Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2021-5 - Regional Official Plan ReviewStaffRepoit Development Services Department REPORT TO: Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: March 8, 2021 J K, R www.kitchener.ca SUBMITTED BY: Bustamante, Rosa, Director of Planning, 519-741-2200 ext. 7319 PREPARED BY: Donegani, Tim, Senior Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7067 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: February 22, 2021 REPORT NO.: DSD -2021-5 SUBJECT: Regional Official Plan Review RECOMMENDATION: THAT the comments included as Attachment A to Staff Report DSD -2021-5 (Regional Official Plan Review) be endorsed; and further, THAT staff be directed to forward this Staff Report DSD -2021-5 and Council's comments to the Region of Waterloo for the Region's consideration in the update to the Region's Official Plan. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to: • enhance understanding of how the Regional Official Plan affects planning in Kitchener; • describe the scope and progress to date of the Regional Official Plan review; • seek Council endorsement of key City comments on the Regional Official Plan review; and • outline next steps in the Regional Official Plan review process and subsequent implications for the City's Official Plan. • To date, City and Regional staff agree on most key issues emerging from the Regional Official Plan Review process. Staff are seeking Council endorsement of key City comments. • There are currently no financial implications resulting from this report. • Community engagement has been led by the Region and is being conducted primarily online at https://www.engagewr.ca/regional-official-plan. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. The Region of Waterloo is updating its Official Plan to accommodate 366,000 more residents and 194,000 jobs by 2051. The Regional Official Plan (ROP) has and will have a significant impact on planning in Kitchener by establishing key policies which include defining the countryside line to limit sprawl and establishing minimum targets for greenfield density and residential intensification. Following the approval of the Region's Official Plan, the City will be required to amend the City's Official Plan to conform to the ROP. Key supportive comments on the Region's work to date: • staff support the proposed Major Transit Station Area boundaries based on the consistent application of criteria that are consistent with the new Growth Plan; • staff support the alternative density target for the Block Line Station Area; • staff support the proposed Regional Employment Areas and preliminary responses to employment conversion requests; • the ROP can and should do more to support housing affordability, for example by strengthening condominium conversion policies, encouraging rental replacement, and enabling the Cities to implement Inclusionary Zoning. Key areas of potential concerns to date: • staff support the concept of newly proposed Major Intensification Corridors in principle, but additional analysis and consultation is required with a broad range of city -building stakeholders; • the role of and opportunity for local intensification and its implications on the need for urban area expansion needs to be further considered by the Region; and • tangible and implementable climate change policies are required to make a meaningful impact. The City's role in the Region's Official Plan Review project is to provide the Region with City comments, concerns and opportunities throughout their process, recognizing that the City's Official Plan will need to be amended following approval of the ROP. The ROP update will be adopted by Regional Council and eventually approved by the Province in mid -2022. Staff will keep City Council apprised of this project throughout 2021 at key milestones. BACKGROUND: The Waterloo Region Official Plan (ROP) is an important planning document that guides decisions related to growth, development, and community investment across the Region. It must be updated periodically in accordance with key Provincial planning documents such as A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and the Provincial Policy Statement (2020). It outlines key planning ideas and policies including the Countryside Line, the LRT central transit corridor, regional groundwater recharge area, and intensification targets. Regional Council initiated this Review of the current ROP (2009) in August 2018. REPORT: The Growth Plan 2020 is similar to the 2006 version. However, a few key changes to the Growth Plan are driving significant components of the ROP review. For the first time, upper tier Official Plans such as the Region's are required to: • plan to the year 2051; • establish detailed boundaries and intensification targets for Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs, e.g. around