Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2023-430 - Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS - Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS - 20 Woolner Trail - Waterloo Catholic District School BoardStaff Report r JR Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 2 DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO.: October 2, 2023 DSD -2023-430 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS 20 Woolner Trail Waterloo Catholic District School Board RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/01 1 /W/TS for the Waterloo Catholic District School Board requesting the addition of Specific Policy Area No. 67 for the lands specified and illustrated as the "Area of Amendment" on Schedules `A' and `B', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-430 as Appendix `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS for the Waterloo Catholic District School Board be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By- law', and `Map No. 1, attached to Report DSD -2023-430 as Appendix `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the subject lands located at 20 Woolner Trail. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. The proposed Amendments support the creation of a Catholic elementary school and secondary school (grades 7-12) in a predominantly residential community within the catchment area (Appendix F) identified by the school board. Community engagement included: o circulation of a preliminary notice letter to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; o installation of 2 large billboard notice signs on the property; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 421 of 668 o follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; o Neighbourhood Meeting held on August 15, 2023; o On-site meeting with community members on September 21, 2023; o postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject site, those who responded to the preliminary circulation; and those who attended the Neighbourhood Meeting; o notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 6, 2023. This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The owner of the subject lands, addressed as 20 Woolner Trail, is proposing to change the Official Plan designation from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Specific Policy Area No. 67' within the City of Kitchener Official Plan, and to change the zoning from `Agricultural Zone (A-1)' with Special Use Provision 69U, and Special Regulation Provision 107R in Zoning By-law 85-1 to `Major Institutional Zone (INS -2)' with Site Specific Provision (381) in Zoning By-law 2019-051 to permit a maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77 square metres of gross floor area and to apply Holding Provision 54H to require an updated Noise Study to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Staff recommends that the applications be approved. BACKGROUND: The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has made applications to the City of Kitchener for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment proposing to permit a new Catholic elementary school and secondary school (grades 7-12) on the subject property in a predominantly residential community within the catchment area identified by the school board. The proposed Official Plan Amendment would add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to permit an Institutional land use designation and a "Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node within the City's Urban Structure. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would add a new site specific provision (381) to permit an increased parking rate on site for the elementary school and secondary school. SITE CONTEXT: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Fairway Road North and Woolner Trail and the site is currently undeveloped. The site is surrounded primarily by low rise residential uses, in close proximity to the Walter Bean Grand River Trail and Grand River, and the adjacent residential property, municipallly addressed as 80 Woolner Trail is a designated property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and is known as the Woolner Homestead The property is currently undeveloped as it formally was used as a gravel pit, which has now been decommissioned. Page 422 of 668 TL CROssW11VD O 1 0 DR s {�O 9tG� �y m R1VERTRAIL Ade !m Y� O n C 0 Z FAIRWAY,Rd N f �ko N SUBJECT AREA UPP�RMRC���� / , L�wER S' Figure 1 - Location Map: 20 Woolner Trail REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a 3 -storey elementary and secondary catholic school (grades 7-12). The proposed development includes 197 parking spaces, which includes 7 Barrier -Free Accessible parking spaces, 4 Electric Vehicle Ready parking spaces, 28 EV spaces for future installation, 15 Class A bicycle spaces and 152 Class B bicycle spaces. A sports field and track are also included within the proposed development. Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 423 of 668 Figure 3 — Proposed Building: Front elevation from Fairway Rd and Woolner Tr. To facilitate the development of 20 Woolner Trail with the proposed school, an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are required to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject lands. The lands are currently designated 'Mixed Use' and 'Low Rise Residential' in the City of Kitchener's Official Plan (2014). The lands are currently identified as a 'Neighbourhood Node' in the Official Plan. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to 'Institutional' and to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to Map 5. Policy 15.D.12.67 is proposed to be added to the text of the Official Plan to permit an 'Institutional' land use designation and a 'Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node Urban Structure Component. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment would remove the subject lands from Zoning By-law 85-1 and add the lands into Zoning By-law 2019-051. The lands are currently zoned 'Agricultural Zone (A-1)' with Special Use Provision 69U and Special Regulation Provision 107R. The lands are proposed to be zoned to 'Major Institutional Zone (INS -2)' with Site Specific Provision (381) to permit a maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77 square meters of gross floor area. Holding Provision 54H is proposed to require an updated Noise Study, to be completed to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Following the digital Neighbourhood Information, Planning staff arranged a meeting with Councillor Schnider, Regional and City transportation staff, along with area residents on site to discuss transportation and safety concerns. As a result of those discussions, further recommendations were included from the Director of Transportation Services that will be implemented and incorporated as part of the development of the site. The following is a summary of those recommendations: • That stopping be prohibited along the east side (school side) of Woolner Trail along the school frontage. • That parking be prohibited on the west side of Woolner Trail between Upper Mercer Street and Fairway Road. Page 424 of 668 • That Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street be monitored upon school opening to make any additional necessary adjustments to parking prohibitions to ensure overall road user safety. • That the speed limit on Woolner Trail be reduced to 30km/h in the identified school zone. • That Upper Mercer Street be considered for seasonal traffic calming beginning in 2024. • That traffic conditions be monitored upon school opening to determine if there are other traffic calming considerations that can be considered for Upper Mercer and Lower Mercer Streets. Further updates will be reviewed as part of the Site plan application that has been submitted (SP23/049/W/TS). Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: Page 425 of 668 The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.1.1 of the PPS promotes healthy, liveable and safe communities which are sustained by promoting efficient development and land use patterns as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of uses, including residential, institutional and employment uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit - supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost- effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a form of development which efficiently uses the lands, provides an elementary and secondary school (institutional use) in close proximity to residential areas within the catchment area as well as transit options including bus transit. This location offers transportation choice for walkers and transit users and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of uses within a community, and that public service facilities should be located in community hubs, where appropriate, to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration with access to transit and active transportation. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will provide an additional institutional use that is compatible with the surrounding community, contributes to a liveable community, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit the development of the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; Page 426 of 668 b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. Policy 3.2.8.6 states that new public service facilities, including hospitals and schools, should be located in settlement areas and preference should be given to sites that are easily accessible by active transportation and transit, where service is available. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed development, including transportation networks and municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to establish a network of continuous sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide direct, safe, comfortable and convenient linkages within the neighbourhood and externally to other neighbourhoods, including linkages to transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations and community facilities. The proposed development will be well connected as existing sidewalks and multi -use pathways have been developed. Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Page 427 of 668 Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute aspects of a complete community on the subject lands with a new elementary and secondary school. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. The subject lands are located within a Neighbourhood Node. The planned function of Neighbourhood Nodes is to serve the day to day commercial needs of surrounding residential areas and are encouraged to be cycling and pedestrian friendly. Properties that are located within a Neighbourhood Node are intended to accommodate mixed use and commercial uses when deemed appropriate for achieving the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node. The Institutional land use designation and uses, and particularly `Major Institutional' uses are not permitted in a Neighbourhood Node. The applicant is proposing to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands to permit an Institutional land use designation and a `Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node. Although institutional and community uses are not part of the Neighbourhood Node designation, the Neighbourhood Node designation does indicate that the intent of the site was to accommodate non-residential uses as part of the community. Institutional uses, such as schools, help serve the existing community by providing educational facilities and amenities that can be used by the neighbourhood, while helping to meet the planned function of the area. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that help meets the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node designation and also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. Page 428 of 668 The `Mixed Use' designation is intended to be flexible and responsive to land use pattern changes and demands and permit a broad range of uses at different scales and intensities depending on the lands' geographic location and identification at the urban structure level. As such, an appropriate and compatible mix and range of commercial, retail, institutional and residential uses, at different scales and intensities will be encouraged and supported within lands designated Mixed Use. The Low Rise Residential' designation permits a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi detached dwellings and other forms of low-rise housing. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to `Institutional' and to add Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands. The Institutional designation's primary use is intended for institutional uses that are of a community or regional nature, such as secondary and post -secondary educational facilities, long-term care facilities and social, cultural and administrative facilities. This land use designation also includes small- scale institutional uses compatible with surrounding uses such as public and private elementary schools, libraries, day care centres, and places of worship. Some of these small-scale institutional uses may also be permitted in other land use designations found in this Plan. The proposed Institutional land use designation will permit the proposed development of the site with an elementary and secondary school. An objective of lands designated Institutional is to provide appropriate locations and opportunities for community infrastructure, facilities and amenities to support a complete and healthy community. Lands which are designated Institutional may have the following characteristics: a) they serve a population beyond that found in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding their location; b) they can generate large volumes of vehicular traffic which generally cannot be accommodated on local streets; c) they may require large areas of land to accommodate buildings, outdoor activity areas and on-site parking; and, d) they generally have extended hours of operation including weekday evenings and weekends and in some cases they may operate 24 hours a day, all year round. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board (Appendix F). The area served by the school goes beyond the immediate neighbourhood and will benefit a considerable portion of the City's population. The proposed school will be constructed on a large parcel of undeveloped land, and is located on a road that has been identified as having capacity to accommodate the additional traffic. Policy 17.E.13.1 of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Page 429 of 668 Provision shall be applied to the lands and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the Region of Waterloo has reviewed and approved an updated Noise Study. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's Official Plan. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; and Building Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief Report was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design, some examples include: providing an architectural design that is appropriate to the existing neighbourhood fabric, providing clean visual site lines, providing safe pedestrian circulation, and providing a sustainable built form. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Streetscape — As part of the site plan approval process the footprint of the building was moved closer to the street to promote an active streetscape. Furthermore, the majority of the parking is buffered from the street as it is located behind the building. City staff will also require adequate landscaping on each side of the property to provide additional screening for the parking areas. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design — As part of the site plan approval process, Staff have requested additional changes to the site, specifically relocating some of the parking spaces away from the front corner of the property, increasing and prioritizing pedestrian access by altering the pedestrian access at the corner, to reduce the number of retaining walls, and increasing the amount of pedestrian accesses to the building. Furthermore, staff have requested that a right out only access be provided for the access closest to the roundabout in order to encourage traffic to be directed to the roundabout. Building design —As part of the site plan process design elements within the building materials such as varying shades of brick and stone accents, have been included to add to the visual interest of the building. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served by public transit. Grand River Transit Route 23 is easily accessible to the site and an Institutional use will help support the ridership of Route 23. Further review of transit routes will be undertaken as the site develops to review if additional routes would be required. Staff also understand that the school board works Page 430 of 668 closely with Grand River Transit to ensure transit options are available to secondary school sites. An objective of the Transportation polices in the Official plan is to develop, support and maintain a complete, convenient, accessible and integrated transportation system that incorporates active transportation, public transit and accommodates vehicular traffic. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the building will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for a variety of community functions, sports events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Furthermore, as noted, though consultation with the area residents, improvements such as no stopping areas, no parking areas, reduction of the speed limit and seasonal traffic calming have all been discussed and will be incorporated and implemented as part of the development of the site. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further explored at the Site Plan Application stage. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 3 be changed from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Site Specific Policy Area No. 67'. Based on the planning analysis, Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051): The subject lands are zoned `Agricultural Zone (A-1) with Special Use Provision 69U, and Special Regulation Provision 107R' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The existing zoning permits primarily agricultural uses as well as a single detached dwelling. Special Use provision Page 431 of 668 69U, which will be removed with this application, permits a gravel pit and Special Regulation Provision 107R further permits extraction from the gravel pit. The applicant has requested a Zoning By-law Amendment to remove the lands from Zoning By-law 85-1 which are zoned `Agricultural Zone (A-1) with Special Use Provision 69U and Special Regulation Provision 107R' and rezone them to `Major Institutional Zone (INS -2) with Site -Specific Provision (381)' in Zoning By-law 2019-051. The proposed Site Specific Provision is to permit an increased maximum parking rate of 1 parking space per 77m2 of gross floor area for a total of 197 parking spaces provided on site. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Site Specific Provision (381): a) The maximum parking rate shall be 1 parking space per 77m2 of gross floor area for a total of 197 spaces. The purpose of this regulation is to provide for an increased parking rate which is appropriate for the development. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 54H: Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision is proposed to be used in order to facilitate the implementation of the `INS -2' zone and site- specific provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the Holding Provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Holding Provision 54H Planning staff are recommending the following Holding Provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: No development on the lands shall occur until such time as a revised Noise Impact Study has been completed, and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Application to change the zoning of the subject lands to `Major Institutional Zone' (INS -2) with Site -Specific Provision (381) and a new Holding Provision 54H' in Zoning By-law 2019-051 represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a elementary and secondary school development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood. Staff Page 432 of 668 are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Appendix `B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications was undertaken in June 2023 to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Appendix "D" of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications: • Planning Justification Report Prepared by: GSP Group, May 2023 • Urban Design Brief, Prepared by: Svedas Architectural Inc., April 2023 • Noise Study Prepared by: Aercoustics Engineering Ltd, May 2022 • Transportation Impact Study Prepared by: R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited, December 2023 • Functional Servicing Report Prepared by: Lanhack Consultants Inc., March 2023 • Sustainability Statement Prepared by: GSP Group, May 2023 • Noise Feasibility Study Prepared by: HGC Engineering, May 2023 • Arborist Report Prepared by: JK Consulting Arborists, April 2023 • Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by: McCallum Sather, April 2021 • Hydrogeological Assessment Prepared by: MTE Consultants, May 2022 Community Input & Staff Responses WHAT WE HEARD Page 433 of 668 417 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified 0 11 people/households provided comment A City -led Neighbourhood Meeting was held on August 15, 2023 and 20 users logged on A City -led on -Site Meeting was held on September 21, 2023 and 12 residents participated Staff received written responses from 11 residents with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Appendix `E'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on August 15, 2023 and a follow up on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023. A summary of what we heard, and staff responses are noted below. What We Heard Staff Comment Concerns that this is a floodplain The application was reviewed by the Grand River area and that flooding could Conservation Authority, and they had no concerns occur with the proposed application. The lands are not within a floodplain but are in close proximity to lands regulated by the GRCA. A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) was submitted and reviewed by City and Regional Staff. Based on the analysis and conclusions there was no concerns raised by either agency. Staff met with residents on- site on September 21, 2023 to listen to their concerns and Transportation Services staff have added some recommendations to address to respond to safety concerns discussed at the Traffic —Speeding, Roundabout meeting. Proposed mitigation measures are outlined capacity, traffic on adjacent in the Transportation comments above. A final TIS roads would be required based on the final site access design determined through the site planning process. Further, the Region has indicated that a roundabout at Eden Oak would only be considered if there is any geometric change to the intersection, or a safety issue has been identified, or traffic control signals are warranted. At this time none of the criteria are met therefor a roundabout would not be considered at this time. The Region is also reviewing Roundabouts through a pilot safety program, and Page 434 of 668 ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023 and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in July of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on June 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 11 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report in Appendix `E'. Planning staff also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. Further an on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023 to discuss specific concerns with the residents. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Page 435 of 668 enhancements could be expanded to the roundabout at a future date should the pilot review be positive. A wildlife connection will remain on the property due Impact on Wildlife to a large swale at the south of the property that will not contain any built features. The property is subject to the City of Kitchener Noise and Lighting By-laws and will be required to adhere to the By-laws. If an exemption is required, the Noise and Lighting Concerns exemption will be required to be obtained through the City. A detailed lighting plan is required through the site plan process and will be reviewed to ensure there is limited light trespass off-site. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023 and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in July of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 6, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix `C'). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on June 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 11 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report in Appendix `E'. Planning staff also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. Further an on-site meeting was held on September 21, 2023 to discuss specific concerns with the residents. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 Page 435 of 668 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-laws 85-1 and 2019-051 REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson - Manager of Development Review, Planning Division Tina Malone -Wright - Supervisor Development Applications, Planning Division APPROVED BY: Readman, Justin - General Manager, Development Services APPENDIX& Appendix A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix C — Newspaper Notice Appendix D — Department and Agency Comments Appendix E — Public Comments Appendix F — Catchment area provided by the school board Page 436 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 20 Woolner Trail Page 437 of 668 INDEX SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 2 APPENDIX 3 AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 20 Woolner Trail TITLE AND COMPONENTS PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT THE AMENDMENT Notice of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 Page 438 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment AMENDMENT NO. ## TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER## SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. ## to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener (2014). This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to: • Amend Map 3 — Land Use by redesignating the lands from Mixed Use and Low Rise Residential to Institutional. • Amend Map 5 — Specific Policy Areas by adding the subject lands addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as Specific Policy Area 67, and • Add Site Specific Policy 15.D.12.67 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Page 439 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.1.1 of the PPS promotes healthy, liveable and safe communities which are sustained by promoting efficient development and land use patterns as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of uses, including residential, institutional and employment uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a form of development which efficiently uses the lands, provides an elementary and secondary school (institutional use) in close proximity to residential areas within the catchment area as well as transit options including bus transit. This location offers transportation choice for walkers and transit users and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of uses within a community, and that public service facilities should be located in community hubs, where appropriate, to promote cost-effectiveness and facilitate service integration with access to transit and active transportation. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed applications will provide an additional institutional use that is compatible with the surrounding community, contributes to a liveable community, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit the development of the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and Page 440 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment infrastructure, provide for a range, and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly -accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. Policy 3.2.8.6 states that new public service facilities, including hospitals and schools, should be located in settlement areas and preference should be given to sites that are easily accessible by active transportation and transit, where service is available. The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Designated Greenfield Areas. The subject lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Areas in the ROP. This neighbourhood provides for the physical infrastructure and community infrastructure to support the proposed development, including transportation networks and municipal drinking -water supply and wastewater systems. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to establish a network of continuous sidewalks, community trails and bicycle pathways that provide direct, safe, comfortable and convenient linkages within the neighbourhood and externally to other neighbourhoods, including linkages to transit stops, employment areas, school sites, food destinations and community facilities. The proposed development will be well connected as existing sidewalks and multi -use pathways have been developed. 5 Page 441 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Regional staff have indicated that they have no objections to the proposed applications (Appendix `D'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Complete Commun A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute aspects of a complete community on the subject lands with a new elementary and secondary school. Urban Structure The Official Plan establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. The subject lands are located within a Neighbourhood Node. The planned function of Neighbourhood Nodes is to serve the day to day commercial needs of surrounding residential areas and are encouraged to be cycling and pedestrian friendly. Properties that are located within a Neighbourhood Node are intended to accommodate mixed use and commercial uses when deemed appropriate for achieving the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node. The Institutional land use designation and uses, and particularly `Major Institutional' uses are not permitted in a Neighbourhood Node. The applicant is proposing to add a Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands to permit an Institutional land use designation and a `Major Institutional' use within a Neighbourhood Node. Although institutional and community uses are not part of the Neighbourhood Node designation, the Neighbourhood Node designation does indicate that the intent of the site was to accommodate non-residential uses as part of the community. Institutional Page 442 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment uses, such as schools, help serve the existing community by providing educational facilities and amenities that can be used by the neighbourhood, while helping to meet the planned function of the area. