Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHK Agenda - 2024-05-07qw-EM6101 U1 � Heritage Kitchener Committee Agenda Tuesday, May 7, 2024, 4:00 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Council Chambers City of Kitchener 200 King Street W, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 People interested in participating in this meeting can register online using the delegation registration form at www.kitchener.ca/delegation or via email at delegation(a)kitchener.ca. Written comments received will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public record. The meeting live -stream and archived videos are available at www.kitchener.ca/watchnow. *Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994.* Chair - J. Haalboom Vice -Chair - P. Ciuciura Pages 1. Commencement 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof Members of Council and members of the City's local boards/committees are required to file a written statement when they have a conflict of interest. If a conflict is declared, please visit www. kitchener. ca/conflict to submit your written form. 3. Delegations Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. 3.1 Item 4.2 - Penny Young & Kayla Jonas Galvin 3.2 Item 4.3 - Candice Bogdanski & Jonathan Dee 4. Discussion Items 4.1 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) - 2091 10m Bleams Road, DSD -2024-147 4.2 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) - 15 m Hidden Valley Secondary Plan — Land Use Implementation Project, DSD -2024-193 4.3 Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-IV-08, 15 m 10 Duke Street West, Partial Demolition with Retention of Front, East, and portion of the West Side Facade, Construction of 45 -Storey Mixed -Use Building, DSD -2024-160 4.4 Notice of Intention to Designate -131 Victoria 10m Street South under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2024-195 4.5 Notice of Intention to Designate - 87 Scott 5 m Street and 82 Weber Street East under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2024-210 4.6 Bill 23 Municipal Heritage Register Review - 20 m May 2024 Update, DSD 2024-194 5. Information Items 5.1 Heritage Permit Application Tracking Sheet 6. Adjournment Marilyn Mills Committee Coordinator 0 153 6*191 556 572 14:1:3 Page 2 of 688 Staff Report r NJ :R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 5 DATE OF REPORT: March 20, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-147 SUBJECT: Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) 2091 Bleams Road RECOMMENDATION: For information. BACKGROUND: The Development and Housing Approvals Division is in receipt of a draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by McNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited (MHBC). The draft HIA was submitted to the City on February 23, 2024 and relates to a demolition control application for the property municipally addressed as 2091 Bleams Road, to demolish two structures on the site. The demolition control application has not yet been deemed complete or circulated. The demolition is proposed in anticipation of a future Plan of Subdivision. The subject property has no status under the Ontario Heritage Act, being neither designated nor listed as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest. It is identified within the Rosenberg Community Secondary Plan as being a potential cultural heritage resource. The site was identified initially in the Southwest Kitchener Urban Area Community Master Plan, Cultural Heritage Background Study dated August 2010 and prepared by heritage consultant Nancy Z. Tausky. It was one of 16 sites of potential heritage value within or around the study area during initial general surveys conducted. Further examination confirmed that the site merited listing in the Municipal Heritage Register and designation under the Ontario Heritage Act with further assessment of the interior. Council adopted the Southwest Urban Area Studies: Community Master Plan, including supporting studies such as the Cultural Heritage Background Study, on August 15, 2011. On October 3, 2011 Council elected not to list 2091 Bleams Road on the Municipal Heritage Register as a non- designated property of cultural heritage value or interest due to protest raised by the then - property owner. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 3 of 688 As of the date of this report, 2091 Bleams Road contains a single-detached residential dwelling and an accessory barn. The property has not been in use for a number of years and the structures are in poor condition. A , ,tom' '� ..� Figure 1: Contextual Map of Subject Property and Surrounding Lands Figure 2: Aerial View of Subject Property Page 4 of 688 yrIV rAND JL • t v REPORT: Evaluation Against Ontario Regulation 9/06 The draft HIA completed an evaluation of the subject property against the criteria for designation determined by Ontario Regulation 9/06. It concludes that only one criterion is met, that being that the subject lands contain an early and rare example of a log house and barn. A summary of the evaluation as concluded by the draft HIA is provided below. Page 6 of 688 Criteria Criteria Met (Yes/No) 1. The property has design value or Yes. 2091 Bleams Road contains an early physical value because it is a rare, and rare example of a log -house, unique, representative or early example constructed c. 1858 pre -confederation, of a style, type, material, or construction and barn. method. 2. The property has design value or No. Both structures are simple physical value because it displays a representations of their architectural style. high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design or physical No. Neither structure exhibits a value because it demonstrates a high construction method or materials beyond degree of technical or scientific their utilitarian function. achievement. 4. The property has historical value or No. The property was not inhabited by an associative value because it has direct individual significance to the community associations with a theme, event, belief, and were not used by or associated with a person, activity, organization or significant theme, even, or organization. institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or No. The information related to the property associative value because it yields, or has been realized and does not contribute has the potential to yield, information to an understanding of a community or that contributes to an understanding of a culture. community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or No. Information related to the architect associative value because it and builder are unknown. demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value No. The surrounding area has evolved because it is important in defining, from its original agricultural context, with maintaining or supporting the character the surrounding area being used for of an area. aggregate activities and currently residential purposes. Page 6 of 688 8. The property has contextual value No. The property does not have a because it is physically, functionally, physical, functional, visual, or historical visually, or historically linked to its association to the surrounding area. surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value No. The subject lands are not considered because it is a landmark. a landmark. Staff are of the opinion that the property may also meet Criteria 4, having historical or associative value to a theme of significance to the community. The property was historically used as a barn and is associated with mid -nineteenth century agricultural practices and early settlement in the area. The theme of agriculture is identified as being of importance to the development of both the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo. The property's connection to this historic use is maintained through the presence of the original barn, which is a feature representative of a farmsteads during this period of time. Impact Assessment The Ontario Heritage Toolkit identifies potential negative impacts to heritage properties and associated heritage attributes as a result of proposed development or alteration. These impacts are as follows: • Destruction of any or part of any significant heritage attributes or features, • Alteration that is not sympathetic or is incompatible with the historic fabric and appearance; • Shadows created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute; • Isolation of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context, or a significant relationship; • Direct or indirect obstruction of significant views or vistas within, from, or of built and natural features; • Change in land use where the use relates to the cultural heritage significance of a site, such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use so that new development fills in the formerly open space; • Land disturbances such as a change in grade that alters soils and drainage patterns which than adversely affect an archaeological resource; There are different classifications for the levels of impact that may be experienced. The draft HIA has concluded that the proposed removal of the structures on the subject property will result in a minor impact relating to the destruction of heritage attributes, as both buildings have been identified as potential heritage resources due to their early and rare construction. However, both have been assessed for their structural stability and it has been determined that they are in poor condition with many damaged and missing components. As such there has been a loss of heritage integrity, and neither would be a good candidate for conservation. Page 7 of 688 Structural Assessment A Structural Condition Assessment dated October 31, 2023 has been completed by MTE Consultants Inc on behalf of the property owner. This report concluded that the structural condition of the barn was poor and presented an immediate risk to trespassers or others entering the building, and the potential for partial collapse in significant weather events was also determined. There are additional concerns with the risk posed by the barn due to its proximity to Bleams Road as well. The condition of the farmhouse was generally fair to poor with some components including logs within the walls and the stone foundation being weathered or deteriorated, though there was no indication of immediate threat of collapse. Conclusions and Recommendations of the HIA Alternative development options were explored within the HIA, including the retention and integration of the buildings. However, this option was determined to not be feasible due to the substantial cost of completing the necessary repairs and upgrades in order to return the structures to stable and usable conditions. Relocation was also not recommended as there is no receiving location identified and the structures would not be good candidates for moving. As such, and due to the impact being deemed to be minor, demolition of the structures was identified as being the preferred approach. The HIA recommends that if demolition is to proceed, a documentation and salvage report be prepared. The purpose of this plan is twofold: the first intent is to record and document the known history, buildings, and structures identified as having cultural heritage value or interest on the subject property. The second intent is to identify historic materials that may be salvaged, reused, and/or interpreted in the proposed new development. The HIA identifies that the salvage and documentation report would also provide recommendations on the re -use of salvaged material as part of a commemorative feature within the planned community. The applicant will be attending the May 7, 2024 meeting of the Heritage Kitchener Committee to answer any questions or concerns. Heritage Planning Staff have reviewed the HIA and provided detailed comments to the application to address areas that require further assessment or discussion. At this time, Heritage Planning Staff are also seeking the Committee's input and comments. It should be noted that this HIA is still in its draft stage. A copy of the HIA has been included as Attachment A in this report. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. Page 8 of 688 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O 1990 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager of Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) — 2091 Bleams Road Page 9 of 688 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Prepared For: Ms. Amanda Knox c/o 539 Riverbend Drive Kitchener, ON Prepared By: MHBC Planning Ltd 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Kitchener ON Page 10 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bfeoms Rood, Kitchener Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Report Overview...............................................................................................................5 1.2 Structural Condition Assessment.................................................................................5 1.3 Subject Property Overview............................................................................................6 1.4 Heritage Status.................................................................................................................6 2.0 Proposed Development......................................................................................................8 3.0 Policy Context........................................................................................................................9 3.1 The Planning Act and PPS 2020...................................................................................9 3.2 Ontario Heritage Act.....................................................................................................10 3.3 Waterloo Region Official Plan.....................................................................................10 3.4 City of Kitchener Official Plan.......................................................................................11 3.5 Rosenberg Secondary Plan.........................................................................................12 4.0 Historical Background........................................................................................................14 4.1 Pre Contact......................................................................................................................14 4.2 Post Contact....................................................................................................................14 4.3 2091 Bleams Road..........................................................................................................15 5.0 Description of Subject Property.................................................................................20 5.1 General Overview..........................................................................................................20 5.2 Barn...................................................................................................................................20 5.3 Log House....................................................................................................................... 22 6.0 Evaluation of Heritage Value.......................................................................................... 26 6.1 Evaluation Criteria.........................................................................................................26 6.2 O.Reg 9/60 Evaluation.................................................................................................26 6.3 Summary of Heritage Value....................................................................................... 28 7.0 Impact Analysis................................................................................................................. 30 7.1 Assessment Criteria...................................................................................................... 30 February 2024 Page 11 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bfeoms Rood, Kitchener 7.2 Impact Assessment........................................................................................................31 7.3 Summary of Impact Assessment............................................................................... 32 8.0 Alternative Development Options and Mitigation Measures .......................... 33 8.1 Alternative Development Options............................................................................ 33 8.1.1 Do-nothing.................................................................................................................33 8.1.2 Adaptive Re -use and Integration......................................................................... 33 8.1.3 Re -locate Buildings.................................................................................................. 33 8.1.4 Demolition (proposed development).................................................................. 33 9.0 Conclusions and Recommendations............................................................................34 10.0 Sources.................................................................................................................................35 Appendix A — MTE Structural Condition Report..................................................................... 36 AppendixB — Chain of Title...........................................................................................................37 February 2024 Page 12 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleoms Road, Kitchener Project Personnel Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, CAHP Gillian Smith, MSc, RPP February 2024 Managing Director of Cultural Heritage Heritage Planner Senior Review Research and Author Page 13 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Executive Summary MHBC Planning Ltd., was retained to complete a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the property addressed as 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener. The property contains a two storey log house as well as a one storey frame barn, both of which are proposed to be removed in order to accommodate a plan of subdivision and road widening. The property is not listed or designated on the Municipal Heritage Register, however, it is recognized in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan as a cultural heritage resource. The policies of the Rosenberg Secondary Plan require the completion of a HIA for development on or adjacent to a cultural heritage resource. This HIA includes a heritage evaluation of the subject property and assesses whether the proposed demolition will result in impacts to identified heritage attributes. This report has also considered alternative development options. This report concludes that the property meets one criteria of Ontario Regulation 9/06. Specifically, the log house is considered early for its construction date of 1858, and the log house and barn are considered rare since few barn and log houses remain within the City of Kitchener. The impact assessment concludes that the proposed demolition will result in a negligeable impact to the property. While the property meets one criterion associated with physical value, the condition of both the barn and house has been assessed by a structural engineer. Conclusions of the Structural Engineering Report (MTE, 2023) conclude that both buildings are in poor condition. Given the poor condition of the buildings, they have lost their heritage integrity and are not representative of their original forms. Their removal is therefore negligible. Alternative development options have been explored. The recommended development option is to proceed as proposed. Proceeding without development will result in the worsening of the condition of the buildings and continued safety hazards. Retaining the buildings is not recommended as the required repairs and reconstruction necessary to restore the buildings would likely far surpass their value. Relocating the buildings is not feasible given that no receiving location has been identified, and the structures are not likely to withstand relocation given their poor condition. Therefore, proceeding as proposed is the most feasible option. Prior to removal of the structures, a documentation report is recommended to support the historic record of the property and provide a comprehensive overview of the property. February 2024 Page 14 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 1.01ntroduction 1.1 Report Overview MHBC Planning Limited has been retained to undertake a heritage impact assessment for the property located at 2091 Bleams Road, City of Kitchener. The property contains a house and accessory barn. Both buildings are proposed for demolition in order to accommodate a plan of subdivision. The property is recognized by the City as a heritage resource as it is identified in the Southwest Community Master Plan. Cultural Heritage Background Study (2010) and subsequently identified on Map 22b Rosenberg Secondary Plan Cultural Heritage Resources. The City requires an HIA for any development proposed either on a heritage property or adjacent. This HIA has been prepared in accordance with the Kitchener Official Plan heritage policies. The purpose of this HIA is to determine if the property is of heritage value or interest and assess whether the proposed removal of the buildings will cause adverse impacts to identified heritage attributes. This report also considers alternative development options and provides mitigation measures, as necessary. The property has not been in use and the existing buildings have been vacant for a number of years. Despite efforts to keep vandals out of the buildings, they have been degraded by vandalism. 1.2 Structural Condition Assessment MTE prepared a Structural Condition Assessment, included as Appendix A. The report concludes that the barn has some significant structural deficiencies. The roof of the barn is currently supported by exterior cladding only. The floor is missing in several locations, which poses a safety hazard for falling through openings. The foundation is parging and poorly connected at corners with missing bracing at the top. While the frame of the barn is level, there is insufficient support, and the wood is deteriorated. Due to missing cladding, the barn is exposed to weathered elements and trespassing. The Structural Condition Assessment concludes that the dwelling is constructed of wood logs, some of which are rotting. Several doors and windows are missing which expose the wood and interior of the dwelling to weather and trespassing. There is mortar deterioration and there are gaps between the foundation and windows and doors, which leads to further exposure to weather and trespassing. Some of the logs are unbraced and are unsupported. February 2024 Page 15 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Given the observations of the report, the structural engineer identifies the barn as an immediate hazard and the potential for collapse in a severe wind event. Similarly, while the dwelling does not pose an immediate danger to individuals and remains in fair structural condition, the condition of the stone foundation and weathered wood is of concern. The cost to repair and return both the barn and the dwelling to a usable condition would far exceed the value of the buildings. The structural engineer therefore recommends that both structures be removed. 1.3 Subject Property Overview The subject property is addressed as 2091 Bleams Road, legally described as Part Lot 133 German Company Tract. It has a lot area of 2.88 acres with approximately 145 metres of frontage on Bleams Road. The property is near the municipal boundary of the City of Kitchener and Wilmot Township, east of Trussler Road, west of Gehl Place, and south of Bleams Road. The subject property is within the Rosenberg community area, within the urban area of Kitchener. The Official Plan designates the subject property as 'Neighbourhood Area' and 'Low Density Residential one' in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan. The property is surrounded by the former gravel pit on the east, west, and south sides. North of the property is low density residential development. Figure 1: Aerial image of subject property a 2091 Bleams Road (Google Earth, 2023) 1.4 Heritage Status To confirm the presence of cultural heritage resources which have been previously identified, several databases were consulted. These databases include the City of February 2024 Page 16 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register, the Ontario Heritage Act Register (Ontario Heritage Trust), and the Canadian Register of Historic Places (CRHP). The property is not included in any of these databases and is therefore not considered a Protected Heritage Property under the Provincial Policy Statement ("PPS"). The subject property has been identified as a cultural heritage resource in the Southwest Community Master Plan: Cultural Heritage Background Study (2010) and identified on Map 22b Rosenberg Secondary Plan Cultural Heritage Resources. The property has been identified by the City as a potential heritage resource. When the Southwest Community Cultural Heritage Background Study was prepared in 2010 the subject property was one of several properties that were being considered for listing on the City of Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register, and a Statement of Significance was prepared for the subject property. It was ultimately determined by City Council that the property would not be listed on the Municipal Heritage Register. C Leaend Cultural Heritage Resources 0 1111111-11 Rd GCT PI Lt 133 Farmstead including lag house i'n 8ie Vernacular arcutedural style and a barn © 1885 Gleams Rd Plan 1469 U 5 Former Willilamsburg School Fbuse bui8 in the Georgian architedural style (1864) 0 1255-1291 FIs Cher Hallman Rd Plan 1469 PI Lt 2 2 storeyyellow bnck building buill In [heItalianate vultedural style (1867 o[ra) Q 1883 Huron Rd GCT PI Lt 153, 5SR-2566 Pt 2 1 112 storey brick building built in lh Omni, Gothic archilectural style (1881 -a) © 1540 F! cher Hallman Rd GCT PI Lis 158-160 1 111 storey stone building bull to the Vlclonan GOimo -111e 11ral style (1870 GfCa) Secondary Plan Boundary • Figure 2: (property 1) 2091 Bleams Rd identified as a heritage resource in the Official Plan (excerpt of Map 22b Rosenberg Secondary Plan, City of Kitchener) February 2024 Page 17 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 2.OProposed Development The subject property is identified in the Kitchener Official Plan as within the Rosenberg Community Secondary Plan. Rosenberg is a complete community designed to be a five minute walking community connected to surrounding neighbourhoods. Rosenberg is bounded by Trussler Road to the west, Bleams Road to the north, extending south to Huron Road, and east towards Fisher Hallman Road. The overall land use plan for the Secondary Plan includes a range of densities and uses. The subject property is designated in the Rosenberg Secondary Plan Land Use Plan as 'Low Density Residential One'. Permitted land uses include low density residential such as single detached, semi-detached, duplex, and townhouse dwellings, with a net density of 10 to 25 units per hectare. There is no current development plan for the property, however, it is expected that future development will be consistent with the applicable land use policies of 'Low Density Residential One' forming part of the broader community development. The Rosenberg community is actively undergoing significant growth and development. Additionally, the Region of Waterloo is planning to reconstruct Bleams Road between Trussler Road and Fischer Hallman Road. The road improvements include widening Bleams Road, extending raised medians, adding roundabouts, left -turn and right -turn lanes, multi -use trails and new curbs along with street lighting. The road widening will apply to the subject property as the Region looks to extend the road right-of-way onto a portion of the subject property. Given the location of the barn adjacent to Bleams Road, it will be need to be removed in order to accommodate the road widening. The road improvements are required as part of the planned development of the Rosenberg community. Construction is expected to start in 2024. February 2024 Page 18 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 3.OPolicy Context 3.1 The Planning Act and PPS 2020 The Planning Act is provincial legislation that guides land use planning in Ontario. It makes a number of provisions respecting cultural heritage. In Section 2, The Act outlines 18 spheres of provincial interest that must be considered by appropriate authorities in the planning process. One of the intentions of the Planning Act is to "encourage the co-operation and co-ordination among the various interests". Regarding cultural heritage, Subsection 2(d) of the Act provides that: "The Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Municipal Board, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, ..." (d) the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest; The Planning Act therefore provides for the overall broad consideration of cultural heritage resources through the land use planning process. The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) was issued under Section 3 of the Planning Act and came into effect May 1, 2020. The PPS is "intended to be read in its entirety and the relevant policy areas are to be applied in each situation". When addressing cultural heritage planning, the PPS provides for the following: 2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. 2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved. 2.6.5 Planning authorities shall engage with Indigenous communities and consider their interests when identifying, protecting and managing cultural heritage and archaeological resources. The following definitions are provided in Section 6.0 of the PPS and outline key terms that are valuable in the overall evaluation of cultural heritage resources: Significant.' In regard to cultural heritage and archaeology, resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes and criteria February 2024 Page 19 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener for determining cultural heritage value or interest are established by the Province under the Ontario Heritage Act. Heritage attributes' means the principal features or elements that contribute to a protected heritage property's cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the 45 1 Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 property's built, constructed, or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual setting (e.g. significant views or vistas to or from a protected heritage property) - Built Heritage Resource.- means a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured or constructed part or remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Indigenous community. Built heritage resources that are located on a property that may be designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or that may be included on local, provincial, federal and/or international registers. Protected Heritage Property- means a property designated under Parts IV, V or VI of the Ontario Heritage Act; a property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts 11 or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; a property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; a property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites. 3.2 Ontario Heritage Act The Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O, 1990, c.0.18 remains the guiding legislation for the conservation of significant cultural heritage resources in Ontario. The cultural heritage evaluation contained in this report has been guided by the criteria provided with Regulation 9/06 of the Ontario Heritage Act that outlines the mechanism for determining cultural heritage value or interest. 3.3 Waterloo Region Official Plan Chapter 3 of the Regional Official Plan provides policies on Cultural Heritage. The Region in tandem with the Area Municipalities will conserve and identify cultural heritage resources. Relevant policies applicable to this proposal include: • The Region and Area Municipalities will ensure that cultural heritage resources are conserved. • Area Municipalities will identify cultural heritage resources by establishing and maintaining a register of properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest. Area Municipalities will include on their register properties designated under Part February 2024 Page 20 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener IV, V or VI of the Heritage Act, and will consider including, but not be limited to, the following additional cultural heritage resources of cultural heritage value or interest* a) properties that have heritage conservation easements or covenants registered against title; b) cultural heritage resources of Regional interest; and c) cultural heritage resources identified by the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Federal or Provincial governments. • Area Municipalities will establish policies in their official plans to require the submission of a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment in support of a proposed development that includes or is adjacent to a designated property, or includes a non -designated resource of cultural heritage value or interest listed on the Municipal Heritage Register. • Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments may be scoped or waived bythe Region or the Area Municipality as applicable. 3.4 City of Kitchener Official Pan Part C, Section 12 provides policies on Cultural Heritage Resources. It is the objective of the City to conserve cultural heritage resources and their heritage values, attributes and integrity, to ensure that all development is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources, and to increase public awareness and appreciation for cultural heritage resources. The Official Plan sets out a number of policies surrounding the identification and conservation of heritage resources and the function of the Municipal Heritage Committee. Section 12 of the Official Plan provides the policies that are specific to cultural heritage resources. Relevant policies to this HIA include: 12.C.13 The City will develop, prioritize and maintain a list of cultural heritage resources which will include the following: a) properties listed as non -designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register; b) properties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act; c) cultural heritage landscapes; and, heritage corridors. The list may also include cultural heritage resources identified in Federal, Provincial and Regional inventories and properties listed on the Heritage Kitchener Inventory of Historic Buildings until such time as these properties are re-evaluated and considered for listing on the Municipal Heritage Register. February 2024 Page 21 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 12.C.1.21. All development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use designations and other policies of this Plan will conserve Kitchener's significant cultural heritage resources. The conservation of significant cultural heritage resources will be a requirement and/or condition in the processing and approval of applications submitted under the Planning Act. 12.C.1.23 The City will require the submission of a Heritage Impact Assessment and/or Heritage Conservation Plan for development, redevelopment and site alteration that has the potential to impact a cultural heritage resource and is proposed: a) on or adjacent to a protected heritage property b) on or adjacent to a heritage corridor C) on properties listed as non -designated of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register d) on or adjacent to an identified cultural heritage landscape. 12.C.1.27. Any conclusions and recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment and Heritage Conservation Plan approved by the City will be incorporated as mitigative and/or conservation measures into the plans for development or redevelopment and into the requirements and conditions of approval of any application submitted under the Planning Act. 3.5 Rosenberg Secondary Plan Under the City of Kitchener Official Plan are a number of Secondary Plans that apply to area communities. The subject property is located within the Rosenberg Secondary Plan, which is a planned community on former aggregate lands. The Secondary Plan outlines heritage resources on Map 22b (refer to figure 2), and provides cultural heritage policies in section 13.10.2.7 of Part 3 Section 13. Objectives of cultural heritage is to appropriately conserve cultural heritage resources and ensure that all development is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources. Applicable policies include: 1. Cultural heritage resources identified in the Southwest Community Master Plan: Cultural Heritage Background Study and shown n Map 22b will be conserved. 2. Development on or adjacent to a cultural heritage resource will require a HIA to be completed in accordance with the City of Kitchener HIA Terms of Reference and will recommend an appropriate conservation strategy for cultural heritage resources. 3. Development on or adjacent to a cultural heritage resource will require a Conservation Plan (CP). February 2024 Page 22 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 4. The City may require a conservation easement to ensure longterm conservation of a cultural heritage resource. The City will ensure that new neighbourhoods are designed and planned to ensure that views and vistas of Kitchener's significant cultural heritage resources are created, maintained and enhanced where appropriate. February 2024 Page 23 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 4.10Historical Background 4.1 Pre Contact The Pre -Contact settlement of the province can be divided into 4 main time periods including Paleolithic, Archaic, Woodland, and Historic. The first Paleo-Indians residing in the province were found between 13,000 and 9,000 years ago. The Paleo period was characterized by a hunter -gatherer society following big game. Archaic Peoples could be found approximately 3,000 to 9,000 years before present (Hamilton AMP, 2016). Their cultures were primarily based by stone, bone, shell, and copper tools. By the Woodland period (3,000 to 400 B.P.), pottery, horticulture and more sedentary lifestyles (such as villages) were common (Hamilton AMP, 2016). The Historic Euro -Canadian period did not begin until the late 1700s. During the American Revolution (1775-1783), the Haudenosaunee (Six Nations) allied with the British. To compensate the Haudenosaunee for their alliance, the governor of Quebec granted them a tract of land on either side of the Grand River, known as the Haldimand Tract. The City of Kitchener is situated on the Haldimand Tract. 4.2 Post Contact Following the American Revolution United Empire Loyalists began migrating north to Ontario (Mackenzie, 2008). The Loyalists, in search of lands to settle, started to displace many of the Indigenous Peoples who lived along the shorelines of Lake Ontario and along the Grand River (Filice, 2020). The subject property is located in the former Township of Waterloo, which was Block 2 of the German Company Tract. In 1798 the Crown sold Block 2 to Richard Beasley, a Loyalist from New York who had arrived in Canada in 1777 (Fraser). Block 2 was then surveyed and further subdivided. At this time, German Mennonite farmers from Pennsylvania were scouting farmland in the area. Several of them went back to Pennsylvania and returned with their families the following year to buy and settle the land (Hayes 5, 1997). As a result, the surrounding area was heavily populated by Mennonite farmers. February 2024 Page 24 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener BLOCK NUMBER TWO LWATI RLOO TOWNS111P7 I SEPT 1805 r � ~ 1 ✓4'r �.1 81 t e Figure 3: German Tract Company Block 2 c. 1805 (University of Waterloo) 4.3 2091 Bleams Road The subject property is in the former Township of Waterloo, described as lot 133 of the German Company Tract (block 2). The property formed part of the Crown grant of block 2 that was sold to Richard Beasly in 1798. In 1805 Beasley sold 60,000 acres of Block 2 to Daniel and Jacob Erb, who sold 83 acres to Christian Eby, a Mennonite farmer from Pennsylvania. Christian Eby's son, Benjamin Eby inherited the property in 1829, and sold it to John Eby and Jacob Brubacher. In 1841, John and Jacob sold the 83 acres back to Benjamin. Eight years later in 1849, Benjamin sold the 83 acres to William Woods. Woods subdivided the 83 acres in 1855, selling 30 acres to Jacob Woelfle, who sold to George Gross, who then sold to Conrad Siebert in 1858. The 1861 Tremaine Map shows the lot as occupied by Conrad Siebert. February 2024 Page 25 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 0 � � 4 v lot.. Figure 4: 1861 Tremaine Map of Waterloo County (City of Waterloo Open Data Content, arcgis.com) It is likely that the log house was constructed by Conrad in 1858. An earlier date of construction is possible, however, given the ownership history, it likely that the property was cultivated farmland used by the Eby family. When the property was sold and divided, Conrad likely constructed the dwelling for his family. Conrad Siebert (1814- 1872) was a German immigrant. He is listed on the 1851 and 1871 census as a farmer living in Wilmot Township. His wife is listed as Florina Siebert. Conrad died in 1872, and his wife Florina inherited the property. She remained the owner until 1876 when she sold it to the Schneller family. In 1905 Abraham Schneller sold to Jacob Heimpel, who owned the property until 1948. The current 288 acres was a result of a severance in 1986. The original use of the property was as agricultural. The 1946 aerial photograph of the subject property shows the farm complex. The agricultural use of the property continued until the late 20th century when aggregate extraction of the area began. February 2024 Page 26 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Figure 5: Aerial of subject property c. 1946 (University of Waterloo) The surrounding area became a center for gravel pit and aggregate extraction starting in the 1970's. The subject property was excluded from the aggregate extraction, which surrounded the subject property. Topographic maps, illustrated in figures 6 and 8, show the growth of surrounding aggregate operations. Figure 6: Topographic map c. 1938 (Department of National Defence) February 2024 Page 27 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 BIeams Road, Kitchener Figure 7: Topographic Map c. 1969 showing development of gravel pits (Department of Energy, Mines and Resources) Figure 8: Topographic Map c. 1976 showing development of gravel pits (Department of Energy, Mines and Resources) February 2024 Page 28 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 BIeams Road, Kitchener The subject property was never included in aggregate use and was severed from the remainder of the lot in 1986. The balance of lot 133 was used as a sand and gravel pit owned by Kieswetter Holdings. Figure 9 is an aerial image from 2005 which shows the abutting lands as an active sand and gravel pit. By this time the subject property was no longer in agricultural use and remained as residential. — � a �- 2091.. or 4r ff *,W le Figure 9: Aerial photograph of property in 1997 showing residential use. The property also contains significant outdoor storage (City of Kitchener Open Data) Figure 10: aerial image of lot 133 in 2005, showing abutting gravel pit (Google, 2023) February 2024 Page 29 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 5.ODescription of Subject Property 5.1 General Overview The property located at 2091 Bleams Road is occupied with two structures, a barn with silo and a farmhouse. The barn is located immediately adjacent to Bleams Road, with the house setback and to the rear of the barn. The landscape of the property consists of vegetation in the form of shrubs and trees. There is a slight tree line along the property boundary creating a distinction between the aggregate use and the property. Access to the property is provided via a grassed over driveway from Bleams Road. Figure 11: current condition of subject property (Google, 2023) 5.2 Barn The barn located on the property is oriented to Bleams road with minimal setback from the roadway. The barn has a gable roof and stone foundation. Attached to the barn is a silo, as well as a rear addition. The barn has not been in use for some time and has been noted in the Structural Condition Assessment (MTE, 2023) as being in poor condition, posing an immediate safety hazard. The date of construction of the barn is unknown. Considering the location of the barn adjacent to the roadway, the fieldstone February 2024 Page 30 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener foundation, and early agricultural cultivation of the property it is estimated that the original barn was built in the Mid to late 1800's. It may be that the earliest section of the barn was constructed in the mid 1800's at the same time as the house. The silo is constructed of concrete and likely dates from the early 20th century. February 2024 Page 31 of 688 Figure 12: Aerial photo, green dashed line indicates original gabled barn, blue dashed line indicates rear addition (Google, 2023) Figure 13: North elevation (front facade), view is taken from Bleam Road (Google, 2023) Figure 14: South elevation (rear fagade), view is _.. taken from rear of barn on subject property. South wall is missing on rear addition portion (MTE, 2023) February 2024 Page 31 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener ` Figure 15: West elevation (side facade), view is _ taken from west side of property. West wall boards on missing on original barn portion (MTE, 2023) Figure 16: Fieldstone foundation along the west elevation (MHBC, 2023) 5.3 Log House The house is located to the rear of the barn with a setback of approximately 36 metres to the road frontage. The house is of log construction, and two storeys in height with a side gable roofline. The house was built in three phases. The original log component was constructed around 1858 and is comprised of the west half. The original log home was built using hand-hewn logs which are joined together using the dovetail joinery technique. Between the logs is the original mortar. An addition was constructed also of log construction, comprising the east half, however, a specific date of the addition is unknown. The logs used for the addition are milled, suggesting that the addition was constructed closer to the 20th century. The house was clad in white aluminum siding in the late 201h century, which was removed in 2010. In the 1990's, a second storey was added to the one storey addition, constructed of woodframe. February 2024 Page 32 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener February 2024 Page 33 of 688 Figure 17: Aerial view of the house. Green dashed line indicates original log house, blue dashed line indicates later additions k (Google, 2023) _s . , Figure 18: View of north elevation (front facade) a .;. with exterior aluminum cladding (Tausky, 2010). Original dwelling is noted in green, i y addition is noted in blue. The date of the photo is unknown, however, it predates the 1990 second storey addition. Figure 19: ell" � View of north elevation (front facade) in �� �Y .tea,-• � ,_ ,. 