LRT stops in Kitchener's context); • plan for a minimum intensification target of 50%, up from the 40% established in the 2006 Growth Plan; • designate Regional Employment Areas which have strong protection policies; and • follow a prescribed Land Needs Assessment methodology for determining the amount of land needed to accommodate growth. These Growth Plan changes mean that several key policy directions that were historically determined at the City level will now be determined by the Region through the ROP. The ROP review will amend the ROP with a planning horizon to 2051 that forecasts 923,000 people and 470,000 jobs throughout the Region - an increase of 366,000 people and 194,000 jobs from 2016. The Regional Official Plan Review (ROPR) is currently completing phase 2 and beginning Phase 3 as shown in Figure 1. Phase 2 (from March 2019 to present) focuses on research, analysis and a set of strategies, technical briefs and discussion papers that explore issues and provide analysis to support updates to the ROP. This report is organized according to these documents that include: 1. Regional Urban Structure; 2. Intensification Strategy (including the Urban Growth Centre, Major Transit Station Areas and Regional Intensification Corridors); 3. Employment Strategy, Regional Employment Areas and Employment Conversion Criteria; 4. Land Needs Assessment and Growth Scenarios (forthcoming) 5. Housing Policy Review; 6. Climate Action Policy Direction Paper; 7. Natural Heritage and Water Resources papers (forthcoming); and 8. Agricultural Systems paper (forthcoming). The City's role in participating in the ROP Review is to provide comments on elements of the ROP review. A Regional Official Plan amendment to implement the outcomes of the ROP review will be adopted by the Region and eventually approved by the Province in Phase 4 of the project. The Kitchener Official Plan must subsequently conform to and provide more detail than the updated high-level policies that will be contained in the ROP. Over the past 18 months, City staff have participated in the Area Municipal Working Group and provided comments on the draft documents. Staff is now seeking City Council endorsement of the key City comments included in Attachment A. Figure 1 - Regional Official Plan Review Process and Timelines Tech�nrcal Steering Area Municipal StakeArolder Provincial Council C nnvn,ttte Committee Working Group Cammift— Agencies Reporting 2. 1. - / • Project BackgroundLaunch & Technical , of • Plan ScenariosReview 20 , 19-202t late 2tt.Z __.Ad 'A AL We are Here Online • Social Media - E -Bulletins • Interactive and Engaging Community Events 1. Regional Urban Structure The Regional Urban Structure is a Waterloo Region -specific map of the key policy areas from the Provincial Growth Plan. An excerpt of the proposed urban structure and intensification areas in Figure 2 shows the municipal boundaries for each City, the limits of the urban area, the built-up area, Regional employment areas and intensification areas such as Major Transit Station Areas and Regional Intensification Corridors. These high-level structuring elements provide the broad strokes of where we plan to grow in the Region. Figure 2 - Draft Regional Urban Structure and Intensification Areas T—ip.r 0-1 / •11 Major Intensi{ioathon Corridors W od—. MNPoterrtaS Intensifieatico Comdors ;aN LRT Stage t r` uvwrk n7 or ,$4 u !CSN LRT Stage 2 Potential Inb n Mcafim Cnnidors 5M m Radius f't MT5A r4.�n4 .a mw�,r 4 t T 0 Mayor Transit Station Area Lo bm5 0 Propmed'Majm Tmnsa Station Area Boundanes - .k Base Mapping Highmys Ld �= —Regional Rinds 111111INPlanned Hghwiay 7 i Raiways `. EMRegional EmployrnentAreas Ruin -Up Area ate' h Wateftdies Region cf Walprtoo krbuTk anal ATpert 9 c �Jrban Mea IMP RCP Amdendr mAn r c :.'htmiapal Boundwr 2. Intensification Strategy The Draft Regional Intensification Strategy (2020) assesses the policy context, demographic and socioeconomic drivers of intensification, historic trends and forecasted amount and type of intensification to inform an appropriate intensification target for the Region. Furthermore, the Strategy details the capacity for development within the built-up area including the Urban Growth Centres, Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs), and Regional Intensification Corridors and throughout the rest of the Built-up Area. It also considers the development potential of the intensification areas in local Official Plans such as Kitchener's City Nodes and Urban Corridors identified on Map 2 of the City's Official Plan. The strategy demonstrates that there is capacity in the Region's built-up area for an additional 172,000 people and 138,000 jobs to 2041. While the Strategy evaluates the water supply and wastewater treatment implications of growth (Regional responsibilities), there