Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PSI Agenda - 2023-10-30
Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Agenda Monday, October 30, 2023, 2:30 p.m. -10:00 p.m. Council Chambers - Hybrid City of Kitchener 200 King Street W, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 People interested in participating in this meeting can register online using the delegation registration form at www.kitchener.ca/delegation or via email at delegation (a)kitchener.ca. Please refer to the delegation section on the agenda below for registration in-person and electronic participation deadlines. Written comments received will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public record. The meeting live -stream and archived videos are available at www.kitchener.ca/watchnow. *Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994.* Chair: Councillor P. Singh Vice -Chair: Councillor D. Chapman Pages 1. Commencement This meeting will begin directly following the Finance and Corporate Services Committee meeting at approximately 2:30 p.m. 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof Members of Council and members of the City's local boards/committees are required to file a written statement when they have a conflict of interest. If a conflict is declared, please visit www.kitchener.ca/conflict to submit your written form. 3. Part One - 2:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. 4. Consent Items The following matters are considered not to require debate and should be approved by one motion in accordance with the recommendation contained in each staff report. A majority vote is required to discuss any report listed as under this section. 4.1 Private Street Naming —1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams 5 Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive, DSD -2023-409 4.2 Private Street Naming - 30-40 Margaret Avenue, DSD -2023-394 20 4.3 Private Street Naming - 67-71 Nelson Avenue, DSD -2023-444 31 4.4 Environmental Improvement Grant Funding Consolidation, DSD -2023- 40 431 5. Delegations Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. All Delegations where possible are encouraged to register prior to the start of the meeting. For Delegates who are attending in-person, registration is permitted up to the start of the meeting. Delegates who are interested in attending virtually must register by 12:30 p.m. on October 30, 2023, in order to participate electronically. 5.1 None at this time. 6. Discussion Items 6.1 2023 Downtown Vision Decision, DSD -2023- 30 m 78 425 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 7. Public Hearing Matters under the Planning Act (Advertised) This is a formal public meeting to consider applications under the Planning Act. If a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City of Kitchener before the proposed applications are considered, the person or public body may not be entitled to appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal and may not be added as a party to a hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal. 7.1 Official Plan Amendment Application 40 m 185 OPA21/004/COK/AR, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA21/040/K/NG, City Wide Lodging House Review, DSD -2023-446 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 8. Part Two - 6:30 p.m. -10:00 p.m. Part two of the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee will begin directly following the Special Council meeting at approximately 6:30 p.m. Page 2 of 668 9. Delegations Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. All Delegations where possible are encouraged to register prior to the start of the meeting. For Delegates who are attending in-person, registration is permitted up to the start of the meeting. Delegates who are interested in attending virtually must register by 4:30 p.m. on October 30, 2023, in order to participate electronically. 9.1 Item 10.2 - Rachel Wolff & Pierre Chauvin, MHBC Planning, Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 9.2 Item 10.3 - Kristen Barisdale, GSP Group 9.3 Item 10.3 - Jennifer Passy, Waterloo Region Catholic School Board 9.4 Item 10.3 - Emily Woolner 9.5 Item 10.3 - Ron Giesler 9.6 Item 10.3 - Gary Minter 9.7 Item 10.3 - David Foster 9.8 Item 10.4 - Adam Layton, Evans Planning Consultants 9.9 Item 10.5 - Andrea Sinclair, MHBC Planning, Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 10. Public Hearing Matters under the Planning Act (Advertised) (Cont'd) This is a formal public meeting to consider applications under the Planning Act. If a person or public body does not make oral or written submissions to the City of Kitchener before the proposed applications are considered, the person or public body may not be entitled to appeal the decision to the Ontario Land Tribunal and may not be added as a party to a hearing of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal. 10.1 Official Plan Amendment Application 45 m OPA23/013/K/JZ, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/232/K/JZ, Lower Doon Land Use Study, DSD -2023-434 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 10.2 Official Plan Amendment Application 30 m OPA23/014/FITS, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/024/FITS, 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, Activa Holdings Inc., DSD - 2023 -429 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 226 357 Page 3 of 668 10.3 Official Plan Amendment Application 45 m 421 OPA23/011/W/TS, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS, 20 Woolner Trail, Waterloo Catholic District School Board, DSD -2023-430 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 10.4 Official Plan Amendment Application 30 m 504 OPA23/0051K/ES, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/009/K/ES, 2934 King Street East, 2748244 Ontario Inc., DSD -2023-428 (Staff will provide a 5 -minute presentation on this matter.) 10.5 Official Plan Amendment Application 30 m 581 OPA23/007/K/CD, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD, 417 King Street West, Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp, DSD -2023-299 (Staff will provide a 15 -minute presentation on this matter.) 11. Information Items 11.1 None 12. Adjournment Marilyn Mills Committee Administrator Page 4 of 668 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Raida Chowdhury, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 6 DATE OF REPORT: September 6, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-409 SUBJECT: Private Street Naming —1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Kitchener acknowledge that Activa Holdings Inc. intends to name three private streets as "Scherlwood Drive", "Jonagold Drive" and "Ridgewater Trail", within a multiple residential development, which will merge three properties on title, located at 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive; and further, That the City's Legal Services Division be directed to proceed with the required advertising, preparation, and registration of the necessary By-law for the naming of "Scherlwood Drive", "Jonagold Drive" and "Ridgewater Trail". REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is the applicant is seeking Council approval to name three private streets within a proposed residential development located at 1198 Fischer - Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive. • The key finding of this report is that the applicant is proposing to name three private street as "Scherlwood Drive", "Jonagold Drive" and "Ridgewater Trail". Staff are satisfied that the proposed private street names are appropriate and support the street naming request. • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included information posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council/committee meeting. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: Activa Holdings Inc. is seeking Council approval to name three private streets within the proposed residential development, which will merge three properties on title, located at 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive. The proposed *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 5 of 668 residential development, which consists of 42 cluster townhouse units and 96 stacked townhouse units, totaling 138 dwelling units, received conditional site plan approval on March 28, 2023, and is currently under review for final approval. (Site Plan Application SP23/006/F/AP). The second phase of the development, located on the western 0.8 hectares of the subject lands proposes an additional 373 dwelling units in the form of two apartment towers, being 14 and 20 storeys. The City is in the process of reviewing that proposal under separate Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications. REPORT: The applicant is proposing to name the private streets as shown in Attachment `D' as "Scherlwood Drive", "Jonagold Drive", and "Ridgewater Trail". The naming of the private streets will eliminate the need for a Multiple Unit Identification Sign at the entrance to the site, and offers improved site navigation for emergency services, residents, and visitors. The proposal has been circulated to internal departments and all concerns have been addressed. The dwellings will be addressed in accordance with the City's Street Naming and Addressing Policy. The Region has approved the proposed street names. Staff are satisfied that the proposed private street names are appropriate and support the street naming request. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson — Manager, Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright — Supervisor, Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Site Plan SP23/006/F/AP — 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive Attachment B — Applicant Request — 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive Page 6 of 668 Attachment C — Agency Comments — 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive Attachment D — Private Street Name Plan — 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road, and 264 Erinbrook Drive Page 7 of 668 C.0 noD T --A — ClJ m = m D � r � 0 D z z �7 NC/)Z Z -1 03c) r m D ZZ Cf) 0 S2o mU> .P m z r/ 0 m 0 0 o m D o m v, CD O O N W W O O :U m Co m a V cJ F -1 NINE. r r O mu Z � ` IV v O Qo 'p M =h z W � C D 0 ME z CJ C/) -m > 00 C/) W '', %Q � CC,) D f O' D o m C m O m c z O W mCnNmO� v O m0<Or�� m Z c r O mV '= I Z C _ W -n T< ED E-, -Di m cm,) 0 r r m iz 0 Z ''' O m r `L o D 00 F W iz 0:q O >D r (eg peoa 1-000H) ab NHNIIVH b3HOSIJ �r D o � w W ¢x ��iuns)� P (tu�S)� (�un�) (nc,> ns), 6 N00�8 J N0018 0 N0018 3 N00`19 d A00,8 " ---.—.-- :---.—.---.---.—.— ------------------------- •� `. �O �O S32JO 3l-1IANVI Z Z w T z z W m M-0-0 � D r w r N (n D O E. o c c m v v v v v, v c o 0 i DDm co _ oo m m r m -222 °— m o m )0- 0 0 0 -`° o n o o 0 0 m o c�D m o c�D CD -6 T CD = CD 0 v w Cf) �7 D n n n �. m<< C < m o v c- rn v N M OM (D N. N. (n (D CD (p 0 CD M M CD N CD >C) Z�D.-,aro o ano nfl. .an-onnA_�nn c ivy oo T(n 7 O :0 .c> O w 0 ti cn °°a p . v CD m rn ....� Z m O W D W N O W Ill W? W N R- N Z 4SO v j N ?mcn O� m ��� �� —I m v N� m� 3� Na D��� a in M CDv v a j m 0 y w N N d N N m N W w 3 m m m iLl O (D N v o N o O W N y S a o 0 _ Z T Z,`c �p D D ;o cp -o -a 3 g o_ o o_ N n 3 n v v w 7 Z N = o 3 w w IV 3 v rn Page 8 of 8 r` P L A N N I N G '1 URBAN DESIGN I__ANDSC:APL R S MHBC ARCH ITLC I URE July 25, 2023 Mr. Garett Stevenson Manager of Development Review Planning Division, City of Kitchener City Hall — PO Box 1118 Kitchener, ON Canada, N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson: RE: Activa Holdings Inc. — Request for Creation of Private Street's - ""Scherlwood Drive", '"Jonagold Way" and "'Ridgewater Lane" 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive, City of Kitchener OUR FILE: Y325Y On behalf of our client, Activa Holdings Inc., please accept this letter as our request for the creation of three private streets for the development planned at the lands municipally known as 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 164 Erinbrook Drive in the City of Kitchener (Lots 1-3, Registrar's Compiled Plan 1483, City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Waterloo). Currently, these lands are undergoing final site plan approval through site plan application number SP23/006/F/AP. Conditional approval was provided by the City on March 28, 2023. We kindly ask the City to consider "Scherlwood Drive", "Jonagold Way" and "Ridgewater Lane" as the preferred private street names for the proposed new streets extending through the subject lands. We confirm that our firm has reserved these street names with the Region of Waterloo. Our client is requesting these private names to provide municipal addressing to the residential units within the proposed development. The following materials have been attached to our submission package to support our request for a Private Street name: 1. A digital copy of the Site Plan (Application No. SP23/006/F/AP) prepared by MHBC Planning Ltd; 2. A digital copy of the proposed Private Street Naming Plan prepared by MHBC Planning Ltd; 3. A cheque payable to the City of Kitchener in the amount of $1,322.00 representing the 2023 fee for Private Street naming and; 4. A cheque payable to the City of Kitchener in the amount of $1,650.00 representing the legal fees required to process the application and creation of a private street. 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive Kitchener, ON I N2B 3X9 519-576-3650 www.mhbcplan.com Page 10 of 668 We kindly request that Staff prepare a report to support the approval of a private street within Lots 1-31 Registrar's Compiled Plan 1483, City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Waterloo. We ask that this report be brought to the next available Community and Infrastructure Services Committee meeting and request confirmation of this meeting date when it is known. Should you require any additional information, please feel free to reach out to the undersigned. Yours truly, MHBC 00� Pierre J Chauvin MA, MCIP, RPP Partner Encl. cc. Alex Sumner and Emily McShane, Activa Holdings Inc. WX Rachel Wolff, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner 2 Page 11 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Dave Seller Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 1:14 PM To: Raida Chowdhury Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Attachments: 2.0 SitePlan_29June2023-Phase1_StreetNames.pdf, 3.0 Bleams 282 Private Street Naming Fee.pdf, 4.0 Bleams Private Street Naming Legal Fees.pdf; Y325Y_ Private Street Naming Request -July 2023.pdf; FINAL DRAWINGS_SP23006FAP.pdf Transportation Services have no concerns. Dave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 east. 7369 I TTY 1-866-969-9994 I dave.seller(@kitchener.ca From: Raida Chowdhury Iij�.ilda_._CIh_owdhury@1kiitchener.ca Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:54 AM To: crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Hello everyone, Please see attached the formal request from MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc., seeking a private street naming request for the developments at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Sherlwood Drive Jonagold Way Ridgewater Lane Please advise if you have any comments by: August 21, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 12 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 1:48 PM To: Raida Chowdhury Cc: Chris Rumig Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments You don't often get email from dhambly@regionofwaterloo.ca. Learn why this is important Hi Raida, wNeIMMIN /r this development, so they may goahead with using the names. Derrick Hambly, GIS Analyst Region of Waterloo I dhambly@regionofwaterloo.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: August 23, 2023 1:37 PM To: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: FW: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments **EXTERNAL ALERT** This email originated from outside the Region of Waterloo. Hello Chris and Derrick, I hope you're well! I'm just looking to follow up on the private street naming request for 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive (attached below). Thanks so much! Kind regards, Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 From: Raida Chowdhury Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:54 AM To: ccu.ur>uu.g r ionofwate_!rloo.c ; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Faa_rba.i_rn. Vcut lne_roeur.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom Ru.ggOq@ku ch ner.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave SeVler@kitcVnener ca> ........ .................. .............. Cc: Tim Seyler <T'im._Sey.VtE@_I i cOn ru U.c > Page 13 of 668 Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Hello everyone, Please see attached the formal request from MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc., seeking a private street naming request for the developments at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Scherlwood Drive Jonagold Way Ridgewater Lane Please advise if you have any comments by: August 21, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 14 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 10:47 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Cc: Chris Rumig Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments I have updated our registered street names list to reflect the changes in suffixes that the applicant has requested. They may go ahead with using Ridgewater Trail, Jonagold Drive and Augustine Crescent for the two developments mentioned below. Derrick Hambly, GIS Analyst Region of Waterloo I dhambly(oregionofwaterloo.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: September 27, 2023 4:34 PM To: Derrick Hambly <DHam bly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Cc: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments **EXTERNAL ALERT** This email originated from outside the Region of Waterloo. Hi Derrick, The applicant has changed the private street naming request to Ridgewater Trail and Jonagold Drive (Scherlwood Drive remains the same) for the development at 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road. Further, they are requesting Augustine Crescent (instead of Augustine Way) for the development at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. Please advise if the Region's comments remain the same or have changed. Thank you! Kind regards, Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 From: Derrick Hambly <[)Ih.� i lkall_y rg iio not q.t lrlloo.gq> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 1:48 PM To: Raida Chowdhury <lilaiidq_ CIhowdlh.giry@Ikir glhn In it q > . Cc: Chris Rumig <C iruJrmni.,g@_rggig_rnofwate.irlloo.ca> Page 15 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Rachel Wolff <rwolff@mhbcplan.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 12:13 PM To: Tim Seyler Cc: Raida Chowdhury Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Attachments: Phase 1 Street Naming Plan - 27 Sept 2023.pdf Thank you for the follow up on this. I have attached a revised street naming plan proposing the revised street naming of Ridgewater Trail and Jonagold Drive. Please let me know if you need anything else. ................. Urban Design r ,p- Architecture 41 Bingemans Centre BingeDrive,1 ' I T 519 576 3650 X 820 Follow : Webpage I Linkedin I Facebook I Twitter I Vimeo I Instagram of R IB, A ,1 1 S T G N This communication is intended solely for the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, protected or otherwise exempt from disclosure. No waiver of confidence, privilege, protection or otherwise is made. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please advise us immediately and delete this email without reading, copying or forwarding it to anyone. From: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Sent: September 27, 2023 11:45 AM To: Rachel Wolff <rwolff@mhbcplan.com> Cc: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Hi Rachel, Just wanted to follow up on this street naming as well for this property. I know we spoke briefly about 30-40 Margaret, but below is comments for this property. Please see Jennifer's comments below and then let me know what another option for Jonagold Way, and Ridgewater Lane, would be so that Fire accepts the road naming. We will then confirm with the Region as well just to cover our basis. Let me know what you decided. Thanks, Page 16 of 668 Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca '�tra��nn��6ui0 U111 I` i' From: Jennifer Arends <J.e.nnifer.Are.nds.@..V i.tchene.r ca> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 11:27 AM To: Tim Seyler <: iw ... ....�i c_ ener.._ca.>; Garett Stevenson < a_re.t.r:_S.reye_rgs rD t..gh eru r: > Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Hi Tim , Again, just think we have some friction with the street naming policy with "Jonagold Way". As "Way" should be used for major and minor collector roads. Also "Lane" should also only be used for right of ways that as 12meters or less in length. Sherlwood Drive is fine as that's good for all proposed local roads. Other options for local roads would be street, avenue or trail. Thanks, let me know if you have any questions. Jennifer Arends Fire Prevention Officer I City of Kitchener 519®741®2200 Ext. 5509 I TTY 1®866®969®9994 I ileiniriiifeir„ irerids lkki ollheroeir ca; From: Raida Chowdhury <Ra.ida_.Cho2 dhuury@kitchiener.ca> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:54 AM To: cu ug_�._r .g.ionof aterloox Barb Fairbairn <Ba.rb.Fau_rbJr.n. Vcu���Oe neroca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom Ru,uggiq kuiclnene�r ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seiler kitchener ca> ......................................................... Cc: Tim Seyler <�...;u,uvu,,,, eyVer@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments Hello everyone, Please see attached the formal request from MHBC on behalf of Activa Holdings Inc., seeking a private street naming request for the developments at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive. See attached for supporting documents and fees The letter requests: Sherlwood Drive Jonagold Way Page 17 of 668 Ridgewater Lane Please advise if you have any comments by: August 21, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 18 of 668 SCHERLWOOD DRIVE � '� U Ra I@IIN'R"i SCHERLWOOD DRIVE Staff Report l IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Raida Chowdhury, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: August 29, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-394 SUBJECT: Private Street Naming — 30-40 Margaret Avenue RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Kitchener acknowledge that Activa Holdings Inc. intends to name a private street: "Augustine Crescent" within a multiple residential development located at 30-40 Margaret Avenue; and further, That the City's Legal Services Division be directed to proceed with the required advertising, preparation, and registration of the necessary By-law for the naming of "Augustine Crescent". REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is the applicant is seeking Council approval to name a private street within a proposed residential development located at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. • The key finding of this report is that the applicant is proposing to name the private street as "Augustine Crescent". Staff are satisfied that the proposed private street name is appropriate and support the street naming request. • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included the information posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council/committee meeting. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: Activa Holdings Inc. is seeking Council approval to name a private street within a proposed residential development located at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. The proposed townhouse residential development, containing 48 dwelling units, received conditional approval on May 8, 2023, and is currently undergoing final approval (Site Plan Application SP22/187/M/AP). REPORT: The applicant is proposing to name the private street as shown in Attachment `D' as "Augustine Crescent". The naming of the private street will eliminate the need for a Multiple *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 20 of 668 Unit Identification Sign at the entrance to the site, and offers improved site navigation for emergency services, residents, and visitors. The proposal has been circulated to internal departments and all concerns have been addressed. The dwellings will be addressed in accordance with the City's Street Naming and Addressing Policy. The Region has approved the proposed street name. Staff are satisfied that the proposed private street name is appropriate and support the street naming request. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson — Manager, Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright — Supervisor, Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Site Plan SP22/187/M/AP — 30-40 Margaret Avenue Attachment B — Applicant Request — 30-40 Margaret Avenue Attachment C — Agency Comments — 30-40 Margaret Avenue Attachment D — Reference Plan — 30-40 Margaret Avenue Page 21 of 668 z 0 Lz ti co 0 Li CD < OfLU CL o CL LU 1� co LU 0 1 8 < (If 0 > LLI 00 5 LLI C-4 C5 N Lu > F < 0 m Of c < CL L, L in u W Lu -j 'Lou F - Im LU Of <Q > o o I >Of < U)LU F --ol UO vs 02— co 0. . � 5 z 2 0 co Lu a_ N C4 0 LU Fo FL0- C:l LU A LU m E c0 J + E p< MR — --7s L L Uz -0 0 LU > Z:) E 2 LU LU w 2 of A > w CL < .-2 F LU IL IL IL CO co m < O LU F L co LL LU L) 6i < Fu C/) in C) 0 U) Ckf < LLI -co < :2 N CO r�v iii Z U) S2 (D UJ —C) �0. 2E Ne < mi LU z -j S'� LU LLI C) 0 w LU U) < LL' 8 �) (D UJ �F Lu z -) m E5 LU z :z Of i nN3AV < Lu GNVN),VVq U, L Ej �71 < 11 < < 0,-) j C=:) < F- ui < Zt oufj Z, If < // a9 Y E Ar, R July 14, 2023 Mr. Garett Stevenson P L A N N I N G URBAN DESIGN I__ANDSC:APL ARCH I URE Manager of Development Review Planning Division, City of Kitchener City Hall — PO Box 1118 Kitchener, ON Canada, N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson: RE: Activa Holdings Inc. — Request for Creation of Private Street - "'Augustine Way" 30-40 Margaret Ave, City of Kitchener OUR FILE: 8784BI On behalf of our client, Activa Holdings Inc., please accept this letter as our request for the creation of one private street for the development planned at the lands municipally known as 30-40 Margaret Street in the City of Kitchener (Lots 193-198, 211-213 and Part of Lots 199-203, 214-218 Registered Plan 374). Currently, these lands are undergoing final site plan approval through site plan application number SP22/187/M/AP. Conditional approval was provided by the City on May 8, 2023. We kindly ask the City to consider "Augustine Way" as the preferred private street name for the right- of-way extending through the subject lands. We confirm that our firm has reserved this street name with the Region of Waterloo. Our client is requesting this private name to provide municipal addressing to the residential units within the proposed development. The following materials have been attached to our submission package to support our request for a Private Street name: 1. A digital copy of the Site Plan (Application No. SP22/187/M/AP) prepared by MHBC Planning Ltd; 2. A digital copy of the Draft R -Plan prepared by J.D. Barnes Ltd. 3. A cheque payable to the City of Kitchener in the amount of $1,322.00 representing the 2023 fee for Private Street naming and; 4. A cheque payable to the City of Kitchener in the amount of $1,650.00 representing the legal fees required to process the application and creation of a private street. We kindly request that Staff prepare a report to support the approval of a private street within Lots 193-198, 211-213 and Part of Lots 199-203, 214-218 Registered Plan 374. We ask that this report be 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive Kitchener, ON I N2B 3X9 519-576-3650 www.mhbcplan.com Page 23 of 668 brought to the next available Community and Infrastructure Services Committee meeting and request confirmation of this meeting date when it is known. Should you require any additional information, please feel free to reach out to the undersigned. Yours truly, Pierre J Chauvin MA, MCIP, RPP Partner Encl. cc. Alex Sumner and Emily McShane, Activa Holdings Inc. WX Rachel Wolff, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner 2 Page 24 of 668 w z� �p Z61 1oz IIS W ------------ — — ---o ^ 55 8 X04 - V i^ E2 X3 6 6",lDf Of Naw - oc - m = o~ - - m odb rz& p F NOHu 06 oO� -0a i X13 &s ..who>ops v ..... :"ee"eee"ew oyg LnT _ - o ■i .„36. J -r Ld izzbiS NzznD �ao�lc Lzz 10� 9zz fol SZ lol Izz lol Szz lol SINV 513zN15 `8S loz� $ �_ — w m ssa<mi m isms mi sv eNav�sv3 of irarans � w z� �p Z61 1oz IIS ------------ — — ---o 0 .uraeicx - —- .„36. s ns - o 0 Ili — —J 0 1 o �� o d � o �- --- - - - --_ - - - i — a - - -- � — --- 0 OJ 6£4b=i199 NlId L 1iJVd w o a scsro-aes Nvsd 'ro iavd - a scsro-aas Ntnd's iadd —� o 9 7 IIIc r 0 O I A8 a' jib asc m ti V 10 446 0 \��=S V A sti^cA °pn*ti scc. x assaouu w z� �p Z61 1oz IIS Raida Chowdhury From: Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:34 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Cc: Chris Rumig; Barb Fairbairn; Tom Ruggle; Dave Seller; Tim Seyler Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments You don't often get email from dhambly@regionofwaterloo.ca. Learn why this is important Hi Raida, I can confirm that Augustine Way has been reserved by MHBC and Activa for this development, so they may go ahead with using the name. Derrick Hambly, GIS Analyst Region of Waterloo I dhambly(aDregionofwaterloo.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: August 4, 2023 11:20 AM To: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments **EXTERNAL ALERT** This email originated from outside the Region of Waterloo. Good morning everyone, Please see attached the formal request from Active Holdings Inc. seeking a private street naming request for the development at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Augustine Way Please advise if you have any comments by: August 21, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 26 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Dave Seller Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 1:10 PM To: Raida Chowdhury Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments Transportation Services have no concerns. Clave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 I TTY 1-666-969-9994 I dave.seller(a_kitchener.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:21 AM To: crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments Good morning everyone, Please see attached the formal request from Active Holdings Inc. seeking a private street naming request for the development at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Augustine Way Please advise if you have any comments by: August 21, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener S19-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 27 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Tim Seyler Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 11:31 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Subject: FW: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments From: Jennifer Arends <Jennifer.Arends@kitchener.ca> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 11:21 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; Garett Stevenson <Garett.Stevenson@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments Hi Tim, Sorry, I suppose this one has come down to me after all. The only concern I have is that the street naming policy does state that all proposed streets having two connections to a parent street bear the suffix "Crescent". Only major and minor collector roads are to have the suffix "Way" Could we have the name as Augustine Crescent? Thank you. KPITIUMMUMTE Fire Prevention Officer I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 Ext. 5509 I TTY 1-866-969-9994 I iieininiifer.erends @Ikiitolhener.oe From: Tim Seyler <,riim....s ler@_kitclhelner..ca.> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 3:59 PM To: Garett Stevenson <Garrett..Stevernson@lkitclheineir.ca> Subject: FW: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments From: Raida Chowdhury <��aida_oC..VJ_ huvurrJ@kitcheu�neir.ca> Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 11:21 AM To: cu uur ug ra .gionof aterloo.ca; Barb Fairbairn <Ba_rb:_Fai_rb Jr ..@:.ki ch_ ner.ca.>; Tom Ruggle <Tom Ru gip@ku lnene�r >; Dave Seller <Dave.SeileU( kitchene�r ca> ......................................................... Cc: Tim Seyler <T'p'm_o_SgyV�r _kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 30-40 Margaret Avenue - Comments Good morning everyone, Page 28 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Tim Seyler Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 11:32 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Subject: FW: SP22/187/M/AP - Fire Route Plan Request for Approval Attachments: RE: Private Street Naming Reservation Request - 30-40 Margaret Ave, City of Kitchener MHBC file:8784BE From: Rachel Wolff <rwolff@mhbcplan.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 3:44 PIVI To: Jennifer Arends <Jennifer.Arends@kitchener.ca> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: SP22/187/M/AP - Fire Route Plan Request for Approval • Thank you for your approval of the fire route plan. I understand from a brief discussion with Tim that planning was looking to bring the private street naming application to the PSIC meeting on September 18 th but needed fire's approva' of the proposed name of Augustine Way. We are happy to revise the name to Augustine Crescent if this change is supportable from your perspective? Please confirm. Tim, please confirm if you need anything from us to facilitate this change if supported by fire. I have attached the Regions approval and correspondence relating to the reservation of the private street name. I will follow up with Derrick to confirm, but based on the reservation request I do not believe the Region is concerned with the suffix of the name and rather is interested in the name itself such that there is no repletion of the same names within the Region. ;;llr l�ii;g1;;lllJI1 11 1111 11 1111 111' 14, all 111111, 111111 1 !i 1, 11 1111ii3lill LA 3 & - zp! I I MHBCPlanning, Urban Design & Landscape Architecture 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Suite 200 1 Kitchener I ON I N2B 3X9 I T 519 576 3650 X 820 1 C 2N, 332 2317 1 F 519 576 0121 1 rwolffCcDmhbcr•)lan.com Follow us. Webpaqe I Linkedin I Facebook I Twitter I Virneo I Instagrarn 01 z ;`, R, 5 MHBC I of R IB, IN1 1) E 'S � G N This communication is intended solely for the named addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, protected or otherwise exempt from disclosure. No waiver of confidence, privilege, protection or otherwise is made. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please advise us immediately and delete this email without reading, copying or forwarding it to anyone. From: Jennifer Arends <,Jeinnifer.Airends.@..I�itclheiner.ca> .......................................................................... . . .................................................... Sent: September 26, 2023 2:53 PM To: Rachel Wolff <E i o ..M.h.tgp E. . f -.@ Subject: RE: SP22/187/M/AP - Fire Route Plan Request for Approval Page 29 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 10:47 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Cc: Chris Rumig Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments I have updated our registered street names list to reflect the changes in suffixes that the applicant has requested. They may go ahead with using Ridgewater Trail, Jonagold Drive and Augustine Crescent for the two developments mentioned below. Derrick Hambly, GIS Analyst Region of Waterloo I dhambly(oregionofwaterloo.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: September 27, 2023 4:34 PM To: Derrick Hambly <DHam bly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Cc: Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive - Comments **EXTERNAL ALERT** This email originated from outside the Region of Waterloo. Hi Derrick, The applicant has changed the private street naming request to Ridgewater Trail and Jonagold Drive (Scherlwood Drive remains the same) for the development at 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road. Further, they are requesting Augustine Crescent (instead of Augustine Way) for the development at 30-40 Margaret Avenue. Please advise if the Region's comments remain the same or have changed. Thank you! Kind regards, Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 From: Derrick Hambly <[)Ih.� i lkall_y rg iio not q.t lrlloo.gq> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 1:48 PM To: Raida Chowdhury <lilaiidq_ CIhowdlh.giry@Ikir glhn In it q > . Cc: Chris Rumig <C iruJrmni.,g@_rggig_rnofwate.irlloo.ca> Page 30 of 668 Staff Report l IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Raida Chowdhury, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: October 2, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-444 SUBJECT: Private Street Naming — 67 and 71 Nelson Avenue RECOMMENDATION: That the City of Kitchener acknowledge that 2415274 Ontario Inc. intends to name a private street, "Luna Crescent" within a vacant land condominium located at 67 and 71 Nelson Avenue; and further, That the City's Legal Services Division be directed to proceed with advertising, preparation, and registration of the necessary By-law for the naming of "Luna Crescent". REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is the applicant is seeking Council approval to name a private street within a proposed residential development located at 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue. • The key finding of this report is that the applicant is proposing to name the private street as "Luna Crescent". Staff are satisfied that the proposed private street name is appropriate and support the private street naming request. • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included the information posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council/Committee meeting. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: 2415274 Ontario Inc. is seeking Council approval to name a private street within a proposed residential development located at 67 and 71 Nelson Avenue. The proposed development is comprised of 23 vacant land condominium units, each of which is planned to contain a future single detached dwelling. Each unit fronts on a private condominium road. The associated Site Plan Application received conditional approval on July 13, 2023, and the owner is progressing towards final site plan approval (Site Plan Application SP22/103/N/AP). *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 31 of 668 REPORT: The applicant is proposing to name the private street as shown in Attachments `A' and `D' as "Luna Crescent". The naming of the private street will eliminate the need for a Multiple Unit Identification Sign at the entrance to the site, and offers improved site navigation for emergency services, residents, and visitors. The proposal was circulated to internal departments and no concerns were identified. The dwellings will be addressed in accordance with the City's Street Naming and Addressing Policy. The Region has confirmed it has no concerns with the proposed private street name. Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed private street name is appropriate and support the private street naming request. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. 0:0I41,141l ys Garett Stevenson, Manager, Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright, Supervisor, Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Approved Site Plan Drawing (Application SP22/103/N/AP) Attachment B — Applicant Request Attachment C — Department & Agency Comments Attachment D — Draft Reference Plan Page 32 of 668 tT i m 1 —NELSON AVENUE r p� (n pm —CZ7 zrn�a o", ',SIy��ON ELEIII MENTIII S�ER,VI}d ING EA EME NT VvNA36 ° =�1- a5n 2,2mM� bfz IIII o z �zN...yss c...a N 3 u�l c C z m w wm a o �I I o y z y 3 ti - �� ,AI I ._45 cn D .. m cm � P61 cn Ul � Z 1 3 n - v 0 0v s 99.377, CD di w O .. I...V — o a ;7 J N ZSS� V V S S c Z m �— m+o — ---� o �a 3 �.� , 2,, oz Q - z zz z µ` N w � y ,o LILD9 N... m _ — nDZs s Ke 7 o m 1.� om m } — - oME � y f -� d 3 t v Z m N v W N$$V R uoiysa��d :N!Nkl4 ASYVY.Y�MWri dA,91A 99N@@ry Y, 10101br m 3 O O r O Z ❑ `� 6 — ,ow���S a m Q ws J.c oaa,L uodoPo, — SYLVIA STREET s C] = \ N 5 —'s P - Cf) r a �d�P� •s w ry co Q < _._.._.._.._. _E O _.._.._.._...... w _ _.._.._.._. c m F} z p _____ >z IIm y ;v i Z EF 3 W«DO m =o CE CmC cn L.......f z °' .-. m y O c G -u N �D 2 N N N G p W p m �D�D m0D rvQ= aDm c mA CD w CD cn m a r m azj O D p A w n a c v� C Cl) m a 90 cDmm G)m m 3 v Naw c9 _� w Zl p D m r g^_ m o rn G C7 O � O O�N� � Q Cn u m m w m Q zo p N V n N A N C7 n n p D m 0 o z z m T O� o X n o N z T F cn m c m o m cn N cn v .ZJ rn m m-i�o o o z o Page 33 of 8 + FIF i% =F Y E °A September 5, 2023 Mr. Garret Stevenson P L A N N I N G URBAN DESIGN LANDSCAPE .� ARCH1LC_C UF�L Manager of Development Review Planning Division, City of Kitchener City Hall — PO Box 1118 Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Stevenson: RE: 67 & 71 Nelson Ave, Kitchener — Request for Creation of Private Street Name OUT FILE: '16233G' On behalf of our client, 2415274 Ontario Inc., please accept this letter as our formal request for the creation of one private street for the development planned at 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue in the City of Kitchener (Plan 675, Pt Lot 9, Registered Plan 58R4637). Currently, these lands are undergoing final site plan approval through application SP/22/103/N/AP. Approval in principle was provided by the City on July 13, 2023. We kindly ask that the City consider "Luna Crescent" as the preferred private street name for the right-of-way extending through the subject lands. We confirm that our firm has reserved this street name with the Region of Waterloo. Our client is requesting this private name to provide unit -specific municipal addressing to all residential units within the proposed development. The following materials have been attached to our submission package to support our request for a private street name: 1. A digital copy of Site Plan SP/22/103/N/AP (Approval in Principle); 2. A digital copy of the required application fees in the amount of $1,322.00; 3. A digital copy of the required legal fees in the amount of $1,650.00; 4. A digital copy of the proposed Private Street Naming Plan; 5. Correspondence with the Region of Waterloo confirming the availability of "'Luna Crescent"; 6. A digital copy of the proposed Municipal Addressing Plan; 7. A digital copy of the Draft R -Plan prepared for the private street; and 8. Correspondence with the City of Kitchener confirming the recommended Municipal Addressing. We kindly request that Staff prepare a report to support the approval of a private street within Part Lot 9, Plan 675, registered Plan 58R4637. We ask that this report be brought to the next available 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive Kitchener, ON I N2B 3X9 519-576-3650 www.mhbcplan.cam Page 34 of 668 Community and Infrastructure Services Committee meeting and request confirmation of this meeting date when it is known. We confirm that the original cheques for the application fees and legal fees have been couriered to your office. We would appreciate confirmation of your receipt of these cheques, in addition to confirmation once they have been deposited. Should you require any additional information, please feel free to reach out to the undersigned. Yours truly, MHBC CC. 2 Sam Celik, 2415274 Ontario Inc. Aml Lavallee - McGarter Grespan Lawyers Robyn McIntyre, BES Planner Page 35 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Dave Seller Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:14 AM To: Raida Chowdhury Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue - Comments Transportation Services have no concerns with the proposed s'tree't name. Clave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 I TTY 1-666-969-9994 I dave.seller(a_kitchener.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:24 AM To: Beth Bruno <Beth.Bruno@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca>; Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Chris Rumig <cru m ig@ regionofwaterloo.ca> Cc: Andrew Pinnell <Andrew.Pinnell@kitchener.ca>; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue - Comments Hello everyone, Please see attached the formal request from MHBC, on behalf of 2415274 Ontario Inc., seeking a private naming request for the private, common element condominium road as part of the planned development at 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Luna Crescent. Please advise if you have any comments by: September 22, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 36 of 668 Raida Chowdhury From: Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 12:10 PM To: Raida Chowdhury Cc: Andrew Pinnell; Barb Fairbairn; Beth Bruno; Tom Ruggle; Dave Seller; Chris Rumig Subject: RE: Private Street Naming Request - 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue - Comments I can confirm that Luna Crescent has been reserved by MHBC for this development, so they may go ahead with using the name. Derrick Hambly, GIS Analyst Region of Waterloo I dhambly(o)regionofwatedoo.ca From: Raida Chowdhury <Raida.Chowdhury@kitchener.ca> Sent: September 12, 2023 9:24 AM To: Beth Bruno <Beth.Bruno@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Torn.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca>; Derrick Hambly <DHambly@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Chris Rumig <Crumig@regionofwaterloo.ca> Cc: Andrew Pinnell <Andrew.Pinnell@kitchener.ca>; Barb Fairbairn <Barb.Fairbairn@kitchener.ca> Subject: Private Street Naming Request - 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue - Comments **EXTERNAL ALERT** This email originated from outside the Region of Waterloo. Hello everyone, Please see attached the formal request from MHBC, on behalf of 2415274 Ontario Inc., seeking a private naming request for the private, common element condominium road as part of the planned development at 67 & 71 Nelson Avenue. See attached for supporting documents and fees. The letter requests: Luna Crescent. Please advise if you have any comments by: September 22, 2023. Thanks! Raida Chowdhury (she/her) Student Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Page 37 of 668 5 r110 - Q � CD s a) � ia� M CY) N C: O m N z V 0 LL N H U N L) 2>' a Q O _ N L U U O C > N Q V > co V 0 LL N H U N L) cs ° g��p a L I M I I I I Is m mrd' I� I II ZZb'- M.OZ,Y9.--- I� °4 I I k � I Ie I I" � y I I ;SII I t °I II w •. �' � 455'Z9 !mry zd '� rys0 L,Y9.9ZN m „I �� i Np °�' a=s 88B'LZ m I � Imo I I °SL, W a e3 a " a 66H Poz °0 8 „u�.�yz..... ooFF6zn�39s����9uR�A� NOS73N?I 440'LS 946'84 I [srry �e) 1 6 .YSOZ,K.BLN Z9Y'HI 'N�ls.3w .a-a1911'OZ —� e3 € N € U H���&a�osSo�g§�.md8p (SZS-W8S NVId 03N315193U A8) $ 8 Q Of z a d co O 8 x2 o L� Q �s �O 8$ (j '�w �� �i p bbbbbbbbbbbbbHUH b 44444 `5 3 a� WCW ut•lo�aI°�- rcac�rc o ��_a8o �o�a_��m_ n :�aa� s - ��Frc k (BLB 'd'a A9) 37N3,IN 13/NbO 't 9 u'Bzr5,3w » n�9sysseN N oar � � 00 � ° Ie , i f f�I i cs ° g��p a L I M I I I I Is mrd' I� I II ZZb'- M.OZ,Y9.--- I� °4 I I k I Ie I I" � y I I ;SII I t °I II w •. �' � 455'Z9 !mry zd '� rys0 L,Y9.9ZN m „I �� i °�' 88B'LZ m I � Imo I I yy ° _gym=- PY. —1 C n ia) 80f'ZfGa DO 4i/ t[so-ti[cc 'rv'I'e " 890'0[ M,OY,05SZN NOS73N?I 440'LS 946'84 I [srry �e) 1 6 .YSOZ,K.BLN Z9Y'HI 'N�ls.3w .a-a1911'OZ —� e3 € N € m n (SZS-W8S NVId 03N315193U A8) $ i �e,�j 1 z a � I � e N 13381S WA1Z S 00 � ° Ie , i f f�I I o l l I •• I I we�; Nri", (.,,.,;sre3X I ° � I I z l� f;; cs ° g��p a L I M I I I I Is mrd' I� I II ZZb'- M.OZ,Y9.--- I� °4 I I k I Ie I I" � y I I ;SII t °I II w In sI Ya °�' 88B'LZ m OZ9'b ❑ BL'f m Z1fl'91 -� / z.--_—.�. '�aJ _gym=- PY. —1 C n ia) 80f'ZfGa DO ry ZZf'OZ �'i MHSO'Ol Stl�01 o ~ M.OZ.iSSZN 3 —IIS.' (T (SGB NYJd (]3d3151�3d Aa) ri '(l � !n fi i� 1332/1S NOS73N?I 440'LS 946'84 I [srry �e) 1 6 .YSOZ,K.BLN Z9Y'HI 'N�ls.3w .a-a1911'OZ —� e3 l�flFe'tm r r=d'„J II��� II � II II i Q �I Staff Report l IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Carrie Musselman, Senior Environmental Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7068 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: October 18, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-431 SUBJECT: Environmental Improvement Grant Funding Consolidation RECOMMENDATION: That the Environmental Stewardship Capital Account currently allocated to the Community Environmental Improvement Grant program be reallocated to the Neighbourhood Development Office to be consolidated with the funding offered through the LoveMyHood Matching Grant, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD -2023-431; and, That Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program — Community Environmental Improvement) be repealed; and further, That Council Policy FIN -GRA -525 (Community Investment) be amended to remove Section 8.1 Community Environmental Improvement Grants (CEIG). REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval to transfer the Community Environmental Improvement Grant funding to the Neighbourhood Development Office. • The key findings of this report are that residents now have several grants available that closely align and, in some cases, overlap with the Community Environmental Improvement Grant (CEIG). Additionally, since the launch of the CEIG the City has established the Neighbourhood Development Office who can more effectively administer grants. • There are no financial implications to the recommendations in this report. • Community engagement included the report posted online as part of the Committee agenda and consultation with the Climate Change and Environment Committee at its September 2023 meeting. • This report supports Environmental Leadership and Great Customer Service. BACKGROUND: Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program — Community Environmental Improvement) (Attachment A) was established in 2001 and amended in 2004, 2008 and repealed and replaced in 2012. In 2015, as part of the corporate Policy Review it was recommended that to ensure policies are up-to-date and *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 40 of 668 still relevant, they should be reviewed every 3-5 years and that each policy have a review date identified on the document. REPORT: When the Community Environment Improvement Grant (CEIG) program was created it was one of the first environmental grants available to residents. The aim of the grant has been to encourage residents to actively participate in environmental initiatives, by undertaking projects that meet the following objectives: • increase awareness of how residents view and treat the air, water, and land resources. • foster a sense of environmental stewardship. • promote community environmental awareness. • promote and initiate the development of community based environmental projects; and, • support environmental research. The grants approved have varied in nature but have primarily been environmental projects such as school yard greening or tree planting or for environmentally focused community awareness events. In 2021, the grant was paused pending its review. CEIG Review - Is the policy current and relevant? Residents now have several environmental grants available, such as the Region of Waterloo Community Environmental Fund, the Grand River Conservation Authority Community Conservation Grants, and the TD Friends of the Environment Foundation Grant, Ontario Community Environment Fund, and Federal EcoAction Community Funding Program. Attachment B provides an overview of the grants outlined above. Additionally, the City now offers the LoveMyHood Matching Grant through the Neighbourhood Development Office. The LoveMyHood Matching Grant includes projects of an environmental nature such as community gardens, food hedges, pollinator gardens, tree planting and more. Since 2016, the LoveMyHood program has funded 44 of the 66 greening related applications received. CEIG Review - Is the policy having the desired effect? Both in 2008 and 2012 staff reviewed the program and implemented changes to improve the program. Following these program improvements, applications submitted continued to be suboptimal, and as such, funds were not able to be fully dispersed. Additionally, for those grants approved, funding is often not adequate to complete projects. In a number of instances, the recipient has used the grant to leverage funding from other sources. CEIG Review — Are staff resources used efficiently? CEIG has one staff resource (a Senior Environmental Planner) who has the grant program included among their duties. Throughout the year they may answer calls or emails as they arise, once a year they would work with communications staff to advertise the program, update the City's website to receive applications, work with the former Environment Committee to review applications and select recipients, and work with finance staff to disperse the funds. In comparison, under the Manager of Neighbourhood Development and Volunteer Engagement the City has a dedicated team of staff who champion the LoveMyHood neighbourhood strategy and support the `resident -led, city -supported' vision through grants, capital projects and other activities Page 41 of 668 with a focus on building capacity, sense of belonging and ensuring equitable distribution of resident - led initiatives in neighbourhoods across the city. For grants and resident -led projects the Neighbourhood Development Office has established a grant selection committee and internal circulation process that gathers feedback from 15 internal divisions within 5 business days. Staff in the Neighbourhood Development Office develop agreements, letters of understanding, and insurance packages that serves as a project's road map to success that clearly outlines roles and responsibilities and creates accountability for residents and staff. The staff in the Neighbourhood Development Office provide strong customer service through a dedicated phone line and email, as well as working closely with resident groups as a single point of contact, being available as a support on a project from start to finish. CEIG Review— Are funds used efficiently? Currently, $5,000 is budgeted annually to facilitate CEIG with a maximum grant allocation of $3,000 for any one project. Between 2004 and 2020, the CEIG supported 65 grants and dispersed approximately a total of $109,400 to organizations (i.e., neighbourhood associations, non -profits, schools) that operate within the city. While the grants that have been dispersed have been well utilized, the total number of applications received has remained relatively low. A total of 88 applications have been received since 2007 and CEIG was able to fund only 53% mainly due to applications not meeting minimum grant requirements. As outlined above, efforts have been made through various CEIG improvements since the grant's inception. Below is an annual breakdown from 2016-2020 of the number of applications received and funded and a description of what was applied for. In 2021 the CEIG was paused pending this review. Year # of applications received # of applications funded Description of projects funded Amount of funds dispersed 2016 8 2 - Edible Forest Heights for the Forest $4,025 Heights Community Centre (FHCC) Food Forest Enhancement Project Remaining - Community Access bikeshare / The balance - Working Centre for a Bikeshare $975 Education Project 2018* 5 5 - Busking for Change for a local $8,000* fundraising campaign piloting 'text - to -donate" software Remaining - Waterloo -Wellington Science & balance — Engineering Fair — DEAR: $2,975 Developing Environmental Advocates and Researchers for a CO2 Simulation Group Activity - K -W Working Centre — for a Sustainable Gardening Workshop Series - KW Habilitation and Rockway Mennonite Collegiate for an inclusive agricultural -based in class and hands on learning opportunity - Trinity Village / Lutheran Homes for a berm revitalization and naturalization project. Page 42 of 668 Year # of applications received # of applications funded Description of projects funded Amount of funds dispersed 2019 4 4 - Kitchener Master Gardeners for $5,000+ room rentals $620 from - Divest Waterloo for a Resiliency carry forward and Regeneration Climate funds. Conversation Event for Faith Communities Remaining - Sunshine Montessori School balance - (SMS) to purchase terra -cycle $2,355 boxes. - Transition Kitchener -Waterloo for room rentals and workshop supplies for Neighbourhood Climate Change Adaptation / Mitigation Workshops 2020 5 3 - Acting Now for the Environment, $5,000 for an education / information +$1,008 sharing / motivation event from carry - Arctic Sea Ice Memorial, for forward installing a public art and funds. environmental education display on the Duke and Ontario Parking Remaining Garage balance - - Homer Watson Friends of the $1,347 Environment, to make the three acres of land surrounding the Homer Watson House & Gallery an environmentally friendly and enjoyable space *In 2017 CEIG was not able to be run due to limited staff resources. The 2017 funds were carried forward to 2018 for a total amount available in 2018 of $10,000 plus the existing balance in the account. In comparison, the City's LoveMyHood Matching Grant has a value of approximately $150,000 annually. The LoveMyHood Matching Grant started in 2020. Prior to that, it had four grant streams (Neighbourhood Matching Grant, Placemaking Challenge Grant, the Community Garden Grant, and a Tree Planting Pilot Grant), that were amalgamated into the LoveMyHood Matching Grant. Applicants (i.e., informal neighbourhood -based community groups) may request amounts up to $30,000. Projects occurring on non -city land are eligible to receive up to $10,000 and events are eligible to receive up to $2,000. Since 2016, the LoveMyHood program has received 66 greening related project applications totaling $589,475 and were able to fund 44 projects, amounting to $300, 892 being awarded. CEIG Review— Recommendation The City has undergone many changes since CIEG was first introduced including the establishment of the Neighbourhood Development and Volunteer Engagement Office whose role is to facilitate new neighbourhood grants. To continue to provide the best grant opportunities to the community, make efficient use of staff resources, leverage other grant opportunities including Kitchener's LoveMyHood Matching Grant, Page 43 of 668 and be fiscally responsible, policies and procedures need to grow and adapt. Therefore, it is recommended that funds currently allocated to CEIG be reallocated to the Neighbourhood Development Office and Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program — Community Environmental Improvement) be repealed. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports Environmental Leadership and Great Customer Service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The Environmental Stewardship Capital Account currently allocated to the CEIG program will be reallocated to the Neighbourhood Development Office to be consolidated with the funding offered through the Love My Hood Matching Grant. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT— Staff consulted with the Climate Change and Environment Committee at the September 21, 2023, meeting. During committee discussion it was mentioned that there is a lack of grants for individuals. Staff have relayed this information onto the Neighbourhood Development and Volunteer Engagement Office. The committee supports the staff recommendation outlined in this report. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • DSD -2023-381 - Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program — Community Environmental Improvement) Repeal • DTS-04-095 Environmental Stewardship Grant Program • CRPS-08-151 Environmental Committee Recommendation: Revised Community Environmental Improvement Grant Criteria & Submission Process • CSD -12-041 Environmental Committee Recommendation: Revised Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program - Community Environmental Improvement) REVIEWED BY: Mark Hildebrand, Director Neighbourhood Programs and Services Natalie Goss, Manager Policy & Research APPROVED BY: Justin Readman - General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Council Policy 1-590 (Grant Program — Community Environmental Improvement) Attachment B — Environmental grants available to residents Attachment C — Proposed amendments to Council Policy FIN -GRA -525 (Community Investment) Page 44 of 668 POLICY NUMBER: 1-590 SUBJECT: GRANT PROGRAM —COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL POLICY RESOLUTION POLICY NUMBER: 1-590 DATE: OCTOBER 4, 2004 AMENDED: OCTOBER 6, 2008 AMENDED: MARCH 15, 2012 POLICY TYPE: FINANCIAL SUBJECT: GRANT PROGRAM - COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT POLICY CONTENT: 1. Purpose Grants are provided to organizations that operate within the City of Kitchener. The purpose of the program is: a) to increase people's awareness of how they view and treat air, water and land resources and encourage them to be involved in solutions to improve the quality of those resources; b) to foster a sense of environmental stewardship; c) to promote community environmental awareness; d) to promote and initiate the development of community based environmental projects; e) to support environmental research. 2. Funding Source Funding is available to a maximum of $3,000.00 for each project in a given year to be funded from the Environmental Stewardship Capital Account. 3. Criteria a) Applicants: i. Applications will be accepted from non-profit groups, neighbourhood associations and communities of interest. A community of interest is defined as a group of individuals who voluntarily associate with each other because they have identified common environmental concerns that impact the city. ii. Applicants must demonstrate an ability to initiate and follow through on projects by having an organizational structure in place to lead and manage the activities and to account for finances. KITCHENER Page 1 of 4 MARCH 2012 Page 45 of 668 POLICY NUMBER: 1-590 SUBJECT: GRANT PROGRAM —COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT iii. Applicants must submit a completed community environmental improvement grant application form, along with all supporting documents as noted in the application form, by the deadline to the City of Kitchener. iv. Applicants are encouraged to propose projects that provide as much public participation and access as possible, e.g. minimum charge or no admission charge whenever possible. V. Applicants seeking continual support for a project are encouraged to seek other funding sources but may reapply every three years. vi. A limit may be placed on the number of applications considered from schools or school related entities in a given year. b) Projects: i. Each project for which funding is requested must demonstrably meet Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan for the Environment and other policy documents, namely: Natural Heritage Systems and Recreational Amenity Areas, Water Resources, Air Quality, Land Resources and Growth Management, Energy Systems, Resource Consumption and Waste Management, and Environmental Education and Public Awareness. ii. Projects must consider inclusion and accommodation of persons with disabilities. iii. Projects should normally be completed within one calendar year from the date the application is approved. iv. Projects that conflict with or are in direct competition with projects performed by the City will not be supported. V. Projects provided by the applicant for which funding is requested must be provided directly to the citizens of Kitchener. c) Financing: i. Projects that bring additional external financing, material or human resources to a project through partnerships are favoured over projects that are only sponsored by the City of Kitchener. ii. Funding for consultants or professional salaries will only be eligible if provided within the context of a partnership with other funders. Applicants must be operating for City of Kitchener residents. A pro -rated contribution may be considered where residence of participants is mixed with other municipalities. Such fees may be allowed to a maximum of $500.00. KITCHENER Page 2 of 4 MARCH 2012 Page 46 of 668 POLICY NUMBER: 1-590 SUBJECT: GRANT PROGRAM —COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT iii. Where applicable, proof of adequate liability insurance should be presented by the applicant requesting the grant. iv. Projects that are the responsibility of other levels of government Municipal, Regional, Provincial or Federal will not be eligible for a Community Environmental Improvement Grant. V. Projects having received funding through the City's Budget process, Tier 1 or 2 Community Grants or Community Garden Grant will not be eligible for a Community Environmental Improvement Grant. vi. Community Environmental Improvement Grants are intended for one time funding only for a specific project. vii. Projects that distribute funds to other organizations will not be considered, e.g. fundraising events. viii. Costs that are associated with ongoing business activity and not a specific requirement of the proposed initiative will not be eligible for a Community Environmental Improvement Grant, e.g. office supplies, telephone/internet fees, salaries, in-kind donations or volunteer time, travel and accommodation costs etc. d) Revisions: i. Any changes to the project timeline, nature and or content of an approved project shall be subject to a revised proposal being submitted to the Environmental Committee which will forward a recommendation to City council as to whether the previously approved funding should be withdrawn. ii. Failure to submit a revised proposal may result in the withholding or repayment of funds. e) Recognition: i. Applicants receiving funds from the City of Kitchener will recognize the City's contribution. The City will provide its corporate logo and corporate name for use in promotional literature and material that may be prepared by the organization/group for which a grant has been received. Such promotional material and literature is to be developed in accordance with the City's Corporate Standards Manual. The format of the recognition will be negotiated by staff and the organization/group. ii. Applicants receiving a grant must give a presentation to the Environmental Committee at the June Committee meeting. A final report detailing grant KITCHENER Page 3 of 4 MARCH 2012 Page 47 of 668 POLICY NUMBER: 1-590 SUBJECT: GRANT PROGRAM —COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT expenditures, summary of activities undertaken, environmental outcomes achieved that include photographs, copies of media coverage received or written feedback must be submitted within one month of the completion of the project or at the November committee meeting, whichever occurs first. iii. All project documentation and photographs become the property of the City of Kitchener for use on its website or other educational material or events. 4. Grant Submission Process a) All grant requests will be reviewed and evaluated by the Environmental Committee and City of Kitchener staff. b) Community Environmental Improvement Grant applications will be received once per year, normally in mid-September (specific deadline dates will be published annually). c) A sub -committee of the Environmental Committee will make grant recommendations based upon input from Environmental Committee members to allocate resources within budget. d) Applicants will be notified of the sub -committee's grant recommendations prior to consideration by the Environmental Committee, normally in October (specific deadline dates will be published annually). e) Applicants who request a grant will be afforded the opportunity to address the Environmental Committee or appropriate Standing Committee of Council as a delegation pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law; delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. f) Generally, grant recommendations will be brought forward for consideration by Council at an appropriate Standing Committee of Council meeting, normally in November or December (specific date will be published annually). g) All decisions made by the appropriate Standing Committee of Council must be ratified by City Council before they are final. The Committee's decision from this meeting will be considered at the next regularly scheduled meeting of City Council. h) Formal notification of successful grant recipients and amounts will be sent to applicants following decisions by Council. i) Payment of grants will occur after Council approval. KITCHENER Page 4 of 4 MARCH 2012 Page 48 of 668 OL CL CL cL N U C (6 N '2 o p Q 41 C m a N c6 U 4° .T. c) Lo N N _C 7 v L E 'X 0 7@ O N ° 3 0 0 C :O L C Q) j c6 7 o a X E N 9 @ N m U o E E c c»@ c O a) 'o a m E c/) D c C V m C U 7 -5.2 aU O m : c E .U� V Y d N U N C C SEN _ 7 O O a) C m m w E a > N L N p 0 m E N A)7 N N c c @ v Et E 0' a) LO O CO aJ (if E NNO UOc / U 70 mOLw p CO ' O O0O v OO o ° > m.O ag N om8 om°a _"73 co CO Z 7o o cp° a L a) O c o (n 7 Y (6 LmC OO)L Co 4 Np7.= - O -oCE D. Em O a 7 O ULEQ aO E p O ( ( U c N Z a) ID 5 'O CmN o �° 7 N @ a A O s N N @ a) c6 C p N > m m 2O E a N D m N N -O Q c c D O L O MO c c a) L 0 a) ° 3 E BO Y O '3 a O LLn �� °@ O.c" C Q 7 U pc 9 ca a) Q N 3 cT N > V m a) -C 5 C > m o o a) ? x c O) o c a) N O_ m lo a) cc r s c a '5 c 'c- v - 7 @ @ N o nc E m.2 a @ 2 a) @ U c m C7 uiO CO N C@@ c O N C N a U N c a)c 72 o .N C 7- N Q a) O d Z m E Eco a) m t m m p c m > m c Q E@ OU ^N. 7 m QO N L m i0 U 7 O E 'V� CO N aw(na p E p m m._ a)° ow OL CL CL cL N U C (6 N '2 o p Q _ m E E 7 0 C = Q U a 7 7 a) N N a N c6 U 4° .T. c) Lo N N _C 7 v L E 'X 0 7@ O N ° 3 0 0 O '-' O a 'N-' O 9 3 N fA C O 00 a).cu 00 N O N E 7 O 00.. D Ol d N@ 70 S6 7 o a X E N 9 @ n° rig ° o° - o E E c c»@ c c c s3 n'a aE r a> aa) » aGs m ae» a) o Z c o m E S N E.? c a o� a a c 1� Z O c6 C C i - m C w O p Q 4 m N a) 4 O C Vi 7 _Q mp a c C V m C U 7 -5.2 aU O m m m N Q .U� V Y d N U N C C SEN c fD m a)p (n 7 O O a) C m m w E a > N L N p 0 m No m._ U Q m a N A)7 N N c W Ccc 7 o m N C— m E m -.pcCim m m E c E m E 0' a) LO O CO aJ (if E NNO UOc / U 70 mOLw p CO ' O O0O v OO -09ja ) O m.O ag N om8 om°a _"73 co CO Z 7o o cp° i'mCn OQ>U-N3 a O .O- co O Nc LmC OO)L Co 4 Np7.= - O -oCE D. Em O 7 O ULEQ aO E p O ( ( U c N Z a) ID 5 'O CmN 0 E o ?EN > m N UOU O OO7 O aa0 O O ° )C U(n mZU OQQON NomNU CL .0 '—m Z O w O O p C C ::k (u a C 1� Z Q7 c C E C w 0 0 `0 I.A. .E m CC y .� c E c7 U [" m E : C I.A.1 C "E f E -7 E° E al 47 °� E 0 E'> Ecce '> Eo N O c 0 06 fk° C7 IAI C.i U.. O (} : U li, n C O C F- IA.I I.A.. (j C w a) O LA. U f].. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 ...... Purpose and Scope.......................................................................................... 2 2.0 ...... EPOLICY 3 Policy No. FIN-GRA-525 3 2.2 Two Types of Community Grants .................................................... 3 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Approval Date: November 24, 2008 Reviewed Date: Nov 2017 Policy Type: COUNCIL Category: Finance Next Review Date: November 2022 6 3.0 .......... Reviewed Date: Sub-Category: Grants, Rebates & Incentives In Kind Facility Grants................................................................................... 11 5.0 .......... Community Development Infrastructure Grants ............................................ Last Amended: September 23, 2019 Author: Administration 15 Repealed: Dept/Div: Community Services, Financial 17 Services, Development Services Replaced by: Related Policies, Procedures and/or Guidelines: LoveMyHood Matching Grant TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 ...... Purpose and Scope.......................................................................................... 2 2.0 ...... Community Grants............................................................................................ 3 2.1 Rationale for Community Grants .................................................... 3 2.2 Two Types of Community Grants .................................................... 3 2.3 Funding Formula for Community Grants ......................................... 4 2.4 Tier 1 Grants................................................................................... 4 2.5 Tier 2 Grants................................................................................... 6 3.0 .......... Travel Assistance Grants................................................................................ 9 4.0 .......... In Kind Facility Grants................................................................................... 11 5.0 .......... Community Development Infrastructure Grants ............................................ 13 6.0 .......... Inclusion Grants............................................................................................ 15 7.0 .......... Youth Recreation Grants............................................................................... 17 8.0 .......... Environment Grants...................................................................................... 18 Omitted 9.0.......... Neighbourhood Association Program Grants ................................................ 19 10.0 ........ Capital Grants............................................................................................... 20 Page 1 of 22 Page 50 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 11.0........ Economic Development Grants..................................................................... 20 12.0 ........ Emergency Grants........................................................................................ 21 13.0 ........ Safe & Healthy Community Advisory Committee Cash Grants ..................... 21 14.0 ........ LoveMyHood Matching Grant.............................................................22 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE: Community investment provides funding and support for programs and opportunities that benefit residents of the City of Kitchener. There is a framework of different investment sources, each with its own governing policy and accountability structure. The objectives of the Community Investment Framework are to: • Rationalize the many ways the community accesses funds from the City; • Make transparent the mechanisms available; • Align with Council priorities funds for different purposes; • Hold the program funding owner accountable for the use and impact of the funds; • Enable Council to weigh the competing priorities for scarce pool of community grants; • Champion City's strategic direction for efficient and effective government. Page 2 of 22 Page 51 of 668 POLICY APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING: ❑ All Employees ❑ All Full -Time Employees ❑ All Union ❑ Management ❑ C.U.P.E. 68 Civic ❑ Non Union ❑ C.U.P.E. 68 Mechanics ❑ Temporary ❑ C.U.P.E. 791 ❑ Student ❑ I.B.E.W.636 ❑ Part -Time Employees ❑ K.P.F.F.A. ❑ Specified Positions only: ❑x Other: community residents ❑x Council ❑ Local Boards & Advisory Committees Page 2 of 22 Page 51 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 2.0 COMMUNITY GRANTS 2.1 Rationale for Community Grants A healthy and vibrant City embraces and nurtures its not for profit organizations and community groups. It views them as partners in the quest to serve residents. It realizes how important is the grassroots desire for people to feel that they belong; to be engaged with others in accomplishing meaningful activity. And, it knows the relationships between engagement, relationships and healthy, safe communities. These organizations and groups exist to do important work with no motive of financial gain. They come into existence because volunteers see a need and rally support from the community to create and deliver new programs, services and facilities. They are a channel for the human desire to help one another, to give back to a community that has enabled healthy, high quality living. The City of Kitchener recognizes the fundamental importance of working side by side with these groups and organizations, continually reaffirming the appropriate roles for all parties. Sometimes the municipality is best able to marshal and deliver community wide services. In other circumstances community groups and organizations are much closer to understanding the evolving needs and interests of residents, and hence better able to provide services specifically tailored to those needs. As well, they can innovate because they can take risks not appropriate for a municipality. Engaging residents as volunteers involves them more directly with their community and enables them to contribute to community building. In the end, not only is a greater range of services made available to residents than the municipality could provide on its own, but individual citizens are provided with opportunities to become involved, contribute, be better connected to their neighbourhood and in their own way help to shape the community for future generations. 2.2 Two Types of Community Grants Tier 1 grants, called foundational or core services, comprise services that are considered by the community to be essential to a healthy and vibrant community and are provided by longstanding, credible organizations. Support will be confirmed in a multi-year operating agreement. These have traditionally been known as annual grants. Page 3 of 22 Page 52 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Tier 2 services are projects or programs selected for support based on Council strategic priorities through an annual peer review process. These have traditionally been known as general provision grants. 2.3 Funding Formula for Community Grants The funding pool for community grants (all Tiers) for 2010 and subsequent years will be increased, subject to annual budget deliberations, by the following factors: • Increased cost measured by Bank of Canada inflation target; plus • Population growth measured by assessment base growth; plus • Community complexity factor of approximately 1%. 2.4 Tier 1 Grants 2.4.1 Purpose Community grants Tier 1 are intended to provide operating support for organizations/groups providing services essential to a healthy and vibrant community. Only organizations/groups providing municipal services in the areas of arts and culture/special events, sports and recreation, and community support and development and funded by the City for at least 5 years through community grants will be considered for funding. 2.4.2 Criteria Tier 1 services must meet the following criteria: 1. Must demonstrably meet Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents. 2. Must be the responsibility of the City of Kitchener, i.e. not be the responsibility of other levels of government; services such as health care, social services, training and education are not eligible. 3. Must not be precluded under the Municipal Act, e.g. religious services. Page 4 of 22 Page 53 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 4. Are not already being provided by the City of Kitchener or by other groups funded by the City of Kitchener. 5. Are services provided directly to the citizens of Kitchener; grants are for direct programs only. Grant applications from organizations that themselves distribute grants to other organizations will not be considered, i.e. fundraising events are not eligible. Service clubs are eligible to apply for funding if the purpose of the event they are sponsoring is deemed to be a municipal responsibility and the event is city-wide, targeted toward a broad cross-section of the community. Organizations/groups receiving Tier 2 funding who wish to be considered for Tier 1 funding must also meet the following criteria: 1. Must be incorporated as a not for profit corporation; for profit corporations and individuals are not eligible. 2. Must have received continuous support by the City of Kitchener for five (5) years or more (providing other Tier 1 services or Tier 2 programs/ projects). 2.4.3 Process Staff will work with Tier 1 organizations to develop multi-year agreements (between one (1) and five (5) years depending on the needs of the community, the nature of the services and the stage of development of the organization). These agreements will outline the responsibilities of the service organization and the City of Kitchener and will be approved by Council. Tier 1 groups are eligible to apply for Tier 2 funding only for one time special projects or events. Requests for additional operating funds are to be negotiated through the agreement process and brought forward to Council for consideration during the annual budget process. Page 5 of 22 Page 54 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 2.5 Tier 2 Grants 2.5.1 Purpose Community grants Tier 2 are intended to provide assistance to organizations/groups that provide services within the City of Kitchener for the common good of residents. Only organizations/groups providing municipal services in the areas of arts and culture/special events, sports and recreation, and community support and development will be considered for funding. The intent is to target a minimum of 20% and a maximum of 40% of the total funds available for each of these three sectors. The purpose of Tier 2 grants is to provide funding for: • operating support to enable the provision of the basic service of the organization • project support • special event support • equipment support (`equipment' is defined as materials required for the basic service to operate, i.e. consumable items having a lifespan of less than three years; grant requests of a `capital' nature are ineligible for funding; `capital' is defined as the acquisition of an infrastructure or asset having a lifespan of three years or greater) 2.5.2 Criteria Tier 2 services must meet the following criteria: Services provided by the organization/group for which funding is requested must demonstrably meet Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents. 2. Services provided by the organization/group for which funding is requested must be considered a municipal responsibility and not be the responsibility of other levels of government; services such as health care, social services, training and education are not eligible. Page 6 of 22 Page 55 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 3. Services provided by the organization/group for which funding is requested must not be precluded under the Municipal Act, e.g. religious services. 4. Services provided by the organization/group for which funding is requested must not already be provided by the City or by other groups funded by the City of Kitchener; requests from organizations/groups that provide similar services as provided by the municipality must be assessed as to whether there is a duplication of services; the municipality will not issue grants for services that conflict with or are in direct competition with programs operated internally. 5. Services provided by the organization/group for which funding is requested must be provided directly to the citizens of Kitchener, i.e. grants are for direct programs only. Grant applications from organizations that themselves distribute grants to other organizations will not be considered, i.e. fundraising events are not eligible. Service clubs are eligible to apply for funding if the purpose of the event they are sponsoring is deemed to be a municipal responsibility and the event is city-wide, targeted toward a broad cross-section of the community. 6. Grant applications submitted by individuals or `part groups' of an organization/group will not be considered. 7. Volunteer organizations/groups planning an event to raise funds to support an organization/group that is receiving a City of Kitchener grant will be not considered for Tier 2 funding. 8. Organizations/groups applying for funding who offer services to residents outside of the City of Kitchener are strongly encouraged to also approach all other relevant municipalities for funding. 9. Organizations/groups wishing to be considered for community grants Tier 2 do not need to be incorporated as not for profit corporations; however, budgets and subsequent accounting must not show an excess of revenue over expenses; applicants must demonstrate the capability to manage and govern the program or project, usually evidenced by the existence of an executive committee or coordinating board. Page 7 of 22 Page 56 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 10. Organ izations/groups are encouraged to ensure as much inclusive public participation and access as possible, e.g. minimum charge or no admission charge whenever possible. 11. Any organization/group applying for funds will give regard to the inclusion and accommodation of persons with a disability. 12. Any organization/group applying for funds that is in arrears and/or in litigation with the City of Kitchener is ineligible. 2.5.3 Process Organizations/groups applying for funding to the City of Kitchener for the first time or those who have received Tier 2 grants (formerly known as general provision grants) in previous years are eligible to apply for: • Operating support to enable the provision of the basic service of the organization • Project support • Special event support • Equipment support (`equipment' is defined as materials required for the basic service to operate, i.e. consumable items having a lifespan of less than three years; grant requests of a `capital' nature are ineligible for funding; `capital' is defined as the acquisition of an infrastructure or asset having a lifespan of three years or greater) Tier 1 groups are eligible to apply for Tier 2 funding only for one time special projects or events. A Peer and Staff Review Committee will review applications as per a variety of assessment areas such as community need, organizational need and capacity, partnership support and financial analysis. The Peer and Staff Review Committee will allocate resources within budget availability and make recommendations to Council. Applicants are welcome to request feedback/debriefing from staff regarding the Peer and Staff Review Committee's grant recommendations prior to the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee meeting when grants will be considered. Page 8 of 22 Page 57 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 3.0 TRAVEL ASSISTANCE GRANTS 3.1 Purpose The travel assistance grant applies to residents of the City of Kitchener, 18 years of age or under, involved in non profit minor sports or cultural activities, who have qualified to compete in sport championships/cultural events. Grants are intended to assist with the cost of travel to and from the event location only, where round trip travel exceeds 500 kilometers. 3.2 Criteria Minor Sports 1. Individuals or team members applying must be 18 years of age or under. 2. Individuals and team members applying must be residents of the City of Kitchener. 3. Grants will only be provided to non profit minor sports teams that have a constitution and an executive elected by the membership in place. 4. The event must be a recognized provincial, national or international championship, sanctioned by a provincial, national or international governing body. Individuals or teams must have qualified to compete in provincial, national or international championships. 5. Teams applying for assistance must be based in the City of Kitchener. Kitchener -Waterloo teams may be considered on a pro -rated basis, taking into account Kitchener residents on the team. 6. Individuals or team members participating for an educational institution (school team) are not eligible to apply. 7. Grants will be available only where round trip travel to a competition exceeds 500 kilometers. 8. An individual or team member will be eligible for one grant per calendar year. Page 9 of 22 Page 58 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Cultural Activities 1. Individuals or team members applying must be 18 years of age or under. 2. Individuals and team members applying must be residents of the City of Kitchener. 3. Individuals or non profit teams involved in cultural activities (e.g. choir, dance) are eligible to apply. Individuals or teams must have achieved a level or standard of skill, as established by the recognized governing body of the activity, to qualify to participate in the event for which a travel grant is requested. 4. Teams applying for assistance must be based in the City of Kitchener. Kitchener -Waterloo teams may be considered on a pro -rated basis, taking into account Kitchener residents on the team. 5. Individuals or team members participating for an educational institution (school team) are not eligible to apply. 6. Grants will be available only where round trip travel to a competition exceeds 500 kilometers. 7. An individual or team member will be eligible for one grant per calendar year. 3.3 Amounts 1. Sport Championship/Cultural Event within Ontario i) Individuals — up to a maximum of $50 ii) Teams — up to a maximum of $40 per competitor, to a maximum of $1,000 per team 2. Sport Championship/Cultural Event outside Ontario but within Canada i) Individuals — up to a maximum of $100 ii) Teams — up to a maximum of $90 per competitor, to a maximum of $1,000 per team Page 10 of 22 Page 59 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 3. Sport Championship/Cultural Event outside Canada i) Individuals — up to a maximum of $200 per competitor ii) Teams — up to a maximum of $175 per competitor, to a maximum of $1,000 per team 3.4 Process 1. Requests for travel assistance grants will be considered by the Community Services Department and processed upon receipt. All grant requests must be supported by a fully completed application form and all required documents. 2. Formal notification of the grant decision will be sent to the applicant by the Community Services Department. If the grant request is denied, the individual or team will be given an opportunity to appeal the decision by appearing before Community and Infrastructure Services Committee. 3. The applicant will submit to Community Services staff a copy of the official results of the tournament/event from the host governing body within thirty (30) days of the completion of the competition/event for which a travel grant is received. 4.0 IN KIND FACILITY GRANTS 4.1 Purpose The City offers in kind (non-cash) facility grants to groups and organizations providing a specific event to the general public, intended for the common good of Kitchener residents, in the areas of arts and culture, minor sports and recreation, and community support and development. In kind facility grants are not intended for ongoing facility rentals for meetings or programming, but rather for one time special events. The purpose of in kind facility grants is to waive facility rental fees for events held at City of Kitchener facilities. Grants are intended to cover rental and staff costs for a basic set-up only. Additional services beyond a basic set- up are to be paid by the renter. Page 11 of 22 Page 60 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 4.2 Criteria 1. The purpose of the event must demonstrably meet Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents. 2. The purpose of the event must be considered a municipal responsibility and not be the responsibility of other levels of government; services such as health care, social services, training and education are not eligible. 3. The purpose of the event must not be precluded under the Municipal Act, e.g. religious services. 4. The event must be provided directly to the citizens of Kitchener, i.e. grants are for direct programs only. Grant applications from organizations and groups that themselves distribute grants to other organizations, groups or individuals will not be considered, i.e. fundraising events are not eligible. Service clubs are eligible to apply for funding if the purpose of the event they are sponsoring is deemed to be a municipal responsibility and the event is city-wide, targeted toward a broad cross-section of the community. 5. Grant applications submitted by individuals or `part groups' of an organization or group will not be considered. 6. Any organization or group that is in arrears and/or litigation with the City of Kitchener is ineligible to apply for funding. 7. Organizations or groups wishing to be considered for an in kind facility grant do not need to be incorporated as not-for-profit corporations. However, budgets and subsequent financial accounting must not show an excess of revenue over expenses. Applicants must demonstrate the capability to manage and govern the event, usually evidenced by the existence of an executive committee or coordinating board. 8. To be eligible for an in kind facility grant, the event is to be open to the general public with no admission charge, or a minimum charge where deemed necessary, to ensure as much public participation and access as possible. 9. Any organization or group applying for funds will give regard to the inclusion and accommodation of persons with a disability. Page 12 of 22 Page 61 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 10. Organizations can request funding for only one event per year, to a maximum of $500. 4.3 Process 1. In kind facility grant requests will be considered by staff of the Community Services Department and processed upon receipt. To be considered for an in kind facility grant, the applicant must submit a fully completed application form, along with required supporting documents as noted on the application form. 2. Formal notification of the grant decision will be sent to the applicant by staff of the Community Services Department. If the grant request is denied by staff, the grant applicant will be given an opportunity to address the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee as a delegation. All decisions made by the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee must be ratified by City Council before they are final. 3. Organizations and groups receiving funds are advised that the grant being given is not to be regarded as a commitment for future assistance. 5.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS 5.1 Purpose The City of Kitchener offers a one-time cash grant to provide seed money to neighbourhood associations and communities of interest for the purpose of community development, whereby residents take action and address self identified issues in their community. The objective of this grant is to promote strong local leadership, volunteerism and partnerships in the economic and social life of the community, and to strengthen networks in neighbourhoods thereby developing neighbourhood cohesion and stability. 5.2 Criteria Page 13 of 22 Page 62 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 1. Applications will be accepted from neighbourhood associations and communities of interest. A community of interest is defined as a group of individuals who voluntarily associate with each other because they have identified common concerns that impact either a geographic area of the city, or the city as a whole. 2. Groups must demonstrate an ability to initiate and follow through on projects by having an organizational structure in place to lead and manage the activities and to account for finances. 3. The application must demonstrably meet one or more of Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents: quality of life, diversity, community engagement, development, environment and/or dynamic downtown. 4. To be considered for this grant, the applicant must submit the following details in the form of a proposal and include: • Organizational structure of the association or community of interest; • Key contact names; • Issue identification , • Purpose and objectives; • Program, project or event description; • Implementation plan and schedule; and Budget, including any other proposed funding sources, etc. 5. Allocations of up to $10,000 (given resource availability) will be made for projects that are either self-sustaining or completed at the exhaustion of the grant. Partnerships with other funders are encouraged. 6. This is a one time cash grant. Applicants who have already received a grant from the community development infrastructure program are ineligible to apply again for this grant. 7. Capital projects are not eligible for a community development infrastructure grant. 5.3 Process 1. Community development infrastructure grant requests will be received and evaluated by staff of the Community Services Department. Page 14 of 22 Page 63 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 2. Formal notification of the grant decision will be sent to the applicant by staff of the Community Services Department. If the grant request is denied by staff, the grant applicant will be given an opportunity to address the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee as a delegation. All decisions made by the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee must be ratified by City Council before they are final. 3. Organizations and groups receiving funds are advised that the grant being given is not to be regarded as a commitment for future assistance. 4. Where appropriate, neighbourhood and special interest groups receiving funds are expected to present a final report to Council upon completion of the program, project or event or after the grant dollars are fully exhausted. 6.0 INCLUSION GRANTS 6.1 Purpose The City of Kitchener offers financial and/or in kind support to community organizations and/or agencies to assist in the delivery of inclusive recreation and leisure programs for persons with a disability living in Kitchener or Waterloo. For the purposes of this grant process, a community organization or agency is defined as a not for profit group or agency. Cash Grant: A funding request to assist in the delivery of a program or an event (e.g. dollars to support the purchase of adaptive equipment, training for staff in the delivery of inclusive programming). In kind Grant: A funding request to assist with the cost of a facility rental (e.g. to offset the cost of a community centre rental charge). 6.2 Criteria 1. Not for profit organizations operating in the City of Kitchener and in the City of Waterloo will be eligible for consideration. 2. Groups must demonstrate an ability to initiate and follow through on projects by having an organizational structure in place to lead and manage the activities and to account for finances. Page 15 of 22 Page 64 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 3. Organizations applying for grants must demonstrate evidence of commitment to inclusivity and to volunteer engagement. 4. Any organization receiving a grant will recognize the City's contribution in any promotional literature. 5. Organizations who receive support from the inclusion grant program are not eligible to apply for funding for the same program/event from the City of Kitchener's community grants program. 6. Requests from organizations that provide similar services as provided by the municipality will be assessed as to whether or not there is a duplication of services. The municipality will not issue grants for services that conflict with or are in direct competition with programs operated internally. 7. The application must demonstrably meet one or more of Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents: quality of life, diversity, community engagement, development, environment and/or dynamic downtown. 8. Partnerships with other funders are encouraged. 9. Capital projects are not eligible for funding. 10. Only one application per agency per year will be considered. 6.3 Process 1. Grant applications will be accepted annually (late winter to early spring) once City Council has approved the annual budget. 2. Inclusion grant requests will be received and evaluated by staff of the Community Services Department. To be considered for an inclusion grant, the applicant must submit the following details in the form of a proposal and include: • Key contact names; • Program, project or event description; • Budget, including any other proposed funding sources, etc.; and • Audited financial statement or recent bank statement. Page 16 of 22 Page 65 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 3. Formal notification of the grant decision will be sent to the applicant by staff of the Community Services Department. If the grant request is denied by staff, the grant applicant will be given an opportunity to address the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee as a delegation. All decisions made by the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee must be ratified by City Council before they are final. 4. Organizations may be required to attend a meeting with staff in order to clarify details on the grant applications. 5. Organizations and groups receiving funds are advised that the grant being given is not to be regarded as a commitment for future assistance. 7.0 YOUTH RECREATION GRANTS 7.1 Purpose The City offers financial assistance to neighbourhood associations and community groups who provide recreation and leisure programs for youth between the ages of 11 and 17. The grant is intended to provide funding to support the costs associated with the hiring of trained and qualified program staff and/or instructors. The objective of this grant is to promote the delivery of affordable, community based programs that support youth in participating in recreation and leisure, leadership and civic engagement programs. 7.2 Criteria 1. The applicant must be an affiliated City of Kitchener neighbourhood association or incorporated agency or supported community group. 2. Program proposals will give regard to persons with a disability, as identified by the Accessibility for Ontarians with a Disability Act (AODA). 3. Associations must have a fee subsidy option available in order to assist in the removal of barriers to participation. 4. The application must demonstrably meet one or more of Council's strategic objectives as documented in the City of Kitchener Strategic Plan and other policy documents: quality of life, diversity, community engagement, development, environment and/or dynamic downtown. Page 17 of 22 Page 66 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 5. Capital projects are not eligible for funding. 7.3 Process 1. Grants are allocated three times per year (fall, winter and spring). 2. Grant dollars will contribute towards the cost of staff wages to a maximum of $300 per session per program or 50% of the total costs if less than $300. 3. Only one program per association will be considered per session. 4. Youth recreation grant requests will be received and evaluated by staff of the Community Services Department. To be considered for a youth recreation grant, the applicant must submit the following details in the form of a proposal and include: • Key contact names; • Program purpose and objectives; and • A recent bank statement or copy of financial statement. 5. Formal notification of the grant decision will be sent to the applicant by staff of the Community Services Department. If the grant request is denied by staff, the grant applicant will be given an opportunity to address the Community and Infrastructure Services Committee as a delegation. All decisions made by the Community and Infrastructure 6. Services Committee must be ratified by City Council before they are final. 7. Organizations and groups receiving funds are advised that the grant being given is not to be regarded as a commitment for future assistance. 8.0 ENVIRONMENT GRANTS ,,1 1Z7, m, , Page 18 of 22 Page 67 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 9.0 NEIGHBOURHOOD ASSOCIATION PROGRAM GRANTS 9.1 Purpose The City of Kitchener offers this grant to affiliated neighbourhood associations to encourage the provision of affordable, neighbourhood - based programming for residents of the City of Kitchener. The objective of this grant is to support citizen leadership in the development and delivery of leisure and recreation -based programming to residents in their local communities, and improve the quality of life in the City of Kitchener. 9.2 Criteria To be eligible, neighbourhood associations must meet the criteria for affiliation, and must be approved for affiliation by Kitchener City Council. 2. Affiliated City of Kitchener neighbourhood associations who offer recreational programming in their local communities are eligible for cash grants. 3. Groups must demonstrate an ability to develop and implement programming, by having an organizational structure in place to lead and manage the activities and to account for finances. 4. Programs must be advertised and be open to the public. 5. Programs must be inclusive and accessible. Page 19 of 22 Page 68 of 668 - 9.0 NEIGHBOURHOOD ASSOCIATION PROGRAM GRANTS 9.1 Purpose The City of Kitchener offers this grant to affiliated neighbourhood associations to encourage the provision of affordable, neighbourhood - based programming for residents of the City of Kitchener. The objective of this grant is to support citizen leadership in the development and delivery of leisure and recreation -based programming to residents in their local communities, and improve the quality of life in the City of Kitchener. 9.2 Criteria To be eligible, neighbourhood associations must meet the criteria for affiliation, and must be approved for affiliation by Kitchener City Council. 2. Affiliated City of Kitchener neighbourhood associations who offer recreational programming in their local communities are eligible for cash grants. 3. Groups must demonstrate an ability to develop and implement programming, by having an organizational structure in place to lead and manage the activities and to account for finances. 4. Programs must be advertised and be open to the public. 5. Programs must be inclusive and accessible. Page 19 of 22 Page 68 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 6. Cash grants will be provided for seasonal programs, to a maximum of ten (10) programs per season, three (3) seasons per year. Grants are not applicable to one time workshops, seminars, clinics or special events. 9.3 Process 1. City of Kitchener staff is available for consultation in regard to the development and delivery of programs. The following program information should be provided to staff in advance of the program: • Program description • Program location • Class size • Key volunteer and/or contact information 2. Grants are allocated for a maximum of three (3) seasons annually. Grant requests must be made to the designated City of Kitchener staff liaison on a seasonal basis. 3. Neighbourhood associations must submit participant statistics. 4. Neighbourhood associations receiving funds are expected to provide information regarding their programs and activities to Council and the public as appropriate. 10.0 CAPITAL GRANTS (NON CITY -OWNED ASSETS) The City of Kitchener does not provide capital grants to groups or organizations for non City -owned assets. For purposes of this policy, the City of Kitchener defines capital grant requests as requests for non-recurring, non-operating funds for the purpose of, including but not limited to, acquiring infrastructure, building renovations and/or major studies. 11.0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GRANTS 12.1 Purpose To provide a process to bring requests for economic development grants which align with the City of Kitchener's Economic Development Strategy forward for Council's consideration. Page 20 of 22 Page 69 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 12.2 Process 1. Requests will be received and reviewed by Economic Development staff. Grant requests which are aligned with the Kitchener Economic Development Strategy and for which budget is available will be processed internally by staff and a summary report will be provided to Council annually. Grant requests which are not aligned with the Kitchener Economic Development Strategy or cannot be accommodated within existing budgets may be brought forward for Council's consideration. Staff will identify possible funding sources should Council wish to approve these requests. 2. Organizations making a request must submit the following information: • Background information on the organization • Specific project details • Detailed project budget • Details of funding requested/received for this project from other sources (e.g. other government organizations, private/business donations, etc.) • Current financial statement of the organization • Information on previous funding requests to the City of Kitchener and outcomes • Identify project objectives consistent with the City's Economic Development Strategy • Any other information relevant to the request 12.0 EMERGENCY GRANTS 13.1 Purpose This policy provides a process to bring grant requests, cash or in kind, for emergency funding forward for Council's consideration. For purposes of this policy, the City of Kitchener defines emergency grant requests as requests that do not fit any other City of Kitchener funding source and could not be planned for during the annual budget process (e.g. local, national or international crisis or emergency, support to neighbouring municipalities). 13.2 Process Requests will be received and reviewed by Financial Planning staff who will bring these forward for Council's consideration. Staff will identify possible funding sources should Council wish to approve the requests. Page 21 of 22 Page 70 of 668 Policy No: FIN -GRA -525 Policy Title: COMMUNITY INVESTMENT 13.0 SAFE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE CASH GRANTS The Safe and Healthy Community Advisory Committee will consider one year cash grants for one time projects, initiatives or events that support inclusion and/or belonging within Kitchener neighbourhoods. Grant requests will be received by the Community Programs and Services Division of the Community Services Department. 14.0 LoveMVHood MATCHING GRANT See related LoveMyHood Matching Grant Procedure (APPENDIX A) 15.0 HISTORY OF POLICY CHANGES Administrative Updates 2016-06-01 - Policy template 1-525 re -formatted to new numbering system and given number FIN -GRA -525. 2018-05-10 - Minor housekeeping changes 2018-04-03 - Department name change due to corporate re -organization. Formal Amendments 2009-06-29 - As per Council directive, 2010-06-28 - As per Council directive, 2011-10-24 - As per Council directive, 2014-04-14 - As per Council directive, 2017-11-06 - As per Council directive, 2019-09-23 - As per Council directive, see report CSD -09-041. see report CSD -10-041. see report CSD -11-142. see report CSD -14-003. see reports INS -17-079 & CSD -17-095 see report CSD -19-020 Page 22 of 22 Page 71 of 668 APPENDIX 'A' mod lover d gred4 pUades Ld,uniiUL1:a�'d peaap9e virr.irkir-or,:p it re M LoveMyHood Matching Grant Criteria Residents take the lead, and the City supports them along the way. That's the vision behind LoveMyHood, Kitchener's approach to making great neighbourhoods. The City of Kitchener offers a LoveMyHood Matching Grant to support new resident -led neighbourhood and placemaking initiatives. City staff are here to help and will work behind the scenes to make it easy for you to make things happen in your neighbourhood. Have questions or need help with your application? Please contact city staff at �o v.2 �r........:j..� .L.u:tcI].er.,.!_e.!:.:.ca... to get started! *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2200 ext. 7083 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. The LoveMyHood Matching Grant is intended to: • Renew or revitalize neighbourhood public and green spaces, contributing to neighbourhood beautification and celebration. • Foster neighbourhood pride and sense of belonging. • Develop stronger relationships between neighbours and neighbourhood groups. • Improve safety, accessibility and/or mobility. • Entrust residents to become more actively involved in their neighbourhoods through working together as neighbours. • Build capacity for long-term change built by neighbours working together. WHIO CAN APPLY Both formal and informal neighbourhood -based community groups in Kitchener are eligible to apply, whether the group is newly formed for the purpose of a specific project, or is a pre-existing group undertaking a project. Applicants must demonstrate that their group: • Is composed of multiple people who live and/or work in the neighbourhood. Page 72 of 668 lover d I gred4 pUades Ld,uniiUL1:a�'d peaap9e virr.irkir-or,:p it re M • Gathered the wider neighbourhood's support for the project, including, at a minimum, notifying all residents within 120 m of the project site. To encourage greater community engagement, preference will be given to groups who demonstrate in their application that they have gone above the minimum engagement requirements. • Has a project budget outlining how they propose to match the grant funding with community resources (in-kind or in -cash). • Has a bank account with at least two people named as signatories for grants over $500. • Agrees to report back upon completion of the project, including an accounting of all revenues, expenses and proof of purchases. PROJECT CMI TEMI Applicants must demonstrate that the project: • Will occur within Kitchener city limits and be geographically defined within a neighbourhood. Acceptable locations include: o City of Kitchener land, such as parks, trails, greenways, boulevards, parking areas, cul- de-sacs, etc. o Other public land owned by school boards, Region of Waterloo, etc. o Private land that is accessible to the general public and not owned by a business (e.g. parking lots, green space around faith/cultural buildings, not-for-profit organizations, etc.) • The application is for a one-time funding request for a neighbourhood project. Please note that this grant is not intended for ongoing maintenance costs. • The project contributes to neighbourhood identity. • The project is equitable, encouraging diverse neighbourhood involvement and participation of residents, community members and volunteers in the project planning and process. Preference will be given to projects that provide more opportunities for residents based on their age, culture, disability, ethnicity, gender, generation, language, region and socio-economic status, with at least one grant per year being awarded to projects in each of the city's 10 wards, provided qualified applications exist. Projects occurring on non -city land will be considered only if they: • Are accessible to the general public. • Include neighbourhood residents in the project planning and implementation process. • Have received advanced permission from the landowner. Page 73 of 668 lover d I gred4 pUades Ld,uniiUL1:a�'d peaap9e virr.irkir-or,:p it re M Capital projects are eligible for this grant. FUNDING REQUESTS a) Applicants may request amounts up to $30,000. Projects occurring on non -city land are eligible to receive up to $10,000 and events are eligible to receive up to $2,000. b) For larger grant amounts, funds may be distributed in installments at the discretion of the City of Kitchener. c) The applicant's matching contribution must be appropriate to the needs of the proposed project, and may include: • Cash donations. • Ongoing volunteer labour/time (valued at $20 per hour). • Donated professional or contractor services, including services from artists and arts organizations (valued at the reasonable retail value of the product/service). • Donated materials and supplies (valued at retail prices). • Borrowed equipment (valued at the cost necessary if it were to be rented). d) The total value of the group's entire contribution to the project must equal or exceed the dollar amount requested. While the match can include contributions from partnerships, including businesses and community organizations, a portion of the match must come from the applicant group itself. e) Funds from other City of Kitchener or sponsor grants cannot be counted as match. In a greater effort to support new and emerging groups, City staff may consider providing additional funding to projects on a case-by-case basis. f) The City's matching contribution may include a combination of in-kind services (e.g. rental of space, city services, installation costs, etc.), and cash. g) Groups that do not complete their project as proposed, or have leftover funds, will be required to return the funds. Of course, plans and timelines may be adjusted if you experience challenges. Please communicate these changes with City staff. HOW TO APPLY Applications will be accepted through an online form available at htt1:`�..: r.1 err„�,rgylrc�c�r�_.... tc�c�l„�, i,rgai pr Y.Zi.r a!t .!r„.n..9, i„ nt. sJ, a, beginning on Tuesday, January 21, 2020. If you require assistance or accommodations with your application, please contact the Neighbourhood Development Office at: Page 74 of 668 lover d I gred4 pUades Ld,uniiUL1:a�'d peaap9e virr.irkir-or,:p it re M • E-mail: LeeMH:(:ICutc:iW��Wr.c: • Phone: 519-741-2200 x HOOD (4663) SELECVION • All grant requests will be reviewed and evaluated by the Love My Hood Matching Grant Selection Committee. The committee consists of a maximum of 11 members, including four City of Kitchener staff, six resident volunteers and one representative from a sponsoring organization. • The selection committee will begin reviewing applications after each quarterly grant deadline, which will occur in February, May, August and November. • Groups will be notified of the outcome of their application as soon as possible, but typically within 4 to 6 weeks of application submission. This will give City staff time to navigate internal processes and departments on your behalf and determine the next steps to make approved projects a reality. • To ensure multiple areas of the city benefit from this grant, preference will be given to awarding at least one grant per year for each of the city's 10 wards, provided qualified applications exist. • To ensure an equitable distribution of grants, priority will be given to new or emerging neighbourhood groups who will benefit the most from funding support. Applications from these new and emerging groups will be given priority consideration during each quarterly intake period over applications from neighbourhoods and groups that have previously received considerable funding through LoveMyHood. • The selection committee may choose not to distribute the full funding amount available per intake period. Any remaining funds will be carried forward into the next intake period. • A group may apply for multiple grants during each intake period, but may only receive one grant per intake. • This is a one-time grant not intended to provide financial support on a recurring basis. Please note that this grant is not intended for ongoing maintenance costs. • Each LoveMyHood Matching Grant applicant and project is unique, and these guidelines cannot address every possible project scenario. Please connect with City of Kitchener staff for additional information. T H� �ICONSMER Before you submit an application, we recommend that all applicants connect with our team of neighbourhood liaisons for assistance. Whether it's helping to ensure your budget is accurate or providing Page 75 of 668 lover d I gred4 pUades Ld,uniiUL1:a�'d peaap9e virr.irkir-or,:p it re M insight on permits and licenses, your neighbourhood liaison can provide useful knowledge on navigating city processes. Please contact city staff at 1o1 i t„ 1�_! d _IJtc,;I. � r.-i.e �„c„a to get started! ................. If approved for a grant, city staff will continue to help you along the way and will navigate city hall on your behalf. As we review your application, we may identify potential approvals or conditions that may be necessary, including: Neighbourhood Support: It is important to make sure that your neighbours support your project, including, at minimum, notifying all residents within 120 m of the project site. Depending on the type of project, you may need to take additional steps to demonstrate neighbourhood support. City staff can help you determine how many residences are within 120 m of the project site and understand what steps are most appropriate, and how to involve your neighbours in a way that is fair, open and inclusive. Agreements: All projects funded by the LoveMyHood Matching Grant require a written agreement or letter of understanding. Staff recognize the need to adapt, negotiate and compromise so that we can develop an agreement that works for everyone. All LoveMyHood agreements are guided by principles of collaboration, respect, and safety. Our agreement serves as your project's road map to success and creates accountability for all of us. It covers requirements and expectations for the following: • Financial Details • Community Engagement • Insurance • Design • Implementation • Maintenance • Communications • Recognition and Sponsorships Recognition: Successful applicants are expected to acknowledge the contributions of the City of Kitchener and other grant sponsors on all promotional materials, and are encouraged to use #LoveMyHood on social media. Recognition in the form of a plaque or other medium is expected for long-term capital projects and community gardens. Evaluations: Successful applicants are required to complete an evaluation form related to improving the LoveMyHood Matching Grant and provide a financial report following the conclusion of the project. A group's eligibility for future grants may be impacted if the evaluation is not completed. Page 76 of 668 lover d I gcot phac=s m""ccI:capeop�e | °*'k/"y'"m°m°, | The City ofKitchener isextremely grateful that you are taking the initiative tomake your neighbourhood Page 77 of 668 Staff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Cory Bluhm, Executive Director Economic Development, 519-741- 2200 ext. 7065 Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Darren Becks, Manager of Downtown Development and Innovation, 519-741-2200 ext. 7064 Natalie Goss, Manager of Policy and Research, 519-741-2200 ext. 7648 WARD(S) INVOLVED: DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO.: Wards 9 and 10 October 10, 2023 DSD -2023-425 SUBJECT: Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles RECOMMENDATION: That the downtown vision and principles, prepared by the Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) in direct collaboration with the project consultant, and staff be endorsed; and, That staff be directed to use the vision and principles to develop an action plan for Downtown Kitchener, and inform new and ongoing City initiatives that include or are about the downtown. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The work of the Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) was framed by the Terms of Reference approved by Council and detailed in Report No. DSD -2022-014. • The Downtown Kitchener vision process was community -led, and staff supported. Central to this community -led process was a Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) comprised of approximately 25-30 members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community each bringing unique and diversified perspectives to the process. • Community engagement for Phase One (June 2022 — April 2023) included workshops with the DCWG as well as participation from approximately 1,700 participants in person through a wide range of engagement methods including pop up sessions at the Kitchener Farmers' Market, meetings with stakeholders, and do-it-yourself workshops and an additional approximately 900 participants online. • Community engagement for Phase Two (May 2023 — August 2023) included a pop-up community engagement session, online feedback from the Engage Kitchener platform, and Council feedback from the August 14, 2023 meeting. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 78 of 668 • This report supports the Strategic Plan theme A Vibrant Economy. BACKGROUND: Downtown Kitchener is at a critical point in its evolution. Unprecedented growth is happening at a time where housing affordability, climate, equity, and social factors are intersecting. The pandemic has caused significant impacts to Kitchener's business community, including the many businesses and organizations reliant on in-person sales/transactions. As a result of all these converging factors, it is an opportune time for the community to shape a new vision for downtown Kitchener. Since June 2022, a Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) has been guiding the development of the vision and principles, with support from City staff and LURA Consulting (a community engagement consultancy). The DCWG is comprised of 25-30 members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives. The work of the DCWG is to create a high-level vision and guiding principles to inform new and ongoing City initiatives. These current and future initiatives may include a land use and zoning framework for the Major Transit Station areas, Civic District Master Plan, District Energy, Bramm Yards Master Plan, Arts and Culture Strategy, Inclusionary Zoning, Places and Spaces, Comprehensive Review of City -owned Properties and a new or updated Official Plan. To date the DCWG shaped and assisted in delivering a fulsome community engagement process to gather input to inform the vision and guiding principles and receive input on the draft. This community -driven process has been intended to build consensus, motivate, and inspire action and ensure inclusive community building. The report titled, "Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles Phase One Engagement Summary' (Attachment A) summarizes input received during Phase One of this project and was used by the DCWG to draft a vision and principles for community and Council comment. The report titled, "Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles Phase Two Engagement Summary' summarizes input during Phase Two of this project (Attachment B). The DCWG utilized input from Phase Two, and with the assistance of an external writer, finalized the Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles, which is the subject of this report. REPORT: Since June 2022, the Downtown Community Working Group has worked together with City staff and LURA Consulting to shape a comprehensive community engagement process and identified key themes and issues in the downtown. From February to April of this year phase one of the DTK Vision and Principles community wide engagement occurred which included: • 1,615 participants over 5 community in-person pop-up events. • 95 participants through 11 do-it-yourself workshops including ones with the City of Kitchener's Downtown Action and Advisory Committee and Climate Change and Environmental Advisory Committee. • 2 meetings with local Indigenous Organizations. • 4 DTK social service organizations through a service provider workshop. • 1,313 project webpage views on the City of Kitchener's website. • 60,216 social media ad impressions. • 3,210 project webpage views on EngageWR. Page 79 of 668 • 899 participants in online engagement, and • 1 Council strategic session From May to August of this year phase two of the DTK Vision and Principles community wide engagement occurred which included: • 242 participants at a community pop-up event, • 1 Council feedback session, • 7 participants at the Downtown Action and Advisory Committee meeting, • 41 participants in an online survey, • 278 project webpage views on the City of Kitchener's website, and • 3,002 project webpage views on EngageWR. The community and Council input received earlier this year is summarized in Attachments A and B to this report. Key messages that emerged throughout the Phase One engagement process that helped to inform a draft vision and principles were: • The need for community -building efforts, strengthening the connection between neighbours. • The importance of vibrant streets, public spaces and green space, especially as density grows within the downtown. • Strong support for more connected and continuous active transportation and public transportation networks. • Greater efforts to support the unhoused/precariously housed and those in crisis who live in Kitchener. • Downtown Kitchenerwas impacted bythe COVID-19 pandemic and requires investment and rejuvenation to support existing local businesses and attract new ventures. • The importance of integrating climate adaptation and resiliency actions into the city's day-to-day functions. • Strengthened support, advocacy, and action towards an inclusive, equitable and accessible downtown, that also helps to advance Truth and Reconciliation. Key messages that emerged from the Phase Two engagement process on the draft vision and principles that helped the DCWG form the final vision and principles were: • A human -centric lens is the correct approach to revitalizing downtown. • Improved access to affordable housing is integral to the success of downtown. • Access to clean and safe green space is a priority for most community members. • Connections to downtown and within downtown, must be safe, affordable, and accessible. • The vision and principles should be unique to downtown Kitchener. Utilizing the extensive community and Council feedback, combined with the support of staff, an external consultant, and writer, the DCWG have prepared the following vision and principles for Council's endorsement. Page 80 of 668 Vision "Downtown Kitchener. The heart of the city that excites, supports, and unites." First Guiding Principle — Radiating Vibrancy DTK pulses with a positive energy that makes it feel alive — from workdays to date nights and every moment in between. It's not just about lively programming; it's about people, places and spaces that hum with purpose. In DTK, sustainable streetscapes blend familiar landmarks with deliberate new designs. Independent shops and restaurants flourish alongside well-known brands in DTK. It's the place where world-class cultural institutions leave lasting impressions. It's where innovation takes root. It's where learning never stops, work feels welcoming and creativity flows naturally. At its core, DTK is more than a desirable destination It's an unmistakable feeling that even if something awesome isn't happening right this minute, it's just around the corner. Second Guiding Principle — Cultivating Connection In DTK, people routinely bump into someone they know well or someone they'd like to get to know better. From solo excursions to group events, DTK fuels shared experiences that leave a lasting impression. DTK prioritizes pedestrians while making sure smart transportation choices abound. It's the place where accessibility is never an add-on but baked in from the start. In DTK, everyone can easily get where they need to go, within and beyond the core. DTK is the place to recall fond memories and make new ones. It's where planning draws from rich roots to fortify the future. It's where creating thoughtful public spaces is at the forefront, not an afterthought. It's where being green isn't a talk track, it's a natural choice. It's the place where people form those magnetic bonds that keep drawing them back to the heart of the city. Third Guiding Principle — Belonging People feel seen in DTK. The Downtown community respects and accepts every person for who they are. DTK provides the comforting feeling that they are meant to be here. Whether simply passing time or on a mission to get things done, DTK makes it easy for people to find support for their goals and acknowledgement of their progress. Working and living in DTK is not an either/or proposition. Housing is deliberately designed for the diverse majority, not the privileged few. DTK embraces a mix of residents who seek security and take care of their neighbours. The DCWG, together with staff are recommending that Council endorse the vision and principles for Downtown Kitchener and that it be used by staff to inform new and ongoing city initiatives that include or are about the downtown. Additionally, subject to Council's Page 81 of 668 approval, staff will develop a high quality designed version of the vision and principles for public use. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports A Vibrant Economy. The DTK vision project delivers a wholistic vision for the future of DTK enabling the continuation of strategic investments supporting job creation, economic prosperity, thriving arts and culture, and great places to live. