to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services for the City of Kitchener, in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. The area grading plan shall be in accordance with the Minutes of Settlement dated August 17, 2015 and will be coordinated with adjacent lands to the east to ensure gradual transition grades between plans to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 2.17 Prior to area grading, servicing and registration of any stage within the plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER shall prepare and implement a detailed "development" monitoring program that will include three phases: "pre - construction", "during -construction" and "post -construction", in accordance with the Alder Creek Watershed Study and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Plan (CH2MHill and North-South Environmental Inc. 2008) and the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (NRSI). The monitoring program is to be approved by the CITY's Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY's Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 2.18 The SUBDIVIDER further agrees to submit, obtain approval of, and implement a detailed "during development" ground water and surface water monitoring and response program. The program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The purpose of the "during development" monitoring program is to ensure that the groundwater infiltration measures satisfy pre -development infiltration targets specified in the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and that Chloride Impact Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and that Chloride Impact assessments meet the Reasonable Use Criteria of the Alder Creek Page 17 of 792 Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved. The "during development" monitoring program is to extend until full build out of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 2.19 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to area grading to submit, obtain approval of, and implement a detailed "post development" monitoring program in accordance with the Storm Water Management Strategy prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 as revised July 18, 2011) and the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved. The program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The purpose of the "post development" monitoring program is to ensure that the stormwater management facilities continue to satisfy the current pre - development conditions for infiltration and to identify any specific additional requirements that may be necessary to monitor, including but not limited to infiltration rates for quantity and quality and chloride impact assessments. The "post development" monitoring program will extend for a two year period after 95% build out of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 2.20 The SUBDIVIDER further agrees to implement, within a reasonable timeframe, any remedial action deemed necessary (including additional monitoring should chloride levels exceed the Reasonable Use Criteria of Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2M HILL, 2008 report as approved), as a result of the aforementioned monitoring program at their sole expense to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 2.21 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit construction details for all or any proposed retaining walls to the satisfaction of the CITY's Director of Engineering Services, in consultation with the CITY's Director of Planning and the CITY's Building Department. 2.22 The SUBDIVIDER shall provide confirmation that any existing private wells and septic systems within the lands proposed to be graded that are required to be decommissioned have been in accordance with the Ministry of the Environment, Conversion and Park standards to the satisfaction of the CITY's Director of Engineering Services. 2.23 Prior to area grading, servicing and registration of any stage within the plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit an Environmental Impact Study, and to obtain approval from the CITY'S Director, Planning in consultation with the CITY'S Director, Parks and Cemeteries, Region of Waterloo, and the Grand River Conservation Authority. Page 18 of 792 2.24 Prior to area grading, servicing and registration of any stage within the plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit a Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan, and to obtain approval from the CITY'S Director, Planning in consultation with the CITY'S Director, Parks and Cemeteries, Region of Waterloo, and the Grand River Conservation Authority. Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan shall include details and plans for wetland habitat creation, habitat enhancements, habitat linkages, wildlife corridor connections (amphibian and turtle crossings roads and trails), trails, vegetation loss compensations, permanent fencing, and on-site interpretive and educational signage. 2.25 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the recommendations in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study Update (NRSI) revised August 2021, including the implementation for the Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan. Where the implementation of the Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan is not completed prior to area grading, the SUBDIVIDER shall provide a Letter of Credit based on 100% of the estimated cost of all works, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning in consultation with the CITY'S Director, Parks and Cemeteries. The Letter of Credit shall be based on an approved Cost Estimate of all works required to implement the Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan. The letter of credit will be released once the City is in receipt of confirmation from the SUBDIVIDER's Landscape Architect that all applicable works, as outlined in the approved Cost Estimate, are completed. 2.26 Prior to area grading, servicing and registration of any stage within the plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER shall obtain, if necessary, any permits and approvals from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) related to species at risk identified on the subject lands in accordance with the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Any measures required by MECP including but not limited to informing and consulting with First Nations, Mitigation Measures and Overall Benefit Activities shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning in consultation with the MECP or other Provincial successor thereof. Mitigation Measures and Overall Benefit Activities that are to be owned and maintained by the CITY shall be to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries and the CITY'S Director of Planning in consultation with the M ECP or other Provincial successor thereof. Part 3 — Prior to Servicing 3.18 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to the CITY'S approval of servicing drawings for lotless blocks intended for street townhouse dwellings or single, semi-detached or duplex dwellings, to submit a draft reference plan for each lot or block, and obtain approval of such reference plan from the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services, in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning. Page 19 of 792 3.19 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing to prepare a detailed Geotechnical/Hydrogeological Investigation Report which shall confirm the suitability of soils to support lot level infiltration of roof water to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Region of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. The design of the infiltration galleries should be oversized by 20% as shall be as outlined in the Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (MTE, July 6, 2018), and all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 3.20 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever occurs first, to prepare an updated water servicing report which shall make recommendations that address water pressure within the limits of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Kitchener Utilities. 3.21 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever shall occur first, to submit, obtain approval of and implement a detailed ground water and surface water monitoring program to evaluate the performance of end of pipe infiltration facilities (including pre -construction and post -construction phases) and to identify if the required water balance is met (as identified in the Alder Creek Watershed Study(2007) and the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update-CHM2HILL, 2008 as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011), to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. Further, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the approved monitoring program to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. 3.22 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever shall occur first, to retain a qualified Engineering Consultant who shall prepare a detailed engineering design and report for stormwater management to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Director of Operations, the Region of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. The stormwater management design and report shall be in accordance with the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update-CH2MHILL, 2008 and shall accommodate a flow of 2.0 cubic metres/second from Area 2 lands of which 1.337 is assigned to Subdivision 30T-18201 and 30T-18202. 3.23 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing stormwater management facilities will be designed to achieve a unitary release rate of 1.1 litres per second per gross hectare in accordance with the Erosion Threshold Analysis prepared by Stantec Inc. dated April 7, 2015, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. 3.24 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing of each stage requiring new stormwater management facilities, including stormwater management ponds, infiltration galleries and other related appurtenances, to provide a letter of credit Page 20 of 792 based on 60% of the estimated cost of the approved infiltration facilities to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. The Letter of Credit will be released two years after 95% of the pond catchment area is stabilized (meaning buildings are constructed and lots/blocks are sodded/vegetated) and the SUBDIVIDER's consulting engineer has certified the infiltration facilities are functioning as intended and approved to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 3.25 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration of each stage, whichever occurs first, to prepare an On -Street Parking Plan to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation Services, in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services and Director of Planning, in accordance with the CITY'S On -Street Parking Policy 1-1070, as approved and amended. The On - Street Parking Plan shall be considered in accordance with the servicing drawings and shall generally provide for one on -street parking space for every two dwelling units. Other options such as driveway length, garage space, communal parking facilities, and/or parking along the park frontage, may be considered in accordance with the CITY'S Policy and to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation Services. 3.26 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing of each Stage, to submit a street cross section plan for all streets in accordance with the City's Complete Street Guidelines, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation and the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. The following preferred cross sections are applicable: Local street, 18 metre right-of-way Minor neighbourhood collector, 20 metre right-of-way 3.27 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever comes first, to submit a detailed stormwater management plan for the stormwater management facilities located within each stage to be registered to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services, Grand River Conservation Authority, and Region including, but not limited to, the design and location of end of pipe infiltration facilities required to sustain the flow of groundwater to Core Environmental Features. 3.28 All public right-of-ways and all services shall be designed and constructed to the standards specified in the most current City of Kitchener Standards, Development Manual, Regional Standards and other applicable Provincial Standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. 3.29 Where major overland flow routes are not on municipally owned lands, the owner must deed to the City of Kitchener a minimum 6.0 m wide drainage corridor. 3.30 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever shall occur first, to submit, obtain approval of and implement a detailed groundwater and surface water monitoring program to evaluate the performance of end of pipe infiltration facilities (including pre -construction and post -construction phases) and Page 21 of 792 to identify if the required water balance is met (as identified in the Alder Creek Watershed Study (2007) and the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update — CH2MHILL, West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 revised July 18, 2011), to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. Further, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the approved monitoring program and complete any redesign and/or remediation to achieve the required targets at the sole expense of the SUBDIVIDER all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 3.31 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever occurs first, to provide detailed sanitary sewer design and to make arrangements satisfactory to the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services for a sanitary sewer connection to the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees that where any upgrades are required to any local sewers required to connect these lands to the trunk sewer will be at the sole expense of the SUBDIVIDER. 3.32 Prior to servicing, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit, if required, a detailed construction dewatering assessment to support a Permit to Take Water and to obtain approval from the CITY'S Director, Engineering in consultation with the CITY'S Director, Planning, and the Grand River Conservation Authority. The dewatering assessment should be reviewed for the southeast region of the Subject Lands during the final design stage (in advance of construction) to estimate construction dewatering requirements for a Permit to Take Water (PTTW). The assessment is to ensure dewatering will maintain the water balance to the wetlands retained within 30T-18201 (Plan 1) (W1 and W4), and within 30T- 18202 (Plan 2) (W1, W2 and W4). Part 4 — Prior to the issuance of building permit in each stage 4.22 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to undertake any measures required to ensure proper water pressure to all lots and blocks within the proposed plan of subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY's Director of Engineering Services or the CITY's Chief Building Official in consultation with CITY's Director of Utilities. 4.23 The SUBDIVIDIER agrees that all dwellings shall be designed in accordance with garage and driveway widths shown on the approved On -Street Parking Plan to the satisfaction of the CITY's Chief Building Official, in consultation with the CITY's Director of Planning and Director of Transportation Services. 4.24 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that no building permit shall be applied for or issued for the following Priority Lots unless the building designs are in accordance with the approved Design Guidelines for Priority Lots to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Chief Building Official, in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning: a) The future Corner (C) Priority Lots in the following blocks; 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 b) Park (P) Priority Lots in the following blocks; 4, 5, 11, 12 Page 22 of 792 4.25 The SUBDIVIDER shall reassess all needs of trees to be maintained as set out in Section 2.10, immediately following the completion of area grading of a particular Stage or Phase. A Tree Maintenance Report as outlined in the CITY'S Tree Management Policy detailing all recommended tree maintenance measures shall be submitted to and approved by the CITY'S Director of Planning. 4.26 a) Where the Detailed Vegetation Plan required in Section 2.10 has identified that there are trees to be retained in a Stage or Phase or that require further study, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit a Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan for the same to the CITY'S Director of Planning in accordance with the CITY'S Tree Management Policy for the following Lots or Blocks within the Stage or Phase: i. those which are subject to site plan approval under Section 41 of The Planning Act; ii. corner Lots where site service locations and building type have not been predetermined; iii. interior Lots having street frontage greater than 13.7 metres iv. those where buildings or structures are proposed to be located deeper on the Lots than as approved on the Detailed Vegetation Plan; and V. those on which the revised grading will have an adverse effect on the vegetation, which is to be saved, as determined by the CITY'S Director of Planning and as shown on the Detailed Vegetation Plan. b) The SUBDIVIDER shall implement all measures for the protection of trees to be retained as approved in the Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan and to provide written certification from the SUBDIVIDER'S Environmental Consultant to the CITY'S Director of Planning that all protection measures have been implemented and inspected in accordance with the CITY'S Tree Management Policy. Part 6 — Other Time Frames 6.10 That prior to registration, the owner enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to ensure that the water balance completed to date be updated with the "as -built" infiltration gallery data (based on suitability of soils encountered during construction) and that this data be reported to the Region of Waterloo in the event that a ground water deficit results and mitigation measures may be required to maintain the existing water balance. 6.11 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to include the following clause in all agreements purchase and sale, and/or rental agreements for all lots with retaining walls: "Purchasers/tenants are advised that a retaining wall is located on this property. The owner of this property also owns his/her section of the retaining wall. The retaining wall is not in public ownership. Monitoring, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of this retaining wall, including any associated costs, are the sole responsibility of the property owner. The City of Kitchener is in no way Page 23 of 792 responsible for this retaining wall. Should this retaining wall fail, it is the property owner's responsibility to repair or replace his/her section of the wall, at his/her cost. 6.12 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to provide the City of Kitchener with evidence that satisfactory arrangements, financial and otherwise, have been made with Canada Post Corporation for the installation of Community Mail Boxed (CMB) as required by Canada Post Corporation, at the time of sidewalk and/or curb installation. 6.13 That the SUBDIVIDER or subsequent Owner agrees to include the following clauses in all Agreement of Purchase and Sale with home buyers, and/or Rental Agreements, which advise: a) that the home/business mail delivery will be from a designated Community Mail Box; b) that identifies the exact Community Mail Box locations. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees that the location of all Community Mail Box facilities will be shown on maps, information boards and plans, including maps displayed in the sales office. 6.14 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to satisfy the CITY'S parkland dedication for the entire subdivision by the conveyance of Park Blocks 23 and 24. Conveyance of each of the said Park Blocks will take place at the time of registration of the stage which includes a parkland dedication block. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that the parkland provided within the plan of subdivision shall be at no additional frontage cost to the CITY and shall be to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries. 6.15 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to occupancy of the units within a stage that includes a park, to install demarcation posts along property lines adjacent to all park and open space blocks to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries. 6.16 The SUBDIVIDER agrees where pressure reducing valves are required, to enter into an agreement with the CITY to provide for such installation; and to include in all agreements of purchase and sale and/or rental agreements, a clause identifying the presence of such water pressure reduction device and advising that it may not be removed by the owner/occupant. 6.17 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that phasing of construction will provide for on-going access to the lands that are located south of and adjacent to the subdivision to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Director of Planning or until the Amand Drive extension has been constructed, whichever comes first. 6.18 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to construct required lot level infiltration galleries for all lots and blocks. Further, the SUBDIVIDER'S consulting engineer will supervise and certify installation prior to occupancy of the applicable lot or block to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. Page 24 of 792 6.19 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to install the granular base of all hard surface community/pedestrian trails shown on the area grading, erosion and siltation control plan to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries. 6.20 The SUBDIVIDER acknowledges that Gehl Place will be closed on a permanent basis by the CITY and converted to a Multi -Use Pathway (Type 1). The closure of Gehl Place by the CITY will be subject to the southerly extension of Amand Drive so as to ensure access to adjacent lands to the south, the extension of the street network through adjacent lands to the east and/or the west such that all stages of the subdivision have two means of access to Bleams Road and/or Trusssler Road. 6.21 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to include the following clause in applicable offers of purchase and sale and tenancy agreements, which shall be registered on the title of the lands immediately upon registration for all lots with rear yard continuous linear infiltration galleries: "Purchasers/tenants are advised that an infiltration gallery is located on the subject property. The owner of this property also owns his/her section of the infiltration gallery. The infiltration gallery is not in public ownership. Monitoring, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of this infiltration gallery, including any associated costs, are the sole responsibility of the property owner. The City of Kitchener is in no way responsible for this infiltration gallery. Should this infiltration gallery fail, it is the property owner's responsibility to repair or replace his/her section of the infiltration gallery, at his/her cost." 6.22 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that construction traffic to and from the proposed subdivision shall be restricted to using Bleams Road and Trussler Road, as appropriate. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to advise all relevant contractors, builders and other persons of this requirement with the SUBDIVIDER being responsible for any required signage, all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 6.23 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to include a clause in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale with home buyers, and/or Rental Agreements, that provides the contact information for the four (4) School Boards in the Region to ensure that purchasers have contacts at the respective Boards for school boundary and other related school accommodation inquiries. 6.24 a) Where a tree designated to be saved suffers minor damage due to construction, the SUBDIVIDER shall implement remedial measures such as trimming, dressing, or bark doctoring at its cost and as directed by its Environmental Consultant who prepared the approved Detailed Vegetation and Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan (if applicable). b) Where a tree designated to be saved suffers major irreparable damage or is judged to be unsafe in the opinion of the SUBDIVIDER'S Environmental Consultant or the CITY'S Director of Planning, the SUBDIVIDER shall remove and replace, at its cost, each such tree with one at least of equal value based on the tree value formula as set out in "Guide for Plant Appraisal" of the International Society of Arboriculture, Latest Edition. C) Tree replacements shall be located on the same lot or block as the tree Page 25 of 792 requiring removal or at a location requiring enhancement within the subdivision. d) Furthermore, such remedial measures or tree replacements shall be approved and implemented to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning, prior to occupancy of the unit(s) where the damaged tree is located or, due to weather conditions, by the next planting season. 6.25 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit, obtain approval of and implement a "pre - construction" monitoring and response program. The during -construction program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The pre -construction monitoring and response program will document current conditions such as the extent and condition of buffer and natural areas, as outlined in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Matttamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (NRSI) revised August 2021. 6.26 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit, obtain approval of and implement a detailed "during -construction" monitoring and response program. The during -construction program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The purpose of the "during construction" monitoring and response program is to ensure environmental mitigations are implemented as per the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (NRSI), that the groundwater infiltration measures satisfy pre -development infiltration targets specified in the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report, as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and that Chloride Impact assessments meet the Reasonable Use Criteria of the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved. The "during construction" monitoring and response program is to extend until full build out of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 6.27 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit, obtain approval of, and implement a detailed "post -construction" monitoring and response program. The post -construction program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Page 26 of 792 2.1 The purpose of the "post -construction" monitoring and response program is to ensure that the stormwater management system and environmental initiatives outlined in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (NRSI) continue to satisfy the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report, as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and to identify any specific additional monitoring and maintenance requirements that may be necessary. The post -construction monitoring and response program shall also monitor impacts to buffers and natural areas and other significant vegetation on the property. The post -construction monitoring and response program shall extend for a two- year period after 95% of the pond catchment area is stabilized (buildings are constructed and lots/blocks are sodded or vegetated) to the satisfaction of the during -construction program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 6.28 The SUBDIVIDER further agrees to implement any remedial action deemed necessary as a result of the "pre -construction", "during -construction" or "post - construction" monitoring and response program at their sole expense , in a timely manner, to the satisfaction of the during -construction program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning, the General Manager, Infrastructure Services, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 6.29 The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement all the recommendations of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (NRSI, revised August 2021) for a period of no less than 5 years from the date of draft plan approval to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Planning. That prior to final approval of the plan to be registered, the SUBDIVIDER shall fulfill the following conditions: The CITY Standard Residential Subdivision Agreement be registered on title. 2. The SUBDIVIDER shall submit copies of the final plan for registration to the CITY'S Director of Planning and shall obtain approval therefrom. 3. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to commute all local improvement charges outstanding on any part of the lands and to pay all outstanding taxes on the lands. 4. The SUBDIVIDER shall install within the subdivision any required geodetic monuments under the direction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services, with co-ordinate values and elevations thereon and submit for registration the plans showing the location of the monuments, their co-ordinate values, elevations and code numbers as prescribed by the Surveyor General of Ontario. Page 27 of 792 5. The SUBDIVIDER shall make satisfactory arrangements with Enova Power (formerly Kitchener -Wilmot Hydro) for the provision of permanent electrical services to the subdivision and/or the relocation of the existing services. Further, the SUBDIVIDER acknowledges that this may include the payment of all costs associated with the provision of temporary services and the removal of such services when permanent installations are possible. 6. The SUBDIVIDER shall make satisfactory arrangements for the provision of permanent telephone services to the subdivision and/or the relocation of the existing services. Further, the SUBDIVIDER acknowledges that this may include the payment of all costs associated with the provision of temporary services and the removal of such services when permanent installations are possible. 7. The SUBDIVIDER shall make arrangements for the granting of any easements required for utilities and municipal services. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to comply with the following easement procedure: (a) to provide copies of the subdivision plan proposed for registration and reference plan(s) showing the easements to HYDRO, and telephone companies and the CITY, to the CITY'S Director of Planning. (b) to ensure that there are no conflicts between the desired locations for utility easements and those easement locations required by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services for municipal services; (c) to ensure that there are no conflicts between utility or municipal service easement locations and any approved Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan; (d) if utility easement locations are proposed within lands to be conveyed to, or presently owned by the CITY, the SUBDIVIDER shall obtain prior written approval from the CITY'S Director of Planning and CITY'S Director of Engineering Services or, in the case of parkland, the CITY'S Director of Operations; and (e) to provide to the CITY'S Director of Planning, a clearance letter from each of HYDRO and telephone companies. Such letter shall state that the respective utility company has received all required grants of easement, or alternatively, no easements are required. 8. The SUBDIVIDER shall dedicate all roads, road widenings, and public walkways to the CITY by the registration of the Plan of Subdivision. 9. The SUBDIVIDER shall erect and maintain a subdivision billboard sign at each major entrance to the subdivision, in accordance with a plan approved by the CITY'S Director of Planning, in accordance with the following criteria: a) The sign shall be in accordance with the CITY'S Sign by-law and shall be located outside the required yard setbacks of the applicable zone and outside Page 28 of 792 the corner visibility triangle, with the specific, appropriate location to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Planning; b) The sign shall have a minimum clearance of 1.5 metres, a maximum height of 6 metres, and a maximum area of 13 square metres; c) Graphics shall depict the features within the limits of the subdivision including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, approved street layout, including emergency access roads, zoning, lotting and specific land uses, types of parks, storm water management areas, hydro corridors, trail links and walkways, potential or planned transit routes and bus stop locations, notification regarding contacts for school sites, noise attenuation measures, environmentally sensitive areas, tree protection areas, special buffer/landscaping areas, water courses, flood plain areas, railway lines and hazard areas and shall also make general reference to land uses on adjacent lands including references to any formal development applications, all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning; d) Approved subdivision billboard locations shall be conveniently accessible to the public for viewing. Low maintenance landscaping is required around the sign and suitable parking and pedestrian access may be required between the sign location and public roadway in order to provide convenient accessibility for viewing; and, e) The SUBDIVIDER shall ensure that the information is current as of the date the sign is erected. Notice shall be posted on the subdivision billboard signs advising that information may not be current and, to obtain updated information, inquiries should be made at the CITY'S Community Services Department — Planning Division or the appropriate School Board for school accommodation information. f) The sign shall also advise prospective residents that students from the subdivision may be directed to schools outside the neighbourhood. 10. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that the streets shall be named as shown on the plan. 11. To expedite the approval for registration, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit to the CITY'S Director of Planning, a detailed written submission documenting how all conditions imposed by this approval that require completion prior to registration of the subdivision plan(s), have been satisfied. 12. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to convey to the CITY the following lands for the purposes stated therein, at no cost and free of encumbrance, concurrently with the registration of each stage of the plan of subdivision within which the identified blocks are located: Stacie 1 Blocks 23, 24 Urban Green Blocks 25-27 Public Walkway Blocks 28-33 Open Space Blocks 15, 34 Access Page 29 of 792 Block 35 Archaeological Site Blocks 15 and 34 shall be transferred to the City of Kitchener as future development blocks and not a road allowance. These blocks will be developed in future for a future road connection to lands to the south of the subject lands. 13. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that the plan shall be registered in one stage in accordance with the following and to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning: a) Following or concurrent with the registration of Stage 1, 30T-18201 and stage 1 30T-14201. 14. The SUBDIVIDER shall satisfy the 5% parkland dedication for the entire subdivision by the conveyance of Park Blocks 23 and 24. 15. The SUBDIVIDER shall agree to provide adequate notice to all home purchasers of the proposal to construct multiuse pathways, including identification of pathway plans and cross sections displayed in sales offices and shall be noted in all agreements of purchase and sale and/or rental agreements when the multi -use pathway is proposed on lands immediately adjacent to the purchased lot. 16. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that if servicing or grading has not commenced prior to final approval of the plan, a Detailed Vegetation Plan is to be submitted for approval by the CITY'S Director of Planning. The Detailed Vegetation Plan shall also show approved grading. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement all of the measures identified in the approved Detailed Vegetation Plan including delivering all information contained in the approved Detailed Vegetation Plan to prospective purchasers to ensure that the requirements are carried out as specified. 17. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to have all proposed tree and shrub plantings on public rights of way reviewed and approved by the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries. 18. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to design and construct the parks Park Blocks 2 and 24 to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning prior to. Grading, topsoiling and seeding shall be completed before occupancy of the first unit or in the event of winter conditions, by June 1st immediately following the issuance of the first occupancy permit. The SUBDIVIDER shall complete construction of the park and community trail within one year of registration or servicing, whichever occurs first. The applicable construction costs such as grading, topsoiling, seeding, sodding in accordance with the City's Local Service Policy, are at the sole cost of the SUBDIVIDER. 19. The SUBDIVIDER shall confirm whether decorative street signage and street lighting will be used for the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation Services and CITY'S Director of Planning and Enova Power (formerly Kitchener -Wilmot Hydro) and the Region of Waterloo. Should these decorative elements be utilized, they shall be installed at the appropriate timeframe and at the SUBDIVIDER'S cost, including the provision of 10% of the cost of Page 30 of 792 materials for future replacement/maintenance, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation Services and Enova Power (formerly Kitchener -Wilmot Hydro). 20. Prior to the Servicing or Registration, whichever shall occur first, of each stage, the SUBDIVIDER shall prepare an On -Street Parking Plan to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Transportation Services, in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in accordance with the CITY'S On -Street Parking Policy, as approved and amended. The On -Street Parking Plan shall be considered in accordance with the servicing drawings and shall generally provide for one on -street parking space for every two dwelling units. Other options such as driveway length, garage space, communal parking facilities, and/or parking along the park frontage, may be considered in accordance with the CITY'S Policy and at the discretion of the Director of Transportation Services. 21. That prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to prepare a brochure for new home purchasers which provides information about the natural heritage features within the subdivision along with advice about good stewardship of these areas, and that the brochure shall be to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Furthermore, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to distribute this brochure to new homeowners. 22. That prior to registration conveyance of Open Space Blocks 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 the SUBDIVIDER shall remove any garbage or debris to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries in consultation with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The SUBDIVIDER shall treat these lands as required by the Kitchener Tree Management Policy (2002) Section 3.3.1.6 including the removal of any garbage or debris to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning and the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries. 23. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to area grading, servicing or registration of all or any part of the plan of subdivision, whichever shall occur first, to prepare a detailed engineering design for Storm Water Management including any requisite monitoring and obtain approval thereof from the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The Stormwater Management design shall be in accordance with the Alder Creek Watershed Study (2007) and Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update-CH2MHILL, 2008 as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011), the Minutes of Settlement dated August 17, 2015, and the City's Integrated SWM Master Plan. The approved engineering design for Storm Water Management will include a maintenance program for a period of two years following 95% build -out of the subdivision, which will ensure the stormwater management facilities function as designed to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 24. That the SUBDIVIDER agrees to include the following statement in all agreements of purchase and sale and/or rental agreements that may be entered into pursuant to Section 52 of the Planning Act, prior to the registration of this plan: Page 31 of 792 "The lot, lots, block or blocks which are the subject of this agreement of lease or purchase and sale are not yet registered as a plan of subdivision. The fulfillment of all conditions of draft plan approval, including the commitment of water supply and sewage treatment services thereto by the Region and other authorities, has not yet been completed to permit registration of the plan. Accordingly, the purchaser should be aware that the vendor is making no representation or warranty that the lot, lots, block or blocks which are the subject of this agreement or lease or purchase and sale will have all conditions of draft plan approval satisfied, including the availability of servicing until the plan is registered." 25. Prior to servicing or registration, whichever shall occur first, the SUBDIVIDER shall prepare a detailed engineering design for Storm Water Management including any requisite monitoring and obtain approval thereof from the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The Stormwater Management design shall be in accordance with the Alder Creek Watershed Study (2007) and Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update-CH2MHILL, 2008 as well as the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18, 2011) and the City's SWM Master Plan. The approved engineering design for Storm Water Management will include a maintenance program for a period of two years following 95% build -out of the subdivision, which will ensure the stormwater management facilities function as designed to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 26. Prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement mitigation measures, and submit, obtain approval of and implement a monitoring program as outlined in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (NRSI Inc., August 2021). This will include biological monitoring and any additions or modifications identified by the City, Region or Grand River Conservation Authority as part of the final review and approval of the monitoring program. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees to implement any remedial action deemed necessary as a result of the aforementioned monitoring program at their sole expense to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services and the Director of Planning in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. 27. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to install black vinyl chain link fence, or approved decorative fencing that is designed to provide visibility along any rear and/or side lot lines identify the blocks or lots that are adjacent to Open Space Blocks to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Operations. 28. The subdivision shall be registered prior to, in conjunction with or subsequent to Subdivision 30T-14201 and that prior to registration of any stage, the SUBDIVIDER shall provide and/or convey any required temporary or permanent easements to the City of Kitchener and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to permit the construction of those services and roads necessary for the development of the subdivision as identified in the Area Servicing Plan as set out in Schedule "131", "132" and "BY to Minutes of Settlement dated August 17, 2015. Further, the Page 32 of 792 design and construction of services within the subdivision shall be in accordance with the Area Servicing Plan attached as Schedules "B1", "132" and "133" to Minutes of Settlement dated August 17, 2015. 