is no evaluation of water and wastewater pipes or stormwater management facilities which are largely the responsibility of Area Municipalities. The Regional Intensification Strategy is different than the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy (2009). The latter will need to be updated after the ROP review is completed to inform the next iteration of the City's Official Plan. 2.1 Urban Growth Centre Downtown Kitchener is the City's Urban Growth Centre as shown on Map 2 of the City's Official Plan and will continue to be a primary Regional and City focus for intensification opportunities. There has been no change to the Growth Plan minimum density target of 200 residents and jobs per hectare (RJs/ha) by 2031 for Kitchener's Urban Growth Centre. As outlined in DSD -20-157, the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy 2020 Annual Monitoring Report, the Urban Growth Centre density was estimated to be 185 RJs/ha at the end of 2019 and is on track to exceed the (higher) 225 RJs/ha density target established in the City's Official Plan. Key City comments: None 2.2 Major Transit Station Areas Major Transit Station Areas (MTSAs) include the lands within 500-800 metres of existing and planned LRT/ION stops or other forms of higher order transit. They are intended to be the second -most important focus for intensification for municipalities after the Urban Growth Centre. The Growth Plan requires MTSAs to be planned to achieve a minimum density of 160 RJs/ha in most cases. Kitchener has completed a significant amount of planning work around MTSAs as part of the Planning Around Rapid Transit Stations (PARTS) Project. This project included Phases 1-2 (2013-2014), the PARTS Central Plan (2016), the PARTS Rockway Plan (2017) and the Parts Midtown Plan (2017). The Neighbourhood Planning Reviews are intended to incorporate the PARTS Master Plans into the City's Official Plan, with updates to 7 of the City's Secondary Plans and the application of zoning in accordance with the City's new Zoning by-law 2019-051. Draft policies emerging from the Neighbourhood Planning Review (NPR) project, including station area boundaries, and associated zoning regulations were considered at a statutory public meeting held in December 2019. Work to update the Official Plan and zoning for Downtown and the Block Line, Fairway and Sportsworld stations will begin later this year. Since the completion of the PARTS Plans, the Growth Plan underwent several changes in 2019 and 2020 and now requires the upper -tier municipality to delineate the boundaries and minimum density targets for MTSAs in the ROP. Furthermore, the Growth Plan, 2020, also requires each station stop have its own MTSA and not be combined with other stations. The Growth Plan now requires the ROP to "maximize the extent" of station areas, even when this includes low rise residential neighbourhoods. The Regional criteria for MTSAs generally includes: • the walking distance and pedestrian connectivity (walkability) to station stops; • areas with high development potential within 800m; • low rise residential neighbourhoods within 500m of the station; • discretion regarding low rise residential neighbourhoods within 500-800m; • the removal of large areas of floodplain or natural heritage features; and • whole blocks and both sides of the street are treated consistently wherever possible. Once City staff understood that, as a result of changes in the Growth Plan (2020), Regional staff would not support the extent of the proposed MTSA boundaries determined in the PARTS project which were previously considered by City Council, City staff were supportive of reviewing all MTSA boundaries across the Region using a set of consistent criteria. This resulted in the expansion of MTSA boundaries in some locations, the reduction or contraction of MTSA boundaries in other areas as well as the division of the PARTS Central MTSA boundaries as shown in Attachment B. It is important to note that the inclusion of a property in an MTSA does not necessarily signify that the property is intended for major change and/or intensification. Official Plan and Secondary plan policies within MTSAs will provide land use designations and further policy direction regarding which lands are and are not the focus for major change and/or intensification. Planning staff intend to report to council on the status of the NPR, including the implications of the ROP review in the coming months. The Growth Plan provides for alternative MTSA density targets where the 160 RJs/ha minimum cannot be met because of Provincial development restrictions or where the station provides a transit point to a major trip generator. Any alternative target must be pre -approved by the Province. The Block Line Station area is severely constrained by natural heritage features, floodplain and railway lands. It also provides a transfer to Conestoga College and is suitable for an alternative target. City staff have reviewed and agree with the proposed alternative target for Block Line Station of 80 RJs/ha. Key City comments: • The City supports the Region's proposed MTSA boundaries as shown in Attachment B. • The City supports the alternative target for Block Line of 80 RJs/ha. • The City will continue to plan for densities greater than 160 RJs/ha in many station areas. 