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — This project is funded through approved capital budget for costs associated with consultant services and community engagement. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: The DTK vision engagement process was centered on COLLABORATION and CONSULTATION. The process was community -led and, staff supported. Central to the engagement process was a DCWG, comprised of 25 to 30 individuals representing different aspects of downtown life. The DCWG informed, guided, and participated in themed conversations which were used, together with broad community input, to develop the vision and principles for Downtown Kitchener. Since June 2022, the DTK Vision Project has included: • 15 DCWG meetings; • 6 community -wide pop-up events with approximately 1,800 participants; • Meetings with local Indigenous organizations; • A workshop with downtown service provider agencies; • 8 Do -it -Yourself Workshop with approximately 95 participants; and, • Two phases of online engagement that included surveys, ideas boards, and mapping exercises with approximately 940 responses and ideas. In addition to the broad representation that was critical to the formation of the Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG), the project team engaged the Downtown Kitchener BIA, the Downtown Action and Advisory Committee (DAAC), the Climate Change and Environmental Advisory Committee (CCEC), Grand River Accessibility Advisory Committee (GRAAC), and Arts and Creative Industries (ACAC) as part of engagement in March/April of this year and had two touch points with Council in April and August of this year. All input received to date was provided to the DCWG to assist them in developing the final vision and series of principles for DTK. INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. Page 82 of 668 PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: DSD -2022-014 Downtown Kitchener Vision Project Plan DSD -2023-197 Downtown Kitchener (DTK) Vision and Growing Together Workshop DSD -2023-315 Downtown Kitchener Draft Vision and Principles REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson, Manager, Development Review APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Attachment B - Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Page 83 of 668 Prepared for: The City of Kitchener Prepared by: LURA Consulting Page 84 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Project Background................................................................................................ 3 Section2: What We Heard..................................................................................................... 4 Section 3: Who We Heard From........................................................................................... 10 Section 4: Engagement and Communications Process.......................................................... 12 Section5: Next Steps........................................................................................................... 15 Appendix A — Downtown Community Working Group Meeting Summaries ............................. 16 Appendix B — Service Provider Workshop Summary .............................................................. 63 Appendix C — Indigenous Organization Meeting Summaries .................................................. 65 Appendix D — Pop -ups Summary .......................................................................................... 69 Appendix E — Council Workshop Summary ........................................................................... 72 Page 85 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Executive u iirn im iir The City of Kitchener is undergoing a process to develop a comprehensive vision and set of guiding principles for Downtown Kitchener, which is at a critical point in its evolution and growth. A Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) is guiding the development of the vision and principles, with support from City staff and LURA Consulting (a community engagement consultancy). The DCWG includes members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives. The work of the DCWG is at a high level, and the resulting vision and principles will inform new and ongoing City initiatives. These current and future initiatives may include land use and zoning framework for the Major Transit Station areas, Civic District Master Plan, District Energy, Bramm Yards Master Plan, Arts and Culture Strategy, Inclusionary Zoning, Places and Spaces, City -owned Lands plan and a new or updated Official Plan. In Phase One, the DCWG has shaped and assisted in delivering a fulsome community engagement process to gather input on the vision and guiding principles. This information will be used in Phase Two to draft a vision that encapsulates Downtown Kitchener in the next decade and identify and define a set of principles that will shape, direct, and contextualize future decision-making. This community -driven process has been intended to build consensus, motivate and inspire action and ensure inclusive community building. This report summarizes input received during Phase One of this project. Phase Two of the project will draw on this input to draft a vision and principles with the DCWG. The vision and principles will be presented to the community for feedback beginning in June 2023. IK y IF ind ii ings Key messages that emerged throughout the engagement process are listed below in no specific order. • The need for community -building efforts, strengthening the connection between neighbours. • The importance of public spaces and green space, especially as density grows within the downtown. • Strong support for more connected and continuous active transportation and public transportation networks. • Greater efforts to support the unhoused/precariously housed and those in crisis who live in Kitchener. • Downtown Kitchener was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and requires investment and rejuvenation to support existing local businesses and attract new ventures. • The importance of integrating climate adaptation and resiliency actions into the city's day-to-day functions. • Strengthened support, advocacy, and action towards an inclusive, equitable and accessible downtown, that also helps to advance Truth and Reconciliation. Page 86 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Engagement (Process The figure below summarizes efforts that have been undertaken to engage the DCWG, interested parties, and members of the public in this process. This engagement reflects efforts to raise awareness of the project and gather input to inform a draft the vision and principles. Approximately 2,659 individuals provided input throughout Phase One from June 2022 to April 2023. 0 1,615gg 11 participants wci6���� participants participants Efi 5 Community 11 Do -it -Yourself 1 Council Pop -UPS Workshops Workshop 2 30 4 MEi�� members organizations do Meetings with 11 Downtown 1 Service LCommunity Provider Local Indigenous Working orking Group Workshop Organizations 1,313 60, 216 3,210 899 Project WebpageProject Webpage Participants in Social Media Views an Impressionss views an Online Engagement Kitchener.ca Engagewr.ea rgcxr �: �--ngagement Promotion Statistics Next 'fie Ips The input gathered and summarized here will be used in Phase Two to draft a vision that encapsulates downtown Kitchener in the next decade and identify and define a set of principles that will shape, direct, and contextualize future decision-making. This will be shared with the public for input starting in June 2023. 2 Page 87 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Section 1,: Piroject IBackground The City of Kitchener's downtown has experienced tremendous change over the past 20 years. Over this time, the city has also undertaken considerable work in the form of investments, plans, and policies focused on the downtown. The downtown now hosts the ION LRT, post -secondary institutions, a significant knowledge economy and tech hubs, and ongoing residential development. Downtown Kitchener is known for its mix of innovation, entrepreneurship, academics, and diversity of spaces, services, restaurants, and events. The City of Kitchener has led this evolution in partnership with the private sector, the business community, community groups and organizations, developers, and community members. Downtown Kitchener is seeing tremendous growth but must confront housing affordability, climate change, and equity challenges. The community established a vision and principles for downtown Kitchener in 2003, and the time has come to develop a new collective vision. As such, the City of Kitchener is undergoing a process to develop a comprehensive vision and set of guiding principles for Downtown Kitchener. The city will be undertaking considerable work related to the downtown over the next several decades. This work must be founded on a forward -thinking, progressive, and consensus -built vision and principles. The vision and principles will establish the direction for City initiatives in equity, experience, growth, and sustainability. These current and future initiatives may include land use and zoning framework for the Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), Civic District Master Plan, District Energy, Bramm Yards Master Plan, Arts and Culture Strategy, Inclusionary Zoning, Places and Spaces, City -owned Lands Plan and a new or updated Official Plan. Engagement: bjeck:ives A Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) is guiding the development of the vision and principles, supported by City staff and LURA Consulting (a community engagement consultancy). The DCWG includes downtown and broader Kitchener community members, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives. The process includes two engagement phases. In Phase One, the DCWG has shaped and assisted in delivering a fulsome community engagement process to gather input on the vision and guiding principles. Phase Two of the project will draw on this input to draft a vision and principles with the DCWG. The vision and principles will be presented to the community for feedback beginning in June 2023. Input was gathered through: • 11 DCWG meetings • Meetings with local Indigenous organizations • A workshop with downtown service provider agencies • A Do -it -Yourself Workshop completed by eight community organizations/city advisory committees • Five community pop -ups • Online engagement (survey, ideas board, and mapping) Summaries of each of these inputs, workshops and conversations can be found in the Appendices. 3 Page 88 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles - Phase One Engagement Summary Vision Elements Within the broader community engagement process, we asked community members to identify their top three words to describe their ideal downtown Kitchener. The top 25 occurring words, and their associated word counts, are listed below. These words will be used by the DCWG to inform the vision during Phase Two. 1. Safe (200) 2. Vibrant (140) 3. Clean (80) 4. Green (72) 5. Walkable (69) 6. Accessible (55) 7. Fun (51) 8. Friendly (42) 9. Lively (41) 10. Welcoming (39) 11. Active (31) 12. Community (30) 13. Inclusive (29) 14. Affordable (28) 15. Busy (27) 16. Interesting (20) 17. Pedestrian (19) 18. Diverse (19) 19. People (18) 20. Parking (18) 21. Events (17) 22. Inviting (16) 23. Bustling (16) 24. Variety (15) 25. Shops (13) The above words are being reported based on frequency among those participating in the broader community engagement process. It is important to note that the meaning of each word varies among respondents. Pheirnatiic Summary At the outset of the process, the DCWG established seven key themes/focus areas to examine and contextualize the conditions in the downtown area. These themes served as the basis for a series of DCWG workshops and the context for broader community engagement. The themes established by the DCWG differed slightly from those in the original Terms of Reference for the project, in the sense that they merged some topics, with equity serving as a lens for all seven. The themes established by the DCWG, as well as the original set from the Terms of Reference, are provided below. 4 Page 89 of 668 Themes Established by DCWG Original Terms of Reference Themes 1. Public Spaces and Parks 1. Growth 2. Culture, Events and Street Life 2. Housing 3. Growth and Housing 3. Neighbourhood 4. Neighbourhoods and the Movement 4. Supporting Existing Business and of People and Goods Recovery 5. Business Recovery and Imagine 5. Business Imagine Forward Forward 6. Movement of People and Goods 6. Climate Change and Environmental 7. Public Spaces Leadership 8. Events, Animation and Street Life 7. Safety and Security 9. Climate and Environmental Leadership 10. Equity 11. Safety and Security 4 Page 89 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary The following section summarizes the input received during Phase One across all community engagement activities, sorted within these seven themes. Public Spaces and Parks Community members of Kitchener largely agree on the importance of public spaces and parks, and these vital community spaces require continued investment and focus over the next ten years. Community members want to see open and informal spaces that people can use in various ways and feel comfortable in. This includes spaces that are free to use and accessible to all community members. DCWG members identified that public spaces need to be intentionally connected to one another. Community members often spoke about establishing places downtown where they could socialize and run programming, such as a farmers' market or concerts. Many community members and DCWG members noted the need for more green space in Downtown Kitchener. Community members desire green space to sit, play, and gather. Specific mention was made regarding having picnic tables, benches, washrooms, and trees. Including those amenities within the green space allows them to be intergenerational, inviting people of all ages and abilities to use the area. Many people mentioned Victoria Park as a valuable area downtown that many people visit. Specifically, participants want the park to have more trees, shade, and social services to assist people currently living there. It was noted that all aspects of parks and public spaces need to be designed for all community members, regardless of ability or mobility considerations. There is a need for accessible picnic tables in parks and public spaces, as well as fully accessible washrooms. For community members to access public parks and spaces, they need to be easy to get to via public transit or cycling. DCWG members mentioned the need for greater connectivity between active transportation routes and public spaces, especially parks. Greater connectivity between amenities would encourage active transportation and is a thread between all seven themes. Culture, (Events and Stireet I1....1ife Community and working group members noted the importance of establishing downtown Kitchener as a destination place. DCWG members want the downtown area to be vibrant, unique, and welcoming. Community and working group members felt that the downtown has become less lively in recent years. Specific suggestions to bring energy downtown include an art walk, more public art, street patios, and musicians. Community members often said they want to spend more time downtown, shopping, eating and enjoying the public spaces. Working group members enjoyed the multicultural festival and would support more events highlighting downtown's multiculturalism. These festivals bring the community together and support the downtown economy. Many community members spoke about the need for activated public spaces and wanted to see more events and festivals in areas such as the Victoria Park Pavilion. Community members who use mobility devices noted they often cannot access event stalls during events because there is no hard surface. When discussing how to reinvigorate the downtown area, specific suggestions from community members include closing King Street to vehicles, keeping the roads and sidewalks clean of litter, better lighting and more seating areas. It was also suggested that items like a piano for people 5 Page 90 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary to use spontaneously, would bring joy and vibrancy downtown. With more people living downtown, community members feel that introducing commercial spaces to the ground floor of multi -unit buildings would bring vibrancy. Mixed-use buildings were often mentioned by community members who want to see a mix of restaurants and shops that represent the multicultural nature of downtown. Community members suggested that additional City signage in other languages, especially Indigenous languages spoken in the area, would make downtown a diverse and welcoming space. It was noted that this would integrate more culture into the neighbourhood, make it more welcoming, and provide a learning opportunity for all. Other community members would like to see more wayfinding and signage that speaks to Kitchener's past and provides information about historical moments. These ideas contribute to a sense of place and build Kitchener's culture. Specific places like the Kitchener Library and the Museum bring significant value to the culture and life of downtown. Growth and II lousiiing The input was wide-ranging when discussing downtown growth, housing, and density. While there is a general understanding that cities in Ontario are growing and becoming denser, there were varying opinions on how Kitchener should accommodate this growth downtown. Some community members, and DCWG members feel downtown Kitchener is the most appropriate place to plan for growth. This would include tall buildings in the downtown core and along the LRT. Those supporting more growth downtown want to encourage it along public transportation routes to support both active transportation and climate goals. DCWG members noted that encouraging growth downtown would bring more significant foot traffic to businesses, likely allowing more local businesses to thrive and attract new businesses. Other community members suggested that growth take place outside of downtown Kitchener. There is a concern among some that providing for a lot of growth downtown may happen without amenities such as parks and shops. Community members generally agreed growth should be done holistically, including green space, public amenities, and investment in public transit. Community members discussed affordable housing throughout the engagement process. Community members would like to see affordable housing built, as well as supportive housing for those experiencing homelessness. Indigenous organizations noted that affordable housing needs to be built in proximity to support services that are required. DCWG members and social service providers noted that supportive housing is currently lacking in the area. It was recognized that the housing crisis needs to be addressed at every level of government. Participants noted that there should be housing types for all provided downtown, including larger units to accommodate larger households. It was noted that encouraging missing middle housing could be one way to address this. INeiiglhlbouirlhoods and the IMoveirnent of People and Goods Connected and consistent transportation networks were regularly mentioned when discussing neighbourhoods and the movement of goods and people. DCWG members noted that the current active transportation and public transit routes are not fully connected, making them I9 Page 91 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary unreliable and, at times, unsafe. Many community members said they would prefer to cycle or take the bus downtown but find it difficult. One example noted often was the bus service, which people would like to operate more frequently. Community members also spoke about the desire for improved active transportation infrastructure. This enhanced infrastructure would include snow clearing of cycling routes year- round. More people would travel that way if the cycling system were improved, with better connection and safety. Many people spoke about bike routes which end abruptly, with no signage directing them to the next path. Community members want to see the public transportation and cycling infrastructure made safer and more user-friendly. This includes connected and continuous routes, protected bike lanes and clear signage. Community members and DCWG members shared concerns over a lack of accessibility when moving downtown. A specific example noted was the lack of sidewalk snow clearing, which creates a significant barrier to movement for those with disabilities. There is a lack of accessible parking and drop-off spaces downtown. This prohibits many people from visiting downtown comfortably and safely. Other examples included uneven sidewalks, signage that is low hanging, poor lighting and grates or drains which obstruct walking. To create stronger neighbourhoods and communities, many community members and DCWG members spoke about building a fifteen -minute community where they could walk or bike to basic amenities and services. For many community members, a healthy street is designed for pedestrian safety over vehicle convenience. This includes widening sidewalks when they are reconstructed, separated bicycle lanes and speed barriers such as planters. 13uusiiness (Recovery and Imagine lf::::oirwaird Kitchener community members are proud of the changes the downtown area has seen over the past decade but feel there is still room for improvement. The pandemic had significant consequences for locally owned businesses. Many shut down, and some storefronts have remained empty, leaving many to feel as though the downtown could still be more vibrant with the return of businesses to these spaces. It was noted that restaurants and bars need to stay open late enough for people to visit after going to theatre or events. Participants expressed concerns over the lack of thriving businesses and shared ideas on how to revitalize downtown Kitchener. Some DCWG members suggested that if the downtown had more people living in it, that increased foot traffic would enable more businesses to open. This would also impact existing businesses positively by allowing them to stay open longer and build a more substantial customer base. Participants suggested that the city could support local businesses by offering grants or incubator loans. Many community members expressed a desire for a more extensive variety of businesses, especially ones encouraging community gatherings, such as bars, restaurants and cafes. Many noted that there is a need for a grocery store located downtown that is accessible by public transit. Concern was noted regarding the lack of accessibility ramps leading to small businesses. 7 Page 92 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary The idea of closing King Street to vehicles is seen to build community and revitalize the downtown. At the same time, there is an understanding that solutions for deliveries and business operations are needed when considering full or partial closure. To encourage people to shop and visit downtown, participants would like to see the downtown become more walkable, with safe sidewalks and road crossings. Participants would also like improvements in the public realm, including additional benches and greenery. Climate Change and IEinviironmen tall II....eaderslhiilp Most participants agreed that climate resiliency and adaptation approaches should be considered when addressing all aspects of downtown. One of the most common interventions that community members would like to see is protected greenspace and tree planting, which supports climate mitigation, resiliency and community gathering. In meetings with Indigenous organizations, it was noted that issues such as climate change, clean water, and clean air urgently need to be addressed. Community members spoke about a design for downtown that is climate focused. They offered suggestions that included guidelines for new buildings, green public spaces, improved waste management, active transportation routes, and green development standards as effective ways for the city to build climate change into new construction. DCWG members suggested moving towards new buildings that are energy efficient, have green roofs and have less concrete. Many community members spoke about re -purposing existing parking lots alongside green development standards. These parking lots could be used as green spaces to reduce the impact of heat islands. Both community members and working group members want to see a downtown Kitchener designed to mitigate flooding risk. Examples of this provided include additional green space instead of parking lots, permeable pavement in the public realm, and pollinator gardens. Adding plants and trees downtown contributes to the overall feeling of a welcoming downtown. Safety and Security The theme of safety and security encompasses the communities need for welcoming, accessible, and equitable spaces. The notion of a lively downtown was heard many times, with participants expressing that the more people who frequent downtown, the safer it becomes. Community members would like to see specific challenges addressed, such as bike thefts, storefront vandalism, and graffiti, which makes the downtown look uncared for, and increases people's feelings of unsafety. Given that there are times when there are few visitors downtown, particularly at night, several participants suggested they would feel safer if there were security patrols on foot. In that vein, many participants noted that increased security through policing may not be the best approach as different populations have different levels of comfort and experience with police, and many people do not feel safer with increased policing. Suggestions were made during the social service provider workshop that building and deploying a community response unit could be more effective. Participants expressed the need for an immediate increase in mental health support. Mobile health units were suggested to be deployed to city areas, providing crisis mental health support and access to longer-term support. It was recognized by a few community members that access to both safe supply and safe injections is critical in supporting vulnerable populations. Other 8 Page 93 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary support needs mentioned were access to housing, food, and hygiene facilities. These wrap- around supports allow people to meet their basic needs. With basic needs met, individuals can then focus on items like employment. Many noted that those individuals in crisis and the wider population would all be served with more significant support and intervention from the City. During conversations with Indigenous organizations, it was noted that safe and accessible space needs to be created for Indigenous people to have ceremonies. This could be a way for the City to contribute to Reconciliation efforts. While some community members differ on the methods to increase safety, the desired end goal is the same. With a vibrant downtown, including street life, businesses, public spaces and parks, greater safety and security can be actualized. DCWG members envision a safe downtown for everyone, with safety interpreted as a place that is welcoming for all. A few community members mentioned wanting to be able to walk the neighbourhood enjoying local shops, parks, and events safely. It is recognized by community members and DCWG members that safety for all includes those experiencing homelessness and that support services must be an integral part of a safe community. Other The COVID-19 pandemic has had a fundamental impact on how community members interact with each other. Community members want downtown Kitchener to rebuild its sense of community by being able to participate in events, hang out in parks and public spaces, and share experiences. Priorities In the online survey, participants ranked the importance of different elements when thinking about the future of Downtown Kitchener. The results are listed below in order of importance as ranked by participants, with the average ranking noted in parentheses. 1. Local shops and new business (4.2) 2. Public safety (4.5) 3. Green space (4.5) 4. Sidewalks and active transportation (5.5) 5. Arts and culture (5.6) 6. Housing (5.6) 7. Events (5.8) 8. Accessibility (6.5) 9. Climate change (6.8) 10. Equity (7.7) 11. Sport and leisure (8.1) 511 Page 94 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Sectilloin ,: Who We Heard IIS iir iirn Survey participants were asked to complete several demographic questions (optional). Responses are summarized below. Aga Iainge The figure below shows the age range of survey respondents. Outreach to lower response groups (e.g. those under 18) will be targeted during engagement on the draft vision and principles. Under 18 years old 18 to 29 years old 30 to 39 years old 40 to 49 years old 50 to 59 years old 60 to 64 years old 65 years old and above Prefer not to answer What is your age? 0 50 100 150 200 Figure 2: Survey Respondent Age (n:::::6 /1) Groups The figure below shows if respondents identify themselves in the following groups. Do you identify as a member of any of the following groups? 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Person with a disability Member of a racialized group Immigrant or Refugee 2LGBTQ+ First Nations, Inuit or Metis None of the above Prefer not to answer Figure 3: Survey Respondent Groups (n:::::680) 10 Page 95 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Gender The figure below shows the gender identity of survey respondents. Which of the following best describes your gender? Woman Man Gender Fluid / Gender Queer Non -Binary Trans Woman Trans Man Two -Spirit I do not identify with a gender Prefer not to answer A gender not listed above (please describe): 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Figure 4. Survey Respondent Gender (n:::::680) 11 Page 96 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary I1....,ocatiion The image below shows the postal codes of the survey participants. %; 1 Waterloo y°i j / �f41N. III f / V Wilms, l oo�im/mrrr�io r %/,/ %/�/ori i0 // %'/ig/ 1 p oi// Carnbridge god / o%1Y avP HOUMON °NAUT014. 9 G i i, R 0 A / f I r^ Dand �G;t �� �,rk➢c. 0/001 Figure 5.-r Survey Respondent Postal Coates (n:::::671) The top five occurring postal codes among survey participants were: 1. N2H (174) 2. N2G (154) 3. N2M (75) 4. N2A (67) 5. N2E (46) Phase One included a variety of engagement methods to seek broad input, described below. (Downtown Community Working Giroulp A Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) was selected by a community selection committee through an application process in May/June 2022. The DCWG is guiding and developing the DTK vision and principles process with the support of City staff and LURA Consulting. Thirty (30) individuals comprise the DCWG, including members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives to the process. The DCWG met eleven times during the first phase of the community visioning 12 Page 97 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary process. The table below includes details of the meeting focus and attendance. Meeting Summaries are available in Appendix A. Date Meeting Topic June 22, 2022 Introduction to Project September 6, 2022 Community Engagement Planning October 4, 2022 Introduction to Theme -based Workshops November 1, 2022 Guided Tour of DTK public spaces and parks December 6, 2022 Public Spaces and Parks January 10, 2023 Culture, Events and Street Life January 24, 2023 Growth and Housing February 7, 2023 Neighbourhoods and the Movement of People and Goods February 21, 2023 Business Recovery and Imagine Forward March 7, 2023 Climate Change and Environmental Leadership March 21, 2023 Safety and Security Service Provider Agencies Service providers who operate in downtown Kitchener participated in a workshop on March 1, 2023. The conversation consisted of introducing the project to the agencies and listening to the experiences and input of agency staff. Four service provider organizations attended the discussion, as follows: • Peregrine Outreach • Sanguen Health Centre • Tiny Home Takeout @ St. Mary's Church • The Working Centre The workshop summary is available in Appendix B. Indigenous 0irgarniizadons The City of Kitchener invited local Indigenous organizations to individual meetings to listen to their experience and knowledge to inform Downtown Kitchener's future. Meeting summaries are available in Appendix C. Organization(s) Meeting Date Number of Attendees Anishnabeg Outreach March 21, 2023 2 Healing of the Seven Generations and Crow Shield Lodge March 24, 2023 2 IIo it Xouirsellf IFaciilliitatiioirn Guilde A Do -it -Yourself (DIY) facilitation guide allowed members of the DCWG and members of the public to run their own workshops within their networks to gather input to help inform the development of the vision and guiding principles. The guide provided step-by-step instructions for facilitating workshops, which took approximately 90 minutes and focused on the same topic areas discussed by the DCWG. The DIY kit was shared directly with the DCWG members and advertised on the Engage webpage. The project team received ten completed kits, listed in the table below. Completing Organization I Workshop Attendees Cit of Kitchener Downtown Action and Advisory Committee 1 7 13 Page 98 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Completing Organization Workshop Attendees Conestoga Downtown Campus Students 5 City of Kitchener Climate Change and Environment Committee 9 Kitchener Google Employees 9 Artists and Business Owners 4 Eastwood Seniors Community 5 Bread and Roses Cooperative Homes 5 Victoria Park Neighbourhood Association x2 24 Arts and Culture Organizations* 15 Grand River Accessibility Advisory Committee 12 Total 95 *including TheMuseum, Centre In The Square, K -W Symphony, ArtsBuild Ontario, InterArts Matrix, Green Light Theatre, Registry Theatre, Grand Philharmonic Choir, the Kitchener Blues Festival, Schneider Haus, and four churches which frequently provide venue space for concerts and other art activities: St. Matthews Lutheran Church, the Anglican Church of St. John the Evangelist, Church of the Good Shepherd and St. Peter's Lutheran Church). Community lPolp,...0 1ps The City of Kitchener held five community pop -ups to gather input on the vision and principles. The pop-up engagement included a vision board, map activity and children's visioning sheets. Images of these activities are available in Appendix D. Location Date Participants Kitchener Market February 24, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 595 Carl Zehr Square February 25, 2023, 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm 66 Kitchener Market March 18, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 515 Carl Zehr Square March 18, 2023, 3:00 pm - 6:00 pm 14 Kitchener Market March 25, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 425 Total 1,615 I:ingage Welb1page The Engage w�b.�pg9.p launched on February 24, 2023, and was open for community input through March 31, 2023. All engagement events and opportunities were promoted on the project page, including the DIY kit and pop-up events. The Engage page used the following activities to gather input: ideas board, survey, and places (mapping) board. The Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles Engage webpage received 3,210 visitors. The following table provides the number of participants for each online engagement activity. Engage Activity Participants Ideas 134 Map 87 Survey 678 Total 899 Counciill Worksholp City of Kitchener staff and LURA Consulting held a workshop on April 17, 2023, with the members of the City Council. All ten Councillors and the Mayor were in attendance. The workshop recapped highlights of the broad community engagement findings for members of Council, and asked them to reflect on their vision for Downtown Kitchener. A summary of this workshop is available in Appendix E. 14 Page 99 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Communications (Methods The city used the following methods to communicate the project, including its relevant engagement opportunities. Project Welblpage The City of Kitchener hosted a project .Ib. a e. This webpage details the project, the working group, and ways to stay involved. It also linked directly to the Engage webpage and encouraged participation in the survey and in-person opportunities. The project webpage received 1,313 visits. Social IMedia If=Iromotiion City of Kitchener's social media channels, Facebook and Twitter, were used to promote awareness of the project with posts linking to information about the study and highlighting public events. Social media ads achieved 60,216 impressions. i1mm=1111m, The City of Kitchener prepared and released a news release on February 28, 2023. The news release highlighted project information and a quote from the City of Kitchener Mayor and invited the community to engage online or in person. IE irnaiill Subscription The Engage page allows community members in Kitchener to sign up for email subscriptions to leverage the subscription to provide updates and notices of events relating to the project. Sectilloin i;i Next Step The DCWG review and analyze the inputs from all engagement activities to develop a draft vision and guiding principles that will encapsulate the work done since June 2022. This draft vision and principles will be presented to the public and Kitchener City Council for input commencing in June 2023. 15 Page 100 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary g Group Meeting Suilmilmf City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnimunlity Wodkiling Group IMeeting #1 Summary The first Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on June 22, 2022, from 4:00 to 6:00 pm at Kitchener City Hall. 25 of 30 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. IDiscussion IDCWG Working Vallues DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions to develop some of the values that will guide their collaboration as they work on a new vision statement and set of principles, as well as navigate a series of topic -based discussions for Kitchener's Downtown. The following questions guided the discussions: 1. What are the top three things that would make this project and experience work well for you? 2. What would make this a safe space to share ideas? What is/is not respectful to say? 3. There will be a chair selected for this group. What qualities would you like to see in them? Responses to the questions are summarized below, sorted by theme areas across each roundtable. Individual responses from the roundtables are noted as bullet points within each theme. What would imake this project and experience work well for you? F:Zesullts oriented • Opportunity to see results and impact • Real impact • Inspired • Knowing the end goal and the impact of the DCWG members individually and as a group • Challenging and rewarding work • Discussions impacting policy • Concrete action • Listen to our voice and execute ideas • Producing concrete results • We make a difference i:..:.:ttectiive meetings • Effective protocols • Productive use of our time and energy • Effective time management • Consistent attendance • Ability to send representatives on our behalf at times we are unable to join • Politicians attend a meeting • Snacks 16 Page 101 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Informal, social activities integrated into agendas Agendas and discussion iiteirns • Have room in the agenda for people to address things they would like to talk about • Having a chance to speak to the group on topics I feel strongly about • Have an opportunity for input and ideas after the meetings • Self-selecting work • Having end dates for goals and ideas to promote accountability • Agendas and information ahead of time to enable time to think ahead of the meetings • Exploring different means of idea -sharing to encourage all members to have an opportunity to share and bring ideas forward Open mindedness and anew perspectives • New perspectives • Flexibility and responsiveness if the group wants to explore other options and ideas • Interactive and collaborative setting • Open to trying new things • Open-mindedness to new or unique ideas • Work collaboratively and get the best of diversity What would malke this a safe space to share ideas? Acceptance • No tolerance policy for hateful speech • Referring to people as they would like to be referred to • Acceptance of everyone • Seeing where others are coming from • No prioritization — make room for everyone • Respect each other's needs and approaches • Avoid generalizations and stereotypes • Equity over equality • Everyone feels welcome and able to contribute • Respecting language and other barriers Constructive • Listen and understand other's thoughts and ideas • Debate but do not argue • Build on each other's ideas and creativity • When you know better, do better • Airtime equitably shared • Do not be dismissive or too quick to reject/contradict If=boll iite • Open and polite • Be gracious • Not putting down others' ideas • Receptive to all views • Speak up when upset or offended • Do not be argumentative or combative 17 Page 102 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Meeting space • Venue with attention to accessibility • A meeting space without disturbing noise • Proper acoustics • Setting up rooms to avoid accessibility barriers What qualities would you like to see lin a clhaiiir? Creates a sate space • Empathetic • Making sure that if someone feels uncomfortable, they can come to them, and problems are addressed • Able to be a safe space for someone to confide in if they are uncomfortable • Willing to listen and respond If=:aciilliitahon and consensus dbuilding • Strong consensus -building • Facilitation skills • Mediator • Facilitator • Having discussions and working towards consensus • Bring out differences for discussion • Do not avoid difficult conversations and topics • Gives everyone a chance for their ideas • Good listener Organized • Organization • Goal -oriented • Organization skills • Focused Open mindedness • Empathetic and open-minded • Open-minded • Openness • Approachable I1....eadeirslhiilp • Experience in managing groups • Leadership • People management • Servant leadership • Good judgement • Confident • Pleasant, kind and respectful • Good understanding of and respect for protocols • Willing to make difficult decisions • Delivering constructive criticism in a positive way IR Page 103 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Willingness to hear input and criticism • Encouraging others • Enthusiastic about people and the DCWG • Lived experience Communication slkiillis • Public speaking • Excellent communication skills • Good communication skills Capacity • Has the time and capacity to take this on • Enough time and capacity to commit to time outside of the meetings Moreover, the DCWG discussed the chair selection process and noted that they would like to get to know each other better before making any such decision. DCWG members also wanted an outline of the position and its work. Wiralp Up and Next Stelps Darren Becks and Natalie Goss from the City's project team reiterated the next steps for the DCWG, the potential for individual work and idea generation over the summer, and our next meeting as a group in September. The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. 19 Page 104 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuiniity Wodkiling Group IMee-fing #2 Summary The second Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on September 6, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 20 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Discussion IDiraft i.::ngagement Strategy DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions to inform project planning and provide input into the draft engagement strategy. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. (Part 1 Why We Care Why does creating a vision and 1piriinciilplles for Downtown Kitchener matter to you? Group 1 • I live here and have lived here for more than 40 years, and I feel a deep commitment to the quality of life in DTK • Have been involved in many City projects • Interested in good design and the history of design • Opportunity with ongoing development — currently more projects now than in the previous 25 years o Private -led development boom needs proper guidance o Development needs to benefit all • Care about the needs of people who live here, including marginalized communities • Want to be proud of DTK, and want it to be a place people come to • Want it to be more than a transient and/or bedroom community — a great place to live and a place people stay Group 2 • Help the homeless and other vulnerable populations • Help influence what types of buildings will be in the downtown (mixed use) • Would like to see a mixture of different businesses (i.e., less cannabis stores) • A diverse view inclusive of ideas, with unique needs or perspectives considered • Need something to aspire to • Accessible transportation for those living downtown • Mitigate noise issues Group 3 • Want a DTK that caters to the community • Want to help shape DTK now and in the future • Create a bright future for DTK • Want DTK to work for everyone o Accessible o Enjoyable o Livable • Provide accountable • Bring it together • Coordinated approach to projects • Inclusive development for everyone Page 105 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Vision not at the expense of others who call DTK home Oiroulp 4 • Values define community • Provide a `guiding light' - easier to move forward with a shared vision • Have our own idea of where we are going • Speaks to inclusion and voices being heard • Opportunity for people to work together • Opportunity for democracy • Community -driven process • Thing big and long-term — something to aspire too • Everyone working toward a common goal 13y Ihaving a slhaired vision and piriirnciiplles foir the downtown, we will see what outcomes? Oiroulp 1 • A lot of people in DTK • A cultural hub • An integrated vision with DTK and historic neighbourhoods (a relationship with the surrounding neighbourhoods) • Pedestrian focus/pedestrian-only areas • Centerpiece of the City • An ambitious vision for the future • New people and new businesses Group 2 • Safer community • High-quality environment • Increased affordability • Housing for everyone o More mid -rise buildings o Units for families • Walkable communities • Parks and recreational opportunities • Building up, not out Group • Accessible • Safe • Diverse • Livable • Brighter future • For all Oiroulp 4 • Progress • Accomplishment • Vibrancy on the street — people, art, music, events, public space • More inclusivity 21 Page 106 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Find commonality • Technology and innovation • Diversity of people, business and events • Making everyone feel at home • More people living downtown • Street activity • Safety • World class mid-sized city • Known for social policy • Affordable homes for all • Main street and pedestrian space (Part 2 Who Should Caere and The (Engaged Who Tis impacted or concerned about the outcomes and tlheirefore should The engaged"? Oiroulp "1 • Social service agencies • Community members/community groups • The Weber Street group and the Victoria Park group • Surrounding neighbourhoods • Community groups and community members' groups • First Nations • Indigenous community members • Businesses • Arts organizations • Multicultural groups • Newcomers • Lower income community members • BIA • Real estate organizations • School boards • Students (elementary, high school, post -secondary) Ciroulp 2 • People who live downtown and in the broader city • Business owners • Staff/students from post -secondary schools • Low-income community members • Landlords • Indigenous communities • Chamber/BIA (but ensure to balance perspectives across different views) • Sustainable Waterloo Ciroulp 3 • All ages and background • Vulnerable population • Social agencies (and can reach people they serve) 22 Page 107 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Local/small businesses • Use existing channels to reach and engage • Community members Group 4 • Newcomers • Businesses/BIA • Not for profit organizations • Community groups • Social agencies • Unhoused people • Developers • Educational establishments • Students Who needsto stay iiirntoirirned about the Ipiroject? Group `I • Politicians Group • Community members Group • Neighbourhoods • Agencies/community groups • 1 institutions • Students • Church community • Property owners • Sports/recreation groups • Schools Group 4 • Politicians • Developers • Neighbourhood associations (Part 3 is:.:::.quiity and Ilrncllusiiorn / is:.:::valluatiing Engagement Aire theire otheir strategises to ernsuire the eingagernernt its equitable and inclusive? Oiroulp `fl • Provide people with something meaningful to engage on • Use language people can understand and ensure information is accessible • Be genuine in our engagement efforts, and use people's input to impact the project o Disingenuous engagement is easy to spot and will distance people from the project • Make an effort to reach people where they are • Meet with trusted community leaders and work with them to broaden outreach (build relationships) 23 Page 108 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Giroulp • Clear goals for engagement • Share impacts/change that have come about because of input received • Track representation (and need to let people know why we are doing this) Giroulp • Thematic workshops • Virtual attendance options • Multi -format engagement (i.e., virtual, surveys, workshops, etc.) — provide different options • Meaningful engagement Giroulp 4 • Different approaches and tools — provide a variety of options • Be online • Go to people/different communities • Translate materials • Accommodate different needs • Outreach through organizations/frontline workers Aire theire otheir strategises you would irecornimend to evaluate tlhe engagement process? Giroulp '1 • Numbers are not everything — look at the quality of engagement and the effort • Do people feel heard and that they influenced outcomes? • What is the depth of engagement? Giroulp 2 • Evaluate the tracking of representation • Has everyone had their voice heard? Giroulp 3 • How to capture and analyze qualitative input • Data needs to reflect quality of conversation and input — taking accurate notes • Surveys about the consultation process Giroulp 4 • Gauging awareness and marketing efforts Part 4 IE::::ingageimeirut Ideas A list of potential engagement and communication tactics were shared with DCWG members, and they were asked to suggest any additional ideas beyond the list. What additional strategises do you suggest to (best eingage the 1public? Giroulp 1 • Idea boards/suggestion boards • Have a presence at local events Giroulp 2 • In-person and virtual workshops • Surveys at pop -ups 24 Page 109 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Go to where people are • Keep topics interesting • Door knocking • Make it fun for people • Family -friendly opportunities • Free parking • Language/translation • Mail outs/notices Groulp • Intentionally design/combine paper and online surveys • Town halls and workshops • Community organizations and agencies • Smaller group discussions — make space for people • Offer meetings at various times (afternoons, evenings, weekends) • Various delivery methods Group 4 • `selfie' stand • Representatives in post -secondary institutions • Hashtags/social media campaigns • Digital and mail • Events and markets • Coffee shops • Community group outreach What additional strategises do you suggest to (best communicate engagement opportunities to the Ipublic? Group 1 • Name/market the project something recognizable, interesting and well-designed • Mail drops/fliers • Condo lobby fliers Group 2 • Local media • Trusted community voices Group 3 • Better link the City website and social media • Neighbourhood associations — reach out to them to inform their members Giroulp 4 • Digital and mail • Partnering with groups with established communications channels • DCWG members promoting opportunities Discussion Chair Selection IProcess A potential chair selection process was shared with DCWG members for their input and consideration. DCWG members suggested and agreed upon an alternative process, as follows: 25 Page 110 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Members can send nominations for co-chair to the project team • Members may nominate other members or themselves • If a member has been nominated by someone else, the project team will check with them first to see if they are interested in being co-chair • Nominees will meet with Justin Readman from the City (co-chair) to further determine interest Wrap Up, and INext Steps A follow-up survey will be sent to DCWG members to help determine topics of future meetings. The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. 0 Page 111 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuinlity WorIkIling Group IMee-fing #3 Summary The second Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on October 4, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 16 of 30 of the Downtown Community Working Group members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Discussion II Nousiirng, Growth, INeiighlbouurlhood, Movement of People & Good's As part of the process to develop a vision and principles, the theme -based workshops for these topics will explore the following key questions: • Growth — where and how should more people and jobs be added in DTK? • Housing - How can DTK be a home for all (e.g., housing supply, housing affordability)? • Neighbourhood - How do we imagine DTK as a distinct neighborhood? • Movement of People and Goods — How do we plan and maintain a transportation system that supports and prioritizes safety for all users and reduces automobile dependence while providing safe and efficient movement of people and goods in and through the downtown? Working group members were asked to identify additional information, experts and knowledge that would support discussions about housing, growth, neighbourhoods, and movement of people & goods. Responses are below. II lousing • Heights —what is included in the Official Plan for heights, what is being built, and what are the trade-offs. • Trends in houselessness, and how that contextualizes historically. • Housing affordability in the downtown areas • Understanding a breakdown of housing types (i.e., single bedroom, two-bedroom, three bedroom, etc.) Schools • What properties exist, what programs and populations • How children can get around town • Policies and changes because of students coming from abroad • Trends on newcomer populations Em • Pedestrian use now • How people are moving around and where they are going (for all modes, not just cars) • Complete streets that are designed for pedestrians and cyclists first • Explore what it takes to make a pedestrian -focused downtown • Bike sharing • Safety considerations for pedestrians 27 Page 112 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • How can we leverage the excess parking • Most developments do not include outdoor amenities or parkland, is there an opportunity to leverage these parking areas? • Bicycle parking If='oll iiciies What is already in place? Frameworks and plans already in place What permissions existing in zoning and the current Official Plan and Regional Official Plan RM Strategies used in other cities, and stats on what changes this has produced in outcomes they are seeing Darren Kropf — Active Transportation Someone who can speak to 15 -minute cities Discussion Ii::::ixiistiing Businesses and (Recovery„ Business imagiine Forward, Public Spaces and Events„ Animation and Street I1....1ife As part of the process to develop a vision and principles, the theme -based workshops for these topics will explore the following key questions: • Supporting Existing Businesses and Recovery (1-4 years out) — How do we support businesses in recovering from the impacts of the pandemic? • Business Imagine Forward (5-10 years out) - What does the retail, hospitality, service, and office sectors look like in the DTK? • Public spaces - How do we plan and support engaging public spaces and places (e.g., parks and amenity spaces) that support a vibrant DTK neighbourhood and quality of life? • Events, Animation, and Street life — How do we support a vibrant street life through festivals, programs, patios etc.? Working group members were asked to identify additional information, experts and knowledge that would support discussions about business recovery, business forward, public spaces and amenities and events. Responses are below. Business irecoveiry and business iimagiine toi acrd • Loss of manufacturing jobs in downtown • Linkage between employment and affordability of living, lifestyle and how changes in the employment mix impact the community • Relationship between workplaces, income and expenditures for households • Who is frequenting business downtown (whether people living downtown are using the businesses — who is shopping downtown as opposed to a mall or shopping centre) • Gaps in retail — what is needed to justify bringing a business downtown and what are the drivers for a business to locate downtown • Walkability and reasons for walking (such as distances between amenities) • Historical context of businesses in Kitchener • Trends in businesses in the future • Conflict between active transportation versus parking needs for business Page 113 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • View of leash -free dog areas • What is the utilization of public spaces — are they at capacity? • Libraries, community centres, and City Hall are important public spaces too and should be included in the discussion 1:::::vents, animation, and stireet Iliife • City staff — what is planned, what it takes to plan events • What events exist and how well are they attended, and how has that changed overtime • Potential discussion question — what DCWG members wish existed EM • BIA to speak on behalf of business owners, patio program, what they are looking to achieve • Business owners who chose to move out of the downtown • Hear from businesses themselves, what policies do they want to see implemented • First Nations and Indigenous groups perspectives on land, use of public spaces and naming Discussion Climate and IEnviirornmen tall I1....eadeirshiilp and i:::::quiity, Safety and Security As part of the process to develop a vision and principles, the workshops for these topics will explore the following key questions: • Climate/Environmental Leadership — How should Kitchener's commitments on climate change and sustainable development be considered and balanced with all other considerations in DTK's future? • Equity - How do we create a downtown that meets the needs of all, is welcoming to all and provides opportunities for all? How do we support those most in need? • Safety and Security - How can we construct and foster an empathetic, supportive community? Working group members were asked to identify additional information, experts and knowledge that would support discussions about climate and environmental leadership, equity, and safety and security. Responses are below. 1:::::qu1ity and security • Clearly define terminology — i.e., what is affordable housing? What is assisted housing? What is affordability? • Identify properties the City of Kitchener owns/leases and how this could help fill the need for housing • Resources for Additions • Affordable housing —is it accessible for those experiencing houselessness • Clarity on mixed housing terminology Clliiirn"nate and enviironirnrnentall Ileadershiilp • What is needed to get district energy downtown? • What would it take to have a retrofitting program downtown? • Plan for waste collection (specifically organics) in multi -residential • How can the individual/business owner help achieve climate goals and targets M Page 114 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Experts from House of Friendships • One Roof — why they moved and how it helps support their clients o Understanding of where the resources are to support houseless — opportunity to locate all in one area • Expert from Unsheltered Campaign • Experts — on children's needs for safety in the community • Hearing from groups representing houseless individuals and/or lower income populations • Sustainable Waterloo Region — what are the opportunities for small business • Indigenous leader on environmental issues • Mathew Day — to discuss building codes Comparators from other cities for all How do the provincial policies impact here Discussion Workshop Forimats The following suggestions were received from DCWG members over the course of the meeting regarding workshop format: • Use smaller group discussions • Rotate groups, so DCWG members are working with different people • Report back to the larger group on the small group discussions • Use "turn and talk" techniques, where members consider response and/or questions in small groups before sharing with the larger group • Use medium-sized circle discussions, where each person gets a chance to talk in subsequent order • Non-verbal gestures to show agreement/support, without taking up talking time Discussion ....... ... IFolpiic 1::3ased Workshop, Survey IResults The group discussed the priorities that emerged from the survey asking their thoughts on the topic -based workshops, as follows: • Housing is so important. It would affect everything else. It is a necessity. The fact that people cannot attain housing suggests something is fundamentally wrong. • Housing needs to be clearly defined, so we understand what affordability means to the downtown, not overall affordability in general. • These top five make sense to me, as drivers for people living and visiting downtown. • Is it possible to start to focus on the top two? What are the main things we need to focus on and use the others as lens. Proposed Combination of IFolpiics Regarding the proposed combination of topics for workshops, the DCWG had the following comments: • Like that they are grouped into five key areas, can we consider narrowing down further? For example„ two key things? • Can we consider at home, in public spaces and at work/businesses as the themes? 30 Page 115 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • We do not want to lose sight of the complexity of the issues we are discussing. • We need to be mindful of the intersectionality of issues. • 1 do not want this group to duplicate the Housing for All groups' work at the City. We can draw out the downtown component of that work. • Equity — worry about it as a separate item, as it is embedded in all others. • Consider including a value -based question as a litmus test to the ideas to ensure overarching elements such as equity are not missed. • Topics cannot be viewed as silos; each one affects the other. Wrap Up and INext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process, committing to the next steps: • Slides with speaking notes will be shared on the shared Teams drive for members to review. • Share potluck survey with DCWG (survey conducted under the My Main Street Program, specific to main street businesses/gaps in the business mix). • Next meeting November 4, 2022 31 Page 116 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Down -town Coirnirnuinii y WorIkIling Group Meeting #4 Summary The fourth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on November 1, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm. The meeting began at the Downtown Community Centre followed by a guided bus tour of some DTK public spaces led by Niall Lobley, Director of Parks and Cemeteries. The following stops were made: • Goudies Lane and Vogelsang Green • Carl Zehr Square and Gaukel Street • Francis Green • Victoria Park • Drive by Charles/Benton 19 of 30 of the Downtown Community Working Group members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. VVellcomiirng (Recap Co Chair, ..I..iimelliines„ 1::1irocess Justin Redman introduced the working group's new co-chair, Jyoti Mehta, to the group. Natalie Goss provided an overview of the thematic discussions and timelines, which include the following (* note additional meetings): • November 1 & December 6 - Public spaces, events, animation, street life • January 10 & 24* - Housing, neighbourhoods, movement of people & goods • February 7 — Climate and environmental leadership • February 21* - Existing businesses and recovery & businesses imagine forward • March 7 - Safety and security Natalie noted an equity lens would apply to all workshops. DCWG members noted the themes cover the major areas; however, they noted the importance of culture and that there should be an opportunity to discuss culture. There was a recommendation to look at leading cities when discussing each topic (i.e., Portland for transportation and Markham for district energy). Susan Hall, LURA, reviewed the process of developing the vision and shared examples of vision statements from other locations to demonstrate the level of detail the final vision will include. There was a suggestion to include the historical context of the downtown as part of the final vision document. Discussion IParks and Public Spaces As part of the tour, working group members were asked to consider the following questions: • What do you value most about public spaces downtown? • Thinking of the future, what kind of public spaces would you want for the next generation? • What top three things stood out to you on the tour? • Anything else you would like to share? Responses are below. 32 Page 117 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Value of Public Spaces Downtown Participants shared the following perspectives on the value of downtown public spaces, including parks: Identity, mulltii use and rnulltii purpose • Multi -use for diverse audiences and purposes (children, pets, performances, dining, etc.) • Multi-purpose, functionality • That these spaces will function as someone yard or outdoor space • People -oriented • The diversity of space • Have a strong sense of identity and capture the imagination of the city Accessible, safe and inclusive • Well -lit • Accessibility (wheelchair/stroller/ etc. access) • Kids and adults to play and meet friends • Are both psychologically and physically accessible, places that all types of people want to spend time in and can spend time in. Gathering, welcoming and relaxing • Opportunity for different people and cultures to come together • Comfortable seating • A place to sit down and relax and enjoy the city • Just wandering around and watching people Active, arts, culture, events • Event space • Art space • Interaction between festivals and community events • Enjoying events • Can accommodate a wide variety of grassroots programming while still maintaining a cohesive identity as a space • Beautiful • Shade • Greenery • Great mix of old and new — historical and modern architecture • Are architecturally or artistically interesting. This makes me want to visit those spaces and spend time there. Walllkalblle and connected • Walkability (close to other amenities such as stores with longer hours, and bathrooms) • They are all within walking distance of each other. No need to find parking or fight traffic • both include and are surrounded by amenities and attractions that make them feel lively and vibrant. • Play an intentional role within the broader network of public spaces and parks. 33 Page 118 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Public Spaces for the IFuture IIdentity, irnnulltii use and irnnulltii purpose • Pop-up activities which will allow flexible use of open spaces • Active spaces for multiple usages Accessible, safe and inclusive • Easily accessible • Places that are inclusive and think about who would be using it so that you feel welcome • Safe places at all times Gatlhed ng, welcoming and relaxing • Green spaces to disconnect from the fast pace of life • Welcoming Active, arts, culture, events • Space for arts and music • Bring the arts to the public (visual, theatrical/plays, music, festivals, etc.) • Beautiful • Historical • Shade • Greenery Wallllkalblle and connected • Closer to transit • More walkable cities (i.e., 15 -minute neighbourhoods) • Commercial (cafes and restaurants) right beside kids' play areas • A dog forest would be great (see Brown County Dog Park in Wisconsin) • A dedicated local food plaza with local food trucks, pop up restaurant cabins, and table spaces (possibly like the boardwalk in Halifax). This could be a destination space that would provide local food entrepreneurs with a chance to test and grow their business, it could serve as a revenue source for the city and would be an attraction for both community members and tourists. • A designated green space where people can bring and consume their own alcoholic beverages after work or on weekends, similar spaces exist in Germany and other European countries. • Downtown sports facilities: outdoor basketball courts, outdoor skatepark, road hockey rink • Publicly accessible "re-wilded" space, forest or other, that collaborates and builds reconciliation with the indigenous communities • Publicly accessible community garden plots that downtown community members can plant, and other community members can walk through and enjoy. 34 Page 119 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary General • More like what you are doing Folp 1FIhire e 1f'Ihlings • Overlapping spaces • Connecting spaces and intersecting (City Hall and Gaukel) • Emphasis on multi -use space for the future • The amount of thought in the design and aesthetic of the parks and public spaces • That more people need to hear this information and plans! • Planning for many uses of space • The idea of "overuse" of space • Lighting • It feels like Kitchener is on the right track with its planning for public space, however, I think that it needs to be more ambitious in placemaking through public space. For example, the new City Hall Square is nice but quite conservative. The square would certainly benefit from more unique public art, sculpture, planter space, a more full- service bandshell, etc. It's not enough just to include subtle features (like the limestone wall), the goal should always be to create public spaces that are immediately recognizable as extraordinary. • Physical connection between public spaces is important. For example, Gaukel should be pedestrian -oriented the full stretch from King to Joseph to connect City Hall Square to Victoria /Willow River Park. Public spaces within downtown should be part of a cohesive network, not a patchwork of isolated islands! • We need more public spaces that add to our collective civic identity. This means intentionally including things for which the community can build emotional attachment to. This will increase and improve our civic connections and will turn "places" into "destinations" to be enjoyed by community members and visitors. As a possible example, the city could move the beloved (and hated) giant intestine sculpture to the City Hall Square. It would instantly become a quirky and Instagram-worthy destination. Has the City thought of ongoing engagement, a sort of bus tour like this for the public, a "Jane's Walk" thing? The information is online, but hard to read and piecemeal rather than this cohesive vision. • Let's stop naming buildings and public spaces after historical people. It can create unnecessary division among the community (as with Victoria Park or SJAM is not necessary. People can be commemorated and memorialized in museums or on informational plaques. Places should be named for their location, their intention, or a feature that defines them. Wiralp Up and Next Steps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process, committing to the next steps: • Slides with speaking notes will be shared on the shared Teams drive for members to review. • Next meeting December 6, 2022. 35 Page 120 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener IDown-town Goirnirnuinii y Wodkiling Group Meeting ummary The fifth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on December 6, 2022, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 16 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. IExamlplles of Gireat 1::1u_ulb111ic Spaces Ahead of the meeting, DCWG members were asked to think about the great public spaces they have visited and what makes them great and to come prepared to share those at the meeting. The following is a summary of the examples that were shared, and other points raised: • Highline Park in New York City includes principles of using forgotten spaces. • Lux Gardens in Paris features bistro tables around a fountain to sit around water. • Washington Square in New York City features trees, flowering shrubs, low -maintenance landscaping, lighting/lamps and fencing. • Bensberg Castle in Germany has a public walk to the fortress; there is something to explore further. Features benches/water, play structures, a series of small gardens from sister cities, and a pagoda. • Main City Square in Hamburg, Germany, has thousands of people sitting in the space, people were sitting enjoying picnics, etc. A place where people gather and be together. This is a good example of fluid uses. • Belfast (downtown) has a sculpture in the centre that children can play on. A pedestrian - only space for leisure. • Rathauspark in Vienna, Austria has pathways lined with benches very close together; there is a fountain and trees. There are always people there in part because there are places to sit. • Museum's Quarter in Vienna, Austria, is a pedestrian -only courtyard space. There are interesting geometric shapes for people to sit on. Shops and cafes are close. It seemed to be used by different people at different times of the day. • The "Rocky Stairs" in Philadelphia provide a space to go and sit, and people watch. • New York City has little pockets or corners incorporating small micro spaces that people can enjoy. • Sherbourne Common in Toronto has an abstract -style playground and across the street is seating - park benches/ Muskoka chairs. It is accessible and well -lit, and they have shows/concerts. A park where you forget you are in a city. • The upper part of City Hall in Kitchener has stairs, benches and planters. This was a favourite place to go with kids. It is a space that could be used for children and is separated from cars. • The University of Ottawa campus has little greenspaces between buildings adjacent to walking paths. It feels safe and well -travelled, with pockets of enclosure and protection. • Older parts of Toronto often are a couple of blocks away from a major street, well - travelled, but big trees, a bit more programmed, small and contained. It has a bit of a mixed park feeling. • Access along pathways and transit roads. • There is a need for active transportation to link parks together. • Chile/Argentina is investing in their public spaces as the densities increase. You cannot reduce the amount and quality of private space without increasing the amount and quality of public space. 36 Page 121 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Savanna, Georgia, parks were part of designing the city in a very systematic and rigid way. • Place des Vosges in Paris is another example of a memorable park space. • We want to avoid the mistakes of Waterloo in the design of open spaces — that are not coordinated. • Consider industrial lands as opportunities for public space. Examples worldwide from Europe, Asia and South America — where they have taken over these spaces to create parkland. • Spur Line Trail, Iron Horse Trail, Victoria Park, and City Hall in Kitchener are great. We have these great elements, but they are not connected. • Sidewalks are not the same as pedestrian paths. They end up being throw -away spaces. If we could find secondary threads to connect these areas, better connections, create even visual connections. • Enjoying spaces that are free of cars. In Europe, spaces are developed before cars. • Consider how the edge of public spaces is defined by the buildings abutting them. Roundtable IDiiscussiioiris Public Spaces DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions on public spaces in DTK. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. Are public parks in downtown IKiitcheneir important, and iit so, wlhy? Group 1 • Yes. The focus has been on housing, but we need public spaces for people to go to accompany new housing. Both the City and developers should provide public spaces. • People move downtown because they want to be around other people. Public spaces provide an element of community. • Public spaces allow people to connect with nature and green spaces. • If the goal is to provide equal access, people will go where they feel they belong. • There have been tensions in Kitchener around encampments in public spaces, and equal access is an important term to use. How can we address it meaningfully? Group 2 • Yes, parks are important. Provide casual, informal spaces. • Victoria Park is a favourite. • Food forest concept. • Parks can provide teachable moments. • Public space is important — need different types of spaces for different purposes. • We will always need traditional park space. Group 3 • Yes, but not in all areas. • South of King — conserve greenspace. • We need to be balanced in our approach. • Public spaces need to be integrated. • Spaces now are not intentional. • Both amount and quality, are critical. • People cannot live at density without the provision of public spaces. 37 Page 122 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Stitch together the fragments. • Make connections between buildings and spaces. Giroulp 4 • Big buildings are increasingly surrounding us. • Offices also need public spaces for people to unwind. • Public spaces cultivate respect for where you live, to have spaces that you can use how you want. • Create appeal in a place. • Public spaces need to be usable year-round. I low important acre parks compared to otheir piriioiriitiies in the downtown? Group 1 • All priorities depend on each other, and there is a need for balance. • Parks are critical to the quality of life. • We need to make space for leisure time. • As living spaces get smaller with density, public spaces become even more important. • When working with developers, be creative in providing public space: update guidelines and requirements for providing public spaces. Giroulp 2 • Parks are more important than vehicular space. • Design DTK around public space. • Housing should, however, be a top priority. • Smaller parks are more community -minded. • Vibrancy of community space. Group 3 • Density necessitates public space. • Investments in transit/cycling have not been the same for public space. • The City alone cannot solve affordable housing but could invest in parks/public spaces. • Public space is a very high priority. • Public space is a catalyst for other work. • Extend spaces — they are for everyone. • Parks should help spur cultural investments. Giroulp 4 • Developers should be concerned about the streetscape to encourage people to live here. • Competing interests need to work together —they need one another. • Parks and residential need to be well-balanced and have equal priority. • We need guidelines surrounding the private provision of public space through developments. o This will be the community members' backyard. • Private amenities exist in some new developments, which takes the pressure off public spaces. Page 123 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles – Phase One Engagement Summary What should Ipairlks iiim the downtown enviironirnent Iloolk Iliilke? Group `fl • Have something linking parks (like a theme or other unifying element). • Greenspace is irreplaceable – we need to maintain what we have. • Integrate new green spaces in development projects –ask developers to provide these spaces. • Include interesting features/attractions (e.g., chess tables, giant Jenga, swings, water features, etc.). • Quiet spaces are also important. Group 2 • Trees are critical. • Can integrate pocket park spaces. • Using public spaces differently. • Closing of roads – especially in the summer. • Smaller. • Interesting spaces that provide identity. • Emotional connection to space. • Beautiful public spaces need recycling/waste facilities. Group 3 • Open space. • Not an afterthought/not just leftover land. • Designed with intention. • Delineate spaces. • Partially framed by the built environment. • Trees, water, greenery. • Designed landscapes. • Lighting. Group 4 • It can be simple – for example, some Muskoka chairs set out for public use. • We are missing a sense of continuity currently. • We need more variety of uses in our public spaces; more amenities. • Buildings need to be well-designed—European examples of patios that spill into and connect with streets. • "Use what you have" – enhance what is available. • Multi -functional spaces. • Games. • Safety is important – partes should be accessible at any time of day. • Provide shade. • Pockets of amenities threaded together (benches). • Accessible. • Highline is a great example of taking an underutilized space. • Toronto's example of reclaiming dead space (Underpass Park, the Brickworks) with art. 39 Page 124 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Ihlow should we adalpt other public spaces we Ihave? Group `fl • Close streets at certain times of day to provide additional public spaces. • Goudies Lane and Gaukel Street are great examples of public spaces being created. • Parking garages can provide spaces for views. • Each park/public space can serve different community needs (design and adapt to the demographics of DTK). Group 2 • Can we turn corners into greenspaces? • Make use of street space. • Take a street that can be closed for five years and keep it closed to cars. • Put play first and use spaces to create joy. • Interactive spaces outside. Group 3 • Reduce parking and provide more public spaces. • Close King Street. • Walking streets/pedestrian streets. • Invest in attributes to enhance spaces. • Use lanes for cultural zones. Group 4 • Joseph has such potential, but it is barren. • Opportunities along Duke to make it more welcoming to pedestrians. • How could we use the right-of-way sections of streets and sidewalks? • Car -free areas (even on specific days). • Range of experiences. • How can we utilize public spaces that are sitting empty? Music would be a great way to use these spaces. • Night market in an empty parking lot. • Transform dead industrial spaces with art. Based on our discussion today, Ihow would you sruiru•nimairiz.e the future of park spaces iiin downtown Kitchener in a siiirnglle statement? Group 1 • Key elements: o Variety/unique elements/ reasons to be there o Connecting thread between public spaces o Green and natural elements o Welcoming o Social o Places to relax and unwind o Year-round • Future park spaces in DTK will be intentionally designed to meet the variety of needs of community members by offering year-round, welcoming, and social greenspaces. 40 Page 125 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Group 2 • DTK has public spaces for people that connect us to community and nature and prioritize people over cars. Public spaces are defined and cared for by their neighbours and are connected as part of a public ecosystem. Public spaces are welcoming to all. Group 3 • Park spaces as the "High Street." Streets are public spaces; public spaces are parks. We want parks to be filled with diverse people and uses and bordered by diverse and complementary uses as a destination that can meet many needs. These spaces that are the living rooms of the city, support people, cultures, and activities of all types, free from cars. Parks are not just grass, trees, and trails — they are intentionally designed. Group 4 • Key elements: o Inclusive o Creative o Innovative o Accessible o Optimized • Creative and innovative public spaces that make the most of what we have are accessible, part of a connected network, people -focused, and animated by diverse, inclusive programming. Wiralp Up, and (Next Steps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. Two workshops will take place in January (January 10 and 24) and February (February 7 and 21). 41 Page 126 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuiniity WorIkIling Giroulp Meeting 6 Summary The sixth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on January 10, 2023, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 21 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Question and Answer Q: How much is housing development a factor in the success of a BIA and its businesses? A: More density will improve foot traffic, encourage business and services to open within walking distance of the future developments. Q: What is the attitude of businesses towards the King Street closure? A: Opinions are mixed, some like to see it activated, some have concerns with deliveries, and food delivery has become key for restaurants. Q: Don't laneways assist in the King Street closure issue? A: Some businesses don't have laneway access. Q: What ideas for improving the downtown have you learned from other BIAs you connect with? A: Making downtown an art destination. Q: Aside from people moving downtown, in the mind of the BIA, what would be the most important change that could be made? A: The BIA is moving into a consultation process with the Economic Development division in the City and we will be asking this question. Q: Part of the drive to remove encampments was from the BIA. Does the BIA contribute to the social issues happening downtown? A: Approximately seven or eight years ago, the BIA created the Discovery Team to help make DTK safe and welcoming for all. Recently, the BIA has taken a step back because the issues are too complex and should be handled by the City and Region. Q: What are rents like for businesses looking to locate DTK? A: The market rate is comparable. We spend a lot of time and money doing business attraction. Roundtable Discussions Culture, Stireet Il....iife and Events DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions on the topic of culture, street life, and events in DTK. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. What does a viibirant downtown culture look and feell like to you? (113uiillds off Ihomework question) Group 1 • Diverse food and experiences, including art and music that are appealing to all ages. • Authentic and connects with the history of the space. • Space allows for people to connect with each other, and those who live nearby. • Encourages community members to have experiences for themselves. Giroulp 2 • A layering of all the things that is culture. • Beautiful buildings and spaces; history is celebrated. • Allows for a mixture of institutions and human activity. • Has an identity where people see themselves in the space. 42 Page 127 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Group 3 • Builds on the neighbourhood feel of the surrounding areas and feels like a community. • The space should be safe, walkable and include places to sit. • Interesting art and installations that draw people, including festivals and events. Giroulp 4 • Diverse and inclusive space that is well lit and safe for everyone. • There is a vibrancy around the clock, especially on weekends. • Good quality business and restaurants, with multicultural food. • Has a vibrant arts and music scene, with local artists. Group a • Bright lighting which makes the space safe and accessible. • It is animated and activated. • Culturally diverse, lots of music and art. • A space for everyone, all ages and accessible. What does it take for downntown to The a cultural centre" What does that mean for s'tree't Ilife and events? Group '1 • Emphasis on what already exists and building connections, allowing it to grow naturally. • It takes concentrated energy and animation. • Intentional activity in all seasons. • Integration between business and street life, events. Giroulp • Needs to be a space where everyone feels welcome and is free to express themselves. • Has a sense of ownership and pride in the space. • Cultural activity that includes things to see, do, hear and eat. • A place where special events are the norm. Group 3 • There should be a bold vision and narrative for the space. • The space is artist -driven. • Intentional activity that is booked and scheduled. • Includes spaces to sit with shade. Group 4 • Celebrates all events and occasions, more than Canada Day. • The space should be interactive, walking tours are a great example. • Artists doing activations, making it a destination. • Murals will not fix everything; social media can be utilized more. • Free and accessible for everyone. Giroulp 5 • Need to define Kitchener identity more. • Fosters diversity. • A space that is accessible and easy. 43 Page 128 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • A mix of produced events and attractions that bring people together. In what ways could arts and culture be pir�odtiized Iby muniiciipall ities? Group 1 • Make it easier for festivals to be successful, road closures would help. • Make events a normal part of downtown life. • Grants, subsidies, incentives. Group 2 • Free studio space for artists. • Incubators and artist housing. • Invest in the Centre in the Square or cut it loose. • Community centre space with a daycare and classes for adults. Groulp • Great holistic thinking. • Building on the existing assets of the downtown. • Interconnectedness between physical spaces and the rest of the city. • Help in keeping costs affordable for artists. • Protection of artist space, utilizing spaces for play and music. Group 4 • Prioritize art submissions by non-dominant groups. • Elevate local musicians and artists. • More thoughtful events, intentional, better logistics. • Encourage diversity and accessibility. Group 5 • Leverage what the city already has. • Multi-purpose. • Reduce barriers to visiting businesses. • Use available space for public open spaces or parkettes. • It takes the buy -in of the community and local businesses. What words best describe the aims and culture scene" Group 1 • Fledgling. • Disconnected. • Better than perceived, lack of awareness. Group 2 • No responses received. Group 3 • Intermittent and under the radar. • Lack of cohesion. • Culturally rich, high quality. Group 4 • Quiet. 44 Page 129 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Lack of intention. • Enjoy the current market Saturdays. Group 5 • Pride in where you live and work. • Accessible. • Elimination of red tape to foster art installations. • Engaging and unique. lBased on our discussion today, Inflow would you surnirnariiz.e the future of the I[) FIK culture in a single statemeint2 Group 1 • Downtown Kitchener will be a destination for events, where culture is an authentic part of everyday life. Group 2 • Our city's living room. o A living room invites people in o DTK should feel like home o People can come and experience and participate o Ownership of creation Group 3 • Alive with a heartbeat of events; always something going on. Group 4 • 1 ntentional • Inclusive • Diverse • Quality • Local/homey • Accessible • Continuous flow Group 5 • Uniqueness creates the destination, vibrant and interactive. Wrap Up and INext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next meeting will take place on January 24, 2023. 45 Page 130 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuiniity Wodkiling Girouip Meeting 7 Suirnirnairy The seventh Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on January 24, 2023, from 4:30 to 7:00 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 19 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Growth and II Nousiiirng Activity The following input was collected during the activity as the group worked through two different considerations in a hands-on growth and housing activity: 1. Adding 18,000 units of housing to provide more housing choice. 2. Adding an additional 13,500 units to provide housing affordability. Consideration 1 Input following the first consideration included the following: • Important to have low-rise units to make it feel like a neighbourhood — to allow for a transition from existing lower density neighbourhoods to higher density development. • Want to see additional housing units near transit stations. • Want to see mid -rise units over the old police station and other business. • Add low-rise units to support the population of people experiencing homelessness, near to where they are staying now. • Use former industrial lands for housing. • Develop housing on the parking lot at Charles and Water Streets. • There is underutilized land near the square. Cons iidera[lo in 2 Input following the second consideration included the following: • Density can be a good thing if done in a mixed way. • This is a good visual reminder that density does not mean the entire city gets demolished; we can intensify but still retain our identity. • It is really amazing that we can add this much density and the city remains vibrant. • If there is this much density, there needs to be schools and other supports in place. • Need to include how traffic will work with and around this new growth. • The corridors can handle the density we need to add. Roundtable IDiiscussiioiris Growth and IHousiiing Following the activity, DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions on growth and housing in DTK. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. Wlhat Ilocahons are suitable for Ilow, medium or Ihigh density girowtlh? Why? Group 1 • It is important for all areas to have a mix of density and types of housing. • Density should be concentrated near the LRT line. • Medium and higher density areas need supports and amenities such as schools, shops, and parks. • All areas need to include green space. 46 Page 131 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Grroulp • Medium and high density should be concentrated along transit lines. • Important to examine opportunities for additional units in laneways, backyards etc. • Need to disperse density across the City of Kitchener and not just downtown. • Necessary to protect green space and build around it. Group 3 • Proximity to the LRT should determine the density. • Growth should occur in corridors such as Queen and Ottawa. • Have low and medium density as buffer areas for established neighbourhoods. • Use underutilized land like parking lots; avoid demolition for environmental reasons. • Important to protect green space. Group 4 • Limit sprawl of growth outside of the city. • Distribute the higher density, have transition zones, options for families. • Ensure higher density is livable i.e.: people, excitement, parks and green space. • Medium and high density along the corridors. I low would you organize and diistdbute iintens iifiication? Group 1 • Close to ION stations and other transit, across from hospital. • Creation of destinations near amenities. • Clustering in a way that makes sense. • Mixed use is important. Group 2 • Ensure that space is left for businesses, arts and culture. • Integrate the new construction into the existing fabric of the city. • Proximity to shops, restaurants and groceries. • Organize in an integrated fashion, services need to be present before density. Group 3 • Intensification near the transit routes. • Understand what is enticing people to move to Kitchener. • Mixed use is important. • We need to encourage the public's understanding of this topic. Group 4 • Organized alongside schools, parks, daycares and businesses. • Mixed use and distributed, not all in the same spot. • Development that works across socio-economic spectrum. • Growth should be across the city. I low important acre housing clhoiice and affordability to you and its this ireflected iiin this exercise? Group 1 • Diversity in housing choice and supply mix i.e.: deeply affordable units. • Rent control should be considered. 47 Page 132 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Variety of housing types is very important. • Expansion of housing types, not just single units. Croup 2 • Housing choice and affordability are incredibly important. • Supply is not enough to drive affordability. • City needs to look at other options to encourage affordability and housing type diversity. • Encourage people to move through the housing spectrum. Croup 3 • Variety of housing is very important, mix needs to include the missing middle. • Need to have more medium sized dwelling units. • Encouragement of co-op housing. • Density can be achieved without relying on high rises (i.e.: multigenerational housing). Group 4 • Encourage affordable housing across the city; this is currently lacking. • Choice of housing form is important, range of unit sizes. • City could incentivize missing housing types. • Important to destigmatize rental units. lBased on our discussion today, Ihow would you sumirnariiz.e the future of growth and housing lin downtown K11cheneir in a single statement? Croulp 1 • Intentionally planned neighbourhoods with a diversity of housing types and densities including affordable and accessible housing. Welcoming to everyone and a diversity of transportation types. Croup • Intentional, thoughtful, livable, diverse and unique. • Communities should feel unique and `not cookie cutter'. Group 3 • Well designed, intentional, integrated. • Livable, transit -oriented, mix of housing types. • Downtown Kitchener is well designed, intensified core neighbourhood, where housing is integrated with commercial retail, arts, culture and green space. Group 4 • Livable, variety, mixed income. • The future of growth and housing in DTK offers well thought out, livable housing, with a variety of choices and walkable amenities. Growth and II lousing Activity Input The group also provided input on the growth and housing activity, summarized below: • Low density foam blocks do not stay in place. • A delight to be in an optimistic attitude in the group — exciting to envision more buildings. ER Page 133 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Having the ability to make some of the housing unit pieces modular, so that they can be stacked. • Label more streets, trails and green spaces. • Show the rail lines more clearly. • Addition of transit terminals would be good. • The model shows that there is still a lot of white space — the city has not been erased even when we add the density. • Actively encourage participants to be creative and to dive into the exercise. Wiralp,...Up, and INext Steps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next meeting will take place on February 7, 2023. 49 Page 134 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuinii y Wodkiling Group Meeting ummary The eighth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on February 7, 2023, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. Ten of the 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. 15 iminute INeiighlbourlhoods Activity Working group members were encouraged to explore how downtown Kitchener aligns with the principles of a 15 -minute neighbourhood or community. Participants placed pieces of string, representing 750 metres, on the map to explore what is walkable throughout downtown and identify areas for better connection. The string length represents the average distance for a 15 - minute walk, based on the City of Kitchener data. The following input was collected during the activity as the group worked through the activity: • Important to increase the amount of mid -block crossings and connections. • It is currently challenging to walk to some of the downtown public schools safely and efficiently. • Victoria Street is one of the most challenging streets for pedestrians. • With the addition of density, neighbourhood connections need to be considered, particularly connections to schools and amenities. • Add amenities to the Mill Street area. The crossing to Cortland Street is challenging. • There is a lack of pedestrian connections to the downtown library. • There are no easy connections to the Via Rail Station. • Many streets in DTK are not safe for those with accessibility needs including: o Signage on pedestrian streets hangs down and poses a danger to hit pedestrians. o During construction, there are many hazards for pedestrians, and there need to be more protective barriers to construction obstacles. o Many streets are narrow and full of objects that can pose hazards to accessibility. For example, sandwich board signage, benches, and planters all use part of the walkable area on sidewalks. o There are curbs at intersections with gradual slopes into the intersection, but often there are drains or grates in the sidewalk that have little or no warning. Roundtable Discussions INeighbourhoods and the (Movement of Goods and 1::leolplle DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions on neighbourhoods and the movement of goods and people in DTK. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. What malkes a gireat neiiglhlbourlhood? What makes it complete? Group 1 • Includes third spaces (i.e., outside work and home where people can meet). • Has an anchor that roots the community, i.e., a library. • Includes accessible services and retail. • Includes lively spaces in and around homes, such as porches and lawns. • Has parking available for visitors, which can be used to slow traffic. • Has diverse community services and amenities. • Includes distribution of social housing and related services. • Has a strong transportation infrastructure. 50 Page 135 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Group • Vibrant community members and people. • Neighbourhood activities and programming such as Artwalk. • A central space for people to gather, such as a park. • Includes a variety of amenities (retail, restaurants, grocery). • Infrastructure should include wide sidewalks and boulevards to accommodate all users. • Includes thoughtful design for all needs and abilities. /hat bairriiers/clhalllleinges eAst that lliiirniit movement in and airound ID FK? I low could these The addressed? Group 1 • Snow clearing for local roads that is properly done includes bike lanes, transit stops and residential sidewalks. • Sidewalks and roads need better barriers to protect pedestrians. • A decrease in the turning radius for vehicles at intersections. • Monitoring and repairing catch basins which get flooded at crosswalks. Giroulp 2 • The current bike lane network lacks connectivity. • Lack of direct routes for pedestrians due to train tracks. • Main road speed limits are too high. • Speed limits should be reduced, introduce traffic calming measures, widen the boulevards and introduce protected mid -block crossings. • The Iron Horse Trail and Victoria intersection should have a signalized intersection. /that does a Ihealltlhy stireet Ilook lliillke in If.) FIK? (Consider accessibility, molbiilliity, different useirs„ clhiilldiren, seniors, business activity etc..).. Giroulp 1 • Has plenty of shade and shelter. • Sidewalks which are wide enough and free of obstructions. • Clear guidelines and grade separation for cyclists. • Increased continuity for pedestrian and cyclist networks. • Infrastructure, which is purpose-built for pedestrians and cyclists, not vehicles. Giroulp 2 • A healthy street has wide sidewalks, proper lighting, benches, shade and planters. • King Street is a great example of a pedestrian -friendly street. • Ontario Street could be designed more like King Street. • Need to consider accessibility, including urban braille and audible indicators. • Introduce mid -block connections and traffic calming. • Move away from vehicle -centric design and towards a more pedestrian focus. • Introduce designated times for different users. • Victoria Street will need to improve with the introduction of more transit stations. 51 Page 136 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary 11 -f its more pedestdan focused, what impact does that Ihave on the exiist'ung functions of downtown streets? Group 1 • DTK can be more pedestrian -focused without negatively impacting vehicle infrastructure. • Improved connections to parking and delivery spaces for businesses are accounted for. Group 2 • Delivery services and waste collection may be impacted. • Fewer people on the street may impact safety. • A balance needs to be struck between various needs. • The more pedestrian -focused and designed, the lesser the impact. (l aced on our discussion 'today, Ihow would you suir>nmairiize the future of irnolbiilliity in downtown Kiitcheneir in a single statement? Group 1 • Continuous and consistent transportation infrastructure that values pedestrians, cyclists and rollers as much as vehicles in terms of safety, accessibility and choice. Group 2 • The future of mobility in DTK is a thoughtfully considered, accessible, inclusive and dynamic transportation system that puts pedestrians first. Wiralp,...Up, and (Next Steps At the end of the meeting, Emily Summers from LURA Consulting introduced the DIY Facilitation Kit. A supplementary e-mail has been sent to all DCWG members. The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next DCWG meeting will be held on February 21, 2023. 52 Page 137 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Down -town Coirnirnuiniity WorIkIling Ciroulp Meeting #9 Summary The ninth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on February 21, 2023, from 4:30 to 6:30pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 14 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. IRouirndtalblle Discussions 13uslness IReflections Ahead of a panel presentation/discussion, working group members in breakout discussions regarding their shopping habits, patterns and desires. Discussions from each group are summarized below. IFRefllectiirng on the past four months, what businesses Ihave you firequented the most? Group 1 • Various restaurants for dining in • Bakeries • Cinema • Matter of Taste • Post Office • Drug Store • Bookstores • Vegan grocery store • Bank Group 2 • Various bars and restaurants • Dollarama • Kitchener Market and food court • Hasty Market • Vietnamese Sub • Mi Tienda Latina • Golden Heart Bakery • Portuguese Baker • Pharmacies • Bank • Marks Caribbean Kitchen IfRefllectiing on the past four irnontlhs, what types of businesses did you wish were downtown that you would Ihave visited? Group 1 • Kids clothing and gift store • Dog grooming • Instrument stores • Night life lounge • Chain pet store • Music venue • Dry Cleaners • Cinema • Arts and craft supplies 53 Page 138 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Gym Groulp • Home goods • Hardware store • Shoe store • Housewares • Furniture • Supermarket • Art Gallery • Clothing • Musical Instruments Based on the giroup"s input on questions 1 and 2, describe the ideal busiiness irnniix you'd lliillse to see I[.)owirntowirn iin tlhe next 10 yeairs„ Group `I • A mix of everyday essentials and niche items. • Stores which attract tourism and visitors. • A variety of price points. • A mix of independent and chain stores. Group 2 • A mix of offerings in each area. • Day to day needs mixed with niche destination shops. • Hybrid stores with online capacity. • Emphasis on culture, food, clubs, cafes and entertainment. • High quality retail. Panel [.11scussiion Three members of the DCWG (Linda Jutzi, Phong Tran, and Craig Beattie) participated in a business panel hosted by Cory Bluhm from the City of Kitchener. Following the discussion, working group members asked the following questions: Q: Is there interest from big businesses at the mall to move downtown? A: Not at this time. There is no incentive in terms of foot traffic to support such a move. Q: Why is the Distillery District in Toronto so popular? A: It is a unique enclave with popular restaurants and bars. Q: What success did the holiday season pop-up shops have in DTK? A: They were very popular; pop -ups help by avoiding the initial business cost start up. IRourndtalblle Discussions 13usiirness (Recovery and imagine Forward DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions regarding the path forward for downtown businesses. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. 54 Page 139 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary IReflecting on the pairnell's iiinsiiglhts, what are the Ikey challenges to irealliiziing youir ideal business irniix? ghat would you change? Group `fl • Necessary to have the right space for the businesses. • Need to have entrepreneurs to open the businesses. • Lack of a downtown reputation to attract outside businesses. • Lack of density to achieve foot traffic. • Ease of plazas and parking in suburban areas. • Perceptions of a lack of vibrancy. • Chains provide ease of shopping. • Financial burden of starting a business. Group 2 • Lack of foot traffic. • Downtown lacks critical mass. • Existing property owners who won't lease their space. Group 3 • Lack of foot traffic. • Lack of clarity about when/if offices will return. • Need to be able to walk to more destinations. • Rent and start-up costs are high. • Car dependence. /hat solutions could The considered to enable the type of dowintown busiiness irrniix your girou.ulp aspires to see as an immediate iresponse to the pandeirn"niicy and over the next 10 years? Giroulp 1 • Shared and hybrid spaces. • Business grants. • Grants and programs for small business owners. • Investment in tourism marketing for the downtown. • Downtown infrastructure and public realm improvements. Groulp • Need to have businesses with name recognition. • Need a good mix of businesses. • Need to make downtown an appealing destination. • Build brand loyalty for local business. • Rent reduction and small business grants. • Making it more pedestrian friendly and less reliant on vars. • Become a destination that needs street access and parking to accommodate. Giroulp 3 • Needs to feel good to go downtown, visually appealing. • Events to bring foot traffic, consistently. • Increase in density. • Restaurants and entertainment to draw people. 55 Page 140 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Investment from City and Region. • Business attraction and retention with BIA guidance. (Based on our discussion today, Ihnow would you summarize the ffuture of business downtown? (e..g..:: We imagine a dowrn'towirn business exlpenIeirnce that its .........................�"o achieve this, the downtown needs .................... Group 1 • Fun to browse. • Consistent. • Alluring public realm and store fronts. • Complete mix. • Pedestrian friendly Group 2 We imagine a downtown business experience that is: • Family focused. • Attractive. • Diverse. • Sufficient for basic needs. • Magical To achieve this, downtown needs: • Awareness that experience starts from the moment you leave the car/transit to within businesses. • City programming. • Walkable. • Colorful. Group 3 • We imagine a downtown experience that is interesting, safe, vibrant and inviting. To achieve this, the downtown needs landmarks, unique infrastructure, housing, and public investment. Wrap ...Up and INext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next DCWG meeting will be held on March 7, 2023. 56 Page 141 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of IKiitclheineir Downtown Coirnirnuiniity Worlkiling Giroulp Meeting 1 g Suirnirinairy The tenth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on March 7, 2023, from 4:30 to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 13 of the 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Staff Presentation and Question and Answer City of Kitchener staff introduced the topic of climate change and environmental leadership. Staff presented on Waterloo Region Climate Action, Green Development Standards and District Energy. The following summarizes a brief question and answer period. Q: Understanding that we are in a development boom, are buildings in the proposal phase being considered for green development standards? A: There are items that can be implemented during the design phase, such as allowances for district energy connection, without additional cost. Q: What can Green Development Standards include? A: This depends on which approach is taken. For example, the City of Toronto uses the planning application process, and looks at design standards related to energy and greenhouse gases. Q: Do the Green Development Standards include green roofs? A: Some cities do have this standard. We are not that far along yet but it will be considered. Q: Why is district energy being considered? A: District energy is more reliable, and redundancy is built into the system. Roundtable IDiiscussiioiris Climate (Issues and IErnviiroininn eintall I1....eadershiilp DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions on climate issues and environmental leadership in DTK. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. What irolle can I[)1f"K 1play to Ihelllp Waterloo [:=Zegiiorn address each aspect of clliiimate chairnge? �"rains portatiion Group 1 • The City of Kitchener should look at fleet emissions. • Encourage the use of public transit and build stronger transit connections. • Need to open roads to pedestrians, active transportation and all rollers. • Build stronger active transportation networks that connect to transit. • Introduce heated and covered transit stops. • Have buses run more frequently to encourage usage. • Municipal approval of e -scooters and micro mobility. • Need cyclist education, most effective with children. • Continuous and consistent infrastructure for all users. Grouip 2 • Downtown is a hub, needs to be connected to encourage different users. • Need for better cycling connections from downtown to the surrounding areas. • Commit to opening the roads for pedestrians, high quality pedestrian environment. • Cycling infrastructure should be more connected and consistent. 57 Page 142 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Increase urban forest coverage, which mitigates heat islands and enhances walkability. • Increase shade and trees in the right of way. • Want to see continuous sidewalk crossings. • Discourage personal trips to lessen congestion. • Increase the usability and ease of active transportation routes. • Prepare for maintenance changes with frost and thaw cycles. Buildings Giroulp 1 • Opportunity to utilize district energy to heat and cool transit hubs. • Introduce solar panels in public spaces. • Excited about the introduction of Green Development Standards. • Building up, not out, is part of our climate responsibility. Giroulp 2 • District energy and green building initiatives through site planning. • Green roofs. • Storm water management. • Wood construction. • Buildings are huge polluters; developers need to be pushed to change. • Energy usage during extremes means potential brown outs; plan for this. • Transition away from in house fossil fuel use. • Encourage sustainable construction materials. F:Iiroduuctiioirn, coins urn and waste Giroulp 1 • Introduction of a grading system which helps customers understand what is local on a restaurant's menu. • Want clear guidelines for recycling in residential buildings. • Support local good production process. • Encourage employment in local farms and food production. • BIA could play a role in advertising restaurants that use local food. Giroulp • Compost program for multi -unit dwellings. • Provide waste services for multi -unit dwellings. • Green roofs for local food production. • District energy to heat small greenhouses. • Re -purpose buildings slated for demolition, re -use building materials. • Introduce a demolition tax, to make it harder to demolish. • Textile recycling. • Encourage re -use, at events and festivals. • More recycling receptacles in public spaces. Wellllbeiiing and prosperity Giroulp 1 • How we address extreme weather (flooding, drainage) impacts people differently. .: Page 143 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • There is a connection between climate and accessibility. • Sidewalks need to be cleared more quickly, snow clearing policies are not equitable. • Need to push politicians for a change in priorities. Group 2 • Housing and supports. • More warming and cooling shelters. • Need to support people close to where they live. • Climate disproportionately impacts people. • Residential development in downtown Kitchener needs balance, to encourage walkability. • Open minded about uses of mixed-use buildings. (Based on our discussion today, Ihow would you suirn~nirnariize the futuire of climate leadership lin downtown Kitchener lin a single staternernt2 Group 1 • Push for policies on district energy and green development standards. • Continuous and connected active transportation and pedestrian focused spaces. • Encouragement of walkability. • Frontier of progress. • Build a better future for our children. Group 2 • Practical interventions that support hyper -local activities, that are sustainable, with a focus on human comfort. Make it easy to make climate friendly choices. Wralp Up, and INext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next DCWG meeting will be held on March 21, 2023. 59 Page 144 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Coirnirnuiniity Wodkiling Group Meeting 11 Suirnirnairy The eleventh Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on March 21, 2023, from 4:30 to 6:30pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 14 of 29 members were in attendance. Discussions at the meeting are summarized below. Staff Presentation QUestiion and Answer At the outset of the meeting, Gloria MacNeil, Director, Bylaw Enforcement, City of Kitchener presented on bylaw enforcement in the city. Following the presentation, working group members asked the following questions: Q: Understanding that your department has implemented a new approach to bylaw enforcement, have you received any input from those you have interacted with? A: The input has been positive. It is very important for our department to communicate proactively, and not just respond to issues when they arise. Q: With many new condos being developed downtown, are you anticipating any changes to enforcement requests? A: When people move downtown, they are not always aware of the noise levels, or street festivals. We will outreach to condo boards ahead of time to communicate what they might experience and how we can support them. Q: Which environmental issues does bylaw interact with? A: We implemented a no idling bylaw. Further, we now have a new position for staff to consider other environmental aspects of the city. Q: How does bylaw prioritize calls/complaints? A: Safety issues always take priority, and after that it is complaint based. We aim to respond initially within 48 hours. Q: How do you integrate an equity perspective into the complaint -based system? A: Council policy allows for our discretion. If we see a specific population or area of the city being reported without adequate justification, we can disregard the call. Q: What is the process for zoning violations? A: We work with the planning department closely on these issues. We will meet with people to discuss how they apply for a variance or bring the issue into compliance. Q: What is the highest number of complaints you receive? What poses the biggest risk? A: The highest number of calls is about parking, and people not paying for parking. The biggest risk is unsecure, empty buildings. Page 145 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Roundtable IDiiscussiIoiris Safety and Security DCWG members were asked to engage in small roundtable discussions regarding safety and security in downtown Kitchener. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. What contrdbutes to a safe, viibiraint and Ilhealltllhy downtown? Group 1 • Everyone has their needs met. • A lively street means a safe street. • Feelings of belonging. • A variety of passive spaces. • Lights, people and spaces for people to gather. • People taking ownership over their space. Group 2 • People looking out for each other, helping each other, and being king. • Having people around and eyes on the street leads to feelings of safety. • Well -lit spaces. • Compassionate approaches to enforcement. • Financial investment in solutions. • Outreach is important, and needs community services that support marginalized populations. • Outreach through mobile vehicles, nursing staff, etc. What support do you thiiinik vulnerable communities need downtown" Group 1 • Supportive and appropriate housing for everyone. • Community space for vulnerable groups. • Mobile community health care. • Support for sex workers. • Support for the queer community. • Safe consumption and supply sites. • Mental health support. Giroup 2 • Funded resources and outreach into the community. • Connect people with the existing services they need. • One-on-one support and human interaction. • Personalized, holistic support addressing upstream issues. • Supporting specific people with their specific needs. • Mobile supports. I low can we irnnalke everyone responsible for safety and well beiiirng lin I[) t..IK? Group 1 • Deconstruct the enforcement process. • The system is intrinsically biased towards those with power and privilege. • Encourage humanity. • Conflict resolution over enforcement. 61 Page 146 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Group 2 • BIA is often asked to focus on safety but has no jurisdiction in this space (in the past they ran the Discovery Team). • In some circumstances, people may not request bylaw enforcement if they are worried about unintended consequences (e.g., reporting a rooming house and the impacts enforcement may have on tenants). • Need a human -centred approach and thought to how bylaws impact people when they are enforced. • Use technology to increase the efficiency of enforcement. Ihtow can safety, empathy, and application of bylaws corntriibute to an inclusive and accepting I[) �"IK community? Group 1 • Build relationships with neighbours. • Social events that invite people to gather. • Creation of community spaces for informal events. • People taking ownership over their communities. Group 2 • More awareness and presence of existing supports so people know who to reach out to when needed. • Signage for reporting and calling issues and concerns. • Build relationships and reduce barriers. • The concept of adaptation and mitigation applies here too. For example, do we want to expend resources to adapt and respond to an issue, or resources to mitigate and prevent an issue? Based on our discussion today, Ihow would you surnrnarize the future of sa'fe'ty and security iiirn downtown IKiitclheirneir in a single stateirn"nernt? Group 1 The safest downtown is the liveliest, where people feel like they belong and are welcome. Where people feel empowered to claim space for themselves, as if it were their own living room. Group 2 • Make wise investments to find solutions. • If you have a downtown that people want to come to, you have a safe downtown. • Human -centered enforcement; not punitive. Wralp....UIp and INext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next DCWG meeting will be held on May 2, 2023. 62 Page 147 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener staff and members of the Consulting Team met with downtown Kitchener service provider agencies on March 1, 2023, at the Downtown Community Centre. Present were representatives from Peregrine Outreach Waterloo Region, Sanguen Health Centre, St. Mary's Church, and The Working Centre. The purpose of the workshop was to: • Introduce the DTK vision and principles project; • Listen to the experiences of service providers in Downtown Kitchener; • Understand the needs and risk factors of clients in Downtown Kitchener; • Discuss a future, inclusive Downtown Kitchener; and, • Develop draft vision statements for Downtown Kitchener. Darren Beck, City of Kitchener, provided an overview of the DTK vision and principles project. LURA Consulting led a round table discussion with attendees. The summary below provides key themes and input from the participants. Current needs of clients you sulplpoirt iiin the ID1FIK • The main need is for housing, and specifically geared to income housing. There is a lack of appropriate and affordable housing available. • When people are housed, and basic needs are met, individuals can focus on other aspects. Their choices and decisions for themselves (e.g., employment, family, health etc.) are different. • Guaranteed income would support the need for housing and alleviate stress for individuals. • Mental health support. Many individuals need support and avenues to seek support that are non -police led. There needs to upstream support for basic needs, that support mental wellbeing. There is a need for de-escalation training and approaches as well as healthcare outside of hospitals and systems which many people are fearful of. • Non -police trained mental health crisis intervention that is available for the public to call for assistance. A mobile bus would be a way to put this into action. • There is a need to create connections between people. Individuals need to feel valued, belonging, and build relationships. • Space needs to be created for the sharing of stories and experiences. • Active community building is necessary to address this risk. • Front line workers are not being adequately supported, which burdens the organization and the individuals they are serving. Training and support should be provided to front- line workers. • Community members, including clients of service providers, fear moving around the community, staying in shelters, finding a warm place or seeking help. • Basic needs such as housing, healthcare and employment need to be met to ensure that all individuals are taken care of and that no one is left behind. • Employment needs to allow for alternative hours to be inclusive. 63 Page 148 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary A future IIS FIK that its supportive iis...... • Understands and recognizes our history, stories, positive and negative approaches so we can continue to learn and evolve • Centered on humanity and empathy. • Breaks down barriers and silos. • Works together to build a strong and inclusive community. • Includes supportive housing for every individual who needs it. • Policy that supports building housing for all. • Introduces the inclusionary zoning policy at the municipal level. • Introduces creative solutions (e.g., porch light counselling). • Creates safe spaces that are available during crisis (e.g., pandemic when shelters are overcrowded). • Accessible. • Responsive to individual needs, focused on empathy. • Acknowledges the good work that has been done and achievements • Well -funded to supports positive wellbeing outcomes An inclusive and safe ID 1FIK iincllu,udes...... • Trained and supported front line and outreach workers, including trauma informed approaches. • Solutions like the mobile bus that bring mental health support to communities in need. • Welcoming and safe community spaces and centres. • Right sized housing. • Continued conversations around community and connection, sharing of stones. • Support or inclusionary zoning. • Creative solutions to arrive at best outcomes. • Encouraging neighbours taking care of each other, building towards a neighbourhood communities. • Policies and advocacy for funding. Vision and IFliriinciilplles At the conclusion of the meeting, attendees were asked to consider core elements of a safe and equitable downtown Kitchener. Responses are provided below. • We are a neighbourhood of communities. • We are a strong community. • Act as good neighbours, take care of ourselves and each other. • This is a together problem. • Accessible and empathetic. • Service providers are funded, trained and supported. • Committed to doing better every year. 64 Page 149 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary l Aniishnalbeg Outreach I eefing Summary City of Kitchener staff and members of the LURA Consulting Team met with Stephen Jackson and Caitlyn McComb of Anishnabeg Outreach on March 21, 2023. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles project to Anishnabeg Outreach and listen to their input and perspectives. Ir.1scussiion The notes below provide a record of input received from Anishnabeg Outreach. Design delivers outcomes. Indigenous people do not trust and will not use colonial solutions. Fostering trust is key. o Build trust through design, function, and form (e.g., use of natural materials). o Create safe spaces through partnerships with Indigenous organizations and use their brand (as opposed to City branding). Reconciliation is misunderstood by many and defined as justice and healing. o However, justice alone will never lead to healing, and instead only offers just enough compromise to move people forward. o Justice was incorporated by the federal government to define compensation. However, people will not properly heal and will focus on what has been lost. o Truth and Reconciliation action items are checkboxes that will not lead to proper healing, and the focus needs to be on healing outcomes. o Reconciliation can be defined by three pillars: ■ Rebuilding language, culture, community, belonging, and family. ■ Offer pathways to engage and train in Reconciliation (i.e., train people in how to embrace the Indigenous talent pool and provide employment opportunities). Raise awareness on matters related to Reconciliation. The City has a platform on which it can do this. o Solutions to issues need to look at the root cause of an issue and address that, and people need to be healed (and trauma addressed) to address a root issue. Highlights of Anishnabeg Outreach's locations and programs include: o A Reconciliation Garden in Breslau that provides land-based healing opportunities and a place for people to learn about Reconciliation. o The Spirit Bundle program, which distributed approximately $1,000,000 in goods (primarily food and clothing) in 2022. o An online repository of knowledge and history, including language and artefacts, that will ultimately be used to inform future STEM curriculums and achieve broad awareness. o Online tools and resources to provide people access to mental health care and healing opportunities. o Have the ability to help people develop life skills, provide opportunities for self - healing, provide opportunities to train and upskill, train organizations on accepting people. o EarlyON centre. o Pollinator gardens, food gardens, medicinal gardens. 65 Page 150 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary The City can help through: o Funding. o Building safe spaces (not done for, but with, Indigenous people). o Raising awareness of Reconciliation (Reconciliation walks, Grandfather Teachings, plaques/QR codes, etc.) in partnership with trusted Indigenous organizations. Page 151 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary Flhe IHealliing of the Severn Geneiraflons and Grow Shilelld I1....o ge IMee-filing Summary City of Kitchener staff and members of the LURA Consulting Team met with Donna Dubie of The Healing of the Seven Generations and Clarence Cachagee of Crow Shield Lodge on March 24, 2023. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles project to The Healing of the Seven Generations and listen to their input and perspectives. Discussion The notes below provide a record of input received from The Healing of the Seven Generations and Crow Shield Lodge. • Crow Shield Lodge focuses on the four pillars of healing, education, land stewardship, and reconciliation. o There is a need in the community for a healing lodge, and Crow Shield Lodge needs land (donated or through a $1 sale) to make this happen. A commitment to help with land could be a step towards reconciliation. • What does reconciliation with the City look like? Currently there is no relationship with the City and The Healing of the Seven Generations (which has been doing work in the community for 22 years). o Work needs to be done by the City to build relationships and advance reconciliation. ■ For example, Toronto has the Medicine Wheel at City Hall. ■ Orange -wrapped transit vehicles (bus, ION, etc.) ■ Community needs to feel any reconciliation efforts from the City are acceptable to them. • There is a need for funding for Indigenous organizations. o Need to make investments for the original people of this land. o The Indigenous community is the fastest growing, and the needs of the community need to be met. • The Healing of the Seven Generations serves approximately 10,000 people per year. • There is a need for accessible and safe spaces for Indigenous people to do ceremonies. o Welcoming o Designed by Indigenous people o Feature a fire pit, moving water, covering, medicine gardens. • Need to learn from our past to chart the best path forward. o Colonialism is ingrained. o Talk about past mistakes and move forward as equals. o Indigenous people need a spot at the decision-making table and need voices present. o It is about people, community, and belonging — need a commitment and accountability to do the right thing. Working to advance the wellbeing of future generations and making it easier for them. o Making heart -based decisions for the next generations. o By the seventh generation from now, it is the intention that people will be healed, and the organization will no longer need to exist. o A lot of people do not have the strength to advocate, and the organization advocates on their behalf. 