2010 showing removal of aluminum cladding and second storey addition "= added (Tausky, 2010). Original dwelling noted in green, additions are noted in tir.. .z blue. Figure 20: A North elevation (front facade), view is taken from Bleams Road (Google, 2023). Y.. Original dwelling is noted in green, later _ _ 4 � L additions are noted in blue. February 2024 Page 33 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener Figure 21: South elevation (rear facade), view is taken from the back of the house (MTE, 2023). Original dwelling noted in green, later additions noted in blue. Figure 22: North elevation (front facade), view is close up of the later additions. Construction materials include logs at first storey and wood framing at second storey (MTE, 2023) Figure 23: Original log house (west elevation) showing original logs and mortar (M H BC). February 2024 Page 34 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener February 2024 Page 35 of 688 Figure 24: Close-up of the original logs and mortar comprising the original portion of the log house (MHBC). Figure 25: Interior photograph of the original hand- hewn timber (MHBC). c k _ Figure 26: Interior photograph of the original logs and mortar (MHBC). _ i February 2024 Page 35 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 6.0 Evaluation of Heritage Value 6.1 Evaluation Criteria The following section of this report will provide an analysis of the cultural heritage value of the subject property as per Ontario Regulation 9/06, which is the legislated criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest. This criterion is related to design/physical, historical/associative and historical values as follows: 1. Is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method, 2. Displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit, or 3. Demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. Has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community, 5. Yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture, or 6. Demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. Is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area, B. Is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings, or 9. Is a landmark. 6.2 O.Reg 9/60 Evaluation The property, including all structures and its landscape have been evaluated for heritage value consistent with the prescribed criteria. The evaluation chart is included in at the end of this section, with an analysis contained below. I 15a rare, unique, representative or ear/y example ofa style, type, expression, material or construction method The property contains a log house constructed in 1858. The log house is considered early given that it pre -dates confederation. The log house and barn are also both considered rare examples of their respective forms and building constructions. There are few remaining barns found within the City of Kitchener, and given the context of the surrounding urban environment, the subject barn is considered rare. Similarly, there are few known log houses within the City of Kitchener. The February 2024 Page 36 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener uncommon log construction of the house is considered rare for the surrounding area. The property therefore meets this criteria. 2. Displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit The buildings are not considered unique, as it demonstrates typical building methods and construction methods of this early form of construction.The dwelling and barn are simple representations of the log house and bank barn styles and do not display a high degree of artistic merit or design beyond that which could be expected for their simple styles. The property does not meet this criteria. 3. Demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement The structures do not demonstrate a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. Both structures are constructed in typical/representative construction methods. The property does not meet this criteria. 4. Has direct associations with a theme, event belief, person, act/v/tyl organization or institution that is significant to a community The property does not have a significant association. The structures were not inhabited by an individual significant to the community and were not used by or associated with a significant theme, event or organization. The property does not meet this criteria. 5. Yle/ds® or has the potentia/ to yie/d information that contributes to an understanding of community or culture Information related to the property has been realized and does not contribute to the understanding of a community or culture. The property does not have the potential to yield further information that would be significant to the community. The property does not meet this criteria. 6. Demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect® artist bur/der designer or theorist who is significant to a community Information related to the architect and builder are unknown, but should be added to the historic record should this information be made available. Notwithstanding that it is unlikely that the property contains the work of significant individuals. The property does not meet this criteria. 7 /s important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area The surrounding area has evolved from its original agricultural context. The mid to late 20th century saw the evolution of the area as a hub of aggregate activity. The aggregate uses of the surrounding area have mostly ceased, with existing and planned community development. The historic agricultural context has not been February 2024 Page 37 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 BIeams Road, Kitchener maintained, and the property is no longer capable of or representative of an agricultural use. Given the evolution of the context and lack of a cohesive historical context, there is no character area for the property to support. The property does not define, maintain, or support the surrounding context. The property does not meet this criteria. 8. is physically, functionally, visually or historical�v linked to its surroundings The property does not have a physical, functional, visual or historical association to the surrounding area. The remaining structures consisting of the barn and house are not linked to the property or broader surroundings. The property does not meet this criteria. 9. Is a landmark The property is not considered a landmark and does not meet this criteria. 6.3 Summary of Heritage Value The subject property meets one of the heritage evaluation criteria, being that the property contains early and rare structures. The log house is estimated to have been constructed in 1856, which is considered early for the context of Ontario as this pre- dates confederation (1867). Additionally, both the barn and log house are rare. There are few remaining barns within the context of the City of Kitchener, and there are scarce known remaining log houses. Therefore, the log house and barn are also considered rare. Due to the loss of integrity and poor condition of the structures, lack of significant associative value, and evolving context of the area, the property does not meet the remaining criteria. February 2024 Page 38 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener February 2024 Page 39 of 688 On lafio Regulation 9106 1. Rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction Yes. method 2. Displays high degree of craftsmanship or artistic No. merit 3. Demonstrates high degree of technical or scientific No. achievement 4. Direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization, institution that is No. significant 5. Yields, or has potential to yield information that contributes to an understanding of a community No. or culture 6. Demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer, or theorist who is No. significant to the community. 7. Important in defining, maintaining or supporting No. the character of an area 8. Physically, functionally, visually, or historically No. linked to its surroundings 9. Is a landmark No. February 2024 Page 39 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 7.01mpact Analysis 7.1 Assessment Criteria The impacts of a proposed development or change to a cultural heritage resource may be direct or indirect. They may occur over a short term or long-term duration, and may occur during a pre -construction phase, construction phase or post -construction phase. Impacts to a cultural heritage resource may also be site specific or widespread, and may have low, moderate or high levels of physical impact. The Ontario Heritage Toolkit Infosheet #5 outlines criteria for assessing impacts on heritage attributes. This criteria considers the following- - Destruction or alteration: of any, or part of any significant heritage attributes or features that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and appearance; - Shadows: created that alter the appearance of a heritage attribute or change the viability of a natural feature or plantings, such as a garden; - Isolation: of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment, context or a significant relationship; - Direct or Indirect Obstruction: of significant views or vistas within, from, or of built and natural features; - A change in land use: such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to residential use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly open spaces; - Land disturbances: such as a change in grade that alters soils, and drainage patterns that adversely affect a cultural heritage resource. This report utilizes guides published by the International Council on Monuments and Site (ICOMOS), Council of UNESCO, from the World Heritage Convention of January of 2011. The grading of impact is based on "Guide to Assessing Magnitude of Impact" as a framework for this report. The level of impact is classified as one of the following- - Potential/negligeable: slight changes to historic building elements or setting that hardly affect it. - None: no change - Minor: change to key historic elements such that the asset is slightly different - Moderate: Change to many key historic building elements, such that the resource is significantly modified. February 2024 Page 40 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener - Major: Change to key historic building elements that contribute to the cultural heritage value or interest (CHVI) such that the resource is totally altered. Comprehensive changes to the setting. 7.2 Impact Assessment The heritage evaluation contained in section 6.0 of this report concludes that the subject property is of cultural heritage value. The heritage value is related to criterion 1 as the property contains early and rare examples of construction in the context of the surrounding area. Therefore, impacts to this heritage value are required to be assessed. The following chart assesses the proposed removal of these buildings on the identified heritage value of the property. Criteria.. Destruction / alteration of Minor The proposal includes the removal of the heritage attributes buildings, which have been identified as heritage resources given their early and rare construction. However, both structures have been assessed for their structural stability. It has been concluded that both structures are in poor condition with many altered, damaged and missing components. The poor condition of both structures has led to a loss of heritage integrity. Neither structure is a good candidate for conservation given their poor condition and lack of heritage integrity. The removal of the structures is therefore minor. Shadows NA This is not applicable as the buildings will be removed. No abutting heritage resources have been identified. Isolation NA This is not applicable as the buildings will be removed. No abutting heritage resources have been identified. Direct or Indirect NA No significant views have been identified of Obstruction of Views the subject property. A Change in Land Use NA The residential use of the property does not have a relationship to the surrounding area. The surrounding area is evolving to accommodate a variety of use, densities, and February 2024 Page 41 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 7.3 Summary of Impact Assessment The onset of this report provided an overview of the Structural Condition Assessment completed by MTE. The MTE report concluded that the condition of both the barn and house has been compromised. Due to the level of deterioration, the specialists do not recommend retention of the structures. The two buildings are in poor condition, which has led to a loss of heritage integrity. Neither the barn nor the house is reflective of their original form. The property meets one of the evaluation criteria on a technicality, being that the remnant structures are early and rare. However, the structures do not accurately represent their original forms and have suffered such that the heritage integrity has been lost. Therefore, the impact of removal is negligible as the property does not have heritage integrity. February 2024 Page 42 of 688 styles. Developing the lands as a subdivision will not result in adverse impacts related to a change in land use. Land Disturbance NA This is not applicable as the buildings will be removed. No abutting heritage resources have been identified. 7.3 Summary of Impact Assessment The onset of this report provided an overview of the Structural Condition Assessment completed by MTE. The MTE report concluded that the condition of both the barn and house has been compromised. Due to the level of deterioration, the specialists do not recommend retention of the structures. The two buildings are in poor condition, which has led to a loss of heritage integrity. Neither the barn nor the house is reflective of their original form. The property meets one of the evaluation criteria on a technicality, being that the remnant structures are early and rare. However, the structures do not accurately represent their original forms and have suffered such that the heritage integrity has been lost. Therefore, the impact of removal is negligible as the property does not have heritage integrity. February 2024 Page 42 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 8.OAlternative Development Options and Mitigation Measures 8.1 Alternative Development Options 8.1.1 Do-nothing The do nothing alternative would result in leaving the remaining buildings on site in their current condition. As identified in the MTE technical report, both buildings are in poor condition. Leaving the property as is would lead to continued deterioration and pose safety hazards. This is not a preferred option and is not recommended. 8.1.2 Adaptive Re -use and Integration This option would result in the rehabilitation of the buildings. This option would result in the restoration, and ongoing maintenance over the long-term, which complies with the conservation goals for heritage properties. However, as described in section 1.1, the MTE study has concluded that retention and repair is not recommended for either building. The repairs and upgrades needed are substantial. The cost to upgrade the buildings would far exceed the value of the buildings. Therefore, while this option would result in retention, it is not a feasible option. 8.1.3 Re -locate Buildings This option involves moving the buildings to a new suitable location. This option is only suitable when there is an appropriate location available to receive the buildings. There are no known receiving sites that are suitable for the buildings. Further, the structural condition of the buildings precludes relocation. Therefore, this option is not recommended. 8.1.4 Demolition (proposed development) The demolition option would result in the removal of the buildings and future development proceeding. As noted in the impact assessment, removal of the buildings would result in a minor impact considering the poor condition and lack of heritage integrity. February 2024 Page 43 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 9.00onclusions and Recommendations The report has evaluated the subject property for heritage value, consistent with Ontario Regulation 9/06, and assessed for impacts on heritage value as a result of the proposed removal of the buildings. The heritage evaluation has determined that the property has heritage value, vested in the early and rare log house and barn that remain on-site. However, it has been concluded by MTE structural engineers that both the barn and log house are in poor condition and are not viable candidates for retention given their current condition. The heritage impact assessment has concluded that the impact of removal will be minor. The property's heritage value is vested in the physical presence of the buildings, however, the poor condition of the buildings demonstrates a loss of heritage integrity. The buildings do not effectively represent their original form and are not good candidates for retention given the level of alteration and damage. Therefore, removal of the buildings is minor given that the heritage value has been compromised. Alternative development options have been explored. No redevelopment of the property would result in the structures remaining and their condition worsening, posing significant safety hazards to the public. Therefore, this option is not recommended. The option of retention and re -use was assessed in the Structural Condition Assessment (MTE, 2023), however, it was concluded that the cost to upgrade the budlings to a safe condition would surpass the value of the structures. This option is therefore not recommended. The option of re -location has similar conclusions, as no receiving site is known and the structures would not withstand relocation. The option of proceeding as planned is the most feasible option. It is recommended that if demolition proceeds, that a documentation and salvage report be prepared. The intent of which is to comprehensively document the property, including interior and exterior photographs, as built drawings, and elevation drawings. The report would also provide recommendations on the salvaging of building materials, such as the original logs, and their re -use as part of a commemorative feature within the planned community. February 2024 Page 44 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener 10.0 Sources Canada. Department of Agriculture, 1851 Census of Wilmot Township, Waterloo, Ontario (1851, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Library and Archives Canada, n.d.) City of Waterloo Open Data. Web Mapping Application, Arcgis.com. https-//www.arcg is.com/home/item.html?id=4ef3e6a00eec46709el4face9c4390 69 Department of National Defence. Stratford, Ontario Map Sheet, 1938. Government of Canada. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. Waterloo -Kitchener, Ontario Map 1969. Government of Canada. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources. Waterloo -Kitchener, Ontario Map 1976. Government of Canada. Fraser, R. Richard Beasley General Bibliography. Dictionary of Canadian Bibliography, vol 7. University of Toronto/University of Lval. 1988. Filice, M. Haldimand Proclamation. The Canadian Encyclopedia. 10 Nov 2020. Geospatial Centre. Digital Historical Air Photos of Wilmot Township. Photo: IMB15. Aerial Photographs, satellite and orthoimagery, University of Waterloo. Google. 2091 Bleams Road, City of Kitchener. Online web mapping. Mackenzie, A. A short History of the United Empire Loyalists. United Empire Loyalists Association of Canada. 2008. Ontario Ministry of Tourism Culture and Sport. Ontario Heritage Act Ontario Heritage Act 2005, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0.18 . Retrieved from the Government of Ontario website: https-//www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90ol8. Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Ontario Heritage Tool Kit: Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, InfoSheet #5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans Queens Printer for Ontario, 2006. Ontario Ministry of Affairs and Housing. Ontario Provincial Policy Statement 2020. S.3 the Ontario Planning Act R.S.O 1996. Retrieved from the Government of Ontario website: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page2lS.aspx Structural Condition Assessment. MTE. November 2023. Tausky, N. Appendix A: Statement of Significance. City of Kitchener. August 2010. Waterloo Region Generations. 2091 Bleams Road. Retrieved from https-//generations.regionofwaterloo.ca/getperson.php?personlD=156&tree=Pr operties1 Wilson, B. Loyalists in Canada. The Canadian Encyclopedia. 12 Aug 2021. February 2024 Page 45 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bfeoms Rood, Kitchener Appendix A — MTE Structural Condition Report February 2024 Page 46 of 688 OrhMTEMTE Consultants 520 Bingemans Centre Drive, Kitchener, Ontario IV213 3X4 October 31, 2023 MTE File No.: C54246-100 Ms. Amanda Knox c/o Paul E. Grespan B.A., LL.B., LL.M. (L.S.E.) Lawyer/Director McCarter Grespan Beynon Weir Professional Corporation 539 Riverbend Drive Kitchener, ON N2K 3S3 Sent by Email: pgrespan@mgbwlaw.com Dear Ms. Knox: RE: Barn and Farmhouse — Structural Condition Assessment 2091 Bleams Road, Kitchener, Ontario At your request Paul Slater, P.Eng. of MTE Consultants Inc. conducted a visual structural condition assessment of the barn and farmhouse on September 27, 2023 at the above noted address. This letter report presents our observations related to the structure of the buildings such as damaged structural members and connections, loose floorboards or open floor conditions, deteriorated foundation elements, and missing cladding. Given the nature of the findings, there are safety concerns for those entering the buildings whether legitimate occupants, visitors or trespassers. Photographs are appended to this letter report that illustrate the structural condition. Observations Barn The structural condition of the barn varies throughout with some deficiencies that are of a significant nature. The structural frame of the barn, comprised of posts and beams with knee braces, is generally plumb and level in most of the front section adjacent to Bleams Road (Photograph 1). However, there are several members of the frame elsewhere that are missing or have compromised connections (see Photographs 2 & 3). The knee brace in Photograph 2 for example is poorly connected to the beam and the roof support post is altogether missing in Photograph 4. The roof is relying presently on support from the exterior cladding. The floor is unguarded in many locations and as such there is a danger of occupants falling at the edge or through openings in the floor (Photographs 2,3,5,8,9,10). The concrete foundation wall shown in Photographs 3, 4 and 5 is badly deteriorated, cracked, poorly connected at corners, and lacks lateral bracing at the top. Engineers, Scientists, Surveyors. Page 47 of 688 Ms. Amanda Knox October 30, 2023 The barn framing shown in Photograph 7 shows worn, deteriorated wood conditions with several open or loose connections. Exterior cladding is missing or damaged; also shown in Photograph 10. The sagging of the west wall of the barn (Photograph 11) indicates structural distress and insufficient structural support. Exterior wall cladding is missing to varying degrees throughout the barn, leading to rain and snow infiltration accelerating the deterioration of interior structural elements (Photograph 12). Many of these areas provide easy access points for trespassers. The stone foundation wall pictured in Photograph 12 is generally true and plumb but has several cracks and stones missing (Photograph 13). Exterior barn boards are cracked or missing in many areas and present a risk of people falling out (-8' drop) to grade below (Photographs 6 and 10). Farmhouse The farmhouse structure is generally in fair to poor condition with walls and floors typically plumb and level, respectively (Photograph 14). The exterior cladding and log structure is exposed, weathered and has some instances of wood rot (Photograph 15). The bottom log of the wall shown in Photographs 17 and 18 is completely rotted through the center. Debris and loose materials are scattered throughout and around the exterior. Windows and doors are missing allowing snow and rain to enter the interior. Vines growing on the roof will contribute to moisture infiltration and damage to roofing (Photograph 14). The stone foundation wall supports the exterior perimeter walls as well as the single interior wall. Mortar deterioration was observed on the interior around the stone (Photograph 19). The stone foundation wall has several window wells as well as a full height door opening (boarded up). These openings are not completely sealed and permit water infiltration and rodents into the building. The support post at the bottom of the stair to the basement is loose without connection to the floor beam (Photograph 21). The upper story wall logs shown in Photograph 22 are unbraced at an interior doorway (abandoned). These logs should be supported by stud framing to prevent lateral dislodgement. The building appears to have been built in two sections: west and east portions. Without historical knowledge, it is speculated that the west half was constructed first with larger rough hewn logs, mortar, and dovetail joinery at corners; while the east portion constructed second with smaller dressed lumber, and simpler corner joinery. Discussion The structural condition of the barn is poor and presents an immediate danger and risk to trespassers or those entering the building, due primarily to the fall hazard. Furthermore, there is potential for partial collapse given a significant wind event. Addressing the structural deficiencies noted above related to the framing, connections, foundation walls, cladding and MTE Consultants I C54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn and Farmhouse Structural Condition Assessment Page 48 of 688 Ms. Amanda Knox October 30, 2023 floorboards will take significant effort and expense. It is the opinion of the author that the cost associated to upgrade the building to a usable and safe standard is not commensurate with the value of the building. The farmhouse does not have indications or symptoms of structural distress and there is no immediate threat of collapse. However, considering the condition of the stone foundation walls and weathered wood structure, the undersigned does not recommend any significant financial investment in the restoration of the building using the existing structure. Rather, it is recommended to demolish the building. Recommendations We recommend that, at a minimum, all doors, windows and other openings that could provide potential access be boarded up to prevent anyone accessing the buildings until the future of the barn or farmhouse are decided. If the farmhouse building is to remain, all vegetation and soil contact with the roof or wood portions should be removed from the building. Ultimately, it is recommended that both the barn and the farmhouse be demolished. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Yours truly, MTE Consultants Inc. DRAFT Paul Slater, P.Eng. Division Manager, Building Structures 519-743-6500 Ext. 1240 pslater(a)mte85.com PAS: jmm Attach MA54246\100\54246-100_Ltr Rpt 2091 Bleams Barn Assessment_ 2023-10-31.docx MTE Consultants I C54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn and Farmhouse Structural Condition Assessment Page 49 of 688 Ms. Amanda Knox October 30, 2023 Limitations This report has been prepared by MTE Consultants Inc. (MTE) at the request of McCarter Grespan Beynon Weir Professional Corporation. The material in it reflects the best judgment of MTE in light of the information available at the time of preparation. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. MTE accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. This assessment does not wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for existing or future costs, hazards or losses in connection with a property. No physical or destructive testing and no design calculations have been performed unless specifically recorded. Conditions existing but not recorded were not apparent given the level of study undertaken. We can perform further investigation on items of concern if so required. Only the specific information identified has been reviewed. The consultant is not obligated to identify mistakes or insufficiencies in the information obtained from the various sources or to verify the accuracy of the information. The Consultant may use such specific information obtained in performing its services and is entitled to rely upon the accuracy and completeness thereof. Responsibility for detection of or advice about pollutants, contaminants or hazardous materials is not included in our mandate. In the event the Consultant or any other party encounters any hazardous or toxic materials, or should it become known to the Consultant that such materials may be present on or about the jobsite or any adjacent areas that may affect the performance of the Consultant's services, the Consultant may, at its option and without liability for consequential or any other damages, suspend performance of its services under this Agreement until the Client retains appropriates consultants to identify and abate or remove the hazardous or toxic materials and warrants that the jobsite is in full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Budget figures are our opinion of a probable current dollar value of the work and are provided for approximate budget purposes only. Accurate figures can only be obtained by establishing a scope of work and receiving quotes from suitable contractors. Any time frame given for undertaking work represents an educated guess based on apparent conditions existing at the time of our report. Failure of the item, or the optimum repair/replacement process, may vary from our estimate. We accept no responsibility for any decisions made or actions taken as a result of this report unless we are specifically advised of and participate in such action, in which case our responsibility will be as agreed to at that time. Any user of this report specifically denies any right to claims against the Consultant, Sub -Consultants, their Officers, Agents and Employees in excess of the fee paid for professional services. MTE Consultants I C54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn and Farmhouse Structural Condition Assessment Page 50 of 688 014MTE Barn Photos Page 51 of 688 Photograph No. 1 - Missing Wall Cladding, Interior Framing Exposure to Elements Photograph No. 2 - Compromised Brace Connection, Unsafe Open Floor MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 1 S 0 0 QQ _S r 0 cQ % 11 A. - a 4 w _ WO 77 Photograph No. 3 - Unguarded Edge of Floor, Deteriorated Concrete Foundation Wall Photograph No. 4 - Post Missing, Unsupported Roof Beam MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 2 v Photograph No. 5 — Unsafe Condition, Compromised and Deficient Bracing and Connection of Wall and Floor Framing Photograph No. 6 — Unguarded Area, Missing and Deteriorated Wall Boards MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 Page 54 of 688 Photograph No. 7 - Deteriorated Framing and Connections Photograph No. 8 - Unsafe and Unsecured Flooring MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 4 .r e!_I I ns 7 .,t Photograph No. 9 — Unsafe Floor; Unsecured Flooring Photograph No. 10 — South Elevation Wall Boards Missing MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 5 Photograph No. 11 — West Elevation; Building Sagging from Insufficient Support Photograph No. 12 —West Elevation; Wall Boards Missing MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 6 Photograph No. 13 - Stone Foundation Wall Deterioration MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 7 014MTE Farm House Photos Page 59 of 688 Photograph No. 14 - Overall Photo Of House Photograph No. 15 - Soil Pile Causing Rot of Wood Framing MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 8 Photograph No. 16 - Unprotected Exposed Wall - Deterioration Photograph No. 17 - Stair to Basement - Rot of Bottom Wall Log MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 9 Photograph No. 18 - Stair to Basement; rot of log (right) Photograph No. 19 - Basement Foundation Wall Mortar Deterioration MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 10 Photograph No. 20 - Foundation Wall Deterioration Open Window Well { a r -A Photograph No. 21 - Loose Disconnected Support Post MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 11 Photograph No. 22 — Upper Story Wall End Logs Unbraced (No Framing) Photograph No. 23 —Wall Joinery Indicates Staged Construction MTE Consultants 1 54246-100 1 2091 Bleams Road Barn Assessment I September 2023 12 Heritage Impact Assessment 2091 Bfeoms Rood, Kitchener Appendix 6 — Chain of Title February 2024 Page 65 of 688 co co 4- 0 N (3) 0 a �s 1i cr- U Q U Q C L 0 C c6 m (D O a) — E LO 00 u 4s a) a)(D e N N O 0 s a) u Q I I u 0 O v i 'p O co N N m M ca J c o 0 0 f6 >� Q a) Q m m m O z z ca a c m s m a) N O� m 00 O- 00 O O O O O O I 06 1 a) J J Z m m H - O u Q U CU CU CU a a H5 a a p (7 (7 = U c)E m m e m e C a) m rq m 0 -q +' m r' a Q Q 1O C7 o f 6 o = o m om W In In In cn a a m m rq en m m OU O O O Q Ln z Q z z Q z g m O 06 S U W S O S U S Q Q J J U Q W co N ceS LU u Q N z p p O z U m z S S U W O z V W J N LU J O W LU J W p a U O Q LU m p J Q Ln J_ N Ln N COLn r'I L 'L W> O W O m m p m a)) t m> �' m G_' W W W W m Q W a-+ � U aLn S co o 06 c m O LU m CO Om p cr- p cr- 0 4� Z O W L- QJ O O Ln Z Q Ln Q Q U Q~ Z Q W i U W S O S U W U J N _ J Q a W CO W Q Oz p } z z O U _ z v z = S U W 0 z L- Lnai U O W O J p a LU m O Q m V p C) LnJ 3: m �j > O W m> >J W m = = m i2 m = m p Q m {Sd J ! W W W W W Y *' U O N O O LO LO N LO F- 4, Owl 00 00 W W 00 00 00 W O ca � cI cI rI rI rI p 75 pp Q) �i ii cn ii ii E Q a) 0)0)O1 N N (o 0)o `� fC E � cI cI cI cI N O 00 U ,j >. O c c 0o 06 06 06 06 06 m O O c O0 r, -a O O O N E Q N 00 N ~ ru 00 cn cn cn cn cn cn LLJ N C7 a W p ca p ca c`o m c`o m c`o m c`o m c`o m c`o m J M m 6L 1-4 O rq D O Z N r -q m m o o ,n N r -i O � m m � � 00 00 rn co L- c m s fC — c� a co co 4- 0 N LU O Z N LU w Z Q Q LLI LLI W N N Z 2 2 O 00 Q� � LO Ol Ol C C I� N rl N 4� 4� C C `V WPC � � rn 00 m � H LU Q > Q � LU Q z a a W W cp Q Q � 2 2 O O c -I \ 00 Ol r -I C co H rn 110 00 rn 00 N Ol c -I c -I Z LU >2 LU O J O 2 H m Q m V O Q LU Q J J J J Cr W LU 2 m O z Q (D ~ W W Z z z z Lu W m N m O \ rn rn Ol r -I C co H 0 m Itt RT O U O vi � c6 Q Q LU Q i J Q Q z J JJ D Q U v� Y v� LU (7 O > LU c ( c6 QC s 4- m z s 4- m m 0 o J m m 0 0 J m m 41 J m m 0 J m m J C O U c m Z (7 � __j w 2 m Q p U z Q (n W w 06 06 m m m m 41 +, O O J J i i c6 c6 m m r -i y, O J i c6 06 m m 4. o J i c6 c6 O O O N I c6 O O O m I c6 O O O � I c6 O O O 00 � I c6 I oo p m l0 N C7 m 4� i co N N N N N N N N N O Q Q LO Q rl CO � LO Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N O O O O 00 00 00 00 00 O) W N co m 2 co 2 U U W O O LU O Z N LU w Z Q Q LLI LLI W N N Z 2 2 O 00 Q� � LO Ol Ol C C I� N rl N 4� 4� C C `V WPC � � rn 00 m � H LU Q > Q � LU Q z a a W W cp Q Q � 2 2 O O c -I \ 00 Ol r -I C co H rn 110 00 rn 00 N Ol c -I c -I Z LU >2 LU O J O 2 H m Q m V O Q LU Q J J J J Cr W LU 2 m O z Q (D ~ W W Z z z z Lu W m N m O \ rn rn Ol r -I C co H 0 m Itt RT O O vi � Q Q LU Q Q J Q Q z J JJ D Q U Q Y LU (7 O > LU c J � Z z co J LLA H Q Z (7 � __j w 2 m Q p U z Q (n W w N LU O L 2 2 O Z s Q J Z N N Q O O O W W W Q Q LO Q rl CO � 0000 w w w z 0) Ol z p w N0 w w = _ �_ 2 2 (7 W W N co m 2 co 2 U U W O O Q Q Q Z w w (7 (n cn cn cn 2 2 2 ?: 2 2 Z m LU O Z N LU w Z Q Q LLI LLI W N N Z 2 2 O 00 Q� � LO Ol Ol C C I� N rl N 4� 4� C C `V WPC � � rn 00 m � H LU Q > Q � LU Q z a a W W cp Q Q � 2 2 O O c -I \ 00 Ol r -I C co H rn 110 00 rn 00 N Ol c -I c -I Z LU >2 LU O J O 2 H m Q m V O Q LU Q J J J J Cr W LU 2 m O z Q (D ~ W W Z z z z Lu W m N m O \ rn rn Ol r -I C co H 0 m Itt RT O O vi LU LLA Q w Q Q z Cr O Q m m U c LU (7 Q 0 Q p O O Q J (Dd w J i w __j (n C W W d W O J W Z Z s O C N N v N m (7 2 LO LO rl n 0000 0000 00 00 00 0) Ol U i 4, i > i o O 2 z Q N N N O N 00 N rm-I i�-I c -I 0o 0o 0o 0o N N N N C C N N N N co co co co (D (7 m m m m ,n I m m M N O °' � � � � � rn r -I r -I m LU O Z N LU w Z Q Q LLI LLI W N N Z 2 2 O 00 Q� � LO Ol Ol C C I� N rl N 4� 4� C C `V WPC � � rn 00 m � H LU Q > Q � LU Q z a a W W cp Q Q � 2 2 O O c -I \ 00 Ol r -I C co H rn 110 00 rn 00 N Ol c -I c -I Z LU >2 LU O J O 2 H m Q m V O Q LU Q J J J J Cr W LU 2 m O z Q (D ~ W W Z z z z Lu W m N m O \ rn rn Ol r -I C co H 0 m Itt RT � / � E u \ 2 m / � f / / / G 5 .g E Q) 5 0 CL § 4- E 7 u 0 \ — C \/f LO \ i Q)0 C � f $ .g § m £ n o 00 ul � £ § m \ 0 ± Q) u \ / / LU G [ E - u Q) \ 0 r) \ / 0 / 2 c ro / e \ [ \ \ / § 3 f \ e .g » _ � : � Q) � E ± § n I } nM / 7 ) mro > } 0 2 i \®2 O & q c \ 3 .g .0 CO e \ \ # ~ - 2 'S O & $ _j & >LU \ / 1o @ u / _ § q q 2 \ c \ a � @ 0 § \ -a E ° & ro 7 2 E E 0 � 0 CL / / % 1 2 -0 u 2 / @ 20 / 2 6 m C ƒ '\ 7 Lu 0 e u RT m m S 0 m S ¢ 2 n 0- Staff Report r NJ :R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Deeksha Choudhry, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7602 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 3 DATE OF REPORT: April 4, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-193 SUBJECT: Hidden Valley Secondary Plan — Land Use Implementation Project Draft Heritage Impact Assessment RECOMMENDATION: For information BACKGROUND: The Development and Housing Approvals Division is in receipt of a draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by Archaeological Research Associates (ARA) Ltd. dated May 2023. The draft HIA was submitted to the City in 2023 and was requested as part of various technical studies being conducted to inform the Hidden Valley Secondary Plan. As part of the HIA, a specific portion of Hidden Valley Road was recommended to be evaluated to determine its cultural heritage value or interest and for it to potentially be considered as a "Heritage Corridor". Hidden Valley Road currently has no heritage status under the Ontario Heritage Act. It is not included on the Inventory of Historic Buildings, not listed as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the City's Municipal Heritage Register and is not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act. However, the Road has been identified as a rural road Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL) and has also been identified in the City's Official Plan as a potential cultural heritage resource. The draft HIA has concluded that Hidden Valley Road does have design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value. The HIA concluded that the entirety of Hidden Valley Road could be designated as a Heritage Corridor, or a portion of it could be designated as a Heritage Corridor. Staff will be moving forward with designating the north -south portion Hidden Valley Road as a "Heritage Corridor" in the Official Plan and recognizing the lower east -west portion of the Hidden Valley Road as a Cultural Heritage Landscape in the Official Plan. The "Heritage Corridor" is south of the proposed River Road realignment. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 69 of 688 The HIA is still in its draft form and has not yet been approved by the Director of Development and Housing Approvals. REPORT: Hidden Valley Secondary Plan Area The Hidden Valley Secondary Plan will replace the existing Residential Hidden Valley Community Plan and the Industrial Hidden Valley Community Plan to implement the Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan. The proposed Master Plan study area is approximately 200 hectares in size, bounded by the Grand River, Wabanaki Drive, Highway 8, and Fairway Road (Fig. 1). Figure 1. Boundary of the Hidden Valley Master Plan (Draft HIA, 2023) In general, the Master Plan proposed the development of: • Low rise residential estates; • Low rise residential detached dwellings on large lots; • Medium rise residential buildings; • High Rise residential apartments; • Mixed-use urban corridors; Page 70 of 688 • Commercial urban corridors; • Business Park for general and service employment opportunities; • Major infrastructure and utility for public uses; • Natural Heritage Conservation; and • Open Spaces The Master Plan also outlined that there might be impacts to Hidden Valley Road as The Region has decided on the revised River Road extension alignment and is proceeding with the design and construction phases. As a result, the existing Hidden Valley Road is proposed to be shortened and realigned into the River Road extension (Fig. 2). The Region has not started construction but anticipates it to take place between 2020-2027. It should be noted that the proposed Heritage Corridor is not included within this realignment and will begin just south of the realignment once it has been completed. There is also a potential Light Rail Transit Corridor that could be constructed through this area, affecting the northernmost part of the Hidden Valley Road. Figure 2. Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan. The proposed realignment (the dotted line) has been highlighted by the red box (City of Kitchener, 2019) To implement the Master Plan, a HIA was requested as part of a broad range of technical studies, to determine whether Hidden Valley Road has cultural heritage value, and what, if any, mitigation impacts should be implemented as part of this realignment. Page 71 of 688 .--r -- - Hidden Valley —d �. _� k Md'.3� * Ud' ResOeriael FrB1R 0 �`F a _ d - : Yur � NCiAkn9d LKpe .d Ian Rn4F�11r y /!L gh Fa ��9h Rx R�d m Whd U. AcanmKerr ® Bua.+rs GanrEmpnynrm ue,nn - Ha Mei .He'Ih�c Cauxf�•eten Cv- V_ Trc Pouryarw 6..1 In.ICA wi, uJic KK 11I4ny0 2s.4n9 $. I,q lo'ikWl Vii cnr7iK iaJ4Y iti• b 7 Scr+B riu ooumwc i:amw c• ww.ho V vx 9 'fn. aw Hurn V�ir.T 1 � - �� f •, aGmrPrnwq MSHnraer Hsns 1.i1� JFP NiFfK °lin P0.,MKy L,n�U N� p ..4•�. i •:�•���"�' , i.5 YW IOW.'i� WIImM SSMIR'YfI�SI'CWIbNfiy ' S�rmll.f .1i "'°'1 SiNrV�nnu Or�nmfrml Gnlre NX. 4• - - ; � � � 11W h , I dr -1�096d 3eYhkYl@ + , kr Irelw! ,emeu a,— _ N' Ca+51rob+0 Y: afG�� i 03ii l VA" Rosa F;—% 'am �..lyvl.le 1WiRor naK �CgmOor . '. s15TA Keary, L.M PKlM E,uarlp �PoGn6.l,:4vlk: ETwl.a...d_ WL*4 1l 11 H3 Jx. N. ]3'4 R,asla al Riwr qd aHnw�'Wiiw�k o�•ne �� 2 enF Hen mefel,alf+a 6e x!!•rn.nee Figure 2. Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan. The proposed realignment (the dotted line) has been highlighted by the red box (City of Kitchener, 2019) To implement the Master Plan, a HIA was requested as part of a broad range of technical studies, to determine whether Hidden Valley Road has cultural heritage value, and what, if any, mitigation impacts should be implemented as part of this realignment. Page 71 of 688 Hidden Valley Road Hidden Valley Road is a remnant of a road that ran from Freeport to the settlement of German Hills. Like many of the roads in Township of Waterloo, Hidden Valley Road was not laid out in a geometric concession, instead becoming part of an irregular network of roads developed to meet the needs of early local settlers in accessing villages, settlements, markets, and other farms. The surrounding area remained agricultural until recently when these has been residential development in the area. Today, it is a narrow two-lane road that runs in an irregular semi -circular loop through the Hidden Valley community in Kitchener (Fig. 3). The topography and setting of the area are described in the Master Plan as "The area is characterized primarily by rolling topography, including several agricultural fields, with large lot estate residential dwellings towards the river". It is a tertiary road that connects the community to the adjacent areas through Wabanaki Drive to the west. Some portions of the road have curbs and some portions do not. The road is situated within a rural setting with some portions of the it in a more residential setting. The area within the looped road mainly consists of hilly areas with walking trails, forested lands, and agricultural fields. Hidden Valley Road also contains a variety of building sizes and architectural styles with varying setbacks. Natural vegetation and mature tree canopy are visible for the entire corridor. The eastern portion of the road has direct views of the forested areas and agricultural fields. Figure 3. Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" (HIA, 2023) Page 72 of 688 Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road's Cultural Heritage Value An evaluation of Hidden Valley Road according to the Ontario Regulation 9/06 determined that the Road meets 3 out of 9 criteria, and is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values (Table 1). Eva$ ation of Property Description Value stawment s Midden Walby Road was cornst-ucted in the late 180ft The alignment of the road, along the Grand River, first appeared in the 1861 Tremaine's map of Waterloo County. The road assumed its current alignment, as a loop. The property has design value or sometime around 1916,28 seen in the Topographic maps. physical value because it is a rare, Since those times, while undergoing minor realignments, unique, representative, or early the road has serviced the Hidden Valley community as a example of a style, type, expression, local, irregular, road leap. The road is lined with mature material or construction methal_ trees and a variety of vegetation. These types of older roads can be related to the irregularly laid) rural roads observed as a characteristic of the City of Kitchener. They are not set according to fixed grids, which are now (,r)rnmon in urban areas. The property has design value or Hidden Valley Road does not display a high degree of physical value because it displaysa craftsmanship OF artistic value. It was constructed using high degree of craftsmanship or artistic common methods and materials for its construction merit. period. The property has design value or Hidden Valley Road does not display a high degree of physical value because it technical or scientifIc achievement. It was built using demonstrates a high degree of common construction techniques for its construction technical or scientific achievement. period. Hidden Dalley Road is part or a local road network that was laid out in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the The property has historical value or southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access associative value because it has direct adjacent farms, markets, other +villages, and mills in the associations with a theme, event, Freeport and German Mills areas. It formed part of the belief, person, activity, organization or Beasley's Old survey and is associated with the institution that is significant to a development of German Mills for agricultural purposes in community. the I 9m century, The road has a direct association with the development of rural areas in southern parts of the Township of Waterloo. The property has hiworical value or Hidden Valley Road contains some remnants along its associative value because it yields, or of rural life, but those do not yield or have the has the potential to yield, information hascontributes potential potential to yield information that contributes to the to an understanding of understanding of the rural community or culture. a cam munitor culture. Page 73 of 688 The property has historical value or associative value because it demonstrates or reflects the work or Hidden Valley Road does not reflect the work or ideas of ideas of an architect, artist, builder, a significant architect, builder, artist, designer, or theorist designer or theorist who is significant who is significant to the community_ to a communit _ Hidden Malley Road was laid to meet the needs of the early settlers to gain access to neighboring villages, The property has contextual value amenities, commerce, and such. Those rural because it is important in defining, characteristics of the Hidden valley Community have maintaining or supporting the character m m in since changed greatly from farmsteads to large estate area residential lots. A4lthough remnants of farm components and some agricultural fields are still found around the Hidden Valley Road, the basic character of the area has since evolved. Midden galley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and The property has contextual value rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such because it is physically, functionally, � follows the rise and fall of the lands. It provides scenic visually or historically linked its views to the agricultural fields throughout various portions surroundings. of the road, the Grand River to the east and forested areas to the north and southwest_ The property has contextual value Midden Valley Road, while actinq as a connector for the because it is a landmark_ Hidden Malley community, it is not geographically located in a prominerit spot to be considered a landmark. Table 1. Ont. Reg. 9/06 Evaluation for Hidden Valley Road (HIA, 2023) Statement of Cultural Heritage Value According to the HIA, Hidden Valley Road has physical value because it is a representative example of rural roads that were essential for the development of an area. Hidden Valley Road was constructed around the late 1800s. The alignment of the road, along the Grand River, first appeared in the 1861 Tremaine's map of Waterloo County. The road assumed its current alignment, as a loop, sometime around 1916, as seen on the Topographic maps. Since those times, while undergoing minor realignments, the road has serviced the Hidden Valley community as a local, irregular, road loop. The road is lined with mature trees and a variety of vegetation. These types of older roads are related to the irregularly laid rural roads observed as a characteristic of the City of Kitchener. They are not set according to fixed grids, which are now observed in most area. Hidden Valley Road has historical and associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, and activity, that is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills in the Freeport and German mills areas. It formed part of the Beasley's Old Survey and is associated with the development of German mills for agricultural purposes in the 19th century. The road has a direct association with the development of rural areas in southern parts of the Township of Waterloo. Hidden Valley Road has contextual value because it is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such follows the rise and fall of the lands. It provides scenic views of the agricultural fields to the west, the Grand River to the east and forested areas to the north and southwest. Page 74 of 688 Heritage Attributes Hidden Valley Road is a representative, example of a type of rural roads that were essential for the development of an area. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: • Narrow two-lane alignment • No shoulders • Variety of vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs • Irregular road loop Hidden Valley Road has direct associations with a theme, and activity, that is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills in the Freeport and German Mills areas. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: • Direct view to the L-shaped barn on the roadside • Remnants of farmsteads visible along the route • Views to agricultural fields, open space and natural vegetation Hidden Valley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such follows the rise and fall of the lands. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect these values: • Scenic views to the surrounding areas and the Grand River • Undulating topography Some of the landscape features of Hidden Valley Road identified by the HIA can be seen below, however, this table does not include all the features that have been identified (Table 2). Page 75 of 688 Features (Adapted Features from Region of of Hidden Waterloo Scenie Valley Description Photo Roads Data Sheet Road 2011 Diverse vegetation is found along the whole Hidden Valley Road. The north portion of the road, running parallel to Highway B, is lined with forested land and agricultural fields towards the south of the road. Towards the north of the road are shrubs. The natural vegetation along this portion of the road does not appear to be maintained. The growth is closer to the road edges (Image 1). The portion of Hidden Valley Road, being proposed as a 'heritage Image 1: North Portion of Road, Parallel to corridor'. has diverse vegetation along the route. Highway B The roadway is lined with cedars, mature weeping willows (November 9,2022: Facing Northwest) and other deciduous trees among others. Apart from bre "Jec}e[etiu-' Yes trees a variety of bushes and shrubs line the west side of the road along the agricultural fields (Image 2). On the east side of the road on the residential properties the trees are planted with a setback and trees are closer to the edcpe of the road on the side with the agricultural fields. This creates an - uninterrupted tine of sight for the winding road culminating in .,. rine-point perspective views across the adjacent fields. ; , nom• The southern portion of Hidden Valley Road from Hidden Valley Creek to Wabanki Drive. contains a landscaped grassed area towards the north of the road and on the south';� Is a tree -lined sidewalk (Image 3). Most of the trees found on this portion are deciduous trees, a mage 2: East Portion of Road. Proposed as a "Heritage Corridor" Novernber 9,2022: Facing Southeast} Image 5: South Portion of Road, From Hidden Valley Crook November 9.2022; Facing East) I t ` r For the whole Hidden Valley Road, portions of the road follow the natural slope of the undulating terrain. It follows the n .n; t " ` 'jr •�, - 4 LandfonnfRa€ief Yes in the hilly areas and turns following the landscape lin - Ty 6J_ These ridges and valleys torn vistas and viewpoints to s ' the adjacent landscape. linage 6:Natural Hilly Terrain November 9,202 2: Facin q North Page 76 of 688 Table 2. Some identified landscape features of Hidden Valley Road (HIA, 2022). Potential Impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the Proposed Development The impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the proposed development have been summarized in the table below (Table 3): Type of Negative Impact Applicable? (YINThe Comments proposed development includes thea realignment of portions of Hidden Valley Road and the Destruction of any, or part of any, Y incvrpnration of a partion of the road into the River significant heritage attributes.. The road runs alongside the Grand River on the east with shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs may views to it (Image 7). It runs parallel to the Grand River up to be removed due to the proposed development. Yes Midden Valley Greek where the road bops back towards the from the cultural heritage values, Wabanaki Drive. Along the road smaller streams were also attributes, character or visual context o to large scale structures, a Commercial business observed that eventually Raw into the Grand River, park at the northern and southern intersections of construction of new buildings that are Y Hidden Valley Road and wabanaki Drive and incompatible in stale, massing, additional low rise residential — large lot_ These materials, height. building orientation or change's would alter the overall natural and open location relative to the heritage Image 7: View of Grand River on East Landscape of the area along the looped road, re$QUrGe- November 9.2022: Facina Southeast hadows created that anter the Hidden Valley Road contains remnants of struri - - y ' N shadows that would alter the appearance of a reflecting its historical use as a service road for famnstc:. heritage attribute_ or plantings, such as a garden. One such example is of a farmstead located at 691 Hioder- Cultural Built Yes Valley Road The bam visible at the road is an L -Shaped Environment bank bam with a gambrel roof. It has rubble stone toundadons with vertical wooden boards elevations (Image 8). Other such components also include wooden fences, ann boulders lined along the roadside in various places. Image 8:View of Adjacent Built Environment November 9,20221 Facing West Table 2. Some identified landscape features of Hidden Valley Road (HIA, 2022). Potential Impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the Proposed Development The impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the proposed development have been summarized in the table below (Table 3): Type of Negative Impact Applicable? (YINThe Comments proposed development includes thea realignment of portions of Hidden Valley Road and the Destruction of any, or part of any, Y incvrpnration of a partion of the road into the River significant heritage attributes.. Road extension.. The vegetatlon along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs may be removed due to the proposed development. Alterations to a property that detract from the cultural heritage values, The proposed new development introduces medium attributes, character or visual context o to large scale structures, a Commercial business a heritage resource; such as tha park at the northern and southern intersections of construction of new buildings that are Y Hidden Valley Road and wabanaki Drive and incompatible in stale, massing, additional low rise residential — large lot_ These materials, height. building orientation or change's would alter the overall natural and open location relative to the heritage Landscape of the area along the looped road, re$QUrGe- hadows created that anter the The proposed site alteration will not create any appearance of a heritage attribute or N shadows that would alter the appearance of a change the viability of a natural future heritage attribute_ or plantings, such as a garden. Page 77 of 688 Table 3. Impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the proposed development (HIA, 2023) Designation of Portions of Hidden Valley Road as a CHL and Heritage Corridor It was determined through the HIA that the entire portion of Hidden Valley Road could be designated as a heritage corridor. However, certain portions of Hidden Valley Road, especially the lower portion that runs east to west, has undergone many changes, and is proposed to undergo other infrastructural changes in the future. Keeping these changes in mind but also recognizing the overall cultural heritage value of Hidden Valley Road, it has been determined that the entirety of Hidden Valley Road will not be designated as a Heritage Corridor. Instead, the north -south portion of Hidden Valley Road will be designated as a Heritage Corridor, and the lower west -east portion of Hidden Valley Road will be recognized as a Cultural Heritage Landscape (. It should be noted that the designation of the north -south portion as a Heritage Corridor does not mean that the road is being designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, instead the heritage corridor will be recognized in the Official Plan, and any development on or adjacent to the corridor might trigger the need for certain technical studies, such as Corridor Enhancement Plans in case a development application has been submitted to ensure that the heritage attributes of Hidden Valley Road remain conserved. Page 78 of 688 The character of the road would be altered_ Isolation of a heritage attribute from its Proposed developme-t of potential high, medium surrounding environment, context or Y and low rise resldentia - ar-ge lot and potential significant relationship, communityfinstituticnal uses of lands will isolate portions of the corridor from the natural and open landsca s_ The proposal for the addition of new medium and high-rise buildings in the Master Plan towards and Direct or indirect obstruction of around Fairway Read and wabanaki Drive will result significant views ar vistas within, from, Y in direct substruction of views to the agricultural fields or of built and natural features. in the northern section of the road. Low rise residential - large lot development and potential community and institutional uses in ether portions of the corridor also may obstruct views. A ::hange in land use such as rezoning r, t attlefield from open space to The portion of the Hidden Malley Road In the norlh residential use, allowing new N will become Part of the River Road extension. As development or site alteration to fill in such, this portion will remain a road. the formerly open 5 aces. The proposed alterations Include the realignment of the Hidden Valley Road_ As Hidden V'alley Road follows its historic alignment. this activity may create land disturbance which may adversely affect unknown archaeological resources, ARA has Land such us r'S ch,'in ronducted a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment as grade that alters soils. and drainago part of the Oass EnvironmenrtalAssessment and patterns that adversely affect an Y Prelommary Design for Upper Hidden Valley Sanitary archaeowgical resource. Pumping station and Forcernaln. ARA determined there are areas of archaeological potential that require a Stage 2Archaeological Assessment and as such, an archaeological assessment is required prior to alterations to Hidden Valley Road as alterations could impact unidentified archaeological sites. Table 3. Impacts to Hidden Valley Road due to the proposed development (HIA, 2023) Designation of Portions of Hidden Valley Road as a CHL and Heritage Corridor It was determined through the HIA that the entire portion of Hidden Valley Road could be designated as a heritage corridor. However, certain portions of Hidden Valley Road, especially the lower portion that runs east to west, has undergone many changes, and is proposed to undergo other infrastructural changes in the future. Keeping these changes in mind but also recognizing the overall cultural heritage value of Hidden Valley Road, it has been determined that the entirety of Hidden Valley Road will not be designated as a Heritage Corridor. Instead, the north -south portion of Hidden Valley Road will be designated as a Heritage Corridor, and the lower west -east portion of Hidden Valley Road will be recognized as a Cultural Heritage Landscape (. It should be noted that the designation of the north -south portion as a Heritage Corridor does not mean that the road is being designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, instead the heritage corridor will be recognized in the Official Plan, and any development on or adjacent to the corridor might trigger the need for certain technical studies, such as Corridor Enhancement Plans in case a development application has been submitted to ensure that the heritage attributes of Hidden Valley Road remain conserved. Page 78 of 688 Figure 4 orange). Proposed Heritage Corridor (highlighted in green) and CHL (highlighted in Potential Mitigation Measures for the Heritage Corridor and CHL The HIA proposed certain mitigation measures for the impacts that were identified as part of any future development to take place in the Hidden Valley Area. These measures include: - Design Considerations — That the design of any new development and structures be sympathetic to the cultural heritage value of the Road, and that minimize any impacts through appropriate height, massing, and architecture. - The requirement of a Landscape Plan for any new development, where appropriate to ensure that the natural and rural characteristics of the area remain conserved. - The requirement of a Corridor Enhancement Plan for any new development to reduce impacts to the cultural heritage value. Page 79 of 688 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2023 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager of Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) Page 80 of 688 1§ AMARA ARCHAEOLOGY I HERITAGE I OUTREACH I EDUCATION Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Cultural Heritage Landscape City of Kitchener Regional Municipality of Waterloo Geographic Township of Waterloo Former Waterloo County Prepared for Planning Division City of Kitchener Tel: (519) 741-2426 Email: Planning@kitchener.ca By Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 219-900 Guelph Street Kitchener, ON N21-1 5Z6 Tel: (519) 804-2291 Fax: (519) 286-0493 araheritage.ca HR -423-2022 ARA File # 2022-0259 26/05/2023 Page 81 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Report Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment Report, City of Kitchener EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Under a contract awarded in August 2022 by City of Kitchener, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. (ARA) carried out a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to support the review and replacement of the existing Residential Hidden Valley Community Plan and the Industrial Hidden Valley Community Plan. The City of Kitchener will replace existing Community Plans with a new Secondary Plan. The Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan (henceforth Master Plan) was approved in 2019 and in order to implement this Master Plan, a Secondary Plan and Supporting Technical Studies are required. This HIA is part of the various supporting technical studies being conducted to inform the Secondary Plan. A specific portion of Hidden Valley Road is recommended to be evaluated to determine its Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI) and for it to potentially be considered a "Heritage Corridor' (City of Kitchener 2019 2022). Hidden Valley Road runs in an irregular, semi -circular loop through the Hidden Valley community in the City of Kitchener. It is a tertiary road that connects the community to the adjacent areas through Wabanaki Drive located to the west. Hidden Valley Road has the Grand River to the east and agricultural properties/lands in the centre of the loop. The Heritage Impact Assessment Report approach included: • Background research concerning the project and historical context of the study area; • Consultation with City of Kitchener staff regarding heritage matters in the study area; • Identification of any designated or listed properties within and adjacent to the study area; • Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road against the criteria set out in Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by 569/22) for determining cultural heritage value or interest; • Evaluation of potential project impacts; and • Provision of suggested mitigation strategies for the future conservation of any portion of Hidden Valley Road. The Hidden Valley Road was evaluated against Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by 569/22) and was found to possess cultural heritage value or interest. The property was found to possess the following values: Hidden Valley Road is a representative example of rural roads that were essential for the development of an area. Hidden Valley Road was constructed around the late 1800s. The alignment of the road, along the Grand River, first appeared in the 1861 Tremaine's map of Waterloo County. The road assumed its current alignment, as a loop, sometime around 1916, as seen in the Topographic maps. Since those times, while undergoing minor realignments, the road has serviced the Hidden Valley community as a local, irregular, road loop. The road is lined with mature trees and a variety of vegetation. These types of older roads are related to the irregularly laid rural roads observed as a characteristic of the City of Kitchener. They are not set according to fixed grids, which are now observed in most urban areas. Hidden Valley Road has direct associations with a theme, and activity, that is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills Freeport and German Mills areas. It formed part of the Beasley's Old Survey and is associated with the development of German Mills for agricultural purposes in the 19th century. The road has a direct association with the development of rural areas in southern parts of the Township of Waterloo. April 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. HR -423-2022 ARA File #2fQ��269 Of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Hidden Valley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such follows the rise and fall of the lands. It provides scenic views of the agricultural fields to the west, the Grand River to the east and forested areas to the north and southwest. The new Master Plan for the Hidden Valley community has the potential to affect Hidden Valley Road. The potential for negative impacts is limited to: • The proposed development includes the realignment of Hidden Valley Road. This would result in an alteration of the road. • Construction of low, medium and high-rise buildings, commercial/business park, potential community and institutional development may remove vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs. • The new development introduces medium to large scale structures along the northern and southern intersections of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive; and low rise residential — large lot and potential community and institutional development in the eastern and southern portions of Hidden Valley Road. These changes would alter the overall natural and open landscape of the area along the looped road. • Proposed development of low, medium and high-rise buildings, commercial/ business park and potential community and institutional uses may isolate portions of the corridor from the natural and open landscape. • Views to the agricultural fields may be directly obstructed in some sections of Hidden Valley Road due to proposed development. As potential impacts were identified, mitigation measures were provided for the remaining portion of Hidden Valley Road as well as the portion to be the River Road extension and the "Heritage Corridor' segment. Mitigation measures include a landscape plan, design considerations and a corridor enhancement plan. As a result of this HIA, the following is recommended: • That a portion of Hidden Valley Road be designated as a "Heritage Corridor" in the Official Plan as it meets the OHA O. Reg. 9/06 (amended by 569/22) criteria. ARA recommends that the portion of Hidden Valley Road running from the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8 south and then west through to the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and River Valley Drive be considered for designation (Map 10); • That if City of Kitchener chooses to designate as above or a smaller portion of Hidden Valley Road, a Corridor Enhancement Plan could be developed that would be attached to the Secondary Plan along with this HIA. Other options include to implement the recommendations of this HIA include policies within the Official Plan and recommendations within a Landscape Plan. • That design considerations are developed to ensure the physical design of any proposed structures should not detract from the character of the area. Any new structures should be sympathetic to the surrounding area and minimize impacts through appropriate height, massing and architecture style. Policies addressing these considerations could be incorporated into Official Plan policies for Hidden Valley Secondary Plan; • A Landscape Plan be developed that could address potential vegetation removal would assist with reducing the visual impact of the development activities. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2W96Wff of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I MAPS IV FIGURES IV TABLES V IMAGES V APPENDICES V ABBREVIATIONS VI PERSONNEL VI 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT 1 2.0 LEGISLATION AND POLICY REVIEW 3 2.1 Federal Guidelines 3 2.2 Provincial Policies and Guidelines 3 2.2.1 Planning Act 3 2.2.2 The Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 3 2.2.3 Ontario Heritage Act 4 2.2.4 Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties 5 2.2.5 Ontario Heritage Tool Kit: Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process 5 2.3 Municipal Policies 5 2.3.1 Region of Waterloo Official Plan 5 2.3.2 Region of Waterloo Scenic Roads Evaluation Tools 6 2.3.3 City of Kitchener Official Plan 7 3.0 KEY CONCEPTS 10 4.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 11 4.1 Limitations 11 4.2 Settlement History 11 4.2.1 Pre -Contact 11 4.2.2 Post -Contact 12 4.2.3 German Mills 13 4.2.4 Settlement of Freeport 14 4.3 Study Area History 14 4.3.1 Mapping and Imagery Analysis 14 5.0 CONSULTATION 22 6.0 FIELD SURVEY 24 7.0 LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION 25 7.1 Contextual Surrounding 25 7.2 Hidden Valley Road Landscape Features 25 8.0 HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 31 8.1 Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road According to O. Reg. 9/06 31 8.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest 32 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR604 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener iv 8.2.1 Introduction and Description of Property 32 8.2.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value/Statement of Significance 32 8.2.3 Heritage Attributes 33 9.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 34 10.0 ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS 37 10.1 Impact Summary 38 11.0 "HERITAGE CORRIDOR" BOUNDARIES 40 11.1 Entire Hidden Valley Road 40 11.2 Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" 40 11.3 ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" 41 11.4 Summary of "Heritage Corridor' Boundaries 41 12.0 MITIGATION MEASURES 42 12.1 Design Considerations (Impact 3) 42 12.2 Landscape Plan (Impacts 2 - 4 and 5) 42 12.3 Protection as a "Heritage Corridor' (Impacts 1, 3 and 5) 42 12.4 Corridor Enhancement Plan (Impacts 1, 3 and 5) 42 13.0 SUMMARY AND CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS 43 14.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES 44 Appendix A: Maps and Images of Hidden Valley Road 48 Appendix B: Team Member Curriculum Vitae 58 MAPS Map 1: Study Area in the City of Kitchener 2 Map 2: G.R. and G.M. Tremaine's Tremaine's Map of the County of Waterloo, Canada West (186 1) 17 Map 3: Parsell and Co,'s Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo, Ontario (1881) 18 Map 4: Topographic Maps from 1916, 1923, 1929, 1936 19 Map 5: Aerial Image (1955) 20 Map 6: Aerial Image (1963) 21 Map 7: Hidden Valley Road Study Area with Photo Locations 48 Map 8: Hidden Valley Road CHL 49 Map 9: Hidden Valley Road Proposed "Heritage Corridor' 50 Map 10: ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" 51 Map 11: ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" with Significant Views 52 FIGURES Figure 1: Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan 36 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR609 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener v TABLES Table 1: Pre -Contact Settlement History 11 Table 2: Post -Contact Settlement History 12 Table 3: Hidden Valley Road Landscape Features 26 Table 4: Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road Using O. Reg. 9/06 31 Table 5: Impact Evaluation of Proposed Site Alteration 37 IMAGES Image 1: North Portion of Road, Parallel to Highway 8 26 Image 2:East Portion of Road, Proposed as a "Heritage Corridor' 26 Image 3: South Portion of Road, From Hidden Valley Creek 27 Image 4:East Portion of Road, Considered "Heritage Corridor' 27 Image 5: South Portion of Road, From Hidden Valley Creek 28 Image 6:Natural Hilly Terrain 28 Image 7:View of Grand River on East 29 Image 8:View of Adjacent Built Environment 29 Image 9:View of Natural Landscape 30 Image 10: View of the north Intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive 53 Image 11: View of North Portion of Hidden Valley Road 53 Image 12: View of Estimated Location of Realignment of Hidden Valley Road to River Road 54 Image 13: View of Hidden Valley Road Proposed as a "Heritage Corridor' 54 Image 14: View of Hidden Valley Creek 55 Image 15: View of South Portion of Hidden Valley Road 55 Image 16: View of Walking Trails Adjacent to Hidden Valley Road 56 Image 17: View of Agricultural Fields and Forested Area Adjacent to Hidden Valley Road 56 Image 18: View of the South Intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanki Drive 57 APPENDICES Appendix A: Maps and Images of Hidden Valley Road 48 Appendix B: Team Member Curriculum Vitae 58 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR609 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener ABBREVIATIONS ARA —Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. BHR — Built Heritage Resource CHL — Cultural Heritage Landscape CHVI — Cultural Heritage Value or Interest EA — Environmental Assessment MCM — Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism OHA — Ontario Heritage Act OHT — Ontario Heritage Trust OP — Official Plan O. Reg. — Ontario Regulation PPS — Provincial Policy Statement PERSONNEL Principal: P.J. Racher, MA, CAHP Heritage Operations Manager: J. McDermid, BA, CAHP Senior Review: K. Jonas Galvin, MA, RPP, MCIP, CAHP Project Manager. P. Young, MA, CAHP Field Survey: P. Young, S. Zia, B.Arch, Dip. Arch. Conservation Historical Research: R. Hendricks, MA Cartographer. M. Johnson (GIS) Technical Writers: P. Young, S. Zia Editor. D. Worby, MA vi Two-page Curriculum Vitae (CV) for key team members that demonstrate the qualifications and expertise necessary to perform cultural heritage work in Ontario are provide in Appendix B. CITY OF KITCHENER REPORT REQUIREMENTS CHART City of Kitchener Requirements (HIA ToR) Relevant ARA Section 1.0 Project Context 4.0 Historical Context Background & Documentation 6.0 Field Survey 7.0 Property Description Appendix A: Maps and Figures Appendix B: Subject Property Images 2.0 Legislation and Policy Review 5.0 Consultation Heritage Analysis 8.0 Heritage Assessment 9.0 Proposed Development 10.0 Analysis of Potential Im acts 10.0 Analysis of Potential Impacts Summary Statement and Conservation 11.0 Considered Alternatives Recommendations 12.0 Mitigation Measures 13.0 Summary and Conservation Recommendations Mandatory Recommendation 13.0 Summary and Conservation Recommendations Literature and References Cited Bibliography and Resources Qualifications and background of Appendix C: Key Team Member's CVs authors/personnel May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR60f of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT Under a contract awarded in August 2022 by City of Kitchener, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. (ARA) carried out a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to support the review and replacement of the existing Residential Hidden Valley Community Plan and the Industrial Hidden Valley Community Plan. The City of Kitchener will replace existing Community Plans with a new Secondary Plan. The Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan (henceforth Master Plan) was approved in 2019 and in order to implement this Master Plan, a Secondary Plan and Supporting Technical Studies are required. This HIA is part of the various supporting technical studies being conducted to inform the Secondary Plan. The proposed Master Plan study area is approximately 200 ha in size and bounded by Highway 8, the Grand River, Wabanaki Drive and Fairway Road in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Bechtel's Tract, Geographic Township of Waterloo (Map 1). Various studies in the City of Kitchener have identified Hidden Valley Road as possessing Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI), these include: In 1994, a Kitchener Scenic Road study. In 2014, the City of Kitchener completed a Cultural Heritage Landscapes (CHL) study and subsequently a Data Sheet L -RD -4 for Hidden Valley Road was produced. The CHL Study identified Hidden Valley Road as having potential for CHVI as a cultural heritage resource or a "Heritage Corridor" within the City of Kitchener's Official Plan, Section 13.C.4. Hidden Valley Road was identified as an original pioneer rural road. In 2019, the Master Plan identified portion of Hidden Valley Road, from south of Hidden Valley Creek to the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8, as a potential "Heritage Corridor'. The portion that was identified as a "Heritage Corridor' is the portion that will remain after the River Road extension (City of Kitchener 2019:4). As the study area contains the entire Hidden Valley Road and as the road has been previously identified as having potential CHVI, ARA suggests that the entire Hidden Valley Road be examined as a potential "Heritage Corridor" (Map 8). To facilitate this examination, the following terms are used throughout this HIA: The study area encompasses the entire Master Plan lands (Map 1); Hidden Valley Road CHL (Map 8) — is the 2014 Cultural Heritage Landscape study CHL (L -RD -4); Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor' (Map 9) - the portion of Hidden Valley Road from south of Hidden Valley Creek to the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8 is recommended within the project RFP to be evaluated to determine its CHVI and for it to potentially be considered a "Heritage Corridor" (City of Kitchener 2019, 2022). This assessment was conducted in accordance with the aims of the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0. 18, Ontario Heritage Tool Kit series (MCM 2006a), the Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2015) and City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014), the Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan (2019) and Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference provided by City of Kitchener — Planning Division specific to this project. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR606 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener V, Map 1: Study Area in the City of Kitchener (Produced by ARA under licence using ArcGIS@ software by Esri, @ Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "2FR604 of 688 K t lle- h— Z s. J0 2.5 5 km a. Riau Hidden Valley Secondary Plan Study Area Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road CITY OF KITCHENER N REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOO1:25,000 Lot 6, Bechtels Tract mossommong�� Geographic Township of Waterloo 0 0.475 0.95km Former WATERLOO COUNTY se P Sources E— HERE. Garmin. Inlennap. increment P Cory,3E ECO U SGS FAO NPS. NRQAN Qea@aze IGN. Kada— ML, D -- S.,- E. J-,. METI. E- h— (—g —g) 0p,,5t—Map contributors. d ffi, GIS Hser Community Map 1: Study Area in the City of Kitchener (Produced by ARA under licence using ArcGIS@ software by Esri, @ Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "2FR604 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 3 2.0 LEGISLATION AND POLICY REVIEW The framework for this assessment report is provided by federal guidelines, provincial environmental and planning legislation, and policies as well as regional and local municipal Official Plans and guidelines. 2.1 Federal Guidelines At the national level, The Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Canada 2010) provides guidance for the preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration of historic places, including cultural heritage landscapes (CHLs) and built heritage resources (BHRs). Such guidance includes the planning and implementation of heritage conservation activities. With respect to CHLs, the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places define them as "any geographical area that has been modified, influenced or given special cultural meaning by people, and that has been formally recognized for its heritage value" (Parks Canada 2010:113). It identifies the three categories of cultural landscapes which are also contained within the UNESCO (2019) Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention: designed; organically evolved (vernacular); and associative. The Standards and Guidelines further outlines specific guidelines for cultural heritage landscapes, including 11 subsections on: "evidence of land use; evidence of traditional practices; land patterns; spatial organization; visual relationships; circulation; ecological features; vegetation; Iandforms; water features; and built features" (Parks Canada 2010:50). 2.2 Provincial Policies and Guidelines 2.2.1 Planning Act Section 2 of the Ontario Planning Act indicates that a council of a Municipality have regard for matters of provincial interest such as: "(d) the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest" (Government of Ontario 2018). Section 3 of the Planning Act directs a municipal Council's decisions to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2020). 2.2.2 The Provincial Policy Statement (2020) The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2020) contains a combined statement of the Province's land use planning policies. It provides the provincial government's policies on a range of land use planning issues including cultural heritage outlined. As outlined in Section 2.0 on Wise Use of and Management of Resources: "Ontario's long-term prosperity, environmental health, and social well- being depend on conserving biodiversity, protecting the health of the Great Lakes, and protecting natural heritage, water, agricultural, mineral and cultural heritage and archaeological resources for their economic, environmental and social benefits" (MMAH 2020:24). The PPS 2020 promotes the conservation of cultural heritage resources through detailed polices in Section 2.6, such as "2.6.1 Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved" and "2.6.3 Planning authorities shall not permit development and site alteration on adjacent lands to protected heritage property except where the proposed development and site alteration has been evaluated and it has been demonstrated that the heritage attributes of the protected heritage property will be conserved" (MMAH 2020:31). May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR606 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 4 2.2.3 Ontario Heritage Act The Ontario Heritage Act (OHA), R.S.O. 1990, c.018 is the guiding piece of provincial legislation for the conservation of significant cultural heritage resources in Ontario. The OHA gives provincial and municipalities governments the authority and power to conserve Ontario's heritage. The OHA has policies which address individual properties (Part IV), heritage districts (Part IV), and allows municipalities to create a register of non -designated properties which may have cultural heritage value or interest (Section 27). In order to objectively identify cultural heritage resources, O. Reg. 9/06 (as amended by O. Reg. 569/22) made under the OHA sets out nine criteria for determining CHVI (MCM 2006b:20-27). The criteria set out in the regulation were developed to identify and evaluate properties for designation under the OHA. Best practices in evaluating properties that are not yet protected employ O. Reg. 9/06 to determine if they have CHVI. In the absence of specific CHL evaluation criteria, potential CHLs are evaluated using the O. Reg 9/06. which is applied to consider the built and natural features of the property and also evaluate the area as a whole. The O. Reg. 9/06 criteria are as follows: 1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative, or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or physical value because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical value or associative value because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or associative value because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. The OHA provides three key tools for the conservation of built heritage resources (BHRs) and cultural heritage landscapes (CHLs). It allows for protection as: 1. A single property (i.e., farmstead, park, garden, estate, cemetery), a municipality can designate BHRs and CHLs as individual properties under Part IV of the OHA. 2. Multiple properties or a specific grouping of properties may be considered a CHL, as such, a municipality can designate the area as a Heritage Conservation District (HCD) under Part V of the OHA. 3. Lastly, a municipality has the authority to add an individual or grouping of non-OHA designated property(ies) (often called "listed" properties) of heritage value or interest on their Municipal Heritage Register. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2WR60T of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 5 An OHA designation provides the strongest heritage protection available for conserving cultural heritage resources. 2.2.4 Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties The MCM's Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (2007) provides statements on heritage conservation best practices. These statements form the ministry's position and are based on international charters and best practices. As with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, these principles are meant to guide changes to cultural heritage resources to ensure that cultural heritage value or interest is conserved. The statements are: 1. Respect for documentary evidence 2. Respect for original location 3. Respect for historic material 4. Respect for original fabric 5. Respect for the building's history 6. Reversibility 7. Legibility 8. Maintenance (MCM 2007). 2.2.5 Ontario Heritage Tool Kit: Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process MCM's Heritage Toolkit Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process, Information Sheet #2 Cultural Heritage Landscapes (2006c:1-2) defines CH Ls, similar to Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, with these definitions: Designed Cultural Landscapes — These are areas that are clearly defined and created intentionally by human design. They may include garden and parkland landscapes constructed for aesthetic reasons and may be associated with religious or monumental buildings. Evolved Cultural Landscapes — This type of landscape is often the result of a social, economic, administrative and/or religious motivation that has continued to develop into its present form due to associations with, or in response to, its natural environment. There are two sub -categories of this CHL type: o Relic Landscape — One in which an evolutionary process came to an end but its significant distinguishing features are still visible. o Continuing Landscape — One that retains associations with traditional practices but which retains an active social role in the current community while continuing to evolve and exhibit material evidence of this ongoing evolution. Associative Cultural Landscapes — These landscapes have religious, artistic, or cultural associations with nature rather than with material cultural evidence, which may be insignificant or absent (MCM InfoSheet #2:1-2). 2.3 Municipal Policies 2.3.1 Region of Waterloo Official Plan The Region of Waterloo Regional Official Plan 2051 Chapter 3 focuses on "Liveability in Waterloo." Section 3.G contains policies related specifically to cultural heritage in Waterloo Region. Policy 3.G.1 indicates that: "The Region and Area Municipalities will ensure that cultural May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2F96Wff of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 6 heritage resources are conserved using the provisions of the Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act..." (2022:48). Policy 3.G.3 states: Area Municipalities will identify cultural heritage resources by establishing and maintaining a register of properties that are of cultural heritage value or interest. Area Municipalities will include on their register properties designated under Part IV, V or VI of the Heritage Act, and will consider including, but not be limited to, the following additional cultural heritage resources of cultural heritage value or interest: (a) properties that have heritage conservation easements or covenants registered against title,- (b) itle,(b) cultural heritage resources of Regional interest, and (c) cultural heritage resources identified by the Grand River Conservation Authority and the Federal or Provincial governments (Region of Waterloo 2015:48-49). In Policy 3.G.4 the Region indicates it will also coordinate and maintain a "region -wide inventory of cultural heritage resources" which will include the resources noted above as well as resources identified by "postsecondary institutions or local historical societies" (Region of Waterloo 2022:49). Policies 3.G.5- 3.G.7 address cultural heritage landscape conservation (2022:49-51). CHLs are to be conserved through the preparation and updating of a Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation which will provide an identification and implementation framework and will allow for the highlighting of CHLs of Regional interest (Policy 3.G.5 Region of Waterloo 2014:49). Policy 3.G.6 further states: "Area Municipalities will designate Cultural Heritage Landscapes in their official plans and establish associated policies to conserve these areas. The purpose of this designation is to conserve groupings of cultural heritage resources..." (Region of Waterloo 2014:50). A study was completed in 2006, Cultural Heritage Landscapes in Waterloo Region: A Framework for Inventory (Scheinman & ENVision 2006), which provides historic themes within the Region to help identify landscapes and outlines candidate CHLs. Following this study, the Region of Waterloo issued the Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Landscape Conservation (2013, updated in 2018). As noted in the discussion above, this guideline outlines the process for identifying landscapes in the Region; specifically, that municipalities should develop a list of candidate CHLs, undertake public consultation, and create an inventory of CHLs and their heritage attributes. 