2.3 Regional Intensification Corridors The Growth Plan requires the Region to consider the identification of Other Regionally Significant Intensification Areas beyond the Urban Growth Centres and MTSAs. The draft Intensification Strategy included in the ROP Review identifies potential corridors shown in Figure 2 including: • Victoria Street North; • Ottawa Street; Manitou Drive and Homer Watson Boulevard; and • Ira Needles Boulevard. Planning for these new corridors supports future opportunities for higher order transit such as Light Rail Transit or Bus Rapid Transit. Corridors are proposed to be planned to achieve a minimum density of 100 RJs/ha in the long term. City staff are awaiting policy details surrounding these corridors, but anticipate that the intensification corridor policies will be less prescriptive than the Region's MTSA policies. Instead, Regional Intensification Corridors should signal a long-term intent to align planning for higher order transit with transit supportive development and densities. This is similar to how the ROP identified the Central Transit Corridor for decades prior to the completion of ION phase 1 in 2019. Key City comments: • The City supports the identification of Regional Corridors in principle, provided that the ROP policies are not overly prescriptive and do not redirect intensification efforts away from the UGC and MTSAs. • More work is needed to understand the infrastructure implications of these new Regional Intensification Corridors. Additional consultation with a broad spectrum of city -building stakeholders is required to build consensus and alignment and deliver on a consistent vision for the Corridors. We look forward to ongoing discussions on this matter. • The Victoria Street North corridor is constrained by shallow lots and adjacent rail and industrial uses, especially on the northwest side. This will limit the opportunities for residential and mixed-use development. • The Ottawa St corridor is likely the best candidate for a Regional Intensification Corridor. • The Manitou/Homer Watson corridor is constrained by the natural heritage system and limited redevelopment opportunities. Planning to achieve 100 RJs/ha in this corridor will be difficult. • City staff is of the opinion that more analysis is required prior to establishing the 100 RJs/ha target in the ROP. 3. Employment Strategy and Regional Employment Area The Employment Strategy assesses and evaluates employment growth in the Region to 2051, proposes Regional Employment Areas in the Regional Official Plan, establishes a minimum density target for employment areas and identifies opportunities for intensification on employment lands. This level of detail regarding employment areas is new to the ROP and sets an important framework for employment areas for both the Region and the Area Municipalities. Regional Employment Areas are large areas intended to support business and industrial activity that have Region -wide significance for current and future employment. The Province recognized the slow erosion of employment areas over the last decade and included strong employment area protections through the Growth Plan to ensure that large areas that support the local and Regional economy would be protected from requests to convert these sites to residential and major retail uses. The proposed Regional Employment Area in Kitchener, shown in Attachment C, aligns closely with the City's proposed Provincially Significant Employment Zones (PSEZ) as outlined in DSD -19-187. Lands identified as Regional Employment Areas can only be considered for conversion to non -employment uses at the time of a comprehensive review of the ROP. In addition to the Regional Employment Areas, additional employment lands will continue to be designated within the City's Official Plan and will serve a local employment function and contribute to complete communities. However, these City -designated employment lands will have future opportunities to request conversion to a non -employment use outside of a comprehensive ROP review process. The Region provided an opportunity for private and municipal requests for certain lands not to be identified as Regional Employment Areas. Requests were evaluated based on Provincial and Regional criteria and in consultation with City staff. Two landowner requests within the City were recommended