67 Page 152 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary • Issues such as climate change, clean water, and clean air urgently need to be addressed. • Homelessness is a problem that needs to be addressed. o Locations for housing need to be near support services that are required. Page 153 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary IIpp iir iii IID .......... Pop ullps Suilmilmailry Between February and March 2023, the City of Kitchener hosted five pop-up engagements in downtown Kitchener to share information and gather input about the Downtown Kitchener (DTK) Vision and Principles project. The purpose of the in-person pop-up engagement was to: • Introduce the project to the public. • Gather input to inform the development of the DTK vision. • Spread excitement about the project within the City of Kitchener. • Direct participants to the project webpage and the City's online engagement platform to learn more about the project, register for the contact list and learn about future engagement opportunities. During the pop-up engagements, participants were presented with two project boards. The first board was a downtown Kitchener vision board, which invited community members to identify key priorities in the evolution of the downtown. The second board was a map of downtown Kitchener which provided context for the project and allowed community members to pinpoint specific areas of interest or concern. In addition, the pop-up had a children's colouring sheet, allowing young children to draw their ideas for the future of DTK. In total, 1,615 community members were engaged in the pop-up engagements. The following table summarizes the level of participation at each pop-up engagement. Location Date Participants Kitchener Market February 24, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 595 Carl Zehr Square February 25, 2023, 4:00 pm - 6:00 pm 66 Kitchener Market March 18, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 515 Carl Zehr Square March 18, 2023, 3:00 pm - 6:00 pm 14 Kitchener Market March 25, 2023, 8:30 am - 2:30 pm 425 Total 1,615 Page 154 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary IKey Pheirnes At the outset of the process, the DCWG established seven key themes/focus areas to examine and contextualize the conditions in the downtown area. These themes served as the context for broader community engagement. The input received during the pop-up engagements has been organized under the seven themes below. Public Spaces and Parks Community members were adamant about the need for more green space. Public space was highlighted as necessary for community wellbeing, both for individuals and the collective. It was noted numerous times that public spaces, especially parks, allow community members to socialize, run events and spend time with their families and pets. Community members would like the spaces to be accessible by public transportation and cycling. Culture, (Events and Stireet I1....iife Community members would like to see greater investment in downtown activation by having more festivals and events. Many community members noted the multicultural festival as an example of a well-done and fun event. Community members would like to see the recognition of downtown's history and architecture, which would contribute to the downtown culture. A few community members expressed the need for Indigenous placemaking. Specific mention was made about the need for more restaurants and bars and street patios. Overall, community members were generally positive about wanting to attend and contribute to a brighter and more vibrant downtown culture and street life. Growth and II Nousiirng Community members engaged in the pop-up activities had varying opinions on downtown Kitchener's growth and housing. Many community members would like to see more housing added downtown, especially along the LRT. Specific comments around the relationship between more housing/more people, and a more vibrant downtown were often made. Community members would like to see affordable housing being built, including more housing for larger households and a growth of missing middle housing forms. It was noted that there is a lack of supportive housing and that the unhoused crisis needs to be addressed immediately. Some community members expressed concern about downtown growth, with worries around existing resources and green spaces being inadequate. Neiiglhlbouirlhoods and the (Movement of People and Goods When discussing neighbourhoods and movement, many community members discussed an opportunity for greater connectivity between public transportation and active transportation routes. Many community members would like to see an improved bus system, and safe bicycle lanes. It was noted that transit stops are not accessible year-round, as they are not cleared of snow. For many, this makes using public transportation impossible. Community members also spoke about wanting to see traffic slowed down, and King Street closed to pedestrians. 13uslness Recovery and Ilirnagiiirne Forward Community members are excited to see a more vibrant downtown, including restaurants and businesses. Community members would like to spend the day downtown, eating and shopping and enjoying events. It is widely recognized that downtown continues to recover from the impacts of the pandemic. Numerous community members noted the need for a grocery store 70 Page 155 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary that is within walking distance of downtown. Community members were generally in favour of mixed-use buildings, with retail on the ground level and housing above. Climate Change and IEiriviironmen tall II....eadeirslhiilp Community members spoke about wanting the City to implement green building standards for the downtown. With a lot of growth happening downtown, community members would like to see them using sustainable building materials, green roofs and energy efficient heating and cooling systems. Across the city, community members would like to see an investment in urban forestry and tree canopy. IMSPEZINEM Due to the lack of foot traffic downtown, especially in the evenings, many community members have concerns about safety and security. It was noted that many downtown buildings look abandoned, which contributes to the concern. Community members made suggestions for a non -police model of community intervention, including training downtown businesses in de- escalation. Specific mention was made about improving street lighting and installing emergency buttons. Many community members would also like to see those who are currently unhoused receive assistance, including mental health support. Overall, community members believe safety, equity and inclusion should be priorities for the City. 71 Page 156 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase One Engagement Summary City of Kitchener staff and LURA Consulting held a workshop on April 17, 2023, with the members of the City Council. All ten Councillors and the Mayor were in attendance. The workshop recapped highlights of the broad community engagement findings for members of Council, and asked them to reflect on their vision for Downtown Kitchener. Vision At the outset of the workshop, LURA Consulting invited the Mayor and Council to share what words they would like to use to describe the future of downtown Kitchener. This input was collected using an online tool called Mentimeter. Below is the word cloud displaying the results of this exercise. Following the Mentimeter activity, members of Council shared the following thoughts: • Many of these words are already part of the work we are doing or aiming for. Council is aiming for a lively and active downtown — a vibrant place to live. • The words are aspirational and represent what we see when we are out in the community. • The words are connected and overlapping. • There is a desire for everyone who lives downtown to be able to walk to amenities. • It is important that the downtown vision continues to be meaningful for people who live in the suburbs. We want to ensure that the voices of people in the suburbs are represented and engaged in this process. • Regarding the word safe in the public responses — would like to assume that it is more about the perception of safety than reality. • The word safe is likely connected to the unhoused community who need our support. • There may be a formula for building a vibrant downtown. It would be great to see the AUD move downtown. • Foot traffic downtown builds vibrancy; we need more people downtown. • Need to be thinking long-term about this work and the connected policies. • We are blessed with green space in our community. • Many of the words are interconnected and overlap with each other. • Want a joyful experience downtown for everyone — vibrant, with amenities, sustainable, friendly, engaging. 72 Page 157 of 668 � "-'d ";t,, ,t� of I f I c;i "'Hdly entertaflnment' hUb a k actK e �"°Mhesse �o- 0 v brant 7113 ✓ f4 1 r 20 w6cornhg Following the Mentimeter activity, members of Council shared the following thoughts: • Many of these words are already part of the work we are doing or aiming for. Council is aiming for a lively and active downtown — a vibrant place to live. • The words are aspirational and represent what we see when we are out in the community. • The words are connected and overlapping. • There is a desire for everyone who lives downtown to be able to walk to amenities. • It is important that the downtown vision continues to be meaningful for people who live in the suburbs. We want to ensure that the voices of people in the suburbs are represented and engaged in this process. • Regarding the word safe in the public responses — would like to assume that it is more about the perception of safety than reality. • The word safe is likely connected to the unhoused community who need our support. • There may be a formula for building a vibrant downtown. It would be great to see the AUD move downtown. • Foot traffic downtown builds vibrancy; we need more people downtown. • Need to be thinking long-term about this work and the connected policies. • We are blessed with green space in our community. • Many of the words are interconnected and overlap with each other. • Want a joyful experience downtown for everyone — vibrant, with amenities, sustainable, friendly, engaging. 72 Page 157 of 668 Prepared for: The City of Kitchener Prepared by: LURA Consulting Page 158 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Contents ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Project Background................................................................................................... 3 Section2: What We Heard......................................................................................................... 4 Section 3: Who We Heard From................................................................................................ 6 Section 4: Engagement and Communications Process.............................................................. 8 Section5: Next Steps................................................................................................................. 9 Appendix A — Downtown Community Working Group Meeting Summaries...............................10 AppendixB — Pop-up Summary ................................................................................................19 Appendix C — Downtown Action and Advisory Committee Meeting Summary ...........................22 Appendix D — Council Meeting Summary ..................................................................................24 Page 159 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Executive ilii iir The City of Kitchener is undergoing a process to develop a comprehensive vision and set of guiding principles for Downtown Kitchener, which is at a critical point in its evolution and growth. A Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) is guiding the development of the vision and principles, with support from City staff and LURA Consulting (a community engagement consultancy). The DCWG includes members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives. The work of the DCWG is at a high level, and the resulting vision and principles will inform new and ongoing City initiatives. These current and future initiatives may include land use and zoning framework for the Major Transit Station areas, Civic District Master Plan, District Energy, Bramm Yards Master Plan, Arts and Culture Strategy, Inclusionary Zoning, Places and Spaces, City -owned Lands plan and a new or updated Official Plan. The process included two engagement phases. In Phase One, the DCWG shaped and assisted in delivering a fulsome community engagement process to gather input from over 2,600 individuals on their hopes and aspirations for Downtown Kitchener. The DCWG then used input collected in Phase One to draft a vision and set of guiding principles. Phase Two of engagement focused on presenting the draft vision and principles to the community for feedback between June and August 2023. This report summarizes input received during Phase Two of this project. IKey Findings Key messages that emerged throughout the engagement process are listed below in no specific order. • A human -centric lens is the correct approach to revitalizing downtown. • Improved access to affordable housing is integral to the success of downtown. • Access to clean and safe green space is a priority for most community members. • Connections to downtown and within downtown, must be safe, affordable, and accessible. • The vision and principles should be unique to downtown Kitchener. Engagement (Process The figure below summarizes efforts to engage the DCWG, interested parties, and members of the public in this process. This engagement reflects efforts to gather input on the draft vision and principles, which were prepared based on input received in Phase One (June 2022 to March 2023) where over 2,600 individuals provided their input. A total of 332 individuals provided input throughout Phase Two from May to August 2023. Page 160 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary G 242 0 30 members ® participants am 1 Community7 2 Downtown��w 11 Pop-up Community participants Working Group participants Meetings 1 Downtown 1 Council Action and Meeting Advisory Committee Meeting 41 278 3,002 ©' n;� •,. Project Project Webpage Participants in Webpage Views Views on Online Survey on Kitchener.ca Engagewr.ca Figure 9 E-ngogement & Promotion Statistics INext Stelps The input received in Phase Two of engagement will be used by the DCWG to assist them in developing a final vision and series of principles for Downtown Kitchener. It is anticipated that these will be presented to Council for a decision in Fall 2023. 2 Page 161 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary The City of Kitchener's downtown has experienced tremendous change over the past 20 years. Over this time, the city has also undertaken considerable work in the form of investments, plans, and policies focused on the downtown. The downtown now hosts the ION LRT, post -secondary institutions, a significant knowledge economy and tech hubs, and ongoing residential development. Downtown Kitchener is known for its mix of innovation, entrepreneurship, academics, and diversity of spaces, services, restaurants, and events. The City of Kitchener has led this evolution in partnership with the private sector, the business community, community groups and organizations, developers, and community members. Downtown Kitchener is seeing tremendous growth but must confront housing affordability, climate change, and equity challenges. The community established a vision and principles for downtown Kitchener in 2003, and the time has come to develop a new collective vision. As such, the City of Kitchener is undergoing a process to develop a comprehensive vision and set of guiding principles for Downtown Kitchener. The city will be undertaking considerable work related to the downtown over the next several decades. This work must be founded on a forward -thinking, progressive, and consensus -built vision and principles. The vision and principles establish the direction for City initiatives in equity, experience, growth, and sustainability. These current and future initiatives may include land use and zoning framework for the Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), Civic District Master Plan, District Energy, Bramm Yards Master Plan, Arts and Culture Strategy, Inclusionary Zoning, Places and Spaces, City -owned Lands Plan and a new or updated Official Plan. Engagement Objectives A Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) is guiding the development of the vision and principles, supported by City staff and LURA Consulting (a community engagement consultancy). The DCWG includes downtown and broader Kitchener community members, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives. The process includes two engagement phases. In Phase One, the DCWG shaped and assisted in delivering a fulsome community engagement process to gather input on the vision and guiding principles. Over 2,600 individuals provided input during Phase One. During Phase Two of the project, the DCWG used input collected in Phase One to draft a vision and set of guiding principles. The draft vision and principles were presented to the community for feedback between June and August 2023 as part of Phase Two engagement through: • Two DCWG meetings • One community pop-up • One meeting with the Downtown Action and Advisory Committee • An online survey • One meeting with Council through the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee Summaries of each of these conversations can be found in the Appendices. 3 Page 162 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Section 2: What We Heard Vision Feedback The draft vision for Downtown Kitchener was presented as follows for feedback: Downtown Kitchener is the inclusive, dynamic and energetic heart of the city. Together our community can thrive through vibrancy, connection and belonging. Key themes emerging from the feedback on the vision included: • The vision statement resonated with community members and how they view the future of downtown Kitchener. • Some felt the statement could be applied to a number of cities, and it was suggested that the vision statement could be more bold, ambitious and distinctive. • Community members related to the themes of connection and belonging moreso than vibrancy. • It was suggested that sustainability and/or resiliency should be added. Innovation was also suggested. • Potentially missing an aspect of the downtown belonging to the entire city. • The vision could be improved by being less abstract. Vibrancy, connection and belonging mean different things to different people. • Community members wanted to see equity and inclusion as a stronger element of the vision. Vibrancy IPiriinciiplle Feedback The draft vibrancy principle was presented as follows for feedback: The DTK community is vibrant. As our city's economic and employment hub, our streets bustle with entrepreneurs' unique shops, restaurants and experiences to explore. World-class cultural institutions, a burgeoning arts scene, unique places, and a diversity of lively festivals define our downtown's identity. Key themes emerging from the feedback on the vibrancy principle included: • The principle generally resonated with people. • There is space in this principle for a more Kitchener -specific example and to focus more on small businesses. • Some felt that the word vibrancy is overused and to consider a more descriptive word instead. • The focus on arts and culture resonates with the community, and recreation would be a good addition. • Could make mention of internally renowned employment and education centres. Acknowledge the great places and institutions where people work and go to school in the downtown. • Would like to see innovation reflected in this principle. • It is important that all word choices can be understood by everyone. • Considering replacing `burgeoning' with `flourishing'. 0 Page 163 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Improved walkability, as well as reliable and affordable transportation. Designate pedestrian only spaces. • Encourage and support restaurants to have inviting patios. • Provide support to the unhoused community. • To encourage vibrancy, downtown should welcome and attract tourists and visitors. • Support local artists and businesses by providing grants, closing streets for events and increasing art installations. • Cleaning up the existing green space and adding more parkland. • Ongoing events and festivals in the downtown. • Focus on being a hub for tech companies. • Recruit businesses to the downtown to get people into office spaces. Connection IPiriinciilplle Feedback The draft connection principle was presented as follows for feedback: The DTK community builds meaningful connections. Diverse residents come together through a shared network of dynamic public places and community spaces. Our downtown prioritizes pedestrians while providing a full range of safe and accessible transportation choices within and beyond the core. Key themes emerging from the feedback on the connection principle included: • The theme of connection resonates with many community members, especially the idea of downtown as a destination. • The principle could make explicit mention of public green spaces. • Community members would like to see improved emphasis on accessibility for all. • The interpersonal connection could be highlighted more. • Consider saying people instead of residents, as the downtown is also for visitors, people coming to work, business owners, etc. • There is room for this principle to be more Kitchener -specific. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Improved safety for pedestrians, including traffic management. • Strengthen cycling and pedestrian connections throughout the city. • Continued conversations between the public and city staff regarding city planning. • Explore potential road closures for pedestrian -focused events. • Improved access to safe and clean public green spaces. • Explore opportunities for further green spaces, such as parkettes. Ilellongiing IPiriinciiplle Feedback The draft belonging principle was presented as follows for feedback: The DTK community is a place where everyone belongs. Thoughtful planning, sustainability and exceptional design weave new growth into the history of DTK, where complete neighbourhoods offer diverse housing forms for people at all stages of life. Our collective decisions center on 5 Page 164 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary inclusivity and empathy to build a welcoming, equitable and accessible downtown where everyone can thrive. Key themes emerging from the feedback on the belonging principle included: • The idea of belonging resonates with many community members, and this principle was generally supported. • People from all walks of life should be able to live and work in downtown Kitchener. • Housing affordability is a central aspect of belonging. • Sustainability could be emphasized more. • The principle could make mention of caring. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Examine and alter existing zoning to allow for more diverse housing, including rent geared to income units. • Lower barriers for newcomers and low-income individuals to participate in city events, recreation, etc. • Ensure public transportation is accessible to all ages by adding benches at all bus stops. • Address community safety from a human -centric perspective. • Provide wellbeing support for all members of our community. eneirall Feedback Overarching feedback related to the vision and principles in general included: • Overall, the vision and principles resonate with community members. • Kitchener -specific language throughout would improve the relatability of the statements. Put the focus on reaching the downtown's potential. • Improved access to clean and safe green space is a priority. • Supporting the entire community, including those who are unhoused, lifts downtown Kitchener as a whole. • Downtown Kitchener should be a place that invites tourists and visitors. • Additional greenspace and climate resiliency are fundamental to the sustainability of downtown. • Community members look forward to seeing the actions that are associated with the vision. Sectilloin ,: Who We Heard IFir Ilam Survey participants were asked to complete several demographic questions (optional). Responses are summarized below. It should be noted that the 242 pop-up participants 0 Page 165 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary represented a wide range of community members in Kitchener, however demographic data was not collected at this event. Age IRaing The figure below shows the age range of survey respondents. 18 to 29 years old 30 to 39 years old 40 to 49 years old 50 to 59 years old 60 to 64 years old 65 years old and above What is your age? 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 18 to 29 years old 11111111 30 to 39 years old 11111111111 40 to 49 years old 11111111111 50 to 59 years old 111111111111 60 to 64 years old IN 165 years old and above Figure 2: Survey Respondent Age (n:::::40) Groups The figure below shows if respondents identify themselves in the following groups. Do you identify as a member of any of the following groups? Person with a disability Member of a racialized group Immigrant or Refugee 2LGBTQ+ First Nations, Inuit or Metis None of the above Prefer not to answer Figure 3: Survey Respondent Grocers (n:::::40) Person with a disability IIIIIIII Member of a racialized group IIIIIIIIII Immigrant or Refugee IIIIIIIIII 2LGBTQ+ IIIIIIIIIII First Nations, Inuit or Metis 24 IN None of the above El Prefer not to answer 7 Page 166 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Gender The figure below shows the gender identity of survey respondents. Which of the following best describes your gender? 0 5 10 15 20 25 Woman a n IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII���O/////////////O//O//O//O//O/�O///O////////////////////////////////%///S 16 22 Woman Gender Fluid / Gender Queer 0 Non -Binary SIU 1 11111111 Man Trans Woman 0 Trans Man 0 1111111111 Gender Fluid / Gender Two -Spirit 0 Queer I do not identify with a gender 0 1 Prefer not to answer I, 2 A gender not listed above (please... 0 Figure 4: Survey Respondent Gender (n:::::40) 11....oca- IIoIIn The top three occurring postal codes among survey participants were: 1. N2G (16) 2. N2H (9) 3. N2M (5) Section ,Engagement aind CornirnuinlicatilloinsProcess Phase Two included a variety of engagement methods to seek broad input, described below. IDown-town C oirnirnuirillty Workling Group A community selection committee selected a Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) through an application process in May/June 2022. The DCWG is guiding and developing the DTK vision and principles process with the support of City staff and LURA Consulting. Thirty (30) individuals comprise the DCWG, including members of the downtown and broader Kitchener community, each bringing unique and diverse perspectives to the process. The DCWG met eleven times during the first phase of the community visioning process, and two times during the second phase of engagement. Meeting summaries for their two Phase Two meetings are available in Appendix A. C o irn irn u n ll ty IPelp,...0 1p The City of Kitchener held one community pop-up to gather input on the draft vision and principles. The pop-up was held at the Gaukel Block Launch Party on June 17, 2023. A total of 242 people spoke with project representatives at the event. A summary of feedback received is available in Appendix B. 0 Page 167 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Il owntowin Action and Advisory Coinnirnlittee Meeting City of Kitchener staff shared the draft vision and principles with the Downtown Action and Advisory Committee at their June 22, 2023 meeting. Seven committee members were in attendance. The presentation recapped the community engagement process that informed the development of the draft vision and principles, which were presented for the Committee's feedback. A summary of the feedback received at this meeting is available in Appendix C. I:ngae Welb1page A survey on the Engageby o launched on July 6, 2023, and was open for community input through August 18, 2023. A total of 41 people completed the survey. The Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles Engage webpage received 3,002 visitors during Phase Two of engagement. Counciill IMeetiing City of Kitchener staff presented to the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee on August 14, 2023. All Councillors and the Mayor were in attendance. The presentation recapped the community engagement process that informed the development of the draft vision and principles, which were presented for Council's feedback. A summary of this meeting is available in Appendix D. oirnirnuniicatiions Methods The City used the following methods to communicate the project, including its relevant engagement opportunities. IPiropect Welblpage The City of Kitchener hosted a project uv, bp.g.g.. This webpage details the project, the working group, and ways to stay involved. It also linked directly to the Engage webpage and encouraged participation in the survey and in-person opportunities. The project webpage received 278 visits during this phase and 1,591 throughout both phases. Sociiall Media Promotion City of Kitchener's social media channels, Facebook and Twitter, were used to promote awareness of the project with posts linking to information about the study and highlighting public events. IE imaiill Subscription The Engage page allows community members in Kitchener to sign up for e-mail subscriptions to leverage the subscription to provide updates and notices of events relating to the project. Sectilloin l;l Next Steps The DCWG will use the input received in Phase Two of engagement to assist them in developing a final vision and series of principles for Downtown Kitchener. It is anticipated that these will be presented to Council for a decision in Fall 2023. D Page 168 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary "Workilling Gilroullp Meeting Suilmilmailrilles City of Kitchener IC: owin own Coirnimuniity Wor1kiling Giroulp I eetiiing #12 Suirnimary, The twelfth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on May 2, 2023, from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 14 of 30 members were in attendance. Discussions of the meeting are summarized below. IPouundtablle [Discussions IF'riinciiplle Statements DCWG members were asked to participate in small roundtable discussions on the seven themes. They were asked to draft a principle statement for each of them based on their discussions in previous workshops and input from the public received during the broad community engagement. Members were invited to move through the themes at their discretion, contributing to each, and reviewing the statements prepared by others. Discussions from each roundtable are summarized below. F:lulblliic Spaces • Public space is the substrate of urban life: every use and activity is situated in it; it ties people, communities, and places together; nourishes them; it welcomes everyone; and is equitably distributed. • Public space is the life of the city. • DTK has a rich variety of multi -use spaces connected via a year-round, accessible green web that forms the underlying connective tissue of urban life. Public space are inclusive; everyone belongs and has the right to the city. • Other ideas: o Backbone o Connective tissue o A rich variety of multi -use spaces connected via a green web o Thread that forms the underlying system o Life in the city o Interconnected Culture, Events and Stireet I1....1ife • DTK becomes the heart of a layered, vibrant, inclusive community and tourist destination, with great cultural institutions, a consistent calendar of diverse, exciting and accessible arts programming. DTK is the destination • DTK supports and nurtures music, art, and theatre. • DTK will be the heart of our community. Girowtlhn and Ihlousiiing • DTK is a well-designed, intensified core neighbourhood with a diversity of housing types and densities, where housing is intentionally integrated with commercial, retail, arts, culture, and green space, supported by a variety of transportation types. • DTK is a growing and evolving complete community with space for everyone, businesses, and activity, supported by a variety of transportation types. The locus of activity in the city. Housing in DTK is intentional. 10 Page 169 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary Neiiglhbouirlhoods and the IMovement of People and Goods • DTK should be designed to provide a predominantly pedestrian environment that also provides a harmonious mix of other transportation types. A safe, accessible, and continuous transportation network. IBusiiimess IF�ecovery and Ilrnagiirne IForwaird • The DTK experience should offer locals and tourists the opportunity to experience a variety of independent local businesses and well-known stores, to encourage them to stay to enjoy food, art, music in a vibrant, welcoming, and inclusive environment. • A destination for shopping and dining that incorporates a variety of interesting businesses. • DTK businesses should reflect our community's unique identity/character and extend into public life. • The sum of the unique ideas, aspirations, and flavour of our city. • DTK businesses should be diverse and unique to show how welcoming DTK really is. Climate and is:::nviirornrnentall Il...eadeirslhiilp • DTK is an environmental leader. • DTK is a pedestrian -focused space with a focus on human comfort for residents, visitors and business owners. It is easy to make climate -friendly and sustainable choices. • DTK is a pioneering environmental leader, supporting innovative approaches to energy use, transportation and green spaces. • Develop climate -friendly infrastructure for residents, businesses and visitors. • Green by-laws for future condos. Safety and Security • A busy, vibrant area that respects marginalized communities and provides care before taking punitive action. • The safest downtown is the liveliest. DTK should make people feel they belong and are welcome; a place that respects marginalized communities. IPllernary Discussion IFIriiirnciiplle IF fiiglhlliiglhts LURA facilitated a plenary discussion on the principle statements, asking working group members to identify the key aspects for each. The results of this conversation are listed below. • Public Spaces o Connected system/network o Shared o Right to the city (democratic) • Culture, Events and Street Life c Nurture o Living/alive c Destination • Growth and Housing o Complete community o Locus o Variety of housing 11 Page 170 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary c Diverse • Neighbourhoods and the Movement of People and Goods o Pedestrian o Safe o Accessible o Harmonious mix • Business Recovery and Imagine Forward o Variety/choice o Unique • Climate and Environmental Leadership o Leadership o Adaptive o Green choices o Easy o Green by design • Safety and Security o Humanity o Caring/belonging o Empathy o Human -centred Vision IIngredients LURA staff also facilitated a plenary discussion on overarching themes/words that can be used in developing a vision statement for DTK, summarized in the list below. • Unique and layered • Heart of the city • Focus on humanity • Inclusive • Reflective of the community • Defining character/identity • Inclusive • Layered • Vibrant/lively • Intentionally planned • Democratic civic space • Accessible • Pedestrian • Network/connection • Collective ownership Patricia Kambitsch from Playthink was at the meeting to prepare a graphic visualization of the key elements emerging from the principles and visioning conversations, the result of which is shown below. 12 Page 171 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary MhY 2 A YI,s<© r pcMo oM �(/ WNOM(N� pUPC rti ID611L . i'U+�°�+ �'r -� 7 w3�es�°�� i,., fTCIEh(F� Lrv. —,— Fuivac DTV k a C 1/,rii uer. ,. ..rvndGemiaGttr' j ,l cue nrmrac ENS „aadese N.aYY�'KI h� � A I�izb [tree io�NrSt 1� tEAf'6ksH,P * naKc S++* au: "",05 d verse „,,r,�� y�..`� � � ��C !r street.04 � � �., � uApAPTrY�� /�'' "._5"' 1K6laYdGvEx o� beYw aer nYsiIrl� �,ty �far�ecfrnq r,I..' "D ail wt4w k. '1�l° "� AkARMaMu� �i tuff ,.cccssrbr6 vAIL Har Maus endly Clr>wxd �revd lea i �� ,wrec�n is Nc,Mci / '�� w� , r onaa �!x " vs nrx�srcoatuR� R�MEr �� V•tltasE ti t I Rl.ke. r� F a �w r AM+ enr��arsls„a. / Nlnli/oa� uNlawe o VIBRANT l ' rove �e 7 rxnve �s s Itnurc CNOIee�da Amaaa 1 We Fi U ikfs 1� ti �� Subs#aYk e,ry Kki�ua,M.r*r�E 6Res r�s�;4 k r dyes paMre ti y�nexk 9 vlw �� Y SYF tMrHaB v p,crvetiy seas $ 4 8sy1n` a � P1 Bn#intq Yt, gra o- x51 'i ww � � cow re l/%i�' m ..... N tgd �� a' L, r �a Rr� / i evRar ., /� A.aressX6Lc � r (� v � �tdrrar,w•aewseaa��a ,rp�e4 esu � � �. J! �%�IGJ�,ECG�ll,R7►tr �!/SYA/�3`� CC.+M�TCc"�” �`AFE�"f✓,f� , ,, P� CI�LifiA2E" 6'A'�1✓1N� , R'E�`dVEkY�' OXY/,��N�"?E"ab"1" q,��/J�/i� �`M�iV' Y r o f i/�r5 L"Aak"S+PrP/V "l�L ',RETPf PPBE" t+S FI�D�w,, , ry Wrap Up and (Next Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The next meeting will take place on May 23, 2023, where principle statements will be refined and a vision statement developed. 13 Page 172 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary City of Kitchener (Downtown Comimunlity Wodkiling Group I eetiing #13 Summary The thirteenth Downtown Community Working Group (DCWG) meeting was held on May 23, 2023, from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm at the Downtown Community Centre. 15 of 30 members were in attendance. Discussions of the meeting are summarized below. IPoundtalblle [Discussions IFliriiirnciilplle Statements DCWG members were asked to provide their input on the set of draft vision statements and draft guiding principles. Discussions from each conversation are summarized below. (Draft Vision Statements A lively and dynamic Iplace for people, where our collective energy cireates a cornmuniity in which we tlhriive„ • Encompasses the most — i.e. where we shop, work, go to school, etc. • This one is the least passive voice, "our language"- the word creates is important, incites ownership- add inclusive, which we all thrive. • Structure of this one is the best, active language. • Want to add inclusivity (i.e. an inclusive community in which we all thrive). • Could merge 1 and 2 — "A dynamic place for people to..." • Like this one the best, lively is redundant. • Inclusive over `lively'. • Does this differentiate the core from other parts of the city? Is this one too generic? • Can we add heart, core, etc. • Is safe missing? • Be less generic; be the place, the lively and dynamic place in DTK. • `Which we can all thrive"- provides opportunity. • In favour of keeping, people. Keeping it human centric, democratic aspect. • Important to have it people -focused, not often seen in city bylaws. • Central place for people, thrive is the evolution word here. • Not a place, but the place, for the whole city, everyone shares it. • People first language. Like open to possibility. • Putting thrive closer to people, human -centric `us' language. • Commons, instead of place. • Sense of/community of possibility to be added. A dynamic Iplace for people, where our collective eneirgy its embodied iin the qualliitiies of excitement, liveliness, and inclusivity.. • Appreciate the inclusivity. • Language is too passive. • Do not like `embodied in qualities" language, abstract. • Does not describe everyday life. • Excitement/liveliness feels the same. • Embodies sounds abstract (not actually happening). A dynamic bulb of actiiviity tlhat embodiies tlhe qualliitiies of exciitemeinrt, Iliivelliiness, and iincllusiiviity„ • Like hub of activity (better than the word `place). 14 Page 173 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • Hub may be too related to transit. • Downtown is too big to be called a hub. Web of activity. Hive. • Can find anything — what a hub means. • Hub, connection, concentration. • Hub means that everything revolves around it. • This option is too passive. • Human -oriented. Ihub of actiiviity where Ipeople come to experience joy and excitement. • Most people dislike this option. A dynarniic core of tlhne city where people are inspired by possibility. • The core aspect differentiates the downtown from the rest of the city. • Like possibility language. • Switch 'dynamic core' with 'heart of the city'. • Forward and future thinking. • Possibility, diversity, inclusion. • Like that it is concise and punchy. • Can find a lot in it when you dig. • Needs more active voice. • Like this one because it is shorter, however, inspired by possibility, it feels too generic, too much like a slogan. • Sense of give and take, engage with community, reciprocal. Can we tie in inspiration and thriving? • Needs to inspire action. Items missing from all statements: • Supporting each other, mutual care. Give and take. • Missing neighbourhood, completeness. • Downtown is the face and identity. IDraft Guiding If=Iriirnciilplle If.D �"IK of tomorrow its Ihorne to a shared and connected system of public spaces tlhe canvas upon which urlbarn Iliife flourishes and 'fosters a sense of belloirngiiirng„ • Replace canvas etc. with 'where.' • Like canvas. • Replace urban with civic (civic means more). • Would need urban in there somewhere. I[) �"IK of tomorrow its the Iheart of the city; a destination tlhat beckons locals and visitors to share lin a symphony of culliiirnairy delights, shopping and lively arts and events programming. • Do we need to say programming? • Too buzzy. • Casino vibes (i.e., people come/experience/consume). • Missing everyday life. 15 Page 174 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • Where locals and visitors can contribute to and experience. • Like locals and visitors' aspect. • Seems like people coming just to absorb. More a sense of participation/creating events. • More concrete language — some of the current language may be off putting (too flowery). • Semi colon should be a colon. • A lot of overlap with 6 (should they be merged?). • We have existing cultural institutions — refer to them somehow in this. • Needs more aspiration. • How can we encourage and accommodate new artistic and cultural spaces, non traditional. • Cornerstones, urban fabric, destination for world class institutions, fostering a spirit of cultural production, everyone should be able to participate. • Speak to fostering events etc. and cultural production. • Everyone should be able to participate. I[) FIK of tomorrow its an intentionally planned, core communiity, where a miix of uses converge, Iproviidiiirng dally needs for residents and businesses alliike„ • Like the word intentional, but not intentionally planned. • Thoughtfully designed. • In favor of intentional, deliberate, designed. • Each principle needs the same voice. • Thoughtfully planned and intentionally designed. • Like the idea of no wasted space. • Holistic. Mixed use converges. • Look at neighbourhood as a whole — holistically designed (as an option for above) • "...so that a mix of uses..." (more active language) • Reflect layers of development in our downtown that have happened over time. I[) FIK of tomorrow its Ihoirne to a flourishing Ipolpullatiiorn with a diverse irairnge of housing types and densities for people at all stages of Iliife, allowing them to call downtown their Ihorne„ • `Densities' will raise questions. • Housing types and tenures. • Everyone is preferred over them language. • Will the word density cause confusion. Range of housing options, forms. • Rent vs owner, accessibility, and affordability. • Housing spectrum language. • Layers of planning downtown, not about erasure. • Include all ages. • Housing sizes, styles, and tenure. • Layered. ID FIK of tomorrow its a Ipedestdain focused rneiighlbouirlhood where people and Ibusiiinesses connect wiitlh tlh61r surrounding tlhirouglh a safe, accessible, and IhairirnoNous irnniix of tiranslportatiion options. • Strength and variety • Pedestrian focus is what we are aspiring to. 16 Page 175 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • Connecting with outside of DTK, get downtown easily, and to get other places, including other cities. • Do not like the word harmonious. I[) FIK of toumonrow its filled with opportunities for leisurely strolls along bustling, lively s'tree'ts Ibursting with shops, eats and places to gather„ • Remove `leisurely stroll'. • Like the idea of walking downtown, on a bustling and busy street. • Remove `eats'. • Concentrating on leisurely takes away emphasis of importance of being able to get to where your going, safety and in a timely manner (i.e. to work). • Language should be aspirational, but not over -the -top. I[) FIK of tornorrow its a resilient community, having ernbraced a leadership irolle lin emissions ireductiion and preparation for climate impacts.. • Easy to make sustainable choices. • Like leadership role. • Preparation for impacts — too harsh. Look for proactive language. • Reference to vegetation/trees/greening the core. • Environmental stewardship/taking care of our space. • Connection to nature/environment. • Respect for natural environment. I[) FIK of 'tomorrow its a convergence of safety, iirncllu.usiiviity, and compassion, where belloingiiing and empathy are at the centre of decision irnalkii ng„ • Majority of participants were in favor of this principle and the way it is worded. • Change to safe, inclusive, and compassionate. Updated Vision Stateirrnernts The project team presented an updated set of draft vision statements for further comment, noted below. t..Ihe heart of the city, where we collectively create a community in which we all can thrive„ • Preferred statement for several members. • Sense of community. • Thrive and inspire go together. • Like collective nature of the statement. • Implies action. • The heart of the city, where through our collective energy we create a community in which we all can thrive. • Heart, collectively, create, community, and thrive are the key concepts. • The heart of the city, where we collectively create a thriving community. Flhe Iheart of the city, where we all can tlhriive„ • Like the brevity. t..Ihe Iheart of tlhe city, where we iiinslpiire each other.. • Inspire each other to thrive. A dyrnarniic Iplace for Ipeople, where we all can tlhr�ve„ • Like that it is brief. 17 Page 176 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary iralp,...Up and T ext Stelps The project team thanked the DCWG members for participating in the meeting and the process. The project team will circulate an updated set of draft vision statements and guiding principles for comment before the June 17, 2023 public engagement. The next DCWG meeting will take place on September 12, 2023 to review feedback received. IN Page 177 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary On June 17, 2023, The City of Kitchener hosted a community pop-up engagement at the Gaukel Block Launch Party as part of Neighbours Day. During the pop-up engagements, participants were presented with the draft vision and principles for Downtown Kitchener and asked to provide their feedback. Additionally, they were also asked for ideas for action for how to make the principles a reality. A total of 242 people spoke with project representatives at the event. Vision Feedback Feedback on the vision included: • Two thumbs up. Vibrancy IPiriinciilpllo Feedback Feedback on the vibrancy principle included: • We enjoy it when there are events downtown. • Can it be more eco -focused? • 1 really like this principle. • 1 love spontaneously running into friends. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Events such as this (Gaukel Street Launch) are great. • Love the picnic table swings on Gaukel Street. • Healthcare to meet the needs of the growing community. • Increase accessibility for all events. • More splash pads. 19 Page 178 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • Year-round events • More sidewalk life: cafes, plants, music. • More garbage cans. • Add compost bins, and more recycling. • Bring seniors downtown, all generations coming together. No one left behind. • More theatre and dance animations, music events. • Downtown needs more trees. • Add more streetscape, active streets. • Nightlife and winter events. • Want to live in a downtown where something is always happening. • Downtown needs a ramp program for business, it is not accessible. • Pedestrian -only blocks. • More events like the Gaukel Street Launch. • More events for young people. • Better parking accommodation. • Have local artists paint more murals and put-up installations downtown. • Free events all year round. • People came to Kitchener from different countries to know each other's culture. There should be more events and festivals so people can know each other and live in harmony, peace and love. • More multicultural events throughout the year. • Affordable artist space (galleries and studios) and marketing support. • Make more streets like Gaukel permanent. • Work hard at making spaces safe for everyone, so diverse groups can cooperate. • More seating and garbage bins. • Mailouts of summer events. • More info about the events Downtown. Connection IPiriinciiplle Feedback Feedback on the connection principle included: • The improved bike lanes have been great. • Very excited about the idea of prioritizing pedestrians. • This expresses how I feel about the downtown. • Love that pedestrians are mentioned. • Inclusivity is important. • Love your neighbour. • Really like this principle. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Have more shops at the retail level in the new condos. • More bike/scooter lanes. • More green spaces to go with the new high rises. • I would like King Street to be pedestrian -only. • Encourage walking through wider sidewalks, lights at night, create interesting places. 20 Page 179 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • Continue to improve the cycling connections. • Subsidized transit. • Best part Downtown is when King Street is closed to cars. • Options to gather indoors in the winter. • Public spaces need to be accessible. • There should be more transportation for people who are disabled so we can enjoy the community. • Ensure public transportation is accessible for everyone. • More spaces where people can sit and hang out. • De-emphasize the car in decision-making. • Free public transit. • Pedestrians must be respected and able to go home safely. • Design for people with disabilities, physical and hidden. • We need more curb cuts. Il ellongiing IPidirnciiplle Feedback Feedback on the belonging principle included: • None received at the pop-up. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • How can the rent be kept low when adding city features. • Limit parking with condos. • Build up, not out, to protect farmland. • Grow near transit. • We need cooling and warming centres. • Support for the vulnerable. • Better social services, street community workers. • Housing for those without and community centre at bus depot. • Social/public housing. • More social services/mental health supports. • Build rental apartments for families and low-income people. • Need a new community centre. • Diverse housing, more family units. • Victoria park is unavailable for many. • We cannot only listen to homeowners when making plans for housing growth, need to make it a place where everyone belongs. • Need to make sure people in different socio-economic groups feel welcome. • Mixed-use development and mid/high rise density. • Need more cooperative and multi -generational housing options. • Family -friendly housing downtown. • High rise units geared to OW and ODSP folks. • Need a gay bar in Downtown Kitchener. 21 Page 180 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary 1 Meeting Surnimailry City of Kitchener staff shared the draft vision and principles with the Downtown Action and Advisory Committee at their June 22, 2023 meeting. Seven committee members were in attendance. The presentation recapped the community engagement process that informed the development of the draft vision and principles, which were presented for the Committee's feedback. Committee members shared the following thoughts: Vision Feedback Feedback on the vision included: • Could replace Kitchener with many other cities. The vision is generic. • It is not daring/bold enough. It is not striving for anything. • What does it mean for Kitchener specifically? Those terms are tossed around in any City. This could also be a statement for hubs and different types of things. • A vision has to be something that gets people to stop and reflect. • How do we craft something more inspirational, distinctive and aspirational? • A vision statement is something that you are not currently. • Maybe the vision should be Downtown Kitchener will be the central downtown for all of Southwestern Ontario. • London sought out a Unesco music destination — what do we want to seek out? • Has to be lofty. Something to strive for. • If you go bolder, you will not please everyone. If you try to please everyone, you don't please anyone. • Better to go further, and be told it is too ambitious. • How do we pull from all this content and roll it into an aspirational statement? • This statement feels like something we could have just written on the first day. • Metaphors are evocative. Downtown is a living room. That evokes specific feelings. • What if a poet rewrote it? Vibrancy IPriinciiplle Feedback Feedback on the vibrancy principle included: • Vibrancy is an overused word. It is in the statements for Stratford, London, and Montreal. • London's statement is a page long that encapsulates the principles and describes the what. • It needs to evoke a feeling. This feels like a recipe for a scone. I want to eat the scone and experience and savour the scone, not just read the list of ingredients. • It is head -centred when it needs to be heart -centred. • Excitement is what vibrancy is. There is energy and electricity. A more descriptive word is needed. • What if the principles were wild metaphors that evoke a feeling? c One challenge with metaphors is that things mean different things to different people. It is also important to keep an equity lens and be mindful of meanings for different cultural groups. • Should be playful. 22 Page 181 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary • This is situational not transformational. • We are the actual ambitious city (not Hamilton). • Suggestions for better words? c Grandma's kitchen ■ But it sounds old and traditional. I want to try something new. ■ Kitchener is both the traditional and the cutting edge. You can have both things in DTK in the same day. • This is not a policy we are writing, it is a vision statement. • It can be longer. It is missing important elements. onnecaiion IPriinciiplle Feedback Feedback on the connection principle included: • None received at this meeting. Il ellongiing IPiriinciilplle Feedback Feedback on the belonging principle included: • The last sentence of this principle is good. • There is interesting history to draw on in DTK. eneirall Feedback DAAC provided the following unanimous input: • Hire a local poet/artist/writer to work through it and write something interesting. • The vision must conjure feelings. • The vision must be more ambitious/aspirational. • The vision must be more specific to Downtown Kitchener. 23 Page 182 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary City of Kitchener staff presented to the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee on August 14, 2023. All ten Councillors and the Mayor were in attendance. The presentation recapped the community engagement process that informed the development of the draft vision and principles, which were presented for Council's feedback. Members of Council shared the following thoughts: Vision Feedback Feedback on the vision included: • Generally like it, but potentially missing an aspect of the downtown belonging to the entire city. It would be good if the second line reflects this. • Like it, but would say "Downtown Kitchener is the heart of the city" then say the other inclusive, dynamic and energetic aspects. • Some will disagree that we are an inclusive city. • We are becoming more dynamic and energetic, but we are not there yet. • Hoping to find something with more punch that does not sound like vision statements from other cities. We are trying to be bold with the vision, and I would like to see something more memorable than thrive or vibrancy. Could we be bolder and more ambitious? • Wording needs to be aspirational and sets the direction we are heading and where the work needs to happen. • Would like to see innovation incorporated and downtown a part of our major employment centre of a changing and dynamic economy. • Do not know if we are being specific enough, and how do we achieve this? • Like the words dynamic, energetic, inclusive and vibrancy, but need to speak more to how we can achieve these. • We had a similar conversation several years ago. The draft vision is what you build on to energize the core and have it become what we want it to be. And that is why it is called our vision. We want it to be this, so we have to say what we want. Vibrancy IPriinciiplle Feedback Feedback on the vibrancy principle included: This something that we are starting to see and a direction we are going. This is the right word, and helps us start thinking about what else we could be doing. Love this word. We want a vibrant community and have that, but there is more to attain. Innovation is what we do in this community, and would like to see this reflected. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • From July 1 to August 31 we could close down King Street to traffic and have festivals and vendors there to bring people downtown. • How can we engage students who go to school downtown to stay here and help contribute to our vibrancy? How can we keep people here? • Rejuvenation of our downtown coming out of the pandemic. • Understanding what the market is for office space and being aggressive in our business recruitment for strategy for the downtown, getting people back into office spaces. 24 Page 183 of 668 Downtown Kitchener Vision and Principles — Phase Two Engagement Summary onnectiion IPiriiinciilplle Feedback Feedback on the connection principle included: • Connection is also good, and can lead to people having a sense of belonging. • The `full range of accessible transportation' feels more like an action. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • How do we get people to connect and get to know each other better? When people connect and talk, we create a sense of belonging. Events that bring people together and spur connection is an idea. • Ensuring that spaces are accessible for all and consult with people with mobility needs to ensure this. • Diverse events and other opportunities to help create connections and belonging. Il ellongiing IPriiinciilplle Feedback Feedback on the belonging principle included: • We are such a diverse city that you are bound to find a group that feels they are not being reflected. A bit hesitant about the word belonging. • Reference the notion of a place where all ages belong. • Rethink the word belonging, perhaps by using the word equity or equitable. • People and businesses are being pushed out of downtown because of costs, which is worrisome. We need to reflect the need for affordability. Ideas for action related to this principle included: • Provide well-being support for all members of our community to reach their potential. enerall Feedback Overarching feedback related to the vision and principles in general included: • Like the direction and words that are here. • Agree with going with three different principles. Connection and belonging are similar and could be combined. Is the economic aspect of vibrancy reflected enough here? Could this be the third principle? We want a booming downtown with thriving businesses and people, events and activity. A place where people can succeed. • This is good, but a lot of what we have had before. We need a little more than this. • Like the three words; they are the right ones. Placemaking, however may be missing. • Put the focus on reaching our potential. • Reflect marginalized community members. • Look for ideas for actions from the work of the residents panel for the Strategic Plan. • We need to be proud of the resiliency of our downtown. Our downtown faces challenges and people continue to make our city a great city. • We may be overlooking living downtown and being part of downtown. • This is about improving the downtown for the benefit and enjoyment of the entire city. 25 Page 184 of 668 Staff Report l IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7073 PREPARED BY: Raida Chowdhury, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Natalie Goss, Manager Policy & Research, 519-741-2200 ext.7648 WARD(S) INVOLVED: ALL DATE OF REPORT: October 17, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-446 SUBJECT: DSD -2023-446 City-wide Lodging House Review (OPA21/004/COK/AR, ZBA21/040/K/NG) RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment OPA21/004/COK/AR proposing amendments to Kitchener's 1994 and 2014 Official Plan to permit lodging houses city-wide everywhere residential uses are permitted be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendments attached to Report DSD -2023-446 as Attachment `A' and Attachment `B', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and, That Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA21/040/K/NG be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law to Zoning By-law 85-1' and `Proposed By-law to Zoning By-law 2019-051' attached to Report DSD -2023-446 as Attachment `C' and Attachment `D' respectively. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to bring forward a planning recommendation regarding Official Plan amendments and Zoning By-law amendments to permit lodging houses city-wide. • Community engagement included: • A Housing for All Lodging House sub -committee was formed with members of the community, staff and Council. The sub -committee prepared an Issues and Options report about lodging houses and in summer 2023 met with staff to review preliminary directions on Official Plan and zoning updates; • An update on the recommended approach for lodging houses was provided to the Lived Expertise Working Group on October 4, 2023, and; • Notice of the public meeting was published in the Record on October 6, 2023. • This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 185 of 668 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council approved Housing for All, the City's first housing strategy which focused on what the city can do to address housing issues. One of the strategy's actions is to report on the feasibility and implications of reviewing and updating current lodging house policies. As part of Housing for All, a Lodging House sub -committee was formed comprised of community members, staff and a member of Council. Together they drafted an Issues and Options paper that recommended removal of references to minimum distance separation and expanding permissions for lodging houses city-wide where residential uses are permitted. They also recommended advancing updates on licensing for lodging houses and engaging with people with lived expertise. Additionally, the Ontario Human Rights Commission has advised all municipalities to avoid the discriminatory impacts of regulations regarding rental housing, including the use of a minimum distance separation. Planning staff is recommending approval of Official Plan amendments and Zoning By-law amendments that will permit lodging houses city-wide. BACKGROUND: This report is one of many reports being presented to Council for consideration in 2023- 2024+ which focuses on housing related studies and initiatives. The graphic below depicts the planned updates to Council over the next 12+ months. N Municipal Housing I I Bill 13, Bill 23, Roll 109 1 1 1 1 Evictions & Pledge Implementation Plan Lodging House Official Plan Displacement Toolkit Growing Together and Zoning Implementation Implementation Engagement Summary Lower Doon Land Use Rental Replacement By - Inclusionary Zoning Study Implementation law Implementation Direction Eviction & Displacement Shared Missing Middle and Webpage & Online Accommodations Affordable Housing Study Reporting UpdateLicensing By-law Update Eviction & Displacement Updates Toolkit Options p (incl. Lodging House) Lived Expertise Rental Replacement By-law Working Group year Z Information Report Work Plan Growing Together Development Implementation Inclusionary Zoning Implementation In October 2019, Council approved report DSD -19-233 — New Zoning By-law (Stage 2a) — Residential Base Zones Comprehensive Review of the Zoning By-law (CRoZBy) Project which included staff's recommendation that the issue of regulating lodging houses in the Official Plan and Zoning By-law be referred to the Affordable Housing Strategy for further consideration. On December 14, 2020 as a part of report DSD -20-214 Council approved Housing for All, the City's first housing strategy which focused on what the city can do to address housing Page 186 of 668 issues including increasing and maintaining the supply of housing within the City of Kitchener while supporting the Region of Waterloo. Housing for All contained over 40 actions the city can take to help realize the right to housing. One of the strategy's actions is to report on the feasibility and implications of reviewing and updating current lodging house policies. In March 2021, staff brought forward a consultant report and recommendations on the Lower Doon Land Use Study as a part of report DSD -2021-11. One recommendation in the consultant report was to allow lodging houses in all residential zones in Lower Doon and to subsequently revise the City's licensing by-law for Lodging Houses. Further, the consultants' report noted that minimum distance separation regulations are an indefensible form of "people zoning" which the Ontario Human Rights Commission has directed municipalities not to use due to its discriminatory and exclusionary nature and impacts. Lodging House Sub -committee As part of the Affordable Housing Strategy, a Lodging House sub -committee was formed in early 2021, comprised of four members of the Housing for All Advisory Committee and togetherformed a working group which helped draft the Issues and Options paper on lodging houses (Attachment E) in Kitchener. The Issues and Options paper included the following recommendations that are appropriate to be addressed through planning tools or processes: • Removal of references to minimum distance separation in the Official Plan and Zoning By-law; • Allow lodging houses as of right in all residential zones across the City; • Advance updates on the licensing framework for lodging houses, and; • Engage with people with lived expertise of lodging houses through the City's Lived Expertise Working Group Lodging Houses in the City of Kitchener Currently there are about 20 licensed lodging houses located across the City of Kitchener. Through investigations conducted by Kitchener's licencing, by-law enforcement and fire prevention staff, discussions with affected parties, and data -mining, staff are aware that there are many more unlicensed properties operating as lodging houses. Unlicensed properties are not annually inspected and operate outside of the requirements and regulations of the city's bylaws. To complete the action item from Housing for All, advance the work of the Housing for All Lodging House Sub -committee, and implement direction from the Ontario Human Rights Commission, planning staff are proposing amendments to Kitchener's Official Plan and Zoning By-laws that seek to permit lodging houses across the city. REPORT: Many municipalities have regulated the form and location of lodging houses and group homes to prevent or reduce perceived over -concentration of lodging houses and group homes and to "protect" neighborhoods. Many municipalities, including Kitchener, implemented zoning and licensing restrictions and separation requirements for these housing types. As part of Official Plan and zoning updates in the mid 2000s, Kitchener sought to limit the creation of new lodging houses, residential care facilities and social service establishments within the Cedar Hill neighbourhood. The Ontario Municipal Board ruled against the City on the basis that imposing by-laws that limit housing availability for Code protected groups is discriminatory, an encroachment on human rights, and is an Page 187 of 668 overall breach of planning principles. Additionally, at that time Kitchener and three other municipalities were challenged by the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal on their use of minimum separation distances and zoning restrictions on group homes and supportive housing. The City subsequently removed the minimum separation distances and restrictions for group homes as a result of the Tribunal's direction. Since that time, the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) has advised all municipalities, through their report titled "Room for everyone: Human rights and rental housing licensing" to avoid the discriminatory impacts of regulations regarding rental housing, including the use of minimum separation distances (OHRC, 2013). Minimum separation distances are arbitrary and mean that if one lodging house is established in a neighbourhood, others cannot locate. This particularly affects groups that may already be the most vulnerable, since the lodging houses they live in cannot be brought into conformity and licensing standards, they are often afraid to report property neglect and standards due to fear of being evicted. The Role of Lodging Houses in the Continuum Housing for All is Kitchener's first housing strategy, and it contains over 40 actions that take a comprehensive approach to meeting supply all around the housing continuum. One of the actions was to report to Council on the feasibility of reviewing the City's lodging house policies. Lodging houses also known as `Multi -Tenant Houses, and historically as `Rooming Houses', and `Boarding Houses', fill an important gap in the provision of housing as it tends to be a more affordable option than other options in the private market. Lodging houses can also encompass some forms of student housing and seniors co -housing. They add to a mix and range of housing options and contribute to stronger and more diverse neighbourhoods. Figure 1 below shows the Wheelhouse which sets the targets for each housing type around the continuum and shows where the market is failing to provide adequate stock. Sh�4terCa,yd a�r'YI �Ii iII I��III�tiI , millll Figure 1: Wheelhouse - Kitchener's reimagined understanding of the housing continuum. Page 188 of 668 As part of the implementation of one of the action items of Kitchener's Housing for All, Kitchener's housing strategy, planning staff are proposing and recommending a series of amendments to permit lodging houses city-wide. Building on the Issues and Options prepared by the Lodging House sub -committee (Appendix E) planning staff conducted supplemental research to better understand ways in which lodging houses are defined in Official Plans and Zoning By-laws; consider how lodging houses can be permitted throughout the city in mixed use and commercial zones; and, considered minimum parking rates. Planning and Licensing staff met with the Lodging House Sub -committee several times throughout Summer 2023 on the supplemental research conducted by staff, and draft directions to amend the Official Plan, Zoning By-law and licensing by-law. Proposed Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendments (85-1 and 2019-051) Planning staff are proposing amendments to Kitchener's 2014 Official Plan and the 1994 Official Plan which continues to apply to Kitchener's Secondary Plan areas in the neighbourhoods surrounding downtown, the North Ward in Ward 10, and Rosenberg in Ward 5. The Official Plan amendments will seek to: • Permit lodging houses anywhere in the city that residential uses are permitted where the primary intent of the land is for residential or mixed use and provided that municipal servicing is available; • Align the definition of lodging houses with the Ontario Building Code and Ontario Fire Code. The proposed definition of lodging houses is: Lodging House — shall mean a dwelling unit where five or more persons, not including a resident owner of the property, may rent a lodging unit and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. Lodging house can include student residences but shall not include a group home; hospital, any small residential care facility or large residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act, or a hotel. • Remove policies and regulations that refer to the use of minimum separation distances for lodging houses. Alternative ways to regulate and define lodging houses were contemplated, including not considering a lodging house a separate use of land and rather a form of tenure. This approach would rely on the City's licensing bylaw provisions for rules and safety mechanisms for lodging houses. At this time planning staff recommend continuing with defining and permitting lodging houses as a use to ensure clarity. Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O 1990, c. P. 13 Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in Page 189 of 668 carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest. Among these matters are the adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing. The matters of provincial interest outlined in Section 3 of the Planning Act are addressed and implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, which directs how and where growth is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and growth. It encourages municipalities to permit and facilitate a range of housing options to respond to current and future needs. Section 1.1.1 b) of the PPS acknowledges that healthy, liveable, and safe communities are sustained by accommodating an appropriate range and mix of affordable and market-based residential housing types as part of complete communities. Similarly, Section 1.4.3 b) states that municipalities shall permit and facilitate all housing options required to meet the social, health, economic and well-being requirements of current and future residents. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan) The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. The Growth Plan (policy 2.2.6.1a) requires that municipalities support housing choice by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities including additional residential units and affordable housing to met projected needs of current and future residents. Further policy 2.2.6.1 e) requires that municipalities implement the above through their official plan policies and designations and zoning by-laws. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in conformity with the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP) The Region of Waterloo's Official Plan (ROP), as amended in 2022 through Regional Official Plan Amendment 6 — plans for growth and change in the Region to 2051. The ROP includes planning to provide for a diverse range and mix of housing options, including affordable Page 190 of 668 housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes. Chapter 3 of the ROP focuses on policies related to housing. Chapter 3 acknowledges that maintaining a healthy supply of rental housing, especially at affordable and mid-range rents, is critical to attracting residents and businesses to the Region and supporting a wider range of housing options that are affordable. Policy 3.A.2 requires that area municipalities, together with the Region, plan to provide a diverse range and mix of housing options with an overall target of a minimum of 30 percent of new ownership and rental housing being affordable to low- and moderate -income households. The policy also looks to provide variety in housing forms, tenures, density and number of bedrooms to accommodate the needs of all sizes, incomes and ages of households. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in conformity with the ROP. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) Kitchener's Official Plan (2014) provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The vision and goals of the Official Plan strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. The City's Official Plan includes an objective (4.1.1) to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure, and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of the Kitchener community through all stages of life. This objective is considered through the policies throughout this section and specifically relevant to the Official Plan amendments that are the subject of this report, policy 4.C.1.12 which acknowledges that the City favours a land use pattern which mixes and disperses a full range of housing types and styles both across the city as a whole and within neighbourhoods. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in conformity with the intent of the Official Plan and better align the Official Plan and Secondary Plans contained within the 1994 Official Plan with advice from the Ontario Human Rights Commission. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions Based on the above -noted planning analysis, direction in Housing for All, subsequent research conducted by the Housing for All Lodging House sub -committee and staff, and advice from the Human Rights Commission, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan amendments represent good planning and recommends that they be approved in the form shown in Attachments "A" and "B". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Based on the above -noted planning analysis, direction in Housing for All, subsequent research conducted by the Housing for All Lodging House sub -committee and staff, and recommendations from the Human Rights Commission, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law amendments represents good planning as they will permit a form of housing broadly across the city that has historically been restricted. The proposed Page 191 of 668 Zoning By-law amendments are consistent with the proposed Official Plan amendments. Staff recommends that the proposed Zoning By-law amendments be approved in the form shown in Attachments "C" and "D". Licensing By-law Updates Planning staff have been working closely with the Licensing Services team on the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments in parallel with anticipated updates to Kitchener's licensing framework for lodging houses. Currently, Licensing Services intends to bring to Council a report with an updated licensing by-law in early 2024 for lodging houses and other shared accommodations, such as short-term rentals. Once Council has considered the proposed licensing by-law, staff will launch a comprehensive communications and education plan to ensure the successful roll out of new zoning and licensing rules for lodging houses and licensing rules for other short-term accommodations. Prior to the implementation of an updated licensing framework for lodging houses, the city will continue to rely on its current Lodging House By-law which require any property operating a lodging house to obtain a licence and undergo annual inspections by property standards and fire prevention to ensure health and safety. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports A Caring Community. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT - This item arose as part of the work of the creation of Housing for All. It is estimated that city staff engaged with close to 500 people including citizens, stakeholders, members of the Advisory Committee, City staff and Members of Council. Further, a Lodging House Review sub -committee worked alongside City staff helped to co -create the issues and options paper and identify potential opportunities. The Lodging House Review sub- committee also provided input on draft directions on proposed updates to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. Finally, an overview of the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments were presented to Kitchener's Lived Expertise Working Group on October 4, 2023. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13 • A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 Page 192 of 668 • Region of Waterloo Official Plan, 2009 • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 1994 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 2019-051 • DSD -2021-11 — Lower Doon Land Study Recommendations Report • DSD -20-214 — Housing for All — City of Kitchener Housing Strategy REVIEWED BY: Helen Fylactou, Manager, Licensing APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Proposed 1994 Official Plan Amendment Attachment B — Proposed 2014 Official Plan Amendment Attachment C — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment 85-1 Attachment D — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment 2019-051 Attachment E — Housing for All Lodging House Sub -Committee Issues and Options Paper Attachment F — Newspaper Notice (October 6, 2023) Page 193 of 668 /_1LTA IA011s7LTA 1:101Is01 :e3rem IaMi• • Ati799[s7/_1O,W_11121 OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER City-wide Lodging House Review Page 194 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE 1994 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER City-wide Lodging House Review INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 4 THE AMENDMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of the Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council DATE 2 Page 195 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan (1994) of the City of Kitchener. This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) has provided direction to all municipalities to remove minimum separation distances from planning instruments as they pertain to lodging houses in order to avoid `people zoning', remove impacts of exclusionary regulation imposed on tenants, and to protect the safety and viability of lodging houses as a form of housing. The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to address this direction of the OHRC by incorporating certain modifications to the text. These modifications support the actions in Housing for All, the City's housing strategy which was approved on December 14, 2020. The effect of the changes are to remove reference to a minimum separation distance for lodging houses, remove exclusionary and discriminatory language and reduce undue policy regulation regarding lodging houses. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT The effect of the amendment is to incorporate certain modifications to the text of the Official Plan to meet the direction of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, and to support the implementation of the City's housing strategy, Housing for All as it pertains to lodging houses. This Official Plan amendment is consistent with and conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), the Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2009), and represents good planning. Land Use Modifications City staff are recommending that all land use designations within all Secondary Plans that permit residential uses permit lodging houses. SECTION 4—THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener 1994 Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Part 3, Section 13.1 Civic Centre Secondary Plan, subsection 13.1.2.1 is amended by adding the words ", lodging houses" before "or multiple dwellings to a maximum of 3 units" and after "duplexes" in the second paragraph b) Part 3, Section 13.2, King Street East Secondary Plan, subsection 13.2.2.1 is amended by deleting the word "small" after "three dwelling units," and before "lodging houses" c) Part 3, Section 13.3 Cedar Hill Secondary Plan, subsection 13.3.3.1 is amended by deleting the word "small" after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three units," and before "lodging houses" d) Part 3, Section 13.4 Mill Courtland -Woodside Park Secondary Plan, subsection 13.4.3.1 is amended by deleting the word "small" after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three dwelling units," and before "lodging houses" Page 196 of 668 e) Part 3, Section 13.5 Victoria Park Secondary Plan, subsection 13.5.3.1 is amended by deleting the word "small' after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three units" and before "lodging houses" f) Part 3, Section 13.6 Victoria Street Secondary Plan, subsection 13.6.3.1 is amended by deleting the word "small' after "and multiple dwellings to a maximum of three units" and before "lodging houses" g) Part 3, Section 13.7 K -W Hospital Secondary Plan, subsection 13.7.3.1 is amended be deleting the word "small' after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three units" and before "lodging houses" in the second paragraph h) Part 3, Section 13.8, North Ward Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.8.2.1 is amended by deleting the word "small' after "semi-detached dwellings" and before "lodging houses". i) Part 3, Section 13.8, North Ward Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.8.2.4 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "health offices" and after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three dwell units". j) Part 3, Section 13.9, Central Frederick Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.9.3.1 is amended by deleting the word "small" after "duplex dwellings" and before "lodging houses" in the second paragraph. k) Part 3, Section 13.9, Central Frederick Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.9.3.2 is amended by deleting the word "small" after "multiple dwellings to a maximum of three units," and before "lodging houses" in the second paragraph. 1) Part 3, Section 13.9, Central Frederick Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.9.3.6 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "home businesses" and after "multiple dwellings in excess of 200 units per hectare". m) Part 3, Section 13.9, Central Frederick Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.9.3.15 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "home businesses" and after "semi-detached dwellings". n) Part 3, Section 13.9, Central Frederick Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.9.3.16 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "educational establishments" and after "multiple dwellings" in paragraph 2. o) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.10.3.2.2.3 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "and special needs housing" and after "multiple dwelling units (not including cluster townhouses)". p) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.10.3.2.3.3 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "and special needs housing" and after "multiple dwelling units (not including cluster townhouses)". q) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.10.3.3.2.1 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "and street townhouse dwellings" and after "semi-detached dwellings". 4 Page 197 of 668 r) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13.10.3.3.3.1 is amended by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "and low-rise multiple dwellings" and after "townhouse dwellings". s) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13 by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "townhouse and after "including". t) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13 by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "townhouse and after "including". u) Part 3, Section 13.10, Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Subsection 13 by inserting the words "lodging houses" before "townhouse and after "may include". .10.3.3.4.1 is amended multiple dwellings" and .10.3.3.5.1 is amended multiple dwellings" and .10.3.3.6.1 is amended multiple dwellings" and Page 198 of 668 APPENDIX 1— NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTIICE �O�F IIC MEETING to change permissions, for lodging houses ....... .. .. . . I -wi Have Your Voice Heard Plainning & Strateg)c Initiatives Committee Date: October3 ,21 23 Location., Couincill Chambers, Kitenor Cit y Hal I Go to skitchen er.ca'tela eetin gs and solect- Current agendas and reports (posted 10 daysbefore meeting), 01 Appear as a Bele gathen 0 Mitch a Meet rig, To learn, more aboot thi Iprpiect, indluding The City of Qdhener will consider an application for Official Pllain Amendments and Zoning By-law Arnendirrients to, facifitate broader permissioris for lodgiing houses, as, a form of housing These change salign wiftiaction iternsfrorn Housingfor, ll, Kitcheneirs, housing strategy and will reirnove excluslonary regulations like minirnurn separation distance rules frorn zoning, Page 199 of 668 informatiorli or) your appea I rights, visit, A13kk www.kitclhn�erxa/ M�"i� 15 Pl/anningApplications V or contact: Natalie Goss, MIa n of Policy Et Research ("I I r'l es nataHe.goss@kitdhen1er.ca 519341.2200 x7648 The City of Qdhener will consider an application for Official Pllain Amendments and Zoning By-law Arnendirrients to, facifitate broader permissioris for lodgiing houses, as, a form of housing These change salign wiftiaction iternsfrorn Housingfor, ll, Kitcheneirs, housing strategy and will reirnove excluslonary regulations like minirnurn separation distance rules frorn zoning, Page 199 of 668 APPENDIX 2 - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES COMMITTEE - OCTOBER 30, 2023 Page 200 of 668 APPENDIX 3 - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL - DATE Page 201 of 668 /_1►VAIA0101AIN101190rem IaEel 99Eel /_1wNA_1►1 OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER City-wide Lodging House Review Page 202 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER Lodging House Review INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 4 THE AMENDMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of the Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council DATE 2 Page 203 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener. This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) has provided direction to all municipalities to remove minimum separation distances from planning instruments as they pertain to lodging houses in order to avoid `people zoning', remove impacts of exclusionary regulation imposed on tenants, and to protect the safety and viability of lodging houses as a form of housing. The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to address this direction of the OHRC by incorporating certain modifications to the text. These modifications support the actions in Housing for All, the City's housing strategy which was approved on December 14, 2020. The effect of the changes are to remove reference to a minimum separation distance for lodging houses, remove exclusionary and discriminatory language and reduce undue policy regulation regarding lodging houses. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT The effect of the amendment is to incorporate certain modifications to the text of the Official Plan to meet the direction of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, and to support the implementation of the City's housing strategy, Housing for All as it pertains to lodging houses. This Official Plan amendment is consistent with and conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), the Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2009), and represents good planning. Land Use Modifications City staff are recommending amendments to the housing section of the Official Plan to enable lodging houses as a permitted use in all land use designations that permit residential uses. SECTION 4—THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Part C, Section 4.C.1.32 is amended by deleting "Section 4.C.1.32" in its entirety and replacing it with the following: "The City will permit lodging houses in any land use designation permitting residential uses, provided that full municipal servicing is available." b) Part C, Section 4.C.1.33 is deleted in its entirety. c) Part C, Section 4.C.1.34 is amended by adding "permit and" after "specifically" and before "regulate". d) Part C, Section 4.C.1.34 is amended by deleting "and the ability to integrate such housing forms in an acceptable and appropriate manner" after "and safety regulations". e) Part C, Section 4.C.1.35 is deleted in its entirety. Page 204 of 668 f) Part C, Section 4.C.1.36 is deleted "Section 4.C.1.36" in its entirety. g) Part F, Schedule A: Glossary of Terms is amended by deleting the glossary term "Lodging House" and replacing it with the following: "Lodging House — means a dwelling unit, where five or more persons, not including a resident owner of the property, may rent a Lodging Units and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. Lodging house can include student residences but shall not include a group home; hospital; any small residential care facility or large residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act; or a hotel." 4 Page 205 of 668 APPENDIX 1— NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTIICE �O�F IIC MEETING to change permissions, for lodging houses ....... .. .. . . I -wi Have Your Voice Heard Plainning & Strateg)c Initiatives Committee Date: October3 ,21 23 Location., Couincill Chambers, Kitenor Cit y Hal I Go to skitchen er.ca'tela eetin gs and solect- Current agendas and reports (posted 10 daysbefore meed nig), 01 Appear as a Bele gathen 0 Mitch a Meet rig, To learn, more aboot thi Iprpiect, indluding The City of Qdhener will consider an application for Official Pllain Amendments and Zoning By-law Arnendirrients to, facifitate broader permissioris for lodgiing houses, as, a form of tiousing These chark gesalign wiftiaction iternsfrorn Housingfor, ll, Kitcheneirs, housing strategy and will reirnove exclusionary regulations like minirnurn separation distance rules frorn zoning, Page 206 of 668 informatiorli or) your appea I rights, visit, A13kk www.kitclhn�erxa/ M�"i� 15 Pl/anningApplications V or contact: Natalie Goss, MIa n of Policy Et Research ("I I r'l es nataHe.goss@kitdhen1er.ca 519341.2200 x7648 The City of Qdhener will consider an application for Official Pllain Amendments and Zoning By-law Arnendirrients to, facifitate broader permissioris for lodgiing houses, as, a form of tiousing These chark gesalign wiftiaction iternsfrorn Housingfor, ll, Kitcheneirs, housing strategy and will reirnove exclusionary regulations like minirnurn separation distance rules frorn zoning, Page 206 of 668 APPENDIX 2 - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF PLANNING AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES COMMITTEE - OCTOBER 30, 2023 Page 207 of 668 APPENDIX 3 - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL - DATE Page 208 of 668 PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener - Lodging House Review) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: Section 4.2 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting the portions of the below text in the definition of "Household" with a strikethrough: Household" shall mean one or more persons living together as a single non-profit housekeeping unit, sharing all areas of the dwelling unit and may, in addition, be designed to accommodate lodging units eentaining less than fEAAF Fesidents. (By-law 94- 1, S.5[d])" 2. Section 4.2 By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting the definition of "Lodging House" in its entirety and replacing thereto as follows: Lodging House" shall mean a dwelling unit, where five or more persons, not including a resident owner of the property, may rant a lodging unit and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. A lodging house can include student residences but shall not include a group home, nursing home, hospital; or any residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act; or a hotel". 3. Section 5.17A of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding the portions of the below text in "Location of Lodging Houses" in grey, and deleting the portions of the below text in "Location of Lodging Houses" with a strikethrough: "LOCATION GF LODGING HOUSES Page 209 of 668 A lodging house shall be connected to full municipal services." 4. Section 6.1.2 a), Off -Street Parking Schedule for All Zones Except Downtown Zones, Column 2, of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended, as it pertains to Lodging House, by adding the portions of the below text that are highlighted in grey, and deleting the portions of the below text with a strikethrough: "I fer eaGh 25.0 square metros of the fleer area deveted to ledging Units. -1 for each Lodging House." 5. Section 6.1.2c) Off -Street Parking Schedule for Downtown Zones, Column 2, of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended, as it pertains to Lodging House, by adding the portions of the below text that are highlighted in grey, and deleting the portions of the below text with a strikethrough: " . 0 for each Lodging House." 6. Section 7, Subsection 7.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging House" after "Health Office" and before "Personal Services". 7. Section 7, Subsection 7.2 Regulations of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "and Lodging Houses" after "Location of Dwelling Units". 8. Section 8, Subsection 8.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Health Office" and before "Office". 9. Section 8, Subsection 8.2 Regulations of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "and Lodging Houses" after "Location of Dwelling Units". 10. Section 9, Subsection 9.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after Health Office" and before "Office". 11. Section 9, Subsection 9.2 Regulations of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "and Lodging Houses" after "Location of Dwelling Units". 12. Section 10, Subsection 10.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Hotel" and before "Office". 13. Section 10, Subsection 10.2 Regulations of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "and Lodging Houses" after "Location of Dwelling Units". 14. Section 11, Subsection 11.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Hotel" and before "Office". Page 210 of 668 15. Section 11, Subsection 11.2 Regulations of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "and Lodging Houses" after "Location of Dwelling Units". 16. Section 15, Subsection 15.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after Home Business" and before "Museum". 17. Section 16.2 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting "Minimum Size of Lodging House" and "9 lodging units". 18. Section 31, Subsection 31.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging House" after "Hospice" and before "Private Home Day Care". 19. Section 31 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 31.3.8, titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 31.3.7 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 20. Section 32, Subsection 32.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging House" after "Hospice" and before "Multiple Dwelling". 21. Section 32, of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 32.3.12 titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 32.3.11 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 22. Section 35, Subsection 35.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Home Business" and before "Private Home Day Care". 23. Section 35 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 35.6, titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 35.5 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 24. Section 36, Subsection 36.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Home Business" and before "Private Home Day Care". 25. Section 36 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 36.2.5, titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 36.2.4 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." Page 211 of 668 26. Section 37, Subsection 37.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Home Business" and before "Private Home Day Care". 27. Section 37 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding a Subsection 37.2.5, titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 37.2.4 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 28. Section 38, Subsection 38.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Home Business" and before "Private Home Day Care" 29. Section 38 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding a Subsection 38.2.7, titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 38.2.6 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 30. Section 47A, Subsection 47A.1 Permitted Uses of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding "Lodging Houses" after "Home Business" and before "Medical Laboratory". 31. Section 47A of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 47A.3.7 titled "For Lodging Houses", after subsection 47A.3.6 thereto as follows: "In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located." 32. Section 53, Subsection 53.2.2 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting "and Lodginq House havinq 9 residents or more" from the subsection title and adding "and" before "Residential Care Facilities" and after "For Multiple Dwellings," in subsection title. 33. Section 53, Subsection 53.2.2.3 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it thereto as follows: "For Lodging Houses" In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located". 34. Section 54, Subsection 54.2.2.2 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting "and Lodging House havinq 9 residents or more" from subsection title and adding "and" before "Residential Care Facilities" and after "For Multiple Dwellings" in the subsection title. 35. Section 54, Subsection 54.2.2.3 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it thereto as follows: Page 212 of 668 "For Lodging Houses" In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located". 36. Section 55, Subsection 55.2.2.2 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting "and Lodging House havinq 9 residents or more" from the subsection title and adding "and" before "Residential Care Facilities" and after "For Multiple Dwellings" in the subsection title. 37. Section 55, Subsection 55.2.2.3 of By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it thereto as follows: "For Lodging Houses" In accordance with the regulations of the dwelling type in which the lodging house is located". 38. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. XX (Lodging House Review 1994 Official Plan Amendment) and Official Plan Amendment No. XX (Lodging House Review 2014 Official Plan) come into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 213 of 668 PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener - Lodging House Review) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2019-051 as it pertains to lodging houses; follows: NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as Section 3 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by deleting the portions of the below text in the definition of "Lodging House" with a strikethrough, thereto as follows: Lodging House - means a dwelling unit where five or more persons, not including a resident owner of the property, may rent a lodging unit and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. Lodging house can include student residences and GORVeRts but shall not include a group home; hospital; any small residential care facility or large residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act; or a hotel." 2. Section 4.11 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding the portions of the below text in "Location of Lodging Houses" in grey, and deleting the portions of the below text in "Location of Lodging Houses" with a strikethrough, thereto as follows: "LOCATION -OF LODGING HOUSES A lodging house shall be connected to full municipal services. Page 214 of 668 3. Section 5 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended, as it pertains to lodging houses, by adding the portions of the below text in "Table 5-5: Regulations for Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements" that are highlighted in grey, and deleting the portions of the below text in "Table 5-5: Regulations for Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements" with a strikethrough thereto as follows: Table 5-5: Regulations for Minimum and Maximum Parking Requirements Use Minimum and Maximum Required Rates for Parking Spaces, COM -2 Visitor Parking Spaces, and Bicycle Parking Stalls COM -4 Lodging House UGC Zones MIX Zones All Other Zones RESIDENTIAL Lodging MonornurnT No minimum 6.r2 (ZFA -2 (:�€A House; r"44pg pac- 1 per lodging 1 per lodging house house Minimum parking spaces: Maximum � $2�r+��€i4 48n42-G€A 48m�-G€A 4. Section 7 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended, as it pertains to lodging houses, by adding the portions of the below text in "Table 7-1: Permitted Uses within the Residential Zones" that are highlighted in grey, thereto as follows: Table 7-1: Permitted Uses within the Residential Zones Use RES -1 RES -2 RES -3 RES -4 RES -5 RES -6 RES -7 Residential Uses Lodging House ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ,/ ✓ 5. Section 9 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended, as it pertains to lodging houses, by adding the portions of the below text in "Table 9-1: Permitted Uses within the Commercial Zones" that are highlighted in grey, after "Light Repair Operation" and before "Manufacturing" thereto as follows: Table 9-1: Permitted Uses within the Commercial Zones Use COM -1 COM -2 COM -3 COM -4 Lodging House J(3) ./(3)(4) 6. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. XX (Lodging House Review 1994 Official Plan Amendment) and Official Plan Amendment No. XX Page 215 of 668 (Lodging House Review 2014 Official Plan Amendment) come into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. 2023. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of Mayor Clerk Page 216 of 668 Housing For All Lodging House Sub -Committee Issues and Options Paper October 2023 Page 217 of 668 Forward and Acknowledgement This issues and options paper was co -created with the lodging house sub -committee comprised of members of the City of Kitchener's Affordable Housing Advisory Committee with support from city staff including Andrew Ramsaroop (former staff in Equity, Anti -Racism, and Indigenous Initiatives Division), Karen Cooper (former staff in the Office of the CAO), and Craig Dumart (Planning Division): • Martin Asling — Member of the Public • Regan Brusse — Member of the Public • Linda Terry — Member of the Public • Debbie Chapman — Member of Council. This paper is meant to create a common understanding of the history of lodging houses within the City of Kitchener, the role they play on the housing continuum, the issues they face and opportunities the City can take to help ensure lodging houses can remain a viable housing form, and advance the City's commitment to realizing the right to housing. Sryo4terC,;,,� a pn- The opportunities outlined in this paper will be used to inform the work of City staff as the lodging house policy review continues. Advancing this action will help the community move closer to more equitable, diverse and inclusive housing options. It progresses the City's strategic goal which is to create and foster a more caring community. Page 218 of 668 Introduction Lodging houses, also known as multi -tenant housing, and historically as boarding houses, or rooming houses have long been a form of housing within Kitchener and many other urban areas throughout Canada. They provide an affordable option for both short term and long- term housing for a variety of income levels, and a variety of household types and are an important part of the housing continuum. Typically, lodging homes have multiple rooms within a singular building with shared amenity space, such as a shared kitchen, shared washrooms, or other amenities. Their typology and design is diverse and they do not necessarily have one form, and they do not necessarily have to be affordable but most often are. Housing for All, Kitchener's housing strategy has actions that will help increase housing opportunities across the housing continuum. Updating the City's lodging house policies was one action of over 40 endorsed by Kitchener City Council. This paper examines the current state, issues and opportunities regarding lodging houses in the City of Kitchener and proposes updates to policy and regulations for consideration. Background Municipalities have regulated the form and location of housing to prevent or reduce perceived over- concentration of lodging houses and group homes and to "protect" neighborhoods. Many cities implemented zoning and licensing restrictions and separation requirements for these housing types and other social services. CMHC commissioned reports that found that for cities in Ontario, zoning was the first tool to regulate and control lodging houses followed by municipal licensing (CMHC, 2000; 2002; Campsie, 2018). At issue is that these types of "dispersal" by-laws were intended to prevent an overconcentration of lodging houses in certain neighbourhoods, but by implementing these types of by-laws cities were portraying residents not as citizens but social problems that require spatial solutions (Finkler and Grants, 2011; Campsie, 2018). A part of the City of Kitchener's Cedar Hill Land Use and Social Environment Study official plan and zoning by-law amendments were proposed that sought to limit the creation of new lodging houses, residential care facilities or social service establishment within the Cedar Hill neighbourhood. In 2010 the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) ruled against the City of Kitchener's Official Plan Amendment No. 58 because imposing by-laws that limit housing availability for Code protected groups was discriminatory, an encroachment on human rights and an overall in breach of planning principles (OHRC, 2013). The City of Kitchener was one of four Ontario cities that were brought to the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario and challenged on minimum separation distances (MSD) and zoning restrictions on group homes and supportive housing. The City subsequently removed the MSD and restrictions for group homes as a result of the Tribunal's direction (OHRC, 2014). While residential care facilities and social service establishment clearly serve Ontario Human Rights Code -protected groups, lodging house residents are diverse, therefore MSDs for lodging houses remained in effect. Page 219 of 668 In October 2019, City of Kitchener planning staff brought forward report DSD -19-233— New Zoning By-law (Stage 2a) — Residential Base Zones Comprehensive Review of the Zoning By-law (CRoZBy) Project. City Council passed all of Planning staff's recommendations including that the issue of regulation of lodging houses in the Official Plan and Zoning By- law be referred to the Affordable Housing Strategy for further consideration. In December 2020, as a part of report DSD -20-214 Council approved its housing strategy titled, "Housing for All". One of the strategy's actions is to report on the feasibility and implications of reviewing and updating current lodging house policies. In March 2021, planning staff brought forward a consultant report and recommendations on the Lower Doon Land Study as a part of report DSD -2021-11. One recommendation in the consultant report was to allow lodging houses in all residential zones in Lower Doon and subsequently revise the City's licensing by-law for Lodging Houses. Relevant Policies There are three municipal policies and by-laws that govern Lodging Houses within the City of Kitchener: • The City of Kitchener's Official Plan, 2014 • The City of Kitchener's Zoning By-law (85-1 and 2019-051) • Kitchener's Business Licensing By-law Chapter 500 — Chapter 553 Lodging House License of the Municipal Code There are also multiple provincial policies and standards that govern lodging houses within the City of Kitchener and either empower or supersede municipal policy, including: • Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c.H.19 • Ontario Building Code, Building Code Act, 1992 (O.Reg. 332/12: Building Code) • Ontario Fire Protection and Prevention Act, 1997 (O.Reg. 213/07: Fire Code) • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13 • Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25 Lodging Houses within the City of Kitchener. The City of Kitchener's Official Plan, 2014 currently defines lodging houses as: Lodging House - a dwelling unit where four (4) or more persons may rent a room for sleeping and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. The City of Kitchener's Zoning By-laws currently defines lodging houses as: Zoning By-law 85-1 "Shall mean a dwelling unit or part thereof containing one or more lodging units designed to accommodate four or more residents exclusive of the owner or primary occupant. The residents may share common areas of the dwelling other than the lodging units, and do not appear to function as a household. This shall not include a group home, nursing home, Page 220 of 668 hospital or any residential care facility licensed, approved or supervised under any general or specific Act or a hotel. This shall include, but not be limited to, student residences and convents. (By-law 2003-163, S.7) (Amended: By-law 2012- 034, S.8)" Zoning By-law 2019-051 "Means a dwelling unit where five or more persons, not including a resident owner of the property, may rent a lodging unit and where the kitchen and other areas of the dwelling unit are shared amongst the persons occupying the dwelling unit. Lodging houses can include student residences and convents but shall not include a group home; hospital; and small residential care facility or large residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act; or a hotel." The City of Kitchener's Business Licensing By-law defines lodging houses as: "means a dwelling or part thereof containing one or more lodging units which lodging units or units are designed to accommodate four or more residents in total. The residents may share common areas of the dwelling other than the lodging units, and do not appear to function as a household. This shall not include a hotel, motel, group home, nursing home, hospital, or any residential care facility licensed, approved, or supervised under any general or specific Act." Currently within the City of Kitchener there are about 20 lodging houses that are licensed and can be inspected annually for safety compliance. Anecdotally however, the majority of lodging houses in the City are unlicensed and therefore are not regulated under the City's business licensing bylaw. They currently exist in a variety of neighbourhoods both in the urban core and in the surrounding residential suburbs, where current zoning regulations may not allow them to become licensed. The City only becomes aware of lodging houses through complaints, fire code violations or bylaw infractions. This means the majority of lodging houses that are currently operating in the City are not able to be inspected for safety, upkeep, and property maintenance. Further, the residents of unlicensed lodging houses are at risk to be displaced due to their unlicensed nature. Key Issues and Opportunities In Toronto, Maytree — a charitable foundation created to find solutions to poverty in Canada - reported that over 100 Notices of Violations were issued in Toronto annually to operators by Municipal Licensing and Standards only 7% were "based on habitability concerns, while 93% were related to "non -permitted" or "no -license" charges" (Maytree, 2020). This infers that enforcement is underutilized by tenants to support property maintenance standards and are focused on displacement in response to complaints from the public. There are a variety of factors for lodging houses being unlicensed: • The City's current Official Plan includes policies suggesting that the Zoning By-law may be used to determine where lodging houses should be permitted and that the use may be subject to standards or location criteria including minimum separation distances. The City's current Zoning Bylaws do not permit lodging houses as of right in all zoning categories where other residential uses are permitted and also restricts them geographically through minimum separation distances. • The City's current Lodging House by-law permits lodging house licenses to be obtained ONLY where a lodging house is permitted in zoning. Page 221 of 668 Operators do not wish to go through the process of bringing lodging houses into conformity with zoning and or licensing provisions. The opportunities within this report will focus on what the City can do to help make lodging houses a safe place to call home. Key Issue 1: There is currently a minimum separation distance (MSD) for Lodging Homes and Correctional Group Homes in the City of Kitchener. There has been an arbitrary minimum separation distance requirement put in place for lodging houses and correctional group homes in the City of Kitchener. This MSD is enforced through the City of Kitchener Official Plan 2014 and the City's Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051. This prevents another lodging house or correctional group home from being established in the same neighbourhood as another and is a major impediment to ensuring an increase in affordable housing and brining illegal lodging homes into legality. The Ontario Human Rights Commission has advised all municipalities to eliminate minimum separation distances. The OHRC states, "Minimum separation distances are basically restrictions — and can adversely affect renters by restricting the options available to them. Municipalities should consider incentives and ways to encourage affordable housing throughout the municipality" (OHRC, 2013). Further, the OHRC states that MSDs are a form of "people -zoning" which is illegal and discriminates against code -protected groups. Opportunity 1.1: The City's Official Plan, 2014 be amended to remove references to the minimum separation distances as it pertains to Lodging Houses Opportunity 1.2: The City's Zoning By-law be amended to remove references to the minimum separation distances as it pertains to Lodging Houses and Correctional Group homes. Opportunity 1.3: Through Housing For All, the City's first housing strategy and its actions the city is undergoing a number of actions to encourage more housing opportunities across all Wards and neighbourhoods in the city and across the housing continuum. Key Issue 2: Lodging Houses are currently only permitted in multi -unit residential zones as -of -right in the current zoning by-law The City of Kitchener is currently in the process of implementing a new comprehensive zoning by-law. Currently By-law 85-1 governs zoning in the City as well, as the partially implemented Zoning By-law 2019-051. In the residential zones of both zoning by-laws Lodging Houses are only permitted in zones which are higher density residential zones. By only allowing lodging homes in these zones as -of -right the policy does not allow lodging homes operating outside of these zones to be legalized or licensed. Further, the Ontario Human Rights Commission consistently recommends that lodging houses be allowed as of right in all residential neighbourhoods. OHRC notes, "In limiting lodging houses only to certain residential zones, the bylaw could have a discriminatory impact". Further, in the Lower Doon land use study final report commissioned by the City of Kitchener, the consultants recommended that lodging houses be permitted in all residential zones in Lower Doon. Understanding that this regulation could not only be limited to Lower Doon, the zoning by-law amendment would need to be a city-wide zoning by-law amendment in order to mitigate any possible discriminatory impacts. Page 222 of 668 Opportunity 2.1: Amend Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051 to allow lodging houses as of right in all residential zones across the entire City of Kitchener as per the recommendations and directions from OHRC. Key Issue 3: There are misconceptions on `Who' lives in Lodging Houses, what role lodging houses have in the housing continuum. Lodging houses play a key role in providing a diverse range of housing in the city. They provide an affordable housing option for those with lower income levels, single person households, students and other groups. In a region where housing costs are rising at an exponential rate, it is vital that we not only ensure we can make lodging houses safe places to live but that we can encourage more lodging houses to become licensed and remove barriers to increasing the uptake of lodging houses as a residential typology. This also includes addressing the issue that most residents either have misconceptions on what lodging houses look like, who lives there and how they contribute overall to healthy, diverse and strong neighbourhoods. Opportunity 3.1: Include lodging houses in the discussion, research, and potential education/communication around NIMBYism through the work of The SHIFT. Opportunity 3.2: Through Housing for All, there will be opportunities to engage people with lived experience and with those who live within lodging houses through the lived experience working group. There is the potential to include someone who either has or currently lives in a lodging house to sit on the working group. Further, through the Business Licensing Review, there is an opportunity to engage with people with lived experience and multi -tenant housing advocates. Key Issue 4: Shutting down Lodging Houses must continue to remain the very last step. In order to avoid the displacement of tenants, more unregulated lodging houses need to become licensed. When lodging houses are shut down and disbanded, the tenants inside are left with very little options. With asking rents out of reach for many, and a long Regional Housing waitlist, residents become displaced, homeless, or unsheltered. The City has a coordinated approach to dealing with by-law infractions which is a coordinated effort between By-law Enforcement, Licensing Services and Fire. However, more can be done and should be done to incentivize and make it easier to become a licensed lodging house. These changes start with permitting lodging houses city-wide through zoning. Further there are opportunities to promote and elevate landlords and operators who set a high standard of maintenance and tenant relations as well as exploring systems that ensure landlord compliance. Table 1: Programs, incentives and policies to protect and increase the number of licensed lodging houses Municipality/Jurisdiction Name/I ncentives/Pol icyType City of Oshawa Lodging House Demerit Point System Compliance Newtown, Australia Boarding House Good Practice Awards Recognition Page 223 of 668 Munici palit /Jurisdiction Name/Incentives/Policy Type CMHC, 2001 Property tax reclassification to Incentive incentivize new stock, maintain the existing stock and keep operators active in the sector. City of Toronto Demolition and Rental Replacement Replacement These opportunities should be leveraged to prevent the disbanding of unlicensed lodging houses, by giving them opportunities to become licensed. Kitchener is currently in the process of updating it's Lodging House By-law. Through this review Kitchener should consider ways to make the lodging house licensing process streamlined, more affordable, and easier for owners, making it more appealing for owners to comply with updated rules for lodging houses. Conclusion Through the addressing the proposed opportunities, the City can help: • Increase the number of licensed lodging houses and thereby help ensure safety of residents. • Encourage good landlord practices as they pertain to lodging houses. • Help educate the general public on the key role lodging houses play on the housing continuum. • Improve the access to a diversity of housing types required to ensure the right to housing. • Ensure definitions are aligned, harmonized and complementary so that they are straightforward to comply with, and • Prevent loopholes in regulation and enforcement which would ultimately impact the safety of tenants. Page 224 of 668 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING to change permissions for lodging houses city-wide gip:. ii1.-wide v , Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Zoom Fleeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Natalie Goss, Manager of Policy Et Research nataLie.goss@ kitchen er.ca 519.741.2200 x7648 The City of Kitchener will consider an application for Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendments to facilitate broader permissions for lodging houses as a form of housing. These changes align with action items from Housing forAll, Kitchener's housing strategy and will remove exclusionary regulations like minimum se aration g distance rules from zoning.Page 225 of 66W Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: John Zunic, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7685 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 4 DATE OF REPORT: October 3, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-434 SUBJECT: Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation RECOMMENDATION: That City Initiated Official Plan Amendment OPA23/013/K/JZ, for the purpose of implementing recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study, including amendments to land uses, Specific Policy Areas, and Cultural Heritage Resources mapping and text amendments, be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-434 as Attachment `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and, That City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/232/K/JZ to amend Zoning By-law 2019-051, be approved in the form shown in the "Proposed By-law" attached to Report DSD -2023-434 as Attachment `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to implement recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment proposed for Lower Doon. It is planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments be approved. • There are no financial implications associated with this recommendation. • Community engagement included: 0 3 rounds of postcard notifications mailed out in advance of community engagements in April 2022, May 2023, and the statutory public meeting in October 2023; o Virtual community check-in held on April 5, 2022; o A project specific EngageWR webpage; o Two "walkshop" walking workshops and two drop-in engagements featuring heritage consultants ASI Heritage in May 2023; o Follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 226 of 668 o Virtual meetings with Six Nations of the Grand River, Conestoga College, and Conestoga Students Inc.; o Drop-in engagement at Conestoga College Doon Campus on July 18, 2023; o Heritage Kitchener committee presentation on the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape on October 3, 2023; o Notice of the virtual open house engagement and statutory public meeting published in the Waterloo Region Record on October 6, 2023; o Virtual Open House held on October 23, 2023; and o Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee held on October 30, 2023. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY City Council approved the Lower Doon Land Use Study in March 2021. Following City Council's approval, Planning staff undertook community engagement on next steps towards implementation of the recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study. This included identifying proposed changes in the Official Plan related to land use, special policy areas, and cultural heritage, as well as changes to zoning that would bring Lower Doon into the new zoning by-law. Planning staff retained cultural heritage consultants Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI Heritage) to support the implementation of heritage recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study. Planning staff is recommending approval of Official Plan amendments and Zoning By-law amendments to implement recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study. BACKGROUND: This report is one of many reports being presented to Council for consideration in 2023- 2024+ which focuses on housing related studies and initiatives. The graphic below depicts the planned updates to Council over the next 12+ months. Municipal Housing I I Bill 13, Bill 23, Bill 109 1 r 1 Evictions & Pledge Implementation Plan Lodging House Official Flan Displacement Toolkit Growing Together and Zoning Implementation Implementation Engagernent Summary Lower Doon Land Use Rental Replacement By - Inclusionary Zoning Study Implementation law Implementation Direction Eviction & Displacernent Shared Missing Middle 'and Webpage & Online Accommodations Affordable Housing Study Reporting Update Licensing By-law Update Eviction & Displacement U dates Toolkit Options p (incl. Lodging House( Lived Expertise Rental Replacement By-law Working Group year Z Information Report Work plan Growing Together Development Implementation Inclusionary Zoning Implementation Page 227 of 668 The City initiated the Lower Doon Land Use Study (the "Study") in 2019 to review current land use and zoning within the Lower Doon study area (Figure 1), examine the planning structure and land use mix, and recommend updates to official plan policies and zoning regulations. The Study was prepared by retained consultants The Planning Partnership and Bray Heritage and culminated in a final report dated January 29, 2021. The Study contained 23 recommendations within the following key themes: protect heritage; enhance the supply of housing; enhance the public realm; allow lodging houses; prepare a planning framework; Figure 1 — Lower Doon Study Area City Council approved the Study in March 2021. Following City Council's approval, Planning staff undertook community engagement on next steps towards implementation of the recommendations contained within the Study. Planning staff retained cultural heritage consultants Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI Heritage) to support the implementation of heritage recommendations identified in the Study. The scope of the cultural heritage work included: reviewing previously completed heritage studies, namely the Lower Doon Land Use Study — Heritage Component prepared by Bray Heritage in 2021 and the Lower Doon and Homer Watson Park Candidate Cultural Heritage Landscape Evaluation Study prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. in 2019; undertaking a field visit of Lower Doon; conducting supplementary background research; refining and expanding the Statement of Significance and Heritage Attributes beyond the work previously completed; and developing accompanying objectives, policies, and guidelines for the conservation of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape (Figure 2). Community engagement on the draft land use and zoning concept, along with the draft Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape materials was undertaken in May 2023 and available for public review and comment between May 10, 2023, and July 31, 2023. Page 228 of 668 l F 7fi AnQG� ..Kiiclop,,i,V. S¢ L , RAW 'V r, a}IPP J pp M E fli Y Figure 2 — Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape (ASI Heritage, 2023) Planning staff are bringing forward a city -initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment ("proposed amendments") to implement land use recommendations contained within the Study. REPORT: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board, and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: a) The protection of ecological systems, including natural areas, features and functions; d) The conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historic, archaeological or scientific interest; f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; i) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; 1) The protection of the financial and economic well-being of the Province and its municipalities Page 229 of 668 t _w .,. .......... urvndMfiwrgrqd' ru , AnamwYv [. nm u NA L , RAW 'V r, a}IPP J pp M E fli Y Figure 2 — Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape (ASI Heritage, 2023) Planning staff are bringing forward a city -initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment ("proposed amendments") to implement land use recommendations contained within the Study. REPORT: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board, and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: a) The protection of ecological systems, including natural areas, features and functions; d) The conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historic, archaeological or scientific interest; f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; i) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; 1) The protection of the financial and economic well-being of the Province and its municipalities Page 229 of 668 p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, i. Is well-designed, ii. Encourages a sense of place, and iii. Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable, and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health, and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed amendments facilitate a compact built form which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to public transit options, and makes efficient use of existing transportation networks. Lands within the Lower Doon study area are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed official plan and zoning by-law amendments are in alignment with provincial policies supportive of providing a broad range of housing. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed amendments will allow for the provision of a broad range of residential, commercial, and institutional uses within Lower Doon. The proposed amendments are compatible with the surrounding community, help manage growth, are transit supportive, and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed amendments and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification within Lower Doon. Existing City processes, including the Site Plan process, provide City staff with an Page 230 of 668 opportunity to request additional information related to engineering matters prior to any development occurring. Based on the foregoing, planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed amendments are in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.1.4 states that the policies of the Growth Plan will support the achievement of complete communities that: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: a. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; b. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; c. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and d. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policy 3.2.2.1 states that Transportation system planning, land use planning, and transportation investment will be co-ordinated to implement this Plan. Policy 4.2.7 states: 1. Cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and benefit communities, particularly in strategic growth areas. Page 231 of 668 2. Municipalities will work with stakeholders, as well as First Nations and Metis communities, in developing and implementing official plan policies and strategies for the identification, wise use and management of cultural heritage resources. 3. Municipalities are encouraged to prepare archaeological management plans and municipal cultural plans and consider them in their decision making. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. It also supports the co- ordination of transportation system planning and land use planning, the conservation of cultural heritage resources, and identification of actions that address climate change. Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed amendments conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): The Regional Official Plan (ROP) designates the Lower Doon study area as Urban Area on Map 1 — Regional Structure and Delineated Built Up Area on Map 2 — Urban System. Policy 2.C.2.1 states "The Urban Area is designated as shown on Map 1. This designation contains the primary urban areas of the Cities of Cambridge, Kitchener and Waterloo, and also extends into portions of the Township of Woolwich. The lands included within this designation are intended to accommodate the largest share, almost 90 percent, of the Region's population and employment growth within the planning horizon of this Plan, and will be planned and developed in accordance with the policies of this Chapter and other applicable policies in this Plan." Policy 2.C.2.2 states "Area municipalities will develop official plan policies and implementing zoning by-laws, and other planning documents or programs to ensure that development occurring within the Urban Area is planned and developed in a manner that: a. implements the Regional urban system described in this Plan; b. advances the community's transition into an energy-efficient, resilient, low - carbon community by: i. promoting a more compact built form that enables a modal shift to most trips being made by walking, cycling, and rolling; ii. contributing to the creation of 15 -minute neighbourhoods; iii. reducing air pollution and achieving the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets of this Plan; c. is serviced by a municipal water and wastewater system, except where specified in accordance with Policy 2.J.8; d. protects the natural environment, including the Grand River and its tributaries, and surface water and groundwater resources in accordance with the policies in Chapter 7 and 8; e. provides a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes, in accordance with all the applicable policies of this Plan; f. conserves cultural heritage resources and supports the adaptive reuse of built heritage resources in accordance with the policies in Chapter 3; Page 232 of 668 g. avoids development and land use patterns that may pose a risk to public health, safety and the environment; h. improves accessibility for persons of all ages and abilities and at all times of year by addressing built form barriers which restrict their full participation in society; i. ensures the development of high quality urban form through site design and urban design standards that create an attractive and vibrant public realm; j. expands residents' convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including to a mobility network that is safe, comfortable and convenient for walking, cycling, and rolling for people of all ages and abilities and at all times of year; Policy 2.F.2 states "Area municipalities, in collaboration with the Region, will develop and adopt a strategy to meet or exceed the minimum intensification targets set out in Table 3, and intensification more broadly throughout delineated built-up areas, which will: c. enable intensification more broadly throughout the area municipality's delineated built-up area through gentle density and other missing middle housing options; d. ensure lands are zoned and development is designed in a manner that supports the achievement of 15 -minute neighbourhoods; e. support the gradual transition of existing neighbourhoods into 15 -minute neighbourhoods that are denser, more energy efficient, and liveable; f. guide and prioritize planning and investment in efficient and modern infrastructure and public service facilities that will support intensification; The proposed amendments contain measures to ensure that development within Lower Doon will achieve the objectives set out in the above-mentioned policies, including promoting a more compact built form of development to enable most trips to be made by active means of travel, contributing to the creation of 15 -minute neighbourhoods, and leveraging existing infrastructure, including municipal water and wastewater systems and Grand River Transit services. The proposed amendments identify land use and zoning changes that provide a diverse range and mix of housing options to meet the needs of all household sizes and incomes. Through the identification of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape, the proposed amendments conserve identified cultural heritage resources within Lower Doon. Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed amendments conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The vision and goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete, and healthy community. The Official Plan includes objective 4.1.1, which aims to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure, and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of the Kitchener community through all stages of life. This objective Page 233 of 668 speaks to the preference for a land use pattern that accommodates a range of housing types across the city as a whole and within neighbourhoods, including Lower Doon. Policies 5.C.1.8 and 5.C.1.9 identify the need for the City to continue diversifying its economic base by supporting City Nodes, among other Urban Structure elements, to be developed with an appropriate range of economic uses, including office, institutional, commercial activity and technology based businesses. Additionally, lands designated Commercial, Commercial Campus and Mixed Use will provide for a sufficient supply and a complete range of commercial goods and services. These areas are intended to intensify and provide a broader range of uses and employment opportunities. The Official Plan also includes objective 12.1.1 which aims to conserve the city's cultural heritage resources through their identification, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. This objective has been met by identifying and conserving heritage attributes within the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks, and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas, Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. Lower Doon includes lands that are identified as a City Node, Community Areas, and Green Areas on Map 3 — Urban Structure of the Official Plan. The planned function of City Nodes is to provide primarily for commercial, and/or institutional uses that have a regional and/or city-wide orientation. Currently, or overtime, City Nodes may include residential uses where appropriate and compatible. City Nodes are intended to intensify, be transit -supportive and cycling and pedestrian friendly. The planned function of Community Areas is to provide for residential uses as well as non- residential supporting uses intended to serve the immediate residential areas. Community Areas may include a range of land use designations, including Low Rise Residential, Page 234 of 668 Medium Rise Residential, High Rise Residential, Open Space, Institutional and/or Major Infrastructure and Utilities. Policy 3.C.2.52 in the Official Plan indicates that limited intensification may be permitted within Community Areas in accordance with the applicable land use designation and urban design policies, and that the proposed development must be sensitive to and compatible with the character, form and planning function of the surrounding context. The planned function of Green Areas is to protect and conserve the ecological functions and features and passive and active recreation that these areas provide. The proposed Official Plan Amendment does not include any modifications to the City's Urban Structure. Land Use Lands within Lower Doon include a mix of land use designations, including Low Rise Residential, Natural Heritage Conservation, Open Space, Institutional, and Commercial. Planning staff are recommending that lands identified as Area 1 identified on Figure 3 be redesianated from Commercial to Hiah Rise Residential . .li . 3TJ-. �,r �� 4• �� r3T p � �3f �� � �,- � r3T �, S .'r.'C?. C?. •r r F.".r. "Cal. 100 44, [P" rir J r ¢ r{¢ Ares 1. r ¢ AP F • P •_ 4�— a JI CITY of KITC'HENIEIR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO MAP 3 LAND USE ILow Rase ResIiden9HkaI CornmeteW Rumness Pairk EmplWinerur Inslrturiona l ETZNaturM Hlenaa,ge Crrns8irvatiibn �s Open Space majorInirastrulcWile and BJH9Hifies Area of Aarrendinient Area 1 From Co mmmercial Y�ua�'awr�' To High Rkse Resideu liW N CHIEDULE W r l REVISED: OFFICIAL PLAN A1V1EN@'H EN'T IFrf 23'6"1'3'X11. UET'RE.a ZONING RY'-I_.Aw"u" AMENDMENT ZBA23'/023]KIJZ APPLICANT- CITY (INITIATED SCALE y 15,000 ''City of Kitcheinerr, 0a t. CITY '4""vID1 E w n " UN Pyr .a� ��tima�W rae+rt=�rvr�mrEr�r.zaEa�auce�suEr�m,Rrw,aEwr r�rar�main� ti1 Figure 3 — Proposed Amendment to Map 3 Land Use (Official Plan) The purpose of this land use change is to implement as -of -right permissions for high rise residential uses on lands identified along Conestoga College Boulevard and referenced in Figure 3, allowing for additional housing forms to be built in close proximity to Conestoga College. The proposed land use change directs growth to the City Node and implements Page 235 of 668 recommendation #8 contained in the Lower Doon Land Use Study which states, "Promote the development of higher density housing and/or mixed use vacant lands south of Homer Watson through Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to permit a greater variety of land uses." The introduction of the high rise residential land use on lands identified in Figure 3 achieves Objective 4. 1.1 of the Official Plan by providing for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure, and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of Lower Doon and the broader Kitchener community through all stages of life. Policy 3.C.2.24. of the Official Plan states "The planned function of City Nodes is to provide primarily for commercial, and/or institutional uses that have a regional and/or city-wide orientation. Currently, or over time, City Nodes may include residential uses where appropriate and compatible. City Nodes are intended to intensify, be transit -supportive and cycling and pedestrian friendly." Policy 3.C.2.28. of the Official Plan states "Within an area identified as a City Node on Map 2 the applicable land use designations may include Commercial Campus, Commercial, Mixed Use, Institutional, Open Space, Medium Rise Residential and High Rise Residential as shown on Map 3 and detailed in Sections 15.D.3, 15.D.4, 15.D.5, 15.D.7 and 15.D.10 depending on the context and the range of uses deemed appropriate for achieving the planned function of that node." Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed land use change is in conformity with the intent of the Official Plan. Specific Policy Areas Removal of Specific Policy Area 26 Planning staff are recommending amendments to Specific Policy Areas in Lower Doon. These amendments include the removal of Specific Policy Area 26 from Map 5 of the Official Plan, as shown on Figure 4, and the deletion of policy 15.D.12.26 from the Official Plan. Policy 15.D.12.26 states "The City will undertake a Master Planning exercise to confirm among other matters the appropriate Urban Structure Component to be applied to the subject lands and the appropriate land use designation mix necessary to achieve the planned function for this area through an Official Plan Amendment. Until such time as a Master Plan has been prepared, in order to provide for a transition of lands designated Commercial and adjacent lands designated Natural Heritage Conservation, appropriately scaled multiple residential development may be permitted, having a minimum Floor Space Ratio of 1.0 and a maximum Floor Space Ratio of 4.0. Where permitted, multiple residential development may locate in free-standing buildings or in mixed use buildings with other compatible commercial uses. However, multiple residential uses may not be permitted in locations immediately adjacent to incompatible commercial land uses." Planning staff are of the opinion that the work completed through the Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation project satisfies the requirement to undertake a Master Planning exercise to confirm the appropriate urban structure component and land use designation mix, and that Specific Policy Area 26 is no longer required. Page 236 of 668 Removal of Specific Policy Area 16 The proposed amendment also includes an administrative amendment to remove Specific Policy Area 16 from Map 5 of the Official Plan (Figure 4). City Council, through Official Plan Amendment 29, approved the deletion of policy 15.D.12.16, which corresponds to Specific Policy Area 16. Adding Specific Policy Area 66 Planning staff are recommending adding Specific Policy Area 66 (Figure 4). The purpose of the Specific Policy Area is to remove the maximum floor space ratio applying to applicable properties designated High Rise Residential and reads as follows: "Notwithstanding section 15.D.3.24, for the lands subject to this Specific Policy Area, there shall be no maximum Floor Space Ratio. A holding provision will be applied through the zoning by-law to require an urban design brief." The objective of this Specific Policy Area is to accommodate the development of high rise residential building forms without utilizing floor space ratio as a mechanism for regulating built form. The Specific Policy Area recognizes the limitation of using floor space ratio, particularly as density permissions vary depending on the size of a given parcel of land. Additional regulations contained within the proposed zoning, including the holding provision to require an urban design brief, are proposed to provide a more appropriate means of regulating the form and density of residential development of the applicable properties within the nodes that are subject to the proposed Specific Policy Area. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies, or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. Planning staff are recommending the removal of two Specific Policy Areas and the addition of Specific Policy Area 66 in order to implement the following recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study: 8. Promote the development of high density housing and/or mixed use on vacant lands south of Homer Watson through Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments to permit a greater variety of land uses; and 16. Prepare a planning framework for Lower Doon to identify the land use and design framework for vacant/underdeveloped lands in the area. Page 237 of 668 ff or it .�I*0 � %Ail'ea 'I rr r �.._ Area 2 SCHEDULEW APPLICANT ° CITY INITIATED CITY WIDE ME HES LIE' 1 " %5,dd@ Itn m4� �l11 � tMN:F� � IIhAIfL➢;�"IDGIII REMSED CITY CII"' KI'TCHIENEIB OFF FICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO MAP 5 SPECIFIC POLICY AREAS N Specific, Policy Areas r 5 300 Joseph 5°rcheeTg Cres MIB Upper Doon Aires of Ameundimenf To, Rei ove Slpeci iiic Relllicy Area 16 Leweirt IDoon A Area 2 Ir To, Rei ove Slpeci iiic Pelllicy Area IL ar 26 Horner'watsen IBlvdfCenestoi College Blvd. Area 3 To, Add Specific Policy Ahrea. 66. Cornestaga College Blvd OFFICIAL PLAIN AMENDMENT OPA231013/<IJZ, ZONING, BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA2W0231K)JZ City of Itc a e W UIOk qka MAPS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PL.0.A'dPPdI1NG 11,..m6 Figure 4 — Proposed Amendment to Map 5 Specific Policy Areas (Official Plan) Cultural Heritage Resources Planning staff recommend the implementation of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape through the addition of text amendments in Section 12 — Cultural Heritage Resources of the Official Plan. The text amendments include policies specific to the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape, as shown in Attachment A. The proposed modifications include the introduction of a new subheading in Section 12 of the Official Plan titled "Cultural Heritage Landscape Implementation" where policies specific to identified cultural heritage landscapes within the City are proposed to be contained, including policies specific to the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape. The Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Report prepared by ASI Heritage is attached as Attachment D. Map 9 of the Official Plan is proposed to be amended to include the extent of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape geography (Figure 5). The proposed official plan amendment is in alignment with objectives 12.1.1, and 12.1.2, and policy 12.C.1.9 of the Official Plan. The proposed official plan amendment implements the following recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study: 1. Identify a Heritage Character Area extending north from the intersection of Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Drive; 2. Include a Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest; 3. Identify the Heritage Attributes; and 5. Conserve properties on the municipal heritage register. Page 238 of 668 Ap '111011V SCHEDULEV APPLICANT: CITY INITIATED CITY WIDE 4 N COILLEGF BL—V[) Q 500 MFTRES SCALE 1:16,000 OATIE_ CITY OF KITCH'ENER OFFICIAL (PLAN AIMitEIMIDM LENT TO MAP 9 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES I N Heritage Conservation District 111111/j Heritage Corridor E i Canadian Heritage (River Cultural (Heritage Landscape 4. 300 Joseph Schnaerg Crescent (IEetz ner Farmstead) 5. Joseph Schoarg Crescent 58R- 10533 Pts 2 & 3 Area of Amendment Area 1 ro,Anid C,EnlltUrW Heritage Landscape 6 Lower IDoon (Willow takePark(andsand 10, 20, and 37 Pinnacle Dr and 10 /CAI1W18MI)GE 5ArrnhnersR D0 RE" I ED, II OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0PA23,1013/K/JZ', ZONING BY-LAW AIMENDIVIENIT ZBA2:3/023iK/ UZ City of Kitchener DEVEnOPMLN1 SERVICES DEPART MEN( PLANNING Figure 5 — Proposed Amendment to Map 9 Cultural Heritage Resources (Official Plan) Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis specific to the proposed amendments to land uses, specific policy areas, and cultural heritage resources, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved as shown in Attachment A. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-law 2019-051) The purpose of the proposed zoning by-law amendment is to bring all properties within Lower Doon into Zoning By-law 2019-051 from Zoning By-law 85-1, as shown on Appendix A in Attachment B. The existing zoning in Lower Doon includes a range of residential, institutional, and commercial zones. The proposed zoning includes the application of residential, commercial, and institutional zones contained within Zoning By-law 2019-051. Page 239 of 668 Proposed Residential Zones Proposed residential zones in Lower Doon include the application of the RES -4: Low Rise Residential Four Zone, RES -5: Low Rise Residential Five Zone, and RES -7: High Rise Residential Seven Zone categories. The RES -4 zone permits a broad range of low-rise residential uses from single detached dwellings to multiple dwellings with up to four (4) residential units. The RES -5 zone also permits a broad range of low-rise residential uses from single detached dwellings to multiple dwellings but does not include a maximum number of permitted residential units. Both the RES -4 and RES -5 zones limit buildings to 3 storeys and 11.0m in height. The RES -7 zone permits multiple dwellings and a range of non- residential uses. Lodging houses are permitted within residential zones RES -4, RES -5, RES -6, and RES -7 in Zoning By-law 2019-051. The proposed zoning by-law amendment implements the following recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study: 8. Promote the development of higher density housing and/or mixed use on vacant lands south of Homer Watson through Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments to permit a greater variety of land uses; 13. Permit Lodging Houses in all residential zones in Lower Doon. Policy 15.D.3.8 of the Official Plan states "15.D.3.8. The Low Rise Residential land use designation will accommodate a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi-detached dwellings, street townhouse dwellings, townhouse dwellings in a cluster development, low- rise multiple dwellings, special needs housing, and other forms of low-rise housing." The RES -4 and RES -5 zones are proposed on lands with a Low Rise Residential land use designation. To determine which zone was appropriate to apply to which lands, staff considered the following: • existing lot area, width, and depth; and • providing a transition between higher density forms of development on the Conestoga College lands to the adjacent low rise residential area. Based on the assessment, lands that have a minimum size that met RES -5 regulations for a range of permitted residential uses, are proposed to be zoned RES -5. Additionally, RES - 5 zoning is proposed to be applied to lands that have the potential to be consolidated along streets that provide a transition between higher and lower density uses (e.g.: Doon Valley Drive). The remaining residential lots within Lower Doon are proposed to be zoned RES -4 as they meet the minimum regulations for a range of permitted residential uses in that zone. The permitted residential uses identified in the RES -4 and RES -5 zone categories are consistent with the range of low density housing types identified in policy 15.D.3.8 of the Official Plan. The RES -4 and RES -5 zone categories permit a range of missing middle residential uses, including street townhouses, cluster townhouses (RES -5 only), and multiple dwellings. Policy 15.D.3.22 of the Official Plan states "The High Rise Residential land use designation will primarily accommodate high density multiple dwellings and special needs housing to achieve a high intensity of residential use." Page 240 of 668 The application of the RES -7 zone category is proposed on lands with a High Rise Residential land use designation which is proposed within the City Node. The permitted residential uses identified in the RES -7 zone category is consistent with the range of high density multiple dwellings identified in policy 15.D.3.22 of the Official Plan. The proposed zoning by-law amendment creates opportunities for increased housing supply by permitting a broad range of low rise residential and high rise residential uses, and includes as of right zoning permissions for at least four dwelling units on all residentially zoned properties. The proposed amendment allows for greater flexibility in the residential uses permitted on lands within Lower Doon and introduces further missing middle "gentle density" housing options consistent with the recommendations and directions within the Study and Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Study. Proposed Commercial Zones Proposed commercial zones in Lower Doon include the application of the COM -2: General Commercial zone. The purpose of this zone is to accommodate retail and commercial uses within the City's Urban Corridors, and Community and City Nodes. The proposed application of the COM -2 zone in Lower Doon is within a City Node on Map 2 Urban Structure of the Official Plan. The COM -2 zone permits a range of commercial uses. The COM -2 zone also permits a "Dwelling Unit", provided that: the dwelling unit be located within a mixed use building containing at least one other permitted use and shall not be located on the ground floor; and the maximum floor space ratio for the dwelling unit use is 2. Policy 15.D.5.15 of the Official Plan states "Lands designated as Commercial are intended to provide for a range of retail and service commercial uses that cater primarily to the weekly and daily needs of residents within the surrounding neighbourhoods." Policy 15.D.5.17 of the Official Plan states "in addition to Policy 15.D.5.16, the permitted uses on lands designated Commercial and identified as a Major Transit Station Area, City Node, Community Node or Urban Corridor on Map 2: a) will include retail, and may include retail commercial centres where they are permitted in accordance with the applicable policies in Section 3.C.2; and, b) may include dwelling units, where appropriate, provided that they are located in the same building as compatible commercial uses and are not located on the ground floor to a maximum Floor Space Ratio of 2.0. The proposed amendment ensures that a commercial function will remain on lands with a commercial land use designation in the Official Plan within the City Node. The proposed amendment also provides a path for dwelling units to be introduced on lands with a commercial land use designation, subject to policy 15.D.5.17 of the Official Plan. Proposed Institutional Zones Proposed institutional zones in Lower Doon include the application of the INS -1: Neighbourhood Institutional and INS -2: Major Institutional zone categories. The INS -1 zone is intended to accommodate institutional uses to serve the surrounding residential communities, whereas the INS -2 zone is primarily intended to serve at a city or regional Page 241 of 668 scale. The proposed amendment applies the INS -1 and INS -2 zones to lands currently zoned institutional in Zoning By-law 85-1. Natural Heritage Conservation Zone Proposed Natural Heritage Conservation zones in Lower Doon include the application of the NHC-1: Natural Conservation zone category. The purpose of the NHC-1 zone is to protect and/or conserve natural heritage features and their ecological functions. Further, it is intended to prevent the aggravation of existing natural hazards and/or the creation of new ones. The NHC-1 zoning applies to properties where there are already restrictions or conditions on development within, or in the buffer to, the natural feature on the property. This includes flooding hazards, slope erosion hazards, and significant wildlife habitat and landforms. Special Regulation Provisions As part of the proposed zoning by-law amendments, planning staff recommend retaining five (5) existing Special Regulation Provisions currently in effect in Zoning By-law 85-1, introducing one (1) new Special Regulation Provision, and introducing three (3) new Holding Provisions. Special Regulation Provisions 375 through 379, as shown in Attachment B, are existing special regulation provisions in Zoning By-law 85-1 specific to previous development applications and are proposed to be applied in Zoning By-law 2019-051. Planning staff recommend amending Zoning By-law 2019-051 to add Special Regulation Provision 380R. "The proposed Special Regulation Provision is to remove the maximum floor space ratio value on lands proposed to be zoned RES -7 and shown as affected by this provision in Appendix A." The purpose of this Special Regulation Provision is to remove the maximum floor space ratio regulation that applies to the RES -7 zone, consistent with proposed Specific Policy Area 66 that proposes to remove the maximum floor space ratio applying to the high rise residential land use within the City Node. Holding Provision 51 H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: "Notwithstanding Section 7 of this By-law, within the lands zoned RES -7 and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Number 254, 255, 283, and 284 of Appendix "A", no development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate tower separation and onsite amenity." The purpose of this holding provision is to require an Urban Design Brief as part of any future re -development as a means of regulating the form and density of proposed buildings, Page 242 of 668 rather than through the application of a maximum floor space ratio. This represents a more appropriate and flexible means of regulating the form and density of residential development of the applicable properties within the City Node that considers the appropriate design of the sites. Holdinq Provision 52H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: "No residential use shall be permitted until a Record of Site Condition (RSC) has been filed on the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Site Registry in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, as amended. This Holding Provision shall not be removed until the Regional Municipality of Waterloo is in receipt of a letter from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) advising that a Record of Site Condition has been filed." In consultation with Region of Waterloo planning staff, the need for a RSC on lands in Lower Doon was identified in accordance with the Region's Implementation Guidelines. Until such time that the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter have been received by the Region, residential development on the lands identified as being impacted by this provision in Attachment B is not permitted. Holding Provision 53H Region of Waterloo planning staff have identified the need for a transportation and stationary noise study on lands in Lower Doon. As such, planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By-law Amendment: "No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses." Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to bring all properties within Lower Doon into Zoning By-law 2019-051 from Zoning By-law 85-1 and represents good planning as it will allow for a broad range of housing types and densities and retains important institutional and commercial functions. The proposed Zoning By-law amendments achieve a balance between the retention of low-rise residential uses that allow for missing middle "gentle density" housing options on lands designated low-rise residential and accommodating high-rise residential uses south of Homer Watson Boulevard within the City Node. The proposed Zoning By-law amendments achieves the planned function of City Nodes by accommodating residential, commercial, and institutional uses without requiring that each property be designated and zoned mixed use. Page 243 of 668 The proposed Zoning By-law amendments are consistent with the proposed Official Plan amendments. Planning staff recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment be approved as shown in Attachment B. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: The recommendation contained in this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: The Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation project features various engagement events commencing in March 2022 and builds on the engagement from the Lower Doon Land Use Study. The following provides an overview of the date and type of community engagement that was undertaken: Date of Engagement Engagement Type March 2022 Development of a Lower Doon En a eWR project webpa e March 2022 — Present Updates to Lower Doon En a eWR project web a e March 2022 - Present Follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public March 2022 — Present Social media posts advertising project updates and upcoming engagement events March 2022 — Present 4 emails to the Lower Doon email contact list (169 email addresses) March 18, 2022 Circulation of postcard notification #1 to property owners within the Lower Doon study area in March 2022 advertising the April 5, 2022, Virtual Community Check -In April 5, 2022 Virtual Community Check -In May 9, 2022 Virtual meeting with Conestoga College administration July 21, 2022 Virtual meeting with Six Nations of the Grand River January 27, 2023 Virtual meeting with Conestoga Students Inc. April 2023 Circulation of postcard notification #2 to property owners within the Lower Doon study area advertising the May 10, 2023, walkshop sessions and drop-in engagements May 10, 2023 2 walkshop (walking workshops) and drop-in engagements at Doon Valley Golf Course with heritage consultants ASI Heritage May 24, 2023 Virtual meeting with Drewlo Holdings June 7, 2023 Virtual meeting with Conestoga Students Inc. June 27, 2023 Virtual meeting with Conestoga College administration June 28, 2023 Virtual presentation of draft project materials at Conestoga Students Inc. "Housing Student Advisory Committee" meeting July 18, 2023 Drop-in engagement at Conestoga College Doon Campus Page 244 of 668 October 2023 Circulation of postcard notification #3 to property owners within the Lower Doon study area advising of the October 23, 2023, virtual "open house" and October 30, 2023, statutory public meeting October 3, 2023 Heritage Kitchener committee meeting presentation and discussion regarding the draft Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape October 6, 2023 Notice of the virtual "open house" engagement and statutory public meeting was published in the Waterloo Region Record October 23, 2023 Virtual open house October 30, 2023 Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee meeting Feedback provided by Heritage Kitchener was incorporated into the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape report prepared by ASI Heritage. Modifications included revised references to Willow Lake Park and historical photos and mapping associated with the Lower Doon Mill and Doon Village Road. In addition to the list of engagement events undertaken above, City of Kitchener and Conestoga Students Inc. social media accounts were used to raise awareness of the project, provide information regarding community engagement events, and provide a link to the project EngageWR webpage (Figure 6). City of Kitchener dG�G VM.: (:) AM Mayl% 202;3 . 1„728 Views Figure 6 — Example of City of Kitchener social media post from May 2023 (left) and Conestoga Students Inc. social media post from July 2023 (right) EngageWR Project Webpaae The Lower Doon EngageWR project webpage was launched in March 2022 and used to host all project materials, as well as provide information on upcoming engagements. Following the May 10, 2023, engagement event, all draft materials were posted to the EngageWR webpage. A total of 7 comments were submitted by members of the public and included in Attachment E. Page 245 of 668 INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. Three rounds of postcard notifications were distributed to property owners and occupants within Lower Doon in March 2022, April 2023, and October 2023. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was posted in the Waterloo Region Record on October 6, 2023, and is attached as Attachment C. Four emails were sent out to the Lower Doon email contact list, which includes 159 unique email addresses, in advance of each community engagement event, when the draft materials were made publicly available, and in advance of the statutory public meeting. CONSULT — Members of the public were consulted as part of the Virtual Community Check - In held on April 5, 2022, and during the two "walkshop" walking workshops and drop-in engagement sessions held on May 10, 2023. The EngageWR project webpage was launched in March 2022 and was used to share project materials and solicit community feedback. The comment period on the draft land use, zoning, and cultural heritage materials was open from May 10, 2023, through July 31, 2023. Planning staff received written responses from 7 members of the public from May 10, 2023, through July 31, 2023, along with 7 comments submitted through EngageWR, which are attached as Attachment E. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Municipal Act, 2001 • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 2019-051 • DSD -2021-11 — Lower Doon Land Use Study Recommendations Report REVIEWED BY: Natalie Goss, Manager, Policy & Research APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Attachment B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment C — Waterloo Region Record Notice (October 6, 2023) Attachment D — Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study - Final Report (ASI Heritage, October 2023) Attachment E — Public Comments (May 10, 2023 — July 31, 2023) Page 246 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" Page 247 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT 01mr,"I[70[ I:IW_1u1:1101a]LVA Ial011 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 6, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council xdatex Page 248 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener. This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to incorporate modifications to the text and mapping of the Official Plan in order to implement recommendations contained within the Lower Doon Land Use Study. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT In 2019, the City initiated the Lower Doon Land Use Study (the "Study"), prepared by retained consultants The Planning Partnership and Bray Heritage. The Study culminated in a final report dated January 29, 2021, and contained 23 recommendations. City Council approved the Study in March 2021. Following City Council's approval, City Staff undertook community engagement on next steps towards implementation of the recommendations contained within the Study. This included developing a proposed land use and zoning concept, and retaining heritage consultants Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI Heritage) to advance the identification and development of a "Heritage Character Area" for a portion of lands within Lower Doon. This body of work has subsequently been referred to as the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape. Community engagement on the draft land use and zoning concept, along with the draft Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape materials was undertaken in May 2023 and available for public review and comment between May 2023 and July 2023. The following text provides additional information on the basis of this Official Plan Amendment. Land Use Modifications City staff are recommending that lands identified as "Area 1" on Schedule `A' be redesignated from Commercial to High Rise Residential. The proposed land use change would implement as -of -right permissions for high rise residential uses on seven (7) vacant parcels and the existing "Residence & Conference Centre — Kitchener -Waterloo" all situated on Conestoga College Boulevard. The proposed land use change implements recommendation #8 contained in the Study which states: "Promote the development of higher density housing and/or mixed use vacant lands south of Homer Watson through Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments to permit a greater variety of land uses". Specific Policy Area Modifications Planning staff are recommending the removal of Site Specific Policy Area 26 and introduction of Site Specific Policy Area 66, as shown on Schedule `B'. The proposed amendment also includes an administrative amendment in the removal of Specific Policy Area 16 from Map 5 of the Official Plan. City Council, through OPA 29, approved the deletion of policy 15.D.12.16 which is specific to Specific Policy Area 16. Planning staff are recommending removal of Specific Policy Area 26, which states that "the City will undertake a Master Planning exercise to confirm among other matters the appropriate Urban Structure Component to be applied to the subject lands and the appropriate land use designation mix necessary to achieve the planned function for this area through an Official Plan Amendment." Planning staff are of the opinion that the work completed following City Council's approval of the Study in March 2021 represents the undertaking of a Master Planning exercise and that this Official Plan Amendment achieves the objective as set out in Specific Policy Area 26. Page 249 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" A new Specific Policy Area 66 is proposed on lands identified as "Area 3" on Schedule `B' with the intent of removing a maximum floor space ratio. The objective of this Specific Policy Area is to accommodate the development of high rise residential building forms without regulating built form through floor space ratio, rather through the submission of an Urban Design Brief secured through a holding provision in zoning for the properties. Cultural Heritage Resources Modifications Planning staff recommend the addition of modifications to Section 12 — Cultural Heritage Resources of the Official Plan to include policies that are specific to the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape. Map 9 of the Official Plan is proposed to be amended to introduce the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape geography where the abovementioned policies would apply. The text and mapping modifications specific to Cultural Heritage Resources implements recommendations #1, #2, #3, and #5 of the Study. Planning staff are of the opinion that the Official Plan Amendment is consistent with and conforms to the Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement (2020), A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), and the Regional Official Plan (2010), and represents good planning. SECTION 4 —THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a. Part C, Section 12 is amended by adding the following after policy 12.C.1.48: 12.C.1.49 Lower Doon The following policies apply to lands identified as Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape on Map 9 — Cultural Heritage Resources: a) The cultural heritage resources and heritage attributes identified in the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study and shown on Map 1 and Map 2 of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Report will be conserved. b) The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or a Heritage Conservation Plan for development, redevelopment, demolition, and site alteration for designated properties within or adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape, where it has been determined that this may result in a significant negative impact on a cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute of the Cultural Heritage Landscape as deemed appropriate by the City's Director of Planning. The Heritage Impact Assessment shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference, or a Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference which will be provided by the City's Heritage Planner and will recommend an appropriate conservation strategy for the cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute. The Heritage Conservation Plan shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Conservation Plan Terms of Reference and will recommend appropriate conservation measures and work for the cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute. The City may require the submission of additional documents and/or studies as deemed appropriate by the City's Heritage Planner. c) The City will ensure that new developments are designed and planned to ensure that views and vistas of Kitchener's significant cultural heritage resources are created, maintained, and /or enhanced where appropriate, as referenced in the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Report (ASI Heritage, September 2023). 4 Page 250 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" d) Any new development that may be proposed within any part of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape identified as exhibiting archaeological potential (as shown on Map 3 of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Report) that will result in subsurface impacts must be preceded by Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment. Any such assessment(s) must be conducted in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (Ministry of Tourism and Culture 2011). e) New development and alterations on properties within and adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape must be compatible with and complementary to the Cultural Heritage Landscape's cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. f) Demolition or removal of heritage attributes within the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape is not permitted. g) The City acknowledges that accessibility requirements are an important consideration for public and private properties and that a balance must be found between meeting accessibility requirements and conserving cultural heritage resources and heritage attributes in order to achieve solutions that meet the needs of both, as much as is feasible. b. Part D, Section 15.D.12 is amended by deleting Policy 15.D.12.26 in its entirety; c. Part D, Section 15.D.12 is amended by adding Site Specific Policy Area 15.D.12.66 after Site Specific Policy Area 15.D.12.65 as follows: "15.D.12.66. Conestoga College Blvd Notwithstanding section 15.D.3.24, for the lands subject to this Specific Policy Area, there shall be no maximum Floor Space Ratio. The City will implement architectural and urban design measures to ensure the development complements and contributes to the existing built environment by requiring, through the use of a holding provision, an urban design brief to be provided. d. Map 3 — Land Use is amended by: Amending lands identified as "Area 1" from Commercial to High Rise Residential as shown on the attached Schedule `A'. e. Map 5 — Specific Policy Areas is amended by: Deleting existing Specific Policy Area 16 Lower Doon identified as "Area 1" as shown on the attached Schedule `B'; Deleting existing Specific Policy Area 26 Homer Watson Blvd/Conestoga College Blvd identified as "Area 2" as shown on the attached Schedule 'B'; iii. Adding Specific Policy Area 66 Conestoga College Blvd identified as "Area 3" as shown on the attached Schedule 'B'. f. Map 9 — Cultural Heritage Resources is amended by: Adding the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape identified as "Area 1" as shown on the attached Schedule `C'. Page 251 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 Advertised in the Waterloo Region Record on October 6, 2023 NOTICE 0"F A PUBLIC MEETING Et "OPEN HOUSE, to change land use and zoning in Lower Doori ................................. NIM' jr John, Zunlg Sen I or Kanner 519.741,2200, x 7685 johri.zunicint clhereef. c,a H ave You r Voice H eard! Planning & Strategic I nitiatives Comm ittee Date; October 30, 2,023 Location,, oruin illi Chambers Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street'West orVirtual Zoom Meeting I avid select Go to kitchioner.ta/meetings ocurrent agendas and reports (posted 10 clays before meeting) appear as, a delegation # watch meeting Virtual Open House Date:, October 23, 2023 Locatin n- Virtual; Zoom Meeting, To learn more, vis[t The C4 of II rtchener vAll consider cfty-initiated 'app Ication s, to amiend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for Lower boon as part, of thve implementabon of the Lov-&r Doon, Land Use, Study., These amendments W11 update land L15esand specific policy areas, introduce the Lower Coon Cultural Heritage, Landscape, and appy new zoning Zoning amendments to site specific reguhitions and the introduction of hc4d!ng provWs are proposed Page 252 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 Page 253 of 668 DSD -2023-434 Attachment "A" APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 Page 254 of 668 a z N T \ LL M co O :t� Y N Wd > D o ° QL ZZ� >1 � C N C7 =JOW c_v a 0 N N Q z V d N E v ° Q CO z D W N V V N O N Q V LL w z _ H z �LU LLZ D N = U) E U� LU w p � SOW c c L p z i of V 2 o EO � a .F E o= z W V w Q J U m z O 2 Q Q W � Q }' o �,, o Q Y III �• .. , i!"" �i d } F- L m J z lam` 4L. RJ r �. 4. LL Z w O > Lek z U) s. '_ rx_ i_ rx_ i_ rx_ N O O • ,'' r.', ' Ilk Ln � x.a•' % w O m 7t.ar C) F— F— LU O W da . i 4 •i�r` • r'. a AL 6- J w U Q (n p 1� 1. . i. ' ::::::::• ::.. ::EEE:. 41 •' � 9t :::.riiii•;iiiiiii. � t 'O1i MM M ...... .......... r , L IL bZ) z t ' t, O O. W o IL U ID . � : •� TRPS U }}�' �'ip•Q'\O +;� ''�°°" � , t, � = $' •' � �ar - $' •' K' � t, � = d a 4t 4 IL t t t Z @ a @ @ ° N IN N J M LL a U >' > ° > M h M W U U U i m C cN a =V JOS M LU t z� � c NQ v )d o U Q CO z HJ�J LLVQM o Q-iU @ N L z0 o ) o U) O 0 a)0 o Wd ° a)> z a > > a5 m Q� Z W z a) o° o E o c W W W Z Wy o � d E o N ° 0) M ° p OWU M E ��� �� MQU o Z�+Q �.i W d Q L O Cfl L O (6 O L O CO z W V a Qa v 6 � QHr QHN0 QHco W �� LU o N V 11 11 Q Q w co l l 1 1 z Q \ Q J r r r r rif4i J O w } F- J 00 i1 z Q (� 0 0- 0 i W Z W LL > I O �.. W O I N o I III III III LLJ I ul I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII U) w 1 Of co N o O o N cri a ' � W ui m O � p W w NOUN L6 -b� i ui Q Cn Ji Q 0 Q F U M L 1 Q o LO W CONFSTOGP Q ,r et Q LU _j o �v 0 U = W I-- F- �O V ZQ U � � U z co 0 ti LO N N (6 n PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener - Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2019-051 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 245, 254, 255, 256, 257, 281, 282, 283, 284, and 286 of Appendix A of By-law 2019-051 are hereby amended by adding thereto the parcels of land to By-law 2019-051 as shown on Attachment 1. 2. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (375) thereto as follows: "375. Within the lands zoned COM -1 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedule 256 of Appendix A, an office use shall be permitted to occupy 100% of the Gross Floor Area." 3. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (376) thereto as follows: "376. Within the lands zoned RES -5 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedules 255 and 256 of Appendix A, a visual barrier shall be required along the easterly side yards where said side yards abut the lot lines of those lots fronting Pinnacle Drive." Page 258 of 668 4. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (377) thereto as follows: "377. Within the lands zoned RES -5 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedules 255 and 256 of Appendix A, the minimum exterior side yard abutting a street for the single detached dwelling existing on May 19, 1998, shall be 3.3 metres." 5. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (378) thereto as follows: "378. Within the lands zoned RES -5 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedule 282 of Appendix A: a. The maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed 98 units; b. The minimum westerly side yard shall be 7.5 metres; c. The maximum building height of any multiple dwelling shall be 8.0 metres; d. Two -unit dwellings or single -unit dwellings maybe permitted on a lot within a comprehensive development consisting of multiple dwellings; e. The minimum separation between dwellings on a lot within a comprehensive development consisting of single -unit, two -unit or multiple dwellings, shall be 6.0 metres within that portion of the lot situated 15.5 metres from the westerly lot line, and no less than 3.0 metres thereafter; f. In the case of a comprehensive development comprising multiple dwellings, only two -unit or single -unit dwellings to a maximum total of eight dwelling units may be permitted adjacent the westerly lot line and north of Old Mill Road; g. A visual barrier shall be provided along the westerly lot line where development is proposed; h. The minimum setback to any building or structure, including accessory buildings, decks, swimming pools or retaining walls, from either the theoretical 2:1 top of slope or actual top of the Grand River Valley slope, whichever is located closer to said building or structure, as shown on a drawing entitled "Top of Bank Detail, G.R.C.A.-1", dated January 20, 2000 Page 259 of 668 and prepared by Mel Code, Consultant, shall be 4.0 metres. The minimum setback to any building or structure, not including accessory buildings, decks, swimming pools or retaining walls, from either the theoretical 2:1 top of slope or actual top of the Grand River Valley slope, whichever is located closer to said building, as shown on the above -noted drawing, shall be 6.0 metres." 6. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (379) thereto as follows: "379. Within the lands zoned RES -5 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedules 255 and 256 of Appendix A, a Multiple Dwelling shall be permitted with a minimum setback from Pinnacle Drive of 3.9 metres." 7. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (380) thereto as follows: "380. Within the lands zoned RES -7 and shown as affected by this provision on Zoning Grid Schedules 254, 255, 283, and 284 of Appendix A, a maximum floor space ratio will not apply." 8. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Holding Provision (51) thereto as follows: "(51). "Notwithstanding Section 7 of this By-law, within the lands zoned RES -7 and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 254, 255, 283, and 284 of Appendix "A", no development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate tower separation and onsite amenity." 9. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Holding Provision (52) thereto as follows: Page 260 of 668 "(52). "No residential use shall be permitted until a Record of Site Condition (RSC) has been filed on the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Site Registry in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, as amended. This Holding Provision shall not be removed until the Regional Municipality of Waterloo is in receipt of a letter from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) advising that a Record of Site Condition has been filed." 10. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Holding Provision (53) thereto as follows: "(53). "No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses." 11. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. _ (Lower Doon Land Use Study Implementation) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of 12023. Mayor Clerk Page 261 of 668 (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z (D Z c a x .a 'D a) U) J_- 2 O CO � U � c U) a� .E a)Q N (n d O 0 (n=l m M N O N T d �C C 41 w d co d t6 D (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z N Z c a x .a N V) _f_- 2 O cl) 3 0- U) U) .E NQ N (n d O O O co M N O N T d �C C 0 w d cn w f6 f� (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z (D Z c a x .a a) U) J_- 2 O co � U � c U) a� .E Q N (n d M N O N T d �C C 41 w CL d cn w f6 D (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z (D Z c a x .a 'D a) U) J_- 2 O CO � U � c U) a� .E a)Q N (n d O 0 (n=l m M N O N T d �C C 41 w d co d t6 D Od N Y M N O M N i 10 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters z 4S 4S34S43544S44SS3 SSSS31 SS55SSS55S43tiSS445SS4SSSSSSS445S44 5 4535SS54SiS44 S'S44S44Si545SSSS5SSSSSSg5SS55SS54SSS4SS45133S114SS3t4S3SSSS3SSS35544StiS445SSSS54S555SS1544534'S 3 443453354451443555 3SS344 yyyySSS55SS5554455444SSS45SS35tSSSS5S4535SS44S SSyyy4S114453 �yS54545514453454444 3SSS54S334Sd34SS35SSSSSSSSSSS45SSSdySS345SS54��131SS334S33S5S354455ySSS51S5 5534544455535433 accts 435SS3SSSSSSS3.5133 54445SS34S4335SS.SS 154335��;4S3335S3.3454555.3.4 ��>rf'r`rr��� <<<<< SS3144S344SS34435� �irs�i S sl g. iS O 0 _ ry 0 w I� � � ' n �__ 44S43SiS445SSiS4S345S45S455 ®� SS43SiS3444SSS4S34SS4SSS435S534SS3SSS113SS334SS4 N. yySy44555 y�SSyyyy4S34SS55SiSSS1 SyS4S34SSSS531455S44SSi553343S4SS334S1S5SSSSS3S44SS34S4SSSSS4SSS33SS435453545 335545544SS5SS35SS335SS3SS435344S3iS435S4S43SSS4SSSS34SSSSS4 y3SS4451445t43SS35S 4SSyy44SSSiS54>ggr�4S`5 554 SS4513SS34iS433S4S35SS3SS435SS3S3SS3SSSSfS443S415t1S45445444S5S515i4 4gS°3444SSS4SS54 N � v ® � SS353S1SS °�®�® S4S43344451543S4S4SSSSS53445544 °�®�®� ;'4143355435454334S53S553SS4SSSSSS1i5533SSt3SS33S4S35 °��°-'�� � �®�®^®� S4SSS1SS534S4SSSSISS4SSSSS445SS3tSS3S3SSS3443334S3tiS34S55453S43SS4S�5S33333S33SS SS435SSS14443544355SSS45S355S4„ �yr5yy54 y4yySSS3 3SS3S3S3S344S45SSS1SS3�tiSS5t5iSS-4t-455331tSS5S45i 441SyS554335S5S34S4S15SS �4433S4S34443344S4SSSSSS44S4S41SS3S54SS4tiS4S34445443334SSSS4SSS5S35444 54413454 }S3S151S 5344444445 .�°S�tS43S4S3S4SSSiSSS3SSS35SS3SSSS53SSStiS43SSS43S5SSSS ®�®� 3444StSS3S4SSS45SS34SSS34S3SSi55 S SSS 5445SSStSS�S55SS5S5S4SSS4S5554S45S45SS4S5SSS5SSSS554SS5iSt444S5"SSSS SSSSS4S5S45414SSSSSS4SS444S4554SSSSSt4g4tSSSSSSSSSSSSSS4tSSSS54S544��SS��SS5SS4 44'3'44"333S435SS435SS35SSS54SS45S3441S35ty4 St354S�SS4S4gytS55y��SSSSt� yy iSt33S43tSS3344SSSS53t4dS55S S � �®^�® ® ® ® ,� SSS4433SSSSS �®;® SY,St44454SSf1SSS44SSS3SS45SS5555S445SS�.S3 �®� �,�i�t44334SS444445SSSS54S35St,S�1-4-44 r4`5444t5StS54S55S454554SSSSSSS S5SS3S5S4135i4S354SS444��1SSSSSS344dS44 SS SS � c 4 S4i4344S134S34SSSSSSS43S43344SS14S334SS34SSS5SSSS5345343S33S4StitSSS�SS3S44433445 y4ViSS555SStSS yytS5S55 433S4SS444S3�43S545�3'SSi4i5344S545S43S5SiS4S3S�435SSSS14SSSSSSStiSS45SSSS1S41t4 SS5S4S � �,��� ygtya.q't54544SSSSS41 �" SS44144SS34SSS5SS55S4S53444Si4334SSS'tSSS31 N iS4 � O Z co «'°�" SS444S5545S5S455S4S534��t5SS44SS4S4SSSSS54SSS�S5443SSSS3554S5SS3S534S34S43S5SSS3 S SSSS14354435544443443S�5S444S444S5S5 tS4S445444SSS354S45SSS544SSt5S4445SSS4SSS4S4S4S4SSSSS3S444S15S SSSSSSSttSSS "���° � 344314443344S45S455S4S533 ti5SSt5S5SS444SS444tS44�ti443344S53SgS�S43S14i4t43S345S433S3S3S44S4S���44544 S O _ — � iq _ "�°'� �° 543554SS344S444455StS154S3134S3tS433S4S3tS43S44 3545454433445514451545�444344SS34SSS344S35S4��SSSS54SS5444553413444�44SSSS4SSSSS 44544SS53SSS54SS35S454S4S544SS5555455455454S�44SSSSSS3SS534SS5544Sy °� SSS43344SS46431t4S35SSt34SS33S534155 S4SS544333454444454tS5344SS54SSS55S45SS44S4S3S4SS344S334S454SS334i5 4434444tSS4 �� °� S4S45443 y44S5544SS54S �� � (6 "��°� m� °® 5444545 yS44S3 4453414SSSSSS414St54SS4tSSS5SS35SS 4 54443544S4SS4 54SS514533SSSSt4StS4S3SS444tS443SS433S4S1t54S354S55S4 3 4544 54SS545SS3gSS4SSS��444SS445t4S435y45544��5S4S1SSS5544554SSSSSS�Sg4SS44S4S � S4SS5S45S44455S45tS4S5�4S554445544554SSSfS4SS44S44S4S3444Sf 43SS6S45S54tSS334554t3SS3S3S454S44S4 S 3 10 � � U T U) CD2 o co c N O 5 53154533455 �SS34�,�.5414 5 S414S435S4t334S3 44S534S3StSSS34S Ssss S3SSt4S3SdSS34SSSiS4S43S4S54SSS35434SSSS55SS35SSi54S334b43S�gS144SS1kS'S4i4 « U im°�° 3w Q cn cC +° 5544i4SS535SSi34S5 »"� 55513454144S3t44SS44Sg�SSS54SS35SS45S4S14S4S5S4S354S54344S34SSS4S� «�� 3544ti4SS5553Si4S45 SS553443344S3tSSSiSSS43S535SSS35S44ySSSf34444SSSi54S33S4354 � 443yy µ µ. ° SS54SSS354S334SS3444 � �«�� 4. 4.15554544455SS45 6353SS344SS534SSS54S4tS43554SS4S43SS4SS SSSS45444554Si5SS3 °�« S 5 11SSS35S4t554��5 435334S3SS355SSS534��SS4553S4S4SSS554S54SSt454S55SS33S 355133443SSS534SS54S434S4344SS4544S454S4dS45544S554S533yS545S5-S�S�SSS�i45"�' S 5453544SSS�S 444555443��y�5y44�SS344334�45 S S3' m �, � "� 453544SSfS44iSS yySSSS34SS33443i44 ° 545354SSSSS3S444S55 y SS SS53SSSi544534S4S4 mMmi� 'S54SSS344S31SSS344SS344S544 31ui °3 34SS54SSSSSS544S4534 553SS434SS3344S344SSt4S35445'4SS SSSSS35Si4 35 j4 SSS\SSS d O Q 4 34434S44S444 l SS314455355441SS SS 44S35SSS454S35S435S54 °4SSy�¢34�SSS SS 4 '�g^�,f4+y4 V W N tS4345S455S3S45S41144 ®�° 544Sf5S S33S�S 4453 �4S354SS4S ° �� � 3 S34S�5 34°i i" ;3�4 43 QO co O (ALL 2 U) �® SSSSS33SSiS5SS3S�4`55"�533455� 4 � 544444SS54SSSS4SSSSSSSSSSSi55S-155554455 S4° )84 44ti,` SSS541SS44S45y54SS 4S 5 4��y54�S54g554 j°''� „✓"u2 ° 3� 154515SSS4iSS 4555 y} SSSSygSS5gS5SgSSS 4SSSSg SyySS hy°®° LU S 5 S S S ®444 SE`S / �� y S 3 �® 5SS5534113�4- S 4y SSyS3y 4gySSS S4S3y4 SySSgy Sy35SS 4 °5���ti �` tY °« 4 SS3YSS45s y dSSSySSy4�4SSSSy3SSySt�SSyS4SS�SFy1S�S5S�5 �®� °®® ;" 45S4SS 4g S4y 4S SSy 4g Stg Sy 535 SSy SS SSSS °��® ! �� � ti. N N E ®: ® �� 3S4S44SS S Sj Sys 4y 4SSSyS SSS SSS SSSS3� SS44Sy 45i d4 SSS g ��,°�®� 5543555,SSSSyyS4yySSy444S4SySy3StgS3y544y4tg34Sg3S4ySSySSSS ®� `� U a O ®°� ° S4SStS4S y SyS4S�SSyS1g�SSy1SSySSy41ySSSy54SSS4S35453SSgStti44S5 �,'�� r� c�'„ E v O Q ° S S4SSSSS SS44S�S455g4�Sy44g34S33yS134SSSySSg35SS�SS4S34SS5yy4 5553545 Sg 4 SS 5 Sy 4 1 Sy S SS S 4 g S Sy S ��® S yti 45 SS Sg 5g SS 44y tg S4y SS 545454 Syy4y3 SSy44 W ����� U co U) SS34S4S3y3S154SSty�SSSSSyySSy43y5S5y4S4�S4144SSS1544tig44ti454ti4SSSS1 m ��® S4 4S SS Sy SSy SS SS SS4Sy SS S6 SS SS SS SSS 4S Sti ® 111 45444 3sSys14S45S�SSy�SSyS4�SS4�4SS4SSy44g1S444SSyS4�4SSyS5SSSSyS4 °� °N 434SS SgySy�Sy34y3Sy3S4y 4ySS3y4SySSSg4ti444Sy4S «""��«�� °,,� r �' p U) m c � ti5g454gS14ySSS54SS 4iy44y3ytys3yyyS4�yys�y4�gySyy4yyy4yySgySSyy4S�SSySyS�SSti55y�Sg ®��°�� ®�® fq w� ��®° Z 70 .� --a co O cu 3t4 154 3SS3�tySSy4�3ySSSyti4SyS4gS3y54Syg3yyS1g553g45}SSSy3S5�5S45SSjS4y4S ° 5�4Sy�Sy�54S41SSSSy41StiSyy3yS�SSSSyyS4gS53y443y4SS3S4y4SS54SS44S5 rnJ J N 531 4S yySgy�3ySS5ySSySSSySSy4SSyS4SyS4yti5y�S3y�Sy1SgSSSgSSy4,43yySSy�SS�S ®°� �� �� 5 gy Sy yyy y4 Sti5 Sy Sgy SS SySSS Syy iy Sy4 SS 553 45 4SS 55 SS " � " � <° � ° �� ��..�. 4 Sy 3 4 5 S 5 S 4 t S 3 S S S S 4 S 4 "�® III 1y 4 Sy 5 5y S Sy 5 Sy 3 SS S S3 S 44 4 4y SS 4 �° ,„„_-� °�,"� � °' ��, �. �� J >+ 44 y1S 54 4y3S4}44Sy4yy Sl y5 tiSS SS y3 g4 1ti4 SS 454 SS SSy tii 4SS Sy SSS SS SS3 S4 4SS Si ...w.__ 11111111 Sy4SSy SgyS4S SSyS3y SSy SS Soy Sy 4.53 4S 354 4S ti34 � � � ., 45 y5 y4 y3 SS yS yS SSy Sy Syy Sy Sy1 Sy3Sg� SySSSy iy4SSy �°�� �,",,°,� "�® , ,, � uuuuuuuum uuuuu 5S y Sy3SS4 5 ty�SSySg3�4SS3y4�Sy55S4�Syy5y4�5yS45y�4yySSySS4y44y�5SyS4S�5gyS4yyS�3°� S3 ty SSySSy S yti SSy SSyS4y SSySS41SSSSSySSySS3y4Syy5y3S4ti5SSySSS3SSS454y45S4S ti.t"�S �°���° v S4S3y4 Sy5Si4 yyy5yy 3yS45y 4yyS4y 44yS4y SSyS4y SSyS4g � � ° � .. � �.� � yS, 3y4 Sy 4yy SS Sy Sy Sys Sgy tys y S ®��® W S � � .. Qv 4 S�Sti�Syy�Stiti445ti1y44y��Sti4SS5�454135�5145354SSSS4y45Sy4 Sy331ySSy35S'y54Sy3tyS4y5SSy5SSyySS3S3yy5SSSSy3S4y14ySS3ySSiy4SS4S �4S SSS SS 4S � iyS �y y4SS5S ��,®°' � �.w °� ® � °�,. / �, ��� � 4�S54S��4543S�S334S�3Sg�54�44S�S3��SS�SSs�y3�Sy��S44355S3S4S3SS SSSy44 ®��®� ®��®® / y4443SSSy�4y35y5S5yS3yy5Syi y4y5SS SS3Sy5 Sy33y5 Sy4S3y°« J�j �,'� VIII E E z 4 y4ySygSS34S 4yS3�g45SyS44Sg4Syy4yySSS�S444yySSy�SggySSgSSy3Syy4SS54yS3Sy4Sy3,. SS SS Sy4S5y4S3Stg 54SSyyS34�5S4ySSg5SS44414S434y4�4443y3 �° �� �� ��®� % yy 4S Sy Sy S4 Sy 44'Sg Sy Sy 4y y 4S S Sy i ��� E _U a z C y3 4y S4g S3 yS 14y SS tSy S4 4tiS SS SiS 4S 454 4S SSS 45 3gS by 5y3 5} 444 j « �« ®� Z. 445 4S .SSS 4S 543 4S 4y 4SS SS 453 4S 94 SS 4 4 � � � � ®� � ��� x .a ami n a) U) � r 4 44y454sss�SsssSysSs444tisysystiysss55�Sy��gy�y4��S44S34�ySSy 4 4y 3y ° S �� «�� °�� O 3 III � 1111111111111110 �w SS Sy 4y 3y SS 4S 54 55 Sy SS S4 Sy Sy S �« ��� � o � — — � d 4S3SSSSyy4ySSSySSySSSyyS4g45S4SyySS,ySSS 4y44s4sS3sSstisSssytS4y3�SSiyS1yS4S,y5SStii4Syy4SSti4sS4i°3� SSS. SS 4S S. SS 4S «"� "� '� " °« °« �IIII S m 4 4 S S S S 44SSr 55 y3` ��� S 4 S 3 S 4 5 SS S 44lr SS S 45 S 44 SyiSSc,SScSyy�S S g 4 °°'�° "� �4r g SS�S53 �g5g SSS S 4 ®°« 1SSS m3 U) a E 43sy454S33y453y4s 4y 3S 3y yS�y5�4SS4SS��SS�yti,S4y55SStiySS{SSSSjS�gyti4gS�4gy�SyS 5S yySySy ygy SS y55 yy yyylyS « �« 4S 4y 34 y3y 3y ySy 5y Sti4 y3 y4,y y4 y14 Sy �«"�«�° 111111 "�° �,®� ���«� «» N in a U, o g 1y S 4y Sg SySSy S 4 S S 4 4 3 1 S 4 S S SS14S SS1ty SSy44y 5SS45y SySSSy5,4°�«°�«� u�� w0 C Od m METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters z SS S4 gSS4SS44yS414 y4� SS4 4444SyS444y44S444Sy444yy44yy4S4S4sS y444y4 S Sy Sy44S44�Sy SSg Sy Sg Is Sy SSy SS SS SS SSy y4y gSSg tiSy goy ss SSy ySy Sy4 SyS i4 SyS y44 4 g S4 Sy Sy4 syS SSS 4gS Sgi Syt ySy 4s4S ySy gs,y y4S4 4s4.4y�LLSS�x4 44Sy4yys444y44SyS44Sg44S44ySy SS 445 ygy 444 % 144544 Sgs yy4 Sy4 y3y4 SSy Sy4 Stg4 S 4SS ySS i SSS SS yS. S Sy SS SS SS�_�_,SS SS SSS yS y_�_,S SS y SS gSy 444 �� SySs Sy4 Sy yys1y4 514yy5Sy 00 00 . N o 00 00 S�,S44 SysS4s4Sys4y4yS44ys4Sys44Sy S SySyS4 y4wbSy yS��S ySySy yS S 4 1y4ySSSisSysy5S4 4 SS4 sS44S444g44 "� 44�S44yyS444S444yS�Syyyy 44 SS4 ySy Sy 4 SSy4ySy4544444444444444444�444444544 44 S Sy gSSgygSyySysySS44ySySySSS4ySy4yS444yS 45, A�y4oSy4SySg4yS4yS�� SS SySy4y44SSgS 4ys 4yS 4ys Sy4 Sy4 Sy4 Sys 4 S s S SS444y44S4,444yS444y44Sy4y44yS4SyS4S4y444yS4SSy44SSy4y444S4 4ySys4Sy44SysS4yySS s4 .Sys yy yS y SyS Sy 4ss 4ys S4ys 4y4SSySyS44 Sg4 SS4y Sg4 4441 Sg4Sg4 S 4y 4y Sy4S 414 4Sy �� � 4�44g g4�S 4SyS5SS4Sysyly �"®� Sy4SSySS SySySySySSySS4ySSSSys4Sy4SS4y4S ys4yS ysSSS5SS4yySS4y 4SSS1SSSgSySy4S4ysSSSys g4 S4 4y44Sy4 SyStiSySy 4ysySySS 4yS SSySSys SS44 4ys S SSysSSyS Sy4S 544 144 � � � yS 4S y4 gSS' y4 gSS yS g4S SyS yS gyy 4 �SS SyS yS4 SyS Sy4Sy4y Sy4 SSg4ySy4 SSy4y4ys SS1SySyS LSy4 4yS Sg4 4y�1ys SSy SSSS Sg4 � 4144451 yS4 4y44Sy444g444SgS44S444Sy44SSSy4y4ysySSg4y41SySSdSSg44yS4S ySy4 SSg 1514 S1ySySySSSSy4ySylSSSy4y4g44SSySySp�s4s�y4� S144ySysyS4ssytgS44�S,„��*®� d41 ,Sgt 4144ySgs4S4ssySgyyS � °�� � 4ygS1S y S y 4y4SSS4gSy4Sg4SSy4SSSSySSSySSSySSSS1S4SgS44SSS4SSy4S454 44 S'go S4SSy4Sy4ySySS44S4SSS.4y °,�� Sy Sy S4 yty y SSy SSy 4Sy SSSySys S44 4y Sgt Sy 5144 Sys Syyiy y Sys s s tys S4 S4ys Sy 4SSy SSy S1 SS y4 "�°y SSy 4Sy SSyS ys 4y4� � o N 4444y444s444SyS44Sti444S444S;444S44414 4445444444444g444g45b4 X444 44444444444444444444yS ®� co _ 444yS444g4s44ggSSitS44S44444s44S4444444454444S444S44444 4844Sy44444y1y4ysy1Sy4ySgsSS44ySysl�Sy4SSSSSSSS44SSS444 S4ySS4 44 4S�`s44 44S444y445y44444444y444m4��°�'�, y�,4 S„�s 4ygyg44y�g4SySgSgSgS4�`�4 "�"� SS y' ySy SSy goy .SS4 y4ysSS4SyS4S toy S4g4 S 4 54 55541514 SSySySy4 54541414 Sy�,,�� N 444y4Sy4ySy4�S444SSSy4S4 444444y4y4y4,54y44Sy4S44y44y4y5444iyy5yyy4s44t4ys44y4Sy44�45 444 S444y4gS 4SSy44S4y41SS4SyS44ylgs4S4 4454 �y �y Sy Sys gys Syt yS4 S �1 4 4 S S S4 SS S 4y 4 � 44yy444y4444S44yy4444y4445444 — S4yS Sy4 Sys tS4 S4SgSys Soy S44 ,414 S4 4 ySs 44s Soy y4 54 1 �� � �<o c �'0 U S4 SgS Sy4 Ss5yy4s s 4 4154 S4S Sy4y gySySySsyySS4ygSS4yS44Sy44syyS 4SS 4gS44 sS4SyS4;ysSS ySs5gSS5 4S Ssy4yS SSSSySyS Syy4 SyS 44s Sy4 SS 446 Sy y� yS yy yS y4 SyS ss 4sS 5;;�4S�S4S4s4$Sg44ySSs4S444S};44g r o 0 D C Q CT) 544y444y44444444g4444y444y14S44i44y1yS4S44y144y54445444y144 4S4Sy44SgSy4Sy44SSt4y4yS4S4S4SSSSyS4S4SSS4ySSS4S4y4SSS4ySSy S 4 S y 4 S�4S�SSSSy4S4ySSySy g4ySS1Sy gi y ���� "� S S 4 4 S 44 4 4 5 445 g4 S S S y yS S g y S S S S S 4y S S S S Sg S S S S ,� SSySyS�yS�S,,y��S-s-S-g4-y-5455 3Wcm � �r J�\'\ Sg4S44S44Sg4SSSyy41SySSSSggySySgSSygy4S44t44454444444454454��4i 445..4}4SSS44sSy4y544yy4g44ySti4ysy44Sg4ys4y4y5444y4S4yS444s1g44y4�s �-4y4siSSS44SS44SSs4�1g4444y 4 4455}Sy55y4s444y444g4444444444yg444445444444444444444444y444y44�4y �4Sysy4Sy44Sg444SyS44yS4S' 444444444444g44y44y44444445Sy444y44444444Sy444g444�4y44y45444y 41544 SSg544 444gy444444444444444444444444444444444444444444454444444454444y444,yy S4 54 Sys 4441 Sg4 Sy4 s4y4ISIS 4y4y4g445 4441445 W,M �� SS4 Soy S4ys Sy4y4s y4 Sy4 441 y4ygsyS 54'"yS ySSSS4ySy4ySS44yiS S4yySSy m� `4y54gy44yyys4yS44Sy444SS44,y4444g ySy yS4 154 SyS y4y5y4 y1Sy yS4gy44y4Sy44SysS4S4yroiSg Sssy Sy4 S4 yS ys 4yS Sys S` a Vr2 LU c N gS45Sy4SSy44SyS4SySiSSy4SgSyS4SSSSS'4144514551454%tS4SSyS4S4S4yg44,4145,4 a�S S4S4`y4S4444S WLR 2 (A 44445444444444444444444444..544454444444444441yy4y�4y444544ti4444S4y1S1y�4S" 44y444S44444444y444S�m yN® � S4S1 yS y4 SSS 44414441444444445454454;444444y444444444144g44444544444444444444441444�4�45y 1Sy14y� 4SSy1444SySySSSSy4SSgSyS��`�'� S4 f54 Sg Sy Sy4 Sy Sly 1y SSy S4 544 S4 Sy� 5,��4 S�� 1 4SS .454 SSySSg S} S yy�1� 4y S44444444y444y14441444444� \ S 1 S y 4 SS N 4 4 o 4 S gS4541SgSyS4sgS14Sy1S5S1S54y1S5sySySySSgSISySySSySyS5Sg5S44SS44y4i4S155��y1yS 41414ySSy4ySSy4yS5Sg4ysy4y4y45sySSysySys 4 rySS41455y4444S445g45s4SS4sySy Sy4y1gs4 445 4144 y 4S 54� Sysay % 1454 SS41444 544 yS55 � cn 45554445 4y4S4ysS4y4y g14SSy44Sy44y4y54S4y444y145414ySyS441S y45g4sSg4yS5SSy4SSysySSySgSSSS4Sy4y4444444 4y S SSSSyS44y444Sys44 44Sy 45y44444544gS44S,S4g4gs 51515444 S4s1Sy44 4gS1yy4S SyS 14 y y4�,Sg4 S4s SgS .Sys �y S 4y S y i ` L ._ c O Sy444gsy445444gsy4y5sy4y 454546 yy 4y41444g1444144445144444445444s44444444y 4y 4y4y444444g44441y44 4 441yysyyg51yyy4y4ay4y4y4� 414 ssy yss 451 ygs �ys+ g4s 14 g4 14 y4y 54 t y 5s 4sS S4s 554 tSs 344 444 455 gSS y4y 134 yS4 yti\s tS4 4 S yS4 SSS 4145 S. 4`y44sy44i�444y444 s E t Q 1145144`y,`S54g1y4114444y451y444y444y4444y44414444445414445444414444444444444444SSs�44 y 445 „ 1SySgSSSS145SySSgSySgsyS5s4SSys4SSg4yS4S45S54y544414y4y14S4yS54y1444ySy54SSySSgS44 4g544�S `� U) SSS154Sg5S4S1 Sy1 S41S 24SS144 4SySiySS ySy1SySS4ySysSSSS4ySS4g414S5S15yS5S14S1S4Sy14ySS44S1yy S14y 114 S Sy4 g4°y 45"i Sy4 Sy 1S S1S SySS'114 ySS 45 y4 S 1S 14 Sy SSy 44 ySS SyS' ySS SSS SSy 144 Zi 4i 14 S14i m 0 cn iyS544S444yS544Sy444SyS4Sssi1S44454441S44yS44S1ySgSySSyS4ySySys4SSySySSgSySy4ySSgSy4ySySSySS� 444gsS4Sy44S}SS4SS4445454SyS4144SyS4S44gS45Sy4Sy4}5S1Sy14S44Sg4ySy4S4ySgSSg4lSysSS1 y4SS S y 415451 Syi54 ¢„y 4 cu O CU cAJ N J 4y4y4414y4y414y1y5141g4144441444y4544144445444544..4.44444544..4544445.4444444~144444444444445544144444'41 y4i4544yy44sy444s5154g444s5444y144SS44y11441Sy4y14i1y4g4y5444y4y4y114y1444y4144yyti4yy44414y4y144�14"4 41�^ f uuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuu 5414gy44yS44y444y114y1444y14414444�5444y�444y44144444gs4SyS44Sys4iy1444y4454154yy,4yy145g144yy1441y441 y 4��4'��\ m uuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuu 4444444444441444444444444444444444.14444444414441454144141444144444y445y1454y44y4g544y44g14441445y44y 414 y544444i44444444 44 44S 4 444yS445S4444S44yg4444444454444444S444k4��S4 445y444444445s4445g441S4444S4SSS 444 S 4SSis4Sy444S544yy444s41yyy141y14544144y14y44444y45�y14y4y444y1444y444y14o1y141Syy44tyy1411y4�4114444514y14t14 5 4 S S y 4 S S 4 S S 4 4 S S 4S y44444y4y44g�y4y4g1g5S115s41y4g4y5SyS141g1441yg44y444554444�44S-4SSSC444S414S1444g14454454g4441y444y444y1544'44 S5 1§ 4g Sy S Sy S Sg S SS yS 4y SS 1 SS �S SS 14 4S E 4445 `44444444444444444444444445��1 y444�Sy41S44441544y44441y444y4444ys4y1144y444y1541Sy44y41syy545y1y4y51y4SS44144SSti54y11y4S454414s441444y1s44145 4y1441S �4yt,iisli44414 4S4444444SS44gti444SS44f,S44Sy44Syy444444ySg44yt4444y 4 4 14 44' z z 4444444444144444444s4444ys45yy4444114Sy44S4145414441444544444yS444444gsS1sy4445s4444 44y4445�\44y4 .s a o 0 T 451451454444444y4444444y1444544444454144414444y44541441y1444y44gS5441444yy4441y141y144yy54Sy444�y445ysS44g445yy445S�4s41 54445144444'Is 1144444441544y4y44141454y441444y4444g1y414y454544g44445444y44445444y14441444144444444y44y4y4y4g4154y44I I i � a � a m y4S441444y4544144514y441144y4y44144454y44y1441454444444,4444y454y444y4545y444yti54yy44syg444y55144444455454444g44444154y44 y yS�45y4SSy4S SgS ig Sys, �' U) Q L S44gsyS144 4444SS4444444SS4445444;4441 1y5144544444444444441444444444444444544444SS4444444�44444y4S14y444y4454444�1y4411151y44y5g44yy44551�4yg444y144yy14sy145� 5~545554 1151554 4y�—"iS���ySSSS Sy4y4gtS S4SyS44yygyS44y 4ySS4y SgS 45445516 444 44455144444444y44444441y44414444g44444444g4444444 4414441 44 54444445 454S444S444444y45�f�gSn o N a u �0 C cn O c J C ca SII w m N 2 (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z N Z c a x .a N V) _f_- 2 O co � U � c U) .E Q N (n d O 0 (n=l m M N O N T d �C C 41 w CL d cn w f6 D (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z (D Z c a x .a 'D a) U) J_- 2 O CO � U � c U) a� .E a)Q N (n d O 0 (n=l m M N O N T d �C C 41 w d co d t6 D 20 N Y M N O M N R", R 10 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters z ------------- O O - w o� � U c6 � O-� U m T Q CD It= O co C ley a 3w Q v) J >+ g 0 d 0 O V� O —� -0 W cv Q O WEL � ti45i �w — > 4 4_i c N cp E T c O L O — E U N c6 U) m ---�... U) C 4w 41 C C � cu O c6 V1J N J = m uuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuu � � 002t min � � • � moi � � O O (7/v�O � 00 4. A- MSN a� E 41 ti ,w, 4, 0 0 41. .,o wm o 01 E Z z n C x .a a� n a� s U @ 4 11% mhle AM AM "11� 'nM^ mUb 4^ .par 01 U) Q = N M U) d U aw w �„ mro w IN � \ o a o W 00 (D ca O U) O U Q x aD CL CL 20 METRIC SCALE 1:4000 100 Meters (DE �E_ E =z Z (D Z c a x .a a) U) J_- 2 O co � U � c U) a� .E Q N (n d O 0 (n=l m M N O N T d �C C 41 w d cn t6 D II'TICE 0F'LIC E ETI HG Et !PEI' HOUSE to change land use and zoniing in Lower Door � ��, II q'�I�""��G' � "L �" ,: ���������� 6. ° �. ° g E z C) i g d John Zuni�c, Senior PLanner jhn. uni , it h n r. Hare Your voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Cate: October 30,2023, Location: Coluncil Chambers Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West rVirt!u l Zoom Meeting and select: Go to kitchener.ca/meetings * current aigendlais and reports (posted l 1 dIays, before meeting) • appear as, a delegation 16 watch, meeting Virtual Open Hlol u Cate: October 23 2023 Location: virtual Zoom Il ti'n , learn ,. T'he City o'Kitchener consider 'M- N_M applications pM'rMoamend - # M Plan andM Zoning By-lawLower .lipart implementation of Lower e i! Land Use StudyThese M # � ■# # M #! # Lower Dof Cultural ■ _Landscape, M apply fONb#M •_i site holding proposed. Lower Donn u. kur � Here to Landscape Study Prepared for the G ty of IKitcheirier October 2023 ASV Project No. 22CH-0 7 Page 273 of 668 Ac kin oM edge irn e rits The study team would like to thank the City's Project Manager, John Zunic, Planner (Policy), as well as Deeksha Choudhry, former Heritage Planner; Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner; and Natalie Goss, Manager, Policy & Research for their guidance and support on this project. Project IPersonne PrincipaV -on -Charge:: Rebecca Sciarra, M.A., C.A.H.P. Lead Cultural Herrtage SlpecWist: Laura Wickett, B.A. (Hon.), Dip. Heritage Conservation TecWcal Writer and Researcher: Lindsay Parsons, M.M.S.t., M.P.L. Geomatics Specialists:: Robin Latour, B.A., M.Phil. Carolyn Nettleton, B.A. (Hon) Jonas Fernandez, MSc Cover Image: Bird's eye photograph of the Village of Doon in 1950, looking northeast toward the Ferrie mill pon(J, mill and Grand River, with Pinnacle Drive in the foreground (Kitchener Public Library, 1950). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study i Page 274 of 668 Table of Contents 1.0 1.1 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Boundary.............................................................. 7 1.2 Summary of Previous Studies.................................................................................................. 8 1.3 What is a Cultural Heritage Landscape?.................................................................................. 9 1.4 A Note to Property Owners................................................................................................... 10 2.0 Com munLy and .St kehoIder Co nsUlt tic un.o.o.o.o.oooo.o.a.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.0000.o.� 3.0 Supplleunnentary Research ....................... ..........................o.00000— 1 3.1 Indigenous Land Use and Settlement.................................................................................... 11 3.2 The Grand River and Schneider Creek................................................................................... 16 3.3 Historical Mapping and Material Review.............................................................................. 16 4.0 Refined Statement ent of Significance aind lderitage Attiributes ......................27 4.1 Description of the Heritage Place.......................................................................................... 27 4.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest................................................................. 28 4.3 Heritage Attributes................................................................................................................ 30 5.0 Poky U=� u�n�W��l<o.o.oooo.o.a.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.0000.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.oooo.o.a.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.o.0000.0.. � 5.1 The Provincial Policy Statement............................................................................................ 31 5.2 The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) ................................................ 32 5.3 Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2015)................................................................................ 33 5.4 City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014)..................................................................................... 34 5.5 Guidelines..............................................................................................................................36 .0 Objective.sa U7olicie.s and 6.1 Recommended Cultural Heritage Objectives and Official Plan Policies and Guidelines for the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape....................................................................................... 37 700 Implementation Recommendations oo.o.o.o.o.o.onono.o.o.o.oa„o„o...... 000000000.0.0.44 . IIReferences........................... .......................--—...........................,,.,,.....................,,o„o„....— 0.,4-.5 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study ii Page 275 of 668 ppend� A„ IPhotogr 1pNc IDocu meintatbin of ldeirftage Attrdbutes .,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.4 plpeuda x B� Gossary ......................................................4...........................63 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study iii Page 276 of 668 IJ st of 1F ii u it s Figure 1: Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Boundary......................................................................8 Figure 2: Plan showing the Lands granted to the Six Nation Indians, situated on each side of the Grand River, or Ouse, commencing on Lake Erie, containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor General, survey Gen. Office York 2nd February 1821 (Library and Archives Canada, Mikan 4129506)....15 Figure 3: 1805 map of lots in Waterloo Township. The approximate location of the study area is circled in red (Waterloo Historical Society 1934)....................................................................................................17 Figure 4: The study area overlaid on the 1861 Map of the County of Waterloo (Tremaine 1861)............18 Figure 5: The study area overlaid on the 1881 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo (Parsell & Co. 1881)......................................................................................................................................19 Figure 6: A painting by Phoebe A. Watson of Doon Mill from the late nineteenth century. In the foreground is the Doon Hotel and village store with the mill in the background (Waterloo Historical Society1941)................................................................................................................................................19 Figure 7: The study area overlaid on a 1916 topographic map (Department of Militia and Defence 1916). ......................................................................................................................................................................20 Figure 8: The ruins of Doon Mill along Schneider Creek likely in the 1920s (Kitchener Public Library, n.d.) ......................................................................................................................................................................21 Figure 9: The study area overlaid on a 1936 topographic map (Department of National Defence 1936).22 Figure 10: The Cluthe resort at Willow Lake in the 1950s (Kitchener -Waterloo Record, n.d.)...................22 Figure 11: A bird's eye photograph of the Village of Doon in 1950, looking northeast with Pinnacle Drive in the foreground. (Kitchener Public Library, 1950)....................................................................................23 Figure 12: The study area overlaid on the 1954 aerial photograph of Kitchener (Hunting Survey CorporationLimited 1954)...........................................................................................................................24 Figure 13: The houses at 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive in 1967 (Kitchener Public Library, 1967) ................... 24 Figure 14: The study area overlaid on a 1976 topographic map (Surveys and Mapping Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources 1976)...................................................................................25 Figure 15: Doon Mill after the storm of 1968 (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1969) ....................................26 Figure 16: The remaining wall of Doon Mill being levelled in 1981 (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1981)...27 Figure 17: Schneider Creek, looking north from the bridge on Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute #2).....49 Figure 18: Schneider Creek, looking northeast from within Willow Lake Park (Heritage Attribute #2)....50 Figure 19: Schneider Creek at its outlet into the Grand River, looking west (Heritage Attribute #2)........50 Figure 20: Limestone ruins of the former Doon Mills complex within the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute#3)......................................................................................................51 Figure 21: Limestone ruins of the former Doon Mills complex within the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute#3)......................................................................................................51 Figure 22: Willow Lake Park with trail along Schneider Creek, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute #4). ......................................................................................................................................................................52 Figure 23: Southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park that follows the alignment of the former Grand Trunk Railway, looking west (Heritage Attribute#5)...................................................................................52 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study iv Page 277 of 668 Figure 24: Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, with trail leading to Grand River, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute#6)................................................................................................................53 Figure 25: Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, with trail leading to Grand River, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute#6)................................................................................................................53 Figure 26: Grand River shoreline (in foreground) within Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute #6). Built Form and Streetscape Attributes.................................................................54 Figure 27: Topography along Pinnacle Drive which slopes towards the Grand River, looking north from 20 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#8)....................................................................................................54 Figure 28: Original alignment, width and rural cross-section of Old Mill Road, looking west from the intersection of Old Mill Road and Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#9).................................................55 Figure 29: Original alignment, width and rural cross-section of Pinnacle Drive, looking south from the intersection of Pinnacle Drive and Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute#9).................................................55 Figure 30: Original alignment, width and rural cross-section of Amherst Drive, looking west along Amherst Drive towards its intersection with Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#9)................................56 Figure 31: 10 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#10).................................................................................56 Figure 32: 20 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#10).................................................................................57 Figure 33: 6 Amherst Drive (Heritage Attribute#11)..................................................................................57 Figure 34: 37 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute#12).................................................................................58 Figure 35: View of Schneider Creek looking north from the bridge on Old Mill Road (View #1) ...............58 Figure 36: View of Schneider Creek looking south from the bridge on Old Mill Road (View #1) ...............59 Figure 37: View of mill ruins looking northwest from the bridge on Old Mill Road (View #2) ..................59 Figure 38: View of the Grand River from the Grand River shoreline on the west side of Schneider Creek, lookingnorthwest (View#3)........................................................................................................................60 Figure 39: View of the Grand River from the Grand River shoreline on the west side of Schneider Creek, lookingsoutheast (View#3).........................................................................................................................60 Figure 40: View of the Grand River looking north from the intersection of Pinnacle Drive and Old Mill Road toward the Waterloo Pioneer Memorial Tower (View#4)................................................................61 Figure 41: View looking south up Pinnacle Drive towards 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive and 6 Amherst Drive (View#5)......................................................................................................................................................61 Figure 42: View looking south up Pinnacle Drive towards 37 Pinnacle Drive (View#5)............................62 Figure 43: View of 37 Pinnacle Drive looking west along Amherst Drive (View#6)...................................62 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study v Page 278 of 668 Ust of IMalps Map 1: Location of select heritage attributes within the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape ......... 41 Map 2: Location of views identified as heritage attributes.........................................................................42 Map 3: Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Results.................43 Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study vi Page 279 of 668 1.0 Il n'tiro a ctiion Archaeological Services Inc. (A.S.I) was retained by the City of Kitchener to implement the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape (referred to hereafter as the "C.H.L.") located within Lower Doon, to support the implementation of the Lower Doon Land Use Study. The Lower Doon Land Use Study includes policies and guidelines addressing new and/or updated land use designations, zoning provisions and urban design guidelines. This report builds on the work presented in previous heritage studies of Lower Doon, including the Lower Doon and Homer Watson Park Candidate Cultural Heritage Landscape Evaluation (Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2019) and the Lower Doon Land Use Study: Heritage Component (Bray Heritage 2021). The scope of work for this report is to: • Review previous studies of the area and background documents; • Conduct a field review of the C.H.L.; • Conduct supplementary historical research to supplement the history of the area presented in previous studies; • Refine and expand the Statement of Significance and Heritage Attributes presented in Bray Heritage; and • Develop objectives, policies and guidelines for the conservation of the C.H.L. 1.1 Lower Door Cubjrai Heritage Landscape Boundary This report implements the Upper Pinnacle Drive Heritage Character Area Boundary recommended in the Lower Doon Land Use Study: Heritage Component (Bray Heritage 2021). The C.H.L. (Figure 1) is located within the former village of Lower Doon, which now forms the southwestern corner of the City of Kitchener. The C.H.L. is bounded by the Grand River to the north, and the property line of Willow Lake Park forms the western boundary, with the southwestern tail of the C.H.L. extending into Homer Watson Park. The eastern edge of the boundary includes residential properties on the east side of Pinnacle Drive between Old Mill Road and Amherst Drive. Old Mill Road runs east -west through the area, and Schneider Creek runs south from the Grand River through Willow Lake Park. The ruins of the Doon Mill and dam are located adjacent to Schneider Creek in the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road. A large portion of the area is forested parkland with public trails. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 7 AS Page 280 of 668 Figure 1: Lower Door Cultural Heritage Landscape Boundary. 1.2 Summary of iyrevious Studies A series of studies, including technical research and analysis and engagement activities, have been undertaken in the City of Kitchener, and Lower Doon in particular. These have resulted in the classification of the Lower Doon C.H.L. and delineation of its boundary. In 2014, the City of Kitchener completed a Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (City of Kitchener 2014) which provided an inventory of Cultural Heritage Landscapes (C.H.L.$) in the City. The study identified the Lower Doon area as needing further investigation to determine if the area should be considered a C.H.L. In 2019, the Lower Doon and Homer Watson Park Candidate Cultural Heritage Landscape Evaluation (Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2019) was completed for the City. This study included the evaluation of the whole Lower Doon area as a potential C.H.L. as well as evaluating other areas within Lower Doon as potential separate C.H.L.s, including the Pinnacle Drive Streetscape and Willow Lake Park. The study determined that Lower Doon as a whole and the Pinnacle Drive Streetscape did not meet C.H.L. criteria, whereas Willow Lake Park did meet C.H.L. criteria. Subsequently, the Lower Doon Land Use Study (The Planning Partnership and Bray Heritage 2021) was undertaken to guide land use planning in the area, and included a separate heritage study. The Lower Doon Land Use Study: Heritage Component (Bray Heritage 2021) re-evaluated the Pinnacle Drive r ,e Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 8 AS Page 281 of 668 streetscape and found that Pinnacle Drive from the intersection of Amherst Drive to Old Mill Road met the criteria for a C.H.L. The report recommended that Upper Pinnacle Drive be combined with the Willow Lake Park C.H.L. as the Lower DoonHeritage Character Area (H.CA.). On March 22, 2021, Council approved the Lower Doon Land Use Study Recommendations Report. Recommendation #1 of the Lower Doon Land Use Study delineated the boundary of the Lower Doon Heritage Character Area, as it was then referred to. There may be additional properties of heritage interest in the area surrounding this delineated boundary and which may warrant further research and investigation. The statement of cultural heritage value or interest, list of heritage attributes and boundary recommended in Bray Heritage form the basis of the C.H.L. that is the subject of the present report. 1.3 What is a Cu�tura� Heritage Landscape:' The Region of Waterloo's Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation describes a cultural heritage landscape as: "A location where the influence of humans on the natural landscape has resulted in a place with distinctive character and cultural importance. These historically significant landscapes are valued for the important contribution they make to our understanding of the history of a place, an event, an individual and/or a community" (Region of Waterloo 2018). The Provincial Policy Statement (2020) provides the basis for defining and protecting cultural heritage landscapes (C.H.L.). The Policy defines a C.H.L. as a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Indigenous community. A C.H.L. may include features such as buildings, structures, spaces, views, archaeological sites, or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to Heritage Conservation Districts, villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, aboriginal trails and industrial complexes of cultural heritage value. UNESCO (UNESCO World Heritage Centre n.d.) describes three main categories of C.H.L.s: • An intentionally designed landscape, such as a garden or a park, often (but not always) associated with religious buildings or large estates. • An organically evolved landscape, resulting from an initial social, economic, administrative, and/or religious imperative and has developed its present form by association with and in response to its natural environment. These landscapes reflect their evolution in their form and component features. Organically evolved landscapes fall into two sub -categories: Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 9 Page 282 of 668 o A relict (or fossil) landscape is one in which an evolutionary process came to an end at some time in the past, either abruptly or over a period. Its significant distinguishing features are, however, still visible in material form. o A continuing landscape is one which retains an active social role in contemporary society closely associated with the traditional way of life, and in which the evolutionary process is still in progress. At the same time it exhibits significant material evidence of its evolution over time. • An associative landscape that is significant for its powerful religious, artistic, or cultural associations of the natural environment rather than material cultural evidence, which may be insignificant or even absent. 1A A INote to Property Owners This report consolidates information from previous heritage studies of the Lower Doon area with supplemental research and analysis of the study area to provide a description of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape (C.H.L.) and articulate its significance as a heritage place within the City of Kitchener. The study also provides objectives, policies and guidelines to provide guidance to property owners and City staff for appropriate change and new development within and adjacent to the C.H.L., while protecting its cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. 2„ 0 C oIrkImunity and Stakeholder Consull-tation As part of the Lower Doon Land Use Study, Bray Heritage and the Planning Partnership held three community consultation events throughout 2020: • February 4, 2020 • September 22, 2020 • November 18, 2020 In each of the community consultation sessions, previously recognized heritage properties as well as potential built and natural heritage were identified as valued aspects of the Lower Doon neighbourhood. Heritage buildings were noted as contributing to the special character of the area along with the mature trees, walking trails, and Schneider Creek. In the final community consultation session, 23 recommendations in 8 categories were presented to the community that were based on previously gathered feedback. Heritage was a main category with six specific recommendations for its conservation, highlighting the value of heritage expressed by the community. As part of the Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project, two community engagement events were held on May 10, 2023. Attendees participated in a walking workshop (known as a "walkshop") through Lower Doon to discuss draft land uses and zoning as well as the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape and its heritage attributes. Drop-in sessions were held following the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 10 �,,a Page 283 of 668 walkshops where attendees could review project materials and provide feedback to the project team. Feedback received regarding the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape has been integrated as appropriate into this final report. .0 Sulplpl ernent ry Research Supplementary historical and archival research on the C.H.L. was undertaken to augment the research contained in previous reports as listed in Section 1.1. The purpose of this supplementary research is to further elaborate on how the area demonstrates cultural heritage value or interest and to inform the refined draft Statement of Significance and list of heritage attributes presented in the Bray Heritage report. This section should be read in conjunction with the historical information contained in previous reports, as it is not intended to provide an exhaustive history of the C.H.L. Research activities included a review of previous reports, analysis of historical mapping and photographs, and a review of archival materials such as newspaper clippings and walking tours held in the Local History and Genealogy collection at the Central branch of the Kitchener Public Library. Key components of this section include an overview of Indigenous land use and settlement, and a review of historical mapping and archival materials to highlight key developments within the area over the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. 3.1 Indigenous Land Use and Settlement Paleo Period (11,000 B.C:.E.-9,000 B.C;.E.) Southern Ontario has been occupied by human populations since the retreat of the Laurentide glacier approximately 13,000 years ago (Ferris 2013). The Paleo period refers to an archaeological period in southern Ontario related to the arrival of the first hunting bands after deglaciation approximately 13,000 to 12,500 years ago. The environment at this time consisted of an open boreal parkland, similar to the modern sub -arctic, with large Pleistocene mammals such as mastodon, mammoth, as well as herds of elk and caribou. Paleo period groups would follow these herds and travel extremely long distances over the course of the year, seldom staying in any one place for a significant length of time. Combined with low regional population levels at this time, evidence concerning Paleo period groups is very limited. Virtually all that remains of this period are the tools and by-products of their flaked stone industry, the hallmark being large distinctive fluted spear points. Paleo period sites are frequently found adjacent to the shorelines of large post -glacial lakes (Ellis and Deller 1990). Archaic Period (9,000 B.C::.E.-1,000 B.C.E.) By approximately 10,000 years ago, the environment had progressively warmed (Edwards and Fritz 1988) and populations now occupied less extensive territories (Ellis and Deller 1990). The Archaic period Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 11 AS Page 284 of 668 is commonly divided into three sub -periods: Early Archaic (circa 9,000-7,000 B.C.E.), Middle Archaic (circa 7,000-3,000 B.C.E.), and Late Archaic (circa 3,000-1,000 B.C.E.). The annual subsistence cycle of mobile groups during this period would have likely involved interior fall and winter micro -band hunting camps, which were situated to exploit nuts and animals attracted to mast -producing forests, with much larger spring and summer macro -band settlements situated near river mouths and lakeshores to exploit rich aquatic resources. The period is characterized by an expansion in the variety of tools produced, including ground -stone tools such as axes and adzes, and notched or stemmed projectile points, with an increased reliance on local chert sources for chipped stone tools. All these changes are also reflected in the increase in the numbers and sizes of sites (Ellis, Kenyon, and Spence 1990). Woodland Period (1,000 B.C.E.-1650 C.E.) The Woodland period is divided into three sub -periods: Early (1,000 B.C.E.-400 B.C.E.), Middle (400 B.C.E.-900 C.E.), and Late Woodland (900-1650 C.E.). The Early Woodland period is characterized by the introduction of ceramic technology into Ontario and an expanding network of societies that shared burial rituals such as the application of red ochre (ground iron hematite) to human remains and the inclusion of exotic grave goods. Burial mounds are also common to this period. During the Middle Woodland period, populations continued to practice residential mobility and to harvest seasonally available resources, including spawning fish. Exchange and interaction networks broaden at this time (Spence, Pihl, and Murphy 1990, 136, 138) and by approximately 2,000 years ago, evidence exists for macro -band camps, focusing on the seasonal harvesting of resources (Spence, Pihl, and Murphy 1990, 155, 164). It is also during this period that maize was first introduced into southern Ontario, though it would have only supplemented people's diet (Birch and Williamson 2013, 13-15). Bands likely retreated to interior camps during the winter. The Late Woodland period witnessed the beginnings of the intense utilization of horticultural crops (particularly corn) which led to decreased mobility and increased populations. Sites from this period are characterized by intense occupation and a greater degree of internal spatial organization and are commonly located on terraces overlooking the floodplains of large rivers, such as the Grand River (Archaeological Services Inc. 1997). From approximately 900 until 1650 C.E., lifeways became more like those described in early historical documents. During what is described by archaeologists as the Early Iroquoian phase (1000-1300 C.E.), the communal site is replaced by the village focused on horticulture. Seasonal disintegration of the community for the exploitation of a wider territory and more varied resource base was still practiced (Williamson 1990, 317). By the second quarter of the millennium, during the Middle Iroquoian phase (1300-1450 C.E.), this episodic community disintegration appears to no longer be practiced with populations now communally occupying sites throughout the year (Dodd et al. 1990, 343). During the Late Iroquoian phase (1450-1650 C.E.) this process continued with the coalescence of these small villages into larger communities (Birch and Williamson 2013). Through this process, the socio-political organization of the First Nations, as described historically by the French explorers who first visited southern Ontario, was developed. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 12 AS Page 285 of 668 The Early Contact Period (1620s-1784) T -he Attawondoron or Neutral Notion In 1626, the Recollet missionary Joseph de la Roche Daillon recorded his visit to the villages of the Attawandaron, an Iroquoian -speaking people who were called the "Neutral Nation" (Gens Neutres) by the French in reference to the fact that this group took no part in the long-term conflicts between the people of the Wendat Confederacy of Simcoe County and the Haudenosaunee in New York. Like the Wendat (Huron), Tionontate (Petun), and the Haudenosaunee (the Five Nations Iroquois of the state of New York), the Attawandaron people were settled village horticulturalists. The Attawandaron territory included the Grand River area, but discrete settlement clusters also extended southeast into the Niagara peninsula, and north to the Hamilton area (Lennox and Fitzgerald 1990). The supposed neutrality of these communities did not protect them from the intertribal conflicts of the seventeenth century that were exacerbated by the intrusion of Europeans, resulting in the dispersal of the three Ontario Iroquoian confederacies (the Wendat, Tionontate, and Attawandaron). By 1650, the Attawandaron were involved in a full-scale conflict with the Seneca, who were assisted by the Mohawk. The villages of the Attawandaron were destroyed by 1651 and their territory came to be occupied by the Mississaugas, an Algonquian people whose subsistence economy was based on hunting, fishing, and gathering wild plants. The English government recognized the Mississaugas as the "owners" of the Grand River territory and negotiated the purchase of a tract of land from them along the Grand River in May 1784. This purchase facilitated a survey of lands that were officially transferred to the Haudenosaunee by Proclamation on October 25, 1784 (Cumming and Mickenberg 1977, 110; Lennox and Fitzgerald 1990). T -he Haudenosounee The Haudenosaunee were historically situated in what is now the state of New York between the Hudson River valley to the east and the Great Lakes to the west though their control and influence extended over large areas of northeastern North America. The Haudenosaunee, also known as the Iroquois Confederacy, the Iroquoian League, the People of the Longhouse, and the Five Nations Iroquois, formed in the late fifteenth century and comprised five independent tribes, the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca, bound by a central constitution and common set of laws. The Confederacy was a democratic system and was known for its political stability. In 1722, the Tuscarora joined the Iroquois Confederacy to form the Six Nations. The Haudenosaunee allied themselves with the British during the American War of Independence and, in consequence, many of their villages were destroyed by rebel forces. At the conclusion of the war, the British government offered to protect the Haudenosaunee and give them land within their boundaries (Johnston 1964). Haldirnand Tract (1784--1841) On August 8, 1783, Frederick North, or Lord North, instructed Governor Frederick Haldimand to set apart land for the Haudenosaunee and ensure that they carried on their hunting and fur trading with the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 13 \� °ar Page 286 of 668 British. On May 22, 1784, a tract of land along the Grand River was purchased by the British government from the Mississaugas who lived in the vicinity (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). The land set apart is called the Haldimand Tract (Figure 2). Joseph Brant led 1,600 Haudenosaunee loyalists to the Haldimand Tract in 1784 and in the fall of 1784, Sir Frederick Haldimand formally awarded the tract to the Mohawks "and others of the Six Nations [Iroquois]" to "settle upon the Banks of the River for that Purpose six miles [10 km] deep from each Side of [it] beginning at Lake Erie, &c. extending in the Proportion to [its] Head." The precise boundaries of the grant were unclear as there was no survey; for example, the northern boundary of the original deed from the Mississaugas to the Crown stated that the line extended "from the creek that falls from a small lake into ... the bay known by the name of Waghquata [Burlington Bay] ... until it strikes the river La Tranche [Thames]." The 1790 survey by Augustus Jones intentionally failed to include the headwaters of the Grand, an action made all the more difficult to address given the unclear description of the extent in the original deeds (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). Brant regarded the territory as his own to manage on behalf of the Confederacy and interpreted the proclamation as tantamount to full national recognition of the Mohawks and fellow tribesmen. This interpretation was strongly denied by the British (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). Appointed as Lieutenant Governor of the new colony of Upper Canada in 1791, John Graves Simcoe refused to permit the Haudenosaunee to sell or lease any part of their reserve because they were arranged independently of the Crown. Brant, on the other hand, argued for the Haudenosaunee's need for an immediate assured income from land sales as they could no longer hope to survive by hunting exclusively. Simcoe thought that if such practices were permitted, it could lead to other Europeans attempting to seize control of the better part of the Haudenosaunee's reserve by any means. It was therefore unresolved as to whether the Haudenosaunee could dispose of their lands directly to whomever they chose (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). In the first few years, Brant, who had been described by some as a Europeanized entrepreneur, took the initiative and invited white friends and acquaintances to the tract and provided them with rough land titles. Over the next 25 years (1784-1810), a considerable number of Europeans and Americans obtained similar leases authorizing them (in Brant's opinion) to occupy and improve lots overlooking the river (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). The subsequent Peter Russel administration (1797-1798), however, recognized the leases and the sales that Brant arranged with white settlers along the Grand River valley. Trustees were appointed to act on the behalf of the Haudenosaunee with the authority to receive payment of purchases. On the other hand, some Haudenosaunee thought that the land sale practices violated the ancient principle that land was not a "commodity which could be conveyed." Two Mohawk sachems even tried to take up arms to depose Brant because they did not agree with his ways. Their efforts were for naught and they returned to the Bay of Quinte where other Haudenosaunee, led by Sachem John Deseronto, had settled after the American Revolution (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 14 Page 287 of 668 A formal investigation of the matter was launched in 1812 although leases were not set aside. Due to problems of white encroachment including squatters without titles, settlers who bought land from individuals or through other transactions with the Haudenosaunee, many of the leases were confirmed by the Crown in 1834-5. Unauthorized sales and agreements remained rampant (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). In 1841, Samuel P. Jarvis (Indian Superintendent) informed the Haudenosaunee that the only way to keep white intruders off their land would be for them to surrender it to the Crown, to be administered for their sole benefit. With this plan, the Haudenosaunee would retain lands that they actually occupied and a reserve of approximately 8,094 ha. Crown records indicate that the surrender of land was made by the Haudenosaunee in January 1841. Today, this history and those surrenders are still contested and there are numerous specific land claims that have been filed by the Haudenosaunee with the federal government regarding lands within the Haldimand Tract (Johnston 1964; Lytwyn 2005). Figure 2: Plan showing the Lance granted to the Six Nation Indians, Situated on each side of the Grand River, or Ouse, commencing on Lake Erie, containing about 674,910 Acres. Thos. Ridout Surveyor- general, survey Gen. Office York 2nd February 1821 (Library and Archives Canada, Mikan 4129506). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 15 \� °r Page 288 of 668 12 The Girand (River and Schneider Creek The Grand River watershed is the largest watershed in southern Ontario at 6,800 square kilometres including the cities of Brantford, Cambridge, Guelph, Kitchener, and Waterloo. The Grand River Watershed includes all the land drained by the Grand River and its tributaries. It begins in Dufferin County in the Dufferin Highlands and travels south 310 kilometres before emptying into Lake Erie at Port Maitland. The Conestogo, Nith, Speed and Eramosa rivers are the major four which feed into the Grand. Roughly 70% of the watershed is made of intensive agricultural areas (Grand River Conservation Authority 2020). The Grand River was an important transportation route and a critical resource extraction area for generations of Indigenous people. Historically, the Grand River has been utilized as a navigable waterway, as a power source (such power sites served as settlement nuclei), and above Brantford as a course for driving logs (Chapman and Putnam 1984:98). It is also the focus of the Haldimand Tract; an area of six miles (10 kilometres) on either side of the river that was awarded to the Haudenosaunee in 1784 (Filice 2016; Lytwyn 2005 ). The Grand River was designated as a Canadian Heritage River in 1994 for its cultural history and recreation (Canadian Heritage Rivers System 2016). Schneider Creek is a tributary of the Grand River that extends southwest. Schneider Creek played a critical role in the development of the Village of Doon when settlers began arriving to the area. The Village of Doon grew up around the mouth of Schneider Creek. In the early 1800s, Schneider Creek was dammed to power Adam Ferrie Junior's grain mill that was built on the shore of the Creek (Homer Watson House and Gallery, n.d.). The dam created a large mill pond to the south that would become known as Willow Lake (The Record 2010). Starting in the 1920s, Willow Lake became a beach resort operated by the Cluthe family. A storm in 1968 caused a surge along Schneider Creek, destroying the dam and draining the Lake into the Grand River (The Record 2010). Willow Lake is now a public park held by the City of Kitchener, and Schneider Creek continues to meander through it. 33 Ildistorica� Mapping and Material) Review Historical mapping and photographs were examined to trace the history of features within the study area as well as to understand how the study area has evolved over time. For nineteenth-century mapping, the 1861 Map of the County of Waterloo (Figure 4) and the 1881 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo (Figure 5) were examined. This report also presents twentieth-century maps and aerial photographs from 1916, 1936, 1954, and 1976 (see Figure 7, Figure 9, Figure 12, and Figure 15). Additionally, archival material is presented to support the historical narrative of the study area (see Figure 3, Figure 8, Figure 11, and Figure 13.) Historically, the study area is located in unnumbered lots of Biehn's Tract in the former Village of Doon, Waterloo Regional Municipality. It should be noted, however, that not all features of interest were mapped systematically in the Ontario series of historical atlases. For instance, they were often financed by subscription limiting the level of detail provided on the maps. Moreover, not every feature of interest would have been within the scope of the atlases. The use of historical map sources to reconstruct or predict the location of former features within the modern landscape generally begins by using common reference points between the various Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 16 AS Page 289 of 668 sources. The historical maps are geo-referenced to provide the most accurate determination of the location of any property on a modern map. The results of this exercise can often be imprecise or even contradictory, as there are numerous potential sources of error inherent in such a process, including differences of scale and resolution, and distortions introduced by reproduction of the sources. Nineteenth and twentieth-century mapping, photograph and archival analysis is presented in chronological order below: The 1805 map of Waterloo Township (Figure 3) depicts the complex survey and lot system utilized in Waterloo Region with the Grand River meandering north -south through the landscape. The study area is set within a rural agricultural context. At this time, the land where the Doon Mill would eventually sit near the mouth of Schneider Creek was owned by John Bean Junior. John built a house and sawmill on the land which were both abandoned when Adam Ferrie purchased the land in 1834 (The Evening Reporter 1954). BLOCK NUMBER TWO CWATFRLOO TOWNSHIP) 1 SEPT 1805 Figure 3: 1805 reap of lots in Waterloo Township. The approximate location of the study area is circled in reel (O/VaLerloo Historical Society 1334). The 1861 map (Figure 4) depicts the Village of Doon forming in the north and east of the study area, centering around the mill pond. By this time, the village has a distinct road pattern within a primarily rural agricultural context. Additionally, buildings are depicted along Upper Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 17 \� °ar Page 290 of 668 Drive in the vicinity of 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive, 37 Pinnacle Drive, and 6 Amherst Drive. The Regency - style cottages at 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive were both likely built around 1858, and the original Red Lion Inn building at 6 Amherst Drive was also constructed by 1858. The building at 37 Pinnacle drive was constructed in 1892 and became the second location of the Red Lion Inn (Homer Watson House and Gallery, n.d.; Bray Heritage 2021). A number of structures (depicted by black dots) are shown to the north of Old Mill Road, including Adam Ferrie's mill building, and to the east of the mill pond along Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Drive. Adam Ferrie's Doon Mills was believed to be the largest mill in Canada at the time of its construction in 1839 and was built at an impressive scale being described as "an impressive and expensive operation. Ferrie, who from his youth had an interest in mechanics, designed the grist mill on a grand scale. Its masonry construction and huge stone dam contrasted with the modest wooden mills typical of rural Upper Canadian" (Burley 2003). By 1860, the Ferrie family no longer operated or owned the mill. The mill would have a number of owners throughout the second half of the nineteenth century. The Grand River meanders across the landscape to the north of the study area with the tributary, Schneider Creek, extending south into the study area to the mill pond and beyond. The Grand Trunk Railway traverses the study area and is depicted running through the village near Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Drive. Figi..are 4: The study area overlaid on the 1361 Map of Lhe County of O/VaLerloo (Trernaine 1361). By 1881, historical mapping depicts the Village of Doon as being more developed, particularly to the southeast of the study area (Figure 5). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 18 AS Page 291 of 668 Figure 5: The study area over -laid on the 1881 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo (Pairselll & Co. 1881). In 1890, Jacob Cluthe bought the mill, Willow Lake, and surrounding land. The mill was a non- operational flour mill when Cluthe purchased it. Cluthe used the mill as a distillery, shoddy plant (recycled wool), and made glue (The Evening Reporter 1952). Figure 6: A painting by Phoebe A. Watson of Doon Mill from the late nineteenth cenb..iry. In the foreground is the Doon Hotel and village store with the mill in the background (\A/aterloo Historical Society 1941). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 19 AS Page 292 of 668 The 1916 topographic map (Figure 7) depicts the same village street alignment from nineteenth-century mapping, with Doon Village Road south of the study area now depicted as a paved main road. The Grand Trunk Railway continues to traverse the study area, although it appears the previous rail station at the southeast corner of Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Drive is now a Post Office. The Red Lion Inn (37 Pinnacle Drive) is noted as a hotel on the map in its extant location. The stone mill building (red square) is depicted in the north of the study area along Schneider Creek with the mill pond to the south. The mill was owned at this time by Jacob Cluthe. Fires broke out in 1904 and 1910 which led Cluthe to abandon operations of the mill and he did not repair the building (Homer Watson House and Gallery, n.d.). A 1920 photograph (Figure 8) of the mill building depicts the heavily deteriorated structure along Schneider Creek. Figure '7: The study area over -laid on a 1916 topographic reap (Department of Militia and Defence 1916), Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 20 AS Page 293 of 668 Figure : The rains of Doon Mill along Schneider Creek likely in the 1920s (Kitchener Public Library, n.d.) The 1936 topographic map (Figure 9) depicts the study area as generally unchanged from the 1916 map. At this point, Willow Lake was operating as a resort run by the Cluthe family that included a beach, concession stands, and cottages along the water. People could pay to enter the resort where they could swim, dive off the diving board, and rent cottages in the summer months (Figure 10). On hot Saturdays or Sundays, close to 1000 cars would arrive (Fear 2010). The Cluthes also operated a farm on the surrounding land. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 21 AS Page 294 of 668 Figure 9: The .study area overlaid on a 1936 topographic map (Departrnent of National Defence 1936). M Figure 10 f he Cluthe resort at O/0(i11Mnr Lake in the 1950s (Kitchener-WaLerlloo Record, n.d.). The 1950 bird's eye photograph (Figure 11) of Doon depicts the residential nature of Pinnacle Drive with the railway in the southeast of the photograph, the mill pond with mill building, and the Grand River traversing the landscape. The Red Lion Inn, 6 Amherst Drive, and part of 20 Pinnacle Drive are partially visible behind tree coverage in the image. The area surrounding Doon remains rural agricultural. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 22 AS Page 295 of 668 Figure 1l:/\bird's eye photograph ofthe Village ofDooninlB5[\looking nor1heastvviLh Pinnacle Drive in theforegnound. (Khzhener Public Library, 1950). The 1954 aerial photograph (Figure 12) depicts the study area as remaining in a primarily agricultural context, with much of the urban development taking place along Pinnacle Drive, Amherst Drive, and Old Mill Road. The mill pond remains intact, and the Grand Trunk Railroad continues to traverse the study area. Lower DmunCultural Heritage Landscape Study 23 ����U Page 296Of668 ���n Figure 12: Fhe study area overlaid on the 1954 aerial photograph of Kitchener (Hunting Survey Corporation Limited 1954). A 1967 photograph (Figure 13) of number 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive depicts the residences as well maintained and with a number of features such as the gable roof and bargeboard along the porch roof. 0,1401 E, M Figure 13: Fhe houses at 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive in 1967 (Kitchener Public Library, 1967). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 24 AS Page 297 of 668 In 1968, the City of Kitchener annexed the village of Doon (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1971). The 1976 topographic map (Figure 14) depicts the urban development of the study area and surrounding area, with new development to the west and south of the study area and within its boundaries. The historical street alignment of the Village of Doon remains intact including Pinnacle Drive, Amherst Drive, and Old Mill Road. The Grand Trunk Railway no longer runs through the region. The mill pond is no longer depicted in the 1976 topographic map, as a 1968 storm had drained the pond into the Grand River, and it is now shown as a wooded area. The 1968 storm greatly damaged the already deteriorated mill ruins, with the west wall being fully knocked over by the flooding (Figure 15). The storm also wiped out the resort built by the Cluthe family. The Cluthe family sold Willow Lake to the City of Kitchener shortly after the storm in 1969. Shortly after, it appears the City of Kitchener transferred ownership of the land to the Grand River Conservation Authority (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1981). Schneider Creek continues to extend south from the Grand River and through the old mill pond. The mill ruins are labelled on the map. After the flood of 1968, Old Mill Road was closed for a number of years and the future of Willow Lake was uncertain. In 1971, there was a push from Doon residents to refill Willow Lake and return it to a place of recreation. The lake was never refilled. Old Mill Road remained closed to traffic until at least the late 1970s (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1977). By the mid-1970s, the City of Kitchener predicted a sharp population increase in the former village of Doon and undertook a number of planning studies concerning traffic flow in the area and subdivision developments (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1976). Figure 14 Fhe study area overlaid or) a 1975 topographic reap (Surveys arra Mapping Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources 1976). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 25 AS Page 298 of 668 Figi..are 15 Doon Mill after the storm of 1968 (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1969). A photograph from 1981 depicts the levelling of the remaining wall of Doon Mill by the Grand River Conservation Authority. This work was undertaken due to safety concerns regarding the structure's stability and the City of Kitchener not providing enough funds to undertake an extensive stabilization project (Figure 16) (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1981). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 26 AS Page 299 of 668 Figure 16 Imre remaining wall of Goon Mill being levelled in 1981 (Kitchener -Waterloo Record 1981). „0 Refined ,StatemeIrl. f Significance and Heritage Attributes This section presents a Statement of Significance and Heritage Attributes for the Lower Doon C.H.L. that refines and expands on the Statement of Significance and Heritage Attributes presented in the Bray Heritage report as part of the Lower Doon Land Use Study, based on supplementary research presented in Section 3.0 and a field review of the C.H.L. undertaken by ASI and City Staff. 4.1 Description of the Heritage Place The Lower Doon C.H.L. is located within the former village of Lower Doon, which now forms the southwestern corner of the City of Kitchener. The C.H.L. is bounded by the Grand River to the north, and the property line of Willow Lake Park forms the western boundary, with the southwestern tail of the C.H.L. extending into Homer Watson Park. The eastern edge of the boundary includes residential properties on the east side of Pinnacle Drive between Old Mill Road and Amherst Drive. Old Mill Road runs east -west through the area, and Schneider Creek runs south from the Grand River through Willow Lake Park. The ruins of the Doon Mill are located in the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 27 AS Page 300 of 668 A large portion of the area is forested parkland, with public trails. The Grand River was an important transportation route and a critical resource extraction area for generations of Indigenous people. 