2.3.2 Region of Waterloo Scenic Roads Evaluation Tools In 2010, Regional Council adopted the Context Sensitive Regional Transportation Design Guidelines (P-10-051). The document states, in section 4.4.5 Special Character Streets/Scenic Roads, that "Historic downtowns, heritage buildings, and natural spaces are some of the most valued assets of any community" and indicates that the design of Regional transportation corridors through such areas should reflect and protect the specific history and/or visual or natural character of each place (Region of Waterloo 2010:100). The Scenic Roads and Special Character Streets Resource Document is a supplement to the Context Sensitive Regional Transportation Design Guidelines (Brook Mclllroy 2013). With the support of the Heritage Planning Advisory Committee, it has been prepared by regional staff in Cultural Heritage, Transportation Planning, Transportation Engineering and Design and May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR60i of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 7 Construction, and is based on earlier research, existing technical documents and current best practices within the Region. The purpose of the Scenic Roads and Special Character Streets Resource Document is to: Identify Regional transportation corridors that are Scenic Roads or Special Character Streets...; and Provide a resource for Regional staff to assist with the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the sections of identified scenic corridors (Region of Waterloo 2011:1). The criteria used to describe a scenic road have been used to organize the landscape description in Section 7.0. 2.3.3 City of Kitchener Official Plan The City of Kitchener Official Plan outlines goals of the Official Plan (OP) which includes providing: ...a framework for the creation and maintenance of a safe and healthy urban environment within which opportunities are provided for people to satisfy their social, economic, cultural and physical needs and for maintaining and conserving the integrity of the natural and cultural heritage (City of Kitchener 2014:2-4). Section 12 of City of Kitchener Official Plan contains policies addressing cultural heritage resources. Within this section there are objectives for the conservation of cultural heritage resources including: 12. C. 1.1. To conserve the city's cultural heritage resources through their identification, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. 12. C.1.2. To ensure that all development or redevelopment and site alteration is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources are conserved. (2014:12-1). Cultural heritage resources are to be included in a list maintained by the City which is to include: a) properties listed as non -designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register,- b) egister,b) properties designated under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act; c) cultural heritage landscapes, and c) heritage corridors (Policy 12.C.1.3. City of Kitchener 2014:12-2). The City also acknowledges that all cultural heritage resources have not been identified and as such, Policy 12.C.1.4. provides for properties that are not "listed or designated to be considered as having cultural heritage value or interest" (2014:12-2). The protection of CHLs is outlined in policies 12.C.1.8. and 12.C.1.12. which provide for inventorying and listing of CHLs on the Municipal Heritage Register, their mapping and their conservation through legislation (2014:12-2-12-3). Beyond these policies the OP contains cultural heritage policies within Section 12 that address Heritage Conservation Districts; archaeology; conservation measures for cultural heritage resources; Heritage Impact Assessments and May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR604 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Heritage Conservation Plans; Heritage Permit application process; the demolition/damage of cultural heritage resources; public infrastructure; incentives; the role and resources of Kitchener including leading by example with the care and management of City -owned cultural heritage resources; and the design and integration of cultural heritage resources in the City. Section 13 of the OP entitled "Integrated Transportation System" focuses on the creation of "An integrated transportation system [which] is an essential part of the city's urban structure and a key element in shaping the form and character of growth in the city" (City of Kitchener 2014:13-1). A component of the integrated transportation system is the conservation of cultural heritage resources. Specifically, there are policies focusing on "Heritage Corridors" in which they are identified as a cultural heritage resource, mapped in the Official Plan and there are policies for their management and conservation (City of Kitchener 2014:13-13-13-16). The use of the Ontario Heritage Act as a tool to designate "Heritage Corridors" is highlighted in Policy 13.C.4.9, but the Policy also notes that "designation in the context of Policy 13.C.4.6 implies an overlay designation over the classification of the street or multi -use pathway and should not be interpreted as meaning designation under the Ontario Heritage Act" (City of Kitchener 2014:13-13). Additionally, Policy 13.C.4.15 states: the City will encourage the formulation and use of Community, Secondary and other Plans and special land use guidelines and development controls on and in the vicinity of Heritage Corridors to maintain the overall visual character of such streets and multi -use pathway and their functional operation (City of Kitchener 2014:13-14). Policy 13.C.4.18 lists seven streets that have been identified as having "potential cultural heritage value or interest to be considered a potential cultural heritage resource" and Hidden Valley Road is included in this list (2014:13-16). 2.3.4 City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (2014) The City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (2014) is a planning tool which provides a legislative framework and planning tools to guide and manage change within identified CHLs. One of the purposes of the CHL Study was to consider "large scale areas that express both the historical process of development and the physical outcomes of that process" (2014: 5). The Study resulted in the identification of 55 CHLs with the City of Kitchener. The CHLs are categorized within one of the following nine categories: • Residential Neighbourhoods • Parks, Natural Areas and other Public/Private Open Spaces • Transportation Corridors and Streetscapes • Institutional Landscapes • Commercial Industrial and Retail Landscapes. • Agricultural Landscapes • Large Lot Residential/Estate Landscapes • Cemeteries • Grand River Valley Landscapes Rural roads are described in the study as: These roads serviced and in some cases continue to service the farm and agricultural community in the southern part of the original Township of Waterloo. Many of these May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR609 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener are part of the random network of roads that connected the small rural hamlets that had agriculture service industries such as grist mills, flax mills and sawmills. Many of these roads have rural cross-sections with narrow shoulders, ditches, utility lines and few fences. Most traverse the natural topography of the glacial landforms without the interruption of major grading (City of Kitchener 2014:12). Al Under the category of "Transportation Corridors and Streetscapes" Hidden Valley Road has been identified as a rural road CHL (L -RD -4). 2.3.5 Summary of Policies The municipal Official Plans, guidance documents and studies recognize the significance of cultural heritage landscapes and heritage corridors within the City of Kitchener. This HIA will address these cultural heritage policies as it analyzes the potential heritage value of the Hidden Valley Road and its potential for designation as a "Heritage Corridor'. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2WR609 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 3.0 KEY CONCEPTS 10 The following concepts require clear definition in advance of the methodological overview and proper understanding is fundamental for any discussion pertaining to cultural heritage resources: Key Definitions from the MMAH/Province are as follows: Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI), also referred to as Heritage Value, is identified if a property meets one of the criteria outlined in O. Reg. 9/06 namely historic or associate value, design or physical value and/or contextual value. Provincial significance is defined under Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) O. Reg. 10/06. Built Heritage Resource (BHR) can be defined in the PPS as: "a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured or constructed part or remnant that contributes to a property's cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including Indigenous community. Built heritage resources are located on property that has been designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act, or that may be included on local, provincial and/or federal and/or international registers" (MMAH 2020:41). Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL) is defined in the PPS as: "a defined geographical area that may have been modified by human activity and is identified as having cultural heritage value or interest by a community, including an Aboriginal community. The area may involve features such as structures, spaces, archaeological sites or natural elements that are valued together for their interrelationship, meaning or association. Examples may include, but are not limited to, heritage conservation districts designated under the Ontario Heritage Act; villages, parks, gardens, battlefields, mainstreets and neighbourhoods, cemeteries, trailways, viewsheds, natural areas and industrial complexes of heritage significance; and areas recognized by federal or international designation authorities (e.g., a National Historic Site or District designation, or a UNESCO World Heritage Site)" (MMAH 2020:42). Conserved means "the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a conservation plan, archaeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment that has been approved, accepted or adopted by relevant planning authority and/or decision -makers. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments" (MMAH 2020:41). Heritage Attributes are defined as: "the principal features or elements that contribute to a protected heritage property's cultural heritage value or interest, and may include the property's built, constructed, or manufactured elements, as well as natural landforms, vegetation, water features, and its visual setting (e.g. significant views or vistas to or from a protected heritage property)." (MMAH 2020:44-45). Protected heritage property is defined as "property designated under Parts IV, V or VI of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement under Parts I I or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by the Province and prescribed public bodies as provincial heritage property under the Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal legislation, and UNESCO World Heritage Sites" (MMAH 2020:49). Significant in reference to cultural heritage is defined as: "resources that have been determined to have cultural heritage value or interest. Processes and criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest are established by the Province under the authority of the Ontario Heritage Act" (MMAH 2020:51). May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR60f of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 11 4.0 HISTORICAL CONTEXT The site history of study area was constructed using available background information obtained from aerial photographs, historical maps (i.e., illustrated atlases) and published secondary sources (online and print). 4.1 Limitations It should be noted that there is always the possibility that additional historical information exists but may not have been identified or accessible for review. 4.2 Settlement History The City of Kitchener and Waterloo County have a long history of settlement including pre -contact and post -contact Indigenous campsites and villages due to its productive riverside lands, as well as favorable farmland. The study area has strong associations with Indigenous communities, and the heritage resources considered in this report can be associated with both Pre -Contact and Post -Contact cultural developments. Accordingly, this historical context section spans the Pre - Contact Indigenous occupation history through Euro -Canadian settlement history to present. The early history of the study area can be effectively discussed in terms of major historical events. 4.2.1 Pre -Contact The Pre -Contact history of the region is lengthy and rich, and a variety of Indigenous groups inhabited the landscape. Archaeologists generally divide this vibrant history into three main periods: Palaeo, Archaic, and Woodland. Each of these periods comprise a range of discrete sub- periods characterized by identifiable trends in material culture and settlement patterns, which are used to interpret past lifeways. The principal characteristics of these sub -periods are summarized in Table 1. Table 1: Pre -Contact Settlement History (Wright 1972; Ellis and Ferris 1990; Warrick 2000; Munson and Jamieson 2013) Sub -Period Timeframe Characteristics Gainey, Barnes and Crowfield traditions; Small bands; Mobile hunters Early Palaeo 9000-8400 BC and gatherers; Utilization of seasonal resources and large territories; Fluted points Holcombe, Hi -Lo and Lanceolate biface traditions; Continuing mobility; Late Palaeo 8400-7500 BC Campsite/Way-Station sites; Smaller territories are utilized; Non -fluted points Side -notched, Corner -notched (Nettling, Thebes) and Bifurcate traditions; Early Archaic 7500-6000 BC Growing diversity of stone tool types; Heavy woodworking tools appear (e.g., ground stone axes and chisels Stemmed (Kirk, Stan ly/Neville), Brewerton Side- and Corner -Notched Middle Archaic 6000-2500 BC traditions; Reliance on local resources; Populations increasing; More ritual activities; Fully ground and polished tools; Net -sinkers common; Earliest copper tools Narrow Point (Lamoka), Broad Point (Genesee) and Small Point Late Archaic 2500-900 BC (Crawford Knoll) traditions; Less mobility; Use of fish -weirs; True cemeteries appear; Stone pipes emerge; Long-distance trade (marine shells andgalena) Meadowood tradition; Crude cord -roughened ceramics emerge; Early Woodland 900-400 BC Meadowood cache blades and side -notched points; Bands of up to 35 people May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR609 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 12 Sub -Period Timeframe Characteristics Saugeen tradition; Stamped ceramics appear; Saugeen projectile points; Middle Woodland 400 BC—AD Cobble spall scrapers; Seasonal settlements and resource utilization; Early Exploration 600 Post holes, hearths, middens, cemeteries and rectangular structures century identified Middle/Late Princess Point tradition; Cord roughening, impressed lines and punctate Woodland AD 600-900 designs on pottery; Adoption of maize horticulture at the western end of Transition Mid- to late Lake Ontario; Oval houses and 'incipient' longhouses; First palisades; and Conflict 17th century Villages with 75 people Late Woodland Glen Meyer tradition; Settled village -life based on agriculture; Small (Early) AD 900-1300 villages (0.4 ha) with 75-200 people and 4-5 longhouses; Semi- permanent settlements Late Woodland Uren and Middleport traditions; Classic longhouses emerge; Larger (Middle) AD 1300-1400 villages (1.2 ha) with up to 600 people; More permanent settlements (30 ears Pre -Contact Neutral tradition; Larger villages (1.7 ha); Examples up to 5 Late Woodland AD 1400-1600 ha with 2,500 people; Extensive croplands; Also hamlets, cabins, camps (Late) and cemeteries; Potential tribal units; Fur trade begins ca. 1580; European trade goods appear Although Iroquoian -speaking populations tended to leave a much more obvious mark on the archaeological record and are therefore emphasized in the Late Woodland entries above, it must be understood that Algonquian -speaking populations also represented a significant presence in southern Ontario. Due to the sustainability of their lifeways, archaeological evidence directly associated with the Anishinaabeg remains elusive, particularly when compared to sites associated with the more sedentary agriculturalists. Many artifact scatters in southern Ontario were likely camps, chipping stations or processing areas associated with the more mobile Anishinaabeg, utilized during their travels along the local drainage basins while making use of seasonal resources. It must be recognized that this part of southern Ontario represents the ancestral territory of various Indigenous groups, each with their own land use and settlement pattern tendencies. 4.2.2 Post -Contact The arrival of European explorers and traders at the beginning of the 17th century triggered widespread shifts in Indigenous lifeways and set the stage for the ensuing Euro -Canadian settlement process. Documentation for this period is abundant, ranging from the first sketches of Upper Canada and the written accounts of early explorers to detailed township maps and lengthy histories. The Post -Contact period can be effectively discussed in terms of major historical events, and the principal characteristics associated with these events are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Post -Contact Settlement History (Smith 1846; Sutherland 1864; Coyne 1895; Lajeunesse 1960; Cumming 1972; Janusas 1988; Ellis and Ferris 1990; Surtees 1994; Hayes 1997; Bloomfield 2006; AO 2015) Historical Event Timeframe Characteristics Brute explores southern Ontario in 1610/11; Champlain travels through in Early 1613 and 1615/1616, making contact with a number of Indigenous Early Exploration 17th groups (including the Algonquin, Huron-Wendat and other First Nations); century European trade goods become increasingly common and begin to put pressure on traditional industries Conflicts between various First Nations during the Beaver Wars result in Increased Contact Mid- to late numerous population shifts; European explorers continue to document and Conflict 17th century the area, and many Indigenous groups trade directly with the French and 'The English; Great Peace of Montreal' treaty established between rou hly 39 different First Nations and New France in 1701 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2FR604 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 13 Historical Event Timeframe Characteristics Growth and spread of the fur trade; Peace between the French and Fur Trade Early to English with the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713; Ethnogenesis of the Metis; Development mid -18th century Hostilities between French and British lead to the Seven Years' War in 1754; French surrender in 1760 Royal Proclamation of 1763 recognizes the title of the First Nations to the Mid- to late land; Numerous treaties subsequently arranged by the Crown; First land British Control 18th cession under the new protocols is the Seneca surrender of the west side century of the Niagara River in 1764; The Niagara Purchase (Treaty 381) in 1781 included this area United Empire Loyalist influx after the American Revolutionary War (1775-1783); British develop interior communication routes and acquire Late 18th additional lands; Between the Lakes Purchase completed with the Loyalist Influx century Mississaugas in 1784 and confirmed in 1792 (Treaty 3); Haldimand Proclamation of 1784 grants land to Six Nations (the Haldimand Tract), clarified by the Simcoe Patent (Treaty 4) in 1793; Constitutional Act of 1791 creates Upper and Lower Canada Became part of York County's 'West Riding' in 1792; Brant surrenders County Late 18ththo Blocks 1-6 of the Haldimand Tract to the Crown in 1798; Became part of Development early 19 the Gore District and Halton County in 1816; Wellington District and century Waterloo County created in 1840; Waterloo County independent after the abolition of the districts stem in 1849 Waterloo initially comprised Block 2 of the Haldimand Tract; Purchased by United Empire Loyalist R. Beasley and his partners in 1798; Deeds could not be issued until full payment was made to Six Nations; Nearly Township Early 5,750 ha sold to Pennsylvania Mennonites and non -Mennonites in 1800; Formation 19th century German Company formed to facilitate a bulk sale of land to Pennsylvania Mennonites, represented by D. Erb and S. Bricker; Remaining 24,281 ha purchased in 1805 with clear title; Lots drawn by shareholders in Pennsylvania; Steady and rapid stream of settlers ensued, disrupted only by the Napoleonic Wars and the War of 1812 Population reached 4,424 by 1841 (mostly Pennsylvania Dutch and German); 33,518 ha taken up by 1846, with 12,151 ha under cultivation; 20 saw mills and 8 grist mills in operation at that time; Traversed by the Township Mid -19th to early Grand Trunk Railway (1856), Galt & Guelph Railway (1855/57), Preston & Development 20th century Berlin Railway (1857/1873) and Waterloo Junction Railway (1889/91); Principal settlements at Berlin, Hespeler, Preston and Waterloo, Other communities at Blair, Bloomingdale, Breslau, Bridgeport, Doon, Freeport, Freiburg, German Mills, New Aberdeen, Oregon (Upper Doon), Shantz, Strasburg and Williamsburg 4.2.3 German Mills Historical maps show that the community of German Mills was located within and adjacent to the northwest section of the study area. German Mills, also known as Parkway, Jewsburg, Edenburg, Hopewell Mills and Bleams Mills, seems to have originated when Philip Bliehm built a sawmill on Schneider Creek in 1812. The mill, which was serviced by one dam, was purchased by Samuel Liebschuetz in 1835 (Janusas 1988:169). During Liebscheutz's period of mill ownership (1835- 1851) he laid plans for the village of Jewsburg, a name reflecting his religion (Benjamin and Berge 2012:56). The southern part of the Township of Waterloo owed much of its early development to the establishment of major thoroughfares in the first quarter of the 19th century. The earliest of these was Bleams Road, built by Philip Bliehm in the 1820s to link the Township of Wilmot and the western part of the Township of Waterloo to his businesses at German Mills (Bloomfield 2006:73-76). The flour mills were the epicentre of the small community, with related businesses that included a stave mill, cooperage and general store. Today, the last vestiges of the settlement are Cress Lane and Webster Road as they are currently aligned (Benjamin and Berge 2012:54). May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 86 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 14 4.2.4 Settlement of Freeport Freeport consisted of a small settlement on both banks of the Grand River and was one of the first areas to be settled in Waterloo County as its location on the Great Road between Preston and Berlin as well as the Grand River allowed ease of movement and access to wider markets not experienced by other pioneers within the Township. Freeport was also known as Toll Bridge and Bridgeville, as it was the location of a tolled bridge that crossed the Grand River. Initially all north -traveling settlers would have to ford the river at Reichert's Ford, later called Livergood's Ford, until the first permanent bridge in Waterloo Township was built in 1820 (Mika and Mika 1977). The highest toll was a sixpence a wagon. The bridge was decommissioned as a toll bridge in 1865, when the village's name was changed to Freeport in order to reflect the new status (Mika and Mika 1977). Most early settlers were of Pennsylvania Dutch origin, although they were soon followed by groups of German immigrants. A post office was established in 1863 and the Freeport United Brethren Church was founded in 1861. The United Brethren is an evangelical Christian denomination with roots in German Reform communities such as the Methodists and the Mennonites, and the Freeport congregation ran an Academy in the hamlet between 1866 and 1872 (Region of Waterloo Museums 2021). The church and academy was the main focus of social and religious life in the village, and many of Freeport's residents volunteered at the Freeport Hospital, a rehabilitation hospital during WWI, later repurposed as a sanitarium for tuberculosis patients from the 1930s into the 1960s (Region of Waterloo Museums 2021). 4.3 Study Area History 4.3.1 Mapping and Imagery Analysis In order to gain a general understanding of the study area, two historic settlement maps, four topographic maps and two aerial images were examined during the research component of the study. Specifically, the following resources were consulted: • G.R. and G.M. Tremaine's Map of the County of Waterloo, Canada West (1861) (OCHMP 2019); • Waterloo Township from H. Parsell & Co.'s Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo, Ontario (1881) (MU 2001); • Topographic maps from 1916, 1923, 1929 and 1936 (OCUL 2023); and • Aerial images from 1955 and 1963 (UW 2021). The limits of the study area, the Hidden Valley Road CHL and the proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor' are shown on georeferenced versions of the consulted historical resources in Map 2—Map 6. Tremaine's Map of the County of Waterloo, Canada West (1861) indicates that the study area comprised part of Bechtel's Tract but was also labelled in other maps as part of Beasley's Old Survey. David Sararus, A.C. Weber, and Andrew Sararus were indicated as owners of parcels within the study area (Map 2). According to Ezra Eby's biographical sketches of Waterloo pioneer families, Nicholas and Mary (Livergood) Sararus immigrated to Waterloo Township from North Carolina with their son Andrew in 1802. The family settled on the west bank of the Grand River near Freeport, and after his parents' deaths in the 1830s Andrew Sararus (1781-1867) inherited the family homestead. His son, David Sararus (1824-1892) is depicted as living nearby. Abraham C. Weber (1817-1874) was born in Berlin (Kitchener), the son of Mennonite settlers from Pennsylvania. He lived with his parents until 1855, when he and his wife May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 8T of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 15 Judith purchased Benjamin Shantz's and the Stafford's farms near Freeport, where he died in the late 1800s (Eby 1896). The study area does not appear on the atlas, as the major thoroughfares at the time were located to the north (the "Great Road," now King Street East, and Bleam's Road) and south. A portion of the Hidden Valley CHL (the bottom/south section) is visible on the map. It is possible the "proposed heritage corridor' portion of what is now Hidden Valley Road existed at the time, but it is not indicated on the map as an important traffic artery. There are no structures depicted on the Sararus or Weber properties, but like the road, that does not mean there were no buildings, just that they are not marked. The Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo, Ontario (1881) is not as detailed as the 1861 map in that it does not list the names of property owners and only indicates the area was part of Beasley's Old Survey (Map 3). However, it indicates that the southern part of Hidden Valley Road (part of the Hidden Valley Road CHL) was joined to the opposite bank of the Grand River by a bridge, instead of simply a ford. The settlement of Freeport was located at a crossroad across the river from the study area, and this southern spur connected Freeport to the settlement of German Mills to the east. There were two other major thoroughfares north of the study area one of which was Bleam's Road, and the other was the "Great Road" which connected the settlements of Preston to Berlin (Kitchener), to the north of the study area. The "proposed heritage corridor' section of Hidden Valley Road is not drawn on the map, but once again it could have existed as a local road or footpath along the west bank of the Grand River. No structures appear either within the study area or along Hidden Valley Road, and steep banks are shaded on either side of the Grand River. Topographic maps show minimal change to the area (Map 4). In 1916 the "proposed heritage corridor' is indicated on the map as a road linking the southern part of Hidden Valley Road that spans the Grand River to Freeport to a spur of the "Great Road" that leads to German Mills, and it ran on a north -south axis along the hilly topography of the Grand River's west bank. The south end of this portion of the road possessed a bridge crossing a tributary creek of the Grand River and was forested with deciduous trees. Three frame houses were indicated on the map, one on each side of the road along the "proposed heritage corridor" and one at the western end of the south portion of the road (part of the Hidden Valley CHL). In 1923 and 1929 the study area appears fundamentally the same as in 1916. By 1936 there have been changes, specifically road alignment of Hidden Valley Road had changed, it was oriented on a straighter north -south axis rather than jogging to the west at the top of the hill near the centre of the "proposed heritage corridor' portion of the road. There was no longer a ford that splits to the east and crosses the Grand River south of Freeport, and the road leading to the ford did not appear on the map at all. This closed an east -west pioneer thoroughfare, and instead routed traffic travelling east from German Mills onto Hidden Valley Road, as they would then need to take King Street East north of the study area to travel to Freeport, Preston, or Kitchener. The bridge that spanned the tributary creek directly south of the former road remained, and both banks of the creek were still forested. The frame house on the west side of the road was no longer present, and there were three frame buildings on the east side of the road that overlooked the Grand River. Lastly, a telephone line crossed the study area at its northern boundary and ran to the community of German Mills. An aerial image from 1955 demonstrates that the study area similarly resembled its 1936 topographic depiction (Map 5). Deciduous forest continued to follow the creek tributary at the study area's southern border, and the road followed the same alignment as in the 1930s. The former alignment of Hidden Valley Road leading to the former fording location remained visible on the landscape, and the road trace of the continuation of Hidden Valley Road could also be seen east of the Grand River. The west side and north end of the study area consisted of cleared agricultural fields that bordered the road, and the east side had some tree cover although house May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 ff of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 16 lots were largely cleared of forest. There were house lots on each side of the study area, which included a barn on the west side cresting the hill that possibly exists today. Driveways branched off the road, the longest of which indicated the road's old alignment and took advantage of the topography's elevated views of the Grand River. By 1963, Highway 8 had been laid north of the study area and bisected the historic route of Hidden Valley Road. As a result, the new section of Hidden Valley Road looped west and followed the route of the highway, while the northern terminus of Hidden Valley Road had been renamed to Hofstetter Avenue, which joined Cameo Drive at King Street East (Map 6). Highway 8's construction fundamentally altered Hidden Valley Road into a loop joining with Wabanaki Road to the west, rather than as a connection between two major pioneer thoroughfares. The vegetation that surrounded the creek had been cleared significantly, as had the east side of the road along the west bank of the Grand River, likely for residential construction. The layout of the agricultural fields adjacent to the road's west edge largely remained the same, even at the northern edge of the study area where the new route of Hidden Valley Road cut through the pastures. There were more house lots present on both sides of the road compared to 1955, especially along the bank of the Grand River on road's east side. Other historic documents, such as Historical Society of Waterloo publications and historic atlases, were examined for any mention of Hidden Valley Road or a similar road nearby with no results. A search was performed of both the Archives of Ontario and the Region of Waterloo Archives descriptive databases but there does not appear to be any textual records or photographs regarding the study area. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?PS8(50 8i of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 17 Map 2: G.R. and G.M. Tremaine's Tremaine's Map of the County of Waterloo, Canada West (1861) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; OHCMP 2019) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 84 of 688 i1 y ,,ala C.. — ,�.�. • 3 4 1 ltr y ♦` obe f wA � q MOO a WA Ilk— OIr tt _ r Study Area � EXPLkyATIfl HB. Hidden Valley Road CHLProposed ARFARA1:15,000 Hidden Valley Road e Corridor" .. _,, .-H"Herita 0 295 590 m MtR*R1j. CCT. se Map SoIX S G M. Tremaine'Tremalne's Map of rhe C^- _ tWatetloo: Canatla Wesf (1841) Map 2: G.R. and G.M. Tremaine's Tremaine's Map of the County of Waterloo, Canada West (1861) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; OHCMP 2019) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 84 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 18 Map 3: Parsell and Co,'s Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo, Ontario (1881) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; MU 2001) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 89 of 688 4low _. 'R t4 4E 44 i Study Area Hidden Valley Road CHL f#Rh► Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" N ti5,000 0 300 a00m ee Map Spprce: Map ofW t—, Tpw-p'imm H. Parsell&—, svaxea Itlaioncal anal ox aye counry or waxanoo•[a aex) Map 3: Parsell and Co,'s Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of Waterloo, Ontario (1881) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; MU 2001) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 89 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 19 E 4R CC FO 111111 110 �r 50 CL �p0rce: GaX [Oa0P08111818) CC • O aL i F� a� Ltd Study Area Hidden Valley Road CHL Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" 11,t VFOR L^. GaX [649P98j �1 B29) rcene fOch mi/l or. /Acfary . • sin a _ tea, u,n nee _ ra fira^^ . . . ar.. ...................... T Mann .....•,._. Weea� lod.;a..�., ila�in,a.e Coeeoe.F re:lrnae/onl ln�preesro�l �x A%INVA" IN 118,752 q 0 375 750m fj1� Map 4: Topographic Maps from 1916, 1923, 1929, 1936 (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri, OCUL 2023) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 89 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 20 Study Area Hidden Valley Road CHL Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" A,166../�#RA N 1:10,©04 0 200 400m 3ase Map Sopma: Aerial lmape [14551 Map 5: Aerial Image (1955) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; UW 2021) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?RS8(50?8f of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener h QPQ 1 SHA/ Study Area Hidden Valley Road CHL Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" d N 1:18,707 0 375 750 m 3aee Map Sopma: Aerial lmape [19631 Map 6: Aerial Image (1963) (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri; University of Waterloo 2021) 21 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 89 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 22 5.0 CONSULTATION BHRs and CHLs are broadly referred to as cultural heritage resources. A variety of types of recognition exist to commemorate and/or protect cultural heritage resources in Ontario. The Minister of Environment and Climate Change, on the advice of the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada (HSMBC), makes recommendations to declare a site, event or person of national significance. The National Historic Sites program commemorates important sites that had a nationally significant effect on, or illustrates a nationally important aspect of, the history of Canada. A National Historic Event is a recognized event that evokes a moment, episode, movement or experience in the history of Canada. National Historic People are people who are recognized as those who through their words or actions, have made a unique and enduring contribution to the history of Canada. There exists Parks Canada's online Directory of Federal Heritage Designations which captures these national commemorations. This directory also lists Heritage Railway Stations, Federal Heritage Buildings and Heritage Lighthouses. The Federal Canadian Heritage Database was searched, and no plaques or properties were noted within or adjacent to Hidden Valley Road (Parks Canada 2022). It is important to note that these federal commemoration programs do not offer protection from alteration or destruction. The Ontario Heritage Trust (OHT) operates the Provincial Plaque Program that has over 1,250 provincial plaques recognizing key people, places and events that shaped the province. Additionally, properties owned by the province may be recognized as a "provincial heritage property" (MCM 2010). The OHT plaque database was searched and none of the properties within or adjacent to the road are commemorated with an OHT plaque (OHT 2021). The Grand River is within and adjacent to the study area and is commemorated with plaques by the Grand River Conservation Authority as a Canadian Heritage River. There are five plaques at various points along the Grand River at associated tributaries which include: Grand River: Cambridge (Galt); Conestogo River: St. Jacobs; Nith River: New Hamburg; Speed River: Guelph; Eramosa River: Halton Hills (GRCA 2023). No plaques relating to the Grand River are located near the road. MCM's current list of Heritage Conservation Districts was consulted. No designated districts were identified in or adjacent to the study area (MCM 2019). The list of properties designated by the MCM under Section 34.5 of the OHA was consulted. No properties in or adjacent to the road are listed. Many municipal heritage committees and historical societies provide plaques for local places of interest. "One role of municipal heritage groups (i.e., municipal heritage committees, historical societies) is to educate and inform the community on local heritage and several ways this could occur could include: producing descriptive guides and newsletters or by installing commemorative plaques" (MCM 2007:8). ARA staff contacted the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo staff via email on November 2, 2022. ARA inquired about: 1) background research, relevant to Hidden Valley Road, conducted as part of City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes (2014) study; 2) studies/reports on the examination of CHLs, especially roadways or Heritage Corridors. In response to the inquiries, the City sent links to the Cultural Heritage Landscapes Data Sheets (2014), while the Region pointed towards a HIA completed by WSP in 2020 titled, "Cultural Heritage Existing Conditions and Preliminary Impact Assessment Report Stage 2 ION LRT" Both the documents discuss the CHVI of the Hidden Valley Road as a potential `Heritage Corridor'. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 84 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 23 At project commencement, through the RFP, City of Kitchener staff identified several heritage related items to be considered as part of this report. It was noted that Hidden Valley Road has been identified in the 2014 City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape study as a CHL (L -RD - 4), and that the Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan was approved by Council in June 2019. A link was also provided to the data sheets for the city's CHL study staff identified that the Official Plan recognizes Hidden Valley Road as having potential cultural heritage value or interest. Lastly, it was noted that there are no listed or designated properties which fall within or area adjacent to the study area. In 2020 ARA conducted a Cultural Heritage Assessment Report (CHAR) as part of the Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design for UpperHidden Valley Sanitary Pumping Station and Forcemain and three built heritage resources were identified adjacent to Hidden Valley Road as having potential CHVI however, these properties are not considered protected properties as they are not designated nor listed. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?RS86046 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 6.0 FIELD SURVEY 24 The field survey component of an assessment involves the collection of primary data through systematic photographic documentation of all potential cultural heritage resources within the study area, as identified through historical research and consultation. A field survey was conducted on November 9, 2022, to photograph and document the Hidden Valley Road (Map 7 for photo locations). The field survey enables the team to record any local features that could enhance ARA's understanding of their setting in the landscape and contribute to the cultural heritage evaluation process. The field survey was conducted from publicly accessible, non -private lands. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?PS8,504 T of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 25 7.0 LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION Hidden Valley Road runs in an irregular, semi -circular loop through the Hidden Valley community in the City of Kitchener. It is a tertiary road that connects the community to the adjacent areas through Wabanaki Drive located to the west (Image 10 and Image 18). Hidden Valley Road has the Grand River to the east and agricultural properties/lands in the centre of the loop (Image 12— Image 14). 7.1 Contextual Surrounding Hidden Valley Road is a narrow two-lane road with portions with no curbs and other portions which are newly paved with curbs and gutters (Image 13 and Image 15). The road is situated within a rural setting with some portions of it within more of a residential setting. The area within the looped road mainly consists of forested lands, hilly areas with walking trails, and agricultural fields (Image 16—Image 17). The Hidden Valley Highlift Pump Station is located in the southeast portion of lands within the looped road. The outer perimeter of the road on the south side contains large estate lots spanning along the length of the road. Hidden Valley Road contains a wide range of building sizes and architectural styles with varying setbacks (Image 13). The houses on the east portion of road, parallel to the Grand River, appear to be older and concealed by natural foliage. A handful of highly visible, large, newer, homes are set closer to the road in other sections of the road. Natural vegetation and a mature tree canopy are visible for the entire corridor (Image 2). The east portion of the road has direct views to the Grand River to the east, and smaller sections provide views of the agricultural fields and forested areas. Some portions of the road have newer trees and therefore lack the mature tree canopy but contain similar undulating topography (Image 6). The southern intersection of Hidden Valley Road with Wabanaki Drive is located at a height of land which provides scenic views of the whole Hidden Valley community. At the southeast corner of the road, there are views to the Grand River. 7.2 Hidden Valley Road Landscape Features The topography and setting of the study area is described in the Master Plan as, "The area is characterized primarily by rolling topography, including several agricultural fields, with large lot estate residential dwellings towards the river' (2019:2). The other landscape features that may provide heritage character and value to the road that observed along the road are described in Table 3. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 ff of 688 0 Im co co 4— r�o J O cB U O CSP O Q mcj� a� Q O N 0 N N N 0 0 04 N � O ti *' R Qi d a) /> t3 a - O s Q O ° z e o a cn o �0co c cc c_ O O �LL� o a' O to O ` wULL ' cm N a=N -` O O LN L 6), O N Ci O Z U) cc E a) Z Z E''r _ s cc cc > O U)-0 a) a) _0m=m m w m m m-o-oc c a3�s=-0a)mm.- c -0 s c mm O o 0 0 o o o C -moo m we c U) 0� o m c m 0) o = U)m �om _0U)= acm) o . m Q�—�' o E m o O =LaO) c) O-0 o a) 0-a)i m c �o O�m: m1C a) : a)-- C: F-- 0) N u) O -0— � m — -FO) m O a) -O O> m a) O O- m m p .� m O O a) a) >, O O a) 0 U) 0 m m c ME m a) ��_� �mmc' E� m ° ° � O m O b i Q O (6 O > a) Q p � N m O 0-2 7 a) m 'O -O U + U .> L C7 U) O U m O (6 .0 O O O m = N c� >-0 -o� m m c m E U) Q�� z) m E -,=, z, u) -= a) -2 -OO`�OU u) -O— O O C Q _0 - 00 mO -0O a) 0. O CQ Q 6 C O O c 0 O m -0 O a) aN) N aC) (6 a) (1) 00 OsN c C(1) O U� 0- -sO N Q C U> mco =.o a) 0 0 O) m O ON 7N O -O a) _ m= m U)-0 m >_2 a)� 2 m OO O o 7 o Hm �0 - N r- d -0 a)U) 7 a _ f4 ° R = f3 li4- O Rca�U) 0, aCcV U) N O O 0o 0O d E L N N a) +c O R R Q)4-30 LL N co co 4— r�o J O cB U O CSP O Q mcj� a� Q O N 0 N N N 0 0 04 N � ti N co co r�o J y Q) cB U O co 0 Q Q Q Q Co aJ 7 0 O - U- o U cn a- y ,� / �0 LL L LL 0 OUIi J OU N d :*{ Oa) N O cm O —_ N � N M N 0) a0 M 0 i' W ci �� $ v O M p ai z Z y� O O)���a) C� -0 -0 — m a) (6 0 0 -O m a) �' U O >E � Ua) L a) i O H �, (6 p a) .D O U i U) p 0 7 7— Lo N o z)a) a) p C m +-' — ' O) O O m -p U 'O U m m a) a) + m im E O a) O �O (n C a) m �O Y O a) O U O m O Q O + U -o a) 2 O > U o ) m? m �U U) a) O -0�O O _ O O m m >> 21, i U fn V .0 L L N C E _0 m )>- --a)6_ E M OO p U O a) U ESLI> w O U) ' m N i p O U)O O L m O O U -0 a) O +-' ~ m O a) -p E m 0 ?� O 'O Q oO (Ui6 m -0 U) O O O m m >, m Un a) L C O S C Cate..,0 H-0 U 0— U) 7-a_ f4 O rn t4 li4- O a+ a) w V a) U_ RcvU N� Oo0 E LN N a) 0 O R R Cl) _0 a�w�0m LL p Ir co co r�o J y Q) cB U O co 0 Q Q Q Q Co OD N co co r�o J Co cB O U ,^^ ,O vJ y ^` Q CCo O N CV) N 0 0 N 0404 c� T� T Wt qAM -'q O LL "'�� L z 7 �tm O Y0 % n •� t C14 A O4�1 O N N '' L O d cn cc O L z L d a is Gl E O cc > cn o z z cc 0 0 0 - 0 m 0 o - E 0 0 O Q� N0m,°' O cO j O -0 'O O } (6 O _ (6 � O 0.�6 O Q a0 > O C o.