29. Prior to Servicing or Registration, whichever shall occur first, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to receive final approval of a Priority Lotting Plan and of Design Guidelines for Priority Lots to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Planning. The Design Guidelines for Priority Lots shall include, but not be limited to, the following considerations: a) For Corner Priority Lots, building elevation drawings shall ensure that consideration has been given to the design treatment along both road frontages for each lot/dwelling, including such items as the provision of porches, porticos, stairs or other projections; secondary or angled door entries; horizontal articulation, brick or masonry -style skirting along both the front and exterior side yard and/or accentuated windows; increased building massing and height; and consideration to fencing and landscaping. b) For Park Priority Lots, building elevation drawings shall ensure that consideration has been given to the design treatment along the road frontage and the park flankage for each lot/dwelling, including such items as the provision for porches, porticos, stairs or other projections, secondary entry doors, horizontal articulation, brick and masonry -style skirting and/or accentuated windows; and consideration to fencing and landscaping. c) For Gateway Priority Lots, building elevation drawings shall ensure that consideration has been given to design treatment along the road frontage including such items as the provision of porches, porticos, stairs or other projections, horizontal articulation, brick and masonry style skirting and/or accentuated windows. 30. The SUBDIVIDER agrees prior to registration to prepare, a community trail design for Gehl Place, to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning. 31. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever occurs first, to prepare an updated water servicing report which shall make recommendations that address water pressure within the limits of the subdivision to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 32. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to registration of to erect signage, clearly setting out the CITY'S future intent to close Gehl Place to vehicular traffic and incorporate the road right-of-way into the community trail system. The location and content of said signage shall be approved by the CITY'S Director of Planning. 33. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to make the necessary arrangements with the adjacent landowner to the east (30T-14201) for the sharing of costs associated with Page 33 of 792 oversizing sewers including the dedicated winter by-pass sewer as required to service these lands and to provide the City's Director of Engineering Services written confirmation that these cost sharing arrangements have been made prior to registration. 34. The SUBDIVIDER provides fill certifications to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Engineering Services, prior to the registration of each phase, to ensure the geotechnical integrity of all filled lands. 3. REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO CONDITIONS: That the plan for final approval may incorporate a lot pattern for all blocks in which single detached and townhouse lots are permitted, at a density not exceeding the density identified in the draft approval conditions; 2. That the SUBDIVIDER agrees to stage the development of this subdivision in a manner satisfactory to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 3. That this plan of subdivision only proceed to registration concurrently with, or following registration of Stage 1 of adjacent Plan 30T-18201 or otherwise deemed satisfactory to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 4. That the subdivision agreement be registered by the City of Kitchener against the lands to which it applies and a copy of the registered agreement be forwarded to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services prior to registration of this subdivision plan; 5. That any dead ends and open sides of road allowances created by this plan of subdivision shall be terminated in 0.3 metre reserves, to be conveyed to and held in trust by the City of Kitchener until required for future road allowances or the development of adjacent land. 6. That the SUBDIVIDER enter into an Agreement for Servicing with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to preserve access to municipal water supply and municipal wastewater treatment services prior to registration or any agreement for the installation of underground services, whichever comes first. Where the SUBDIVIDER has already entered into an agreement for the installation of underground servicing with the area municipality, such agreement shall be amended to provide for a Regional Agreement for Servicing prior to registration of any part of the plan. The Regional Commissioner of Engineering and Environmental Services shall advise prior to an Agreement for Servicing that sufficient water supplies and wastewater treatment capacity is available for this plan to be registered; 7. That, prior to registration or servicing, whichever comes first, the Functional Servicing Report (MTE, dated July 6, 2018 and/or future amendments thereto) be completed to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. Page 34 of 792 8. That, the SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever occurs first, to submit an updated water servicing report for the entire plan of subdivision, with such report to assess the need for pressure reducing valves, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 9. Where individual pressure reducing valves are required in Condition No. 8, the SUBDIVIDER must enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to provide for such installation; and to include in all agreements of purchase and sale and/or rental agreements, a clause identifying the presence of such water pressure reduction device and advising that it may not be removed by the SUBDIVIDER/occupant. 10. That, prior to any grading or construction, and registration of this plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER submits a final lot grading and drainage plan for the entire plan for review and approval to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 11. That, prior to registration of this plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER prepare a groundwater monitoring and mitigation plan to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. The plan must include and /or address the following: a. Achievement of the infiltration targets of the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared by AM EC (June 22, 2011 and revised July 18 2011); b. Any significant changes in ground water levels and/or geochemistry such as elevated chloride levels; C. An infiltration implementation plan which reviews and addresses problems associated with the installation of end -of -pipe and/or lot level infiltration facilities due to poor soil, high water table, or the implementation of the materials management plan; and d. Monitoring prior to, during, and post -construction for a two year period following 95 percent build -out of the plan of subdivision. Further, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement any remedial action deemed necessary (including additional monitoring should chloride levels exceed the Reasonable Use Criteria of Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2M HILL, 2008 report as approved), as a result of the aforementioned monitoring program at their sole expense to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services, Grand River Conservation Authority, and the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 12. That, prior to servicing or registration, whichever comes first, the SUBDIVIDER submit a final detailed stormwater management strategy and drainage plan for the stormwater management infrastructure located within the plan to be registered to the satisfaction of the City of Kitchener, Grand River Conservation Authority, and the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. The detailed stormwater management strategy and drainage plan shall include, but not be limited to, the design and location of infiltration facilities required to sustain the flow of groundwater to Core Environmental Features; Page 35 of 792 Furthermore, that the detailed SWM strategy and drainage plan, required above, be completed in accordance with the conclusions and recommendations of the accepted functional drainage plan titled "Area 5 — Functional Drainage Plan (Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed)" (MTE and NRSI, dated August 31, 2018) and preliminary stormwater management report titled "Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community" (MTE, dated July 6, 2018; last revised August 31, 2021). 13. That prior to registration, the owner enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services, to ensure that the water balance completed to date be updated with the "as -built" infiltration gallery data (based on suitability of soils encountered during construction) and that this data be reported to the Region of Waterloo and City of Kitchener in the event that a ground water deficit results and mitigation measures may be required to maintain the existing water balance, such as building infiltration galleries with an overflow connection to stormwater infrastructure on those lots which an infiltration gallery was originally not built due to unsuitable soils. Monitoring reports for the infiltration in the groundwater recharge areas are required for 2 years post development of the subdivision to ensure the water balance is being achieved. 14. That, prior to registration of this plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to include the following clause in the agreements of purchase and sale or rental agreements for all residential lots and blocks in the stage(s) to be registered: "This property is located within a Wellhead Protection Area designated by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. To reduce the risk of contamination to the Region's current and future municipal drinking -water supply, the installation of a geothermal well on this property is not permitted." 15. That prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER decommissions any monitoring and private wells (not used for long term monitoring) and septic systems on the property in accordance with O. Reg. 903 prior to any grading on the property; and furthermore, that the SUBDIVIDER enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to decommission any long term monitoring wells no longer used for such purposes, all to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 16. That prior to registration, if required, the SUBDIVIDER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to implement the conclusions and recommendations of the accepted Materials Management Plan (MTE, dated November 3, 2020) to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 17. That the boundaries of the Core Environmental Feature within the subject lands be interpreted as shown on Map 1 (Core Environmental Features and W4) of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019, Updated August 20, 2021). Page 36 of 792 18. That prior to registration of this plan of subdivision, the Core Environmental Features and associated buffers on the subject lands (Open Space — Blocks 31 and 32) and restoration zones (including Open Space - Block 30) be placed in suitable natural heritage conservation zoning. 19. That prior to any land clearing, grading or construction on the subdivision lands, the SUBDIVIDER confirms that no clearing of vegetation on the site occur during the bird breeding season (April 1 - August 31) in compliance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act unless it can be ascertained by a qualified expert that no birds covered by the Act are observed to be breeding in or adjacent to the affected area. 20. That prior to any land clearing, grading or construction on the subdivision lands, the SUBDIVIDER will enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to provide copies of all reports required under Overall Benefit Permit WC- C -001-19, including annual monitoring reports and final reports, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 21. That, prior to registration and any land clearing, grading, or the installation of services, the SUBDIVIDER submit a detailed erosion and sediment control plan acceptable to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services, City of Kitchener and Grand River Conservation Authority in order to prevent sedimentation into the Core Environmental Features located in Open Space Blocks 31 and 32. 22. That, prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER submit a Detailed Vegetation Management Plan and a Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan, in accordance with the Overall Benefit Permit WC -C-001-19 and the recommendations of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019, Updated August 2021) including the design of restoration zones and buffers identified on Map 6, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services and the City of Kitchener, and in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. 23. That, prior to registration the SUBDIVIDER submit landscaping and planting plans consistent with Overall Benefit Permit WC -C-001-19 for all buffer areas contiguous to the Core Environmental Features, wetlands and stormwater management facilities located within the plan of subdivision, and that recommended plantings shall consist of locally -appropriate, self-sustaining native vegetation to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services, the City of Kitchener, and in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. 24. That, prior to registration of this plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER submit a detailed monitoring plan for the Core Environmental Features, Buffers and Restoration Zones (Open Space Blocks 31, 32 and 33) on the subject lands as outlined in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019, Updated August 2021, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services and the City of Kitchener, in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. Furthermore, as Page 37 of 792 necessary, the SUBDIVIDER enter in an agreement with the City of Kitchener to implement any required remedial action deemed necessary as a result of the monitoring plan. 25. That, prior to registration, the owner remove any debris and/or garbage from Core Environmental Features within the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City and the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 26. That, prior to registration of this plan of subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER provides a brochure and other information tools for new home purchasers and residents which provides information about the natural heritage features within the subdivision, along with advice about how they can be good stewards of these areas, and that the brochure be to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The SUBDIVIDER will be required to enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener or the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to distribute the approved stewardship brochure or other comparable information tools to home purchasers. 27. That, prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to distribute source water protection and winter salt management information with all offers to purchase and/or rental agreements, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 28. That, prior to registration, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the recommendations and implement the avoidance and protection measures of Archaeological Site Block 35 as recommended and described in the following reports: a. Stage 4 Archaeological Mitigation of Site AiHd-160 Parts of Lot 141 and 142, German Company Tract Small Lot, Geographic Township of Waterloo, County of Waterloo, Now in the City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario", (prepared by ASI, dated Feb 27, 2023 b. Stage 3 Site-specific Assessment of the "Locus B" Archaeological Site Avoidance and Protection Area, a Portion of Site AiHd-160, Parts of Lot 141 and 142, German Company Tract Small Lot, Geographic Township of Waterloo, County of Waterloo, Now in the City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Ontario — Original Report and Supplementary Documentation (prepared by ASI, dated March 15, 2022). 4. OTHER AGENCY CONDITIONS: Grand River Conservation Authority Prior to any grading or construction on the site and prior to registration of the plan, the owners or their agents submit the following plans and reports to the satisfaction of the Grand River Conservation Authority. a) A detailed final stormwater management report in accordance with the 2003 Ministry of the Environment Report entitled "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual" and in keeping with the Rosenberg Page 38 of 792 Secondary Plan Mattamy Community 30T18201 & 30T-18202 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (dated August 31, 2021, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc). b) Final Lot Grading, Servicing, and Storm Drainage Plans. C) A final erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the Grand River Conservation Authority's Guidelines for erosion and sediment control, indicating the means whereby erosion will be minimized and sediment maintained on-site throughout all phases of grading and construction. d) The submission and approval of a Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses permit from the GRCA prior to any grading or construction in a regulated area. 5. CLEARANCE CONDITIONS 1. That prior to the signing of the final plan by the CITY'S Director of Planning, the Director shall be advised by the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services that Conditions 3.1 to 3.36 have been carried out to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The clearance letter from the Region shall include a brief statement detailing how each condition has been satisfied. 2. That prior to the signing of the final plan by the CITY'S Director of Planning, the Director, shall be advised by the telephone company that Conditions 2.1.6 and 2.1.7 have been carried out satisfactorily. The clearance letter should contain a brief statement as to how the conditions were satisfied. 3. That prior to the signing of the final plan by the CITY'S Director of Planning, the Director shall be advised by Enova Power (formerly Kitchener -Wilmot Hydro) that Conditions 2.1.5 and 2.1.7 have been carried out satisfactorily. The clearance letter should contain a brief statement as to how the conditions were satisfied. 4. That prior to the signing of the final plan by the CITY'S Director of Planning, the Director shall be advised by the Grand River Conservation Authority that Condition 4.2 has been carried out satisfactorily. The clearance letter should contain a brief statement as to how the condition was satisfied. NOTES The owner/developer is advised that the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 14-046 are applicable. 2. The final plans for Registration must be in conformity with Ontario Regulation 43/96, as amended, under The Registry Act. 3. It is the responsibility of the Owner of this plan to advise the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the City of Kitchener Planning Division of any changes in ownership, agent, address, and phone and fax numbers. Page 39 of 792 4. The owner/developer is advised that the Regional Municipality of Waterloo has adopted By -Law 17-076, pursuant to Section 69 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. P.13, as amended, to prescribe a tariff of fees for application, recirculation, draft approval, modification to draft approval and registration release of plans of subdivision. 5. The owner/developer is advised that pursuant to Regional By -Law 17-076, the current fee for review of a road traffic noise study is $250.00, payable to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo upon submission of the study for review. 6. This draft plan was received on or after January 1, 2007 and shall be processed and finally disposed of under the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended by S.O. 2006, c. 23 (Bill 51). 7. The Owner is advised that draft approval is not a commitment by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to water and wastewater servicing capacity. To secure this commitment the owner/developer must enter into an "Agreement for Servicing" with The Regional Municipality of Waterloo by requesting that the Region's Planning, Development and Legislative Services Department initiate preparation of the agreement. When sufficient capacity is confirmed by the Region's Commissioner of Transportation and Environmental Services to service the density as defined by the plan to be registered, the owner/developer will be offered an "Agreement for Servicing". This agreement will be time limited and define the servicing commitment by density and use. Should the "Agreement for Servicing" expire prior to plan registration, a new agreement will be required. The owner/developer is to provide the Regional Municipality of Waterloo with two print copies of the proposed plan to be registered along with the written request for a servicing agreement 8. To ensure that a Regional Release is issued by the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services to the City of Kitchener prior to year end, it is the responsibility of the Owner to ensure that all fees have been paid, that all Regional conditions have been satisfied and the required clearance letters, agreements, prints of plan to be registered, and any other required information or approvals have been deposited with the Regional Planner responsible for the file, no later than December 15th. Regional staff can not ensure that a Regional Release would be issued prior to year end where the Owner has failed to submit the appropriate documentation by this date. 9. The Owner is advised that the lands, or a portion of the lands, are subject to the Region of Waterloo International Airport Zoning Regulations issued under the federal Aeronautics Act. The purpose of the Regulations is two -fold: 1) to prevent lands adjacent to or in the vicinity of the Region of Waterloo International Airport site from being used or developed in a manner that is incompatible with the safe operation of the airport or an aircraft; and 2) to prevent lands adjacent to or in the vicinity of facilities used to provide services relating to aeronautics from being used or developed in a manner that would cause interference with signals or communications to and from aircraft or to and from those facilities. It is the landowner's responsibility to be aware, and to make all users of the land aware of the restrictions under these Regulations which may include but not limited to height restrictions on buildings or structures, height of natural growth, interference with communications, and activities or uses that attract birds. Page 40 of 792 10. The Owner is advised that the lands, or a portion of the lands, may be subject to Canadian Aviation Regulations Standard 621.19 issued under the federal Aeronautics Act. This Standard allows aviation officials to assess individual obstructions, namely buildings, structures or objects, to determine if they are likely to constitute a hazard to air navigation and consequently require marking and/or lighting in accordance with the Standards. Persons planning to erect an obstruction, namely a building, structure or object, including a moored balloon, either permanently or temporarily, should contact the Regional Manager, Aerodrome Safety (Ontario Region), Transport Canada at (416) 952-0248 as early as possible and provide the necessary information on the planned obstruction using the Aeronautical Obstruction Clearance Form (#26-0427) issued by Transport Canada. 11. When the survey has been completed and the final plan prepared to satisfy the requirements of the Registry Act, they should be forwarded to the City of Kitchener. If the plans comply with the terms of approval, and we have received an assurance from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the applicable clearance agencies that the necessary arrangements have been made, the Manager of Development Review's signature will be endorsed on the plan and it will be forwarded to the Registry Office for registration. The following is required for registration under The Registry Act and the Region's purposes: One (1) original mylar Three (3) mylar copies Four (4) white paper prints Page 41 of 792 m o - A t P 441 � Bill 14 �4a T 13209 � � REs Unls �Ik Lan 2C 99 37� �, a o ESKERW v----� m STAG �, OpeyiSpace �o�� �g n I —_ I �� :u�Es Blocks Blocks: �e t1.27ha mgt A ;� n _ I I �2 urn I I Blocks: I Blocks: s,u Block Blk 35 RCHAEOLOGICA �'Blk 33 BIk2 'THORN LODGE WAY REs I Block3 Open Space aes �., 41 Ji,li I s o she 0.9 RES i --------- - TOTA - l�;eos�� ee ,Aoo I� ,1 TOTA - GREAT OAK _ ES I I I I I I ES .u.00 aES a Es ES - m 4-1111, 12 B'11 I Blk 32 �� s > Open -Space - _ _ o� - m I I I I I 6.29ha Bill 1 n u� a m a I I I I I I m I ,2a m aY m€ T o TAILWIND CRES _ �------ I I ^1 I s oo elk:�� I aes'4 s Bill 11 TAILWIND CRES 'g la ` — -- — BIk 31 Open Space 2.20ha Other Lands Owned I By Applicant II II II II II II II PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 0 10 25 50 Too 2079546 ONTARIO LIMITED SCALE: 1:2,000 TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LT 141 PT LT 142 PT LT 143 1 DATE: MAY 23, 2023 REVISED: SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 30T-18 OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPAI ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZB, City of Kitchc Development Services Department CITY L OR ---3—J RD AMEND ____+______r ------------------------ ___________________�=====r=====__ ��,�rr,,-----------------------�_-----� _---- _—_—_—_—_—_— ------------------------- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-Ems_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-F_-_-_-_---��_-_-_-_-_- _________ ___—=----- __------ Low Rise _____ — — — — — — — — — — — — — ----------------- — - — — — — — — — — — — — __--__—___—_—____=_=_=_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_-1,-------�—_ ==== -- — — — — � Prime Ag — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - = — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- C — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Natural H ----���______ �____ --------------- --- Open Sp, -_______________ ___—_—_----- _--_—__�__====—rt---- 0 Refer to •--------_--- �____________ -------- JL JL ----------- ---- -- --�= Area ofAmendm( � � ---_—_—_----_—_—_--_—_—_—___—_---_—_--_- _—_—_--- - J< JL JL -LL JL r ,-1. ____ To Remo) AIL Jj-____________ _=_===rt-- �i 1 J� JL J� JL —___________ J<f @•' �� �AndAdd 1L 1L JL 1L J.L � 1L 1L — — — — — — — — — — 1L 1L 1L 1L • — — — — Refer to ; iL J< J< JL JL � — — — — — — — — J< JL J< �! _ _ _ — 1L JL JL JL J.L AL 1L � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ JL JL 1L 1L 1L 1L — — — iL J< J< JL JL J< _ — — — — — — J< JL J< J< J< — — — 1L JL JL 1L J.L AL 1L 1L — — — -- — 1L AL 1L 1L 1L 1L 1L JL JA- L — — — — 1L J< JL JL JL J< — — J< JL JL J< J< J< — — — — 1L 1L 1L JL 1L IL � 1L JL - — — AL 1L JL JL JL 1L 1L 1L 1L AL 1L — — — — — 1L J< J< JL JL J< JL J< JL JL J< JL JL = _ 1L JL JL 1L IL 1L 1L I-11LL 1L 1-11LL 1L AL 1L 1-11LL 1L 1L J-11LL JL JA- IL-11LL _ _ _— JL JL JL JL — — — }�i 1L IL 1L 1L 1L JL JL 1L 1L 1L JL JL JL IL 1L 1L 1L IL 1L IL — — — JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL = _- 1L 1L JL JL JL JL IL JL '+ J.L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L JL JL JL IL — — JL JL JL JL 11L JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL ' 1L 1L 1L 1L J.L 1L IL 1L J.L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L IL — — JL JL JL JL JL�r, JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL _ - �L 1L JL 1L J.L JL 1L 1L -_ 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L - -L JL JL JL !�� 1. •`•`.! JL JL JL JL JL JL JL - -LL JL AL 1L 1L 1L a: IL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L 1L JL 1L JL 1L JL JL JL JL p . { - + } JL JL JL JL JL JL JL AL I& 1L AL JL 1L 1L ' # 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL S JL JL JL JLC { J r J< JL JL JL JL JL JL JL 1L 1L ' ' .-- 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L ' ' .- - JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL f� JJL IL IL -LL JL -LL IL IL AL IL IL IL 11 JL 11 1L * � • JL 11 1L Jl 1L 11 Jl 1L 1L - L ` • fi s•� Y+✓` JL JL JL t•tir JL JL JL JL JL JL JL r. . 1L JL 1L JL!{. JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L •.f{ -' JL JL JL - JL JL JL JL JL JL JL +` 1L JL 1L 1L '� AL JL 1L 1L JL 1L 1L JL 1L JL Jl ' +` JL JL JL JL JL JL JL JL .; SCHEDULE Wmo REVISED: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDME METRES APPLICANT: 2079546 ONTARIO ZONING BY-LAW AMENDN SUBDIVISION APPLICATIC LIMITED SCALE 1:12,000 TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LT 141 City of Kitcher PT LT 142 PT LT 143 DATE: MAY 23, 2023 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTME ly�x•1���1.7�[H7�:»mac] A NP CITY ( OFFICIAL PL MAP 22 a ROS LAN Landuse Low Den: Medium [ Medium [ ® Mixed Us Neighbou Neighbou Open Sp, Natural H Secondary Plat .�. �� 1 Special Policy ••••a Deferral O Lands to be Ad p Hydro Corr -77 DEFERRAL 2 X% % NP Neighbourt %% uc Urban Gree ](�� Public Elen SCHEDULE Wmo REVISED: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDME METRES ZONE CHANGE APPLICAT APPLICANT: 2079546 ONTARIO LIMITED SCALE 1:12,000 SUBDIVISION APPLICATIC TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LT 141 PT DATE: MAY 23, 2023 City of KitchE LT 142 PT LT 143 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTP AMENDMENT NO. ### TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER 2079546 Ontario Limited Page 45 of 792 AMENDMENT NO. ### TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER 2079546 Ontario Limited INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 4 THE AMENDMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of June 19, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — June 19, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — June 26, 2023 SCHEDULE `A' AMENDMENT TO MAP 22e — ROSENBERG SECONDARY PLAN LAND USE PLAN Page 46 of 792 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 —TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ### to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener. This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend Map 3 — Land Use to add the subject lands into the Roseneberg Secondary Plan. Community structure elements and land use designations have not been approved for these lands in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, which is part of the City's Official Plan. Through this application, the subject lands are proposed to be added to the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is also to amend Map 22e in Part 3, Section 13 — Secondary Plans. The Roseneberg Secondary Plan is proposed to be amended to implement a proposed draft plan of subdivision which includes up to 277 dwelling units, an Urban Green, as well as open space and walkway blocks. The proposed changes to the Land Use Plan (Map 22e) include: - Designated residential development areas as Low Density Residential 1 - Designating Open Space Blocks - Designating Natural Heritage Conservation Blocks No new land use designations are proposed as part of this application SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT The Applicant has requested draft approval of a plan of subdivision approval, approval of an Official Plan Amendment, and approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment to being the lands within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and Page 47 of 792 (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS sets out principles to achieve "healthy, liveable and safe communities". The PPS is supportive of efficient development patterns that optimize the use of land, resources, and public investment in infrastructure and public service facilities. Further, the PPS directs the development of new housing to locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs and promotes densities for new housing which efficiently uses land, resources, infrastructure, and public service facilities. Section 3(5) of the Planning Act requires that a decision of the council of a municipality shall be consistent with the policy statement that are in effect on the date of decision and shall conform with the provincial plans that are in effect on that date, or shall not conflict with them, as the case may be. The PPS focuses growth and development within urban and rural settlement areas while supporting the viability of rural areas. Land use must be carefully managed to accommodate appropriate development to meet the full range of current and future needs, while achieving efficient development patterns and avoiding significant or sensitive resources and areas which may pose a risk to public health and safety. Efficient development patterns optimize the use of land, resources and public investment in infrastructure and public service facilities. These land use patterns promote a mix of housing, including affordable housing, employment, recreation, parks and open spaces, and transportation choices that increase the use of active transportation and transit before other modes of travel. Policy 1.1.1 of the PPS states that, "Healthy, liveable and safe communities are sustained by: a) promoting efficient development and land use patterns which sustain the financial well- being of the Province and municipalities over the long term; b) accommodating an appropriate affordable and market-based range and mix of residential types (including single -detached, additional residential units, multi -unit housing, affordable housing and housing for older persons), employment (including industrial and commercial), institutional (including places of worship, cemeteries and long-term care homes), recreation, park and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs; e) promoting the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs; g) ensuring that necessary infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to meet current and projected needs; h) promoting development and land use patterns that conserve biodiversity; and Page 48 of 792 i) preparing for the regional and local impacts of a changing climate." Policy 1.1.2 requires that sufficient land shall be made available to accommodate an appropriate range and mix of land uses to meet projected needs for a time horizon of up to 25 years, informed by provincial guidelines. The PPS notes that settlement areas are urban areas and rural settlement areas, and include cities, towns, villages and hamlets, and policy 1.1.3.1 states that settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and development. Policy 1.1.3.2 states that land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on densities and a mix of land uses which; a) efficiently use land and resources; and b) are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion. Further, policy 1.1.3.2 states that land use patterns within settlement areas shall also be based on a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3, where this can be accommodated. Policy 1.1.3.3 requires that Planning authorities (such as the City of Kitchener) shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for transit -supportive development, accommodating a significant supply and range of housing options through intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs. The proposed draft plan of subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment applications represent the final phase of a larger planned development that has been designed with a mix of housing types and densities and introducing new commercial and institutional uses. The proposal makes efficient use of the land through comprehensively planned development and that meet minimum density requirements, thus maximizing the recently constructed infrastructure which was installed to service this area. The plan provides for a range of low rise residential housing types and densities that are in close proximity to the planned Urban Green. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications are consistent with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) Part of the Vision of the Greater Golden Horseshoe (GGH) is to ensure municipalities have sufficient housing supply that reflects market demand and what is needed in local communities. Two of the guiding principles of the Growth Plan are to prioritize intensification and higher densities in strategic growth areas to make efficient use of land and infrastructure and support transit viability and to support a range and mix of housing options, including second units and affordable housing, to serve all sizes, incomes, and ages of households. The Growth Plan directs Planning authorities in the Region of Waterloo to plan for a population of 923,000 people and 470,000 jobs by 2051. This would mean a population increase of approximately 299,070 in comparison to the Region's 2020 population of 623,930.The forecasted growth to the 2051 horizon is allocated to each municipality in the Region based on the following considerations: the vast majority of growth will be directed to settlement areas that have a delineated built boundary, have existing or planned municipal water and wastewater systems, and can support the achievement of complete communities. As one of three cities in the Region, Page 49 of 792 it can be expected that Kitchener will be allocated a significant amount of the additional population allocation. The development of the subject lands are within the City's delineated `Designated Greenfield Area'. New development taking place in designated greenfield areas must be planned, designated, and zoned in a manner that supports the achievement of complete communities, supports active transportation, and encourages the integration and sustained viability of transit services. The Growth Plan notes that complete communities should be designed to meet people's needs for daily living throughout an entire lifetime by providing convenient access to an appropriate mix of jobs, local services, public service facilities, and a full range of housing to accommodate a range of incomes and household sizes. Complete communities support quality of life and human health by encouraging the use of active transportation and providing high quality public open space, adequate parkland, opportunities for recreation, and access to local and healthy food. Complete communities support climate change mitigation by increasing the modal share for transit and active transportation and by minimizing land consumption through building compact, mixed-use communities. The subject lands are located within the City's Designated Greenfield Area, an area within the Settlement Boundary that is designated for growth. Policy 2.2.7.1 states that new development taking place in designated greenfield areas will be planned, designated, zoned and designed in a manner that: a) supports the achievement of complete communities; b) supports active transportation; and c) encourages the integration and sustained viability of transit services. Policy 2.G.1.2 (Table 4) of the Regional Official Plan (approved as amended in April 2023) requires that the minimum density target applicable to the designated greenfield area for Kitchener is not less than 65 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The minimum density for Kitchener's designated greenfield area, in Kitchener Official Plan policy 3.C.A.A14.a) is 55 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The proposed density range for this community is a minimum of 53 residents and jobs (not including work from home) combined per hectare based on the total build out of 166 single detached dwellings and a maximum of 62 residents and jobs (not including work from home) combined per hectare based on the total build out of 277 townhouse dwellings. Up to 277 dwelling units, in a combination of single detached and townhouse dwellings, are planned. The planned density of this development exceeds minimum density targets in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The total density will be determined at the final build out of the lands, depending on the scale and density of the multiple dwelling sites. Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed applications conform to the Growth Plan. The lands have been designated to permit residential, open space blocks, and two Urban Greens. The applications propose a variety of low density dwelling types. The planned density is 53-62 residents and jobs combined per hectare. Page 50 of 792 The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is currently consulting on proposed policies for an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not currently in effect. Minimum greenfield density targets are not contained within the draft PPS. Regional Official Plan The subject lands are within the `Urban Designated Greenfield Area' established in the Regional Official Plan. The build out of the lands will include a combination of single detached dwellings, duplexes, semi-detached dwellings, fronting and live -work townhouses dwellings and the density will be within the range required by the City of Kitchener Official Plan. In accordance with Regional Official Plan policy 2.G.1.4, Kitchener will establish policies in our Official Plan to ensure that new development within designated greenfield areas is phased in a manner that provides for the logical and orderly progression of development, ensures that the pace, scale and phasing of development is aligned with the delivery of infrastructure and public service facilities in a financially sustainable manner at the Regional and/or City level; and will not adversely affect the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets. The ROP policies require new communities to have sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide linkages within the neighbourhood and to other neighbourhoods, transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations, and community facilities. Regional Planning have provided comment on the proposed applications, including subdivision approval conditions, but overall have no objections to the proposed applications. This future neighbourhood will complete the western portion of the Rosenberg community. The City's Development Manual, coupled with the attached draft approval conditions, will ensure that the lands are appropriately developed to City and Regional standards. Official Plan The vision of the City's Official Plan states "Together we will build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community contributing to an exceptional quality of life." A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including a full range and mix of housing types. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. Housing Policy 4.1.1 states a housing objective of the City is to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. Policy 4.C.1.12 notes the City favours a land use pattern which mixes and disperses a full range of housing types and styles both across the city as a whole and within neighbourhoods. Policy 4.C.1.1 states that the City will maintain at all times the ability to accommodate residential growth for a minimum of ten years through residential intensification and redevelopment and, if necessary, lands which are designated and Page 51 of 792 available for residential development. The proposed land use designations and proposed zoning permit a range of housing options throughout the community. Designated Greenfield Area Policy 3.C.1.14.a) requires that a Designated Greenfield Area must be planned and developed to achieve a minimum average density of 55 residents and jobs combined per hectare on lands not subject to a plan of subdivision application as of June 16, 2006. As per policy 3.C.1.15, the achievement of the average density targets is planned through the development of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The proposed density of this community is a minimum of 53-62 residents and jobs combined per hectare based on the total build out of the lands. Rosenberg Secondary Plan Community structure elements and land use designations have not been approved for these lands in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, which is part of the City's Official Plan. Through this application, the subject lands are proposed to be added to the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. These lands are part of a planned complete community where people can walk or cycle to school, shop, and work. This neighbourhood follows the "five minute walk principle" design and has been designed to be connected to the surrounding area, including the communities to the east which are approved and under construction. The proposed applications conform to the objectives of the community structure elements in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. In addition to the centrally located neighbourhood park, an Urban Green is proposed to ensure that public amenities are within a comfortable walk (around 5 minutes) for all residents. An Urban Green is planned and required in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act and the City's Parkland Dedication Policy. The Urban Green will be centrally located generally within the 5 minute walk model. A variety of built form typologies are planned for this community, including single detached dwellings, duplexes, semi-detached dwellings, fronting and live -work townhouses. The Urban Green is planned for the gateway intersection and will feature a landscape design that is welcoming. The Rosenberg community is home to a natural heritage system of Core Areas and Non -Core Areas including Provincially Significant Wetlands, Regionally Significant Core Environmental Features, Significant Habitat of Endangered or Threatened Species, Locally Significant Woodlands, Locally Significant Wetlands and Locally Significant Valleylands. All development is required to implement the recommendations of the Alder Creek Watershed Study and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Plan Update (CH2MHILL, 2008), Strasburg Creek Master Watershed Plan (Paragon, 1991) and Implementation Report (City of Kitchener, 1996) and the Middle Strasburg Creek Environmental Implementation Statement (Stanley Consulting, 1997) as well as relevant documentation completed through the Southwest Urban Area Studies: Community Master Plan and Rosenberg Secondary Plan where appropriate. The Region has confirmed that correspondence from Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry (April 4, 2022) indicates the Ministry's acceptance of the status of the wetlands identified as W1, W2 and W4 in the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) as Page 52 of 792 Provincially Significant Wetlands, and as such, these areas are now considered to meet the Regional Official Plan (ROP) criteria for designation as Core Environmental Features. Further, the Region's Environmental Planner confirmed that Wetland W4 is partially within the limits of Plan 30T-18201. The wetland (W4) is proposed to be protected and a 30 metre buffer has been applied to the wetland which is comprised of a 15 metre `no touch' area directly adjacent to the wetland, and a 15 metre enhancement area outside of the no touch area. The wetland and the associated buffer also incorporate components of the Blanding's Turtle mitigation plan, which has been approved by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). Notwithstanding the inclusion of a portion of wetland W4 and associated Blanding's Turtle enhancement within this plan, Regional environmental staff withdraw their objection to this plan proceeding to draft approval based on confirmation from MECP that there are no concerns and/or anticipated mitigation measures required which will impact the proposed draft plan (30T-18201). The wetland identified as "W4" and the associated 30 metre buffer ("Open Space Block 33") located in the northern portion of the subject lands are proposed to be zoned as `Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1)' which prohibits development activities. A portion of the lands within the Grand River Conservation Authority regulated limit. GRCA staff have undertaken a preliminary review of the applications and are supportive of draft approval and have provided draft approvals conditions which has been incorporated in Appendix `A'. Regional and City Environmental Planning staff have reviewed the proposed plan of subdivision and have no concerns with the proposed applications and have provided draft approval conditions for further review at different stages (prior to grading, prior to registration). Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202 has been modified to include lands which are part of a registered archaeological site of cultural heritage value or interest (the "Locus B" Archaeological Site Avoidance and Protection Area, a Portion of Site AiHd-160) for which a Stage 4 Mitigation of Development Impacts is required (Archaeological Services Inc. 2022). The site is currently surrounded by active agricultural fields. Through the draft approval of Plan of Subdivision 30T- 18202 and the related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, appropriate zoning will be applied that would prohibit any development on these lands, including limiting any activities that might alter the archaeological site in any way, either temporarily or permanently such as minor forms of soil disturbance, tree removal, minor landscaping, utilities installation, etc. As an interim measure, draft approval conditions are proposed to require fencing of the site to prevent any soil disturbance with earth moving associated with the subject lands. Neighbourhoods in Rosenberg are planned to promote walkability, to create efficient and interconnected circulation routes, to achieve transit -supportive development, and to provide for a transportation network that is based on a modified grid pattern with short walkable blocks within 450 metres of transit service. Rosenberg Way, Bandon Drive, and George Israel Street have (in the plan to the north) all been identified as potential transit routes. As such, all higher density and non-residential uses have been planned to front these streets to provide easy access to the public transportation system. Rosenberg Way is planned as a secondary bike route and primary priority street. All lots will be serviced with municipal sanitary sewers and municipal water servicing in accordance with City standards. Engineering Services staff have confirmed that there is sufficient servicing capacity. Conditions of approval have been included to ensure that services are constructed at the appropriate timeframes. Page 53 of 792 SECTION 4—THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Map 3 — Land Use - is amended by removing the lands shown shown attached as Schedule A and adding the subject lands within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. b) Part C, Section 13 — Secondary Plans, Map 22e — Land Use Plan is amended by incorporating the land use designation boundary changes described in Section 2 above and shown attached as Schedule B. io Page 54 of 792 APPENDIX 1 Advertised in The Record — May 26, 2023 Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of June 19, 2023 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood Bleams Road Et Gehl Place Proposed Subdivision ■ 271 Units Urban Green s 1417 0 p spacc Have Your Voice Heard! Planning& Strategic Initiatives Committee Date, June 19, 2023 Location. Council Chambers,, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West arVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select_ * Current agendas a r7 d reports [pasted 10 days bergre rrreetin Peef as a delesgiition a Watch a meeting To learn rr ore about tliis piuject, invludinr$ inforTnjitlan on vc.ur appe,3i r ht5, visit www.kitchener.ca Planning,Appl ications -�)r :: tvritac;t: Garett Stevenson, Interim Director arett.stevenson,:a) kitchener.ca 519,741.2200 x7070 The City of Kitchener will consider applications for a Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zonin€, By -lav Amendment for the lands to be developed with a residential subdivision with up to 277 love rise dwelling units, an urban green, as well as open space and wal kway blocks. 11 Page 55 of 792 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — June 19, 2023 12 Page 56 of 792 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — June 26, 2023 13 Page 57 of 792 PROPOSED BY — LAW 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended and By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-laws for the City of Kitchener — 2079546 Ontario Limited) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 and By-law 2019-051 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 are hereby amended by removing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Areas 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto. 2. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019- 051 are hereby amended by adding thereto the lands specified and illustrated as Areas 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto. 3. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) under By-law 85-1 to Low Rise Residential Five Zone (RES -5) with Site Specific Provision (369) in By-law 2019- 051. 4. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 2 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) with Special Use Provision 69U under By-law Page 58 of 792 85-1 to Low Rise Residential Five Zone (RES -5) with Site Specific Provision (369) in By-law 2019-051. 5. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 3 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Prime Agriculture Zone (AGR -1) under By-law 2019-051 to Low Rise Residential Five Zone (RES -5) with Site Specific Provision (369) in By- law 2019-051. 6. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 4 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) under By-law 85-1 to Recreation Zone (OSR-1) in By-law 2019-051. 7. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 5 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Prime Agriculture Zone (AGR -1) under By-law 2019-051 to Recreation Zone (OSR-1) in By-law 2019-051. 8. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 6 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) under By-law 85-1 to Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) with Site Specific Provision (370) in By-law 2019-051. 9. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 7 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Prime Agriculture Zone (AGR -1) under By-law 2019-051 to Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) with Site Specific Provision (370) in By-law 2019-051. Page 59 of 792 10. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 8 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) under By-law 85-1 to Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) with Site Specific Provision (370) in By-law 2019-051. 11. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 9 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Prime Agriculture Zone (AGR -1) under By-law 2019-051 to Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) in By-law 2019-051. 12. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By -Law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcels of land specified and illustrated as Area 10 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Agricultural Zone (A-1) under By-law 85-1 to Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) in By-law 2019-051. 13. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix "A" to By-law 2019-051 are hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 14. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Site Specific Provision (369) thereto as follows: "(369). Notwithstanding Section 3, Section 4 and Section 7 of the By-law within the lands zoned Low Rise Residential Five Zone (RES -5) and shown as Areas 1, 2, and 3 and being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 51 and 63 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: i) In addition to the permitted uses listed in Table 7-1, the following uses shall also be permitted: Dwelling, Live -Work Townhouse Page 60 of 792 ii) For lands subject to this regulation: "Dwelling, Live -Work Townhouse" means a Townhouse dwelling unit with dedicated non-residential ground floor uses. "Bay/Boxout Window Projections" means a building projection with windows and/or door, with or without a foundation. iii) Stairs and access ramp may be permitted in the front yard or exterior side yard provided the minimum setback to the stair and access ramp encroachment is 0.6 metres from the street line. iv) Terraces, porches, balconies and decks may be located within a required front yard or exterior side yard, provided the terrace, porch or deck is set back a minimum of 2.0 metres from the front lot line and a minimum of 1.5 metres from the side yard lot line abutting a street, whether covered or not covered, and provided they are not enclosed and do not exceed 1.2 metres in height above finished grade level. V) Covered porches that are open on the first floor with or without railings and with or without living space above may encroach into the driveway visibility triangle to a maximum of 2.5 metres. vi) On a corner lot, an access driveway shall not be located closer than 4.5 metres to the intersection of street lines abutting the lot and shall permit the parking of motor vehicles. vii) "Bay/Boxout Window Projections" may encroach a maximum of 1.0 metre into a required front yard, exterior side yard and/or rear yard, provided that the building projection is not more than 4.0 metres wide. viii) The following regulations shall apply for Single Detached Dwelling and Single Detached Dwelling with an Attached Dwelling Unit: a. The minimum corner lot width shall be 12.0 metres. Page 61 of 792 b. The minimum exterior side yard shall be 3.0 metres. c. The minimum front yard shall be 3.5 metres. d. The minimum rear yard shall be 7.0 metres e. The minimum rear yard shall be 3.0 metres for corner lot for a Single Detached Dwelling with one or two Attached Dwelling Units provided that not less than 50% of the corner lot is a minimum of 7.0 metres f. The minimum side yard shall be 0.6 metres on one side and 1.2 metres on the other. g. Porches may encroach into the side yard provided the minimum setback to side lot line is 0.6 metres. h. The maximum building height shall be 12.5 metres. i. The maximum lot coverage shall be a total of 60 percent, of which the habitable portion of the dwelling units shall not exceed 55 percent and the accessory buildings or structures, whether attached or detached, shall not exceed 15 percent. ix) The following regulations shall apply for Semi -Detached Dwellings: a. The minimum exterior side yard shall be 3.0 metres. b. The minimum front yard shall be 3.5 metres. c. The minimum rear yard shall be 7.0 metres. d. The maximum building height shall be 12.5 metres. e. The maximum gross lot coverage shall be 65 percent, of which the habitable portion of the dwelling unit shall not exceed 55 percent and the accessory buildings or structures, whether attached or detached, shall not exceed 15 percent. X) The following regulations shall apply for Street Townhouse Dwellings: a. The minimum corner lot width shall be 9.0 metres. b. The minimum exterior side yard shall be 3.0 metres. c. The minimum front yard shall be of 3.5 metres. d. The minimum interior side yard shall be 0.6 metres. Page 62 of 792 e. The minimum rear yard shall be 7.0 metres for each townhouse dwelling. f. The maximum building height shall be 15.0 metres and 3 storeys. g. The maximum lot coverage for Townhouse Dwellings shall be 65 percent, of which the habitable portion of the dwelling unit shall not exceed 55 percent and the accessory buildings or structures, whether attached or detached, shall not exceed 15 percent. h. The maximum number of attached units for Townhouse Dwellings shall be 8 dwelling units." 15. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Site Specific Provision (370) thereto as follows: "(370). Notwithstanding Section 4 and Section 13 of the By-law within the lands zoned Natural Conservation Zone (NHC-1) and shown as Areas 5, 6, 7 and 8 being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Number 51 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: i) This site contains a registered archaeological site of cultural heritage value or interest (the "Locus B" Archaeological Site Avoidance and Protection Area, a Portion of Site AiHd-160) for which a Stage 4 Mitigation of Development Impacts is required (Archaeological Services Inc. 2022). ii) Site development or grade alteration, including any activities that might alter the archaeological site in any way, either temporarily or permanently such as minor forms of soil disturbance, tree removal, minor landscaping, utilities installation, preparing the site for agricultural activity including backfilling, ploughing and/or planting, site grading and site development of the proposed adjacent subdivision, and landscape restoration work, is strictly prohibited." Page 63 of 792 16. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. (Mattamy - Kitchener Green) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of .2023 Mayor Clerk Page 64 of 792 ZONE GRID REFERENCE BY-LAW 85-1 BY-LAW 2019-051 SCHEDULE NO. 51 AND 63 A-1 AGRICULTURAL ZONE AGR -1 PRIME AGRICULTURE ZONE SUBJECT OF APPENDIX'A' 1-1 NEIGHBOURHOOD OSR-1 RECREATION ZONE KITCHENER ZONING BY-LAW INSTITUTIONAL ZONE OSR-3 OPEN SPACE: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 85-1 AND 2019-051 P-2 OPEN SPACE ZONE NHC-1 NATURAL CONSERVATION ZONE AMENDMENT TO BY -1 R-4 RESIDENTIAL FOUR ZONE RES -5 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL FIVE ZONE AREA 1 - FROM AGRICULTURA Bk2° , _„�� TO LOW RISE RESIDE �RE SCyE�y� WITH SITE SPECIFIC Blk 375.x.- _ 10 1-1 597R UNDER BY-LAW 2019- OSR-3 \ _ ftWOODWAY _ RE 3$ ppen Space I a t--1 r a;� �� 474U AREA 2 - (347) AREA 8 i 1.27ha NHC-1 RE� 5 d3� i I RESS FROM AGRICULTURA WITH SPECIAL USE P CHE¢ I TO LOW RISE RESIDE OSR-1 Elk 2 RE S 1011h. 61°U CHE� 1664 WITH SITE SPECIFIC 31k 35 ° A�p��ry�;pI ' _ ! __J ^@i I -UNDER BY-LAW2019- HC-1 RCHAE OG A ”" " rR�A-3 LOD— WAYlk3 I E Open Space E5Z I r__--_ -r I AREA 3 - 0.5 a 0.91 ha E25 S I -- - FROM PRIME AGRICL AREA i i I i __ _ UNDER BY-LAW 2019 - AREA 10 ,i N�9asa"a,e--I-------I -- TO LOW RISE RESIDE s,oh AREA % ` °W„a Re I"@MI A=1'I19R1 WITH SITE SPECIFIC 5 /AREA 4 ---� I 691 UNDER BY-LAW2019- 5 s AREA 4 - B� 21— i = I ��—B1k, I0E „" �RA4 FROM AGRICULTURA °.za I o I �I RES ,3 1, ^_ TO RECREATION ZON R„ L-----ekza^;�------- aBa I R- 517R AREA 5- R39 I D I I I I FROM PRIME AGRICL ,u_ Z leiksi ie�kn I L—_—__—__J o 1035„a I'm a,K° I I I I UNDER BY-LAW2019- Blk32 I$'s�^„=,o-,° ^,=I IR ;ams TO RECREATION ZON Open Space WAA CROSS CRES ------- I M o 14su"� �,°�"�I � I AREA 6 - AGR -1 6.29ha 1 A�iEl41 1� i I I FROM AGRICULTURA °,z„" 1sL-- 1 �.01 0 l o TO NATURAL CONSEF - m II I I WITH SITE SPECIFIC v� I ! L --y UNDER BY-LAW 2019- 1 m , AREA 7 - i TAILWIND CRES _ (��Q I -- FROM PRIME AGRICL _ r _ ��� i A EA I UNDER BY-LAW 2019- --, s,k, _ _ _ e,s„a ° AREA 9 a 6„a i � i g -� TO NATURAL CONSEF ---a E ° I I �„ ° WITH SITE SPECIFIC r- ETk„ ` R25 u",ter x_48__ AREA 10 A-1 UNDER BY-LAW 2019- 1 i;��----- AREA 8 - TAILWIND CRES i; R'ES' P-2 597R FROM AGRICULTURA a WITH SPECIAL USE P oTO NATURAL CONSEF WITH SITE SPECIFIC ok3° 3 UNDER BY-LAW 2019- Blk 31 AREA . r P,� A-1 AREA 9 - Open Space FROM PRIME AGRICL 2.20ha 3 EXISTING ZONE LIMITS UNDER BY-LAW 2019- TO NATURAL CONSEF PROPOSED ZONE LIMITS UNDER BY-LAW 2019 - Other Lands Owned REFER TO DETAIL SCHEDULE AREA 10 - z FROM AGRICULTURA AGR -1 By Applicant I TO NATURAL CONSEF I UNDER BY-LAW 2019 - MAP NO. 1 0 50 100 150 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA1 2079546 ONTARIO LIMITED METRES SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 30T-182 SCALE 1:4,000 OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA1E TRACT GERMAN COMPANY MAY 23, 2023 cit of Kitchener PT LT 141 PT LT 142 PT LT 143 „� 1- 11- -A--- 11 �R NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING \ for a development in your neighbourhood Bleams Road ft Gehl Place RTMENER Proposed Subdivision A131k a 0 VARV 277 Urban Ope.. Dwelling Green Space Units Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: June 19,2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West orVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchener.ca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Garett Stevenson, Interim Director garett.stevenson@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7070 The City of Kitchener will consider applications for a Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands to be developed with a residential subdivision with up to 277 low rise dwelling units, an urban green, as well as open space and walkway blocks. Page 66 of 792 KIT( t( 5 Internal memo ii�li�.t� Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca Date: December 27, 2018 To: Garen Stevenson, PIanner From: Brandon Sloan, Manager of Long Range PIanning & PoIicy Planning Dayna Edwards, Senior Planner (Urban Design) Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18201 Official Plan Amendment OP 181005&0061BJGS Zoning By-law Amendment ZCI006&0071BIGS Bleams Road and Gehl Place Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Inc. The Long Range and PoIicy Planning Section has received the circulation of a Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-Iaw Amendment Applications for the development of the subject lands within the west side of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan for a range of land use and dwelling types. We provide the fol€owing comments for your consideration. Planning Policy and Kitchener Official Plan The synopsis and assessment of Planning Policy provided in section 5 of the Planning Report, prepared by SGL is quite helpful to address consistency and conformity. Policy staff are currently reviewing the items in more detail and would appreciate any comments that Regional planning staff and the file planner have in this regard. Proposed Official Plan Amendments #9 and #2 This includes the more recent addition to the City Urban Area through the Region of Waterloo Official Plan process. The new area requires amendments to base maps in the Official Pian (Maps 2, 3 and possibly others) and each of the Secondary Plan maps. Policy staff are currently reviewing the items identified in the application, specifically Section 3.4 and Appendix A of the Planning Report in more detail and will provide additional comments under separate cover. Assistance can be provided with respect to the detailed wording of the formal Amendment{s} when preparing them for Council consideration. Rosenberg Secondary Plan Planning Policy staff appreciate that the Planning Report addresses conformity with the various elements of the Secondary Plan. On cursory review, it would appear that the major topic elements are included within the analysis which is satisfactory to achieve the terms of the study for our review. Policy staff are currently reviewing the items in more detail and will provide additional comments under separate cover. Some initial comments include: Map 22a should be updated to reflect the proposed slight revision to the 5 -min neighbourhood walk. The proposal could be an improvement from the original plan and has the potential to create a good sense of place and community gathering spaces We appreciate that the Urian Greens are proposed in roughly the locations indicated on the Community Structure Plan Bleamsllsaiah Dr is a Neighbourhood Gateway and Isaiah Dr and Rosenberg Way are both Priority Streets. As such, they would have some urban design attention and emphasis to enhance sense of place and wa€kabi€ity, typically via conditions of approval and a Streetscape Plan. Zoning details may geed to be considered along those locations as well. Page 67 of 792 f Internal memo Development Services Department wwwkitchener. ca There is the potential for a great Type 1 Multi -Use Pathway network and its connection with Rosenberg Way. Further details should be considered for design and implementation via appropriate staff and conditions of approval. Several amendments would be required for the Land Use Plan. A Neighbourhood Institutional site should be identified (in addition to the one school site). The details of the proposed changes to the water management area(s) and SWM facilities will need to be confirmed prior to be reflected on the Land Use Plan and Map 22f. Density The location is within the uncommitted portion of the City's Designated Greenfield Area. The lands that are currently within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan were collectively planned to achieve 74 persons and jobs per hectare based on the approved land use plan and in effect methodology at the time. The portion of lands within that plan would need to be compared to the approved land use and any adjustments made. The implementing zoning would help ensure that the blocks and area is planned to help achieve the overall density. The new lands are not part of an approved Secondary Plan and may require consideration of the new Growth Plan (2017) targets. These have not been allocated at the regional/city scale at this time. Policy staff are currently reviewing the items in more detail, specifically section 3.2 of the Planning Report, and will provide additional comments under separate cover. Additional input from Regional staff and discussion with the file planner and applicant may be required. Kitchener Growth Management Plan The subject Iocations are identified as 'Priority B' within the Kitchener Growth Management Plan 2017-2019 (IDs # 1133-136). These applications would help towards the completion of the Rosenberg community. We appreciate the efforts of the applicant to work with City staff on the appropriate timing of these Iands within the overall Kitchener program for managing growth and staff resource priorities. Pending the detailed review of the applications, issue resolution, and any competing `Priority A' items, it would be appropriate to move forward with the file in 2019. New Zoning By-law (CRoZBy) The City's Comprehensive Review of the Zoning By-law (CRoZBy) project is well underway to update the By-law and implement the new Official Plan. A Statutory Public Meeting was held in 2018 for the non-residential sections and a draft was released of the residential sections. It is expected that Council will make a decision on these in 2019. Should that occur prior to these applications being considered, the new zoning codes/types could be utilized for this location and modified as appropriate for the context. Urban Des€qn Urban design policies are intended to address the visual character, aesthetics and compatibility of land use including heritage features. The objective of Urban Design policies is to create a sense of place, pedestrian friendly street networks and streetscapes and access to public transit and public amenities, such as parks and open spaces. Part B: Urban Design Briefs — Sections 4.2, 6 and 7 of the Urban Design Manual provides design and development expectations for new development located in suburban neighbourhoods. Page 68 of 792 I L Internal mere I1iTI'} il.,Ll .i� Development Services Department www1itch en er. c a The followin urban design comments pertain the information contained within the Urban Desi n Report and the community masterplan as presented: • Development located along Bleams Road should address both Bleams Road and the internal streets in terms of variation and excellence in building design, materials, style and colour. The mixed use blocks along Isiah Drive should have ground oriented retail addressing the pedestrian realm with a high quality streetscape design. Some lots are not proposed to front on Rosenberg Way. - Corner lots should focus their primary frontage towards 5 the higher order street. All corner lots should treat both the side and front facades and highly articulated and well- - design primary frontages. • To increase vehicular and pedestrian connect and to have lots fronting on the open space, a roadway should be extended across the frontage of the open space shown i below: e` • Rosenberg Way and Isiah Drive are both identified as priority streets in the Secondary Plan. A streetscape plan for these streets should be provided as a condition of approval • Mid -block connections should be employed through longer block particularly where alignment with open space occurs. The following urban design policies are provided for future reference when proceeding with detailed dgsign� 40 Buildings at priority lot locations such as gateways, along major roads, corner sites, heritage areas, park views or at terminating vistas should be designed as landmarks, with architectural innovation and quality urban design that reflects the community character. 4 Variation and excellence in building design, including architectural features, building materials, style, colour and other individual design elements, will be expected for each block of land and will be reviewed through development applications and building elevations. Where possible, corner lots shall have their primary frontage oriented towards the higher -order street. A mix of Iot frontage along all street blocks will be encouraged. Small lot frontages are best located in close proximity to neighbourhood park spaces. Long blocks of similar lot frontages and/or concentrations of small Iot frontages in any area of the Rosenberg Community will be discouraged. s The use of public and/or private rear lanes should be considered in order to meet planning objectives for streetscape, built form, on -street parking and reduce conflicts between multi -use pathways, driveways and transit. Page 69 of 792 I -� internal memo Davelopment Services department www.kitchenerea Sustainability Measures The applicant should strive to incorporate transportation demand management, energy, water and waste conservation measures along with other sustainable development elements within the new subdivision area. Policy staff are reviewing the applicable section of the Planning Report (page 57) and will provide more detailed comments under separate cover for this topic and any potential conditions of approval. Conditions of Approval Following more detailed review and discussion, any further recommendations and potential conditions of approval can be provided to the file planner. Please let us know if you have any questions pertaining to these comments. Brandon Sloan, BES, MCIP, RPP Manager, Long Range & Policy Planning P: 519-741-2200 ext. 7648 E: brandon.sloan kitchener.ca Dayna Edwards, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner (Cuban Design) P: 519-741-2200 ext. 7324 E: dayna.edwardsAkitchen er.ca Page 70 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department Date: November 2, 2018 To: Garett Stevenson, Planner From: Victoria Grohn, Heritage Planner cc: Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Official Plan Amendment Application OP1810061GIGS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA18/007/G/GS 161 Gehl Place "Application 2" Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Inc. www.kitchener.ca Heritage Planning staff have reviewed the supporting information relating to the draft plan of subdivision, official plan amendment, and zone change applications for 161 Gehl Place. The subject property is not Iisted or designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. The subject property, 161 Gehl Place, is Iocated adjacent to 236 Gehl Place, which is Iisted as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the City's Municipal Heritage Register. Section 2 of the Planning Act indicates that Council shall have regard to matters of Provincial interest such as the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest. In addition, Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions of Council shall be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Section 2.6 of the PPS indicates that "significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved." At the Mune 12, 2017 Pre -Submission Consultation meeting, Heritage Planning staff requested clarification as to how access to the cultural heritage resource at 236 Gehl Place would be maintained in both the short- and long-term, given that appropriate access is important to ensure a range of conservation options are available for the cultural heritage resource at 236 Gehl Place. It does not appear that this has been addressed in the draft plan or Planning Report submitted as part of this application. Heritage Planning staff request that the access to 236 Gehl Place be addressed. Page 71 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Faranak Hosseini Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 4:20 PM To: Garett Stevenson Subject: Draft Plain of Subdivision Application 30T-18201 - Transportation Services Comments Hi Garret, Please find below the Transportation Services corn ments regarding the Draft Pian of Subdivision Application 30T-18201. I. Traffic circles should be provided at the intersections of George Israel Street and Rosenberg Way, and Street L and Rosenberg Way. 2. Bike lanes should be provided on Rosenberg Way and Isiah Drive. 3. A traffic circle or a raised all -way stop controlled intersection should be provided at the intersection of Rosenberg Way and Isaiah Drive. Further discussions with the School Board is required to determine the control type at this intersection. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Faranak Husseini, E.I.T., M.A.Sc. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services j City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext 7565 (o) I TTY 1-856-959-9994 1 faranak.hosseini kitchener.ca Page 72 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Faranak Hosseini Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 10:45 AM To: Garett Stevenson Subject: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18201 - Transportation Services Comments Hi Garett, Please find below my revised comments. 1_ Traffic circles should be provided at the intersections of George Israel Street and Rosenberg Way, and Street L and Rosenberg Way. 2. Bike lanes should be provided on Rosenberg Way and Isiah Drive, 3. A traffic circle or a raised all -way stop controlled intersection should be provided at the intersection of Rosenberg Way and Isaiah Drive. Further discussions with the School Board is required to determine the control type at this intersection. 4, An on -street parking plan is required. 5. Special zoning regulations comments: Please see my comments in red below. Porches Stairs and access ramps may encroach into a required front yard or side yard abutting a street, provided the minimum setback to the encroachment is 1.0 metres from the street line. Any porch is Iocated in a driveway visibility triangle, the porch shaII not exceed 0.9 metres in height above finished grade, and railings shall be constructed in a manner and of materials that do not obstruct visibility. On a corner lot, an access driveway shaII not be Iocated closer than 6.0 metres for corner Iots with frontage on a Major Community Collector Street, Local Street, or Minor Neighbourhood CoIIector Street. On a corner lot, an access driveway shall not be located closer than 7.0 metres for corner lots with frontage on a Major Community Collector Street or Minor Neighbourhood Collector Street. Single Detached and Duplex Dwelling - Minimum Front Yard Setback — 3.5 metres, except no part of any building used to accommodate off- street parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to a street line. No part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be Iocated closer than 6.0 metres to a street Iine. Semi -Detached Dwelling: - Minimum Front Yard and Minimum Side Yard Abutting a Street — 3.0 metres, except no part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to the street line. No part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 6.0 metres to a street line. Street -Fronting Townhouse Dwelling Minimum Front Yard Setback — 3.5 metres, except no part of any building used to accommodate off- street ffstreet parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to a street Iine. - Minimum Side Yard Abutting a Street — 3.0 metres, except no part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to a street line, where an access driveway crosses the side lot line and leads to the space inside the garage. Page 73 of 792 No part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shaII be Iocated closer than 6.0 metres to a street line. MuItiple DweIIings Parking shall be provided at a rate of 1.25 spaces per unit Off-street parking may not be located between any building fapade and the streetline A parking justification study is required. For Garage Townhouse DweIIing {rear lane/road access with frontage on a street. Minimum Rear Yard - 2.0 metres, except no pari of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to the rear lot Iine Minimum access to driveway on corner lot at Iocal street -- 4.5 metres No part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be Iocated closer than 6.0 metres to the rear lot Iine. For Back -to -Back Townhouse Dwelling - Minimum Front Yard — 2.0 - 3.0 metres, except no part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 5.7 metres to the front lot line. No part of any building used to accommodate off-street parking shall be located closer than 6.0 metres to the front lot line. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Faranak Hosseini, E.x.T., M.A.5c. Traffic Planning Analyst 1 Transportation Services j City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext 7665 (o) I TTY 1-866-969.9994 1 faranak.hosseini a)kitchener,ca From: Garett Stevenson Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 4:35 PM To: Faranak Hosseini <Faranak.Hosseini@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 3OT-18201- Transportation Services Comments Hi Faranak, Do you have any comments on the proposed new configuration of Rosenberg Way? Any Transportation comments on the proposed special zoning regulation proposed? Porches - Stairs and access ramps may encroach into a required front yard or side yard abutting a street, provided the minimum setback to the encroachment is 1.0 metres from the street line. - Any porch is located in a driveway visibility triangle, the porch shall not exceed 0.9 metres in height above finished grade, and railings shall be constructed in a manner and of materials that do not obstruct visibility. Page 74 of 792 Faranak Hossein!, E.I.T., M.A.Sc. Traffic PIanning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext 7665 (o) I TTY 1-866-969-9994 j faranak.hosseini&kitchener.ca Page 75 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca Date: May 23, 2019 To: Garett Stevenson From. Jason BruIe cc: Linda Cooper Subject: Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 30T-18201 & 30T-18202 Zone Change Applications ZBA181006/B/GS R ZBA18/0071GIGS Official Plan Amendment Applications OP18/005/GIGS & 0P18/006/G/GS Owner: Mattamy Development Corporation Site Address: 1801 & 1873 BIeams Road and 161 Gehl Place Prior to Draft A o� roval: 1. Temporary turning circles need to be contained whoIIy within the stage of the subdivision in which they are servicing (can't be located in an adjacent future stage) and further to that they must also be within the same subdivision. Please revise the draft plans to show the temp turning circles for stage 6 of 30T-18201 wholly contained within 30T- 18201. 2 The southerly limit of Street X in draft plan 30T-18201 and continuing into draft plan 30T- 18202 indicates that the road right-of-way (including the traveled portion of the road) is within the 30m setback from the wetland. This should be revised so that the right-of-way is outside the wetland setback. 3. Coordination needs to be achieved between "Street M" in 30T-18201 and " Stam son Street" in 30T-14201 for servicing and overland flow routing. 4. Nate that the City of Kitchener's Infiltration value for sanitary sewers is 0.15L/s/ha and not the 0.25L/s/ha as identified on the design sheet. Please revise for detailed engineering submission post draft approval. Conditions of Draft Plan Approval: Prior to Grading,- The rading: The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to grading, servicing or registration, of all or any part of the plan of subdivision or the conveyance of easements to extend sanitary and/or storm sewers through the subdivision, that the SUBDIVIDER shall complete a Record of Site Condition (RSC) for all the lands in accordance with Ontario Regulation 153104 and the RSC shall be acknowledged by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). Prior to submitting the RSC and the commencement of area grading for the subdivision; site alteration, materials management, filling and preliminary grading will be permitted provided these activities comply with a materials management plan to be approved by the Region's Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services and a preliminary grading plan to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Page 76 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department l Int www,kitchener. ca (MNR&F) or any Provincial success or thereof. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees the preliminary grading plan and implementation of same will ensure drainage through lands to the east does not exceed pre -development drainage flows 2. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the Erosion Threshold Analysis and specifically Model 4 prepared by Stantec Inc. dated April 7, 2015 including implementation of the unitary release rate of 1.1 litres per second per hectare which is assigned to Area 2 and 3 of the Rosenberg Secondary Planning Area on a proportionate gross area basis, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the GRCA. 3. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement a detailed "pre -construction" monitoring program. The monitoring program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the CITY'S Director of Planning, the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The "pre -construction" monitoring program will document current groundwater infiltration conditions, and will be used to provide baseline information to compare conditions through the "during" and "post" construction monitoring periods. 4. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit, obtain approval of and implement a detailed "during development" monitoring and response program. The program is to be approved by the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The purpose of the "during development" monitoring program is to ensure that the groundwater infiltration measures satisfy pre -development infiltration targets specified in the AIder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as well as the South west Urban Area Study, Comprehensive Storm Water Management Strategy Prepared by AMEC (June 22, 2011 as revised July 18, 2011) and that Chloride Impact assessments meet the Reasonable Use Criteria of the AIder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved. The "during development" monitoring program is to extend until 95% build out of the subdivision. 5. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to submit, obtain approval of, and implement a detailed "post development" monitoring program in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Water Management Strategy Prepared by AM EC (June 22, 2011 as revised July 18, 2011) and the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved. The purpose of the "post development" monitoring program is to ensure that the stormwater management facility continues to satisfy the current pre - development conditions for infiltration and to identify any specific additional requirements that may be necessary to monitor, including but not limited to: infiltration rates for quantity and quality and chloride impact assessments. The "post development" monitoring program will extend for 2 years after 95% build out of the subdivision all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the GRCA and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 0 The SUBDIVIDER further agrees to implement any remedial action deemed necessary (including additional monitoring) for 2 additional years should chloride levels exceed the Reasonable Use Criteria of Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Page 77 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca Subwatershed Update CH2MHILL, 2008 report as approved, as a result of the aforementioned monitoring program at their sole expense to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the GRCA and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 7. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that the Middle Strasburg Creek Flood Control Environmental Assessment (EA) shall be completed prior to area grading and further that the recommendations of the EA, including the construction and location of the culvert be implemented in accordance with the EA and completed prior to area grading all to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services and the Grand River Conservation Authority. The City is 100% responsible for the cost of these works. If sufficient money is not allocated from the appropriate CITY Development Charge Account(s) to permit the CITY to fund these works or the works are not a Development Charge eligible expense and the SUBDIVIDER wishes to proceed, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to provide and up- front the cost of these works. Should these works become a Development Charge eligible expense, the CITY agrees to recognize any monies paid by the SUBDIVIDER for any works or services normally paid out of the CITY'S Development Charge Account with such monies to be refunded or to be recognized as a credit towards any CITY Development Charge payable for each lot or block only within the registered plan in accordance with the applicable CITY Development Charge By-law and Policies in effect at the time the monies are paid by the SUBDIVIDER or the works become a Development Charge eligible expense, whichever shall be later. If the registration of the plan is staged, a Supplementary Agreement identifying each lot or block for which credits are payable shall be registered for each stage prior to the registration of each stage of the plan of subdivision, until there is no outstanding balance remaining. When no outstanding credit balance remains, then the Development Charges will be paid in the normal manner in accordance with the CITY'S By-law. If, following the registration of the entire plan of subdivision and issuance of all building permits, there is any outstanding credit balance, it shall remain with the lands to be used as a credit for future development, or alternatively, the CITY may enter into an agreement with the SUBDIVIDER, under Section 40 of the Development Charges Act, to enable the transfer of Development Charge credits to other benefiting lands within the community, subject to satisfactory arrangements being made between all parties. 8. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to coordinate grading with adjacent lands to the east to ensure gradual transition grades between plans to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. The SUBDIVIDER agrees to prepare a grading plan for the subject lands that considers the current environmental and ground water constraints, recognizes and follows the requirements as set out in the minutes of settlement from the GMB hearing, and further the approval requirements of the City of Kitchener, GRCA, MNR& , and Region of Waterloo. The SUBDIVIDER is responsible to match existing grades at the shared property line. Any changes to the grades at the shared property line shall be subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. Page 78 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department 9. Approval is required by Hydra for any work within the Hydra corridor. www.kitchener.ca 10. Noise warning clauses are required on title of lots in accordance with the Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment, MTE Consultants Inc., July 6, 2018. Further, a final Environmental Noise Assessment Report is required prior to grading approval. 