4.2 Statement of Wtural Heritage Value or, lnterest Design/Physical Value The Lower Doon C.H.L. has design and physical value as a representative example of a nineteenth- century settlement complex in Upper Canada. The C.H.L. forms the core of the historical village of Doon and includes elements critical to the development of a typical nineteenth-century settlement, including an industrial operation (the mill) sited on a watercourse (Schneider Creek), a former rail line sited in proximity to the mill, a small collection of residential and commercial buildings, and segments of the original village street network. These landscape and built features represent key characteristics and important periods in the evolution of the village of Doon, from its origins as an industrial village in the early nineteenth century to a residential suburb and regional park in the mid -20th century. While many nineteenth-century buildings that formed part of Doon have been removed, properties within the C.H.L. adjacent to Willow Lake Park on Pinnacle Drive (from Old Mill Road to the intersection of Amherst Drive) provide surviving examples of nineteenth-century hotel and residential buildings that express Lower Doon's development as a village over the mid-to-late nineteenth century. These include a former hotel (the Red Lion Inn at 37 Pinnacle Drive), a former hotel/shop/club (6 Amherst Drive), as well as examples of mid -nineteenth century housing. Pinnacle Drive, Amherst Drive and Old Mill Road represent parts of the original village street network and alignments. The southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park follows the general alignment of the Galt Branch of the Grand Trunk Railway, which was built in the 1850s, and extends a short distance into Homer Watson Park. The Doon railway station (no longer extant) was located at the southeast corner of Pinnacle and Amherst Drives. The ruin of the mill within the C.H.L. also has design and physical value as an early example of a mill complex constructed of stone in Upper Canada, in contrast to more typical wooden mills constructed in the early -to -mid nineteenth century. The mill is noted in the local newspaper as once being the largest grist mill in Canada. This industrial complex formed the core of Bonnie Doon, later known as Lower Doon. In 1834, Adam Ferrie Junior purchased 300 acres of land to build a large milling operation that he named Doon Mills, after an area in his native Scotland. In 1839, Ferrie built a large hewn stone dam to create a mill pond on Schneider Creek and then built a limestone grist mill, three storeys tall with three- foot thick walls. The stone dam was washed out due to quicksand in 1840, and Ferrie built a replacement dam using deeply buried log pile and concrete. While the mill pond has been drained and converted to parkland, the footprint of Willow Lake Park delineates the general size, shape, and location of the former mill pond. Following the closure of Doon Mills due to fires in 1904 and 1910, the historical mill pond was converted to recreational use by the Cluthe family, who developed a public resort around the mill pond called Willow Lake. Starting in the 1920s, Lawrence and Bertha Cluthe allowed visitors to swim and skate on the pond, and they opened Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 28 Page 301 of 668 concession stands and built a diving board and cottages (no longer extant). With the collapse of the mill dam in the 1960s, the mill pond emptied, and the landscape began to be naturalized. By the late 1960s, Lower Doon was becoming a bedroom suburb for the region, and the municipality converted the former lake into a public park, next to the ruins of the mill. Historical/Associative Value The C.H.L. is associated with the nineteenth-century settlement and development of the village of Doon, starting in the 1830s, and with Doon's founder Adam Ferrie Junior and the Ferrie family, driving forces behind Doon's development into a thriving industrial village that reached its height in the late nineteenth century. While many of Doon's nineteenth-century structures have been removed, the ruins of Doon Mill, the dam, and traces of the mill pond are significant surviving remnants of the original site around which Doon developed. The mill operations spurred the economic and physical development of the village of Doon. By 1852, Doon had developed as a "company town", with a population of 452 and over 10 enterprises owned by the Ferrie family as well as 11 houses built for its workers and 20 lots sold to residents. At its height in the late nineteenth century, along with its sister village of Upper Doon (located just upstream), Lower Doon supported a variety of industries as well as shops, schools, hotels, churches, and a range of housing. The evolution of Doon into the twentieth century is also expressed within the C.H.L. The name of Willow Lake Park is taken from the resort called Willow Lake that was developed around the mill pond by the Cluthe family in the 1920s. The C.H.L. also includes largely unchanged portions of the Grand River shoreline that would have influenced the paintings of nineteenth-century Canadian artist Homer Watson (1855-1936), whose portrayals of pioneer life in the Lower Grand River Valley are important early examples of Canadian landscape painting. Watson was born near Doon and depicted the general area in many of his paintings. Watson describes the Doon mill pond as "the most charming place in the vicinity" in his essay "A Landscape Painter's Day" (1890). Watson's former house was originally built and occupied by Adam Ferrie Junior and is located just west of the H.C.A boundary at 1754 Old Mill Road. The house and grounds are now a public art gallery dedicated to preserving Watson's artistic legacy. Contextual Value The C.H.L. has contextual value for its importance in defining and maintaining the scenic nineteenth- century character of the area in connection to the former Village of Doon. The C.H.L., particularly in the vicinity of the mill ruins, has a distinctive sense of place that transports the visitor back in time. The naturalized parkland and tree -lined trails in Willow Lake Park provide scenic recreational space along Schneider Creek. The limestone ruins of Doon Mill mark the entry to the trail running north from Old Mill Road on the west side of Schneider Creek and evoke a nineteenth-century character. The sloping topography reflects the area's proximity to the Grand River. The trail follows Schneider Creek to its Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 29 Page 302 of 668 outlet into the Grand River, with views of the natural shoreline of the Grand River and Schneider Creek that are largely unchanged from the nineteenth century. Aspects of this park landscape are also valued for the impact on day-to-day living of people who visit and utilize the public park. The bridge along Old Mill Road also provides scenic views of Schneider Creek. The portion of Pinnacle Drive within the C.H.L. also has scenic qualities, owing to the sloping topography, remaining nineteenth-century buildings and mature trees and vegetation. The streets within the C.H.L. do not have curbs or sidewalks (with the exception of the bridge on Old Mill Road), which contributes to a nineteenth-century village streetscape quality. The C.H.L. is also physically, visually, and historically linked to its surroundings, including Schneider Creek, the Grand River, and surviving built resources surrounding the C.H.L. associated with the Ferrie family and the former Village of Doon. This includes Homer Watson House to the northwest at 1754 Old Mill Road, which was constructed in about 1834 by Adam Ferrie. While many of the nineteenth-century buildings on surrounding streets have been replaced, the layout of Doon's nineteenth-century street network is still partially extant and these streets connect to the road segments included within the C.H.L. The mill ruins within the C.H.L. also serve as a landmark along the trails in the area's parkland, orienting trail users. 43 Heritage Attributes Appendix A contains photographic documentation of the heritage attributes listed below. Landscape 1. Topography of the area which slopes towards the Grand River 2. Schneider Creek and its outlet into the Grand River 3. Limestone ruins of the former Doon Mills complex (Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road) 4. Willow Lake Park as delineating the general shape and location of the former mill pond 5. Southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park and Homer Watson Park on the south side of Schneider Creek that follows the alignment of the former Grand Trunk Railway 6. The Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, including surviving portions of the Grand River shoreline at the outlet of Schneider Creek 7. Mature trees Built Form and Streetscapes 8. Topography along Pinnacle Drive which slopes towards the Grand River 9. Original street alignment, width, and rural cross-section expressing the nineteenth-century road network of the village of Doon (Old Mill Road, Pinnacle Drive, and Amherst Drive). 10. Surviving examples of early housing (10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive): Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 30 AS Page 303 of 668 o The property located at 10 Pinnacle Drive contains a one -and -a -half storey residence constructed c. 1857-1858 with a low-pitched side gable roof and symmetrical three -bay fagade with a central shed roof dormer. A covered verandah spans the front fagade on the first storey. The exterior is clad in painted brick. o The property located at 20 Pinnacle Drive contains a one -storey residence constructed c. 1858 with a side gable roof and symmetrical three -bay front fagade. Built in the Regency style, the roof overhang creates a covered verandah along front fagade with decorative trim and the front door surround has a transom and side lights. The exterior is clad in red brick. 11. Surviving example of an early hotel/shop/club (6 Amherst Drive) o The property located at 6 Amherst Drive contains a two-storey residence constructed c. 1858 with a low-pitched hip roof, symmetrical three -bay facade and central gable dormers on the south and west facades. The exterior is clad in stucco. 12. Surviving example of an early hotel (37 Pinnacle Drive, the former Red Lion Inn) o The property located at 37 Pinnacle Drive contains a two-storey former hotel building constructed in 1892 with a hip roof and symmetrical five -bay fagade with two central hip dormers. The front door features a transom and a verandah supported by turned wooden posts with a balcony on the second storey spans the front fagade. The exterior is clad in painted brick. Views 1. Views of Schneider Creek looking north and south from the bridge on Old Mill Road 2. Views of the mill ruins looking northwest from the bridge on Old Mill Road 3. Views of the Grand River from the Grand River shoreline on the west side of Schneider Creek 4. Views of the Grand River looking north from the intersection of Pinnacle Drive and Old Mill Road toward the Waterloo Pioneer Memorial Tower 5. Views looking south up Pinnacle Drive towards 10, 20 and 37 Pinnacle Drive and 6 Amherst Drive 6. Views of 37 Pinnacle Drive looking west along Amherst Drive 5.0 Policy Fraimework The following provides a summary of applicable policy at the provincial, regional and municipal levels with regards to heritage conservation and cultural heritage landscapes, as well as an overview of national, provincial and regional guidance documents. 5.1 The I3rovind l I3olicy Statement The Planning Act (1990) and related Provincial Policy Statement (P.P.S. 2020) make a number of provisions relating to heritage conservation (Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 1990; 2020). One r ,e Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 31 AS Page 304 of 668 of the general purposes of the Planning Act is to integrate matters of provincial interest in provincial and municipal planning decisions. To inform all those involved in planning activities of the scope of these matters of provincial interest, Section 2 of the Planning Act provides an extensive listing. These matters of provincial interest shall be regarded when certain authorities, including the council of a municipality, carry out their responsibilities under the Act. One of these provincial interests is directly concerned with: 2.(i) the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest The P.P.S. indicates in Section 4.0 - Implementation/Interpretation, that: 4.6 The official plan is the most important vehicle for implementation of this Provincial Policy Statement. Comprehensive, integrated and long-term planning is best achieved through official plans. Official plans shall identify provincial interests and set out appropriate land use designations and policies. To determine the significance of some natural heritage features and other resources, evaluation may be required. In order to protect provincial interests, planning authorities shall keep their official plans up-to-date with this Provincial Policy Statement. The policies of this Provincial Policy Statement continue to apply after adoption and approval of an official plan. Section 2.0, Wise Use and Management of Resources addresses the long-term prosperity of the province and the importance of protecting natural and cultural heritage and archaeological resources for their economic, environmental, and social benefits. More specifically, Section 2.6 pertains specifically to Cultural Heritage and Archaeology policy and states that: • Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved (Policy 2.6.1); • Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved (Policy 2.6.3); • Planning authorities should consider and promote archaeological management plans and cultural plans in conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources (Policy 2.6.4); and, • Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting, and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources (Policy 2.6.5). 5.2 The Growth Plea for the Greater Gdden Horseshoe (2020) The Greater Golden Horseshoe (G.G.H.) is one of the most dynamic and fastest growing regions in North America (Government of Ontario 2020a). The Growth Plan for G.G.H. provides a vision and direction for r ,e Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 32 �, Page 305 of 668 the planning and development that supports economic prosperity, protects the environment, and helps communities achieve a high quality of life. The Plan identifies the Region of Waterloo as part of the Greater Golden Horseshoe Growth Plan Area. Concurrently, the G.G.H. Plan refers to and provides policy direction for cultural heritage and archaeological resources, and recognizes that unmanaged growth can degrade, among other features, the regions cultural heritage resources. The G.G.H. Plan further states that cultural heritage resources and open spaces within cities, towns, and countryside provide people with a sense of place. The G.G.H. Plan establishes general policies for conserving cultural heritage resources in the context of growth and intensification: 0 Cultural heritage resources will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and benefit communities, particularly in strategic growth areas (Policy 4.2.7.1); Municipalities will work with stakeholders, as well as First Nations and Metis communities, in developing and implementing Official Plan policies and strategies for the identification, wise use and management of cultural heritage resources (Policy 4.2.7.2). 5.3 Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2015) The Region of Waterloo Official Plan (O.P.) is the regional municipality's guiding document for directing growth and change for a period of 20 years, and includes the cities of Cambridge, Waterloo, and Kitchener (Region of Waterloo 2015). The vision of the plan embraces sustainability and liveability as central concepts in ensuring the Region of Waterloo is an inclusive, thriving, and sustainable community committed to maintaining harmony between rural and urban areas and fostering opportunities for current and future generations. In achieving the goal of liveability, the plan recognizes that much of Waterloo Region's distinctive character is associated with its various cultural heritage elements, including the Grand River and its diverse range of cities, towns, villages, hamlets, and countryside. Ensuring liveability means planning to retain and/or create the types of distinct local communities that will provide people with choices about where they live, work, and play. 5.3.1 Shaping Waterloo Region's Urban Communities Chapter 3 of the Regional O.P., Liveability in Waterloo Region, contains policies and objectives with the overall goal of creating vibrant urban and rural places. Among the objectives in achieving this includes supporting the conservation of cultural heritage resources (Objective 3.8 and Section 3.G). Section 3.G relates to Cultural Heritage and states that the inheritance of natural and cultural assets gives people a sense of place, community, and personal identity. The plan states its commitment to the conservation of its cultural heritage as these assets enhance the quality of life of the community, support social development and promote economic prosperity. Policies presented in Section 3.G address identification, conservation, and promotion of individual properties, cultural heritage landscapes, archaeological resources, and scenic roads. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 33 Page 306 of 668 The following policy pertains to cultural heritage landscapes: Area Municipalities will designate Cultural Heritage Landscapes in their official plans and establish associated policies to conserve these areas. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of cultural heritage resources that together have greater heritage significance than their constituent elements or parts. (Policy 3.G.6) 5.4 City of Kitchener Oficial Plain (2014) The City of Kitchener's Official Plan (City of Kitchener 2014b) provides policy direction for cultural heritage resources within the City, including the Lower Doon Secondary Plan study area. Sections, objectives and policies within the Official Plan that are relevant to this report are included in Section 12: Cultural Heritage Resources. Summaries of the relevant policies within these chapters are included below. It should also be noted that the majority of the lands within the Cultural Heritage Landscape are identified in the Official Plan as being part of the Natural Heritage System. Kitchener's Natural Heritage System is comprised of natural heritage features that maintain local and regional biological, hydrological, ecological and geological diversity and functions, support viable populations of indigenous species, and sustain local ecosystems. There is a strong relationship between natural and cultural heritage within the Cultural Heritage Landscape. While the objectives, policies and guidelines presented in Section 6.0 below focus on cultural heritage, natural heritage policies contained in the Official Plan also apply to the Cultural Heritage Landscape, and the cultural heritage policies do not preclude them. Section 12 of the Official Plan relates to the Cultural Heritage Resources within the City of Kitchener. The City recognizes the benefits of cultural heritage resources as focal to community identity and economic prosperity. Section 12 describes four objectives related to heritage, particularly the City's support for the conservation and promotion of the City's cultural heritage resources. Policy 12.C.1.4. acknowledges that not all of the City's cultural heritage resources may have been identified and accordingly, a property does not have to be listed or designated to be considered as having cultural heritage value or interest. Cultural Heritage Landscapes Policy 12.C.1.8 requires that the City, in cooperation with the Region and the Municipal Heritage Committee, identify and inventory cultural heritage landscapes in the city and list them on the Municipal Heritage Register. Policy 12.C.1.9 requires that significant cultural heritage landscapes be identified on Map 9 in the City's Official Plan and states that an amendment to the Official Plan will not be required to identify cultural heritage landscapes on the Municipal Heritage Register. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 34 AS Page 307 of 668 Policy 12.C.1.10 requires the conservation of significant cultural heritage landscapes within the city. Policy 12.C.1.1.12 recognizes the Grand River as a Canadian Heritage River and supports efforts to conserve the river's natural, cultural, recreational, scenic and ecological features. Policy 12.C.1.19 provides for the City to use measures beyond the Ontario Heritage Act to conserve built heritage and cultural heritage landscapes and implement Cultural Heritage Resource Conservation Measures Policies in the Official Plan. "These may include, but are not limited to covenants and easements pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act; by-laws and agreements pursuant to the Planning Act (Zoning By-law, demolition control, site plan control, community improvement provisions, provisions in a subdivision agreement); and by-laws and agreements pursuant to the Municipal Act (Property Standards Bylaw, tree by-law, sign by-law)." Policy 12.C.1.21 requires that all development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use designations and other policies of the Official Plan will conserve Kitchener's significant cultural heritage resources. Public Infrastructure Policy 12.C.1.37 requires that all private and public works projects affecting a cultural heritage resource will be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada and may require the submission of Heritage Impact assessment, Heritage Conservation Plan and/or Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Corridors Section 13: Integrated Transportation System contains a number of policies regarding Heritage Corridors. Map 9 of the Official Plan identifies Old Mill Road from Mill Park Drive to Doon Valley Drive as having an overlay designation as a heritage corridor (this does not mean designation under the Ontario Heritage Act). This includes the portion of Old Mill Road located with the C.H.L. Policy 13.C.4.11 states that alterations to the heritage attributes of Heritage Corridors, such as widening the carriage way or changing the surface treatment, will be discouraged and may be subject to the preparation of a scoped Heritage Impact Assessment. Policy 13.C.4.15 encourages "the use of Community, Secondary and other Plans and special land use guidelines and development controls on and in the vicinity of Heritage Corridors to maintain the overall visual character of such streets and multiuse pathway and their functional operation." Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 35 Page 308 of 668 5.5 GUidellines 5.5.1 Regional IrnplernerrtaLion Guideline for CuILL.Aral Heritage Landscape Conservation The Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation (Region of Waterloo 2018) was endorsed by the Region of Waterloo Council in 2013, and updated in 2018, and is intended to provide guidance to applicants, Municipal Heritage Advisory Committees, and Regional and Area municipal staff on the implementation of C.H.L. policies of the Regional Official Plan. This document contains background information on C.H.L.s; the rationale for C.H.L. conservation; the provincial, regional, and municipal policy context; a policy review of Regional documents; and the key steps involved in the conservation process, including identification of candidate C.H.L.s, research, evaluation, engagement, reporting, and formal recognition through C.H.L. designation. Further, this document provides additional conservation measures which may be recommended based on the results of a C.H.L. study such as technical guidance in the application of policies and Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments. 5.5.2 Provincial and National Reference Documents and Standards for Heritage Conservation The following documents have been utilized to develop policies presented in this report and which are demonstrative of industry -accepted standards for best conservation practice in Ontario and Canada: • Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process (Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism 2006) • Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historical Properties (Ontario Ministry of Culture 2007) Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Historic Places (Parks Canada 2010) .0 Objectives, Poki s and Guidelines The objectives, policies, and guidelines presented below have been developed to ensure the long-term protection of the cultural heritage value of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape and its heritage attributes. These objectives and policies are intended to form cultural heritage objectives and official plan policies specific to Lower Doon and should be read and interpreted alongside the Statement of Significance and Heritage Attributes presented in Section 4.0 of this report. These objectives, policies and guidelines are intended to provide guidance to property owners and City staff for appropriate change within and adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape, while protecting its cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. Italicized terms are defined in the Glossary in Appendix B. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 36 AS Page 309 of 668 6.1 Recommended Cultural) Heriitage ObjecUves and Offidal Plan Policies and GUiidelliines for the (._ower Boon Cultural Heritage (Landscape Preamble The objectives, policies and guidelines below address the cultural heritage resources and heritage attributes within and adjacent to the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape, as identified in the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study and shown on Map 1 and Map 2. However, it is possible that additional cultural heritage resources or heritage attributes may be identified within or adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape based on further study and/or receipt of appropriate supplemental research, analysis and/or documentation. The properties at 6 Amherst Drive and 10 Pinnacle Drive, identified as built heritage resources within the Cultural Heritage Landscape, should be studied in more detail in order to understand and articulate their cultural heritage value and individual heritage attributes. Existing land uses within the Cultural Heritage Landscape consist of parkland and residential land use, which are consistent with the historical land -use development patterns. The design of the new Old Mill Sanitary Pumping Station on the south side of Old Mill Road is an example of a new building successfully integrated into the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape. The building responds to the qualities of the area through its low-rise height and massing that evokes a house, and details such as the gable roof, end chimneys and masonry cladding, while still remaining legible as a new building. Its integration into the landscape and topography of Willow Lake Park complements and enhances the cultural heritage value of the Cultural Heritage Landscape. 1. Obiectives 1. To appropriately conserve cultural heritage resources. 2. To ensure that new development is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources. 2. General Policies 1. The cultural heritage resources and heritage attributes identified in the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study and shown on Map 1 and Map 2 will be conserved. The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or a Heritage Conservation Plan for development, redevelopment, demolition, and site alteration for designated properties within or adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape, where it has been determined that this may result in a significant negative impact on a cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute of the Cultural Heritage Landscape as deemed appropriate by the City's Director of Planning. a. The Heritage Impact Assessment shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Terms of Reference, or a Scoped Heritage Impact Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 37 AS Page 310 of 668 Assessment Terms of Reference which will be provided by the City's Heritage Planner and will recommend an appropriate conservation strategy for the cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute. The Heritage Conservation Plan shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Conservation Plan Terms of Reference and will recommend appropriate conservation measures and work for the cultural heritage resource or heritage attribute. b. The City may require the submission of additional documents and/or studies as deemed appropriate by the City's Heritage Planner. The City will ensure that new developments are designed and planned to ensure that views and vistas of Kitchener's significant cultural heritage resources are created, maintained, and /or enhanced where appropriate. 4. Any new development that may be proposed within any part of the Cultural Heritage Landscape identified as exhibiting archaeological potential (as shown on Map 3) that will result in subsurface impacts must be preceded by Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment. Any such assessment(s) must be conducted in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (Ministry of Tourism and Culture 2011). 5. New development and alterations on properties within and adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape must be compatible with and complementary to the Cultural Heritage Landscape's cultural heritage value and heritage attributes. 6. Demolition or removal of heritage attributes within the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape is not permitted. 7. The City acknowledges that accessibility requirements are an important consideration for public and private properties and that a balance must be found between meeting accessibility requirements and conserving cultural heritage resources and heritage attributes in order to achieve solutions that meet the needs of both, as much as is feasible. 2.1. Public Realm Guidelines 2.1.1. Parkland 1. Mature trees and vegetation within Willow Lake Park, Homer Watson Park and the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road will be maintained and conserved. 2. The City acknowledges that maintenance to parkland may be required. Any alterations required to Willow Lake Park and Homer Watson Park will be compatible with and sympathetic to the heritage attributes located within them, including but not limited to: topography, Schneider Creek, and the southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park and Homer Watson Park on the south side of Schneider Creek that follows the alignment of the former Grand Trunk Railway. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 38 Page 311 of 668 3. Any alterations required to the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road will be compatible with and sympathetic to the heritage attributes located within it, including but not limited to: topography, Schneider Creek, and mill ruins. 4. The existing alignment of the southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park and Homer Watson Park that follows the alignment of the former Grand Trunk Railway will be maintained and conserved. 2.1.2 Grand River Shoreline 1. The Grand River shoreline within the Cultural Heritage Landscape will be conserved in its naturalized state. 2. Any alterations to the Grand River shoreline within the Cultural Heritage Landscape will enhance the overall setting and history of the site and conserve its cultural heritage value. 2.1.3 Mill Ruins 1. The limestone ruins of the Ferrie Mill located within the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road will be conserved and stabilized in alignment with ongoing City initiatives. 2.1.4 Roads and Circulation Routes The portion of Old Mill Road within the Cultural Heritage Landscape forms part of a Heritage Corridor as per the City of Kitchener Official Plan. 1. The existing alignment and width of streets within the Cultural Heritage Landscape will be conserved, including the segments of Old Mill Road, Pinnacle Drive and Amherst Drive. 2. Transportation facilities and/or streetscape improvements will be needed to meet the needs of residents of all ages and abilities, and these improvements shall be appropriately balanced and integrated with the existing context of the Cultural Heritage Landscape. In order to achieve this, heritage studies may be requested and undertaken as part of these improvements. 2.1.5 Interpretation Plan 1. An interpretation plan should be developed for the Cultural Heritage Landscape, for integration into the public realm. The interpretation plan should communicate the history and significance of the Cultural Heritage Landscape. This could include, but is not limited to, wayfinding signage or plaques throughout the Cultural Heritage Landscape and/or at its entry and exit points. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 39 AS Page 312 of 668 2.2 Built Form Guidelines 1. The properties at 6 Amherst Drive and 10, 20, and 37 Pinnacle Drive, and their primary buildings will be conserved in a manner that ensures their integrity and respects the cultural heritage value of the Cultural Heritage Landscape. 2. Repair rather than replacement of damaged or deteriorated heritage attributes is encouraged. Where repair is not feasible, replacements should be in-kind, conserving the historical form, appearance, materials, and features of the heritage attribute and should be physically and visually compatible with the property in terms of its form, appearance, materials, and features. 3. New development within or adjacent to the Cultural Heritage Landscape will be visually and physically compatible with, but subordinate to and distinguishable from the properties within the Cultural Heritage Landscape, and shall not negatively impact the cultural heritage value or heritage attributes of the Cultural Heritage Landscape. 4. New development on or adjacent to the properties at 6 Amherst Drive and 10, 20, and 37 Pinnacle Drive will be compatible with the height, massing, and materials of the existing buildings on the properties, as described in the list of heritage attributes. 2.3 Protection of Views 1. Views from the public realm identified as heritage attributes and shown on Map 2 will be conserved. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 40 AS Page 313 of 668 u 0 0 JII , JAA ... . ........ I u u 0 0 0 v 3 0 JII, 700 hmpl eirnent tfi n Recommendations tion 1. The Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape should be designated as a significant cultural heritage landscape in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and identified on Map 9 of the Plan. Guideline III in the Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation (Region of Waterloo 2018) recommends that the Official Plan identify designated C.H.L.s using an official name, a statement of significance and a general location map, and reference the detailed documentation within the C.H.L.'s Technical Study. The Guideline also advises that additional C.H.L. conservation policies and/or a detailed map may be included. 2. Publicly -owned lands located within the Lower Doon C.H.L. should be appropriately managed by the City of Kitchener to ensure the conservation of the C.H.L.'s identified heritage attributes and in accordance with the objectives, policies, and guidelines presented herein. These lands include Willow Lake Park and the ruins of Doon Mills, Schneider Creek, the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, and the original street alignment of Old Mill Road, Pinnacle Drive, and Amherst Drive . Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 44 AS Page 317 of 668 8.0 References Archaeological Services Inc. 1997. "Master Plan of Archaeological Resources for the City of Brantford, Technical Report." Toronto: Report on file with the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Birch, J., and R. F. Williamson. 2013. The Mantle Site: An Archaeological History of an Ancestral Wendat Community. Latham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Bray Heritage. 2021. "Lower Doon Land Use Study Heritage Component." Burley, David. 2003. "Ferrie, Adam (1813-49)." http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/ferrie_adam_1813_49_7E.html. Canadian Heritage Rivers System. 2016. "Grand River." 2016. http://chrs.ca/the-rivers/grand/. City of Kitchener. 2014a. "City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes." CHL Inventory. Report on File at ASI, Toronto, ON.: The Landplan Collaborative, Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd, and Archaeological Services Inc. https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_CHL_Study_Report.pdf. ---. 2014b. "City of Kitchener Official Plan, as Approved, with Modifications by the Region of Waterloo on November 19, 2014." https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD_PLAN_New-Official-Plan--- CONSOLIDATED-Version-Modifications-Deferrals--AppeaIs.pdf. Cumming, Peter A., and Neil Mickenberg. 1977. Native Rights in Canada. Second Edition. Toronto, Ontario: The Indian -Eskimo Association of Canada in association with General Publishing Co. Limited. Department of Militia and Defence. 1916. "Topographic Map - Galt Sheet." Department of National Defence. 1936. "Galt Sheet." National Topographic System. Dodd, C. F., D. R. Poulton, P. A. Lennox, D. G. Smith, and G. A. Warrick. 1990. "The Middle Ontario Iroquoian Stage." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C. J. Ellis and N. Ferris, 321-60. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter OAS, Number 5. London, ON: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Edwards, T.W.D., and P. Fritz. 1988. "Stable -Isotope Paleoclimate Records from Southern Ontario, Canada: Comparison of Results from Marl and Wood." Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 25: 1397-1406. Ellis, C. J., and D. B. Deller. 1990. "Paleo-Indians." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C. J. Ellis and N. Ferris, 37-64. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter OAS, Number 5. London, ON: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 45 AS Page 318 of 668 Ellis, C. J., I. T. Kenyon, and M. W. Spence. 1990. "The Archaic." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C. J. Ellis and N. Ferris, 65-124. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter OAS, Number 5. London, ON: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Fear, Jon. 2010. "Flash from the Past: Doon Mill Pond Becomes a Popular Summer Retreat." The Record, 2010. https://www.therecord.com/life/2010/11/26/flash-from-the-past-doon-mill-pond- became-a-popular-summer-retreat.html. Ferris, N. 2013. "Place, Space, and Dwelling in the Late Woodland." In Before Ontario: The Archaeology of a Province, 99-111. McGill -Queen's University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/J*.ctt32b7n5.15. Filice, Michelle. 2016. "Haldimand Proclamation." Canadian Encyclopedia. June 3, 2016. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/haldimand-proclamation. Government of Ontario. 2020a. "A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe." https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-greater-golden-horseshoe-place-to-grow-english-15may2019.pdf. ---. 2020b. Provincial Policy Statement. https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-provincial-policy-statement- 2020-accessible-fina I -en -2020-02-14. pdf. Grand River Conservation Authority. 2020. "Our Watershed." Grand River Conservation Authority. 2020. https://www.grandriver.ca/en/our-watershed/Our-Watershed.aspx. Homer Watson House and Gallery. n.d. "Historical Walking Tour of Lower Doon." https://www.homerwatson.on.ca/about/walking-tours/lower-doon/. Hunting Survey Corporation Limited. 1954. "Digital Aerial Photographs, Southern Ontario 1954." 1954. http://maps.library.utoronto.ca/data/on/AP_1954/index.html. Johnston, C. E. 1964. The Valley of the Six Nations: A Collection of Documents on the Indian Lands of the Grand River. Toronto, Ontario: The Champlain Society. Kitchener Public Library. n.d. "Birds Eye View of the Village of Doon, 1950." ---. n.d. "Residence on Pinnacle Drive, 1967." ---. n.d. "Ruins of Ferrie Mill, circa 1920." Kitchener -Waterloo Record. 1969. "Doon Mill's Owner in Doubt," 1969. ---. 1971. "Honor of Joining City `Not Enough,"' 1971. ---. 1976. "2000 Population Predicted at Doon," 1976. ---. 1977. "Doon Road Plans Stalled Again," 1977. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 46 AS Page 319 of 668 ---. 1981. "Once the Largest in Canada, Most of Doon Mill Levelled," 1981. --. n.d. "Original Ferrie Grist Mill, Built in 1839." ---. n.d. "Thousands Cooled off at Willow Lake in Doon." Lennox, P.A., and W.R. Fitzgerald. 1990. "The Culture History and Archaeology of the Neutral Iroquoians." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C.J. Ellis and N. Ferris, 405-56. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS, Number 5. London: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Lytwyn, V. P. 2005. "Historical Research Report: Aboriginal Settlement and Use of the North Pickering Development Planning Area and Adjacent Lands, 1690-1923." Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. 1990. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13. --. 2020. "Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, Under the Planning Act." Queen's Printer for Ontario. Ministry of Tourism and Culture. 2011. "Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists." Cultural Programs Branch, Ontario Ministry of Tourism and Culture. Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport, M.T.C.S. 2006. "Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process: Info Sheet #5, Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans." http://www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/publications/Heritage_Tool_I<it_Heritage_PPS_infoSheet.pdf. Ontario Ministry of Culture. 2007. "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties." https://www.heritagetrust.on.ca/en/pages/tools/tools-for-conservation/eight- guiding-principles. Parks Canada. 2010. "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada." Canada's Historic Places. https://www.historicplaces.ca/media/18072/81468-parks-s+g-eng- web2.pdf. Parsell & Co., H. 1881. "Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo." Region of Waterloo. 2015. "Regional Official Plan." https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/regional- government/land-use-planning.aspx. ---. 2018. "Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation." On file with the author. Spence, M. W., R. H. Pihl, and C. Murphy. 1990. "Cultural Complexes of the Early and Middle Woodland Periods." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C. J. Ellis and N. Ferris. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5. London: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 47 AS Page 320 of 668 Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2019. "Lower Doon and Homer Watson Park Candidate Cultural Heritage Landscape Evaluation." Surveys and Mapping Branch, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. 1976. "Waterloo -Kitchener Sheet." National Topographic System. The Evening Reporter. 1952. "History of Doon Recalled by Cluthe Mill Site, Willow Lake," 1952. --. 1954. "Bonnie Doon, One of Ontario's Oldest Settlements," 1954. The Planning Partnership, and Bray Heritage. 2021. "Lower Doon Land Use Study." The Record. 2010. "Flash from the Past: Doon Mill Pond Became a Popular Summre Retreat," 2010. https://www.therecord.com/life/2010/11/26/flash-from-the-past-doon-mill-pond-became-a- popular-summer- retreat.html#:—:text=Willow%20Lake%20was%20a%20private,mill%20beside%20the%20Grand% 20River. Tremaine, G.C. 1861. "Tremaine's Map of Waterloo County." Toronto: George C. Tremaine. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. n.d. "Cultural Landscapes." UNESCO World Heritage Centre. n.d. https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/. Waterloo Historical Society. 1934. "Twenty -First and Twenty -Second Annual Reports of the Waterloo Historical Society." ---. 1941. "Twenty -Ninth Annual Report of the Waterloo Historical Society." Williamson, R. F. 1990. "The Early Iroquoian Period of Southern Ontario." In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by C. J. Ellis and N. Ferris, 291-320. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5. London: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 48 AS Page 321 of 668 Appendix : I h t Ira jp [ it c Documentation of H e Ir i to e Attributes The following figures are representative photographs of the Heritage Attributes of the Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape, as identified in Section 4.3. Note that Attribute 1 - Topography of the area which slopes towards the Grand River - and Attribute 7 — Mature trees — are represented throughout this collection of photographs. All photographs were taken by A.S.I. on September 29, 2022. Landscape Attributes Figure 1"7 Schneider Creek, looking north from the Fridge on Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute #2). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 49 Page 322 of 668 Figure 18: Schneider Creek, looking northeast from within Willow Lake Park (Heritage Attribute 142). Figure 19: Schneider Creek at its outlet into the Grand River-, looking west (Heritage Attribute 42). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 50 AS Page 323 of 668 Figure 20: Limestone ruins of the former Doon Mills complex wiLhirl the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute 43). Figure 21: Limestone ruins of the former Doon Mills complex within the Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute 43). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 51 AS Page 324 of 668 Figure 22: Willow Lake Park with trail along Schneider Creek, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute #4-). Figure 23: Southernmost trail within Willow Lake Park that follows the alignment of the former Grand Trunk RailWay, looking west (Heritage Attribute #5). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 52 AS Page 325 of 668 Figure 24: Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, with trail leading to Grand River-, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute #6). Figure 25: Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road, with trail leading to Grand River, looking northeast (Heritage Attribute 46). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 53 AS Page 326 of 668 Figure 26: Grand River shoreline (in foreground) within Grand River Natural Area north of Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute #6). Built Form and SLreeLscape ALI:ribULes Figure 27: Fopography along Pinnacle Drive which slopes towards the Grand River, looking north from 20 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute 48). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 54 AS Page 327 of 668 Figure 28: Original alignment, width and rural cross-section of Old Mill Road, looking west from the intersection of Old Mill Road and Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute 49). Figure 29: Original alignment, width and rural cross-section of Pinnacle Drive, looking south from the intersection of Pinnacle Drive and Old Mill Road (Heritage Attribute 49). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 55 1 Page 328 of 668 Figure 38: Original alignment, width and rural cnoss-section of Amherst Drive, looking west along Amherst Drivetovvards its intersection with Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute #9). Figure 31: 10 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute #1O\. Lower DmunCultural Heritage Landscape Study 56 ����U Page 329Of668 ���n Figure 32: 20 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute #10). Figure 33: 6 Amherst Drive (Heritage Attribute 411). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 57 AS Page 330 of 668 Figure 34:.37 Pinnacle Drive (Heritage Attribute #12). Views Identified as Heritage ALLribUtes Figure 35: View of Schneider Creek looking north from the bridge on Old Mill Road (View #1). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 58 AS Page 331 of 668 Figure 36: View of Schneider Creek looking south from the bridge orl Old Mill Road (View #1). Figure 37: View of mill ruins looking northwest from the bridge on Old Mill Road (View #2). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 59 1 Page 332 of 668 Figure 38: View of the Grand River from the Grand River shoreline on the west side of Schneider Creek, looking northwest (View #3). Figure 39: View of the Grand River from the Grand River shoreline on the west side of Schneider Creek, looking southeast (View #3). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 60 AS Page 333 of 668 Figure /10: View of the Grand River looking north from the inter -section of Pinnacle Drive and Old Mill Road LOWard the Waterloo Pioneer Memorial Tower (View #4). Figure 41: View looking south up Pinnacle Drive towards 10 and 20 Pinnacle Drive and 6 Arnher-st Drive (View 45). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 61 1 Page 334 of 668 Figure /12: View looking south up Pinnacle Drive towards 37 Pinnacle Drive Figure 4-3: View of 37 Pinnacle Drive looking west along Arnherst Drive (View #-6). Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 62 AS Page 335 of 668 Appendix o Glossary Addition: New construction that extends the pre-existing building envelope in any direction, and which increases the building's pre-existing volume. Adjacent: Lands, buildings and/or structures that are contiguous or that are directly opposite to other lands, buildings and/or structures, separated only by a laneway, municipal road or other right-of-way. (Official Plan) Alteration: Any change to a property on the Heritage Register in any manner including its restoration, renovation, repair or disturbance, or a change, demolition or removal of an adjacent property that may result in any change to a property on the Heritage Register. Alteration and alter have corresponding meanings. Built Heritage Resources: A building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community. Built heritage resources are generally located on property that has been designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or listed by included on local, Regional, Provincial and/or Federal registers. (Official Plan) City: Refers to the Corporation of the City of Kitchener. (Official Plan) Compatible: Refers to the physical and visual impacts of new development on existing structures and contributing properties. Physical compatibility refers to the use of materials and construction methods that do not negatively impact the contributing property, detract from or damage its heritage attributes. Visual compatibility refers to designing new work in such a way that it is distinguishable from the historic building, while complementing its design, massing, and proportions. (Standards & Guidelines) Conserve/Conserved/Conservation (in regard to cultural heritage and archaeology): The identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a heritage conservation plan, archeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments. (Official Plan). Cultural Heritage Landscape: A defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, main streets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, viewsheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities. (Official Plan) Cultural Heritage Resources: Includes buildings, structures and properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act or listed on the Municipal Heritage Register, properties on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings, built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes as defined in the Provincial Policy Statement. (Official Plan) Cultural Heritage Value: The aesthetic, historic, scientific, cultural, social or spiritual importance or significance for past, present or future generations. The heritage value of an historic place is embodied in its character - Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 63 Page 336 of 668 defining materials, forms, location, spatial configurations, uses and cultural associations or meanings. (Standards and Guidelines) Development: The creation of a new lot, a change in land use, the construction of buildings and structures or an addition or alteration to a building or structure that substantially increases the size or usability of the site, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does not include: a) activities that create or maintain infrastructure authorized under an environmental assessment process; and, b) works subject to the Drainage Act. (Official Plan) Heritage Attributes: The principle features or elements that contribute to a cultural heritage resource's cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property's built or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual setting (including significant views or vistas to or from a cultural heritage resource. (Official Plan) Heritage Conservation Plan: A document that details how a cultural heritage resource can be conserved. The conservation plan may be supplemental to a heritage impact assessment, but is typically a separate document. The recommendations of the plan should include descriptions of repairs, stabilization and preservation activities as well as longterm conservation, monitoring and maintenance measures. (Official Plan) Heritage Corridors: Streets or multi -use pathways which because of their unique structural, topographic and visual characteristics, as well as abutting vegetation, built environment and cultural landscape, historical significance or location within a Heritage Conservation District are recognized as a cultural heritage resource and are intended to be conserved. (Official Plan) Heritage Impact Assessment: A document comprising text and graphic material including plans, drawings, photographs that contains the results of historical research, field work, survey, analysis, and description(s) of cultural heritage resources together with a description of the process and procedures in deriving potential effects and mitigation measures as required by official plan policies and any other applicable or pertinent guidelines. A heritage impact assessment may include an archaeological assessment where appropriate. (Official Plan) Integrity: As it relates to a heritage property or an archaeological site/resource, is a measure of its wholeness and intactness of the cultural heritage value and attributes. Examining the conditions of integrity requires assessing the extent to which the property includes all elements necessary to express its cultural heritage value; is of adequate size to ensure the complete representation of the features and processes that convey the property's significance; and the extent to which it suffers from adverse affects of development and/or neglect. Integrity should be assessed within a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment. (Official Plan) Views and Vistas: Significant visual compositions of the built and natural environment that enliven the overall physical character of an area. Views are generally panoramic in nature while vistas are typically a strong individual feature framed by its surroundings. (Official Plan) Lower Doon Cultural Heritage Landscape Study 64 Page 337 of 668 John Zunic From: Alide Forstmanis Sent: Friday, May 12, 2023 2:05 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Subject: Re: Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project - Draft materials now available on EngageWR Thank you John. I participated in the first "workshop", and asked you about the difference between "park" and "green space". Is "green space" mainly flat, with no trees, only grass and "park" has trees, shrubs etc? Could either be used for future housing? Look forward to your response. Kindly, Alide Alicle Forstmanis On May 12, 2023, at 12:19, Secondary Plans (SM) <SecondaryPlans@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hello, The Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project hosted two "walkshops" and drop-in sessions on Wednesday May 10th, 2023. The draft materials that were shared this past Wednesday are now available for viewing and commenting on the LowerDccLnu uewr w .._._.._ Regards, John Zunic John Zunic (he/him), BES Planner (Policy) I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 Ext 76851 TTY 1-866-969-9994 :cg.!id .irypklans a k itcheiner.ca ii rini� n g 0 gip. pung. 4unage002pr„ <image010.jpg> Page 338 of 668 John Zunic From: Carrie O'Brien <CObrien@drewloholdings.com> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2023 7:13 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Cc: George Bikas; Connor Turnecliff Subject: Re: Lower Doon Secondary Plan - Drewlo Lands Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Natalie & John, Following up on the email below. We understand that recommendations of the completed Land Use study speak to encouraging high density residential on the lands south of Homer Watson — a significant chunk of which is owned by Drewlo Holdings. We'd like to schedule a meeting to discuss. Please advise of a few dates/times that work for your team. Regards, Carrie CARRIE O'BRIEN Land Development Planner Drewlo Holdings Inc. Ihr .ps_://�r�nrw drew1o.lrno.diiings::c aitt Office: 519-472-8200 x1077 Mobile: 226-926-5709 From: Carrie O'Brien <CObrien@drewloholdings.com> Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 at 12:33 PM To: "secondaryplans@Kitchener.ca" <secondaryplans@Kitchener.ca> Cc: George Bikas <GBikas@drewloholdings.com>, Connor Turnecliff<cturnecliff@drewloholdings.com> Subject: Lower Doon Secondary Plan - Drewlo Lands Hi Natalie & John, We just received notice for the community'walkshop' next week. As you are likely aware, Drewlo Holdings owns a decent chunk of land in the Lower Doon area, specifically the properties north and south of Conestoga College Blvd. We thought that it may be more productive to meet over zoom to discuss the recommendations for the our lands, rather than taking up space at the community meetings next week. Let us know if that would be an option and we can arrange a virtual meeting. Page 339 of 668 Thanks, Carrie CARRIE O'BRIEN Land Development Planner Drewlo Holdings Inc. I r .ps_./.. wJnr�nr..dite IIo.I o�.IIdii_in..s�oirrn Office: 519-472-8200 x1077 Mobile: 226-926-5709 IN P *0'Q � I Page 340 of 668 John Zunic From: Robert MacFarlane Ze|inka Priamo Ltd. <oobertm@zpp|anzom> Sent: Tuesday, May 16 2023 10:26 AM To: Secondary Plans (3K4) Sm6YmcK: RE: Lower OoonSecondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project Draft materials now available onEngageVVR Hi John, wanted to get a better sense of next steps in the Lower Doon Secondary Plan project. Will the City be drafting new OP policy nrzoning provisions, specific toLower Doun.aepart ofthis process? Rob MacFarlane, MPL, MCIP, RPP Senior Associate Zelinka Priamo Ltd. — Land Use Planners Toronto Office 20 Maud Street, Suite 305 Toronto, ON M5V 2M5 (P) 416-622-6064 X 222 (C) 416-801-6140 From: Secondary Plans (SM)<SecondaryP|ans@kitchenecca> Sent: Friday, May 1Z,3O2312:ZOPK4 To: undisclosed -recipients: Subject: Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project - Draft materials now available on EngageWR Hello, TheLovxerDuunSecondaryP|anLandUse|mp|ementatiunProjecthoatedtvvu"vva|kshuus"anddrup-insessiunoon Wednesday May 101h , 2023. The draft materials that were shared this past Wednesday are now available for viewing and commenting unthe . ]ohnZunic John Zunic (he/him), BES Planner (PWicy)|City ofKitchener 519-741-2200 Ext 76851 TTY 1-806-969-9994 1 .,5 cQ.!ada.!EWjainsCa)lk��.clheineir,,ca Page 341 of 668 John Zunic From: Barb Thomas Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 10:55 AM To: Mayor; Christine Michaud; Garett Stevenson; John Zunic Cc: Louisa Stephenson; Daryl Howes -Jones; Randall Martin; heather.clemmer; Jenny Keeler; Jerome James; LORI/RICK SCHULZ; Louise Doon Settlement; Valerie James; ron- teresa.feth; Mary Cunningham; Andrew Luis; klausie94; hdmm; Ruthanne Thiessen; Al Cunningham; Jean Haalboom; Marg Rowell; susan kinzie; Barb Shakosky; scott Murray; Janet Kunsch; Armin & Carol Froelich; Sharon Allamby; Rosie Annaliese; miss maggie; Paul Aquilina; Ella T. Nojd; SAROJ PATEL; Maurice Boughton; Amy Mueller; Sandor; Matthew Melnychuk; Raylee Bonnell; Michael Brisson; RM Reyno; Kanstantsin Kavaliou Subject: Rezoning - Land Use Review of Lower Doon Attachments: Draft Lower Doon Zoning Map - Zoning By-law 2019-051.pdf (689 KB) (pdf).webloc Some people who received this message don't often get email from Hello Neighbours, Learn why this is important The first draft of the Lower Doon Secondary Plan was unveiled May 17. The Plan proposes that every property in Lower Doon, from the creek to the college (as well as a couple of properties adjacent to the church), be "upzoned" to permit multi residential buildings. This proposal is unique to Lower Doon and has not been applied to any other established neighbourhood in Kitchener. The proposal can be found at the city's website https://www.engagewr.ca/lowerdoon. I have attached the proposed zoning map (below). A substantial majority of the properties are proposed to be rezoned Res 5. Res 5 zoning permits everything from single family homes to "stacked townhomes". Stacked townhomes are stacked on top of each other and back to front so that eight units could occupy a single lot. The backyard is paved for parking and a garbage bin. This is the preferred development type for Waterloo's Northdale Neighbourhood (see picture). Page 342 of 668 Homeowners will be incentivised to sell if a large multi -residential building with a paved backyard is built next door. Over time the multi -residential build is likely to dominate the neighbourhood just as happened in Northdale, Waterloo. A minority of the properties in Lower Doon are proposed to be rezoned Res 4. Res 4 zoning permits up to four units on a lot. Most of the proposed Res 4 lots are too small to qualify for Res 5 zoning, but if a developer acquires two adjacent properties that developer could then ask for Res 5 zoning. There is no planning reason for the City to refuse such an application. Effectively the entire neighbourhood is proposed to be zoned Res 5 and the Northdale model will be in place. Currently there is an application in the works to build stacked townhouses at 86 Pinnacle Drive. The development is to contain 16 units, 32 bedrooms and 23 parking places. The attached rendering shows how dramatically the streetscape will be forever altered. Res 5 zoning will permit the development to go ahead. Expect more to follow. The City Planners told us that nobody with Res 5 zoning has to build a multi unit building, but in Planning the maximum becomes the minimum i.e. no one will build four units when they can build eight. As well, developers are constantly requesting and being granted permission to build beyond the maximums set out in the zoning. We can also expect future requests to create fewer parking places than the bylaw requires resulting in parking woes on top of paved backyards. z Page 343 of 668 The Proposal to apply Res 5 zoning is unique to Lower Doon. Throughout the balance of Kitchener, established neighbourhoods have been rezoned to Res 2 and Res 3 which do not permit stacked townhouses. Many established neighbourhoods also have height restrictions to help maintain the character of the neighbourhood. The proposed zoning will allow 3 stories and 11m in height. Currently there are only 2 stories in Lower Doon and 10.5 m in height. The extra .5m will allow for a basement bedroom storey just as is proposed at 86 Pinnacle. While the College creates a demand for more housing in the neighbourhood, it should be noted that the college in a presentation to the City of Guelph in regards to a new satellite campus undertook to build student housing in Guelph. Even Doug Ford's Build More Homes legislation requires only a maximum of three units per lot. Lower Doon was the first settlement in the Region and still has many homes that were built more than 150 years ago. Sadly planning staff did nothing to create a "complete community" as per the city's official plan taking that history into account. Instead it appears to be planning a "neighbourhood" of short term residents, large box like buildings and paved yards and not a community for all cross sections of the community. Please take your opportunity to comment on the proposal. It is not written in stone and need not go ahead as proposed. Let them know what you think of and how you feel about the proposed zoning changes. https://www.engagewr.ca/lowerdoon?tool=brainstormer#tool tab Barbara Thomas Randall Martin Page 344 of 668 John Zunic From: Oliver Jahn Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 6:39 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Subject: Re: Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project - Draft materials now available on EngageWR Hello John, When would you expect a report to Council with recommendations? Regards Oliver Sent from my iPad On May 12, 2023, at 10:19 AM, Secondary Plans (SM) <SecondaryPlans@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hello, The Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project hosted two "walkshops" and drop-in sessions on Wednesday May 10th, 2023. The draft materials that were shared this past Wednesday are now available for viewing and commenting on the Lower Doon ena.e pggg.i.. ir_ Regards, John Zunic John Zunic (he/him), BES Planner (Policy) I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 Ext 76851 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 : ;. !ada.!EV ans d 1 tcheineir„ca iu7:ag (.)0p.IIsng'> uu7ru,:uge0 0 png!> 1 Page 345 of 668 "VIIina "„V:",007dmlr VII inaf e U08,p & u inni DgeOOI!) IID u <image010.jpg> Page 346 of 668 John Zunic From: Andrew Luis Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 1:37 PM To: John Zunic Subject: Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project- COMMENTS Hi John, I appreciate the City of Kitchener holding the walking tour on May 10th. The tour was informative and makes me proud about the area of Kitchener that i live in given its long history relating to early settlement of the area. My one comment pertains to new developments within the area. I think that if the City of Kitchener is going to set a precedent by permitting 3 storey structures in what is a tight -knit area, I believe that any new building should contain numerous character traits and represents a design -build model that is reminiscent of older properties in the area. I'd like to give kudos to the City of Kitchener for contracting out the Water Infrastructure building on Old Mill Road (we met just beside it on the walking tour). The building contains character which enriches the neighbourhood, blending in perfectly with the surrounding area. My comment is that any new building and development applications in the Lower Doon area need to be constructed in a fashion that respects and represents the history of our community. Thank you. Andrew Page 347 of 668 John Zunic From: Bryan Cluthe Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 2:52 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Subject: Lower doon Afternoon, My names Bryan Cluthe, I've shared feedback regarding the project on engageWR and wanted to reach out to see if there was more I could do. I've grown up in the area my whole life and my grandfather Lawrence Cluthe owned what was willow Lake. There's references to protecting heritage and property standards and if you go to the area now it doesn't appear that's happening at all. Student rentals have started to destroy what is our beloved home and property standards have fallen. I can't see how three storey buildings would improve the area. Why isn't the city enforcing property standards now? Thanks, Bryan Cluthe Sent from my iPhone Page 348 of 668 John Zunic From: John Zunic Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 4:16 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Subject: FW: Conestoga Students Inc. Lower Doon Land Use Submission - 07.31.2023 Attachments: CSI Lower Doon Land Use Comment Submission - 07.31.2023.pdf John Zunic (he/him), BES Senior Planner I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 Ext 76851 TTY 1-866-969-9994„polh�n„z.uniiccalkiitcleneir..ca %// lMHz/. /' From: Justin McLaughlin <Jmclaughlin2@conestogac.on.ca> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 3:05 PM To: John Zunic <John.Zunic@kitchener.ca> Cc: Nathan Barnett <Nbarnett@conestogac.on.ca>; Nelson Chukwuma <Nchukwuma@conestogac.on.ca> Subject: Conestoga Students Inc. Lower Doon Land Use Submission - 07.31.2023 Hi John, Please find attached CSI's comments on the Lower Doon Land Use's recommendations regarding the rezoning that is being proposed. If there are any questions, please let us know! Thanks, an Conestoga Students Inc Justin McLaughlin helhim Senior Manager, Advocacy 1-548-889-2641 Celebrating 50 Years Leading the Student Experience Proud Member mmber of ffi c Caunaa:dfian Aflhan�cc of Student Assor„,.oaq:iions, (CASA) Experiencing an emergency or mental health crisis? Please call 911 or Here 24/7 Crisis Services at 1-844-437-3247. Page 349 of 668 Conestoga Official Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may be privileged or confidential. Any distribution, printing or other use by anyone else is prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately, and permanently delete this email and attachments. Page 350 of 668 Nelson Chukwuma Conestoga Students Incorporated (CSI) Room 2A106 299 Doon Valley Drive Kitchener, Ontario N2G4M4 July 31, 2023 John Zunic, Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4G7 RE: Support for Lower Doon Zoning Changes Dear John Zunic, On behalf of Conestoga Students Inc., the official student association of Conestoga College representing over 24,000 students, I would like to express our support for the recommendations presented in the Lower Doon Land Use report, particularly regarding zoning changes including additional dwelling units (up to 3), allowing for lodging houses, licensing requirements for lodging houses, and improving the availability of uses of the lands in Lower Doon to support gentle intensification. As an organization that has been rooted in the Lower Doon community for 50 years, we have been one of many stakeholders who have worked to ensure students are welcomed and become respectful members of the community through initiatives such as the Town and Gown Committee, the creation of the Student Living Guide, tenant rights and responsibilities education, and more. Today, the Lower Doon community is a hub for students to settle and pursue postsecondary education, while living alongside long-term local community members. As Conestoga College has grown its footprint in Lower Doon, students have not been able to find housing near the Doon campus due to the opposition of the local residents to any form of new development that is not a single-family detached dwelling. As this opposition has continued for years, compounded by a general lack of housing availability more broadly across the Region of Waterloo for both rental and market dwellings, we continue to encounter challenges in providing all persons in our communities with increased housing options. Neighbourhoods and communities should be developed to allow all community members to have options for where they want to live, and they should not be restricted to specific demographic groups. This includes ensuring a mix of residential dwellings, including single-family, semi-detached, townhome, and apartments, to create diverse communities with a range of housing types and prices, as these zoning changes support. As such, we are pleased to see the recommendations presented in Lower Doon Land Use report, particularly regarding permitting additional dwelling units (up to 3), allowing for lodging houses, licensing requirements for lodging houses, and improving the availability of uses of the lands in Lower Doon to support gentle intensification. Page 351 of 668 Beginning with the permission of additional dwellings units, it is well known that there is a general lack of housing and rental availability not just in the Lower Doon area or even the City of Kitchener, but throughout the Region of Waterloo more broadly. By aligning with the provincial guidelines to safely allow for up to 3 dwelling units on a property, and as well as aligning with the rest of the similarly zoned areas within the city regarding duplexes/additional dwelling units, the number of available units can increase in a way that safely addresses the housing needs of students and other community members, while still respecting the heritage of the Lower Doon area. Furthermore, by permitting lodging houses through these recommended zoning changes, we can begin to address safety concerns many students, particularly international students who often face barriers to finding safe housing or when reporting unsafe housing. Lodging houses often allow tenants to rent at a lower cost than a whole apartment or house, as costs like utilities are shared among numerous tenants, addressing concerns of affordability that are key for many students. CSI is also pleased to see a focus on house amenities, as opposed to "people zoning" regarding the permissibility of lodging houses. As outlined in the report, "people zoning" often disproportionately affects marginalized communities. By focusing on house amenities, we can ensure that tenants have safe lodgings that fit their needs, allowing for a gentle intensification of the Lower Doon area that is necessary to address the changing needs of the areas' residents — student and non -student alike. Also, we are delighted to see a recommendation regarding licensing for lodging houses, though we encourage the City of Kitchener to implement rental licensing more comprehensively throughout the city for various forms of rental units. This can address many concerns of both students and broader community members regarding everything from tenant safety to neighbourhood aesthetics. Rental licensing programs reduce the onus of reporting from tenants (a complaint's -based system), and instead focus on the landlords, reducing landlord absenteeism and ensure that there are proactive and ongoing randomized inspection of rental properties to ensure no tenants experience violations of their rights and that unit upkeep, such as snow clearing and garbage, is dealt with in a timely manner. Programs with limitations on the type of properties (Le., using a lodging house only rental licensing program) can create loopholes and oversights that often leave a portion of tenants without the protections afforded in a licensing structure. Therefore, only a comprehensive licensing system, which sees all rental units in a given municipality require registration and licensing, can ensure tenant safety. Furthermore, any rental licensing program, whether it be comprehensive or property focused, should protect tenants first and foremost, through various methods such as constant updates, transitional housing, and more. Costs of a licensing structure should strive to be revenue -neutral or even run a deficit for municipalities rather than generate surplus revenue. Licensing fee structures that are not prohibitive in price, offer a discounted rate to multi -unit property owners or landlords in good standing are effective means of ensuring property owner buy -in and preventing licensing costs from being passed down to tenants. While rental licensing regimes may run up against heightened opposition by landlords and other stakeholders, there are similar, yet less invasive, programs to track properties for rent and keep prospective tenants informed. The Landlord Certification project in Montreal aims to reduce the risks to tenants of renoviction practices and predatory rent increases by creating a public, accessible tracking system of properties registered through the project. Page 352 of 668 Finally, the inclusion of changing some commercial lands to mixed use land is another welcomed improvement to the Lower Doon area. Ultimately, Lower Doon, like much of the City of Kitchener and the Region more broadly, is in need of increased housing supply. By moving currently commercial use only lands to mix use lands, we not only increase the availability of new housing supply, but also ensure that supply is near to other, commercial necessities. This mix use land designation can also work to decrease residents' carbon footprints as more necessities are within walking or active transportation distance. CSI appreciates the heritage and beautification concerns of local residents, but believes the outlined recommendations strike a healthy balance to address the needs of the greater community. CSI hopes that the City of Kitchener will give the appropriate consideration to the need for increased, safe housing for diverse communities in the Lower Doon area and move forward with the proposed recommendations. CSI appreciates the opportunity to submit our comments regarding this development and looks forward to continuing to work with stakeholders to improve housing availability and affordability in the community. Sincerely, Nelson Chukwuma President Page 353 of 668 John Zunic From: Carrie O'Brien <CObrien@drewloholdings.com> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 6:41 PM To: Secondary Plans (SM) Cc: George Bikas; Connor Turnecliff Subject: Lower Doon Secondary Plan - Drewlo Land Use Implementation Comments Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged You don't often get email from cobrien@drewloholdings.com. Learn why this is important Hi Natalie & John, Drewlo Holdings Inc. owns a significant portion of developable land within the Lower Doon area. We've had a chance to review the posted documents and would like to offer the following comments. As a residential developer and purpose-built rental housing provider, we were excited to see that the Land Use Study recommended the preparation of a land use and urban design framework for the vacant lands south of Homer Watson Boulevard, abutting Conestoga College Boulevard. Particularly the development of higher density housing and/or mixed uses on the vacant lands south of Homer Watson. Drewlo Holdings Inc. owns 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 73 and 81 Conestoga i the snip below). The p.!E ggp ed Land Use schedule would redesignate Drewlo lands from Commercial to Mixed Use. While we are supportive of the flexibility this will introduce for redevelopment, we would caution Staff that a Mixed Use designation may be planning for more retail/commercial then can be supported by the market. The Official Plan indicates that "although residential development is permitted and encouraged within lands designated Mixed Use, it is not the intent of lands designated Mixed Use to lose the planned retail and commercial function to service surrounding neighbourhoods". Given the significant amount of vacant commercial/retail space in the area and to better implement Recommendation #8 of the 02:1 Lowelr.._��_o auk..._La_�r_d..._�U.,se._:5.t_u�u_d.y, we feel "Community Node" with a designation of "High Rise Residential" should be applied instead. Page 354 of 668 As you are aware, the lands are within a City Node, which are primarily planned for commercial and/or other institutional uses that have a regional and/or city-wide orientation. Where a City Node overlays a Mixed Use Land designation, the OP only permits the establishment of new retail commercial centres or expanding existingretail etail commercial centres, per policy 3.C.2.24. If the current proposal were passed, these lands would require a subsequent OPA to facilitate higher density housing. We request the Secondary Plan adjust the Urban Structure to identify the areas as a Community Node, which permits commercial uses with a mix of residential and institutional uses to support and complete the surrounding community. The High Rise Residential designation still permits a planned range of commercial uses (15.D.3.5) but will accommodate the higher density housing as the predominant land use - as was identified and recommended in the Land Use Study. Policies of the Secondary Plan will need to support a higher FSR than generally permitted by Policy 15.D.3.23. Given proximity to Conestoga College, the 401 and future planned transit we suggest that maximum FSR is not required (as Homer Watson is a Planned Transit Corridor, the lands represent a future high transit trip generator). The MIX -3 Zone proposed only accommodates developments at a medium density. We request that the RES -7 zone be considered instead to more accurately reflect the recommendations of the Land Use Study and our intended development. As indicated previously, we would request that the maximum FSR be removed. We also request that the Maximum Building Height/Storeys be increased to support development up to 25 storeys. Land Use designation and Zoning that implements the intended vision for this area would allow Drewlo to move directly to Site Plan Consultation and Application, which would bring this development to market significantly faster. High density housing in this location has potential to address a lot of neighbourhood concerns regarding student housing, and will contribute to Kitchener's goal of 35,000 new units by 2031. We're happy to schedule a meeting to discuss in more detail. Regards, Carrie CARRIE O'BRIEN Land Development Planner Drewlo Holdings Inc. D:u. ltps://www„ direwloholdont;.s„corn Office: 519-472-8200 x1077 Mobile: 226-926-5709 Page 355 of 668 Project: Lower Doon Secondary Plan Land Use Implementation Project Ideas: What are your thoughts on the draft land use map? [2018-08-15 to 2023-10-10] (Showing 7 of total 7) No. Contribution Posted at 1 Idea: Allow 3&4 storey, mid -density in all residential areas 13 May 2023, 01:45 PM 2 Idea: If City sets precedent to permit 3 story bldgs, ensure new bldgs 24 May 2023, include heritage traits e.g. the City built water tower on Old Mill Road 01:21 PM Idea: Don't build three story buildings in a heritage residential area. Description: One can only assume all of this is due to student 14 Jun 2023, 05:36 3 housing, stop destroying the area and build these units on the PM institutional property on Conestoga Boulevard. This is absolutely insane. 4 Idea: Since there is no walk way, Reduce the speed limit and make a 15 Jun 2023, 03:42 bump. Cars goes fast and often dont stop during school bus stop. PM 5 Idea: Allow multi dwelling units. Banning made worse without city 15 Jun 2023, 03:48 approval more illegal and unsafe student living condition. PM 6 Idea: Ridiculous Rezoning for the oldest neighbourhood in Kitchener. 19 Jun 2023, 09:11 2 storey max. AM Idea: Concerned that once again there is nothing for dogs in the re - 7 zoning. 26 Jun 2023, 05:15 Description: We need a small and large dog park, so our 4 -legged PM family members can play without disrupting the lives of others. Page 356 of 668 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 6 DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO. October 2, 2023 DSD -2023-429 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/014/F/TS Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/024/F/TS 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Activa Holdings Inc. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/014/F/TS for Activa Holdings Inc. requesting the addition of Special Policy Area 6 for the lands specified and illustrated as the "Area or Amendment" on Schedule `A', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-429 as Appendix `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/024/F/TS for Activa Holdings Inc. be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. V and `Map No. 2' attached to Report DSD -2023-429 as Appendix `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for the subject lands located at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. • The proposed amendments support the creation of a mixed-use development consisting of two residential towers, 14 storeys and 22 storeys in height, with a total of 373 residential dwelling units, and commercial units on the ground floor. • Community engagement included: o circulation of a preliminary notice letter to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 357 of 668 • installation of a large billboard notice sign on the property; • follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; • Neighbourhood Meeting held on September 7, 2023; • postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site, those who responded to the preliminary circulation; and those who attended the Neighbourhood Meeting; • notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 6, 2023. This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The owner of the subject lands addressed as 1198 Fischer Hallman Road is proposing to change the Official Plan designation from `Mixed Use Two' to `Mixed Use Two with Special Policy Area 6' in the Official Plan, and to change the zoning from `Residential Six (R-6) Zone' in Zoning By-law 85-1 to `High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU -3) zone' with Special Regulation Provision 806R to permit a mixed use development, an increase in floor space ratio, an increase in building height, a reduced setback to the abutting residential zone, a reduced street line stepback, and a parking reduction to 0.8 parking spaces per dwelling unit and to apply Holding Provision 111 H to require an updated Noise Study. It should be noted that the new designations are only being applied to a portion of the lands as outlined in `Appendix B'. Staff are recommending that the applications be approved. BACKGROUND: Activa Holdings Inc. has made an application to the City of Kitchener for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment proposing to permit a new mixed-use development on the subject property, containing 2 residential buildings containing a total of 373 dwelling units. Commercial uses are proposed on the ground floor of the building. The lands are being developed along with the adjacent lands at 1274 Bleams Road and 264 Erinbrook Drive. The lands to the east have received conditional site plan approval for 138 dwelling units in the form of townhouse dwelling units, and stacked townhouse dwelling units. A Minor Variance Application was approved by the Committee of Adjustment to permit an increase in building height for the townhouse units, within the center of the site due to the grade of the property. The lands are designated `Mixed Use Two', `Medium Density Residential One', and `Low Density Residential One' within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, and as previously noted the lands subject to these applications are designated as `Mixed Use Two'. The subject lands are currently zoned `Residential Six Zone (R-6)' in Zoning By-law 85-1. Existing Residential Zone (R-6) zoning permissions include: • Residential Uses o Single Detached Dwelling o Semi -Detached Dwelling o Multiple Dwelling (Maximum 3 dwelling units) o Street Townhouse Dwellings • Home Business • Residential Care Facility Page 358 of 668 SITE CONTEXT: The subject site is an irregular shaped lot which has approximately 150 meters of frontage along Fischer Hallman road and has a lot area of 5.41 hectares. The subject site currently contains a single detached dwelling however the majority of the site is vacant. The portion of the property to the east has already received conditional site plan approval for 138 residential units in the form of townhouses and stacked townhouses, as shown on Figure 2 below. The surrounding neighbourhood consists of low rise residential uses to the north and east, and a variety of commercial uses to the west and south. The property addressed as 1200 Fischer -Hallman Road at the intersection of Fischer Hallman Road and Bleams Road, is not part of this application and has received conditional site plan approval for a 34 -storey, 323 residential multiple dwelling. <. r. ta�+- ONE C Figure 1 - Location Map: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Page 359 of 668 U) ry°) LU Liu () 0ILUa E�WNBF�00K DR >w p x3a G"1 C Figure 1 - Location Map: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Page 359 of 668 M.yV ., •. I�© yy��U •3 111H 16 Figure 2 — Zoning Area Map: REPORT: r� 1198 Fischer Hallman Road The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a mixed-use development containing 2 residential towers consisting of 373 dwelling units and commercial units on the ground floor. The buildings are proposed to be 14 and 22 storeys in height, with 349 parking spaces. 188 Class A (secure indoor) bicycle parking spaces are proposed along with 9 Class B bicycle parking spaces. Vehicular access is proposed as a right in/right out access point from Fischer Hallman Road, as well as accesses via Bleams Road and Rockwood Road. Table 1. Proposed Development Concept Statistics Page 360 of 668 Unit Types 228 — One Bedroom Units 136 - Two Bedroom units . . ....................................................................................................................... 9 - Three Bedroom Units Commercial Area 1,086 square meters storm Watav Management OZJ4 ba. Figure 3 — Development Concept Site Plan V M Page 361 of 668 ..................... . . ....................................................................................................................... ROCKWOOD RD — ------- --------- - . . .. ...... tow mw --- MOM -, ri I eawi Aram FF -Y-7-1 urrw storm Watav Management OZJ4 ba. Figure 3 — Development Concept Site Plan V M Page 361 of 668 Figure 4 — Proposed Building Rendering: Front elevation along Fischer -Hallman Rd. To facilitate the development of 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road with the proposed development concept, an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are required to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject lands as the existing Official Plan policies only permit a maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 4.0 and the zoning only permits a maximum FSR of 0.6. The lands are currently designated `Mixed Use Two' in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan in the Official Plan and zoned `Residential Six Zone (R-6)' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The subject lands were designated in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan to permit medium density residential uses, however the zoning was not updated through that planning process, therefore property specific applications are required. The applicant is proposing to add Special Policy Area 6. Special Policy Area 13.10.3.6 permits a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 6.3 whereas the current Official Plan policies permit a maximum FSR of 4.0, and to permit a building height of 22 storeys whereas the current policy permits a maximum of 14 storeys. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would include special regulation provision 806R to permit an increase in floor space ratio, building height in metres and storeys, setback from a residential zone, street line stepbacks and minimum parking rates. It would also add a new Holding Provision 111 H to require an updated Noise Study. Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Page 362 of 668 Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus transit and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active Page 363 of 668 transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents market-based housing. The City's Urban Structure is composed of Intensification Areas which include the Urban Growth Centre (Downtown), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), City Nodes, Community Nodes, Neighbourhood Nodes, Urban Corridors (including Corridors in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan) and Arterial Corridors. They are connected by transit corridors and the integrated transportation system which are key elements in shaping growth and built form in the city. As Intensification Areas, these areas are generally intended to provide for a broad range and mix of uses in an area of higher density and activity than surrounding areas. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will facilitate the intensification of the Urban Corrdior with a mixed-use development that is compatible with the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; Page 364 of 668 iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. The development of the subject lands with a more intense residential use within the City's delineated Built -Up Area, represents intensification and will help the City to meet density targets. MTSA and Urban Corridors (including Corridors in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan) are planned to accommodate additional housing opportunities that will make use of existing infrastructure and support the viability of existing transit. Housing policies of the Growth Plan support the development of a range and mix of housing options that serves the needs of a variety of household sizes, incomes, and ages. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed residential development, including transportation networks, municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems, and a broad range of social and public health services. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete, and healthy community. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks, and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet Page 365 of 668 most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 373 residential dwelling units and 1,026 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, and building step backs, have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas, Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within a Corridor within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Community Structure Plan. Corridors are intended to provide a balanced distribution of commercial, office, institutional and multiple residential uses. The planned function of Corridors are to provide for compact and intensive development along a transit corridor. The Corridor is primarily intended to serve the adjacent residential neighbourhoods and employment areas. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for a Corridor but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use Two', `Medium Density Residential One', and `Low Density Residential One' (Map 22e, Rosenberg Secondary Plan) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The `Mixed Use Two' designation is generally intended to provide commercial and office uses that serve the entire Rosenburg Community and adjacent Planning Communities, along with residential that is at higher densities than the surrounding area while achieving a built form that is compatible, accessible, safe and efficient for all modes of travel. The applicant is proposing to add Special Policy Area 6 to the Rosenberg Secondary Plan (Map 22e) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 6.3 whereas the current Official Plan policies only allow for a maximum FSR of 4.0, and to permit a building height of 22 storeys whereas the policies only allow for a maximum of 14 storeys. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and Page 366 of 668 where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo to ensure a future assessment be undertaken to determine the impact of on-site noise sources on on- site and off-site site sensitive receptors, when detailed building designs are known. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate on-site amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Streetscape — The Fischer -Hallman Road frontage is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's residential lobby. At -grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The towers have a well-defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Brief. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Further review of the Shadow Impact Study will be undertaken through the detailed site planning process. Wind Study Page 367 of 668 A Wind Study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application, if necessary, to mitigate wind. Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed towers are generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the off-site separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served well by public transit, with access to Grand River Transit Routes 12, 33 and Xpress Routes 201. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units and the development is contemplated to include a range of unit types. These new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Page 368 of 668 Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions: The Official Plan Amendment Application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 22e — Rosenberg Secondary Plan be amended from `Mixed Use Two' to `Mixed Use Two with Special Policy Area 6'. Based on the planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix «A„ Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-law 85-1): The subject lands are zoned `Residential Six Zone (R-6)' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The existing zoning permits residential uses including Single Detached Dwellings, Duplex Dwellings, Street Townhouse Dwellings and Multiple Dwellings. The R-6 zone currently allows for a maximum building Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 0.6 and a maximum building height of 10.5 metres for the subject lands in the City of Kitchener's Zoning By-law. The applicant has requested an amendment to Zoning By-law 85-1 to change the zoning from `Residential Six Zone (R-6) to `High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU -3)' with `Special Regulation Provision 806R and Holding Provision 111 H' in Zoning By-law 85-1. A Holding Provision is required to require a final noise study at the site plan stage. Official Plan policies indicate that where special zoning regulations are requested for residential intensification or a redevelopment of lands, the overall impact of the site- specific zoning regulations will consider compatibility with existing built form; appropriate massing and setbacks that support and maintain streetscape and community character; appropriate buffering to mitigate adverse impacts, particularly with respect to privacy; avoidance of unacceptable adverse impacts by providing appropriate number of parking spaces and an appropriate landscaped/amenity area. Page 369 of 668 The applicant is seeking to amend the Zoning By-law to add Special Regulation Provision 806R and Holding Provision 111 to Zoning By-law 85-1. The proposed Special Regulation Provision is to permit an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR), increased building height, regulate buildings setbacks, reduce the required parking rate and required visitor parking in accordance with Zoning By-law 85-1. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Special Regulation Provision 806R: a) That the maximum Floor Space Ratio shall be 6.3. The purpose of this regulation is to cap the Floor Space Ratio and ensure development does not generally exceed the density presented in the concept plans. b) That the maximum building height shall be 22 storeys (75 metres). The purpose of this regulation is to limit the building height to ensure development does not generally exceed the height presented in the concept plans. c) Parking be provided at a rate of 0.8 parking spaces per dwelling unit. 4% of the required parking spaces shall be shared for visitor parking and non-residential uses. Bicycle and electric vehicle parking are to be provided in accordance with By-law 2019- 051. Shared visitor and commercial parking shall be permitted in accordance with By- law 2019-051. The purpose of this regulation is to provide for a minimum parking rate which is appropriate for the development as well as require adequate bicycle parking spaces and future electric vehicle charging parking spaces. The proposed ratio results in a parking rate of 0.8 parking spaces per dwelling unit (inclusive of visitor spaces). The subject lands will have adequate access to public transit and pedestrian/cycling networks and adequate bike storage will be provided within the development for residents. Planning and Transportation Services staff is of the opinion that the parking rate is appropriate for the subject lands. d) The minimum yard setback abutting a residential zone shall be 7.3 metres from the building. The purpose of this regulation is to allow the building to be built closer to the adjacent portion of the lands that contain the townhouse units. The setback is required from the proposed zoning line, however there is also amenity space adjacent to the townhouses which gives greater separation to the proposed new building. e) The minimum street line stepback shall be 2.4 metres The purpose of this regulation is to allow the building to have a stepback closer to Fischer - Hallman Road than what is permitted. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 111 H: Page 370 of 668 Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. In this case, a Holding provision is used to require a final noise study in order to facilitate the implementation of the `MU -3' zone and special regulation provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the holding provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Holdinq Provision 111 H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: No development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Updated Noise Study has been completed to ensure a future assessment be undertaken to determine the impact of on-site noise sources on on-site and off-site site sensitive receptors, when detailed building designs are known to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application to change the zoning of the subject lands to `High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU -3) with Special Regulation Provision 806R and Holding Provision 111 H' represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a mixed-use dwelling development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, which will add visual interest at the street level and skyline, and will appropriately accommodate on-site parking needs. Staff are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Appendix `B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications was undertaken in July 2023 to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Appendix "D" of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: • Planning Justification Report Prepared by: MHBC Planning, June 2023 • Urban Design Brief, Shadow Study Prepared by: MHBC Planning, June 2023 • Wind Study Prepared by: Rowan Williams Davies & Irwin Inc (RWDI), March 2023 Page 371 of 668 • Transportation Impact Brief Prepared by: Paradigm Transportation Solutions, June 2023 • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report Prepared by: MTE, June 2023 • Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by MHBC Planning, December 2022 • Archaeological Assessments Prepared by: Archaeological Research Associates Ltd., October 2023 • Sustainability Statement Prepared by: MHBC Planning, June 2023 • Noise Feasibility Study Prepared by: HGC Engineering, June 2023 • Arborist Report Prepared by: WSP, December 2022 Community Input & Staff Responses 398 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified 4 people/households provided comment (���,� A City -led Neighbourhood Meeting was held on September 7, 2023 `1I, j�� and 20 users logged on Staff received written responses from 4 residents with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Appendix `E'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on September 7, 2023. A summary of what we heard, and staff responses are noted below. What We Heard Staff Comment Concerns the proposed development will create traffic A Traffic Impact Study was submitted and reviewed by City and Regional Transportation staff who did Page 372 of 668 that existing roads can not not identify any major traffic concerns as a result of handle. the proposed development. Vehicular access is proposed as a right in/right out access point from Fischer Hallman Road, as well as accesses via Bleams Road and Rockwood Road. Staff are aware of ongoing traffic concerns at the intersection of Fischer Hallman and Bleams roads. A recent roundabout was recently installed and during construction there were delays travelling through this intersection. Road improvements are underway for Fischer Hallman south of the subject lands and planned for Bleams Road west of the subject lands. Overtime, road improvements over time will improve vehicle movements in this area, and new cycling facilities will improve active transportation options. A Shadow Impact Study was submitted and reviewed by City Urban Design Staff who did not Concerns the proposed identify any major shadow concerns as a result of development will cast large the proposed development. Shadows extend north shadows into existing low rise neighbourhoods but move quickly from west to east. A large urban green space at the centre of the development is proposed, which will be further Increased amenity space should reviewed through the site plan approval process. be provided for residents Interior amenity space is also proposed internal to the building for residents to use. The roundabout was designed with consideration for General concerns over pedestrians and vehicles. The Region is working pedestrian safety who walk and towards a pilot project for increased safety measures use the roundabout and this roundabout could be considered for safety enhancements after review of the pilot project. Planning Conclusions: In considering the foregoing, staff are supportive of the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications to permit the development of a mixed -used development at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road. Staff is of the opinion that the subject applications are consistent with policies of the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conform to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Regional Official Plan, and the City of Kitchener Official Plan and represent good planning. Planning staff are recommending that the applications be approved. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. Page 373 of 668 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget - Bill 109, More Homes for Everyone Act, 2022 introduced a requirement for a municipality to refund planning application fees if a decision is not made within a prescribed timeframe. Decisions on Zoning By-law Amendments, when combined with an Official Plan Amendment, are required within 120 days to retain planning application fees, for applications received after July 1, 2023. A decision must be made by Council prior to November 14, 2023 or the Planning Division must issue an application fee refund of $12,800.00, being 50% of the $25,600.00 Major Zoning By-law Amendment Application fee. The Planning Division does not have a funding source or budget for refunding planning application fees. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in July of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on July 27, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 4 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report. Planning staff also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter. • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 1994 • Rosenberg Secondary Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson - Manager of Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright - Supervisor Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Readman, Justin - General Manager, Development Services Page 374 of 668 APPENDIX& Appendix A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix C — Newspaper Notice Appendix D — Department and Agency Comments Appendix E — Public Comments Page 375 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Page 376 of 668 INDEX SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 3 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 1198 Fischer Hallman Road TITLE AND COMPONENTS PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT THE AMENDMENT Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 Page 377 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER## SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener (2014). This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend the Official Plan by adding Special Policy Policy Area No. 6 to Map 22e — Rosenberg Secondary Land Use Plan and by adding associated Policy 13.10.3.6 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement Page 378 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus transit and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents market-based housing. The City's Urban Structure is composed of Intensification Areas which include the Urban Growth Centre (Downtown), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), City Nodes, Community Nodes, Neighbourhood Nodes, Urban Corridors (including Corridors in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan) and Arterial Corridors. They are connected by transit corridors and the integrated transportation system which are key elements in shaping growth and built form in the city. As Intensification Areas, these areas are generally intended to provide for a broad range and mix of uses in an area of higher density and activity than surrounding areas. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will facilitate the intensification of the Urban Corrdior with a mixed-use development that is compatible with the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and 4 Page 379 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. The development of the subject lands with a more intense residential use within the City's delineated Built -Up Area, represents intensification and will help the City to meet density targets. MTSA and Urban Corridors (including Corridors in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan) are planned to accommodate additional housing opportunities that will make use of existing infrastructure and support the viability of existing transit. Housing policies of the Growth Plan support the development of a range and mix of housing options that serves the needs of a variety of household sizes, incomes, and ages. Page 380 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed residential development, including transportation networks, municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems, and a broad range of social and public health services. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete, and healthy community. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks, and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 373 residential dwelling units and 1,026 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, and building step backs, have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas, Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within a Corridor within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, Community Structure Plan. Corridors are intended to provide a balanced distribution of commercial, office, institutional and multiple residential uses. The planned function of Page 381 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Corridors are to provide for compact and intensive development along a transit corridor. The Corridor is primarily intended to serve the adjacent residential neighbourhoods and employment areas. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for a Corridor but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use Two', `Medium Density Residential One', and `Low Density Residential One' (Map 22e, Rosenberg Secondary Plan) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The `Mixed Use Two' designation is generally intended to provide commercial and office uses that serve the entire Rosenburg Community and adjacent Planning Communities, along with residential that is at higher densities than the surrounding area while achieving a built form that is compatible, accessible, safe and efficient for all modes of travel. The applicant is proposing to add Special Policy Area 6 to the Rosenberg Secondary Plan (Map 22e) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 6.3 whereas the current Official Plan policies only allow for a maximum FSR of 4.0, and to permit a building height of 22 storeys whereas the policies only allow for a maximum of 14 storeys. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo to ensure a future assessment be undertaken to determine the impact of on- site noise sources on on-site and off-site site sensitive receptors, when detailed building designs are known. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate on-site amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Page 382 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Streetscape — The Fischer -Hallman Road frontage is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's residential lobby. At -grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The towers have a well-defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Brief. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Further review of the Shadow Impact Study will be undertaken through the detailed site planning process. Wind Study A Wind Study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application, if necessary, to mitigate wind. Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; Page 383 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed towers are generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the off-site separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served well by public transit, with access to Grand River Transit Routes 12, 33 and iXpress Routes 201. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units and the development is contemplated to include a range of unit types. These new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Page 384 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions: The Official Plan Amendment Application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 22e — Rosenberg Secondary Plan be amended from `Mixed Use Two' to `Mixed Use Two with Special Policy Area 6'. Based on the planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan (1994) is hereby amended as follows: a) Part 3, Section 13.10.3.6 Special Policy Areas is amended by adding Special Policy Area 6 as follows: 6. Special Policy Area 6 Notwithstanding the `Mixed Use Two' land use designation and policies on lands municipally known as 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 6.3 and a building height of 22 storeys (75 metres) will be permitted. A Holding provision pursuant to Section 17.E.13 will apply to residential uses. The Holding provision will not be removed until such time as: a) An updated noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. b) Amend Map No. 22e — Secondary Plan — Rosenberg Plan for Land Use by designating the lands, municipally addressed as 1198 Fischer Hallman Road as `Mixed Use Two with Special Policy Area 6' instead of `Mixed Use Two', as shown on the attached Schedule `A'. 10 Page 385 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETI�NG �or a development in your neighbourhood 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Concept Drawing Haive You rVoice (Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee, Date, October 30, 2023 Location, Colunicil Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King, Street, West, ""'V'irtual Zoom Meeting Go to Ikitchnener 'ca/meetings and select: & CUrrent agendas and reports (posted 10 da s befo re rnieefinp) Appear as a delegation & Watch a meeting lb learn more aboutthis projiect, including jinfbirmatiori orl YOW" appeal riip ,hts, viisft'. www,kitchenenca/ PlainningApplications or contact: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner t ii rn. sey I e 0� ) k i t c h e n e r. ca S19.741.2200 x"7860 The City of Il itchener will consider applications to amend the Official (Plain and Zoning, By-law for the property located at 1198, Fischer Hall[rnan Road. Thiis is to facifitate, the deveblpment of niNed Use buildings which unjcludes 2 residential towers, 14, and 22 storeys, conjsusting of 373 residential dwelling Units, and comm erciall units on the grOUnd floor. Site-spebfic regulations are proposed to pernift an increased Flbor Space Ratio of 6. 34, a n�axir`nLlimi building height of 75 metres (22 storeys), reduced yard setbacks, and a parking reduction. 11 Page 386 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 12 Page 387 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 13 Page 388 of 668 SCHEDULE No. 45 VIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII/ uuuuuuuuuuuuuuluu� ill$ illlllllu�m kl MAP NO. 2 DETAIL from SCHEDULE NO. 93 of APPENDIVA' 0 MET 10 IC SCAL A 11 DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2023 metes N PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener - 2821889 Ontario Inc. — 1198 Fischer Hallman Road WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Number 93 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcel of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener attached hereto from Residential Six Zone (R-6) to High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU -3) with Special Regulation Provision 806R and Holding Provision 111 H and Property Detail Schedule Number 45. 2. Schedule Number 93 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 is hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 3. Appendix "B" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Property Detail Schedule Number 45 which is attached hereto, as Map No. 2. 4. Appendix "D" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 806 thereto as follows: "806. Notwithstanding Sections 6.1.2 and 55.2.1 of this By-law within the lands zoned MU -3 and shown as affected by this subsection on Schedule Number 93 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: a) the maximum floor space ratio shall be 6.3; b) the maximum building height shall be 22 storeys (75.0 metres); c) the minimum yard setback abutting a residential zone shall be 7.3 metres; Page 391 of 668 d) the minimum street line stepback, the horizontal distance of the portion of the building above the base recessed from Fischer Hallman Road street line fagade of the base, shall be 2.7 metres; e) A minimum parking rate of 0.8 spaces per dwelling unit; f) A minimum visitor parking rate of 0.04 spaces per dwelling unit. g) Bicycle and electric vehicle parking are to be provided in accordance with Table 5-5 in Zoning By-law 2019-051; h) Shared visitor and commercial parking spaces are permitted in accordance with Section 5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051." 5. Appendix "F" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 111 H thereto as follows: "111. Notwithstanding Section 55 of this By-law within the lands zoned MU -3 and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Number 93 of Appendix "A": a) No development on the lands shall occur until an updated noise study has been submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo." 6. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. —(1198 Fischer Hallman Road) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 392 of 668 z 0 F p � w � 1 0 Q p ' o ' �I C-0 w 1 O O rn M tF 1 O W 1 1� of c } w p Z w T r p o 04 N 0 -1 LU z w z O N LU N O z W z QU � N ' � W D 2 OONw' Opp W LU NO�U LU In 0 U Q �p O Y LU z�F �I0o� yJO Q Z p p W C 1 o Lij J _ Of p d r a O Q Q J J J J Q Q Q Q Q a d W D In W p ' Z W O X O Z V U O x W p LU z LU Z O X Q N Q CO QX Q Q J W w Q W W W W W C' F p p p p w w Z Z (n F W O N Z N w } Q 2 fq J (n } J (n Q Z i J~ _> j � z U (n W W W W W W O Q p IN D U O U Z W } ON X Z F Z CO W (D U Q 1 Q W F LLJp�zz O FZ �dpLO LU H JQQQWWWW DpUQ z Wm'ZJ W Q p O Q ~ W F J Q U p z Q Z Of i Q 0 0 N (Q _ U U Z Z Z 2' of a' E H H W r J U Z Q Q F a F z z z p 0 z Of Z O X IN O H Z M W r w (n U p d o O LLJ LU F w w W�����_ 0 0 0 0 m wLU — p w w= p WIN LL u W prOf(3 � � cn z O O� c~n Z 0 N �pdw IM wwp=z�pp-iazU�ofz6J)Uicn�¢��zzNz=��Mz zIQU �wafOO —ZZ �O 2 M MQ W W W W } N NQ �Q M c0 �O GULL~ " U) QQLL --IN m W N Z O O� m Q CO U UN �N d �N NCOOY O O N M Uo r ' ... N r M N r M a a W ~ X LL E M CO N H HLL LL N O z CY) O z Z m Q d N a �F w Z Z S� W (� a 2 +_� o W Z2 LU Q O� z >F W Q J ��♦ a a V m J O Q Edw Z U p Z LL N O � 1 g ' IL ' �I N s.x 1 O i O CN M tF 1 O W 1 1� CID r N 1 Cl) 04 N rL n m a a W ~ X LL E M CO N H HLL LL N O z CY) O z Z m Q d N a �F w Z Z S� W (� a 2 +_� o W Z2 LU Q O� z >F W Q J ��♦ a a V m J O Q Edw Z U p Z LL N O 1 � 7 cn n 1 �I N s.x O O CN M tF 1 O W 1 1� �v 'NQ� w W ~ M ' � O O mmu°muu mums 1 o Lij J W moon uummruVu CV ' to ' U Q uuuuVnppuuu Q' _. . ..........muuuuuuuuu (n Q 1 � 7 n uumuunnniiii10°°°°�iiiiryuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuu CP o 1 �I r M tF 1 7 �I 7.9 U Z Z Q _O Q Q = H Z O w 2 oo U _ U) N OD 00 N a) r NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Concept Drawing 1 J s e St m eys Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Zoom Fleeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner ti m.seyler@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7860 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law for the property located at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road. This is to facilitate the development of mixed use buildings which includes 2 residential towers, 14 and 22 storeys, consisting of 373 residential dwelling units, and commercial units on the ground floor. Site-specific regulations are proposed to permit increase F oor S a Ratio of 6.34, a maximum buildingheight of 75 metres (22 sto� iO 59�ks, and g � a parking reduction. Tim Seyler, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Community Services Department City Hall P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Seyler: Post Circulation Comments OPA 23/014/F/TS ZBA 23/024/F/TS Activa Holdings 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road CITY OF KITCHENER PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca File: D17-50/23014 & C14-60/23024 September 29, 2023 The owner is proposing to develop the lands with a mixed use development containing 2 residential towers consisting of 373 residential units and commercial units on the ground floor. The buildings are proposed to be 14 and 22 stories in height, with 349 parking spaces (parking structure). In order to permit the proposed development, an Official Plan Amendment to the Mixed Use land use designation to add a site-specific policy area and Zoning By-law Amendment to amend the Zoning By-law to Mixed Use Two (MIX -2) from Residential Six (R-6). The addition of site-specific provisions to the proposed MIX -2 zone are required. Details of the proposed applications are summarized as follows: Proposed Official Plan Amendment The applicant is proposing a site-specific policy area to permit a maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 6.34, and a building height of 22 storeys (75 metres). Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment The applicant is proposing to add a site-specific provision to the proposed `Mixed Use' (MIX -2) zoning on site for: Document Number: 4490391 Version: 1 Page 1 of 5 Page 395 of 668 • Increase in Floor Space Ration to 6.34 • Building height and Number of storeys • Parking Maximum • Street Line Stepback • Setback abutting a Residential Zone Water Services Water Services staff supports the proposal to service the site from the municipal main on Rockwood Road. Due to the sites proximity to the region -owned watermains on Bleams Rd and Fischer Hallman Rd, the applicant should be made aware that no connection to regional watermains will be permitted in accordance with Section B.2.1.4.1 of the Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services for February 2023. Salt Management Plan The lands are designated Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Area 8 on Map 6a of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). The purpose of this designation and corresponding policies in Chapter 8 of the ROP is to protection the Region's long term municipal groundwater supplies. Hydrogeology and Water Programs staff has no comments on the FSR/ SWM report. A salt management plan will be required as part of the future site plan application. Corridor Planning Environmental Noise Study The applicant has submitted a noise study which assess road traffic and stationary noise sources. This study entitled "Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road and 1274 Bleams Road" (HGC, June 20, 2023) is currently under review. Pending acceptance of the study the recommendations, must be secured by way of an agreement with the City and/or Region as part of any future planning application such as consent or plan of condominium on the lands. It is noted that Owner's Statement is not included in the report and must be received prior to accepting the Noise Report. In the meantime staff is recommending a holding provision be including in the ZBL amendment to secure review and acceptance of the study. In addition, to ensure a future assessment be under taken to determine the impact of on-site noise sources on on-site and off-site sensitive receptors, when detailed building designs are known. Conditions for Other Applications There is an active Site Plan application for the proposed development (SP 23/006/F/ AP). The SWM, Grading and TIS are being reviewed through this application. The Document Number: 4490391 Version: 1 Page 2 of 5 Page 396 of 668 Region's comments dated February 14, 2023 on the application are attached for your information. Housing General The following Regional policies and initiatives support the development and maintenance of affordable housing: • Regional Strategic Plan o Objective 4.2 requires the Region to make affordable housing more available to individuals and families. • 10 -Year Housing and Homelessness Plan o contains an affordable housing target which is that 30% of all new residential development between 2019 and 2041 in Waterloo Region is to be affordable to low and moderate income households. • Building Better Futures Framework o shows how the Region plans to create 2,500 units of housing affordable to people with low to moderate incomes by 2025. • Region of Waterloo Official Plan o Section 3.A (Range and Mix of Housing) contains land use policies that ensure the provision of a full and diverse range and mix of permanent housing that is safe, affordable, of adequate size, and meets the accessibility requirements of all residents. The Region supports the provision of a full range of housing options, including affordable housing. Should this OPA/ZBA be approved, staff recommend that the applicant consider providing a number of affordable housing units on the site, as defined in the Regional Official Plan. Rent levels and house prices that are considered affordable according to the Regional Official Plan are provided below in the section on affordability. In order for affordable housing to fulfill its purpose of being affordable to those who require rents or purchase prices lower than the regular market provides, a mechanism should be in place to ensure the units remain affordable and establish income levels of the households who can rent or own the homes. Staff further recommend meeting with Housing Services to discuss the proposal in more detail and to explore opportunities for partnerships or programs and mechanisms to support a defined level of affordability. Affordability Document Number: 4490391 Version: 1 Page 3 of 5 Page 397 of 668 For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of an ownership unit, based on the definition in the Regional Official Plan, the purchase price is compared to the least expensive of: Housing for which the purchase price results in annual accommodation costs $1,960 which do not exceed 30 percent of gross $418,100 annual household income for low and moderate income households Bachelor: $1,075 Housing for which the purchase price is 1 -Bedroom: $1,245 at least 10 percent below the average $679,300 purchase price of a resale unit in the 3 -Bedroom: $1,631 regional market area 4+ Bedroom: n/a *Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2022). In order for an owned unit to be deemed affordable, the maximum affordable house price is $418,100. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of a rental unit, based on the definition of affordable housing in the Regional Official Plan, the average rent is compared to the least expensive of: A unit for which the rent does not exceed 30 per cent of the gross annual $1,960 household income for low and moderate income renter households A unit for which the rent is at or below the Bachelor: $1,075 average market rent (AMR) in the 1 -Bedroom: $1,245 regional market area 2 -Bedroom: $1,469 3 -Bedroom: $1,631 4+ Bedroom: n/a *Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2022) In order for a rental unit to be deemed affordable, the average rent for the proposed units must be at or below the average market rent in the regional market area as shown above. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly by email at JMaanMiedema(a)-regionofwaterloo.ca or by phone at 226-753-9593 should you have any questions or wish to discuss in more detail. Document Number: 4490391 Version: 1 Page 4 of 5 Page 398 of 668 Archaeological Assessment Regional staff acknowledge receipt of the Archaeological Assessment (October 17, 2022), supplementary, and Indigenous Engagement reports completed by ARA. The Ministry provided acknowledgement of receipt on October, 18, 2022. No further action is required. Regional Development Charges The Owner/Applicant should also be advised that any future development on the subject lands will be subject to provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Region Application Fee The Region's fees for these applications were received August 14, 2023. Subject to the above comments, Regional staff has no objection to City staff proceeding with recommendations to Kitchener Committee and Council on the applications. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Shilling Yip, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner cc. Pierre Chauvin, MHBC Planning Document Number: 4490391 Version: 1 Page 5 of 5 Page 399 of 668 City of Kitchener OPA & ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Application Type: Official Plan Amendment & Zoning Bylaw Amendment Comments Of: Planning- Urban Design Commenter's Name: Rojan Mohammadi Email: Rojan.mohammadi@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext: 7326 Date of Comments: September 1, 2023 ❑ I plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑X No meeting to be held. ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 1. Documents Reviewed: • Architectural Drawings (May 2023), prepared by Martin Simmons Sweers • Arborist Report (December 2022), prepared by WSP • Urban Design Brief (June 2023), prepared by MHBC • Pedestrian Wind Comfort Assessment (March 2023), prepared by RWDI • Planning Justification Report (June 2023), prepared by MHBC 2. Site -Specific Comments & Issues: • Clarification is required whether the entire floor 5 is dedicated to amenity area or not. Please label outdoor versus indoor amenity areas. • Any proposed vegetation/Tree proposed on Fishers Hallman Road and Rockwood Drive should be shade tolerant as per shadow study analysis. • It is recommended to provide a bike storage in Tower A as well to increase safety and access for the users. • Provide Class B bike parking. Page 400 of 668 • Relocate snow storage locations on the curb island to a more appropriate area. Accumulation of snow in the proposed areas would interfere with visibility for pedestrian and drivers and run offs to the adjacent accessible parking spaces. • Additional crosswalk connection is recommended to ensure safety. • A streetscape design should be provided for the Fischer Hallman Road to include street trees, enhanced landscaping, prominent commercial and building entrances, connection to the public sidewalk and internal pedestrian and cycling connection. • More details and precedents are required for the rear elevation, structured parking screening and first floor commercial. There are no active use/eyes on the street on that side of the development and that may cause CEPTED issues. It is recommended to activate the space by adding some residential units and/or implement some of the suggestions below: o Art installation at the terminal view o Glazing the stairwell o Landscape strip as per the rendering to decrease the use of overwhelming amount of brick o Increase the use of basket weave design more than the solid brick • A full qualitative wind study, taking into consideration the proposed 34 storey tower adjacent to the property is to be provided prior to site plan approval. The wind mitigation recommendations outline in the full wind study are to be implemented into the building and site design to ensure pedestrian safety and a high degree of comfort yet -around for site users. 2. Comments on Submitted Documents: • Sketchup model should be provided to confirm shadow analysis. Page 401 of 668 City of Kitchener - Comment Form Project Address: 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road Application Type: OPA/ZBA Comments of: Environmental Planning (Sustainability) — City of Kitchener Commenter's name: Raida Chowdhury Email: raida.chowdhury@Icitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Written Comments Due: September 1, 2023 Date of comments: August 30, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and/or Reports submitted and reviewed as part of a complete application: • Sustainability Statement, 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road, prepared by MHBC, June 28, 2023. 2. Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the supporting documentation (as listed above) to support an OPA/ZBA application proposing 373 residential units and 1,086 m2 of commercial space on the subject property, regarding sustainability and energy conservation, and provide the following comments: - Although the Ontario Building Code (OBC) is progressive, going forward all developments will need to include energy conservation measures that go beyond the OBC as the City (and Region of Waterloo) strive to achieve our greenhouse gas reduction target. - A Sustainability Statement (as per the City's Terms of Reference) will be required as part of a complete Site Plan Application which can further explore and/or confirm additional sustainability measures that are best suited to the development as the design evolves. - Upon review of the supporting documentation, the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments can be supported as several sustainable measures have been proposed or are being considered for the development. - The development proposes several sustainable measures including: o The compact and efficient design of an underutilized lands o Control measures to improve stormwater runoff quantity and quality o Building orientation for southern exposure reducing heating requirements o The use of low or no VOC paints and finishes to minimize air pollutants in interior materials o On-site waste management facilities o Building envelope designed beyond OBC requirements 3. Conditions of Site Plan Approval: Page 402 of 668 • To submit a revised Sustainability Statement to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Planning. Further, the approved sustainability measures recommended in the Sustainability Statement will be implemented in the landscape, stormwater management, and building design, to the satisfaction of the City's Manager of Development Review. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.4.5. The City will encourage and support, where feasible and appropriate, alternative energy systems, renewable energy systems and district energy in accordance with Section 7.C.6 to accommodate current and projected needs of energy consumption. • Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.4. In areas of new development, the City will encourage orientation of streets and/or lot design/building design with optimum southerly exposures. Such orientation will optimize opportunities for active or passive solar space heating and water heating. • Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.8. Development applications will be required to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City, energy is being conserved or low energy generated. • Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.27. The City will encourage developments to incorporate the necessary infrastructure for district energy in the detailed engineering designs where the potential for implementing district energy exists. 5. Advice: ➢ As part of the Kitchener Great Places Award program every several years there is a Sustainable Development category. Also, there are community-based programs to help with and celebrate and recognize businesses and sustainable development stewards (Regional Sustainability Initiative - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/regional-sustainability- initiative and TravelWise - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/travelwise). ➢ The 'Sustainability Statement Terms of Reference' can be found on the City's website under 'Planning Resources' at ... https://www.kitchener.ca/SustainabilityStatement Page 403 of 668 City of Kitchener Heritage — OPA/ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road File Number: ZBA23/024/F/TS, OPA23/014/F/TS Comments Of: Heritage Planning Commenter's Name: Deeksha Choudhry Email: deeksha.choudhry@kitchen er.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 Date of Comments: August 10, 2023 Heritage Planning staff has reviewed the following material for the proposed development on the lands municipally addressed as 1198 Fischer Hallman Road to provide the comments outlined below: • Architectural Drawings for the proposed Development; • ZBA Application Form; and • Approved Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) The proposed development includes the construction of two residential towers consisting of 373 residential unites, and commercial units on the ground floor. The buildings are proposed to be 14 and 22 stories in height, with 349 parking spaces. Heritage Planning Comments This OPA/ZBA application is related to Site Plan Application SP23/006/F/AP. As part of the Site Plan Application, staff required that a HIA be submitted with a complete application. The existing house on the subject property is included on the Inventory of Historic Buildings, but the HIA confirmed that the building has lost its integrity due to many alterations over the years. As such, it was concluded that designation not be pursued even though it satisfied cultural heritage evaluation criteria. The HIA was approved by the Director of Planning on July 25, 2023. The recommendations that were included in the HIA are being implemented as part of Site Plan Application SP23/006/F/AP. As such, heritage planning staff have no issues or concerns with this OPA/ZBA application. Page 404 of 668 From: Gaurang Khandelwal <Gaurang.l<handelwal@kitchener.ca> Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 11:48 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road (OPA/ZBA) Hi Tim, I have reviewed the OPA/ZBA application for 1198 Fischer Hallman Road. No major policy concerns with the proposal for Phase 2 lands. However, please consider the following for Phase 1 lands. ➢ 1198 Fischer Hallman Road - Phase 1 lands Lands are designated Mixed Use 2, Medium Density Residential 1 and Low Density Residential 1, and zoned R-6 in ZBL 85-1. Low Density Residential 1 land use does not permit multiple dwellings. However, R-6 zone permits multiple dwellings. Applicant is proposing to redesignate the lands to Medium Density Residential 1 and Low Density Residential 1 but keep the R-6 zoning in ZBL 85-1. It is suggested that the entirety of the Phase 1 lands be considered for Medium Density Residential 1 designation or Special Policy Area that permits stacked townhouses and RES -5 zone in ZBL 2019-051. Lands within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan area are expected to eventually be bought into ZBL 2019-051 and the equivalent zone to the existing R-6 zone will be RES -5. Site specifics with RES -5 zoning could be included to recognize height variances granted through A2023-067. Regards, Gaurang Khandelwal (he/him), MA, MCIP, RPP Planner (Policy) I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7611 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 gaurang. khandelwal(cDkitchener.ca Page 405 of 668 Address: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Owner: Activa Holdings Inc. Application: ZBA23/024/F/TS and OPA23/014/F/TS Comments Of: Parks & Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross Email: Lenore.ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: Aug 30 2023 ❑ 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑X No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 1. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of an OPA and/or ZBA to allow the development of the lands with a mixed use development containing 2 residential towers consisting of 373 residential units and commercial units on the ground floor. The buildings are proposed to be 14 and 22 stories in height, with 349 parking spaces. In order to permit the proposed development, an Official Plan Amendment to the Mixed Use land use designation to add a site-specific policy area and Zoning By-law Amendment to amend the Zoning By-law to Mixed Use Two (MIX -2) from Residential Six (R-6). The addition of site-specific provisions to the proposed MIX -2 zone are required. • Planning Justification Report • Urban Design Brief • Architectural Drawings • Truck Movement Plan • Arborist Report • Functional Site Grading Plan • Wind Study 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments, however there are minor updates required to the documentation noted below to address Parks and Cemeteries concerns with the proposed OPA/ZBA applications. Parks and Cemeteries can provide conditional support to the applications subject to receiving satisfactory updates to the documentation noted. Should document updates not be available prior to the application proceeding to Committee and Council, a Holding Provision should be considered ensure the submission and approval of such documents to Parks and Cemeteries satisfaction. The parkland dedication requirement will be deferred at the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications and assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be Page 406 of 668 assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval. Parkland dedication will be taken as cash -in -lieu of land according to the Planning Act and Park Dedication Bylaws and Policies in effect. 3. Comments on Submitted Documents 1) Arborist Report — WSP dated Dec 16 2022 a) There are no City owned trees within the 'phase 2' portion of the site lands b) As part of a future site plan application street trees will be required along Rockwood Road. c) As part of a future site plan application Parks and Cemeteries will coordinate with Urban Design and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo to approve street trees along Fischer Hallman Road. d) Trees identified for removal within the 'phase 1' portion of the site and the associated valuation/compensation have been satisfactorily addressed. No revisions required by Parks and Cemeteries. 2) Urban Design Brief — MHBC dated June 2023 a) Pg 24 Amenity Area Considerations. It is positive that all units within 'phase 2' are planned to have private balconies and that the Urban Green as proposed through the RosenBuerg Secondary Plan has been accommodated in the 'phase 1' portion of the site. b) Conceptual details, images and commentary should be provided for the podium level amenity space and pavilion to help guide detailed design through the site plan stage. Preliminary wind, shadow and noise analysis should inform these amenities and include the mitigation that has been identified through preliminary analysis to allow seating and play equipment for residents of all ages and abilities. A revised Urban Design Brief or a Holding Provision for a suitable revised document is required. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual 5. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval Dedication requirements are subject to the Parkland Dedication Policy and rates in effect. Please be advised that an updated Parkland Dedication Policy and By-law were approved by City of Kitchener Page 407 of 668 Council on August 22 2022. The Bylaw is under appeal. Further changes to the Bylaw may be required as a result of the Bill 23 — More Homes Built Faster Act. Page 408 of 668 City of Kitchener Application Type: Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/024/F/TS Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/014/F/TS Project Address: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Comments of: Transportation Services Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: dave.seller@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 Date of Comments: August 29, 2023 a. As part of a complete Zoning By-law amendment application, a Transportation Impact Brief (TIB) was submitted (June 22, 2023) by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited in support of this OPA/ZBA application. Transportation Services offer the following comments. Development proposal The applicant is proposing to develop 139 townhouse units for phase 1 and one 14 -storey and one 22 -storey residential apartments with 373 units plus 1086 mZ of ground floor commercial space within phase 2. The site will be serviced by three access points. Two all moves access points along Rockwood Road and Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) for phase 1 and one right -in -right -out (RIRO) access to Fischer -Hallman Road (Regional Road 58) for phase 2. In phase 1 the development is estimated to generate 89 AM and 101 PM peak hour vehicle trips and in the full buildout for phase 2 (phases 1 & 2), it is estimated that the site will generate 212 AM and 241 PM peak hour vehicle trips. Roadway analysis Phase 1 and phase 2 analysis includes site generated traffic plus forecasted background traffic. 2022 existing traffic conditions PM peak hour roadway capacities were reviewed for the below roadways and they are all operating below their respective capacities. • Fischer -Hallman Road (Regional Road 58) — major arterial capacity 30000 vehicles per day (vpd) (21530 vpd existing) • Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) - major arterial capacity 30000 vpd (12320 vpd existing) • Rockwood Road — minor neighbourhood collector capacity 5000 vpd (1770 vpd existing) Phase 1— 2027 total traffic conditions The intersection traffic movements were analyzed for the below locations and expressed as level of service (LOS) and volume to capacity ratios (v/c). It was determined that the new site access points are forecasted to have a LOS of C or better and v/c ratios of 0.08 or lower during the AM and PM Page 409 of 668 peak hours. Rockwood Road is forecasted to operate with LOS A and v/c ratios of zero during the AM and PM peak hours. There were no critical traffic movements identified. • Rockwood Road at NEW site access • Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) at NEW site access Phase 2 — 2032 total traffic conditions The intersection traffic movements were analyzed for the below locations and expressed as level of service (LOS) and volume to capacity ratios (v/c). It was determined that the site access points are forecasted to have a LOS of D or better and v/c ratios of 0.25 or lower during the AM and PM peak hours. Rockwood Road is forecasted to operate with LOS A and v/c ratios of 0.01 or lower during the AM and PM peak hours. There were no critical traffic movements identified. • Rockwood Road at site access • Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) at site access • Fischer -Hallman Road (Regional Road 58) at NEW site access (RIRO) Left turn lane analysis A left turn lane analysis was completed along Rockwood Road at site access, utilizing the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Geometric Design Standards for the 2032 Total future traffic conditions. It was determined that a left turn lane along is not warranted along Rockwood Road. Transportation Services supports Paradigms findings. A left turn lane is warranted along Bleams Road (Regional Road 56) at the site access under 2027 and 2032 total traffic conditions. The Region of Waterloo will provide the final comments regarding the left turn lane along Bleams Road (Regional Road 56). Conclusion Based on the analysis and conclusions within the TIB, Transportation Services are of the opinion that this development in phase 1 or phase 2 will not negatively impact Rockwood Road or the three site access points. Page 410 of 668 From: Planning <planning@wcdsb.ca> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 3:32 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 1198 Fischer Hallman Road (OPA/ZBA) Good Afternoon Tim, The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has reviewed the subject application and based on our development circulation criteria have the following comment(s)/condition(s): A) That any Education Development Charges shall be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). B) That the developer and the Waterloo Catholic District School Board reach an agreement regarding the supply and erection of a sign (at the developer's expense and according to the Board's specifications) affixed to the development sign advising prospective residents about schools in the area. C) That the developer shall include the following wording in the site plan agreement to advise all purchasers of residential units and/or renters of same: "In order to limit risks, public school buses contracted by Student Transportation Services of Waterloo Region (STS WR), or its assigns or successors, will not travel on privately owned or maintained right-of-ways to pick up and drop off students, and so bussed students will be required to meet the bus at a congregated bus pick-up point." If you require any further information, please contact me by e-mail at Jordan. Neale@wcdsb.ca. Thank you, Jordan Neale Planning Technician, WCDSB 480 Dutton Dr, Waterloo, ON N2L 4C6 519-578-3660 ext. 2355 Page 411 of 668 From: Chris Foster -Pengelly <cfosterpen8eUy@grandhverza> Sent: Friday, August 4,20233:l3PM To: Tim Sey|er<Tim.Sey|er@Ntchenerza> Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment 1198Fischer Hallman Road (OPA/Z8A) The subject property isnot regulated bvthe GRCAunder Ontario Regulation 16V/O6.Assuch, vvewill not be providing comments. RIM Chris ll:::�osteir lReingeNly,�A,.Sc,. Office: 519-O21-276Jext. 2319 Toll-free: 1-866-900-4722 Page 412 of 668 Date: August 29, 2023 To: Tim Seyler From: Jason BrOI6 Subject: Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment Applications Activa Holdings Inc. 1198 Fischer Hallman Road, Kitchener ZBA 23/024/F/TS OPA 23/014/F/TS Klr',o rf,-v".R The below comments have been prepared through the review of the supplied Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report dated June 26, 2023 prepared by MTE Consultants Inc.; in support of the above noted applications. General Comments: 1. Engineering is in support of the applications. Any comments below can be used to direct detailed design. Sanitary: 2. Proposed flows were checked against the Middle Strasburg Trunk Sanitary Sewer design flows and determined to be acceptable. 3. Where are the towers connecting to the sanitary? Only a grading plan was submitted with this circulation and the servicing plans associated with the phase 1 portion don't show it either. Water (Angela Mick, Kitchener Utilities): 4. Any buildings over 84m tall require a second water service in accordance with Ontario Building Code section 3.2.9.7 (4). 5. Refer to email from Angela Mick dated August 28, 2023 (attached). Storm and Stormwater Management: 6. Note: SWM fees with respect to retention or quality are assessed and calculated in the year in which they are to be paid. Jason Brule, C.E.T. Engineering Technologist Page 413 of 668 From: Zachary Emmerton Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2023 2:08 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: 1198 Fischer Hallman Rd Development Comments Hello Mr Seyler, I am unable to attend the neighborhood information meeting but I would still like to provide my comments and support for the development that Activa Holdings is proposing for 1198 Fischer Hallman Rd. I would like to start off by saying that I am in support of the development of this currently underutilized parcel of land within the city. As is well documented the city as well as the country is currently in dire need of additional housing units. This resulted as you know in the province requiring each region to have a certain number of units constructed by 2031 and for Kitchener this is 35000 units. This development will help to meet that pledge by providing nearly 400 housing units of that 35000 to the market. It is within an area where it is reasonable to accommodate such growth as there is adequate transit with the 12, 22, 33 and 201 all within reasonable walking distances as well as many services that people need such as banks and grocery stores. This development also goes towards making the 15 minute communities that are outlined within the Region's official plan as it provides a large amount of commercial space fronting Fischer Hallman in a manner that is pedestrian and cyclist oriented which is typically lacking in the suburban environment. As a pedestrian, being able to go places without going through parking lots is a major benefit, hence this development is a great benefit to the public realm as it is considering other users instead of just vehicles. The height of this development is also reasonable considering the surrounding context of both low rise and other approved developments. Immediately adjacent to this site is 1200 Fischer Hallman Rd which has conditional site plan approval for a 34 floor building which would be adjacent to the 22 floor building for this project. Thus the height that Activa is asking for certainly fits in with the future context of the Fischer Hallman and Bleams intersection, secondly it provides adequate height transitions from the existing low rise residential as the tallest building is located as far as feasible from the low rise housing so the height of this development certainly fits with the surroundings. Considering the 34 floor building adjacent to this development would it be possible to increase the building height of the 22 floor building if it were to include affordable housing units or more 3 bedroom units since those both don't seem to be significant aspects of this development. I know that the city increased the height of the project at 200 Victoria St S from 42 to 45 as the developer included 3 floors of affordable housing so would something like that be possible here if the developer included more 3 bedroom units and/or affordable housing? I understand that there will be a decrease in the amount of parking spaces in comparison to what zoning requires, considering the draft zoning plan for areas within MTSAs developed through the Growing Together program contains no parking minimums, is there any way that there could be even less parking in this location considering there is significant transit connectivity as well as fairly good cycling connectivity, especially now with the Region's bridge across the expressway. I understand that it may not be possible considering the current reality of the area around the development but is it possible for the developer to include provisions to potentially reduce the amount of parking in the future for more secure bicycle storage areas? Or even units facing the park in the first phase of the development instead of parking? Page 414 of 668 Ov8[8U This d8Ve|DpDl8D1 fits in OiC8k/ with the future context of the FlSCh8T H@U08O and Bleams intersection as well as the Rosenberg Secondary Plan and Regional Official Plan so I believe this would b88great location for aDincrease iDdensity and the changes that ACiiVB wants are reasonably considering the future surroundings. Thanks for your time, Z@Ch@ryEDl0ertOn Fmm:bamster43 Sent: Thursday, September 21,2023 3x47PIVI To: Tim Sey|er<Tm.Sey|er@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road 0 You don't often get email from 0 Thanks, Tim, | noticed in your response about traffic that no mention was made ofErinbrook. Fischer-HmUmon/B|aomn/Rookwood is already m nightmare and will only get worse with more construction in the Schlegel Park/Huron area. At it is now, there are days when traffic is backed up to Westmount approaching the roundabout atB|eams. | am deeply concerned about the impact on Erinbrook and it looks to methat this isn't even a consideration. The last thing this street needs is increased traffic. I have lived on Erinbrook for 15 years and I am likely to move because of the increased traffic that will come with this development. | believe the residents ofErinhrookare being completely forgotten. The development itself looks {}K but there is no way traffic won't increase on my street with an entrance off Rockwood Road. Not chance. Mark On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 02:40:33 p.m. EDT, Tim Sey|er<wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks for the follow up email. There is e video of the meeting online and you vvnu|d be able to see it via this link aowell you can continue tomonitor the City's planning application website for more information (link below). We are looking botake this application to Council at the end of October, and I've noted your traffic concerns to our transportation division to see if there is any mitigation measures planned for the area, and what the timelines would be as a response. There is o traffic impact brief also online that has been reviewed by City staff, and will also be reviewed by Regional staff. Please let me know if you have any other questions Page 415 of 668 Senior Planner | Planning Division ICity ofKitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim. SeKtk[@kkitg�hener ga From: ha Sent: Thursday, September 21.2O2312:53PW1 To: Tim Sey|er , Paul Singh Subject: 1198 Fischer Hallman Road Greetings, I sent an email this summer asking about the traffic impact of 1198 Fischer Hallman on Erinbrook Drive and | didn't receive eresponse. I completely forgot about the Sept. 7 Zoom meeting (that's on me) and was wondering whether this subject was addressed. |fthe new development has any sort ofaccess from Rockwood Road, this will be a disaster for Erinbrook Road residents. Our street in already overused by high-speed drivers using it as a shortcut between the Trillium Industrial Park and VVesimount Road/Fischer Hallman. | shudder to think what this new development will do. The city was supposed to install calming measures this summer but nothing materialized other than out|inesontheroadondefewabrpsignsthathovedoneNOTH|NGtos|mwdowndhvernordeorease Is there a way the meeting can still be viewed or is there a written report from it that I Could see? From: barnster43 Sent: Wednesday, August 9,2O2]1l:39 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@l<itchener.ca>; Paul Singh <Paul.Singh@kitchener.ca> Subject: 1198Fischer Hallman Road Greetings, I am reaching Out with a question about this proposed monstrosity that will have a massive impact -- mainly negative? -- on my neighbourhood. First, | can't imagine what the homeowners on Rockwood Road are thinking. Just imagine buying a house with a vacant field across the streot, only to discover years later that this massive project will impact you like this. Sunlight? Gone. Traffic impact? Massive. Home value? Down. Years of construction mese. Page 416 of 668 Second, I see that Paradigm Transportation Solutions has completely ignored this project's impact on Erinbrook Drive. I expect it will be huge. The City of Kitchener recently announced minor changes to Erinbrook that focused on the speed of traffic and completely ignored the high volume. Erinbrook is the major artery for the neighbourhood but in recent years has become a high-speed expressway for people who want a shortcut between Trillium Park and Westmount Road. Others use it to avoid the roundabout at Bleams and Fischer -Hallman. I would like to know the expected traffic impact on Erinbrook and what steps will be taken to minimize the impact on this once -quiet street. Also, the traffic at the Fischer-Hallman/Bleams roundabout is already a mess during peak hours. This will only make it work. Mark Brvson Kitchener From: Karen Tu Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 12:19 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Ayo Owodunni <Ayo.Owodunni@kitchener.ca>; Paul Singh <Paul.Singh@kitchener.ca> Subject: 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road Good afternoon Tim, I am a long term resident on and am writing re: the proposed development at 1198 Fischer -Hallman Road Winiener. I understand there is a scheduled Virtual Zoom Meeting for this development on September 7th and in case I am unable to attend, here are my questions and concerns. Is this development intended to be for unit purchase or are they rental buildings like the townhouse development currently proposed on Main St. near the Sobeys? Privacy concerns that units, especially those with balconies, can overlook the residential homes surrounding the area. 3. Vehicles use Helena Feasby as a cut through to the Goodlife gym and Main Street amenities. I have seen the traffic increased on Helena Feasby over the years, including speed concerns. I have always tried to have an open communication and raise concerns with my local councillor re: this and I continue to push for methods to decrease traffic and increase speed deterrents. What is being considered and implemented for my neighbourhood to ensure it is not negatively impacted? I want to protect the quiet and calmness of my neighbourhood, and the safety of its residents. 4. It is expected that there will be an increase in traffic due to this development - however, as a pedestrian, currently, I already find it incredibly difficult to cross at the roundabout. Will there be additional safety measures implemented at the roundabout (e.g. flashing ped lights like the one that is available on Glasgow St. near the Belmont intersection)? Page 417 of 668 5. Both usable and non -usable green space has reduced overtime, and I do not see much in the plans in terms of creating additional green space (people and pet friendly) to support the influx of residents. The nearby Max Becker Commons is already seeing a reduction to accommodate further development. The plan for 1198 FH needs to see additional green space to support the neighbourhood as a whole. 6. The tree report indicates that more trees should be planted than taken down to support the development. However, I urge the planners and the City to really promote more than a 1:1 replacement approach. Please consider planting shade heavy canopies, A LOT of trees and greenery, and generally promote a more sustainable and community friendly environment. Furthermore, there could potentially even be a City program to encourage local residents with a "free tree" program for example. I have major concerns that these buildings are going to affect the community feeling, safety and value of my property. 7. General neighbourhood safety - As mentioned above, this development will have a significant impact on the population of the community. Have safety considerations been taken - security cameras, increased pedestrian lighting, pedestrian traffic, bicycles etc. I am sure I will have more questions and concerns as additional documentation is released to the public. In the meanwhile, please feel free to reach out to me if ou have any questions or require clarifications. Email is preferred, but I can also be reached at Regards, Karen Page 418 of 668 From: k la Www� Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 1:48 PM To: Tim Sey|er<Tm.Sey|er@kbchenecca> Subject: Re: FischerHaUmanand Q|eamsconstruction Thank you Tim. Sent from myiPhone >OnSep 15,2023,at1:14PM, Tim Seyer wrote: >HiKamal, � > Thank you for your comments. They still can be accepted and will be part of my report when it goes to Council. For updates on the application please see the Planning application website which I've put the link below. > If you have further questions, or comments please don't hesitate to send them to me. •Thanks, •Tim Gey|er, BEG, MC|P, RPP xSenior Planner | Planning Division | City ofKitchener � •---Origi • From: k iiiiilmm •5ent: Friday, September 15,2O23 10:35 AM • To: Tim Sey|er •Subject: Re: FischerHaUmanand 0eamsconstrudion � > Hi Tim, � > | had lost the letter that was sent to uswith the due date and was not sure ifvvewould beable to share our concerns still. � > But, my family has been living in this area ever since our house was built in 1999. With the development that has taken place around Fischer Hallman and Bleams it has been quite inconvenient and our area has become a lot busier with traffic. With this new development of buildings and Page 419 of 668 townhomes it will create more chaos and it will be busier for our little neighbourhood. Right now it is a very peaceful place to stay and adding hundreds of thousands more people into this area will take away the peace and comfort. It would be stressful coming home fighting through more traffic than we already have. A person comes home to relax especially with how stressful times have become. If this project takes place I would love to move but housing has become impossible and that wouldn't be possible. The rich just get richer and the middle class suffers because no one is really willing to listen. It's just a bit frustrating because I've lived here all my life and our neighbourhood is just so perfect and beautiful and it's sad to see it turn into a dump. If you had lived in this area and this was taking place would it make you happy? � > Thank you, � > Kamal � > Sent from my iPhone � >>OnSep 14,2023,at2:44 PM, Tim 6ey|er wrote: >> Hi Kamal, >> I'm the planner assigned to the application at 1198 Fischer Hallman Road and Kristen has asked me to reach out toyou. >> What type of information are you looking for, or what questions do you have? >> Please let meknow and | can respond accordingly. >> Thanks, >> Tim 8ey|er, BES, MC|P, RPP >> Senior Planner | Planning Division | City ofKitchener >>519-74l-22OOext. 786O|TTY 1-856-969'9994| >>> From: k la >>> Sent: Thursday, September 14,2O231U:54AM >>> To: Planning (SK4) >x>Subject: FischerHaUmanand B|eamsconstruction >>> Hello, >>> We received a letter a few weeks ago in regards to construction of town homes/bui Idi ngs on the corner of Fischer Hallman and Westmount, would you be able to direct me to someone who can assist with this topic please. >>> Thank you, >>> Kamal ��� Page 420 of 668 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 2 DATE OF REPORT: October 2, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-430 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS 20 Woolner Trail Waterloo Catholic District School Board RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/01 1 /W/TS for the Waterloo Catholic District School Board requesting the addition of Specific Policy Area No. 67 for the lands specified and illustrated as the "Area of Amendment" on Schedules `A' and `B', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-430 as Appendix `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS for the Waterloo Catholic District School Board be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By- law', and `Map No. 1', attached to Report DSD -2023-430 as Appendix `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the subject lands located at 20 Woolner Trail. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. • The proposed Amendments support the creation of a Catholic elementary school and secondary school (grades 7-12) in a predominantly residential community within the catchment area (Appendix F) identified by the school board. • Community engagement included: • circulation of a preliminary notice letter to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; • installation of 2 large billboard notice signs on the property; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 421 of 668 o follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; o Neighbourhood Meeting held on August 15, 2023; o On-site meeting with community members on September 21, 2023; o postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject site, those who responded to the preliminary circulation; and those who attended the Neighbourhood Meeting; o notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 6, 2023. This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The owner of the subject lands, addressed as 20 Woolner Trail, is proposing to change the Official Plan designation from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Specific Policy Area No. 67' within the City of Kitchener Official Plan, and to change the zoning from `Agricultural Zone (A-1)' with Special Use Provision 69U, and Special Regulation Provision 107R in Zoning By-law 85-1 to `Major Institutional Zone (INS -2)' with Site Specific Provision (381) in Zoning By-law 2019-051 to permit a maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77 square metres of gross floor area and to apply Holding Provision 54H to require an updated Noise Study to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Staff recommends that the applications be approved. BACKGROUND: The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has made applications to the City of Kitchener for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment proposing to permit a new Catholic elementary school and secondary school (grades 7-12) on the subject property in a predominantly residential community within the catchment area identified by the school board. The proposed Official Plan Amendment would add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to permit an Institutional land use designation and a "Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node within the City's Urban Structure. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would add a new site specific provision (381) to permit an increased parking rate on site for the elementary school and secondary school. SITE CONTEXT: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Fairway Road North and Woolner Trail and the site is currently undeveloped. The site is surrounded primarily by low rise residential uses, in close proximity to the Walter Bean Grand River Trail and Grand River, and the adjacent residential property, municipallly addressed as 80 Woolner Trail is a designated property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and is known as the Woolner Homestead The property is currently undeveloped as it formally was used as a gravel pit, which has now been decommissioned. Page 422 of 668 r". 1!. �a AVI_ 6"FhNVW, y'1;'+?"e. Figure 1 - Location Map: 20 Woolner Trail REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a 3 -storey elementary and secondary catholic school (grades 7-12). The proposed development includes 197 parking spaces, which includes 7 Barrier -Free Accessible parking spaces, 4 Electric Vehicle Ready parking spaces, 28 EV spaces for future installation, 15 Class A bicycle spaces and 152 Class B bicycle spaces. A sports field and track are also included within the proposed development. Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 423 of 668 � e q iN W J ro- Figure 1 - Location Map: 20 Woolner Trail REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a 3 -storey elementary and secondary catholic school (grades 7-12). The proposed development includes 197 parking spaces, which includes 7 Barrier -Free Accessible parking spaces, 4 Electric Vehicle Ready parking spaces, 28 EV spaces for future installation, 15 Class A bicycle spaces and 152 Class B bicycle spaces. A sports field and track are also included within the proposed development. Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 423 of 668 Figure 3 — Proposed Building: Front elevation from Fairway Rd and Woolner Tr. To facilitate the development of 20 Woolner Trail with the proposed school, an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are required to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject lands. The lands are currently designated `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' in the City of Kitchener's Official Plan (2014). The lands are currently identified as a `Neighbourhood Node' in the Official Plan. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to `Institutional' and to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to Map 5. Policy 15.D.12.67 is proposed to be added to the text of the Official Plan to permit an 'Institutional' land use designation and a `Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node Urban Structure Component. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would remove the subject lands from Zoning By-law 85-1 and add the lands into Zoning By-law 2019-051. The lands are currently zoned `Agricultural Zone (A-1)' with Special Use Provision 69U and Special Regulation Provision 107R. The lands are proposed to be zoned to 'Major Institutional Zone (INS -2)' with Site Specific Provision (381) to permit a maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77 square meters of gross floor area. Holding Provision 54H is proposed to require an updated Noise Study, to be completed to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Following the digital Neighbourhood Information, Planning staff arranged a meeting with Councillor Schnider, Regional and City transportation staff, along with area residents on site to discuss transportation and safety concerns. As a result of those discussions, further recommendations were included from the Director of Transportation Services that will be implemented and incorporated as part of the development of the site. The following is a summary of those recommendations: • That stopping be prohibited along the east side (school side) of Woolner Trail along the school frontage. • That parking be prohibited on the west side of Woolner Trail between Upper Mercer Street and Fairway Road. Page 424 of 668 • That Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street be monitored upon school opening to make any additional necessary adjustments to parking prohibitions to ensure overall road user safety. • That the speed limit on Woolner Trail be reduced to 30km/h in the identified school zone. • That Upper Mercer Street be considered for seasonal traffic calming beginning in 2024. • That traffic conditions be monitored upon school opening to determine if there are other traffic calming considerations that can be considered for Upper Mercer and Lower Mercer Streets. Further updates will be reviewed as part of the Site plan application that has been submitted (SP23/049/W/TS). Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: Page 425 of 668 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.1.1 of the PPS promotes healthy, liveable and safe communities which are sustained by promoting efficient development and land use patterns as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of uses, including residential, institutional and employment uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit - supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost- effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a form of development which efficiently uses the lands, provides an elementary and secondary school (institutional use) in close proximity to residential areas within the catchment area as well as transit options including bus transit. This location offers transportation choice for walkers and transit users and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of uses within a community, and that public service facilities should be located in community hubs, where appropriate, to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration with access to transit and active transportation. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will provide an additional institutional use that is compatible with the surrounding community, contributes to a liveable community, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit the development of the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; Page 426 of 668 b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. Policy 3.2.8.6 states that new public service facilities, including hospitals and schools, should be located in settlement areas and preference should be given to sites that are easily accessible by active transportation and transit, where service is available. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed development, including transportation networks and municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to establish a network of continuous sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide direct, safe, comfortable and convenient linkages within the neighbourhood and externally to other neighbourhoods, including linkages to transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations and community facilities. The proposed development will be well connected as existing sidewalks and multi -use pathways have been developed. Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Page 427 of 668 Complete Communi A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute aspects of a complete community on the subject lands with a new elementary and secondary school. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. The subject lands are located within a Neighbourhood Node. The planned function of Neighbourhood Nodes is to serve the day to day commercial needs of surrounding residential areas and are encouraged to be cycling and pedestrian friendly. Properties that are located within a Neighbourhood Node are intended to accommodate mixed use and commercial uses when deemed appropriate for achieving the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node. The Institutional land use designation and uses, and particularly `Major Institutional' uses are not permitted in a Neighbourhood Node. The applicant is proposing to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands to permit an Institutional land use designation and a `Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node. Although institutional and community uses are not part of the Neighbourhood Node designation, the Neighbourhood Node designation does indicate that the intent of the site was to accommodate non-residential uses as part of the community. Institutional uses, such as schools, help serve the existing community by providing educational facilities and amenities that can be used by the neighbourhood, while helping to meet the planned function of the area. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that help meets the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node designation and also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. Page 428 of 668 The `Mixed Use' designation is intended to be flexible and responsive to land use pattern changes and demands and permit a broad range of uses at different scales and intensities depending on the lands' geographic location and identification at the urban structure level. As such, an appropriate and compatible mix and range of commercial, retail, institutional and residential uses, at different scales and intensities will be encouraged and supported within lands designated Mixed Use. The Low Rise Residential' designation permits a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi detached dwellings and other forms of low-rise housing. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to `Institutional' and to add Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands. The Institutional designation's primary use is intended for institutional uses that are of a community or regional nature, such as secondary and post -secondary educational facilities, long-term care facilities and social, cultural and administrative facilities. This land use designation also includes small- scale institutional uses compatible with surrounding uses such as public and private elementary schools, libraries, day care centres, and places of worship. Some of these small-scale institutional uses may also be permitted in other land use designations found in this Plan. The proposed Institutional land use designation will permit the proposed development of the site with an elementary and secondary school. An objective of lands designated Institutional is to provide appropriate locations and opportunities for community infrastructure, facilities and amenities to support a complete and healthy community. Lands which are designated Institutional may have the following characteristics: a) they serve a population beyond that found in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding their location; b) they can generate large volumes of vehicular traffic which generally cannot be accommodated on local streets; c) they may require large areas of land to accommodate buildings, outdoor activity areas and on-site parking; and, d) they generally have extended hours of operation including weekday evenings and weekends and in some cases they may operate 24 hours a day, all year round. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board (Appendix F). The area served by the school goes beyond the immediate neighbourhood and will benefit a considerable portion of the City's population. The proposed school will be constructed on a large parcel of undeveloped land, and is located on a road that has been identified as having capacity to accommodate the additional traffic. Policy 17.E.13.1 of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Page 429 of 668 Provision shall be applied to the lands and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the Region of Waterloo has reviewed and approved an updated Noise Study. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's Official Plan. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; and Building Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief Report was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design, some examples include: providing an architectural design that is appropriate to the existing neighbourhood fabric, providing clean visual site lines, providing safe pedestrian circulation, and providing a sustainable built form. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Streetscape — As part of the site plan approval process the footprint of the building was moved closer to the street to promote an active streetscape. Furthermore, the majority of the parking is buffered from the street as it is located behind the building. City staff will also require adequate landscaping on each side of the property to provide additional screening for the parking areas. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design — As part of the site plan approval process, Staff have requested additional changes to the site, specifically relocating some of the parking spaces away from the front corner of the property, increasing and prioritizing pedestrian access by altering the pedestrian access at the corner, to reduce the number of retaining walls, and increasing the amount of pedestrian accesses to the building. Furthermore, staff have requested that a right out only access be provided for the access closest to the roundabout in order to encourage traffic to be directed to the roundabout. Building design — As part of the site plan process design elements within the building materials such as varying shades of brick and stone accents, have been included to add to the visual interest of the building. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served by public transit. Grand River Transit Route 23 is easily accessible to the site and an Institutional use will help support the ridership of Route 23. Further review of transit routes will be undertaken as the site develops to review if additional routes would be required. Staff also understand that the school board works Page 430 of 668 closely with Grand River Transit to ensure transit options are available to secondary school sites. An objective of the Transportation polices in the Official plan is to develop, support and maintain a complete, convenient, accessible and integrated transportation system that incorporates active transportation, public transit and accommodates vehicular traffic. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the building will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for a variety of community functions, sports events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Furthermore, as noted, though consultation with the area residents, improvements such as no stopping areas, no parking areas, reduction of the speed limit and seasonal traffic calming have all been discussed and will be incorporated and implemented as part of the development of the site. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further explored at the Site Plan Application stage. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 3 be changed from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Site Specific Policy Area No. 67'. Based on the planning analysis, Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051): The subject lands are zoned `Agricultural Zone (A-1) with Special Use Provision 69U, and Special Regulation Provision 107R' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The existing zoning permits primarily agricultural uses as well as a single detached dwelling. Special Use provision Page 431 of 668 69U, which will be removed with this application, permits a gravel pit and Special Regulation Provision 107R further permits extraction from the gravel pit. The applicant has requested a Zoning By-law Amendment to remove the lands from Zoning By-law 85-1 which are zoned 'Agricultural Zone (A-1) with Special Use Provision 69U and Special Regulation Provision 107R' and rezone them to `Major Institutional Zone (INS -2) with Site -Specific Provision (381)' in Zoning By-law 2019-051. The proposed Site Specific Provision is to permit an increased maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77m2 of gross floor area for a total of 197 parking spaces provided on site. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Site Specific Provision (381): a) The maximum parking rate shall be 1 parking space per 77m2 of gross floor area for a total of 197 spaces. The purpose of this regulation is to provide for an increased parking rate which is appropriate for the development. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 54H: Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision is proposed to be used in order to facilitate the implementation of the `INS -2' zone and site- specific provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the Holding Provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Holding Provision 54H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: No development on the lands shall occur until such time as a revised Noise Impact Study has been completed, and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application to change the zoning of the subject lands to `Major Institutional Zone' (INS -2) with Site -Specific Provision (381) and a new Holding Provision 54H' in Zoning By-law 2019-051 represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a elementary and secondary school development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood. Staff Page 432 of 668 are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Appendix `B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications was undertaken in June 2023 to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Appendix "D" of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications: • Planning Justification Report Prepared by: GSP Group, May 2023 • Urban Design Brief, Prepared by: Svedas Architectural Inc., April 2023 • Noise Study Prepared by: Aercoustics Engineering Ltd, May 2022 • Transportation Impact Study Prepared by: R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited, December 2023 • Functional Servicing Report Prepared by: Lanhack Consultants Inc., March 2023 • Sustainability Statement Prepared by: GSP Group, May 2023 • Noise Feasibility Study Prepared by: HGC Engineering, May 2023 • Arborist Report Prepared by: JK Consulting Arborists, April 2023 • Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by: McCallum Sather, April 2021 • Hydrogeological Assessment Prepared by: MTE Consultants, May 2022 Community Input & Staff Responses WHAT WE HEARD Page 433 of 668 0a�ll� 417 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated a ����� �' and notified 11 people/households provided comment A City -led Neighbourhood Meeting was held on August 15, 2023 and 20 users logged on A City -led on -Site Meeting was held on September 21, 2023 and 12 residents participated Staff received written responses from 11 residents with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Appendix `E'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on August 15, 2023 and a follow up on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023. A summary of what we heard, and staff responses are noted below. What We Heard Staff Comment Concerns that this is a floodplain The application was reviewed by the Grand River area and that flooding could Conservation Authority, and they had no concerns occur with the proposed application. The lands are not within a floodplain but are in close proximity to lands regulated by the GRCA. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) was submitted and reviewed by City and Regional Staff. Based on the analysis and conclusions there was no concerns raised by either agency. Staff met with residents on- site on September 21, 2023 to listen to their concerns and Transportation Services staff have added some recommendations to address to respond to safety concerns discussed at the Traffic— Speeding, Roundabout meeting. Proposed mitigation measures are outlined capacity, traffic on adjacent in the Transportation comments above. A final TIS roads would be required based on the final site access design determined through the site planning process. Further, the Region has indicated that a roundabout at Eden Oak would only be considered if there is any geometric change to the intersection, or a safety issue has been identified, or traffic control signals are warranted. At this time none of the criteria are met therefor a roundabout would not be considered at this time. The Region is also reviewing Roundabouts through a pilot safety program, and Page 434 of 668 ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023 and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in July of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on June 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 11 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report in Appendix `E'. Planning staff also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. Further an on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023 to discuss specific concerns with the residents. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Page 435 of 668 enhancements could be expanded to the roundabout at a future date should the pilot review be positive. A wildlife connection will remain on the property due Impact on Wildlife to a large swale at the south of the property that will not contain any built features. The property is subject to the City of Kitchener Noise and Lighting By-laws and will be required to adhere to the By-laws. If an exemption is required, the Noise and Lighting Concerns exemption will be required to be obtained through the City. A detailed lighting plan is required through the site plan process and will be reviewed to ensure there is limited light trespass off-site. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023 and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in July of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on June 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 11 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report in Appendix `E'. Planning staff also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. Further an on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023 to discuss specific concerns with the residents. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Page 435 of 668 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051 REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson - Manager of Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright - Supervisor Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Readman, Justin - General Manager, Development Services APPENDIX& Appendix A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix C — Newspaper Notice Appendix D — Department and Agency Comments Appendix E — Public Comments Appendix F — Catchment area provided by the school board Page 436 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 20 Woolner Trail Page 437 of 668 INDEX SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 3 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 20 Woolner Trail TITLE AND COMPONENTS PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT THE AMENDMENT Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 Page 438 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER## SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener (2014). This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to: • Amend Map 3 — Land Use by redesignating the lands from Mixed Use and Low Rise Residential to Institutional. • Amend Map 5 — Specific Policy Areas by adding the subject lands addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as Specific Policy Area 67, and • Add Site Specific Policy 15.D.12.67 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Page 439 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.1.1 of the PPS promotes healthy, liveable and safe communities which are sustained by promoting efficient development and land use patterns as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of uses, including residential, institutional and employment uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a form of development which efficiently uses the lands, provides an elementary and secondary school (institutional use) in close proximity to residential areas within the catchment area as well as transit options including bus transit. This location offers transportation choice for walkers and transit users and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of uses within a community, and that public service facilities should be located in community hubs, where appropriate, to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration with access to transit and active transportation. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will provide an additional institutional use that is compatible with the surrounding community, contributes to a liveable community, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit the development of the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and 4 Page 440 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. Policy 3.2.8.6 states that new public service facilities, including hospitals and schools, should be located in settlement areas and preference should be given to sites that are easily accessible by active transportation and transit, where service is available. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed development, including transportation networks and municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to establish a network of continuous sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide direct, safe, comfortable and convenient linkages within the neighbourhood and externally to other neighbourhoods, including linkages to transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations and community facilities. The proposed development will be well connected as existing sidewalks and multi -use pathways have been developed. Page 441 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute aspects of a complete community on the subject lands with a new elementary and secondary school. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. The subject lands are located within a Neighbourhood Node. The planned function of Neighbourhood Nodes is to serve the day to day commercial needs of surrounding residential areas and are encouraged to be cycling and pedestrian friendly. Properties that are located within a Neighbourhood Node are intended to accommodate mixed use and commercial uses when deemed appropriate for achieving the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node. The Institutional land use designation and uses, and particularly `Major Institutional' uses are not permitted in a Neighbourhood Node. The applicant is proposing to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands to permit an Institutional land use designation and a `Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node. Although institutional and community uses are not part of the Neighbourhood Node designation, the Neighbourhood Node designation does indicate that the intent of the site was to accommodate non-residential uses as part of the community. Institutional Page 442 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment uses, such as schools, help serve the existing community by providing educational facilities and amenities that can be used by the neighbourhood, while helping to meet the planned function of the area. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that help meets the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node designation and also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The `Mixed Use' designation is intended to be flexible and responsive to land use pattern changes and demands and permit a broad range of uses at different scales and intensities depending on the lands' geographic location and identification at the urban structure level. As such, an appropriate and compatible mix and range of commercial, retail, institutional and residential uses, at different scales and intensities will be encouraged and supported within lands designated Mixed Use. The Low Rise Residential' designation permits a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi detached dwellings and other forms of low-rise housing. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to `Institutional' and to add Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands. The Institutional designation's primary use is intended for institutional uses that are of a community or regional nature, such as secondary and post -secondary educational facilities, long-term care facilities and social, cultural and administrative facilities. This land use designation also includes small-scale institutional uses compatible with surrounding uses such as public and private elementary schools, libraries, day care centres, and places of worship. Some of these small-scale institutional uses may also be permitted in other land use designations found in this Plan. The proposed Institutional land use designation will permit the proposed development of the site with an elementary and secondary school. An objective of lands designated Institutional is to provide appropriate locations and opportunities for community infrastructure, facilities and amenities to support a complete and healthy community. Lands which are designated Institutional may have the following characteristics: a) they serve a population beyond that found in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding their location; b) they can generate large volumes of vehicular traffic which generally cannot be accommodated on local streets; c) they may require large areas of land to accommodate buildings, outdoor activity areas and on-site parking; and, d) they generally have extended hours of operation including weekday evenings and weekends and in some cases they may operate 24 hours a day, all year round. Page 443 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board (Appendix F). The area served by the school goes beyond the immediate neighbourhood and will benefit a considerable portion of the City's population. The proposed school will be constructed on a large parcel of undeveloped land, and is located on a road that has been identified as having capacity to accommodate the additional traffic. Policy 17.E.13.1 of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to the lands and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the Region of Waterloo has reviewed and approved an updated Noise Study. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's Official Plan. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; and Building Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief Report was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design, some examples include: providing an architectural design that is appropriate to the existing neighbourhood fabric, providing clean visual site lines, providing safe pedestrian circulation, and providing a sustainable built form. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Streetscape — As part of the site plan approval process the footprint of the building was moved closer to the street to promote an active streetscape. Furthermore, the majority of the parking is buffered from the street as it is located behind the building. City staff will also require adequate landscaping on each side of the property to provide additional screening for the parking areas. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design — As part of the site plan approval process, Staff have requested additional changes to the site, specifically relocating some of the parking spaces away from the front corner of the property, increasing and prioritizing pedestrian access by altering the pedestrian access at the corner, to reduce the number of retaining walls, and increasing the amount of pedestrian accesses to the building. Furthermore, staff have requested Page 444 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment that a right out only access be provided for the access closest to the roundabout in order to encourage traffic to be directed to the roundabout. Building design — As part of the site plan process design elements within the building materials such as varying shades of brick and stone accents, have been included to add to the visual interest of the building. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served by public transit. Grand River Transit Route 23 is easily accessible to the site and an Institutional use will help support the ridership of Route 23. Further review of transit routes will be undertaken as the site develops to review if additional routes would be required. Staff also understand that the school board works closely with Grand River Transit to ensure transit options are available to secondary school sites. An objective of the Transportation polices in the Official plan is to develop, support and maintain a complete, convenient, accessible and integrated transportation system that incorporates active transportation, public transit and accommodates vehicular traffic. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the building will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for a variety of community functions, sports events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Furthermore, as noted, though consultation with the area residents, improvements such as no stopping areas, no parking areas, reduction of the speed limit and seasonal traffic calming have all been discussed and will be incorporated and implemented as part of the development of the site. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Page 445 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Sustainable development initiatives will be further explored at the Site Plan Application stage. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 3 be changed from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Site Specific Policy Area No. 67'. Based on the planning analysis, Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) is hereby amended as follows: a) Amend Section 15.D.12 Area Specific/Site Specific Policy Areas by adding Policy 15.D.12.67 as follows: 15.D.12.67. 20 Woolner Trail Notwithstanding the Neighbourhood Node identification, on lands municipally known as 20 Woolner Trail, the applicable land use designation will include Institutional. A Holding provision pursuant to Section 17.E.13 will apply to institutional uses. The Holding provision will not be removed until such time as: a) A revised noise impact study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. b) Amend Map No. 3. — Land Use, by designating the lands municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as `Institutional' instead of `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential', as shown on the attached Schedule A; c) Amend Map No. 5 —Specific Policy Areas, by adding No. 67 to the lands addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as shown on the attached Schedule `B' 10 Page 446 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 20 Woolner Trail Concept IDraring Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 0, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West ar"Virtual Zoom Meeting Go to, Ikitchenerca/meetings and select, • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) Appear asa delegation 0 Watch a meefing Tb learn more about this project, inclUding inforrna tilon on your appeal rights, visit: wwwAitchener.ca/ PlaniningApplications or contact: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner tim.seyler( Ikitclhener.ca 519.741.2200 x78,60 The City of Kitchener wRl consider applications to annend the Official Plan and Zoning �By-law to facikate the development of an Elementary and Secondary School for Giradles 7-12. The applications are to change the Official Pllan Designation and Zoning Category from VNed Use' and 'Residendal' to 'Institutional'. A site specific regulation is also proposed for an increased parking rate. Page 447 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 12 Page 448 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 13 Page 449 of 668 a a Z (n ci W j a M0 > LLN� 00 d co (a >�o W Q p o ZZ� ? � ( c� =JQW cII � N Q z HCL H N N Q CO z J H U CL N z Y Q Z � m U L a 0LL Q `� w 0 c o ami •o Z w z rOLLo� 0) � = a �, X w oLLI r W 0' _0E 0- J u N Z i s V Q o x @ Q E o o o o � LLJ o J Z O Q QLLH QLLH Q Q Y U) ......... ......... ,. i LU F; s; co z U LU CO IL IL i6l. LLI IL t i tie ■ r• i tie ■ r• i +e ■ � U Z d W {, �.�� 4.■,��.` 4rt{, ��``".��''` Ort{, ��``".��'` Ort{, �� N � t 4L i 'tie ■ ; }i r' i 'tie ■ ; }i r' [ 'tie ■ ; } r', t. r ♦ U) 4L 4L. IL 41,jLO C ....�. IL o :: �: ~ r t ♦ cn N � ws • O w Jf1 l •° p O :" 444 .... `♦ (3 ~ .... p ', �♦ w 0 ...... Vie• �♦ J W �R. ♦ U Q t- " _ Ul s Q ``s`' r' J U 0� 0 co tp'm„r W O LU LU 0 04 L.L Z a a L \ LU j a >� E. , v! Y^^/ \ " M d W W Q aI Q Q M a O W JO (=jdOV dH Q Q CO z HJ�J Y Q Z O m i co L +r c CL U N H L a a wvwa OL�L Q >, �, (0100z cn� w w LL 0V N J -0 w S W U Q o Z Lu Q < ui ui Q. CIO�`�_ i a Z J J a� > p w a } m F- z J Q (D Lu U Z — a O IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII LL LL Z O w > O N LU 0 D w III III � � LLI fn LO o N N U) LU O O 0' w m Lu O 0 U O C:) w J W U U_ J Oo _ 0� m UO Q z W Om ti0 z Oz z \� W _ Q (j)O 3: ~ O C) FL: U ZO Q H U N s Q PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended, and By- law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-laws for the City of Kitchener - Waterloo Catholic District School Board. — 20 Woolner Trail WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 and By-law 2019-051 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 are hereby amended by removing therefrom the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 2. Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 are hereby further amended by removing the zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 3. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by adding thereto the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1 attached hereto, and by zoning the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 lands thereafter as Major Institutional Two Zone (INS -2) with Site Specific Provision (381) and Holding Provision 54H. 4. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 are hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 5. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (381) thereto as follows: Page 452 of 668 "381. Notwithstanding Tables 5-5 and 8-2 of this By-law within the lands zoned INS -2 and shown as affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: a) a maximum parking rate of 1 space per 77 square meters of gross floor area; 6. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Holding Provision (54) thereto as follows: "(54). Notwithstanding Section 11 of this By-law within the lands zoned I NS -2 and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 Appendix "A": a) no development on the lands shall occur until such time as a revised Noise Impact Study has been completed, and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo." 7. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. _ (20 Woolner Trail) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 453 of 668 u� a UY H W z 2Ei 0 o J w w z0 z LU oQ w�� W Z Z N O Z N Q z N z W Z 0 0 N OCN p O co r p Z O N N W N o Z Z O Q N (n W Z ?j 2 0 = Z Q = VJ co Q 11 0 W Z W Z Q Q O H H W w 0 u'> Q w _ Q Z� Z O= w O J J J J J N co N LL vJ N w 0 a 0— z D H Q Q Q Q Q J p Q J 00 Z D z J% Z 0 U > w0� Z Z Z Z Z Z N Q of p ONOF z� Lc, z w � w�� w w w w w 0 wp } N p 3: DO _ Qd J OaUn� O O _� a z.. cn cn o cn <n D zQ C° _� _ W �W � C7 m �WpU pD 0 J N W 0 U ULU LU we ~ �N _z 0 af Q� O O z WO H W .~ U d N UY Z Q z J Q a O w w w w w Un W N Z J Z W U O N M Z) J (n W 0� D Q c z Q Un cn N Un Un Un co Un z j Q 0 Z d LL LL Q N L J Q z UQQ<?Uanz< rJ Z waf = �E E E E E �zXN O O O Zz m Q a LU �UjU}�wo� �y o N� Q a awl pJzw N i U) a—i-i N �z U r2 UaWmOHJO� N Q 2 O O O� O N W W W Z O W w or¢Una��u�0� C -D � QUaw , H N Un Z O O J J J J J M A\ zQ� UWQ zw Q (D < of w � N O'Q � N c) �n ax Z F CO W W O�0M 00 J Q 2 C, J Z U of �Z Un Un Un Un Un z2QU W Z �G' W'—ZZO — ZZ } M �, } �0 2 Un U)< W W W W W LL LZ N- Q Q LL �< D < D 00 Q [1 CL CO N Z O 02 of w(if Er of z N U) 0 W � d cl 2 p �■d llllZ 0 Un W Z + (n OIL) I') Q Z w , J Q AW W a �a0 > w _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 61�1��y��� �14�cf�rr�a�9�, Z U p LL i �'IT y 1r4�1�� ��b"���� 4 co 1 Lc)Cr �lbrrr"i�ti�S�cq 44'1 o O 1 �� ;r1"Iil'i•, �� ��� o N � 1 W 4�W Sr ai��'r.'�.4�� Lo� O m �a W o O M LU c O N LL O J w _� W cv U Q a L7 cl IIVI�IIII lumuuu�jpppjp0u umuuuuuuuumuuuuuum um � II U II rn — uuuuuuu w Iii u �u10 uluuuuuuul a umuluu � � m J N II II M N � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III IIIIII VIII , LU U)U co — O J pppp 0 w N ~ 0 0 Lu Lu IIIIIII' w'^ J •� Q O L?a UOo 00 v� N„ Q U � � N J\�� ppp011lllllluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum = O LLJ M z � � , . Vimuuuum°°uuIIIIIII �� �) NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 20 Woolner Trail Concept Drawing Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Zoom Fleeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications E II e i,"Y >I e ii ii t a ry Et P ;u rri ii g or contact: Ilrr i >I ease Tim Seyler, Senior Planner S(:11 mol tim.seyler@kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7860 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to facilitate the development of an Elementary and Secondary School for Grades 7-12. The applications are to change the Official Plan Designation and Zoning Category from `Mixed Use' and `Residential' to 'Institutional'. A site specific regulation is also proposed for an increased parking rate. Page 455 of 668 PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT w; AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada Region of Waterloo Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca Tim Seyler, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Community Services Department City Hall P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Seyler: Update to Comments OPA 231011/W/TS ZBA 23/018M/TS Waterloo Catholic District School Board 20 Woolner Trail CITY OF KITCHENER Shilling Yip (226) 753-1064 File: D17-50/23011 & C 14-60/23018 October 12, 2023 Further to the Region's comments of October 2, 2023 staff wish to provide an update at this time. It recommended, that the proposed ZBL amendment include a holding provision to address the following: 1) Submission of a revised Fire Flow Analysis and servicing drawings; 2) Review and acceptance of the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022); and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits; 3) Review and acceptance of the transportation impact study entitled, Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District (R.J. Burnside, December 2022); and Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 "East Kitchener School Board" Page 1 of 3 Page 456 of 668 4) Submission of the MECP's Record of Site Condition Acknowledgement Letter for RSC #231915. Submission of Revised Fire Flow Analysis and Servicing Drawings A revised Fire Flow Analysis (MTE, August 23, 2023) has been submitted and is currently under review by staff. Staff understands City staff is prepared to address fire flow as part of Site Plan (SP), and to circulate the Region. Regional staff can also support deferral of the fire flow analysis to SP with proviso that the report (and servicing drawings) be reviewed and accepted by the Region's Water Services Engineering and Planning staff as part of that review process. A servicing option provided in the Analysis includes extending water services off Eden Oak Trail and crossing Fairway Road (Regional Road 53) to service the site. The Region's Corridor Management staff has concern that the applicant may have to cut the roadway to do this work and that this is not preferable as this road was recently reconstructed. Directional drilling should be considered. This method is also being reviewed by Water Services Engineering & Planning, and Hydrogeology and Water Programs staff. Review and Acceptance of Noise Study Staff has reviewed the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022). Noise sources identified in the report include road and aircraft traffic noise, and stationary noise sources such as dust collector, rooftop mechanical equipment, and emergency generator. Mitigation options have been recommended which include but not limited to central air conditioning, noise barriers, minimum / maximum sound power levels, and acoustic enclosure. The report concludes the development can meet the Region's noise guideline and the MECP NPC -300 noise guideline sound level limits with the appropriate noise mitigation measures being implemented. Comments on Study will be provided under separate cover. A detailed review of these mitigation measures and certification by a professional engineer in acoustics will be required to ensure sound levels meet guideline limits at points of reception. As you know, Regional staff has had some discussion with City staff regarding securing implementation of the above requirements, including use of a holding provision or potentially through the site plan process. Staff understands at this time that the Study recommendations cannot be secured through the site plan. This being the case, Regional staff continue to recommend use of a holding provision to secure implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. The "H" may be removed following receipt of a certificate of compliance, acceptable to the Region and the City, from a professional engineer qualified in acoustics, that all mitigation measures to be implemented as part of Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 Page 2 of 3 Page 457 of 668 this development will meet sound level limits of the Region's and MECP NPC -300 noise guideline at sensitive receptors. Regional staff acknowledges receipt of the Consultant Declaration and Owner's Statement for the noise study from the applicant on October 6, 2023. Review and Acceptance of Transportation Impact Study Staff continues to review the transportation impact study entitled, "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022). Regional staff also supports deferring review and acceptance of this study to the Site Plan at this time. Record of Site Condition The Region required the applicant to submit a copy of the MECP acknowledgement letter for the filing the Record of Site Condition with the Ministry for this property. Staff confirms this letter was received by the Region on October 2, 2023, and that no further action is required by the applicant. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Shilling Yip, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner cc. Kristen Barisdale, GSP Group Kevin Dolishny, Region Water Services Joginder Bhatia, Region Corridor Planning Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 Page 3 of 3 Page 458 of 668 Tim Seyler, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Community Services Department City Hall P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Seyler: Post Circulation Comments OPA 231011/W/TS ZBA 23/018/W/TS Waterloo Catholic District School Board 20 Woolner Trail CITY OF KITCHENER PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G 4A Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca File: D17-50/23011 & C14-60/23018 October 2, 2023 Regional staff has reviewed the above -noted applications and provide the following comments for the City's consideration at this time. The 7.35 ha (18.6 ac) site is located on the south side of Fairway Road N., to the east of Woolner Trail and north of the Grand River, in the Grand River South community of the City. It has approximately 483m of frontage on Fairway Road and approximately 100m frontage on Woolner Trail. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) is proposing to construct a new elementary and secondary school containing grades 7-12, on full municipal services. The Official Plan amendment consists of an amendment to Map 3- Land Use in the Official Plan from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional'. The site is zoned Agricultural (A-1) with Special Use and Regulation Provisions 69U and 107R' in City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 which does not permit a secondary school. The zoning by-law amendment consists of re -zoning the property from Agricultural (A-1) in ZBL 85-1 to Major Institutional (INS -2) in Zoning By-law 2019-051. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 1 of 6 Page 459 of 668 A site specific provision to permit an increased parking rate of 1 space per 81 m2 for a total of 188 parking spaces is also requested. The lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Area on Map 3a of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). Policy 2.D.1 in the ROP supports the creation of complete communities with development patterns, densities, and appropriate mix of uses that support walking, cycling and the use of transit. Water Services Water Services staff has indicated there are inconsistencies between the proposed servicing drawings found in the Functional Servicing Report and the Fire Flow Analysis. A revised fire flow analysis, and servicing drawings will be required. Staff is recommending a holding provision be included in the ZBL amendment to secure review and acceptance of the revised fire flow analysis, and servicing drawings. Hydrogeology and Water Programs The lands are designated Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Areas 2 and 5 on Map 6a and Microbial Risk Management Zone on Map 6f) of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). The purpose of this designation and corresponding policies in Chapter 8 of the ROP is to protect the Region's long term municipal groundwater supplies. Staff notes the municipal drinking -water supply wells within proximity to this site is supplied by Groundwater Under the Influence of Surface Water (GUDI wells), which require a higher level of protection and treatment than other municipal drinking -water supply wells. Hydrogeology and Water Programs (HWP) staff notes the subject property is within 200 metres of a municipal supply well. As such, HWP will require: 1) that the applicant consult with staff if construction will occur within 200 metres of a supply well, 2) a construction spill prevention and response plan must be prepared and implemented per the DGSSMS, as part of future site plan, 3) that enhanced construction standards are required for stormwater and sanitary sewers within 200 metres of a municipal supply well, per the DGSSMS. Engineering drawings must be submitted to the Region for review and acceptance as part of site plan. HWP's guidance documents for construction work within 200m of a municipal supply well are attached for information. 4) that HWP staff be notified prior to commencement of construction due to the proximity of the property to a supply well, and Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 2 of 6 Page 460 of 668 5) A salt management plan will be required as part of future site plan. Archaeology This property has been previous assessed and cleared of all archaeological concerns. No further action is required. Record of Site Condition A Record of Site Condition was filed for this property in 2022 to allow the proposed institutional use (RSC #231915). Please provide the Region with a copy of the Ministry's RSC Acknowledgement Letter for our records. Corridor Planning Environmental Noise Study The applicant has submitted a noise study which assess road traffic, aircraft, and stationary noise sources. This study entitled "Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022) is currently under review. Noise sources assessed include road and air traffic noise, and stationary noise. Recommended mitigation include air conditioning, rooftop barrier, acoustic enclosure for emergency generator. Pending acceptance of the study the recommendations must be secured by way of an agreement with the City and/or Region as part of any future planning application such as consent. Staff notes the Consultant's Statutory Declaration and Owner's Statement have not been included with the report and must be received prior to accepting the Noise Report. In the meantime staff is recommending a holding provision be including in the ZBL amendment to secure review and acceptance of the study, and to provide for certification at detailed building design that the mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits. Transportation Impact Study Staff acknowledges receipt of the report "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022) which is currently under review. Comments will be provided when available. In the meantime, staff is recommending a holding provision be included in the ZBL amendment to provide for its review and acceptance. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 3 of 6 Page 461 of 668 Site Plan Related Matters The Functional Servicing Report is currently under review and comments will follow separately. • Any new servicing/removal/update to existing services would require separate approval through Municipal Consent, prior to Site Plan clearance. • A Regional road Work Permit will be required prior to start of any work within the Regional road right-of-way. Regional Road Widening Dedication — In this area, the Regional Road 53 (Fairway Road North) right of way width matches the designated road width in Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). No further road widening dedication is required in association with the ROP designated road width. Transit Planning It is likely Grand River Transit will be required to put additional service during morning and afternoon bell time to meet additional demand and address overcrowding, such as providing additional trips on existing Route 23 which currently runs along Fairway Road and Zeller Drive. Neighbourhood Traffic Concerns Regional staff acknowledges neighbourhood residents have raised a number of concerns with traffic in the area, including a site visit with residents, City and Regional staff September 21, 2023. Staff can advise on the following at this time. Roundabout Option at Eden Oak Trail and Fairway Road The Region has a policy when a roundabout is to be considered. The Policy states that a roundabout should be considered: If there are any geometric changes to an intersection (e.g., addition of lane or an approach); If there is a safety issue that has been identified; or If additional traffic control, such as traffic control signals, are warranted. A review shows that a roundabout would not be considered an option at this time as none of the above would be met. However, this does not mean that a roundabout will not be considered at a point in the future should the geometry, collision history or the need for additional control changes. The current configuration provides for a right turn in/out only due to an existing median. Given this design, additional control would not be warranted. Additionally, because of the restricted movements there is no collision pattern of concern. During the period between 2016 and 2020 there have been no reported collisions. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 4 of 6 Page 462 of 668 Lowerina Speed Limit The posted speed limit along Fairway Road at Eden Oak Trail is 60km/h. The posted speed of 60km/h continues for a distance of approximately 230 metres east of Eden Oak. Although staff do not have any speed surveys near Eden Oak along Fairway Road, staff suspect that average travel speeds are likely at or slightly higher than the posted 60km/h. The Region may consider a school period posted speed reduction on Fountain because there is a planned right in/out access. Any speed reduction may be subject to the Region's ASE expansion. Any Upgrades to the Existing Roundabout Currently, there are no plans to change the roundabout at Zeller Drive. At Regional roundabouts, pedestrians experience a better level of service in terms of delay. All Regional roundabouts include Level 2 PXO's which give priority to pedestrians. This means motorists must stop when a pedestrian is waiting to cross at the designated crossing location. The Region is working towards a pilot of rapid flashers at roundabouts. If the results of the pilot are positive, Old Zeller at Fountain may be a candidate if their use is expanded. The Region is working towards a pilot of raised crosswalks at roundabouts. If the results of the pilot are positive, Old Zeller at Fountain may be a candidate if their use is expanded. Regional Development Charges The Owner/Applicant should also be advised that any future development on the subject lands will be subject to provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Region Application Fee To Regional staff's knowledge, the Region's planning fees are outstanding. By copy of this letter, the applicant is asked to provide the required fees as soon as possible. Summary Subject to the above comments, and receipt of the Region's fees, Regional staff has no objection to City staff proceeding with recommendations to Kitchener Committee and Council on the applications. In summary, Regional staff is recommending the proposed ZBL amendment include a holding provision to address the following: Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 5 of 6 Page 463 of 668 1) Submission of a revised Fire Flow Analysis and servicing drawings; 2) Review and acceptance of the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022); and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits; 3) Review and acceptance of the transportation impact study entitled, "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022); and 4) Submission of the MECP's Record of Site Condition Acknowledgement Letter for RSC #231915. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Shilling Yip, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner cc. Kristen Barisdale, GSP Group Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 6 of 6 Page 464 of 668 Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail Application Type: Official Plan Amendment OPA23/011/W/TS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA23/018/W/TS Comments of: Environmental Planning — City of Kitchener Commenter's Name: Carrie Musselman Email: carrie.musselman@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 X 7068 Date of Comments: July 27, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and Reports submitted as part of a complete Planning Act Application: • Arborist Report Pertaining to: Southeast corner of Fairway Road North & Woolner Trail, Kitchener ON, prepared by Urban Arboretum, dated December 21, 2022. • Functional Servicing Report for 200 Woolner Trail, Hamilton ON, prepared by Lanhack Consultants Inc., dated March 24, 2023. 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the studies as noted above to support an official plan and zoning bylaw amendment to support the proposed development of a new secondary school, and note: 1) From the Arborist Report, staff have calculated a total of 178 individual trees are located on the property, and note: a) 48 trees (26.9%) are recommended to be preserved b) 27 trees (15.1%) are recommended to be injured, and i) 10 of the trees recommended to be injured are Potential Boundary Trees. c) 103 trees (57.8%) are to be removed as they would not survive development impacts. i) 2 of the trees recommended to be removed are in shared ownership and 2 others in potential shared ownership. 2) The Arborist Report has noted trees in shared ownership to be removed to facilitate the development. a) Written agreement to remove trees in shared ownership is required and is to be included with the Arborist Report. b) If either of the property owners don't agree to tree removal(s), the proposed development can't proceed as designed, and it will need to be modified from what has been submitted for further review and approval. 3) It is recommended that the proposed site design, overall grading and proposed parking be revised to provide the retention of additional trees and vegetation. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 465 of 668 4) An ecologically sound tree replacement plan (to support the future site plan application) will be necessary to mitigate tree removals. Transplantation of existing trees onsite should be evaluated. An assessment of the value of the vegetation proposed for removal should be prepared. This value can be the basis for compensation plantings provided beyond the Urban Design Manual base standards. Environmental Planning staff can support the Official Plan and Zoning By Law Amendment. Staff believe the above noted comments/concerns can be addressed through the City's Site Plan process and/or requirements. 3. Policies, Standards and Resources: Tree Management • As per Section 8.C.2.16. of the Official Plan, the City will require the preparation and submission of a tree management plan in accordance with the City's Tree Management Policy (available on the City's Website), where applicable, as a condition of a development application. o Any tree management plan must identify the trees proposed to be removed, justify the need for removal, identify the methods of removal and specify an ecologically sound tree replacement scheme and any mitigative measures to be taken to prevent detrimental impacts on remaining trees. • policy 8.C.2.6., the City will incorporate existing and/or new trees into the streetscape or road rights-of-way and encourage new development or redevelopment to incorporate, protect and conserve existing healthy trees and woodlands in accordance with the Urban Design Policies in Section 13 (Landscape and Natural Features) of the Urban Design Manual and the Development Manual. Hedgerows • As per Section 8.C.2.19. of the Official Plan, when considering development, redevelopment or site alteration proposals, the City may require the protection and enhancement of hedgerows, especially where: a) they link other elements of the Natural Heritage System; b) wildlife regularly use them as habitat or movement corridors; c) they are composed of mature, healthy trees; d) they contain trees that are rare, unique, culturally important or over 100 years in age; or, e) they contribute to the aesthetics of the landscape. Natural Heritage Features • The mapping and criteria for identifying individual natural heritage features is included in the Kitchener Natural Heritage System Technical Background Report (rev. June 2014). 4. Advice: • 20 Woolner Trail is 6.48 ha (16.01 acres) in size and so the City's Tree Conservation By-law applies. If the owner would like to remove a tree (not part of a planning approval), a tree conversation permit may be required. Additional information can be found on the City's A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 466 of 668 website at: https://www.kitchener.ca/en/building-and-development/tree- conservation.aspx#Tree-conservation-permits. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 467 of 668 City of Kitchener Heritage — OPA/ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail File Number: ZBA23/018/W/TS, OPA23/011/W/TS, SP23/049/W/TS Comments Of: Heritage Planning Commenter's Name: Deeksha Choudhry Email: deeksha.choudhry@kitchen er.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 Date of Comments: July 13, 2023 Heritage Planning staff has reviewed the following material for the proposed development on the lands municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail to provide the comments outlined below: • Heritage Impact Assessment dated April 2021; • Letter of Submission dated May 17, 2023; • Proposed Site Plan; and • Urban Design Brief dated April 16, 2023. The subject property municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail does not have any heritage status. However, it is located adjacent to 80 Woolner Trail, which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Heritage Impact Assessment A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was submitted in support of this and a previous consent application B2021-011. The HIA went before the Heritage Kitchener Committee at its April 7, 2021, meeting. The HIA has also received approval on April 9, 2021. OPA/ZBA Application Since the HIA has been approved and there has been no major change in the proposed development, staff do not have any additional comments or considerations as part of the OPA/ZBA process. Site Plan Application The approved HIA included some recommendations that should be addressed as part of the Site Plan process. This included: -Lighting requirements A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 468 of 668 - Fencing Requirements - Tree/vegetation cover Heritage Planning Comments As per the recommendations of the approved HIA, heritage planning staff would require that a fence be installed between the shared property lines of 80 Woolner Trail and 20 Woolner Trail. Staff would also require the design details of the proposed fence so that staff can ensure that is compatible with the adjacent heritage property. As part of the Site Plan process, staff would like to include the following conditions: Prior to Site Plan ADDroval I. That prior to Site Plan Approval, that the proposed Lighting Plan be reviewed and approved by the City's Heritage Planner in conjunction with the City's Urban Designer. II. That prior to Site Plan Approval, a Tree and Vegetation Inventory for the trees proposed to be removed along the shared property lines of 20 Woolner Trail and 80 Woolner Trail be submitted to the satisfaction of the City's Heritage Planner. III. Prior to Site Plan Approval, that the proposed fence details be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the City's Heritage Planner. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 469 of 668 Address: 20 Woolner Trail Owner: Waterloo Catholic District School Board Application: OPA23/011/W/TS and ZBA23/018/W/TS Comments Of: Parks and Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross Email: Lenore.ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: July 312023 ❑ 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) X❑ No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 5. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of requested to amend the Official Plan to redesignate the property to 'Institutional' from 'Mixed Use' and 'Low Rise Residential'. The owner has requested to amend the Zoning By-law to 'Institutional (INS -2)' in By- law 2019-051 from 'Agriculture One Zone (A-1) with Special Use and Regulation Provisions 69U and 107R' in Zoning By-law 85-1. An increased parking rate of 1 space per 81m2 for a total of 188 parking spaces is also requested. • Planning Justification Report • Urban Design Brief • Noise Impact Study • Arborist Report 6. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments and can provide support to the applications. Updates to technical reports as noted below can be reviewed and approved through the site plan application SP23/049/W/TS. 7. Comments on Submitted Documents 1) Arborist Report and Tree Protection Plan — Arborwood Tree Service Inc —rev date Jan 04 2023 a) As noted in Parks and Cemeteries comments for site plan application SP23/049/W/TS, a revised Arborist Report and Tree Protection Plan are required to accurately reflect required removals and tree protection fencing especially along the Woolner Trail road widening and along the shared Woolner Farm property line. b) The updates that are required to the Arborist Report and the Tree Protection Plan are not necessary for the OPA and ZBA to proceed and can be addressed through the site plan application. 8. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 470 of 668 • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual 9. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. As per the Parkland Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy, Parkland dedication is not required "for properties to be developed by, on behalf of, and for use by publicly funded school boards operating within the City of Kitchener". A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 471 of 668 City of Kitchener Application Type: Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail Comments of: Transportation Services Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: dave.seller@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 Date of Comments: August 4, 2023 a. As part of a complete OPA/ZBA application, a Transportation Study (TS) was completed (December 2022) by R. J. Burnside & Associates Limited in support of this application. Transportation Services review of this TS focused on roadways that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Kitchener. Development proposal The applicant is proposing to construct a new elementary and secondary school containing grades 7 to 12. In the 2028 future scenario, the development is estimated to generate 943 AM and 532 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The site will be serviced by three access points. Two full move accesses along Woolner Trail and one right -in right -out access along Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53). Based on the Site Plan submitted for the Site Plan Review Committee meeting on July 19, 2023, the plan noted a total of 188 parking spaces are being proposed. Intersection analysis Traffic operations for existing (2021) and future (2023 & 2028) conditions were analyzed for the following locations. Future traffic conditions include school generated traffic plus background traffic. Existing 2021 • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street — signalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) B or better. • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail — roundabout o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Woolner Trail at Upper Mercer Street — unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. Future 2023 & 2028 • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street — signalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 472 of 668 0 Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail — roundabout o In both the AM and PM peak hours most traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. o In the AM 2028 conditions, the northbound (Woolner Trail) traffic is operating with a LOS F and volume to capacity ratio greater than 1.00. This critical traffic movement is due to the high traffic volumes along Fairway Road North, which causes the delays at this approach to the roundabout. These delays are forecasted to be for short durations. • Woolner Trail at Upper Mercer Street - unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at NEW site access — unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. • Woolner Trail at NEW north site access — unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Woolner Trail at NEW south site access — unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. It should be noted that the new school AM (arrival) and PM (dismissal) times are typically between 8:20 am to 9:10 am and 3:00 pm. When comparing the PM dismissal and PM background peak hour traffic times as indicated below, they are offset and therefore, do not overlap. However, in the AM, there may be an overlap of school traffic and AM peak hour background traffic for a brief period. Background traffic AM and PM peak hour times were provided as part of the Region of Waterloo traffic counts that are within the TS submitted by Burnside. The AM and PM bell times were provided by the Catholic School Board. Background traffic AM peak hour • 7:30-8:30 am - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street • 7:30-8:30 am - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail Background traffic PM peak hour • 4:45 — 5:45 pm - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street • 4:30 — 5:30 pm - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail Traffic infiltration analysis The TS noted that some school traffic may use Upper Mercer Street to access the proposed school. Upper Mercer Street is designated as a Local roadway and typically has a vehicle capacity up to 2000 vehicles per day (vpd). Upper Mercer Street carries between 300 to 1000 vpd, depending on your A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 473 of 668 location along the roadway. It was estimated that with the addition of the new school, less than 300 additional vpd are being added to Upper Mercer Street and can be accommodated as there is available vehicle capacity. Walkability analysis Pedestrian walkability to/for the site and surrounding area can easily be achieved, as sidewalks are generally provided on both sides of roadways in the surrounding area. Also, to improve pedestrian and cycling connectivity for the new school and neighbourhood, is a new 3m boulevard multi -use trail (BMUT) to be installed as part of the development between Fairway Road North and along the Woolner Trail school frontage. Vehicle swept path analysis The following design vehicles were reviewed for on-site loading/garbage. • Private FL Refuse Truck - acceptable • Heavy Single Unit (HSU) - acceptable • School bus —acceptable Parking supply analysis The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 188 parking spaces, which is over the maximum 162 parking spaces required. The TS noted the surplus parking is to provide the school with planning flexibility for the site and in conversations with the traffic consultant the parking provided should be acceptable and no shortfall is anticipated. In other words, it is not expected that there will be any overflow of school parking on the surrounding street network. Transportation Services have no concerns with surplus parking being proposed for this development. Conclusion Based on the analysis and conclusions within the TS, Transportation Services is of the opinion that this development will not negatively impact the overall traffic operations of City of Kitchener roadways within the study area. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 474 of 668 From: Barry Cronkite <Barry.Cronkite@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 11:59 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Tr. - Updated comments Hi Tim, here's some info: In addition to comments previously provided, Transportation services met with neighbourhood residents to discuss traffic and parking concerns. To address concerns, the following is recommended: • That stopping be prohibited along the east side (school side) of Woolner Trail along the school frontage • That parking be prohibited only the wet side of Woolner Trail between Upper Mercer Street and Fairway Road • That Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street be monitored upon school opening to make any additional necessary adjustments to parking prohibitions to ensure overall road user safety • That the speed limit on Woolner Trail be reduced to 30km/h in the identified school zone • That Upper Mercer Street be considered for seasonal traffic calming beginning in 2024 • That traffic conditions be monitored upon school opening to determine if there are other traffic calming considerations for Upper Mercer and Lower Mercer Streets. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 475 of 668 From: Niall Melanson <Niall.Melanson@kitchener.ca> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 3:14 PM To: Lynn Ingram <Lingram@mte85.com> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; Angela Mick <Angela.Mick@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: CPA/ZBA 20 Woolner Comments Hey Tim At this time I can confirm that sanitary capacity is available and Engineering supports the ZBA. Lynn - Was there any update on the Water Distribution Analysis? I am yet to see anything and at this time KU cannot sign -off. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. Niall Melanson, C.E.T. Project Manager, Development Engineering, City of Kitchener niall.melanson@kitchener.ca, 519-741-2200 x 7133 200 King St. W., Kitchener, ON N2G 4GX A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 476 of 668 From: Gaurang Khandelwal <Gaurang.Khandelwal@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 9:49 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 20 Woolner Trail (OPA/ZBA) Hi Tim, Thanks for discussing this yesterday. The proposed OPA is to change the urban structure from Neighbourhood Node (Secondary Intensification Area) and Community Area to Community Node (Primary Intensification Area), and from Mixed Use and Low Rise Residential to Institutional land use designation. Policy 3.C.2.5 directs addition of new Primary Intensification Areas to be considered only during a comprehensive review. Further, Policy 3.C.2.6 speaks to expansion of Primary Intensification Areas and Secondary Intensification Areas. Expansion of Secondary Intensification Areas may be permitted through the review of a PJR that justifies the expansion is warranted, desirable and appropriate. However, Neighbourhood Node does not permit Institutional land use designation. The addition of a Community Node (including the change of a Neighbourhood Node) is not supported outside of a comprehensive review. At this time, I believe a site specific to allow institutional land use designation within the existing urban structure should be okay and any change to the urban structure should be undertaken during comprehensive review of the OP. Regards, Gaurang Khandelwal (he/him), MA, MCIP, RPP Planner (Policy) I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7611 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 claurang. khandelwalCabkitchener.ca A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 477 of 668 From: BISKABORN, Brad <Brad.Biskaborn@canadapost.postescanada.ca> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:12 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation of Full Site Plan for 20 Woolner Trail - SP23/049/W/TS Hi Tim, This school development would receive their mail from a community mailbox. There is an existing mailbox site at the side of 145 Upper Mercer St, which would most likely be used for this school to collect their mail. If you have any questions let me know. Thank -you. Regards, Brad Biskaborn Delivery Services Officer / CANADA POST 955 Highbury Ave N. London ON, N5Y 1A3 519-495-5373 A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 478 of 668 From: circulations@wsp.com <circulations@wsp.com> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 2:34 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@Icitchener.ca> Subject: Site Plan Application (SP23/049/W/TS); 20 Woolner Tr., Kitchener 2023-06-26 Tim Seyler Kitchener Attention: Tim Seyler Re: Site Plan Application (SP23/049/W/TS); 20 Woolner Tr., Kitchener; Your File No. SP23/049/W/TS To Whom this May Concern, We have reviewed the circulation regarding the above noted application. The following paragraphs are to be included as a condition of approval: "The Owner acknowledges and agrees to convey any easement(s) as deemed necessary by Bell Canada to service this new development. The Owner further agrees and acknowledges to convey such easements at no cost to Bell Canada. The Owner agrees that should any conflict arise with existing Bell Canada facilities where a current and valid easement exists within the subject area, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of any such facilities or easements at their own cost." Upon receipt of this comment letter, the Owner is to provide Bell Canada with servicing plans/CUP at their earliest convenience to planninganddevelopment@bell.ca to confirm the provision of communication/telecommunication infrastructure needed to service the development. It shall be noted that it is the responsibility of the Owner to provide entrance/service duct(s) from Bell Canada's existing network infrastructure to service this development. In the event that no such network infrastructure exists, in accordance with the Bell Canada Act, the Owner may be required to pay for the extension of such network infrastructure. If the Owner elects not to pay for the above noted connection, Bell Canada may decide not to provide service to this development. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 479 of 668 To ensure that we are able to continue to actively participate in the planning process and provide detailed provisioning comments, we note that we would be pleased to receive circulations on all applications received by the Municipality and/or recirculations. We note that WSP operates Bell Canada's development tracking system, which includes the intake and processing of municipal circulations. However, all responses to circulations and requests for information, such as requests for clearance, will come directly from Bell Canada, and not from WSP. WSP is not responsible for the provision of comments or other responses. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Juan Corvalan Senior Manager - Municipal Liaison Email: planninganddevelopment@bell.ca A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 480 of 668 �,,nd It Administration Centre: 400 C:lyde Road, PC), Box /29 C cvnhridape, C)Id I`d 113 `M6 Ph4' in(.'k:'k P) 62 1 2/0 1 Tod@ free( 14('56 (.)C)U 4/,,.12 Fax;:,11) 021 4,S44 wwwgrandriver.ca Go n July 13, 2023 Tim Seyler Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener ON N2G 4V6 tim.seyler(a)kitchener.ca Re: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/01 1 /W/TS Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS Site Plan Application SP23/049/W/TS 20 Woolner Trail, Kitchener Waterloo Catholic District School Board Dear Mr. Seyler, Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff have reviewed the above -noted application for a new secondary school. Recommendation We recommend deferring a decision on these applications until issues with the GRCA's Land Management Division and the proposed stormwater management are resolved. Documents Reviewed by Staff Staff have reviewed the functional servicing report (Lanhack Consultants, March 2023) and grading plans (Lanhack Consultants, revised March 24, 2023) submitted with this application. This follows our April 21, 2022 pre -consultation comments. Page 1 of 2 C ri'',) e i, oi,, r,,rv,'aIirraa ()rar arn:a, rprr s,,rlirar i r i o's 36 Cori,'errtirrra A i C, I i o r i r i t-, ih'ie aC,rrri(J A Canadian 4leric�,r e River Page 481 of 668 GRCA Comments The GRCA has reviewed this application under Ontario Regulation 686/21, acting on behalf of the Province regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020), as well as in accordance with Ontario Regulation 150/06 and GRCA's Board approved policies. Information currently available at our office indicates that the subject lands contain the Grand River floodplain. We have no concerns in principle with the development from a regulatory perspective. However, the site is adjacent to GRCA's Woolner Flats property, and is on a former portion of the property divested to the applicant. The functional servicing proposes discharging stormwater to a sediment basin (possibly established for construction of Fairway Road North over the Grand River), which would then flow overland towards the existing drainage channel. It is my understanding that a) this may not be to a satisfactory engineering standard, and b) may not be congruent with previous property agreements with the GRCA. We recommend that the applications are deferred so the applicant can hold further discussions with our Land Management Division, and ensure the proposed stormwater management for the site is in keeping with previous agreements. The applicant previously paid a fee for our comments on a previous consent application, and no additional fees are required for these applications. A separate fee will be required for a GRCA permit, if applicable. We trust this information is of assistance. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Ron Gasparetto, Manager of Conservation Lands, directly at 519-621-2763 ext. 2207 or rgasparettoCD.grand river. ca. Sincerely, Trevor Heywood Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority cc: Ron Gasparetto, GRCA Carrie Musselman, City of Kitchener Page 2 of 2 Page 482 of 668 From: M Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:26 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: M B ruth.jane99 Subject: Neighbourhood Meeting of Aug. 15/23 Tim, I would like to say that my wife and I thoroughly enjoyed last night's zoom meeting of the proposed development of the new school in our neighbourhood. We had brought up the question last night about possibly making parking on Woolner Woods, Upper Mercer, and Lower Mercer one side only from two sided parking at present. I had brought this matter up with Councillor Dave Schnider a year ago to no avail. I will attach that email at the end of this email. Our concern is although we agree with the proposed entrances and exits as presented last evening, if the (30) school buses enter the roundabout at Fairway onto Wooler and then enter the designated school bus entrance, it will be a sharp turn into the parking lot. The easiest access to this lot would be down Upper or Lower Mercer as there would be no sharp turn into the lot. At present during the year there is parking allowed on both sides of these 3 roads. Also at present it is impossible for 2 vehicles to pass each other in opposite directions when there are vehicles parked across from each other and this is the case almost daily during the spring, summer, snd fall when there are no night time parking bans in effect. If the school bus drivers decide to use Upper and Lower Mercer to access the parking lot, there will be accidents waiting to happen from vehicles parked on both sides of the street and people backing out of their driveways unable to see the school bus. There are also 3 mailboxes on these streets. I have seen the letter carrier have to park in a lane of traffic for the 10 or 15 minutes it takes to fill the boxes. It is unsafe for the letter carrier as well as anyone driving by in this situation. I do realize that there is a 3 hour restriction for parking during the weekdays. Travelling these streets either on foot or in a vehicle I have not noticed a ticket on any vehicle and I have seen vehicles parked for 2 or 3 days without moving. Below are excerpts from my emails with Dave Schnider from June 2022: Dave, The reason for my email today is that I was talking to our postal carrier this morning and wondered why it took him 20 minutes to go the distance of 2 community mailboxes. I know him so I was just joking but his response wasn't a joke. He said at the box on Upper Mercer, cars completely block in the mailbox and also park on the other side of the road and he has to double park for 10-15 minutes. This makes it very hard to manoeuvre Page 483 of 668 around and I have had to do it many days. The same thing happens to a lesser extent at the mailbox on Lower Mercer because vehicles just block the mailbox but are not parked on the other side of the street. I have mentioned this to you before about parking on both sides of Upper Mercer because it is always full of vehicles, usually on both sides of the road. At that time you had mentioned that there wasn't enough traffic to warrant no parking on one side. This is a problem all summer. I have no idea where they park all winter. Anyway, is there any chance of no parking signs going up on either side of the community mailboxes on both of these streets? I also thought there was only 3 hour parking allowed throughout the day. Many move but many sit there all day or for days. Thanks for reading this, Mike Brown Mike, I'll check with our traffic department about the possibility of No Parking signs around the mailboxes. Any change like this would involve a survey of affected households. No Parking restrictions are usually done for safety reasons. It's been my experience that most residents don't want to lose on street parking spaces. I'll also connect with our Bylaw Department because you're right, it's a 3 hour parking limit. I can ask that they try to patrol this area a little more. I'll get back to you. I've copied my assistant Elizabeth Leacock on this reply so there is a record of your concerns. She may also assist me with assisting you. All the best, Mike Dave Tim, Thanks for taking the time to read this. Regards, Mike & Ruth Brown Page 484 of 668 From: Karen Nicole Morris Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 1:34 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Kitchener development at 20 Woolner Trail Hi Tim, I received the notice regarding the 20 Wooler Trail proposal. I understand the need for more schools in the area, but I have concerns for this location. We see deer and foxes often in this area frequently. It's home and food supply for many critters. It's a really nice area to walk around for access to the trails. The traffic along Fairway Rd is concerning. There is congestion during rush hours. A lot of cars speed along Fairway, including in the roundabout at Wooler Trail/Old Zeller/Fairway. I walk and cross here often. It's pretty dangerous. Some people don't yield to pedestrians. I would be extremely concerned for kids safety there. Thank you for your consideration. Karen Morris From: Guy P Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 3:05 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Comments regarding proposed development at 20 Woolner Trail in Kitchener Hello, I was extremely surprised to find out another school was planned to be built on Fairway Road at the Woolner Trail roundabout. I just hope the lessons learned from the problems still ongoing around Chicopee Hills P.S. regarding student road safety, traffic congestion and access to the school are taken into consideration BEFORE approval of this project. With the 3 schools so close to each other and the amount of traffic brought into the area, in addition to the extremely busy Fairway Road and Page 485 of 668 roundabout, you are looking at a traffic disaster far worse than the situation being ignored right now around Chicopee Hills. It's only a matter of time before a tragedy happens there. Feel free to look up some of the articles already done by local media about the problem if you need more information. Sincerely, Guy An area resident From: Webb -Owen, Kim Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 10:17 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Andrew & Kim Subject: Proposed Development - 20 Woolner Trail Good Friday Morning! I hope this finds you well and having a good day. My husband and I live at and are in receipt of the notice of a proposed school being developed at Woolner/Fairway. We would like to voice our concerns and objection to this build as follows: 1) Is proposed area not a flood plain? 2) Excessive amount of traffic at this roundabout. Already a congested area morning and night. The area has already increased in population with resident properties and traffic due to building the bridge over the river. 3) Concerns of roundabout and students walking — safety concern and again the congestion for trying to get out of the neighbourhood for residents trying to get to work during same hours. 4) Three schools in close proximity. 5) Protected area behind Upper Mercer (Forested area). Students walking in this protected area. Concern of cigarettes being dropped and not butted out and potential fires. Concern of students having easy access to trespass on personal residents. Page 486 of 668 6) Wildlife already being forced to smaller area due to residential area built. Forcing wildlife out of an area that they roam. 7) Students having such close proximity to water. 8) Airport noise disruptive to classes. We will be participating in the Virtual Call on August 15. Thank you for your time and attention to our concerns. Kind regards, Andrew and Kim Owen -----Original Message ----- From: joshdaws Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:13 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@I<itchener.ca> Subject: Re: RE: Feedback: 20 woolner trail construction [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Hi Tim, Thanks for responding. I did indeed take a look through all the reports and saw that they had to project the traffic numbers as it was measured during "the Covid times'. My specific concern is more that typically in the morning/evening the roundabout is significantly busy (even outside of a school hours). I have seen a buildup of traffic on some mornings. Given that traffic will have to turn left to get into the driveway of the school, I can see many parents/busses/other vehicles trying to shortcut and travel down upper/lower Mercer so that it is a turn right thus creating a buildup of traffic. Given that there are two +/-600ppl schools already, adding a 1400ppl school will essentially double the traffic when at capacity. Thanks again! I appreciate the time. Page 487 of 668 Josh On 2023-07-31 at 3:12 PM, Tim Seyler wrote: Hi Josh, Thank you for your comments. The applicant has prepared a transportation impact brief that is currently being reviewed by the City and Region's transportation staff. Their comments will be included in a recommendation report to council, as will yours. I have also added you to the circulation list so you can receive further updates on this application. Please let me know if you have further questions. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca -----Original Message ----- From: joshdaws Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:32 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Feedback: 20 woolner trail construction [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification j Hi there, Just wanted to quickly mention that I am concerned about the added traffic on upper Mercer St if the entrance is on woolner trail for the pickup/drop off. Whilst I am not generally opposed to the construction of the school itself. I am not necessarily in favor of the entrance on woolner trail as it is going to add a ton of extra traffic. Especially in conjunction with the 2 other schools in the area. I just wanted to mention this as a concern. Thanks Josh -----Original Message ----- From: John Hagey_ Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 3:25 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: School beside river Tim Thank you As is the case with relying on yesterdays models for layout of flood plains, we will be caught facing a disaster that we could have avoided. We have seen , and listened to planners around the country trying to cover there mistakes with " well this is something we have never seen before ". New models are required now. History says whatever can happen will happen. John > On Jul 31, 2023, at 3:09 PM, Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> wrote: > Hi John, > Thank you for your comments. I wanted to let you know that the GRCA is also being consulted on this project and from their records the location for the school is outside of the floodplain limits. Their comments will be included in a recommendation report to council, as will yours. I have also added you to the circulation list so you can receive further updates on this application. > Thanks, > Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP > Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener > 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca > -----Original Message----- • From: John Hagey > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 7:40 PM > To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchen er.ca> > Subject: School beside river > [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] > Tim > It's a flood plain, Tim! > You are too young to remember Hurricane Hazel, but that whole area was under water! > The engineering done to mitigate flooding issues is not nearly enough. > Use your common sense! Do not put anything there. > This is simply hard to imagine that no lessons have been learned. > John > Sent from my iPhone Page 489 of 668 From: rgiesle Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 3:45 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; Dave Schnider <Dave.Schnider@kitchener.ca>; kbarisdale@gspgroup.ca; Jennifer.Passy@wcdsb.ca; S vanDeKeere <SvanDeKeere@regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail Neighbourhood Meeting - OPEN CALL FOR COMMENTS Dear IM r,. Seyleir, This letter is sent to you in furtherance to the open call for comments from the neighbourhood regarding the proposed Elementary and Secondary School development for the block of land entitled 20 Woolner Trail. Residents from Woolner Trail, including the occupants of the Woolner Heritage Farm at 80 Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street met when we first received the invitation to discuss our thoughts and understand our appeal rights. At this point there had already been a sharing of supporting documents from representatives of the Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) to some select residents, which was very helpful to the group of residents in that they could make themselves familiar with the plans and reports that had already been produced. After familiarizing ourselves with the plans and reports we requested and have since undertaken a meeting with Board representatives to further discuss concerns from the residents regarding the impact of this development on our community. Accordingly, please find two attachments to this letter. Attachment 1 provides bullet points of our concerns followed by proposed amendments to the Planning Justification Report, including rational and supporting documentation from the Grand River South Community Plan. Attachment 2 is a list of the residents who have participated and support the thoughts and comments detailed in Attachment 1. We understand and appreciate that there is a process to be followed, with regards to community involvement in planning and development of major projects. We also appreciate that the City of Kitchener is exceeding provincial requirements by providing access to these key documents at this time in the process. However, the residents reserve the right to continue to suggest amendments to the existing plans and request access to City of Kitchener and Regional Planning staff prior to the City Council providing any final approval to the plan. Understanding Page 490 of 668 our appeal rights is important, however, involvement in open and honest communication, proposing amendments, having impactful discussions, and raising concerns prior to final decision-making is far more important to the residents at this time in the process. To that end we will continue to have meetings with WCDSB representatives. As well, we will be requesting meetings with Councilor Dave Schnider, our Ward 2 council representative, and through him, members of the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo staff who can provide details of the transportation and traffic studies for Fairway Road, including Woolner Trail and Eden Oak Trail. As well we would be very interested in ensuring that Open Houses with the rest of the Ward 2 residents will be undertaken prior to any final decision on this project, as this major development will impact us all. Please confirm receipt of this letter. Respectfully submitted on Jully 28, 2023 @ 16„60, Ron GiesIler, lin care of the residents of Woollner IFiraiill, Upper and Il,,,,,oweir Ileirceir Streets (see Attachment 2) cc List of residents et al Attachment 2 Attachment 1 Residents of Upper Mercer, Lower Mercer and Woolner Trail have had an opportunity to speak with representatives of the Waterloo Separate School Board regarding the Proposed Development of 20 Wooler Trail. The residents have reviewed all documentation, including the School Board's Planning Justification Report, and are most concerned in seeking resolution and clarification around the following areas of focus: • Traffic to and from the community o Building of a second roundabout on Fairway Rd N at Eden Oak Trail to provide full access to the Site, mitigating overflow traffic into the existing residential community o Prevention of parking and speeding on Woolner Trail, Upper and Lower Mercer streets o Reduction of speed limit on Fairway Road N ■ 40 km while school is in session, 60 km otherwise ■ Controlled by speed indicator flashing lights • Access to and from Woolner Trail with regards to the new Site as well as the Grand River, Boat Launch, Trans Canada Trail, Walter Bean and community trails for walking, hiking, biking, paddling. o Pedestrian access ■ Pedestrian crossing guards at peak times ■ Pedestrian Flashing crossing indicators at non -peak times Page 491 of 668 o Vehicular access to and from the Site on Woolner Trail be restricted to Left -in only via the proposed South driveway and Right -out only via the proposed North driveway o Parking —the prevention of Woolner Trail (as well as Upper and Lower Mercer Streets) from becoming secondary parking for the Site. o Bicycle traffic — bike lanes (as detailed in Section 8.4 of the Grand River South Community Plan [GRSCP]) should be a major consideration on Fairway road for student egress to and from the Site as well as to accommodate other community bicycle traffic Security and Safety o Fencing of appropriate height and material o Residential access/ability to contact Site Security Force Noise and lighting o Increased Foliage to maintain and enhance sound barrier to the Woolner Heritage Farm and adjacent residential areas o Mitigate impact on wildlife in the adjacent Natural Heritage System (Section 1.0 of GRSCP) a Cultural, environmental and wildlife concerns o Discussions with/Involvement of Indigenous Peoples in development of the Site Plan o Potential of undertaking an Endangered Species Study o Potential of undertaking an Archeological Study The following information is a list of potential changes geared towards a collective compromise of the Planning Justification Report for 20 Woolner Trail, Waterloo Catholic District School Board for the City of Kitchener, May 2023. 