��0 5 o U) U T Q �-0E� m m > ai -0- 0 c m -0 m m 0 o ui _0 0 0 0 = Q m 0 c 0 m 0 c o N N LL N 7-a_ f4 R = R O rn - tea' li O 'RCN01 - CU r_ O 0 a� c N O 0 O L N N E M o a)4- 0 U J co co r�o J Co cB O U ,^^ ,O vJ y ^` Q CCo O N CV) N 0 0 N 0404 c� T� T rn N co co r�o J 0 U O Q O N Q N 0 N N N 0 0 N � r ' Cc W i C r f'I a) a s r I,. aJ � >2 C O W tm a) U) �, r R LL c O R LL L04 N C d I- w CV s,. `�. R :a N O o r� �. a 6> aid>> C. N r4 O cc > co Z — Z ai E L O N G O uj C 'O N N 'O CL CU'O Q O m m Z, > J a) �O O O a3 O) � � a) �(O O•� U Y > p a5 i C 0 a3 C (6 U O O a) 0 0 > O O O Q (� O C O-0 a m a5 -O O O m > N Q O > O O O m O� O O UO O a--� -O ) . O m 00 O U O u) u 2 Ea) -6 u) o m -0 a) o E o 'O O) U a -O7O E C O) Y O �:3 O 0a3 .O 0 a3 O U O Q Q O > E �Ua)aa) SEs sUa3 m U) >E c U) O a3 O C a) U M O i C a) E O a) m a) C—U) -O >a3 H O _O a5 (�6 O S 20>� 000-0 >_> N a) N O rn rn R = R > li4- O 'R 01— CU C a) U) V 0 cc OmC LU) E mE O R R O > U- UW co co r�o J 0 U O Q O N Q N 0 N N N 0 0 N � R m m S_ 2r�o Q�ƒ0 §CSP �& �J \7 Q) ) ± «(�< 2 ) 2 § ° ]LL z& 2g �C'l \\ %E y . �( > z //\�o/\/ #gfoff°* � _� _� « §�=§t§£'= . a e._ a 4 ; Geek= eo=o.o=3e »�%2e/a M (1)_ & y '2 33fj o46 q«/ \�\§®�� 0 E/&[\}3�0 ' 7//22=e U) 4 � � ( = -° " C-) -0 C: e> ƒ!\.g/a7±ƒ *U) 0ESG ==�ywU)e0-= =0') U) _0 C, \�=>Ec\0) = E a)– e U) = e ± a 4.-0 a te /=40M 0 em8L2 LG 0'a- / J��� 0 20 $2dU \ < U)0e0M .2oq & I/Mk #U) ±4- /\ m m S_ 2r�o Q�ƒ0 §CSP �& �J \7 Q) ) ± Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 8.0 HERITAGE ASSESSMENT 31 To provide an accurate impact assessment against the Master Plan, it is worthwhile to assess the whole of Hidden Valley Road through an O. Reg 9/06 (amended by O. Reg. 569/22) evaluation and provide a Statement of CHVI and list of heritage attributes. 8.1 Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road According to O. Reg. 9/06 Using information gathered in the field survey, and additional historical and contextual research, an evaluation of Hidden Valley Road, according to O. Reg. 9/06 (amended by O. Reg. 569/22) was conducted and can be found below in Table 4. Table 4: Evaluation of Hidden Valley Road Using O. Reg. 9/06 Evaluation of Property Description ✓ Value Statement(s) Hidden Valley Road was constructed in the late 1800s. The alignment of the road, along the Grand River, first appeared in the 1861 Tremaine's map of Waterloo County. The road assumed its current alignment, as a loop, The property has design value or sometime around 1916, as seen in the Topographic maps. physical value because it is a rare, Since those times, while undergoing minor realignments, unique, representative, or early ✓ the road has serviced the Hidden Valley community as a example of a style, type, expression, local, irregular, road loop. The road is lined with mature material or construction method. trees and a variety of vegetation. These types of older roads can be related to the irregularly laid rural roads observed as a characteristic of the City of Kitchener. They are not set according to fixed grids, which are now common in urban areas. The property has design value or Hidden Valley Road does not display a high degree of physical value because it displays a craftsmanship or artistic value. It was constructed using high degree of craftsmanship or artistic common methods and materials for its construction merit. period. The property has design value or Hidden Valley Road does not display a high degree of physical value because it technical or scientific achievement. It was built using demonstrates a high degree of common construction techniques for its construction technical or scientific achievement. period. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid out in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the The property has historical value or southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access associative value because it has direct adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills in the associations with a theme, event, ✓ Freeport and German Mills areas. It formed part of the belief, person, activity, organization or Beasley's Old Survey and is associated with the institution that is significant to a development of German Mills for agricultural purposes in community. the 19th century. The road has a direct association with the development of rural areas in southern parts of the Township of Waterloo. The property has historical value or Hidden Valley Road contains some remnants along its associative value because it yields, or route of rural life, but those do not yield or have the has the potential to yield, information potential to yield information that contributes to the that contributes to an understanding of understanding of the rural community or culture. a community or culture. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8,50 9 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 32 Evaluation of Property Description ✓ Value Statement(s) The property has historical value or associative value because it Hidden Valley Road does not reflect the work or ideas of demonstrates or reflects the work or a significant architect, builder, artist, designer, or theorist ideas of an architect, artist, builder, who is significant to the community. designer or theorist who is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road was laid to meet the needs of the early settlers to gain access to neighboring villages, The property has contextual value amenities, commerce, and such. Those rural because it is important in defining, characteristics of the Hidden Valley Community have maintaining or supporting the character since changed greatly from farmsteads to large estate of an area. residential lots. Although remnants of farm components and some agricultural fields are still found around the Hidden Valley Road, the basic character of the area has since evolved. Hidden Valley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and The property has contextual value rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such because it is physically, functionally, ✓ follows the rise and fall of the lands. It provides scenic visually or historically linked to its views to the agricultural fields throughout various portions surroundings. of the road, the Grand Riverto the east and forested areas to the north and southwest. The property has contextual value Hidden Valley Road, while acting as a connector for the because it is a landmark. Hidden Valley community, it is not geographically located in a prominent spot to be considered a landmark. 8.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest The whole Hidden Valley Road was evaluated against O. Reg 9/06 and was determined to possess CHVI. The Statement of CHVI and identified heritage attributes form the basis for the impact evaluation and suggested mitigation measures in the rest of this report. 8.2.1 Introduction and Description of Property Hidden Valley Road runs in an irregular, semi -circular loop through the Hidden Valley community in the City of Kitchener. It is a tertiary road that connects the community to the adjacent areas through Wabanaki Drive on the north as well as south. 8.2.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value/Statement of Significance Hidden Valley Road is a representative example of rural roads that were essential for the development of an area. Hidden Valley Road was constructed around the late 1800s. The alignment of the road, along the Grand River, first appeared in the 1861 Tremaine's map of Waterloo County. The road assumed its current alignment, as a loop, sometime around 1916, as seen in the Topographic maps. Since those times, while undergoing minor realignments, the road has serviced the Hidden Valley community as a local, irregular, road loop. The road is lined with mature trees and a variety of vegetation. These types of older roads are related to the irregularly laid rural roads observed as a characteristic of the City of Kitchener. They are not set according to fixed grids, which are now observed in most urban areas. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?RS86044 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 33 Hidden Valley Road has direct associations with a theme, and activity, that is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills in the Freeport and German Mills areas. It formed part of the Beasley's Old Survey and is associated with the development of German Mills for agricultural purposes in the 19th century. The road has a direct association with the development of rural areas in southern parts of the Township of Waterloo. Hidden Valley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such follows the rise and fall of the lands. It provides scenic views of the agricultural fields to the west, the Grand River to the east and forested areas to the north and southwest. 8.2.3 Heritage Attributes Hidden Valley Road is a representative, example of a type of rural roads that were essential for the development of an area. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: • Narrow two-lane alignment • No shoulders • Variety of vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs • Irregular road loop Hidden Valley Road has direct associations with a theme, and activity, that is significant to a community. Hidden Valley Road is part of a local road network that was laid in the 1800s to connect early settlers in the southern part of the Township of Waterloo to access adjacent farms, markets, other villages, and mills in the Freeport and German Mills areas. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect this value: Direct view to the L-shaped barn on the roadside Remnants of farmsteads visible along the route Views to agricultural fields, open space and natural vegetation Hidden Valley Road is physically and functionally linked to its surroundings. The road is set into the undulating and rolling topography of the Hidden Valley area and as such follows the rise and fall of the lands. The road contains the following heritage attributes that reflect these values: Scenic views to the surrounding areas and the Grand River(see Map 11) Undulating topography May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?PS86046 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 34 9.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The council of City of Kitchener approved a new Land Use Master Plan for the Hidden Valley (Master Plan) area in 2019 (Figure 1). The city is currently working towards preparing a Secondary Plan that would replace the existing Residential Hidden Valley Community Plan and the Industrial Hidden Valley Community Plan that was approved in 1989-90. This plan steered the development of Hidden Valley area in the late 1990s to the early 2000s. "The City is in the process of essentially overhauling the entire local level planning framework to respond to and implement changes in provincial, regional and city policy. The old land uses from the Official Plan, the existing Community Plans and the outdated zoning from 1985-1994 need to be replaced." (City of Kitchener 2019:4) The new Secondary Plan would be added to the City's Official Plan (OP) via amendments. In general, the Master Plan proposes the development of: • Low rise residential estates • Low rise residential detached dwellings on large lots • Medium rise residential buildings • High Rise Residential apartments • Mixed-use urban corridor • Commercial urban corridor • Business Park for general and service employment opportunities • Major Infrastructure and utility for public uses • Natural Heritage Conservation • Open Spaces The proposed Hidden Valley Master Plan study area is approximately 200 acres of land in size and it has been characterized as "primarily... rolling topography, including several agricultural fields, with large lot estate residential dwellings towards the river' (City of Kitchener 2019:3). As noted in the Master Plan's discussion of Issues and Opportunities, "Hidden Valley is a special character area with some unique attributes" (City of Kitchener 2019:4). The Master Plan identifies certain considerations from a land use policy perspective and one of these considerations is: Hidden Valley Road is a significant `Cultural Heritage Landscape' and under consideration as a `Heritage Corridor' (City of Kitchener 2019:4). There are several policy key directions for Hidden Valley area, as identified in the Master Plan report, including a subsection on Cultural Heritage (2019:6) which states: 1. The portion of Hidden Valley Road from approximately just south of Hidden Valley Creek to the location of the start of the new access arrangement to River Road extension near Highway 8 is the only portion of the road that would be the significant Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL). 2. Find opportunities to acknowledge and celebrate the Grand River, Indigenous Culture and the historical context of the area. This could be connected with future park and open space features, wayfinding, interpretive panels, views and vistas or other opportunities (2019:6). May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File "?%504T of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 35 Outlined in the Master Plan study Hidden Valley Road will be impacted as "The Region has decided on the revised River Road extension alignment and is proceeding with the design and construction phases" (City of Kitchener 2019:4). As such, the Hidden Valley Road is proposed to be shortened and realigned into the River Road extension. In the northern portion of the Master Plan area, within the older "Hidden Valley Industrial Community Plan" area, proposed land uses are: Medium Rise Residential, High Rise Residential (the city is looking at an option that does not include high-rise residential zoning), Mixed Use and Commercial. Along the western edge of the Master Plan study area, in the area of the south intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive, land uses proposed are Commercial and Business Park Employment Uses. In the southern and eastern area of the Master Plan Low Rise Residential — Large lot and Low Rise Residential — Estate land use are proposed with plans to conserve the natural heritage of the area (Figure 1). May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #?RS8(50 ff of 688 0 7 a� LL co co 4- r�o J O cB U� O Q t m Q M U O O N cB t U L Q O N N N 00 N (ocj� z_ wig � d a a t n ra i f 2 Z O 7 a� LL co co 4- r�o J O cB U� O Q t m Q M U O O N cB t U L Q O N N N 00 N (ocj� z_ Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 37 10.0 ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS The new Master Plan for the Hidden Valley community has the potential to affect Hidden Valley Road. MCM InfoSheet #5: Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans (MCM 2006d:3) provides a list of potential negative impacts (for evaluating against any proposed development impacts) which can be classified as either direct or indirect. Direct impacts (those that physically affect the heritage resources themselves) include, but are not limited to initial project staging, excavation/levelling operations, construction of access roads and renovations or repairs over the life of the project. These direct impacts may destroy some or all significant heritage attributes or may alter soils and drainage patterns and adversely impact unknown archaeological resources. Indirect impacts include but are not limited to alterations that are not compatible with the historic fabric and appearance of the area; alterations that detract from the cultural heritage values, attributes, character or visual context of a heritage resource. This could include the construction of new buildings; the creation of shadows that alter the appearance of an identified heritage attribute; the isolation of a heritage attribute from its surrounding environment; the obstruction of significant views and vistas; and other less -tangible impacts. Of direct relevance to Hidden Valley Road, this project entails the construction of new land use sectors and roads together with the realignment of existing ones, along with other proposed development. There are currently no development plans for the proposed development lands that would aid in the identification of project impacts. Potential impacts and mitigation options related to the project will be discussed at a high level. An assessment of impacts on Hidden Valley Road can be evaluated using the negative impacts presented in InfoSheet #5: Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans (MCM 2006c). The impacts are examined below in Table 5. Table 5: Impact Evaluation of Proposed Site Alteration (Adapted from MCM 2006c:3) Type of Negative Impact Applicable? Comments The proposed development includes the realignment of portions of Hidden Valley Road and the Destruction of any, or part of any, Y incorporation of a portion of the road into the River significant heritage attributes. Road extension.. The vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs may be removed due to the proposed development. Alterations to a property that detract from the cultural heritage values, The proposed new development introduces medium attributes, character or visual context of to large scale structures, a commercial business a heritage resource; such as the park at the northern and southern intersections of construction of new buildings that are Y Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive and incompatible in scale, massing, additional low rise residential — large lot. These materials, height, building orientation or changes would alter the overall natural and open location relative to the heritage landscape of the area along the looped road. resource. Shadows created that alter the The proposed site alteration will not create any appearance of a heritage attribute or N shadows that would alter the appearance of a change the viability of a natural feature heritage attribute. or plantings, such as a garden. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' �Z of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 38 Type of Negative Impact Applicable? Comments The character of the road would be altered. Isolation of a heritage attribute from its Proposed development of potential high, medium surrounding environment, context or Y and low rise residential — large lot and potential significant relationship. community/institutional uses of lands will isolate portions of the corridor from the natural and open landsca e. The proposal for the addition of new medium and high-rise buildings in the Master Plan towards and Direct or indirect obstruction of around Fairway Road and Wabanaki Drive will result significant views or vistas within, from, Y in direct obstruction of views to the agricultural fields or of built and natural features. in the northern section of the road. Low rise residential — large lot development and potential community and institutional uses in other portions of the corridor also may obstruct views. A change in land use such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to The portion of the Hidden Valley Road in the north residential use, allowing new N will become part of the River Road extension. As development or site alteration to fill in such, this portion will remain a road. the formerly open spaces. The proposed alterations include the realignment of the Hidden Valley Road. As Hidden Valley Road follows its historic alignment, this activity may create land disturbance which may adversely affect unknown archaeological resources. ARA has Land disturbances such as a change in conducted a Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment as grade that alters soils, and drainage part of the Class Environmental Assessment and patterns that adversely affect an Y Preliminary Design for Upper Hidden Valley Sanitary archaeological resource. Pumping Station and Forcemain. ARA determined there are areas of archaeological potential that require a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment and as such, an archaeological assessment is required prior to alterations to Hidden Valley Road as alterations could impact unidentified archaeological sites. 10.1 Impact Summary As Table 5 summarizes, the proposed Master Plan will have impact on the heritage attributes of Hidden Valley Road as defined by MCM InfoSheet #5: Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans (2006b). The potential impacts include: • Impact 1 — The proposed development includes the realignment of Hidden Valley Road. This would result in an alteration of the road. • Impact 2 — Construction of low, medium and high-rise buildings, commercial/business park, potential community and institutional development may remove vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs. • Impact 3 - The new development introduces medium to large scale structures along the northern and southern intersections of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive; and low rise residential — large lot and potential community and institutional development in the eastern and southern portions of Hidden Valley Road. These changes would alter the overall natural and open landscape of the area along the looped road. • Impact 4 - Proposed development of low, medium and high-rise buildings, commercial/ business park and potential community and institutional uses may isolate portions of the corridor from the natural and open landscape. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 39 • Impact 5 - Views to the agricultural fields may be directly obstructed in some sections of Hidden Valley Road due to proposed development May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 40 11.0 "HERITAGE CORRIDOR" BOUNDARIES Section 8.1 and 8.2 above provide the evaluation of Hidden Valley Road for potential CHVI. It was determined that it has value and a Statement of CHVI and a list of heritage attributes is provided. The value for Hidden Valley Road is associated with the full looped road. In various sources Hidden Valley Road has been considered as having potential cultural heritage value or interest and that it may be considered a cultural heritage resource (City of Kitchener Official Plan), a CHL (City of Kitchener CHL study 2014), and a potential "Heritage Corridor" (Master Plan 2019; Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference 2022). These different sources provide different maps or descriptions of Hidden Valley Road as a potential cultural heritage resource. Outlined below is a discussion of the potential for Hidden Valley Road to be considered a "Heritage Corridor" and alternative lengths are suggested. ARA proposes an alternative segment of Hidden Valley Road that could be considered the "Heritage Corridor'. 11.1 Entire Hidden Valley Road The City of Kitchener CHL (2014) study identified Hidden Valley Road as a CHL (L -RD -4) and the data sheet contains a map of the CHL with its extent being the entire looped road. The City of Kitchener Official Plan identifies Hidden Valley Road as one of several streets having cultural heritage value or interest to be considered a cultural heritage resource (2014:13-16). Both of these sources indicate the road in its entirety is to be considered a CHL or a cultural heritage resource (not mentioning specifically a CHL) (Map 8). ARA has evaluated Hidden Valley Road against O. Reg. 9/06 and it has been found to have CHVI, and as such, the entire Hidden Valley Road in its current configuration could be designated a "Heritage Corridor" in the Official Plan as it has heritage attributes that are found along the entire length of the current road. However, as noted in the Master Plan and the Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference, a portion of Hidden Valley Road is to be realigned and to become part of the River Road extension, this portion will no longer be part of Hidden Valley Road. 11.2 Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" The Master Plan and the Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference both identify a specific portion of Hidden Valley Road as a potential "Heritage Corridor'. Specifically, within the Master Plan (2019:9) the proposed "Heritage Corridor' is depicted as starting where the road curves to the south along the eastern stretch and runs until just south of Hidden Valley East Creek. In the Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference it states: The portion of Hidden Valley Road from just south of Hidden Valley Creek to the location of the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8 is the only portion of the road that would be considered a CHL (2022:2). This portion of Hidden Valley Road is depicted in Map 9. Based on the evaluation of Hidden Valley Road and the determination that it meets criteria under the OHA O. Reg. 9/06, ARA confirms that this portion of Hidden Valley Road could be designated in the Official Plan as a "Heritage Corridor'. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O BL�l of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 41 11.3 ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" The entire looped Hidden Valley Road meets the criteria to be designated a "Heritage Corridor' as determined in Section 8.1. River Road is to be extended in the future, and a portion of Hidden Valley Road is to be realigned and become part of the River Road extension. As such, Hidden Valley Road will be shorter in length. ARA proposes it would be preferrable that a larger segment than is currently proposed in the Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference be designated as a "Heritage Corridor' in the Official Plan. ARA recommends the majority of the remaining portion of Hidden Valley Road be considered for designation in the Official Plan as a "Heritage Corridor'. The "Heritage Corridor" would begin at the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8 south and then west through to the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and River Valley Drive (Map 10). 11.4 Summary of "Heritage Corridor" Boundaries Hidden Valley Road in its entirety as well as the original proposed "Heritage Corridor", from just south of Hidden Valley Creek to the location of the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8, was evaluated and has been determined to have met OHA criteria. As such, the entire road or a portion of it may be designated as a "Heritage Corridor' in the Official Plan. Three alternatives have been considered above as potential Hidden Valley Road Heritage Corridors; ARA proposes a length for the "Heritage Corridor' that would contain a larger portion of the remaining road be considered(Map 10).. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O� i of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 42 12.0 MITIGATION MEASURES Given that potential impacts have been identified, mitigation measures must be recommended. The MCM's Info Sheet #5. Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans (2006c:4) lists several specific methods of minimizing or avoiding negative impacts on a cultural heritage resource. Some of the methods to minimize negative impacts on a cultural heritage resource include integrating design elements through massing, setback, and materials, and adding buffer zones (i.e., vegetative screening). Therefore, general mitigation measures which align with conservation principles and heritage best practices are provided below. 12.1 Design Considerations (Impact 3) The proposed land uses/development outlined in the Master Plan towards and around Fairway Road and Wabanaki Drive proposed subdivision are to include commercial and business park, low rise residential and potential community/institutional uses. Given these proposed activities will be adjacent to the remaining Hidden Valley Road and community, it is recommended that the physical design of any proposed structures should not detract from the character of the area. Any new structures for the new development should be sympathetic to the surrounding area and minimize impacts through appropriate height, massing and architecture style. These design considerations could be incorporated into Official Plan policies that are to be developed for the Hidden Valley Secondary Plan. 12.2 Landscape Plan (Impacts 2 - 4 and 5) The proposed developments may remove vegetation along the shoulders, including mature trees and shrubs. A Landscape Plan to address potential vegetation removal or enhancement would assist with reducing the visual impact of the development activities particularly in areas where significant views have been identified (see Map 11). The Landscape Plan could address: 1) protecting existing significant roadside vegetation, 2) areas appropriate for enhancing vegetative screening and 3) recommendations for replanting. A Landscape Plan with policies to protect, enhance and/or replant vegetation could be incorporated into, or appended to the Secondary Plan. 12.3 Protection as a "Heritage Corridor" (Impacts 1, 3 and 5) If some or all of Hidden Valley Road is designated as a "Heritage Corridor" in the Official Plan there will be many opportunities to reduce impacts to the cultural heritage value and the heritage attributes identified with the road. Protection as a "heritage corridor' directs the City to use Secondary Plans to maintain the overall visual character of such streets and their functional operation (City of Kitchener 2014:13-14). As such, the Secondary Plan should include policies to protect the heritage attributes and views, including at minimum guidance for protection or enhancement of roadside vegetation (see Section 12.2) and requirement for Heritage Impact Assessments for development adjacent to the Heritage Corridor. 12.4 Corridor Enhancement Plan (Impacts 1, 3 and 5) A Corridor Enhancement Plan, as suggested in the Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference (2022) could be developed to reduce impacts to the SCHV. The Corridor Enhancement Plan could address protecting, enhancing and providing screening with vegetation along the corridor as identified in Section 12.2. The RFP further notes that this Corridor Enhancement Plan should include "preservation of May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 43 grades and road profiles and establishing direction for future public works, maintenance and improvements". Another recommendation may include seeking opportunities to interpret some of the identified cultural heritage resources associated with the Cultural Heritage Landscapes (i.e., with plaques, public art) which could be installed in publicly accessible lands. These could be also be addressed through the Landscape Plan. 13.0 SUMMARY AND CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS Hidden Valley Road runs in an irregular, semi -circular loop through the Hidden Valley community in the City of Kitchener. It is a tertiary road that connects the community to the adjacent areas through Wabanaki Drive on the north as well as south. The evaluation against O. Reg 9/06 of the road found the whole of Hidden Valley Road meets the criteria and as such, any portion of the road may be designated as a "Heritage Corridor' in the Official Plan. The Master Plan project entails the construction of new land use sectors and roads together with the realignment/truncating of existing ones, along with other proposed development. There are currently no development plans for the proposed development lands that would aid in the identification of project impacts. Potential impacts and mitigation options related to the project were discussed at a high level. As a result of this HIA, the following is recommended: That a portion of Hidden Valley Road be designated as a "Heritage Corridor" in the Official Plan as it meets the OHA O. Reg. 9/06 (amended by 569/22) criteria. ARA recommends that the portion of Hidden Valley Road running from the start of the new River Road access to Highway 8 south and then west through to the intersection of Hidden Valley Road and River Valley Drive be considered for designation (Map 10); That if City of Kitchener chooses to designate as above or a smaller portion of Hidden Valley Road, a Corridor Enhancement Plan could be developed that would be attached to the Secondary Plan along with this HIA. Other options include policies within the Official Plan and recommendations within a Landscape Plan. Along with the "Heritage Corridor" and potentially a Corridor Enhancement Plan, the following conservation/mitigation strategies are suggested moving forward: That design considerations are developed to ensure the physical design of any proposed structures should not detract from the character of the area. Any new structures should be sympathetic to the surrounding area and minimize impacts through appropriate height, massing and architecture style. Policies addressing these considerations could be incorporated into Official Plan policies for Hidden Valley Secondary Plan; A Landscape Plan be developed that could address potential vegetation removal, enhancement and replanting would assist with reducing the visual impact of the development activities. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93Qe X96 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 44 14.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES Archaeological Research Associates (ARA) 2020 Cultural Heritage Assessment Report, Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design for Upper Hidden Valley Sanitary Pumping Station and Forcemain, City of Kitchener, Regional Municipality of Waterloo, Lots 51 and 53, German Company Tract & Bechtels Tract, Geographic Township of Waterloo, Former Waterloo County. Archives of Ontario (AO) 2022 Archives of Ontario: Accessing our Collections. Accessed online at: http://www. archives.gov.on.ca/en/access/our collection.aspx. Benjamin, L. and J. Berge 2012 Journey Through German Mills in Waterloo Historical Society Annual Volume. Bloomfield, E. 2006 Waterloo Township Through Two Centuries. Kitchener: Waterloo Historical Society. Brook Mcllory Planning + Urban Design Inc. (BMP) 2011 Scenic Roads and Special Character Streets. Resource Document. Accessed online at: https://www. regionofwaterloo. ca/en/exploring-the-region/resources/Documents/Scenic- Roads-and-Special-Character-Streets-Resource-document-access. pdf. City of Kitchener 2014 Cultural Heritage Landscape Study. Accessed online at: https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD PLAN CHL Study Re orp t. pdf. 2019 Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan. Accessed online at: https://www.kitchener.ca/en/resourcesGeneral/Documents/DSD PLAN Hidden Valley Land Use Master Plan.pdf. 2022 Hidden Valley Community Heritage Impact Assessment & Corridor Enhancement Plan Terms of Reference. Planning Division Coyne, J. H. 1895 The Country of the Neutrals (As Far as Comprised in the County of Elgin): From Champlain to Talbot. St. Thomas: Times Print. Cumming, R. (ed.) 1972 Historical Atlas of the County of Wellington, Ontario. Reprint of 1906 Edition. Toronto: Historical Atlas Publishing Co. Ellis, C.J. and N. Ferris (eds.) 1990 The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, OAS Number 5. London: Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' S71 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 45 Government of Ontario 2006 Ontario Regulation 9/06 made underthe Ontario Heritage Act. Accessed online at: www.e- laws.gov.on.ca/html/reqs/english/elaws reqs 060009 e.htm. 2009 Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. 0.18. Accessed online at: www. e- laws.gov.on.ca/ html/statutes/english/elaws statutes 90o18 e.htm. 2022 Parks Canada Directory of Federal Heritage Designations. Accessed online at: https://www. pc.gc. ca/apps/dfhd/results- resultats eng.aspx?p=1&m=10&g=&desCheck=NHS&desCheck= EVE NT&desCheck=P ERSON&desCheck=HRS&desCheck=F H BRO&desCheck=H L&c=Brampton&ctI00%24 Main%24PageSearch1%24ddlProvince=&dev=&ctI00%24Main%24PageSearch1 %24dd ICustodian=. Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) 2023 Heritage River Plaques. Accessed online at: https://www.grandriver.ca/en/our- watershed/Heritage-River-Plagues.aspx. Hayes, G. 1997 Waterloo County: An Illustrated History. Kitchener: Waterloo Historical Society. Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada (HSMBC). H. Parsell & Co. 1881 Illustrated Historical Atlas of Waterloo County. Toronto: H. Parsell & Co. Janusas, S. 1988 Archaeological Perspective of a Historic Overview of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Regional Municipality of Waterloo Planning and Development Department, Waterloo. Lajeunesse, E.J. 1960 The Windsor Border Region: Canada's Southernmost Frontier. Toronto: The Champlain Society. McGill University (MU) 2001 The Canadian County Atlas Digital Project. Accessed online at: http://digital.library.mcgill.ca/countyatlas/default.htm. Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism (MCM) 1992 Guideline for Preparing the Cultural Heritage Resource Component of Environmental Assessments. 2006a Ontario Heritage Toolkit Series. Toronto: Ministry of Culture. 2006b Heritage Property Evaluation: A Guide to Listing, Researching and Evaluating Cultural Heritage Property in Ontario Communities. Ontario Heritage Tool Kit Series. Toronto: Ministry of Culture. 2006c Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process. Ontario Heritage Tool Kit Series. Toronto: Ministry of Culture. 2007 Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties. Accessed online at: https://www.ontario.ca/page/eight-guiding-principles-conservation-built-heritage- properties 2010 Standards & Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties. 2019 List of Heritage Conservation Districts. Accessed online at: www.mtc.gov.on.ca/en/ heritage/heritage conserving list.shtml. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' §7L of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 46 Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) 2020 Provincial Policy Statement. Toronto: Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Munson, M.K. and S.M. Jamieson (eds.) 2013 Before Ontario: The Archaeology of a Province. Kingston: McGill -Queen's University Press. Ontario Council of University Libraries (OCUL) 2023 Historical Topographic Map Digitization Project. Access online at: https:Hocul. on. ca/topomaps/. Ontario Historical County Maps Project (OHCMP) 2019 Ontario Historical County Maps Project. Accessed online at: http:Hmaps.library.utoronto.ca/hgis/countymaps/maps.html. Ontario Heritage Trust (OHT) 2021 Ontario Heritage Plaque Guide. Accessed online at: www.heritagetrust.on.ca/en/ index.php /online-plaque-quide. Parks Canada 2022 Directory of Federal Heritage Designations. Accessed online at: https://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/dfhd/search-recherche eng.aspx. 2010 Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada 2nd Edition. Accessed online at: www.historicplaces.ca/media/18072/81468-parks-s+g-eng- web2. pdf. Region of Waterloo 2013 Regional Implementation Guideline for Cultural Heritage Conservation. Accessed online: https://www. regionofwaterloo. ca/en/exploring-the- region/resources/Documents/Final Implementation Guideline for CHL Conservation - access. pdf. 2018 Regional Implementation Guideline for Conserving Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resources. Accessed online at: https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/exploring- the- region/resources/Documents/Implementation Guideline for Conserving RSCHR.pdf. 2022 Regional Official Plan. Accessed online at: https://www.regionofwaterloo.ca/en/doing- business/Regional Official Plan.aspx. Smith, WH. 1846 Smith's Canadian Gazetteer. Comprising Statistical and General Information Respecting all Parts of the Upper Province, or Canada West. Toronto: H. & W Rowsell. Surtees, R.J. 1994 Land Cessions, 1763-1830. In Aboriginal Ontario: Historical Perspectives on the First Nations, edited by E.S. Rogers and D.B. Smith, pp. 92-121. Toronto: Dundurn Press. Sutherland, J. 1864 County of Waterloo Gazetteer and General Business Directory for 1864. Toronto: Mitchell & Co. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§73 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 47 University of Waterloo (UW) 2021 Geospatial Centre Accessed online at: https:Huwaterloo. ca/library/geospatial/collections/aerial-photographs-satellite-and- orthoimagery. Warrick, G. 2000 The Precontact Iroquoian Occupation of Southern Ontario. Journal of World Prehistory 14(4):415-456. Wright, J.V. 1972 Ontario Prehistory. An Eleven -Thousand -Year Archaeological Outline. Archaeological Survey of Canada, National Museum of Man. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' §4 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Appendix A: Maps and Images of Hidden Valley Road Study Area Hidden Valley Road CHL Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" Image Location /2106�.-Mu N 1:10,000 0 200 400m �a�mm,n,a<�",\g��see �a6e. me0pe�a"�eEamen\❑�ae�a-ama,�o 3—Map S-- Region —6— (2020) Map 7: Hidden Valley Road Study Area with Photo Locations (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener f: 6. ;T 7 ti Y � .' L ..r • I NMI a AL i r Study Area ® Hidden Valley Road CHL Al mild ;A1 1111111111114 i I,►� ARA N 7:10,000 0 200 400m oseeins Mu c:Rrcensea amlor (open aovemmem❑cense-Ontario 3ase dap Spuvice', ReA�pa of WaEerfoo 17420) Map 8: Hidden Valley Road CHL (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Axa I i': 'RaT"a F r e, +g{ v f t�' = Study Area Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" A%6vA" 1,10,000N 0 200 400m ' Information ficensetl untler[he Open Goaernmeni Licence-Oniarie Map Spueea: Region of Wabrlco [2020) Map 9: Hidden Valley Road Proposed "Heritage Corridor" (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri) 50 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§� of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 51 Study Area ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" I A%6vA" 1,10,000N 0 200 400m Information ficensetl untler [he Open Go�ernmen� Licence-Oniarie 3ase Map Spueea: Region of Wabrlco [2020) Map 10: ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 52 = Study Area ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" ySignificant Views 6-7Ate► N 110,000 0 200 400m M. pnisInfirmalim icantler Me Dpan Cmve�mm�n[Branca-Ontaeip se Map Sa--Region-. pt WakMpp [2020 Map 11: ARA Proposed Hidden Valley Road "Heritage Corridor" with Significant Views (Produced under licence using ArcGIS® software by Esri, © Esri) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�§6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Image 10: View of the north Intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanaki Drive (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing South) Image 11: View of North Portion of Hidden Valley Road (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing East) 53 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93Qe ��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Image 12: View of Estimated Location of Realignment of Hidden Valley Road to River Road (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing Northwest) Image 13: View of Hidden Valley Road Proposed as a "Heritage Corridor" (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing South) 54 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��j of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Image 14: View of Hidden Valley Creek (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing Southeast) May 2023 HR -210-2020 Image 15: View of South Portion of Hidden Valley Road (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing West) 55 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd ARA File #2,93&,O��3 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Image 16: View of Walking Trails Adjacent to Hidden Valley Road (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing North) Image 17: View of Agricultural Fields and Forested Area Adjacent to Hidden Valley Road (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing North) May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��73 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener Image 18: View of the South Intersection of Hidden Valley Road and Wabanki Drive (Photo taken on November 9, 2022; Facing West) 57 May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' �Z of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 58 Appendix B: Team Member Curriculum Vitae Kayla Jonas Galvin, MA, RPP, MCIP, CAHP Heritage Operations Manager ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LTD. 1 King Street West, Stoney Creek, L8G 1G7 Phone: (519) 804-2291 x120 Fax: (519) 286-0493 Email: kayla.ionasgalvin(a�araheritage.ca Web: araheritage.ca Biography Kayla Jonas Galvin, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd.'s Heritage Operations Manager, has extensive experience evaluating cultural heritage resources and landscapes for private and public -sector clients to fulfil the requirements of provincial and municipal legislation such as the Environmental Assessment Act, the Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties and municipal Official Plans. She served as Team Lead on the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Historic Places Initiative, which drafted over 850 Statements of Significance and for Heritage Districts Work!, a study of 64 heritage conservation districts in Ontario. Kayla was an editor of Arch, Truss and Beam: The Grand River Watershed Heritage Bridge Inventory and has worked on Municipal Heritage Registers in several municipalities. Kayla has drafted over 150 designation reports and by-laws for the City of Kingston, the City of Burlington, the Town of Newmarket, Municipality of Chatham -Kent, City of Brampton and the Township of Whitchurch-Stouffville. Kayla is the Heritage Team Lead for ARA's roster assignments for Infrastructure Ontario and oversees evaluation of properties according to Standards & Guidelines for the Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties. Kayla is a Registered Professional Planner (RPP), a Member of the Canadian Institute of Planners (MCIP), is a professional member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) and sits on the board of the Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals. Education 2016 MA in Planning, University of Waterloo. Thesis Topic: Goderich —A Case Study of Conserving Cultural Heritage Resources in a Disaster. 2003-2008 Honours BES University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Joint Major: Environment and Resource Studies and Anthropology. Professional Memberships and Accreditations Professional Memberships and Accreditations Current Professional Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) Current Member of the Canadian Institute of Planners (MCIP). Current Registered Professional Planner (RPP). Current Board Member, Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals. Work Experience 2013—Current Heritage Operations Manager, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. Oversees business development for the Heritage Department, coordinates completion of designation by-laws, Heritage Impact Assessments, Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessments, and Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluations. 