11. Detailed Geotechnical/Hydrogeological Investigation Report must be submitted to the City for review. This report must distinguish the suitability of soils to support the infiltration of roof water. Prior to. Servicing - 1, All public right-of-ways and all services shall be designed and constructed to the standards specified in the most current City of Kitchener Standards, Development Manual, Regional Standards and other applicable Provincial Standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. 2. A detailed water servicing report is required to review the extent of Iands that can be serviced by municipal water distribution network. A copy of this report should be directed to Engineering, Region of Waterloo and Utilities Division for approval. 3. Prior to Servicing or Registration which ever shall occur first, The SUBDIVIDER agrees to retain a qualified Engineering Consultant who shall prepare a detailed engineering design and report for stormwater management in accordance with the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Strategy for the South West Urban Area prepared in June 2011 by AMSC, the Alder Creek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update by CH2MHILL in 2008 (which accommodates a 2.0 cubic/metres/second flow from Area 2 lands, of which flow rates assigned to subdivision 30T-18201 shall be in accordance with Table 1, Schedule C of the Minutes of Settlement dated August 17, 2015) and the City of Kitchener Integrated Stormwater Management Master Plan (ISWM-MP) volume retention policy (the most stringent policy will apply) to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Director of Operations, the Region of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. In addition, the SUBDIVIDER shall have landscape plans for the stormwater management facilities prepared by a Landscape Architect to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Parks and Cemeteries and the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. The approved engineering design for Storm Water Management will include a maintenance program for a period of 2 years post 95% build out of the subdivision, which will ensure stormwater management facilities function as designed to the satisfaction of the CITY's Director of Engineering. Any redesign and remediation required for the stormwater management facilities to achieve their required targets shall be at the sole expense of the SUBDIVIDER all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 4 The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever shall occur first, to submit, obtain approval of and implement a detailed groundwater and surface Page 79 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department I KFIX -NER www.kitchenerca water monitoring program to evaluate the performance of end of pipe infiltration facilities (including pre -construction and post -construction phases) and to identify if the required water balance is met (as identified in the Alder Creek Watershed Study (2007) and the Alder Greek Watershed and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Update --- CH2MHILL, West Urban Area prepared by AM EC (June 22, 2011 revised July 18, 2011), to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Grand River Conservation Authority. Further, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to implement the approved monitoring program and complete any redesign and/or remediation to achieve the required targets at the sole expense of the SUBDIVIDER all to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. 5. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing stormwater management facilities will be designed to achieve the unitary release rate of 1.1 litres per second per gross hectare in accordance with Model 4 of the Erosion Threshold Analysis prepared by Stantec Inc. dated April 7, 2015, to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services in consultation with the Grand River Conservation Authority. . Where major overland flow routes are not on municipally owned Iands, the owner must deed to the City a minimum 6.0 m wide drainage corridor. 7. Lot IeveI infiltration gaIIeries are required to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering. 8. All SWM systems including infiltration requirements must meet City of Kitchener design standards and applicable Regional, GRCA and Provincial standards. A 20% oversizing of infiltration measures must be incorporated in the design. 9. Prior to Servicing of each stage requiring new stormwater management facilities, including stormwater management ponds, infiltration galleries and other related appurtenances, the SUBDIVIDER shall provide a letter of credit based on 60% of the estimated cost of the approved infiltration facilities to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services.. The Letter of Credit will be released two years after 95% of the buildout of subdivision is stabilized (meaning buildings are constructed and lot/blocks are sodded/vegetated) and the SUBDIVIDER's consulting engineer has certified the infiltration facilities are functioning as intended and approved to the satisfaction of the CITY's Director of Engineering Services. 10. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing the extension of the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer is required to service this plan of subdivision and shall be in accordance with the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sewer EA or any addendum thereto to the satisfaction of the CITY'S Director of Engineering Services. It is acknowledged that these works, including design expenses, are included in the City's Development Charge By-law 99-106, as amended, and the City shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of these works. 11. The SUBDIVIDER agrees that prior to servicing or registration, whichever occurs first, to provide detailed sanitary sewer design and to make arrangements satisfactory to the Page 80 of 792 Internal memo Development Services Department I K_A:,!fR www.kitchener. ca CITY'S Director of Engineering Services for a sanitary sewer connection to the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer. The SUBDIVIDER further agrees that where any upgrades are required to any local sewers required to connect these lands to the trunk sewer will be at the sole expense of the SUBDIVIDER. Prior to Re istration: That prior to final approval, the owner enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to ensure that the water balance completed to date be updated with the "as -built" infiltration gallery data (based on suitability of soils encountered during construction) and that this data be reported to the Region of Waterloo in the event that a ground water deficit results and mitigation measures may be required to maintain the existing water balance. Monitoring reports for the infiltration in the groundwater recharge areas are required for 2 years post development of the subdivision to ensure the water balance is being achieved. 2 That the SUBDIVIDER enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener which shall be registered on the title of Tots with retaining walls immediately upon registration of the subdivision. Said agreement shall implement the following clause with respect to the retaining wall located on these lots and must be included in all offers of purchaselsale and tenancy agreements: "Purchasers/tenants are advised that a retaining wall is located on this property. The owner of this property also owns his/her section of the retaining wall. The retaining wall is not in public ownership. Monitoring, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of this retaining wall, including any associated costs, are the sale responsibility of the property owner. The City of Kitchener is in no way responsible for this retaining wall. Should this retaining wall fail, it is the property owner's responsibility to repair or replace his/her section of the wall, at his/her cost. In addition, the zoning for this property prohibits the placement or construction of dwellings, sheds, containers, detached garages, accessory buiidings, indoor pools, outdoor pools, and any other building or structure and storage and parking of vehicles, trailers, major recreational equipment within the area as shown in Property Detail Schedule No. 36 of the City's Zoning By-law. The purpose of this requirement is to maintain the integrity of the retaining wall." Jason Brule, C.E.T. Interim Project Manager SAGenerail03-03-544 Subdivision Files\30Ts - 58MQOT-18201 & 30T-18202 Mattamy Rosenberg0raft Plan\Correspondence130T-18201 and 30T-18202 Draft Plan Circulation Cornments.doc Page 81 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Jason BruIe <Jason.BruIe@kitchener.ca> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2020 2:15 PM To: Garett Stevenson Cc: Chris Nechacov Subject: RE: Message from Jason Bruce (7419) Hi Garett, I have been speaking with Chris from SWM (copied) about this. We are both in support of it so long as there is an agreement in place between the City/Developer/School Board concerning it all like we spoke about last week. We would both like to be circulated when it comes time to draft the agreement if possible. think that gets you to where you need to be currently? Let me know if there is anything else you need from us in the interim. Regards, Jason BrO16, C.E.T. 519-741-2200 ext.7419 From: Garett Stevenson <Garett.Stevenson@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 3:58 PM To: Jason Brule <Jason.Brule@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Message from Jason Brule (7419) Hey Jason, See attached. The track and field area for the school is proposed within the SWM facility, but would only impacted in the event of a 100 year flood. This would be outside of the infiltration cell. Thanks, Garett From: Jason Brute <Jason.Brule@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 9:04 AM To: Garett Stevenson <Garett.Steve nson@kitchener.ca> Subject: Message from Jason Brule (7419) Page 82 of 792 l 3 ::I 1 Page 83 of 792 f z 0 U LU U) rLL� t.1 J Q L 2i r� V J z }� c� s b �16 Id p zzo � C ' a ULU ry r N Zur w E ' Z 4 _z C)C � � w ❑(]Z a a, �:� �� N ~ - 0 U. z LLF c� s S W E �16 Id p zzo " o z � �Q U Zur w E ' Z 4 _z 0. ❑(]Z a a, �:� �� G iFl p� O 4 a Page 84 of 792 —j _ C � _ ?2 f� y��� I — - - �l11111111� N Y PI1�11 /ff11RIF4u1..1� IL oma r ti._ • 3' - D a. - W -~- � s - z tl �o L kM O n his �i U J LLJ e ILI �} LL i 1) .Fri STREET R is #.Y y��� N — - - �l11111111� N Y PI1�11 /ff11RIF4u1..1� IL oma r ti._ • 3' - D a. - W -~- O F -o s - CL tl �o L I O n �i U e ILI �} LL i 1) .Fri STREET R #.Y I O n �i U e ILI �} LL i U LL co ■o Page 85 of 792 I ■o Page 85 of 792 Internal Memo K4, R Infrastructure Services Department wwmkftehener cn Date: November 5, 2018 To: Garett Stevenson, Planner, Development Services From: Mark Parris, landscape Architect, Parks & Cemeteries Division cc: Subject: Operations Review and Comments Subdivision: 3OT-18201 & 18202 Stage: Draft Plan of Subdivision 1. APPLICATION INFORMATION: Subdivision Name Subdivision Number(s) Secondary Plan Name Submission Stage Submission Date 2. OVERALL RESPONSE Mattamy Community 3OT-18201 & 30T-18202 Rosenberg Draft Plan of Subdivision October 5, 2018 Overall support of the submission TBD. 3. STANDARD SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS These review comments intend that the Draft Plan application be made subject to all of the Standard Conditions of Subdivision in their entirety, latest version, including the Condition requiring that the developer meet the latest revision of the Development Manual which is updated from time to time. Page 86 of 792 KI, C-_� __3 InternalMerna Ki'it:l �� NI1 Infrastructure Services Department www.kitebener.ra 4. LAND CONVEYANCES Park Land Dedication Eligible: Block No, Block Type Area (ha) Comments 15 Park 3.10 Neighbourhood Park connected to adjacent school 1.42 17 SWM block and SWM block 19 Walkway 0.53 Multi -use pathway corridor 20 Park 0,47 Urban Green 25 Park 0.41 Urban Green 26 Park 0.36 Urban Green 30 Park 0.51 Urban Green TOTAL 5.38 The application current exceeds the 5% maximum allowable park dedication, calculated at 5.255ha (see Appendix A) Conveyances: Block No. Block Type Area (ha) Comments 18 Open Space 1.43 21 Open Space 0.58 22 Open Space 0.11 23 Open Space 1.42 17 SWM 7.30 27 SWM 4.15 TOTAL 14.99 Other lands: SWT2, W4, non-core area isolated wetland (Secondary Plan), core environmental feature (NHS) Wildlife corridor Natural Area buffer Portion of FOD5-2, W2 and W1 NIA NIA Block No. Block Type Area ON Comments 20 Walkway Q.Q1 NIA TOTAL O 64 Page 87 of 792 InternalMemo 4,3 lnfrasfrucfure Services Department www.kirchener ra 5. CRITICAL. COMMENTS The following comments are considered critical to address prior to supporting the subdivision application and may require special conditions within subsequent subdivision agreements: Item Comments Block 15 — a} SWM Report figure 4.1 indicates 4-8 meters of fill to attain park grades. Neighbourhood Filling procedures and details must be approved by the City of Kitchener Park prior and follow the latest Development Manual specifications (Section L.11 as of the time of these comments). Approval of the fill must be acquired prior to the acceptance of the park parcel %} Lot Grading Plan AG1.5 shows a walkway stump along the east side of the property adjacent to the proposed School Block. If this is intended to be converted to an overflow location it will not be deemed acceptable. It is critical to maintain an at -grade connection to the school block to ensure shared use of recreational facilities. If the intent is a walkway access to the SWM, this is supported but will be determined during park design and Engineering submission stage. ---------- -- ---- - - - --- - ---------------------- -- ---- - - - - --- - -- Block 1$ & 23 c} Between Block 18!23 (W4} and the adjacent wetlands {W1} is an area of -- Open Space habitat restoration outside of the 30m setbacks. This area is identified as (Wetland) a wildlife corridor, specifically for amphibian and turtle crossings. The area is also identified as a potential connection point between Street Y and the proposed walkway block south of Street T. A revision of the EIS is required to look at the opportunity at achieving this connection while maintaining the wildlife corridor recommendation. ...................},.......... y._.................................................,.....,........ Black 19 - d Walkwa is within �Ihe 3(lm setback of W1 core environmental feature, Walkway also identified as Jefferson Salamander habitat. This walkway block represents a critical component of the east -west MUP connection across the subdivision. A revision of the EIS is required to plot and plan for the impact of the trail within the 30m setback zone. The consultant must address the details of the trail including grading, surface type and construction methods to determine appropriate mitigations. The revision of the ITIS is required prior to the acceptance of the block. P) Grading noted in the corridor up to 14%. The maximum allowable grade is 5%. Grades to be revised and confirmed prior to acceptance of the block. -------------------------- ........... ------ ----- -- Block 20 - Park f} Approximately 30% of the park is used for a 3:1 return slope from the adjacent property. Parks is willing to accept this preliminary grading and as park space within the park dedication portfolio should the developer further refine the grading pian to show access to the top of the slope. If no access is planned, the area will be re -assigned to conveyance and removed from consideration of the park dedication calculation. Block 21 ----------------- g } Access from Street AD to the end of Ge....."`..._... .. _. -.. h! Place Trail and northernn extent Open Space of wetland W5 will be required as emergency access and future trail planning A revision to the EIS Is required to laok at the cpportunjty.@l @Oievft this Page 88 of 792 ----------------- -:..._..------------------------------------------------------------ connection within the 30m setback of wetland W5. ...... . ............ . _...--..__----- ------------ ---- - ---- A Mufti -Use h} multi -use pathway connection required per Multi -use Pathway and Pathway Trials Masterplan (2012) to achieve the east -west corridor from Trussler to the east end of the subdivision. This application is missing the MUP link from Trussler to Isaiah Dr. This can be achieved by requiring a 3.0m MUT within the Rosen burg right-of- way from Trussler to the frontage of Block 15, and ensuring a trail connection through the park and SWM Block 17 during park planning and engineering submissions Proposed i} Two walkway blocks are proposed to better facilitate pedestrian Walkway movement through the subdivision and connections to major park or Blocks institutional nodes. a. Between Streets Y and AC at the western portion of the roadways b. Between Rosenberg Way and Street Or immediately south of Block 30. (item to be discussed with Transportation) 81ock 22 — j} Block 22 does not serve any benefit to be in public ownership at this time Open Space and lacks any public frontage. Recommendation to retain the block in private ownership (item to be discussed with Environmental Planner) Page 89 of 792 nn p I tel nal Me �m o A Wrastructure Services Department wwwA trhener.ra ----------------- -:..._..------------------------------------------------------------ connection within the 30m setback of wetland W5. ...... . ............ . _...--..__----- ------------ ---- - ---- A Mufti -Use h} multi -use pathway connection required per Multi -use Pathway and Pathway Trials Masterplan (2012) to achieve the east -west corridor from Trussler to the east end of the subdivision. This application is missing the MUP link from Trussler to Isaiah Dr. This can be achieved by requiring a 3.0m MUT within the Rosen burg right-of- way from Trussler to the frontage of Block 15, and ensuring a trail connection through the park and SWM Block 17 during park planning and engineering submissions Proposed i} Two walkway blocks are proposed to better facilitate pedestrian Walkway movement through the subdivision and connections to major park or Blocks institutional nodes. a. Between Streets Y and AC at the western portion of the roadways b. Between Rosenberg Way and Street Or immediately south of Block 30. (item to be discussed with Transportation) 81ock 22 — j} Block 22 does not serve any benefit to be in public ownership at this time Open Space and lacks any public frontage. Recommendation to retain the block in private ownership (item to be discussed with Environmental Planner) Page 89 of 792 } internal Memo 1T l ` Infrastructure Services Department www.k1%hener.ca C. OTHER COMMENTS The following comments are considered important to address prior to subdivision approval but may not impact the overall support of the development application: Item Comments Secondary a) 5.1 Neighbourhood Parks - Lighting is not a requirement of Plan Report neighbourhood park facilities, and will not be considered part of the developer -build requirements of the park spaces bj 5.1 Neighbourhood Parks — Active sportsfield is identified as potential use for the park space. This has an impact on the required supporting infrastructure, including servicing and parking facilities. The applicant shall plan for any active, programmed spaces within the park in conjunction with the City's Parks & Cemeteries and Sport departments c) 5.2 Urban Greens — Fountains will not be accepted in publicly owned and operated park spaces. E15 d Permanent wildlife fencin Es identified as a recommended management feature and shown Blocks 23, 18, and part of 19. Developer to provide additional information on the construction details of the proposed fence and maintenance I life -cycling requirements of the fence e} Requirements of Moth Plan 1 and Plan 2 Stewardship Management Plans, outlined in 8.1 and 8.2, must be adhered to by the developer, including: a. Permanent wildlife fencing b. Home Owners manual c. Monitoring programs, pre and post construction d. On-site interpretive and educational signage ...._.-- Block 15 & 17 ------•---------------------------------.. f} Proposed 3:1 slope connecting park property to 4.Om maintenance — Park/SWM access on Block 17 SWM Pond to blended into the park property for stronger connection and more effective maintenance practices - Re -grading to be done with a future trail connection from the south edge of the block to the north-west corner of the block at Rosenberg Way. Refer to Appendix B — Park Block 15 Suggested Grading for more information ----------- Block 17 — -------------------------------------------------------...---...I........... g) Soften radius of the north-east corner walkway to SWM transition to SWM achieve a minimum 6.©m inside radius. Corner treatment to address maintenance vehicle movement. ..................................... Block 25 -Park •------- --------- -- ---- ---- ------ -- ------ - -- ----- ----- - -----...., h} 'ark grading accepted at this time. Grading design to be revisited during Engineering Submissions to properly design grades to meet recreational needs. It is suggested that the park block can be effectively terraced with proper 5% accessible trails to both tiers ............................... Block 27 - - - i) Consolidate MUP and sidewalk kn RO- W- or Stree-t AA into ane 3.0m wide SWM MUP within the road allowance Page 90 of 792 InternalMe o K Infrastructure Services Department wwwAitchener ra .. ---- - --- --- --- ---- - ----- - --- --- - -- -- Street M'& j} Street M and 30T-14.2.01 roadways do not align. Parks will not support the Gehl PI Trail use of Gehl Place as a road allowance to connect these streets 7. QUESTIONS The following are questions prepared in advance of the staff only discussion meeting: a} Will Street X extend beyond its current southern extent? b) Institutional is proposed in both Block 16 of this application, and Block 1 (Stage 8) of the adjacent Stamm subdivision. What boards are planned for these blocks? c} Street X will need a multi -use pathway crossing at either Street AA or Street V. Are any of these intersections controlled, and which one is best to use as the crossing point? Page 91 of 792 i InternalMemo 1,— flair ::R fdrastructure Services #3epartment WWWAitchener-ca APPENDIX A — PARK DEDICATION CALCULATION Subdivision IMattamy Community Sub. No. I 30T•18201818202 PART 1: PARK DEDICATION BASED ON 1A FSA PER 300 UNITS Range of Units Shown on Plan of Subdivision: Minimum Maximum 1A) Parkland Dedication for 1.0ha per 500 Units PART 2: PARK DEDICATION BASED ON LAND AREA 2A) Total Land Area within Plan of Subdivision Less. 213) Commercial Land Use 2C) Industrial Land Use 20) Conveyed Open Space (less SWM facilities) 2E) Total Lands far 5% Dedication (2A - (213+2C+2D)) 2F) Total Lands for 2% Dedication (213 +2C) 2G) Park Dedication Based on Land Area ((2E x 51lo)+(2F x 2%)) PART 3: TOTAL. PARK DEDICATION FOR SUBDIVISION Park Dedication by 1.0 ha per 500 Units (1A) Park Dedication by 2% and 5% (2G) 3A) Total Park Dedication Required PART 4: PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS 7ii35 gni-; 108,840 ha 0,000 0.(100 3.540 105.100 000 ha ha ha ha ha L!,2dti 11a 5,255 ha -5.27.3 ha 5.2;15 ha 5.255 ha Required Park Dedication (3A) 5.255 ha Park Dedication Shown on Draft Plan 5.380 ha Park Dedication Deficiencyt5urpius 0,125 ha Form completed by.' Mark Parris Date of completion: November 5, 2018 Page 92 of 792 Internal memo Infrastructure Services Department www.kitchener.ca Date: January 11, 2021 To: Garett Stevenson, 519-741-2200, ext. 7670 From: Jonn Barton, 519-741-2600 ext.4152 cc: fife Subject: Mattamy-Gehl subdivision (30T-18201118202) — Re -Circulation Submission: Parks Comments 1. Documents Referenced — 2020-10-27 Re -Submission .1 Reply to City Comments (SGL — Aug. 31, 2020) .2 Figure 1 — Park Block 8 (MTE — Nov. 2019) .3 Trails (MTE —April 14, 2020) .4 Archaeological Site Management Plan (ASI — May 25, 2020) .5 Draft Plan — Redlines (SGL — May, 2020) .6 Final Material Management Plan (MTE — Nov. 3, 2020) .7 Lot Grading Plans - AG1.1-1.5 (MTE — Nov. 29, 2019) 2. Summary of Proposed Park, Open Space and Walkway Conveyances Proposed Park Dedication Land: Stage -Block No. Block Type Area (ha) Comments 30T-18201 _ 1-22 Park 0.38 Urban Green 1 -37 Park 0.37 Urban Green 2-16 Park 3.00 Neighbourhood Park connected to adjacent school block and SWM block 4 - 11 Park 0.48 Urban Green 5 - 8 Park 0.48 Urban Green 30T-18202 1-24 TOTAL Walkway 0.18 Multi -Use Trail corridor - Gehi Trail extension 4.89 1 The proposal currently does not meet the minimum 5% park dedication requirement, calculated at 5.224ha (see Appendix A). An additional 0.334ha of park land is required. Page 93 of 792 Internal memo Infrastructure Services Department Open Space and Walkways: Stage -Block No. Block Type Area Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area, (ha) 30T_-18201 archaeological protection zone 1 — 6 1-20 Walkway 0.60 1 - 21 Open Space 1.60 4-37 Walkway 0.02 5 - 1 Walkway 0.03 5-4 Walkway 0.03 30T-18202 I jA:. www.kitchener.ca Comments Connection for trail around wetland Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area Enhanced connection between parks Connection between street loops Connection between street loops 1 - 1 Open Space 1.63 Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area, archaeological protection zone 1 — 6 Open Space 0.12 Habitat buffer zone 1 -21 Walkway 0.02 Connection to Gehl Trail 1 -23 Open Space 0.60 Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area 1 —25 Open Space 6.68 Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area 1-26 Open Space 2.26 Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area 1 —28 Open Space 0.17 Protected wetlandfJESA habitat area Sub -Total Open Space 13.06 Sub -Total Walkways 0.70 TOTAL 13.76 2 Total developable land for the subdivisions is 104.48ha, with the total land area of the subdivision defined at 117.54ha (see Appendix A). 3. Parks Comments for Other Documents Reply to City Comments 1 Park BIock 16 (p1)- Noted and accepted. 2 Trail at Wetlands W4 and W1 (p2): 1 While the proposed realignment of Streets X and L has improved the overall buffer area available through the open space and park blocks here, there is concern with the effects of the proposed grading in AG1.6 on wetland W4 which will eliminate approximately 60% of the existing recharge of the wetland. This represents an Operational concern that the health of this area will be compromised to the point of requiring large-scale removals/rehabilitation in the near future. An EIS for this proposed grading plan is requested to determine next steps. .2 The proposed trail alignment still traverses within the 30m buffer of wetland W1 and into the northern buffer area defined by the archeological site management plan. In keeping with the recommendations of both the EIS and the archeological site management plan the trail alignment needs to be re -aligned outside of these buffer areas. Page 94 of 792 Internal memo J K R Infrastructure Services Department www.kitchenerca 3 Trail at Block 23/Wetland W8 (p2): Adjustment to block 23 size and layout is noted and accepted. 4 Grading (p3): .1 It is noted that the proposed grading for park block 8 (stage 5) does not meet the minimum standards defined in the development manual for 100% of the park area. With a more than 10m difference in elevation between the property line with the adjacent block and the ROW the cost of attempting to construct with these grades is prohibitive for the city. Going forward there are 2 options for this block: A. The developer agrees to modify the draft agreement to include a condition that any and all additional costs owing to the slopes in this block to meet any programming needs determined by the city are the responsibility of the developer (i.e. not DC eligible), Additional non -DC eligible costs would include (but are not necessarily limited to) armour stone retaining, guard-rails, additional fill, additional drainage infrastructure and any costs for design and construction of building on a slope (such as custom structure design, fabrication and installation). B. The city does not accept the block for conveyance as parkland and the developer locates an alternate block on the site to meet the parkland dedication requirement. .2 Noted that proposed overland flow routes and slope percentages for walkway blocks are now included. 5 Walkway Blocks (pp4-5): 1 The proposed east -west trail does provide a valuable community trail corridor between the Gehl Trail and the residences immediately to the south-west of it. However it falls short of the stated goal for the city of a continuous east -west active transportation link through the site. To meet this goal a boulevard multi- use trail (BMUT) should also be planned for on both sides of Rosenberg Way. Resolution of any potential challenges to this (such as planned single residential with driveway access from Rosenberg Way) should be initiated with Transportation and Parks staff. .2 As noted previously in comment 3.2.2 issues remain with the proposed alignment of the trail through buffer areas for both wetland W1 and the archeological protection area. Revised Draft Plan 6 Revisions 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 & 12: Noted and accepted. Final Material Management Plan 7 Noted environmental concerns identified in the report that are within proposed park land: .1 Stage 4, Block 11 — contains Area 6 material (foundry sand stockpiles) Page 95 of 792 Internal memo Infrastructure Services Department i KJT( i II .\'ER www.kitchener.ca 2 Stage 5, Block 8 — contains Area 1 material (perimeter screening berms of unknown quality) and Area 9 material (relocated material by the current owner in accordance with the pit rehabilitation plan) 3 Stage 1, Block 35 — is entirely within Area 8 (historical soil, aggregate and reclaimed asphalt processing operations) 8 Noted are the methodology and approach for the environmental concerns within park land: .1 Area 1 material (in park Mock 8) — Perform additional borehole testing. .2 Area 6 material (in park block 11) — Perform borehole testing to confirm no hazard remains even with previous removal of foundry sand and subsequent surface testing. .3 Area 8 material (in park block 35) — Perform additional borehole testing in grid pattern as well as further sampling and evaluation during the excavation and redistribution of the material in Stage 2 of material management plan. .4 Area 9 material (in park block 8) — Ongoing investigation through pit rehabilitation plan in Stage 2 of material management plan - 9 Ensure future borehole and other testing areas adequately capture conditions in proposed park Iand blocks containing material noted as environmental concern. 10 Noted that areas of perched water tables within or approximated near to park land (Stg 1, Blk 35 - BH -03-10, MW -3D-1 3; Stg 2, Blk 16 — BH -02A-10) are well below proposed surface levels. 11 MM7.1: Ail parks on the site are located within areas of noted as heavy fill areas. In proposed grading plans for the site an approach to compaction and settling that will adequately address concerns of settling for any proposed structures within parkland should be included. 12 MM10.2: 1 The foundry sand stockpile was located (MM10.2) but the salt stockpile was not - please locate extents of stockpile location as well. .2 Please clarify intent and results for boreholes noted in park block 35 (stage 1 ) — BBX- 10, TP -17, TP -18, TP -21 and TP -23. Lot Grading Plans (AG1.1-1.6) 13 AG 1.3: Intent seems to be to use the roundabout area for excess overland flow in heavy storm events. Note that if this is the case then planting opportunities on the roundabout may be limited or precluded. 14 AG 1.4: As previously noted in comment 3A.1, proposed grading for all of park block 8 (stage 5) does not meet the minimum grading standards defined in the development manual. A resolution as per the options stipulated above is requested. 15 AG 1.6: Page 96 of 792 Internal memo Infrastructure Services Department www. kitchen er. ca As noted previously in comment 3.2.1 there is concern with the proposed grading solution which reduced the available recharge areas of wetland W4 by cutting it off from approximately 60% of the existing overland flow area. An EIS that address the impacts of the proposed grading here on the affected wetlands is requested. I The proposed grading for the entirety of park block 22 (stage 1) does not come close to meeting minimum grading standards for park land defined in the development manual. Without any apparent opportunity for alternative solutions (as with park block 8 in stage 5) this block is not accepted for conveyance as park Iand. An alternate Iocation for the park on the site is to be provided by the developer within the south-east area of the site. END OF COMMENTS Page 97 of 792 Internal memo. Infrastructure Services Department www.kitchener.ca APPENDIX A -- PARK DEDICATION CALCULATION Subdivision Mattamy Community Sub. No. I 30T•18201 & 18202 PART 1: PARK DEDICATION BASED ON 1.0 HA PER 500 UNITS Range of Units Shown on Plan of Subdivision Minimum 1839 units Maximum 2635 units 1A) Parkland Dedication for 1.0ha per 500 Units 5,584 ha PART 2: PARK DEDICATION BASED ON LAND AREA 2A) Total Land Area within Plan of Subdivision 11T.540 ha Less: 215) Commercial Land Use 2C) Industrial Land Use 2D} Conveyed Open Space (less SWM facilities) 2E) Totai Lands for 5% Dedication (2A - (2B+2C+2D)) 2F) Tatai Lands for 2% Dedication (28 + 2C) 2G) Park Dedication Based on Land Area ((2E x 5%)+(2F x 2%)) PART 3: TOTAL PARK DEDICATION FOR SUBDIVISION 0.0co 0,0W 13.06€1 104.460 0,000 ha Ina ha ha ha Park Dedication by 1.0 ha per 500 Units (1A) 5.664 ha Park Dedication by 2% and 5% (2G) 5.224 ha 3A) Total Park Dedication Required 5.224 PART 4: PARK DEDICATION ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS Required Park Dedication (3A) 5.224 tea Park Dedication Shown on Draft Plan 4.89D Ila Park Dedication Deficiency/Surplus I -0.33,f ha Form completed by, Jonn Barton Date of completion: January 14.2021 Page 98 of 792 Internal memo Infrastructure Services Department www.kltchener.ca Date: To: Garett Stevenson, 519-741-2200, ext. 7070 From: Jonn Barton, Parks & Cemeteries, 519-741-2600 ext. 4152 cc: Subject: Parks & Cemeteries Comments for 30T-18201 (Matta my -Gehl) -- School Sites Options Meetings (all stakeholders) • May 24, 2019 Submission(s) Reviewed • School Options Package (May 21, 2019 µ- Options 1, 2, 3A, 313, 4 & 5) General Comments 1. The prime considerations for park block 15 with respect to any potential school siting configuration are size and frontage. As a result only Options 4 & 5 are considered feasible for Parks & Cemeteries. 2, Additional consideration is needed for the anticipated use of park lands by the proposed schools, as well as any publicly accessible elements at the schools, to better compliment publicly available resources. a. To this end each respective school board is asked to submit a set of expectations for use of park lands, and what facilities at each proposed school would be generally available to the public outside of school hours. b. Parks & Cemeteries in turn can provide a general overview of anticipated programming needs for park block 15. 3. The meeting of May 24, 2019 discussed the configuration for block 17 SWMF as having a wet cell on the west side and a dry cell on east side. If neither school board are permitted by policy to incorporate the dry cell into programming for their respective school sites, then flipping the location of school block 15 and park block 15 for Options 4 & 5 is proposed so that park block 15 can better integrate the dry cell into any park programming. - END OF COMMENTS - Page 99 of 792 Region of Waterloo VIA EMAIL Garett Stevenson Senior Planner, City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x7070 Ge refit. steve n sonCW, kitche ne r. ca Dear Mr. Stevenson PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES Community Planning 150 Frederick Street 8th Floor Kitchener Ontario N26 4.33 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4466 www. re g io nofwa to r I oo. ca Peter Ellis 519-575-4400 x3899 pel[isA-regionofwater[oo.ca Pile: D18-20/18201 D18-20118202 Re: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18209 Official Plan Amendment Application OP1810051B1GS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA1810061B1GS Bleams Road "Application 1" CITY OF KITCHENER a Draft Pian of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Official Plan Amendment Application OP1810061G1GS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA1810071GIGS 161 Gehl Place "Application 2" Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Inc. CITY OF KITCHENER Preliminary Post -Circulation Comments #1 March 20, 2020 The Region has prepared the following post circulation comments for the above Draft P[ans of Subdivision 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 applications and related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. The purpose of these comments is to outline any items which need to be addressed prior to draft approval and to identify any items that may be imposed as conditions of draft approval. The original application was received by the Region in October 2018 and a recirculated draft plan and supporting studies and reports were received by the Region in February 2020. The applications propose to create two residential subdivisions over 6 stages of development consisting of: a) 1,656 (min) to 2,825 (max) residential units,- Document nits; Document Number: 3244872 Page 1 of 11 Page 100 of 792 PreIimina Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 -- 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 b) a school; c) four urban green blocks (small parks); d) a Iarge neighbourhood park; e) an environmental linkage; f) multiple walkway blocks and open spaces; g) five medium density blocks; and h) three mixed use blocks. This proposed community is centered along the future Rosenberg Way, which is a future street that will extend from Fischer Hallman all the way to Trussler Road, Rosenberg Way will be south of, and parallel to, Bleams Road. A neighbourhood park and school site have been shown at the future intersection of Rosenberg Way and the extension of Isaiah Drive (south of Bleams Road). Two medium density blocks and two mixed use blocks are shown at the intersections of Bleams Road and Isaiah Drive, and a medium density block and a mixed use block is shown at Rosenberg Way and Trussler Road. See the list of related studies on the last page of this memo. The City of Kitchener has provided a high-level overview of the draft plan revisions in their Recirculation Memo dated January 27, 2029. 1. Water Services Regional Water Services Staff have reviewed the Functional Servicing Report from MITE dated July 6th, 2018 and have the following comments: It is noted that there are two maps produced in Figure 5.2 in Section 5.2 of the report dated July 9th, 2018 and Figure 2.1 in the preliminary report of July 6th, 2018. It appears these maps are the same but have different numbers and dates. Staff comments below will be based on figure 5.2 as shown in Section 5.2 of the report. It is unclear to staff whether the following pipes (J-506 and J-12; J-518 and J-20) will be located in a road corridor or utility corridor? 1t is noted that the location of the Zone 516 PRV on Bleams Road is not shown in the correct location. It should be located in the Red Clover Crescent at Bleams Road. The 300mm pipe along Street L from J-508 to J-529 does not appear to connect to the 450mm watermain on BIeams Road. If Street L watermain is aligned east of the PRV on Red Clover Court (north of Bleams Road), a connection to the 450 Zone 5 section of the watermain is permissible. Otherwise this could be considered a long dead-end. PIease review watermain sizing. As part of a previous OMB decision on the South Estates Plan of Subdivision (30T-08206), the final Schedule B-1 Functional Servicing Plan by MTE dated June 23, 2015 has a 300 mm watermain along the length of Rosenberg Way. However, between J-603 and J-646 (school location), the water main was Document Number: 3244872 PIRagibof@4 of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 --- 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 reduced to 200mm. Please revise the watermain size to 300 mm as this will provide for flexibility in the future (pressure zone divide modification). Staff would want to be able to feed the school from the other pressure zone in the case of a watermain break/emergency. Detail design for the pressure zone divide should also include a fire hydrant located at the divide in order to have greater maintenance flexibility. - It is unclear why the pipe located between J-802 and J-612 is a 300 mm pipe. Please explain your rationale. Regional Water Services staff are still reviewing the updated reports from the recent 2020 recirculation. Comments will be provided once available. 2. Transportation Comments The following comments result from Regional Transportation Staffs review of the following reports and studies: .