1.1 Proposed amendments to the Overview Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "Development includes two full access driveways along Woolner Trail, and one right- in/right-out access along Fairway Road." CHANGE TO: "Development includes one full access driveway via a new roundabout along Fairway Road North at Eden Oak Trail, one left -in (south) for all inbound traffic including school busses and one right - out (north) for traffic exiting Woolner Trail bound for the Fairway Road/Old Zeller roundabout" 2.1 Site Location and Description Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "The Site is generally bound by Fairway Road North to the north and east, the former Woolner Farm (80 Woolner Trail) to the south, and Woolner Trail to the east." CHANGE TO: The Site is generally bound by Fairway Road North to the north and east, the Heritage Woolner Farm site (80 Woolner Trail) to the south, and Woolner Trail to the east." 2.2 Site Context and Surrounding Uses Page 492 of 668 EXISTING TEXT: "The Site is located on the periphery of an existing residential neighbourhood. As identified on Figure 2, the Site is surrounded by existing low rise residential uses to the north (on the north side of Fairway Road) and to the west (west of Woolner Trail)." CHANGE TO: "The Site is located directly adjacent (South Boundary) to the existing Heritage Farm Site designated as 80 Woolner Trail. The Site is located on the periphery of an existing residential neighbourhood. As identified on Figure 2, the Site is surrounded by existing low rise residential uses to the north (on the north side of Fairway Road) and to the west (west of Woolner Trail)." 3. Proposed Development Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "The Proposed Development will include two access driveways on Woolner Trail. The southern driveway will provide for full movement access to the south parking lot as well as the bus lay- by area identified along the western property line, adjacent to Woolner Trail. The second driveway access on Woolner Trail provides for the exiting of school buses as well as vehicular access to a small parking lot located at the northwest corner of the Site and proposed parking area adjacent to the Fairway Road North frontage. The Proposed Development also includes a right-in/right-out driveway from Fairway Road North, providing vehicular access only to on-site parking areas." CHANGE TO: "The Proposed Development will include two access driveways on Woolner Trail. The southern driveway will provide a left -in only access for all vehicular traffic for access to the south parking lot as well as the bus lay-by area identified along the western property line, adjacent to Woolner Trail. The second driveway will be restricted to right -out exit only of school buses as well as vehicles exiting from the south parking lot as well as a small parking lot located at the northwest corner of the Site and proposed parking area adjacent to the Fairway Road North frontage. The Proposed Development also includes a full access driveway from Fairway Road North, providing vehicular access to on-site parking areas and the proposed sports field and associated facilities. This full access driveway will provide a school bus overflow route to the Site where school busses can wait for available spaces in the bus lay-by area traffic during peak drop-off and pick-up times. It will also provide a primary means for car traffic to enter and exit the Site. This will be facilitated by a new roundabout to include access to Eden Oak Trail and accommodated by the newly proposed 40 km speed limit while school is in session and 60 km otherwise. This will be controlled by flashing lights and speed cameras as are already in use in other school areas in Kitchener and Cambridge." N B: As Noted in Section 4.1 (from 3.5 of the Woolner — Fairway — Heritage Impact Assessment), "Based on the nature of the development and its proximity to the adjacent heritage property, it is recommended that a fence be provided within the south and west yards of the subject property, adjacent to 80 Woolner Trail. If it is proposed on the property line, approval by the City will be required as per section 1.9b and 1.10 of the conservation agreement and heritage permit requirements. Further consultation with the City would be required to obtain a full copy of the easement agreement. A tree and vegetation inventory may be required only if a fence is proposed on the shared property line with the property at 80 Woolner Trail. Alternately, we can support the construction of a fence within the subject property, away from the shared property line. In this approach, the fence would be sufficiently screened from Page 493 of 668 view and provide protection, therefore there are no heritage impact concerns. The fence would need to comply to the City's fence by law, in matters such as height. Details regarding the fence design should be deferred to the Site Plan Approval stage, to be considered together with other Site Plan requirements and the applicable municipal fence by-law." It is Proposed that, fencing should consist of an 8 foot anti -climb fence using a building material , other than wood, to increase the longevity and durability of the structure. Rational: Students or other visitors to the school/sports field, who may leave the Site and trespass onto the Heritage Farm property, poses a liability to the Woolner family making them potentially vulnerable to property damage and/or personal injury. The School Board is only insured for accidents on school property so the Woolner family would be left liable for any incidents that occur on their farm property. This potential for liability does not currently exist and only exists if the development is approved and completed. A fence of sufficient deterrent protects both the Waterloo Regional School Board and the Woolner Family from potential liability. When deciding on the appropriate building material for the fence it is important to consider the wildlife. For example, Deer can jump up to a height of about a 6ft fence ...and chain link fences pose a hazard to the deer due to their legs getting caught in the fence as they jump. It is further proposed that, security of the Site and Heritage Woolner Farm would be improved by the presence of a 24/7 security patrol, as is currently in place for the Chicopee Hills School property (corner of Lackner Blvd and Fairway Rd N) or by the installation of a security system, possibly tied to the Site, that would provide instant notification of a breach of Site along the borders of the Woolner Heritage Farm. As Noted in Section 4.1 (from 3.5 of the Woolner — Fairway — Heritage Impact Assessment), "It is recommended that a lighting plan be reviewed at the site plan stage to ensure no undue impact to the adjacent heritage property. Providing adequate lighting also has the potential to provide an added means of security surrounding the property." It is proposed that, a sound/light barrier consist of the planting of Thuja Green Giant (or similar) trees in front of the fencing. Rational: The Heritage Woolner Farm is inhabited by the Woolner Family. Thuja Green Giant is a type of cedar that is considered to be an excellent screening conifer. Sound and bright lights will be expected to project outwards from the proposed sports field. The sport field is not only intended for Site activities but is also proposed to be leased out for "extra -Site" activities, potentially on weekends and in the evenings after the Site activities have ceased. The planting of this or similar foliage will provide the Woolner Family with some peace and provide some separation and barrier from the potential sound and light "noise" emanating from the sports field. When deciding on the type of lighting and the potential use of the sport field, certain considerations should be kept in the forefront. The sport field is proposed to be built in an area adjacent to the Grand River. This area is currently inhabited by wildlife, some of which is nocturnal. Evening activities undertaken at the sport field should be limited to a reasonable curfew to ensure that local inhabitants, wildlife and human, are not unduly disturbed by bright lights and sound "noise". Page 494 of 668 As noted in the section 4.2, "Traffic travelling to the site may infiltrate the existing residential neighbourhood to the west of the Site. The Transportation Study notes that Upper Mercer Street currently carries between 300 and 1,000 vehicles a day, whereas local roads are typically designed to carry over 2,000 vehicles a day. It is estimated that the Proposed Development will add less than 300 vehicle trips a day on Upper Mercer Street." It is proposed that, while traffic travelling to the site may infiltrate the existing residential neighbourhood to the west of the site, the enclosed proposed changes to the South and North Woolner Trail driveways to the Site will better direct flow to and from the Site via Fairway Road with limited use of Woolner Trail. The South driveway limited to left -in and the North driveway limited to right -out directs any traffic, using these points of entry and departure, efficiently to and from the existing roundabout at Fairway Road, Woolner Trail and Zeller Drive. It is already proposed that this roundabout be enlarged to accommodate the expected increase in traffic for this section of Woolner Trail. The proposed new roundabout on Fairway Road at Eden Oak Trail will greatly increase access to the Site for proposed "extra -Site" use of the sports field and its amenities as well as improve the daily access for school busses and vehicular traffic during peak drop-off and pick-up periods. The Fairway Road driveway should be designated as the primary school bus entrance as it provides for efficient access to the Site with bus loading and unloading occurring safely on Site property. It is further proposed that, the development of the Site should not negatively impact parking in either Lower Mercer, Upper Mercer or Woolner Trail. While a traffic impact study has been conducted it is not clear to the residents living on these neighbourhoods how the City of Kitchener plans to prevent these residential streets from becoming over -flow parking for the new Site. The following contains considerations for Site Planning lifted from the current Grand River South Community Plan. Highlighted areas have significant impact with regard to Site Plan approval. 1.0 "The area contains a diverse Natural Heritage System, including the Grand River and its floodplain, Lackner Woods and Natchez Hills Environmentally Sensitive Policy Areas, Idlewood Creek, Chicopee Creek, and the adjacent Chicopee Park. The Grand River South Community Plan proposes that such natural areas be linked by a comprehensive and continuous open space network, and integrated within the future residential community in a sustainable manner." 3.5 "That new development give consideration to the creation and enhancement of views and vistas through road layout, use of natural topography, preservation of environmental features, and the strategic siting of new community landmarks. Views of the Grand River shall be of particular importance." 7.1 "That the Community Plan recognize, and encourage public ownership of, the following significant natural resources comprising the Community's Natural Heritage System: Lackner Woods and Natchez Hills Environmentally Sensitive Policy Areas (ESPAs), flood plain and valley lands associated with the Grand River, Idlewood Creek and Chicopee Creek, and the upland woodlot at the southwest corner of Zeller Drive and Woolner Drive (i.e. the Fung Woodlot)." Page 495 of 668 7.4 "That upland forest areas, excluding required wetland buffer areas, which are designated within the City of Kitchener Municipal Plan for urban development but designated on the Community Plan Land Use Plan as Open Space, shall be considered eligible as part of the required parkland dedication provided all active park areas, as shown on the Land Use Plan, can be satisfied through the required parkland dedication for each respective subdivision. If all required parkland dedication is utilized for active parks, public acquisition of such lands by other means shall be encouraged. This policy shall apply to those portions of the Fung woodlot recommended for retention and protection in the Ecoplans Woodlot Analysis (January 1997), and including the kame feature." 7.8 "That, having given serious consideration to an analysis of the effects of peak aircraft noise levels on proposed athletic fields, a district park/district sports field of approximately 12 hectares be located on lands within the area above 30 NEF/NEP as shown on the Land Use Plan. The District Park shall include active, possibly lighted, sports fields for organized sports, including associated parking areas, and may include playground equipment for neighbourhood park purposes. Camping grounds shall not be permitted above the approved 30 NEF/NEP contour. The District Park shall be a key access point to the Grand River Corridor." 7.12 "That a community trail network be established, as shown conceptually on the Land Use Plan, in order to provide continuous open space linkages between Open Space areas designated on the Land Use Plan, provide recreational opportunities and visual amenities for the public, and to provide habitat and suitable movement corridors for small wildlife. These linkages shall, where feasible, make use of hedgerows, storm water management areas, parks and school sites. The community trail network should be linked to the on -road sections of the bikeway network as shown on Schedule 3." 8.4 "That Fairway Road, east of Lackner Boulevard, be recognized as Regional Road No. 53 and designated as a Primary Arterial Road with a right-of-way of 35 metres, and shall provide on -road bicycle lanes as recommended in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo Bicycle Master Plan and the City of Kitchener Bikeway Study." 8.5 "That the alignment of Fairway Road, east of a point 150 metres west of Zeller Drive, be determined by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo through the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act." 8.17 "That the cost of primary walk links, including those shown on the Land Use Plan, and which may include pedestrian bridges, providing direct links from residential areas to schools, parks, transit routes and commercial lands, be funded by the development proponent. To the extent that such links function as a community trail, a portion of the cost may be funded by development charges. Additional primary links may be identified through the subdivision review process." 11.4 "That development on or adjacent to property designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act or listed on the municipal data base of heritage resources be subject to Policies 5.3.14 and 5.3.15 of the City of Kitchener Municipal Plan. If required, a Heritage Impact Assessment shall be approved prior to or concurrent with the granting of draft plan approval in conformity with the City's process dealing with the conservation of heritage resources within the plan of subdivision process. Page 496 of 668 The Heritage Impact Assessment shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Guidelines and will identify a recommended strategy for the conservation of the heritage resource." Attachment 2 Residents of Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street & Lower Mercer Street in support of this letter and attachments 1] Dale Woolner 2] Bar Jones 3] Judy Bloomfield 4] Nancy Rotozinski 5] Ron Giesler 6] Sharon Giesler 7] Carolyn McCallum 8] Rosemary Off 9] Sheila Bookjans 10] Fernanda Pires 11] Judy Beauchamp 12] Gary&Lucy Minter 13] Tony&Elaine Oakman 14] Paul Kristensen 15] Amanda Green 16] Sandy Pastway 17]April Manahan 18] Dave&Annette Strobel 19] Karen Boa 20] Sonya Hamilton 21] Jerry Kloepfer 22] Guy Pink 23] Larry Kotseff 24] Dave&Renate Foster 25] Carol&Len Simpson 26] Tonya Lambkin Page 497 of 668 From: Ikotseff Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:00 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchen er.ca> Cc: Ron Giesler David Foste Dale Woolner Dave Schnider <Dave.Schnider@kitchener.ca>; mhenderson@regionofwaterloo.ca Subject: WCDSB Proposal at 20 Woolner Trail Good morning Tim, Thanks to you and your team for hosting last night's public meeting regarding the WCDSB proposal at 20 Woolner Trail. It provided the opportunity for members of our community to express their concerns regarding the significant impacts of the proposal on our neighbourhood. In this regard and further to Mr. Giesler's previous email to you, please let us know when a meeting will be arranged with staff at the city and the region to discuss our concerns. In particular, we feel that additional options for primary access to the proposed school site need to be examined along Fairway Road. In addition, we would appreciate receiving a list of those in attendance at last night's public meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Regards, Larry Kotseff From: Ron Giesler Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 2:05 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchen er.ca>; 'LARRY KOTSEFF Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Thanks very much Tim, we appreciate you getting back to us and we will see you next Thursday. Page 498 of 668 Get Outlook for iOS From: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 1:24:07 PM To: 'Ron Giesler' 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Hi Ron and Larry, Thanks again for the conversation this morning Ron, and I apologize for not getting back to you both earlier in the week. As per our conversation, I've arranged for City and Regional staff to meet you out on site at gam next Thursday (21ST). We can meet at the intersection of Woolner Tr. And Upper Mercer to make an easy reference point, and then we can discuss the site by walking up Woolner. I hope that works for both of you and feel free to invite any other resident that has some concerns. I did mention to Ron that I didn't want this to be a group of 30-50 people, so if we can keep it limited that would be great. I've also reached out to a few other residents and Councilor Schnider as well. If anything comes up between now and then I will let you know, and I hope you would do the same for me. I look forward to our discussion then. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca From: Ron Giesler Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:32:02 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Tim, thank you for your previous message as well as this follow up message inviting us to a sit down with the transportation staff regarding the proposed development at 20 Woolner Trail. After conferring with Larry we are prepared to meet with you and the appropriate staff on the following dates: Sept.12 AM or PM Sept.13 AM Page 499 of 668 Sept. 14 AM Sept.21 AM Get Outlook for iOS From: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:25:46 AM To: 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Larry and Ron, Hope you both had a nice weekend. I just wanted to follow up on my email below requesting some times that would work for you so that we can have an on site meeting with transportation staff. If you could please let me know this week that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler(c@kitchener.ca From: Tim Seyler Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 11:11 AM To: 'LARRY KOTSEFF' I Subject: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Larry and Ron, I hope you both are having a good week. I've been in discussion with City and Regional Transportation staff and we are able to have an on site meeting with you in the forthcoming days to discuss the development at 20 Woolner Tr. I wanted to reach out to both of you to see what day would work best and what time you would like the meeting to be at. If you could send me a few dates that you would be available, then I will be able to coordinate with the members of the Applicant team, City staff and Regional staff so that we can have a thorough discussion. Hopefully through these discussions we can have some meaningful conversations that result in some solutions to the issues that you for see. Once we have the specific date, we will also be able to invite other residents, but I thought it would be easier to coordinate first with the two of you. If you could let me know a few dates and times by the end of the week that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Page 500 of 668 Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca -----Original Message ----- From: Judy Broomfield Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 2:33 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail -August 15th Presentation [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Thanks Tim, much appreciated. > On Aug 22, 2023, at 2:15 PM, Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> wrote: > Hi Judy, > Thanks for the email. The slides and the link to the video are now all online, and you can click the link below to access it. https://can0l.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapp2.kitchener.ca%2FAppDocs/ 2FOpen Data%2FAMANDADataSets%2FSupporting Documents List 684835.pdf&data=05%7C01%7CTi m.Seyler%40kitchener.ca%7Ce72e147adef24736a2c208dba33e3b4c%7Cc703d79153f643a59255622eb3 3alb0b%7C0%7C0%7C638283259904135594%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWljoiMC4wLiAwMDA iLCJQljoiV2luMzliLCJBTil6lklhaWwiLCJXVC16Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yVD61J2kwmloXh9B I<nyVN5wG4gkTeNgepXhz%2B%2BdM 10s%3D&reserved=0 > If you have any other questions, please feel free to reach out. > Thanks, > Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP > Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener > 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca > -----Original Message----- * From: Judy Broomfield > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 3:19 PM > To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchen er.ca> Page 501 of 668 > Subject: 20 Woolner Trail - August 15th Presentation > [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] > Tim, could you please advise when a copy of the August 15th Presentation related to 20 Woolner Trail will be made available on-line ? > Judy Broomfield From: Nasha Kroutil Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 9:59 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: School development Fairway & Woolner Hi Tim, I am a resident of the nearby area. Just interested to see more of the plans/details of the school that's expected to go in the subject area between Fairway Road and Woolner Crt. 1. Can you share concept drawings 2. What type of school is planned to go there? 3. How big is the parking area expected to be? 4. Are any other businesses expected to go around the school? 5. Any traffic lights planned? 6. Walkways for children to cross? Thanks so much, Nasha Page 502 of 668 7 4 7 v Vol, on76 I,Fo-pt-i —do q i "0 r Saint John Pani 11 "'A . . . . , Proplosed Schoo� Locafloin . . . . .. ..... .. ..... ... .. m Legend Schoos ol v Roads P R�vers Ca f1"I", nadw, Martyrs (JK to Grade 6 and 7/8 directed to 7-12 EK Sohj Soho Saint John PaW 11 [JK to Grade 6 and 718 directed to 7-12 EK SchooQ L '4C RSt. Anne (K) [JK to Grade 8] . . . . . ...... St, Danel [JK to 6 and 718 Erected to 7-12 EK Schcoil .. . .. .. .. . . Nxrv" 711 St, Patnak [JK to Grade 8] Page 503 of 668 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Eric Schneider, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7843 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 2 DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO. October 2, 2023 DSD -2023-428 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/005/K/ES — Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/009/K/ES — 2934 King Street East — 2748244 Ontario Inc. RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA/23/005/K/ES for 2748244 Ontario Inc. requesting to add Specific Policy Area 68 to Map 5 — Specific Policy Areas of the Official Plan and to add Policy 15.D.12.68 to facilitate a mixed use development having 77 residential units and 1217 square metres of commercial space with a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.6, be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-428 as Attachment `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo for approval, and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/009/K/ES for 2748244 Ontario Inc. be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. 1', attached to Report DSD -2023-428 as Attachment `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the lands located at 2934 King Street East. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. • Community engagement included: o circulation of a preliminary notice to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; o installation of 2 large billboard notice signs on the property; o Neighbourhood Meeting held on August 24, 2023; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 504 of 668 o notice advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site, those who responded to the preliminary circulation; and those who attended the Neighbourhood Meeting; o notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 6, 2023. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Planning staff is recommending approval of the requested Official Plan Amendment to add Specific Policy Area 68 to Map 5 and Policy 15.D.12.68 to the text in the Official Plan to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.6. Planning Staff is recommending approval of the requested Zoning By-law Amendment Application to add Site Specific Provision (382) and a new Holding Provision 55H to the existing General Commercial (COM - 2) zone in Zoning By-law 2019-051 to permit an eleven (11) storey mixed-use development, having 1217 square metres of commercial floor area, with an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) and building height, reduced yard setbacks, an increase in the number of required parking spaces, prohibition on geothermal wells, and a Holding Provision to require a Record of Site Condition, and to implement a Detailed Stationary Noise Study. Staff are recommending that the applications be approved. The proposed redevelopment would replace and provide more than twice the existing commercial floor space (585 square metres existing, 1217 square metres proposed) as well as adding 77 dwelling units above the commercial floors. BACKGROUND: The City of Kitchener has received applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment from 2748244 Ontario Inc. for a development concept of an 11 -storey mixed-use building containing 77 dwelling units and 3 commercial units containing 1217 square metres of commercial floor space. The lands are within an `Urban Corridor' in the Urban Structure and designated `Commercial' in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. Site Context The subject lands are addressed as 2934 King Street East. The subject lands are an irregular shaped lot with frontage onto 3 streets: King Street East (Regional Road), Morgan Avenue, and Centreville Street. The subject lands have a lot area of 0.34 hectares with a frontage of approximately 49 metres on King Street East, 70 metres on Morgan Avenue, and 78 Metres on Centreville Street. The subject lands are currently developed with a one - storey commercial building consisting of convenience retail, restaurant, pharmacy, and other commercial uses, containing 585 square metres of commercial floor area There are no existing residential units on this property. A gas station was formerly on the subject lands. The surrounding neighbourhood contains a variety of uses including commercial uses primarily along King Street, including a 12 -storey hotel, and a mix of residential uses to the north of Centreville Street including townhomes, apartments, semi-detached and single detached dwellings. Page 505 of 668 c,< .. SUBJECT AREA 5 Figure 1 - Location Map: 2934 King Street East mom,„ 1*1 REPORT: The applicant is proposing to redevelop the subject lands with a 11 -storey mixed use building containing 77 dwelling units, 1217 square metres of commercial space on the first and second floors, two levels of underground parking, and a green roof on the 11 th floor. The proposed building is classified as a "Compact Point Tower" in the City's Tall Building Guidelines. Vehicular access is proposed on Morgan Avenue, with the existing driveways on King Street East and Centreville proposed to be closed. Seventeen (17) surface parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the building and 140 spaces within the two underground levels, for a total of 157 parking spaces. Page 506 of 668 Figure 2 — View of Subject Lands (intersection of King Street East and Morgan Avenue) Page 507 of 668 Figure 3 — Rendering of Proposed Building (Intersection of King Street East and Morgan Avenue) The proposed development includes 41 one -bedroom, 18 two-bedroom, and 18 three- bedroom units. Indoor amenity areas are proposed on the 2nd and 11th floors. The "tip" of the subject lands at the corner of Morgan and Centreville Street is proposed as a garden pavilion outdoor amenity area and landscaped space. Two outdoor amenity areas are also proposed on the rooftop of the second floor. Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and Page 508 of 668 (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. � 1 y W1 A- , � u un rou 4aAa 14 ,� ow�K � � nwcunwaen y iar o:ac ( rt AVON,y�� ..t._ ....� ....'. " � a4nrc ,i,mm 4, �.�z ar, ,rxirn a,r ti. e4�r�ixr a. ---- KING STREET EAST Figure 4: Concept Plan Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the Page 509 of 668 integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed use development includes one, two and three-bedroom units. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use development that is compatible with the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; Page 510 of 668 iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Built -Up Area in the ROP. The proposed development conforms to Section 2.F of the ROP as the proposed development supports the achievement of the minimum annual intensification targets within the delineated Built -Up Area. Growth is directed to the Built Up Area of the Region to make better use of infrastructure that can assist in transitioning the Region into an energy efficient, low carbon community. Furthermore, intensification within the Built -Up Area assists the gradual transition of existing neighbourhoods within the Region into 15 -minute neighbourhoods that are compact, well connected places that allow all people of all ages and abilities to access the needs for daily living within 15 minutes by walking, cycling or rolling. The Region of Waterloo have indicated they have no objections to the proposed application (Attachment `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas, Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within an Urban Corridor. The planned function of Urban Corridors is to provide for a range of retail and commercial uses and intensification opportunities that should be transit -supportive. Page 511 of 668 Land Use The subject lands are designated `Commercial" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Commercial designation permits a variety of commercial uses, as well as dwelling units up to a maximum FSR (Floor Space Ratio) of 2.0. The applicant is proposing to add a Special Policy Area to permit an increase in the FSR to 2.6. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision to ensure a Record of Site Condition is obtained and an Environmental Noise Study is implemented is being proposed. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for an Urban Corridor but also contributes to the vision for a more sustainable city. The compact building form and efficient use of land contribute to a sustainable method of redevelopment for the lands. Green roof and light colored rooftop are proposed to reduce solar heat absorption. Urban Design Policies: The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development satisfies these policies including: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief is acceptable and outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning regulations. Streetscape — The proposed building has been oriented with pedestrian access toward King Street East, the highest order frontage for the site. Vehicular access is provided from Morgan Avenue. The ground floor is proposed as commercial and lobby space, activating the ground floor. Safety — As with all developments that go through site plan approval, staff will ensure Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets emergency services policies. Safe vehicular movements for commercial vehicles and waste pick-up vehicles will also be evaluated. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a building that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned Page 512 of 668 surroundings. The proposed tower form is a Compact Point Tower, which typically will produce less adverse impacts (privacy, shadowing etc.) than a tower with a larger floor plate or a slab shape. An angular plane analysis demonstrates that the proposed scale and building height is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The vision for the scale and density for the site was taken from existing local cues, in particular the 12 -storey hotel building located across Morgan Avenue. Tower Design The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Point Tower" as the proposed tower floor plate is 736 square metres in area. The tower is situated to maximize separation from existing low-rise residential areas on Centreville Street. The tower portion of the building steps back from the podium. The relative height is similar to the existing 12 - storey hotel building across Morgan Avenue. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 -metre -tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape with an active use. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the requirements outlined in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. Wind control features will be required through the site plan application. Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower meets the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines and exceeds the off-site separation targets on the North and West sides. Page 513 of 668 Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to several bus stops, including Express Route 206. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications support a more dense residential development. The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the range of dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including one, two, and three-bedroom units. The wide range of units, in this location, will appeal to a variety of household needs and directly responds to the need for more housing during the current housing crisis. Official Plan Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment Application requests to retain the existing `Commercial' land use designation as shown on Map 3 — City of Kitchener Official Plan and amend Map 5 to add `Specific Policy Area 68'. Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Attachment "A". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment: The subject lands are currently zoned General Commercial (COM -2) in Zoning By-law 2019-051. Dwelling units, and a wide range of commercial uses are permitted on the subject lands. The applicant has requested an amendment to add Site Specific Provision (382) to the subject lands. Official Plan policies indicate that where special zoning regulations are requested for residential intensification or a redevelopment of lands, the overall impact of the site specific zoning regulations will consider compatibility with existing built form; appropriate Page 514 of 668 massing and setbacks that support and maintain streetscape and community character; appropriate buffering to mitigate adverse impacts, particularly with respect to privacy; avoidance of unacceptable adverse impacts by providing appropriate number of parking spaces and an appropriate landscaped/amenity area. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the requested Site Specific Provision: a) That the maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) for all uses shall be 2.6 The purpose of this regulation is to cap the Floor Space Ratio (FSR) and ensure development does not exceed the density presented in the concept plans. The requested increase is deemed appropriate as the site is well buffered from low rise residential areas, the proposed tower is similar in size to existing buildings nearby on the King Street corridor, and the proposed design achieves many principles of good urban design such as adequate tower separation, provision of balconies and outdoor amenity space, and activation of the street line. b) That the maximum building height be 45 metres, and 11 storeys. The maximum building height for a mixed-use building in the COM -2 zone is 25 metres, approximately 8 storeys. The applicant is requesting additional building height and has demonstrated that the site has adequate separation from the low rise residential lands, with no adjacent property lines abutting low rise areas. Staff are supportive of the requested building height. c) That the maximum parking rate for dwelling units is 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The applicant is requesting to exceed the maximum parking rate for dwelling units in the Zoning By-law. The intent of the regulation for maximum parking is to discourage large surface parking areas. The majority of parking (140 of 157 spaces) are located underground for the proposed development. Staff acknowledges that the streetscape and efficient use of the lands will not be compromised with the proposed parking rate as parking is proposed to be located underground. Another factor that contributes to a greater need for parking is the ratio of two-bedroom and three-bedroom units. The proposed development contains 18 two-bedroom and 18 three-bedroom units, representing 46% of the total units as `family sized'. These family sized units typically required a higher parking demand. d) The minimum front yard setback (King Street East) shall be 0 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. The purpose of this regulation is to regulate the building setback to address the street and provide an appropriate streetscape relationship with the proposed building. The proposed 0 metre setback is proposed for a 2 -storey podium portion of the building, whereas the tower portion of the main building will be set back approximately 6.5 metres from the front lot line. The Region of Waterloo right-of-way on King Street East is approximately 27 Page 515 of 668 metres wide, and there currently exists over 7 metres of right-of-way between the street line and the travelled portion of the road. e) The minimum rear yard setback (Centreville Street) shall be 3.5 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. The purpose of this regulation is to regulate the building setback to adjacent properties and provide for an adequate building setback for landscaping and amenity areas. The proposed 3.5 metre setback is represented by a 1 -storey garden pavilion building, whereas the tower portion of the main building will be set back approximately 19 metres from the rear lot line. Adequate landscaped area and amenity space is provided at grade at the "tip" of the site at the intersection of Centreville Street and Morgan Avenue. f) The minimum exterior yard setback (Morgan Avenue) shall be 2.5 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. The purpose of this regulation is to regulate the building setback to a street line. The proposed 2.5 metre setback is for the podium portion of the building, whereas the tower portion of the main building will be set back approximately 7 metres from the street line at Morgan Avenue. g) The minimum interior yard setback shall be 1.8 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. The purpose of this regulation is to regulate the building setback to adjacent properties and provide for an adequate building setback. The proposed 1.8 metre setback is for the 1-2 storey podium portion of the building, whereas the tower portion of the main building will be set back approximately 8 metres from the interior side lot line. The podium portion of the building is not expected to generate adverse impacts to the neighbouring commercial lands. h) That geothermal energy systems are prohibited on site. The purpose of this regulation is to protect sensitive groundwater areas. Due to potential for contamination on the subject lands, the Region of Waterloo requires a prohibition on geothermal energy on the subject lands. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 55H: Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to facilitate the implementation of the site specific provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the holding provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Page 516 of 668 Holdina Provision 55H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision be included as part of the Zoning By-law Amendment: A) `No residential use shall be permitted until such time as a Record of Site Condition is submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP). This Holding Provision shall not be removed until the Region of Waterloo is in receipt of a letter from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) advising that a Record of Site Condition has been completed to their satisfaction.' There are high environmental threats located on and adjacent to the subject lands in accordance with the Region's Threats Inventory Database (TID) due to past and current land uses. A Record of Site Condition (RSC) and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter shall be required in accordance with the Region's Implementation Guidelines. Until such time that the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter have been received by the Region, residential redevelopment of the site is not permitted. B) `That a Holding Provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses.' A noise study was submitted and reviewed as part of the subject application. Regional Staff have provided peer reviewed comments that will need to be addressed before the Holding Provision can be lifted. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application to add Site Specific Provision (382) and Holding Provision 55H represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a mixed-use development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, which will add visual interest at the street level, provide enhanced landscaping that will contribute to the streetscape, and which will appropriately accommodate on-site parking needs. Staff are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Attachment 'B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications was undertaken to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Attachment 'D' of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: Page 517 of 668 Planning Justification Report Prepared by: Evans Planning, April 2023 Urban Design Brief Prepared by: John G. Williams Architect, February 9, 2023 Architectural Package Prepared by: Keith Loffler McAlpine Architects, April 15, 2023 Tree Preservation Plan & Arborist Report Prepared by: Canopy Consulting, April 1, 2023 Traffic Impact Study: Prepared by: Trans -Plan Transportation Engineering, November 2022 Environmental Noise Assessment Prepared by: SLR Consulting, October 26, 2022 Geotechnical Report: Prepared by: Sola Engineering, November 22, 2022 Hydrogeology Assessment Prepared by: Harden Environmental Services Limited, November 29, 2022 Grading and Servicing Plan Prepared by: Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd, April, 2022 Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report Prepared by: Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd, January 27, 2023 Landscape Plan Prepared by: Landscape Planning Landscape Architects, January, 2023 Phase I & II Environmental Site Assessment Prepared by: Rubicon Environmental, November 3, 2022 Pedestrian Wind Assessment Prepared by: SLR Consulting, October 27, 2022 Community Input & Staff Responses Staff received written responses from 3 residents with respect to the proposed development. These are included in Attachment `D'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on August 24, 2023. Staff followed up with residents to answer questions related to whether the units would be affordable, if existing commercial tenants would be able to rent space in the new building, and to respond to concerns regarding too much residential development in the area. In response, the applicant is not proposing to include affordable housing units and the units would be market rate. The applicant stated that they would agree to work with existing commercial tenants to rent space in the proposed building. Page 518 of 668 WHAT WE HEARD (I lIik 3 people provided comments A City-led Neighbourhood Meetings held on August 24 and 3 different users logged on 325 households (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified Planning Conclusions In considering the foregoing, staff are supportive of the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications to permit 2934 King Street East to be developed with a mixed-use building. Staff is of the opinion that the subject applications are consistent with policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, conform to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Regional Official Plan, and the City of Kitchener Official Plan and represent good planning. It is recommended that the applications be approved. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023 and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. Two large notice signs were posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in May 2023. Page 519 of 668 Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, those responding to the preliminary circulation and who attended the Neighbourhood Meeting. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Attachment `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on May 15, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 3 members of the public. Planning staff responded to emails and answered questions. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Region of Waterloo Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 2019-051 REVIEWED BY: Stevenson, Garett — Manager of Development Review, Planning Division Malone -Wright, Tina — Supervisor, Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Readman, Justin - General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Attachment B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Attachment C — Newspaper Notice Attachment D — Department and Agency Comments Attachment E — Public Comments Attachment F — Concept Plan Page 520 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 2934 King Street East Page 521 of 668 INDEX SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 3 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 2934 King Street East Street TITLE AND COMPONENTS PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT THE AMENDMENT Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 Page 522 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. XX to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener. This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend the Official Plan by adding Site Specific Polciy Area 68 to Map 5 (Specific Policy Areas) and by adding associated Policy 15.2.12.68 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT The subject lands are currently designated as Commercial within Map 3 - Land Use in the Official Plan. The lands are identified as within an Urban Corridor on Map 2 - Urban Structure of the Official Plan. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement 3 Page 523 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed use development includes one, two and three-bedroom units. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use development that is compatible with the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by 4 Page 524 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Built -Up Area in the ROP. The proposed development conforms to Section 2.F of the ROP as the proposed development supports the achievement of the minimum annual intensification targets within the delineated Built -Up Area. Growth is directed to the Built Up Area of the Region to make better use of infrastructure that can assist in transitioning the Region into an energy efficient, low carbon community. Furthermore, intensification within the Built -Up Area assists the gradual transition of existing neighbourhoods within the Region into 15 -minute neighbourhoods that are compact, well connected places that allow all people of all ages and abilities to access the needs for daily living within 15 minutes by walking, cycling or rolling. Page 525 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 The Region of Waterloo have indicated they have no objections to the proposed application (Attachment `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas, Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within an Urban Corridor. The planned function of Urban Corridors is to provide for a range of retail and commercial uses and intensification opportunities that should be transit -supportive. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Commercial" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Commercial designation permits a variety of commercial uses, as well as dwelling units up to a maximum FSR (Floor Space Ratio) of 2.0. The applicant is proposing to add a Special Policy Area to permit an increase in the FSR to 2.6. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision to ensure a Record of Site Condition is obtained and an Environmental Noise Study is implemented is being proposed. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for an Urban Corridor but also contributes to the vision for a more sustainable city. The compact building form and efficient use of land contribute to a sustainable method of redevelopment for the lands. Green roof and light colored rooftop are proposed to reduce solar heat absorption. Page 526 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 Urban Design Policies: The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development satisfies these policies including: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief is acceptable and outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning regulations. Streetscape — The proposed building has been oriented with pedestrian access toward King Street East, the highest order frontage for the site. Vehicular access is provided from Morgan Avenue. The ground floor is proposed as commercial and lobby space, activating the ground floor. Safety — As with all developments that go through site plan approval, staff will ensure Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets emergency services policies. Safe vehicular movements for commercial vehicles and waste pick-up vehicles will also be evaluated. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a building that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned surroundings. The proposed tower form is a Compact Point Tower, which typically will produce less adverse impacts (privacy, shadowing etc.) than a tower with a larger floor plate or a slab shape. An angular plane analysis demonstrates that the proposed scale and building height is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The vision for the scale and density for the site was taken from existing local cues, in particular the 12 -storey hotel building located across Morgan Avenue. Tower Desian The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Point Tower" as the proposed tower floor plate is 736 square metres in area. The tower is situated to maximize separation from existing low-rise residential areas on Centreville Street. The tower portion of the building steps back from the podium. The relative height is similar to the existing 12 -storey hotel building across Morgan Avenue. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 -metre -tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape with an active use. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the requirements outlined in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are Page 527 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 generally suitable. Wind control features will be required through the site plan application. Tall Buildina Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower meets the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines and exceeds the off-site separation targets on the North and West sides. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to several bus stops, including Express Route 206. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications support a more dense residential development. The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Page 528 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the range of dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including one, two, and three-bedroom units. The wide range of units, in this location, will appeal to a variety of household needs and directly responds to the need for more housing during the current housing crisis. SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Part D, Section 15.D.12. is amended by adding Policy 15.D.12.68 as follows: "15.D.12.68. 2934 King Street East Notwithstanding the Commericial land use designation on lands municipally known as 2934 King Street East, a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.6 will be permitted. b) Amend Map No. 5 — Specific Policy Areas by adding Specific Policy Area No. "68. 2934 King Street East" to the `Area of Amendment', as shown on the attached Schedule 'B'. Page 529 of 668 APPENDIX 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 2934, King, Street East Concept Drawing ... .......... Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date-, October 30, 2023 Location. Councill Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 IKing, Street West, orVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchen e nca/m eeti n gs anal select: 0, Current agendas ard reports (posted 10 days before nrieeflnp) Appear as a delegatiori 0 Watch a rneetirig To iearn rnore about tHs project, in,duding inforni,cqUon on your appear rioh,ts, vis[t, ti wwwkitchenenca/ �Planni ngApplications or contact, Eric Schneider, Senior Planner eric.,schneider,(n)ki-tchener,.ca S19.741.2200 x7843 Fhe City of Kitchenerwill consider applications for an, Officlail Plan Amendment and a Zoning By_law Amendment to facilitate the, re,deveiopme,nt of the site with the removal of the existing one -storey, commercial plaza and replacinigitwith an 1 1 -storey mixed use building havinga FloorSpace Ratio of 2,.6,witlijgro,uindfloo,rco,mr-ne,rciaillanid 77 dweRing Units on the, floors above and having, 1157 parking spaces., 10 Page 530 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 11 Page 531 of 668 Attachment "A" DSD -2023-428 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 12 Page 532 of 668 m Q Q 0 q m LO Q � E � 2 / = m 2 m ƒ = )[{ \ a. LU LU2 « w \ = \ 7 < 7 K ƒ § \ � " % / // k CO \ _� e E ■ \ ± _gm n N i< 2 2 L m o�p� §%/�$ «® m/ ° �� \ E °2 w 2 z 2¢ �0EV = R 4 k/M 2 R Z LU �§ U 2 w \ I / E<~ 2 3 V y « CL ® 0. w \ \ \ « + / / LU 2 Im, IN � IN\, 0 2< « m §c �. « / \m ƒ 2 Q CO 3 e z / k 0 �£ O N / 6 G / 0 � ± CO > � ƒ CO LO \ « N �® G 00 § o C) i L _ � ? G \ / / / 2 @ \ J U \ 2 > / 2 , Q (D / \7 CO U w 2 O ± <C14 . ƒ CN C14 m Q Q 0 q m LO Q � E � follows: DSD -2023-428 Attachment "B" PROPOSED BY — LAW , 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — 2748244 Ontario Inc. — 2934 King Street East) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2019-051 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as Zoning Grid Schedule Number 220 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcel of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from General Commercial (COM - 2) to General Commercial (COM -2) with Site Specific Provision (382) and Holding Provision (55H). 2. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (382) thereto as follows: "382. Notwithstanding Section 9 and Table 5-5 of this By-law within the lands zoned COM - 2 and shown as affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Number 202 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: a) The maximum floor space ratio for all uses shall be 2.6. b) The maximum building height shall be 45 metres, and 11 storeys. C) The maximum parking rate shall be 1.65 parking spaces per dwelling unit. d) The minimum front yard setback (King Street East) shall be 0 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. e) The minimum rear yard setback (Centreville Street) shall be 3.5 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. f) The minimum exterior side yard setback (Morgan Avenue) shall be 2.5 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. g) The minimum interior side yard setback shall be 1.8 metres for a portion of the building that is less than 12 metres in building height. Page 534 of 668 DSD -2023-428 Attachment "B" h) Geothermal energy systems shall be prohibited." 3. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Section (55H) thereto as follows: "(55). Notwithstanding Section 9 of this By-law within the lands zoned General Commercial (COM -2) and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Number 220 of Appendix "A", no residential uses shall be permitted until such time as the following conditions have been met and this holding provision has been removed by by-law: a) A Record of Site Condition (RSC) has been filed on the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Site Registry in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, as amended. This Holding Provision shall not be removed until the Regional Municipality of Waterloo is in receipt of a letter from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) advising that a Record of Site Condition has been filed; and b) A detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study is submitted and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo." 4. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. , 2934 King Street East comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13., as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 535 of 668 Z W N w Z O LL, O rn O N LU IN W O zp Z J W N LU Y x U Z N N O Q Z LL o O - O w w N Z Q 0 0 zv0_ w Z X Z) w 0 N Q O OZZ. O O LL � } �/J N J Q "' 0)QOO� w w - a g g w 3 W W (n N TQ>z Uz0 zzzzzW a W O U w w w w O w w J � Y Q 2Of11- CO�C ZILU ��� �000 Q m Cl) O Lo C7 z V% m 0 2 U� d X Z O LU LU LU O w LU C, Z O o Z Q O(nZ O QOUaa QFF wDD Ll)new-n0�� Lu0Q0 Z Q N /La Q Z w Q U Z r Z Z Z r W 0 0= O Z X N O m Q W W � O wo O N w w W p W 0 2 N N F- U, 00 c� w X a �wz O �w - _Q W ZQ2iw=O a Q cv O O? N � wwa= Z ^H m W LU Z: J J w o w d' Z2QU W Z U) < w0 -z } �n corn } O w w w U x U OULiw V a f/1 QQU--- C�U��mUOfOf O?2O N(n0Y Q � }'p fn r W Z U W ti, y 2 W Z > U2 Q 2 � �, uuul a O LU W r 1111111 LU ' Z F- LU W N'N a }+ d O m�VJ o C� Q > LU w zt z U 0 Z LL O LL_ ' N O 1 U N LU LUCl) oc bM�l o N -� ---- -- '-- -- - bbd-- 0 0 .0 01 Q X r 1 W W � p CO �� Lo 1 W O Q uuuuuuuuuuuuuumW O 2�S Q a' 2 LL! ' o w M Q -1 Lli 1 F- LU (n in O 1 U 1 � pp1111j111V1111111 d 1 O o rn IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP N' N (; 7� W SSP �J W m '' '? C) NUc OI O � Z 2' W M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII U10 O IIIIIIIIIIIII 1 LlJ �,IIIIIIIIIIII ' Q cD 1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIu,,,II,,,,11,,,,11,,,1,,,,,,,,,,,,,1 � � Z z ' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII z _ ���`� uuull uuuuuu„uuwu111jpp0uuuuuuuuuuuuw a O Y J uuululul � � � � r ��� � 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111�111 � � � r M W N imIIVI ,n C 0p fq N - ppuuuuuuuuuuWuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu � uu,,,iuuuuluu Flo, N V ' Lu 0 0101011 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 2934 King Street East Concept Drawing 7 II:° w e II 1,, i rt Jr. i.( r S p a IIu i �� � � f d 3 Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Zoom Fleeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Eric Schneider, Senior Planner eric.schneider@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7843 The City of Kitchener will consider applications for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with the removal of the existing one -storey commercial plaza and replacing itwith an 11 -storey mixed use building having a Floor Space Ratio of 2.6, with ground floor commercial and 77 dwelling units on the floors above and having 157 parking spaces. Page 537 of 668 Internal memo Development Services Department Date: June 15, 2023 To: Eric Schneider From: Nolan Beatty Subject: Zoning By -Law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment Application 2934 King Street E 2748244 Ontario Inc. ZBA23/009/K/ES OPA23/005/K/ES I K�rcr�ZR www.kitchener.ca The below comments have been prepared through the review of the supplied Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report "2934 King St East - FSRSWM.pdf', dated June 13, 2023 prepared by Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd.; in support of the above noted applications. General Comments: 1. Engineering is in support of the above applications. Any comments below can be used to direct detailed design. Sanitary: 2. A conservative flow estimate for the development of 4.OL/sec was used to verify capacity in the existing sanitary system; the City's model indicates no impacts downstream of this development. 3. City of Kitchener design guideline for residential flow rate is 305L/cap/day and infiltration rate of 0.15L/sec/ha. Please update design sheet accordingly. Water (Angela Mick, Kitchener Utilities): 4. Only a single water service is permitted into the property. Any branching of a service line for separate fire and domestic supply must be done on private property. 5. Servicing from the 150mm PVC watermain on Centreville Street is recommended if the required service size of the proposed development doesn't exceed 150mm. This watermain is newer and will provide more reliable service compared to the aging cast iron watermains on King Street E. and Morgan Avenue, that will eventually need replacement. 6. A hydrant flow test is required on Centreville Street to confirm sufficient capacity is available (if servicing from Centreville). Required flows for the development need to be compared to existing flows using a hydrant flow test or modelling. All watermain distribution systems must be able to transfer the larger of maximum day plus fire or peak hour. Page 538 of 668 Internal memo Development Services Department Stormwater Management (SWM): www.kitchener.ca 7. A more thorough review of the site SWM will be conducted with detailed design. 8. Note: SWM fees with respect to retention or quality are assessed and calculated in the year in which they are to be paid. �K Nolan Beatty, C.E.T. Engineering Technologist Page 539 of 668 City of Kitchener COMMENT FORM Project Address: 2934 King Street East Application Type: Official Plan Amendment OPA23/005/K/ES Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA23/009/K/ES Comments of: Environmental Planning — City of Kitchener Commenter's Name: Carrie Musselman Email: Carrie.Musselman@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 x 7068 Date of Comments: June 2, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and Reports submitted as part of a complete Planning Act Application: Arborist Report & Tree Preservation Plan 2934 King Street East, Kitchener ON prepared by Canopy Consulting dated April 1, 2022. 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the studies as noted above to support an official plan and zoning bylaw amendment to support the proposed development of an 11 -storey mixed use building, and note: 1) The application and supporting study noted above meets the intent and requirements of the City's Tree Management Policy. In summary, the report noted: a) 10 trees greater than 10cm DBH have been inventoried as part of this project, i) 9 of the trees are in fair condition, 1 tree is in poor condition. ii) None of the trees are located within the municipal road allowance. iii) There is no tree Species At Risk (Butternut or Black Ash) present. b) All 10 trees are in conflict with the proposed development or are not suitable candidates for preservation. As such, all trees are recommended for removal. c) There are no natural heritage features or functions of local, Regional, Provincial or national significance on, or immediately adjacent to, the subject properties. Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the Arborist Report & Tree Preservation Plan noted above and find it acceptable for the purposes of supporting the OPA and ZBA applications. A landscape planting plan will be required as part of the site plan process. It is recommended that future landscaping should meet or exceed the number of trees removed from site. Further, City Environmental Planning have no concerns regarding the proposed OPA and ZBA from a natural heritage policy perspective. 3. Policies, Standards and Resources: Tree Management A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 540 of 668 City of Kitchener COMMENT FORM As per Section 8.C.2.16. of the Official Plan, the City will require the preparation and submission of a tree management plan in accordance with the City's Tree Management Policy (available on the City's Website), where applicable, as a condition of a development application. o Any tree management plan must identify the trees proposed to be removed, justify the need for removal, identify the methods of removal and specify an ecologically sound tree replacement scheme and any mitigative measures to be taken to prevent detrimental impacts on remaining trees. policy 8.C.2.6., the City will incorporate existing and/or new trees into the streetscape or road rights- of-way and encourage new development or redevelopment to incorporate, protect and conserve existing healthy trees and woodlands in accordance with the Urban Design Policies in Section 13 (Landscape and Natural Features) of the Urban Design Manual and the Development Manual. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 541 of 668 6OOSouthgate Drive Tel: -0518.823]311 Guelph ONCanada Fax. 4-1.519.823]316 NIG 41D6 E-mail: solutions@rwdi.com August 25, 2023 Melissa Mohr, MOP,RPP Region nfWaterloo 150Frederick Street, OmFloor Kitchener, ON N2G4H3 Re PeerRevew-Noise 2934 King Street East, Waterloo RVVD|Reference No. 23VV54V Dear Melissa, The Region ofWaterloo hasretained RVYD|tnconduct apeer review ofa noise assessment for a proposed development at2934King Street East inKitchener. The applicant isproposing a redevelopment nfthe site with an11-stnreymixed-use building. The review considered the report titled "Environmental Noise Assessment 2934 King Street East, Waterloo, ON", project number 241.30511.00000prepared bySLR Consulting ([anada)Ltd. and dated October 26,2U22. The report considers noise from the surrounding roadways, rail lines, and commercial stationary sources. Weconcur that these are the appropriate types ofsources toconsider here. Z. Rail traffic isassessed for the CPR Waterloo Subdivisionnai||ineasisnecessary.Onlynoiseis considered from this rail line and riot vibration, which is reasonable given the setback distances involved. 3. Road traffic is assessed based on King Street East Fairway Road North, Morgan Avenue and Highway 8. a. kisappropriate toconsider King Street East, Fairway Road North, Morgan Avenue and Highway 8. b. The report notes that the project is bounded by Centreville Street to the north but does not assess its effects on the development. It appears that this is a local road that connects Morgan Avenue and Fairway Road North (and becomes]ensenAvenue as it loops) and services a small number of local residences. Sound level contributions frorn this roadway are not likely tochange the outcome ofthis assessment, »oitis appropriate to exclude it frorn the assessment. However, justification for excluding it should beprovided inthe report. � ~�BEST m2023nwumuI,1c,('w,m)ALL n�Gm»RESERVED MANAGED Mrs ^="=m"intended for the somu�m����°��°a���"�"���*��*=�,� �� ����COMPANIE~ ��u=�'/ �� ���*/ notify Lis �"eainwn1°m=w=�"mmmex ' this document in "= rent fo""°"""rd=°""accoss°. ity, plea ^"","ta""the se rid =of`""""c""ne"t~°"./sol ,.=~m"m.="m°,"°n*oyuzor, nwdioom mmz nwum"�°�^m°°==y*m�av��=*,."�=�°awm°v"�^m"x"�^=�"° � Page 542Of668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPID Region of Waterloo AUGUST 25,2023 4. Road traffic assessment guidance and limits are cited from Ministry ofEnvironment, Conservation and Parks <ME[P1publication NP['3OO. The Region has developed and published local guidance. Since the Regional Municipality nfWaterloo Noise Policy Implementation Guideline has some variation from NPC -300, this published local guidance would be applicable in preference to the MECP guidance where there are differences. The variations are minor and have no effect on the technical analysis as the criteria is the same, but may influence the wording ofthe recommendations, especially those pertaining towarning clauses. The report should beupdated toinclude references toRegiuna|guidance. 5. Rail traffic guidance and limits for noise and vibration are derived from several documents. a. Weconcur that MECPpublication NPC-3O0isapplicable. b. The Regional Municipality ofWaterloo Noise Policy Implementation Guideline is not listed but isapplicable. |tshould beapplied inpreference toNPC-3U0,where there are differences with NP[ -30O. c. Railway Association of[anada/Federationof[anadianMunicipa|ities(RA[/F[M) Guidelines for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations, which are current guidance, have not been referenced. However, the criteria the guidelines recommended inthe document match those used within the report. Therefore, omitting this document does not have aneffect onthe technical analysis. h. Indoor and outdoor sound level limits for road traffic noise are presented in Table 1 and align with the Regional guidance document for most parts. The only discrepancy, which has no bearing on the technical analysis or recommendations in the report, is the nighttime criteria for living rooms. Table 1 notes itas45dBA,while the Region does not provide anighttime criteria for living rooms. 7. Road and rail traffic noise are evaluated, and presented separately, across each fa(acle, as well asateach ofthe three outdoor living areas (OUV. a. Evaluating each fa�ade is appropriate. b. Combined road and rail sound levels are also presented at each fa�ade and OLAs in the report, which bappropriate. 8. Future road traffic information for King Street East, Fairway Road North, and Morgan Avenue at a I 0 -year future date was provided by the Region. Highway 8 road traffic data was obtained from the Ontario Ministry ofTransportation andpnojectedtoa1O-yearhorizon. a. Use ofthis data for Bishop Street, Montrose Road, and King Street isappropriate. b. The data from the Region was valid at the tirne the report was written in 2022. Note that while this is acceptable here, future report updates will require updated traffic data from the Region. c. The forecast from the Region indicates that the City of Kitchener should be contacted concerning Morgan Avenue. The report indicates that the City ofKitchener was contacted, The City ofKitchener notes that the Regional traffic data ismore Page 2 Page 543 of 668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPP Region of Waterloo AUGUST 25, 2023 conservative than the City's data. Using higher, more conservative trafficdatais conservative, thus acceptable. d. Highway 8 road traffic data is for 2016 but was the latest available clataset at the time the report was written. In early 2023, MTU released the latest provincial set ofroad traffic data, When projected tothe samehorizon year, the latest datasecresults inan approximately 10% higher road traffic volume than assessed. As a doubling in traffic volumes results in a 3 d inceasea 10% increase inthe traffic volumes is not expected tochange the overall outcome ofthis assessment but may increase the Sound Transmission Class requirements for the south facade. The volumes should be updated tobeconsistent with the latest provncia|dmosec 9. Projected future rail traffic volumes are provided in Table 6. We note that: a. The data is projected to a 1 0 -year future date as specified by the guidance documents. b. CP rail data was not available but appears to be conservative when compared with other data available to RVVDL 10. Modelling ofroad traffic was done using the [adna/Asoftware package. Wenote that: a. The sound propagation from its generation on the road to the point of reception used the algorithms described inISO 961I This approach isacceptable for use where the model results compare closely with ORNAMENT orSTAMSONcalculations. b� A comparable STAMSON sample calculation for the southern facade (fa�acle along King Street East) is provided. This is a good comparison to provide as it is the most impacted fa�ade. The calculation includes impact from all nearby roadways (King Street East, Morgan Avenue, Fairway Road North, and Highway D)'which is appropriate. c Road traffic volumes for the roads appropriately align with the data provided by the Region and MTO. d. The terrain ismodelled asflat orgently sloping, which isappropriate. e. Reflective ground absorption values are used in the model, which is appropriate. [ The modelled source -receiver distances are reasonable. g. Modelled exposure angles are reasonable. h. Intervening structures have not been included, which is conservative, but reasonable, especially for upper stories that could have a direct line -of -sight to the roads. 11. Asample calculation for the rail noise sources is not provided. Asample calculation, like the one for road noise sources, should beprovided. 12. Tables 7 and 8 summarize the road and rail traffic modelling results at the facades and the OLAs,respec1ively. a. The worst-case sound level for each facade has been presented, which is appropriate. b. Sample road traffic noise comparison between STAMSON and Cadna/A, in Appendix E of the report, shows a sound level at the southern fa�ade that is higher than any of the results provided inTables 7and 8.The sample STAMSON calculation provides the sound level at a height of 1.5 m. The first level of the development is for cornmercial uses with residential uses starting at the upper floors, which are further away from the Page 3 Page 544 of 668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, QPP Region of Waterloo AUGUST 25,2023 road. Therefore, it appears reasonable for sound levels at the residential floors to be lower than the sample Sound level provided in Appendix E. This discrepancy in sound levels should be clarified in the report. 13. The report states that the road sound level limits are exceeded during daytime and nighttime atthe facades, and atthe OLAs. Weconcur with this conclusion. 14. Recommendations are provided concerning the excess sound levels, a. The requirement for upgraded fa�udeconstrucdonusesvindowtofloorrmiosof70% for living/dining rooms and 50%for bedrooms with anSTC uf3Oassumed for all windows along the southern facades. Based nnour experience, this appears reasonable. b. Supporting fa�adecalculations are provided inAppendix D.The inputs and assumptions match results inTable 7and appear reasonable. c The report's requirement for central air conditioning aligns with the guidance requirements and isappropriate. d� Noise barrier walls are recommended for all OLAs which isappropriate. 15. Warning Clauses are provided concerning sound from road and rail activity. a. We concur that the need for warnings is appropriate. b. Recommended warning clauses are appropriate but align with NPC -300 and not with the Region wording. Warning clause language should beupdated toalign with Region language. c. The warnings may be revised or additional warning provided based on comments provided here. 16. The report uses the NPC -300 guideline for assessment of the stationary sources, We concur that this isthe current practice inthe Region. 17. The area isdescribed asaClass 1 acoustic environment. The influence ofadjacent commercial activity, road and rail traffic are consistent with this observation. Description ofthis acoustic environment asClass 1 is appropriate. 18. The application ufthe exclusion limits for aClass 1area isacceptable. 19. Similar to sources of road traffic noise, sound frorn stationary Sources was evaluated at each building fa�adeand atoutdoor amenity spaces. 20. Stationary -source noise was evaluated from anearby commercial/retail bui|dingat2922King Street East, Dance Adventure, Canadian Tire Gas+, Great Canadian Oil Change and Radisson Hotel Kitchener Waterloo. a. It is appropriate that these locations be evaluated for the proposed development. b. Publicly available street view imagery shows a new medical facility at3| Kingsbury Drive that appears to have large rooftop mechanical equipment. There is also a car wash across the street from the development at 2905 King Street East. These sites Pa e4 Page 549of 668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPP Region ofWaterloo AUGUST 25,2023 should also be considered in the assessment orjustification should be provided for excluding them. 21. Commercial/retail building at 2922 King Street East. a. A kitchen exhaust associated with a restaurant at this location is modelled as the only source of noise. This appears reasonable. t, Daytime and evening operation only were confirmed bySLR nntwo different site visits, which isappropriate given the restaurant's working hours. c. The source is assumed to be operating continuously during the daytime and evening hours, which isappropriate. d. The kitchen exhaust sound levels were measured bySLR. 22. Dance Adventure. a. Rooftop sources are assumed to be HVAC units that continuously operate during the day/evening hours and operate at 30 minutes per hour during the nighttime hours. This appears tobereasonable. 23. Canadian Tire Gas+. a. Rooftop sources are assumed to be an HVAC unit and a cooling unit that continuously operate during the day/evening hours and operate at 30 minutes per hour during the nighttime hours. This appears tobereasonable. 24. Great Canadian Oil Change. a. Daytime operation ufthe service center isappropriate. Appendix 6notes the assumed operating times, which appear to be reasonable and in-line with RWDI's experience. b. Although the report provides limits for impulsive sources of sound, there is no indication whether ornot there are any impulsive sources ofnoise atthis location. |tis RWDI's experience that there may be occasional impulsive events, such as hammering. The report should further clarify if impulsive noise was noted at this location during the site visits. |fimpulsive noise ispresent, itshould beincluded inthe report. 25. Radisson Hotel Kitchener Waterloo. a. The hotel isunder aCertificate ofApproval (Air)([nt4) for astandby generator. SLR confirmed the existence and testing procedures of this generator with hotel staff. b. A rooftop HVAC unit was assumed to continuously operate during the day/evening hours and operate at 30 minutes per hour during the nighttime hours. This appears to be/easonab|e. c Arooftop exhaust fan was assumed tooperate 30minutes per hour during the daytime, evening and nighttime hours. Without any additional details on the nature of this exhaust fan, it is difficult to conclude if daytime and evening operating conditions are appropriate. The current claytime/evening operation assumption does not match assumptions rnade for other sources of noise within the vicinity. justification should be provided for assuming reduced daytime and evening demand for this source of noise, or its operating time should be increased to 60 minutes per hour during the daytime and evening hours. P e5 Page 5W�of 668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RIDID Pegion of Waterloo AUGUST 25,2023 26. Appendix G provides Sound Power Level Specifications for equipment used in the assessment. We note the following concerning the table: a. The impact wrench is noted to have a quasi -steady sound quality which requires the application of a 10 dB penalty in accordance with MECP NPC -1 04 - "Adjustments" document. It is unclear if this 10 dB penalty has already been applied to the sound power level presented in this appendix or if this penalty is applied on top of the provided sound power level. The provided sound power level for the impact wrench is reasonable without the 1OdBpenalty. b. The compressed air bnoted tohave atonal sound quality which requires the application of a 5 dB penalty. it is unclear if this penalty was already applied to the provided sound power level for this source, or if this penalty is applied on top of the provided sound power level. If the penalty is already applied to the source sound power level, then the original source sound power level is lower than other SLR reports. If this is the case, justification should be provided for using lower source sound power level. c The sound power level ofthe generator has been assumed such that itcomplies with the hotel's CofA. It is not clear what emergency generator approval process was required asthe ME{Phad afew atthe time ofissuance ofthe [o#\.|tshould be clarified which approval process was assumed asthis may affect the resulting generator sound power level. 27. Modelling was done inthe [adna/Asoftware package. a. The ISO 9613sound propagation algorithms in[adna/Aare asuitable model. b. The model settings are provided and are conservative, but appropriate for the area. c. To provide clarity concerning the model, a sample calculation for all sources at the point ofreception should beprovided. 28. Stationary source sound level results (both continuous and emergency sources) are presented inTables 13through 15for each fa�adeaswell asateach ofthe OLAs. a. Sound level results appear reasonable for the sources being modelled. However, these may increase if additional sources, indicated under comment 19, are modelled. b. Sound levels summarized in Tables 13 - 15 match sound levels shown in Figures 8 - 13. c Figures 11through 13donot indicate the presence of the noise barrier walls recommended tomitigate transportation sound level exceedances With the inclusion of these noise barrier walls, sound levels at the OLAs will likely be lower. Therefore, the presented sound levels atthe OLAsare conservative, but reasonable. 29. The sound level mapping makes clear that the continuous sound frorn Surrounding sites is evaluated cumulatively, asisexpected. |Lisconsistent with the Region's position that impact from stationary sources should beconsidered cumulatively. 30. A Warning Clause concerning the potential for sound from the stationary Sources is provided for application throughout the development. Weconcur that this warning would berequired. The location ofits application may berefined atSite Plan approval. Page 54 of 668 Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RIDP Region of Waterloo AUGUST 25,2023 31. The report considers impact of the surroundings on the developr-rient but does not assessthe impact ofthe development onitself nronthe surroundings. kisnoted that information related to the building's mechanical systems is not yet known. The report should be supplemented with this additional assessment once the appropriate information is known, and prior to issuance of building permits. 32. The Conclusions and Recommendations section lists the mitigation and warning requirements that the report has specified. a. The section accurately summarizes the ecnmmendadonsmade throughout the report. b. The transportation noise conclusions would require to be updated to match the Region language regarding warning clauses. c. The stationary noise conclusions would require to be updated based on comments made herein. 33. The overall conclusion isthat adequate control can beachieved without upgraded glazing, without barriers, and the inclusion of ventilation and warning clause requirements. This is an inaccurate statement since upgraded windows were recommended for one of the facades, and barriers were recommended for all three OLAs. This conclusion should be revised to match the recommendations made within the report. Furthermore, the overall conclusions do not discuss the effects of the stationary sources on the proposed development. An overall concluding statement for stationary sound levels should be provided. The environmental noise study provided for 29]4King Street East, Kitchener presents anassessment for road and rail traffic and stationary source noise sources. The Region ofWaterloo seeks assurance that the sound levels and impacts are accurate and complete. Minor revisions tothe analysis, additional information, clarification and supporting justification is required to address accuracy and completeness. However, weconcur with the report's conclusions and recommendations. Yours truly, RVVD| S|rviGnoevP�ng. Senior Engineer, Noise &Vibradon Page 7 Page 548of 668 Melissa Mol-ir, MCIP, RPP Region ofWaterloo RWDI#2300540 AUGUST 25,2023 SVG/ This report entitled Peer Review- Noise 2934 King Street East and dated August 2S, 2023 was prepared by RWDI AIR Inc. ("RWDI")for the Region of Waterloo ("Client"). The findings and conclusions presented in this report have been prepared for the Client and are specific to the peer review described herein ("Project"), The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on the information available to RWDI when this report was prepared. Because the contents of this report may not reflect the final design of the Project or subsequent changes made after the date of this report, RWDI recommends that it be retained by Client during the final stages of the project to verify that the results and recommendations provided in this report have been correctly interpreted in the final design of the Project. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report have also been made for the specific purpose(s) set out herein. Should the Client or any other third party utilize the report and/or implement the conclusions and recommendations contained therein for any other purpose or project without the involvement of RWDI, the Client or such third party assumes any and all risk of any and all consequences arising from such use and RWDI accepts no responsibility for any liability, loss, or damage of any kind suffered by Client or any other third party arising therefrom. P e8 Page 541M 668 Eric Schneider Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 6th Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Schneider, PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SEIRVICES Community Planning 150 Frederick Street 8th Floor Kitchener Ontario N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax:519-575-4466 www.regionofwaterloo.ca i &m mw v & on ff n n wa ro u nowom File: D17/2/23005 C14/2/23009 September 5, 2023 Re: Proposed Official Plan Amendment OPA 23/05 and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 23/09 2934 King Street East Evans Planning (C/O Satjit Lail) on behalf of 2748244 Ontario Inc. Evans Planning has submitted a site-specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment Application for a development proposal at 2934 King Street East (referred to as subject lands) in the City of Kitchener. The applicant has proposed the redevelopment of the site with an 11 -storey mixed use building containing 77 dwelling units. The ground floor is proposed to contain 800M2 Of commercial space. One hundred fifty seven (157) parking spaces are proposed within 2 levels of underground parking. The subject lands are located in the Urban Area and designated Built Up Area in the Regional Official Plan. The site is designated Commercial in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and Zoned General Commercial (COM -2) in Zoning By-law 85-1. The Owner has requested an Official Plan Amendment to redesignate the subject lands from the Commercial designation to the Commercial designation with a Special Policy to permit a Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 550 of 668 Floor Space Ratio of 2.52. The Owner has also requested a Zoning By-law Amendment to rezone the subject lands from the General Commercial (COM -2) Zone to add a special regulation to permit a maximum Floor Space Ratio of 2.52, permit reduced yard setbacks, increased building height, special provisions for the number of parking spaces and location as well as a reduction in the visibility triangles. The Region has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offers the following: Regional Comments Consistency with Provincial Legislation and Regional Official Plan Conformity The subject lands are designated "Urban Area" and "Built -Up Area" on Schedule 2 of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and the site is designated Commercial in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. Built Up Area Policies: The development concept proposes a high density development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum annual intensification target established for the Built -Up Area of Kitchener of 60%. Section 21 of the ROP establishes policies to support the achievement of the minimum intensification targets within the delineated Built -Up Area. Growth is directed to the Built Up Area of the Region to make better use of infrastructure that can assist in transitioning the Region into an energy efficient, low carbon community. Furthermore, intensification within the Built -Up Area assists the gradual transition of existing neighbourhoods within the Region into 15 minute neighbourhoods that are compact, well connected places that allow all people of all ages and abilities to access the needs for daily living within 15 minutes by walking, cycling or rolling. In addition to the above planning comments, Regional staff have the following technical comments relating to the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: Region of Waterloo International Airport: The subject lands are located outside of the Airport Zoning Regulation (AZR), and Regional staff understand that the proposed building elevation is 372.7m ASL and respectfully request information relating to the crane when it becomes available. Furthermore, Regional staff wish to advise that if the crane is above 400m ASL, an aeronautical assessment shall be completed to ensure the crane does not impact the Runway 08 LNAV approach. Regional staff highly recommend the maximum height of 400m ASL to be implemented in the regulations of the Zoning By-law for the proposed building. Any crane used for the construction of this development (e.g. towers, rooftop HVAC, communication towers/antennas) must also be below the maximum height of 400m ASL. Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 551 of 668 In addition to the above, the applicant shall be required to complete and submit the following forms to NAV Canada and Transport Canada: NAV CAN F-LDU-100 Land Use Form here: https://www.navcanada.ca/en/aeronautical- information/land-use-program.aspx F-LDU-101 Crane Height Form https://www.navcanada.ca/en/aeronautical- information/land-use-program.aspx Transport Canada Aeronautical Assessment Form 26-0427E (1812-09) at https://wwwapps.tc.gc.ca/Corp-Serv-Gen/5/forms-formu laires/down load/26- 0427_BO_PX Environmental Threats/Record of Site Condition: There are high environmental threats on and adjacent to the subject lands due to past/historic uses of the subject lands and adjacent sites. As a density increase of a sensitive land use has been proposed on the subject lands, a Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement letter are required for the entirety of the subject lands in accordance with the Region of Waterloo's Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications on or Adjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites. The Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter were not received as part of the Complete Application for the Zoning By-law Amendment and as a result, the Region shall require a Holding Provision to be implemented as part of the Zoning By-law Amendment. The Holding Provision shall prohibit the proposed development until the submission of the RSC and the Ministry's Acknowledgement Letter have been received to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The following wording is required for the holding provision: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a Record of Site Condition (RSC) in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, as amended, has been filed on the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Site Registry and the RSC and Ministry's Acknowledgement letter is received to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Please exclude any property to be dedicated to the Region of Waterloo from the Record of Site Condition (RSC) application. Further information can be found in the road widening section below. Noise Study Peer Review (Transportation, Vibration and Stationary Noise): Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 552 of 668 The Noise Study entitled "Environmental Noise Assessment, 2934 King Street East, Waterloo, ON" prepared by SLR Consulting (Canada) Ltd. dated October 26, 2022 has been received and although in principle, the Region concurs with the conclusions and recommendations, additional information is required to receive assurance that the sound levels and impacts are accurate and complete. Peer review comments are attached to this letter. Regional staff require that the following Holding Provision be imposed on the lands to ensure updates to the study are made and a detailed Environmental Noise Study has been submitted to the Region's satisfaction. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. Corridor Planning: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning BV -law Amendment Stage: Stormwater Management and Site Grading.- Regional rading.Regional staff have received and are reviewing the report entitled "2934 King Street East, Kitchener, ON, Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report" dated January 27, 2023, Grading Plan C01 and Servicing Plan CO2 dated January 27, 2023, all prepared by Aplin & Martin Consultants Limited and have found these documents satisfactory at this stage (Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment stage). Site Plan Application Stage: Regional Road Dedication: A 7.62 m x 7.62m daylight triangle is required at the intersection of King Street East and Morgan Avenue. An Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS) must determine the exact road dedication to be dedicated to the Region of Waterloo in consultation with the Regional Transportation Planner. The Owner/Applicant must engage an OLS to prepare a draft reference plan which illustrates the required road allowance widening. Prior to depositing the reference plan, the OLS must submit a draft copy of the plan to the Transportation Planner for review. Further instructions will come from the Region's Legal Assistant with regard to document preparation and registration once the draft reference plan is satisfactory. Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 553 of 668 Further to the above, Regional staff have received and are reviewing the reports entitled Commercial Properties, Conveyance Land, 2934 King Street East, Kitchener Ontario, N2A 1A7 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment dated November 3, 2022 and Commercial Properties, Conveyance Lands, 2934 King Street East, Kitchener Ontario, N2A 1A7 Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment dated November 11, 2022. Comments will be provided separately. Access Permit/TIS/Access Regulation A Regional Access Permit is required to close the existing access to King Street East. The application can be found here: h.Lt�.//fo�rms.reio�nofwa�terloo�.ca/Pl�anWin�-and�- Econom There is no fee for this permit. Stormwater Management and Site Grading: Detailed civil engineering plans will be required for review and approval by Regional staff at the future site plan application stage. Where possible, please coordinate underground service connections from the local municipal road rather than the Regional Road. Site Plan Application Fee: Please be advised that a site -plan pre -consultation fee of $300.00 and a site plan application review fee of $805.00 is required as part of the future site plan application. Hydrogeolocty and Source Water Pr®crams In reviewing the Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Phase 2 study, Regional staff note that contaminants of concern were compared to the Table 3 standards. Please be advised that contaminants of concern need to be compared to the Table 2 standards as all water in the Region of Waterloo is considered potable. This is noted in Section 5.1 of the Implementation Guidelines for the Review of Development Applications on or Adjacent to Known or Potentially Contaminated Sites and the ESA is required to be updated accordingly. Please be advised that the Region does not support permanent active or passive dewatering controls for below -grade infrastructure (e.g. foundations, slabs, parking garages, footings, piles, elevator shafts, etc.); therefore, below -grade infrastructure requiring dry conditions must be waterproofed. Due to the potential for contamination on the subject lands, Regional staff require a prohibition on geothermal energy to be written into the zoning by-law. The required wording for the prohibition is: Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 554 of 668 Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling; including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. In addition, the owner/developer is advised that a Salt Management Plan will be required through a future site plan application. Housing Services The following Regional policies and initiatives support the development and maintenance of affordable housing: • Regional Strategic Plan • 10 -Year Housing and Homelessness Plan • Building Better Futures Framework • Region of Waterloo Official Plan The Region supports the provision of a full range of housing options, including affordable housing. Should this development application move forward, staff recommend that the applicant consider providing a number of affordable (as defined in the Regional Official Plan) housing units on the site. Rent levels and house prices that are considered affordable according to the Regional Official Plan are provided below in the section on affordability. In order for affordable housing to fulfill its purpose of being affordable to those who require rents or purchase prices lower than the regular market provides, a mechanism should be in place to ensure the units remain affordable and establish income levels of the households who can rent or own the homes. Staff further recommend meeting with Housing Services to discuss the proposal in more detail and to explore opportunities for partnerships or programs and mechanisms to support a defined level of affordability. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of an ownership unit, based on the definition in the Regional Official Plan, the purchase price is compared to the least expensive or: Housing for which the purchase price results in annual accommodation costs $385,500 which do not exceed 30 percent of gross Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 555 of 668 annual household income for low and moderate income households $1,470 Housing for which the purchase price is at least 10 percent below the average $576,347 purchase price of a resale unit in the Bachelor: $950 regional market area 1 -Bedroom: $1,134 *Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021). In order for an owned unit to be deemed affordable, the maximum affordable house price is $385,500. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of a rental unit, based on the definition of affordable housing in the Regional Official Plan, the average rent is compared to the least expensive of: A unit for which the rent does not exceed 30 per cent of the gross annual $1,470 household income for low and moderate income renter households A unit for which the rent is at or below the Bachelor: $950 average market rent (AMR) in the 1 -Bedroom: $1,134 regional market area 2 -Bedroom: $1,356 3 -Bedroom: $1,538 4+ Bedroom: $3,997 'Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021) In order for a rental unit to be deemed affordable, the average rent for the proposed units which have fewer than 3 bedrooms must be at or below the average market rent in the regional market area as shown above. For proposed units with three or more bedrooms, the average rent for the units must be below $1,470. Fees: The Region acknowledges receipt of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment review fees totalling $10,000 (deposited July 20, 2023). Follow Up: As per the above comments, the following must be updated prior to the Region being in a position to provide final comments on the application: 1. Updates to the Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment using the correct Table 2 standards as detailed above. Conclusions: Once the above items have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, the following shall be implemented within the site-specific Zoning By-law Amendment to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo: Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 556 of 668 1. That the Zoning By-law for the subject lands is recommended to contain a maximum height permitted on site for buildings and any associated structures (e.g. rooftop HVAC, communication towers/antennas) and construction cranes of 400m ASL. 2. The implementation of a holding provision to obtain a Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter for the entirety of the subject lands. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a Record of Site Condition (RSC) in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, as amended, has been filed on the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) Environmental Site Registry and the RSC and Ministry's Acknowledgement letter is received to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. 3. The implementation of a holding provision to obtain an Environmental Transportation and Stationary Noise study to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The required wording for the Holding Provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. and, 4. That a geothermal prohibition be implemented within the site specific Zoning By-law. The required wording for the prohibition is: Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling; including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Next Steps: Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 557 of 668 Please be advised that any future development on the lands subject to the above -noted application will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19- 037 or any successor thereof. Further, please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the decision pertaining to this application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, -P Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner C. Evans Planning C/O Satjit Lail (Applicant) 2748244 Ontario Inc. (Owner) Document Number: 4472240 Version: 1 Page 558 of 668 Hi Eric, No heritage planning comments or concerns for this application. Page 559 of 668 VVeare inreceipt ofyour Site Plan Application, 2984King Street East dated May 1Qm,2O23.VVehave reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. ities and Corridor jAnd!� only. For proposals affecting 'Low Voltage Distribution Facilities' please consult your local area Distribution Supplier. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: P|easese|ecL"5earoh"and|ocateaddressinquesionbventehngtheaddressorbvzoomin8inundout ofthe map � ? [\ MENU 14ELP SEARCH Montreal rc Bur 6 Ed prarn ,Z '140 R Chester If Hydro One is your local area Distribution Supplier, please contact Customer Service at 1-888-664-9376 or e-mail Custom e rCom to be connected to your Local Operations Centre Thank you, Dennis De Rango Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Department Hydro One Networks Inc. ong Page 560 of 668 Jeremiah Johnston Corridor Management Planner Corridor Management Section Ministry ofTransportation Operations Branch West 659Exeter, Road, London, ONN6EIL3 Page 561 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Address: 2934 King St E Owner: 2748244 Ontario Inc. Application: OPA23/005/K/ES and ZBA23/009/K/ES Comments Of: Parks and Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross and Taylor Stapleton Email: Lenore. ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: June 12 2023 ❑X 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑ No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 1. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of an 11 -storey mixed use building containing 77 dwelling units and approximately 800 M2 of ground floor commercial space. A Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.52 is proposed. 157 parking spaces are proposed within 2 underground parking levels. In order to permit the proposed development, an Official Plan Amendment to the Commercial land use designation to add a site-specific policy area and Zoning By-law Amendment to add a site-specific to the existing COM -2 zone are required. • Planning Justification Report • Arborist Report • Architectural Package • Conceptual Landscape Plan • Grading Plan and Servicing Plan • Noise Study • Tree Preservation Plan • Urban Design Brief and Sustainability Statement • Wind Study 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments and can provide conditional support subject to the minor updates to submitted studies that are noted below. The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully— Building Community Page 1 of 3 Page 562 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form 3. Comments on Submitted Documents 1) Preliminary Grading Plans C01 rev #1 dated 2023.01.27—Aplin & Martin Consultants Ltd a) The preliminary Grading plan shows a retaining wall along the Centreville St property line. All building and retaining walls footings/foundations should be designed to be completely within the property limits. b) On-site landscape plantings will be required and sufficient planting room should be included in the design to accommodate required trees. 2) Conceptual Landscape dated January 2023— Landscape Planning a) Street trees within the rights of way will be required and reviewed as part of a future site plan application. Securities will be required. b) New City street trees may be possible along King St E, Morgan Ave and Centreville St depending on infrastructure and available soil volumes. Street tree planting shall conform to Section M of the Development Manual. Tree planting is to be approximately one large stature tree (LST) per 10 lineal meters of frontage with the intent of creating a continuous tree canopy. The number of proposed street trees is subject to available minimum soil volumes, which shall be augmented as needed by the use of soil cell technology. The proposed street trees shall be shown on the Street Tree Planting Plan (STPP) stamped by a certified Landscape Architect and submitted for review and approval by Parks & Cemeteries that will be required as a condition of site plan approval. This plan shall include all landscape elements and relevant data that will affect the implementation of street tree plantings as intended, such as proposed and existing utilities and available soil volumes. Tree Planting and Landscape requirements will be coordinated and approved with Urban Design and the Region of Waterloo. 3) Arborist Report and Tree Management Plan dated 04.01.2022 —Canopy Consulting a) There are no inventoried City -owned trees adjacent to the site that will be impacted by the proposed development nor is there any un -inventoried vegetation within the City rights of way that will be impacted. 4) Urban Design Brief —John G. Williams Architect Limited dated February 9 2023 a) The UDB provides acceptable commentary and conceptual images for the proposed on-site amenity areas related to passive and adult -focused use but does not include commentary or conceptual images to guide the development of on-site amenity spaces that are geared towards children. With almost half of the proposed units 2- and 3 -bedroom suites, children will live in this development and on-site amenities suitable for children should be provided. b) The UDB indicates that mature treed vegetation at the corner of Morgan Ave and Centreville St may be retained; this is contrary to the Arborist Report and Tree Management Plan c) A minor addendum/update to the Urban Design Brief is required. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Pag2AAb3 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual S. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval as cash -in -lieu of land. Based on the preliminary proposal submitted for OPA/ZBA an estimate of the required Parkland Dedication is provided using the approved land valuation of $5,931,000/ha and a dedication rate of 1ha/1000 units; a maximum dedication of either land or CIL of 10% and a capped rate of $11,862/unit. The estimated cash -in -lieu park dedication for the proposed 0.34285 ha site with 77 proposed units and an FSR of 2.52 is $203,344. As a portion of the proposed development is considered non-residential and notwithstanding the conditions of park land dedication under Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 Chapter 273.1.2. and 273.1.3.1, all non-residential (portions of) developments are exempt from park dedication requirements (Park Dedication Policy section 4) Calculation: 77 units/1000 units x $5,931,000/ha = $456,687 (Bylaw 2022-101) 0.34285 ha x $5,931,000/ha x 0.1= $203,344 (More Homes Built Faster Act) Dedication requirements are subject to the Parkland Dedication Policy and rates in effect. Please be advised that an updated Parkland Dedication Policy and By-law were approved by City of Kitchener Council on August 22 2022. he Bylaw is under appeal. Further changes to the Bylaw may be required as a result of the Bill 23 — More Homes Built Faster Act. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 564 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change Comment Form Address: 2934 King St E Owner: Enter project address. Application #: OPA/ZBA Comments Of: Urban Design- Planning Commenter's Name: Pegah Fahimian Email: Pegah.fahimian@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 Ext. 7342 FA Date of Comments: June 15, 2023 110111711 ❑ I plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ® No meeting to be held, g El do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns)"i, 1. Documents Reviewed:���"''% i o • Architectural Floor plans by KLMA �•- • Shadow Study by K MAi • Urban Design Brief- John G. Williams Limited , • Wind Study - Pedestrian Level Wind — Preliminary Impact Assessment by,SLR //O///1 i,,, I have reviewed the updated/revised documentation noted bw that has been submitted in support of ' %eloi, an OPA and ZBA to add Special Provisions to the existing High?/l,ntensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU - While the concept of residential intensification on this site is positive, and many previous staff comments have been incorporated into the proposaf some design modifications must be addressed in the Site Plan Application to create a cleVeldp6brit proosal that is well-designed and appropriate for this site and neighbourhood. • Urban Design Brief, John GWillrams"Limited Tall Building Design Analysis: The tall building design guidelines are an excellent compatibility test for proposals exceeding their�zoning permissions. The proposal meets the design criteria for tall building design guidelines a'nd exceeds the separation target on the west and north side. Buildi,ng:Design 2 -'storey pedestrian -scaled podium along King and Morgan Street distinguished by tall towers, step -backs and intended architectural treatment. The proposed relative height accommodates human= scaled built form along streetscapes while accommodating compatibility matters. Contemporary architectural style and details are to be refined through the site plan process. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community P e1of5 Rage 565 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change Comment Form On-site Amenity area: • Required amenity space calculations are contained in the Urban Design Manual and include two parts — one for a general amenity area and one for children's play facilities in multiple residential developments. (2m2 x #units) + (2.5m2 x #bedrooms - #units) = outdoor amenity space. Please provide the calculation for the required outdoor amenity. The UDB did not provide any commentary or precedent images related to "the provision of robust on-site amenity space for all ages and abilities." Additional information should be provided, ��,. regarding the various on-site amenity spaces in the UDB (common, individual, indoor;<'and outdoor). The Urban Design Brief should include text and conceptual images that demonstrate the% commitment to providing sufficient and appropriate amenity space for a),I poi ntial residents on site Written Analysis for Shadow Studies, Required Shadow Study drawings should include the folloWl 'g''t,esftlafe"s and times: Spring and Fall %i %.. Equinoxes: March 21st, hourly increments between 09:0W ,- 18:,00; and, September 21st, hourly increments between 09:00 —18:00. Winter and Summer Solstices: December 21st, hourly increments between 11:00 —15:00; and, June 21st, hourly increments between 08:00 —19:00. • Provide a Summary outlining how the Shadow Irnpacibiteria have been met and a description of any mitigating features incorporated into the site and building design. • Description of any locations/uses of areas not meeting the Shadow Impact Criteria (include a key plan for reference); `' Wind Study - Pedestrian Level Wind—,Prehrriirary Impact Assessment by SLR A further quantitative win' Ycoupled with a detailed wind tunnel analysis will be required as part of the full site plari/,/application package. According to the submitted study, wind control measures are recommended on /the terraces of levels 2 and 3 for the winter season. The rooftop terrace is expected to be windierthan`'desireci./"'` A revised design proposal should be developed that addresses the wind impacts outlined in the submitted'wind study. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community P e2of5 Rage 566 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change Comment Form * For tall buildings with retail or other active uses at grade, provide a ground floor height of 4.5m (minimum)topermit avariety ofretail types and activities. � Consider adding further architectural expression to the proposed street -facing fagades; explore options to maximize utility, interest, and expressiveness of the ground floor of a residential building. This can include more glazing, an articulated main entrance, active uses and amenities, agveater variety of surface treatments and seating options, and strategic ways of incorporating modern art and visual elements into the public realm. ' � The proposed fagade along King and Morgan Street is too monolithic. The fagade needs more work asitcurrently feels more like background, More emphasis will he placed on` analyzing how the street -facing facades function, how it responds to specific site conditions and how they will be experienced bypedestrians. The podium massing should the impact that it's having onthe public realm, and itsu e dhatitcVu|dbedesi8nedwithmmre ` care to animate and diversify the fagades and overall expression. Please see attached precedents. w The podiums would benefit from more openings, breaks, porosity, and animation to provide much-needed variety along the street elevations. m The proposed long podium should be broken down using enhanced detailing and articulation, According to Tall Building Design Guidelines, buildings longer than 70m should demonstrate enhancedctneetscapin8, materials and building articulation. ACity for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Vag 1047 of 668 C City of Kitchener Zone Change Comment Form The proposed garden amenity area does not have a defined pedestrian connection to the propos m Place enclosed balconies onthe north and west elevations toreduce overlook onto surrounding . ` private spaces. � There are three entry doors proposed along king street with similar detailing and material. The proposed corner treatment to be further enhanced to create visual interest at the street edge b« using adifferent material orglazed system. ^ ` • The underground parking structure should � the property lines to accommodate the necessary soil volume to support required large-statured, high -canopy trees. w The location of residential and commercial garbage storage, loading area and Passenger pick up /drop-offarea should benoted mnthe site plan. * The area between the building's face and the property line should be well integrated with the street and public realm to deliver high-quality, seamless private, semi -private and public spaces. w Provide natural surveillance by employing high percentages of glazing, active uses at ground level and incorporating more units with windows and balconies on the main facade with views onto the street w The building 's interface and relationship with the street and adjacent properties should be thoroughly explored. • 3 -bed units are desirable as they provide more living space for families. A higher percentage of these units might help with community engagement. • Utility locations should be considered at the early design stages. All utility locations, including the meter room and transformer room to be shown on the |ayout. Building - mounted or ground-based AC units should be located away from public view and fully screened. • All visible elements of building, including utilities (meters, conduits), HVAC (a/c units, vents) and load ing/se rvici ng areas, are to be integrated into the design of the building and shown on elevation drawings ospart ofthe building elevation approval process. • Wind assessment and shadow study is required for outdoor amenities and the pedestrian realm. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community City of Kitchener Zone Change Comment Form Summary: In summary, Urban Design staff are supportive of the zone change/official plan amendment. While the concept of residential intensification on this site is positive and many previous staff comments have been incorporated into the proposal, Urban Design staff recommend that the Urban Design Brief be endorsed, and that staff be directed to implement the Urban Design Brief through future Site Plan Approval processes. df r ' W R/ i rr // i i"% v r o � / r �r r jrG' ��ii A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page5of5 age 569 of 668 Hey Eric, This is not regulated by the GRCA and we have no comment. Thanks, "rrevor Heywood B.Sc.(Env.) Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority 400 Clyde Road, PO Box 729 Cambridge, ON N1 R 5W6 Phone: 519-621-2763 ext. 2292 Ew"MIES111SWUMMEME oust Page 570 of 668 The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has reviewed the sub ' ject application and based on our development circulation criteria have the following comment(s)/condition(s): Aj That any Education Development Charges shall be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). Additionally, the Board would encourage the City to consider extending sidewalk along the south-west side of Centreville Street and support for the developer to provide pedestrian connectivity toCentreville Street inthe site plan design. This would better support active school travel opportunities for future students within walking distance toneighbourhood schools. |fyou require any further information, please contact me6ve-mail at Jordan. Neale@Acdsb.ca. Thank you, Jordan Neale Planning Technician, VVCDS8 40]Dutton Dr, Waterloo, ONN2L4C6 S19-578-3GGOext. 23G5 Page 571 of 668 The Waterloo Region District School Board 0&/RDSEDhas reviewed the above -noted application that pnDpDS8S amendments to facilitate the CODSLnUCtiDn of an 11 StOnBy mixed-use tOVVe[ |DC|UdiDg 77 dwelling WDiiG. TheVVR[}SB offers the following CoDlNeOtG. Student Accommodation At this time, the subject lands are within the boundaries of the following WRDSB schools: w Howard Robertson PS(Junior Kindergarten tOGrade G); • Sunnyside PS(Grade 7toGrade 8);and ° Eastwood [| (Grade 9toGrade 12). TheVVRDSB\s provides information on student eDPJ|Dl8nt and 8CCODl0Od8tioD at these SChOO|S. Portable daSSR]omS may be located on-site to provide additional capacity on an interim basis. Student Transportation The WRDSB supports active transportation, and we ask that pedestrians be considered in the review of all development applications to ensure the enhancement of safety and connectivity. Please b2advised that Student Transportation Services OfWaterloo Region 'SSchOV| buses will not travel privately owned or maintained right-of-ways to pick-up/drop-off students. Transported students will be required to meet the bus at a congregated bus pick-up point. STSVVRrn3yhBVe8ddition@|COOl0eOtSabOUtstUdentpick-UppUiDUS\p|8Ce08DtOnDlUOiCipg| right-of-ways. Education Development ChaLqes Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the WRDSB's.Education 2022 or any successor thereof and may require the payment Of Education Development haq]eS for these developments prior tOissuance Df8building permit. The WRDSB requests to be circulated on any subsequent submissions on the subject lands and reserves the right to comment further on this application. If you have any questions about the comments provided, don't hesitate to contact the undersigned. Page 572 of 668 Page 573 of 668 City of Kitchener Application Type: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/005/K/ES Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA2K/ES Project Address: 2934 King Street East Comments of: Transportation Services [mmnnente/sName: Dave Seller Email: Phone: 5I9-741-2ZOOext. 7369 Date ofComments: June 12,2O23 a. Aspart o[acomplete Zoning By-law amendment application, a Transportation Impact Study (T|G), Parking Review and Site Plan Review was submitted (November 2022) by Trans -Plan Transportation Inc. in support of this OPA/ZBA application. The applicant is proposing to develop a 11 -storey mixed use building with 77 apartment units and 1688m/(1O169ft2)ofcommercial space. The development isestimated togenerate 7IAK4and 99 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The vehicle trips included the residential and commercial component, as well as trip reductions for internal and pass -by trips. The site will be serviced by one full moves access along Morgan Avenue and is proposing 155 parking spaces. Transportation Services review focused mnCity ofKitchener roadways and the site access. Intersection analysis The two intersections noted below were reviewed under 2022 existing traffic conditions and were expressed as level of service (LOS) and vehicle delay (s). • Morgan Avenue & Centreville Road/ Hotel Access (unsignaUzed) • Morgan Avenue & King Street East (Regional Road OunsiQna|ized) The 2022 existing traffic condition analysis indicated that the Morgan Avenue & Centreville Road/ Hotel Access are operating with a LOS B or higher and delays of 14 seconds or lower within the AM and PK4peak hours. Morgan Avenue &King Street East analysis indicated that traffic travelling southbound along Morgan Avenue towards King Street East is operating with a LOS C and delays of16seconds inthe AMpeak hour. The PK8peak hour indicated that the southbound movement is operating with a LOS F and vehicle delays of 60 seconds. The queuing along Morgan Avenue is expected, due to the higher traffic volumes along King Street East. The three intersections noted below were reviewed under 2027 future total traffic conditions and the analysis isexpressed asnoted above for the 2O22traffic conditions. m Morgan Avenue & Centreville Road/ Hotel Access (undgna|iued) • Morgan Avenue & King Street East (Regional Road 8unsigna|ized) Page 574 of 668 The 2027 future total traffic conditions indicated the Morgan Avenue & Centreville Road/ Hotel Access are operating with a LOS C or higher and delays of 16 seconds or lower within the AM and PM peak hours. Morgan Avenue & King Street East analysis indicated that traffic travelling southbound along Morgan Avenue towards King Street East is operating with a LOS C and delays of 16 seconds in the AM peak hour. The PM peak hour indicated that the southbound movement is operating with a LOS F and vehicle delays of 260 seconds. It should be noted that the PM peak hour 95th percentile queuing along Morgan Avenue is estimated to queue back from King Street East 173.8m and could at time block access points along Morgan Avenue. The queuing along Morgan Avenue is expected under the existing conditions and the 2027 future scenario, due to the higher traffic volumes along King Street East. Morgan Avenue & NEW proposed Site Access analysis indicated that the intersection could operate with a LOS B or higher and delays of 16 seconds or lower within the AM and PM peak hours. Left turn lane analysis A left turn lane analysis was completed along Morgan Avenue at the proposed site access, utilizing the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Geometric Design Standards for the 2027 future total traffic condition scenario. It was determined that a left turn lane along Morgan Avenue at the proposed site access is not warranted. Vehicle swept path analysis A swept path analysis was submitted for the garbage pick-up area utilizing the design vehicle FL - WC, loading area utilizing the design vehicle MSU and parking areas utilizing the design vehicle P. Each swept path analysis is acceptable. It should be noted that the "List of Figures" page and some of the actual figure numbers in the report do not match. Parking supply Under the current zoning 2019-051, a minimum of 140 to a maximum of 174 parking spaces are required for the combined uses. Based on this application, the applicant is proposing to provide a total of 155 parking spaces which includes the residential and commercial use and is within the minimum/maximum range. The applicant is proposing a minimum of 12 visitor parking spaces for the residential use, which meets the intent of the 2019-051 zoning. Conclusion Based on the methodology and analysis within the TIS by Trans -Plan Transportation Inc., Transportation Services supports the submitted report is support of the applicants OPA/ZBA applications. A discussion took place with Transportation Services management staff and it was determined that, as part of the site plan process, a 1.8m wide concrete sidewalk be installed as part of the development along the entire Centreville Street frontage. Page 575 of 668 Dave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 dave.seller( kitchener.ca Page 576 of 668 Eric Schneider From/: Lauhe0bhen Sent: Monday, May 22,2O2]S:31 PM To: Eric Schneider Subject: 2g34king steast [You don't often get email from Learn why this isimportant ot Hi|live off Jansen on Huber in the east end of Kitchener. I do not want nor do we need another condominium tower around here with the new one on Weber and Fergus not even done! This is ridiculous! Is anything that has been built or will be built in the near future low income housing?? I think not@ I know that the majority of these places are going to rented for outrageous amounts orsold for the same! Doyou people inthe planning dept know what isgoing onin community? So no to the new tower unless itis guaranteed to be for the middle class ��thxfor asking, hope you guys take the comments to heart or why botherP Oh and I guess the places over there will have to get torn down G)So another reason for NOH Sent from my iPhone Page 577 of 668 Eric Schneider From: Jacqui Rellinger Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 9:50 AM To: Eric Schneider Subject: Application for development 2934 King St E [You don't often get email from earn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Hi Eric, I would like to appeal the planning application for 2834 King St E. On the website it directs me to contact the City Planning Contact so I am emailing to do so. I can be contacted at this email or Jacqueline Rellinger Page 578 of 668 You don't often get email from, Good morning, hiday, August 25i2O237:S6AK4 Eric Schneider Re: Development at29]4King. St. E LeqLayhy this is important I am writing in regards to the proposed plaza development taking place at 2934 King. St. E. I am the current owner of the restaurant The Grill Burger Kitchen. Could you please provide some information about what will happen to the current commercial tenants?. Will we be accommodated the new building?. Some of us still have a few years left on our leases. And if everything gets approved, approximately how long before construction begins?. Any information will be really appreciated. Thank you for your help inthis matter. Regards, AhmerSarfarao Page 579 of 668 I . U D O\\ 8 m r 4 p J 0 D oz o 61 C.) 7, p 4 H- I z x -F c c 'c ,8 R X A 2 R N 8 -E -E E O\\ 8 m r 4 61 7, p -F c c 'c ,8 R X A 2 R N 8 -E -E E -E OR mon aaNN�a welz az O\\ Staff Report l IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Craig Dumart, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7073 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO. October 4, 2023 DSD -2023-299 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/007/K/CD Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD Address: 417 King Street West Owner: Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA/23/007/K/CD for Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp requesting a land use designation change from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area No. 8' to permit a 55 -storey mixed use development on the lands specified and illustrated on Schedule `A', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-299 as Appendix `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD for Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. 