2009-2013 Heritage Planner, Heritage Resources Centre, University of Waterloo Coordinated the completion of various contracts associated with built heritage including responding to grants, RFPs and initiating service proposals. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 59 2008-2009 Project Coordinator—Heritage Conservation District Study, ACO Coordinated the field research and authored reports for the study of 32 Heritage Conservation Districts in Ontario. Managed the efforts of over 84 volunteers, four staff and municipal planners from 23 communities. 2007-2008 Team Lead, Historic Place Initiative, Ministry of Culture Liaised with Ministry of Culture Staff, Centre's Director and municipal heritage staff to draft over 850 Statements of Significance for properties to be nominated to the Canadian Register of Historic Places. Managed a team of four people. Selected Professional Development 2021 "Workshop on recent changes in the Ontario planning legislation: what all heritage advocates need to know", webinar, hosted by the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario, with reps from MMAH. 2019 2019 OPPI and WeirFoulds Client Seminar: Bill 108 — More Homes, More Choice, 2019 2019 Annual attendance at Ontario Heritage Conference, Goderich, ON (Two -days) 2019 Information Session: Proposed Amendments to the OHA, by Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism. 2018 Indigenous Canada, University of Alberta. 2017 Empowering Indigenous Voices in Impact Assessments, Webinar, International Association for Impact Assessments. 2017 Capitalizing on Heritage, National Trust Conference, Ottawa. 2016 Heritage Rising, National Trust Conference, Hamilton. 2016 Ontario Heritage Conference St. Marys and Stratford. 2015 Introduction to Blacksmithing, One -Day. Selected Publications 2018 "Conserving Cultural Heritage Landscapes in Waterloo: An Innovative Approach." Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals Newsletter, Winter 2018. 2018 "Restoring Pioneer Cemeteries" Ontario Association of Heritage Professionals Newsletter. Spring 2018. 2015 "Written in Stone: Cemeteries as Heritage Resources." Municipal World, September 2015. 2015 "Bringing History to Life." Municipal World, February 2015, pages 11-12. 2014 "Inventorying our History." Ontario Planning Journal, January/February 2015. 2014 "Mad about Modernism." Municipal World, September 2014. 2014 "Assessing the success of Heritage Conservation Districts: Insights from Ontario Canada." with R. Shipley and J. Kovacs. Cities. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 60 Penny M. Young, MA, CAHP (#P092) Heritage Project Manager ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LTD. 1 King Street West, Stoney Creek, L8G 1 G7 Phone: (519) 804-2291 x121 Email: Pen ny.younq(a)araheritage.ca Web: araheritage.ca Biography Penny Young has 30 years of cultural heritage management experience, 21 years working in government, where she managed and coordinated the impacts to cultural heritage resources including heritage buildings, bridges, archaeological sites and cultural heritage landscapes for compliance with municipal, provincial and federal legislation and policy. Penny Young is listed a Heritage Specialist on the Ministry of Transportation Ontario's Registry, Appraisal and Qualification System (RAQS). Penny has considerable experience conducting and directing cultural heritage resource work according to the Ontario Heritage Toolkit series, the Standards and Guidelines for Provincial Heritage Properties, MTO Environmental Reference for Highway Design - Section 3.7 Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes and MTO Environmental Guide for Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscapes. She is a professional member of the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals and holds a Professional Licence (archaeology) #P092 from the MCM. She also holds memberships in the Ontario Professional Planners Institute, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals, Ontario Association of Impact Assessment, and the Ontario Archaeological Society. Education 1990-1993 Master of Arts, Department of Anthropology McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario. Specializing in Mesoamerican and Ontario archaeology. 1983-1987 Honours Bachelor of Arts (English and Anthropology), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. Professional Memberships and Accreditations Current Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism Professional Licence (archaeology) (#P092). Current Professional Member, Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP). Current Member, Ontario Archaeological Society (OAS). Current Member, Ontario Association of Impact Assessment (OAIA). Current Pre -Candidate Member of the Ontario Professional Planners Institute (OPPI). Current RAQS registered with MTO. Work Experience Current Heritage Project Manager, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. Coordinates ARA project teams and conducts heritage assessment projects including Heritage Impact Assessments, Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessments, and Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluations. Additional responsibilities include the completion of designation by-laws and heritage inventories. Liaises with municipal staff, provincial ministries and Indigenous communities to solicit relevant project information and to build relationships. 2008-2016 Heritage Planner, Culture Services Unit, Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism. Responsible for advising and providing technical review for management of cultural heritage resources in environmental assessment undertakings and planning projects affecting provincial ministries, municipalities, private sector proponents and Indigenous communities. Advised on municipalities' Official Plan May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O� of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 61 (OP) policies cultural heritage conservation policies. Provided guidance on compliance with the Public Work Class EA, other Class EA legislation and 2010 Standards and Guidelines for Provincial Heritage Properties. 2014 Senior Heritage Planner, Planning and Building Department, City of Burlington (temporary assignment) Project manager of the study for a potential Heritage Conservation District. Provided guidance to a multiple company consultant team and reported to municipal staff and the public. Liaised with Municipal Heritage Committee and municipal heritage property owners approved heritage permits and provided direction on Indigenous engagement, archaeological site assessments and proposed development projects. 2011 Heritage Coordinator, Building, Planning and Design Department, City of Brampton (temporary assignment) Project lead for new Heritage Conservation District Study. The assignment included directing consultants, managing budgets, organizing a Public Information Session, and reporting to Senior Management and Council. Reviewed development/planning documents for impacts to heritage including OP policies, OP Amendments, Plans of subdivision and Committee of Adjustment applications and Municipal Class EA undertakings. 2010-2011 Senior Heritage Coordinator, Culture Division, City of Mississauga Provided advice to Senior Management and Municipal Council on heritage conservation of built heritage, archaeological sites and cultural heritage landscapes. Liaised with multiple municipal staff including the Clerks' office, Parks and development planners and the public. Supervised and directed project work for junior heritage planner. 1999-2008 Regional Archaeologist, Planning and Environmental Section, Ministry of Transportation Responsibilities included: project management and coordination of MTO archaeology and heritage program, managed multiple consultants, conducted and coordinated field assessments, surveys and excavations, liaised with First Nations' communities and Band Councils, estimated budgets including $200,000 retainer contracts. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 62 L. Renee Hendricks, M.A. Cultural Heritage Technician ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LTD. 219 — 900 Guelph Street, Kitchener, ON N2H 5Z6 Phone: (705) 977 3099 Fax: (519) 286-0493 Email: renee.hendricks(a�araheritage.ca Web: araheritage.ca Biography L. Renee Hendricks joined ARA's heritage team in 2022 as a researcher and technical writer. Prior to joining ARA Renee worked on research for archaeology and heritage reports at Parslow Heritage Consultancy. Renee holds an archaeological applied research license (R1229) issued by the Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism. Renee has worked on numerous heritage projects across Ontario and her role consists of researching land records, archival materials, and other historic documents related to heritage resources and complete the technical writing for heritage assessments in both urban and rural areas. Renee is familiar with Ontario's Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists, as well as the Ontario Heritage Act, the Ontario Heritage Toolkit, and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places. She also holds a Master of Arts degree in Anthropology from Trent University in 2018, which added to her Bachelor of Arts degree, also in Anthropology, from Texas State University (2008). Education 2018 MA in Anthropology, School of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario. 2008 BA, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas Anthropology (Major) and History (Minor). Professional Memberships and Accreditations Current Archaeological Research License #R1229, MCM. Current Member, Ontario Archaeological Society. Current Member, Canadian Archaeological Association. Current Member, Society for Historical Archaeology. Work Experience Current Researcher and Technical Writer, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. Assists in the drafting of proposals and reports related to Heritage Impact Assessments, Built Heritage Resources, Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluations, and Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessments, and perform research in order to assist in the evaluation of heritage resources. 2022 Cultural Materials and Resource Specialist, Parslow Heritage Consultancy, Inc. Assisted PHC's Cultural Heritage Division with general and archival research, the drafting of reports, and property documentation, as well as assisted the Archaeological Division with report drafting and artifact identification. 2020-2022 Senior Field Technician, Parslow Heritage Consultancy Inc. Worked as a field technician on numerous Pre and Post -Contact sites on Stage 1 through 4 Archaeological Assessments, served as acting field director as necessary, developed artifact procession and analysis forms for labwork, processed and catalogued historic artifacts and assisted in the completion of archaeological reports for MTCS. 2019 Field Technician, ASI, Inc. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O��6 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 63 Worked as field technician on numerous Pre and Post -Contact sites for various clients. Conducted archaeological assessments and mitigation work (Stages 2 through 4) and served as an acting field director on a Stage 2 Pedestrian Survey. 2019 Field Technician, Patterson Group. Worked as a field technician on a job for Parks Canada, under Federal jurisdiction, developing an understanding of Federal guidelines for archaeology. Worked closely with archaeological monitors from Caldwell and Walpole First Nations as part of a team. 2019 Field Director, AS&G Archaeological Consulting. Responsible for overseeing and supervising Stage 1 through 4 Archaeological Assessments, taking field notes and photographs, documenting site conditions, and ensuring that all work met the MCM's Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. 2016-2019 Field Technician, AS&G Archaeological Consulting. Excavated and documented numerous Pre and Post -Contact archaeological sites, Stages 1 through 4, documented site conditions, participated in Indigenous engagement through monitoring partnerships, conducted extensive archival work for Stage 1 assessments, and identified and catalogued mostly historic artifacts for reports. Select Relevant Projects Cultural Heritaae Evaluations 2022 68 College Street, City of Toronto. Client: Infrastructure Ontario. 2022 Ranger Lake Forward Attack Base, Sault Ste. Marie. Client: Infrastructure Ontario 2022 George Harvey Collegiate Institute, City of Toronto. Client: Toronto Lands Corp. 2022 965 Gartshore Road, Township of Centre Wellington. Client: R.J. Burnside & Assoc. 2022 1069 St. ClairAvenue West, City of Toronto. Client: 2162049 Ontario Inc. 2022 465 D'Arcy Street, Town of Newmarket. Client: Laurie Mountford. 2022 170 Roehampton Avenue, City of Toronto. Client: Capital Developments. 2022 328 Main Street, Town of New Dundee. Client: R.V. Anderson, Ltd. Heritaae Impact Assessments 2022 2165 Dundas Street West, Town of Oakville. Client: Schlegel Villages, Inc. 2022 3403 Liberty Street North, Municipality of Clarington. Client: Jayzeee Properties Inc. 2022 297 Church Street, Town of Oakville. Client: Templar Group. 2022 Picton Harbour Lofts, Town of Picton. Client: Bay Hill Developments. 2022 18642 Leslie Street, Township of Bradford -East Gwillimbury. Client: Laxim Investments. 2022 12455 Creditview Road, Town of Caledon. Client: Argo Alloa Corp. 2022 311 Rymal Road, City of Hamilton. Client: Springbrook Associates, Ltd. 2022 164, 168, and 176 Rymal Road East, City of Hamilton. Client: Springbrook Associates, Ltd. Heritage Designation Reports 2022 Elgin Hall, Village of Mount Elgin. Client: Township of Southwest Oxford. Documentation/Salva_ge Reports 2021 1783 — 1785 Bayview Avenue, City of Toronto. Client: Metrolinx. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93Qe X96 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 64 Sumra Zia, G.D.A.C., B.Arch Cultural Heritage Technician ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LTD. 1 King Street West, Stoney Creek, ON L8G 1G7 Phone: (514) 755-9291 x 124 Fax: (519) 286-0493 Email: sum ra.zia(a)araheritage.ca Web: araheritage.ca Biography Sumra Zia, joined the Heritage team at ARA as a Cultural Heritage Technician, and works on heritage impact, assessment, and evaluations. Before joining the heritage team at ARA, Sumra completed a Graduate Diploma in Architectural Conservation from Carleton University in Ottawa. The diploma added to her bachelor's degree in Architecture and Planning from NED University in Pakistan. She has work experience in architecture design, interior design, urban planning, adaptive reuse projects together with working on historic buildings as a conservation specialist. Sumra is well versed with the Ontario Heritage Act, the Ontario Building Code, Ontario Heritage Toolkit and the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places. Sumra has worked with local communities on tangible and intangible issues connected to architectural practices and as a part of her Architectural Conservation degree has completed various case studies on heritage properties in Canada, which range from the Royal Botanical Gardens in Burlington to the Elgin Hotel in Ottawa. She is passionate about studying the effects of global climate change on cultural heritage properties and landscapes and how working with climate change could be beneficial for best conservation practices. Education 2022 Graduate Diploma in Architectural Conservation, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON. 2018 B. Arch in Architecture and Planning, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, Pakistan. Professional Memberships and Accreditations Current PCATP, Pakistan Council for Architects and Town Planners Current IAP, Institute of Architects Pakistan Work Experience Current Cultural Heritage Technician, Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. Works under the Project Managers on, Heritage Impact Assessments, Built Heritage and Cultural Heritage Landscape Assessments, Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluations, and other cultural heritage services. 2020-2021 Project Architect, Doodling Studio. Coordinated the completion of various architectural projects leading a team of draftsmen, 3D visualizers and architects. Coordinated with clients for interior design and selection of materials and textures. Conducted site surveys in coordination with contractors to follow project schedules and workflow. 2019-2020 Architect, Zeeshan Umair Architects. Prepared excel spreadsheets for bill of quantities for clients and contractors. Coordinated with vendors and distributors for latest and most viable construction technology and materials. Punctually dispatched design proposals consisting of drawings and complete set of details for project execution. 2018-2019 Junior Architect, DAZ Design Studio. Worked alongside the principal architect and interior designer on an urban design and restoration project. Coordinated directly with construction workers to ensure May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O' g71 of 688 Heritage Impact Assessment Hidden Valley Road, City of Kitchener 65 adequate and correct implementation of design on site. Prepared working drawings for design execution in line with project deliverables. 2015 Architecture Intern, Habib Fida Ali Architects. Presented design options for a welfare organization office together with a team of senior architects. Explored manual sketching and watercolor mediums for the presentation of ideas, mood boards and final proposals. Delivered hand -made presentations to the board members of the welfare organization for interior space options. Professional Development 2022 AODA Customer Service Standards Training 2022 WHIMIS 2022 ACO Arch styles presentation 2022 ICOMOS University Forum, Just Transitions: Heritage Education for Climate Adaptation, hosted by academic members of the Climate Heritage Network 2022 Hobin Prize in Architecture & City Building awards ceremony 2021 Carleton Workshops 2021 Student well-being 2021 Anti -racism 2021 Research Ethics 2021 Untold Histories - Storytelling through Heritage, webinar by DWG. 2021 Changing the Narrative: Dispelling Homophobia, hosted by Afro-Caribbean Mentorship Program. 2021 DWG +Architectures of Hiding I Indigenous Walks 2021 Ingenious Talks Online: Recording Historic Sites from Home - Developing A Collaborative Learning Approach for Architectural Conservation and Sustainability, hosted by Carleton University, Ottawa. 2021 Demographic Re -Assembly - Online Forum, Ottawa as a case study for how cities respond to demographic shifts and the forces behind them. May 2023 Archaeological Research Associates Ltd HR -210-2020 ARA File #2,93&,O�g3 of 688 Staff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: April 22, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-160 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-IV-08 10 Duke Street West Partial Demolition with Retention of the Front, East Side, and Portion of West Side Fagade and Construction of 45 -Storey Mixed - Use Building RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Sections 30(2), 33, and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-IV-08 for the property municipally addressed as 10 Duke Street West be approved to permit: 1. The partial demolition of the building, excluding the front (south) fagade, east side fagade, and part of the west side facade; and 2. The construction of a 45 -storey mixed-use building with retained portions of the original building integrated into the podium Subject to the following conditions: a) That the final Heritage Impact Assessment be submitted and approved by the Director of Development and Housing Approvals prior to the issuance of the heritage permit; b) That the final Conservation Plan, including a Salvage and Documentation Plan and Commemoration and Interpretation Plan, be submitted and approved by the Director of Development and Housing Approvals and the City's Heritage Planner prior to the issuance of the heritage permit; c) That the final Temporary Protection Plan, including a Demolition and Stabilization Plan and Structural Assessment Report, be submitted to the *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 153 of 688 satisfaction of the City's Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner prior to the issuance of a Heritage Permit; d) That the final Risk Management Plan, including the Vibration Monitoring Report, be submitted to the satisfaction of the City's Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner prior to the issuance of a Heritage Permit; e) That final building elevations be submitted for review to the satisfaction of the City's Manager of Development Review in conjunction with Heritage Planning Staff and Urban Design Staff prior to the issuance of the heritage permit; f) That the final demolition permit be reviewed, and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning Staff prior to the issuance of a demolition permit; and g) That the final building permit be reviewed, and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning Staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to present the proposed redevelopment of the subject property municipally addressed as 10 Duke Street West. The redevelopment includes the retention in full of the front and east side fagade of the building as well as part of the west side fagade, to be integrated into the podium of a new 45 -storey mixed-use building. • The key finding of this report is that though partial demolition is proposed, the majority of the building is to be retained and identified heritage attributes, including the contextual value of the property, will be maintained while allowing for the intensification and use of a currently vacant and under-utilized site. • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-IV-08 applies to the property municipally addressed as 10 Duke Street West, and proposes the partial demolition of the existing building while retaining the entirety of the front and east side fagade and a portion of the west side fagade to be integrated into the podium of a new 45 -storey mixed-use building. The subject property is currently listed as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register. A Notice of Intention to Designate was passed by Council on April 8, 2024, though a designation by-law has not yet been passed. A draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was completed as part of the site plan application for this proposed work, in addition to a number of other studies including a Conservation Plan with Salvage and Documentation Report and Commemoration Plan and a Stabilization and Demolition Plan with a Structural Assessment Report. Through the completed studies recommendations and strategies have been formed and implemented which will allow for the conservation of the heritage value and significance of the subject property while the new construction takes place. A summary of each of the submitted supporting material is provided in this report. Page 154 of 688 BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2024-IV-08, which seeks permission for the partial demolition of the building on the property municipally addressed as 10 Duke Street West, where the entirety of the front and east side fagade as well as a portion of the west side fagade will be retained and incorporated into the podium of a new mixed-use development. The proposed development will be 45 -storeys in height, with the podium levels containing commercial, office, amenity, and parking while the tower will provide for 499 residential units. The proposed is part of an active site plan application (SP22/104/D/AP). 10 Duke Street West is currently listed as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register. A motion to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the subject property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act was passed by Council on April 8, 2024. Council resolved the following: "That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 10 Duke Street West as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD -2024-133." The Notice of Intention to Designate was published on April 12, 2024. Though a designating by-law has not yet been passed by Council, the conditional approval of the site plan requires that the designating by-law be passed under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act prior to Site Plan Approval. It is anticipated that the designating by-law will go before Council on May 27, 2024, and passed within the requisite 120 day timeframe of the ad being published. Through the designing by-law, the design and physical, historical and associative, and contextual value of 10 Duke Street West will be recognized. A summary of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria that is met or not met is provided in the table below. Criteria Criteria Met (Yes/No) 1. The property has design value or physical value because Yes it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, material, or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because No it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design or physical value because it No demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value Yes because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or associative value because Yes it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. Page 155 of 688 6. The property has historical value or associative value No because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value because it is Yes important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is Yes physically, functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a Yes landmark. The heritage attributes identified in the proposed Statement of Significance to accompany the designating by-law are as follows: • Exterior elements related to the Colonial Revival architectural style of the building, including: o Red Flemish brick; o Rectangular plan; 0 11 bays along Duke Street and 6 bays along Queen Street; o Segmentally flat windows openings with brick voussoirs; 0 8/12 windows with limestone sills; o Main entrance door with door surround, transom and entablature; o The limestone band between 2nd and 3d floors; and o The parapet along the roofline. • Interior elements including: o Brass elements: Stair railings, newel post caps and wall grilles; and, o Roman Travertine tile in vestibule entrance and lobby. • Elements related to the contextual value of the subject property and its status as a landmark, including: o Prominent location at the intersection of Duke Street West and Queen Street North; o Balanced front and side fagades; and o The massing of the building fronting onto both Duke Street West and Queen Street North. REPORT: The subject property is located on the north-west corner of the Duke Street West and Queen Street North intersection, within the City Commercial Core of the City of Kitchener, Region of Waterloo. At present it contains a vacant three-storey commercial brick building, constructed c. 1949 in the Colonial Revival architectural style. Page 156 of 688 �� st 52 1 Cie! i! 50 E41-J19+T. > i'r. .' MII CIi �'••. 1r, 104 r 1. ..rJ Mi• f+.sal 'I' ,r�rl,a The R� ]I r 96 l 57 /�� '~.'•�` \ SAY 49 CITY COMMERCIAL CORE 't - . .. 42 90 3 2 "' * 133 34 ��� 36 fle�tcl►anneMural TINA. rkal"I , ., Ff B 44 1aJ 60 ROOF ;' •�" DUk `' Voge tq r ar, 72 Figure 1: Location Map of Subject Property Figure 2: Front (South) Facade of Subject Property Page 157 of 688 Proposed Development The proposed redevelopment contemplates the construction of a new 45 -storey mixed-use building on site, with the retained front and side fagades of the existing building on 10 Duke Street West integrated into the podium. The podium will continue to support commercial uses, in addition to office, amenity, and parking spaces. The remaining levels of new construction will accommodate 499 residential units. The applicants worked with Heritage Planning Staff and their retained heritage consultants in the design of the podium. It will be setback and lifted from the retained facades, creating greater visual separation between the heritage resource and the new construction to ensure that attention is directed towards the heritage resource and its prominence along the street front is maintained, in addition to preserving a pedestrian scale. The proposed surrounding material will be clear or neutral glazing, which keeps the new construction complementary to but distinct from the original building. Figure 3: Rendering of Front (South) and Side (East) of Proposed Development Page 158 of 688 oux Figure 4: Architectural Drawing of East Side Fagade of Proposed Development ffim � z wEmrrmiuM ate........ Figure 5: Architectural Drawing of West Side Fagade of Proposed Development The following sections provide a summary of the studies and plans requested as part of the development process. The intent of these key documents are to provide a detailed explanation of the work proposed, the methodology involved to carry out the work proposed, and how the protection and conservation of the identified heritage resource will be ensured during the duration of the work being undertaken. Draft Heritage Impact Assessment McCallum Sather was retained by the applicants to complete a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for the proposed planning application. The HIA is intended to both identify cultural heritage resources involved in the planning application and determine potential impacts that may result due to the proposed development, as well as provide recommended mitigation measures. The HIA completed by the heritage consultants and revised January 2024 established that the subject property is a significant cultural heritage resource and meets the criteria for Page 159 of 688 designation, with both exterior and interior heritage attributes being identified. The analysis of potential impacts as a result of the proposed development was completed using the framework provided by the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism, and Culture Industries Info Sheet #5 Heritage Impact Assessments and Conservation Plans. A summary is provided below. Impact Analysis Destruction of any, or part of any, Partial demolition is proposed, though the significant heritage attributes or features. majority of the exterior envelope is being proposed so this impact is determined to be minor. The majority of exterior heritage attributes will remain. While significant change is proposed to the interior, interior heritage attributes have been identified, documented, and are proposed to be salvaged and reused in the new construction. Alteration that is not sympathetic, or Partial demolition is proposed, though the incompatible, with the historic fabric and majority of the exterior envelope is being appearance. proposed so this impact is determined to be minor. The new construction incorporates setbacks and stepbacks as well as complementary material so that is it distinguishable but distinct from the original building. Shadows created that alter the viability A shadow impact analysis has been done of a heritage attribute or an associated and found that there are some shadows cast natural feature or plantings, such as a on the adjacent properties at 49 Queen St N garden. and 30-32 Duke St W/141 Ontario St N. These properties are listed as non- designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the municipal heritage register. The duration of the shadows cast is minimal and this impact is considered to be minor. Shadow impacts have been minimized through the use of appropriate setbacks and reduction of the tower floor plate. Isolation of a heritage attribute from its The original building remains in-situ and the surrounding environment, context or a new construction has been setback from the significant old. As such there are no impacts. relationship. Direct or indirect obstruction significant No significant views or vistas were identified views or vistas within, from or of built with, to, or from the subject property. As the and natural features. original building is remaining in place, the street -front facades are being retained in Page 160 of 688 The draft HIA made the following recommendation to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development: • The new building should use setbacks on the east fagade at ground level to give a clear buffer and more visual prominence to the existing building. • Measured drawings and photographs of the existing building should be prepared. • A condition assessment of any affected heritage attributes and heritage conservation drawings for construction prepared by a qualified consultant reflecting construction methodology in accordance with the conservation standards outlined in Section 3.3. • Monitoring of the existing building throughout the entire project should be done by a qualified professional in order to proactively address unforeseen complications. • Repairs to the original building, if needed, are to be completed with compatible materials and methods as per best practices. • Alterations should be completed in such a way that it does not cause irreparable loss of original fabric and in the future, alterations can be taken down or changed back without negative impact to the original. • Salvage and store any demolished heritage attributes for reuse in the new construction wherever possible. These elements should be incorporated in visible areas including, but not limited to, exterior and/or interior side of entryways, vestibules, lobby and amenity spaces. • 10 Duke Street West is recognized for its design, contextual, historical and associative values. We recommend designation of the proposed retained facades of the Economical Insurance building built in 1949 as it satisfies the criteria for designation as per Ontario Regulation 9/06. Alternative development options, including retention of the building in full, was explored during the planning process and is discussed in the draft Heritage Impact Assessment. This option was determined to not be feasible given the size of the site, the relative size and Page 161 of 688 their entirety, and the new construction has been setback from the old, visibility of the original building is maintained. A change in land use where the change The original use as office space is being in use may impact the property's CHVI; maintained. Though additional uses such as residential and amenity spaces are to be added. Land disturbances such as a change in There are no proposed changes in grade grade that alters soils and drainage level. Potential land disturbances that may patterns which may adversely affect a occur with the construction process are to be cultural heritage resource. mitigated through propose stabilization and monitoring through all phases of the project. This includes vibration monitoring and regular inspections. Should unexpected damage occur, work is to halt and a discussion with qualified professionals will occur on how remediation might be approached. The draft HIA made the following recommendation to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development: • The new building should use setbacks on the east fagade at ground level to give a clear buffer and more visual prominence to the existing building. • Measured drawings and photographs of the existing building should be prepared. • A condition assessment of any affected heritage attributes and heritage conservation drawings for construction prepared by a qualified consultant reflecting construction methodology in accordance with the conservation standards outlined in Section 3.3. • Monitoring of the existing building throughout the entire project should be done by a qualified professional in order to proactively address unforeseen complications. • Repairs to the original building, if needed, are to be completed with compatible materials and methods as per best practices. • Alterations should be completed in such a way that it does not cause irreparable loss of original fabric and in the future, alterations can be taken down or changed back without negative impact to the original. • Salvage and store any demolished heritage attributes for reuse in the new construction wherever possible. These elements should be incorporated in visible areas including, but not limited to, exterior and/or interior side of entryways, vestibules, lobby and amenity spaces. • 10 Duke Street West is recognized for its design, contextual, historical and associative values. We recommend designation of the proposed retained facades of the Economical Insurance building built in 1949 as it satisfies the criteria for designation as per Ontario Regulation 9/06. Alternative development options, including retention of the building in full, was explored during the planning process and is discussed in the draft Heritage Impact Assessment. This option was determined to not be feasible given the size of the site, the relative size and Page 161 of 688 position of building on site, and the construction and load-bearing capabilities of the existing building which would limit what could be built at the rear of the property or on top of the existing building. Relocation of the building was also explored but determined to not be a desirable approach due to the loss of the contextual value that would result. Draft Conservation Plan A draft Conservation Plan (CP) dated April 25, 2022, revised January 2024, and prepared by McCallum Sather has been submitted to the City. The intent of the CP is to address how identified heritage resources and attributes will be conserved using appropriate conservation principles. This includes an assessment and documentation of existing conditions and recommendations for short, medium, and long-term conservation measures. Short-term measures usual involves any conservation work to be undertaken prior to construction, medium-term measures relate to activities during and immediately following the completion of construction, and long-term measures consist of monitoring and conservation to be done for the life of the development. These measures have been summarized from the CP in the table below. Conservation Measure Type Measure Short-term • Salvage of identified interior and exterior elements. • Partial demolition of the heritage building including stabilization of the retained facades, as outlined in the stabilization plan. • Hoarding and protection for demolition and construction, including the installation of a temporary entry door and plywood cover at the front entrance, cornice and carved corbel brackets, and building corners. • Moisture integrity and protection of building envelope (ongoing measure to be implemented in the short term and executed through the medium and long term). • Monitoring implementation (ongoing measure to be implemented in the short term and executed through the medium and long term). Medium-term • Minor patching, repointing, or pinning with salvaged materials as needed. • Repair of masonry and limestone mortar joints or other limestone elements. • Front door restoration or replacement. • Restoration by replacement of any identified elements with significant damage or deterioration greater than the possible scope of repair. Where repair is not feasible and replacement can not be completed with salvaged material, like -for -like material shall be found. Page 162 of 688 Other recommendations of the conservation include the re -installation of interior heritage elements, the installation of signage that is contemporary but compatible and easily reversable in design, and the installation of exterior lighting that complement the architectural details of the building while increasing safety and security. Salvage and Documentation Salvage and Documentation has been included as part of the prepared Conservation Plan. It provides an inventory of the built heritage fabric that can be salvaged from the subject property before or during the partial demolition. Items identified for salvage are as follows: :erm p • Basement window infill using similar textured but Original Location lighter -toned limestone, set back to show the 1 previous existence of the openings. North Facade - As highlighted in Figure 17 • Window replacement using new models that are compatible in appearance and character with the structures original windows. Existing windows are 2 not original and detract from the cultural value of North Facade - As highlighted in Figure 17 the building. • Cleaning of masonry and limestone. Long-term • Maintenance including routine clean up. 3 • Monitoring of the condition of the building. North Facade- As highlighted in Figure 17 • Warranty inspection and condition assessment inspections. Other recommendations of the conservation include the re -installation of interior heritage elements, the installation of signage that is contemporary but compatible and easily reversable in design, and the installation of exterior lighting that complement the architectural details of the building while increasing safety and security. Salvage and Documentation Salvage and Documentation has been included as part of the prepared Conservation Plan. It provides an inventory of the built heritage fabric that can be salvaged from the subject property before or during the partial demolition. Items identified for salvage are as follows: :erm p Item Description Original Location Proposed Location 1 Red Flemish brick North Facade - As highlighted in Figure 17 A dedicated controlled and monitored storage room in the corner of a parking level - 2 Brick voussoirs North Facade - As highlighted in Figure 17 A dedicated controlled and monitored storage room in the earner of a parking level - 3 Two stone sills North Facade- As highlighted in Figure 17 Adedicated controlled and monitored storage room in the corner of a parking level - 4 Part of the stone hand between North Facade- As highlighted in Figure 17 Adedicated controlled and monitored storage 2nd and 3rd floors room in the corner of a parking level. 5 Part ofthe stone band below the North Facade- As highlighted in Figure 17 Adedicated controlled and monitored storage parapet room in the corner of a parking level- s Pilasters capitals and base & North facade - As highlighted in Figure 17 Adedicated Controlled and monitored storage Corner cornice piece (1) room in the corner of a parking level - 7 Solid panels of white roman tray- Entrance Lobby along Duke Street Adedicated controlled and monitored storage ertine stone room in the corner of a parking level - a Solid brass convector grilles Entrance Lobby along Duke Street Adedicated controlled and monitored storage room in the earner of a parking level. Figure 6: Inventory of Salvaged Material (Excerpt from Conservation Plan) Some of the reclaimed material is proposed to be kept in a controlled and monitored storage room on site, to be used for future required repairs and maintenance of the building. Other Page 163 of 688 interior elements are recommended to be incorporated into the new vestibule and shared lobby of the building. Commemoration and Interpretation Plan The draft Conservation Plan has also included a Commemoration and Interpretation Brief. The focus of the commemoration strategy for 10 Duke Street lies in the retention and incorporation of the front, east side, and partial west side fagades of the original building into the new construction. However, a heritage plaque is also proposed to be installed within the front landscaped area long the Duke Street fagade. The location is to be publicly accessible and will provide viewers with information about the site's history and significance. The exact design and content of the plaque is still in the draft stage. 10 DUKE STREET WEST Economical Fire Insurance Company of Berlin the Econamical Mutual fire Insurance Company of aserlin. Untarfo, was founded in 1871, when it Issued Its first policy on a house and barn, on November 25th, 1671. At the time, the small town of Berm hat! .-, population of 2.143 persons, and people were motivated by the fear u• foe which was always present through knowledge of great fares sti,ch at. St. John's. Newfoundland, In 1616, quebec City in 1645 and 1866. Ottawa and Hull in 1900. and Toronto in 1904. to name only a few_ Fire Insurance in small centfes such as Berlin was expensive and difficult to obtain at the time - The first company offKe was located an Queen Street North in Bertin, ON. I rom 1871 - 1948, Ecanomaca occupied a different office buildings in Berlin- the raptd growth of the company post -World War U resulted ii the need for a larger and mote modern premise- In 1988, the present site at [hike and Queen Streets wa. acquired, and the Toronto-based archnecture firm of Messrs. Mathers & haldenby were commissioned I... design anew head office on the site. Ma.thers & Haldenby Architects are weal known for their work on a numbe of notable buildings in Toronto, including the Roharts ulrary at University of Toronto Campus. Queen's Par, Complex, Roy Thompson Hatt, as well as the Pubk Archives and National Library Building in Ottawa EconotnKal Mutual Iire insurance occupied the building from it's opening on F ebruary22, 1952 until 198: the heritage value of 111 Duke St, W fesides in the Bowring architectural characteristics that are inclKative of the Colonial Revival architectural style: red fk4 wtshbrick, rectangular plan, repeatiangbays, segmented windowL openings with brick voussoars. 