- Preliminary Stormwater Management Report from MTE dated July 6, 2018 (revised November 29, 2019); • Functional Servicing Report from MTE dated July 6, 2018 (revised November 29, 2019); • Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment from MTE dated July 6, 2018 (revised November 1, 2019); and • Transportation Impact Study from SaIvini Consulting dated July 2018 (addendum December 20, 2019). Regional Road Dedication This section of Regional Road 56 (gleams Road) has a designated road width of 30.480m (100ft) in accordance with Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). The existing Bleams Road width along this section varies in width, and appropriate road widening dedications will be required to bring the Bleams Road right of way up to the designated road width. Daylight triangle dedications measuring 7,62m x 7.62m (25ft x 25ft) will be required at the intersection of all local municipal roads with Bleams Road. It appears that the Plan of Subdivision drawing provided with the application, shows road widening and daylight triangle dedications along Bleams Road. Please ensure that the daylight triangle dedications are measured post road widening. This section of Regional Road 70 (Trussler Road) has a designated road width of 30.480m (100ft) in accordance with Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). While no further road widening dedication is required along this section of Trussler Road in association with the ROP designated road width, daylight triangle dedications measuring 7.62m x 7.62m (25ft x 25ft) will be required at the intersection of the local municipal roads with Trussler Road. Additional property dedication may also be required in association with the future Trussler Road re -construction project (see Transportation Capital Program — TCP — information below for more details). Document Number: 3244872 Pape IageOW2 Of 792 Prelimina Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 — 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 A daylight triangle measuring 15.24m x 15.24m (50ft x 50ft), measured post road widening, will also be required for the Trussler Road & Bleams Road intersection. This daylight triangle is the standard Regional size and additional property dedication may be required to accommodate the future intersection design of the Trussler Road & Bleams Road intersection. The owner/applicant must engage an Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS) to prepare a draft Reference Plan which illustrates all required road widening, daylight triangle and road improvement dedications along both Bleams Road and Trussler Road. The draft Reference Plan should be sent to Regional staff for review and approval prior to deposit and the completion of the plan. Please ensure that the property requirements shown on the approved Reference Plan are reflected correctly on all plans going forward. Regional Staff will review Phase l and Phase II ESAs studies for the subject lands in terms of dedicating these lands to the Region of Waterloo. Please exclude the portions of land to be dedicated to the Region of Waterloo from any Record of Site Conditions (RSCs) required for the subject properties. Access Permit/TIS/Access Regulation The Plan of Subdivision proposes three Local Municipal Streets (Street L, Isaiah Drive, and George Israel Street) connections to Bleams Road and one Local Municipal Street (Rosenberg Way) connection to Trussler Road. All existing redundant access locations to both Bleams Road and Trussler Road must be closed to Region of Waterloo and City of Kitchener standards and this includes any boulevard restoration activities. A Regional Road Access Permit application for the closure of all access locations will be required. There is no fee associated with the closure applications. A Regional Road Access Permit application and associated $230 fee will be required for all four Local Municipal Street locations. Please visit the Region of Waterloo website to find the application form (haps://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/doing businesslappl ications-licences-and-permits. aspx) The above can be conditions of draft approval. Region of Waterloo staff have received a copy of the Transportation Impact Study Addendum dated December 20, 2019 completed by SaIvini Consulting which is an update to the original Transportation Impact Study (TIS) dated July 2018. Review of the Transportation Addendum is underway by Region of Waterloo staff and comments will be provided under separate cover. Any road/intersection improvement identified by either the applicant's transportation consultant, or as part of Regional BIeams Road reconstruction Environmental Assessment (EA), will be implemented via a Regional construction project. The applicant will be responsible for providing the land required to implement any improvements. In addition, the developer will be responsible for functional and design Document Number: 3244872 af09 of 792 PreIiiminary Post-Cireulation,RegionaI Comments #11-- 30T-182.01 and 30T-18202 cost estimates (if required). A follow-up meeting will be scheduled in the near future to discuss required road improvements. Stormwater Management & Site Grading Region of Waterloo staff is currently reviewing the Revised Functional Servicing Report dated November 29, 2019 completed by MTE Consultants related to the proposed subdivisions. The report has been circulated to the appropriate Region of Waterloo staff and comments will be provided once available. Region of Waterloo staff have received the Revised Preliminary Stormwater Management Report dated November 29, 2019 completed by MTE Consultants related to the proposed subdivisions. The report has been circulated to the appropriate staff and comments will be provided once available. In the meantime, it is noted that grading related to the subject properties must be compatible with the existing and proposed Bleams Road & Trussler Road rights of way. Transit Planning Grand River Transit (GRT) staff comments on the original submission and recirculated plan and related reports and studies are below: GRT is designing for a local route in this area post 2021, with a number of stop locations within the 30T-18201 subject lands. The following twelve (12) preliminary GRT stop locations are identified: 1. Rosenberg Way at Street Q (eastbound); 2. Rosenberg Way at Street Q (westbound); 3. Rosenberg Way at George Israel Street (eastbound) -- proposed shelter; 4. Rosenberg Way at George Israel Street (westbound) -- proposed shelter; 5. George Israel Street at Bleams Road (northbound); 6. George Israel Street at Bleams Road (southbound); 7. Rosenberg Way at Isaiah Drive (westbound) — proposed shelter; 8. Rosenberg Way at Isaiah Drive (eastbound) — proposed shelter; 9. Rosenberg Way at Street T (eastbound); 10. Rosentberg Way opposite Street T (westbound); 11. Rosenberg Way at Street X (eastbound); and 12. Rosenberg Way at Street L (westbound). As a condition of draft approval, the Developer will be required to provide sufficient funds for the future construction of landing pads and other amenities as noted below at each of these locations identified by GRT. These funds will allow for the appropriate phasing of infrastructure in relation to the timing of service introduction. At major intersections and adjacent to higher -density blocks, funds for shelters and shelter pads will also be required — this would apply to stops 3, 4, 7, and 8 listed above. In some cases, easements for shelter pads may be required, but this will need to be assessed at the site plan review stage. The table below provides an overview of the Document dumber: 3244872 PaRageof1'J4 of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 approximate per unit and total costs associated with each of these amenities, as well as the sum total of transit amenity funds requested by GRT. Amenity Dimensions Per Unit Cost Number Re aired Total Cost Landing pad 9.5 m (length) x $3,300 12 $3,600 2.0 m width Shelter pad* 4 m (length) x 2.3 $1,600 4 $6,400* m width Glass shelter 3.7 m (length) x $12,000 4 $48,000 1.5 m width Total transit stop amenity costs $94,000 `may not be required if shelters placed on wide (>3m) boulevard landing pad — dependent on boulevard width The actual costs will be based on the cost of these amenities at the time of payment. In addition to these amenities, there are a number of design recommendations that would help to make these subdivisions more transit -supportive, These include: Mixed uses along Rosenberg Way should be oriented towards the street in order to promote activity, natural surveillance, and overall streetscape animation. Medium density blocks, townhouses and single-family dwellings and their driveways in the residential blocks abutting Rosenberg Way should be oriented towards internal collector roads to avoid conflicts between buses and vehicles pulling out of driveways. Ensuring access will be particularly challenging for some blocks, as it appears that they will be accessed via Rosenberg Way. The stop locations described above will also need to be located away from driveways and the driveway locations should be paired if possible to reduce the number of conflict points. Measures to reduce the potential for conflict between stopping buses and vehicles at the proposed transit stops at the Rosenberg Way I Isaiah Drive intersection should be considered. The proposed stop locations between Blocks 9 (mixed-use/neighbourhood institutional) and 16 (park) will need to be reviewed carefully to ensure that the potential for conflict between transit and school vehicles (adjacent block 15 — school) is reduced. It appears that the majority of residential properties within the 30T-18201 subdivision fall within the recommended 450 m walk distance to/from a transit stop. However, this is not the case for all residents within the 30T-18202 subject lands: the street pattern creates a challenge for some residents to access transit, particularly those located on Streets AC and Y. GRT staff recommend the applicant consider realigning these streets into more of a grid pattern (e.g. create a connection from Streets ACIP to Street U or T) to provide shorter wanting distances to transit stops along Rosenberg Way. Document Number: 3244872 PP0Cfeo1@5 of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 -- 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) staff has also provided comments pertaining to these applications: - Continuous sidewalks (consistent with AODA Accessible Built Environment Standard) should be provided along both sides of all adjacent public streets. - It is recommended that cycling connections be provided to Bleams Road as there is a planned Multi -Use -Trail (MUT), Bleams Road then connects to Fischer - Hallman Road which also has a planned MUT. It is recommended that bike lanes be considered on any internal roadways. - It is recommended that bike parking facilities be considered in the proposed park blocks. Environmental Noise Region of Waterloo staff have received the updated Preliminary Environmental Noise Study, completed by MTE Consultants and dated November 1, 2019, related to the proposed subdivisions. Review of the study is underway by Region of Waterloo staff and comments will be provided once available. Transportation Capital Program TCP This section of Bleams Road and Trussler Road has been identified in the current Region of Waterloo 10 -Year Transportation Cap ita€ Program (TCP) as being up for reconstruction in 2023 (Bleams Road) and 2024 (Trussler Road). For more information related to these projects, please visit the Region of Waterloo website (https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/living-here/construction-and-road-closures.aspx) or contact the Region Project Manager Greg Proctor (519-575-4729 or gproctor&reg ionofwaterloo.cafor the Bleams Road reconstruction and Justin Armstrong (519-575-4400 ext., 3164 oriuarmstronggregionofwaterloo.ca) for the Trussler Road reconstruction. Region of Waterloo International Airport The subject properties are located within the Region of Waterloo International Airport Zoning Regulated Area (AZR). Although there are no concerns related to the proposed building heights, or aircraft noise all development must comply with airport regulations. Chain Link Fence As a condition of draft approval, a minimum 1.5m high, maintenance -free chain link fence will be required along back -lotted property frontage with Bleams Road and Trussler Road. The chain link fence should be located on the Regional right of way, offset 0.15m from the property line, post road widening dedication. Through the Site Plan process, it may be identified that multi -residential Mocks with property along the Regional right of way no longer require chain link fence. This can be a condition of draft approval. Document Number: 3244872 Page 7 of1 age 16 of 792 iminary Post -Circulation Reqional Comments #1 — 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 3. Source Water Protection The site is within Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Areas 2, 3, 8 and within a Regional Recharge Area. Regional Hydrogeology and Sourcewater (HSW) staff have reviewed the original reports submitted with the initial subdivision and CPAIZBA applications. Preliminary comments indicated that they wanted to review Provincial Ministry comments relating to PSW, Core Features, Wetland Complex, stormwater management strategy, recharge targets, and long-term groundwater-surfacewater resource management strategies to see how those comments were framed. Staff understands Ministry comments are outstanding. HSW comments remain outstanding on the updated reports and studies that were recently submitted with the recirculation. HSW staff have requested a `Materials Management Plan' be provided to the Region's satisfaction. This plan is meant to outline how existing materials on-site and imported materials will be managed throughout the various stages of development and post - development as per the Region's Potable Groundwater Criteria Use in the Region of Waterloo 2010 (the plan identifies a significant amount of imported soils will be necessary for the development). This plan dated December 20, 2019 by MTE Consultants has been provided to the Region and relevant staff are still reviewing the contents of the report. Comments will be provided once available. HSW staff also indicate that a Source Water Protection Potential Contamination Study (SWPPCS) be completed to the Region's satisfaction. This study is being requested under the Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications On or Adjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites (2009). This study is meant to characterize groundwater conditions and provide conclusions on past and present potential sources of site contamination which may affect groundwater - see section 4.0 Conditions of Approval under the Guideline at the following link: https://www. regionofwaterloo. ca/en/resou rces/Appl ication sli m plementationG u idea i nesContarni n ated&tes.pdf. 4. Record of Site Condition A Record of Site Condition (RSC) was requested as part of the presubmission consultation. Staff notes that a residential RSC (from 2009) exists for 161 Gehl Place (30T-18202). It is noted that if the site use or operations have changed since then, or if there are new contaminants of concern identified, then a new RSC may be required. A RSC has not yet been completed on the 30T-18201 subject lands. Per Region Implementation Guideline on development applications and contaminated sites, two options are available as to when the RSC must be completed. Either prior to adoption of the proposed zoning by-law for the lands, or apply a holding provision in the zoning Document Plumber: 3244872 Pto# ®T of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 --- 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 by-law and that the "H" not be lifted until such time as the RSC has been completed. In this case, either option is acceptable to Regional staff. Please be advised that the RSC must exclude the road widening requirements along gleams Road and Trussler Road (as necessary) noted above in item #2. 5. Archaeological Assessment Far 30T-18201 (gleams Road Lands) • Prior to Draft Approval the Region will require the submission of the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment for the subject property, and if recommended by the Stage 1, a Stage 2 Assessment. Further, the Region will require a Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism, and Culture Industries Acknowledgement Letter for the Stage 1 (and possibly 2) Assessment(s) For 30T-18202 f 151 Gehl Place Lands Regional staff have received a copy of the Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment for the subject property. Regional staff understand further archaeological assessment work continues or is currently underway. Prior to Draft Approval the Region will require the submission of: Q A Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries Acknowledgement Letter for the Stage 3 Archaeological Assessment for AiHd-150; o The Stage 4 Archaeological Assessment for AiHd-150; and * The Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries Acknowledgement Letter for the Stage 4 Archaeological Assessment for AiHd-150. 6. Preliminary Environmental Planning Comments The following preliminary comments are offered based on environmental planning staff review of the Environmental Impact Study completed by NRSI dated July 2018 (Updated December 2019) and other supporting documents relating to Draft Plans of Subdivision 30T-18201 and 30T-18202. 30T-18201 — There are no Core Environmental Features currently designated, and as such, Environmental Planning has no concern with this application proceeding at this time. 30T-18202 -- Further discussion between Regional, City, and Provincial staff are ongoing and comments will be provided when available. Document Number: 3244872 P eag9 e of 1R8 of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1 — 30T-18201 and 30T-18202 7. General Comments Land Use Compatibility The HGC Environmental Noise Study (June 22, 2011) completed as part of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan identified potential for land use compatibility/noise issues associated with the variety of land uses on the subject lands, specifically mixed use, institutional, higher density residential blocks, and other sensitive land uses on the draft plan. These potential land use compatibility issues should be identified and addressed in the supporting studies and reports. Further discussion is required on how to implement this requirement moving forward. Density The "Planning Justification Addendum Report" (SGL Planning and Design Inc, December 2019), notes an overall density range between 47-79 people and jobs per hectare. The density for this site must meet the densities proposed for the overall Rosenberg Secondary Plan. Regional staff are reviewing the proposed densities in these plans of subdivision, as well as other adjacent pians of subdivision, to determine compliance. Aggregate License It is noted that the Iands (30T-18201) are still licensed under the Aggregate Resources Act. Staff understand that all aggregate operations will cease and licences surrendered once residential uses are introduced. If this is not the case, a condition of draft approval will be required to ensure compatibility is addressed prior to registration of any stage of the plan. Fees and Charges The Region acknowledges the receipt of applicable fees for these applications which were received in 2018 ($11,540.00 — 3OT-18201; $5,572.50 — 30T-18202; $5,750 — per GPA; $6,402.50 per ZBAIEISITISINoise Study). The Region also acknowledges the receipt of the applicable recirculation fee ($2,300.00 Under By-law 19-016), which was received on March 11, 2020. Pursuant to the 2017 Regional Fee By-law, which was in effect when the applications were submitted, the Region's additional fee for draft approval of a plan of subdivision is $4,025.00 for each subdivision. These fees are payable prior to the Region's issuance of conditions of draft approval to the approval authority for the subdivision. Document dumber: 3244872 Pal0®P of 792 Preliminary Post -Circulation Regional Comments #1--30TA8201 and 30T-18202 Regional Development Charges Any future development on the subject lands will be subject to provisions of Regional Development Charges By-law 19037 or any successor thereof. Regional staff continues to review the circulation. In the meantime, if you have any questions, feel free to give me a call. Yours truly, Peter Ellis, MES Principal Planner cc. Brad Trussler, Mattamy Homes (via email) Shilling Yip, Community Planning, Region of Waterloo (via email) Document Number: 3244872 Pag 11 of 7, age 1 0 of 792 Region of Waterloo February 1, 2621 Brad Trussler Mattamy Homes Waterloo -Wellington Division 433 Steeles Avenue East Milton, ON L9T 8Z4 Dear Mr. Trussler: PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www. re g i o n ofwa to r l o o.ca Fife No.. D18-20156 BLEAMS Ian Cook Construction Re: Region of Waterloo Transportation Related Conditions Update -- South Estates (Cook HomeslMattamy Homes), 1531 BIeams Road, City of Kitchener, 30T-08206 This letter is a follow up to earlier conversations related to Regional Road network improvements for the Cook HomeslMattamy Homes (South Estates) Plan of Subdivision (30T-08206). The most recent Modification to Conditions of Approval issued by the City of Kitchener is dated July 2, 2020. Region of Waterloo conditions included the following: 21- a) That prior to final approval, the Owner will provide a functional design and cost estimate for a westbound left -turn lane with 40 metre storage length and appropriate tapers on Bleams Road at Forestwalk Street. b) That prior to final approval, the Owner will provide a functional design and cost estimate for a southbound left -turn lane with 50m storage on Trussler Road at Bleams Road. c) That prior to final approval, the Region has the necessary physical and financial resources to construct all required road improvements in a) and b), above,- d) bove,d) That conditions a), b) and c) above all be fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and legislative Services. As you know, Region of Waterloo Design & Construction staff are moving forward with the Bleams Road Environmental Assessment (EA) for the future road re -construction between Fischer -Hallman Road and Trussler Road within the City of Kitchener. To avoid duplication between the Bleams Road EA and the Plan of Subdivision application, the Region of Waterloo will no longer require the Owner to submit the functional designs and cost estimates as noted under Regional condition 21. These will be addressed through the Bleams Road EA work. DOCS: 3548627 Page 111 of 792 Yours Truly, /)�� ,Jason Wigglesworth, C.E.T. Transportation Planner (519) 505-4535 CC. Shilling Yip -- Region of Waterloo Peter EIlis — Region of Waterloo Greg Proctor-- Region of Waterloo Darryl Spencer -- Region of Waterloo Sergio Zaga — Stantec AIexander Drung — Mattamy Homes Garett Stevenson — City of Kitchener Document Number: 3548527 Page 112 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Alexander Drung <AIexander.Drung@mattamycorp.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2022 11:09 PM To: Brad Trussler; Peter Ellis Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] Reserved Street name Request - 30T -08201/30T-08202 Hi Peter, please see the below email chain with Chris Rumig regarding street names. Alf of the street names in our draft plan have been approved per the lists below. PIease let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Alex From: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Thursday, December 9, 20213:50 PM To: Alexander Drung rAlexander.Drung@mattamycorp.com>; 'Barb Fairbairn' <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchen er.ca> Subject: (EXTERNAL] Reserved Street name Request - 30T -08201/30T-08202 Hi Alex, I've reserved the following street names on behalf of Mattamy: Street name Status Averill Reserved Baltusrol Reserved Debonair Reserved Great Oak Reserved Northwood Reserved Seminole Reserved Thorn Lodge Reserved Waycross Reserved Winged Foot Reserved Thanks, Chris Rumig GIS Analyst - Information Technology Services, Region of Waterloo 150 Frederick St, 511 Floor, Kitchener, ON N2G 4.13 226-339-3257 c rum ip,@ region ofwate rloo.ca From: Alexander Drung <Alexander,Drung2mattamycorp.com> Sent: December 9, 20212:50 PM Page 113 of 792 To: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regi onofwaterIoo.ca>,'Ba rb Fairbairn' <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Reserved Street name Request - 30T -08201/30T-08202 Hi Chris, we were short a few names stilt. Please see attached a few more to confirm. This should be enough for our subdivision. Thanks, Alex From: Chris Rumig <rumig@regionofwaterfoo.ca> Sent: Thursday, december 9, 20219:38 AM To: Alexander Drung <Alexander.Drung@mattamycorp.corrr. 'Barb Fairbairn' <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reserved Street name Request - 30T -08201/30T-08202 Good Morning Alex, I've reviewed the list of street names you supplied and I've made note in the table below which streetnames were reserved for Mattamy and those which could not be reserved as they were already in use. Street name Status Bandon Reserved Beacon Reserved Bethpage Reserved Blackwoif Reserved Brookline Reserved Crosscurrent Reserved Essex Reserved FieIdway Reserved Homelands Reserved Hummingbird Already in use Mackenzie McKenzie already in use Maple Leaf Already in use Merlon Reserved M u i rfiel d Reserved Oakmont Reserved Pinsent Reserved Rosebush Reserved Sand Hills Aiready in use Sawgrass Reserver Summerside Already in use Sunningdale Reserved Tailwind Reserved Tillinghast Reserved If you have any questions — please feel free to contact me. Page 114 of 792 Chris Rumig GIS Analyst - Information Technology Services, Region of Waterloo 150 Frederick St, 5t'' Floor, Kitchener, ON N2G 4.13 226-339-3257 cru m ig@ regio nofwate rl oo.ca. From: Alexander Drung <Alexander.Drun mattam cor .comp Sent: December 8, 20218:41 AM To: Chris Rumig Crum[gC7regionofwaterioo.ca>; 'Barb Fairbairn' EBarb.Fairbairn@k.itche.ner.ca> Subject: FW: [EXTERNAL] RE: Street Names Hi Chris, I am working with Brad on the Kitchener Green subdivision on Bleams Rd (30T-18201 and 30T-18202). I understand there were some street names already reserved for Mattamy to use in this subdivision. We were stiil several names short, so we have come up with an additional list I wanted to provide you for your approval. I have checked them against existing reserved names within the Region, which there should not be duplicates, but could you kindly confirm these names could also be reserved for us? Thanks, Alex Alex Drung Senior Land Development Manager t (9Q 5) 203-3955 (direct) c (4 16) 804-8521 CanadlrtTop alexander,druno-Urnattamycorp.com E�p€oyw ' Mattamy Homes Canada Greater Toronto West Division: 433 Steeles Avenue East, Suite 110, Milton, ON L9T 8Z4 Notice: This email is intended for use of the party to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please inform me and delete it. Thank you From: Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 202111:16 AM To: Brad Trussier <Brad.Trussler@mattamycorn.com> Cc:'Chris Rumig' <Crumig@repionofvvaterloo.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Street Names Hello Brad, could you please tell me which subdivision(s) in Kitchener these names relate to (30T# please). Chris, thanks for including the link to the website to look up reserved names. Thanks very much. Barb Barbara Fairbairn Addressing Analyst I Building Div I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 e7329 I TTY 1-866.969-9994 1 barb.fairbairna@kitchener.ca Page 115 of 792 From: Chris Rumig <Crumigeregionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 202111:08 AM To:'Brad.Trussler@mattamycorp.com' <Brad.Trussler@mattamycorp.com> Cc: Tim Walden <TWaIden @ regi onofwaterloo.ca>; Shilling Yip <SYipr@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Street Names Good Morning Brad, I've reviewed the list of streetnames you submitted for consideration for your subdivision plans in Kitchener. I have indicated in the following table the street names I have reserved on behalf of Mattamy. 5treetname Comment Solitude Reserved for Mattamy Sheephorn Reserved far Mattamy Gold Dust Sawbuck Reserved for Mattamy Reserved for Mattamy Rattlesnake Reserved for Mattamy Greystone already in use Edgewater already in use Burgundy Reserved for Mattamy Blueberry already reserved Bellflower already reserved Conners Too phonetically close to Conner St which is already in use Leggatt Reserved for Mattamy Skyline Reserved for Mattamy Cooperhead Reserved for Mattamy Sidewinder Reserved for Mattamy Allan already in use As well, I wanted to note that weekly we update a table of all reserved streetnames on the Region's open data Portal [https:Zjrowopendata- rmw.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/reserved-streetnames/explore} which you can download. If you have any questions — please feel free to contact me. Regards, Chris Rumig GIS Analyst - information Technology Services, Region of Waterloo 150 Frederick St, 5i6' Floor, Kitchener, ON N2G 413 Page 116 of 792 DRAFT 1 PRELIMINARY REGIONAL CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 30T-18201 (Mattamy Kitchener Green -- Area 2) June 30, 2022 Please note that these Regional Conditions of Draft Approval are considered preliminary and draft, and do not represent a comprehensive or final list of Regional conditions. In particular, environmental planning conditions have not been provided yet. These conditions may be subject to change. — Peter Ellis, Principal Planner That the OWNER (Kitchener Green Limited Partnership) satisfies the following conditions to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services: 1. That this approval applies to Plan of Subdivision 30T-18201 for Kitchener Green Limited Partnership (OWNER) in the City of Kitchener, CAD File No. 30T- 18201.dwg dated March 2022 and which shows the following: Stage 1 Blocks 1-32 Block 33 Blocks 34-35 Blocks 36, 37, 44 Block 38 Block 39-43 Stage 2 BIocks 1-11 BIock 12 BIocks 13-14 BIock 15 BIock 16 Block 17 Block 18 Block 19 Blocks 20-21 Blocks 22-28 Singlps/Towns (Residential) - Park - Public Walkway - Open Space/SWM Road Widening - 0.3m Reserve - Singles/Towns (Residential) - Walkway - Multiple Residential Mixed Use (Res./Commercial) - Multiple Residential/Institutional - Institutional - Community Park Open Space/SWM - Road Widening - 0.3m Reserve (294-476 units) (108-174 units) (250-404 units) (100-350 units) (120-250 units) (0-100 units) Document Number: 4117002 Page 1 of 9 Page 117 of 792 Stage 3 Block 1 - Multiple Residential (150-325 units) Block 2 - 0.3m Reserve Stage 4 Blocks 1-30, 39 - Singles/Towns (Residential) (345-568 units) Block 31 - Multiple Residential (75-290 units) Block 32 - Mixed Use (Res./Commercial) (80-200 units) Block 33 - Park Blocks 34-35 - Walkway Block 36 - Road Widening Blocks 37-38 - 0.3m Reserve Stage 5 Blocks 1-20 Singles/Towns (Residential) (207-341 units) Block 21 - Multiple Residential (80-150 units) Block 22 - Park Block 23-24 - Walkway Block 25 - Road Widening Stage 6 Blocks 1-3 - Singles (Residential) (10-18 units) Stage 7 Blocks 1-4 - Singles (Residential) (16-29 units) Block 5 - Future Development Blocks 6-7 - Future Access Total 1.,996 to 3,994 units 2. That the plan for final approval may incorporate a lot pattern for all blocks in which single detached, semi-detached and townhouse lots are permitted, at a density not exceeding the density identified in the draft approval conditions; 3. That the OWNER agrees to stage the development of this subdivision in a manner satisfactory to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 4, That the subdivision agreement be registered by the City of Kitchener against the lands to which it applies and a copy of the registered agreement be forwarded to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services prior to final approval of the subdivision plan; 5.. That any dead ends and open sides of road allowances created by this plan of subdivision shall be terminated in 0.3 metre reserves, to be conveyed to and held Document dumber: 4117002 Page 2 of 9 Page 118 of 792 in trust by the City of Kitchener until required for future road allowances or the development of adjacent land. 6. That the OWNER enter into an Agreement for Servicing with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to preserve access to municipal water supply and municipal wastewater treatment services prior to final approval or any agreement for the installation of underground services, whichever comes first. Where the OWNER has already entered into an agreement for the installation of underground servicing with the area municipality, such agreement shall be amended to provide for a Regional Agreement for Servicing prior to registration of any part of the plan. The Regional Commissioner of Transportation and Environmental Services shall advise prior to an Agreement for Servicing that sufficient water supplies and wastewater treatment capacity is available for this plan, or the portion of the plan to be registered, 7. That the OWNER include the following statement in all agreements of lease or purchase and sale and/or rental agreements that may be entered into pursuant to Section 52 of the Planning Act, prior to the registration of this plan: "The lot, lots, block or blocks v,vh+ch are the subject of this agreement of lease or purchase and sale are not yet registered as a plar) of subdivision. The fulfillment of all conditions of draft phin i�pproval, including the commitment of water supply and sewage treatment sewices :thereto by the Region and other authorities, has root yet been completed [o permrt�registration of the plan. Accordingly, the pur6haser should be aware that tKe vendor is making no representati6h or warranty that the <lv; , lots, block or blocks which are the subject oft �s_agreemeal6r lease or purchase and sale will have all conditions of draft plan approval satisfied, indading the availability of servicing until the plan is registered. 8. That the F=unctional Servicing Report {MITE, July 6, 2[ 18) be completed to the satisfaction of the Region Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 9. That prior to final approval, the OWNER submit a Final Water Distribution Analysis. and detailed water servicing report for the entire pian of subdivision, with such report to assess the need for pressure reducing valves, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 19. Where pressure reducing valves are required in Condition No. 9) above, the OWNER must enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to provide for such installation; and to include in all agreements of purchase and sale and/or rental agreements, a clause identifying the presence of such water pressure reduction device and advising that it may not be removed by the owner/occupant. Document Number: 4117002 Page 3 of 9 Page 119 of 792 11. That, prior to final approval of all or any part of this plan of subdivision, the OWNER agrees to submit for review and approval, engineering drawings of the connections to the Regional watermain at Isaiah Drive and George Israel Street to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 12.That prior to final approval, the OWNER submit a stormwater management monitoring & contingency plan, to the satisfaction of the Region Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services_ The plan shall include during- and post -construction groundwater monitoring as recommended in MTE's Groundwater Sampling Program -- Technigal Memorandum dated December 12, 2019. Post -construction monitoring shall continue for a minimum of two years following 90% build-out:`Furth'ermore, the Owner enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo'to secure implementation of the SWM monitoring plan; 13. That prior to final approval, the OWNER decommissions any monitoring and private wells (not used for long term monitoring) and septic systems on the property in accordance with O. Reg. 903 prior to any grading on the property; and furthermore, that the OWNER enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener to decommission any long term monitoring wells no longer used for such purposes, all to the satisfaction of the,,, egional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services_ 14. That prior to final approval, if req uired,the OWN ER'enter into an agreement with the Region of Waterloo to implement the conclusions and recommendations of the accepted Materials Management Plan by MTE dated November 3, 2020 to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo - 15. That, prior to final approval, the OWNER completes a Record of Site Condition (RSC) for the entire plan of subdivision, and that a copy of the RSC document(s) and MECP acknowledgerr ent be provided to the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development grid Legislative Services. Applicable Environmental.Planning DA Conditions to go here 16. That prior to any land clearing, grading or construction on the subdivision lands, the OWNER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to indicate that no clearing of vegetation on the site occur during the bird breeding season (May 1 — July 31) in compliance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act unless it can be ascertained by a qualified expert that no birds covered by the Act are observed to be breeding in or adjacent to the affected area. Document dumber: 4117002 Page 4 of s Page 120 of 792 17. That, prior to final approval, the OWNER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to distribute source water protection and winter salt management information with all offers to purchase and/or rental agreements, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. 18.That, prior to final approval, the OWNER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to complete salt management plans for all Multiple Residential Blocks (Blocks 13, 14, 16, Stage 2;, Block 1, Stage 3; Block 31, Stage 4; Block 21, Stage 5) and Mixed Use Blocks (Block 15, Stage 2; Block 32, Stage 4) prior to site plan approval andlor Vacant Land Condominium Blocks, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning. Development and Legislative Services. Furthermore, that the agreement contains a provision to include implementation of the salt management plan by way of declaration associated with any future applications f t7p..lan of coridorninium, 1 9,That, prior to final approval, the OWNED enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener with the following clause relating to the accepted Archaeological Assessment reports: a. Until such time as a permanent chain link fence has been erected along the ..iii/•i.,,. northern limits of Block 37�(Stage fl and along the southern limits of Block 35 of adjacent draft plan ofisubdiv'sian%30T-18202-as recommended in the ow, %'O/'' i/i/ Report titled: 'PFeIin-iinary Stage 4'Archaeolog%ice icaI Mitigation of Site AiHd- 150" (prey red by ASI ; dated' une 25, 2021 }'and shown on the Map titled: "Matta.my Community EIS, Nat-ral Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan" (prepar-ed by Natural Resd it"ce Solutions Inc., dated April 22, 2022), THAT, the Temporary Avoidant .and Protection Fencing erected on April 21, 2021 be maintained in good condition to protect unintentional soil.disturbarde the adjacent Block 35 "Archaeological Site" of draft plan of srabdivisinn 30T-18202. 20. Thai; prior to any grading or construction, and final approval of all or any part of this plan 0 Subdivision, the OWNER submits a final lot grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. The lot grading and drainage plan must consider existing and future grades/profiles for Bleams Road (Regional Road 56); 21. That prior to any grading or construction, and final approval of all or any part of this plan of Subdivision, the SUBDIVIDER submits a final Iot grading and drainage plan for review and approval by the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. The lot grading and drainage plan must consider existing and future grades/profiles for Trussler Road (Regional Road 70); Document Number: 4117002 Page 5 of 9 Page 121 of 792 22. The prior to final approval of a I I or any part of this subdivision, or prior to commencement of any construction work with the Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) right-of-way, the OWNER must enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to obtain a Municipal Consent and Work Permit from the Region for such works; 23. The prior to final approval of all or any part of this subdivision, or prior to commencement of any construction work with the Trussler;Road (Regional Road 70) right-of-way,the OWNER must enter into an a reemer � with the Regional g g Municipality of Waterloo to obtain a Municipal Consent and Work Permit from the Region for such works; 24. That prior to final approva€ of all or any part of this subdivision,;,the OWNER provides engineering drawings which include details of boule i".restoration for Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) to the"satisfaction of the Regional. Conn}issionef of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 25. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this subdivision_ the OWNER provides engineering drawings which include details of boulevard restoration for Trussler Road (Regional Road 70) to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 26. That prior to final approval of all or any part of the Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to provide the necessary financial resources for any decorative street lighting that may be prop ed by the OWNER ov'r d above the Region's standard illumination re uirernents along B€eanL Road (Regional Road 56); 27. That prior to final appfavaI of all or 'a"riy'part of the Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to provide the necessary financial resources for any decorative street lighting that may be proposed by the OWNER over and above the Region's standard illumination requirements along Trussler Road (Regional Road 70); 28. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER obtains Regional Road Access Permits for the intersections of: Bleams Road and Essex Road, Bleams Road and Isaiah Drive, Bleams Road and George Israel Street; 29. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER obtains a Regional Road Access Permit for the intersection of Trussler Road and Rosenberg Way; 30. That Block 36, Stage 1 and Blocks 20 and 21, Stage 2 and Block 36, Stage 4 be conveyed to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo at no cost and free of Document Number: 4117002 Page £ of 9 Page 122 of 792 encumbrance, concurrently with the registration of applicable stages of the Plan of Subdivision, for road widening from the centreline of BIeams Road (Regional Road 56); 31.That prior to final approval -of all or any part of this subdivision, the OWNER enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to provide sufficient certified funds for the following transit amenities for 10 transit stops along Rosenberg Way and 2 transit stops along George Israel Street in order to provide Grand River Transit services to this plan consisting Of - a, Transit landing pads (12); b, Transit shelter pads (4); and c. Transit shelters (4) To the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 32. That prior to final approval of each stag ebf registration, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the Regional MunicipaK.lity pf_06ferloo to grant any easements as necessary, at no cost to the Region, for the,"lprovision of transit amenities within each stage, as noted in Condition 31 abode;; iia,,.. , .. . 33. That prior to final approval of all OF any part of this Plan ',of Subdivision, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo has the necessary land required within the limits of the Plan of Subdivision to construct the necessary intersection improvements at`the Biearns Road and Isaiah Drive intersection, to the satisfaction of the Regional .Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services,- 34. ervices;34. That prior to apprav of all or any pa bf this Plan of Subdivision, the Regional Municipality of Water bb-hhas the necessary land required within the limits of the Plan of Subdivision to cohstruct the necessary intersection improvements at the BIeams Road and Essex Road, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning. Development and Legislative Services; 35.That prior to approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo has the necessary land required within the limits of the Plan of Subdivision to construct the necessary intersection improvements at the BIeams Road and George Israel Street intersection, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 36. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER agrees to provide for any road widening dedication along BIeams Road and Tru ssler Road frontage and daylight triangles as identified in the Environmental Assessment projects for BIeams Road and Trussler Road to the Document Number: 4117002 Page 7 of 9 Page 123 of 792 satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 37. That prior to finaI approvaI of a I I or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER agrees: a_ to provide a functional design and cost estimate for a southbound left -turn lane with 70 metre storage length and appropriate tapers on Trussler Road at Rosenberg Way; b. that the Region of Waterloo has the necessary,, hysical and financial resources to construct all required road im rove;ments in 37.a) above; and q p c. That conditions 37,a) and 37_b) above all be fulfilled. to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner or Planning,`DevelopFner t and Legislative Services. 38. That prier to final approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER submits for review and approval any functional design and:cost estimate for any interim Regional Read improvements including any 1�-ft-hand turn lanes, right-hand turn lanes, appropriate starae lengths, and appropriate tapers identified in associati0fi With the Pian of Subdivision construction, to the satisfaction of the Regional Cornmissloner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services; 39. That prior to final approval of all yr any part of this' Plan of Subdivision, the Regional MLJnicipality of Waterloo has the necessary physical and financial resources to provide for any interim Toad improvements identified in Condition 38 above, to the.afisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Housing and Community Services; 40. That prior to finaI approval of all or part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the City of Kitchener and/or Regional Municipality of Waterloo as necessary; 'to provide for implementation of the recommendations contained in the report entitled "Rosenberg Secondary Plan Mattamy Community, Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment" (MTE Consultants, July 6, 2018 and last revised November 1, 2019 ); 41.That, notwithstanding Condition 40 above, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to complete a detailed noise study to determine noise attenuation requirements for Multiple Residential Block 13, 14, 15,10, 17 Stage 2 and Block 1 Stage 3 and Blocks 31, 34, Stage 4 and Block 21, Stage 5 that may be impacted by road and stationary noise, to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Planning, Development and Legislative Services. The detailed noise study must be completed prior to final Site Plan approval for each identified block. Where appropriate, the lands shall be designed to avoid the use of physical noise attenuation measures through appropriate site design and setbacks; Document Number-: 4117002 Page 8 of 9 Page 124 of 792 a, Furthermore, the agreement shall include a provision to enter into an amending agreement or new agreement with the City of Kitchener and/or the Regional Municipality of Waterloo as necessary, to provide for implementation of the noise attenuation requirements recommended in the detailed noise study. 42. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this Plan of Subdivision, the OWNER enters into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to provide for installation of a 1.5m metre high chain-link fence, ,:it a minimum, along: Block 1, Stage 3; Blocks 13 and 14, Stage 2; Blocks 8, 9, 31 and 32 Stage 4; Block 1 and 21, Stage 5; and Block 5, Stage 7. Document Number: 4117002 Page 9 of 9 Page 125 of 792 30T-18201, KITCHENER GREEN MATTAMY, GEHL & BLEAMS ROAD; ROSENBERG SECONDARY PLAN AREA REGION OF WATERLOO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING -- PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL Correspondence from Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry (April 4, 2022) indicates the Ministry's acceptance of the status of the wetlands identified as W1, W2 and W4 in the EIS as Provincially Significant Wetlands (and confirmed by GRCA in correspondence dated June 17, 2022), and as such, these areas are now considered to meet the Regional Official Plan (ROP) criteria for designation as Core Environmental Features. The ROP mapping will be updated to reflect this with the next update to the natural heritage features. Wetland W4 is partially within the limits of Plan 30T-18201. The wetland (W4) is proposed to be protected and a 30m buffer has been applied to the wetland which is comprised of a 15m `no touch' area directly adjacent to the wetland, and a 15m enhancement area outside of the no touch area. The wetland and the associated buffer also incorporate components of the Blanding's Turtle mitigation plan which is still under review with the MECP. Notwithstanding the inclusion of a portion of wetland W4 and associated Bianding's Turtle enhancement within this plan, regional environmental staff withdraw their objection to this plan proceeding to draft approval based on confirmation from MECP (date ) that there are no concerns and/or anticipated mitigation measures required which will impact the proposed draft plan (30T-18201). Conditions of draft approval for the adjacent plan (30T-18202) will be withheld until MECP accepts the proposed BIanding's Turtle Mitigation Plan. The wetland identified as "W4" and the associated Sam buffer ("Open Space BIock 37") Iocated in the southeastern portion of the subject lands should be placed in an appropriate Natural Heritage Conservation Zone and corresponding designation which prohibits development activities. There are no other RegionaIIy-designated Core Environmental Features within the limits of 30T-18201. For the purposes of 30T-18201, environmental planning staff request the inclusion of the following conditions of draft approval: I . That the boundaries and buffers of the Core Environmental Feature (Provincially Significant Wetland ("W4"}) within the subject lands be interpreted as shown on Map 4a of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019). 2. That prior to final approval of all or any part of this plan of subdivision, the Core Environmental Feature (Provincially Significant Wetland) and associated buffers on the subject lands (Block 37, Open Space) be placed in suitable natural heritage conservation zoning. 