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that help meets the planned function of the Neighbourhood Node designation and also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more sustainable city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential" (Map 3) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The `Mixed Use' designation is intended to be flexible and responsive to land use pattern changes and demands and permit a broad range of uses at different scales and intensities depending on the lands' geographic location and identification at the urban structure level. As such, an appropriate and compatible mix and range of commercial, retail, institutional and residential uses, at different scales and intensities will be encouraged and supported within lands designated Mixed Use. The Low Rise Residential' designation permits a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi detached dwellings and other forms of low-rise housing. The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation to `Institutional' and to add Site Specific Policy Area No. 67 to the subject lands. The Institutional designation's primary use is intended for institutional uses that are of a community or regional nature, such as secondary and post -secondary educational facilities, long-term care facilities and social, cultural and administrative facilities. This land use designation also includes small-scale institutional uses compatible with surrounding uses such as public and private elementary schools, libraries, day care centres, and places of worship. Some of these small-scale institutional uses may also be permitted in other land use designations found in this Plan. The proposed Institutional land use designation will permit the proposed development of the site with an elementary and secondary school. An objective of lands designated Institutional is to provide appropriate locations and opportunities for community infrastructure, facilities and amenities to support a complete and healthy community. Lands which are designated Institutional may have the following characteristics: a) they serve a population beyond that found in the immediate neighbourhood surrounding their location; b) they can generate large volumes of vehicular traffic which generally cannot be accommodated on local streets; c) they may require large areas of land to accommodate buildings, outdoor activity areas and on-site parking; and, d) they generally have extended hours of operation including weekday evenings and weekends and in some cases they may operate 24 hours a day, all year round. Page 443 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment The proposed school is located adjacent to a residential community, and it is located within the catchment area identified by the school board (Appendix F). The area served by the school goes beyond the immediate neighbourhood and will benefit a considerable portion of the City's population. The proposed school will be constructed on a large parcel of undeveloped land, and is located on a road that has been identified as having capacity to accommodate the additional traffic. Policy 17.E.13.1 of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to the lands and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the Region of Waterloo has reviewed and approved an updated Noise Study. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's Official Plan. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; and Building Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Brief Report was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Brief outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design, some examples include: providing an architectural design that is appropriate to the existing neighbourhood fabric, providing clean visual site lines, providing safe pedestrian circulation, and providing a sustainable built form. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process. Streetscape — As part of the site plan approval process the footprint of the building was moved closer to the street to promote an active streetscape. Furthermore, the majority of the parking is buffered from the street as it is located behind the building. City staff will also require adequate landscaping on each side of the property to provide additional screening for the parking areas. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Site Design — As part of the site plan approval process, Staff have requested additional changes to the site, specifically relocating some of the parking spaces away from the front corner of the property, increasing and prioritizing pedestrian access by altering the pedestrian access at the corner, to reduce the number of retaining walls, and increasing the amount of pedestrian accesses to the building. Furthermore, staff have requested Page 444 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment that a right out only access be provided for the access closest to the roundabout in order to encourage traffic to be directed to the roundabout. Building design —As part of the site plan process design elements within the building materials such as varying shades of brick and stone accents, have been included to add to the visual interest of the building. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The proposed development aims to increase density on an existing site that is served by public transit. Grand River Transit Route 23 is easily accessible to the site and an Institutional use will help support the ridership of Route 23. Further review of transit routes will be undertaken as the site develops to review if additional routes would be required. Staff also understand that the school board works closely with Grand River Transit to ensure transit options are available to secondary school sites. An objective of the Transportation polices in the Official plan is to develop, support and maintain a complete, convenient, accessible and integrated transportation system that incorporates active transportation, public transit and accommodates vehicular traffic. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the building will have to feature a high-quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for a variety of community functions, sports events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking will be required as part of the Zoning By-law. Furthermore, as noted, though consultation with the area residents, improvements such as no stopping areas, no parking areas, reduction of the speed limit and seasonal traffic calming have all been discussed and will be incorporated and implemented as part of the development of the site. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Page 445 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment Sustainable development initiatives will be further explored at the Site Plan Application stage. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 3 be changed from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional' with Site Specific Policy Area No. 67'. Based on the planning analysis, Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) is hereby amended as follows: a) Amend Section 15.D.12 Area Specific/Site Specific Policy Areas by adding Policy 15.D.12.67 as follows: 15.D.12.67. 20 Woolner Trail Notwithstanding the Neighbourhood Node identification, on lands municipally known as 20 Woolner Trail, the applicable land use designation will include Institutional. A Holding provision pursuant to Section 17.E.13 will apply to institutional uses. The Holding provision will not be removed until such time as: a) A revised noise impact study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. b) Amend Map No. 3. — Land Use, by designating the lands municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as `Institutional' instead of `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential', as shown on the attached Schedule A; c) Amend Map No. 5 —Specific Policy Areas, by adding No. 67 to the lands addressed as 20 Woolner Trail as shown on the attached Schedule `B' >0 Page 446 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 1 - NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 20 Woolner Trail C Concept Drawing A� @90115 0 fib Elementary Et Parking Secondary Increase School 1'>J R Have You r Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West . vrVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchen er.ca%meetings and select: Current agendas and reports (pasted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation *Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information an yourappeal rights,visit: www.kitchener.ca/ PI a n ni ngApp I i cation s or contact: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner tim.seylerCok tchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7860 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-lawto facilitate the development of an Elementary and Secondary School for Grades 7-12. The applications are to change the Oficial Plan Designation and Zoning Category from `Mixed Use' and `Residential' to 'Institutional'. A site specific regulation is also proposed for an increased parking rate. Page 447 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee — October 30, 2023 12 Page 448 of 668 Attachment "A" Proposed Official Plan Amendment APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council — November 6, 2023 13 Page 449 of 668 t•r,,r_.''',. CITY OF KITCHENER .r-{ ..,--^ OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO MAP 3 }€!e'r r.`' LAND USE L- t �'r. � � � • ,7 t �'r. 0 . ,� - r -.-r-{ - - ,� r •'''• ' •` •''' N Low Rise Residential Medium Rise Residential p}* }* tq, ^ ; f d'* L• d'� L. .0,. .� ..- _ ..-fi ..-� Mixed Use Natural Heritage Conservation ti,•- �`'#T C.,•- �`' Open Space w... ,, Area 2 S., f ' S; ! �• Area of Amendment •.�fi;�. �!r Area 1 .� L• IL� .46 -; . -{'fid; i Area 1 i From Low Rise Residential To Institutional IF' i Area 2 ',r }r''.�' •',r F i f "; i From Mixed Use To Institutional F i i r ik •• � _ €! C. 4P I SCHEDULE }A} REVISED: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA23/011/W/TS 0 250 APPLICANT: WATERLOO CATHOLIC METRES ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA23/018/W/TS DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD SCALE 1:8,000 Cityof Kitchener FILE: OPA23011WTS_MAP3 20 WOOLNER TRAIL DATE: OCTOBER 2, 2023 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING mxd CITY OF KITCHENER OFFICIAL PLAN WOOLWICH AMENDMENT TO MAP 5 SPECIFIC POLICY AREAS N Specific Policy Areas ® 10. Lackner/Fairway Rd Area of Amendment To Add Specific Policy Area 67. 20 Woolner Trail 4A C/rN F� t✓ o� A P CAMBRIDGE �3 SCHEDULE 'B' 0 500 REVISED: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA23/011/W/TS ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA23/018/W/TS METRES APPLICANT: WATERLOO CATHOLIC City of Kitchener FILE OPA23011 WTS_MAP5 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD SCALE 1:15,000 20 WOOLNER TRAIL DATE: OCTOBER 2, 2023 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING mxd PROPOSED BY — LAW ,2023 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended, and By- law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-laws for the City of Kitchener - Waterloo Catholic District School Board. — 20 Woolner Trail WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 and By-law 2019-051 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 are hereby amended by removing therefrom the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 2. Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 are hereby further amended by removing the zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 3. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 are hereby amended by adding thereto the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1 attached hereto, and by zoning the lands specified and illustrated as Area 1 lands thereafter as Major Institutional Two Zone (INS -2) with Site Specific Provision (381) and Holding Provision 54H. 4. Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 are hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No. 1 attached hereto. 5. Section 19 of By-law 2019-051 is hereby amended by adding Section 19 (381) thereto as follows: Page 452 of 668 "381. Notwithstanding Tables 5-5 and 8-2 of this By-law within the lands zoned INS -2 and shown as affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 of Appendix `A', the following special regulations shall apply: a) a maximum parking rate of 1 space per 77 square meters of gross floor area; 6. Section 20 of By-law 2019-51 is hereby amended by adding Holding Provision (54) thereto as follows: "(54). Notwithstanding Section 11 of this By-law within the lands zoned INS -2 and shown as being affected by this subsection on Zoning Grid Schedule Numbers 272 and 291 Appendix "A": a) no development on the lands shall occur until such time as a revised Noise Impact Study has been completed, and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo." 7. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. _ (20 Woolner Trail) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of .2023. Mayor Clerk Page 453 of 668 RIVER -r- SUBJECT AREA(S) RE - ( C _ E.292. AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW 85-1 AND 2019-051 N Z CH 24 AREA 1- i ~_ FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONE (A-1) OSR-2 R-8 597R, WITH SPECIAL USE PROVISION 69U 769R 419U � --- AND SPECIAL REGULATION PROVISION 107R UNDER BY -LAW -85-1 TO MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL ZONE (INS -2) RES -5 WITH SITE SPECIFIC PROVISION (381) (220), _ - AND HOLDING PROVISION (54H) (228) UNDER BY-LAW 2019-051 i OS -3 BY-LAW 85-1 -1A-1 AGRICULTURAL ZONE i 9 P-3 HAZARD LAND ZONE AREA 1 10 R-8 RESIDENTIAL EIGHT ZONE BY-LAW 2019-051 i MIU-1 MAJOR INFRASTRUCTURE AND UTILITY ZONE NHC-1 NATURAL CONSERVATION ZONE `-------OSR-2 OPEN SPACE: GREENWAYS ZONE OSR-3 OPEN SPACE: STORMWATER MANAGMENT ZONE NHC-1 -=--------,.- _ - RES -1 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL ONE ZONE RES -2 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL TWO ZONE RES -1 Y��..".."� �~ �_-RES-3 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL THREE ZONE ov +• 7 - - - - - - - - - -Y RES -4 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL FOUR ZONE -- _-- - -- RES -5 LOW RISE RESIDENTIAL FIVE ZONE INS -2 MAJOR INSTITUTIONAL ZONE � ------ S-5 _ " � "~ ZONE GRID REFERENCE ERS( P-3 r SCHEDULE NO. 272 AND 291 -��-' OFAPPENDIX'A' KITCHENER ZONING BY-LAW 85-1 AND 2019-051 E _ ~~- ~fit ��`^- ® ZONE LIMITS ER MERCERS O- FLOODING HAZARD RES- MIU-1 +, �� _ i. - - SLOPE EROSION HAZARD i00 OSR-3 ES -2 ~� ~' _ ter` ie '``� ~mss '� /� ��/� SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT AND SR -2 ��x-` e s i! !` �, // ///j LANDFORMS MAP NO. 1 o so 100 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA23/018/W/TS WATERLOO CATHOLIC DISTRICT METRES OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA23/011/W/TS SCHOOL BOARD SCALE 1:4,000 City of Kitchener FILE: 20 WOOLNER TRAIL DATE: OCTOBER 2, 2023 ZBA23018WTS _MAP1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING mxd NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 1 for a development in your neighbourhood 20 Woolner Trail IKITcFTNER The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-lawto facilitate the development of an Elementary and Secondary School for Grades 7-12. The applications are to change the Official Plan Designation and Zoning Category from `Mixed Use' and `Residential' to 'Institutional'. A site specific regulation is also proposed for an increased parking rate. Page 455 Of 668 Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West Yom= arVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) Concept Drawing • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting A©, To learn more about this project, including ©M© information on your appeal rights, visit: VAR. www.kitchener.ca/ PlanningApplications ELementary Et Parking or contact Secondary Increase Tim Seyler,Senior Planner School tim.seyler@kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7860 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-lawto facilitate the development of an Elementary and Secondary School for Grades 7-12. The applications are to change the Official Plan Designation and Zoning Category from `Mixed Use' and `Residential' to 'Institutional'. A site specific regulation is also proposed for an increased parking rate. Page 455 Of 668 PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G U Canada Region of Waterloo Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca Tim Seyler, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Community Services Department City Hall P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Seyler: Update to Comments 0 P 23/011/W/TS ZBA 23/018/W/TS Waterloo Catholic District School Board 20 Woolner Trail CITY OF KITCHENER Shilling Yip (226) 753-1064 File: D17-50/23011 & C 14-60/23018 October 12, 2023 Further to the Region's comments of October 2, 2023 staff wish to provide an update at this time. It recommended, that the proposed ZBL amendment include a holding provision to address the following: 1) Submission of a revised Fire Flow Analysis and servicing drawings; 2) Review and acceptance of the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022); and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits; 3) Review and acceptance of the transportation impact study entitled, "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022); and Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 Page 1 of 3 Page 456 of 668 4) Submission of the MECP's Record of Site Condition Acknowledgement Letter for RSC #231915. Submission of Revised Fire Flow Analysis and Servicing Drawings A revised Fire Flow Analysis (MTE, August 23, 2023) has been submitted and is currently under review by staff. Staff understands City staff is prepared to address fire flow as part of Site Plan (SP), and to circulate the