Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2023-299 - Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/007/K/CD - Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD - 417 King Street West, Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp.Staff Report r JR Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: October 30, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Craig Dumart, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7073 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: REPORT NO.: October 4, 2023 DSD -2023-299 SUBJECT: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/007/K/CD Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD Address: 417 King Street West Owner: Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp RECOMMENDATION: That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA/23/007/K/CD for Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp requesting a land use designation change from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area No. 8' to permit a 55 -storey mixed use development on the lands specified and illustrated on Schedule `A', be adopted, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2023-299 as Appendix `A', and accordingly forwarded to the Region of Waterloo for approval; and That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/01 1 /K/CD for Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. 1, attached to Report DSD -2023-299 as Appendix `B'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for the property located at 417 King Street West. It is Planning staff's recommendation that the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications be approved. Community engagement included: o circulation of a preliminary notice letter to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 581 of 668 o installation of two large billboards notice sign on the property (one facing each street); o follow up one-on-one correspondence with members of the public; o Neighbourhood Meeting held on July 11, 2023; o postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject site and those who responded to the preliminary circulation; o notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on October 13, 2023. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Planning staff is recommending approval of the requested Official Plan Amendment Application to add Specific Policy Area 8 to Map 4 and Policy 15.D.2.71 to the text in the Official Plan to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23. Planning Staff is recommending approval of the requested Zoning By-law Amendment Application to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U" to "Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U' in Zoning By-law 85-1 to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR); to regulate building setbacks; and to regulate parking and bicycle parking requirements and to apply a Holding Provision 109H to require an updated Urban Design Brief and an updated noise study prior to final site plan approval. Staff recommends that the applications be approved. BACKGROUND: Vanmar Developments (417 King GP Corp) has made applications to the City of Kitchener for an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment proposing to change the land use designation and zoning of the lands at 417 King Street West to permit the lands to be developed with a 55 storey mixed use development with 622 residential units and two (2) ground floor commercial units. The proposed development includes parking located underground, and internal to the building in the podium above the ground floor. The lands are within the Urban Growth Centre, designated `Innovation District' in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and are zoned as `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' in Zoning By-law 85-1. Existing Warehouse District Zone (D-6) zoning permissions include: • Commercial and light industrial uses; • Maximum floor space ratio of 2.0; • Rear yard setback of 7.5 metres; and • Maximum front yard setback of 2.0 metres. Special Regulation Provision 122R exempts parking from existing uses in buildings that existing prior to 1992. Special Use Provision 142U regulates a maximum gross leasable space of 1,000 square metres. Page 582 of 668 Site Context The subject lands are addressed as 417 King Street West and are situated within the City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre (Downtown). The subject lands are located at the southern side of the block bound by King Street West, Francis Green (a City -owned parkette) and Halls Lane. The subject property has a lot area of 0.28 hectares (0.69 acres) with 56 metres of frontage along King Street West and Halls Lane West. 417 King Street West is currently developed with a 1 storey commercial building (former location of Ziggy's Cycle) with a surface parking lot. The subject lands do not contain any residential units and directly abut Francis Green to the southeast and a 19 -storey mixed use development located (1 Victoria condominium) to the northwest of the subject lands. The surrounding neighbourhood consists of a variety of uses including mid -rise and high rise mixed-use, commercial uses, and institutional office buildings. �,A Sao ���-1 J¢�� Q - z ��C vat-4iiC7� �MA6C Figure 1 — Location Map: 417 King Street West REPORT: The applicant is proposing to develop the subject lands with a with a 55 -storey mixed use development with a proposed Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23. The proposed development includes one building with a 49 -storey tower on top of a 6 -storey podium. The high rise mixed use building proposes a total of 622 residential units with 184 parking spaces located within 1 level of underground parking and 1 level of parking internal to the building. 622 Class A bicycle parking spaces are proposed along with 6 Class B visitor bicycle Page 583 of 668 spaces. Primary vehicular access is proposed from Hall Lane. One of the ground floor commercial units and the residential lobby is proposed at grade along King Street West and one ground floor commercial unit is proposed facing the Francis Green Parkette. Table 1 below highlights the development concept statistics while Figures 2 and 3 show the proposed development concept site plan and building elevations of the development proposal. Table 1. Proposed Development Concept Statistics Ifni I I WC11Of" - Is SIFORM I M Y Y KIP -0 STY. ,j PFOPY73ECI y RE'!K!ElfilAL •- " TOWER f5 i! i i4f Y 5 MPH T[I�i'/iCE M u a _ fA/ItH I;FTttH PA(RK Vi - 1 I .....f !es I+ALLS LN W Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 584 of 668 Development Concept Number of Units 622 residential dwelling units, 2 ground floor commercial units Parking Spaces 184 parking spaces Building Height 55 storeys Class A (indoor secured) 1 per unit (622) Bicycle Parking Class B (outdoor visitor) 6 Bicycle Parking Electric Vehicle Ready 36 Parking Stalls Floor Space Ratio 23 Unit Types 297 — 1 -bedroom units 229 - 1 bedroom plus den units 96 — 2 -bedroom units Ifni I I WC11Of" - Is SIFORM I M Y Y KIP -0 STY. ,j PFOPY73ECI y RE'!K!ElfilAL •- " TOWER f5 i! i i4f Y 5 MPH T[I�i'/iCE M u a _ fA/ItH I;FTttH PA(RK Vi - 1 I .....f !es I+ALLS LN W Figure 2 — Development Concept Site Plan Page 584 of 668 To facilitate the redevelopment of 417 King Street West with the proposed development concept, an Official Plan Amendment and a Zoning By-law Amendment are required to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject lands as the existing Official Plan policies and zoning permit a maximum Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 3.0. The lands are currently designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and zoned `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The current land use designation and zoning have been in place since the early 1990s which do not align with the planned function of the Downtown, to accommodate density appropriate for a central Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), and recently approved developments that are newly constructed or under development. The owner is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to Map 4 and Policy 15.D.2.71 to the text in the Official Plan to allow for an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 and requested to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U' to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U' in Zoning By-law 85-1, to allow for a FSR of 23; regulate parking and bicycle parking requirements; and to further regulate building setbacks. Holding Provision 109H is also proposed to be added to the property to require an updated Urban Design Brief demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity to the satisfaction of the City of Kitchener's Director of Planning. The Holding Provision will also prevent the development of the site with sensitive uses, including residential uses, until the Region is in receipt of a revised noise study is completed to the satisfaction of the Region of Waterloo. Y y ' Figure 3 — Proposed Building �b Rendering: The front elevation along King Street West Page 585 of 668 Planning Analysis: Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. Page 586 of 668 To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus, rapid transit, and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents an attainable form of market- based housing. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use multiple dwelling development that is compatible with the planned function of the area and the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; Page 587 of 668 iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Policy 2.2.4 requires that planning be prioritized for MTSAs on priority transit corridors, including zoning in a manner that implements the policies of the Growth Plan. MTSAs on priority transit corridors will be planned for a minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare for those that are served by light rail transit or bus rapid transit. The Region of Waterloo's ION is a form of light rail transit and the ION stations are Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) that are required to achieve the minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The subject lands are located within the City's delineated Urban Growth Centre (UGC), and within a Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) in the 2014 Kitchener Official Plan. In the City's Official Plan on Map 2 — Urban Structure the lands appear within the MTSA boundary for the ION Central Station. The Region of Waterloo commenced the Regional Official Plan Review project and as part of that work, revised MTSA boundaries were approved in August 2022. The subject lands are within the Central Station MTSA. The proposed development provides residential intensification and will help the City achieve density targets in the MTSA. The proposed designation and zoning will support a higher density housing option that will help make efficient use of existing infrastructure, parks, roads, trails and transit. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Urban Growth Centre in the ROP. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. The subject lands are located in the Central Station (MTSA) in the ROP. The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha on Page 588 of 668 a site specific basis and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. Airport Zoning Regulations The subject lands are located outside of the federally regulated Airport Zoning Regulation (AZR). Prior to construction of any buildings and installation of the stationary crane for construction, the owner is required to submit Land Use Proposal Submission Forms for Land Use and Cranes to NAV CANADA and an Aeronautical Assessment Form to Transport Canada for review of the proposed tower and temporary cranes and to evaluate the impacts to flight paths. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 622 residential units and 730 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, building step backs, and vehicular and pedestrian connections to Francis Green, King Street, and Halls Lane have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The OP establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of Page 589 of 668 development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre (UGC), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within the UGC. The UGC (Downtown) is the primary Urban Structure Component and Intensification Area. The planned function of the UGC is to accommodate a significant share of the Region's and City's future population and employment growth. Section 3.C.2.13 of the OP indicates that the UGC is planned to achieve, by 2031 or earlier, a minimum density of 225 residents and jobs combined per hectare and assist in achieving the minimum residential intensification target identified in Policy 3.C.1.6. The UGC is planned to be a vibrant Regional and Citywide focal point and destination and is intended to be the City's primary focal point for residential intensification as well as for investment in institutional and Region -wide public services, commercial, office, recreational, cultural and entertainment uses. The site is also within the Central Station Area and within 400 metres of both the Central and Victoria Park ION stops. In accordance with Policy 3.C.2.17 of the OP, the planned function of the MTSAs is to provide densities that will support transit, and achieve a mix of residential, office, institutional and commercial uses. They are also intended to have streetscapes and a built form that is pedestrian -friendly and transit -oriented. Policies also require that development applications in MTSAs give consideration to the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) policies contained in Section 13.C.3.12 of the OP. Generally, the TOD policies support a compact urban form, that supports walking, cycling and the use of transit, by providing a mix of land uses in close proximity to transit stops, to support higher frequency transit service and optimize transit rider convenience. These policies also support developments which foster walkability by creating safe and comfortable pedestrian environments and a high-quality public realm. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will help to increase density in an area well served by nearby transit and rapid transit while being context sensitive to surrounding lands and provides excellent access to off-road pedestrian and cycling facilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for the UGC and MTSA but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more environmentally friendly city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Innovation District is characterized by a mix of high rise and medium residential, mixed use, commercial and office buildings and old large industrial buildings which either have been converted to loft style office, residential and other viable uses or have the potential to do so. This area of the city is expected to evolve and transform into a dense urban contemporary setting with continued growth in the high- tech industry coupled with the research office uses affiliated with the nearby post- secondary institutions. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Page 590 of 668 Policies 15.D.2.50 to 15.D.2.52 of the City of Kitchener's Official Plan encourage growth in this area to occur by permitting a full range of complementary commercial uses and encouraging high density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to the Urban Growth Centre,(Map 4) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 whereas the current Official Plan policies allow for a maximum FSR of 3.0. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the City of Kitchener is in receipt of an Urban Design Report and until such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo. Growing Together The Growing Together project is the continuation of the City's ongoing planning review process that began with PARTS and advanced through the Neighbourhood Planning Review (NPR) project, while also responding to new direction from the province, implementing the updated Regional Official Plan, and addressing new and emerging city priorities. Preliminary direction on a draft approach to growth and change have been drafted by staff and is currently available public for consultation. Staff are recommending a form based zoning approach as part of the Growing Together project, which will place a greater emphasis on the pedestrian experience and design of buildings at grade and as experienced on the street, as well as appropriate tower floor plate sizes, separations and setbacks which protect from tower overlook within and between sites, which preserve access to sunlight and mitigates shadow impacts, and which provides for an interesting skyline — which is also the goal of the City's Tall Building Guidelines. Staff have drafted the recommended special policy and zoning regulations for the subject lands in consideration of the direction of the Growing Together project. Staff are of the opinion that the subject lands are appropriate for high-rise, high-density development, subject to demonstration that the proposed built form achieves the objectives of the Urban Design Manual and the Tall Building Guidelines. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Scorecard was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Scorecard outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. An Page 591 of 668 urban design report will be required and secured through a Holding Provision. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate onsite amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Streetscape — The King Street frontage and side yard abutting Francis Green (city owned parkette) is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's lobby. At grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Staff are recommending a Holding Provision apply to the subject land demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes. Through the Site Plan approval process staff will work with the applicant to further enhance the podium design and further active the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The tower has a well defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Tower Design The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Slab" as the proposed tower floor plate is less than 850 square metres in area. The tower placement has been oriented towards King Street with a 6 storey podium. The tower massing is broken up vertically by variation and the articulation of building materials and step backs. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 metre tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Shadows for compact slab buildings are longer and narrower, meaning there are further off-site impacts, but the impacts are shorter for all off-site properties. Page 592 of 668 Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application is necessary to mitigate wind. Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower is generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the offsite separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to the two station stops the Central Station and the Victoria Park ION stop. The building has excellent access to cycling networks, including existing on and off-street cycling facilities and is located in close proximity to the downtown cycling grid. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. Policy 3.C.2.22 states that until such time as Station Area Plans are completed and this Plan is amended accordingly, in the interim, any development application submitted within a Major Transit Station Area will be reviewed generally in accordance with the Transit - Oriented Development Policies included in Section 13.C.3.12 Page 593 of 668 The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications support a more compact mixed-use development in the City of Kitchener's primary intensification area (UGC). The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4. 1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including, one, one plus den and two-bedroom units. Theses new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 4 — Urban Growth Centre in the 2014 Official Plan be changed from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area 8'. Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Page 594 of 668 Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved in the form shown in Appendix "A". Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment (Zoning By-law 85-1) The subject lands are zoned `Warehouse District Zone (D-6)' in Zoning By-law 85-1. The existing zoning permits a range of commercial and light industrial uses with a maximum permitted Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 2.0. The applicant has requested an amendment to Zoning By-law 85-1 to change the zoning from `Warehouse District Zone (D-6)' to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H' in Zoning By-law 85-1. Official Plan policies indicate that where special zoning regulations are requested for residential intensification or a redevelopment of lands, the overall impact of the site- specific zoning regulations will consider compatibility with existing built form; appropriate massing and setbacks that support and maintain streetscape and community character; appropriate buffering to mitigate adverse impacts, particularly with respect to privacy; avoidance of unacceptable adverse impacts by providing appropriate number of parking spaces and an appropriate landscaped/amenity area. The applicant is seeking to amend the Zoning By-law to add Special Regulation Provision 804R and Special Use Provision 486U to Zoning By-law 85-1. The proposed Special Regulation Provision is to permit an increased Floor Space Ratio (FSR), regulate buildings setbacks, and regulate vehicular and bicycle parking requirements while the proposed special use provision proposes to add multiple dwellings and retail are permitted uses. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Special Regulation Provision 804R: a) That the maximum Floor Space Ratio shall be 23. The purpose of this regulation is to cap the Floor Space Ratio and ensure development does not generally exceed the density presented in the concept plans. The 23 FSR is appropriate in this location and allows for a 55 storey building that meets the tall building guidelines. b) That electric vehicle parking and bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 and the required parking rates shall be provided in accordance UGC Zones in Table 5-5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051. The purpose of regulation b) is to provide for a parking rate which is appropriate for the development. The lands are designated Urban Growth Centre — Innovation District. While Urban Growth Centre (UGC) zones have not been created in Zoning By-law 2019-051, Parking Regulations contained in Section 5 provide a specific Urban Growth Centre (UGC) parking ratio, which permits zero parking be provided for most uses including multiple residential dwellings. This parking ratio implements Official Plan policies that provide for reduced parking rates in support of, and in recognition of, active transportation and transit availability in intensification areas. New UGC/MTSA zones will be established as part of the Growing Together project later this year. Page 595 of 668 The UGC parking rates also require 1 Class A bicycle parking space (long-term secure and weather protected e.g., bike room) per unit as well as Class B bicycle parking (short- term secure (outdoor bike rack). In addition, 20% of the parking which is provided must be electric vehicle ready. The subject lands have adequate access to public transit and pedestrian/cycling networks and adequate bike storage will be provided within the development for residents. Planning and Transportation Services staff is of the opinion that the parking rate is appropriate for the subject lands. c) The minimum rear yard setback, and side yard setback shall be 0 metres. The purpose of this regulation is to allow the building's podium to be located right up to the rear and side property lines. The subject lands have frontage on two public right of ways (Halls Lane, and King Street West) which do not have a minimum yard setback when abutting a street. The request to reduce the yard setbacks allows the podium to be built to the property line allows for efficient and effective use of the lands. d) No maximum gross leasable commercial space for Convenience Retail or retail shall apply. The purpose of this regulation is to allow for larger ground floor commercial units. Currently two ground floor units 394.44 square metres and 335.23 square metres are proposed however there are options for units to divided up into smaller units. e) Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited. The Region of Waterloo has indicated Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited to mitigate the risks associated with contaminants that will remain beneath the site when the property is redeveloped. Staff offer the following comments with respect to the proposed Special Use Provision 486U: a) The following new uses shall be permitted: i. multiple dwelling ii. retail The purpose of this regulation is to allow residential uses and retail uses on the subject land. The current zoning of the property does not align with the subject lands 2014 Official Plan Designation (Innovation District) as the new downtown zoning to implement the 2014 Official Plan has not been completed. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Staff offer the following comments with respect to Holding Provision 109H: Official Plan policies require that holding provisions will be applied in those situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to facilitate the implementation of the `D-6' zone and special Page 596 of 668 regulation provision. The City will enact a by-law to remove the holding symbol when all the conditions set out in the holding provision have been satisfied, permitting development or redevelopment in accordance with the zoning category assigned. Holding Provision 109H Planning staff are recommending the following holding provision as part of the Zoning By- law Amendment: No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review stationary noise sources in the vicinity of the site, the potential impacts of noise (e.g., HVAC systems) on the on-site sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. No development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity. A noise study was prepared in support of the proposed Zoning By-law and reviewed by the Region of Waterloo. Additional building noise mitigation measures will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an addendum to the noise study will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. High quality urban design is expected for the subject lands and extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and with adequate onsite amenity for future residents is required to be provided onsite. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Conclusions Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to change the zoning of the subject lands to `Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H' represents good planning as it will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a mixed use dwelling development that is compatible with the existing neighbourhood, which will add visual interest at the street level and skyline, and will appropriately accommodate on-site parking needs. Staff are supportive of the proposed development and recommend that the proposed Zoning By-law amendment be approved as shown in Appendix `B'. Department and Agency Comments: Circulation of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment was undertaken in May 2023 to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. No major concerns were identified by any commenting City department or agency and any Page 597 of 668 necessary revisions and updates were made. Copies of the comments are found in Appendix `D' of this report. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: • Planning Justification Report Prepared by: MHBC Planning, April 2023 • Wind Study Prepared by: RWDI, April 2023 • Building Elevations and Shadow Study Prepared by: Kirkor Architects, April 2023 • Transportation Impact Study Prepared by: Paradigm Transportation Solutions, May 2023 • Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report Prepared by: WalterFedy, March 2023 • Sustainability Statement Prepared by: MHBC Planning, May 2023 • Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared by: MHBC Planning, March 2023 • Noise Feasibility Study Prepared by: HGC Engineering, April 2023 • Arborist Report Prepared by: JK Consulting Arborists, March 2023 Community Input & Staff Responses WHAT WE HEARD 735 addresses (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified 8 people/households/businesses provided comment A City -led Neighbourhood Meeting was held on July 11, 2023, and 11 users logged on Page 598 of 668 Staff received written responses from 8 residents with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Appendix `E'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on July 11, 2023. A summary of what we heard, and staff responses are noted below. What We Heard Staff Comment Staff received numerous emails in support of the proposed development. As noted in the staff report Residents support the the location is appropriate as the subject lands are development and feel it's the located in the heart of the City of Kitchener's appropriate location for a Downtown (Urban Growth Centre) which is planned development of this scale. for significant growth and within close proximity to multiple ION station stops and a planned transit hub at King and Victoria Streets. The City of Kitchener does not regulate number of bedrooms. While the City does not regulate the number of bedrooms, a mix of unit types is strongly encouraged. In September 2022, we received new housing census data — we know; ■ We have 99,805 dwelling units in Kitchener 61 % are 3+ bedrooms. We also know household data now as well: ■ 58% of households have 1-2 people (26% 1 Three bedroom units should be person, 32% 2 people) included in the proposed ■ 15% of all dwellings are in buildings greater development. than 5 storeys When a comparison is made between the household and housing data, we have 27,000 3+ bedroom homes which are occupied by one or two people. This means that 44% of all large units in Kitchener have more bedrooms than people living in the dwelling. The City is currently implementing a Missing Middle study as part of the Growing Together project which is reviewing how the City can continue to achieve a balance of all housing types of all sizes across the City. Concerns the proposed A Traffic Impact Study was submitted and reviewed development will create traffic by City and Regional Transportation staff who did that existing roads can not not identify any major traffic concerns as a result of handle. the proposed development. Page 599 of 668 Victoria Park and other nearby In addition to access to multiple parks and urban city owned parks are at capacity greens within walking distance, the proposed and cannot accommodate development includes a 7t" floor landscaped 700 additional residents. square metre (7535 square foot) amenity terrace as well as 900 square metre (9688 square feet) of indoor amenity area. The City's Parkland Dedication Policy will also require Parkland Dedication in the form of cash in lieu at the site plan approval process. Not enough bicycle parking is The design was amended to provide 1 Class A being provided. bicycle parking spaces per dwelling unit are required as part of the proposed By-law. Affordable Units should be This development is not receiving affordable housing provided. sponsorship. A mix of unit types and unit sizes are proposed. The two (2) bedroom units could offer a more affordable option for future owners/tenants who could share some living costs. The Innovation District land use designation does not have a maximum building height. The proposed height and density are justified and appropriate for the subject lands. The subject lands are located in the heart of the City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre (Downtown), an area planned for significant A 55 storey building is too tall. intensification, which includes multiple high rises that are similar in height and density which are currently built, under construction or planned. The subject lands are within close proximity to multiple major transit station areas. The location of the proposed development of this height and density is appropriate. The City of Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre consists of numerous high-rises that are built or approved to be built ranging from 10 storeys to 50 storeys. Comparable high-rise buildings in height that are built, under construction or proposed include The building should be similar in the following developments: height to what is built now in the DTK (60 Frederick St) - 39 Storeys (built) downtown. Charlie West (60 Charles St W) - 31 Storeys (built) 20 Queen Street -.34 Storeys (under review) Station Park (607 King St W), 18 (built), 28 (built), 36 (under construction), 40 and 50 storeys (under review) Page 600 of 668 10 Duke Street — 45 Storeys (final site plan approval issued 30 Francis Street — 45 Storeys (under construction) 88 Queen Street — 45 Storeys (under review) 50 Borden — 51 and 57 Storeys (under review) Planning Conclusions In considering the foregoing, staff are supportive of the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the development of a mixed used development at 417 King Street West. Staff is of the opinion that the subject applications are consistent with policies of the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conform to Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Regional Official Plan, and the City of Kitchener Official Plan and represent good planning. Planning staff are recommending that the applications be approved. ALIGNMENT WITH CITY OF KITCHENER STRATEGIC PLAN: The recommendation of this report supports the achievement of the City's strategic vision through the delivery of core service. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. These applications were received prior to July 1, 2023, and therefore not subject to fee refund provisions in the Planning Act. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. A large notice sign was posted on the property and information regarding the application was posted to the City's website in May of 2023. Following the initial circulation referenced below, an additional postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands, and those responding to the preliminary circulation. Notice of the Statutory Public Meeting was also posted in The Record on October 13, 2023 (a copy of the Notice may be found in Appendix C). CONSULT — The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment were circulated to residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject lands on May 23, 2023. In response to this circulation, staff received written responses from 10 members of the public, which were summarized as part of this staff report. Planning staff Page 601 of 668 also had one-on-one conversations with residents on the telephone and responded to emails. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Growth Plan, 2020 • Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 • Regional Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 85-1 REVIEWED BY: Tina Malone -Wright —Supervisor of Development Applications Garett Stevenson - Manager of Development Review APPROVED BY: Justin Readman - General Manager, Development Services APPENDIX& Appendix A — Proposed Official Plan Amendment Appendix B — Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment Appendix C — Newspaper Notice Appendix D — Department and Agency Comments Appendix E — Public Comments Page 602 of 668 AMENDMENT NO. XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 417 King Street West Page 603 of 668 AMENDMENT NO.XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER CITY OF KITCHENER 417 King Street West INDEX SECTION 1 TITLE AND COMPONENTS SECTION 2 PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 3 BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT SECTION 4 THE AMENDMENT APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 Notice of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee of October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee October 30, 2023 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council Page 604 of 668 AMENDMENT NO.XX TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER SECTION 1 — TITLE AND COMPONENTS This amendment shall be referred to as Amendment No. XX to the Official Plan of the City of Kitchener (2014). This amendment is comprised of Sections 1 to 4 inclusive. SECTION 2 — PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend the Official Plan by adding Site Specific Policy Area No. 8 to Map 4 - Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) and by adding associated Site Specific Policy Area 15.D.2.71 to the text of the Official Plan. SECTION 3 — BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT Planning Analysis Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 25. Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Page 605 of 668 The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is proposing an integrated province -wide land use planning policy document, potentially replacing the Provincial Policy Statement and A Place to Grow: Growth plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with a singular Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) which is in draft form and not in effect at the time this report was prepared. Provincial Policy Statement, 2020: The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 1.4.3(b) of the PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, liveable and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting the environment, public health and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. To support provincial policies relating to the optimization of infrastructure, transit and active transportation, the proposed designation and zoning facilitate a compact form of development which efficiently uses the lands, is in close proximity to transit options including bus, rapid transit, and makes efficient use of both existing roads and active transportation networks. The lands are serviced and are in proximity to parks, trails and other community uses. Provincial policies are in support of providing a broad range of housing. The proposed mixed-use development represents an attainable form of market-based housing. Planning staff is of the opinion that the proposed application will facilitate the intensification of the subject property with a mixed-use multiple dwelling development that is compatible with the planned function of the area and the surrounding community, helps manage growth, is transit supportive and will make use of the existing infrastructure. No new public roads would be required for the proposed development and Engineering staff have confirmed there is capacity in the sanitary sewer to permit intensification on the subject lands. Based on the foregoing, staff is of the opinion that this proposal is in conformity with the PPS. A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020 (Growth Plan): The Growth Plan supports the development of complete and compact communities that are designed to support healthy and active living, make efficient use of land and infrastructure, provide for a range and mix of housing types, jobs, and services, at densities and in locations which support transit viability and active transportation. Policies of the Growth Plan promote growth within strategic growth areas including Page 606 of 668 major transit station areas, in order to provide a focus for investments in transit and other types of infrastructure. Policy 2.2.6.1(a) states that municipalities will support housing choice through the achievement of the minimum intensification and density targets in this plan by identifying a diverse range and mix of housing options and densities, including additional residential units and affordable housing to meet projected needs of current and future residents. Policies 2.2.1.4 states that complete communities will: a) feature a diverse mix of land uses, including residential and employment uses, and convenient access to local stores, services, and public service facilities; b) improve social equity and overall quality of life, including human health, for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes; c) provide a diverse range and mix of housing options, including additional residential units and affordable housing, to accommodate people at all stages of life, and to accommodate the needs of all household sizes and incomes; d) expand convenient access to: i. a range of transportation options, including options for the safe, comfortable and convenient use of active transportation; ii. public service facilities, co -located and integrated in community hubs; iii. an appropriate supply of safe, publicly accessible open spaces, parks, trails, and other recreational facilities; and iv. healthy, local, and affordable food options, including through urban agriculture; e) provide for a more compact built form and a vibrant public realm, including public open spaces; f) mitigate and adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, improve resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and contribute to environmental sustainability; and g) integrate green infrastructure and appropriate low impact development. The Growth Plan supports planning for a range and mix of housing options and, in particular, higher density housing options that can accommodate a range of household sizes in locations that can provide access to transit and other amenities. Policy 2.2.4 requires that planning be prioritized for MTSAs on priority transit corridors, including zoning in a manner that implements the policies of the Growth Plan. MTSAs on priority transit corridors will be planned for a minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare for those that are served by light rail transit or bus rapid transit. The Region of Waterloo's ION is a form of light rail transit and the ION stations are Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) that are required to achieve the minimum density target of 160 residents and jobs combined per hectare. The subject lands are located within the City's delineated Urban Growth Centre (UGC), and within a Major Transit Station Area (MTSA) in the 2014 Kitchener Official Plan. In the City's Official Plan on Map 2 — Urban Structure the lands appear within the MTSA boundary for the ION Central Station. The Region of Waterloo commenced the Regional 5 Page 607 of 668 Official Plan Review project and as part of that work, revised MTSA boundaries were approved in August 2022. The subject lands are within the Central Station MTSA. The proposed development provides residential intensification and will help the City achieve density targets in the MTSA. The proposed designation and zoning will support a higher density housing option that will help make efficient use of existing infrastructure, parks, roads, trails and transit. Planning staff is of the opinion that the applications conform to the Growth Plan. Regional Official Plan (ROP): Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. The subject lands are designated Urban Growth Centre in the ROP. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. The subject lands are located in the Central Station (MTSA) in the ROP. The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha on a site specific basis and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Regional policies require Area Municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic and personal support needs of current and future residents. Planning staff are of the opinion that the applications conform to the Regional Official Plan. Airport Zoning Regulations The subject lands are located outside of the federally regulated Airport Zoning Regulation (AZR). Prior to construction of any buildings and installation of the stationary crane for construction, the owner is required to submit Land Use Proposal Submission Forms for Land Use and Cranes to NAV CANADA and an Aeronautical Assessment Form to Transport Canada for review of the proposed tower and temporary cranes and to evaluate the impacts to flight paths. City of Kitchener Official Plan (OP) The City of Kitchener OP provides the long-term land use vision for Kitchener. The vision is further articulated and implemented through the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and policies which are set out in the Plan. The Vision and Goals of the OP strive to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community. Page 608 of 668 Complete Community A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including, a full range and mix of housing, including affordable housing, recreation, commerce, community and cultural facilities, health care facilities, employment, parks and open spaces distributed and connected in a coherent and efficient manner. A complete community also supports the use of public transit and active transportation, enabling residents to meet most of their daily needs within a short distance of their homes. Kitchener will be planned as a complete community that creates opportunities for all people to live, work and interact within close proximity. Planning for a complete community will aid in reducing the cost of infrastructure and servicing, encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation, promote social interaction, and foster a sense of community. The applicant is proposing to contribute to a complete community with 622 residential units and 730 square metres of non-residential commercial and retail space. Considerable thought for the orientation and placement of the building, podium height, building step backs, and vehicular and pedestrian connections to Francis Green, King Street, and Halls Lane have been incorporated into the design for this high intensity mixed use development. Urban Structure The OP establishes an Urban Structure for the City of Kitchener and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. Intensification Areas are targeted throughout the Built-up Area as key locations to accommodate and receive the majority of development or redevelopment for a variety of land uses. Primary Intensification Areas include the Urban Growth Centre (UGC), Major Transit Station Areas (MTSA), Nodes and Corridors, in this hierarchy, according to Section 3.C.2.3 of the Official Plan. The subject lands are located within the UGC. The UGC (Downtown) is the primary Urban Structure Component and Intensification Area. The planned function of the UGC is to accommodate a significant share of the Region's and City's future population and employment growth. Section 3.C.2.13 of the OP indicates that the UGC is planned to achieve, by 2031 or earlier, a minimum density of 225 residents and jobs combined per hectare and assist in achieving the minimum residential intensification target identified in Policy 3.C.1.6. The UGC is planned to be a vibrant Regional and Citywide focal point and destination and is intended to be the City's primary focal point for residential intensification as well as for investment in institutional and Region -wide public services, commercial, office, recreational, cultural and entertainment uses. The site is also within the Central Station Area and within 400 metres of both the Central and Victoria Park ION stops. In accordance with Policy 3.C.2.17 of the OP, the planned function of the MTSAs is to provide densities that will support transit, and achieve a mix of residential, office, institutional and commercial uses. They are also intended to have streetscapes and a built form that is pedestrian -friendly and transit - oriented. Page 609 of 668 Policies also require that development applications in MTSAs give consideration to the Transit -Oriented Development (TOD) policies contained in Section 13.C.3.12 of the OP. Generally, the TOD policies support a compact urban form, that supports walking, cycling and the use of transit, by providing a mix of land uses in close proximity to transit stops, to support higher frequency transit service and optimize transit rider convenience. These policies also support developments which foster walkability by creating safe and comfortable pedestrian environments and a high-quality public realm. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed development will help to increase density in an area well served by nearby transit and rapid transit while being context sensitive to surrounding lands and provides excellent access to off-road pedestrian and cycling facilities. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment will support a development that not only complies with the City's policies for the UGC and MTSA but also contributes to the vision for a sustainable and more environmentally friendly city. Land Use The subject lands are designated `Innovation District' (Map 4, Urban Growth Centre) in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The Innovation District is characterized by a mix of high rise and medium residential, mixed use, commercial and office buildings and old large industrial buildings which either have been converted to loft style office, residential and other viable uses or have the potential to do so. This area of the city is expected to evolve and transform into a dense urban contemporary setting with continued growth in the high-tech industry coupled with the research office uses affiliated with the nearby post -secondary institutions. The primary uses permitted in the Innovation District include offices, particularly research and high-tech offices institutional uses and residential uses. Policies 15.D.2.50 to 15.D.2.52 of the City of Kitchener's Official Plan encourage growth in this area to occur by permitting a full range of complementary commercial uses and encouraging high density residential uses. The applicant is proposing to add Specific Policy Area 8 to the Urban Growth Centre,(Map 4) to allow a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23 whereas the current Official Plan policies allow for a maximum FSR of 3.0. Policy 17.E.13.1. of the City of Kitchener Official Plan require that holding provisions will be applied in situations where it is necessary or desirable to zone lands for development or redevelopment in advance of the fulfillment of specific requirements and conditions, and where the details of the development or redevelopment have not yet been fully resolved. A Holding provision may be used in order to implement this Plan to ensure that certain conditions, studies or requirements related to a proposed Zoning By-law Amendment are met. A Holding Provision shall be applied to residential uses, day care uses and other sensitive uses and will not be removed through a by-law amendment until such time as the City of Kitchener is in receipt of an Urban Design Report and until Page 610 of 668 such time as a Noise Study has been reviewed and approved by the Region of Waterloo. Growina Toaether The Growing Together project is the continuation of the City's ongoing planning review process that began with PARTS and advanced through the Neighbourhood Planning Review (NPR) project, while also responding to new direction from the province, implementing the updated Regional Official Plan, and addressing new and emerging city priorities. Preliminary direction on a draft approach to growth and change have been drafted by staff and is currently available public for consultation. Staff are recommending a form based zoning approach as part of the Growing Together project, which will place a greater emphasis on the pedestrian experience and design of buildings at grade and as experienced on the street, as well as appropriate tower floor plate sizes, separations and setbacks which protect from tower overlook within and between sites, which preserve access to sunlight and mitigates shadow impacts, and which provides for an interesting skyline — which is also the goal of the City's Tall Building Guidelines. Staff have drafted the recommended special policy and zoning regulations for the subject lands in consideration of the direction of the Growing Together project. Staff are of the opinion that the subject lands are appropriate for high-rise, high-density development, subject to demonstration that the proposed built form achieves the objectives of the Urban Design Manual and the Tall Building Guidelines. Urban Design The City's urban design policies are outlined in Section 11 of the City's OP. In the opinion of staff, the proposed development meets the intent of these policies, specifically: Streetscape; Safety; Universal Design; Site Design; Building Design, and Massing and Scale Design. To address these policies, an Urban Design Scorecard was submitted and has been reviewed by City staff. The Urban Design Scorecard outlines the vision and principles guiding the site design and informs the proposed zoning by-law regulations. An urban design report will be required and secured through a Holding Provision. Extra attention to high quality urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes is expected for the subject lands with adequate onsite amenity for future residents. Detailed design will be reviewed through the site plan design and approvals process and an updated urban design report will be required prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Streetscape — The King Street frontage and side yard abutting Francis Green (city owned parkette) is activated by at -grade commercial units and the building's lobby. At Page 611 of 668 grade commercial units and the building lobby have direct access to public sidewalks. The tower podium has a defined base which will enhance the streetscape. Staff are recommending a Holding Provision apply to the subject land demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes. Through the Site Plan approval process staff will work with the applicant to further enhance the podium design and further active the streetscape. Safety — As part of the site plan approval process, staff will ensure Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles are achieved and that the site meets the Ontario Building Code and the City's Emergency Services Policy. Universal Design — The development will be designed to comply with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and the Ontario Building Code. Skyline — The proposed building will provide a new feature on the City's skyline. The proposed building will create visual interest from several different vantage points. Site Design, Building Design, Massing and Scale — The subject site is designed to have a development that will be developed at a scale that is compatible with the existing and planned built form for the surrounding neighbourhood. The tower has a well defined podium and building step backs which helps enhance the public realm. Tower Design The proposed building tower is classified as a "Compact Slab" as the proposed tower floor plate is less than 850 square metres in area. The tower placement has been oriented towards King Street with a 6 storey podium. The tower massing is broken up vertically by variation and the articulation of building materials and step backs. Furthermore, balconies for the residential units are included and 4.5 metre tall ground floor commercial units are proposed which will enhance the streetscape. Shadow Impact Study The owner has completed a Shadow Impact Study in addition to the Urban Design Report. Staff have reviewed the study and are satisfied the shadow study meets the City's requirements, with respect to shadow impacts, as noted in the City of Kitchener Urban Design Manual. Shadows for compact slab buildings are longer and narrower, meaning there are further off-site impacts, but the impacts are shorter for all off-site properties. Wind Study A wind study was prepared for the consideration of this development proposal and reviewed by staff. The wind conditions surrounding the proposed development are generally suitable. A full Wind Assessment be required and reviewed at the site plan application stage and wind control features will be required through the site plan application is necessary to mitigate wind. 10 Page 612 of 668 Tall Building Guidelines The proposed development has also been reviewed for compliance with the City's Design for Tall Buildings Guidelines. The objective of this document is to: • achieve a positive relationship between high-rise buildings and their existing and planned context; • create a built environment that respects and enhances the city's open space system, pedestrian and cyclist amenities and streetscapes; • create human -scaled pedestrian -friendly streets, and attractive public spaces that contribute to livable, safe and healthy communities; • promote tall buildings that contribute to the view of the skyline and enhance orientation, wayfinding and the image of the city; • promote development that responds to the physical environment, microclimate and the natural environment including four season design and sustainability; and, • promote tall building design excellence to help create visually and functionally pleasing buildings of architectural significance. The proposed development concept has been reviewed with these objectives in mind. City staff has confirmed that the proposed tower is generally consistent with and meet the overall intent of the City's Design for Tall Building Guidelines. More specifically, the proposed development generally meets the offsite separation distance requirements of the Design for Tall Building Guidelines and will be further reviewed through the site plan approval process prior to removal of the Holding Provision. Transportation Policies: The Official Plan supports an integrated transportation system which incorporates active transportation, allows for the movement of people and goods and promotes a vibrant, healthy community using land use designations and urban design initiatives that make a wide range of transportation choices viable. The subject lands are located in close proximity to the two station stops the Central Station and the Victoria Park ION stop. The building has excellent access to cycling networks, including existing on and off- street cycling facilities and is located in close proximity to the downtown cycling grid. The location of the subject lands, in the context of the City's integrated transportation system, supports the proposal for transit -oriented development on the subject lands. Policy 3.C.2.22 states that until such time as Station Area Plans are completed and this Plan is amended accordingly, in the interim, any development application submitted within a Major Transit Station Area will be reviewed generally in accordance with the Transit -Oriented Development Policies included in Section 13.C.3.12 The proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications support a more compact mixed-use development in the City of Kitchener's primary intensification area (UGC). The location of the proposed buildings, secured through the proposed site-specific provisions, will result in a compatible built form that fosters walkability within a pedestrian -friendly environment that allows walking to be safe, comfortable, barrier -free and a convenient form of urban travel. 