for inclusion from the Region's Employment Area: one property located near the intersection of Goodrich and Wabanaki; and one located on Union Street. Four privately -initiated requests were recommended for exclusion. Key City Comments: • The City generally supports the proposed Regional Employment Area and the preliminary recommendations on conversion requests. • The Regional Employment Area should not include any lands identified as Regional Greenlands or City Natural Heritage Conservation designations. • It is important that any Regional policies regarding commercial uses within Regional Employment Areas be carefully crafted to ensure that a significant amount of protected employment lands are not lost to commercial uses. 4. Growth Scenarios and Land Need Assessment The Land Needs Assessment (LNA) uses a Provincially prescribed methodology to determine the amount of land required to accommodate the 2051 population and employment forecast. It will: • evaluate a base case that uses the minimum residential intensification target of 50% annually, and minimum Greenfield density of 50 RJs/ha per the Growth Plan; • consider two alternative scenarios with higher assumptions around the rate of intensification and the density of Greenfield development; • allocate population and employment growth, Greenfield density, and intensification targets to the Area Municipalities to 2051; and • determine the amount and location of land that may need to be added to the Urban Area to accommodate growth. The Growth Scenarios work will evaluate the most appropriate location for any Urban Area expansion considering growth management, transportation, infrastructure, agriculture, natural heritage, livability and economic development criteria. A financial impact assessment will consider the cost of providing water, wastewater, roads and stormwater to various candidate areas. This ROP review will also provide direction on the location of the Countryside Line and Regional groundwater recharge area in southwest Kitchener. The Region plans to release this work in March 2021 for consultation with further refinement of a preferred growth scenario to continue into the summer and fall of 2021. City staff plan to report back to City Council to provide comments on this key portion of the ROP review. Key City comments: • The land needs assessment should continue to plan for growth in the Downtown Kitchener Urban Growth Centre beyond 2031 and more than the minimum density target of 200 RJs/ha; as well as beyond the minimum density target of 160 P+J per hectare in many MTSAs. Higher rates of intensification outside of intensification areas and a broader mix of densities should be assumed in the LNA considering historic and emerging development patterns and typologies and increasing demand for missing middle housing (e.g. additional dwellings, backyard homes and duplexes). This approach helps provide for the full range and mix of housing, complete communities, opportunities to age in place, makes efficient use of existing infrastructure, provides opportunities for gentle density in existing neighbourhoods and advances affordability objectives. • The Growth Scenario work should evaluate a scenario with no urban area expansions and a transition to a 100% residential intensification target after the currently Designated Greenfield Areas are developed. 5. Climate Change The Region is using climate change as a lens to inform all components of the ROP review. It has set an ambitious and wide-ranging set of directions. City staff await how these directions will be translated into ROP policies. Key City comments: • City staff are encouraged by the ambition in the Policy Direction Paper. While it is important to acknowledge the many long-standing planning objectives such as planning for compact mixed-use development have positive climate impacts, the City recommends that the ROP include a small set of impactful, tangible, and implementable ROP climate policies. For example, the ROP could direct that Regional roads be developed as complete streets, prohibit adding additional vehicle lanes, and be more selective in taking land for road widenings through the development review process. A Regional policy framework to encourage renewable energy production that fills the gap created by the repeal of the Green Energy Green Economy Act could also be impactful. 6. Housing Policy Review The Region provided a brief that addresses the range and mix of housing needs and focuses on affordable housing. It considers strengthening policies governing conversion of existing rental buildings to condominiums and establishing protected MTSAs (PMTSAs) to allow the Cities to implement inclusionary zoning for affordable housing. Key City comments: • The condominium conversion policies in the ROP should be more stringent. The ROP review should include municipality -specific housing mix targets. The ROP review should consider policies that encourage or require rental replacement for affordable units lost through redevelopment. 