Region. Regional staff can also support deferral of the fire flow analysis to SP with proviso that the report (and servicing drawings) be reviewed and accepted by the Region's Water Services Engineering and Planning staff as part of that review process. A servicing option provided in the Analysis includes extending water services off Eden Oak Trail and crossing Fairway Road (Regional Road 53) to service the site. The Region's Corridor Management staff has concern that the applicant may have to cut the roadway to do this work and that this is not preferable as this road was recently reconstructed. Directional drilling should be considered. This method is also being reviewed by Water Services Engineering & Planning, and Hydrogeology and Water Programs staff. Review and Acceptance of Noise Study Staff has reviewed the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022). Noise sources identified in the report include road and aircraft traffic noise, and stationary noise sources such as dust collector, rooftop mechanical equipment, and emergency generator. Mitigation options have been recommended which include but not limited to central air conditioning, noise barriers, minimum / maximum sound power levels, and acoustic enclosure. The report concludes the development can meet the Region's noise guideline and the MECP NPC -300 noise guideline sound level limits with the appropriate noise mitigation measures being implemented. Comments on Study will be provided under separate cover. A detailed review of these mitigation measures and certification by a professional engineer in acoustics will be required to ensure sound levels meet guideline limits at points of reception. As you know, Regional staff has had some discussion with City staff regarding securing implementation of the above requirements, including use of a holding provision or potentially through the site plan process. Staff understands at this time that the Study recommendations cannot be secured through the site plan. This being the case, Regional staff continue to recommend use of a holding provision to secure implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. The "H" may be removed following receipt of a certificate of compliance, acceptable to the Region and the City, from a professional engineer qualified in acoustics, that all mitigation measures to be implemented as part of Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 Page 2 of 3 Page 457 of 668 this development will meet sound level limits of the Region's and MECP NPC -300 noise guideline at sensitive receptors. Regional staff acknowledges receipt of the Consultant Declaration and Owner's Statement for the noise study from the applicant on October 6, 2023. Review and Acceptance of Transportation Impact Study Staff continues to review the transportation impact study entitled, "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022). Regional staff also supports deferring review and acceptance of this study to the Site Plan at this time. Record of Site Condition The Region required the applicant to submit a copy of the MECP acknowledgement letter for the filing the Record of Site Condition with the Ministry for this property. Staff confirms this letter was received by the Region on October 2, 2023, and that no further action is required by the applicant. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Shilling Yip, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner cc. Kristen Barisdale, GSP Group Kevin Dolishny, Region Water Services Joginder Bhatia, Region Corridor Planning Document Number: 4498104 Version: 1 Page 3 of 3 Page 458 of 668 Region of Waterloo Tim Seyler, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Community Services Department City Hall P.O. Box 1118 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Seyler: Post Circulation Comments 0 P 23/011/W/TS ZBA 23/018/W/TS Waterloo Catholic District School Board 20 Woolner Trail CITY OF KITCHENER PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th Floor Kitchener ON N2G U Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca File: D17-50/23011 & C 14-60/23018 October 2, 2023 Regional staff has reviewed the above -noted applications and provide the following comments for the City's consideration at this time. The 7.35 ha (18.6 ac) site is located on the south side of Fairway Road N., to the east of Woolner Trail and north of the Grand River, in the Grand River South community of the City. It has approximately 483m of frontage on Fairway Road and approximately 100m frontage on Woolner Trail. The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) is proposing to construct a new elementary and secondary school containing grades 7-12, on full municipal services. The Official Plan amendment consists of an amendment to Map 3- Land Use in the Official Plan from `Mixed Use' and `Low Rise Residential' to `Institutional'. The site is zoned Agricultural (A-1) with Special Use and Regulation Provisions 69U and 107R' in City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 which does not permit a secondary school. The zoning by-law amendment consists of re -zoning the property from Agricultural (A-1) in ZBL 85-1 to Major Institutional (INS -2) in Zoning By-law 2019-051. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 1 of 6 Page 459 of 668 A site specific provision to permit an increased parking rate of 1 space per 81 m2 for a total of 188 parking spaces is also requested. The lands are designated Urban Designated Greenfield Area on Map 3a of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). Policy 2.D.1 in the ROP supports the creation of complete communities with development patterns, densities, and appropriate mix of uses that support walking, cycling and the use of transit. Water Services Water Services staff has indicated there are inconsistencies between the proposed servicing drawings found in the Functional Servicing Report and the Fire Flow Analysis. A revised fire flow analysis, and servicing drawings will be required. Staff is recommending a holding provision be included in the ZBL amendment to secure review and acceptance of the revised fire flow analysis, and servicing drawings. Hydrogeology and Water Programs The lands are designated Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Areas 2 and 5 on Map 6a and Microbial Risk Management Zone on Map 6f) of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). The purpose of this designation and corresponding policies in Chapter 8 of the ROP is to protect the Region's long term municipal groundwater supplies. Staff notes the municipal drinking -water supply wells within proximity to this site is supplied by Groundwater Under the Influence of Surface Water (GUDI wells), which require a higher level of protection and treatment than other municipal drinking -water supply wells. Hydrogeology and Water Programs (HWP) staff notes the subject property is within 200 metres of a municipal supply well. As such, HWP will require: 1) that the applicant consult with staff if construction will occur within 200 metres of a supply well, 2) a construction spill prevention and response plan must be prepared and implemented per the DGSSMS, as part of future site plan, 3) that enhanced construction standards are required for stormwater and sanitary sewers within 200 metres of a municipal supply well, per the DGSSMS. Engineering drawings must be submitted to the Region for review and acceptance as part of site plan. HWP's guidance documents for construction work within 200m of a municipal supply well are attached for information. 4) that HWP staff be notified prior to commencement of construction due to the proximity of the property to a supply well, and Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 2 of 6 Page 460 of 668 5) A salt management plan will be required as part of future site plan. Archaeology This property has been previous assessed and cleared of all archaeological concerns. No further action is required. Record of Site Condition A Record of Site Condition was filed for this property in 2022 to allow the proposed institutional use (RSC #231915). Please provide the Region with a copy of the Ministry's RSC Acknowledgement Letter for our records. Corridor Planning Environmental Noise Study The applicant has submitted a noise study which assess road traffic, aircraft, and stationary noise sources. This study entitled "Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022) is currently under review. Noise sources assessed include road and air traffic noise, and stationary noise. Recommended mitigation include air conditioning, rooftop barrier, acoustic enclosure for emergency generator. Pending acceptance of the study the recommendations must be secured by way of an agreement with the City and/or Region as part of any future planning application such as consent. Staff notes the Consultant's Statutory Declaration and Owner's Statement have not been included with the report and must be received prior to accepting the Noise Report. In the meantime staff is recommending a holding provision be including in the ZBL amendment to secure review and acceptance of the study, and to provide for certification at detailed building design that the mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits. Transportation Impact Study Staff acknowledges receipt of the report "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022) which is currently under review. Comments will be provided when available. In the meantime, staff is recommending a holding provision be included in the ZBL amendment to provide for its review and acceptance. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 3 of 6 Page 461 of 668 Site Plan Related Matters • The Functional Servicing Report is currently under review and comments will follow separately. Any new servicing/removal/update to existing services would require separate approval through Municipal Consent, prior to Site Plan clearance. A Regional road Work Permit will be required prior to start of any work within the Regional road right-of-way. Regional Road Widening Dedication — In this area, the Regional Road 53 (Fairway Road North) right of way width matches the designated road width in Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP). No further road widening dedication is required in association with the ROP designated road width. Transit Planning It is likely Grand River Transit will be required to put additional service during morning and afternoon bell time to meet additional demand and address overcrowding, such as providing additional trips on existing Route 23 which currently runs along Fairway Road and Zeller Drive. Neighbourhood Traffic Concerns Regional staff acknowledges neighbourhood residents have raised a number of concerns with traffic in the area, including a site visit with residents, City and Regional staff September 21, 2023. Staff can advise on the following at this time. Roundabout Option at Eden Oak Trail and Fairway Road The Region has a policy when a roundabout is to be considered. The Policy states that a roundabout should be considered: If there are any geometric changes to an intersection (e.g., addition of lane or an approach); If there is a safety issue that has been identified; or If additional traffic control, such as traffic control signals, are warranted. A review shows that a roundabout would not be considered an option at this time as none of the above would be met. However, this does not mean that a roundabout will not be considered at a point in the future should the geometry, collision history or the need for additional control changes. The current configuration provides for a right turn in/out only due to an existing median. Given this design, additional control would not be warranted. Additionally, because of the restricted movements there is no collision pattern of concern. During the period between 2016 and 2020 there have been no reported collisions. Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 4 of 6 Page 462 of 668 Lowering Speed Limit The posted speed limit along Fairway Road at Eden Oak Trail is 60km/h. The posted speed of 60km/h continues for a distance of approximately 230 metres east of Eden Oak. Although staff do not have any speed surveys near Eden Oak along Fairway Road, staff suspect that average travel speeds are likely at or slightly higher than the posted 60km/h. The Region may consider a school period posted speed reduction on Fountain because there is a planned right in/out access. Any speed reduction may be subject to the Region's ASE expansion. Any Upgrades to the Existing Roundabout Currently, there are no plans to change the roundabout at Zeller Drive. At Regional roundabouts, pedestrians experience a better level of service in terms of delay. All Regional roundabouts include Level 2 PXO's which give priority to pedestrians. This means motorists must stop when a pedestrian is waiting to cross at the designated crossing location. The Region is working towards a pilot of rapid flashers at roundabouts. If the results of the pilot are positive, Old Zeller at Fountain may be a candidate if their use is expanded. The Region is working towards a pilot of raised crosswalks at roundabouts. If the results of the pilot are positive, Old Zeller at Fountain may be a candidate if their use is expanded. Regional Development Charges The Owner/Applicant should also be advised that any future development on the subject lands will be subject to provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Region Application Fee To Regional staff's knowledge, the Region's planning fees are outstanding. By copy of this letter, the applicant is asked to provide the required fees as soon as possible. Summary Subject to the above comments, and receipt of the Region's fees, Regional staff has no objection to City staff proceeding with recommendations to Kitchener Committee and Council on the applications. In summary, Regional staff is recommending the proposed ZBL amendment include a holding provision to address the following: Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 5 of 6 Page 463 of 668 1) Submission of a revised Fire Flow Analysis and servicing drawings; 2) Review and acceptance of the noise study entitled," Noise Impact Study, East Kitchener School, Fairway Road, Kitchener, Ontario" (Aercoustics, May 21, 2021 and Revised August 16, 2022); and certification accepted mitigation measures recommended in the study meet NPC -300 noise level limits; 3) Review and acceptance of the transportation impact study entitled, "East Kitchener Catholic School, Transportation Study, Waterloo Catholic District School Board" (R.J. Burnside, December 2022); and 4) Submission of the MECP's Record of Site Condition Acknowledgement Letter for RSC #231915. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Shilling Yip, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner cc. Kristen Barisdale, GSP Group Document Number: 4490572 Version: 1 Page 6 of 6 Page 464 of 668 Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail Application Type: Official Plan Amendment OPA23/011/W/TS Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA23/018/W/TS Comments of: Environmental Planning — City of Kitchener Commenter's Name: Carrie Musselman Email: carrie.mussel man@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 X 7068 Date of Comments: July 27, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and Reports submitted as part of a complete Planning Act Application: • Arborist Report Pertaining to: Southeast corner of Fairway Road North & Woolner Trail, Kitchener ON, prepared by Urban Arboretum, dated December 21, 2022. • Functional Servicing Report for 200 Woolner Trail, Hamilton ON, prepared by Lanhack Consultants Inc., dated March 24, 2023. 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the studies as noted above to support an official plan and zoning bylaw amendment to support the proposed development of a new secondary school, and note: 1) From the Arborist Report, staff have calculated a total of 178 individual trees are located on the property, and note: a) 48 trees (26.9%) are recommended to be preserved b) 27 trees (15.1%) are recommended to be injured, and i) 10 of the trees recommended to be injured are Potential Boundary Trees. c) 103 trees (57.8%) are to be removed as they would not survive development impacts. i) 2 of the trees recommended to be removed are in shared ownership and 2 others in potential shared ownership. 