3. That prior to any land clearing, grading or construction on the subdivision lands, the developer enter into an agreement with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to indicate that no clearing of vegetation on the site occur during the bird breeding season (May 1 - July 31) in compliance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act unless it can be ascertained by a qualified expert that no birds covered by the Act are observed to be breeding in or adjacent to the affected area. Document Number: 4121511 Page 126 of 792 4. That prior to any land clearing, grading or other site alteration, the developer ensures compliance with the Endangered Species Act. 5. That prior to final approval or any land clearing, grading or construction on the subject lands, the developer enter into an Agreement with the City of Kitchener to install fencing along the southern limits of the subdivision consistent with the recommendations of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019) and the BIanding's Turtle Mitigation Plan for the adjacent lands (30T-18202) to ensure the exclusion of BIanding's Turtles from the subject property. Further, the Agreement should include the requirement to develop and implement protocols to monitor for turtle activity during construction, and to provide aII personnel on site during construction with the protocols to follow in the event a turtle is observed within the construction zone. 6. That prior to final approval, or any land clearing, grading or construction on the subject lands, the developer enter into an Agreement with the City of Kitchener to install permanent fencing along the outer Iimits of Block 37. 7. That, prior to final approval of Stages 1, 2, 5 and 6 and any land clearing, grading, or the Installation of services, the developer submit a detailed erosion and sediment control plan acceptable to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, City of Kitchener and Grand River Conservation Authority in order to prevent sedimentation into Blocks 37 and the Care Environmental Feature located on the adjacent Iands, south of the subject property. 8. That, prior to final approval, the developer submit a detailed stormwater management pian for the stormwater management facilities located within each stage to be registered to the satisfaction of the City of Kitchener, Grand River Conservation Authority, and Regional Municipality of Waterloo; further, that the stormwater management plan includes, but is not limited to, measures required to sustain the flow of groundwater to Core Environmental Features. 9. That, prior to final approval, the developer submit a Detailed Vegetation Management PIan and a Natural Heritage Restoration and Enhancement Plan, in accordance with the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019) which includes measures to enhance connectivity of turtle habitats, vegetation loss compensation, permanent wildlife fencing, wildlife corridor details, to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the City of Kitchener, and in consultation with Grand River Conservation Authority. 10. That, prior to final approval of Stages 1, 2, 5 and 6, the developer submit Iandscaping and planting plans for all buffer areas contiguous to the environmental features and for the stormwater management facilities located within the stage to be registered, and that recommended plantings shall consist of locally -appropriate, self-sustaining native vegetation to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, the City of Kitchener and the Grand River Conservation Authority. 11. That, prior to final approval of aII or any part of this plan of subdivision, the developer submit a detailed monitoring plan for the Core Environmental Feature and buffer/enhancement area (BIock 37, Stage 1) on the subject lands as outlined in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study — Update (Natural Resource Solutions Inc., December 2019) to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, the City of Kitchener and the Grand River Document Number: 4I2I5II Page 127 of 792 Conservation Authority. Furthermore, that the developer enter in an agreement with the City of Kitchener to implement any required remedial action deemed necessary as a result of the monitoring plan. 12. That, prior to final approval of all or any part of this plan of subdivision, the developer provides a brochure and other information tools for new home purchasers and residents which provides information about the natural heritage features within the subdivision, along with advice about how they can be good stewards of these areas, and that the brochure be to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The developer will be required to enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener or the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to distribute the approved stewardship brochure or other comparable information tools to home purchasers. Document Number: 4121511 Page 128 of 792 ff I AL Id Walerloo Catholic alstrict School Board October 22n", 2018 Garett Stevenson, Planner CSD — Planning Division City of Kitchener, 6 l Floor 200 King Street West, P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 Dear Garett Stevenson: W w v,• _ W c d s b _ c a RE: Draft Pian of Subdivision Application 30T-18201 and Draft PIan of Subdivision Application 30T- 18202 Staff at the Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) has reviewed the subject applications and has the following comments: The WCDSB is requesting a school site within 30T-18201 that meets the following requirements: 0 Approximately 6 acres • Regular shape (either a square or rectangle). • Frontage along two streets We understand that this school site was not contemplated in the Secondary Plan. However, due to increasing enrolment numbers and our most recent Education Development Charge background study, we need two additional school sites within the southwest area of Kitchener. We trust this request will not be difficult to accommodate given that a neighborhood institutional zone was originally proposed within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, specifically within the limits of this draft plan. We would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you in person to discuss the location of our school site within this draft plan of subdivision. We feel it would be appropriate to invite the Waterloo Region District School Board to this meeting to discuss how school accommodation will be handled within this area. The WCDSB is open to several location and has identified some possibilities below. Location 1: Stage 3, Block 15 (currently designated as a 3.10ha park) 480 Dutton Drive - Waterloo Ontario Conadu - N2L 4C6 Telephone; 5 T 9.578.3660 - Fax: 5] 9.884.6635 Page 129 of 792 III ti FIi f. •l H� ;¢'�• _IayF F Ii.nl �Iw. 1 ilily 1 IAV. 4r, LZ I yzu••� � w-��� �� _ .. ••. $ik 1s alk 16 3. iOhB I 9..".4ha w F+ F•i iti! y u r•i� F3iK 17 " # � i Upon SpaEs t Location 2: Stage 5, Land west of Block 15 (currently designated as B I k 9, BIk 10, BIk 11, Blk12, BIk 25, and a portion of street 0). rl.1o"". rr eel•= I 1 7 IR 'J` J. p`,.,s7EEEC'S1 w Y'— ipalrE Fao , _•�- •-• w BIk 15 +� j >F1PCtz0 Pork - ' MOM MI Location 3: Stage 4, Land at the corner of George Israel Street and Rosenberg Way (Currently designated as BIk 30, part of BIk 7,8, 11, 12,13, and 14, and a portion of street C). 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2L 4C6 Telephone: 519.578.3660 ■ Fax: 519.884.6635 Page 130 of 792 Regardless of the site, all standard WCDSB conditions of subdivision would apply. We request that the City add these conditions to our school site: That prior to final approval, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to provide the CITY'S Director of Planning with a letter from the Waterloo Catholic District School Board indicating that satisfactory arrangements have been made to acquire Block —("the School Block") for school purposes. The School Block shall contain not less than hectares. (Block and hectares to be determined and currently left blank intentionally). 2. That the SUBDIVIDER shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in wording satisfactory to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board, to: a. grade the School Block and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and sod/seed the lands to the specifications determined by the Board; b. remove all trees and buildings on the School Block as determined by the Board; c. remove stockpiled topsoil within 30 days of written notice by the Board, and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and sod/seed the lands to specifications determined by the Board; d. construct a 1.5 -meter -high black vinyl chain link fence, along all boundaries of the School Block, with the exception of the road frontage, to the specifications determined by the Board; e. construct the fences prior to the issuance of building permits for any lands abutting the School Block; and f. provide the foregoing at no cost to the Board. 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2I. 4C6 Telephone: 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6635 Page 131 of 792 3. That the SUBDIVIDER shall submit to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board, at no cost to the Board, a report from a qualified consultant concerning: a. the suitability of Block _ for school construction purposes, relating to soil bearing factors, surface drainage, topography and environmental contaminants; and b. the availability of natural gas, hydro, water supply, storm sewer and sanitary sewer services adequate for the construction of an elementary school. 4, That the SUBDIVIDER shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement in wording acceptable to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board that the services referred to in Condition 3(b) shalI be installed to the mid -point of the frontage of the elementary school site, or in a Iocation otherwise determined by the Board, at no cost to the Board. b.. That prior to final approval, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit to the Waterloo Catholic District Schaal Board for review and approval, a copy of the final engineering plans as approved by the City of Kitchener which indicate the storm drainage system and the overall grading plans for the complete subdivision area. 6_ That the Waterloo Catholic District School Board shall advise that conditions 1 to 5 have been met to its satisfaction. The clearance leiter shall include a brief statement detailing how each condition has been satisfied or carried out. 7_ That the following warning clause be included in all offers of purchase and sale or leaselrental agreements for all residential dwelling units within this plan until such time as a permanent school is assigned: "The Waterloo Catholic District School Board advises all prospective purchasers and tenants of residences within the Mattamy Community (30T-18201 and 30T- 18202) subdivision that unless the provincial funding model provides sufficient funds to construct a new school, there can be no assurance as to the timing of a new school construction nor a guarantee that an elementary school will be provided within this subdivision notwithstanding the designation of an elementary school site" The following condition be added to the Waterloo Region District School Board school block: "That prior to final approval, if the Waterloo Region District School Board has elected to waive their interest in the elementary school site (Stage 3, Block 16), that the Waterloo Catholic District School Board be provided the opportunity to also acquire Stage 3, Block 16, subject to the same conditions of approval, or provide notification in writing that interest in the site has been waived. 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada o N2L 4C6 Telephone. 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6535 Page 132 of 792 Lastly, students generated from the proposed development will be bussed to Blessed Sacrament until a new school is built east of Gehl Place and west of Fischer Hallman Road. The WCDSB is requesting sidewalks on both sides of all streets to be constructed and maintained year round from the community to the School Board property line. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Mapreet Sian, BSc., MSc. Planning Planning Officer 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2L 4C6 Telephone: 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6535 Page 133 of 792 W wv W w c d s 6 c a npavp Waterloo Catholic OistFLct School Board January 9t", 2018 Garett Stevenson, Planner CSD — Planning Division City of Kitchener, 6111 Floor 200 King Street West, P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 Dear Garett Stevenson:: RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 3OT-18201 and Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Staff at the Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) has reviewed the subject applications and has the following comments: The WCDSB is requesting a school site within 30T-18201 that meets the following requirements: • Approximately 6 acres * Regular shape (either a square or rectangle). • Frontage along two streets We understand that this school site was not contemplated in the Secondary Plan. However, due to increasing enrolment numbers and our most recent Education Development Charge background study, we need two additional school sites within the southwest area of Kitchener, one of which we are requesting in this area. We trust this request will not be difficult to accommodate given that a neighborhood institutional zone was originally proposed within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, specifically within the limits of this draft plan. This neighborhood institutional zone has since been removed and is missing from in the current provided plan. The WCDSB is requesting this institutional zone be added back into the Rosenberg Secondary Pian for the purpose of a Catholic elementary school. The WCDSB is open to several locations and has identified some possibilities below: Location 1: Stage 5, Land west of block 15 (currently designated as BIk 9, BIk 10, BIk 11, B1k12, BIk 25, and a portion of street O). 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2L 4C6 Telephone: 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6635 Page 134 of 792 Z7 Location 2: Stage 4, Land at the corner of George Israel Street and Rosenberg Way (currently designated as Blk 30, part of BIk 7,8, 11, 12,13, and 14, and a portion of street C). These 2 location are preferred suggestions, and other available location imitating these sites will also be acceptable for the purpose of a school site. Regardless of the site, all standard WCDSB conditions of subdivision would apply. We request that the City add these conditions to our school site: 1. That prior to final approval, the SUBDIVIDER agrees to provide the CITY'S Director of Planning with a letter from the Waterloo Catholic District School Board indicating that satisfactory arrangements have been made to acquire 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • NZI. 4C6 Telephone: 5 T 9.578.3660 • Fax: 519-884.6635 Page 135 of 792 Block —("the School Block") for school purposes. The School Block shall contain not less than — hectares. (Block and hectares to be determined and currently left blank intentionally). 2_ That the SUBDIVIDER shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement, in wording satisfactory to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board, to: a. grade the School Block and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and sod/seed the lands to the specifications determined by the Board; b_ remove all trees and buildings on the School Block as determined by the Board; c_ remove stockpiled topsoil within 30 days of written notice by the Board, and in doing so compact, fill with clean material, replace any topsoil disturbed in the grading process and sod/seed the lands to specifications determined by the Board; d construct a 1.5 -meter -high black vinyl chain link fence, along all boundaries of the School Block, with the exception of the road frontage, to the specifications determined by the Board; e_ construct the fences prior to the issuance of building permits for any lands abutting the School Block; and f. provide the foregoing at no cost to the Board. 3_ That the SUBDIVIDER shall submit to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board, at no cost to the Board, a report from a qualified consultant concerning: a_ the suitability of Block —for school construction purposes, relating to soil bearing factors, surface drainage, topography and environmental contaminants; and b. the availability of natural gas, hydro, water supply, storm sewer and sanitary sewer services adequate for the construction of an elementary school. 4. That the SUBDIVIDER shall agree in the Subdivision Agreement in wording acceptable to the Waterloo Catholic District School Board that the services referred to in Condition 3(b) shall be installed to the mid -point of the frontage of the elementary school site, or in a location otherwise determined by the Board, at no cost to the Board. 5. That prior to final approval, the SUBDIVIDER shall submit to the Waterioo Catholic District School Board for review and approval, a copy of the final engineering pians as approved by the City of Kitchener which indicate the storm drainage system and the overall grading plans for the complete subdivision area. 6. That the Waterloo Catholic District School Board shall advise that conditions 1 to 5 have been met to its satisfaction. The clearance letter shall include a 480 Dutton Drive - Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2L 4C5 Telephone: 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6635 Page 136 of 792 brief statement detailing how each condition has been satisfied or carried out. 7. That the following warning clause be included in all offers of purchase and sale or leaselrental agreements for all residential dwelling units within this plan until such time as a permanent school is assigned: "The Waterloo Catholic District School Board advises all prospective purchasers and tenants of residences within the Mattamy Community (39T-18291 and 39T- 18292) subdivision that unless the provincial funding model provides sufficient funds to construct a new school, there can be no assurance as to the tinning of a new school construction nor a guarantee that an elementary school will be provided within this subdivision notwithstanding the designation of an elementary school site" The following condition be added to the Waterloo Region District School Board school block: "That prior to final approval, if the Waterloo Region District School Board has elected to waive their interest in the elementary school site (Stage 3, Block 16), that the Waterloo Catholic District School Board be provided the opportunity to also acquire Stage 3, Block 16, subject to the same conditions of approval, or provide notification in writing that interest in the site has been waived. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Ma yne2 c iakt Mapreet Sian, BSc., MSc. Planning PIanning Officer 480 Dutton Drive • Waterloo Ontario Canada • N2L 4C6 Telephone. 519.578.3660 • Fax: 519.884.6635 Page 137 of 792 4rLd +nl t c� January 3, 2019 Administration Centre: 400 Clyde Road, PO. Box 729 Cambridge, ON N1 R 5W6 Phone: 519-621-2761 Tall free: 1-866-900-4722 Fax: 519-621-4844 wwwwgrandriver.ca Garett Stevenson, Planner Development Services Department - Planning City of Kitchener, City Hall P.O. Box 1118, 200 King Street West Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 OR: 30T-18201 and 3OT-18202 Re: Notice of Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 3OT-18201, Official Plan Amendment Application 0P1810051BIGS and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA1 810061BIG S for Bleams Road "Application 1", Blearn s Road and Trussler Road, City of Kitchener 8< Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202, Official Pian Amendment Application OP181006JGIGS and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA18/0071GIGS for 161 Gehl Place "Application 2", City of Kitchener Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Inc. Dear Mr. Stevenson: In consideration of the above noted applications, the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) has now undertaken a preliminary review of the following supporting materials: Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18201), prepared by SGL Planning and Design Inc., signed June 28, 2018 • Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18202), prepared by SGL Planning and Design Inc., signed June 28, 2018 Area 5 Lands Functional Drainage Study (Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed), prepared by MTE Consultants Inc. and Natural Resource Solutions Inc., dated August 31, 2018 Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study (EIS), prepared by Natural Resource Solutions Inc., dated July 2018 Preliminary Stormwater Management {SWM} Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 • Hydrogeology Study, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 Functional Servicing Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 ■ Geotechnical Recommendations — Proposed Residential Subdivision, Rosenberg Area 2 Lands, Kitchener, Ontario, prepared by DS Consultants Ltd., dated June 12, 2018 Member of Conservation Ontario, representing Ontario's 36 Conservation Authorities I The Grand - A Canadian HP6tane River Page 138 of 792 Based on our review of the EIS, it is aur understanding that the appiicant is proposing the removal of four wetlands within the boundaries of Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18201 (referred to as W5, W6, W7 and a wet depression), as well as one wetland within the boundaries of Draft Plan of Subdivision 3OT-18202 (referred to as W3). However, the assessment in the EIS of whether they meet GRCA requirements for removal is not complete: • EIS Section 7.1.1 notes that, "Under the General Habitat Description for Blanding's Turtle (MNRF 2017b), W5 may qualify as Category 2 habitat, although it has not been confirmed by the MNRF to date" (page 44). EIS Section 7.2.1 notes that, "Under the General Habitat Description for Blanding's Turtle (MNRF 2017b), this wetland [W3j may qualify as Category 2 habitat, although it has not been confirmed as Bianding's Turtle Habitat by the MNRF, to date" {page 59}. Based on the information above, we believe it is premature to propose development within the natural features until it has been confirmed by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) whether the wetlands are considered habitat for BIanding's Turtle and/or significant wildlife habitat, and the EIS is updated to demonstrate that they can meet GRCA policies for removal. We understand that MNRF is requesting additional information to review under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The EIS should be amended to address our above comments and include the MNRF interpretation of the ESA. At this time we can offer the following preliminary comments on the above noted applications. Please consider these comments preliminary in nature as we may have additional comments upon receipt of a response and following a more comprehensive review. 1. Section 2.4 of the Hydrogeology Study (pages 6-7) notes that infiltration testing was undertaken for SWMF1 (TL1, TL2, TL3 and TL4) and SWMF2 (Area 1 and Area 2), with reference to Appendix F for infiltration testing outcomes. Appendix F only includes outcomes for testing at SWMF1. Results of infiltration testing for SWMF2 are also required for review. 2. A monthly breakdown of the water balance is needed to demonstrate that the infiltration targets will be met considering the winter bypass for infiltration basins. Based on our review of the Preliminary SWM Report, we understand that the water balance calculations provided in Tables 5.8 and 5.9 are based on continuous modeling. The monthly breakdown should demonstrate that the model was run for all months to identify pre -development conditions, and only during non -winter months to identify post - development conditions. 3. The recommended wetland buffers in the EIS are inconsistent with the recommendations for a minimum 30 metre buffer (development setback limits) in the Alder Creek Watershed Study and Upper Strasburg Creek Subwatershed Plan Update (CH2M Hill and North-South Environmental Inc., 2008) and the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. EIS Page 139 of 792 Section 5.6 (Buffers) notes a 15 metre no -touch buffer is required and recommends a 30 metre habitat enhancement buffer (page 39). It is noted that proposed Street X (north - south from subdivision 30T--18201 to 30T-18202) encroaches within the 30 metre buffer to wetland W4 and a proposed public walkway encroaches into the 30 metre buffer to wetland W1. The overall collective extent of the buffers should be applied to protect the form and function of the feature and species present. 4. it is our understanding that the wetlands referred to as W5, W6, W7 and the wet depression in the EIS are within an area currently licensed under the Aggregate Resources Act. We request clarification on what stage the license will be surrendered and if any modifications are required to the restoration plans based on the proposed applications. 5. EIS Sections 7.1.1 and 7.2.1 make generai statements that wetlands W3, W5, W6, W7 and the wet depression do not meet any of the criteria in Section 8.4.4 of the G RCA Consolidated Policies for Implementing Ontario Regulation 150106. To help facilitate our review, each wetland proposed for removal should be individually screened in the EIS to demonstrate how they meet each of the criteria in Section 8.4.4 of our policies. Additionally, we have a minor editorial comment: 6. The reports reviewed reference different wetland naming (e.g. the EIS identifies wetland W5 as the small wetland north of the woodland; whereas the Preliminary SWM Report and Functional Servicing Reports identify Wetland W5 located at the southeast corner of the property within the Stamm Subdivision), as well as different terms for the areas being referenced. This can be followed when reviewing the reports individuaily; however, it becomes confusing when cross-referencing reports. We recommend that future reports develop a consistent naming standard for clarification of areas being referenced. Once the above preliminary comments have been addressed, we can review and provide comprehensive comments on the Draft Plans of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law amendments. We can confirm receipt of the subdivision fees (70% of the base fee and per net hectare fee) of $21,000 for 30T-18201 and $11,243.89 for 30T-18202. The remaining 30% subdivision base and per net hectare fee will be requested prior to issuance of conditions of draft plan approval. Page 140 of 792 We look forward to a response to our comments. Please contact the undersigned at 519-621- 2763 ext. 2319 or thughes@grandrive r.ca if you have any questions. Sincerely, Trisha Hughes Resource Planner Via email. Barbara Steiner, City of Kitchener Jane Gurney, Region of Waterloo Peter EIlis, Region of Waterloo Shilling Yip, Region of Waterloo David Marriott, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Graham Buck, Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Page 141 of 792 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Guelph DIStFiCt 1 Stone Road West Guelph, Ontario N 1 G 4Y2 November 2, 2018 Garett Stevenson - Planner Minist6re des Richesses naturelles et des Forfits Telephone: [519] 8264955 Facsimile: (519) 826.4929 Development Services Division, Planning Kitchener City Hall, 61h Floor 200 King Street West, P.G Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 raj Ontario Re: Bleams Road "Application 1" and Gehl Place "Application 2" Draft Plans of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment applications, and Zoning By-law Amendment applications Mattamy Homes, B & B Kieswetter Excavating Inc., Select Sand and Gravel Ltd., and Kieswetter Holdings Ltd. 1801 and 1873 Bleams Road and 161 Gehl Place, City of Kitchener, Regional of Waterloo IVINRF Comments Mr. Stevenson, The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) Guelph District Office can confirm receipt of the Draft Plan of Subdivision, Off iciai Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for Bleams Road (Application 1) and 161 Gehl Place (Application 2) in the City of Kitchener. These applications are supported by the Rosenberg Secondary PIan -- Mattamy Community Environmental Impact Study (EIS) dated July 2018, and draft plans. The MNRF has completed our review of the applications and supporting documents, and can offer the following tech nicaI comments for the City's consideration. MNRF Comments As noted in the EIS, the majority of the subject lands are currently licensed under the Aggregate Resources Act (ARA). Please note that these licenses must be surrendered to the MNRF prior to any development commencing on the subject lands that would be inconsistent with the approved site plans. For further comment on the ARA, including the information required to support the surrender of the licenses, it is recommended that the applicants contact Diane Schwier (Aggregates Technical Specialist) at 519-826-4934 or at diane.schwier@ontario.ca. Page 46 of the EiS provides a description of the direction the proponent will take with respect to Blanding's Turtle. In addition, the same section of the report provides some of the potential mitigation that will be used. Additional details on the proposed mitigation measures are provided on maps 5 and 6. Their recommended approach is consistent with how MNRF has been engaged in the past. MNRF recommends that the proponent engage with MNRF staff as To meet with our staff please be sure to call ahead and make an appointment. For general information visit: www.mnr.eov.on.ca or www.ontario.ca Page 142 of 792 soon as possible to discuss the proposed mitigation and potential E'ndongeredSpecies Act (ESA) requirements. MNRF is undertaking a review of the wetlands and the potential for the Strasburg 1 wetland to be upgraded to provincially significant wetland (PSW). Staff notes that the observation of 8landing's Turtle in W4 would result in the evaluated non-PSW being changed to PSW and the addition of W4 to the complex. The addition of wetland unit W3 to the PSW is not justified as the wetland is small (< the 0.5 hectare minimum) and there is not sufficient reason for inclusion into the complex. I hope the above technical comments on the ARA and the ESA will help to inform your review. Please contact Dave Marriott at david. marriott@ontario.ca or 519-826-4926 if further comment or clarification is required. Regards, Tara McKenna, District Planner Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Guelph District 1 Stone Road West Guelph, ON, N1G 4Y2 Phone: (519) 826-4925 cc: Graham Suck, MNRF David Marriott, MNRF Diane 5chwier, MNRF Page 143 of 792 Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Guelph District 1 Stone Road west Guelph, Ontario N 1 G 4Y2 November 19, 2018 Garett Stevenson - PIanner Minist6re des Richesses naturelles et des Forets Telephone: (519) 826-4955 Facsimile: (519) 828-4929 Deveiopment Services Division, Planning Kitchener City Hall, 6`h Floor 200 King Street West, P.O Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Ontario Re: Bleams Road "Application 1" and Gehl Place "Application Z" Draft Plans of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment applications, and Zoning By-law Amendment applications Mattamy Homes, B & B Kieswetter Excavating Inc., Select Sand and Gravel Ltd., and Kieswetter Holdings Ltd. -1801 and 1873 Bleams Road and 161 Gehl Place, City of Kitchener, Region of Waterloo - MNRF Comments Mr. Stevenson, The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) Guelph District Office previously provided technical comments to the City on November 2, 2018, regarding the subject planning applications. As discussed, we would like to take this opportunity to provide the City with the following supplementary comments on the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that has been submitted in support of the applications. These comments build on our previous Endangered Species Act (ESA) technical comments, and are intended to provide the City and the project team with clarification on the potential implications of the Act moving forward. MNRF Comments • Blanding's Turtle is listed as threatened under the ESA, and the species receives both individual and general habitat protection under the Act. The general habitat description (GHD) for Blanding's Turtle details how the species habitat has been categorized, in accordance with the policy `Categorizing and Protecting Habitat under the Endangered Species Act`. The EIS correctly notes that the wetlands within the subject lands were not identified by the MNRF as habitat for Blandings Turtle at the time of the reporting. It is important to note, however, that habitat mapping for species at risk are considered open files. The Blanding's Turtle GHD directs that all suitable wetlands or waterbodies within 2 km from an occurrence, and those features that are within 500 meters of each other, are protected as Category 2 habitat. It is understood that an individual Blanding's Turtle was observed on the subject lands (in wetland W4) in 2018. Based on this observation and the direction in the GHD, the MNRF can confirm that Blanding's Turtle Category 2 habitat is present on the subject lands. This includes wetland W4, where the turtle was observed, and all other suitable wetlands that would meet the Category 2 habitat description in the To meet with aur staff please be sure to call ahead and make an appointment. For general information visit: vdvrw.:nrr.gov.on.ca or www.ontaria.ca Page 144 of 792 GHD. The areas between these Category 2 habitats that would provide movement corridors far Blanding's Turtles are also protected as Category 3 habitat. It is recommended that the project team submit an ESA Information Gathering Form (IGF) to the province that addresses Blanding's Turtle. The purpose of the IGF is to provide the necessary information to inform whether or not the proposed activity will likely contravene the ESA, and whether an authorization under the Act may be required. The IGF will need to account for any potential adverse impacts to individual Blanding's Turtles and any potential adverse impacts to the species described Category 2 (e.g. wetland removal) or 3 habitats, which may result from the proposed development. This information will be important to inform the potential implications of the ESA for the proposed development. We hope that the supplementary technical comments on the ESA will help to inform the City's review of the subject planning applications. Please contact the undersigned if further comment or clarification is required. Regards, ❑ave Marriott, District Planner Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Guelph District 1 Stone Road West Guelph, ❑N, NIG 4Y2 Phone: (519) 826-4926 cc: Graham Buck, MNRF Barb Steiner, City of Kitchener Page 145 of 792 Ministry of Northern Development, Ministere Do Developpement du Nord, des Mines, Mines, Natural Resources des Richesses naturelles and Forestry et des Forts Land Use Planning and Strategic Issues Section de Pamenagement du territoire et des Section questions stratEgiquas Southern Region Region du Sud Regional operations Division 300 Water Street Peterborough, ON K913C7 Tel.: 705 761.4839 April 4, 2022 Division des operations regionales 300, rue Water Peterborough (ON) K91 30 TC.: 705 751-4839 2079546 Ontario Limited C/o Brad Trussler 433 Steeles Ave E. Suite 110 Milton, ON L9T 8Z4 Ontario Q SUBJECT: Re-evaluation of the Strasburg 1 Wetland Complex City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Halton Dear Brad Trussler, The Ministry of Northern Development Mines, Natural Resources and (NMNRF) has reviewed and confirmed the re-evaluation for the Strasburg 1 Wetland Complex undertaken by Natural Resource Solutions Incorporated on behalf of Mattamy Homes (2079546 Ontario Limited). The re-evaluation resulted in a change in the status of the wetland from non -provincially significant to provincially significant. The Strasburg 1 wetland complex is situated in the west portion of the City of Kitchener, south of Highway 7 in parts of Lot 1, 41 and Lot 1, 42, German Company Traci, Waterloo. Note that the updated wetland boundary is available for download through Land Information Ontario (LIO) and can be viewed through the NDMNRF's Natural Heritage "Make a Map" program https://www.ontario.ca/page/make-natural-heritage- area-map. If you have any questions regarding the wetland complex or the specific wetland unit on your property, please do not hesitate to contact Lisa Solomon, Management Biologist, at 437-247-6500 or lisa.solomon a@ontario.ca. Upon request, the wetland evaluation can also be emailed to you in a pdf format. Page 146 of 792 Sincerely, ti Suzanne Robinson AI Strategic Project Supervisor Land Use Planning and Strategic Issues Section Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resource and Forestry Page 147 of 792 November 2, 2018 Garen Stevenson, BES, RPP, MC€i? Planner City Hall, P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, N2G 4G7 Dear Garrett: Re: draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T•18201 Official Plan Amendment Application OP18i0051BIGS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA1810061B1G5 Bleams Road "Application 1" Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18202 Official Plan Amendment Application OPI810061G1GS Zoning Bylaw Amendment ZBA1810071GIGS 161 Gehl Place "Application 2" Kitchener Green Ltd. S 2079546 Ontario Inc. Waterloo Region District School Board Planning staff has reviewed the submission for approval of the aforementioned draft plans of subdivlslon and provide the following comments: The proposed elementary school site/park campus Is well situated and will enable the Board to service the appilcant's subdivisions as well as the surrounding lands of the Rosenberg and Trussler North Communities. In that regard, the proposed school location is favoured over the original Rosenberg Community Plan concept. The Board appreciates having had the opportunity to work with the City and the consultant for the applicant to develop the school and park campus shown in the plan. The Block 16 school parcel contains 3.0 hectares, which Is slightly more than the Board's required minimum area of 2.83 ha. (7.0 acres); however, its larger size will enable partner uses on the property that may Include chlldcare and BarlyON centres similar to those proposed in Huron South. The layout shares sufficient side yard with the adjacent park to permit overlapping and complementary facilities. Accesses to the campus are also well accommodated with uninterrupted street frontages on the north and east. Since the final design of the park and school blocks may be subject to further consultation regarding site constraints (such as topography), any modifications to the preliminary grading and servicing plans will need to be understood to further develop concepts for this campus. 51 Ardeft Avenue Kkhenef. ON NzC 2R5 Y: 519.570.0003 F: 5ti9.7az X354 w:dsb ca In IAUS-�Ox CC* wpm @ IntAWN Cum ass Page 148 of 792 The applicant has indicated in the planning justification report that the plays will be staged from east to west, with the school park site comprising a portion of stage 3. The Board asks that each stage be required to confirm that adequate school capacity is located nearby to service the proposed dwelling units. In the event this cannot be satisfied, the school block should be advanced and an agreement entered into to convey the block to enable the construction of additional school accommodation. No stages beyond Stages 1 and 2 should be registered unless the Board has cleared its accommodation concerns or has an acceptable Agreement of Purchase and Sale from the landowner to convey the property. It is further requested, 1) That the following conditions of draft plan approval be imposed upon the subject plan of subdivision to satisfy the requirements of the Waterloo Region District School Hoard (the "Board"): a) The elementary school block (the "School Site") be zoned (1) or (1-1) Neighbourhood Institutional; b) The School Site be developed and registered within Stage 2 or 3 of the plan, concurrent with the registration of the streets upon which it fronts; c) Prior to the registration of any stage after Stages 1 and 2, the owner shall have entered into an Agreement satisfactory to the Waterloo Region District School Board for the transfer of the School Site. 2) That prior to final approval, the owner shall submit to the Board a report from a qualified consultant confirming: a) the suitability of the School Site for school construction purposes, with particular regard to soil bearing capacity, surface drainage, stormwater management, topography and environmental contaminants; b) the final engineering plans as approved by the City of Kitchener which identify the storm drainage system that will service the School Site and the overall grading plans for the complete subdivision area, and, c) the availability and sufficiency of natural gas, electrical, telephone, data. and television cable (including fiber optic), water, storm and sanitary sewer services, intended to service the School Block 3) If the Board has elected to waive its interest in the School Site, the Waterloo Catholic District School Board shall also have the opportunity to acquire the block, subject to the Page 2 Page 149 of 792 same terms and conditions of approval, unless it has given notification in writing that its interest has similarly been waived. Additionally, the Board requires, 4) That the City of Kitchener and prospective purchasers of property and tenants within the plan be advised that, notwithstanding the designation of a School Site, unless the Ontario education funding model provides sufficient funds to construct new schools, there can be no assurance as to the timing of now school construction nor a guarantee that elementary school accommodation will be provided within the subject plan. 5) That the owner supply, erect, and maintain a sign (at its expense and according to the Board's specifications) affixed to the permanent development sign for the plan advising prospective residents that students may be directed to schools outside the neighbourhoods within the pian; 6) That the owner agree In the Subdivision Agreement to notify all purchasers of residential units and/or renters of same, by inserting the following clauses in all offers of Purchase and Sale/Lease, until such time as a permanent school is assigned: "Whereas the Waterloo Region District School Board may designate this subdivision as a Development Area for the purposes of school accommodation, and despite the best efforts of the Board, sufficient accommodation may not be available for all anticipated students. You are hereby notified that students may be accommodated in temporary facilities andlor bussed to a school outside the area, and further, that students may, in future, be transferred to another school." The Board encourages the provision of internal walkways/bike paths throughout the community to reduce walking distances and to optimize the safe travel of students to the proposed school site. Sincerely, cC'- - h � '-I �1 Shawn Calloni Principal Planned,?IandUmen cc. Nathan Hercanuck Lindsay Ford Brad Trussler Page 3 Page 150 of 792 f xJ_ PUBLIC WORKS & T�1NN5HI1' ENGINEERING �F WI LMOT 60 Snyder's Road West, Baden, ON N3A 1A1 Public Works -Engineering Department T: 519-634-8444 F: 519-634-5044 Email: engineering@wilmot.ca INTERNAL MEMORANDUM TO: Harold O'Krafka CC_ Jeff Molenhuis Alastair Duncan PREPARED BY: Mark .Jeffery DATE: December 19, 2018 RE: Mattamy Development Lands - Kitchener Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Traffic Impact Study, Functional Servicing Report and Preliminary SWM Report for the above noted development. We offer the following comments: Traffic Impact Studer 1. Recommend the applicant re-evaluate the traffic patterns at the intersection of Trussler Road and Rosenberg Way closer to final build out, as the connection to Trussler Road is not proposed until 2031. We make this request based on the following: i. At full build out, Trussler/Rosenberg is expected to operate with high delays for left turn movements. ii. Further analysis also found that the justification for signals was not met. iii, The study concludes that since other traffic routes are available, the congestion at Trussler Road and Rosenberg Way is not a concern. However, the additional traffic will be rerouted to Bleams Road and Trussler Road where the same issue is occurring as the study forecast has indicated the westbound left turning traffic from Bleams Road to Trussler Road will also operate with high delays. 2. Due to the proposed vertical re -alignment of Trussler Road, please confirm the new profile will not negatively impact existing driveways and will match into the existing road profile south of Rosenberg Way. Please refer to Lot Grading Plan No. 1, Dwg. No. AG1.1. Wilmot is a cohesive. vibrant and welcoming countryside community vvilmot.ca Page 151 of 792 TOWNSHIP L' O% WILMOT Functional Servicinq Report Page 2 of 2 Mattamy Development lands - Kitchener December 19, 2018 -1. Confirm existing private wells located within close proximity to the proposed subdivision will not be affected. 