7. Natural Heritage No significant policy changes are proposed for the Regional Greenland System. Minor boundary adjustment are proposed to reflect updated modeling, fieldwork and to align with the City Zoning By-law update (CRoZBy). Key City comments: None. 8. Agriculture System The ROP review includes recommendations on the candidate prime agricultural areas identified by the Province in North Dumfries, Wilmot, Cambridge and Waterloo. No changes are being considered for Kitchener's rural and agricultural areas. Key City comments: None. Timing and Next Steps Intensification Strategy - April 2021 MTSA boundary delineations and alternative density target requests to Regional council Employment Strategy - April 2021 Draft Regional Employment and employment area conversion requests to Regional Council Land Needs assessment and growth scenarios June 2021 Consultation on preferred growth scenario (including report to City Spring/Summer Council) 2021 Present Draft ROP amendment to Regional council Fall 2021 Statuary Public Meeting to consider adopting growth related Q1 2022 components of ROP review Draft Amendment for non -growth components presented to council Fall 2021 -Winter (natural heritage and water resources systems mapping, mineral 2022 aggregates, source water protection and agricultural system) Statuary Public Meeting to consider adopting non -Growth -Related Q2 2022 components of ROP review Province approvesgrowth-related ROP amendment July 2022 Province approves nongrowth-related ROP amendment Fall 2022 City OP amended to conform with ROP amendment 2023 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. How and where we grow has significant financial implications on the capital, lifecycle and operational costs of providing infrastructure and community services for future generations. Additional details regarding the financial implications for various growth scenarios will be detailed in the Region's Fiscal Impact Assessment of the Growth Scenarios. In addition, low density and sprawling communities can contribute to social and environmental issues like climate change, noise pollution and public health impacts which are difficult to quantify but are important to consider. Work to update the City's Official Plan to conform with the ROP must be completed within one year of the ROPR approval by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. There is currently a budget of $12,500 in 2022 to complete this work. The adequacy of this budget will be reviewed once the extent of the conformity work has been scoped. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Council / Committee meeting. The Region is leading the consultation on this project. Engagement is primarily virtual and centred on www.engagewr.ca/regional-official-plan. In addition to asynchronous engagement, live engagement events included: o Kick-off open houses, including one at the Kitchener Public Library, Fall 2019; o Ask a Planner webinar, June 2020; and o COVID-19 symposium held jointly with the University of Waterloo, August 2020. City staff intend to update relevant City council advisory committees on the ROP review project in the coming months. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter. APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Key City Staff comments on the Regional Official Pan Review Attachment B — Comparison of City proposed MTSA boundaries and Region Proposed Boundaries Attachment C - Proposed Regional Employment Area and preliminary responses to conversion requests Attachment A — Key City Staff comments on the Regional Official Pan Review Major Transit Station Areas • The City supports the Region's proposed MTSA boundaries as shown in Attachment B. • The City supports the alternative target for Block Line of 80 RJs/ha. • The City will continue to plan for densities greater than 160 RJs/ha in many station areas. Regional Intensification Corridors • The City supports the identification of Regional Corridors in principle, provided that the ROP policies are not overly prescriptive and do not redirect intensification efforts away from the UGC and MTSAs. • More work is needed to understand the infrastructure implications of these new Regional Intensification Corridors. Additional consultation with a broad spectrum of city -building stakeholders is required to build consensus and alignment and deliver on a consistent vision for the Corridors. We look forward to ongoing discussions on this matter. • The Victoria Street North corridor is constrained by shallow lots and adjacent rail and industrial uses, especially on the northwest side. This will limit the opportunities for residential and mixed-use