8/12 windows with store sills, main entrance door with door surrourwd, transon and entablature, stone band between 2nd and 3rd fl"s, and a strong parapet along the rooflene. Figure 7: Proposed Content of t he Commemorative Plaque Draft Structural Assessment and Retention Plan A Structural Assessment and Retention Plan has been completed by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd, dated November 17th, 2023 and most recently revised March 28, 2024. The report includes a visual assessment and inspection of the building on the subject property to determine existing conditions and structure. The findings of this report were used to inform detailed design and construction approach of the new development. Sketches of key typical Page 164 of 688 details identified during inspection are included in Appendix A of the Structural Assessment and Retention Plan. A retention approach (stabilization plan) forms the second part of the submitted plan. This section details the proposed method to retain the existing south, east, and partial west fagades in-situ during construction of the new building. The existing structural steel framing of the retained walls will be further supported with new temporary steel bracing and lateral support members, the later of which may be removed once the loads are transferred to new floors to be installed. Recommendations to disconnect material and conduct the partial demolition is also included. The portions of the existing fagade to remain are proposed to be separated from those to be demolished by way of saw -cutting, as an appropriate mortarjoint line the exterior wythe. After it is recommended that the wall ends be temporarily capped with plywood and a membrane, to mitigate water infiltration or other damage until the ends are permanently tied into the new building envelope. Saw -cutting is also the recommended methodology to separate the portion of floor slabs to be demolished from those that are to remain. The specific sequencing of the demolition and stabilization is provided in Section 5.1 of the Structural Assessment and Retention Plan. Risk Management Plan A Risk Management Plan dated April 4, 2024 has been prepared on behalf of the applicants by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. The intent of the Risk Management Plan is to identify potential physical risks to the original building that may occur during the construction period and provide a response or strategy to be implemented to mitigate said risks. The Risk Management Plan details risks that may result from construction activities, including impact or spill damage, fire, or work performed not in accordance with approved plans. It also identifies vibration risks, weather risks, and other risks such as vandalism or schedule delays. The detailed response to each risk identified is provided in Section 6: Risk Assessment Table of the Risk Management Plan. It also identifies which parties involved in the proposed project should be contacted and what their responsibilities would be should an identified risk occur. Vibration Monitoring Plan While completed as a separate report, the Vibration Monitoring Plan forms part of the Risk Management Plan. It identifies that overall, vibration from excavation is expected to be relatively minimal, with general vibration from other construction stemming from equipment use. The Vibration Monitoring Plan recommends proceeding within the following limits for construction, to mitigate effects on the historic building including any possible deteriorated material or sensitive finishes: • 3 mm/s for vibrations less than 10 Hz • 3 to 8 mm/s for vibrations between 10 to 50 Hz, to be interpolated linearly • 8 to 10 mm/s for vibrations between 50 to 100 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, and • 10 mm/s for vibrations above 100 Hz Page 165 of 688 Monitoring is recommended to be implemented through the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs, to be securely affixed to the fagade. ArION Figure 8: Proposed Locations of Vibration Monitors Should the monitors report an exceedance event, an automated email will be sent to the contractor, property owner, and appropriate consultants. Should the exceedance not be the result of disturbing the monitoring equipment of very localized activity around it, and the consultant considers the exceedance to be significance, then the site will be reviewed for damage that may have resulted and construction activity will be modified to avoid further harm. Heritage Planning Comments In reviewing this application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The existing building is currently listed as a non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the City's Municipal Heritage Register-, • A Notice of Intention to Designate was published on April 12, 2024, to designate the existing building-, • The designating by-law to be passed by Council will ensure that the fagade and heritage attributes of the building will be protected in the case of future applications-, • Retention of the building in full was explored during the planning process. However, the size of the lot and the size and position of the building drastically reduce the feasibility of new construction at the rear of the site. Further, the existing building was not constructed to and cannot support the addition of 40 storeys above it while remaining structurally stable without serious and costly intervention which may impact the integrity of the existing fagades. • While facadism is not a preferred practice in heritage conservation, in the context of this proposed development it is the approach that balances interests while allowing for the intensification of the site. The entirety of the front and east side facades as well as a portion of the west side fagade will be integrated into the podium and will allow for the retention of most identified heritage attributes as well as maintain the contextual significance of the building. Page 166 of 688 • The submission of supporting plans and studies, summarized in the report above, details the specifics on how the identified heritage resource and attributes will be adequately protected and conserved pre -construction, during construction, and after construction activities. The submission of these documents in a requirement to be completed prior to any activity commencing on site, prior to the issuance of final site plan approval, and/or prior to the issuance of the final heritage permit. Heritage Planning Staff have also assessed the proposed work against the best practices and guidelines from the following provincial documents. The Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historical Properties The Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historical Properties, prepared by the Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism and endorsed by the Ontario Heritage Trust, provide a framework for decision making in architectural conservation, so that interventions respect or minimize affects on character, features, and context. The proposed work complies with the eight principles; in particular the following are met. • Respect for documentary evidence — do not base restoration on conjecture. Conservation work should be based on historical documentation, such as historical photographs, drawings and physical evidence. • Respect for the original location — do not move buildings unless there is no other means to save them. Site is an integral component of a building. Any change in site diminishes heritage value considerably. • Respect for historical material — repair or conserve rather than replace building materials and finishes, except where absolutely necessary. Minimal intervention maintains the historical content of the resource. • Legibility— new work should be distinguishable from old. Buildings should be recognized as products of their own time, and new additions should not blur the distinction between old and new. The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada is a pan - Canadian collaboration between different federal, provincial, and territorial governments. While it does not constitute legislation, it does provide sound and practical guidance to achieve good conservation practice. It is a tool that has been adopted by many governing bodies of different scales. The proposed work for 10 Duke Street West complies with the following general standards identified within the document: • Standard 1 — Conserve the heritage value of an historic place. Do not remove, replace or substantially alter its intact or repairable character defining elements. Do not move a part of an historic place if its current location is a character -defining element. • Standard 3 — Conserve heritage value by adopting an approach calling for minimal intervention. • Standard 4 — Recognize each historic place as a physical record of its time, place and use. Do not create a false sense of historical development by adding elements from other historic places or other properties, or by combining features of the same property that never coexisted. Page 167 of 688 • Standard 7 — Evaluate the existing condition of character -defining elements to determine the appropriate intervention needed. Use the gentlest means possible for any intervention. Respect heritage value when undertaking an intervention. • Standard 8 — Maintain character -defining elements on an ongoing basis. Repair character -defining elements by reinforcing their materials using recognized conservation methods. Replace in kind any extensively deteriorated or missing parts of character -defining elements, where there are surviving prototypes. • Standard 9 — Make any intervention needed to preserve character -defining elements physically and visually compatible with the historic place and identifiable on close inspection. Document any intervention for future reference. The proposed work also complies with a number of the detailed guidelines relating to the conservation, rehabilitation, and restoration of built elements. Additional Comments Further, Heritage Planning Staff are generally in agreement with the findings and conclusions of the revised Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated November 22, 2021 and most recently revised January 2024. Though some of the building is proposed to be demolished, the majority is conserved and will be integrated into the new development, protecting identified heritage attributes and maintaining the contextual significance of the site. Further, portions of the building are proposed to be salvaged and stored to be used in the continued upkeep and maintenance of the building. Heritage Planning Staff agree with the measures outlined in the HIA and are of the opinion that the recommended measures, in addition to other identified conditions, will be sufficient in appropriately protecting, conserving, and integrating the heritage resource. The approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act is not a waiver of any of the provisions of any legislation, including but not limited to the requirement of the Ontario Building Code and Kitchener's Zoning By-law. In this regard, the applicant is advised that full site plan approval and a building permit are still required. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Kitchener has been consulted. Page 168 of 688 PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 1990 • Draft Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) 10 Duke Street West • Notice of Intention to Designate 10 Duke Street West REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-IV-08 Attachment B — Heritage Impact Assessment Attachment C — Cultural Heritage Conservation Plan Attachment D - Structural Assessment and Retention Plan Attachment E — Risk Management Plan Attachment F — Vibration Monitoring Plan Page 169 of 688 2024 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS �—� Development & Housing Approvals .L 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor MNER Kitchener ON N2G 4V6 519-741-2426; plan ning@kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION Page 7 of 10 ❑ Exterior ❑ Interior ❑ Signage 2 Demolition ❑ New Construction ® Alteration ❑ Relocation 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: 10 Duke Street West, Kitchener, ON N2H 3W4 Legal Description (if know): Building/Structure Type: ❑ Residential ® Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Institutional Heritage Designation: ® Part IV (Individual) ❑ Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes ® No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Vanmar Developments Duke LP Address: 145 Goddard Crescent City/Province/Postal Code: Cambridge, ON N3E 0131 Phone: Email: 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Paul Leveck Company: Urban Legend Developments Ltd. Address: 300-22 King Street S Waterloo ON City/Province/Postal Code: Waterloo, ON N2J1N8 Phone: Email: Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2024 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Page 8 of 10 Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. See Heritage Conservation Plan, submitted 25 April 2022, revised 1 Janary 2024 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: Conditional Site Plan Approval received for proposed demolition, retention, and conservation strategy Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: The property is in the process of being designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act The property's primary elevation, attributes, and value will be preserved. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): See the Heritage Conservation Plan and Risk Assessment Plan submitted in conjunction with this application 7. PROPOSED WORKS a) Expected start date: TBD Expected completion date: TBD b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? ® Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? ® Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ❑ Yes ® No e) Other related Building or Planning applications Application number, Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2024 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Page 9 of 10 The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: IMM, _-- - Date: April 8, 2024 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 9. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I/ We, Vanmar Developments Duke LP , owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize Paul Leveck / Urban Legend Developments Ltd. to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/Agent: . Date: April 8, 2024 Paul Leveck, A.S.O. Vanmar Developments Duke LP Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage 2024 Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: STAFF USE ONLY Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community rage Page 10 of 10 0 • ; �F �9 a ILn ------------- 0 wol— ' �Al :E i 4-1 L ^0 C 1L W 4-1 c E Ln Ln wV 'n w L eev U M E hW ro 4-1 .�n 1 TW i r V 4-1 D U _ t i y■� RM 4 Irk II r, a IN ] i{ i4 I I ■-1A"u, ti� ` �.;: @ '.'�i� y C�3.�• 1 Rhe 4-1 L ^0 C 1L W 4-1 c E Ln Ln wV 'n w L eev U M E hW ro 4-1 .�n 1 TW i r V 4-1 D U M # a e m– 2– NT o e&_–& m m�* e o e e» && x& m m#�� q q # e e m e V) c 0 / e :Ll 7 L) .g / / / ƒ ?C ./ 4- c / 2 E 2 g /ƒ06 \ > 2 / ƒ % 0 \: 0 \ 0 2 ± J ._ G \ % 0 '== 2 0 / 7) y °0 \ \ \ / \ / m g m C 2 g \ 0 \ \ / § V) c 0 :Ll 7 \ / / ?C ./ % / 2 5 :g 06 c > (A g % \: 2 V) J c '/ 2 % \ 2 f / 0 0 D / 3 \ > \ = \ - .? § \ \ 0 \ \ / § = t C of 2 5 3 a L G \ 3 \ < 4— e E > ) I f@ g m g m N w m m m m m m S 0 LO � ¢ 2 n � \ ./ \ \ 0 /tLo c / E 2 0 a e f c / 2 m \ / = c c .E 2 z ) / / / 72 » ƒ ƒ / ® \ < / / 'a E 2 .g [ D 7 [ $ a- 0 2 o e E c/ % 2 c t g E\ c '� a a e -0 \ / / / K 0 / / \ / / ƒ ƒ < - g m f 9 g g g 9 # # # # e e » 00 e m m S 0 LO � ¢ 2 n � _0 aJ O to C ✓ w w +' w w _0 _0 a1 rn w i C b.0 C rn i +' `- aJ ro ro aJ v aJ L .� v . 7 0 > > ?� aJ L i aJ 0 aJ � X ✓ i .� � }' O to ro C aJ — C m A v ra o m �' v 0 o - a/i v v -C ro aU E� V V D m L C C rn rn aJ rn aJ C i� _Q � 0� �--� p� rB — d w i v O p -C 0 _ C aJ C rB rb v - i O N rp pp V Q O O O Ln Q N CO C N C p bo O o n n N > A° aJ C aJ O bC0 b�0 Q °' Q N aJ C =� bC0 i O w O rn 0 ° i C° L r�0 0 x aJ > C aJ O Q° C Q) CN O a) V m aJ >, to rn L O }, 0 v 0— v E r° E ro w =— — Orn 7 rn 7 >, 0 Q cm >' E E Q ° Q aJ 0 ✓ aJ •a0Fli 0 C ° O C L aJ ° ° ° °� —api — C v °J E v Q) O v 0 O i > E Q> ru u o o- o ma f6 O M to C ro W M M O °Q '� Ln Ln t'o U Ln E v °J L Q) M O i C bA rn +-' N C rn i� }' 0 aJ bA m ro bA ro vJi > �n = w M M v ami •� :30 f° rB aj r a' L p v i bo O O u }' u Ln ° Ln Q C i O �' +� O p C i O C Q i O .n .^ V V V >, U� v M v v v v o v •� v Qj m n o Qj "' v v v .X L E Ln .� v tea, oQ Ln m r—° v aQ, o^ O C w o o a, ra n o P' � o o V Q o aQ, -C v D Q� -° D v L/; o M C aE, -0� ° o a°J, v �o o ro Ln .—n rn v ao ao Q ° o Z) ''' ao ° Q v �^ C ao o Qj ° v C �' E a> >_ v C rmo Q m° 'v, u Q c O D p •� o ._ a, v ° bo O O a, m a' •— C Q E a, ra o Ln a, ro �, a, w O — bo � p >, ao i C = Q n � E o p o 0 v 7-o o w m o +� aJ CQj Ou Q> v V axi .� Q o p w O ria Q ro o, E E o f .� co — o u E E E rn >, w E C -0 w rn w _0 _0 w rn i �, C C b.0 }-' w >, aJ C O C C i to aJ a) '-' '-' W +--� C aJ O W C to � QJ QJ-C +� ra 'L ra m i� Qj m > O •� a N > C O w C m +� C ✓ m '� ao o v -C a, a, p �° E a, rn > m C o C ' n i = N Q C °— a1 rb ro i C C O �' E 'v v ro v v M m V - w— C v a' m O Q O Q aJ -o� _ w -C L d i ro 7 O 0 O C-0 E u Q 0 > a, �' O E a, �, �, v ao Q a, ro Q o f r° v r° 0 3 Ln a w E a>i Q)i Ln `—' � Q Q v E n i rn Q> f6 = " 'n ru �i f° O v C o E C Ln aJ Q bA ° >, d '�-' C NO v O = ° D aJ -C ° C O C 0 >.-Q Q ro N� C w v, aJ C v N bio ra Q rn o' n ro }' o 0 v m ai E ai -0— f° o i� E V ro O O V aJ O 'i Ln a) v '--' i- rn C to rn Q v bo N aJ � �° O O Q> I> N a1 C aJ O O C - O O C CQ) > D— -C 0 V O v o ro >, -0 Ln E- c ° i Q) W '- 7) �' r° E> E m p v O w> v Q Q n rn C V >= v N n n �, ro rB _ o f c w u a, ro v >, a, N N Ln _ v E rte° O M M- ra L v C `n ra o p '� oN o v Q f6 ru o °>>C Ln >, i i.iE wQ v O = o � N>0aa' w ° C o te -0 ra>,Q o oO Cp-0 V aJ m to v - o-0 E O OnVo O Q p O v rn V ra V :3 vC -0 Ln a) v D Cv ro w F • E o= -0 4t = ra °' a' m Ln 0 n oo i o ai ao Q) Q) Y v ra- v o � N� v 0 w a, .� a, o O Q i rn O ra aJ ro L 0 z N N -0 ° Q bA i V O Q E f6 Q vw a n � w-0 v v`° Q o Q Ln � _ v ,n f° p Eu ,�, ro O v ro ro v v- Q �' L V Q V N N aJ - � O 0 W rn rn w aJ V Q N V V D v E '� O N i1 o C p i C 0- E ° ami o v i r° •� o '� > rho Q airo Q) a`n, Ln C Q O o o f am u- Ln o Q r C ate, ro v L W s' C i N QJ L v Ln L — C (D L 7 ✓ p •C Ln C V QJ a' v i Q •� ro i N~ a ro -0 C M U a' C rho .E Q ro O R' � E F a, 3 0 E a' 'Q O f6 V a, o U r-.+ �n v o - ao D O v v v v N> E Q C a -- o- `° - o E v° Z3 ra o bo °Q _ o Q_ z° an' C-0 `" u E bA a; o v o Z3 V C > V C �, C a1 O I� a1 rn ra aJ N= E w i i M i N ) v� u 'E E E v v a> E v �, � a' v U O L O Q v, E E> E �, w v u v o O v C v C W E ° w O E —° O o a, O A C v a, w-0 v O O o V ._ Q F- u w� O F- m Ln F- 0- o' O_ k•• � 0 CL (1) � � � � 0 � r Q) 5 m E \_ \ t < / / E \ / / / \ \ ƒ \00 / / ƒ <.g % * * 2 \ 3 / 3 / / \ c \ G 2 = V) / 3 / / ƒ / E u ^ E 2 < / E § D u E / 2 0 { J � ■ m m S 0 rl- � ¢ 2 n � \ a W tA O CL i 0- N N r _r C 'V C N C X i O i O-0 C i — N p =_.� O i- :3 O O C r M V V N V bio C V w }' V1 p �-J w C O C i N O V Q N �_ L •0 Vl c D N Ln N bA o 0- O0 0 p N �_ E N L O CO N in N bA C v O i v V > � Z I Ln O Ln L N O N o T �..� a Ln r0 Q E > o o �o M .� Ln Q E v -0- o Q Q) N p v, V a; O L p a°J, �' — Ln Ln L 0 0— Q v i C Q) -Y N E'EC � w V L +' 7 �..� w n w in v M p 7 i O N w Ln �--� N 'C C u i �--' Ln L V — C O V 7 +--�L rp p N +' ro '_' C Ln b.0 Q C Q °_ X w U •L ✓ bio N .O E Ln M 0 C to w O C C Lv N fp C bA >' Q O N •� N Ln i u i L ro p u n N L in to i� u L Ln O O 4; ro 0 a i b�0 Ln •C O 'i N M 4J M to > N N L Ln L N —O O N M V N Q 0 �O Z CO v ,� Q N N i V Q w v, i O V n p C u w O X N O Ln N — N - r0 C M '_' S Q i L C N N +� M ✓ ao ° Q L ) ° N '� L bio N o w .� a, �° a > r a C O a, � u o ao °J a, ao w to c O to °� E � a ? cm Q) w v o v O C C MLn Ln o c—ro �o v — C ov 'X O o 0 o Q M v -C a, v N m Q d o ° N N bAN `�° b.0 >, N v, v N `� N o v, v Q +' +-+ v V ✓ ✓ 7 ✓ 7 � L N Qom—, �-.� ° Ln bio U C � 0 > L,)V 7 V p X N O ^ N O ° L/) '� v O in Q L Q v u t0 4J i bA N �"' in L O i o Q E �, E T w — N v o ao 2! •7 0 C CO w W N Q L N Ln N ,�., in N N u C N •� v, O w N O N N b�.0 •bA Z) N u •`n -0 N >� O L � , N N 4J O N V wi > N N j E b�0 Ln to ° v 7 > C O O u O by M Z= w >C M C o. O r6 V SJ- L U L o_ O Ln ✓ — u ro N p u E c N O N O N +' v v Q Q) C V 0- ° C �--� to M > bo `Z' •C - C — M N i N 00 N U Ln ro n N O a) O Q O '— V ,moi, f6 E v E L IE 0° v c 0 - L L N LD .— ~ v, V > L •� u L Q Ln N _ ✓ Q N — r0 N w �O r o V -0 _; _0 C Q N > cB bA N 7 N u W O C b.0 �, i t0 Q o M to w Ln r--� -0'� C tai, i _ 0 to Ln E o v E >� }' o a, 7 U v Q �' = o 0 0- C ° O u N V ,'Ji, C 0 M bA to u bA O Q :Ln t, �_ bA • = �_ N M Z, O U 0 0 M o� Qj > v �' -0 L O a, V E Ln b0 C '� O E� L C N L N i c O— L o O N M M 0 N Q -0 N N Qj CA w�--� ti �O N -O � N •L Ln W u ro M O N •— — 2 w V Z3 ° a O C — L N Q C V, ✓ C O 7 X Qj Qj L p ao E °Q QJ Q _ n3 - w v CU Z v °Q E '� v v o O O v D O v i Q D M � v v O Q ° �_ " - N o a � �' F S L Q v Qom' � = > .E V, V � ._ .- V J .- N L E O w O cB Q N Ln v .Q O 0- 0- E QE 7 O L v E Q 0 v v Qj N z N 7 M Qj Qjw N N O N co co O 0) (6 0- MOE N N 0 in0 .in W +_' _0 >; Ln N O C bA to 'a L C L U, ,.� C rn O C C N 41 E i Q O, > N L C O n p N > 0 E L E fi5 i� i r—i � N N C E C �O N Q Ln M -o N� c N O C p O C C� E � •— C E —O E o m �•-' E `� c i� O > - O N Ln +' Q Q L w M W Z3 V V N Vi N O V V N l6 N M 0 b�.0 V W lW �•-' o '� v Q O WE r6 N-0 N = w p N Q rB i '� '� � — �i N E ro >, �, C C O0 N w M N Ln N • U M to -u N >> � � 5 -0 7 V •� N 7 rB •C N a N O D E rB vi N rn rB v O bio C_ v o -C �_ V C C N N Q O � O- ` N rn rB L C O U �_ W N N .0 N ✓ N W vi L •� C w O 'L N C M V ,E i E 'E I v o i rB f6 u p i Y .0 M N n N Q i N +' b0 v Ln o O W CO r6 N > C s' E CO to >> M N i C C = �--� -0 - N N E of p p N m O M � M i i C M 0 E M -' —O O v Q O C •n Q C V Ln V Q p i bA C C O bA b' V V +' L C> E X L O Q V �— N � C C b�0 �_ b�0 0 M w C p N > L r6 L > O _` ro E V ✓ V N N —_ O N 0 E 7 .�—�' N N O i y •E N Q N OV V N r6 c0 i U C rn N M i b.0 n C O vi - >, i C O W i M C O E O rn N O W > C O N C O Ln V N rn X N N V V OV N Ln V �_ L °' >, v E L C — bA �_ C L C =-0 C w C N v > C v i C C N M v C E _^ C N u a, O Ln rn O O Q V W Q o i a, C w N n > O C i Ln N .� M V >, bA N i f6 °J M v L C E Q �_ C> rn M v W o E Q) i v to M N n M N M -0= rB C E- O r,4 — O O O p MCC N L �--� C i rn > C 0 .� O E O Z rn i� U N Ln > N W N Ln N_ w N N N 4O > �' E N E rn Ln C �, V L V V C Q W Q i Q ao E 7 - Q — M Q N C rD Ln C O w r0 v E H= O °' i O �, V v - v r„ v � v Q o 0 Ln V > v b �° Q 0 a v �' '� E U o v n C i Ln L C C U N Orn M O 0 M C N Q N — -C D_0 u Ln C E v OV N Q= N •0 O C Ln d Q 0 M = W O V = E - O N O ro w v, o O rn = L/) = o rn X= O V M V T V N C Ln O > O> (1) > N U. v i M V v > M W bA n u i rv) D r^ -CL a O i C N M L rn rn O V �' O O i _A i M V N O rn u i �' w L r^ Q Q L u i i bA N N L H Q n Q Q E Q Q E N- ro O H O rB M O M O w� H d N , n n N N O N co co O 0) (6 0- MOE c O V C_ Q) Ln L Q) L Lnm -+ gy V C, Q E Q) b0 L Q) L v v v 0 69 1 / z LU LU O u O � z 0 ry u C 73 t 0 11' _0 4 � Q) Q) CY 0 Q) P O u Q) F 46) in O c O 5: 4,� U O N u C LE O N O ., Q � o �Q .j co r LL Q) \ E \ � A � ® to\= E G 2& t±) m= 9 ® 7 2 m 2= \ \ � / \ \ G Ln Ln \ / / ® / / ® 2 = / / S p = y - y ® 0 ) \ \ \ \ \ D 0 00 G e 2- 2= g y G ®/ @ / \ t § / 5 0 / } ƒ § \ E / 3 E \ / \ ) t= 3§ 0-> / \ g£ 2 Q) e l ± = g m G) % \ u \ @ E _ \ o \ % 5 e n ± ± /# a% g Cr \ 2\ 2 &±= e 5 G e\ g \ 2 \ \\( \ Ln =U \\ § o}. . m $-Y m m a 2% 7 f 7 , C:L% ± \ e s 2 2 o s \ 00- > § _ \� / » a : o ° 0 § m # o ° ° _ 4—\ . / m % 7 . 7 a / ± ± m / { \ \ ? ƒ 2 \ L 7 e¥ t e e G o 0 \ / \ % § \ 7 / 0 \ / \ \ z \ / ) / \ � \ \ & - k /) \ \ / ° (� j Ln ( u \ \ 5 3 / / E e \ / D L/) ± \ t = \ = 5 7 $ 5 \ 2 ® = 4 3 m Q) t/ 0 0 f 0 e�(1)= 5 7 N / 3 \ a G 5 \ / / / \ \ 2 m m S 0 co ¢ 2 n � Kel \ s Q) E U) L/) Q) U) L/) ru t m CD - E I M zv it Ail 1 1 C 0 (L w " �LL6 m 0 ?/Z. I. • co (1) M, M, co co 4- 0 (Y) co (1) c� a N to ru Q .� ro C ra C ro u V L ro Q) a) L 3 Q) ) � °i '� Ln v' v v o C N 00 7 r i w C=-0 ro O LL +--� b.0 ro — •� C M C ro a) 7 O '0 Y C 7 o � a) O V a1 �) ro O N b-0 E ro OF —O -0 i a1 vra - C E n i a1 C C _ m '--� C Q) Ln a) m o o o O� V 0 C � Q V p E �-.� ami CQ E p > Ln�6 Vl lfl J--, C fo U V O '� bA �' fo O Q X a) 00 ro ra Ln LL C Z a1 m L r w ra •� Lw C Q 0 L p01p tJ Y N O Q E C ° ° N n C O E i w O EO OV o N N b�.0 I N m 00 w EO aJ Vf O J U m M `� N r X O �, — w V `� O C N V V E O O E i Q >, C a) E >, C ra N _ i O E ra �i C Ol L O Q C ro N a) O .o w a1 V 0✓ i C m M Ln E o Q Q Q E Ln V v a) E° a) 00 ra p O O a, v °' C Y 7 °' > X w °° U cB 3 v f6 C Q m •� > Q) �+ C .� U w a) ?� O 7 O C a) O N — N C O ~ C a i w r6 Q v _ ° O ~ ui o E O Y _ f0 N ro ro i u L O N to in O> 7 u O v> V 7 M M i 00 7 i) -� rn O U > w ,C C m m H C O Q w `� � i a) N i �--� r6 f>>6 C O ,C a1 V Ln o O C rn X O c Ln C �> C �--� i a) J--' C C ro C ra C O ra C .� 00 E LL `� C — C — `� O 7 O N tJ E >, N ° ro �O C L p01p n I'0 p V O Ln C `� V-0 °�' ro E v v ro Q) o O a> Q �° ° v E v M a) N v V a) C C ro C rn E rn v a1 �, >, o H aoLn C E LL ra .� C ra ✓ Lnn C OV Ln � V � C Q a) w O C C rp a) L C (o C C fo r6 C ro r6 r0 C a1 7 = wo C o u aiLn E ru .- f6 a, ra c ra v m -da) C C L ° O ° C a1 V i E v N �i > V a1 bA a) � N p C M C O a) a) a1 I� +� L a1 -5;, a1 N a1 i a1 L ro a) In H L H i Q V L H C L 00 r +� Q CO m -0 w Z LL D .� .� ,�., >, l0 -0 O C E ' Uj w 0 a1 a1 61 ro i E a) C L C >O •'� Ln r m L rn C w w- to vii i E +�-� ro i v O V O E •� C a) (+'1 N Q ro Z i LL O O bA > Q) N a1 " C ro —O m X U fo i-� r01ii O� L .E 00 D O 6 to C C O Ln � C O aj O C V 0 O C' 'Q bA a) O N r _ n 7 C 7 rho O L N _C }' > C a1 O O O O ru V U) V E Q C O O >, C > -i L _ C O a) N E +� X a) E n o � rB ro ami a) ro — X E ro C N r0 C . > C O Q -o N o O (D Lnm V r�o w ~ C ° N= W =-0 Ln ro E O roLn C C O v E E m 2 E m •''' 7 C W Ln C E C L r6 OV � L a1 > �i �,>�n� a) O C voo O N a1 CQ m a) ° w v > O n v C� — E N ° N C N .N v ° F i rB M� Ln p O L to rn a) L a) ro ,., v rn a) .b.0 a) ° E m L ro C _ w E CO o a �_ m w M w w a) ro O N Qj rno 3 E a, o o .- a>, O rn ) 0 O Ln •— ° ro E m a) ro o ai O Ln �, °�' ro a, a) ° Q .. o � rCo O L r01ii N 3 C i L N C ° C E C oo i — = rn _C a) E a) E > Ln f 6 bA - i ro O N M rE6 Q i bA —C Q O t6 i i rSS - o C V w O Ln C Z V Q) a) O •� N C° Q .� 2 O ra ra C 0 C ro Ln rn V C 0 O ro a) Ln rn C n ro E N v �n C N C bA C C7 r O ° co o f v ° v w V E o v r° 4-- m Z _O N O C w o rn m E C O ro CO°° U �- ,L 'bA Z C - — ro C v v — ro v _C V_ v v � v w O X m C o O > 7 U) }' N N ° C M "' 0 C v o 0 0 ° 0 E m m O o C C a) O O 00 C oo .r^ a) o C ro C O C v o= ro L/) }, O >; o Ln o � i C a) N Q) ,rn 00 i >> > C �_ }-' i a) ro a) v, >' a) m ro C r O ra C m p b.0 C V ) > •i i bA C � a) X bA = CO Q �., v uj E N �° ro E N a) Ln V� v C ro v v v Q) >� V rn v E v v v° Y y m co m w y _ M O 0 ro ra Q E O V (2) V C ra C Q) LL ra 7 L N 0 C 7 O V (3) O It 00 C Q E O V Q) V C i 7 C I U) Q) C > u V C Le. co 8 ITL co i Q) L ro LnE 7 ro V V co co O LO co r (D 0) m 0- w a, , i o O v �o v ra Q o v o w v ro O i LJQ Q V E Q ° Ln C (3) w ° aJ i ° V O N ' bA �_ �_ r6 v D to - U 7 n5 w (p Q r a) Ln a E �--' _ 'U ° x v� v O v v v Q m v w '� rn c c 0 T° i roQ D w a) - m _Lnu E a0 C Q E Q D W V i aJ ra to b.0 c N > Q = in a1ru U i = v ° N 7 .� >� aJ m C ?� C i in i to v L/)_0a1 Oc O O O Ln 7 i r6 v •L n Q i Ln m � Q L ,� mv aJ N i m T 0 2 >° N — 0 v j, Z >i p>-'aJ +� to Ln Q 06 bA H wu ILn O Q° 00 O 0 V N ° > H O `° G- O �_ v i OU L u x v u O �b.0 N ro Q a1 U � Q J U C O U O uj +� 0 ,� Q) O Q to E � N= u 'aJ u U � d J aJ m V v 0 C m � V C O -O Ln � � ° J J E �' ) E E Q o '� C Q >, -0 v J �_ O i a1 T H i 00 v i ai pp c Lnn O m C Q) ov w Q .� ° d i ii rn o H c LU bA O c u C O m �n NaJ in to i s C °; E ojf �-- aJ V i a1 bA C �--� aJ C �--� N ✓ J f6 Ln T N ° E O O n ?� v O c a L N o .� bio E 3-0 a c Ln v o u M v z CO vi > E v 06 Z) O u_ m a a o V V Q' E E) �_ Q o v D o E 0 Ln ° E v _ Q Z ° "' v N ._ V a, O OU }' � E C Ou N L V U Ln M V . . . . . LU v _ H c m 06 O c m u C m w i m Y- to w O a1 W C '--' w m o w— C-o O 32 w Qj O a1 L C O O N= CO ° C C aJ ° wN cc y(1) w w c Ln a w •L m _0 Ol Ln ro Ln O ° c N _0 � 2 Ln c Ln,� m N N ,� > > V u w w Ln 00 c 0- 0 ° L OU u u; In - o - C c v M Ln -0 Ln c v o U v v -0v OLn V Ln w 0 E° r Ln v a) E m E f6 a, ( n f° Ln a1 N Q = C Ln E v v O ° _0 E i a) L H a1 �_ v O v L N 0 C a1 = � v — � O Q °O E Q o E EO m 1 � O C Z3 in N > Q Ln E C 0 0 ,o ''�! co C to O O V Ln __ '�. COi >, 0 Ln 4*-- •� w O m O O r ro f6 E m w U c � E x E Ln m f E rn O O ° O N E O C C i O w -0 �O Ln M Z w 0 p ° in m _ a 0 > n V ru L QJ ° U N n 2 i C 61 N - O m Z -o w * r .— i T H O N N i ru m v oo toLn -LI Q v Ln E i o Ln i v E O O M Q = a) ° N O Ln 0 — — -0 Z -0 a, o _rl .— co co O LO co r (D 0) m 0- w 0 00 00 u r 00 qrl Ln r 5 Ln r ai i co � 0 7 M o L° 0 o QjL ti �� a, co W V_ Qj M QJ 7 0 = CL Q1 N - i � C V N Q1 Q1 L 4- C V L D 0 E V tLo QJ C U i v QJ rQ 0 i C L/1 0 C � Q ro N bio C bA iJ C E l/1 LL Ll 7 0— V .Fo NV V C C ro ru C 7 LL C � Q1 C L � Ll Q rQ 0 :3 V :3 QJ U ro CV_ � C 0 C 0 V y� W C C Q1 — Q1 u 0 CC rQ 0 QJ W 7 QJ i 0 ro QJ L/1 V w C J Q O V C ra - � � CL C QJ O QJ L � L Q V LL O Y m Z) QJ 7 M 0 U O QjL 0 � � O V W V_ Qj Ln C QJ 7 0 = CL N - i L Y QJ Q � N L 4- C V w Q L Y 0 E tLo QJ C U i v rQ 0 i C L/1 0 QJ C N bio C bA iJ C m 0 0 - LL Ll 7 .� ru E ru ruC L U N N C- (1) N E Ln Ln N Ln Ln U t Q E Q) b-0 L v C- L,) !n >N N N V1 I 0 I N Q) i Q) O L a Q) bA m Q) bA .i O bA Z 06 c Q) V Q O c O 4-J^ Y.i .i V ^Ul W 0 06 c O V ^c W N k' Ln O Z:� U � E -p O N, = m _0 O > C N M N O O1 N C T Q C > N U X U U XQ O o N � N U N C N 0) N Q p� O C:� O U E .. N N X i W _0 d C N U - 0 o m N U U U N U Q � U CO N � 0m Q -F- u- u- � E N� U ✓ C N .— u U N i v v Q E v ao v ru rU6 v °i' aru C to •— .2 N U C p N Ln a, a a m rn 1 w ° m Q) c o v +" to C r6 Ln O —_ +-' Q M bA C Ln Q> bA Cu to N O N r, I� i n O O O C C 0 a' O Ln -0 ;_- O > O L N +� N bA N N N N -0 to N -0 � a - O w +�—' ON to — � .� i ru C3 a,n ru O ro v aA = J Ln o °' *Fu M Qj c �_ 0 > . m Q ra Q w U v a v >� .� rro =_0 c 0� a u .� - 'ru o v �' v o c v v o w u ro c i v 'm v _ co °° a� ru }, °' m V w — .3 a, ro Ln v L — oQ o vra v ao � '�, 0 3— Ln v Ln v— � ap U aA p vi ra z u 0 '2 N C 'rn p N Q p o Q L, L, Q n c a; a; z o i tea, v >, > o E° o v Ln o ° o o =a Ln 'bA z v o m- U V— Qrj ,�, U N c- V M N v �i v O z C z to Q N N bo L N C Z� a 'Z O N N J �' -0 N -0 � - — 'rn v � o r0 ,--� fl - U r^ b.0 i O U N i U N bio ro U ,) n N > L L oru ,--� n t>'i >, O n 0 .� J C +' > C ro w0 � '� O c L .� N > m ' .� N w Z '�..� N u i L O i }' > _ w z >, i �, N m U N E i rn Z) to a E> �° v Q v a) N rn � o rho •° u av, o Ln Ln I- U °i c c c c Q o c v Q U N to N O .� Q � N C ° i U 4J 0 to 7 D j U N � D a N N +-' C r6 �, 'p C N Q C O � O w m � M N a O Oi CV ON ON i � >, i i1 O �� O N •U �_ E Ln V O N Ln _ Q Q Qj _ �>Qj _ C M N 4O _ = N Q L o Q ° ° w ° d C O E H = — H = — W W Ln N — H ° Q— N V) Q k' Ln O Z:� U � E -p O N, = m _0 O > C N M N O O1 N C T Q C > N U X U U XQ O o N � N U N C N 0) N Q p� O C:� O U E .. N N X i W _0 d C N U - 0 o m N U U U N U Q � U CO N � 0m Q -F- u- u- � E i N L ro Ln ro U U co co 4- 0 co (6 r N b0 Q °J W to Q) ao E aj ro a, LnQ v D o = Q w ro �, = ro aj u ru -0 O '� bA O > U U aj H C: ro C:c N ru aj T •� �"i VI U L N V OU C Ln ro O O Ln — N N O — ro ro E E _ O i O Qj Ln � C bA N V Qj C N C , �"� Q)co — N U to N i •— u i C O N � Q i Q bA rn Q i Vl rn ro vi >, N i O N u n N O ro L O > .0 N U C O i L V w O ro ro ro N Ln Qj Qj M to Q L N Q)_0 Q C fo O O N r6 w ap E C N bA E XELC-o C -C N N O Q LL O O Q O N � Q N Ln O p -0� N U O ro ro N C N Q u C +� L C C L N L i �n Ln ro .N N E •0 0 ru rp m U N 7 n C O U O � Q 'u ro O C-0 C O = C O N T U ro C Ou i N ro `� rn CO f'V N C '� u O ru O T Q T N w brnp i aj _ ^ -0 -0 — -0 L O O rn LL N Ln ru p _ c N Ln O 0 ro •� N Q Ln i ro p O Q u i bA — T dj rn N N i r ro W C y' N C - L V1 N C Q �' p ra _ +-' ro .E U , rn ra N ro ro ro O O L U N w i -0 m E E N m L 72 > N N i w- O C L O u C u O O u O l/1 bA bA � n 0 H H m m C C i rn C �--' Q rod �"' > U E> Q> -0 p v 00000000 v v v ru vi co °'Qj E �o O n -C i C ro L N � N ra N O N +J a,.— O N N 0 .0 N N L L N L L O dj Ln N H H m Q _ ro Q -0 O O Q O � i ro 0 O T n N UZ3 Q z U Q) u v v v Z' u v N _0i 61 N O O -0 N O C T u C rn E O N �' +--� 7Z3 E : Ln ro pp Q' E v u Ln a E L � U 4j O O C _ rn L i O U O rn N t+4 - to N C W d C U -Y to O _ C N i O Q N N U N bio f'V i i O 7 ,. N I N~ N 0 E 0 Ln n Qj T Qj >, N ro .i _ ro c N O L O E p ro ON bA CO N .in >, `-- O E C T 'L ro ro +-� i N O U Fu _ :3 > � v OC v N WQ U i +--' - N � ✓ cj 0 v N M O �--� N rn W L O W U C Nom--+ N -_ E .0 C u i N in p C ---- ' 7 m d N - N !E ro Ln 0 W i rn ro C U')Q ro 'i W Y N Qj U O N U N i ro I1 + Ci 0 o c N 'ED .E 0 N - N N N Q = to u .� = = N N u to N N — 'p U N _ N H rn - N Ol N-0 4- 0 C ro +' Y co co 4- 0 co (6 r N b0 Q Ln C N E N N -0 bA — ra rn C T N u C rn to T Q) N `- O C C U— N i 0 = -0 O U -y i = r6 O U ro N m > Q u u O u � _ •i z > +n to C T O C rn u o 0 u o v o ro .� N o _ N V Ln to L�pQ) �— O +' X L/) CD �veD-C:�.ov��_ :Ll C N ro 3:, u ro — C N u — r�6 QJ to O N N O i iJ Q .— N C O Q) E E Z O ruLU o` N Ou 7 00 i O O I N O i �O N O u }' r i -, to O C m .— d Q N u N i r6 C -0 N C C N E-0 0 bio N-0 U U -0C 0 -6 Z) Q O C -0 C L +� r6 LU N N U U i a C O ':3 N 4J L N ✓ U N-0 -0 C C ro N 0 E -0 •C to Obioi t 1 i n O r6 T~ T L Eu L m N-0 rro 'p,p in Co N C N ✓ U C ro 0T r° ro 61 M E to u Fa N 4- U C bA O ' O u o > bA O 0 N Q) bA N C � ro v L - v v -0 U C v r, C > a io C C 'ro c N C C Qj Ln N E bA .� C .� Ln "6 v v 0 }' +-' Lf) 0 u O N ro v O-0 rn -0 -a U O Y o co 0 E .0 C a, `b Ln ro v ro V i u .� 7 N > E a v c .. E m 0v >, o —n O QJ v > w N -0 to ° Ln bD Ln E to ro -p 0 O-0 Ln O — v Qi N U w �' 1 C C — M - i N C E i v L N C L U Li Q �' O v v N to O .n Q O N C N H C O bA .4J ro to C .z Ln CV "6 u u N > o O !n N �.'i N O :5 Q ro v U i Ln C ro �--� O C O o �--� r6 N 6 Q -Y oo 7 -0 bA ?� O O U m M m L i - r6 Q � ro rn CO C O O-0 Z/ — C O O M m U N _ i C O N r6 �' C N v N C ro 4 -0 ro -0 0- to �--� -O N �--� oA 0 �O bio4,-O N T C N l j 0 ro Q) - •7 N -0 LO Q-0 C v N T Q O N 7 N 61 -0 ro -0 0 'i r6 C M ro to Q -0 -0 O v C Q Fn M > N C r Q -O (J � -0 u N -0 �_ C O) i Lq �..� N r6 U O N L_ U C i > O C C .O �' Q rp Uj C C C . Ln Q "6 u .L .E ,�, Q) t 1 Q r6 in U ro L ro bA C Q C v 0 7 E U "6 to ro rn C +' 0 i O -O X N C C OJ L N C > C- ' in v> E ro 0 ro n -a- H U U O = H ro Q r Q ro N > N N > N C � � C O o U b0 i Ln 7 N bA 0- u U N O O N U 'E O U bo raC c U C N 0 O O d = O O N E cc 0 X � w C +� o O ._ r N N C C O 0 In CO O O O u Q) 0 U L O O U ro a, m > v v z u -0 Q) u v o ro -0 N _ N V C to �— O +' X L/) CD C:>,,=., :Ll C N ro ro N N C N O — bo �' C Z3 u u .� O' C E E Z O ruLU o` Ou 7 O U v T N C n O C Q Q N u N C V C bio U ro d L !n 7 LU Q1 0N O ':3 �--� N 4J L N ✓ 61 N-0 v O rq i -0 0 V Obioi n T~ U L N-0 rro 'p,p N iJ N C N ✓ �_ 7 N 0T r° O M E to 7 Fa N n n !n O E 3 > bA O O O ro a� L C "00 '� -0 U C r, v > .0 io � O Z3+� Q i O N +-' Lf) 0 u r Q N N LU u i rn L ) .r_n ro i ro w 7 'i � o a, `b N v ro V i u .� 7 N > E a v c v E m U�> >, o —n O QJ ,., > w N i to C V1 0 to ro -p 0 �..+ In N w O — �.' 0 ro Qi N U w O ✓ 1 C U — M - i N ro �--� C U 7 O v D C u U v v to Q .n rn v� "6 v E rn ro 0 u Ln CV "6 u N N ±' Y Ln = N 0 � O :5 C 2 �J LL +� Y ✓ Ln C ro O N T Ln ro 7 u N u u ro u co 8 CDLrn (D 0) m 0- Q) ro E ro V V rio uj p O N T i N r, -0 6 T — N bA N `� O N bA O bA = u u N M 6l N r6 > O i Y� U N b- O 0 6 W C i Ln LL .0 N N O bA N "� OU �'-' ✓ QJ "6 r6 i �_ N In "6 >�> b0.0 :3i u O ro Y N Ln in O O 00 u m N i C ro ro i= `� N N u b-0 Ln o N v -0 = O u Q O L C m C O w n N rn n O N C _ Ln 6 Q� m c � u rn N i 0O � C: O N ro M N `� M i N bA N C O Z "6 O C r6 O .� In N b�.0 O O O L i = T r6 O X Vii N -o OJ u •� � E "O C O -o m -o fl- ; N N v _0 - ro 0 N O O p Y Q O �' N L V1 C u r6 r6� o C ro C O i >, E -ON E-0 O C-0 rn •� In > s' 41 r6 .� fl- i o 'O O � v O N rn Emu u ) .0 •U OJ j i Ln N EO O Ln C~ � o a)u� bA C L H i= N -O w N O' N in N u i N -O c Q Q) �, O U ; o ra u to 0 i r6 ?� �,Ln i - L m - M - U.) N E �' c c u O N N 0 L �O O Y '� ru � N C w rn Z "6 O U iJ O U L N u -0-0 O N ro i Z O i N u C C U N � bA n ro QJ C N �+ N C L O B V C p— C "6 C -O u r6 N C N N U N i In N OJ ro _0 O V �_ u r6 C Ill N O L N . C L -0 � N= > N C bA bA u iJ Z3 C .� ro N 0 H = O_ v � ON O � Vl O C o N C i Ol O V N C m `� N-0 N p N ro i O Ln 6l C V � O bA C I C N T E _0_ i L a •� V 0- C rn — ro LL "6 7 � O >, N L N rn "6 a C: .E .� > C N ; V "O C c- Y C N -Y C O u C N +'-' Q N O .0 O N ro r6 O O iJ O ZLn r6 E Ln i L u C—_ C bjo ro O ro 7 rn u C C C Q N— N I l0 � O O C rn U 2- rn O N __ O E V L N rCo w 0 O u m N C On rn i O N O Nm N i N N iii O 'O c i O i9 _0 m U >' N N N i 0 bc0 O C 0 O1 ro .� m � -0 > ro H N � O ro ro Ln -06 - N N > -O C E O i N ro Q> > i rn N i i N +� N r N Z C -Q > Q V w �--� C I u r6 i > N N i v N Vl C M 4J - N •L o O Ln L I� 7 N u .0 O O by N M by bA N i C O �i rn N +� w - c- CO of Li- LL 00 pi i O w "O C rn J C �..� m > ro O "O m i Q ro in C O O O O O_ UU O Ln C C C Y bC.O m O 7 !? m C f6 N Vl N L ✓ N Ln o 4J F- m N to p L O im _ !? bA rn C C O T N � L E C O N-0 N C (u y C C ra to i p N M � C N 'L N O > C L bA N C V 0 > N L N C N L — 7 - r6 H .c Y -0 O ma_ "6 bA M m m N ,O a = H ro Q i N o E L roLn QC > U C ro > i u N N N o — > N N of }' 0.0 N u u u �--� 'i C N rn O f rn O U n N NO r�6 N L N Ln (A N N N U C N �' C C U N „ r m c .� O N j r0_ > m u O N N ro C L/) N fV N OJ 1 C u rn �..� b.0 Ln LIPLI) 2 C Q N N fl- Z u Z N ro 001.0 r6 L L ro ro C v u N = bA .� N N M CO "6 m iJ Y +e rn V)T i - M 0 31 U') bo O N N O -0 Z3 _ ro C O bA — N E C � U > N 7 C to �--� C Y N C N L i O ro I{ vo Qjv N L ra —U i N �--� N T o !? V In rn ro In 7 o C O i ro v i }' Fa U m _ C ~ N r6 N .rn O E E N i > N � -o O I, O m C Z O C OJ W O C U L — N U O ro .� N 010 Z T N� u u N C vo v m F- co ro N �, v n3 = a, LU Z Wi L OJ F- N 2 u � N u 7 Ul E O — 'i d T v Q b0 7+ — >, a ,� - - - z C w N In O p U C ._ V ro rn a, -- w T U o C N = O C v > LU v p o v '� v> t — .m O O Q) to � V n v O— °J Q ro CD CD u N v o:= E 0 i O N O to N `° V N ro N ro `Q to U F --O D M u U� E V) ro ro u co co O 0) m 0 - co 2 & r (D 0) 0- � C ° v v Q) a c v In c W0 v Q) _ �, 'i u E N O N O C u ,� _ n ro i ro O U .— C y.� ro O N v v= v Q) L O 3 Q a 'i a ro aJ 3: _ to = N a) Q) u �..� ro Ln Q) i a) "6 C O to >N N C i N L T O u >a) > ro O u > �' � N Q) bA _� N `� �' � > ro oA �' "6 aJ i � Ln C ro 2i o — u Q aJ N a1 Ln iri >� � l/1 aJ '�, ~ rn T O O rn rz Q C N 'L u rN6 O aJ i U N io C r6 0 (3) L L ,., C �--' to aJ > u C) bA C -6 4-N pp to ro U ro Q) ro X p ro ro p U b�jp = a) N rio '� C U O Q) a) :3O UCE 0 �--�_ a1 "6 aJ u N L:/:, ro O OLn C bio > — a1 C o OU w + - L u O a)ro 010 O :3o 0 ,U O O a) u U -O iro u L Ln -0 r6 O C ro r6• wM Lnro to ra - O 3 � w o _0 N o O � � 0 Q) C T Q U r c- -0 O .� ui a) ro Ln> C O O �1 i w Q) a) Q) �' Q + Q) O u 7 O O O O N 0 N O ro N > C �--� M T i Q L U r6 N M to a) �--� V C N i V c a1 i �..� r6 U N to �--� �= n z i Q) o L> i ) > r0 Q O Q to uu L a) Q r6 d = }' U > — Q L L L L U = U J L ro O c-0 bA v v v v o o o o o o v o n O Ln n aJ C to � �--� Q' - N M ro -O to m a) Ln C :3Q) -0ro Q) Q) aJ p a) aJ i °' aJ - — _ �' = a a AINT .., Q) +' T C aJ Ln �n 00 U Z3 U O •� oO '— ro -0 rp L C >> USA v Of N� _ N i U C O aJ u L ro V)ti ro i bA u l5� O 11 }' ro C O N .— 7 '� O u , S— U }' D u 4- p z o Y° w v = 0 4- 4J N �J N rn M �O N O -0.� T 7 a1 Q) In 1 aJ aJ > a) to Qj 0 O M U a) O U —_ , v p QJ v i y, N i }' u C :3O O ro N o oro T to �_ o U a1 U Q)Qj ro Ory)Ln>, L aJ to � �_ Qj 7 U U U Ln O N a1 Ln T E z m M aJ pp C j —O Ln E O Ln O p C:'i � M ro i C o V aJ L '-' ro ro O lin j 1 Q) 7 u i O bA Q v o+ M i Ln QJ i i T= 0 a) ren N u •C •� = a) M 7 a) Q Q- i aJ Z aJ C u r' -'o QJ v Q) L 5 i i aJ O - 6 L C 'C U L O �..� U i C ,., qp a) )i N ru a v Qj ro o v v v o u 4J Ln roO to — Q)u ~ b�0 w ro Q — O T i w C aJ ro ro Fa p O > E 7 T Q0 7 i O i O X aJ O O •u m Q) QJ Q a) aJ L ~ MQ ro Ln N M QJ C ro E u }' C a) > o Q) Y - w rn vo o > w o a) ro o M o o O m 0 U 0 0 Ln co 2 & r (D 0) 0- L N L ro LnE 7 ro V V m -0 Ln 3 C: 00 ao O o O Q) 00 v Q) -10 u rn rn rn �i O Ln ro E N c ro C7 bO O L -0 c -0 U r u ro V O N c F5 O'D u N -0L m ,r V ro C Qj L V) V ro O C u V bA E ) c rn7 Ln Ln C N to C }, 0 N L V N U O bA C M E = H 0 N L U O 00 ro Ln ^ 00 Z L u ^ ILI N Ln c +' �O U L L L a) N L r\i 0J o o a E c v O L N C O c u L F- U U Qj c ro C O C N O Ln � C L 0000 C O O -0 Q O L N �O N tR N ra N N i O O U V 7 ru 10 0 4J � N � � ro J U) -0 Ln ra Q ro M N E Ln 3: u w ra v bA p v Ln L N X Q m V = Q co co 4- 0 ('7 0) ^(U LL O N N bO ru Q Ln ra Ln 3 I— O 00 o O Q) v Ln u L �i O Ln ro E c ro Ln 7 m -0 r N ro O T N NL rn ,r Oro C Qj O Ln u T u C E O rn7 Ln Ln C N to C N L bA U O i bA C 0 Q) E Q ro C }; Z ILI N Ln O �O L a) Ln c E T o o a E c v O L Q C c u ro U bA Qj c O C N C C = � bA L j U u Y Q v L v �O N = W L C C C LnC i O O rn Ln O •i N T 0 a: i.:i w O Ln Ln ro J co co 4- 0 ('7 0) ^(U LL O N N bO ru Q 0 Q) u c ro C N C N C E N O V fl- ro C O N c u C O N N 4-- Ln N D O Q > N c N ) v Ln X bA N V C C OL ro N OU Ln LE L N L C O += Q Ln O O 0 i y L ro rn N r0 N OJra ru m ro o fl- o O O � U C y •� to C O '� M N L L N C N i C N Q ra N ) � O u N 0J U LL N cr� N O L O Q �O i +) T }'O C N 0 ro v U bO U N d Qj L � N N �; �..� �--' N 7 L C O �, > L ) N L b0 Z3 M ro In �, M Q)bO Q)� C J U L N N _ C N U u z c bA C O - C Y O Ln vi u0 u o bA w L N N T 7 c O Q U ) O N N F Lc � O m i ro Lr) 7 C) � � O 'ra bA O r0 N N C C N U 0-- v v .^ E c O N N O E O c - O V T L OU L N F- O c ro Q= O~ z C _Q U U L N Z m Q V L E C d bA Vl N T C � w O N C v C U U H �..� L to = C N bA C N N Fo O r6 0- N C 7 OU a i 0 O oc .�p a= , v v c Q v r^ V1 L V rn U L o E o v U- Ln v E = � ±-, Y w 0 v D m I U -0 in o U w O co co 4- 0 ('7 0) ^(U LL O N N bO ru Q C ra C ro L V ro Q) QJ L N c O t+ O V c tA �X W 06 c O .i V N Q) 0 N L V Q) V L Q Q) E v Q) C C O a) v V ro m w Q) ✓ '� >O� d Ln � Q) Q) N C -0 N N QJ E N I _Ln OO �i O ro v= Q a) E m i Ln Q) > Ov N O ,i N Q) v Ln O2 v— N L CO }' O N — � v>'i 0 O � L bio C C E i Q •rS5 E Nra E Ln L C p Ln 7 �_ •C E f6 V1 f6 O E L ro in o v V rn C E N r0 NV - E o C Ln E a) V Ln O O L n Q O Ln v C Ln N v= Nru v Ln -6 ra O •� LU Q) Q) 0 Q C C H Q)> � Q) � C ra Ln > a) rV i r6 QJ L ON Q C C 2O f0 Ln C O 7 7 N Ln \ i-� r6 v Q > L o Q) V >, Q) Ln C a, > > QJ w V 0 0 O = n Q) Ln c a) E L O E > Q C i L V raI Vrn 0 �_ C O Q) >> E U bA V O _y C 7 C E C �- 7 ra >, O C Q O = Ln O O M 0 w C X C F,Nro Fo C i L E v V i N co C C •� O Ln 0 L to ELno � L > QJ E EO a) QJ Q bA L 7 Q) Vl s m t6 d Q L N Q v C > ro V •C LL Q w O N 0O rn - v— O c •i N L QJ In •E �; Q) N QV V � a) U Q) > Oi V Q W C E C ra LL 7 mm In N �-' Q O E O C V v Q) V L E -0 C C C O a) Q) V ro m w Q) '� M N d Ln � Q) O N C -0 N N QJ L N i OO �i O � v= Q V- i m i Ln Q) > Ov N 'O ,i N Q) N Q L }' O N QJ � � QJ 0 O O L bio O C O C Q •rS5 V Nra L Ln L C Ln N E f6 V1 f6 O E rn L C f0 o v rn C N N `a 0 O E o C ra E Ln O C O O L n Q .Ln Ln C C Ln i N Nru Ln ra O > ' Q) Q) 0 Q C C H � Q) � C ra Ln > a) rV i r6 > L ON Q C C 2O Q) L C O Q N i N - C i-� r6 v E > > o E V Ln QJ C O0 a� w V 0 0 = Ln '_ L N E 0 > Q) L i Vl raI Vrn ra C O E o O V O _y C u C �- 7 ra C c C Q O = .> O O M O - i - O O C rn C }-' N iJ O U) Q E 0 Ln O 0 ra bA 0 � ra C Q) C ra 7 Q) O O V � V1 Q1 Ln i O ro O a) E V QJ i O C n .0 �: Q) L E O C >> C v— v= N O i O i -O V Q) -0 N E X N O- N O v > -5-C O N F, Q) E C = O C 0 O -0 Q V O L 6 O O C V C 0 Q) Q) Q) X > N v — bA H -0 0 ro V d- ra C Q ra 0J � Q) C O bio N C > ro O C •� L Q) V O C Q ra bio i C N O C C bA C C Oro ro � C Q) L V Q) Q) bo _0 ro C C ra C V N � C Q ro O V > QJ 0 E w bo to O Ln X Q) L •E- O O Q) w N a) > C � � 7 O E E O O CO Ln N O w v -0 Ln C bo ra C — � Q) 7 -ro C C E 7 bA Q) C a1 0 O M L ro � O PJ bA a) Q) OLn Ln m w Q) c U C -M G E W V 5 v Ln OL QJ MDWN Ln QJ _0 O � -_ C QJ >-, E E m to N 0 �, O L O N C ru QJ Q bA C ✓ i C VE OL p M QJ 0 j QJ Fv ro ro O i O N bOp V O+� 7 - 0 o m w u E C v M C CM � i�QJ O O ro O Ln N O m N O bA rn i V U Li -b.0 L i QJ Q C C C a1 C to a) 4J V1 0 Ln � � � � = C 0J � L r0 rn +' � +' r0 Q O QJ u 7- C �' w Q) E H -a -6 E C O C C L C C _0-0 v-0 V ro O C }' bA O 2 O C C rn V rn ,C L p� O i� O rp C M w ro w aJ +' -0c) C E C >, > rn - -0 O O E 0 v= V � C n N L O _0 bbio E Q) C -Y E O SOA -0 N O i N p O Z w 0 •C w m Q) 00 QJ O C O V N E � O E f6 _Qm � ; - Q) -om rB N i QJ , L O � O > V C a1 i-0 Q C E +� ro O O C rB Q i C C Q C N i Q O p N C iC C O OLn 3: C ro C p O V 0 O O Q) N> —-6 � E> Q) N N _ � 00 p 7 C Ln C N� C C-0 u N (0 �O a1 o aJ = E C Q E a) n C E 3 0J r^o Q oo •in rn Ln w C_ N C rB a1 E v E O Q) *.;--3 }, ro Q ro ro > Q a U L Q) Q) I- N a) i N V O O C O N O bA 4J > Q) rB F, O = O + V1 ro O vii V1 Ou — O � 0 O 0-0 H Ln l � 0) 7 O C N V cB C O a) to 7 V ro to w Q) U � E w QJ L Ln �i C V- i m i Ln Q) > O V bA O O LL 'O ,i N Q) L vi C O 4-- 0 O O H bio a)0 N QJ •rS5 �-- Vl L �--' _ CVLn L a) O E f6 V1 f6 � C f0 M a) C QJ V C � O N U 0 O M O V E Ln w ro a) i ro O O L n Q Ln Ln L Ln o o th ate) > Q) Q) O H C C ra Ln a) .� L 0 C 2O N L N Q Q) ro rn �_ v E V a)5< o E v Ln OL QJ MDWN Ln QJ _0 O � -_ C QJ >-, E E m to N 0 �, O L O N C ru QJ Q bA C ✓ i C VE OL p M QJ 0 j QJ Fv ro ro O i O N bOp V O+� 7 - 0 o m w u E C v M C CM � i�QJ O O ro O Ln N O m N O bA rn i V U Li -b.0 L i QJ Q C C C a1 C to a) 4J V1 0 Ln � � � � = C 0J � L r0 rn +' � +' r0 Q O QJ u 7- C �' w Q) E H -a -6 E C O C C L C C _0-0 v-0 V ro O C }' bA O 2 O C C rn V rn ,C L p� O i� O rp C M w ro w aJ +' -0c) C E C >, > rn - -0 O O E 0 v= V � C n N L O _0 bbio E Q) C -Y E O SOA -0 N O i N p O Z w 0 •C w m Q) 00 QJ O C O V N E � O E f6 _Qm � ; - Q) -om rB N i QJ , L O � O > V C a1 i-0 Q C E +� ro O O C rB Q i C C Q C N i Q O p N C iC C O OLn 3: C ro C p O V 0 O O Q) N> —-6 � E> Q) N N _ � 00 p 7 C Ln C N� C C-0 u N (0 �O a1 o aJ = E C Q E a) n C E 3 0J r^o Q oo •in rn Ln w C_ N C rB a1 E v E O Q) *.;--3 }, ro Q ro ro > Q a U L Q) Q) I- N a) i N V O O C O N O bA 4J > Q) rB F, O = O + V1 ro O vii V1 Ou — O � 0 O 0-0 H Ln l � 0) Q) \ E \ s E g/// mJ- E v » y ® f t e ± _D m// 0 0 — / / E / o£= E \ x \\\ �±0 CD - 0 = > / & 7 E 2 \ \ +z£\ z = e 3 e e £ z a J u tLo / owo \axs s s e 220 2/\{ %zap ez=� \ / E 3 m z E 4 # 7 y = / E > 2 / 7 / � U / \ % 2 e § \ 3 ® \E . / \ -Fa / u iz 3/\\ c a = 3 \ « 0 e u 2 \ E 0 y = m 0 \9U 0 > 2 Q c j4[2 z \ 2 / % / } 3 � < / 0 3azaa ±©g\\ \0 ate eea m m 2 0 LO m ¢ 2 n 0- b. \ \ \ \ \ Q) m 7 7 J { \ \ 0 \ \ \ ± ± I ± } 7 / 0 \ § E Ln / _ \ ( ( 2 / § g - 2 m G 2 \o L © G \ a y \ / § § a g / e m . § } / ru § x ƒ 2 / ± z \ ) \ \ / \ 7 / / a a = e g e a c 3 Ln Ln / / / c E a Q) / = = 2 2c 2 2 ° \ / m \ 2 u [ % Q)\ \ 3�b'D m \ 7 U f » g % \ \ ) / j U # % y % o// y 2 o G rU E Q / (1)- a y0 Q \ -0\ \ \ « 7 / 2 ƒ e e 2 0 } \ 3§ ± / \ 2 _ / � Q) ro LnE ro V V i rn rn rn i C O V i N i rn i rn -c c L w-oc awi a) ra Z)Q) _0° 0 c -Q 0 c C v n ro 7 ro L V)7 aJ N ° - aJ N ro v E O a) aa) 3 v v V I ±- � p z �" r" ✓ O N Q C o C 00 C '_' > b.0 Y aJ V w .0 0 Y Ln N C '_' a1 m i=� ro ° 0 �O .� ° ro C bA i w ra n C X Ln O ro C N o C Ln ro > ru -0- V N 0 0 °� Q — v — Q v > E V - f6 -0 Ln O-0 rro v C ro pp ° O o bio ra o N L O i v C 2 C N t6 Q ra N V }-' c aJ `� `~ N C ro f 6 -0 � r^ > M C o 'i 7 C ° O rn 'i N m +� C C ro Lf) ai rB w C O N v w 'in 'i i Q .L aJ w 7 aJ N i O� rn r V N L L 'C O Ln p rra ro C C p V Vl .0 ) i v U) O ro Ln C m O �, X - O .0 O J 00 'u N i w = O� C C n .- W O Q mV m rn aJ Q C r6 -0O aJ C C v m v v v .p Q 0 >> ro 0--0 O i N- w o 2: N C- V ro ro Cm > rn O rn -C }' O ro +� rn ro E ai N c o N i, 0 `� i, C 0 i 0 O O �° N N .� v i Q o > ro Q N N V b0 N C ro C v- i a, p v O v C- ro w a, vi o .� O Q ro E Z) rn o LU ra Ln U Ln ra LU Ln Ln 0 — O N O C N Qj w 'C w N 70 N V v a) ro c i Y �, ro v V -C aJ rn L V1 L i w iJ N O .� -C d m Vl M L ra :L- - aJ rn ,., C 00 w Q i to C r0 V >QJ c m to �_ N N It O� E C �E O v •- � �� v N- ro C N Zi C = L Q �' rn rn 'rp rB m Ln w m E ro i aJ C i ,� w > Q O aJ L ro u w 0O C O Ln M W ro a1 v >, O� bA C w V a1 -p- L 2 p N i > i C V O L0 -C ro bo - o V ro aJ • V 7 ro � N a) ✓ V -Q n w M p ro C C n > aJ C 7 C O n i J � C m m i i ro C w N �_ � co Q Q E i ro o bio O 0 >' Q =ro ° v 3 v o x C °-C Ln Qj> > c C C O V N E co V .O w N Ln C ro C Ln w 0- 0 i C V ro C z > O O , O aj .