2_ Applicant is to pursue a legal outlet for any storm runoff tributary to either of the two existing culverts located on Trussler Road that outlet westerly into the Township of Wilmot. In lieu of pursuing a legal outlet for storm water runoff, the applicant may wish to investigate the possibility of intercepting surface runoff from rear lots proposed to drain to Trussler Road and direct this surface runoff to a proposed storm sewer internal to the development. Preliminary SWM Report 1. No comment. Wilmot is a cohesive. vibrant and welcoming countryside community whiot ca Page 152 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Garett Stevenson Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 1:41 PM To: 'Harold Q'Krafka' Cc: BMacKinnon@regionofwaterloo.ca Subject: RF: Mattamy Hi Harold, Thanks for your comments. The alignment of Rosenberg Way was established through the secondary plan process which was supported by a comprehensive transportation analysis. Once I have comments from all agencies and departments, we can discuss further. Thanks, Garett From: Harold ❑'Krafka <harold.okrafka@Wilmot.ca> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 9JO AM To: Garett Stevenson <Garett.Stevenson@kitchener.ca> Cc: BMacKinnon@regionofwaterloo.ca; Engineering engineering@Wilmot.ca> Subject: Mattamy Thank you for the circulation of 30T-18201 and 30T-18202. Attached are the comments of our Public Works Department. In addition, Development Services offers the following comment for consideration. As you are aware Trussler Road represents the Countryside Line, a hard edge to future urban growth of the City of Kitchener. The Township is of the opinion that in order to respect the Countryside Line it is important to incorporate design components to highlight that there is no intention to further expand urban development westerly beyond Trussler. A similar design was requested and implemented along the Wilmot Line in the design of Waterloo Westside subdivisions. As such, the Township requests consideration of backlotting the development to Trussler Road without a physical road connection to Trussler. In our opinion Rosenberg Way should terminate at Street B. Access from this development to Trussler Road via Bleams Road is reasonable in our opinion. If emergency access is a concern within the design we would suggest limiting the connection of Rosenberg Way to that of an emergency access controlled by gates. By copy of this comment to the Region of Waterloo we are requesting that they give consideration to this request as well given Trussler Road is a Regional Road and access thereto is controlled by the Region of Waterloo. I trust these comments are of assistance. We would ask that you please ensure that the Township of Wilmot is included in any future correspondence regarding these proposed plans. Page 153 of 792 Thank you. Harold Harold O'Krafka, MCIP, RPP Director of Development Services 60 5nyder's Road West, Baden, ON N3A 1A1 P. 519.634.8519 x 236 1 F. 519.634.5044 ,1 Tall. 1.800.469.5576 1 TTY. 519.634.5037 www. wilmot.ca I Follow us on Twitter 2WiImotTownshig Wilmot is a cohesive, vibrant and welcoming countryside community. %111 -MOT STA?T.] ENT OF CU` frIDEN, Ila l.t I Y: This electron t transmission. melt d:ng an aitad cd document[s). may Contain ir.loru,auon that is pncilcgcd, contldcnual 0r 01hcn•: rs:: protected Isom disclosure under applicable I:nv ,trid I Rn the soli use o!' the rnwniRd r:;cipiQnI(s) II' Lhe ri�c.-'is•cr of this mformauon is not tIic mtcnded rk�cipienr, or the e:rrploye4.!ngunl res ponsihlc t'lor&Iitonrig the inIormaunn to the InWo 'd recipient. )0u r.rc hcrrby not li:d tbat any us.. reading, d15s.nit nallDn, distribution. copying or siwapt' n this trtlorinaron is s[ricth prob rbiwd. II you L•arr ruc:ivtd tl ns mfonnanon m error, please nom% Iltc sender by ccurrn cirarl and delete the etc mon lc transintssurim, nciudina all auachiw s 1'roin sour sc_ slum. if roti hasp r,�con•cd thio Inessane as putt or cnrporati or commercial con mi:n!cat Ions and wish not to re:eiac s+ieh please s ii a rertuesr to ursubscribel67µiImot .ca Page 154 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Harold O'Krafka <harold.okrafka@Wilmot.ca> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 1:52 PM To: Garett Stevenson Cc: Nathan Wilkinson Subject: [EXTERNAL) RE: Department - Agency Re -Circulation 30T-18201 & 30T-18202 (Mattamy) Hi Garett Just a quick note to confirm that our only requested condition of draft approval remains the same. The Township of Wilmot requests "the circulation of the engineering drawings for the reconstruction of Tru ssler Road, south of Bleams Road, to ensure entrances providing access to existing properties on the west side of Truss ler Road, have been considered and incorporated into the design. A review fee of $500 is required by Wilmot Township at time of drawing submission." Please forward the conditions of Draft Approval when same are approved. Thanks and have a great weekend. Regards Harold Harold O'Krafka MCIP RPP Director of Development Services From: Garett Stevenson <Garett.5tevenson@kitchener.ca> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 7:50 PM To: 'Peter Ellis' <PEllis@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Jonn Barton <jonn.Barton@kitchener.ca>;'Jane Gurney' <JGurney@regi onofwaterloo.ca>; Jason Brute <Jason.BruIe@kitchener.ca>; 'Marriott, David (MNRF)' <David.Marriott@ontario.ca>;'Graham.Buck@ontario.ca' <Graham.Buck@ontario.ca>;'Shawn Callon' <shawn_calIon @wrdsb.ca>; Harold O'Krafka <harold.okrafka@Wilmot.ca>;'BERE, Jamie' <james.bene@canadapost. postescanada.ca>; Victoria Grohn <Victoria.Grohn@kitchener.ca>; 'McKenna, Tara (MNRF)' <Tara.McKenna@ontario.cap;'Bishmita.Parajuli@HydroOne.com'<Bishmita.Parajuli@HydroOne.com>; 'Meaghan.Palynchuk@bell.ca' <Meaghan.Palynchuk@bel l.ca>; Michael Palmer <Michael.Palmer@kitchener.ca>; Barbara Steiner <Barbara.Steiner@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca>; Rosa Bustamante Rosa.Bustamante@kitchener.ca>;'Shilling Yip' <SYip@regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: Department - Agency Re -Circulation 30T-18201 & 30T-18202 (Mattamy) CAU T10 N: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click [inks or open any attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Please see the attached second re -submission letter. A separate email with a link to the City's Fileshare system with the materials will be provided separately. Page 155 of 792 I am now preparing final draft approval conditions. If you have additional comments or revised or new conditions, please provide to me by November 20, 2020. Thanks, Garett Garett Stevenson, BES, RPP, MCIP Senior Planner J Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7070 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994ag rett. Residents are encouraged to visit kitchener.calcovid19 for the most up-to-date information about City services. WILMOT STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This electronic transmission, including any attached document(s), may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law and is for the sole use of the intended red pient(s). If the receiver of this information is not the intended recipient, or the employee agent responsible for delivering the information to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, reading, dissemination, distribution, copying or storage of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the electronic transmission, including all attachments from your system. If you have received this message as part of corporate or commercial communications and wish not to receive such please send a request to unsubscribe@wilmot.ca Page 156 of 792 CANADAPOST PASTES CANADA 2701 RiVERSOE.DRiVE SUITE N0820 2701 PROM RIVERSIDE BUREAU N0820 OTTAWA ON K1A 081 OTTAWA ON K1A 001 CANADAPOST CA FOSTESCANADA CA November 6, 2018 Garett Stevenson Planner Planning Dlvision-City of Kitchener PO Box 1118 Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 Reference: Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-18201 & 30T-18202 Bleams Rd "Application 1 & 161 Gehl Place "Applicatlon 2" Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Ltd. Garett: Canada Post Corporation appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above noted application and it is requested that the developer be notiffed of the following: Canada Post has reviewed the proposal for the above noted Development Application and has determined that the completed project will be serviced by centralized mail delivery provided through Canada Post Community Mail Boxes. In order to provide mail service to this development, Canada Bost requests that the owner/developer comply with the following conditions: The owner/developer will consult with Canada Post to determine suitable permanent locations for the placement of Community Mailboxes and to Indicate these locations on appropriate servicing plans. The Builder/Owner/Developer will confirm to Canada Post that the final secured permanent: locations for the Community Mailboxes will not be in conflict with any other utility; including hydra transformers, bell pedestals, cable pedestals, flush to grade communication vaults, landscaping enhancements (tree planting) and bus pads. The owner/developer will Install concrete pads at each of the Community Mailbox locations as well as any required walkways across the boulevard and any required curb depresslons for wheelchair access as per Canada Post's concrete pad specification drawings. The owner/developer will agree to prepare and maintain an area of compacted gravel to Canada Post's specifications to serve as a temporary Community Mailbox location. This location will be in a safe area away from construction activity in order that Community Mailboxes may be Installed to service addresses that have occupied prior to the pouring of the permanent mailbox pads. This area will be required to be prepared a minimum of 30 days prior to the date of first occupancy. Page 157 of 792 => The owner/developer will communicate to Canada Post the excavation date for the first foundation (or first phase) as well as the expected date of first occupancy. The owner/developer agrees, prior to offering any of the residential units for sale, to place a "Display Map" on the wall of the sales office in a place readily available to the public which indicates the location of all Canada Post Community Mailbox site locations, as approved by Canada Post. The owner/developer agrees to Include In all offers of purchase and sale a statement, which advises the prospective new home purchaser that mall delivery will be from a designated Community Mailbox, and to include the exact locations dist of lot #s) of each of these Community Mailbox Iocations; and further, advise any affected homeowners of any established easements granted to Canada Post. - The owner/developer will be responsible for officially notifying the purchasers of the exact Community Mailbox locations prior to the closing of any home sales with specific clauses in the Purchase offer, on which the homeowners do a sign off. Multi -unit buildings with a common indoor entrance fall under Canada Post's multi -unit policy: The owner/developer will be required to provide and maintain the centralized mail facility (Lock Box Assembly) at their own expense. Buildings with 100 or more units require a rear loading LBA with dedicated secure mailroom. Canada Post further requests the owner developer be not/fled of the following: 1 The owner/developer of any condominiums will be required to provide winter snow clearance at the Community Mailbox locations ? Any existing postal coding may not apply, the owner/developer should contact Canada Post to verify postal codes for the project 3 The complete guide to Canada post's Delivery Standards can be found at: httns://www.canadaeost.r.alcgolmc/assets/pdflbusiness/standardsmanual en,gdf Regards, Jamie Here Delivery Services Officer j Delivery Planning Canada Post 955 Highbury Ave N London ON N5Y 1A3 519-280-7958 j a m es. bere@canad a post.ca Page 158 of 792 Kitchener Utilities � tortem�rr� 3 Angela Mick, P.Eng. Utilities Water Engineer November 1, 2018 Re: Rosenberg Secondary P1an/Mattamy Community Preliminary Water Distribution Analysis — July 6, 2018 The following are comments pertaining to the above, : KITCHENER UTILITIES Kitchener Operations Facility 131 Goodrich Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 2E8 Telephone: 519-741-2600 x4408 Loraine Baillargeon Fax: 519-741-2638 TTY:1-866-969-9994 Email: angela.mick@kitChener.ca Website: www.kitchenerutilities.ca The pressure divide between Pressure Zones 5 and 6 is at Red Clover Crt as shown in the figure below Comments were based on Figure 2.1 in the Preliminary Water Distribution Analysis but there is also Figure 5.2 in Section 5.2 of the Functional Servicing Report — are these exactly the same map? Pressure Zone 5 Side • 300mm watermain between J-529 and J-548. This does not connect to Bleams road and is will be a dead end. Does the pipe need to be this large or can it be reduced in size • Streets don't align in the adjoining Stamm Subdivision — the watermains should be located on streets Pressure Zone 6 Side We would like to see the watermain between J-543 and J -6461J-505 (school location) be increased to a 300mm to provide for flexibility in the future (pressure zone divide). We would want to be able to feed the school from the other pressure zone in the case of a watermain break/emergency. The 300mm size for this main was part of the OMB decision. During the design phase there will be a need to strategically place hydrants. 300mm watermain between J-602 and J -6I2— why is this a 300mm? Should it be a smaller diameter 01.vncd && Operatcd Py the City of Kitchener I,I in :I R Page 159 of 792 Angela (Nick, P,Eng, Utilities Water Engineer i iy7r X75-: M3 n PN a FE-+ Jar � ry —`'� x�xs�rearavo�?{a?slan 9'I b jgi i� i. rel 11� 51 a'I 1i110°i ii i 1� 1 .• �. . I'.•' -`- 1 ,- . r 1; ansa= • Y OIYaI Regards, Angela Mick, P.En& Utilities Water Engineer "66. R KITCHENER UTILITIES Kitohener Operations Facility 131 Goodrich Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 2E8 Telephone: 519-741-2600 x4408 Loraine Bail€argeon Fax:519-741-2638 TWY:1-866-969-9994 Email: angela.mick@kitchener,ca Website: www.kitchenerutilities.ca 5{ ; w m r, I.»z� ll � 430'm PVC R Owncd & Operated ¢v the C:ir} of Ki(chelie r C Page 160 of 792 Kitchener UfiNties IY C.ammvnity-Demrd � ,+� foro:�eriflFtY4wrs -i'-°` Angela (Nick, P,Eng, Utilities Water Engineer i iy7r X75-: M3 n PN a FE-+ Jar � ry —`'� x�xs�rearavo�?{a?slan 9'I b jgi i� i. rel 11� 51 a'I 1i110°i ii i 1� 1 .• �. . I'.•' -`- 1 ,- . r 1; ansa= • Y OIYaI Regards, Angela Mick, P.En& Utilities Water Engineer "66. R KITCHENER UTILITIES Kitohener Operations Facility 131 Goodrich Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 2E8 Telephone: 519-741-2600 x4408 Loraine Bail€argeon Fax:519-741-2638 TWY:1-866-969-9994 Email: angela.mick@kitchener,ca Website: www.kitchenerutilities.ca 5{ ; w m r, I.»z� ll � 430'm PVC R Owncd & Operated ¢v the C:ir} of Ki(chelie r C Page 160 of 792 Hydro one Networks Inc. Facilities & Real Estate P.O. Box 4300 Markham, Ontario OR 525 www. Hydro0n e. com Courier: 185 Clegg Road Morkham. Ontario LbG 1 B7 VIA E-MAIL ONLY TO garett.stevenson kitchener.ca October 16, 2018 Development Services Department Planning City Hall, P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Attention: Garett Stevenson Dear Garette Stevenson: Re Draft Plan of Subdivision, Kitchener Green Ltd. & 2079546 Ontario Inc. 161 Gehl Place Kitchener File: 30T-18201 Q? hydro Please be advised that Hydro One Networks Inc. ("HONI") has completed a preliminary review of the proposed plan of the above noted subdivision application. As the subject property is abutting and/or encroaching onto a HONI high voltage transmission corridor (the "transmission corridor"), HONI does not approve of the proposed subdivision at this time, pending review and approval of the required information. The comments detailed herein do not constitute an endorsement of any element of the subdivision design or road layout, nor do they grant any permission to access, use, proceed with works on, or in any way alter the transmission corridor lands, without the express written permission of HONI. The following should be included as Conditions of Draft Approval: The developer must contact Lana Kegel, Senior Real Estate Coordinator at 905-946-6277 to discuss all aspects of the subdivision design, ensure all of HONI's technical requirements are met to its satisfaction, and acquire the applicable agreements. 2. Prior to HONI providing its final approval, the developer must make arrangements satisfactory to HONI for lot grading and drainage, Digital PDF copies of the lot grading and drainage plans (true scale), showing existing and proposed final grades, must be submitted to HONI for review and approval. The drawings must identify the transmission corridor, location of towers within the corridor and any proposed uses within the transmission corridor. Drainage must be controlled and directed away from the transmission corridor. 3. Any development in conjunction with the subdivision must not block vehicular access to any HONI facilities located on the transmission corridor. During construction, there must be no storage of materials or mounding of earth, snow or other debris on the transmission corridor. Page 161 of 792 4. At the developer's expense, temporary fencing must be placed along the transmission corridor prior to construction, and permanent fencing must be erected where subdivision lots directly abut the transmission corridor after construction is completed. 5. The costs of any relocations or revisions to HONI facilities which are necessary to accommodate this subdivision will be borne by the developer. The developer will be responsible for restoration of any damage to the transmission corridor or HONI facilities thereon resulting from construction of the subdivision. 6- HONI's easement rights must be protected and maintained. In addition, HONI requires the following be conveyed to the developer as a precaution: 7. The transmission lines abutting the subject lands operate at either 500,000, 230,000 or 115,000 volts. Section 188 of Regulation 213191 pursuant to the Occupational Health and Safety Act, require that no object be brought closer than 6 metres (20 feet) to an energized 500 kV conductor. The safe vertical distance for 230 kV conductors is 4.5 metres (15 feet), and for 115 kV conductors it is 3 metres (10 feet). It is the developer's responsibility to be aware, and to make all personnel on site aware, that all equipment and personnel must come no closer than the safe vertical distance specified in the Act. All parties should also be aware that the conductors can raise and lower without warning, depending on the electrical load placed on the line. Our preliminary review only considers issues affecting HONi's transmission facilities and transmission corridor lands. For any proposals affecting distribution facilities (low voltage), the developer should consult the local distribution supplier. If you have any questions, please contact me at dennis.derango@hydroone.com or at 905-946-6237. Yours truly, Dennis De Rango Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Hydro One Networks Inc. Cc: liana Kegai — Hydro One Networks File- 3OT-18201 Page 2 of 2 Page 162 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: circulations@wsp.com Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 2:43 PM To: Garett Stevenson Subject: Application 1 - OPA (OPA 1 8/005/B/GS), ZBLA (ZBA18/006/B/GS) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18201); Application 2 - OPA (OPA18/006/B/GS), ZBLA (ZBA 1 8/007/B/G S) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18202) 2018-10-05 Garett Stevenson Kitchener Attention: Garett Stevenson Re: Application 1- OPA (OPA18/005/13/GS), ZBLA (ZBA18/006/B/GS) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18201); Application 2 - OPA (OPA18/006/B/GS), ZBLA (ZBA18/007/B/GS) and Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18202); Your File No. OPA18/005/B/GS,OPA18/006/B/GS,ZBA18/006/B/GS,ZBA18/007/B/GS,30T-18201,30T-18202 Our File No. 83314 Dear Sir/Madam, We have reviewed the circulation regarding the above noted application. The following paragraph is to be included as a condition of approval: "The Owner shall indicate in the Agreement, in words satisfactory to Bell Canada, that it will grant to BeII Canada any easements that may be required, which may include a blanket easement, for communication/telecommunication infrastructure. In the event of any conflict with existing Bell Canada facilities or easements, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of such facilities or easements". We hereby advise the Developer to contact Bell Canada during detailed design to confirm the provision of communication/telecommunication infrastructure needed to service the development. As you may be aware, Bell Canada is Ontario's principal telecommunications infrastructure provider, developing and maintaining an essential public service. It is incumbent upon the Municipality and the Developer to ensure that the development is serviced with communication/telecommunication infrastructure. In fact, the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) requires the development of coordinated, efficient and cost-effective infrastructure, including telecommunications systems (Section 1.6.1). The Developer is hereby advised that prior to commencing any work, the Developer must con€irm that sufficient wire - fine communication/telecommunication infrastructure is available. In the event that such infrastructure is unavailable, the Developer shall be required to pay for the connection to and/or extension of the existing communication/telecommunication infrastructure. Page 163 of 792 If the Developer elects not to pay for the above noted connection, then the Developer will be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Municipality that sufficient alternative communication/telecommunication will be provided to enable, at a minimum, the effective delivery of communication/telecommunication services for emergency management services (i.e., 911 Emergency Services). MMM (a WSP company) operates Sell Canada's development tracking system, which includes the intake and processing of municipal circulations. Please note, however, that all responses to circulations and other requests, such as requests for clearance, come directly from Hell Canada, and not from MMM. MMM is not responsible for the provision of comments or other responses. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Meaghan Palynchuk Manager, Municipal Relations Access fretwork Provisioning, Ontario Phone: 905-540-7254 Mobile: 289-527-3953 Email: Meaghan.Palynchuk@bell.ca NOTICE: This communication and any attachments ("this message") may contain inform at on which is privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise subject to restricted disclosure under applicable law. This message is for the sale use of the intended recipiont(s). Any unaulhorized use disclosure, viewing, copying, alteration, dissemination or distribution of. or reliance on, this message is strictly prn,hihiled, If you have received this message in error, or you are not arl authorized or intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, delete this message and all copies from your e-mail system and destroy any printed copies. You are receiving this communication because you are listed as a current WSP conlact. Should you have any questions regarding WSP's electronic communications policy. please consult our Anti Spam Commitment at www.wsi).com/casi. For aaiy concern or if you believe you should not be receiving this message, please forward this message to caslccmplianceCd;wsp.com so that we can promptly address your request. Note that not all messages sent by WSP qualify as commercial electronic messages AVIS : Ce message, incluant taul fichier raccompagnant (v le message r)}, peut contenir des renseignements ou de rinformation priviloi@s, confidentiels, proprielaires ou a divutgation res[reinle en vertu de la tai. Ce message est destine a I'usage exclusif duldes deslrnalaae{s} voulu(s). I-oute utilisation non permise, divulgation, leclure, reproduction. modification. diffusion ou distribution est interdrle. Si vous avez regu ce message par erreur, ou que nous n'etes pas un destinataire autorise ou voulu, veuillez eel aviser 1'expediteur immediatement et detruire le message et toute copie electronique ou imprimce. Vous recevez tette communication car vous faites partie des contacts de WSP. Si vous avez des questions concemant la polilique de communications elecironiques de WSP, veuillez consulter notre Crlq,igi merit anli-pourriel au www.wsp.comllcap- Pour toute question ou si vous croyez que vous ne devriez pas recevoir ce message, priere de le transferee au conformitelcapCa7wsp.com afin que nous puissions rapidement trailer votre demande. Nater que ce ne sant pas taus les messages transmis par NJSP qui constituent cies messages electroniques commemiaux. Page 164 of 792 July 28, 2022 Via email 30T-18201 Adminii5tr,ation CeRtre: 400 CI& Road, f'Ds Box 729 Cambridge, ON 'a I R 5W6 Phnnp: ,,' TD11 free_ 1- +- -#7?2 Fax: 519--62.1-I$ vrww.grandriwPx_r.4 Garett Stevenson, Manager of Development Review Planning Division, City of Kitchener Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson, Re: Applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18201, Official Plan Amendment OP18/005/B/GS and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 18/006/B/GS for Bleams Road "Application 1" Bleams Road and Trussler Road, City of Kitchener Kitchener Green Ltd./Mattamy Homes/2079546 Ontario Inc. Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has received the above -noted applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment approvals for lands within the Rosenberg community. Recommendation GRCA staff have no objection to the approval of the above -noted applications, subject to the conditions detailed below. Documents Reviewed by Staff Staff have completed a review of the following documents submitted with this application: • Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18201), prepared by City of Kitchener Development Services Department, Planning, dated July 6, 2022, received July 26, 2022 • Zone By -Law Amendment, Map No. 1, prepared by City of Kitchener Development Services Department, Planning, dated July 6, 2022, received July 26, 2022 • Land Use Schedule 30T-18201 + 30T-18202, prepared by the City of Kitchener, dated August 2021, received July 21, 2022. • Preliminary Stormwater Management (SWM) Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., most recently revised August 31, 2021, received July 19, 2022 • Engineering Drawings (Lot Grading Plans Drawing Numbers AG 1.1 to AG 1.6 and Trail Plan), prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., most recently re -issued August 31, 2021, received July 19, 2022 • Email from Garett Korber (MTE Consultants Inc.) to Chris Foster -Pengelly (GRCA), re: Draft Plan of Subdivision - 30T-18201 GRCA comments, received July 25, 2022. Membef oF Consetyackm OnrafIQ r resanongOnurics 16 Conwrvaticn AuThwities I The Grand - A r"% :_f;; Hfl Page 165 of 792 • Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study - Update, prepared by Natural Resource Solutions Inc., most recently revised August 2021, received May 12, 2022 • Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Mattamy Community Urban Design Brief, prepared by NAK design strategies, prepared August 16, 2021, received July 21, 2022 • Hydrogeology Study, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 • Functional Servicing Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 • Geotechnical Recommendations — Proposed Residential Subdivision, Rosenberg Area 2 Lands, Kitchener, Ontario, prepared by DS Consultants Ltd., dated June 12, 2018 GRCA Comments The GRCA has no objection to draft plan approval subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to any grading or construction on the site and prior to registration of the plan, the owners or their agents submit the following plans and reports to the satisfaction of the Grand River Conservation Authority. a) A detailed final stormwater management report in accordance with the 2003 Ministry of the Environment Report entitled "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual" and in keeping with the Rosenberg Secondary Plan Mattamy Community 30T18201 & 30T-18202 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (dated August 31, 2021, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc). b) Final Lot Grading, Servicing, and Storm Drainage Plans. c) A final erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the Grand River Conservation Authority's Guidelines for erosion and sediment control, indicating the means whereby erosion will be minimized and sediment maintained on-site throughout all phases of grading and construction. d) The submission and approval of a Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses permit from the GRCA prior to any grading or construction in a regulated area, including any grading within wetlands and the "wet depression," as identified in the EIS (prepared by NRSI, revised August 2021), and their regulated allowances. In support of final design and the clearance of conditions, the following comments are to be addressed to the satisfaction of the GRCA: 1. Section 2.4 of the Hydrogeology Study (pages 6-7) notes that infiltration testing was undertaken for SWMF1 (TL1, TL2, TL3 and TL4) and SWMF2 (Area 1 and Area 2), with reference to Appendix F for infiltration testing outcomes. Results of infiltration testing for each SWM facility is required for review. Using the results of the infiltration testing, the water balance analysis must demonstrate that monthly infiltration targets can be met, to the satisfaction of the GRCA. 2. A monthly breakdown of the water balance is required to demonstrate that the infiltration targets will be met considering the winter bypass for infiltration basins. Based on our review of the Preliminary SWM Report, we understand that the water balance calculations provided in Tables 5.8 and 5.9 are based on continuous modeling. The monthly breakdown should demonstrate that the model was run for all months to identify Page 166 of 792 pre -development conditions and that pre -development conditions can be matched. Please note that results of the final water balance may impact lot configurations and sizing. We trust that the municipality will ensure the Subdivider's Agreement between the owners and the municipality contain provisions for the completion and maintenance of the works in accordance with the approved plans and reports noted in Condition 1) above. The GRCA acknowledges past receipt of the subdivision fee (70% of the base fee and per net hectare fee) of $21,000 for 30T-18201. By copy of this correspondence, the applicant will be invoiced the remaining balance of $9,000. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at cfosterpengelly@gran driver. ca or 519-621-2763 ext. 2319. Siinda. cerely, Chris Foster -Pengelly, M.Sc. Resource Planner, Water Management Division Copy: Barb Steiner, City of Kitchener Jane Gurney, Region of Waterloo Alex Drung, Mattamy Homes Brad Trussler, Mattamy Homes Paul Lowes, SGL Planning & Design Inc. Garett Korber, MTE Consultants Inc. Jessica Linton, NRSI Page 167 of 792 6ACL 5, o� �I tic" January 25, 2023 Admini5trakion Cerrlre: 40O Clyde Road, I",D, Boy 729 Cambridge, ON 'N I R 5W6 FhDne: G ;"W Toll fry: 11-666-9W4 7R2 Fax; 519-6214W ww w.grandriweT.r-3 Via email 30T-18202 Garett Stevenson, Manager of Development Review Planning Division, City of Kitchener Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson, Re: Applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision 30T-18202, Official Plan Amendment OP18/006/G/GS and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 18/007/G/GS for 161 Gehl Place "Application 2," City of Kitchener Bleams Road and Trussler Road, City of Kitchener Kitchener Green Ltd./Mattamy Homes/2079546 Ontario Inc. Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has received the above -noted applications for Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan Amendment, and Zoning By-law Amendment approvals for lands within the Rosenberg community. Recommendation GRCA staff have no objection to the approval of the above -noted applications, subject to the conditions detailed below. Documents Reviewed by Staff Staff have completed a review of the following documents submitted with this application: • Draft Plan of Subdivision (30T-18202), prepared by City of Kitchener Development Services Department, Planning, dated July 21, 2022, received October 29, 2022 • 30T-18202 Draft Zoning Map #1, prepared by City of Kitchener Development Services Department, Planning, dated March, 2022, received October 29, 2022 • Preliminary Stormwater Management (SWM) Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., most recently revised August 31, 2021, received July 19, 2022 • Rosenberg Secondary Plan - Mattamy Community, Environmental Impact Study - Update, prepared by Natural Resource Solutions Inc., most recently revised August 2021, received May 12, 2022 • Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Mattamy Community Urban Design Brief, prepared by NAK design strategies, prepared August 16, 2021, received July 21, 2022 • Hydrogeology Study, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 • Functional Servicing Report, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc., dated July 6, 2018 • Geotechnical Recommendations - Proposed Residential Subdivision, Rosenberg Area 2 Lands, Kitchener, Ontario, prepared by DS Consultants Ltd., dated June 12, 2018 Mernber DF Consetyacion € ntaric, rwesentjrtigOntario's 1& Cc�nwrvaglon &Th&le�es I The Grand - A _, Page 168 of 792 GRCA Comments The GRCA has no objection to draft plan approval subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to any grading or construction on the site and prior to registration of the plan, the owners or their agents submit the following plans and reports to the satisfaction of the Grand River Conservation Authority. a) A detailed final stormwater management report in accordance with the 2003 Ministry of the Environment Report entitled "Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual" and in keeping with the Rosenberg Secondary Plan Mattamy Community 30T18201 & 30T-18202 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report (dated August 31, 2021, prepared by MTE Consultants Inc). b) Final Lot Grading, Servicing, and Storm Drainage Plans. c) A final erosion and sediment control plan in accordance with the Grand River Conservation Authority's Guidelines for erosion and sediment control, indicating the means whereby erosion will be minimized and sediment maintained on-site throughout all phases of grading and construction. d) The submission and approval of a Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses permit from the GRCA prior to any grading or construction in a regulated area. In support of final design and the clearance of conditions, the following comments are to be addressed to the satisfaction of the GRCA: 1. Section 2.4 of the Hydrogeology Study (pages 6-7) notes that infiltration testing was undertaken for SWMF1 (TL1, TL2, TL3 and TL4) and SWMF2 (Area 1 and Area 2), with reference to Appendix F for infiltration testing outcomes. Infiltration results appear to be missing for SWMF2. Results of infiltration testing for each SWM facility is required for review. Using the results of the infiltration testing, the water balance analysis must demonstrate that monthly infiltration targets can be met, to the satisfaction of the GRCA. 2. A monthly breakdown of the water balance is required to demonstrate that the infiltration targets will be met considering the winter bypass for infiltration basins. Based on our review of the Preliminary SWM Report, we understand that the water balance calculations provided in Tables 5.8 and 5.9 are based on continuous modeling and provide annual infiltration values. The monthly breakdown should demonstrate that the model was run for all months to identify pre -development conditions and that pre - development conditions can be matched. Please note that results of the final water balance may impact lot configurations and sizing. 3. Please provide details regarding infiltration trench sizing. We trust that the municipality will ensure the Subdivider's Agreement between the owners and the municipality contain provisions for the completion and maintenance of the works in accordance with the approved plans and reports noted in Condition 1) above. The GRCA acknowledges past receipt of the subdivision fee (70% of the base fee and per net hectare fee) of $11,243.89 for 30T-18202. By copy of this correspondence, the applicant will be invoiced the remaining balance of $4,819.11. Advisory Comments Portions of blocks 28, 29, 32, and 33 in the proposed Draft Plan contains wetlands and their associated buffers. The GRCA recommends that the NHC land use designation and zoning be applied to the wetlands and their buffers. Page 169 of 792 Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned at cfosterpengelly@grand river. ca or 519-621-2763 ext. 2319. Sincerely, Chris Foster- Penr,elly, M.Sc. Resource Planner, Water Management Division Copy: Alex Drung, Mattamy Homes Page 170 of 792 Ontario 0 Ministry of the Environment, Ministere de I'Environnement, de la Conservation and Parks Protection de la nature et des Pares PERMIT UNDER s.17 (1) in accordance with the criteria in clause 17(2)(c) of the ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, 2007 Permit #: WC -C-001-19 Issued to: Mattamy Homes Limited 433 Steeles Avenue East Unit 110 Milton, ON L9T 8Z4 Term: This permit comes into force on the date it is issued and expires when all conditions are satisfied. Location: 161 Gehl Place, Kitchener, in the area identified as subject to Draft Plan 30T-18202 in Schedule B (the "Site"). Project Description: Construction of residential lots and blocks, a street network, stormwater management facility and park blocks (the "Project"). Authority: This permit is issued to Mattamy Homes Limited (the "Proponent") under subsection 17 (1) of the Endangered Species Act, 2007 ("ESA") in accordance with the criteria in clause 17(2)(c) of that Act. 2. Application to Species: This permit applies to Blanding's Turtle, a species listed as threatened in O. Reg. 230/08: Species at Risk in Ontario List, and its habitat which are protected under the ESA. 3. Authorization: This permit authorizes the Proponent to engage in the following activities at the Site that would otherwise be prohibited by subsections 9(1) and 10(1) of the ESA, for the purpose of carrying out the Project or fulfilling the conditions of this permit: (a) harm, harass, capture, possess and transport Blanding's Turtles; and (b) damage or destroy up to 10.3 hectares of Category 3 Habitat for Blanding's Turtle. 4. Conditions: Pursuant to subsection 17(6) of the ESA, authorizations in section 3 of this permit do not apply unless the Proponent complies with the requirements imposed by conditions in this permit. Page 171 of 792 5. Compliance: Section 36 of the ESA provides that non-compliance with the prohibitions in subsections 9(1) and 10(1) of that Act and any provision of this permit constitutes an offence. 6. Schedules: The following schedules form part of this permit: • Schedule A: Conditions • Schedule B: Project Location (the Site) • Schedule C: Permanent Fencing and Habitat Creation Area • Schedule D: Permanent Fencing System Dumfries Road • Schedule E: Radio Telemetry Study Boundary Pursuant to s. 17(1) of the ESA and in accordance with the criteria in clause 17(2)(c) of the ESA, I hereby issue this permit authorizing the activities described above, subject to the conditions set out herein. David Piccini Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Date of Issuance: 03/04/23 (dd/mm/yy) V Page 172 of 792 SCHEDULE A: CONDITIONS Definitions 1. In this permit, "Active Season" means the period when Blanding's Turtles are most likely to be outside of their overwintering site (normally between April 15 and October 15); "Encounter" means any encounter with individual Blanding's Turtles at the Site; "Hatching Season" means the period when Blanding's Turtle hatchlings are most likely to emerge from their nest (normally between August 15 and September 30); "MECP", "Ministry" means the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; "Nesting Season" means the period when Blanding's Turtles are most likely to be searching for the appropriate locations for nesting, establishing nest sites and nesting (normally between May 1 and July 15); "NHIC" means the Natural Heritage Information Centre; "Overall Benefit Activities" means the activities identified in conditions 18, 19, 20 and 21; "Permanent Fencing" means the permanent exclusion fencing intended to exclude Blanding's Turtles from accessing the Site both prior to the beginning of and following the completion of the Project, which is required to be installed in accordance with condition 13; "Permanent Fencing System" means the fencing installed in accordance with condition 20; "Project Activities" means activities associated with undertaking the Project or fulfilling the conditions of this permit which may impact the Protected Species or its habitat, including construction, vegetation and tree removal, site grading, heavy equipment use at the Site and Overall Benefit Activities; "Qualified Professional" means a person who has the education, training, experience and expertise in the conservation and protection of the Protected Species, unless indicated otherwise, to undertake the requirements of this permit that are to be undertaken or overseen by that person; "Protected Species" means Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii); "Provincially Significant Wetland" means any wetland that achieves a total score of 600 or more points, or achieves a score of 200 or more points in either the Biological or the Special Features component in the science -based ranking system known as the Ontario Wetland Evaluation System; "SARO List" means O. Reg. 230/08: Species at Risk in Ontario List; "Significant Rainfall or Snowmelt Event" means an event during which at least 15 mm of rainfall or snowmelt has been received within 24 hours at the Site, or 191 Page 173 of 792 an event with an intensity of at least 5 mm/hr and during which at least 10 mm of rainfall or snowmelt has been received at the Site; "Temporary Fencing" means the fencing installed in accordance with condition 12; "Temporary Overall Benefit Fencing" means the fencing installed in accordance with condition 18(a); and "Wildlife Custodian" means a person who holds a valid wildlife custodian authorization under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997. General 2. The Proponent shall retain a Qualified Professional to: (a) undertake the activities that this permit requires to be undertaken by a Qualified Professional; and (b) supervise and assist with other activities required by this permit that are within the purview of a Qualified Professional. 3. The Proponent shall keep a copy of this permit on the Site and ensure that a copy of the permit is accessible at all times by any person engaging in an activity that is authorized or required by this permit. 4. The Proponent shall: (a) give a copy of this permit to every Qualified Professional working on the Site, and (b) ensure that a copy of this permit is carried by any person who transports a Protected Species individual under the authority of this permit for the purposes of relocation or providing custodial or veterinary care. 5. The Proponent shall act with due diligence to prevent killing, harming, or harassing any individual of the Protected Species while carrying out the Project Activities and while fulfilling the conditions of this permit. 6. The first time Project Activities are commenced, the Proponent shall notify the MECP within 24 hours by email to SAROntario(a)ontario.ca, referencing the permit number. 7. At the request of MECP staff and on reasonable notice, the Proponent shall provide MECP staff and others accompanying them with access to the Site and any other areas for the purposes of observing the Site and any activities undertaken in relation to this permit. If access is requested to an area not on the Site and not owned by the Proponent, the Proponent shall make reasonable efforts to obtain the requested access. For greater certainty, this condition does not affect the powers of an enforcement officer under the ESA. 11 Page 174 of 792 8. The Proponent shall notify the MECP immediately by email at SAROntario(a)ontario.ca, referencing the number of this permit, if the Proponent's name or address changes or if the Proponent: (a) becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; (b) has a receiver appointed over it; (c) takes a step toward dissolution or is amalgamated; (d) undergoes a change in control or ownership; (e) takes or is subject to any other thing which adversely affects the Proponent's ability to satisfy this permit; or (f) is unable to satisfy any of the conditions of this permit. 9. First Nations: The Proponent shall continue to share information about this permit, any amendments to this permit, and the implementation of this permit with the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, Six Nations of the Grand River and the Haudenosaunee Development Institute (on behalf of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council). The Proponent shall carry out the following to fulfill the commitments that have been made to First Nations: (a) inform and consult with the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation and Six Nations of the Grand River when: i. developing the stewardship brochures required under condition 16; ii. developing planting plans under condition 18; and iii. developing the creation plan for the wetland required under condition 18(b)v.; and (b) provide summary letters of the progress of the Project components described in condition 9(a) to the Haudenosaunee Development Institute. Mitigation Measures 10. Education and Awareness: Before any person engages in Project Activities, the Proponent shall ensure that a Qualified Professional provides education and awareness training to the person that addresses: (a) the existence of the Protected Species and its habitat at the Site; (b) the requirements of this permit; (c) potential threats posed by Project Activities to the Protected Species and its habitat; (d) an explanation of mitigation efforts that must be taken in order to avoid killing, harming or harassing the Protected Species, and to avoid damaging or destroying its habitat; (e) appropriate action(s) to take if an Encounter occurs; and :l Page 175 of 792 (f) how to report sightings of the Protected Species or Encounters to the NHIC and to the Ministry. 