development. • The Ottawa St corridor is likely the best candidate for a Regional Intensification Corridor. • The Manitou/Homer Watson corridor is constrained by the natural heritage system and limited redevelopment opportunities. Planning to achieve 100 RJs/ha in this corridor will be difficult. • City staff is of the opinion that more analysis is required prior to establishing the 100 RJs/ha target in the ROP. Employment Strategy and Regional Employment Area • The City generally supports the proposed Regional Employment Area and the preliminary recommendations on conversion requests. • The Regional Employment Area should not include any lands identified as Regional Greenlands or City Natural Heritage Conservation designations. • It is important that any Regional policies regarding commercial uses within Regional Employment Areas be carefully crafted to ensure that a significant amount of protected employment lands are not lost to commercial uses. Growth Scenarios and Land Need Assessment • The land needs assessment should continue to plan for growth in the Downtown Kitchener Urban Growth Centre beyond 2031 and more than the minimum density target of 200 RJs/ha; as well as beyond the minimum density target of 160 P+J per hectare in many MTSAs. • Higher rates of intensification outside of intensification areas and a broader mix of densities should be assumed in the LNA considering historic and emerging development patterns and typologies and increasing demand for missing middle housing (e.g. additional dwellings, backyard homes and duplexes). This approach helps provide for the full range and mix of housing, complete communities, opportunities to age in place, makes efficient use of existing infrastructure, provides opportunities for gentle density in existing neighbourhoods and advances affordability objectives. • The Growth Scenario work should evaluate a scenario with no urban area expansions and a transition to a 100% residential intensification target after the currently Designated Greenfield Areas are developed. Climate Change • City staff are encouraged by the ambition in the Policy Direction Paper. • While it is important to acknowledge the many long-standing planning objectives such as planning for compact mixed-use development have positive climate impacts, the City recommends that the ROP include a small set of impactful, tangible, and implementable ROP climate policies. For example, the ROP could direct that Regional roads be developed as complete streets, prohibit adding additional vehicle lanes, and be more selective in taking land for road widenings through the development review process. A Regional policy framework to encourage renewable energy production that fills the gap created by the repeal of the Green Energy Green Economy Act could also be impactful. Housing Policy Review • The condominium conversion policies in the ROP should be more stringent. • The ROP review should include municipality -specific housing mix targets. • The ROP review should consider policies that encourage or require rental replacement for affordable units lost through redevelopment. Attachment B - Comparison of City proposed MTSA boundaries and Region Proposed Boundaries AT SA Boundary [PARTS and NPR] Rapid Transit Stations Rapid Transit MTSA Boundary Review Rapid Transit Station Phase 1 — Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase 1 Midtown and Central MO Region Proposed [modified] & Adapted Bus Rapid Transitstation - Adapted Bus Rapid Transit C orridor Rapid Transit Station Phase 2 Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase 2 AT SA Boundary [PARTS and NPR] Rapid Transit Stations Rapid Transit MTSA Boundary Review • Rapid Transit Station Phase 1 - Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase 1 Mill and Borden MTSA Region Proposed M Adapted Bus Rapid Transitstation - Adapted Bus Rapid Transit Corridor 13 1,Rapid Transit Station Phase 2 Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase2 MT SA Boundary [PARTS and NPR] Rapid Transit Stations Rapid Transit MTSA Boundary Review 0 Rapid Transit Station Phase 1 — Light Rail Transit C orridor Phase 1 Block Line and Fairway Ma Region Proposed 10 Adapted Bus Rapid Transit Station - Adapted Bus Rapid Trait Corridor Rapid Transit Station Phase 2 Light Rail Transit C orridor Phase hir SA Boundary (PART S and NPR) Rapid Transit Stations Rapid Transit MTSA Boundary Review • Rapid Transit Station Phase 1 - Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase 1 Sportsworld � Region Proposed * Adapted Bus Rapid Tra ns it Station - Adapted Bus Rapid Transit Corridor Rapid Transit Station Phase 2 Light Rail Transit Corridor Phase2 Attachment C — Proposed Regional Employment Area and preliminary responses to conversion requests tmpioymenr 4onversion nequesi (rnvaiermuniapa) Preliminary Conversion Recommendations