1', attached to Report DSD -2023-299 as Appendix `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the property located at 417 King Street West. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. Community engagement included: o circulation of a preliminary notice letter to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 581 of 668 o installation of two large billboards notice sign on the property (one facing each street); o follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; o Neighbourhood Meeting held on July 11, 2023; o postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject site and those who responded to the preliminary circulation; o notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 13, 2023. This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Planning staff is recommending approval of the requested Official Plan Amendment Application to add Specific Policy Area 8 to Map 4 and Policy 15.D.2.71 to the text in the Official Plan to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23. Planning Staff is recommending approval of the requested Zoning By-law Amendment Application to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U" to "Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U' in Zoning By-law 85-1 to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR); to regulate building setbacks; and to regulate parking and bicycle parking requirements and to apply a Holding Provision 109H to require an updated Urban Design Brief and an updated noise study prior to final site plan approval. Staff recommends that the applications be approved. BACKGROUND: Vanmar Developments (417 King GP Corp) has made applications to the City of Kitchener for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment proposing to change the land use designation and zoning of the lands at 417 King Street West to permit the lands to be developed with a 55 storey mixed use development with 622 residential units and two (2) ground floor commercial units. The proposed development includes parking located underground, and internal to the building in the podium above the ground floor. The lands are within the Urban Growth Centre, designated `Innovation District' in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and are zoned as `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' in Zoning By-law 85-1. Existing Warehouse District Zone (D-6) zoning permissions include: • Commercial and light industrial uses; • Maximum floor space ratio of 2.0; • Rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; and • Maximum front yard setback of 2.0 metres. Special Regulation Provision 122R exempts parking from existing uses in buildings that existing prior to 1992. Special Use Provision 142U regulates a maximum gross leasable space of 1,000 square metres. Page 582 of 668 Site Context The subject lands are addressed as 417 King Street West and are situated within the City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre (Downtown). The subject lands are located at the southern side of the block bound by King Street West, Francis Green (a City -owned parkette) and Halls Lane. The subject property has a lot area of 0.28 hectares (0.69 acres) with 56 metres of frontage along King Street West and Halls Lane West. 417 King Street West is currently developed with a 1 storey commercial building (former location of Ziggy's Cycle) with a surface parking lot. The subject lands do not contain any residential units and directly abut Francis Green to the southeast and a 19 -storey mixed use development located (1 Victoria condominium) to the northwest of the subject lands. The surrounding neighbourhood consists of a variety of uses including mid -rise and high rise mixed-use, commercial uses, and institutional office buildings. REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a with a 55 -storey mixed use development with a proposed Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23. The proposed development includes one building with a 49 -storey tower on top of a 6 -storey podium. The high rise mixed use building proposes a total of 622 residential units with 184 parking spaces located within 1 level of underground parking and 1 level of parking internal to the building. 622 Class A bicycle parking spaces are proposed along with 6 Class B visitor bicycle Page 583 of 668 h� G w� d� SUBJEC 1 AREA E 05 co 9 Figure 1 — Location Map: 417 King Street West REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a with a 55 -storey mixed use development with a proposed Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23. The proposed development includes one building with a 49 -storey tower on top of a 6 -storey podium. The high rise mixed use building proposes a total of 622 residential units with 184 parking spaces located within 1 level of underground parking and 1 level of parking internal to the building. 622 Class A bicycle parking spaces are proposed along with 6 Class B visitor bicycle Page 583 of 668 spaces. Primary vehicular access is proposed from Hall Lane. One of the ground floor commercial units and the residential lobby is proposed at grade along King Street West and one ground floor commercial unit is proposed facing the Francis Green Parkette. Table 1 below highlights the development concept statistics while Figures 2 and 3 show the proposed development concept site plan and building elevations of the development proposal. Table 1. Proposed Development Concept Statistics I NOCTO ID STEM KING, 9ft Vi Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 584 of 668 Development Concept Number of Units 622 residential dwelling units, 2 ground floor commercial units Parking Spaces 184 parking spaces Building Height 55 storeys Class A (indoor secured) 1 per unit (622) Bicycle Parking Class B (outdoor visitor) 6 Bicycle Parking Electric Vehicle Ready 36 Parking Stalls Floor Space Ratio 23 Unit Types 297 — 1 -bedroom units 229 - 1 bedroom plus den units 96 — 2 -bedroom units I NOCTO ID STEM KING, 9ft Vi Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 584 of 668 To facilitate the redevelopment of 417 King Street West with the proposed development concept, an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment are required to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject lands as the existing Official Plan policies and zoning permit a maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 3.0. The lands are currently designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and zoned `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The current land use designation and zoning have been in place since the early 1990s which do not align with the planned function of the Downtown, to accommodate density appropriate for a central Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), and recently approved developments that are newly constructed or under development. The owner is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to Map 4 and Policy 15.D.2.71 to the text in the Official Plan to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 and requested to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U' in Zoning By-law 85-1, to allow for a FSR of 23; regulate parking and bicycle parking requirements; and to further regulate building setbacks. Holding Provision 109H is also proposed to be added to the property to require an updated Urban Design Brief demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity to the satisfaction of the City of Kitchener's Director of Planning. The Holding Provision will also prevent the development of the site with sensitive uses, including residential uses, until the Region is in receipt of a revised noise study is completed to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Figure 3 — Proposed Building Rendering: The front elevation along King Street West Page 585 of 668 Planningi Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. Page 586 of 668 To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus, rapid transit, and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents an attainable form of market- based housing. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use multiple dwelling development that is compatible with the planned function of the area and the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; Page 587 of 668 iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Policy 2.2.4 requires that planning be prioritized for MTSAs on priority transit corridors, including zoning in a manner that implements the policies of the Growth Plan. MTSAs on priority transit corridors will be planned for a minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare for those that are served by light rail transit or bus rapid transit. The Region of Waterloo's ION is a form of light rail transit and the ION stations are Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) that are required to achieve the minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The subject lands are located within the City's delineated Urban Growth Centre (UGC), and within a Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) in the 2014 Kitchener Official Plan. In the City's Official Plan on Map 2 — Urban Structure the lands appear within the MTSA boundary for the ION Central Station. The Region of Waterloo commenced the Regional Official Plan Review project and as part of that work, revised MTSA boundaries were approved in August 2022. The subject lands are within the Central Station MTSA. The proposed development provides residential intensification and will help the City achieve density targets in the MTSA. The proposed designation and zoning will support a higher density housing option that will help make efficient use of existing infrastructure, parks, roads, trails and transit. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Urban Growth Centre in the ROP. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. The subject lands are located in the Central Station (MTSA) in the ROP. The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha on Page 588 of 668 a site specific basis and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. Airport Zoning Regulations The subject lands are located outside of the federally regulated Airport Zoning Regulation (AZR). Prior to construction of any buildings and installation of the stationary crane for construction, the owner is required to submit Land Use Proposal Submission Forms for Land Use and Cranes to NAV CANADA and an Aeronautical Assessment Form to Transport Canada for review of the proposed tower and temporary cranes and to evaluate the impacts to flight paths. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 622 residential units and 730 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, building step backs, and vehicular and pedestrian connections to Francis Green, King Street, and Halls Lane have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The OP establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of Page 589 of 668 development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre (UGC), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within the UGC. The UGC (Downtown) is the primary Urban Structure Component and Intensification Area. The planned function of the UGC is to accommodate a significant share of the Region's and City's future population and employment growth. Section 3.C.2.13 of the OP indicates that the UGC is planned to achieve, by 2031 or earlier, a minimum density of 225 residents and jobs combined per hectare and assist in achieving the minimum residential intensification target identified in Policy 3.C.1.6. The UGC is planned to be a vibrant Regional and Citywide focal point and destination and is intended to be the City's primary focal point for residential intensification as well as for investment in institutional and Region -wide public services, commercial, office, recreational, cultural and entertainment uses. The site is also within the Central Station Area and within 400 metres of both the Central and Victoria Park ION stops. In accordance with Policy 3.C.2.17 of the OP, the planned function of the MTSAs is to provide densities that will support transit, and achieve a mix of residential, office, institutional and commercial uses. They are also intended to have streetscapes and a built form that is pedestrian -friendly and transit -oriented. Policies also require that development applications in MTSAs give consideration to the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) policies contained in Section 13.C.3.12 of the OP. Generally, the TOD policies support a compact urban form, that supports walking, cycling and the use of transit, by providing a mix of land uses in close proximity to transit stops, to support higher frequency transit service and optimize transit rider convenience. These policies also support developments which foster walkability by creating safe and comfortable pedestrian environments and a high-quality public realm. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will help to increase density in an area well served by nearby transit and rapid transit while being context sensitive to surrounding lands and provides excellent access to off-road pedestrian and cycling facilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for the UGC and MTSA but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more environmentally friendly city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Innovation District is characterized by a mix of high rise and medium residential, mixed use, commercial and office buildings and old large industrial buildings which either have been converted to loft style office, residential and other viable uses or have the potential to do so. This area of the city is expected to evolve and transform into a dense urban contemporary setting with continued growth in the high- tech industry coupled with the research office uses affiliated with the nearby post- secondary institutions. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Page 590 of 668 Policies 15.D.2.50 to 15.D.2.52 of the City of Kitchener's Official Plan encourage growth in this area to occur by permitting a full range of complementary commercial uses and encouraging high density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to the Urban Growth Centre,(Map 4) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 whereas the current Official Plan policies allow for a maximum FSR of 3.0. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the City of Kitchener is in receipt of an Urban Design Report and until such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo. Growing Together The Growing Together project is the continuation of the City's ongoing planning review process that began with PARTS and advanced through the Neighbourhood Planning Review (NPR) project, while also responding to new direction from the province, implementing the updated Regional Official Plan, and addressing new and emerging city priorities. Preliminary direction on a draft approach to growth and change have been drafted by staff and is currently available public for consultation. Staff are recommending a form based zoning approach as part of the Growing Together project, which will place a greater emphasis on the pedestrian experience and design of buildings at grade and as experienced on the street, as well as appropriate tower floor plate sizes, separations and setbacks which protect from tower overlook within and between sites, which preserve access to sunlight and mitigates shadow impacts, and which provides for an interesting skyline — which is also the goal of the City's Tall Building Guidelines. Staff have drafted the recommended special policy and zoning regulations for the subject lands in consideration of the direction of the Growing Together project. Staff are of the opinion that the subject lands are appropriate for high-rise, high-density development, subject to demonstration that the proposed built form achieves the objectives of the Urban Design Manual and the Tall Building Guidelines. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Scorecard was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Scorecard outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. An Page 591 of 668 urban design report will be required and secured through a Holding Provision. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate onsite amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Streetscape — The King Street frontage and side yard abutting Francis Green (city owned parkette) is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's lobby. At grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Staff are recommending a Holding Provision apply to the subject land demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes. Through the Site Plan approval process staff will work with the applicant to further enhance the podium design and further active the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The tower has a well defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Tower Desiqn The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Slab" as the proposed tower floor plate is less than 850 square metres in area. The tower placement has been oriented towards King Street with a 6 storey podium. The tower massing is broken up vertically by variation and the articulation of building materials and step backs. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 metre tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Shadows for compact slab buildings are longer and narrower, meaning there are further off-site impacts, but the impacts are shorter for all off-site properties. Page 592 of 668 Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application is necessary to mitigate wind. Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower is generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the offsite separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to the two station stops the Central Station and the Victoria Park ION stop. The building has excellent access to cycling networks, including existing on and off-street cycling facilities and is located in close proximity to the downtown cycling grid. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. Policy 3.C.2.22 states that until such time as Station Area Plans are completed and this Plan is amended accordingly, in the interim, any development application submitted within a Major Transit Station Area will be reviewed generally in accordance with the Transit - Oriented Development Policies included in Section 13.C.3.12 Page 593 of 668 The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications support a more compact mixed-use development in the City of Kitchener's primary intensification area (UGC). The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including, one, one plus den and two-bedroom units. Theses new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 4 — Urban Growth Centre in the 2014 Official Plan be changed from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area 8'. Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Page 594 of 668 Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-law 85-1) The subject lands are zoned `Warehouse District Zone (D-6)' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The existing zoning permits a range of commercial and light industrial uses with a maximum permitted Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.0. The applicant has requested an amendment to Zoning By-law 85-1 to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6)' to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H' in Zoning By-law 85-1. Official Plan policies indicate that where special zoning regulations are requested for residential intensification or a redevelopment of lands, the overall impact of the site- specific zoning regulations will consider compatibility with existing built form; appropriate massing and setbacks that support and maintain streetscape and community character; appropriate buffering to mitigate adverse impacts, particularly with respect to privacy; avoidance of unacceptable adverse impacts by providing appropriate number of parking spaces and an appropriate landscaped/amenity area. The applicant is seeking to amend the Zoning By-law to add Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U to Zoning By-law 85-1. The proposed Special Regulation Provision is to permit an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR), regulate buildings setbacks, and regulate vehicular and bicycle parking requirements while the proposed special use provision proposes to add multiple dwellings and retail are permitted uses. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Special Regulation Provision 804R: a) That the maximum Floor Space Ratio shall be 23. The purpose of this regulation is to cap the Floor Space Ratio and ensure development does not generally exceed the density presented in the concept plans. The 23 FSR is appropriate in this location and allows for a 55 storey building that meets the tall building guidelines. b) That electric vehicle parking and bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 and the required parking rates shall be provided in accordance UGC Zones in Table 5-5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051. The purpose of regulation b) is to provide for a parking rate which is appropriate for the development. The lands are designated Urban Growth Centre — Innovation District. While Urban Growth Centre (UGC) zones have not been created in Zoning By-law 2019-051, Parking Regulations contained in Section 5 provide a specific Urban Growth Centre (UGC) parking ratio, which permits zero parking be provided for most uses including multiple residential dwellings. This parking ratio implements Official Plan policies that provide for reduced parking rates in support of, and in recognition of, active transportation and transit availability in intensification areas. New UGC/MTSA zones will be established as part of the Growing Together project later this year. Page 595 of 668 The UGC parking rates also require 1 Class A bicycle parking space (long-term secure and weather protected e.g., bike room) per unit as well as Class B bicycle parking (short- term secure (outdoor bike rack). In addition, 20% of the parking which is provided must be electric vehicle ready. The subject lands have adequate access to public transit and pedestrian/cycling networks and adequate bike storage will be provided within the development for residents. Planning and Transportation Services staff is of the opinion that the parking rate is appropriate for the subject lands. c) The minimum rear yard setback, and side yard setback shall be 0 metres. The purpose of this regulation is to allow the building's podium to be located right up to the rear and side property lines. The subject lands have frontage on two public right of ways (Halls Lane, and King Street West) which do not have a minimum yard setback when abutting a street. The request to reduce the yard setbacks allows the podium to be built to the property line allows for efficient and effective use of the lands. d) No maximum gross leasable commercial space for Convenience Retail or retail shall apply. The purpose of this regulation is to allow for larger ground floor commercial units. Currently two ground floor units 394.44 square metres and 335.23 square metres are proposed however there are options for units to divided up into smaller units. e) Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited. The Region of Waterloo has indicated Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited to mitigate the risks associated with contaminants that will remain beneath the site when the property is redeveloped. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Special Use Provision 486U: a) The following new uses shall be permitted: i. multiple dwelling ii. retail The purpose of this regulation is to allow residential uses and retail uses on the subject land. The current zoning of the property does not align with the subject lands 2014 Official Plan Designation (Innovation District) as the new downtown zoning to implement the 2014 Official Plan has not been completed. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 109H: Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to facilitate the implementation of the `D-6' zone and special Page 596 of 668 regulation provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the holding provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Holding Provision 109H Planning staff are recommending the following holding provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review stationary noise sources in the vicinity of the site, the potential impacts of noise (e.g., HVAC systems) on the on-site sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. No development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity. A noise study was prepared in support of the proposed Zoning By-law and reviewed by the Region of Waterloo. Additional building noise mitigation measures will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an addendum to the noise study will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. High quality urban design is expected for the subject lands and extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and with adequate onsite amenity for future residents is required to be provided onsite. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to change the zoning of the subject lands to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H' represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a mixed use dwelling development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, which will add visual interest at the street level and skyline, and will appropriately accommodate on-site parking needs. Staff are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Appendix `B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment was undertaken in May 2023 to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any Page 597 of 668 necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Appendix `D' of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: • Planning Justification Report Prepared by: MHBC Planning, April 2023 • Wind Study Prepared by: RWDI, April 2023 • Building Elevations and Shadow Study Prepared by: Kirkor Architects, April 2023 • Transportation Impact Study Prepared by: Paradigm Transportation Solutions, May 2023 • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report Prepared by: WalterFedy, March 2023 • Sustainability Statement Prepared by: MHBC Planning, May 2023 • Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by: MHBC Planning, March 2023 • Noise Feasibility Study Prepared by: HGC Engineering, April 2023 • Arborist Report Prepared by: JK Consulting Arborists, March 2023 Community Input & Staff Responses 1►JI : lei STA :1 : I A k:U7 735 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified 8 people/households/businesses provided comment A City -led Neighbourhood Meeting was held on July 11, 2023, and 11 users logged on Page 598 of 668 Staff received written responses from 8 residents with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Appendix `E'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on July 11, 2023. A summary of what we heard, and staff responses are noted below. What We Heard Staff Comment Staff received numerous emails in support of the proposed development. As noted in the staff report Residents support the the location is appropriate as the subject lands are development and feel it's the located in the heart of the City of Kitchener's appropriate location for a Downtown (Urban Growth Centre) which is planned development of this scale. for significant growth and within close proximity to multiple ION station stops and a planned transit hub at King and Victoria Streets. The City of Kitchener does not regulate number of bedrooms. While the City does not regulate the number of bedrooms, a mix of unit types is strongly encouraged. In September 2022, we received new housing census data — we know; ■ We have 99,805 dwelling units in Kitchener 61 % are 3+ bedrooms. We also know household data now as well: ■ 58% of households have 1-2 people (26% 1 Three bedroom units should be person, 32% 2 people) included in the proposed ■ 15% of all dwellings are in buildings greater development. than 5 storeys When a comparison is made between the household and housing data, we have 27,000 3+ bedroom homes which are occupied by one or two people. This means that 44% of all large units in Kitchener have more bedrooms than people living in the dwelling. The City is currently implementing a Missing Middle study as part of the Growing Together project which is reviewing how the City can continue to achieve a balance of all housing types of all sizes across the City. Concerns the proposed A Traffic Impact Study was submitted and reviewed development will create traffic by City and Regional Transportation staff who did that existing roads can not not identify any major traffic concerns as a result of handle. the proposed development. Page 599 of 668 Victoria Park and other nearby In addition to access to multiple parks and urban city owned parks are at capacity greens within walking distance, the proposed and cannot accommodate development includes a 7t" floor landscaped 700 additional residents. square metre (7535 square foot) amenity terrace as well as 900 square metre (9688 square feet) of indoor amenity area. The City's Parkland Dedication Policy will also require Parkland Dedication in the form of cash in lieu at the site plan approval process. Not enough bicycle parking is The design was amended to provide 1 Class A being provided. bicycle parking spaces per dwelling unit are required as part of the proposed By-law. Affordable Units should be This development is not receiving affordable housing provided. sponsorship. A mix of unit types and unit sizes are proposed. The two (2) bedroom units could offer a more affordable option for future owners/tenants who could share some living costs. The Innovation District land use designation does not have a maximum building height. The proposed height and density are justified and appropriate for the subject lands. The subject lands are located in the heart of the City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre (Downtown), an area planned for significant A 55 storey building is too tall. intensification, which includes multiple high rises that are similar in height and density which are currently built, under construction or planned. The subject lands are within close proximity to multiple major transit station areas. The location of the proposed development of this height and density is appropriate. The City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre consists of numerous high-rises that are built or approved to be built ranging from 10 storeys to 50 storeys. Comparable high-rise buildings in height that are built, under construction or proposed include The building should be similar in the following developments: height to what is built now in the DTK (60 Frederick St) - 39 Storeys (built) downtown. Charlie West (60 Charles St W) - 31 Storeys (built) 20 Queen Street - 34 Storeys (under review) Station Park (607 King St W), 18 (built), 28 (built), 36 (under construction), 40 and 50 storeys (under review) Page 600 of 668 10 Duke Street — 45 Storeys (final site plan approval issued 30 Francis Street — 45 Storeys (under construction) 88 Queen Street — 45 Storeys (under review) 50 Borden — 51 and 57 Storeys (under review) Planning Conclusions In considering the foregoing, staff are supportive of the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the development of a mixed used development at 417 King Street West. Staff is of the opinion that the subject applications are consistent with policies of the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conform to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Regional Official Plan, and the City of Kitchener Official Plan and represent good planning. Planning staff are recommending that the applications be approved. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023, and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in May of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 13, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix C). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on May 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 10 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report. Planning staff Page 601 of 668 also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 REVIEWED BY: Tina Malone -Wright— Supervisor of Development Applications Garett Stevenson - Manager of Development Review APPROVED BY: Justin Readman - General Manager, Development Services APPENDIX& Appendix A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix C — Newspaper Notice Appendix D — Department and Agency Comments Appendix E — Public Comments Page 602 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 417 King Street West Page 603 of 668 AMENDMENT NO.XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 417 King Street West INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 4 THE AMENDMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council Page 604 of 668 AMENDMENT NO.XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. XX to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener (2014). This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend the Official Plan by adding Site Specific Policy Area No. 8 to Map 4 - Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) and by adding associated Site Specific Policy Area 15.D.2.71 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT Planning Analysis Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Page 605 of 668 The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus, rapid transit, and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents an attainable form of market-based housing. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use multiple dwelling development that is compatible with the planned function of the area and the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including 4 Page 606 of 668 major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Policy 2.2.4 requires that planning be prioritized for MTSAs on priority transit corridors, including zoning in a manner that implements the policies of the Growth Plan. MTSAs on priority transit corridors will be planned for a minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare for those that are served by light rail transit or bus rapid transit. The Region of Waterloo's ION is a form of light rail transit and the ION stations are Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) that are required to achieve the minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The subject lands are located within the City's delineated Urban Growth Centre (UGC), and within a Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) in the 2014 Kitchener Official Plan. In the City's Official Plan on Map 2 — Urban Structure the lands appear within the MTSA boundary for the ION Central Station. The Region of Waterloo commenced the Regional Page 607 of 668 Official Plan Review project and as part of that work, revised MTSA boundaries were approved in August 2022. The subject lands are within the Central Station MTSA. The proposed development provides residential intensification and will help the City achieve density targets in the MTSA. The proposed designation and zoning will support a higher density housing option that will help make efficient use of existing infrastructure, parks, roads, trails and transit. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Urban Growth Centre in the ROP. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. The subject lands are located in the Central Station (MTSA) in the ROP. The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha on a site specific basis and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. Airport Zoning Regulations The subject lands are located outside of the federally regulated Airport Zoning Regulation (AZR). Prior to construction of any buildings and installation of the stationary crane for construction, the owner is required to submit Land Use Proposal Submission Forms for Land Use and Cranes to NAV CANADA and an Aeronautical Assessment Form to Transport Canada for review of the proposed tower and temporary cranes and to evaluate the impacts to flight paths. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Page 608 of 668 Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 622 residential units and 730 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, building step backs, and vehicular and pedestrian connections to Francis Green, King Street, and Halls Lane have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The OP establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre (UGC), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within the UGC. The UGC (Downtown) is the primary Urban Structure Component and Intensification Area. The planned function of the UGC is to accommodate a significant share of the Region's and City's future population and employment growth. Section 3.C.2.13 of the OP indicates that the UGC is planned to achieve, by 2031 or earlier, a minimum density of 225 residents and jobs combined per hectare and assist in achieving the minimum residential intensification target identified in Policy 3.C.1.6. The UGC is planned to be a vibrant Regional and Citywide focal point and destination and is intended to be the City's primary focal point for residential intensification as well as for investment in institutional and Region -wide public services, commercial, office, recreational, cultural and entertainment uses. The site is also within the Central Station Area and within 400 metres of both the Central and Victoria Park ION stops. In accordance with Policy 3.C.2.17 of the OP, the planned function of the MTSAs is to provide densities that will support transit, and achieve a mix of residential, office, institutional and commercial uses. They are also intended to have streetscapes and a built form that is pedestrian -friendly and transit - oriented. Page 609 of 668 Policies also require that development applications in MTSAs give consideration to the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) policies contained in Section 13.C.3.12 of the OP. Generally, the TOD policies support a compact urban form, that supports walking, cycling and the use of transit, by providing a mix of land uses in close proximity to transit stops, to support higher frequency transit service and optimize transit rider convenience. These policies also support developments which foster walkability by creating safe and comfortable pedestrian environments and a high-quality public realm. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will help to increase density in an area well served by nearby transit and rapid transit while being context sensitive to surrounding lands and provides excellent access to off-road pedestrian and cycling facilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for the UGC and MTSA but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more environmentally friendly city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Innovation District is characterized by a mix of high rise and medium residential, mixed use, commercial and office buildings and old large industrial buildings which either have been converted to loft style office, residential and other viable uses or have the potential to do so. This area of the city is expected to evolve and transform into a dense urban contemporary setting with continued growth in the high-tech industry coupled with the research office uses affiliated with the nearby post -secondary institutions. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Policies 15.D.2.50 to 15.D.2.52 of the City of Kitchener's Official Plan encourage growth in this area to occur by permitting a full range of complementary commercial uses and encouraging high density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to the Urban Growth Centre,(Map 4) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 whereas the current Official Plan policies allow for a maximum FSR of 3.0. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the City of Kitchener is in receipt of an Urban Design Report and until Page 610 of 668 such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo. Growing Together The Growing Together project is the continuation of the City's ongoing planning review process that began with PARTS and advanced through the Neighbourhood Planning Review (NPR) project, while also responding to new direction from the province, implementing the updated Regional Official Plan, and addressing new and emerging city priorities. Preliminary direction on a draft approach to growth and change have been drafted by staff and is currently available public for consultation. Staff are recommending a form based zoning approach as part of the Growing Together project, which will place a greater emphasis on the pedestrian experience and design of buildings at grade and as experienced on the street, as well as appropriate tower floor plate sizes, separations and setbacks which protect from tower overlook within and between sites, which preserve access to sunlight and mitigates shadow impacts, and which provides for an interesting skyline — which is also the goal of the City's Tall Building Guidelines. Staff have drafted the recommended special policy and zoning regulations for the subject lands in consideration of the direction of the Growing Together project. Staff are of the opinion that the subject lands are appropriate for high-rise, high-density development, subject to demonstration that the proposed built form achieves the objectives of the Urban Design Manual and the Tall Building Guidelines. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Scorecard was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Scorecard outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. An urban design report will be required and secured through a Holding Provision. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate onsite amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Streetscape — The King Street frontage and side yard abutting Francis Green (city owned parkette) is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's lobby. At Page 611 of 668 grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Staff are recommending a Holding Provision apply to the subject land demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes. Through the Site Plan approval process staff will work with the applicant to further enhance the podium design and further active the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The tower has a well defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Tower Design The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Slab" as the proposed tower floor plate is less than 850 square metres in area. The tower placement has been oriented towards King Street with a 6 storey podium. The tower massing is broken up vertically by variation and the articulation of building materials and step backs. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 metre tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Shadows for compact slab buildings are longer and narrower, meaning there are further off-site impacts, but the impacts are shorter for all off-site properties. Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application is necessary to mitigate wind. io Page 612 of 668 Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower is generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the offsite separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to the two station stops the Central Station and the Victoria Park ION stop. The building has excellent access to cycling networks, including existing on and off- street cycling facilities and is located in close proximity to the downtown cycling grid. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. Policy 3.C.2.22 states that until such time as Station Area Plans are completed and this Plan is amended accordingly, in the interim, any development application submitted within a Major Transit Station Area will be reviewed generally in accordance with the Transit -Oriented Development Policies included in Section 13.C.3.12 The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications support a more compact mixed-use development in the City of Kitchener's primary intensification area (UGC). The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. 11 Page 613 of 668 At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4.1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including, one, one plus den and two-bedroom units. Theses new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 4 — Urban Growth Centre in the 2014 Official Plan be changed from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area 8'. Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved. 12 Page 614 of 668 SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Part D, Section 15.D.2. is amended by adding Site Specific Policy 15.D.2.71 as follows: "15.D.12.71. 417 King Street West Notwithstanding the Innovation District land use designation and policies within the Urban Growth Centre, on lands municipally known as 417 King Street West, a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23.0 will be permitted. b) Amend Map No. 4 — Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) by adding Specific Policy Area "8. 417 King Street West (Policy 15.D.2.71)" to the `Area of Amendment', as shown on the attached Schedule `A'. 13 Page 615 of 668 APPENDIX 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 114''Zill A A 4 7 King, Street W st Co n ce pt D RwAg . ............ 7" 2 'IV 5- 1 Ig low of on, U 0 lb .. ..... . A6M 1 v 11 .71 IMF.", Have Ybur Voice Heard! ftwmsi�e-� i4ww4%Db Date: 0,ctobeir3,023, Lxxaflort, Cwncll CharnbWns, Kfttbionior-Ch�yy Hi0i'l 2W Kng, Street Wwst i rual Zoom Meating ,q tic, to kitchiener.,ca/meetings, and seWt.- Curent asondas and repoms, "10 di"ry,--; Ix-l"ore, rneetil'tj,'O, Appow as a dde$Mbn 1p Wa te h a rnee't I i,iqp 70 k? a F1 1 rtlere- J; ix)LIT MiS. (WOjel7r, indut."firig 5040; l~.kltchenerxa/ PlaiinkII&IpWallanis or on n, tiw-t Crai IIDumaM, Senior" Pu,/,,,nnlRT cra igiildu rim rt@ kitichienerri,ca 519141.22,00x,7073 The City o,fKiWhener wil consWer apjAlatons twarnendthe, Official Plan and,Zoning By- Wvw to faciWe the, 110le larlds wilit'I'l,i) ' S,x ey ItTlxexl k,lso IXjildirl, with a Fbor:Spiace Ratio of 23 haO-% 622 reldenW units and Ejwir id flocy,; c-ro, rr-i m e rcia 1 uh,its-A total of '111 84vehicle parlking spaces and 312 licycle parking spaciesare proposed fbt Page 616 of 668 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 is Page 617 of 668 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council - DATE 16 Page 618 of 668 PROPOSED BY — LAW 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. — 417 King Street West) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcel of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U to Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H. 2. Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 is hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No.1 attached hereto. 3. Appendix "C" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 486 thereto as follows: "486. Notwithstanding Section 17.1 of this By-law, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A", Multiple Dwellings and Retail shall be permitted." 4. Appendix "D" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 804 thereto as follows: "804. Notwithstanding Sections 17.1,17.3 and 6.1.2 of this By-law, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A", the following special regulations shall apply: Page 620 of 668 i) The maximum Floor Space Ratio shall be 23. ii) Electric vehicle parking and bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 and the required parking rates shall be provided in accordance UGC Zones in Table 5-5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051. iii) The minimum rear yard and side yard setbacks shall be 0.0 metres iv) No maximum gross leasable commercial space for Convenience Retail or Retail. V) Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited." 5. Appendix "F" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 109H thereto as follows: "109H. Notwithstanding Section 17 of this Bylaw, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule 84 of Appendix "A": i) No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review stationary noise sources in the vicinity of the site, the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the on-site sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. ii) No development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity." 6. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. 33 (417 King Page 621 of 668 Street West) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 622 of 668 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 417 King Street West Concept Drawing LJr. i ( S Ra'[Jo of 21 Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Zoom Fleeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Craig Dumart, Senior Planner craig.dumart@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7073 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a 55 -storey mixed use building with a Floor Space Ratio of 23 having 622 residential units and ground floor commercial units. A total of 184 vehicle parking spaces and 312 bicycle parking spaces are proposed for the development. Page 624 of 668 City of Kitchener - Comment Form Project Address: 417 King Street West Application Type: OPA/ZBA Comments of: Environmental Planning (Sustainability) — City of Kitchener Commenter's name: Raida Chowdhury Email: raida.chowdhury@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Written Comments Due: June 26, 2023 Date of comments: June 13, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and/or Reports submitted and reviewed as part of a complete application• i Sustainability Statement 417 King Street West, prepared by MHBC, dated May 5, 2023. 2. Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the supporting documentation (as listed above) to support a site plan application proposing a 55 -storey mixed use building, containing 622 residential units, regarding sustainability and energy conservation, and provide the following comments: - Although the Ontario Building Code (OBC) is progressive, going forward all developments will need to include energy conservation measures that go beyond the OBC as the City (and Region of Waterloo) strive to achieve our greenhouse gas reduction target. - Upon review of the supporting documentation, the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments can be supported as several sustainable measures have been proposed or are being considered for the development. - The development proposes several sustainable measures including: o The utilization of existing servicing o The consideration to encourage greater public transit use o Building orientation for southern exposure reducing heating requirements o On-site garbage, recycling, and compost o Roof design to support future Solar Panel installation o On-site secure bike parking promoting active transportation o Electric vehicle parking spaces, fitted with re -charge stations o Measures to preserve rainwater for irrigation Potential items for consideration are: o Building envelope (wall, roof, and window thermal performance) designed beyond OBC requirements Page 625 of 668 o Use of alternative water supply and demand management systems such as rainwater, harvesting and grey water reuse, or readiness of the development to incorporate such systems in the future o Measures to incorporate net zero emissions or LEED standards o Installing white or light-colored material on the roof to reduce heat island effects and reduce cooling requirements o Use low or no VOC paints and finishes to minimize air pollutants in interior materials A Sustainability Statement (as per the City's Terms of Reference) will be required as part of a complete Site Plan Application which can further explore and/or confirm additional sustainability measures that are best suited to the development. 3. Policies, Standards and Resources: ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.4.5. The City will encourage and support, where feasible and appropriate, alternative energy systems, renewable energy systems and district energy in accordance with Section 7.C.6 to accommodate current and projected needs of energy consumption. e Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.4. In areas of new development, the City will encourage orientation of streets and/or lot design/building design with optimum southerly exposures. Such orientation will optimize opportunities for active or passive solar space heating and water heating. ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.8. Development applications will be required to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City, energy is being conserved or low energy generated. ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.27. The City will encourage developments to incorporate the necessary infrastructure for district energy in the detailed engineering designs where the potential for implementing district energy exists. 4. Advice• ➢ As part of the Kitchener Great Places Award program every several years there is a Sustainable Development category. Also, there are community-based programs to help with and celebrate and recognize businesses and sustainable development stewards (Regional Sustainability Initiative - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/regional-sustainability- initiative and TravelWise - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/travelwise). ➢ The 'Sustainability Statement Terms of Reference' can be found on the City's website under 'Planning Resources' at ... https://www.kitchener.ca/SustainabilitVStatement Page 626 of 668 City of Kitchener Pre -submission Application Comment Form Project Address: 417 King St W Date of Meeting: NA Application Type: ZBA / OPA Comments Of: Development Engineering Commenter's Name: Eric Riek Email: eric.riek@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7330 Date of Comment: jo,,, ❑ I plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no c,oncerns)`-% 1. Site Specific Comments & Issues: %, %r °� • No specific concerns.%, O of a comDlete Planni "V,, 'o Zoning Bylaw Amendment: ..%; • No concerns with the Functional Servicing Report, sanitary capacity is available and water distribution report1s acceptable. • Stormwater Management may be addressed through the Site Plan Approval process. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 627 of 668 City of Kitchener Heritage — OPA/ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 417 King Street West File Number: ZBA23/011/K/CD Comments Of: Heritage Planning Commenter's Name: Deeksha Choudhry Email: deeksha.choudhry@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 Date of Comments: June 12, 2023 Heritage Planning staff has reviewed the following material for the proposed development on the lands municipally addressed as 417 King Street West to provide the comments outlined below: • Draft Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated March 23, 2023; • Architectural Drawings for the proposed development; • Official Plan Amendment Application; • OPZ ZBA Submission Cover Letter dated May 5, 2023; • Planning Justification Report; • Zoning By-law Amendment Application. 1. Site Specific Comments: The subject lands municipally addressed as 417 King Street West do not have any heritage status. However, they are located adjacent to 404-410 King Street West, also known as the Kaufman Lofts, and designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Furthermore, the subject property is also located within the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape. Section 2 of the Planning Act identifies matters of provincial interest, which includes the conservation of significant features of architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest. Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions of Council be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Policy 2.6.1 of the PPS states that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Regional and municipal policies and guidelines also address the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The Regional Official Plan contains policies that require the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The City's Official Plan contains policies that require development to have regard for and incorporate cultural heritage resources into development. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 628 of 668 2. Draft Heritage Impact Assessment for 1385 Bleams Road Since the proposed development is adjacent to protected heritage property, the submission of a Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was made a requirement of any planning application. A scoped HIA, dated March 2023, and prepared by MHBC Ltd. has been submitted to the City. The scoped HIA has concluded that the proposed development will not have any impacts on the adjacent heritage resource. According to the HIA: "The proposed redevelopment will not result in adverse impacts to the Kaufman Building, Lang Tanning Building, or the surrounding CHL. The proposed development does involve excavation, which could result in vibrations during construction. We note that the Kaufman Building was originally designed for industrial use, which housed large and heavy machinery. The construction and materials used, including thick concrete floors, walls and steel reinforcement, ensure that the building was built to withstand vibrations or other intensive activities. Therefore, impacts due to vibration during construction are unlikely." 3. Heritage Planning Comments Heritage Planning staff provide the following comments for consideration as part of the HIA: The HIA has not yet been circulated to Heritage Kitchener for comment and feedback. This will be done at next available meeting. Even if impacts from vibrations are not expected, adequate fencing should be considered to protect the Kaufman house during construction. A pre -construction structural assessment and a post -construction structural assessment might be required to ensure other construction activities have not caused any damage to the building. Heritage Planning staff also provide the following comments for consideration as part of the OPA/ZBA: The total height of the podium should be in keeping with the height of the surrounding, Kaufman Lofts, and Tannery buildings. Additional requirements might be included as part of site plan conditions to be fulfilled prior to full site plan approval. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 629 of 668 111—VIN MEE From: [anieK4usse|man Sent: Wednesday, May 24'2O23I1OPK4 To: [eigDumart Subject: FW: Circulation for Comment 417 King Street West (OPA/Z8/) Attachments: department 8/agency letter 417King Street VVest.pdf,{)PA230O7KCD_k4AP4.pdf; Z8A23011K[D_K4AP1.pdf Hello Craig, Environmental Planning has no concerns and/or comments regarding the proposed OPA/ZBA at 417 King Street West. Regandm, Carrie Musse|rnan (she/her), BSc.. Dip., RPP' W1C|P Senior Environmental Planner Planning | City of Kitchener 510-741-22OOx70G8|TTY 1-8GO-9Gg-gSA4| From: Christine Kompter<ChhsLine.Kompter@kbchener.ca> Sent: Wednesday, May 24,2U231:42PK4 To: Metro|inx(GO)-Development (Deve|opment.Coordinator@Metro|inx.00nn) <deve|opmenLcmordinatnr@metno|inx.corn>;_DL_#_DSD _ Planning <DSD-P|anningDk�sion��khzhenecca>;8eU-c/o VVGP<circu|adons��wsp.com>;Carlos Reyes <Cor|os.Reyes��kitchener.ca>;Darren Kropf<Darren.Kruof@kitchenerza/; Dave Seller <Dave.6e||er@kiLrhenerza>;David Heuchert<Dave.Heuchert@kitchenerza>; David Paetz <David.Paetz@kitchener.ca>;Ellen Kayes<E||en.Kayes@kitchener.ca>;EnovaPower Corp. Greig Cameron <8reiQzarneron@enovapovverzom>;EnovaPower Corp. - Shaun Wang <shaun.vvang@enovapovverzom>;GRC4 Planning (p|annin8@8randriver.ca)<p|anninQ@8randriverzo>;Hydro One - Dennis DeRan8o <|andusep|annin8@hydroonezom>;Jim Edmondson °Jim.Edmnndson@kitchener.ca>;Justin Readman <]usdn.Readman@kitchenerza>; Katherine Hughes <Ka1herine.Hu8hes@kitchenerza>; MikeSei|ing <Mike.Seiling@kitchener.ca>; Ontario Power Generation <Executivevp.lawanddevelopment@opg.com>; Park Planning (SK4)<Park.P|anning@kitchenerza>;Region - Planning <P|anningApp|ications@regionohxater|oo.ca>;Property Data Administrator (SM)<PropDataAdmin@kitchenerza>;Robert Morgan <Robert.Morgan@kitchenerza>;Steven Ryder <Steven.Ryder@kitchener.ca>;Sy|vieEastman <6y|vie.Eastman@kitchener.ca>;Tom RuQg|e <Tonn.RugQ|e@kitchener.ca>;UVV-VVU5A(Feds)/pres@wusaza\<pres@wusa.ca>;VVCDS8 Planning <p|annin8@vvcdshza>;VVRD3B-Board Secretary (e|oine_burns@wrdsb.ca)<e|aine_burns@wrdsb.ca>;VVRDSB- Planning <p|anning@wrdsbza> Cc: Craig Dumah<Craig.Dumart@kitchenerza> Subject: Circulation for Comment -417King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Please see attached. Additional documentation can befound inAMANDA folders 23-11O866& 23-lIU878(City staff) and ShareFile (external a9encies). Comments orquestions should bedirected toCraig Dumart,Senior Planner / 519-741-2200 0073). ChdstineKompter Administrative Assistant | Planning Division | City OfKitchener ZOO King Street West, 6m Floor | P.O. Box 11I8 | Kitchener ON N2G4G7 519-741-2IO0ext. 7425 | TTY 1-R6G,9S9-9994| Page 630 of 668 From: Trevor Heywood <theywood @gnandriver.ca> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 10:03 AM To: CoigDumart Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Hey Craig, Not regulated bvGRCA'DOcomment. Trevor Heywood Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority From: Planning <p|anning@grandrivecca> Sent: Wednesday, May 24,2O232:1OPM To: Trevor Heywood <theyvvoud@Qrandriverza> Subject: FW: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) From: Christine Kompter Sent: Wednesday, May 24,2O331:42PM To: Metro|inx/GU\- Development 1DL_#_DSD _Planning Bell c/o VVSP Carlos Reyes DorrenKroof Dave Seller <; David Heuchert � David PaeLz < ; Ellen Kayes<�EnovaPowerCmrp� Greig Cameron � �EnovaPower Corp. Shaun Wang L>; Planning <�HydroOne DennisDeRan8o� ; Jim Edmondson JusdnReadman Katherine Hughes ; MikeSei|ing<; Ontario Power Generation � � ParkP|onnin�(SK4)� ; Region Planning <� Property Data Administrator (SK4) ; Robert Morgan Steven Ryder Sy|vieEarLman <�Tom Ru�8|e� >; UVV-VVUSA(Fedd ( \ ;VVCDSB-Planning VVRDSB-BoardSecretary/ VVRD�8 Planning Cc: Craig Dumar1 Subject: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Please see attached. Additional documentation can befound inAMANDA folders 33-11O865&23-11O878(City staff) and ShareEile. (external agencies). Comments mrquestions should bedirected toCraig DunmartSenior Planner 519-741-2200 x7073). KhhstiMekompter Administrative Assistant | Planning Division | City ofKitchener 200 King Street West, 61^ Floor | P.O. Box 1118 | Kitchener ON N2G4G7 519-74I-22OOext. 7425 | TTY 1'86G-969-9994| Page 631 of 668 From: Brandon Coveney<p|anning@wrdsb.ca> Sent: Tuesday, May 3(\2O2311:4]AK4 To: [eigDumart Cc: _ Christine Kompter;Planning Subject: Re: [Planning] Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) You don't often get emai|hnmpbnning@wrdsbza. Learnwhy this im rtant May 30, 2023 Re: Circulation for Comment 417 King Street West Municipality: Kitchener Location: 417 King Street West Owner/Applicant: VANMAR DEVELOPMENTS 417 KING GP CORP The Waterloo Region District School Board (WRDSB) has reviewed the above -noted application that proposes amendments tOfacilitate the construction of a 55 storey mixed use tower including 622 residential units. The VVRDSBoffers the following comments. At this time, the subject lands are within the boundaries of the following WRDSB schools: King Edward FS(Junior Kindergarten to Grade 6); Courtland Avenue PS(Grade 7toGrade 8);and Kitchener -Waterloo Collegiate and Vocational School (Grade 9tmGrade 12\. TheVVR[}SB'S provides information ODstudent enrolment and 8Cc0DlnOOd@tiOD at these schools. Kitchener -Waterloo Collegiate and Vocational School (K[|) is currently experiencing accommodation pressure. Portable classrooms may be located on-site to provide additional capacity on an interim basis. Please note that site constraints exist @t King Edward PSwhich will |iO0d our ability hJ add temporary accommodation (e.gportables) DD-siLe.The \80R[)SBwill continue iomonitor enrolment and consider alternative solutions inthe event that pressure materializes from the above -noted application O[subsequent applications within this school boundary. The VVRDSBSupports active transportation, and weask that pedestriansbe considered iDthe review Cfall development applications to ensure the enhancement of safety and connectivity. Please beadvised that Student Transportation Services OfWaterloo Region 'Sschool buses will not travel privately owned or maintained right-of-ways to pick-up/drop-off students. Transported students will be required to meet the bus at @ congregated bus pick-up point. STSWR may have additional cODlrDeDtS about student pick-up pOint(s) placement on [nUDiCipa| right-of-ways. Page 632 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Address: 417 King St W Owner: Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp Application: OPA23/007/K/CD and ZBA23/011/K/CD Comments Of: Parks and Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross Email: Lenore. ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: June 12 2023 ❑X 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑ No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 1. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of an OPA and ZBA to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 55 storey mixed use building with 622 residential units with ground floor commercial units. A total of 184 vehicle parking spaces and 311 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. • Planning Justification Report • Urban Design Score Card • Windy Study • Shadow Study • Building Elevations and Renderings • Noise Study • Arborist Report 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments and can provide conditional support subject to the minor updates to submitted studies are noted below. Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement will be deferred at the Official Plan Amendment/Zoning By-law Amendment applications and assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es), residential units and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval taken as cash in lieu of land. An estimate is provided using the approved land valuation of $43,243,000/ha, a dedication rate of 1ha/1000 unit; a maximum dedication of either land or CIL of 10% and a capped rate of $11,862/unit. The estimated cash -in -lieu park dedication for the proposed 0.275619ha site with 622 proposed units is $1,130,523 A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Pge 1 of 3 Page 633 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Calculation: 622 units x $11,862 = $7,378,164 (Bylaw 2022-101 capped rate) 0.275619 ha x $43,243,000/ha x 0.1= $1,130,523 (More Homes Built Faster Act 10% cap) 3. Comments on Submitted Documents The following comments should be addressed. 1) Arborist Report including Tree Protection and Enhancement Plan dated March 2023— JK Consulting Arborists a) The report accurately notes that the canopy of the trees within Francis' Green extend in a minor way over the property line and the proposed tree protection fencing reflects the existing hardscape conditions rather than the typical City protection standards of dripline + 1m. The four inventoried trees within Francis Green are large, mature trees and have been assessed to be in "Good" condition and recognizing that the root system of large trees may extend well beyond the dripline and into the subject site, an ISA valuation of these trees should be provided as part of the formal site plan application. b) Security deposits for protection of existing vegetation maybe required as part of the site plan approval requirements. 2) Urban Design Scorecard Architectural set a) As identified in Places and Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener, the City Commercial Core Planning Community is currently critically underserved with active neighbourhood park space and the proposed redevelopment will exacerbate this deficit. The provision of on-site amenities suitable to all ages, including children's play facilities, will be critical to support for this proposal. The site plan, Urban Design Scorecard, Architectural plans/renderings and supporting technical studies such as the Wind and Shadow analyses, should reflect and accommodate sufficient and suitable on-site amenity spaces. These documents should be updated to provide conceptual details and precedent images for on-site amenity spaces to guide detailed site design through the site plan application. b) Revised/amended UDB and Architectural plans/renderings are required. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 2 of 3 Page 634 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change/ Official Plan Amendment Comment Form 5. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval Parkland dedication is required for the application as cash -in -lieu of land. Dedication requirements are subject to the Parkland Dedication Policy and rates in effect. Please be advised that an updated Parkland Dedication Policy and By-law were approved by City of Kitchener Council on August 22 2022. The Bylaw is under appeal. Further changes to the Bylaw may be required as a result of the Bill 23 — More Homes Built Faster Act. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 3 of 3 Page 635 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Dave Seller Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 8:39 AM To: Craig Dumart Subject: OPA/ZBA comments: 417 King Street West City of Kitchener Application Type: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/007/K/CD Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD Project Address: 417 King Street West Comments of: Transportation Services Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: dave.seller@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 Date of Comments: June 19, 2023 a. As part of a complete Zoning By-law amendment application, a Transportation Impact Study (TIS), was submitted (May 2023) by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited in support of this OPA/ZBA application. Transportation Services review focused on roadways that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Kitchener. Development proposal The applicant is proposing to develop a 55 -storey mixed use building with 622 apartment units and 654m2 (7039ft2) of ground floor commercial space. The development is estimated to generate 96 AM and 120 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The vehicle trips included the residential and commercial components, as well as trip reductions for internal capture trips, mode split and pass -by trips. The site will be serviced by two full moves access points along Halls Lane West and a total of 184 parking spaces are being proposed. Intersection analysis The four intersections noted below were reviewed under 2022 existing traffic conditions and were expressed as level of service (LOS) and vehicle delay (s). The existing traffic analysis indicated that the intersections of Francis Street South & Charles Street West is operating with a LOS C and delays of 22 seconds in the PM peak hour, while the remaining intersections had higher LOS and lower delays. • Francis Street South & King Street West (Regional Road 15) - signalized • Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South (Regional Road 55) — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Halls Lane West— unsignalized • Francis Street South & Charles Street West (Regional Road 64) - signalized The six intersections noted below were reviewed under 2028 total traffic operations and the analysis is expressed the same as the 2022 existing conditions noted above. The 2028 analysis indicated that the intersection of Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South in the PM peak hour was operating with a LOS D and delays of 27 seconds along Halls Lane West. The lower LOS and higher delays are due to the amount of vehicle traffic along Victoria Street South and drivers turning left onto Victoria Street South from Halls Lane West, while the remaining intersections characteristics had higher LOS and lower delays. • Francis Street South & King Street West (Regional Road 15) - signalized Page 636 of 668 • Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South (Regional Road 55) — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Halls Lane West — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Charles Street West (Regional Road 64) — signalized • Halls Lane West & NEW site access 1 — unsignalized • Halls Lane West & NEWsite access 2— unsignalized Left turn lane analysis A left turn lane analysis was completed along Victoria Street South at Halls Lane West, utilizing the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Geometric Design Standards for the 2028 Background and 2028 Total future traffic conditions and it was determined that a left turn lane along Victoria Street South is warranted but not recommended for the following reasons. It may not be feasible to install a left turn lane due to geometric constraints related to ION tracks and sidewalks. Left turn lanes are generally provided at major intersections and would not fit the existing character of the roadway. Transportation Services supports Paradigms recommendation. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) This development is well situated within the Urban Growth Center (UGC) to take advantage of the existing alternative modes of transportation available in the area to reduce vehicle dependency. There are several Grand River Transit (GRT) routes that are less than 200m from this development. They include the following routes: 1, 2, 6, 7, 20, 34, iXpress 204 and ION Central Station. These routes offer connectivity to a broader transit network throughout the Region of Waterloo and within Kitchener itself. The walkability for pedestrians accessing the site and surrounding area can easily be achieved, as sidewalks are provided on both sides of roadways in the surrounding area which provide connections to entertainment, employment and commercial uses. There is existing cycling in the area, as well as future cycling connections to the downtown cycling grid. To encourage cycling and take advantage of the cycling opportunities in the area, the applicant will be providing 312 Class A indoor secure bicycle parking spaces and 6 Class B outdoor bike parking spaces. The applicant must lease parking spaces separately from the cost of a unit. Providing free on-site parking undermines the likelihood of someone to use an alternative mode of transportation if parking is free. Parking supply analysis Under the current 85-1 zoning by-law (ZBL) within the UGC, a minimum of 1 parking space per unit is required, unless a unit is less than 51m', where a parking rate of 0.165 spaces per unit would apply. The commercial portion has a parking rate of 1 parking space per 95m'of GFA and there is a zero visitor parking required. The total parking requirement under 85-1 is 446 parking spaces. While the future 2019-051 ZBL is not in effect, the minimum parking requirements within a mixed-use development in the UGC would be zero for each use (residential, visitor and retail). Based on this proposal of 184 parking spaces, a surplus of parking is being provided and exceeds the future parking requirements. Conclusion Based on the methodology, analysis and conclusions within the TIS, Transportation Services supports the proposed parking supply of 184 parking spaces for this development. Page 637 of 668 b. It should be noted that the applicant was proposing to close a portion of Halls Lane West to create a one-way section which is not supportable by the City of Kitchener, as 30 Francis St West already has a portion of Halls Lane West closed with a one-way section and Francis St West is closed from Charles St West to Halls Lane West. These closures have been in place for at least seven months and are planned for a 48 month closure during their construction period with completion around 2026. The applicant also suggested the use of Francis Green Park during the construction phase. Transportation Services staff are unclear of any communications between the applicant and City of Kitchener staff regarding their proposed closures. c. A TIS must be submitted for the background traffic during the construction phase during the proposed road closure to assess impacts on the surrounding road network. Dave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 dave.seller(a kitchener.ca Page 638 of 668 Region of Waterloo Craig Dumart Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 6th Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Dumart, PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES Community Planning 150 Frederick Street 8th Floor Kitchener Ontario N213 U Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4466 www. regionofwaterloo.ca Melissa Mohr 1-226-752-8622 File: D17/2/23007 C14/2/23011 June 29, 2023 Re: Proposed Official Plan Amendment OPA 23/07 and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 23/011 417 King Street West MHBC Planning (C/O Andrea Sinclair and Juliane von Westerholt) on behalf of Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. CITY OF KITCHENER MHBC Planning has submitted a site-specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment Application for a development proposal at 417 King Street West (referred to as subject lands) in the City of Kitchener. The applicant has proposed the redevelopment of the site with a 55 storey mixed use building containing 622 residential units with ground floor commercial uses. A total of 184 vehicular parking spaces with 311 Bicycle parking spaces are proposed within the underground parking structure and within the podium of the building. Access to the structured parking is located from Halls Lane West with pedestrian access proposed from King Street West. A separate loading access is proposed from Halls Lane West. An amenity terrace is located on the roof of Level 7. Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 639 of 668 The subject lands are located in the Urban Area and designated Urban Growth Centre in the Regional Official Plan. The site is designated Innovation District in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and zoned Warehouse District -Six (D-6) Zone in Zoning By-law 85-1. The Owner has requested an Official Plan Amendment to add a special policy permitting an FSR of 21. The Applicant has requested a Zoning By-law Amendment to add special regulations to the existing zoning to permit a floor space ratio of 21; to allow for residential uses; to allow for a reduction in the parking to 0.29 parking spaces per dwelling units and 0 spaces for non-residential uses; to permit a rear and side yard setback of 0 metres and to permit a 1.1 m west side yard setback. The Region has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offers the following: Regional Comments Consistency with Provincial Legislation and Regional Official Plan Conformity The subject lands are designated "Urban Area" and "Urban Growth Centre" on Map 1 of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and the site is designated Innovation District in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The subject lands are also located within the Central Station Major Transit Station Area (MTSA). Urban Growth Centre Policies: The subject lands are located within two strategic growth areas of the Region (Urban Growth Centre and Major Transit Station Area. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. Furthermore, through the development, the applicant has proposed a reduced vehicular car parking rate with indoor and outdoor bicycle parking that can support access and use of the transit and cycling networks within the vicinity of the subject lands. Major Transit Station Area Policies: The subject lands are located in the Central Station Major Transit Station Area (MTSA). The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 640 of 668 This development proposes a higher density mixed use residential/commercial development with apartment style housing, above ground floor retail space. In addition, commercial space is proposed on the ground floor adjacent to King Street and adjacent to Francis Green. Higher density, mixed use developments are encouraged within MTSAs through the policy framework contained in the ROP. Region of Waterloo International Airport In accordance with Regional Official Plan Policy 5.A.20, the Region will ensure that proposed developments do not negatively affect the usability, accessibility or safe operations of the airport either on a temporary or permanent basis. Regional staff have concerns with this development as the development (building and proposed crane) exceeds the maximum elevation permitted within the Airport's Instrument Approach Surface of 487 m ASL and the height of the building and crane. Therefore, the applicant shall either reduce the height of the building or submit an Aeronautical Assessment to ensure the proposed development does not negatively impact the airports operation. Further information regarding this matter can be found below. In addition to the above planning comments, Regional staff have the following technical comments relating to the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: Region of Waterloo International Airport: The subject lands are located outside of the current and proposed AZR and within the instrument approach surface of the Region of Waterloo International Airport. Within the instrument approach surface, there is a maximum height limitation of 487m ASL before any buildings or construction cranes would impact airport operations. The concept drawings prepared with the application show a ground floor elevation of 509.4m ASL which exceeds the maximum elevation permitted within the instrument approach area. The development, as proposed, will impact the Waterloo Region International Airport Runway 08 RNP approach, which has a maximum allowable development elevation of 487m ASL. It may also impact the other Runway 08 approaches (LPV, LNAV/VNAV, ILS) and Runway 26 missed approach. In accordance with Regional Official Plan Policy 5.A.20, Regional staff, through the review of development applications, shall ensure that proposed developments do not negatively affect the usability, accessibility or safe operations of the Region of Waterloo International Airport, either on a temporary or permanent basis. Furthermore, in accordance with City of Kitchener Official Plan Policy 6.C.3.17, in planning for land uses in the vicinity of the Region of Waterloo International Airport, the Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 641 of 668 City will prohibit any land use or structure which could affect the operation of the Airport or cause a potential aviation safety hazard. In order to further assess this proposal, the Region requires the building height to be reduced to ensure the building including any construction crane does not exceed the height limitation of 487m ASL. Alternatively, the applicant shall submit an aeronautical assessment for further review and comment by the Region to ensure the proposed development does not negatively impact the airport operations. Record of Site Condition/Environmental Threats There are high environmental threats on and adjacent to the subject lands due to past/historic uses of the subject lands and adjacent sites. As a density increase of a sensitive land use has been proposed on the subject lands, a Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement letter shall be required for the entirety of the subject lands in accordance with the Region of Waterloo's Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications on or Adjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites. The Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter were not received as part of the Complete Application for the Zoning By-law Amendment. In accordance with the Region's Implementation Guidelines, the Region can defer the requirement of the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter to the building permit stage with confirmation from the Chief Building Official of the City of Kitchener confirming that the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter will be obtained prior to building permit issuance. The Region received confirmation from the City of Kitchener's Chief Building Official that an RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter are required to permit this development; therefore, Regional staff will defer the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter for the entirety of the site to the Building permit stage in accordance with the Region's Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications on orAdjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites. Environmental Noise (Road and Stationary Noise) Study: An Environmental Noise report entitled "Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario" prepared by HGC Engineering, dated April 17, 2023 and associated peer review fee of $4,520.00 have been received and provided to the Region's third party peer reviewer. Regional staff have received the following preliminary comments from the peer reviewer: Stationary Noise Concerns: HGC indicates that examples of the proposed balcony mitigation are provided within the report, however, they are not included. Without an example of the proposed mitigation Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 642 of 668 for the balcony, it is unclear how the mitigation recommendations are to be implemented. Furthermore, mitigation is recommended for floors 17 through 20 on the westerly tower fagade. The stationary sources that the fagade is being protected from appear to be in line with these floors and would likely have a direct line -of -sight to the windows. It is unclear how the mitigation would work based on the details provided (i.e. dimensions of the barriers). The same comment applies to the southern and eastern facades but at higher floors. The study must include the following additional sources to be modelled: • UW's School of Pharmacy to the west has significant rooftop equipment that has not been included or acknowledged in the report. The building appears to have Strobic exhaust fans which can be a significant noise source. In addition, the building contains multiple large cooling towers that have not been assessed. • The Beer Store immediately northeast has refrigeration equipment on the roof that has not been included in the assessment. • There is the initial stages of a new building behind the TD building to the east that has not been identified in the study. This should be included in the assessment and sample calculations should be provided. Transportation: Road and rail traffic volumes were obtained from historical work HGC has done in the area. Please be advised that these volumes are outdated and are required to be updated for both road and rail traffic. Furthermore, it is unclear if rail whistles at crossings have been assessed, the LRT system has not been discussed and sample calculations should be provided for road and rail noise sources. Fulsome comments relating to the noise study will follow under a separate cover and acceptance of the study and related implementation measures by the Region is required prior to a recommendation being made to the City of Kitchener on the file. To address these requirements, the Region shall require a Holding Provision until a transportation, rail and Stationary noise study has been received and accepted by the Region. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 643 of 668 impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. Corridor Planning: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Stage: Stormwater Management and Site Grading: Region of Waterloo staff has received the functional serving report entitled "Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Vanmar Developments Inc., 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment" prepared by WalterFedy, dated March 28, 2023 and it is acceptable at this stage (Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment stage). Site Plan Application Stage: Stormwater Management and Site Grading The Region of Waterloo shall require a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for review and approval at the site plan stage. Detailed comments related to the site specific grading and servicing details_ will be provided under a future site plan application. Access Permit/TIS/Access Regulation: The subject lands have vehicular access from Halls Lane with no vehicular access from King Street West and Regional staff have no objection to the vehicular access at this stage. Regional Road Dedication: The subject lands have direct frontage on King Street West (Regional Road 15). This section of King Street West has a designated road width of 26m in accordance with Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and a road dedication of approximately 5m is required across the entire King Street West frontage. The exact amount of road widening shall be determined by an Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS) in consultation with the Region's Transportation Planner. Although the dedication of the lands can be deferred to the site plan stage, Regional staff note that the dedication appears to be appropriately shown on the concept plans. Please be advised that the dedication shall be confirmed by an Ontario Land Surveyor through the detailed design stage (site plan stage). In addition, as indicated above, please ensure the Record of Site Condition (RSC) excludes the road dedication along King Street West. Site Plan Application Stage: Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 644 of 668 Regional Road Dedication: As indicated above, a road dedication shall be required along the King Street West right-of-way. The exact amount of road dedication must be determined by an OLS in consultation with the Region's Transportation Planner. Please ensure that the correct road dedication is shown on all plans moving forward. The draft reference plan showing the road widening to be dedicated to the Region shall be submitted to the Transportation Planner for review and once the draft is been accepted, the Registered Plan must be sent to the Transportation Planner. Stormwater Management and Site Grading: Detailed civil engineering plans shall be required for review and approval by Regional staff at the site plan stage. Where possible, please coordinate underground service connections from the local municipal road rather than the Regional Road. Site Plan Review Fee: Please be advised that the Region of Waterloo shall require an $805.00 review fee associated with a formal site plan application. Hydrogeology and Water Programs/Source Water Protection Please be advised that the Region does not support permanent active or passive dewatering controls for below -grade infrastructure (e.g. foundations, slabs, parking garages, footings, piles, elevator shafts, etc.) therefore, Below -grade infrastructure requiring dry conditions should be waterproofed. In addition, a prohibition on Geothermal Wells as defined in Chapter 8 of the Region Official Plan shall be implemented within the site specific Zoning By-law amendment, including vertical open and closed loop geothermal energy systems. The required wording for the prohibition is: Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling, including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Housing Services The following Regional policies and initiatives support the development and maintenance of affordable housing: Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 645 of 668 • Regional Strategic Plan • 10 -Year Housing and Homelessness Plan • Building Better Futures Framework • Region of Waterloo Official Plan The Region supports the provision of a full range of housing options, including affordable housing. Should this development application move forward, staff recommend that the applicant consider providing a number of affordable (as defined in the Regional Official Plan) housing units on the site. Rent levels and house prices that are considered affordable according to the Regional Official Plan are provided below in the section on affordability. In order for affordable housing to fulfill its purpose of being affordable to those who require rents or purchase prices lower than the regular market provides, a mechanism should be in place to ensure the units remain affordable and establish income levels of the households who can rent or own the homes. Staff further recommend meeting with Housing Services to discuss the proposal in more detail and to explore opportunities for partnerships or programs and mechanisms to support a defined level of affordability. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of an ownership unit, based on the definition in the Regional Official Plan, the purchase price is compared to the least expensive of: Housing for which the purchase price results in annual accommodation costs which do not exceed 30 percent of gross $385,500 annual household income for low and moderate income households Housing for which the purchase price is at least 10 percent below the average $576,347 purchase price of a resale unit in the regional market area `Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021). In order for an owned unit to be deemed affordable, the maximum affordable house price is $385,500. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of a rental unit, based on the definition of affordable housing in the Regional Official Plan, the average rent is compared to the ►east expensive of A unit for which the rent does not exceed $1,470 30 per cent of the gross annual Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 646 of 668 household income for low and moderate income renter households A unit for which the rent is at or below the Bachelor: $950 average market rent (AMR) in the 1 -Bedroom: $1,134 regional market area 2 -Bedroom: $1,356 3 -Bedroom: $1,538 4+ Bedroom: $3,997 *Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021) In order for a rental unit to be deemed affordable, the average rent for the proposed units which have fewer than 3 bedrooms must be at or below the average market rent in the regional market area as shown above. For proposed units with three or more bedrooms, the average rent for the units must be below $1,470. Fees: Please be advised that the Region is in receipt of the Official Plan Amendment review fee of $7,000.00 and the Zoning By-law Amendment Review fee of $3,000.00 (total $10,000) deposited June 22, 2023. Conclusions: At this time, the Region has the following concerns relating to the application: 1. The proposed height of the building exceeds the maximum height limitation of 487m ASL for the Runway 08 RNP approach surface. Regional staff have concerns with the height of the building based on the Runway 08 RNP approach and Runway 26 missed approach as outlined in the comments above. This concern must be satisfactorily addressed prior to a recommendation being made to Council for the City of Kitchener. Follow Up: In addition to the concerns identified related to airport operations and the proposed building heights, the following must be implemented within the Zoning By-law: That a Holding Provision apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a transportation, rail and stationary noise study is acceptance of the study and related implementation measures to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 647 of 668 completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. 2. Inclusion of a geothermal prohibition in the zoning by-law amendment. The required wording for the prohibition is, Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling, including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Next Steps: The applicant shall address the Regions concerns as identified above. Please be advised that any future development on the lands subject to the above -noted application will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19- 037 or any successor thereof. Further, please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the decision pertaining to this application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner C. MHBC Planning Inc. C/O Andrea Sinclair and Juliane vonWesterholt (Applicant), Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. C/O Mauricio Miranda (Owner) Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 648 of 668 :OC METROLINX To: Craig Dumart, Senior Planner, City of Kitchener From: Third Party Projects Review - Adjacent Developments - GO Expansion and LRT Metrolinx Date: June 26', 2023 Re: OPA23/007/K/CD & ZBA23/01 1 /K/CD - 417 King Street West, Kitchener Metrolinx has reviewed the first Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 417 King St W, Kitchener. It is Metrolinx's understanding that the proposal consists of a 55 -storey mixed-use building with 622 units with at -grade commercial. Metrolinx's comments on the Application are noted below: The subject property is located within 300 meters of Metrolinx's Guelph Subdivision which carries Metrolinx's Kitchener GO Train service. Metrolinx is in receipt of the Noise Feasibility Study prepared by HGC Engineering dated April 17, 2023. Metrolinx provides the following comments: o Metrolinx understands that Rail -Data was obtained from Metrolinx on November 7, 2019. However, Metrolinx notes that their Rail -Data Forecast has been updated as of December 2022. Please revise the Noise Study to reflect the most up -to date Rail -Data as the rail forecast has increased significantly since 2019. For your convenience, please see the most up to date data attached. (The proponent may also obtain Metrolinx's most up to date rail forecast by submitting a request to raildatarequests@metrolinx.com). Please note that the attached Rail -Data is projected to 2032. o We note that the Noise Consultant has reccomended noise control measures, including the inclusion for air conditioning, upgraded building fagade constructions, and warning clauses in order to achieve MECP noise guidelines. However, as the Noise Study is to be updated, we await the updated report. Metrolinx will require that recommendations made by the Noise Consultant are adhered to in order for approval at Site Plan phase. Please provide the Final Detailed Noise Assessment for review and satisfaction of Metrolinx. o We note further that the Noise Consultant has performed an acoustical assessment of the Temporary Kitchener Layover Facility located approximately 500m to the west of the subject site. We acknowledge and accept that the assessment concludes that sound levels from the Layover do not exceed applicable limits. Please note as well that Metrolinx has updated their warning clause as of February 2023. Please revise the Noise Study to include the followirig: o The Proponent shall provide confirmation to Metrolinx, that the following warning clause will be inserted into all Development Agreements, Offers to Purchase, and Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease of each unit within 300 metres of the Railway Corridor: o Warning: The Applicant is advised that the subject land is located within Metrolinx's 300 metres railway corridor zone of influence and as such is advised that Metrolinx and its assigns and successors in interest has or have a right-of-way within 300 metres from the subject land. The Applicant is further advised that there may be alterations to or expansions of the rail or other transit facilities on such right-of-way in the future including the possibility that Metrolinx or any railway entering into an agreement with Metrolinx to use the right-of-way or their assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand or alter their operations, which expansion or alteration may affect the environment of the occupants in the vicinity, :X!: METROLINX 1 Page 649 of 668 :00: METROLINX notwithstanding the inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual lots, blocks or units. The Owner shall grant Metrolinx an environmental easement for operational emissions, which is to be registered on title for all uses within 300 metres of the rail right-of-way. Included is a copy of the form of easement for the Proponent's information. The Proponent may contact Farah.Faroque@metrolinx.com with questions and to initiate the registration process. Registration of the easement will be required prior to clearance of Site Plan Approval. (It should be noted that the registration process can take up to 6 weeks). Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Best regards, Farah Faroque Project Analyst, Third Party Projects Review Metrolinx 10 Bay Street I Toronto I Ontario I M5J 2N8 :X:: METROLINX 1 2 Page 650 of 668 :Dt�: METROLINX Form of Easement WHEREAS the Transferor is the owner of those lands legally described in the Properties section of the Transfer Easement to which this Schedule is attached (the "Easement Lands"); IN CONSIDERATION OF the sum of TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) and such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the Transferor, the Transferor transfers to the Transferee, and its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual non-exclusive easement or right and interest in the nature of a permanent and perpetual non-exclusive easement over, under, along and upon the whole of the Easement Lands and every part thereof for the purposes of discharging, emitting, releasing or venting thereon or otherwise affecting the Easement Lands at any time during the day or night with noise, vibration and other sounds and emissions of every nature and kind whatsoever, including fumes, odours, dust, smoke, gaseous and particulate matter, electromagnetic interference and stray current but excluding spills, arising from or out of, or in connection with, any and all present and future railway or other transit facilities and operations upon the lands of the Transferee and including, without limitation, all such facilities and operations presently existing and all future renovations, additions, expansions and other changes to such facilities and all future expansions, extensions, increases, enlargement and other changes to such operations (herein collectively called the "Operational Emissions"). THIS Easement and all rights and obligations arising from same shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees, servants, tenants, sub -tenants, customers, licensees and other operators, occupants and invitees and each of its or their respective heirs, executors, legal personal representatives, successors and assigns. The covenants and obligations of each party hereto, if more than one person, shall be joint and several. Easement in gross. :X= METROLINX 3 Page 651 of 668 :00�: METROLINX Rail -Data for 417 King St W. Kitchener (as of December 2022) *Please note that this Rail -Data is forecast to 2032. The subject lands (417 King St W, Kitchener) are located within 300 metres of the Metrolinx Guelph Subdivision (which carries Kitchener GO rail service). It's anticipated that GO rail service on this Subdivision will be comprised of diesel trains. The GO rail fleet combination on this Subdivision will consist of up to 2 locomotives and 8 passenger cars. The typical GO rail weekday train volume forecast near the subject lands, including both revenue and equipment trips is in the order of 99 trains. The planned detailed trip breakdown is listed below: i.._....... 1 Diesel i 2 Diesel 1 Diesel 2 Diesel Locomotive Locomotive Locomotive Locomotive j I Day (0700 62 1 14 Night (2300 21 2 12300)'.. . _--- i 10700) (.. I The current track design speed near the subject lands is 30 mph (48 km/h). There are anti -whistling by-laws in affect at Park St, Strange St, Lancaster St. W. Reg. Rd. 29, Saint Leger St, and Duke St at -grade crossing. Operational information is subject to change and may be influenced by, among other factors, service planning priorities, operational considerations, funding availability and passenger demand. It should be noted that this information only pertains to Metrolinx rail service. It would be prudentto contact other rail operators in the area directly for rail traffic information pertaining to non-Metrolinx rail service. :0-t: METROLINX 1 4 Page 652 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Jason Dahle n> Sent: Tuesday, June l3, 2023 3:25 PM To: Mayor, Debbie Chapman Cc: Craig Dumart Subject: 417 King Street West Kitchener- Concerns t You don't often get email from rn why this is important u Dear Mayor Barry and Councillor Chapman, I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed 55 -story, 622 dwelling unit development at 417 King Street West. While I am in favor of development in the downtown core, I do not believe that a building of this height and density is suitable for the area. My concerns are as follows: • The building would block the views of many people who live downtown, which would negatively impact their quality of life. • The increased density would lead to more traffic flow and congestion in an already busy area, which would create safety concerns and inconvenience for residents and visitors alike. There have been several other projects that were not approved in the Kitchener- Waterloo region, which highlights the importance of carefully considering the impact of new developments. For example, in 2013, a proposed 55 -floor condo at 417 King Street West was met with opposition from the community which is the same location in question. The community expressed concerns about the building's height and density, which they believed would negatively impact the downtown core. Instead of a 55 -story building with 622 units, I suggest a building with fewer units and a lower height that would not block or overpower the 40 -story building being built next door and the 19 story building at 1 Victoria St S. This alternative proposal would have the following benefits: • It would not block the views of many people who live downtown, which would preserve their quality of life. • It would not increase traffic flow and congestion in an' already busy area, which would maintain safety and convenience for residents and visitors alike. • It could include prime commercial space on the ground floor, which would provide a benefit to the community. Examples of High -Rise Buildings Which Were Not Approved in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: 1. Proposed 55 -floor Condo at 417 King St. W. This project was met with opposition from the community in 2013. The community expressed concerns about the building's height and density, which they believed would negatively impact the downtown core. 10 Duke West. This project was proposed but has not yet been approved. It is a 45 -story building that would be located in the downtown core. Gaslight Condos: Tower This project was proposed but has not yet been approved. It is a 40 -story building that would be located in the downtown core. I urge you to consider this alternative proposal when evaluating the proposal for 417 King Street West. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jason Dahle Page 653 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Joachim Pfister Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 1:57 AM To: Craig Dumart; Werner Michael Dietl Subject: 417 King Street West - neighbourhood feedback You don't often get email from am why this is im on rtant Hi Craig, We would like to raise the following comments and questions related to the proposed development at 417 King Street West. Kind regards, Werner Dietl and Joachim Pfister (owners of 1. - 2. 3. Electric cars 4. r) a. b. c. Is there a requirement on the number of parking spaces that require electric d. charging? Or could the city mandate this from the developer to make the proposed development future proof? e. f. 9. h. Is the electrical grid in DTK stable enough to provide enough electricity L for all the new neighbours of 1 Victoria Street South (417 King Street West and 30 Francis Street), especially when EV usage will be increasing? j 5. 6. 7. Fire emergencies 8. a. b. c. Is there enough water/hydrants in the vicinity of 1 Victoria St South d. (19 floors), 30 Francis Street (45 floors), 417 King Street West (55 floors) in case of major fire event to protect all of the neighboring buildings - taking into account that the block is growing in density with several highrise buildings (notably, multiple e. fire events happening on the same block)? We understand that the "Functional Servicing Report" contains a fire hazard planning - but it seems to be performed for a specific proposition and not taking into context the whole block. f. 9• 1 Page 654 of 668 h. i. How does the city ensure that fire trucks can park/access the buildings, j. especially in case of a very busy Halls Lane West where many delivery vehicles are parked through different times of the day? The traffic impact study does not consider delivery traffic. k. I. M. n. Where are the supposed emergency assembly areas where people should gather o. in case of an alarm so that emergency vehicles are not blocked (for all buildings on that block)? P. q• r. s. Does the city have enough capacity for this increased emergency load? Do we have the training and equipment to handle a fire on the 55th floor? U. 3. 4. 5. Delivery vehicles (commercial + e.g. food delivery) situation in Halls Lane West 6. Delivery vehicles seemed not to hi-nnncirlcrcrl in +he traffic impact 7. study. But living here in _ _. ___ ___...._. rs now, we sometimes see interesting things happening, especially in Halls Lane West (with UHaul rentals + delivery vehicles + residents entering or exiting the existing 1 Victoria Parking garage). 8. a. b. c. What will the city do to have delivery vehicles being able to make deliveries to 417 d. King Street West without blocking Halls Lane West (especially since no visitor parking is envisioned for 417 King Street West according to the Zoning Compliance Table). e. f. 9- h. The parking for delivery vehicles needs to be rethought/reconsidered by the city for i. the entire block because Halls Lane West will serve as the main entrance for 3 highrise buildings and their parking garages (1 Victoria Street South, 33 Francis Street and the 417 King Street West). j• k. I. m. We suggest that the city of Kitchener, in anticipation of the traffic amount of residents, n. delivery vehicles and Uhaul rentals, considers to transform Halls Lane West into a one way street. Traffic could flow into from Francis Street and exit at Victoria Street. Thus, one side of the Halls Lane West could serve as a parking space for deliveries/Uhaul o. pickup or dropoff waiting cars and the traffic could still flow. This measure should be considered in combination with forbidding left turns on Victoria Street South into Halls Lane West which would reduce traffic congestion due to people turning left from p. Victoria Street into Halls Lane resulting in blocking the intersection due to further traffic. Furthermore, this might reduce issues with pedestrians that are put into danger when someone does this left turn manoever and wants to quickly turn into Halls Lane q. and "forgets" about pedestrians. r. 9. 10. 11. Gap between 1 Victoria Street South and 417 King Street West (`Exit from (Parking' on 12. the plan) Page 655 of 668 13 a. b. c. How does the proposed building (417 King Street West) ensure that this small lane will d. not turn into an "unsafe" place where homeless people could try to seek shelter or drug trafficking could take place (central location and little visibility from the main arteries of King Street West and Halls Lane West)? e. 14. 15. 16. 1 bedroom vs. 2 bedroom units 17. a. b. c. Having mostly 1 bedroom units per floor (only 2x 2 -bedroom units per floor) seems disproportionate d. which will have an impact on the people living in the newly proposed project and to its neighbours. The proposition seems to cater to singles whereas for a healthy mix of population, also small families should be considered who would be better -suited in 2 -bedroom e. units. Downtown Kitchener should strive for a balance that every group is represented and no specific population will be too dominant. Is this something the city of Kitchener can exert influence upon the builder? f. 18. 19. 20. Excavation work and soiled streets 21. a. b. c. How does the developer of the proposed building ensure that residents needing to access d. Halls Lane West don't get dirty feet or cars during the excavation phase? Will the developer be required to provide street cleaning? Background: During the excavation work for 33 Francis Street South, dirt accumulated to our perception in a substantially larger e. amount in the parking garage of 1 Victoria due to cars passing by the excavation truck loading zone from 33 Francis Street South. f. 22. 23. 24. Additional load on Willow Green (Victoria) park 25. a. b. c. How is the developer proposing to account for the huge additional load on the recreational d. spaces in our neighborhood, in particular Willow Green? e. 26. 27. 28. Commercial units on the ground level 29. a. b. c. Can the developer be required to add commercial units on the ground floor? With this d. high number of additional residents, the whole block and neighbourhood would benefit from commercial spaces that could be used for restaurants. e. Page 656 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Kevin Young Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 3:36 PM To: Craig Dumart You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Hi I am Kevin Young I like what I see but see no mention of geared to income units, or did I miss this in any reports. Other than that I thank staff for a job well done. Page 657 of 668 Craig Dumart EMMOMMUM From: Brian Shillingford , .y.. A,—_N[UiUn.rne- Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 1:20 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: 417 King Street West (55 Storey Development) You don't often get email fror. Learn why this is important Hello Craig, I am emailing to submit my comments regarding the proposed 55 storey development. To be blunt, 55 storeys is too tall for Kitchener. I suspect this proposal is an effort to increase dwellings to help with the housing crises. Instead of turning KW into a city of sky -scraping condo buildings a better solution is to change the zoning and allow for true mixed use and mixed density. If zoning is changed to remove single family dwelling neighbourhoods then low-rise apartments and condos can be developed. Sky scrapers propose a number of issues. As they get taller more space is wasted. Multiple elevator shafts are needed, support columns need to be larger, and this results in less liveable space per floor than shorter buildings with the same footprint. Additionally, tall condo and apartment buildings block the sun, and if more and more of them are built then the wind tunnel effect can happen. On top of this, another issue is density within the city. By building tall buildings you will be increasing density in a very small area. If you rezone the city and have mixed density throughout, then the density is also spread throughout the city. Please reconsider this development. Rezoning, low-rise buildings throughout the city, and mixed use (allowing for small shops to exist in residential areas) will result in a better city and better neighbourhoods. Thank you, Brian Page 658 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Ken Friedmann Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 7:03 AM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Re: 417 King Street Application meeting last night You don't often get email from earn why this is important Craig, correction ... I meant the parking lot at Frances and Charles, not King and Charles. And just a thought ... a Rink and NHL hockey team would look fantastic there!! With Kitchener being 4th largest metro area in Ontario, I believe we have the critical mass for something exciting like this. Just would need some local businesses and wealthy individuals to step up to lead the charge and not sure we have that just yet but maybe with continued growth in the tech area the money would be there for an ambitious venture of attracting an NHL franchise. I believe the community would greatly support this. Ken On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:35 AM Ken Friedmann Hi Craig, thanks for being part of the meeting last night. > wrote: I wanted to send some comments. One of the community members expressed concerns with being overwhelmed by the developmental pace of DTK and negative impacts and in particular the load on traffic from an inconvenience point of view and also environmental. I totally have the opposite perspective. I moved downtown a year and half ago for the sole purpose of being more in the action. I am thrilled with the development and growth downtown because right now I feel DTK is lacking some vibrancy and I believe that will change with all that is planned and the growth. Development in the downtown area makes environmental sense with having many services easily accessible to many people. I don't understand the point made last night, that building these new places will increase the environmental impact. Perhaps in the immediate area but overall your plans are greatly reducing the environmental impact, especially when it comes to cars etc. I look at my own personal changes. I now walk to my dentist, optometrist, service Ontario, the movies, my financial planner, grocer, restaurants and my lawyer is also downtown. Previously I was driving to all of these services. In fact, if not for needing to go to the Toronto office twice a week, I would consider not having a vehicle and grabbing the share cars on the rare occasion when needed So I just wanted to give you comments from a different perspective. My only real hesitation in full endorsement of the 417 development is that I live in Kaufman Lofts with my unit facing King and the new structure, along with the Frances street will loom large over my place and take away a lot of the sunlight I currently enjoy through the 10' windows, but I realize I can't have everything so overall I'm in favor of the new developments downtown and expect that at some point the empty and rarely used large parking lot at King and Charles (I think it's the Manulife parking lot) will also see some development and excited to see what is planned there... can you share what might be in store for that land? I do have one other question and I think you may have given a brief update but I missed it. As said I go to Toronto twice a week and would love to get off the 401 and just wonder about where the region is at with the new transit hub at King and Victoria. I know that construction was supposed to start in 2020 and being conveniently close to the transit Page 659 of 668 hub was one of the reasons why I wanted to move downtown. Can you tell me what stage that endeavor is at and expected time for completion and start of all day GO service? Thanks Craig, Ken Friedmann Page 660 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Jeremy Chamilliard Sent: Wednesday, July 12,2023 2:24 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Re: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting Attachments: IN8 Construction Neighbour Notice- Extended Working Hours.pdf Thanks for the speedy reply, Craig. I hope we're not Cutting into your vacation. I can't speak for the other neighbourhood meeting participant (and their tenants), but at 1 Victoria, a letter was circulated implying the construction hours were INRs to set and they were just letting us know they would be changed will reach out to bylaw and see what they say. Regards, Jeremy On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:44 AM Craig Dumart <Craig.Duma rt@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hi Jeremy, I am glad you were able to attend the meeting. I am not sure if they (I1\18) have an exemption or what permissions they have. Noise and construction By-law questions and concerns are fielded by our by-law enforcement staff. Have you had a chance to reach out to them regarding your concerns? Craig Get Outlook for iOS From: Jeremy Chamilliard <j Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 10:39:/-4 Mm To: Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Fwd: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting You don't often get email fron am why this is important Another attempt after correcting the typo from https://calendar.kitchener.ca/default/`Detail/2023-07-11-1900- Neighbourhood-Meeting-Proposed-Development-417-Kin "Email" link. Hope this one gets through. ------ Forwarded message --------- From: Jeremy Chamilliard <ichamilliard@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:31 AM Subject: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting To: <%20craig.dumart@kitchener.ca> Hi Craig, Thanks for joining the neighbourhood meeting last night and fielding questions. Page 661 of 668 I'm not sure if construction is relevant at this stage, but one of the questions was about Tek Tower / 30 Francis S construction noise and it seemed like you and "the applicant" were dodging the question talking about lam - 7pm bylaws and no work on Sundays. I'm not sure if you meant to dodge. Apologies if you did. I think the concern was that IN8 has let neighbours at 1 Vic and Kaufman know they will be working from 4AM to midnight to take advantage of the summer months/weather, and this is disturbing the participant's tenants. It's great that VanMar won't work on Sundays (IN8 doesn't either), but will they work from 4AM - midnight during summer months? Regards, Jeremy Page 662 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Andrew W Peters Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 7:29 PM To: Craig Dumart; Debbie Chapman Cc: Mayor Subject: Re: Proposed Building at 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario 0 You don't often get email from ____ n why this is important Hi Craig and Debbie, I sincerely appreciate your time at the council meeting last night. I made the comment/ question regarding parking enforcement. I own units at, d unfortunately the parking license system is quite flawed and has been since construction was completed. The condo corporation is responsible for maintaining the parking garage yet the developer owns the parking garage under a separate corporation name. The developer at 1 Victoria, Momentum Developments is quite close with Vanmar. Momentum through a separate corporations owns a company called Park Co, which is used for parking management at station park, 100 Victoria, Charlie West and 1 Victoria. I have attached a photo taken this afternoon at Their system has not been operational over the last three years. I am aware that the same system isnot functional at station park, Charlie West, or 100 Victoria. I bring this to your attention because I don't believe the developer is being truthful when they state that they have the tenants and area residents best intention when it comes to parking management which also deviate from the honesty of their proposal when it comes to an accurate number of parking spaces allocated per unit. Neither Park Co, Momentum Developments or Vanmar are at all aware of parking utilization in any of their buildings. Regards, Andrew Page 663 of 668 From: Andrew W Peters _ Sent: Tuesday, lune 13, 2023 5:55 PM To: Mayor <mayor@kitchener.ca>; Debbie Chapman <Debbie.Chapman@kitchener.ca>; Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Proposed Building at 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario You don't often get email from a )m. Learn why this is important Good afternoon, I am writing to express my concerns about the environmental and traffic flow issues in Kitchener, mainly downtown. As a resident of the community, I believe it is crucial to ensure that our city is taking the necessary steps to become more sustainable and environmentally friendly. One of the main concerns I have is the proposed building at 417 King Street West. The size and height of the building appear to be signiflcanfly out of proportion with the surrounding area, which may disrupt the established aesthetic and architectural harmony that characterizes the downtown core. This discrepancy has the potential to diminish the appeal of the area and detract from the unique charm that attracts residents and visitors alike. Additionally, the potential impact on traffic and parking in the vicinity could exacerbate the existing strain on Kitchener's infrastructure. Increased traffic congestion would not only inconvenience residents but also pose safety risks to pedestrians and cyclists. Moreover, I believe it is imperative to consider the environmental implications of such a development. Given the growing urgency of climate change, it is crucial that new constructions prioritize sustainable practices and energy-efficient technologies. I request a thorough environmental impact assessment to ensure that the proposed building aligns with Kitchener's commitment to becoming a greener and more sustainable city, as well as testing given the location and environmental issues that were discovered in that city block during the construction of 1 Victoria St S and that are present in the land bordering the UW School of Pharmacy. I would appreciate reviewing the Planning Justification Report for this location. In closing, I kindly request that you take into account the concerns I have raised regarding the proposed building at 417 King Street West and the environmental issues in Kitchener. By carefully considering these factors, we can ensure that any developments in our neighborhood contribute positively to the overall well-being of the community and align with the shared vision for a vibrant, sustainable, and inclusive Kitchener. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing your response and engaging in further discussions on this issue and will attend on July 11 for the Zoom Meeting. Yours sincerely, Andrew Peters <image012.jpg> 3D Axonometric View (Courtesy of Kirkor Architects) Page 665 of 668 On Jun 20, 2023, at 10:38 AM, Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thank you for your taking time to provide comments. You have been added to the email distribution list to keep you informed on the proposed development. Please let me know if you would like to discuss the proposed the development in advance of the neighbourhood meeting and I will arrange fora phone call to discuss. Thanks, Craig Dumart, BES; MCIP, RPP Senior Planner i Planning Division i City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 ext 7073 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 i craig.dumartP—kitchener.ca <irnage00i .png> <image002.png> <image003.png> <irn2ge004.png> <irnage005.png> <irn2ge000.png> <irnage007.pnp <irn-age008.Png> <irnage000.png> <image010.png> <image011.jpg> 3 Page 666 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Katie Steckly and Daniel Penner < Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:10 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Feedback on the Proposed Development for 417 King Street W You don't often get email from _ a...0 ..,.��. am why this is important Hello, My name is Daniel Penner and I'm a unit owner and resident d, ). I'd like to provide feedback on the Proposed Development for 417 King Street W. Kitchener. wasn't able to attend the virtual meeting on Tuesday but I have read through the planning documents in detail. Here is my feedback, from highest priority to lowest: • Developer should pay for a portion of (or enhancements to) the proposed Transit Hub. o Similarly to how the approved development immediately south (on the NW corner of Francis and Charles) paid for enhancements to the Francis Green o Residents of this development will be primary users of the Transit Hub (due to proximity and the fact that most units won't have parking spots) which is excellent! • Include 3 and 4 bedroom units o I'd like there to be diversity of demographics and family units downtown; not solely young professionals o I'd suggest a minimum of 15% of the units be 3+ bedrooms • Include Affordable Housing or Social Housing o Specifically I'd like to see 20% units sold below market rate to individuals and families who could not otherwise afford to be homeowners. o Even if that isn't possible, I'd ask that the pricing of the units be such that it meets the Region of Waterloo's definition of Affordable Housing (30 per cent of their income on housing costs) • Mitigations for wind conditions on sidewalks o The wind study acknowledges "localized uncomfortable conditions during winter months". There is already a "Venturi Effect" or "wind tunnel" noticeable in the area that I've noticed on my own experience. o I'd like to see both hard and soft wind barriers (fixed canopies and windscreens on the structure; trees or hedges along the sidewalk — if there's enough light to keep them alive). At least 1 bike parking space per unit o Given how compact bike parking is, this seems like a bare minimum. At least 50% of required parking be EV ready o I personally think this would be a selling point for the developer. It seems like a small ask. I understand that this process is a negotiation with the developer. What I ask is that you drive a hard bargain on behalf of the city and its residents. I agree that this is the exact type of development that the city should be encouraging (high density within the core), but it seems to me there is no shortage of developers proposing new condos in this area. I strongly believe we should be negotiating for every communal benefit we can get from these developers, even if that means scaring a few of them off. Page 667 of 668 I'd appreciate a reply so that I know you received this email and an acknowledgement that my comments will be included within the summary of public feedback. I'm also happy to follow-up if any of my comments are unclear or if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your openness to feedback! Daniel Penner Page 668 of 668