11 Page 613 of 668 At future site plan approval processes, the design of the buildings will have to feature a high quality public realm to enhance the identity of the area and create gathering points for social interaction, community events and other activities. Additionally, secured and visitor bicycle parking is required as part of the Zoning By-law. Housing Policies: Section 4. 1.1 of the City's Official Plan contains policies with the primary objective to provide for an appropriate range, variety and mix of housing types and styles, densities, tenure and affordability to satisfy the varying housing needs of our community through all stages of life. The proposed development increases the amount of multiple dwelling units available in the city. The development is contemplated to include a range of unit types including, one, one plus den and two-bedroom units. Theses new units will meet and appeal to a variety of household needs. Sustainable Development Section 7.C.4.1 of the City's Official Plan ensures developments will increasingly be sustainable by encouraging, supporting and, where appropriate, requiring: a) compact development and efficient built form; b) environmentally responsible design (from community design to building design) and construction practices; c) the integration, protection and enhancement of natural features and landscapes into building and site design; d) the reduction of resource consumption associated with development; and, e) transit -supportive development and redevelopment and the greater use of other active modes of transportation such as cycling and walking. Development applications are required to demonstrate that the proposal meets the sustainable development policies of the Plan and that sustainable development design standards are achieved. Sustainable development initiatives will be further implemented at the site planning approval process through the detailed design review of the building. Proposed Official Plan Amendment Conclusions The Official Plan Amendment application requests that the land use designation as shown on Map 4 — Urban Growth Centre in the 2014 Official Plan be changed from `Innovation District' to `Innovation District with Specific Policy Area 8'. Based on the above -noted policies and planning analysis, staff is of the opinion that the proposed Official Plan Amendment represents good planning and recommends that the proposed Official Plan Amendment be approved. 12 Page 614 of 668 SECTION 4 — THE AMENDMENT The City of Kitchener Official Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) Part D, Section 15.D.2. is amended by adding Site Specific Policy 15.D.2.71 as follows: "15.D.12.71. 417 King Street West Notwithstanding the Innovation District land use designation and policies within the Urban Growth Centre, on lands municipally known as 417 King Street West, a Floor Space Ratio (FSR) of 23.0 will be permitted. b) Amend Map No. 4 — Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) by adding Specific Policy Area "8. 417 King Street West (Policy 15.D.2.71)" to the `Area of Amendment', as shown on the attached Schedule `A'. 13 Page 615 of 668 APPENDIX 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your ne ighbourhood 417 King Street West Ir 4M Concept Dr&Mng h 15 0 M i xed SS Stars, Use 622 Dwelling Units Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Comm ittue, Date; October 30,2023 Locatiom Counci I Chambers. Klt "r C Hall King Street West _rMrtual Zoom Iii-satl n Liu vi Ikitchener.-ca/ eetings and Selaet: + Cu"rnt agendm �,,iir, 4yja ed 16 Jf =I re rriteLirs Appear as a -dalagartian +'Watch a mowlr To learn mure about this project, includir information or y sur t apeal rlgr1ks Mr : w-kit-chener ca/ Fklann ing#ppliut ons Floor Space Cra ig Du mart Sen for PLa rrner Kati o of 21 cra ig du ma t# @ ki tchen er,ca 519.741.2200 x.7073 The Uty of IFbchener will -consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By -low to facilltati�, 1 ho fedevelopment of the lards with -a SS-st r- rnixw use Wilding with a Floor Space Ram of 23 havirrg 622 residential units and gFound floor commercial un its. A total of 184 vehicle panting spate -and 312 tricycle parking spate .are proposed fif thi%,Iopincnt. Page 616 of 668 APPENDIX 2 Minutes of the Meeting of Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee —October 30, 2023 15 Page 617 of 668 APPENDIX 3 Minutes of the Meeting of City Council - DATE 16 Page 618 of 668 ._,Moo, PROPOSED BY — LAW 2023 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 85-1, as amended known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. — 417 King Street West) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 85-1 for the lands specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcel of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 122R and Special Use Provision 142U to Warehouse District Zone (D-6) with Special Regulation Provision 804R, Special Use Provision 486U and Holding Provision 109H. 2. Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 85-1 is hereby further amended by incorporating additional zone boundaries as shown on Map No.1 attached hereto. 3. Appendix "C" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 486 thereto as follows: "486. Notwithstanding Section 17.1 of this By-law, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A", Multiple Dwellings and Retail shall be permitted." 4. Appendix "D" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 804 thereto as follows: "804. Notwithstanding Sections 17.1,17.3 and 6.1.2 of this By-law, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule Number 84 of Appendix "A", the following special regulations shall apply: Page 620 of 668 i) The maximum Floor Space Ratio shall be 23. ii) Electric vehicle parking and bicycle parking shall be provided in accordance with Section 5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 and the required parking rates shall be provided in accordance UGC Zones in Table 5-5 of Zoning By-law 2019-051. iii) The minimum rear yard and side yard setbacks shall be 0.0 metres iv) No maximum gross leasable commercial space for Convenience Retail or Retail. V) Geothermal Energy Systems shall be prohibited." 5. Appendix "F" to By-law 85-1 is hereby amended by adding Section 109H thereto as follows: "109H. Notwithstanding Section 17 of this Bylaw, within the lands zoned D-6 and shown as being affected by this Subsection on Schedule 84 of Appendix "A": i) No residential use shall be permitted until a detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures recommended to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review stationary noise sources in the vicinity of the site, the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the on-site sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. ii) No development on the lands shall occur until such time as an Urban Design Brief is approved by the City's Director of Planning demonstrating a high quality of urban design that contributes positively to the public realm and streetscapes with adequate onsite amenity." 6. This By-law shall become effective only if Official Plan Amendment No. 33 (417 King Page 621 of 668 Street West) comes into effect, pursuant to Section 24(2) of The Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2023. Mayor Clerk Page 622 of 668 I\ 5 U-3 716R, 129 1 -1 717R, J68U � M-2 MU -3 716R, 718R, 46 MU -3 716R - 7117R, 465U 40 1 1-3 M-2 36U -6 638R, 4 7U, MU -3 7 482U,f i 3436 mD-6 _ 1381 428U, \J 42H 626R AR Al -6 Z D-6 1 D-1 96R D- D -6 702R 776R 703R D-6 D-6 10H, 105R, 116U J/ I D-5 104R &Ilfkol z CIO MAP NO. 1 0 50 100 VANMAR DEVELOPMENTS 417 KING METRES GP CORP. SCALE 1:4,000 417 KING ST W DATE: AUGUST 22, 2023 BY-LAW 85-1 C-1 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL ZONE D-1 RETAIL CORE ZONE D-5 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE D-6 WAREHOUSE DISTRICT ZONE 1-1 NEIGHBOURHOOD INSTITUTIONAL ZONE M-1 INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE M-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE MU -1 LOW INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE MU -2 MEDIUM INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE MU -3 HIGH INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE R-5 RESIDENTIAL FIVE ZONE R-6 RESIDENTIAL SIX ZONE R-7 RESIDENTIAL SEVEN ZONE D-1 120R \ ZONE GRID REFERENCE .CHEDULE84_ _ _ _ _ _ _ SCHEDULE NO. 84 OFAPPENDIX'A' CHEDULE 85 J� KITCHENER ZONING BY-LAW 85-1 AND 2019-051 Q ZONE LIMITS C7 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA23/011/K/CD OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA23/007/K/CD City of Kitchener FILE ZBA23011 KCD_MAP1 DEVELOPME T SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING mxd MU-1�OU 557 D-61,0q5Q R3�, SUBJECT AREA(S) D-6 105R 116U!f4T U-2 N AMENDMENT TO BY-LAW 85-1 141 U AREA 1 - D- FROM WAREHOUSE DISTRICT ZONE (D-6) 6105R, WITH SPECIAL REGULATION PROVISION 122R 16U, AND SPECIAL USE PROVISION 142U D-6 10 TO WAREHOUSE DISTRICT ZONE (D-6) D-6 OH D- 10 R WITH SPECIAL REGULATION PROVISION 804R 10 3 U AND AL USE PROVISION 86U 16 03' S-(N AND HOLDING ING PROVIISIION 109H 1386 D-6 �,\S F�PN 423R 428U, \J 42H 626R AR Al -6 Z D-6 1 D-1 96R D- D -6 702R 776R 703R D-6 D-6 10H, 105R, 116U J/ I D-5 104R &Ilfkol z CIO MAP NO. 1 0 50 100 VANMAR DEVELOPMENTS 417 KING METRES GP CORP. SCALE 1:4,000 417 KING ST W DATE: AUGUST 22, 2023 BY-LAW 85-1 C-1 CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL ZONE D-1 RETAIL CORE ZONE D-5 COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE D-6 WAREHOUSE DISTRICT ZONE 1-1 NEIGHBOURHOOD INSTITUTIONAL ZONE M-1 INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL ZONE M-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE MU -1 LOW INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE MU -2 MEDIUM INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE MU -3 HIGH INTENSITY MIXED USE CORRIDOR ZONE R-5 RESIDENTIAL FIVE ZONE R-6 RESIDENTIAL SIX ZONE R-7 RESIDENTIAL SEVEN ZONE D-1 120R \ ZONE GRID REFERENCE .CHEDULE84_ _ _ _ _ _ _ SCHEDULE NO. 84 OFAPPENDIX'A' CHEDULE 85 J� KITCHENER ZONING BY-LAW 85-1 AND 2019-051 Q ZONE LIMITS C7 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT ZBA23/011/K/CD OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT OPA23/007/K/CD City of Kitchener FILE ZBA23011 KCD_MAP1 DEVELOPME T SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING mxd NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 1 for a development in your neighbourhood 417 King Street West X � IKITcFTNER Concept Drawing Mixed 55 Storeys, Floor Space Use 622 Dwelling Ratio of 21 Units Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: October 30, 2023 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200 King Street West arVirtual Zoom Meeting Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchener.ca/ PlanningApplications or contact Craig Dumart, Senior Planner craig.dumart@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2200 x7073 The City of Kitchener will consider applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a 55 -storey mixed use building with a Floor Space Ratio of 23 having 622 residential units and ground floor commercial units. Atotal of 184 vehicle parking spaces and 312 bicycle parking spaces are proposed for the development. Page 624 of 668 City of Kitchener - Comment Form Project Address: 417 King Street West Application Type: OPA/ZBA Comments of: Environmental Planning (Sustainability) — City of Kitchener Commenter's name: Raida Chowdhury Email: raida.chowdhury@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7078 Written Comments Due: June 26, 2023 Date of comments: June 13, 2023 1. Plans, Studies and/or Reports submitted and reviewed as part of a complete application• i Sustainability Statement 417 King Street West, prepared by MHBC, dated May 5, 2023. 2. Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the supporting documentation (as listed above) to support a site plan application proposing a 55 -storey mixed use building, containing 622 residential units, regarding sustainability and energy conservation, and provide the following comments: - Although the Ontario Building Code (OBC) is progressive, going forward all developments will need to include energy conservation measures that go beyond the OBC as the City (and Region of Waterloo) strive to achieve our greenhouse gas reduction target. - Upon review of the supporting documentation, the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Amendments can be supported as several sustainable measures have been proposed or are being considered for the development. - The development proposes several sustainable measures including: o The utilization of existing servicing o The consideration to encourage greater public transit use o Building orientation for southern exposure reducing heating requirements o On-site garbage, recycling, and compost o Roof design to support future Solar Panel installation o On-site secure bike parking promoting active transportation o Electric vehicle parking spaces, fitted with re -charge stations o Measures to preserve rainwater for irrigation Potential items for consideration are: o Building envelope (wall, roof, and window thermal performance) designed beyond OBC requirements Page 625 of 668 o Use of alternative water supply and demand management systems such as rainwater, harvesting and grey water reuse, or readiness of the development to incorporate such systems in the future o Measures to incorporate net zero emissions or LEED standards o Installing white or light-colored material on the roof to reduce heat island effects and reduce cooling requirements o Use low or no VOC paints and finishes to minimize air pollutants in interior materials A Sustainability Statement (as per the City's Terms of Reference) will be required as part of a complete Site Plan Application which can further explore and/or confirm additional sustainability measures that are best suited to the development. 3. Policies, Standards and Resources: ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.4.5. The City will encourage and support, where feasible and appropriate, alternative energy systems, renewable energy systems and district energy in accordance with Section 7.C.6 to accommodate current and projected needs of energy consumption. e Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.4. In areas of new development, the City will encourage orientation of streets and/or lot design/building design with optimum southerly exposures. Such orientation will optimize opportunities for active or passive solar space heating and water heating. ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.8. Development applications will be required to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City, energy is being conserved or low energy generated. ® Kitchener Official Plan Policy 7.C.6.27. The City will encourage developments to incorporate the necessary infrastructure for district energy in the detailed engineering designs where the potential for implementing district energy exists. 4. Advice: ➢ As part of the Kitchener Great Places Award program every several years there is a Sustainable Development category. Also, there are community-based programs to help with and celebrate and recognize businesses and sustainable development stewards (Regional Sustainability Initiative - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/regional-sustainability- initiative and TravelWise - http://www.sustainablewaterlooregion.ca/our-programs/travelwise). ➢ The 'Sustainability Statement Terms of Reference' can be found on the City's website under 'Planning Resources' at ... https://www.kitchener.ca/SustainabilitVStatement Page 626 of 668 City of Kitchener Pre -submission Application Comment Form Project Address: 417 King St W Date of Meeting: NA Application Type: ZBA / OPA Comments Of: Development Engineering Commenter's Name: Eric Riek ' %/, Email: eric.riek@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7330 %j Date of Comment: jo,,, ❑ I plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns)`-% 1. Site Specific Comments & Issues: V 'o • No specific concerns:;, %,/� 2. Plans, Studies and Reports to subniit,,as part of a complete Planning Act Application: Zoning Bylaw Am'. endment: %'%,, '''0 ''o '"oo. • No concerns with the Functional Servicing Report, sanitary capacity is available and water distribution reportA acceptable. i,,. /�% • Stormwater Management may be addressed through the Site Plan Approval process. 000 A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 627 of 668 City of Kitchener Heritage — OPA/ZBA Comment Form Project Address: 417 King Street West File Number: ZBA23/011/K/CD Comments Of: Heritage Planning Commenter's Name: Deeksha Choudhry Email: deeksha.choudhry@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 Date of Comments: June 12, 2023 Heritage Planning staff has reviewed the following material for the proposed development on the lands municipally addressed as 417 King Street West to provide the comments outlined below: • Draft Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated March 23, 2023; • Architectural Drawings for the proposed development; • Official Plan Amendment Application; • OPZ ZBA Submission Cover Letter dated May 5, 2023; • Planning Justification Report; • Zoning By-law Amendment Application. 1. Site Specific Comments: The subject lands municipally addressed as 417 King Street West do not have any heritage status. However, they are located adjacent to 404-410 King Street West, also known as the Kaufman Lofts, and designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Furthermore, the subject property is also located within the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape. Section 2 of the Planning Act identifies matters of provincial interest, which includes the conservation of significant features of architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest. Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions of Council be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS). Policy 2.6.1 of the PPS states that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Regional and municipal policies and guidelines also address the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The Regional Official Plan contains policies that require the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The City's Official Plan contains policies that require development to have regard for and incorporate cultural heritage resources into development. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 628 of 668 2. Draft Heritage Impact Assessment for 1385 Bleams Road Since the proposed development is adjacent to protected heritage property, the submission of a Scoped Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was made a requirement of any planning application. A scoped HIA, dated March 2023, and prepared by MHBC Ltd. has been submitted to the City. The scoped HIA has concluded that the proposed development will not have any impacts on the adjacent heritage resource. According to the HIA: "The proposed redevelopment will not result in adverse impacts to the Kaufman Building, Lang Tanning Building, or the surrounding CHL. The proposed development does involve excavation, which could result in vibrations during construction. We note that the Kaufman Building was originally designed for industrial use, which housed large and heavy machinery. The construction and materials used, including thick concrete floors, walls and steel reinforcement, ensure that the building was built to withstand vibrations or other intensive activities. Therefore, impacts due to vibration during construction are unlikely." 3. Heritage Planning Comments Heritage Planning staff provide the following comments for consideration as part of the HIA: The HIA has not yet been circulated to Heritage Kitchener for comment and feedback. This will be done at next available meeting. Even if impacts from vibrations are not expected, adequate fencing should be considered to protect the Kaufman house during construction. A pre -construction structural assessment and a post -construction structural assessment might be required to ensure other construction activities have not caused any damage to the building. Heritage Planning staff also provide the following comments for consideration as part of the OPA/ZBA: • The total height of the podium should be in keeping with the height of the surrounding, Kaufman Lofts, and Tannery buildings. • Additional requirements might be included as part of site plan conditions to be fulfilled prior to full site plan approval. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 629 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Carrie Musselman Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 3:10 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: FW: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Attachments: department & agency letter - 417 King Street West.pdf, OPA23007KCD_MAP4.pdf; ZBA23011 KCD_MAP1.pdf Hello Craig, Environmental Planning has no concerns and/or comments regarding the proposed OPA/ZBA at 417 King Street West. Regards, Carrie Musselman (she/her), BSc., Dip., RPP, MCIP Senior Environmental Planner I Planning I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 x 7068 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 carrie.musselman(a�kitchener.ca From: Christine Kompter<Christine.Kompter@kitchener.ca> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 1:42 PM To: Metrolinx (GO) - Development (Development.Coordinator@Metrolinx.com) <development.coordinator@metrolinx.com>; _DL_#_DSD _Planning <DSD-PlanningDivision@kitchener.ca>; Bell - c/o WSP <circulations@wsp.com>; Carlos Reyes <Carlos.Reyes@kitchener.ca>; Darren Kropf <Darren.Kropf@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca>; David Heuchert <Dave.Heuchert@kitchener.ca>; David Paetz <David.Paetz@kitchener.ca>; Ellen Kayes <EIIen.Kayes@kitchener.ca>; Enova Power Corp. - Greig Cameron <greig.cameron@enovapower.com>; Enova Power Corp. - Shaun Wang <shaun.wang@enovapower.com>; GRCA - Planning (planning@grandriver.ca) <planning@grandriver.ca>; Hydro One - Dennis DeRango <landuseplanning@hydroone.com>; Jim Edmondson <Jim.Edmondson@kitchener.ca>; Justin Readman <Justin.Readman@kitchener.ca>; Katherine Hughes <Katherine.Hughes@kitchener.ca>; Mike Seiling <Mike.Seiling@kitchener.ca>; Ontario Power Generation<Executivevp.lawanddevelopment@opg.com>; Park Planning (SM) <Park.Planning@kitchener.ca>; Region - Planning <PlanningApplications@regionofwaterloo.ca>, Property Data Administrator (SM) <PropDataAdmin@kitchener.ca>; Robert Morgan <Robert.Morgan@kitchener.ca>; Steven Ryder <Steven.Ryder@kitchener.ca>; Sylvie Eastman <Sylvie.Eastman@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; UW-WUSA (Feds) (pres@wusa.ca) <pres@wusa.ca>; WCDSB - Planning <planning@wcdsb.ca>; WRDSB - Board Secretary (elaine_burns@wrdsb.ca) <elaine_burns@wrdsb.ca>; WRDSB - Planning <planning@wrdsb.ca> Cc: Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Please see attached. Additional documentation can be found in AMANDA folders 23-110866 & 23-110878 (City staff) and ShareFile (external agencies). Comments or questions should be directed to Craig Dumart, Senior Planner (craig.dumart@kitchener.ca; 519-741-2200 0073). Christine Kompter Administrative Assistant I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor I P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2200 ext. 7425 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 christine.kompter@kitchener.ca Page 630 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Trevor Heywood <theywood@grandriver.ca> Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 10:03 AM To: Craig Dumart Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Hey Craig, Not regulated by GRCA, no comment. Trevor Heywood Resource Planner Grand River Conservation Authority From: Planning <planning@grandriver.ca> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 2:10 PM To: Trevor Heywood <theywood@grandriver.ca> Subject: FW: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) From: Christine Kompter<Christine.Kompter@kitchener.ca> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 1:42 PM To: Metrolinx (GO) - Development (Development.Coordinator@Metrolinx.com) <development.coordinator@metrolinx.com>; _DL_#_DSD_Planning <DSD-PlanningDivision@kitchener.ca>; Bell - c/o WSP <circulations@wsp.com>; Carlos Reyes <Carlos.Reyes@kitchener.ca>; Darren Kropf <Darren.Kropf@kitchener.ca>; Dave Seller <Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca>; David Heuchert <Dave.Heuchert@kitchener.ca>; David Paetz <David.Paetz@kitchener.ca>; Ellen Kayes <Ellen.Kayes@kitchener.ca>; Enova Power Corp. - Greig Cameron <greig.cameron@enovapower.com>; Enova Power Corp. - Shaun Wang <shaun.wang@enovapower.com>; Planning <planning@grandriver.ca>; Hydro One - Dennis DeRango <landuseplanning@hvdroone.com>; Jim Edmondson <Jim.Edmondson@kitchener.ca>; Justin Readman <Justin.Readman@kitchener.ca>; Katherine Hughes <Katherine.Hughes@kitchener.ca>; Mike Seiling <Mike.Seiling@kitchener.ca>; Ontario Power Generation <Executivevp.lawanddevelopment@opg.com>; Park Planning (SM) <Park.Planning@kitchener.ca>; Region - Planning <PlanningApplications@regionofwaterloo.ca>; Property Data Administrator (SM) <PropDataAdmin@kitchener.ca>; Robert Morgan <Robert.Morgan@kitchener.ca>; Steven Ryder <Steven.Ryder@kitchener.ca>; Sylvie Eastman <Sylvie.Eastman@kitchener.ca>; Tom Ruggle <Tom.Ruggle@kitchener.ca>; UW-WUSA (Feds) (pres@wusa.ca) <pres@wusa.ca>; WCDSB - Planning <planning@wcdsb.ca>; WRDSB - Board Secretary (elaine burns@wrdsb.ca) <elaine burns@wrdsb.ca>; WRDSB - Planning <planning@wrdsb.ca> Cc: Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) Please see attached. Additional documentation can be found in AMANDA folders 23-110866 & 23-110878 (City staff) and ShareFile (external agencies). Comments or questions should be directed to Craig Dumart, Senior Planner (craig.dumart@kitchener.ca; 519-741-2200 0073). Christine Kompter Administrative Assistant I Planning Division I City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 61" Floor I P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener ON N2G 4G7 519-741-2200 ext. 7425 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 christine.kompter@kitchener.ca Page 631 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Brandon Coveney <planning@wrdsb.ca> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:43 AM To: Craig Dumart Cc: Christine Kompter; Planning Subject: Re: [Planning] Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West (OPA/ZBA) You don't often get email from planning@wrdsb.ca. Learn why this is important May 30, 2023 Re: Circulation for Comment - 417 King Street West Municipality: Kitchener Location: 417 King Street West Owner/Applicant: VANMAR DEVELOPMENTS 417 KING GP CORP Good Morning Craig, The Waterloo Region District School Board (WRDSB) has reviewed the above -noted application that proposes amendments to facilitate the construction of a 55 storey mixed use tower including 622 residential units. The WRDSB offers the following comments. Student Accommodation At this time, the subject lands are within the boundaries of the following WRDSB schools: • King Edward PS (Junior Kindergarten to Grade 6); • Courtland Avenue PS (Grade 7 to Grade 8); and • Kitchener -Waterloo Collegiate and Vocational School (Grade 9 to Grade 12). The WRDSB's 2020-2030 Long -Term Accommodation Plan provides information on student enrolment and accommodation at these schools. Kitchener -Waterloo Collegiate and Vocational School (KCI) is currently experiencing accommodation pressure. Portable classrooms may be located on-site to provide additional capacity on an interim basis. Please note that site constraints exist at King Edward PS which will limit our ability to add temporary accommodation (e.g portables) on-site. The WRDSB will continue to monitor enrolment and consider alternative solutions in the event that pressure materializes from the above -noted application or subsequent applications within this school boundary. Student Transportation The WRDSB supports active transportation, and we ask that pedestrians be considered in the review of all development applications to ensure the enhancement of safety and connectivity. Please be advised that Student Transportation Services of Waterloo Region (STSWR)'s school buses will not travel privately owned or maintained right-of-ways to pick-up/drop-off students. Transported students will be required to meet the bus at a congregated bus pick-up point. STSWR may have additional comments about student pick-up point(s) placement on municipal right-of-ways. Page 632 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Address: 417 King St W Owner: Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp Application: OPA23/007/K/CD and ZBA23/011/K/CD Comments Of: Parks and Cemeteries Commenter's Name: Lenore Ross Email: Lenore. ross@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext 7427 Date of Comments: June 12 2023 ❑X 1 plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) ❑ No meeting to be held ❑ I do NOT plan to attend the meeting (no concerns) 1. Documents Reviewed: I have reviewed the documentation noted below submitted in support of an OPA and ZBA to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 55 storey mixed use building with 622 residential units with ground floor commercial units. A total of 184 vehicle parking spaces and 311 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. • Planning Justification Report • Urban Design Score Card • Windy Study • Shadow Study • Building Elevations and Renderings • Noise Study • Arborist Report 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parks and Cemeteries has no significant concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments and can provide conditional support subject to the minor updates to submitted studies are noted below. Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement will be deferred at the Official Plan Amendment/Zoning By-law Amendment applications and assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es), residential units and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval taken as cash in lieu of land. An estimate is provided using the approved land valuation of $43,243,000/ha, a dedication rate of 1ha/1000 unit; a maximum dedication of either land or CIL of 10% and a capped rate of $11,862/unit. The estimated cash -in -lieu park dedication for the proposed 0.275619ha site with 622 proposed units is $1,130,523 A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Pge 1 of 3 Page 633 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Calculation: 622 units x $11,862 = $7,378,164 (Bylaw 2022-101 capped rate) 0.275619 ha x $43,243,000/ha x 0.1= $1,130,523 (More Homes Built Faster Act 10% cap) 3. Comments on Submitted Documents The following comments should be addressed. 1) Arborist Report including Tree Protection and Enhancement Plan dated March 2023— JK Consulting Arborists a) The report accurately notes that the canopy of the trees within Francis' Green extend in a minor way over the property line and the proposed tree protection fencing reflects the existing hardscape conditions rather than the typical City protection standards of dripline + 1m. The four inventoried trees within Francis Green are large, mature trees and have been assessed to be in "Good" condition and recognizing that the root system of large trees may extend well beyond the dripline and into the subject site, an ISA valuation of these trees should be provided as part of the formal site plan application. b) Security deposits for protection of existing vegetation maybe required as part of the site plan approval requirements. 2) Urban Design Scorecard Architectural set a) As identified in Places and Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener, the City Commercial Core Planning Community is currently critically underserved with active neighbourhood park space and the proposed redevelopment will exacerbate this deficit. The provision of on-site amenities suitable to all ages, including children's play facilities, will be critical to support for this proposal. The site plan, Urban Design Scorecard, Architectural plans/renderings and supporting technical studies such as the Wind and Shadow analyses, should reflect and accommodate sufficient and suitable on-site amenity spaces. These documents should be updated to provide conceptual details and precedent images for on-site amenity spaces to guide detailed site design through the site plan application. b) Revised/amended UDB and Architectural plans/renderings are required. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 2 of 3 Page 634 of 668 City of Kitchener Zone Change/ Official Plan Amendment Comment Form 5. Anticipated Fees: Parkland Dedication The parkland dedication requirement for this submission is deferred and will be assessed at a future Site Plan Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the OPA and ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval Parkland dedication is required for the application as cash -in -lieu of land. Dedication requirements are subject to the Parkland Dedication Policy and rates in effect. Please be advised that an updated Parkland Dedication Policy and By-law were approved by City of Kitchener Council on August 22 2022. The Bylaw is under appeal. Further changes to the Bylaw may be required as a result of the Bill 23 — More Homes Built Faster Act. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 3 of 3 Page 635 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Dave Seller Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 8:39 AM To: Craig Dumart Subject: OPA/ZBA comments: 417 King Street West City of Kitchener Application Type: Official Plan Amendment Application OPA23/007/K/CD Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA23/011/K/CD Project Address: 417 King Street West Comments of: Transportation Services Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: dave.seller@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 Date of Comments: June 19, 2023 As part of a complete Zoning By-law amendment application, a Transportation Impact Study (TIS), was submitted (May 2023) by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited in support of this OPA/ZBA application. Transportation Services review focused on roadways that are under the jurisdiction of the City of Kitchener. Development proposal The applicant is proposing to develop a 55 -storey mixed use building with 622 apartment units and 654m2 (7039ft2) of ground floor commercial space. The development is estimated to generate 96 AM and 120 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The vehicle trips included the residential and commercial components, as well as trip reductions for internal capture trips, mode split and pass -by trips. The site will be serviced by two full moves access points along Halls Lane West and a total of 184 parking spaces are being proposed. Intersection analysis The four intersections noted below were reviewed under 2022 existing traffic conditions and were expressed as level of service (LOS) and vehicle delay (s). The existing traffic analysis indicated that the intersections of Francis Street South & Charles Street West is operating with a LOS C and delays of 22 seconds in the PM peak hour, while the remaining intersections had higher LOS and lower delays. • Francis Street South & King Street West (Regional Road 15) - signalized • Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South (Regional Road 55) — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Halls Lane West — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Charles Street West (Regional Road 64) - signalized The six intersections noted below were reviewed under 2028 total traffic operations and the analysis is expressed the same as the 2022 existing conditions noted above. The 2028 analysis indicated that the intersection of Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South in the PM peak hour was operating with a LOS D and delays of 27 seconds along Halls Lane West. The lower LOS and higher delays are due to the amount of vehicle traffic along Victoria Street South and drivers turning left onto Victoria Street South from Halls Lane West, while the remaining intersections characteristics had higher LOS and lower delays. • Francis Street South & King Street West (Regional Road 15) - signalized Page 636 of 668 • Halls Lane West & Victoria Street South (Regional Road 55) — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Halls Lane West — unsignalized • Francis Street South & Charles Street West (Regional Road 64) — signalized • Halls Lane West & NEW site access 1 — unsignalized • Halls Lane West & NEWsite access 2— unsignalized Left turn lane analysis A left turn lane analysis was completed along Victoria Street South at Halls Lane West, utilizing the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Geometric Design Standards for the 2028 Background and 2028 Total future traffic conditions and it was determined that a left turn lane along Victoria Street South is warranted but not recommended for the following reasons. It may not be feasible to install a left turn lane due to geometric constraints related to ION tracks and sidewalks. Left turn lanes are generally provided at major intersections and would not fit the existing character of the roadway. Transportation Services supports Paradigms recommendation. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) This development is well situated within the Urban Growth Center (UGC) to take advantage of the existing alternative modes of transportation available in the area to reduce vehicle dependency. There are several Grand River Transit (GRT) routes that are less than 200m from this development. They include the following routes: 1, 2, 6, 7, 20, 34, iXpress 204 and ION Central Station. These routes offer connectivity to a broader transit network throughout the Region of Waterloo and within Kitchener itself. The walkability for pedestrians accessing the site and surrounding area can easily be achieved, as sidewalks are provided on both sides of roadways in the surrounding area which provide connections to entertainment, employment and commercial uses. There is existing cycling in the area, as well as future cycling connections to the downtown cycling grid. To encourage cycling and take advantage of the cycling opportunities in the area, the applicant will be providing 312 Class A indoor secure bicycle parking spaces and 6 Class B outdoor bike parking spaces. The applicant must lease parking spaces separately from the cost of a unit. Providing free on-site parking undermines the likelihood of someone to use an alternative mode of transportation if parking is free. Parking supply analysis Under the current 85-1 zoning by-law (ZBL) within the UGC, a minimum of 1 parking space per unit is required, unless a unit is less than 51m', where a parking rate of 0.165 spaces per unit would apply. The commercial portion has a parking rate of 1 parking space per 95m'of GFA and there is a zero visitor parking required. The total parking requirement under 85-1 is 446 parking spaces. While the future 2019-051 ZBL is not in effect, the minimum parking requirements within a mixed-use development in the UGC would be zero for each use (residential, visitor and retail). Based on this proposal of 184 parking spaces, a surplus of parking is being provided and exceeds the future parking requirements. Conclusion Based on the methodology, analysis and conclusions within the TIS, Transportation Services supports the proposed parking supply of 184 parking spaces for this development. Page 637 of 668 b. It should be noted that the applicant was proposing to close a portion of Halls Lane West to create a one-way section which is not supportable by the City of Kitchener, as 30 Francis St West already has a portion of Halls Lane West closed with a one-way section and Francis St West is closed from Charles St West to Halls Lane West. These closures have been in place for at least seven months and are planned for a 48 month closure during their construction period with completion around 2026. The applicant also suggested the use of Francis Green Park during the construction phase. Transportation Services staff are unclear of any communications between the applicant and City of Kitchener staff regarding their proposed closures. c. A TIS must be submitted for the background traffic during the construction phase during the proposed road closure to assess impacts on the surrounding road network. Dave Seller, C.E.T. Traffic Planning Analyst I Transportation Services I City of Kitchener 519-741-2200 ext. 7369 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 1 dave.seller(a kitchener.ca Page 638 of 668 Region of Waterloo Craig Dumart Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 6th Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Dumart, PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES Community Planning 150 Frederick Street 8th Floor Kitchener Ontario N213 U Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 TTY: 519-575-4608 Fax: 519-575-4466 www. regionofwaterloo.ca Melissa Mohr 1-226-752-8622 File: D17/2/23007 C14/2/23011 June 29, 2023 Re: Proposed Official Plan Amendment OPA 23/07 and Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA 23/011 417 King Street West MHBC Planning (C/O Andrea Sinclair and Juliane von Westerholt) on behalf of Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. CITY OF KITCHENER MHBC Planning has submitted a site-specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By- law Amendment Application for a development proposal at 417 King Street West (referred to as subject lands) in the City of Kitchener. The applicant has proposed the redevelopment of the site with a 55 storey mixed use building containing 622 residential units with ground floor commercial uses. A total of 184 vehicular parking spaces with 311 Bicycle parking spaces are proposed within the underground parking structure and within the podium of the building. Access to the structured parking is located from Halls Lane West with pedestrian access proposed from King Street West. A separate loading access is proposed from Halls Lane West. An amenity terrace is located on the roof of Level 7. Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 639 of 668 The subject lands are located in the Urban Area and designated Urban Growth Centre in the Regional Official Plan. The site is designated Innovation District in the City of Kitchener Official Plan and zoned Warehouse District -Six (D-6) Zone in Zoning By-law 85-1. The Owner has requested an Official Plan Amendment to add a special policy permitting an FSR of 21. The Applicant has requested a Zoning By-law Amendment to add special regulations to the existing zoning to permit a floor space ratio of 21; to allow for residential uses; to allow for a reduction in the parking to 0.29 parking spaces per dwelling units and 0 spaces for non-residential uses; to permit a rear and side yard setback of 0 metres and to permit a 1.1 m west side yard setback. The Region has had the opportunity to review the proposal and offers the following: Regional Comments Consistency with Provincial Legislation and Regional Official Plan Conformity The subject lands are designated "Urban Area" and "Urban Growth Centre" on Map 1 of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and the site is designated Innovation District in the City of Kitchener Official Plan. The subject lands are also located within the Central Station Major Transit Station Area (MTSA). Urban Growth Centre Policies: The subject lands are located within two strategic growth areas of the Region (Urban Growth Centre and Major Transit Station Area. Development within the Urban Growth Centre is intended to achieve by 2031 or earlier a minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs combined per hectare. In addition, development within Urban Growth Centres are to accommodate significant population and employment growth that supports the transit network at the regional scale. The development concept proposes a higher density mixed use development that contributes to the achievement of the minimum intensification target established for the Urban Growth Centre Area of 200 people and jobs per hectare. Furthermore, through the development, the applicant has proposed a reduced vehicular car parking rate with indoor and outdoor bicycle parking that can support access and use of the transit and cycling networks within the vicinity of the subject lands. Major Transit Station Area Policies: The subject lands are located in the Central Station Major Transit Station Area (MTSA). The minimum density target within the Central Station MTSA is 160 people and jobs/ha. The density proposed through this application exceeds the density target of 160 people and jobs/ha and the proposed development will contribute to the achievement of the overall density target for the Central Station MTSA. Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 640 of 668 This development proposes a higher density mixed use residential/commercial development with apartment style housing, above ground floor retail space. In addition, commercial space is proposed on the ground floor adjacent to King Street and adjacent to Francis Green. Higher density, mixed use developments are encouraged within MTSAs through the policy framework contained in the ROP. Region of Waterloo International Airport In accordance with Regional Official Plan Policy 5.A.20, the Region will ensure that proposed developments do not negatively affect the usability, accessibility or safe operations of the airport either on a temporary or permanent basis. Regional staff have concerns with this development as the development (building and proposed crane) exceeds the maximum elevation permitted within the Airport's Instrument Approach Surface of 487 m ASL and the height of the building and crane. Therefore, the applicant shall either reduce the height of the building or submit an Aeronautical Assessment to ensure the proposed development does not negatively impact the airports operation. Further information regarding this matter can be found below. In addition to the above planning comments, Regional staff have the following technical comments relating to the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment: Region of Waterloo International Airport: The subject lands are located outside of the current and proposed AZR and within the instrument approach surface of the Region of Waterloo International Airport. Within the instrument approach surface, there is a maximum height limitation of 487m ASL before any buildings or construction cranes would impact airport operations. The concept drawings prepared with the application show a ground floor elevation of 509.4m ASL which exceeds the maximum elevation permitted within the instrument approach area. The development, as proposed, will impact the Waterloo Region International Airport Runway 08 RNP approach, which has a maximum allowable development elevation of 487m ASL. It may also impact the other Runway 08 approaches (LPV, LNAV/VNAV, ILS) and Runway 26 missed approach. In accordance with Regional Official Plan Policy 5.A.20, Regional staff, through the review of development applications, shall ensure that proposed developments do not negatively affect the usability, accessibility or safe operations of the Region of Waterloo International Airport, either on a temporary or permanent basis. Furthermore, in accordance with City of Kitchener Official Plan Policy 6.C.3.17, in planning for land uses in the vicinity of the Region of Waterloo International Airport, the Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 641 of 668 City will prohibit any land use or structure which could affect the operation of the Airport or cause a potential aviation safety hazard. In order to further assess this proposal, the Region requires the building height to be reduced to ensure the building including any construction crane does not exceed the height limitation of 487m ASL. Alternatively, the applicant shall submit an aeronautical assessment for further review and comment by the Region to ensure the proposed development does not negatively impact the airport operations. Record of Site Condition/Environmental Threats There are high environmental threats on and adjacent to the subject lands due to past/historic uses of the subject lands and adjacent sites. As a density increase of a sensitive land use has been proposed on the subject lands, a Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement letter shall be required for the entirety of the subject lands in accordance with the Region of Waterloo's Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications on or Adjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites. The Record of Site Condition and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter were not received as part of the Complete Application for the Zoning By-law Amendment. In accordance with the Region's Implementation Guidelines, the Region can defer the requirement of the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter to the building permit stage with confirmation from the Chief Building Official of the City of Kitchener confirming that the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter will be obtained prior to building permit issuance. The Region received confirmation from the City of Kitchener's Chief Building Official that an RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement Letter are required to permit this development; therefore, Regional staff will defer the RSC and Ministry Acknowledgement letter for the entirety of the site to the Building permit stage in accordance with the Region's Implementation Guideline for the Review of Development Applications on orAdjacent to Known and Potentially Contaminated Sites. Environmental Noise (Road and Stationary Noise) Study: An Environmental Noise report entitled "Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development, 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario" prepared by HGC Engineering, dated April 17, 2023 and associated peer review fee of $4,520.00 have been received and provided to the Region's third party peer reviewer. Regional staff have received the following preliminary comments from the peer reviewer: Stationary Noise Concerns: HGC indicates that examples of the proposed balcony mitigation are provided within the report, however, they are not included. Without an example of the proposed mitigation Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 642 of 668 for the balcony, it is unclear how the mitigation recommendations are to be implemented. Furthermore, mitigation is recommended for floors 17 through 20 on the westerly tower fagade. The stationary sources that the fagade is being protected from appear to be in line with these floors and would likely have a direct line -of -sight to the windows. It is unclear how the mitigation would work based on the details provided (i.e. dimensions of the barriers). The same comment applies to the southern and eastern facades but at higher floors. The study must include the following additional sources to be modelled: • UW's School of Pharmacy to the west has significant rooftop equipment that has not been included or acknowledged in the report. The building appears to have Strobic exhaust fans which can be a significant noise source. In addition, the building contains multiple large cooling towers that have not been assessed. • The Beer Store immediately northeast has refrigeration equipment on the roof that has not been included in the assessment. • There is the initial stages of a new building behind the TD building to the east that has not been identified in the study. This should be included in the assessment and sample calculations should be provided. Transportation: Road and rail traffic volumes were obtained from historical work HGC has done in the area. Please be advised that these volumes are outdated and are required to be updated for both road and rail traffic. Furthermore, it is unclear if rail whistles at crossings have been assessed, the LRT system has not been discussed and sample calculations should be provided for road and rail noise sources. Fulsome comments relating to the noise study will follow under a separate cover and acceptance of the study and related implementation measures by the Region is required prior to a recommendation being made to the City of Kitchener on the file. To address these requirements, the Region shall require a Holding Provision until a transportation, rail and Stationary noise study has been received and accepted by the Region. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 643 of 668 impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. Corridor Planning: Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Stage: Stormwater Management and Site Grading: Region of Waterloo staff has received the functional serving report entitled "Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Vanmar Developments Inc., 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment" prepared by WalterFedy, dated March 28, 2023 and it is acceptable at this stage (Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment stage). Site Plan Application Stage: Stormwater Management and Site Grading The Region of Waterloo shall require a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for review and approval at the site plan stage. Detailed comments related to the site specific grading and servicing details_ will be provided under a future site plan application. Access Permit/TIS/Access Regulation: The subject lands have vehicular access from Halls Lane with no vehicular access from King Street West and Regional staff have no objection to the vehicular access at this stage. Regional Road Dedication: The subject lands have direct frontage on King Street West (Regional Road 15). This section of King Street West has a designated road width of 26m in accordance with Schedule `A' of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) and a road dedication of approximately 5m is required across the entire King Street West frontage. The exact amount of road widening shall be determined by an Ontario Land Surveyor (OLS) in consultation with the Region's Transportation Planner. Although the dedication of the lands can be deferred to the site plan stage, Regional staff note that the dedication appears to be appropriately shown on the concept plans. Please be advised that the dedication shall be confirmed by an Ontario Land Surveyor through the detailed design stage (site plan stage). In addition, as indicated above, please ensure the Record of Site Condition (RSC) excludes the road dedication along King Street West. Site Plan Application Stage: Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 644 of 668 Regional Road Dedication: As indicated above, a road dedication shall be required along the King Street West right-of-way. The exact amount of road dedication must be determined by an OLS in consultation with the Region's Transportation Planner. Please ensure that the correct road dedication is shown on all plans moving forward. The draft reference plan showing the road widening to be dedicated to the Region shall be submitted to the Transportation Planner for review and once the draft is been accepted, the Registered Plan must be sent to the Transportation Planner. Stormwater Management and Site Grading: Detailed civil engineering plans shall be required for review and approval by Regional staff at the site plan stage. Where possible, please coordinate underground service connections from the local municipal road rather than the Regional Road. Site Plan Review Fee: Please be advised that the Region of Waterloo shall require an $805.00 review fee associated with a formal site plan application. Hydrogeology and Water Programs/Source Water Protection Please be advised that the Region does not support permanent active or passive dewatering controls for below -grade infrastructure (e.g. foundations, slabs, parking garages, footings, piles, elevator shafts, etc.) therefore, Below -grade infrastructure requiring dry conditions should be waterproofed. In addition, a prohibition on Geothermal Wells as defined in Chapter 8 of the Region Official Plan shall be implemented within the site specific Zoning By-law amendment, including vertical open and closed loop geothermal energy systems. The required wording for the prohibition is: Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling, including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Housing Services The following Regional policies and initiatives support the development and maintenance of affordable housing: Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 645 of 668 • Regional Strategic Plan • 10 -Year Housing and Homelessness Plan • Building Better Futures Framework • Region of Waterloo Official Plan The Region supports the provision of a full range of housing options, including affordable housing. Should this development application move forward, staff recommend that the applicant consider providing a number of affordable (as defined in the Regional Official Plan) housing units on the site. Rent levels and house prices that are considered affordable according to the Regional Official Plan are provided below in the section on affordability. In order for affordable housing to fulfill its purpose of being affordable to those who require rents or purchase prices lower than the regular market provides, a mechanism should be in place to ensure the units remain affordable and establish income levels of the households who can rent or own the homes. Staff further recommend meeting with Housing Services to discuss the proposal in more detail and to explore opportunities for partnerships or programs and mechanisms to support a defined level of affordability. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of an ownership unit, based on the definition in the Regional Official Plan, the purchase price is compared to the least expensive of: Housing for which the purchase price results in annual accommodation costs which do not exceed 30 percent of gross $385,500 annual household income for low and moderate income households Housing for which the purchase price is at least 10 percent below the average $576,347 purchase price of a resale unit in the regional market area "Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021). In order for an owned unit to be deemed affordable, the maximum affordable house price is $385,500. For the purposes of evaluating the affordability of a rental unit, based on the definition of affordable housing in the Regional Official Plan, the average rent is compared to the least expensive or: A unit for which the rent does not exceed $1,470 30 per cent of the gross annual Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 646 of 668 household income for low and moderate income renter households A unit for which the rent is at or below the Bachelor: $950 average market rent (AMR) in the 1 -Bedroom: $1,134 regional market area 2 -Bedroom: $1,356 3 -Bedroom: $1,538 4+ Bedroom: $3,997 'Based on the most recent information available from the PPS Housing Tables (2021) In order for a rental unit to be deemed affordable, the average rent for the proposed units which have fewer than 3 bedrooms must be at or below the average market rent in the regional market area as shown above. For proposed units with three or more bedrooms, the average rent for the units must be below $1,470. Fees: Please be advised that the Region is in receipt of the Official Plan Amendment review fee of $7,000.00 and the Zoning By-law Amendment Review fee of $3,000.00 (total $10,000) deposited June 22, 2023. Conclusions: At this time, the Region has the following concerns relating to the application: 1. The proposed height of the building exceeds the maximum height limitation of 487m ASL for the Runway 08 RNP approach surface. Regional staff have concerns with the height of the building based on the Runway 08 RNP approach and Runway 26 missed approach as outlined in the comments above. This concern must be satisfactorily addressed prior to a recommendation being made to Council for the City of Kitchener. Follow Up: In addition to the concerns identified related to airport operations and the proposed building heights, the following must be implemented within the Zoning By-law: That a Holding Provision apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a transportation, rail and stationary noise study is acceptance of the study and related implementation measures to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The required wording for the holding provision is: That a holding provision shall apply to the entirety of the subject lands until a satisfactory detailed transportation (road) and stationary noise study has been Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 647 of 668 completed and implementation measures addressed to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The detailed stationary noise study shall review the potential impacts of noise (e.g. HVAC systems) on the sensitive points of reception and the impacts of the development on adjacent noise sensitive uses. 2. Inclusion of a geothermal prohibition in the zoning by-law amendment. The required wording for the prohibition is, Geothermal Wells are prohibited on site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling, including open -loop and closed-loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Next Steps: The applicant shall address the Regions concerns as identified above. Please be advised that any future development on the lands subject to the above -noted application will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19- 037 or any successor thereof. Further, please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the decision pertaining to this application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, Melissa Mohr, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner C. MHBC Planning Inc. C/O Andrea Sinclair and Juliane vonWesterholt (Applicant), Vanmar Developments 417 King GP Corp. C/O Mauricio Miranda (Owner) Document Number: 4422481 Version: 1 Page 648 of 668 :OC METROLINX To: Craig Dumart, Senior Planner, City of Kitchener From: Third Party Projects Review - Adjacent Developments - GO Expansion and LRT Metrolinx Date: June 26', 2023 Re: OPA23/007/K/CD & ZBA23/01 1 /K/CD - 417 King Street West, Kitchener Metrolinx has reviewed the first Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 417 King St W, Kitchener. It is Metrolinx's understanding that the proposal consists of a 55 -storey mixed-use building with 622 units with at -grade commercial. Metrolinx's comments on the Application are noted below: The subject property is located within 300 meters of Metrolinx's Guelph Subdivision which carries Metrolinx's Kitchener GO Train service. Metrolinx is in receipt of the Noise Feasibility Study prepared by HGC Engineering dated April 17, 2023. Metrolinx provides the following comments: o Metrolinx understands that Rail -Data was obtained from Metrolinx on November 7, 2019. However, Metrolinx notes that their Rail -Data Forecast has been updated as of December 2022. Please revise the Noise Study to reflect the most up -to date Rail -Data as the rail forecast has increased significantly since 2019. For your convenience, please see the most up to date data attached. (The proponent may also obtain Metrolinx's most up to date rail forecast by submitting a request to raiIdata req uests@metrolinx.com). Please note that the attached Rail -Data is projected to 2032. o We note that the Noise Consultant has reccomended noise control measures, including the inclusion for air conditioning, upgraded building fagade constructions, and warning clauses in order to achieve MECP noise guidelines. However, as the Noise Study is to be updated, we await the updated report. Metrolinx will require that recommendations made by the Noise Consultant are adhered to in order for approval at Site Plan phase. Please provide the Final Detailed Noise Assessment for review and satisfaction of Metrolinx. o We note further that the Noise Consultant has performed an acoustical assessment of the Temporary Kitchener Layover Facility located approximately 500m to the west of the subject site. We acknowledge and accept that the assessment concludes that sound levels from the Layover do not exceed applicable limits. Please note as well that Metrolinx has updated their warning clause as of February 2023. Please revise the Noise Study to include the followirig: o The Proponent shall provide confirmation to Metrolinx, that the following warning clause will be inserted into all Development Agreements, Offers to Purchase, and Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Lease of each unit within 300 metres of the Railway Corridor: o Warning: The Applicant is advised that the subject land is located within Metrolinx's 300 metres railway corridor zone of influence and as such is advised that Metrolinx and its assigns and successors in interest has or have a right-of-way within 300 metres from the subject land. The Applicant is further advised that there may be alterations to or expansions of the rail or other transit facilities on such right-of-way in the future including the possibility that Metrolinx or any railway entering into an agreement with Metrolinx to use the right-of-way or their assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand or alter their operations, which expansion or alteration may affect the environment of the occupants in the vicinity, :X!: METROLINX 1 Page 649 of 668 :00: METROLINX notwithstanding the inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual lots, blocks or units. The Owner shall grant Metrolinx an environmental easement for operational emissions, which is to be registered on title for all uses within 300 metres of the rail right-of-way. Included is a copy of the form of easement for the Proponent's information. The Proponent may contact Farah.Faroque@metrolinx.com with questions and to initiate the registration process. Registration of the easement will be required prior to clearance of Site Plan Approval. (It should be noted that the registration process can take up to 6 weeks). Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Best regards, Farah Faroque Project Analyst, Third Party Projects Review Metrolinx 10 Bay Street I Toronto I Ontario I M5J 2N8 :X:: METROLINX Page 650 of 668 :Dt�: METROLINX Form of Easement WHEREAS the Transferor is the owner of those lands legally described in the Properties section of the Transfer Easement to which this Schedule is attached (the "Easement Lands"); IN CONSIDERATION OF the sum of TWO DOLLARS ($2.00) and such other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by the Transferor, the Transferor transfers to the Transferee, and its successors and assigns, a permanent and perpetual non-exclusive easement or right and interest in the nature of a permanent and perpetual non-exclusive easement over, under, along and upon the whole of the Easement Lands and every part thereof for the purposes of discharging, emitting, releasing or venting thereon or otherwise affecting the Easement Lands at any time during the day or night with noise, vibration and other sounds and emissions of every nature and kind whatsoever, including fumes, odours, dust, smoke, gaseous and particulate matter, electromagnetic interference and stray current but excluding spills, arising from or out of, or in connection with, any and all present and future railway or other transit facilities and operations upon the lands of the Transferee and including, without limitation, all such facilities and operations presently existing and all future renovations, additions, expansions and other changes to such facilities and all future expansions, extensions, increases, enlargement and other changes to such operations (herein collectively called the "Operational Emissions"). THIS Easement and all rights and obligations arising from same shall extend to, be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective officers, directors, shareholders, agents, employees, servants, tenants, sub -tenants, customers, licensees and other operators, occupants and invitees and each of its or their respective heirs, executors, legal personal representatives, successors and assigns. The covenants and obligations of each party hereto, if more than one person, shall be joint and several. Easement in gross. :X= METROLINX 3 Page 651 of 668 :00�: METROLINX Rail -Data for 417 King St W. Kitchener (as of December 2022) *Please note that this Rail -Data is forecast to 2032. The subject lands (417 King St W, Kitchener) are located within 300 metres of the Metrolinx Guelph Subdivision (which carries Kitchener GO rail service). It's anticipated that GO rail service on this Subdivision will be comprised of diesel trains. The GO rail fleet combination on this Subdivision will consist of up to 2 locomotives and 8 passenger cars. The typical GO rail weekday train volume forecast near the subject lands, including both revenue and equipment trips is in the order of 99 trains. The planned detailed trip breakdown is listed below: i.._....... _.._... _- . 1 Diesel i 2 Diesel 1 Diesel 2 Diesel Locomotive Locomotive Locomotive Locomotive j I Day (0700 62 1 14 Night (2300 21 2 107 11 00) The current track design speed near the subject lands is 30 mph (48 km/h). There are anti -whistling by-laws in affect at Park St, Strange St, Lancaster St. W. Reg. Rd. 29, Saint Leger St, and Duke St at -grade crossing. Operational information is subject to change and may be influenced by, among other factors, service planning priorities, operational considerations, funding availability and passenger demand. It should be noted that this information only pertains to Metrolinx rail service. It would be prudentto contact other rail operators in the area directly for rail traffic information pertaining to non-Metrolinx rail service. :0-t: METROLINX 4 Page 652 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Jason Dahle n> Sent: Tuesday, June l3, 2023 3:25 PM To: Mayor, Debbie Chapman Cc: Craig Dumart Subject: 417 King Street West Kitchener- Concerns t You don't often get email from rn why this is important Dear Mayor Barry and Councillor Chapman, I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed 55 -story, 622 dwelling unit development at 417 King Street West. While I am in favor of development in the downtown core, I do not believe that a building of this height and density is suitable for the area. My concerns are as follows: • The building would block the views of many people who live downtown, which would negatively impact their quality of life. • The increased density would lead to more traffic flow and congestion in an already busy area, which would create safety concerns and inconvenience for residents and visitors alike. There have been several other projects that were not approved in the Kitchener- Waterloo region, which highlights the importance of carefully considering the impact of new developments. For example, in 2013, a proposed 55 -floor condo at 417 King Street West was met with opposition from the community which is the same location in question. The community expressed concerns about the building's height and density, which they believed would negatively impact the downtown core. Instead of a 55 -story building with 622 units, I suggest a building with fewer units and a lower height that would not block or overpower the 40 -story building being built next door and the 19 story building at 1 Victoria St S. This alternative proposal would have the following benefits: • It would not block the views of many people who live downtown, which would preserve their quality of life. • It would not increase traffic flow and congestion in an' already busy area, which would maintain safety and convenience for residents and visitors alike. • It could include prime commercial space on the ground floor, which would provide a benefit to the community. Examples of High -Rise Buildings Which Were Not Approved in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada: 1. Proposed 55 -floor Condo at 417 King St. W. This project was met with opposition from the community in 2013. The community expressed concerns about the building's height and density, which they believed would negatively impact the downtown core. 2. 10 Duke West. This project was proposed but has not yet been approved. It is a 45 -story building that would be located in the downtown core. 3. Gaslight Condos: Tower This project was proposed but has not yet been approved. It is a 40 -story building that would be located in the downtown core. I urge you to consider this alternative proposal when evaluating the proposal for 417 King Street West. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jason Dahle Page 653 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Sent: To: Subject: You don't often get email from Hi Craig, Joachim Pfister Monday, June 26, 2023 1:57 AM Craig Dumart; Werner Michael Dietl 417 King Street West - neighbourhood feedback am why this is im on rtant We would like to raise the following comments and questions related to the proposed development at 417 King Street West. Kind regards, Werner Dietl and Joachim Pfister (owners of 1. - 2. 3. Electric cars 4. r) a. b. c. Is there a requirement on the number of parking spaces that require electric d. charging? Or could the city mandate this from the developer to make the proposed development future proof? e. f. 9. h. Is the electrical grid in DTK stable enough to provide enough electricity L for all the new neighbours of 1 Victoria Street South (417 King Street West and 30 Francis Street), especially when EV usage will be increasing? j 5. 6. 7. Fire emergencies 8. a. b. c. Is there enough water/hydrants in the vicinity of 1 Victoria St South d. (19 floors), 30 Francis Street (45 floors), 417 King Street West (55 floors) in case of major fire event to protect all of the neighboring buildings - taking into account that the block is growing in density with several highrise buildings (notably, multiple e. fire events happening on the same block)? We understand that the "Functional Servicing Report" contains a fire hazard planning - but it seems to be performed for a specific proposition and not taking into context the whole block. f. 9• 1 Page 654 of 668 h. i. How does the city ensure that fire trucks can park/access the buildings, j. especially in case of a very busy Halls Lane West where many delivery vehicles are parked through different times of the day? The traffic impact study does not consider delivery traffic. k. I. M. n. Where are the supposed emergency assembly areas where people should gather o. in case of an alarm so that emergency vehicles are not blocked (for all buildings on that block)? P. q• r. s. Does the city have enough capacity for this increased emergency load? Do we have the training and equipment to handle a fire on the 55th floor? U. 3. 4. 5. Delivery vehicles (commercial + e.g. food delivery) situation in Halls Lane West 6. Delivery vehicles seemed not to hi-nnncirlcrcrl in +he traffic impact 7. study. But living here in _ _. ___ ___...._. rs now, we sometimes see interesting things happening, especially in Halls Lane West (with UHaul rentals + delivery vehicles + residents entering or exiting the existing 1 Victoria Parking garage). 8. a. b. c. What will the city do to have delivery vehicles being able to make deliveries to 417 d. King Street West without blocking Halls Lane West (especially since no visitor parking is envisioned for 417 King Street West according to the Zoning Compliance Table). e. f. 9- h. The parking for delivery vehicles needs to be rethought/reconsidered by the city for i. the entire block because Halls Lane West will serve as the main entrance for 3 highrise buildings and their parking garages (1 Victoria Street South, 33 Francis Street and the 417 King Street West). j• k. I. m. We suggest that the city of Kitchener, in anticipation of the traffic amount of residents, n. delivery vehicles and Uhaul rentals, considers to transform Halls Lane West into a one way street. Traffic could flow into from Francis Street and exit at Victoria Street. Thus, one side of the Halls Lane West could serve as a parking space for deliveries/Uhaul o. pickup or dropoff waiting cars and the traffic could still flow. This measure should be considered in combination with forbidding left turns on Victoria Street South into Halls Lane West which would reduce traffic congestion due to people turning left from p. Victoria Street into Halls Lane resulting in blocking the intersection due to further traffic. Furthermore, this might reduce issues with pedestrians that are put into danger when someone does this left turn manoever and wants to quickly turn into Halls Lane q. and "forgets" about pedestrians. r. 9. 