2) The Arborist Report has noted trees in shared ownership to be removed to facilitate the development. a) Written agreement to remove trees in shared ownership is required and is to be included with the Arborist Report. b) If either of the property owners don't agree to tree removal (s), the proposed development can't proceed as designed, and it will need to be modified from what has been submitted for further review and approval. 3) It is recommended that the proposed site design, overall grading and proposed parking be revised to provide the retention of additional trees and vegetation. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 465 of 668 4) An ecologically sound tree replacement plan (to support the future site plan application) will be necessary to mitigate tree removals. Transplantation of existing trees onsite should be evaluated. An assessment of the value of the vegetation proposed for removal should be prepared. This value can be the basis for compensation plantings provided beyond the Urban Design Manual base standards. Environmental Planning staff can support the Official Plan and Zoning By Law Amendment. Staff believe the above noted comments/concerns can be addressed through the City's Site Plan process and/or requirements. 3. Policies, Standards and Resources: Tree Management • As per Section 8.C.2.16. of the Official Plan, the City will require the preparation and submission of a tree management plan in accordance with the City's Tree Management Policy (available on the City's Website), where applicable, as a condition of a development application. o Any tree management plan must identify the trees proposed to be removed, justify the need for removal, identify the methods of removal and specify an ecologically sound tree replacement scheme and any mitigative measures to be taken to prevent detrimental impacts on remaining trees • policy 8.C.2.6., the City will incorporate existing and/or new trees into the streetscape or road rights-of-way and encourage new development or redevelopment to incorporate, protect and conserve existing healthy trees and woodlands in accordance with the Urban Design Policies in Section 13 (Landscape and Natural Features) of the Urban Design Manual and the Development Manual. Hedgerows • As per Section 8.C.2.19. of the Official Plan, when considering development, redevelopment or site alteration proposals, the City may require the protection and enhancement of hedgerows, especially where: a) they link other elements of the Natural Heritage System; b) wildlife regularly use them as habitat or movement corridors; c) they are composed of mature, healthy trees; d) they contain trees that are rare, unique, culturally important or over 100 years in age; or, e) they contribute to the aesthetics of the landscape. Natural Heritage Features • The mapping and criteria for identifying individual natural heritage features is included in the Kitchener Natural Heritage System Technical Background Report (rev. June 2014). 4. Advice: • 20 Woolner Trail is 6.48 ha (16.01 acres) in size and so the City's Tree Conservation By-law applies. If the owner would like to remove a tree (not part of a planning approval), a tree conversation permit may be required. Additional information can be found on the City's A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 466 of 668 website at: https://www.kitchener.ca/en/building-and-development/tree- conservation.aspx#Tree-conservation-permits. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully— Building Community Page 467 of 668 City of Kitchener Heritage — OPA/ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail File Number: ZBA23/018/W/TS, OPA23/011/W/TS, SP23/049/W/TS Comments Of: Heritage Planning Commenter's Name: Deeksha Choudhry Email: deeksha.choudhry@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 Date of Comments: July 13, 2023 Heritage Planning staff has reviewed the following material for the proposed development on the lands municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail to provide the comments outlined below: • Heritage Impact Assessment dated April 2021; • Letter of Submission dated May 17, 2023; • Proposed Site Plan; and • Urban Design Brief dated April 16, 2023. The subject property municipally addressed as 20 Woolner Trail does not have any heritage status. However, it is located adjacent to 80 Woolner Trail, which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Heritage Impact Assessment A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was submitted in support of this and a previous consent application B2021-011. The HIA went before the Heritage Kitchener Committee at its April 7, 2021, meeting. The HIA has also received approval on April 9, 2021. OPA/ZBA Application Since the HIA has been approved and there has been no major change in the proposed development, staff do not have any additional comments or considerations as part of the OPA/ZBA process. Site Plan Application The approved HIA included some recommendations that should be addressed as part of the Site Plan process. This included: -Lighting requirements A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 468 of 668 - Fencing Requirements - Tree/vegetation cover Heritage Planning Comments As per the recommendations of the approved HIA, heritage planning staff would require that a fence be installed between the shared property lines of 80 Woolner Trail and 20 Woolner Trail. Staff would also require the design details of the proposed fence so that staff can ensure that is compatible with the adjacent heritage property. As part of the Site Plan process, staff would like to include the following conditions: Prior to Site Plan Approval I. That prior to Site Plan Approval, that the proposed Lighting Plan be reviewed and approved by the City's Heritage Planner in conjunction with the City's Urban Designer. II. That prior to Site Plan Approval, a Tree and Vegetation Inventory for the trees proposed to be removed along the shared property lines of 20 Woolner Trail and 80 Woolner Trail be submitted to the satisfaction of the City's Heritage Planner. III. Prior to Site Plan Approval, that the proposed fence details be submitted and approved to the satisfaction of the City's Heritage Planner. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 469 of 668 Address: 20 Woolner Trail Owner: Waterloo Catholic District School Board Application: OPA23/011/W/TS and ZBA23/018/W/TS Comments Of: Parks and Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross Email: Lenore. ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: July 312023 ❑ 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑X No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 5. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of requested to amend the Official Plan to redesignate the property to 'Institutional' from 'Mixed Use' and 'Low Rise Residential'. The owner has requested to amend the Zoning By-law to 'Institutional (INS -2)' in By- law 2019-051 from 'Agriculture One Zone (A-1) with Special Use and Regulation Provisions 69U and 107R' in Zoning By-law 85-1. An increased parking rate of 1 space per 81m2 for a total of 188 parking spaces is also requested. • Planning Justification Report • Urban Design Brief • Noise Impact Study • Arborist Report 6. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments and can provide support to the applications. Updates to technical reports as noted below can be reviewed and approved through the site plan application SP23/049/W/TS. 7. Comments on Submitted Documents 1) Arborist Report and Tree Protection Plan — Arborwood Tree Service Inc— rev date Jan 04 2023 a) As noted in Parks and Cemeteries comments for site plan application SP23/049/W/TS, a revised Arborist Report and Tree Protection Plan are required to accurately reflect required removals and tree protection fencing especially along the Woolner Trail road widening and along the shared Woolner Farm property line. b) The updates that are required to the Arborist Report and the Tree Protection Plan are not necessary for the OPA and ZBA to proceed and can be addressed through the site plan application. 8. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 470 of 668 • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual 9. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. As per the Parkland Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy, Parkland dedication is not required "for properties to be developed by, on behalf of, and for use by publicly funded school boards operating within the City of Kitchener". A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 471 of 668 City of Kitchener Application Type: Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS Project Address: 20 Woolner Trail Comments of: Transportation Services Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: dave.seller@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 Date of Comments: August 4, 2023 a. As part of a complete OPA/ZBA application, a Transportation Study (TS) was completed (December 2022) by R. J. Burnside & Associates Limited in support of this application. Transportation Services review of this TS focused on roadways that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Kitchener. Development proposal The applicant is proposing to construct a new elementary and secondary school containing grades 7 to 12. In the 2028 future scenario, the development is estimated to generate 943 AM and 532 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The site will be serviced by three access points. Two full move accesses along Woolner Trail and one right -in right -out access along Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53). Based on the Site Plan submitted for the Site Plan Review Committee meeting on July 19, 2023, the plan noted a total of 188 parking spaces are being proposed. Intersection analysis Traffic operations for existing (2021) and future (2023 & 2028) conditions were analyzed for the following locations. Future traffic conditions include school generated traffic plus background traffic. Existing 2021 • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street — signalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) B or better. • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail — roundabout o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Woolner Trail at Upper MercerStreet— unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. Future 2023 & 2028 • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street — signalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 472 of 668 • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail — roundabout o In both the AM and PM peak hours most traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. o In the AM 2028 conditions, the northbound (Woolner Trail) traffic is operating with a LOS F and volume to capacity ratio greater than 1.00. This critical traffic movement is due to the high traffic volumes along Fairway Road North, which causes the delays at this approach to the roundabout. These delays are forecasted to be for short durations. • Woolner Trail at Upper Mercer Street - unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at NEW site access — unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. • Woolner Trail at NEW north site access— unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and operate with a Level of service (LOS) A. • Woolner Trail at NEW south site access— unsignalized o In both the AM and PM peak hours all traffic movements on City of Kitchener roadways have excess vehicle capacity and are operating with a Level of service (LOS) C or better. It should be noted that the new school AM (arrival) and PM (dismissal) times are typically between 8:20 am to 9:10 am and 3:00 pm. When comparing the PM dismissal and PM background peak hour traffic times as indicated below, they are offset and therefore, do not overlap. However, in the AM, there may be an overlap of school traffic and AM peak hour background traffic for a brief period. Background traffic AM and PM peak hour times were provided as part of the Region of Waterloo traffic counts that are within the TS submitted by Burnside. The AM and PM bell times were provided by the Catholic School Board. Background traffic AM peak hour • 7:30 — 8:30 am - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street • 7:30 — 8:30 am - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail Background traffic PM peak hour • 4:45 — 5:45 pm - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Pebblecreek Drive/ Upper Mercer Street • 4:30 — 5:30 pm - Fairway Road North (Regional Road 53) at Old Zeller Drive/ Woolner Trail Traffic infiltration analysis The TS noted that some school traffic may use Upper Mercer Street to access the proposed school. Upper Mercer Street is designated as a Local roadway and typically has a vehicle capacity up to 2000 vehicles per day (vpd). Upper Mercer Street carries between 300 to 1000 vpd, depending on your A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 473 of 668 location along the roadway. It was estimated that with the addition of the new school, less than 300 additional vpd are being added to Upper Mercer Street and can be accommodated as there is available vehicle capacity. Walkability analysis Pedestrian walkability to/for the site and surrounding area can easily be achieved, as sidewalks are generally provided on both sides of roadways in the surrounding area. Also, to improve pedestrian and cycling connectivity for the new school and neighbourhood, is a new 3m boulevard multi -use trail (BMUT) to be installed as part of the development between Fairway Road North and along the Woolner Trail school frontage. Vehicle swept path analysis The following design vehicles were reviewed for on-site loading/garbage. • Private FL Refuse Truck - acceptable • Heavy Single Unit (HSU) - acceptable • School bus —acceptable Parking supply analysis The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 188 parking spaces, which is over the maximum 162 parking spaces required. The TS noted the surplus parking is to provide the school with planning flexibility for the site and in conversations with the traffic consultant the parking provided should be acceptable and no shortfall is anticipated. In other words, it is not expected that there will be any overflow of school parking on the surrounding street network. Transportation Services have no concerns with surplus parking being proposed for this development. Conclusion Based on the analysis and conclusions within the TS, Transportation Services is of the opinion that this development will not negatively impact the overall traffic operations of City of Kitchener roadways within the study area. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 474 of 668 From: Barry Cronkite <Barry.Cronkite@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 11:59 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Tr. - Updated comments Hi Tim, here's some info: In addition to comments previously provided, Transportation services met with neighbourhood residents to discuss traffic and parking concerns. To address concerns, the following is recommended: • That stopping be prohibited along the east side (school side) of Woolner Trail along the school frontage • That parking be prohibited only the wet side of Woolner Trail between Upper Mercer Street and Fairway Road • That Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street be monitored upon school opening to make any additional necessary adjustments to parking prohibitions to ensure overall road user safety • That the speed limit on Woolner Trail be reduced to 30km/h in the identified school zone • That Upper Mercer Street be considered for seasonal traffic calming beginning in 2024 • That traffic conditions be monitored upon school opening to determine if there are other traffic calming considerations for Upper Mercer and Lower Mercer Streets. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 475 of 668 From: Niall Melanson <Niall.Melanson@kitchener.ca> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2023 3:14 PM To: Lynn Ingram <Lingram@mte85.com> Cc: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; Angela Mick <Angela.Mick@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: OPA/ZBA 20 Woolner Comments Hey Tim At this time I can confirm that sanitary capacity is available and Engineering supports the ZBA. Lynn - Was there any update on the Water Distribution Analysis? I am yet to see anything and at this time KU cannot sign -off. Please follow up as soon as possible. Thank you. Niall Melanson, C.E.T. Project Manager, Development Engineering, City of Kitchener niall.melanson(okitchener.ca. 519-741-2200 x 7133 200 King St. W., Kitchener, ON N2G 4GX A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 476 of 668 From: Gaurang Khandelwal <Gaurang.Khandelwal@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 9:49 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 20 Woolner Trail (OPA/ZBA) Hi Tim, Thanks for discussing this yesterday. The proposed OPA is to change the urban structure from Neighbourhood Node (Secondary Intensification Area) and Community Area to Community Node (Primary Intensification Area), and from Mixed Use and Low Rise Residential to Institutional land use designation. Policy 3.C.2.5 directs addition of new Primary Intensification Areas to be considered only during a comprehensive review. Further, Policy 3.C.2.6 speaks to expansion of Primary Intensification Areas and Secondary Intensification Areas. Expansion of Secondary Intensification Areas may be permitted through the review of a PJR that justifies the expansion is warranted, desirable and appropriate. However, Neighbourhood Node does not permit Institutional land use designation. The addition of a Community Node (including the change of a Neighbourhood Node) is not supported outside of a comprehensive review. At this time, I believe a site specific to allow institutional land use designation within the existing urban structure should be okay and any change to the urban structure should be undertaken during comprehensive review of the OP. Regards, Gaurang Khandelwal (he/him), MA, MCIP, RPP Planner (Policy) I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7611 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 gaurang. khandelwala-kitchener.ca A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 477 of 668 From: BISKABORN, Brad <Brad.Biskaborn @ca nada post. postescanada.ca> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 2:12 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: RE: Circulation of Full Site Plan for 20 Woolner Trail - SP23/049/W/TS Hi Tim, This school development would receive their mail from a community mailbox. There is an existing mailbox site at the side of 145 Upper Mercer St, which would most likely be used for this school to collect their mail. If you have any questions let me know. Thank -you. Regards, Brad Biskaborn Delivery Services Officer / CANADA POST 955 Highbury Ave N. London ON, N5Y 1A3 519-495-5373 A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 478 of 668 From: circulations@wsp.com <circulations@wsp.com> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 2:34 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Site Plan Application (SP23/049/W/TS); 20 Woolner Tr., Kitchener 2023-06-26 Tim Seyler Kitchener Attention: Tim Seyler Re: Site Plan Application (SP23/049/W/TS); 20 Woolner Tr., Kitchener; Your File No. SP23/049/W/TS To Whom this May Concern, We have reviewed the circulation regarding the above noted application. The following paragraphs are to be included as a condition of approval: "The Owner acknowledges and agrees to convey any easement(s) as deemed necessary by Bell Canada to service this new development. The Owner further agrees and acknowledges to convey such easements at no cost to Bell Canada. The Owner agrees that should any conflict arise with existing Bell Canada facilities where a current and valid easement exists within the subject area, the Owner shall be responsible for the relocation of any such facilities or easements at their own cost." Upon receipt of this comment letter, the Owner is to provide Bell Canada with servicing plans/CUP at their earliest convenience to plannineanddevelopment@bell.ca to confirm the provision of communication/telecommunication infrastructure needed to service the development. It shall be noted that it is the responsibility of the Owner to provide entrance/service duct(s) from Bell Canada's existing network infrastructure to service this development. In the event that no such network infrastructure exists, in accordance with the Bell Canada Act, the Owner may be required to pay for the extension of such network infrastructure. If the Owner elects not to pay for the above noted connection, Bell Canada may decide not to provide service to this development. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 479 of 668 To ensure that we are able to continue to actively participate in the planning process and provide detailed provisioning comments, we note that we would be pleased to receive circulations on all applications received by the Municipality and/or recirculations. We note that WSP operates Bell Canada's development tracking system, which includes the intake and processing of municipal circulations. However, all responses to circulations and requests for information, such as requests for clearance, will come directly from Bell Canada, and not from WSP. WSP is not responsible for the provision of comments or other responses. Should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Juan Corvalan Senior Manager - Municipal Liaison Email: plannineanddevelopment@bell.ca A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 480 of 668 July 13, 2023 Administration Centre: 400 Clyde Road, P.J. Box 729 Cambridge, ON N1 R 5W6 Phone: 519-621-2761 Toll free: 1-866-900-4722 Fax:519-621-4844 www.grandriver.ca Tim Seyler Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener ON N2G 4V6 tim.seyler(a)kitchener.ca Re: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/011/W/TS Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application ZBA23/018/W/TS Site Plan Application SP23/049/W/TS 20 Woolner Trail, Kitchener Waterloo Catholic District School Board Dear Mr. Seyler, Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff have reviewed the above -noted application for a new secondary school. Recommendation We recommend deferring a decision on these applications until issues with the GRCA's Land Management Division and the proposed stormwater management are resolved. Documents Reviewed by Staff Staff have reviewed the functional servicing report (Lanhack Consultants, March 2023) and grading plans (Lanhack Consultants, revised March 24, 2023) submitted with this application. This follows our April 21, 2022 pre -consultation comments. Page 1 of 2 Member of Conservation Ontario, representing Ontario's 36 Conservation Authorities I The Grand — A Canadian Heritage River Page 481 of 668 GRCA Comments The GRCA has reviewed this application under Ontario Regulation 686/21, acting on behalf of the Province regarding natural hazards identified in Section 3.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS, 2020), as well as in accordance with Ontario Regulation 150/06 and GRCA's Board approved policies. Information currently available at our office indicates that the subject lands contain the Grand River floodplain. We have no concerns in principle with the development from a regulatory perspective. However, the site is adjacent to GRCA's Woolner Flats property, and is on a former portion of the property divested to the applicant. The functional servicing proposes discharging stormwater to a sediment basin (possibly established for construction of Fairway Road North over the Grand River), which would then flow overland towards the existing drainage channel. It is my understanding that a) this may not be to a satisfactory engineering standard, and b) may not be congruent with previous property agreements with the GRCA. We recommend that the applications are deferred so the applicant can hold further discussions with our Land Management Division, and ensure the proposed stormwater management for the site is in keeping with previous agreements. The applicant previously paid a fee for our comments on a previous consent application, and no additional fees are required for these applications. A separate fee will be required for a GRCA permit, if applicable. We trust this information is of assistance. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Ron Gasparetto, Manager of Conservation Lands, directly at 519-621-2763 ext. 2207 or rgasparetto(a)grand river. ca. Sincerely, Trevor Heywood Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority cc: Ron Gasparetto, GRCA Carrie Musselman, City of Kitchener Page 2 of 2 Page 482 of 668 From: M B Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:26 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: M B ruth.jane99 Subject: Neighbourhood Meeting of Aug. 15/23 Ti m, I would like to say that my wife and I thoroughly enjoyed last night's zoom meeting of the proposed development of the new school in our neighbourhood. We had brought up the question last night about possibly making parking on Woolner Woods, Upper Mercer, and Lower Mercer one side only from two sided parking at present. I had brought this matter up with Councillor Dave Schnider a year ago to no avail. I will attach that email at the end of this email. Our concern is although we agree with the proposed entrances and exits as presented last evening, if the (30) school buses enter the roundabout at Fairway onto Wooler and then enter the designated school bus entrance, it will be a sharp turn into the parking lot. The easiest access to this lot would be down Upper or Lower Mercer as there would be no sharp turn into the lot. At present during the year there is parking allowed on both sides of these 3 roads. Also at present it is impossible for 2 vehicles to pass each other in opposite directions when there are vehicles parked across from each other and this is the case almost daily during the spring, summer, snd fall when there are no night time parking bans in effect. If the school bus drivers decide to use Upper and Lower Mercer to access the parking lot, there will be accidents waiting to happen from vehicles parked on both sides of the street and people backing out of their driveways unable to see the school bus. There are also 3 mailboxes on these streets. I have seen the letter carrier have to park in a lane of traffic for the 10 or 15 minutes it takes to fill the boxes. It is unsafe for the letter carrier as well as anyone driving by in this situation. I do realize that there is a 3 hour restriction for parking during the weekdays. Travelling these streets either on foot or in a vehicle I have not noticed a ticket on any vehicle and I have seen vehicles parked for 2 or 3 days without moving. Below are excerpts from my emails with Dave Schnider from June 2022: Dave, The reason for my email today is that I was talking to our postal carrier this morning and wondered why it took him 20 minutes to go the distance of 2 community mailboxes. I know him so I was just joking but his response wasn't a joke. He said at the box on Upper Mercer, cars completely block in the mailbox and also park on the other side of the road and he has to double park for 10-15 minutes. This makes it very hard to manoeuvre Page 483 of 668 around and I have had to do it many days. The same thing happens to a lesser extent at the mailbox on Lower Mercer because vehicles just block the mailbox but are not parked on the other side of the street. I have mentioned this to you before about parking on both sides of Upper Mercer because it is always full of vehicles, usually on both sides of the road. At that time you had mentioned that there wasn't enough traffic to warrant no parking on one side. This is a problem all summer. I have no idea where they park all winter. Anyway, is there any chance of no parking signs going up on either side of the community mailboxes on both of these streets? I also thought there was only 3 hour parking allowed throughout the day. Many move but many sit there all day or for days. Thanks for reading this, Mike Brown Mike, I'll check with our traffic department about the possibility of No Parking signs around the mailboxes. Any change like this would involve a survey of affected households. No Parking restrictions are usually done for safety reasons. It's been my experience that most residents don't want to lose on street parking spaces. I'll also connect with our Bylaw Department because you're right, it's a 3 hour parking limit. I can ask that they try to patrol this area a little more. I'll get back to you. I've copied my assistant Elizabeth Leacock on this reply so there is a record of your concerns. She may also assist me with assisting you. All the best, Mike Dave Tim, Thanks for taking the time to read this. Regards, Mike & Ruth Brown Page 484 of 668 From: Karen Nicole Morris Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 1:34 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Kitchener development at 20 Woolner Trail Hi Tim, I received the notice regarding the 20 Wooler Trail proposal. I understand the need for more schools in the area, but I have concerns for this location. We see deer and foxes often in this area frequently. It's home and food supply for many critters. It's a really nice area to walk around for access to the trails. The traffic along Fairway Rd is concerning. There is congestion during rush hours. A lot of cars speed along Fairway, including in the roundabout at Wooler Trail/Old Zeller/Fairway. I walk and cross here often. It's pretty dangerous. Some people don't yield to pedestrians. I would be extremely concerned for kids safety there. Thank you for your consideration. Karen Morris From: Guy P Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 3:05 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Comments regarding proposed development at 20 Woolner Trail in Kitchener Hello, I was extremely surprised to find out another school was planned to be built on Fairway Road at the Woolner Trail roundabout. I just hope the lessons learned from the problems still ongoing around Chicopee Hills P.S. regarding student road safety, traffic congestion and access to the school are taken into consideration BEFORE approval of this project. With the 3 schools so close to each other and the amount of traffic brought into the area, in addition to the extremely busy Fairway Road and Page 485 of 668 roundabout, you are looking at a traffic disaster far worse than the situation being ignored right now around Chicopee Hills. It's only a matter of time before a tragedy happens there. Feel free to look up some of the articles already done by local media about the problem if you need more information. Sincerely, Guy An area resident From: Webb -Owen, Kim Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 10:17 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Andrew & Kim Subject: Proposed Development - 20 Woolner Trail Good Friday Morning! I hope this finds you well and having a good day. My husband and I live at and are in receipt of the notice of a proposed school being developed at Woolner/Fairway. We would like to voice our concerns and objection to this build as follows: 1) Is proposed area not a flood plain? 2) Excessive amount of traffic at this roundabout. Already a congested area morning and night. The area has already increased in population with resident properties and traffic due to building the bridge over the river. 3) Concerns of roundabout and students walking — safety concern and again the congestion for trying to get out of the neighbourhood for residents trying to get to work during same hours. 4) Three schools in close proximity. 5) Protected area behind Upper Mercer (Forested area). Students walking in this protected area. Concern of cigarettes being dropped and not butted out and potential fires. Concern of students having easy access to trespass on personal residents. Page 486 of 668 6) Wildlife already being forced to smaller area due to residential area built. Forcing wildlife out of an area that they roam. 7) Students having such close proximity to water. 