11. Record of Training: The Proponent shall keep a record of training conducted in accordance with condition 10 and that record shall include: (a) the name of each Qualified Professional who conducted the training; (b) the names of all persons trained; (c) a declaration signed by each trainee certifying that they have been trained in accordance with the requirements under condition 10; (d) the date(s) of the training; (e) the manner in which the training was provided; and (f) a copy of the training materials. 12. Temporary Exclusion Fencing: Prior to commencing any Project Activities, the Proponent shall install Temporary Fencing to prevent the movement of the Protected Species into the Site and to restrict machinery access to the remaining portions of the Site where Project Activities are not taking place. The Proponent shall ensure that the Temporary Fencing is installed, inspected and maintained as follows: (a) such fencing shall be installed in accordance with the direction provided in "Reptile and Amphibian Exclusion Fencing: Best Practices" found at- https://www.ontario.ca/page/reptile-and-am phi bian-exclusion-fenci ng; (b) Temporary Fencing shall be installed in the location identified as "Wildlife Guidance Fence" in the map provided in Schedule C; (c) the final design and location (including entry/access area) of the Temporary Fencing, including any adjustments as required by the ground conditions, shall be approved by a Qualified Professional; (d) the Temporary Fencing shall be installed prior to the start of the Active Season and remain in place throughout the Active Season of each year in which Project Activities are occurring; (e) once installed, the Temporary Fencing shall be inspected once per week when Project Activities are occurring, by a Qualified Professional or designated staff member who has been trained by a Qualified Professional, during the Active Season of each year in which Project Activities are occurring; (f) during any period in which the Temporary Fencing is not being inspected once per week during the Active Season, a Qualified Professional shall inspect the Temporary Fencing a minimum of once a month and within 48 hours of any rainfall or windstorm event that in the opinion of a Qualified Professional could compromise the integrity of the Temporary Fencing; M Page 176 of 792 (g) any damage to the Temporary Fencing shall be repaired by the end of the business day when the damage is observed or, if observed on a non- business day, the end of the next business day; and (h) the Temporary Fencing shall be maintained in place until all Project Activities within the Site are completed or Permanent Fencing is in place. 13. Permanent Exclusion Fencing: The Proponent shall install and maintain Permanent Fencing to prevent the movement of the Protected Species into the Site once the sediment and erosion control measures required in condition 14 are no longer needed and all heavy equipment use is finished at the Site, and in accordance with the following: (a) the Permanent Fencing shall be installed in accordance with the direction provided in "Best Management Practices for Mitigating the Effects of Roads on Amphibian and Reptile Species at Risk in Ontario" found at: https://files.ontario.ca/bmp here 2016 final final resized.pdf-1 (b) the Permanent Fencing shall be installed in the location identified as "Wildlife Guidance Fence" in the map provided in Schedule C; (c) each end of the Permanent Fencing shall be designed to curve inward to direct the Protected Species away from the Site or tie directly into permanent fencing on adjacent lands; (d) the final design and location (including entry/access area) of the Permanent Fencing, including any adjustments as required by the ground conditions, shall be approved by a Qualified Professional; (e) once installed, the Permanent Fencing shall be inspected once per month by a Qualified Professional during every Active Season until the end of the period specified in condition 13(g), to ensure that it is in good working condition; (f) any damage to the Permanent Fencing shall be repaired by the end of the business day when the damage is observed or, if observed on a non- business day, the end of the next business day; and (g) the Permanent Fencing shall be maintained in place until a final report is submitted in accordance with condition 27. 14. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures: The Proponent shall implement erosion and sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences) at the Site prior to the commencement of any Project Activities and maintain them in place until the completion of the Project, to prevent construction run-off and soil sedimentation from entering adjacent lands. The Proponent shall inspect the erosion and sediment control measures bi-weekly with additional inspections carried out immediately following any Significant Rainfall or Snowfall Event or inclement weather. The Proponent shall fix any deficiencies found by the end of the business day the damage is observed or, if observed on a non -business day, the end of next business day. 7 Page 177 of 792 15. Protection from Invasive Species: The Proponent shall ensure that all machinery is cleaned in accordance with the publication "Clean Equipment for Industry Protocol' (printed April 2013 and updated May 2016), currently found at: http://www.ontarioinvasiveplants.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Clean- Equipment-Protocol June2016 D3 WEB-1.pdf, immediately prior to entering the Site. 16. Stewardship Brochures: Commencing on the date on which this permit is issued and until a final report is submitted in accordance with condition 27, the Proponent shall distribute to all new homeowners at the Site, a stewardship brochure developed by a Qualified Professional that includes the following information: (a) details about the Protected Species including its identification features and biology; (b) the existence of the Protected Species within the Site, as well as the protections that apply to the Protected Species under sections 9 and 10 of the ESA; (c) tips for living respectfully with the Protected Species, including guidelines for proper garbage and compost storage to limit the attraction of predators to the Protected Species; (d) how to report a sighting of the Protected Species to the NHIC; (e) details on the purpose and location of the Permanent Fencing and the Overall Benefit Activities; and (f) details outlining the risk of Protected Species road mortality, including high risk periods each year (e.g. the Nesting Season), and describing actions homeowners can take to reduce the risk of Protected Species road mortality. Encounters 17. Encounters including Injured or Dead Individuals: The following requirements shall apply in relation to Encounters while carrying out the Project or fulfilling the conditions of this permit: (a) For all Encounters that occur while carrying out Project Activities, the Proponent shall: cease all activity within 30 metres of the Protected Species individual that may result in adverse impacts to the individual, and protect the individual from further harm; contact a Qualified Professional immediately to report the observation and ensure the Qualified Professional arrives within two (2) hours of the Encounter; iii. monitor the location of the Protected Species individual at all times until arrival of the Qualified Professional; E Page 178 of 792 iv. subject to conditions 17(b), (c) and (d), ensure that a Qualified Professional confirms that the Protected Species individual has left the Site of its own accord or safely relocates the individual before resuming any activity within 30 metres of the location of the Encounter and the individual; and V. record the following information and include them in the annual reports required to be submitted under condition 26: A. name of the observer; B. date and time of the Encounter; C. location of the observation (UTM coordinates or detailed description); D. digital photograph(s) if possible; and E. summary of action taken. (b) If the Encounter involves a Protected Species individual that is nesting, or if a Protected Species nest is discovered, the Proponent shall: immediately create a minimum 30 -metre setback around the nest and nesting individual and ensure no Project Activities occur within this area; ensure the nest is protected from all disturbances until the end of the Hatching Season of that year, which includes maintaining a 30 -metre setback from the nest; iii. install a nest protector around the nest in accordance with the document "How to Build a Turtle Protector During Nesting Season", published by the Canadian Wildlife Federation, currently found at https://cwf-fcf.org/en/explore/turtles/htt nest protector en Ir.pdf; iv. ensure weekly monitoring of the nest site is completed by a Qualified Professional during the Hatching Season; V. ensure that the Protected Species individuals, including the hatchlings and any nesting individuals, disperse from the nest site under their own ability before resuming Project Activities or, if this is not feasible, a Qualified Professional safely relocates the Protected Species before resuming Project Activities; and vi. if a situation arises where it is not possible to protect the nest of the Protected Species where it has been laid or it is not possible to wait for hatchlings to disperse on their own, contact an authorized Wildlife Custodian to request their assistance. If the Wildlife Custodian determines that artificial incubation is feasible, the Proponent shall coordinate with the Wildlife Custodian to facilitate transport of the eggs, their artificial incubation, and the release of the Protected Species back into the wild. M Page 179 of 792 (c) If the Encounter involves an injured Protected Species individual at the Site, the Proponent shall: cease all work within 30 metres of the injured individual; ii. ensure the individual is protected from further harm until such a time as it can be collected by a Qualified Professional; iii. follow the protocols outlined in the publication "Ontario Species at Risk Handling Manual: For Endangered Species Act Authorization Holders", available online at: https://files.ontario.ca/environment-and- energy/species-at-risk/mnr sar tx sar hnd mnl en.pdf; iv. document the location where the Protected Species individual was found and the circumstances under which the individual was found injured; V. obtain advice and any necessary care for the individual from a veterinarian licensed in Ontario with appropriate wildlife experience; vi. in the event the Proponent obtains veterinary care under condition 17(c)v., pay for that care; vii. after obtaining appropriate veterinary advice or care in accordance with condition 17(c)v., transfer the individual to an authorized Wildlife Custodian experienced in handling turtle species; and viii. report the incident to MECP at SAROntario(a)ontario.ca, referencing the permit number, before the end of the next business day. (d) If a Protected Species individual is killed or a Protected Species individual is found dead at the Site, the Proponent shall: collect the individual and store it in a safe and refrigerated place; ii. document the location and circumstances under which the individual was killed or found dead; iii. report the incident to the MECP by email at SAROntario(a-)-ontario.ca, referencing the permit number, before the end of the next business day; and iv. comply with any instructions provided by the Ministry regarding the handling and/or transfer of the dead individual. If handling or transfer of the dead individual is not required by the Ministry, the Proponent shall dispose of the dead individual in an appropriate manner. (e) Within three (3) months of any Encounter, the Proponent shall provide the following information to the NHIC by emailing NHICreguests(o)ontario.ca; name of species; ii. name of the observer; iii. date and time of the Encounter; iv. location of the Encounter (UTM coordinate or detailed description); and 10 Page 180 of 792 V. digital photographs, if possible. Overall Benefit Activities 18. Habitat Creation and Enhancement: Within seven (7) years of the commencement of any Project Activities, the Proponent shall, under the supervision of a Qualified Professional, create Protected Species habitat in accordance with Schedule C and the following: (a) habitat creation shall be undertaken outside of the Active Season. If it is not possible to adhere to this timing restriction, then Temporary Overall Benefit Fencing shall be installed, inspected, and maintained to exclude Blanding's Turtles from areas where the habitat creation is being undertaken in accordance with the following: fencing shall be installed in accordance with the direction provided in the Ontario publication "Reptile and Amphibian Exclusion Fencing: Best Practices" (published November 6, 2020) as amended (currently found at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/reptile-and-amphibian-exclusion- fencin ; fencing shall be installed to isolate the areas in which work is occurring within Zones 1 through 5 as identified in Schedule C; iii. the final design and location (including entry or access areas) of the fencing shall be approved by a Qualified Professional; iv. fencing shall be installed prior to the start of the Active Season and remain in place throughout the Active Season of each year in which habitat creation is undertaken; v. once installed, the fencing shall be inspected once per week, by a Qualified Professional during the Active Season of each year in which habitat creation is undertaken; vi. any damage to the fencing shall be repaired by the end of the business day when the damage is observed or, if observed on a non -business day, the end of the next business day; and vii. fencing shall be maintained until all works described in Schedule C are completed. (b) Habitat creation shall include the following: in Zone 1, as identified in Schedule C, a minimum of 2.91 hectares of habitat shall be created in order to enhance the function of an amphibian and reptile movement corridor, including: 1. the addition of natural materials to create microhabitats for turtles and other wildlife; 2. the creation of three (3) swales, each a minimum size of ten (10) metres in length by five (5) metres in width and a minimum of 50 centimetres deep; 11 Page 181 of 792 3. the creation of three (3) of the artificial nesting areas required under condition 19; and 4. the development and implementation of a planting plan, including locally appropriate shrubs and herbaceous species, to establish a diverse community of vegetation and to contribute to a movement corridor; ii. in Zone 2, as identified in Schedule C, a minimum of 0.81 hectares of habitat shall be created in order to enhance the function of an amphibian and reptile movement corridor and reduce edge effects, including the addition of planted trees to establish canopy cover, shrubs, and natural materials such as stumps, logs, limbs or large rocks; iii. in Zone 3, as identified in Schedule C, a minimum of 0.54 hectares of habitat shall be created to connect Provincially Significant Wetland units, including: 1. the creation of three (3) of the artificial nesting areas required under condition 19; 2. retention of natural materials (log, limbs or large rocks) to create microhabitats for amphibians and reptiles; and 3. the development and implementation of a planting plan, using locally appropriate shrubs and herbaceous species, to establish a diverse community of vegetation and to contribute to a movement corridor; iv. in Zone 4, as identified in Schedule C, a minimum of 1.37 hectares of habitat shall be created in order to connect Provincially Significant Wetland units, including: 1. the addition of natural materials to create microhabitats for amphibians and reptiles; 2. the creation of a total of six (6) swales, each at least ten (10) metres in length by five (5) metres in width and a depth of 50 centimetres; and 3. the development and implementation of a planting plan including species that will establish quickly and create a dense barrier between the residential development and the created habitat; and v. in Zone 5, as identified in Schedule C, a minimum of 0.92 hectares of habitat shall be created in order to connect forested areas to the north and southwest, including: 1. planting appropriate canopy cover and shrubs to create shade, leaf litter and areas to hide; 2. creation of a wetland, at least 20 metres in length and ten (10) metres in diameter and a depth of 50 centimetres; and 12 Page 182 of 792 3. placement of natural materials such as stumps, logs, limbs or large rocks. 19. Installation of Turtle Nesting Habitat: Within one (1) year of the commencement of any Project Activities, the Proponent shall install and maintain six (6) artificial nesting mounds in the areas identified in Schedule C as "Turtle Nesting Site" in accordance with the following: (a) each mound shall be at least six metres in diameter and half a metre in height; (b) a weed barrier shall be placed under each mound; (c) each mound shall be made of the following materials: 75-60% sand; and 25-40% gravel; (d) each mound shall be located within 100 metres of aquatic turtle habitat and placed a minimum of thirty (30) metres from linear landscape features (e.g. roads, trails, habitat edges) to reduce predation; and (e) each mound shall be placed in an open canopy and be south facing and installed in a manner and at a location such that it receives greater than eight (8) hours of direct sun per day. 20. Installation of Permanent Fencing System Adjacent to Dumfries Road: The Proponent shall install and maintain a minimum of 350 metres of permanent turtle exclusion fencing to reduce road mortality along Dumfries Road in accordance with the following: (a) fencing shall be installed within two (2) years of the commencement of any Project Activities; (b) fencing shall be installed adjacent to Dumfries Road in the location indicated in Schedule D; (c) fencing shall be installed in accordance with the direction provided in the Ontario publication "Best Management Practices for Mitigating the Effects of Roads on Amphibian and Reptile Species at Risk in Ontario" (April 2016), currently found at: https://files.ontario.ca/bmp here 2016 final final resized.pdf; (d) each end of the fence shall be designed to curve inward to direct the Blanding's Turtles away from Dumfries Road or tie directly into permanent fencing on adjacent lands; and (e) fencing shall be maintained in good condition until a final report is submitted in accordance with condition 27. 21. Radio Telemetry Study to Track Habitat Use, Seasonal Movements and Threats: Within one (1) year of commencement of Project Activities, the Proponent shall undertake a radio telemetry study in the areas identified in 13 Page 183 of 792 Schedule E as the "Current Study Boundary" and the "Increased Study Area Boundary" in accordance with the following: (a) A minimum of ten (10) radio tracking units shall be used to track turtle movements for a two (2) year period to collect data on habitat use and seasonal movement patterns in the area of Dumfries Road, including the Drynan Tract, Sudden Tract and intervening lands; to fill in knowledge gaps regarding spatial and temporal data on wetland habitat use, terrestrial overland migrations and nesting areas. Monitoring 22. Effectiveness Monitoring of Habitat Created or Enhanced: The Proponent shall ensure that a Qualified Professional monitors the habitat required to be created or enhanced for the Protected Species under condition 18 in accordance with the following: (a) basking surveys shall be carried out each year for the first five (5) years following completion of habitat creation or enhancement in each of the zones identified in Schedule C to determine the presence of the Protected Species as well as use of the created or enhanced habitat. Basking surveys shall be conducted in accordance with the following: survey methodology shall adhere to the Ontario publication "Survey Protocol for Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) in Ontario", (Published: August 1, 2015), as amended (currently found online at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/survey-protocol-blandings-turtle-ontario); and five (5) surveys shall be conducted annually between the start of the Active Season and June 15 each year; (b) monitoring shall be conducted annually for a period of five (5) years, commencing two (2) years following completion of habitat creation or enhancement in each of the zones identified in Schedule C, to assess the following parameters: vegetation cover; aquatic plant coverage; iii. presence of invasive species; iv. stability of the banks/slopes; V. water levels; and vi. water quality; (c) photographs of the created or enhanced habitat shall be taken during each monitoring period under conditions 22(a) and 22(b); and 14 Page 184 of 792 (d) if it is discovered that the habitat created or enhanced requires maintenance or improvements, the Proponent shall immediately take actions to correct or improve the created or enhanced habitat. 23. Effectiveness Monitoring of Turtle Nesting Habitat: The Proponent shall ensure that a Qualified Professional monitors the turtle nesting habitat installed under condition 19 in accordance with the following: (a) the artificial nesting mounds shall be monitored for a period of three (3) years commencing two (2) years after installation; (b) weekly visual surveys shall be carried out throughout the Nesting Season, recording nesting turtles or signs of nesting turtles (tracks, test pits, egg -shell fragments); (c) weekly substrate temperature readings shall be recorded; and (d) during each survey, the artificial nesting mounds shall be inspected to ensure that no defects exist, and any deficiencies shall be recorded and immediately repaired. 24. Effectiveness Monitoring of the Dumfries Road Permanent Fencing System: The Proponent shall ensure that the Permanent Fencing System is monitored by a Qualified Professional for effectiveness in accordance with the following: (a) the Permanent Fencing System shall be monitored for a period of five (5) years after installation; (b) monitoring shall begin at the start of the Active Season immediately following installation of the Permanent Fencing System; (c) monitoring shall consist of road mortality surveys completed on foot and include the entire road surface of Dumfries Road that lies adjacent to the Permanent Fencing System and visible adjacent areas within 50 metres of the road right-of-way on both sides; (d) year 1 shall include surveys once per week from May 15 to July 15 and again from August 25 to October 15; (e) years 2 through 5 shall each include five (5) surveys between April 15 and June 15 and surveys once per month in July, August, September and October; (f) during each survey, any signs of wildlife road mortality shall be recorded; and (g) during each survey, the Permanent Fencing System shall be inspected to ensure no defects exist in the fencing and any deficiencies shall be recorded and immediately repaired. Corrective Actions 25. On an ongoing basis from the start of any Project Activities until all other conditions of this permit are satisfied, the Proponent shall take corrective actions, such as replacing vegetation that does not survive or repairing defects in the Permanent Fencing or Permanent Fencing System observed through monitoring. 15 Page 185 of 792 Reporting 26. Annual Reporting: In each year in which monitoring is required under conditions 22, 23, or 24 or corrective action is taken under condition 25, the Proponent shall submit an annual report by December 31 of that year to the MECP by email at SAROntario(a)ontario.ca, referencing the permit number, which shall include the following information from that year: (a) a detailed summary of all awareness activities (i.e., on-site training) completed in accordance with condition 10; (b) digital photographs of the Temporary Fencing, Permanent Fencing and erosion and sediment control measures, dates of installation, and records of repairs, in accordance with conditions 12, 13 and 14; (c) a detailed rationale for any adjustments made to the final design and location of the Temporary Fencing or Permanent Fencing in accordance with condition 12(c) or 13(d); (d) an assessment of the installation and effectiveness of the Permanent Fencing and erosion and sediment control measures; (e) a detailed description, map and photographs of all observations of any other species on the SARO List incidentally encountered within the Site; (f) a detailed description, map and photographs of all Encounters recorded in accordance with condition 17(a)v.; (g) a detailed description of the effectiveness monitoring completed in accordance with condition 22 for the habitat created or enhanced under condition 18, including: a summary of basking surveys carried out under condition 22(a) including survey dates, times, weather conditions, search effort and methodology; ii. a summary of monitoring carried out under condition 22(b), including outcomes for parameters monitored; iii. any photographs taken under condition 22(c); iv. a summary of each sighting of an individual Protected Species or other species on the SARO List during the monitoring conducted under condition 22, including: A. date and time of observation; B. location of observation; and C. digital photograph, if possible; V. a detailed summary of any deficiencies found in the created or enhanced habitat, and how and when they were corrected. 16 Page 186 of 792 (h) A detailed description of effectiveness monitoring completed in accordance with condition 23 for the artificial nesting mounds installed in accordance with condition 19, including: i. a summary of information collected during the visual surveys conducted in accordance with condition 23(b), including dates, times, weather conditions, search effort and methodology; ii. a summary of substrate temperature readings collected in accordance with condition 23(c); iii. a summary of each sighting of an individual Protected Species or other species on the SARO List during the monitoring conducted under condition 23, including: A. date and time of observation; B. location of observation; and C. digital photograph, if possible; iv. a detailed summary of any deficiencies found in the artificial nesting mounds and how and when they were corrected. (i) A detailed description of effectiveness monitoring carried out in accordance with condition 24 for the Permanent Fencing System, including: i. a description of survey dates, times, weather conditions, search effort and methodology; ii. a summary of each sighting of an individual Protected Species or other species on the SARO List during the monitoring conducted under condition 24, including: A. date and time of observation; B. location of observation; and C. digital photograph, if possible; iii. a detailed summary of any deficiencies found in the Permanent Fencing System and when and how they were corrected. (j) A detailed description of the telemetry study carried out in accordance with condition 21, including: a description of study dates, times, weather conditions, search effort and methodology; ii. a summary of each sighting of individually tracked turtles including: A. date and time of observation; B. location of observation; and C. digital photograph, if possible; 17 Page 187 of 792 iii. a summary of the number of students that participated in telemetry surveys and how they benefitted from being involved in this aspect of the monitoring program. 27. Final Reporting. No later than one year following completion of all monitoring required under conditions 22, 23, and 24, the Proponent shall submit the following to the MECP by email at SAROntario(a)ontario.ca, referencing the permit number: (a) A final report on the Overall Benefit Activities which includes a final summary of all activities conducted in accordance with conditions 22 through 24, including: i. a summary of the results of the five (5) years of monitoring conducted under condition 22(a); ii. a summary of the results of the five (5) years of monitoring conducted under condition 22(b); iii. an analysis of the overall effectiveness of the habitat created or enhanced in accordance with condition 18 and recommendations for future improvements; iv. a summary of the results of the three (3) years of monitoring conducted under condition 23; V. an analysis of the overall effectiveness of the artificial nesting mounds created in accordance with condition 19 and recommendations for future improvements; vi. a summary of the results of the five (5) years of monitoring conducted under condition 24; vii. an analysis of the overall effectiveness of the Permanent Fencing System installed in accordance with condition 20 and recommendations for future improvements; viii. a summary of lessons learned through the radio telemetry study carried out in accordance with condition 21; and ix. a summary of any corrective actions undertaken in accordance with condition 25. (b) A detailed assessment of whether the requirements of this permit implemented at the time of the report have provided an overall benefit to the Protected Species. 18 Page 188 of 792 SCHEDULE B: PROJECT LOCATION (THE S PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 1 .. , W ,ft on. I'm am motwAF, -)Ww Loth Ci~ to AftkAM ROM w Too WAL IM " A&Yi1.W Lwrr User Sok &'Thai r -MCI i vols"d wr as• .w w.r.. r ..� 12ft lbo y ..� rrr 114 y rt owsaw sp— •. .�'�. �' '� ...moo o.,r'j � � r � •� . lr � r+�wqurb& j i 00W 50K6 Z 3oft } PLAN OF SUBDIVISION 1 .. , W ,ft on. I'm am motwAF, -)Ww Loth Ci~ to AftkAM ROM w Too WAL IM " A&Yi1.W Lwrr User Sok &'Thai r -MCI i vols"d wr as• .w w.r.. lbo y ..� re' -k em+ to*xi REVOM OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT [3'18 006 C ZC7NE BYLAW AMENDMENT Z13A18 007 G` City of Kitchener M Woprer 9srrdm CwpwvmsK Pp ----, SCHEDULE C: PERMANENT FENCING AND HABITAT CREATION AREA •rrrri..ra�..r Yir._rY.._ r..rt l.w.. M���!•>oa.SlAs,r...wl.,.:... alas r. iNrllY a,�_,Yrriisai-.n!!. • 4F_rf�..rl..tis s. 4.�__.w, .I • rwi r•_rM•sl. ru.rs,r\rte .�lrt r.r.�� i •�� r.r♦f .w �r1s �r.r..rarr. rw.e....■r._r • ++�..w.rrrrr rra.a.ww •rw.r..w.wrw_ r•.K ...4H y fi. Y.l.1l.M r nr.a,w.rlrY,.i•.r,ah..,.rn...rs..i..w �•!, �rYl�rs.r +HMI.a/.•.. `wrrw,ww•.�w►Y_+_+.._w�M.i._ I.,r_ •...+. r.r.pt •.u._. �sr. ar.r.Ri rNYf�......,.. rr.r fa rrr..,.......i. ,.r rra iri,...w rr.�,YS'rfi l.M4 '..a.�IwirY _.rr r..._a■.wrliwrrrl..�r....�ar.. •r... r • r�rr lr. w_rsr_wirHs f�Fr. M Y�•�r.ii s/. r�I._.�..l.rw^I rr - s_.r.rr�wrrf++.K.rr r rr.�•rr,�.rr r�it...Y +r+.w.�. . r.r..wr,.rri...�.rww.ryarr�w yam. 4�.w..Mry, irn_ iyr�.r M rrro � rlrr_...e. .+..�Y.ir� r. rrr<rrirr�r�i r�.rwrr.r•.I.r..rf.w..M,....r.. r.+..�.w �.dMissr . r.rw•w�w�..+r..s+�.r....r i.�....�aa�s, .rr..,.. ••.lrss...r.tr . Ay!_�.rr rVw lf.rtr.irw..t1M A � r p {�■f i i' i R l��r YYsrrnR.Ai R•r,.,_. • 4w�.�..�r..ar,.. w.ir.w iwM rr.M - .r.+I .I.raarwrrr.Y_ .r W. • r!la..r r�M..rr.Ms..r.�..s +.�r_r..+►r r.rrrr. aw • srMw,wrr..rr.rr_r......�s. iI$!1r r..rr.,.ar.r�rtrwr.. rr rrI•w..Yr MIr.M.M..f M w.I,■rw arm ��rM.■�w.n. r,r•r.r� + ,�Ml,�liwlY.+.w.•lll�•yK rY..w+•wry^.r�rrr,i..rr. 11�Y �aG}Y ter. Rego Nr a 4 Arbkial Tape No%brg Edo C 1 i an �{i��s•�u1k��+tr ce ' w I Y i Yl6efti" e3 Garett Stevenson From: Darren Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 11:15 AM To: Garett Stevenson Subject: RE: Questions Regarding the Draft Plan for Subdivision Application 30T-18201 etc. Thanks a lot for your prompt and thorough response Garett! Clearly this is long term build and we are quite some ways from foundations being poured and roads being widened! Darren. On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:15 AM, garett.stevenson@kitchener.ca wrote: Hello Darren, Bleams Road in this location is a Regional Road, and the Subdivider must provide the Region with the physical land to widen the right-of-way to 30.48 metres. There will be future studies completed by the Region on; - Widening and reconstructing Bleams Road, - Potential roundabout at the Trussler/Bleams roads intersection, and - Trussler Road (from Bleams Road to Highway 7/8) widening to 4 lanes. The details of designs are not available at this stage and the Environmental Assessment (EA) is planned to start during 2020. The Subdivider is being asked to provide the lands for future road and intersection improvements only at this point. Check back in the New Year on this website to see if there is any new information posted. htt s://www.re ionofwaterloo.ca/en/Iivin -here/construction-and-road-closures.as x# As for the construction of the subdivision, we are at the very beginning of the planning phase. There is a lot of community planning, construction design, and the actual extension of sewers (from the other side of Fischer Hallman) that needs to occurs first. That work will be progressing over the next five years or so, depending on the market sale of homes. This is a fairly large application as well, so it will be built in stages and it could take 5-10 years just to build out the plan that was circulated. Thanks, G a rett Page 193 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Garett Stevenson Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 5:54 PM To: Subject: RE: Mattamy Resident Circulation Let me know if another night would work better as I am happy to meet in person if that assists. 1. The City approves blocks for future development — so it is not until the builder decides what kind of townhouse(s) (standard, stacked, etc) that they will build will be know the final number. Assume that 14 would be the maximum and likely what would be built. 2. We will work with the developer on revising their plans in response to comments I get through the process. Once there is an agreeable revised plan, Council could approve the plan subject to conditions. That would occur in the spring likely — so there is time. If you were thinking about having your property be included in the applications, the applications could be amended with your consent. Thanks, Garett From: Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3:15 PM To: Garett Stevenson <Garett.Stevenson@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: Mattamy Resident Circulation Hey Garett, Tomorrow doesn't work out for my brother-in-law to meet. I really only have a couple more questions anyways so I may as well just ask you through email, and then we don't have to meet tomorrow. 1. On the drawings that were attached in your email, it's showing 8-14 townhouses being planned for development on my property. Can you be definitive on the number? Is it closer to 8 townhouses or closer to 14 townhouses? Obviously the number would have an impact on the selling price of my property. 2. When do the final plans have to be submitted to the city? If you want to email me the answers, that would be great. Thanks, Sent from my Phone Page 194 of 792 Garett Stevenson From: Greg Proctor < G Proctor@ regionofwaterloo.ca > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 4:26 PM To: Cc: Richard Parent; Marcos Kroker; Garett Stevenson; Bob Henderson; Mike Jones Subject: RE: Include on future circulations regarding Trussler and/or Bleams Road Hello I am the Project Manager assigned to the upcoming Bleams Road reconstruction project. The project limits are from Trussler Road to Fischer -Hallman, and it is currently scheduled for reconstruction in the year 2021. However, it is anticipated that this date for construction may be pushed further into the future to better align with the proposed developments in the area. LEFT TURN LANE ON BLEAMS AT CHURCH ACCESS - Although a left turn on Bleams Road at the church access is not currently included within the scope of the project, the Region will be pleased to evaluate whether a warrant for a left turn is met. To undertake this, the Region will need some information about the church such that an approximate number of vehicles trips can be determined and then an analyses/warrant calculated to see if a turn lane is warranted, based on current and projected traffic volumes on Bleams Road. If you could provide the following information about the church, we can let you know the result of the left turn warrant fairly quickly: # seats Square footage of the church # parking spots ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHTS AT CHURCH ENTRANCE - at this point, luminaires have not been identified at this location. However, I will be further investigating the placement of luminaires along Bleams Road, and will keep you abreast of this. STREET SIGNS AT BOTH ENDS OF BLEAMS ROAD INDICATING DIRECTION TO CHURCH - the decision to allow the installation of these signs is left to Region of Waterloo Traffic Engineering staff. If agreeable with you, I think that the best way to review this request for signs to be installed, is to have you work directly with Traffic Engineering staff. I have included the names of Bob Henderson and Mike Jones on this email as they are likely the people you will work with on this issue. Regards Greg Proctor, C.E.T. Project Manager Design and Construction Division Region of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener ON N2G 4J3 519-575-4729 gproctor@regionofwaterloo.ca _-Original Message ----- From: Garett.Steve nson@kitchener.ca[maiIto: Garett.Stevenson@kitchener.ca] Page 195 of 792 Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 4:11 PM To: Peter Ellis Subject: FW: Application 30T-18201 Hi Peter, Please see the comments below. Can you please ensure that i is included on future circulations regarding Trussler and/or Bleams Road improvements? Thanks, Garett Garett Stevenson, BES, RPP, MCIP Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7070 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 garett.stevenson@kitchener.ca ----Original Message ---- From: Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 11:16 AM To: Garett Stevenson <Garett.Stevenson @kitchener.ca> Cc: Subject: re: Application 30T-18201 Hi Garett, We spoke sometimes at the begging of this month. I called you in behalf of St. John the Baptist Romanian Orthodox Church, which has its property right across future subdivision, at 2150 Bleams Rd. Overall, we no objections regarding the application itself, however we would like to voice our concerns about future road traffic changes for Bleams Rd. I understood that Bleams Rd being a regional road, it belongs to Region of Waterloo, which has jurisdiction over it and is responsible for any future developments. Also I understood that you can pass on to Region of Waterloo our comments as well. Here is what we would like to get, if possible: 1. A middle turning lane in front of our entrance. Even if the speed limit is reduced to 50kmh, pulling over into our property could pose a risk especially for our elderly parishioners 2. Additional street lights for our entrance. Bleams Rd has no street lights and even we have our lit sign, it is easy to miss the entrance especially when poor weather conditions. 3. Street signs at both ends of Bleams indicating direction to our church. We have many people missing our church due to the fact there is another Bleams Rd that belong to Mannhein, which is few hundred meters away from Kitchener's Bleams. Page 196 of 792 #1 and #2 are obviously for safety reasons, Although #3 is for an easy access, at the end of the day, confused people can potentially be involved easier in a car accident. We appreciate your help in this matter. best regards, Page 197 of 792 January 21, 2019 Mr. Garett Stevenson City of Kitchener Planning Division 200 King Street West, 6`h floor Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson: KITCH EN ER WOODBRIDGE LONDON KINGSTON BARRIE BURLINGTON RE: Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 30T-18201 and 30T-18202, Official Plan Amendment Applications OP18/005/B/GS and OP18/006/G/GS and Zone Change Applications ZBA18/006/B/GS and 18/007/G/GS OUR FILE: 9735H We are writing on behalf of Stamm Investments Limited (the adjacent property to the east) and as a follow-up to our recent meeting at which time we discussed the referenced applications. We ask that you consider the following comments: I i The lands that are subject to Subdivision Application 30T-18202 are located outside the limits of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The lands were added to the City Urban Area through the settlement of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). At the time settlement discussions were taking place, we inquired regarding the adequacy of downstream sanitary sewers to accommodate the lands subject to Subdivision Application 30T-18202. Modeling completed by the City of Kitchener indicated the development of the lands could result in downstream surcharging of the MSTSS. We have reviewed background reports relating to the subdivision and confirm our understanding that proposed subdivision grades would have the effect of expanding the sanitary drainage area such that the entire subdivision will outlet to the MSTSS. We understand this could exacerbate the surcharging anticipated by City staff. In consideration of the surcharging issue, we ask the City to confirm sanitary sewer capacity within the MSTSS will be assigned to lands within the Rosenberg Secondary plan in priority to Subdivision Application 30T-18202 and in accordance with the approved Rosenberg Secondary Plan — Land Use Plan. We also ask the City to confirm there is available capacity in the MSTSS to accommodate Subdivision 30T-18202 prior to approval of Official Plan Amendment Application OP18/006/G/GS and Subdivision Application 30T-18202. 2) As you may be aware, a portion of the lands subject to Subdivision Application 30T-18201 will outlet to and be attenuated by Stormwater Management Pond No. 1 located within the limits of tY e Stamm Plan of Subdivision. Stamm has no objection to this principle, provided Subdivision 200-540 BINGEMANS CENTRE DRIVE / KITCHENER / ONTARIO / N28 3X9 / T 519 576 3650 / F 519 576 0121 / WWW.MHBCPLAN.COM Page 198 of 792 30T-18201 is subject to the standard City condition which obligates the subdivider to cost -share the stormwater management facility. 3; We understand the developer is proposing to close Gehl Place. We confirm the Rosenberg Secondary Plan does not propose or otherwise contemplate the closure of Gehl Place between Rosenberg Way and Bleams Road. Although Stamm does not oppose the ultimate closure of Gehl Place, the closure should not occur until alternative access is provided to lands to the south, two means of access to Bleams Road and/or Fischer -Hallman Road are available to all stages of the Stamm Subdivision and ARA Licence No. 5627 is amended to preclude the use of Gehl Place as a haul route. 4) Minutes of settlement with the City of Kitchener include an overall servicing scheme for lands within the Rosenberg Community located south of Bleams Road, west of Fischer -Hallman Road and generally north of the Williamsburg Cemetery. The servicing scheme provides for an overland flow route, watermain and storm sewer where Stamson Street is shown in the Stamm Plan of Subdivision. Subdivision 30T-18201 does not provide for a street. connection/overland flow route at this location. Subdivision 30T-18201 should be revised to show a local street connection that aligns with Stamson Street in the location shown in the Stamm Plan of Subdivision. This revision would be in keeping with the approved functional servicing plan, the intended pattern of development and densities contemplated for the Rosenberg Secondary Plan and facilitate the potential closure of Gehl Place. 5) Street "AA" within the limits of Subdivision 30T-18201 should align with Eskerwood Way located within the Stamm Plan of Subdivision. We have been in communication with the applicant and confirm we have agreed to minor revisions to the horizontal alignment of Eskerwood Way and Street "AA" to resolve this minor discrepancy. Subdivision 30T-18201 should be revised to reflect the minor change shown on the attached plan. 6) As you may recall, there was considerable discussion with respect to the vertical alignment of Rosenberg Way at the eastern limit of the Stamm Subdivision. The finished elevation of Rosenberg Way was included as a condition of draft plan approval for Subdivision 30T-08206. We suggest the finished elevation of Stamson Street, Rosenberg Way and Eskerwood Way at the west limit of Gehl Place should be included as conditions of draft plan approval. The following elevations are proposed: Stamson Street - 355.04 mASL Rosenberg Way - 353.92 mASL Eskerwood Way - 356.49 mASL 7) We confirm a number of services within the limits of the Stamm Subdivision are being oversized and/or provided for the benefit of Subdivision 30T-18201. Services that benefit Subdivision 30T- 18201 include a dedicated storm sewer, storm and sanitary sewers and watermains. Stamm acknowledges they have a responsibility to provide for the development of the adjacent subdivision. Having said this, the adjacent developer(s) should pay their fair share of the benefit received and in this regard, we ask that the referenced subdivisions be subject to appropriate conditions of draft plan approval regarding cost-sharing of this infrastructure. Page 199 of 792 8) Minutes of Settlement with the City of Kitchener establish downstream erosion threshold targets. Stormwater management facilities within Subdivision 30T-18202 should be designed to ensure downstream erosion targets are met. Implementation should be assured through draft plan conditions. We thank you for your consideration. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss matters in further detail. Yours truly, MHBC Paul R. Britton, M.C.I.P., R.P.P PRB:ce _= Della Ross, Juliane von Westerholt, Trevor Witt, fan Andres, Paul Grespan, Brad Trussler Paul Lowes Page 200 of 792 Page 201 of 792