10. 11. Gap between 1 Victoria Street South and 417 King Street West (`Exit from (Parking' on 12. the plan) Page 655 of 668 13 a. b. c. How does the proposed building (417 King Street West) ensure that this small lane will d. not turn into an "unsafe" place where homeless people could try to seek shelter or drug trafficking could take place (central location and little visibility from the main arteries of King Street West and Halls Lane West)? e. 14. 15. 16. 1 bedroom vs. 2 bedroom units 17. a. b. c. Having mostly 1 bedroom units per floor (only 2x 2 -bedroom units per floor) seems disproportionate d. which will have an impact on the people living in the newly proposed project and to its neighbours. The proposition seems to cater to singles whereas for a healthy mix of population, also small families should be considered who would be better -suited in 2 -bedroom e. units. Downtown Kitchener should strive for a balance that every group is represented and no specific population will be too dominant. Is this something the city of Kitchener can exert influence upon the builder? f. 18. 19. 20. Excavation work and soiled streets 21. a. b. c. How does the developer of the proposed building ensure that residents needing to access d. Halls Lane West don't get dirty feet or cars during the excavation phase? Will the developer be required to provide street cleaning? Background: During the excavation work for 33 Francis Street South, dirt accumulated to our perception in a substantially larger e. amount in the parking garage of 1 Victoria due to cars passing by the excavation truck loading zone from 33 Francis Street South. f. 22. 23. 24. Additional load on Willow Green (Victoria) park 25. a. b. c. How is the developer proposing to account for the huge additional load on the recreational d. spaces in our neighborhood, in particular Willow Green? e. 26. 27. 28. Commercial units on the ground level 29. a. b. c. Can the developer be required to add commercial units on the ground floor? With this d. high number of additional residents, the whole block and neighbourhood would benefit from commercial spaces that could be used for restaurants. e. Page 656 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Kevin Young Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 3:36 PM To: Craig Dumart You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Hi I am Kevin Young I like what I see but see no mention of geared to income units, or did I miss this in any reports. Other than that I thank staff for a job well done. Page 657 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Brian Shillingford , .y.. A,—_N[UiUn.rne- Sent: Monday, June 26, 2023 1:20 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: 417 King Street West (55 Storey Development) You don't often get email fror. Learn why this is important Hello Craig, I am emailing to submit my comments regarding the proposed 55 storey development. To be blunt, 55 storeys is too tall for Kitchener. I suspect this proposal is an effort to increase dwellings to help with the housing crises. Instead of turning KW into a city of sky -scraping condo buildings a better solution is to change the zoning and allow for true mixed use and mixed density. If zoning is changed to remove single family dwelling neighbourhoods then low-rise apartments and condos can be developed. Sky scrapers propose a number of issues. As they get taller more space is wasted. Multiple elevator shafts are needed, support columns need to be larger, and this results in less liveable space per floor than shorter buildings with the same footprint. Additionally, tall condo and apartment buildings block the sun, and if more and more of them are built then the wind tunnel effect can happen. On top of this, another issue is density within the city. By building tall buildings you will be increasing density in a very small area. If you rezone the city and have mixed density throughout, then the density is also spread throughout the city. Please reconsider this development. Rezoning, low-rise buildings throughout the city, and mixed use (allowing for small shops to exist in residential areas) will result in a better city and better neighbourhoods. Thank you, Brian Page 658 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Ken Friedmann Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 7:03 AM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Re: 417 King Street Application meeting last night You don't often get email from earn why this is important Craig, correction ... I meant the parking lot at Frances and Charles, not King and Charles. And just a thought ... a Rink and NHL hockey team would look fantastic there!! With Kitchener being 4th largest metro area in Ontario, I believe we have the critical mass for something exciting like this. Just would need some local businesses and wealthy individuals to step up to lead the charge and not sure we have that just yet but maybe with continued growth in the tech area the money would be there for an ambitious venture of attracting an NHL franchise. believe the community would greatly support this. Ken On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 6:35 AM Ken Friedmann Hi Craig, thanks for being part of the meeting last night. > wrote: I wanted to send some comments. One of the community members expressed concerns with being overwhelmed by the developmental pace of DTK and negative impacts and in particular the load on traffic from an inconvenience point of view and also environmental. I totally have the opposite perspective. I moved downtown a year and half ago for the sole purpose of being more in the action. I am thrilled with the development and growth downtown because right now I feel DTK is lacking some vibrancy and I believe that will change with all that is planned and the growth. Development in the downtown area makes environmental sense with having many services easily accessible to many people. I don't understand the point made last night, that building these new places will increase the environmental impact. Perhaps in the immediate area but overall your plans are greatly reducing the environmental impact, especially when it comes to cars etc. I look at my own personal changes. I now walk to my dentist, optometrist, service Ontario, the movies, my financial planner, grocer, restaurants and my lawyer is also downtown. Previously I was driving to all of these services. In fact, if not for needing to go to the Toronto office twice a week, I would consider not having a vehicle and grabbing the share cars on the rare occasion when needed. So I just wanted to give you comments from a different perspective. My only real hesitation in full endorsement of the 417 development is that I live in Kaufman Lofts with my unit facing King and the new structure, along with the Frances street will loom large over my place and take away a lot of the sunlight I currently enjoy through the 10' windows, but I realize I can't have everything so overall I'm in favor of the new developments downtown and expect that at some point the empty and rarely used large parking lot at King and Charles (I think it's the Manulife parking lot) will also see some development and excited to see what is planned there... can you share what might be in store for that land? I do have one other question and I think you may have given a brief update but I missed it. As said I go to Toronto twice a week and would love to get off the 401 and just wonder about where the region is at with the new transit hub at King and Victoria. I know that construction was supposed to start in 2020 and being conveniently close to the transit Page 659 of 668 hub was one of the reasons why I wanted to move downtown. Can you tell me what stage that endeavor is at and expected time for completion and start of all day GO service? Thanks Craig, Ken Friedmann Page 660 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Jeremy Chamilliard Sent: Wednesday, July 12,2023 2:24 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Re: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting Attachments: IN8 Construction Neighbour Notice- Extended Working Hours.pdf Thanks for the speedy reply, Craig. I hope we're not Cutting into your vacation. I can't speak for the other neighbourhood meeting participant (and their tenants), but at 1 Victoria, a letter was circulated implying the construction hours were INRs to set and they were just letting us know they would be changed will reach out to bylaw and see what they say. Regards, Jeremy On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:44 AM Craig Dumart <Craig.Duma rt@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hi Jeremy, I am glad you were able to attend the meeting. I am not sure if they (I1\18) have an exemption or what permissions they have. Noise and construction By-law questions and concerns are fielded by our by-law enforcement staff. Have you had a chance to reach out to them regarding your concerns? Craig Get Outlook for iOS From: Jeremy Chamilliard <j Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 10:39:/-4 Mm To: Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Fwd: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting You don't often get email fron am why this is important Another attempt after correcting the typo from https://calendar.kitchener.ca/default/`Detail/2023-07-11-1900- Neighbourhood-Meeting-Proposed-Development-417-Kin "Email" link. Hope this one gets through. ------ Forwarded message --------- From: Jeremy Chamilliard <ichamilliard@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:31 AM Subject: 417 King W Neighbourhood Meeting To: <%20craig.dumart@kitchener.ca> Hi Craig, Thanks for joining the neighbourhood meeting last night and fielding questions. Page 661 of 668 I'm not sure if construction is relevant at this stage, but one of the questions was about Tek Tower / 30 Francis S construction noise and it seemed like you and "the applicant" were dodging the question talking about lam - 7pm bylaws and no work on Sundays. I'm not sure if you meant to dodge. Apologies if you did. I think the concern was that IN8 has let neighbours at 1 Vic and Kaufman know they will be working from 4AM to midnight to take advantage of the summer months/weather, and this is disturbing the participant's tenants. It's great that VanMar won't work on Sundays (IN8 doesn't either), but will they work from 4AM - midnight during summer months? Regards, Jeremy Page 662 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Andrew W Peters Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 7:29 PM To: Craig Dumart; Debbie Chapman Cc: Mayor Subject: Re: Proposed Building at 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario You don't often get email from ____ n why this is important Hi Craig and Debbie, I sincerely appreciate your time at the council meeting last night. I made the comment/ question regarding parking enforcement. I own units at. d unfortunately the parking license system is quite flawed and has been since construction was completed. The condo corporation is responsible for maintaining the parking garage yet the developer owns the parking garage under a separate corporation name. The developer at 1 Victoria, Momentum Developments is quite close with Vanmar. Momentum through a separate corporations owns a company called Park Co, which is used for parking management at station park, 100 Victoria, Charlie West and 1 Victoria. I have attached a photo taken this afternoon at Their system has not been operational over the last three years. I am aware that the same system isnot functional at station park, Charlie West, or 100 Victoria. I bring this to your attention because I don't believe the developer is being truthful when they state that they have the tenants and area residents best intention when it comes to parking management which also deviate from the honesty of their proposal when it comes to an accurate number of parking spaces allocated per unit. Neither Park Co, Momentum Developments or Vanmar are at all aware of parking utilization in any of their buildings. Regards, Andrew Page 663 of 668 I w From: Andrew W Peters _ Sent: Tuesday, lune 13, 2023 5:55 PM To: Mayor <mayor@kitchener.ca>; Debbie Chapman <Debbie.Chapman@kitchener.ca>; Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> Subject: Proposed Building at 417 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario You don't often get email from a )m. Learn why this is important Good afternoon, I am writing to express my concerns about the environmental and traffic flow issues in Kitchener, mainly downtown. As a resident of the community, I believe it is crucial to ensure that our city is taking the necessary steps to become more sustainable and environmentally friendly. One of the main concerns I have is the proposed building at 417 King Street West. The size and height of the building appear to be signiflcanfly out of proportion with the surrounding area, which may disrupt the established aesthetic and architectural harmony that characterizes the downtown core. This discrepancy has the potential to diminish the appeal of the area and detract from the unique charm that attracts residents and visitors alike. Additionally, the potential impact on traffic and parking in the vicinity could exacerbate the existing strain on Kitchener's infrastructure. Increased traffic congestion would not only inconvenience residents but also pose safety risks to pedestrians and cyclists. Moreover, I believe it is imperative to consider the environmental implications of such a development. Given the growing urgency of climate change, it is crucial that new constructions prioritize sustainable practices and energy-efficient technologies. I request a thorough environmental impact assessment to ensure that the proposed building aligns with Kitchener's commitment to becoming a greener and more sustainable city, as well as testing given the location and environmental issues that were discovered in that city block during the construction of 1 Victoria St S and that are present in the land bordering the UW School of Pharmacy. I would appreciate reviewing the Planning Justification Report for this location. In closing, I kindly request that you take into account the concerns I have raised regarding the proposed building at 417 King Street West and the environmental issues in Kitchener. By carefully considering these factors, we can ensure that any developments in our neighborhood contribute positively to the overall well-being of the community and align with the shared vision for a vibrant, sustainable, and inclusive Kitchener. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing your response and engaging in further discussions on this issue and will attend on July 11 for the Zoom Meeting. Yours sincerely, Andrew Peters <image012.jpg> 3D Axonometric View (Courtesy of Kirkor Architects) Page 665 of 668 On Jun 20, 2023, at 10:38 AM, Craig Dumart <Craig.Dumart@kitchener.ca> wrote: Hi Andrew, Thank you for your taking time to provide comments. You have been added to the email distribution list to keep you informed on the proposed development. Please let me know if you would like to discuss the proposed the development in advance of the neighbourhood meeting and I will arrange fora phone call to discuss. Thanks, Craig Dumart, BES; MCIP, RPP Senior Planner i Planning Division i City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 ext 7073 1 TTY 1-866-969-9994 i craia.dumartP—kitchener.ca <irnage00i .png> <image002.png> <image003.png> <irn2ge004.png> <irnage005.png> <irn2ge000.png> <image007.pnp <irn-age008.Png> <irnage000.png> <image010.png> <image011.jpg> Page 666 of 668 Craig Dumart From: Katie Steckly and Daniel Penner < Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2023 12:10 PM To: Craig Dumart Subject: Feedback on the Proposed Development for 417 King Street W You don't often get email from _ a...0 ..,.��. —arn why this is important Hello, My name is Daniel Penner and I'm a unit owner and resident d, ). I'd like to provide feedback on the Proposed Development for 417 King Street W. Kitchener. wasn't able to attend the virtual meeting on Tuesday but I have read through the planning documents in detail. Here is my feedback, from highest priority to lowest: • Developer should pay for a portion of (or enhancements to) the proposed Transit Hub. o Similarly to how the approved development immediately south (on the NW corner of Francis and Charles) paid for enhancements to the Francis Green o Residents of this development will be primary users of the Transit Hub (due to proximity and the fact that most units won't have parking spots) which is excellent! • Include 3 and 4 bedroom units o I'd like there to be diversity of demographics and family units downtown; not solely young professionals o I'd suggest a minimum of 15% of the units be 3+ bedrooms • Include Affordable Housing or Social Housing o Specifically I'd like to see 20% units sold below market rate to individuals and families who could not otherwise afford to be homeowners. o Even if that isn't possible, I'd ask that the pricing of the units be such that it meets the Region of Waterloo's definition of Affordable Housing (30 per cent of their income on housing costs) • Mitigations for wind conditions on sidewalks o The wind study acknowledges "localized uncomfortable conditions during winter months". There is already a "Venturi Effect" or "wind tunnel" noticeable in the area that I've noticed on my own experience. o I'd like to see both hard and soft wind barriers (fixed canopies and windscreens on the structure; trees or hedges along the sidewalk — if there's enough light to keep them alive). At least 1 bike parking space per unit o Given how compact bike parking is, this seems like a bare minimum. At least 50% of required parking be EV ready o I personally think this would be a selling point for the developer. It seems like a small ask. I understand that this process is a negotiation with the developer. What I ask is that you drive a hard bargain on behalf of the city and its residents. I agree that this is the exact type of development that the city should be encouraging (high density within the core), but it seems to me there is no shortage of developers proposing new condos in this area. I strongly believe we should be negotiating for every communal benefit we can get from these developers, even if that means scaring a few of them off. Page 667 of 668 I'd appreciate a reply so that I know you received this email and an acknowledgement that my comments will be included within the summary of public feedback. I'm also happy to follow-up if any of my comments are unclear or if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your openness to feedback! Daniel Penner Page 668 of 668