8) Airport noise disruptive to classes. We will be participating in the Virtual Call on August 15. Thank you for your time and attention to our concerns. Kind regards, Andrew and Kim Owen -----Original Message ----- From: joshdaws Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 7:13 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: RE: Feedback: 20 woolner trail construction [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka. ms/ Lea rnAboutSenderldentification ] Hi Tim, Thanks for responding. I did indeed take a look through all the reports and saw that they had to project the traffic numbers as it was measured during "the Covid times". My specific concern is more that typically in the morning/evening the roundabout is significantly busy (even outside of a school hours). I have seen a buildup of traffic on some mornings. Given that traffic will have to turn left to get into the driveway of the school, I can see many parents/busses/other vehicles trying to shortcut and travel down upper/lower Mercer so that it is a turn right thus creating a buildup of traffic. Given that there are two +/-600ppl schools already, adding a 1400ppl school will essentially double the traffic when at capacity. Thanks again! I appreciate the time. Page 487 of 668 Josh On 2023-07-31 at 3:12 PM, Tim Seyler wrote: Hi Josh, Thank you for your comments. The applicant has prepared a transportation impact brief that is currently being reviewed by the City and Region's transportation staff. Their comments will be included in a recommendation report to council, as will yours. I have also added you to the circulation list so you can receive further updates on this application. Please let me know if you have further questions. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca -----Original Message ----- From: joshdaws Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 6:32 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Feedback: 20 woolner trail construction [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Hi there, Just wanted to quickly mention that I am concerned about the added traffic on upper Mercer St if the entrance is on woolner trail for the pickup/drop off. Whilst I am not generally opposed to the construction of the school itself. I am not necessarily in favor of the entrance on woolner trail as it is going to add a ton of extra traffic. Especially in conjunction with the 2 other schools in the area. I just wanted to mention this as a concern. Thanks Josh -----Original Message From: John Hageym Page 488 of 668 Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 3:25 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: School beside river Tim Thankyou As is the case with relying on yesterdays models for layout of flood plains, we will be caught facing a disaster that we could have avoided. We have seen , and listened to planners around the country trying to cover there mistakes with " well this is something we have never seen before ". New models are required now. History says whatever can happen will happen. John > On Jul 31, 2023, at 3:09 PM, Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> wrote: > Hi John, > Thank you for your comments. I wanted to let you know that the GRCA is also being consulted on this project and from their records the location for the school is outside of the floodplain limits. Their comments will be included in a recommendation report to council, as will yours. I have also added you to the circulation list so you can receive further updates on this application. > Thanks, > Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP > Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener > 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca > -----Original Message----- • From: John Hagey > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 7:40 PM > To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> > Subject: School beside river > [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at > Tim > It's a flood plain, Tim! > You are too young to remember Hurricane Hazel, but that whole area was under water! > The engineering done to mitigate flooding issues is not nearly enough. > Use your common sense! Do not put anything there. > This is simply hard to imagine that no lessons have been learned. > John > Sent from my iPhone Page 489 of 668 From: rgiesle Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 3:45 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; Dave Schnider <Dave.Schnider@kitchener.ca>; kbarisdale@gspgroup.ca; Jennifer.Passy@wcdsb.ca; S vanDeKeere <Svan DeKeere@ regionofwaterloo.ca> Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail Neighbourhood Meeting - OPEN CALL FOR COMMENTS Dear Mr. Seyler, This letter is sent to you in furtherance to the open call for comments from the neighbourhood regarding the proposed Elementary and Secondary School development for the block of land entitled 20 Woolner Trail. Residents from Woolner Trail, including the occupants of the Woolner Heritage Farm at 80 Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street and Lower Mercer Street met when we first received the invitation to discuss our thoughts and understand our appeal rights. At this point there had already been a sharing of supporting documents from representatives of the Waterloo Catholic District School Board (WCDSB) to some select residents, which was very helpful to the group of residents in that they could make themselves familiar with the plans and reports that had already been produced. After familiarizing ourselves with the plans and reports we requested and have since undertaken a meeting with Board representatives to further discuss concerns from the residents regarding the impact of this development on our community. Accordingly, please find two attachments to this letter. Attachment 1 provides bullet points of our concerns followed by proposed amendments to the Planning Justification Report, including rational and supporting documentation from the Grand River South Community Plan. Attachment 2 is a list of the residents who have participated and support the thoughts and comments detailed in Attachment 1. We understand and appreciate that there is a process to be followed, with regards to community involvement in planning and development of major projects. We also appreciate that the City of Kitchener is exceeding provincial requirements by providing access to these key documents at this time in the process. However, the residents reserve the right to continue to suggest amendments to the existing plans and request access to City of Kitchener and Regional Planning staff prior to the City Council providing any final approval to the plan. Understanding Page 490 of 668 our appeal rights is important, however, involvement in open and honest communication, proposing amendments, having impactful discussions, and raising concerns prior to final decision-making is far more important to the residents at this time in the process. To that end we will continue to have meetings with WCDSB representatives. As well, we will be requesting meetings with Councilor Dave Schnider, our Ward 2 council representative, and through him, members of the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo staff who can provide details of the transportation and traffic studies for Fairway Road, including Woolner Trail and Eden Oak Trail. As well we would be very interested in ensuring that Open Houses with the rest of the Ward 2 residents will be undertaken prior to any final decision on this project, as this major development will impact us all. Please confirm receipt of this letter. Respectfully submitted on July 28, 2023 @ 15:00, Ron Giesler, in care of the residents of Woolner Trail, Upper and Lower Mercer Streets (see Attachment 2) cc List of residents et al Attachment 2 Attachment 1 Residents of Upper Mercer, Lower Mercer and Woolner Trail have had an opportunity to speak with representatives of the Waterloo Separate School Board regarding the Proposed Development of 20 Wooler Trail. The residents have reviewed all documentation, including the School Board's Planning Justification Report, and are most concerned in seeking resolution and clarification around the following areas of focus: • Traffic to and from the community o Building of a second roundabout on Fairway Rd N at Eden Oak Trail to provide full access to the Site, mitigating overflow traffic into the existing residential community o Prevention of parking and speeding on Woolner Trail, Upper and Lower Mercer streets o Reduction of speed limit on Fairway Road N ■ 40 km while school is in session, 60 km otherwise ■ Controlled by speed indicator flashing lights • Access to and from Woolner Trail with regards to the new Site as well as the Grand River, Boat Launch, Trans Canada Trail, Walter Bean and community trails for walking, hiking, biking, paddling. o Pedestrian access ■ Pedestrian crossing guards at peak times ■ Pedestrian Flashing crossing indicators at non -peak times Page 491 of 668 o Vehicular access to and from the Site on Woolner Trail be restricted to Left -in only via the proposed South driveway and Right -out only via the proposed North driveway o Parking — the prevention of Woolner Trail (as well as Upper and Lower Mercer Streets) from becoming secondary parking for the Site. o Bicycle traffic — bike lanes (as detailed in Section 8.4 of the Grand River South Community Plan [GRSCP]) should be a major consideration on Fairway road for student egress to and from the Site as well as to accommodate other community bicycle traffic • Security and Safety o Fencing of appropriate height and material o Residential access/ability to contact Site Security Force • Noise and lighting o Increased Foliage to maintain and enhance sound barrier to the Woolner Heritage Farm and adjacent residential areas o Mitigate impact on wildlife in the adjacent Natural Heritage System (Section 1.0 of GRSCP) • Cultural, environmental and wildlife concerns o Discussions with/Involvement of Indigenous Peoples in development of the Site Plan o Potential of undertaking an Endangered Species Study o Potential of undertaking an Archeological Study The following information is a list of potential changes geared towards a collective compromise of the Planning Justification Report for 20 Woolner Trail, Waterloo Catholic District School Board for the City of Kitchener, May 2023. 1.1 Proposed amendments to the Overview Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "Development includes two full access driveways along Woolner Trail, and one right- in/right-out access along Fairway Road." CHANGE TO: "Development includes one full access driveway via a new roundabout along Fairway Road North at Eden Oak Trail, one left -in (south) for all inbound traffic including school busses and one right - out (north) for traffic exiting Woolner Trail bound for the Fairway Road/Old Zeller roundabout" 2.1 Site Location and Description Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "The Site is generally bound by Fairway Road North to the north and east, the former Woolner Farm (80 Woolner Trail) to the south, and Woolner Trail to the east." CHANGE TO: The Site is generally bound by Fairway Road North to the north and east, the Heritage Woolner Farm site (80 Woolner Trail) to the south, and Woolner Trail to the east." 2.2 Site Context and Surrounding Uses Page 492 of 668 EXISTING TEXT: "The Site is located on the periphery of an existing residential neighbourhood. As identified on Figure 2, the Site is surrounded by existing low rise residential uses to the north (on the north side of Fairway Road) and to the west (west of Woolner Trail)." CHANGE TO: "The Site is located directly adjacent (South Boundary) to the existing Heritage Farm Site designated as 80 Woolner Trail. The Site is located on the periphery of an existing residential neighbourhood. As identified on Figure 2, the Site is surrounded by existing low rise residential uses to the north (on the north side of Fairway Road) and to the west (west of Woolner Trail)." 3. Proposed Development Amendment EXISTING TEXT: "The Proposed Development will include two access driveways on Woolner Trail. The southern driveway will provide for full movement access to the south parking lot as well as the bus lay by area identified along the western property line, adjacent to Woolner Trail. The second driveway access on Woolner Trail provides for the exiting of school buses as well as vehicular access to a small parking lot located at the northwest corner of the Site and proposed parking area adjacent to the Fairway Road North frontage. The Proposed Development also includes a right-in/right-out driveway from Fairway Road North, providing vehicular access only to on-site parking areas." CHANGE TO: "The Proposed Development will include two access driveways on Woolner Trail. The southern driveway will provide a left -in only access for all vehicular traffic for access to the south parking lot as well as the bus lay-by area identified along the western property line, adjacent to Woolner Trail. The second driveway will be restricted to right -out exit only of school buses as well as vehicles exiting from the south parking lot as well as a small parking lot located at the northwest corner of the Site and proposed parking area adjacent to the Fairway Road North frontage. The Proposed Development also includes a full access driveway from Fairway Road North, providing vehicular access to on-site parking areas and the proposed sports field and associated facilities. This full access driveway will provide a school bus overflow route to the Site where school busses can wait for available spaces in the bus lay-by area traffic during peak drop-off and pick-up times. It will also provide a primary means for car traffic to enter and exit the Site. This will be facilitated by a new roundabout to include access to Eden Oak Trail and accommodated by the newly proposed 40 km speed limit while school is in session and 60 km otherwise. This will be controlled by flashing lights and speed cameras as are already in use in other school areas in Kitchener and Cambridge." NB: As Noted in Section 4.1 (from 3.5 of the Woolner — Fairway — Heritage Impact Assessment), "Based on the nature of the development and its proximity to the adjacent heritage property, it is recommended that a fence be provided within the south and west yards of the subject property, adjacent to 80 Woolner Trail. If it is proposed on the property line, approval by the City will be required as per section 1.9b and 1.10 of the conservation agreement and heritage permit requirements. Further consultation with the City would be required to obtain a full copy of the easement agreement. A tree and vegetation inventory may be required only if a fence is proposed on the shared property line with the property at 80 Woolner Trail. Alternately, we can support the construction of a fence within the subject property, away from the shared property line. In this approach, the fence would be sufficiently screened from Page 493 of 668 view and provide protection, therefore there are no heritage impact concerns. The fence would need to comply to the City's fence by law, in matters such as height. Details regarding the fence design should be deferred to the Site Plan Approval stage, to be considered together with other Site Plan requirements and the applicable municipal fence by-law." It is Proposed that, fencing should consist of an 8 foot anti -climb fence using a building material , other than wood, to increase the longevity and durability of the structure. Rational: Students or other visitors to the school/sports field, who may leave the Site and trespass onto the Heritage Farm property, poses a liability to the Woolner family making them potentially vulnerable to property damage and/or personal injury. The School Board is only insured for accidents on school property so the Woolner family would be left liable for any incidents that occur on their farm property. This potential for liability does not currently exist and only exists if the development is approved and completed. A fence of sufficient deterrent protects both the Waterloo Regional School Board and the Woolner Family from potential liability. When deciding on the appropriate building material for the fence it is important to consider the wildlife. For example, Deer can jump up to a height of about a 6ft fence ...and chain link fences pose a hazard to the deer due to their legs getting caught in the fence as they jump. It is further proposed that, security of the Site and Heritage Woolner Farm would be improved by the presence of a 24/7 security patrol, as is currently in place for the Chicopee Hills School property (corner of Lackner Blvd and Fairway Rd N) or by the installation of a security system, possibly tied to the Site, that would provide instant notification of a breach of Site along the borders of the Woolner Heritage Farm. As Noted in Section 4.1 (from 3.5 of the Woolner — Fairway — Heritage Impact Assessment), "It is recommended that a lighting plan be reviewed at the site plan stage to ensure no undue impact to the adjacent heritage property. Providing adequate lighting also has the potential to provide an added means of security surrounding the property." It is proposed that, a sound/light barrier consist of the planting of Thuja Green Giant (or similar) trees in front of the fencing. Rational: The Heritage Woolner Farm is inhabited by the Woolner Family. Thuja Green Giant is a type of cedar that is considered to be an excellent screening conifer. Sound and bright lights will be expected to project outwards from the proposed sports field. The sport field is not only intended for Site activities but is also proposed to be leased out for "extra -Site" activities, potentially on weekends and in the evenings after the Site activities have ceased. The planting of this or similar foliage will provide the Woolner Family with some peace and provide some separation and barrier from the potential sound and light "noise" emanating from the sports field. When deciding on the type of lighting and the potential use of the sport field, certain considerations should be kept in the forefront. The sport field is proposed to be built in an area adjacent to the Grand River. This area is currently inhabited by wildlife, some of which is nocturnal. Evening activities undertaken at the sport field should be limited to a reasonable curfew to ensure that local inhabitants, wildlife and human, are not unduly disturbed by bright lights and sound "noise". Page 494 of 668 As noted in the section 4.2, "Traffic travelling to the site may infiltrate the existing residential neighbourhood to the west of the Site. The Transportation Study notes that Upper Mercer Street currently carries between 300 and 1,000 vehicles a day, whereas local roads are typically designed to carry over 2,000 vehicles a day. It is estimated that the Proposed Development will add less than 300 vehicle trips a day on Upper Mercer Street." It is proposed that, while traffic travelling to the site may infiltrate the existing residential neighbourhood to the west of the site, the enclosed proposed changes to the South and North Woolner Trail driveways to the Site will better direct flow to and from the Site via Fairway Road with limited use of Woolner Trail. The South driveway limited to left -in and the North driveway limited to right -out directs any traffic, using these points of entry and departure, efficiently to and from the existing roundabout at Fairway Road, Woolner Trail and Zeller Drive. It is already proposed that this roundabout be enlarged to accommodate the expected increase in traffic for this section of Woolner Trail. The proposed new roundabout on Fairway Road at Eden Oak Trail will greatly increase access to the Site for proposed "extra -Site" use of the sports field and its amenities as well as improve the daily access for school busses and vehicular traffic during peak drop-off and pick-up periods. The Fairway Road driveway should be designated as the primary school bus entrance as it provides for efficient access to the Site with bus loading and unloading occurring safely on Site property. It is further proposed that, the development of the Site should not negatively impact parking in either Lower Mercer, Upper Mercer or Woolner Trail. While a traffic impact study has been conducted it is not clear to the residents living on these neighbourhoods how the City of Kitchener plans to prevent these residential streets from becoming over -flow parking for the new Site. The following contains considerations for Site Planning lifted from the current Grand River South Community Plan. Highlighted areas have significant impact with regard to Site Plan approval. 1.0 "The area contains a diverse Natural Heritage System, including the Grand River and its floodplain, Lackner Woods and Natchez Hills Environmentally Sensitive Policy Areas, Idlewood Creek, Chicopee Creek, and the adjacent Chicopee Park. The Grand River South Community Plan proposes that such natural areas be linked by a comprehensive and continuous open space network, and integrated within the future residential community in a sustainable manner." 3.5 "That new development give consideration to the creation and enhancement of views and vistas through road layout, use of natural topography, preservation of environmental features, and the strategic siting of new community landmarks. Views of the Grand River shall be of particular importance." 7.1 "That the Community Plan recognize, and encourage public ownership of, the following significant natural resources comprising the Community's Natural Heritage System: Lackner Woods and Natchez Hills Environmentally Sensitive Policy Areas (ESPAs), flood plain and valley lands associated with the Grand River, Idlewood Creek and Chicopee Creek, and the upland woodlot at the southwest corner of Zeller Drive and Woolner Drive (i.e. the Fung Woodlot)." Page 495 of 668 7.4 "That upland forest areas, excluding required wetland buffer areas, which are designated within the City of Kitchener Municipal Plan for urban development but designated on the Community Plan Land Use Plan as Open Space, shall be considered eligible as part of the required parkland dedication provided all active park areas, as shown on the Land Use Plan, can be satisfied through the required parkland dedication for each respective subdivision. If all required parkland dedication is utilized for active parks, public acquisition of such lands by other means shall be encouraged. This policy shall apply to those portions of the Fung woodlot recommended for retention and protection in the Ecoplans Woodlot Analysis (January 1997), and including the kame feature." 7.8 "That, having given serious consideration to an analysis of the effects of peak aircraft noise levels on proposed athletic fields, a district park/district sports field of approximately 12 hectares be located on lands within the area above 30 NEF/NEP as shown on the Land Use Plan. The District Park shall include active, possibly lighted, sports fields for organized sports, including associated parking areas, and may include playground equipment for neighbourhood park purposes. Camping grounds shall not be permitted above the approved 30 NEF/NEP contour. The District Park shall be a key access point to the Grand River Corridor." 7.12 "That a community trail network be established, as shown conceptually on the Land Use Plan, in order to provide continuous open space linkages between Open Space areas designated on the Land Use Plan, provide recreational opportunities and visual amenities for the public, and to provide habitat and suitable movement corridors for small wildlife. These linkages shall, where feasible, make use of hedgerows, storm water management areas, parks and school sites. The community trail network should be linked to the on -road sections of the bikeway network as shown on Schedule 3.11 8.4 "That Fairway Road, east of Lackner Boulevard, be recognized as Regional Road No. 53 and designated as a Primary Arterial Road with a right-of-way of 35 metres, and shall provide on -road bicycle lanes as recommended in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo Bicycle Master Plan and the City of Kitchener Bikeway Study." 8.5 "That the alignment of Fairway Road, east of a point 150 metres west of Zeller Drive, be determined by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo through the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process under the Environmental Assessment Act." 8.17 "That the cost of primary walk links, including those shown on the Land Use Plan, and which may include pedestrian bridges, providing direct links from residential areas to schools, parks, transit routes and commercial lands, be funded by the development proponent. To the extent that such links function as a community trail, a portion of the cost may be funded by development charges. Additional primary links may be identified through the subdivision review process." 11.4 "That development on or adjacent to property designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act or listed on the municipal data base of heritage resources be subject to Policies 5.3.14 and 5.3.15 of the City of Kitchener Municipal Plan. If required, a Heritage Impact Assessment shall be approved prior to or concurrent with the granting of draft plan approval in conformity with the City's process dealing with the conservation of heritage resources within the plan of subdivision process. Page 496 of 668 The Heritage Impact Assessment shall be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener Heritage Impact Assessment Guidelines and will identify a recommended strategy for the conservation of the heritage resource." Attachment 2 Residents of Woolner Trail, Upper Mercer Street & Lower Mercer Street in support of this letter and attachments 11 Dale Woolner 2] Bar Jones 31 Judy Bloomfield 4] Nancy Rotozinski 51 Ron Giesler 61 Sharon Giesler 71 Carolyn McCallum 8] Rosemary Off 91 Sheila Bookjans 101 Fernanda Pires 11] Judy Beauchamp 121 Gary&Lucy Minter 131 Tony&Elaine Oakman 141 Paul Kristensen 151 Amanda Green 16] Sandy Pastway 17]April Manahan 181 Dave&Annette Strobel 19] Karen Boa 20] Sonya Hamilton 211 Jerry Kloepfer 22] Guy Pink 23] Larry Kotseff 24] Dave&Renate Foster 251 Carol&Len Simpson 26] Tonya Lambkin Page 497 of 668 From: I kotseff Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 8:00 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Cc: Ron Giesler David Foster Dale Woolner Dave Schnider <Dave.Schnider@kitchener.ca>; m he nde rso n @ regio nofwate rloo.ca Subject: WCDSB Proposal at 20 Woolner Trail Good morning Tim, Thanks to you and your team for hosting last night's public meeting regarding the WCDSB proposal at 20 Woolner Trail. It provided the opportunity for members of our community to express their concerns regarding the significant impacts of the proposal on our neighbourhood. In this regard and further to Mr. Giesler's previous email to you, please let us know when a meeting will be arranged with staff at the city and the region to discuss our concerns. In particular, we feel that additional options for primary access to the proposed school site need to be examined along Fairway Road. In addition, we would appreciate receiving a list of those in attendance at last night's public meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Regards, Larry Kotseff From: Ron Giesler Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 2:05 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Thanks very much Tim, we appreciate you getting back to us and we will see you next Thursday. Ron Page 498 of 668 Get Outlook for iOS From: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 1:24:07 PM To: 'Ron Giesler' 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Hi Ron and Larry, Thanks again for the conversation this morning Ron, and I apologize for not getting back to you both earlier in the week. As per our conversation, I've arranged for City and Regional staff to meet you out on site at gam next Thursday (21ST). We can meet at the intersection of Woolner Tr. And Upper Mercer to make an easy reference point, and then we can discuss the site by walking up Woolner. I hope that works for both of you and feel free to invite any other resident that has some concerns. I did mention to Ron that I didn't want this to be a group of 30-50 people, so if we can keep it limited that would be great. I've also reached out to a few other residents and Councilor Schnider as well. If anything comes up between now and then I will let you know, and I hope you would do the same for me. I look forward to our discussion then. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca From: Ron Giesler Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:32:02 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca>; 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Tim, thank you for your previous message as well as this follow up message inviting us to a sit down with the transportation staff regarding the proposed development at 20 Woolner Trail. After conferring with Larry we are prepared to meet with you and the appropriate staff on the following dates: Sept.12 AM or PM Sept. 13 AM Page 499 of 668 Sept. 14 AM Sept.21 AM Get Outlook for iOS From: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 10:25:46 AM 'LARRY KOTSEFF' Subject: RE: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Larry and Ron, Hope you both had a nice weekend. I just wanted to follow up on my email below requesting some times that would work for you so that we can have an on site meeting with transportation staff. If you could please let me know this week that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca From: Tim Seyler Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 11:11 AM To: 'LARRY KOTSEFF' I Subject: 20 Woolner Trail - On site meeting Good morning Larry and Ron, I hope you both are having a good week. I've been in discussion with City and Regional Transportation staff and we are able to have an on site meeting with you in the forthcoming days to discuss the development at 20 Woolner Tr. I wanted to reach out to both of you to see what day would work best and what time you would like the meeting to be at. If you could send me a few dates that you would be available, then I will be able to coordinate with the members of the Applicant team, City staff and Regional staff so that we can have a thorough discussion. Hopefully through these discussions we can have some meaningful conversations that result in some solutions to the issues that you for see. Once we have the specific date, we will also be able to invite other residents, but I thought it would be easier to coordinate first with the two of you. If you could let me know a few dates and times by the end of the week that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP Page 500 of 668 Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca -----Original Message ----- From: Judy Broomfield Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 2:33 PM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: Re: 20 Woolner Trail -August 15th Presentation [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka. ms/Lea rnAboutSenderide ntification ] Thanks Tim, much appreciated. > On Aug 22, 2023, at 2:15 PM, Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> wrote: > Hi Judy, > Thanks for the email. The slides and the link to the video are now all online, and you can click the link below to access it. https://canol.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2FaPP2.kitchener.ca%2FAPPDocs/ 2FOpenData%2FAMANDADataSets%2FSupporting Documents List 684835.pdf&data=05%7C01%7CTi m.Seyler%40kitchener.ca%7Ce72e147adef24736a2c208dba33e3b4c%7Cc703d79153f643a59255622eb3 3alb0b%7C0%7C0%7C638283259904135594%7CU nknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJW IioiMC4wLiAwMDA i LCJQI ioiV2luMzl iLCJ BTil6l klhaWwiLCJXVCI6M n0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yVD6IJ2kwm1oXh9B knyVN5wG4gkTeNgepXhz%2B% 2BdM 10s% 3D&reserved=0 > If you have any other questions, please feel free to reach out. > Thanks, > Tim Seyler, BES, MCIP, RPP > Senior Planner I Planning Division I City of Kitchener > 519-741-2200 ext. 7860 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca > -----Original Message----- * From: Judy Broomfield > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 3:19 PM > To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Page 501 of 668 > Subject: 20 Woolner Trail - August 15th Presentation > [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] > Tim, could you please advise when a copy of the August 15th Presentation related to 20 Woolner Trail will be made available on-line ? > Judy Broomfield From: Nasha Kroutil Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 9:59 AM To: Tim Seyler <Tim.Seyler@kitchener.ca> Subject: School development Fairway & Woolner Hi Tim, I am a resident of the nearby area. Just interested to see more of the plans/details of the school that's expected to go in the subject area between Fairway Road and Woolner Crt. 1. Can you share concept drawings 2. What type of school is planned to go there? 3. How big is the parking area expected to be? 4. Are any other businesses expected to go around the school? 5. Any traffic lights planned? 6. Walkways for children to cross? Thanks so much, Nasha Page 502 of 668 Option 6 0-11'1<t D UP p k} n 1, Canadian Martyrs St. Anne (K4 y. n 4� Saint John Paul II 8� a•.4 ► St pani2l P Ads ` '� s$ C ss Parr .k 'Proposed School Location ..r 3 s+ s serial{ n Legend �a j'Schools a � 0 Z Roads'+ Rivers`c Canadian Martyrs [JK to Grade 6 and 718 directed to 7-12 EK School] Saint John Paul II [JK to Grade 6 and 718 directed to 7-12 EK School]�,'r r �p St- Anne (K) [JK to Grade 81 #z St. Daniel [JK to 6 and 718 directed to 7-12 EK School]$ St. Patrick [JK to Grade 81LB afl. r rk Page 503 of 668