� ro ai D O a, bA a, a, V V C O V 'L ao C '7 C C v n i C N N N 0 rn ro ro C C N N C aa) 'v Y aV'i �, a°i Ln w }' w 0 '� c = aQi m a > � v c u w i N w > w N p N O V w N 01 ro L N p O Q Vl C7 i O- O Q) V V1 V rn z �: O T5 ci J H V V Y i 4 >> -C aJ a1 C a1 s' aJ L a1 >, w }' C uC w a1 -0 M rn - C rl tA Z3 O O ✓ C ry E-0 - rB ro O 0 > r- 0 rn w C N u 7 w O C N aJ rn rn rn L O W rD 7 C N - N > i O O p N - C N L 0 a1 to C aJ i bio rn r6 L i Q p �--� C rn aJ V N C N Oo Q) .� �1 '_' O aJ O i a1 w � i bA rn C N V 0 �_ i a, N N O C ro ^ o > f6 -0 � v ° Q o �' ~ L E •C bA `� -C L a1 rn O w a1 — - - >, Q� Q 0 •� aJ ro 7 a1 .ra - �0 N w0 L C _ = m O ro r6 mC rn O C E C C �, O .� V o a1 C C � rru Ln o W aJ vii 0 0 i V ro v L v 0 Ln b.0 N r i � 00 (6 0 x N aJ rn N ra 'i bA r6 V 7 C C rn O O W N 00 i o a, 'E E a, � m a, � ao � �' v z00 c ro = _ r^ a� o O n ai o ~ _n o ro -0 = � .- v Y bA0 L bA 'i ro •� Z3 Q O -0 rn bA C E N C 0 f6 ° a1 0 V a1 a, C w 7 C p C j N a1 Ln �° W �+ 0 rn _E x C Ln r0 O w •i = i � w ro > v, m C = ' n 'L Ln .Fn E o bo o� a, o v .� m o a, o v `° ro ro v v ro w rn N Q D > — LL >' >, ro w O oo E ro V V a) 0 ro >, O > X v V ai V o o 0 Q v bio �_ 0 f6 ro ro co ro ro rn a� o o O L > �_ _ N n L v w v O rro N E L V ro > O C Q �_ O V V N w n �' CO Q N O n n °O O U M N N p N n E ro v 0 N 00 m bA C i W V rn i m w 7 ,., V Q `� C ru ru N Ln i L c ro N C v O r�ii C i J ro -0 ru-C ° i L V bA o n 'E 0 ro Q O a, a, Q> c 0 p ° O LU C -b�0 > Q i N C w ai � V ro rn i� V rn C 0 w 0 Q) C O j ai .O a� ro ° +� w 0 a) C � ro ro - � v >, vii Q v 3 o v v> v ani ani `-' > N v bA v �' bA Q ro +-' � ro C O i Q E :- a1 C aJ i C rn O Q LL C E m o c Q� Q- .o iii Q > b�0 C C p v U C Y m � � O 7 �>> O rC0 Ln ru E vl aJ a1 N 0 ° N M > .� ro O � aJ 0 N C � > O i �-0> C w �_ w v Sao v Ln> 2 a) — }, w 2 v ro Q v 4' =a 0 w a >, i ro Fu o ro rn = p F 4-- M O Q L4 z_y o n ami o °�bio Ln -0 o ° E o Q " E o v QJ V w Q ) o E m r0 V ✓ ✓ L rB C C H i m� rvj Ln W O _0 n roLn 0 QJ N vii - 0 w v }' V axi E Ln Qj o W= = H Q 0 r° w ro = H O w ro -- = w co co 4- 0 ti N 0) c6 0 - Q . Ln m c m C m L V aJ v s_ W D J J Q D X W H z O u I ", '' n 7 ❑ EI >, + s= v wv O + .� f0 iri S ao a1 + 4 � S i C v O v O O C +- + r � O O Ln C a1 + m V u � S E + v E V V •c i 4-J ru b0 N v >Dv c C O Ln s_ C C bA S2 Ln L C •— s' m s_ C Ln�.' S= bA N U f6 L Ln i S U fV s_ i a1 O Q a1 E ~ � ra Es_ Ln Z � ru V ru Ln E v v O r0 O W ~ ~ ru o m O C � ao Qut 4 -- � C O Ln Ln V -� U Ln a) a1 m � C) 7 N m > C In a1 O O V Um i O Ln C O i 0 UC Y � � O �1 � E � Ln dJ O p 0 >, Ln O bA LU 4-JV u a1 w O Ln L1 L s_ +� Ln a1 s- y a) (D l7 v V >, p H E a1 V Uvi a1 V s_ V 'Ln i Q W _ 4-J bA In E L r, J Ln "tf E 0- c 0 Q v C-�e O m O V S1 � 4 V J aJ y _ i O n ro r6 ra O V a� S2 M u Lno i O V O LL� E ,� Ln� S2o Ln aJ E a) L = V r0 z O ~ V O i O M0 a_ (j >_ Z O L V � O N 7 r0 7 L C>>m a1 W O H O Ln > 00 s_ r V1 u V L E a) L.L v !Y N L j O Ln C Ln O � V C � O ru Ln � b�0 C Ln r0 O C O Ln un -o E C 7 C) r S2 bA w Ln ro O O 7 ru r bA Ln u bE0 N Of Ln 00 N m li Ln � •s= + V O f0 iri S bA a1 + 4 � S i C C ru v O C O L + r Sru C O O Ln C a1 + m V u � S m + LA o b c s= V •c i v ( ru b0 N f O V c C O Ln s_ C C V V1 Ln _Ln Ln •� S m - •c O S= bA N i O L Ln i S U fV i G O Q a1 E ~ � ra Es_ Ln v � ru Q ru Ln E v v v r0 O W ~ ~ ru o m O C � ao Qut T; � •s= V O Ln Ln bA C � C v u S O L + r !E Ln C C ( ro C + ru X V •c i a1 E r O S O V c C O Ln s_ C bA s W S O v _Ln Ln •� S m - •c O Ln U fV i a1 Ou N r r0 Ln t ru > i 0 r l � C O L) V -� U Ln a) > ' LnL m � C) 7 N m > Q) L ro LnE ro V V u u � � O N O i aJ bA � '�' w N "6 CO Q) E� .o a a ro .Z s v CO N O N N _ i aJ Ln `n Ln O a u p '� L u t H c N O o O i u Q) v Q ro Q) o c z J? v a s i aJ — u -O -C 00 :3 b-0 C M ro W Ln = p ' Q) c in v Q u .0 Q i 4p a v M 'L i Q N O p i N t in N Q) 0) u v v a v = v v_ Qj '� a a Q) o0 a `�° C v i C 0 N in abA v v 7 v N s w a M o O aJ N U aJ o �' a o aJ oA - = o a Lna o a .c > o O Qj o010 v o a a v V Qi u i i V .ro Z U N f6 ti p O v N to Q s ao a v Q)c c v N � t a i v OLI)c O f6 Q °-0 v oo v v v CL Ou v pu O d aJ ro 0C, a " v d Z. o c o o °�° s a o w m ago a F X a NbA Z `� .� v Ln W o N C +., O a aJro p �, L O v N a C in 1 O p O O N a �.+ W L v a u a., a O u °i „� u = 4 o O •� v c Q o L, a v v Q v a v t a v a c o a ° v o c N N o 0 u� 0_ a 'S v a' ? v in Q a a a' 2 .o O Ln aJ -0 u u o, w p N a a�� u o s v z, � o oo v o s z v a 0 f6 a, O .� a O a v v v v v o v 'v a v vo -13 Q) C:3:a Q v O0 v W a a "o o Ln a v oN Q v O b bo ��' a� u O ro C N = °° °' � > v u = a '= > N r C N Q U c v L O O a a Ln z Ln .o v o IL o .� E° cWE 'a o (A v ro u M a c v Cr1 a o v o o r� v a �, v ai CC O Q> ro v N N v Q Ni a ar w c a c v b - 0 u v a 'n a) o � �' o N 0 x 0 oto Qj 0 `/1 i Q > LnN a .� f6 aJ m V Qj o c aA -C3 v v'a a> `f o-13 Ln o ra v -E Q, , o o z v_� v a� Ln Qji �o `. L U p N in u • in Q D O O v p a �' ai N aV'i Q v CC J = =� O O i O u to N N a� Abp '" i v Qj v v O `x° U ZI r� o Q ro L u a O L v a bA Q c � C roaJ N V to p L O v N� U N O C —_ C J d O N O v t — N — y� t v O O Q p Q o c H m +-' N � N v O ,� °' o Q to Y w }' c QLnN C O bo C a Y N a, v °�—' °' ° '� a n v c ,v _ o a o a ._� a v Ln c c N E o 0 Ln Qj v N v M in Z) rra aj � t v = v C O v, O y O O' 0 Qj `n °' 00 O O aJ 2 in ro � v °' u v a" i v v ,n = `6 Qi n v p o E +° �" � v aj bA v n aJ u o v v � v nQJ v o_ v co v m - rte° O- t_ v o O u x w! o '� o U u i' `� Z c° � rn a r-° � 0 as E `Y L o QJ r i O o •� a 4p v a i o O °n' �j °' co v QJ c v E o E v� v v a v a i oA v v v N y ro Ln v a c u o �b_o o co � on a c u :u QJ v i v V ND v O; O t •p N in v v O E a) O a) O z Ln L -r3 ,� L a O Q o E _ a aa °i u ,Q - o aQ a) a, aJ E aJ E y Y v o t6 � ro �i N O Y li u v 0 _ o° o o c a v V � 0 v u 3 3 u 3 0 •� O i Z) N +' bio �, Q a v a c v t Y N v u o 3 v Qj Li- v U a, �.1 'a„ �o b4 -F3w O w V �I o v 0 7 a.o a, �0 u N � i Z a 0) �- Qj v 0 vi aJ a) co M� v _ a v v � 0 �"� H Q O-- H O S , uu � v V —= U N N 6) r R C N= c` Tin GMoo �v as., u ,_ Q m d � p[p Q CJ tp O D B s L ❑ & 4C5 m _ 3 A ±' R co 2 4& Cs - 0 N^'' V/ LL C N= "6 as., u a C 'i i f6 N L � .� ±' ! O W O c � 0 O N a L �J U u �' u v E _ o� p v o r o O p O N N o p ro � u p i i �7 'i 'i E Q) LU a o F- u Q c Qj °J a c o u u °� vi c v O s c v c c c ruo `� Q) O v v v, 0- O �' O O N 2 '�Ln •— N rn O i O N ro �' rn u iLn N Ln N -0 042 �' c c ro v, o � O i Oc Q O O W Ln OU 'v E N U S u ao a u o>ro a v E f6 a c °; O v v m cr v v o o Q) E Q E t' Ln Q v rho E v v �' c ro v v o E' w E O i Q �, oC Q c c a c o `ti c> �' O Q O Q O i N W I O i to p �, L f6 N bA W o i v v > ro c a �' c O c�� m, o = v E c 6 N C7 6 �-- Nro O OC Z Ln Q u v v Ora v u O N N -0U v > l7 v c_ a u a s v, o a; l7 > v O > v +-' N N m p lJJ "6 r6 r6 •U O U S a" fl- O Z � Q O p i O 1 C7 'i N E +' c> "6 Q `, .O O i Q N rho .� N N °' o M � a o Q °; o O� v E v oC v o 0 o to L, w b-0 � `o o E v o E Q D O O O Q Q. V rV = m d N N u N "6 M '� H" V O E r6 O m wLL 0 i O v v a o °' o a -0 v C_ o a o N i J a O O Q N ,�, r6 O '�, N i '�, ro > C��7 �_ v v a, n cn o o s �' v v o E L - _ U Y v v v �_ O u Qj w- - O i o N J o 0 N0 O N U o O U v a 3 M o o N OC �'' N "6 ON Lf) N U U N i N -p ON v i U N o o 0O -0-0 Z3-2 0 i O = u o u Ln o E = c O U �— �, a a 6 c Z, u O C7 o o �, °-u� o _ o 3 c o Ln v u Q a o n v v L7 °' ° ro v ao v �_ _ �° c- - c ro a :� c c O bn o c p> °' O (� n c .O Q 0 Q � N N N v U �i O=Ln b0.0 �, i 0 li l.7 T c r6 bA bA = � N N C u ^ f'rl V, r6 O NJ N = i r6 -6 c c c s _ L N i U f'V i m Q Q lJ �..' N Q c � rB O E y u r0 Z O M N O r..' d O `2, N 0 N N N 7 .E L.7 Q T u Q N c -0 "6 ro "6 N rO u Q) CZ 0 N GJ QJ O E O IQ, v m H v Q 7 H Q s oc QJ rU — 0 E N 0 co 2 4& Cs - 0 N^'' V/ LL Q) 5 m E _ \ � \ \ \ 7 \ \ S _ 5 ° / 2 § _ E 0 g _ E 7 \ \ � / ® \ / ƒ \ \ 2 ° u ° ( s ® / 2 ƒ D N $ $ \ c f Qj\ § � / \ \ c & e / ¢ / s \ k e e 2 z@ 2— e± 0. o) 0 \ ° / 3=2 ) ƒ \ 2w % e « 2 E ° � a \ \ \ 5 \ 0 k G \ / ® �: \ 3 / t \ % # «. k g / e = ° = x > � \ 7 Ln / \ [ \ \ / / R © E \ 2 / G _ / @ 3 ° � o w/ « o W a [ » / ® \ g a / o \ \ \ / � \ � \ 2 u % \ 2 E o \ y, u L e 2 / ° E o/ a= 2 / w¥° B � § ° e E % 5 4 % / o ƒ / 7 \ \ \ \ \ o \ \ \ \ o � .. ® � ƒ � / 2 g 2 \ 2 / y w \ \ \ ) / n = § / % f G CL §+ /Ln @ 0 7 e ƒ = g s =\ S \ § \ 2 \ \ / Ln y o % � / \ \ \ \ } \ \ % g \ / o e o e f u 0 \ _ /e \ « 2 0 o M /& t 3 p e c/ e / E° a * k f/ E W\ g=ƒ E/ ra d t / ® � 'S $ / e o e/ £ « k\ k k 3 4 Qi z z o 3\ z m % J C v v t Q E v N Q) N L Ln l/1 N Y 7 0 6 M �� �t 1 ar•�ry '� � �fyg ib5[q (1 JrryyF{1, `Ay i _ 1 � 1\ 1 z � Vier Z •r 4 �+'-�' �i' Jp 1 fl �Momw •• I�'� � ��ee4 •1 �`` ,� � J/+�rv'�'r `{Ii I � �/' � '� ��� �1�aL ta 7-- �` s ti a n' Rv C 3 m1 m s ! Z wa N n � J m w Ln Al AN 91 diRN Z ���t •\'� ,MSR. • 9 s lit z 3 os` x�C3-73 ME2 8. LA CL 4 • !! 1:' i i% ti• y a i Y O x C N Q Q Q Q Lri O �I O o �Q Z Q, r Q u = Qz Q 0 u Ln J C) 4,5 E =u muo 73 Q N � v 73 O v C N m u u N � N 7 LL co 2 O N N L N L ro LnE ro V V \ co N co \ (C) U 4– 0 c C7 O N N a Q O N C O _0 Q) Q) U N 7 N 0 O L O U E T _0 N O Q � Q x C Ln N Q NI Q m Q m 2 _I O u xi O C Q) CD- 0- 0- u �I _0 _0 C 7 mN J I J Oi = u N z = j m I a7J � 7 U � C�C C U U O cm c a� � o of m u N 0 O Q E 2 u U c U S F y d a 3 rt_ 0 E 'c v 0 c .E c v p v 0 U– o _ .0 U a J Uft oL - oom� rove L v dm °' ar 3r. E o o M ro v s n>`° E s 2 0 3 o_ iv o Sy E E E E c v s s V m O' E 0 0 Ion U ro i t +� E b`n cmi U u U O c c O v v O_c s O -u E- p ro o — O U °� m `p Q m� 3 E j vi 2£ c U a m on U �--p U– —S vi c E c y v roa y i _ro c Y V °cn a 'n o a ai =� d d c u c O v -tea r u ro a T c o >'u m o s o ° c–ro EE�.y damroov�darY .433 �i. p c s u U T p ov ° V` o U° _O Oson c v° s, a✓ O O u c v v m J w ` 2 2 c -p son U m= d s 2 O o .2-2v y s, o y 0 o m O'er o,ro O 3-0 U c ro ` -a v w g E'2 o G p -'u U EE 2 y moa E C o S', O ro N J N y CJ r U 0 c[ m � `° 3 'U U m a u U NI • pyo i•� O O } U� u ¢ ' Mi - ` m r •� wE Z �E O 411 E r U a u v E u 0 jrl ayy G V a s1 _ ar iS'i:]>..iyJ ,E V`;�v v s, O ro ❑ � �F • w ai� o = a a m 0- V a S '0 'cm It; > 0 0 J Y \ co N co \ (C) U 4– 0 c C7 O N N a Q O N C O _0 Q) Q) U N 7 N 0 O L O U E T _0 N O Q � Q x C Ln N Q NI Q m Q m 2 _I O u xi O C Q) CD- 0- 0- u �I _0 _0 C 7 mN J I J Oi = u N z = j m I a7J � 7 U � C�C C U U O cm c a� � o of m u N 0 O Q E 2 i�*/ AX4hg/, Qj ru LnE 7 ru V V -to a"' Qj to� Ln C -0 N -0 C -0 to to L -0 4--Qj Ln +� v, rn C C a0 O C Qj o C N m O = — C z �-Il U �6 •C C rn i� rB o r0 Q ro C ?� � i H c c ->= C t5b Ln N Q) bA C O C ro •_ Ln +�-' C r Q E + a0 z aj v N r O °-OM C a >, n v � a .0 Q L ✓ Q C ° Q O V C a1 Q L aQj Q a, +� c E c° Q rO o Q _0 c Q) ,� > v a - Qj Ln v a '� Ln v c Qj Qj c v ro -0° i c u u b=-0 °'n E v° m ,n 3 �' U Qj o Qj +� +� Ln E Qj c v v v o ofl o jZQjuu VWMvLnLn v pZ o c m Qj uu Qj E cLU a QJ Z— ° rn E cm -a Q c L' v v v u c +� c c E Ln o —— a Qj - o= ° m ac, o c QJ ,,, f 6 -0 to QjLn c o�—— Q a v ° v ° °1n c v Q 3 � O v, c .o .o c_0= Q `° V Q E v D C - z U u a Z i p rO Ln o }jQj Qj Q u a a u u 3 v 'Q c u o aj E f6 v> ° a= Z Q Qj > c cO LL Ln — i _, H aj m Q M V Z o v c o aci aci b b _0 V c u o v acj � v w E D w Q Li � rz E� o O= E c-0 Qj m— v c v c O x v v vA -W v O u 0 H-0 Qj b0 a O Qj 7 w u °' �J W " QJ QJ QJ a aVJ Q L ru — mw V. V, w � O OV C y' a N 7 V = N bA L `� - O C CO u �J z -too = O L Q �--. M W C 7 7 C W �--. ruC —O � QLj rz Lri N to O Q i C L O �_ to bA w M mo � d' am+ v � Qj u v� mo v L"= �' c >, c c }' Y � a1i, aj a1 E 7 Qj r0 m N r6 O Qj � ra 7 L d1 0- U Qj L V O O a Q rp = O —O �' aj aj W E o o 0 W a+ = v Q Qj Qj Qj :t,- C 7 V, bA bA ° aj to aj z U O O v L .y'�- `- 1 to Q C Ln LnU C � � C v, C Q� � � C W � � v p� Qj O U O iQj L Qj ruLn L >, rB i1 i Q = V r0 .o m Qj in C = �+ ¢j Qj C 'O L Q w N L Q Cr ° QJ U N a o bo . p c a, b c mo aj }' Z z H aj v, Qj Q C Y f0 CO Qj Q =Qj _ O C .— O r0 L � aj QJ Ln> O �--. m 7 Ln L Lbio S .a0 QQj .0 � C Ny 7 b.0 �--� C C 7 i Qj Q rQ f0 O Qj rL6 rub CLn O c ru — bA :Ll �--- •Qj c� ° p Q a UQj o Q E E U v m c v �° O O Qj Q U i +� o a rV n N QJ Qj O=, D=== O F- O O O= Qj O u f0 7 v u u L rB OfN w m Ln m a ro mo w— = c N d U Ln b0 C +' W C >; Qj L b0 75 O - (D i >, ,v, b0 w C r0 c b0 O i v O O Q: m U 'i V to Qj �, C C C c mE >✓ O Qj Qj - _ � m V c O •E Qj Om m o Qj r5 Ln i ° Ln m Ln °J O aj m E to Qj v Q = v n c a a, c E Q c C Qj aj Ln a1 O -O Z o Ou N m u Qj O Ln —Qj i Q O - 'u ` a0 -o u ''' Q �' ri° c v Ln u — Qj Qj c Ln rS5 w �--. V- Qj O 00 O .- M L ro aj c ou Q>j E O ruo � N �° .� •ao C O c v raj >, L -0 v b0 -G M >, .0 O r—° x Qj L E o c c (D a, .L O— o ma o V >, O � 72 rn Qj Q ro c E — ro f° •� E QJ L QJ '-' C C Qj m Qj O Ln w ro U Ln o w ° 0 v O u c ,ao o wra o m tea, N O OU 0 N rn 'v, N v, C m Q W 'i w V, aj �--. > u Qj Qj L aj aj b.0 ,� L O Ln aJ aj L -o o L L v, Qj N }' c bio L C L O Q — w N V to N a1 U C ° f0 }' Qj L . aj `� c O •L •L F- C i mo Qj •� Qj �, aj - � Q w ro O O Qj U m � C E aj b.0 O U N -C C a1 C O r0 Qj mou Qj aj Ln a p O r0 `� c Q QL 0j Q L u N Qj '-' L m C F5 Qj Ln Qj> +� u L Qj aj p Q 80 b.0 C aj —QJ Om i U Qj v 0 M= Ln w L = U U W M rB +� •� aj L rS5 O � i r0 ma u J Qj w z '_' V QJ . U aj �--. aj O V aj 0 C QJ aj Q - -C N N Q p V, — > p J V, . aj L V i O 2 G Qj u n ru u = I �— — aj aj 0• j d > M '-' b-0 (J ro w U N O CO 0 C O ° c QjU .O rL6 = v L to Ln v V) U E ¢ 7 L r0 r�L6 i N +� Ln O '� � ru Qj O u = _ N Ln Ln C �j O rB Qj a1 Y c 0 U L 0 U L >Qj W O 0 C E u > M L1 �--. aj Y O Q O Qj > 7 �-.� i 7 ?� m i r0 Qj Q p j Ll rn 0 QJ Qj 'L a"'' M m Q C O m O C p v w L Qj c a c> c v O rO Qj •u aj to p N rB � +� +� .L N •C rB L >, 0 b0 Qj m c r'Ji, O V V W O Qj mi r0 rB L i O •� 'J N — U C - c —j X m aj O Z cm 'L C i Qj QJ � , E �' Qj Qj '� O ;_-� N c Q O W L m d Ln Q- QJ V r° N rn X }' z O Q 2 v—, a, o to H Ln w b0 Qj _ QJ 7 V, C C C aj Q o Q U c M V c _ D Ln Qj V M rO O n C to v ° f6 L ~ m 7 U O u C f� — O i aj }' Qj 'u }' Qj Qj u c w C LL c 0 a rn . .L c rn Ln H Ln.. ~ aj d '� v E _ V C m o ro 075U ro i a = QJ f0 N c j ro aj Ln Qj 'u aj aj °A v, u ° c o Q w E aj aj v, C i r w to >> C ^ Q b'O iB C V C +' r0 C N aj O 7 �_ w ° aj QJ QJ L m to Om O •L M rS5 D r V O OV •L Qj Ln u bA O=— L -6 L L z Q O D O ^ C Qj — M E Qj v, U aj �--. C u C.J Qj N Qj� � �, V In = = — � •i H Q to D �i r O Y _ U L �� r .� 0 L O co co O O LO O N (D c6 N m Q) tz0 10 Q bC.p �¢, Lq v •Q v w O i v j v >, v 0.0 N-0�Ln Ln aJ k Qi L 'Q Q — a v �, a , i O O U °i ro - D m i>, i� ro ro 'o o - ,+-,� Ln .Q ,a��, C a i a°'q v v O Q a��i i ro ro u � = Qj a v " o `ti w u a .a - rn ma L c °' 7 ra OL o a>i bA L o � ¢moi N ,,,� o Q v � Qj ov rn v a v QJ __ Ln c 0 v �° p o � ao i ao 2 ro a1 E o ao Y c Ln Lna QJ ro .� L D - auJa bo Ln v v a v aJ 2 bA — aJ i L "= v rn = ¢, rn i s �; a N y a1 C b i a Li N a s a N b-0 N rn u in M V a1 `^ O a,p ro 0 4 v o o � o Lz Y E v o o + Ln Q_ �i •L ° aJ ° o— aJ v ° u u >, -f6 N `ti •U v Y .b-0 ¢� O s a N .X N O p�,o ra aJ aJ a) aJ p L v, O O~ b�0 X' C t6 w 7� L in n U a = � �i v Q o ti v •� v ru� >O 'ra ro }' t v c Y v a '� C a a o O o W =� C i o ro E O010 N z C N Y —Ln �, O N �, a oX C a ,� N ,n O — N m � o i� N w C o o a a o, v v=_0� aJ C ¢ O o ra `� bA ra Ln v ; u Li Qj i i = a o = a '��- o o a o s Ln v v v E u v vLn a, oC > O D Ln u p `ti i n Q O ro O }) - '5 v "_ -c o p i v a N v p L Q— � ra bb d O fl O au, O O v o O O > >, f o °n' to O Y° N = o a t v � a- b-0 ��" bo -0 aJ Q Ln N ani .bo a O aJ o c E Q n p .c = v a s N O j oo 'S � '" : v L �, ;, -Z vii b. — E N aci a� U U n ° aJ � b�o' � O N N ° N ra QJ aJ c aJ �' c- a v s O o °i a b o = o ai v n3 Cl) Y Ln a o v v Q ra Wi — v bio Ln s C3 .L Ln .0 "6 C e� U p N L p� ro rn Q Q aJ w Q N in Ln a bio u ° Ou .� Q �O .o o "0 -C3 v •_ u t w C v o N :zzU Q '� = i ° u > 6 a a v Qj ro -Fu L O N arz -� rn M p rn rn N '� d N a N X t C L L OLA r Ln iJ a -Q a p Q a a s a a v Of u o u> r m s �i�'' E C "6 'i •L O a C O— w -Q ro ro ro Q) L 0 = Z30 i O = 7 C a ti v Q u E oo m u u� to � v= p °Q i v b�0 'i v in o E L - ,Q a bA 'ln .� ro i QJ C O +-• N Z s +' c u i aJ i C i QJ Ln QJ a s Ln v C: u .� v c ,a''n Q a L }' v E Q o °p •� — v E aJ o Ln O ro v Q-) v E aA C Q °�' C O aJ in p0 0 O ro O a o O `° 0 ra ra Q E N _ ro Li Q; O ao v c w aJ > � n- v v v > � E L u ^ °; `° i °in' ro "6 v Q O O O X � v -p O N 0 v v \ o v > v Z o Q v N N U C C Q o rO 'v o E E o v o Ln 'Z3 v= Y v a a; = u> O ao �° v o> Fo .c — ° v a u E E ro v° Ln o O f6 > ra > c �' aJ _ v Qj -p aJ to O ro :�' Qj i u bA r° N a s o-0 E m >, p O .� 'a ° �' � O > aJ Ul o U ro v ro v v o � v n ro I- QJ W v- > v 0 3 o �' ° o 'i f C •� C aJ = � Q aJ C C to Q U0 — N N C rp ro C QJ N O O L N "°6 O '� ° -6 -C aJ aJ E aJ C L- 0 C a a '� •� �-•- C i� C aJ rS5 u N QJ biom H QJO i i aJ Q O N u0 v O _ aJ u v O u O O EE m 'a �° c v .� a, Q •E o ao r° On v o Z3o co aJ bA C � C u Z3 L,) aJ O C L Ln QE m E +-' _ o a � o �> aJ c QJ bio v ,L v aJ rn ro 'X ° rn v v j >, ao aJ Q n u ru }' c amu, c ro �0 Q c v o c — v a) i i c ao c a 'a a c v QJ c ,' '� c c v c aJ E c ro v v a a 0 o '� v— w E v° v .c L v � N a+ v i v v a O aJ E Q v Q C C Q v f0 aJ u C aJ u Q N ° .c o > a L ° N b.0 f6 Z w .}�' I� a Y H F L ° u r>o > 7 N .0 ro u x pp C 'Q O�J C V N O C +-' aJ ra •tn aJ aJ V a° C v c ro v Li bo Q v '^ v >> v aa) c rn c v c v s a �+ ro v> ab Q o o '� O O °J Q- o O ra �% C 7 o C o N a i ° N QJ N C Q v v u tn Q c v rn aJ i �' v o Ln �' c 0 Q v E Ln s N aJ C Q '� O rru '� f0 L v O 'L •� aJ O O D ro E o c �, ra ro �--� N u +..� d U Ln L1 u -C ✓ u w -0 M u aJ co 0 CSS O N (D 0) m Q) M LnE M V V U N O N N N �; L N b-0 N bA M Ln CU V _ Q a b00 u° V1 c O 0 0 o 0 u ?� a)O L c v- 0 C w0 C N p L i N D N •� m U o O o -0 �p Ln v a o Q = O ° 'E v o v .- a 2Vi o O o F n a w a i o v v V aD '�— ro V n V > > p -0N -0b 0 N in v Q o:3 u a s b0 w i O O b0 O V Ln 'n „� o bq v .� •i N E Ln In +� +� •�' .O O u a Qi a' a o 0 m bA 0- v0 a ab0, o c a _ — a t V 3 Ln '� M N r0 Y C Q v a °' c o bw.0 N- D U V v u Q V o m .v = o o i in o n m o u Ln Q ° N v> a n a L Ln Ln 0 Qj o I-eu a; 3 �o i - o O Q� f° > N o v aLn m a ° ~ > o LD a Ln0 a c E C Qj W� oo °i o no o v ate, v v v c o x a v b Q n o C 6 m Ln rB ?j N O o ° m � a °' a _0C t:lbc C O C i wQ O a L L, v L > C C 0 (D o v — v v u �QJ Ln vQj ni a a v '� '� OLn L; n in Owc Q D 0- — — — Q N-0 O ,n N owM Q r0 0Q N Q .� L d' L L ,�., C) N C N L N Q -rz NL .L N N .L - N c o a o M� � o a; v v-0 c v a Q E v .o O> a°i ° E o ami E c w N N f2 a O L v v v e;° N C ro c v o ai z ° CU Ln O vLn bo " > a.0 v> V Z Fu" C E R aL, a a C C M v� v_0 Era c a s E v°J i s v> v v c C ani x v v z o .o ° .E .�, v v E O 'E ° c v a °' i > in � v i C > L R o v ,L„ Q fl a v v v v ° E Ln a a a °' a, `n E c Q c ate, Ln 0 0 au, °° 'a b0 M M Q o o E 'E E c C- v O ro `n b y N O Q u i Q a I- Ln m Q Ln� u E Fu C M Q a v � Cu v L M Lo L v 'M - v E •C .v M a N O N 'E bA b�-0 �, Qj ° -5 O ° -Q c C � N r0 u i c a � ° u c i Ln= E M ro Ln i a v ,b-0 L — C v °' a v D w v, ,� C v M v W v M ", ° 0 0 0 E O a, o ro E> �, z u C i , L Q Ln C �--� �'.' N R o , o OC3 -0 o u ate, E z O in u N QJ O > ro 7 in C a° a }' a v— o Qj a, Mv �J c v b E U Z3Y C a b0 E ai _0 0 0 E O N V c v boo v a v v° o (D W >, w Q a c a, o au, •> > a, � E m o O a v v o O C W M O N CU ao u Q �o o s L C •- -0 L a a i M— ° C N E rt o a v a LL o aui V E v O L � ~ N '_n `� r0 'v, N L v 0 O N E H� ry O a N vi bA L N in in u nl O vi N .� N N nl u � ro C �+ . O O L/) L Ln V � > a c 'a Q o O C v v °' w v v a, w a, V L N C L N o c_" o i M V a, O N u L O O O u N Q E Q �--, r6 va a Ln v Q v 'c v G) O D ate, r° v o v� Y o Q a O .- O o .- .E m V E� co co O I- 0 O N N (6 m Q) b-0 (10 Q E 0 T) co C& O N i v Ln C� �_ o ao v= v ' rp O 7 — Q) bA m +'~ N w� w ~ ✓ L 'i Ln Ln m bA N J O +' i i O Q • in in N N N i ° V Q N Q Q L N Ln 4J O QJ Ln O Z r0 .� 0 v fB OV Ln 0 Q O > C Ln n ro L O O Q Cb 'i in -O Ln 7 N to O Q O N -0 •tn N L O N N b.0 N M N Ln r0 N — § N Q .2 >, w to - -0 v NQuw— — — O i Q N. O L 'DON M NV E OV Ln O3 V V C N 0 N v Q E > o~ Q w °Q o o a, o c 1° ° v Q w OU m °— Ln o •� v U QO L O O U _E to Q)C 7 0 > N V +(3) C Q C � Vl > to L O N b.0 N C N O ~ 7 4J N C N E .c N E O ro O Q� � Q V Q +-' C Q° Ln im 7 > u o v o -0 ° �; u Q >; Ln c v-2 Q o Q Lnv E -0 ra � n N •C C ro x Q to N N C to C to bA C E O L Ln i C y' E O O C o u C -a E +' C N wo m ✓ u r0 w N bA 7 U L a, a, (� C C o� ° E C O- w C3 N V N � :--� 'i •- N D � C b0 E> N L V rL° i v Q) v a— E C ° f6 — ro v 0- C3 L aCi E w bA v — Q) Q W = V n w O 5 V ° O C -0 ro V ZZ O N N O D Q -0 N N—c C Q co ~ > � X C r6 >> 1 r6 L u O ro bA C c °OJ �L' Oi n E v Ln v c-, psE v� VvWOv n O v C N C vC Q 7 ?� O OC N Q L N 0 N '--' Q N to W X' N '� O0 �' N 7 ° w 7 L w O o v 0 v O w � — O- H O Q ro Q Q ro — N N 3: -C) i-0 bA b -0C_0 m N v C C i O C V .V o c o -c av Q ro v to C O Ln X N o n a C O V Ln V N D LlQ u v 'C c c v OV �_ v �, ✓ O >, r0 C C `n `� N ~ `� O ro w ra (3) o o '� a Z N N v m-0 v N v V V �, L t- to C u_ o v _ a � C °V Ln_ v E +" Q -� +" bA m �_ m > C •� ✓ '� ns v a i a 0 ° m > �, C Ln a x a s a, a, °Q Ln.a a, v - v, v QJ L E Fa L a o v ° v o-0 M v °1 n °�' Ln L v u Ln a v w V >, p '� a, E a, t .a v a v v f6 > o v U o v •bA N �, �, in Q Ln IE o v 'a a 'a V w w a, >, V v a `n zz Q Lna C C Q v Q m o z a °' °' v, t U E v .`n 'a �= o O ° 0 'a m LnL LnLn a v a a o Q Ln a v 3 �' LA a s cr v v o o v L 0 a 0 O_0 - N �_ u a -0 — N L u bA �' f6 N a a �� f6 m , LnE N in V m .bo N N O bo Ln W p W v ;, Ln O a, E O Q ao u v a .a Z Ln U c o O Q rC v �, ^ C ' a -Qo L b-0 o v C3Q ° ° Ln C ro a o o a, 'x �� Q o •u o v ao C o a, v Qj QJC e� .� y� �, " � -C — Ln 4J O N w C °Q u ori u`, a a b Ln�° E w� ori V E 3 0 �° a o •� Q� ° Q 0 v ao i o v o v° Z3 0 o G .L^ > Q o V o v F '0 C u c tA Q f6 = u v O v o c a v C C -r a, v -C 0 -C 0 u Ln �, a v � ro .^ O— C v, F F E 0 T) co C& O N co co 4- 0 Q rn o N o N 0 N Q) Q) u N Q) 3 0 u E N 0 C C O 0 0 M Y • -, 4 c - t S jp co co 4- 0 Q rn o N o N 0 N Q) Q) u N Q) 3 0 u E N 0 C C O 0 0 M § F 7 FZ o § / a \ Q) \ � ra @ Z3 — 2 E G % \ \ \ \ 0 / \ § % \ \ §_0 \ x / \ Ln0 § 2 \ = § a / § k \ 0 Ln y \ 6 ® S 8 a n \ \ \ \ ura \ 7 \ \ \ \ 0- 2 \ % / \ .2 / / \ . / 8 § .& \ %C, / \ \ S 2 c Ln °> e \ ® \\ %§ z % G \ 2 = ) ® / f a2/ 3 3 2 3 8 % o'% u z § j e m 0 & _ o Qj J /\ ƒ [ E E \ \ \ \ / / 2 \ ° z (\ u g m% e= 3 e C3® ° j Z3 § 3 \ u / \ 9 z / _ \ \ a § 2 a 5 = 12,\® o e \ / 6 \ / 2 o 8 % ° 7 w 4 y\_ w e = \ \ ( \ / / G \ ( j / & k c \ t / \ ) © \ E ( g \ } \ ' % _ / z ( 3 _ m a _ e \ k / m % ®e e % { / . / ` / \ = / 5 m 7 ) t \ .@ ®LL m o % a # ( �° = \ = \ \ \ k J / 7 § \ ) \ M J \ / c / QJ / \ % \ 2 % > \ 7 ®® = e ® y R ' / / w % ) / 0 / ' 2 { / \% % § ± u 2 G e 3 I 2> w%/ t => m S o% a tA y\ # Qi x. ° m E § 5 a y 7 3 \ : 2 \ [ \ m \ e { % / E / 7 / \ / e G / a \ \ § ( \ m _ 3G c \ k m e ©/' / s J g \ \ \\ \ 2 \ \ k ®\ \ t\ o Ln G= O= s/= o \ a G ) ' o ° 0 _ ° ± © ° e 3 a � -- % a e = ©— E % � \ ® r: f / � / } $ G \ / / � \ 4.1 \ a \ t \ (/ / } % % § § 2 \ m / e / o G ° / § \ R 3 @ / — a 2 / ._ o \ W g c % t R ° \ o } ƒ � & / 5 / e E \ m O ƒ \ \ \ / / \ / \ R � 5 2 2 z m 2 / E \ \ E \ / \ N L ro LnE ro U U co co O N N co m N b9 Q QJ c ° }' ao QJ Ln N p - v v v bA bA c v c v Q) L N L QJ a L O aJ C O - 4J c c N QJ aJ C ro ° ro .i, m p m O u L (U6� ro -� L ro }, E -p LnQj C •� Q Qj L aJ O r6 •c .� i p U QJ QJ m v QJ m U O i rn Q N — c aJ v° O ro �' v to �; i rn a O v v ._ v 3:, vii O �--� a aJ x o � C O tin bA c p "06 -0 in �--� W' -N -C �--� 'n - = dbA c p p •�,0 u .0 O i a r6 � L i C v aJ i O- f6 i O C � - + u to ro � o C V N o U O v vc U 'i Ln v E O O U3: v QJ Q) 0 N rz- .0 6 QJ E L v aJ -0 ONo Ln U � 3n E L aJ c v O bo c Lbp i c Qj i ro L p N T bA Q .c c v .c v QJ °u v aJ •� in rn Ln ro -0 v O N o -CLn O bA M O bA QJ N QJ O i E 7 '�' i O ra U N= O C � o QJ c O '� i �J 1 O O aJ .� aJ N ro QJ Q+ v � c }' L ocz, �; c +-' U > bQ C QJ i aJ - i L +-' c aJ QJ c ro Ln o v E o C v ro }' N M "6 E v O c > ro Ln c O r0 c Ln C i Qj Ln V O Q C >, O n v O O v E w (DC C i ru bA •3 O p ro = N f6 N - vi c O 7 bA m O Oc r6 - i C aJ �' Q ° Qj Q� � QJ O `� p .Ln C C E c �J L U QJ ro QJ O •� H O ° N a o 6 ro_ C O O Q 6 U C .0 C aJ QJ t7 u Qv E C c � b9 . v L O O -p � �J � p rid � o c u '= .� a °- E ruo Qj >° n3 b o o O u ro w O o E v � o w o - v m ro o 4� Q p L � u C w - L aJ O C- o F > ro i u > - r6 i s L a a _ c i= aJ i O L �' O Q O �, L � .0 v O E i ro a ro C ro QJ i c u a c f 6 ra — Z o z iJ U � v Q t N c f6 vOi QJ ti O a a U Q O L +' �i Q �J O i +� V1 c N �O a iJ O aJ E QJ QJ N "O M ro v_ rra � m to n p fl n M— � •i aJ aJ C C Ln > a Q) J ra � N O E_ C C v aJ O ao C -C o M O 0 `~ QJ Q a o '� Q O 6 p Q ° 0 p c aJ Q aJ i c u rn C ° aJ O C a u O Q O C .� O -p iJ - o •E p-0 r- bA i� QJ N QJ 0 O ° m E Q Ln L Q "06 • Vf i �-' c .c QJ ¢moi Lu � L O .� L QJ v aJ n3 L H aJ i N u ro N H N c SC L N -0r0 E c i L c rn o N > O U c Ln u r6 v c f0 S i1 i L ro o �' QJ a L QJ U Q ro 'U E L aJ >, Mz QJ r6 L Vl c- '� 7 7 ,>', bA 0= — .�, c= C Ln v C aJ w m c v � 1 QJ L L t a QJ ro Ed i �° °� _ >� c c — ° o o °�° o v Q E O A W c c p QJ aJ - C ro N O LDP•� QJ O Q, � bA O E a1 Z .0 aJ N .� C V - a N j V O N Oc � c0 QJ Om O � .i E 2 u u � V' — a _ c aJ Q LD rn ra � Q-0 C ro H Q ro in co co O N N co m N b9 Q QJ c ° }' ao QJ Ln N p QJ c aJ rn -0 c > QJ c aJ QJp bA L E QJ E > c C i U aJ C ro ro m O u QJ ro ro W bb -p -O c a �'' U Qj L V •c .0 U QJ QJ c �' ro U i rn c c QJ 7 O ro L to �; i c CO O L QJ vii i = 'C T � �, tin bA c 0 "06 aJ - N = QJ c p O Q u .0 C r6 � L i v = _ r6 f6 i ro u � - + u � � bA c C V N U O > > U 'i O r6 �--� aJ > m N .0 6 QJ E N aJ -0 Ln U n _ � O E L aJ c v O bo c aJ c E c E Qj E ro Q N N ro v v c v QJ °u v E i° in rn c ro v v O Q-0 v -CLn Ln c OU O i O bA O c U C � 'Qj X 0' - bA c iJ rn OU v � c }' i N QJ i "6 U7 aJ +-' U 11 bA bQ C i aJ to L +-' c QJ c ro QJ i C C C Q }' N N "6 N C O > ro Ln c O r0 c Ln i Qj Ln V O ro C n C Qj O 'i aJ w (DC bA C p c Ln-Fo O Oc ° Q, u> C vEi aJ w c QJ c- -0 Q) aJ ° ro E aJ Ln O - �--� p C U C aJ ro � CL t7 c Z3 M c c m bA L O -0 C E a o 'V v' °- O m ro U >° O rn - O u ro Q E o E a U o _ p o c O w O ro c u C-0 d-0 V O i O=-0 N rn c O E N > u_ ro v_ rra � m to n p fl n M— � v ro _ ro > E Q) J ra E_ O U° U ao C o a; .� c ° c c O +, c C C bA aJ O C to O ro �J iJ - p r- bA i� QJ N QJ 0 O m m E "Z. Ln L LnLn U r6 QJ l/1 Lu aJ L O aJ •� QJ "6 i v r6 x v 0 c �.' E O� QJ N Q > U i c QJ f0 i1 QJ ro QJ ro L - - 'U E L aJ >, QJ r6 L Vl c- '� 7 7 ,>', bA c L C C O i ro ro m a aJ ruo E> U Ln rn aJ — C o i w V1 `� -0 ro c c p �' �i aJ - C ro L rn O U C 2 O E a1 � = C OLf) C aJ � QJ rho V rio aJ c L QJ Om O = ra - u � v _ c aJ N O ra - C a1 L C Q L rp ro U U > 7 L C oo O bA Uro U ° ra V v ro v E U E O rn � ro 5 L, C c O .� > c ro O +� i O o M rn C c •� i v rn bA c �, C 7 bO ,C .� u Q U •U CO ,� ° V bA ren c N N O O C u ° U O � E aJ C O v� M r6 aJ c Q aJ ra .� U7 aJ ro '� Q ro aJ QJ V N C L b.0 p o .� i +�-' aJ ;J QJ Q QJ N v> Q .0 a O c .ao Q) v v o p .c > v _ v ro o w a'o � u ro ° C QJ v o > v a c f6 0 rO C � c 7 'C M +' QJ i N Q Qj O C O ruo 'c N "6 aJ T L>' M Q L _ �_ O U ro Q) aJ =- Qj fl. ro c E 2 c c r�6 Ln aJ aJ C ro Q V m QJ Z +� Q 0 aJ (Vi Q=-0 o 0 c O �� a1 w . u +' vi C Q N � >> E p 0. Q c co co O N N co m N b9 Q i N aJ aJ —_ Ln O v 6 Q a v U O u a u vLn a Ct Ln -0 uv U N •LQ bA aJ O O i v� O v E _ '� a� c c v— U aJ �O M- c CO QJ L Qj p X T i r N O p V �..� in O Z aJ N O bA aJ i > c ra Q Q v Q � s Qj Ln ao ,v, "0 , Z D o v O Qj u ro c > .� a o; in v Q i "O in O O 7 o "6 bAro ra u Ln a ro TUA c � � = - tip °i u °'ro Q) 7 — ma; N ro v bA in Z3 L c Ln v ao � o N bA > .i ¢j �, u �, O .� 0- in .x bA N _ X E .� .� a O ° a O O u i �' u bA ti N L Ln x v� ;_ `° - v v a v — a; v X aJ v L a c i a c .p = L ,o �, +--� u a — v ao -0 u fl u� v o v o _ o a ra a }' ro w o u s o o � Ln a ao c t c v � >, c a v }' in 7 = a a S v u .o z Q c � O Ln u bvo ro 7 ro E O N ¢ = i a n ro O "ZI— ti v O o v a o v b -o - v Q° a o Ln E o o axi v bo 9 ) N u Qj pi a v o �, N o_ v c Y � in c c N -a Q L rEo += a �' E L -p in N O 6 i .0 bo O 4; "6 "6 a OU N T p in O Q) NQJ u�, a in +, i O i aJ N i Q to t O i 0 bA Ln O aJ Qj Oi v C to bb -0 N Z Ln Ln a Q Ln aJ bio o N a N a� o u v E c E ro a O i = U Q ro O aJ ra N aJ Q ao v c o u L a v u x o c o .� v c� v p =— a v bo v v i c p� fl- O o m � a a o m Q Q N �, Z v o a Q a �° �° a, a a Q u ° v o 0 Ln c° O a ao C c p c u c u a '^ c O }' ro = bA }' N c v O U j ' .0 o i a N Qj ro Ln > v, O c a L —CL aJ Ln Z3E a '� v in Ln v ori v a aJ c v -6 ro O U �o o o v, o —0 — — — Q o s aJ = -0 aJ c " In -a aJ T L aJ aJ bA a-' U L aJ C p r6 z, aJ c ^� aJ 3: aJ .— O i c-0 O E �' O- C u aJ o in Z,� a> a n ro o° o N s Ln L aJ v in c i N E Q i Q ,n ELn w t " L °; > L �' '� }' N aJ aJ i -0 c c Z ra 3 a L a c N +v� c ro c n c v v E in a a E� �, O N ruo O ro O u O Ln USA O x N O O Qj Q U O i ro aJ i v U E Q,E > C c = N aJ ,� a +n � N V) L aJ O Q 7 •C c >, � in aJ Q O `� O N w °' E Q L — O aJ c u L }' c O c N E E a Ln � o c c 2, m. c� Ln E u v °�° v 5 Qj v v a O c v> v ro a' •7 p `L° °�° -C Oj aJ G a aJ VI aJ i L - aJ +� ro aJ fl- aJ U ra N +� c ro aJ bA "� O a O u n " _ �' c "C5 o U Q v a -C3 v ro c U 0 3: ( r>6 -i T N i ro oL, c u o v=-o roa E c � c- == `° E E- L Z 7 0 0 � c v L N � U 7 O E c aJ c bA U� ro 'c w c i O O z v `O c N O -O `n E 'in v bA Q• _T U v" v E c ro p p -O p u v N > ro a b o N u `o -p , Ln 0� M aJ � t O� o a v . n rco ro Q Q v o o c a E v c ao c in ,n c o 3 c .E v c v c o n v a -Z3 o U c v i .c E o O N O Q > u v O �' v in o aJ a Oc z� � E ro v c U U L N -c O w Q)N Ln OLn Q s �b_0 v p c v E v0 U L wt }' aJ c a L Qj u w a u u +J dA c-2 Ln p aJ ro -O ro Q i O y� L o bcA +' i in O L ¢� m .N N b.o Ln c i +� r6 U c N O 'L aQ U `� a aJ i c 7 F -0 -c V1 aJ > u v L v a v N O i u ao O .Z, E c ro N c x v .Z v ro c v H w s aJ aJ Q. o v� � E `o v v L v c O_ ro N aci E H in Q Q O 7 N v c u by L o, .E - in C— aJ L vO aJ •X N N in i N _ ,— _T .� a9 � a L O v •L = N C co > Q �' 'X aJ OU LLn c 0 v E Q v ��� aJ u °�° °' E v � a u 'x v N aJ aNi aJ 7 c Ln 3� aJ c O d a L L N v w M � L in 0 n3 0 E � c ro � .mac.. Q � U � u ab c oo c x v v L L bA c N 0- E E O U O c Ln R co a cg- N 0) c6 W ro LnE ro U U E aJ O a1 f6 a v I c Ln r6 'i 0 o H v „ .o o c a o = o-0 p c E u� fl v Ln X .� v Ln `u n to W i L to o v a W c aJ f6 _ o ro 'a c �° o ro U o X O N p v a o 'Ln °J > o +�i to r�o � aJ aJ C p c W Q N o o i 7 }' 'i bA N to "6 "6 u L � c In a1 r6 ru U t N c O u to aJ �..� — •E to a., L i Q W O'DO aJ t a(A W r Q .- i USA Mi 6 i Ln O v L O bA W U O N bA � L f6 o u L •,�, 'E aJ > N ro ro pp C + UbA rou aJ X m E EN L v_ ro }' >, N ro to W fo Q W .0 rip i o ,L ro p E p 7 c F aJ o> ro `n bA 6 o rp Q O m w L w a1 U p c ro p a c v p O W to .ZI u v u c _ o p L Wr6 O t�i� — bA O w 1 ru aJ W ru d aJ v L ro i bb twit tin L �u (o L W a" OU L 7 ro W . Q UO -0 W� H L ro v O Q m u Q i X o— Ln Q u � v L c U N W Q r6 c ro O ZZ v 0 '+' o .0 aJ aJi Q O rn 7 bA '� ro u -p '+' U O tL rroo N Q i :3 O O > Ln to ro v to a O- m aJ O c o v c i v a v v cLn °; > c Q Q v a o v o c r6 '� "6 bA ro i N u to L O o -0 O -- r6 � -0 �, U) r--� U i ro 0c i aJ N c >, "6 c o o c z - W ro c p-0 -0 v N v M v O :_ � + ro a s n v �_ ao '� c M rod �, .rn 0O 0 o c N aJ ? M 'O O +-' _ O Ln Q m Q aJ bA >, rru O N Q Q ou U i 0 '0 N N b�.0 v U •� WO r6 i WaJ O L to a1 O •U L N '-� to aJ . aJ W 7 W -a a ao v avo a °Q'Q ao a Oao r a s aco v i aJ 'a v a v •a v v O O o Q. i U i v rz N o �_ i t v O j, a s a vo Ln u v N " c 'r —LnU .� a t a N s " c v v� v ro O Q N t to a u W o, c v v a v O .� oc Q c v v v i 'i L > v °' u v '°' v & F5 t� '-' Ln cro Ln -c Qj v ro LA ° ao �_ �' � Fz .v �, j _ a O o a qjt o a u Ln v a a o o ao o p 'a c s p v o p a o a a u Q °p rho u v c s a v i a v i o S a o o = o c . i Ln v o-tu ao 'o Qj Qv u a u a W i CW cz t CZo° > ra a °' o u p o u ° o °i O Q-0-0 v - a> z o a c .� a o v " .o v o v aa) a s -Q a v c c s v c v a v qj v � o Ln v i Ln _ :� c y O Q E v °�' c oQ a v E- .5 u a oQ a i Q O ——Z v a v �' a Q O c 4t 'i Q Qj v o ° °Ln"' a o W i v o a v ao v v v o a '° v Q '= Q a��, o 'L , Q U ra -� a a o � a u °' Ln c c v a a u W; v u i to aw v v to N rn r" 'a °Q n a CU a to a Q o '� C v to aJ ro o n� to a .� u to a U OX Q N a a C S v- a; a of -v v� S c �- a s co co O m N (D 0) 0- CD- V Ln Ln E v LL N C Q b0 c V N cr v N � Ln O Ln C N :3 N O 7 > a-�e to V C O � Ln ra Ln � bA C � r O Q) V1 Q) O Ln _0 N .0 7 0ra bO w o m U') aci f° E to N r V1 7.1 N T N L E N bA _0 C Q O E Q ro 3 O LO V) VUM O O O (Ac O 7 0 Q) ii O )c L N o C\ �..� = X r6 to by Oc 0) E Ln v Ln a) Q Q c N > o ^+ O O ) -0 -2 Y W LL U) O m 0 O (� m N Z uQjUo a) O C v N L �j c E Q a O bA c E � +' '- Q v Ln W N O O v O O �°��0L "6 to O ^ bA p C O Q ii O in x= O Q) -, ro 0 Lm Q)}, Q) ° ~ c O N /L� 5 O "6 In V) C v -0 i O p i u O QO N E ~ a N 7 ro C bA C O i C C ■O aj E O_ 00 C 'cB E Q N U E v ■� o -0f6 LI)O v p v '� C N U-0 N N u Q O Q V/ bA v n O O M O0 C O N O Q D W '� E ro N N N .� a'' -0 E C ..}■ r6 X m Ou V H -0 7.1 L v Q) o Q aj }, Q) ro LnL Q D D � E v O bA ro N i O N N N Q) -C T ro Ln ru v 2F C C rp u E v 0) Q N L O U � � Q N �_ L C) L _0 U C Vii O '� O '� Q U Ll - 0 4J i L Ln N Qji Q) i � � H 0 L Qj O i bA O ro aj Z u ro aj a v N .ao c v N v 0 N N 7 U �a� �o �° LE ro N T N L E N bA _0 C Q O E 0) LO v VUM O O Ch (Ac O 't-- 0 N O L N N C\ M = O CD- by O 0) O d O a) Q Q c Z Q C .0 Cl)N (n O O m0 Q> Y Y (J LL U) O m 0 O (� m N Z O a) O _ r6 (� Q O �j c E Q a L v Q) o Q aj }, Q) ro LnL Q D D � E v O bA ro N i O N N N Q) -C T ro Ln ru v 2F C C rp u E v 0) Q N L O U � � Q N �_ L C) L _0 U C Vii O '� O '� Q U Ll - 0 4J i L Ln N Qji Q) i � � H 0 L Qj O i bA O ro aj Z u ro aj a v N .ao c v N v 0 N N 7 U �a� �o �° LE ro co S 4& N N 0) (6 0- N O N L N N bA _0 C Q v VUM v C T (Ac O 0 — C aj w i C CD- by O C �-- C C b 0 C Q C .0 O O O Q> N >�O (J N N O E bA C L _ r6 N �j c E Q a bA c i O ,�., Vt in v "6 to w O C bA r6 N bA 3 OC "6 i N p O "6 x C v ~ C N N M N C C N LI)O v p O '� C N •� O N Q O U O bA E -p M •C M 0- D W Q N N N .� a'' -p C U ro `� •tn bA r6 X C C Q D (u O 7 T +�-' N O L/)bA 0 C C N O i U C v v Q EN Lf)Q) y� (o V w V7 N U OU N NC 0 O to N O N N f6 E QJ 4j ij Ln M O Q _ VI T Cc O V mE lin 010 N bA ro O u N w _ C Qj Ln —_ O �' O V7 N Q N c C O 06 -0 Z O Q N N > i N N l) v v == 7 Q) o co� C E v v a a .� v v c aj aj 010_0 c c m6 C p O = Ln C N 6 co p c aj O '�-- MQ w o cr W �— v Q O m U 2 b0 Q -6 N U C s' C O u Q N N •� > �j 0 N in Z O co S 4& N N 0) (6 0- i N L ro LnE 7 ro V V to N m i Ln 7 Q) N N V1 N 7 0 bA C O m C O m > OJ Q) L D O to Q) L H N v L Ln L C O 7 O LnC bA N O C Era C C 7 O Q ra O C O v Q L v C C O E N L L b0 7 O L y� N +' E O C N N 0) N � C N � N O O O � i N � � N N D Q) N_ Q N 0 Ln O C � O V a '+ v O u +� N i i O Q O C L � O Y E Z N `n m O N U� ) C U M LA N (3) + N LL N 0) co co 4- 0 LO N N 01 O N Q bA �J D ra u Q ; N +L/)-' L C O u d -0 N ra C C E � N N +� ?� > 'L ra V1 l/1 = OO bA — e _0 to N O O 7ru C C 0 i 0 LnV N Ln Cro N Q bo v O O L C ro C N L M }' rn O 1F ro Q w N V U)_ C V1r Ln r0 N O > O N Q -0 rai _ ro ra C ro > r6 bA N �+ C ro ro C 0 u ro u V N O > C O V w L N _ Q L V Q i 2 Ln E E v ra bALn Ln O •C v Ln C Q)Ln L u C Ln O L 'L Z O > O N O u o o� O N }, N •- o Q- N � +' L rCo L v N Q TDO to ro bA rnN Q L O C C Cw O Ln vui v OLn C O C NO C •� }' Ln O O N .� N E U 0 C > r6 L N i L O i O �, 0 rn n E 75 OV +� w n C N to ro C Ln '� f° !E E L 5, X N N N Q O> C ro i O ro N O C EC C N O Q— j C n N V i V -0 w W !n Qm) N w- N axi E to Q Z n ro C uV to N m i Ln 7 Q) N N V1 N 7 0 bA C O m C O m > OJ Q) L D O to Q) L H N v L Ln L C O 7 O LnC bA N O C Era C C 7 O Q ra O C O v Q L v C C O E N L L b0 7 O L y� N +' E O C N N 0) N � C N � N O O O � i N � � N N D Q) N_ Q N 0 Ln O C � O V a '+ v O u +� N i i O Q O C L � O Y E Z N `n m O N U� ) C U M LA N (3) + N LL N 0) co co 4- 0 LO N N 01 v v v U N o v N c _0 ) E O m c CD v � m E Q v O °' -0 r °J o C) N N � � 0 b 0-- L- O U V N � v * O O u v Q N � >v > V O LL Q Z c- C N L un � N N � N m 7 _v V N _0 C � >N r) qco cu- 4& CSS N N U C V) 2 W O Ln N N N� C N ro � +_' 010 u N qp p ro i N N N Q = o C= O C O Q p N M W EO i N Q Q) N N n O m i bA 6 ro-0 Ln Qj Q , Q N Q C O j ,0, C N > bA 0 N C j .� b.0 N u r0 in '�n ro Q C C-0 N N Ln M C L ro i :� M u N N "6 +� 0 'fin =C C u }' Q v N Ln to 7C bbo — m E u E uj u p c =, j N N m � C X m Q ,� C N o N bA 7 bio -0 � O C QJ �' C v� C .Ln u O C C N N C � C� v v v QU Q) > E Q app v ru �--+ O N C L C- N N m -p L N-0 Q -0 ra -0 Cp 0 � ro � 4J in �' in E E N u C ,O, C C rp N N rLn v i O Q —= u O QJ O v -Y p Q Ln iLn �_ O Q rra W Q N E E u Q O v ro Q N c a0 p ro C ,C, � X M y E i - •> Q N N 7 w N-0 u .— -0 Q w ru p bA C n L in `� O C .� ro O C N C ,N +� - ro L +••� H - "6 bA H m W to p u i O Ul -0 C-0 NLn C � v C E C cn NQJ Q QJ •C C 4J >E N — I •� Ln ro � Ln Qj r uo L S .� v O bA C C O N N m N � to .E C in C i C 00 c r O u -5 m E ra CV N Q N N i . E E +� r6 > � u Ln to r6 CV � O > O m .Lf, ro •}' r6 L 0 Q �' C C r6 C �, Ln E � I- O to 0 i C O 0 0 - 0 Q N L bA > Qj O Q bA to r6 +' i Qj N i � �C�D Qj 0 v v OMM LL J O 00 p m in O E � � � O C m� M 7 u L m v v OC �n p a C) -0 E> �' fl v J v a>J v v Ln w O C o E p� Ln Ln c Q� L u i v O N Q +J O N u N r6 V r6 O Q N tin E QJ >, c v c- m E C i O in Lj i bA •N N N N +' 0 2 z > Q ) O " Q Q 0 - N a) C � - N N ro uu = N V N N � C > fYf N 7 ru0 L m = o }' ° W O= •,., c O c w Q v o v - u .- Q .E Y -0 � m N 0 in > Vl ui Q qco cu- 4& CSS N N Q) 5 m E \ \ / G \ Ln \ % e � G 3 = c ± Q) S E E » ± % 2 0 %[ e —= \ e / / 5 \ 5 « = S c 7 e 2 \ E 2 N { 5Qj m u E m \ ¢ § \ E 5 a e 0 - 2 y m 2 , - \ � \ 0 \ / / \ \ 4 § � � ƒ 0 ra J / % e / e 7 e % \ / u Qj© u n E\ g _ E { \ \ \ \ § ( 7 f 3 2 / ®©� E 5 u _ g o ' > f - / ' _ 5 _ 7 % 2 \ un \ 4-J / � \ \ \ _ = c y ± § ± 4-J/ / \ o = ° o E / ° § E � 0\ kUl)° 2= / 5 e y \ 2 «§: u m m » 0 u/ \ / 4 2 \ / 7 2 \ 06 o / / 4-- .. e _ g u % m 2 = = � E / ( k \ / m / G E( ƒ m E G_ u 7° 8 = y o$ -FD u 3° g>_ D \ r 0 Ul)� \ f \ 2ƒ E \ / Qj E \ 2 \ a \ e > y 2 un = u e E 2 a g G 3 \ g \ G ( / Ln E \ \ / \ 2 t k\ \(/ 2 E= B\ \ \ E e \ \ t [ ® 0 / w ± / e E e $ §� u e . . . \ % y 6 c O Q) 3 Q) c Q) Q) CY Q) Q O w 3 = W 73 W m Q) Y O1 7 � D � N N L M O N O N O p O V Q U N U C Q N � L N N L L.L C C O � V U m C � � Q N U N J lO N Lri 7 Il co du 4& A N N Q) E u V o -0 -C ao ro -C v E to v v _0 v -0Op C N ED C i1 C— Ln C C Q co ami ° oo Do o a, Ln Z) o } 0Q o 4 -- ai O C m 2 N N p,p Q N 0') Q i O �, 3 w o o to - — N O A C o -0 v v �, a, - v v '� C w }; m Q N o v o E w a, Z) aA O O O 0) (6 Q v �, Ln a, a, v -0 v" O - Z, 0 a w �' ao m� w O o o^ -C — — o Q a, a, v tea, — '� v C O r6 v C E V o n Z, v D to 0O N N ra i=- L Q E— •C bA C , V) 4J ` / Q L E ;_, O i ) C N C rB •L _ )n V N L V N — o Q C E O to Q O N L C Q O Q N O O O N +� C N V C E E -C D ' L m L C Ln bA Q N — V bA O mLn U L O Ln �' > O C V N O � N )n )n C v ��--' O w v Q) CLn ��Q) OQ i M r0 �..� V i •� a O M � v c- 7 N w ro -0 V in ^ 0 N Ln N N bA 0.0'-' N to Q N Ln ® 4d Q N m ? N •— N ro N L ✓ i ) C O r0 OL �..� OJ E N-0 C E o E C o E ra c v� v ru 'y D Q O ro n w a - Q) _C Ln N V/� � Ln Q)m z'- V) V O � y� > O — y., Q) Ln 4J Lh M V N -0 -0 N N �_, O }' N N E N QJ m m O rB i N C `� O ✓ Q _ to C b 0 i 0 n N ruo m— ~ Q V °J C bA C C °' rB O Q a- bCA E a- ra -C C ,�. , ✓ p o v Qui i C E •FI) C U Q N O C O C o i 3 o O 'v — C� Ln O-0 Q Q Q C v p a, v Lii �' o- Ln o- m o ° E L Q- v ao Q CN C Ln LnN LnLn u Q C- Q) E Ln v Lnm t Q E N bQ a� N Q) Ln Q) C 0 q o qCi Ci CK N N a) 0) m 0- O C i N -Q u m -0 = V0 C N -0 to N i O O O— N N c � Q§ —O E C O i 7 N u to ra U L Ln Q N O •L m •i C v C > _ w Ln u= O O N w w QJ a, ✓ Ln •c i v - a, N 0 3 Ln > E .— C C Ln N a; Cu C C J N O O m w C N Q C C Q)i 0 ?� Q to Y to r0 4-- r6 W m L }' w C 0 w i O L O E O Q Q V j N O O C E Q +� C EO C b0 N �+ O to N 4J N C i m O Q— C C C rn v OQ o v v E O > ° Ln Ln -CE r0 o u i N Q N N Q >> L � Q i 0 �J N .� N p 0 L -0 u N =� E to E ro oQ °'� Ln _0n m H -0 v -0 i L �i 7 N C O N.- _ bio C r0 �+ V N L Vl 0 7 }' �' bA N Q C C E 4J r0 m ✓ N f6 � a, O E> ro E � � bA � Q E — m o v °1 o o a, `�° m `� E -o° v E o - O F to N m bA v� Q i N O N > L N C r0 ro — O 0 N N C V N C �--� C Vl O >, +-' 0-0 0 O i N iJ E 4J i to �, b-0 'in C rB .0 = E ,., C � >, x rn O 7 �' 7 C ,., O v �— E C 4J x v C v Q) o ro °' -0 0 Q O w � E 0 L C v C C N ao C E Q '� i' Q C �-.� L r6 r6 L > rS5 u L N C rS5 r0 Ln CC C O v O M Ln C N V N o M Q u n O Ln n Q N — ro O� rbA > .E O m-0 v C O i m Q 2 O N +-' co N E n rB +� �' m C N 4-- O Q B Q O Ln E �' C M 0 W v ' ro v Q O v v i Ln C °o ao °' f6 ao C v v O C O Ln Q) E v I _a Ln C C O .N .N C N i 2 'L p O L `� L a — E C .L Ll-ro ro ' Li -E Q v Q Q v3: o-0 Q) 4-- O v v v= ao = L N C C O L L L � C C O d, N O N b0 O w o ff O bA '� 0 w 7 to N Q i C N ru C •— Ln C O QE v E v U- i-= � E� v� o m 3- C O C = Q m ro Q rB N m u N 7 Ln O m ,�., -Y rn �--� w 4T -QC — C bA C O N Cp O .i bA N L, O 0 N N N N i N O O C n +' C to 00 -0 Ln �' N bA N N , `0 O Y N to ' = u 'X > N i O O X a) u V O X u O N 7 ro O u C �' rn n v- O O N W=OW rn = N o v v O — a) = Ll E Q w , axi O O L C ruo L C m ✓ w bA C C C w C rn i N Q O v O N O u O ro O CO- }' ro O � N N � C ro 0 Q) O .0 O r6 .� C C O � X 2 - E O N > O v > M O Q '� O ,, O — ro E N N u NE = L N u � M 0 E � i Z L N M u N u N -0-0 N �' m i m w C i O in N 0 L m Q �, Ln i r0 N w C ro C b-0 C N Q N O C '� r�ii C � =— �' C C � i C - Q C to >, _ rn QJ E O N- v N O O rp — Ln N . C C ro Q N •'� �' X ?� C ro L C O N > .E N C C �_ C rn 4J .E a C O o-o W N �' �% LA C O a N -0 -O M O .� H O-0 o > c ai Q o u° v o o ro .0 E O E .0 o °' o b Q v- Co N c °' 0 D C W W r>Co C° w H co •E Ln C V C C i 'c6 N> 0 '� to .Ln L Q) O � v '--' u� tea, rB v u v o C o v Co o= •� o o> o- Q ro C Q C E v ro a) n = E o ) C D ° o � o Q c v w � o C o O Q B V> N � O u � O E NN .rn O . O O O OX C E D _ -0 V O.0 o roN i N 0 Q1 rp C -0 CU Q i co E C O r6 Ul + N O U L r6 .� iJ N O u Lz 4--' r -0 = O o = O O m O to O ) CV)C i Q) v >, v �+ a c Q "0 Q O ro q o qCi Ci CK N N a) 0) m 0- Q) ro LnE ro V V co co 4- 0 N N N O1 a Q) — -oC a, �, E o ° V Q) a �' = — c Ln `° v z v °�' Ln Q = u o V z `n ro E a, >' m w -y o o n bio v 0O u ~ o Ln f6 °n' '� C N C C N > ro ° Vi �' ro aJ -0 C u ro u — v W o a� v Q) Q� w `° Ln V �' a, born ) ro Qru o Ln �° a' o }' D �' o E o N N u U j — ° aJ w >, —_ ro n Ln Q aJ Ln M 0 Ln Q o Ln v a, - a, to V °' Q °' v O ;o -Y L Ln V a) r° C ro Q aJ O Z X 0 V f6 C S � p aJ O �-' •� ° � � v aJ — Q Vl aJ i N r6 �-' V Ln O o v N o j L •� rroii bio � 0 V C V u ro :'' .� C C rn V ro O M aJ C L ro N OV +�-' � ru E aJ m C L aJ 2 L— Vt i >, -0 ro O p 0 Q i 'j ° Q> aJ rVo O '� N r6 Vi w v >> v N Ln N aJ bA -' aJ O O i 0- E aJ L C �' rn L �'' o aJ C ro O >, 7 � rn C 7 o - L N O C C C bA bA rB o U] Ui -0— ° -0 m �' .� w -0 �.' L V ro ro u C � H �' — u ro LnLnn )� o LA a) Ln bA w >' O ro Q n .� w O O w �' O O O N aJ rn 7 p aJ 2 . �' 7 '� Q O u Q u Q Q 0 to o ut ° N O C C Q Q Q t6 bA C i L c- aJ O C aJ m rn rho N f6 aJ aJ a1 aJ '�>—' aJ LnV L z C z N w H 0 u m M 0 u b�.0 H� rra rra i� O �O C v -6 bo N E , V > w �o O O ro bA N (o (o V Ln �' ✓ rn •L aJ O aJ C u p C rn Ln Ln o N m- v L N > N }' aJ Q .� to C i 7 21 r-' u O Ln L 7 L aJ ) On Ln �J N fo `� �J aJ Ln C C Q; C a1 o O L O C a1 �' �' O O n N u ro ro Q) Vl O aJ X O ro v O C Q ° ° L i w O C 4--N C= m Q C 'i Qj aJ Q z m C >, U w m O C u ro N O O LO bio w ro `� = O� N N > Q) E ra i o Ln � _ f Ln Lno �' O ra v O N i L >, rVo ut u ut C ut Vt - aJ O > > w aJ ria v C v}>' > ' ro i� N "— ro C f6 v W ✓ ra rn v a1 L �' N rn i N p O ro r-' r-' u-0 bo Ln N a) r-' N O IN/1 L N Q O Vl m p U C rb E +' 7 C aJ ro In O U O i O a� O bA C .T > N N O Q E � `� E C EC � C v �.' op 7 M i z E N —Ln ro O v 0 V rn Ln a N C C O C aJ V iL- aJ O Q Q O E L M O C lfl o bo �b0 aJ N ro Q Ln Q) 0bo z u ro >�ai ro o v v° E z O�ro 0 O v v o D o rn ao � E -C w L L�' 3 ° v v 'D w E C O ro a ro Ln H O C w o V-0-0 0 ro H e w Ln Z w Q v o o) Q) w� c ao W W >-0 v O �o O i +a ro M 4_' — � D 4-+ N � C V1 C V) 0 • � ro ro V ro , — � � — O aJ N Q i C p -0 Q r6 > bA C C C= _E Ln aJ m C r6 0 U O C ro 4w v ro o c � ° ° o o i > v v r D ° v V, •— �, =- X o o — .No H 'ti - V V v �' un v ao •� E v +' H i C 4, C C ru C = O C L = v� v O V O to C � O 4- L" ro Ln C Vt Vi C �.. a) O O+ O O ', C v 4� O Q v v, '^ v, v — a' a E � 6 +r u u o o a Q D ro o C -0 �, ro o o V o, o a c H ru Q ° v u v i i.� J =IA � � .� C b C 4- O 2 = r- C -o .0 .a (Y) r_' ro 0 0 V, 0 ro �, D a v (, Ln O _5 co co 4- 0 N N N O1 a N E LnN Ln a u Q C- Q) N E Ln N Ln m t CQ E N bo N Q) N N In aJ 7 0 co a 070 N N 0) aJ rn i rn � 4J L a,o ao aJ O E Ll Q O 4J L U i O to n3 Q LnL T i C Ln CO O N ro O u _ n O C MO }, w U m u j� Ln 0 N O Q T Q r6 W U u rn O L C -0 i C N pp 0 E bA O Ln C U C Q C .0 N ro w 4 O ) 0Q -p "6 E Q O 0 v C E N ro i �+ O O O .0 -0to Ln N i fV6 u v N E > C p O C Ln bo O Ln r6 Q > 0 Ln •X 0 m U7 +' 0 C .L 7 ru U u m O C O L v N i LI) T 0 Ln — ro Q L ) Qro Q p ro r L C� v� C C = Ln r 1 : C O C C O O > rho � Ln a •Ln - Ln QJ E X E ro u v � — Q= U °J o v v v L,)— v C o i auJ — n fl Q n C Q v - v U p C _ Q O C N C i� Q Q O bA C✓ L O C U m N E Q� O U C C u C C -O Ln E Q z N vii �% +O-' ,�., �--� Q Ln E u — Q w aJ Q aJ .� ro C N �, N = rn 4J L u_ N N bA E E bA C rn N C b.O C N "O p � �' E ro i f6 C C Ou Q C p E N i r _ I)— N Q 0- —_ 6 N m u � 6 bA C Q N N O m �' L/)C O Q -p U N O 0 F u '�, C N U O O �_ C "6 Q N — v L u O ro �--� C C C N— Q c '�, C rn m 0 �'' -O E bA ro O O E .O i ro-0 C N C in 'X bA C !, C O Q CO M N - C ro 0 C p .- =_ pp N-0 L N "6 O O .— ro i C rn QJ O C3:'� L C Q Q 0 m Qj O C 06 N rCp C O C i N Q b.0 (o v to QJ U N }' 0 �c �' CLn In L C N C N 0 N rn N - v Q)_ N ro C Q — r6 = ~ C U i Q N C E N N I- > � = O � OL v N O "6 O L p iJ Q) ro �' bA N C ro -O' O — N C C O ~ N Q 4J O C H U N N C C u - i O N .rn i ro E Q E N .� Q Q .0 H-0 In O -0 C CO rn _ Q a O Q N __ N r6 N N r6 bA ru E Q) i N Q N 7 Ln 7 -C �--� L N C F 4J -0 "6 C U v 00 Q C U Ln U O Q� C �--� O 3 -0 L C O avii C bA �J ON Ln C T NLn -p = O O, �, O L •X u l0n � Qj -0 -O O F N a., .O i C m 4J O C ro O ro Q) C v N v N }' v O O Q v>== N-0 N E O W N 0 O E N O Q r6 rn r6r6 i v N }' C C E •C C Q r6 = '� C O p 2 O O E N Q "6 U O-0 bA �J �' rn O C N O rn Q C rn Q N rn -0 N N Q 4J to ro C "p •� N N r6 "6 � —_ C bA u C .Qj i bA 'p C N -p bo ro C N L f6 ' > > aJ C N — u C L C C O E> C ro w H J u r6 N N N rn vi Ln b0 D Q) �--+ r Q) Lu (A 0 L r--+ 0 'i V r6 4- CL > rte-+ ru E t i tn L N .� C V r6 W 4-1 N tA V _ r6 i I- N O N _0 to C r C 4--V � O > raro to C 0 N fC f6 bA C V it N N ro C = C bo Ln $ N b0 0 0 Cru b0 ru> N O 5 ' U N _ N = C ro r6 bA ro 0 N d C O Q ro V •� N ro 4. > ro Ln 4.1 = ro co a 070 N N 0) W M E M V V tA v c N Q v N N c O u W a) to a) C a) +-' a) a) a) — w Ln ai _ U" � v � a) v V Ln co V L E� 0 rts i X i a) y r p H O n u V Ln N M 0 bA in _ i 0 Q 0 i Ln L E 0 bAW0 0vb-0 Ln o w Ou T) O0 Ln 7 a) b -0E v O w v c C o> bio o L a1 to MC ✓ Ln Ln a) M i� — 'X O ui W a - v u v W u W V u O0 n a1 o v Q a) C W W E f0 N V i� Q)O '7 N 7 �' a) >' -0 a M aJ V O in V p E C bA o a) ,., a) C i a) w M to ro >, v N w in O O Q) XbA N Ln u aJ 'a O n ra �' V C -0 M C i 0— C — t v u ra c O n W i �, Ln L rt V R3 Q C- C 7 a) w a) }' bA a) i O E O E C M ra a1 V fp a) a) p bA M rt ° v a0 v a) a) > a0 E a) Ln Q L of b�0 v O M �' u u �—�' R3 w N i a >> i� O •� W V > O E Ln a) o Ln V z o v W c v ao o Ln -0 `° aui w o Q) o WWo v u v n v N C M 0O Ln N - -- ra ate' ° C 'M N rts i 0 -0 O V M >, O V O rts a C o bA a) � O O .p Ln Ln } M 0- 0 .- O Y O- a) •w '--� C 2-Oi-� � 0 cM O Q a) v — a) Oc C Z a) V1 -0 in — — i M i Ln o a) .> c a, M a) o u c ra c O ±f _E m Q a; ° i a Ln z — Q O M Q . � — V p N N MLn `ti v ami}' f 6 a E `�° v o Ln E E� v, O tn p Ou v 0 O O O NO o l7 O }—' > p in a) a) p L/) u a O C a)Ln i a) v W v u Q ao O p a) bb C Q) o v o O F W 'E C D C i -o— N a0 u C — Ln -0 rts N N O Cv C a) Z3 N �, a) 'i M p O E a) N N a .��' a) RS Q C L Q bA -0O I v - -0 C o -Y 0 V Z3 M w W o M t}n a) 0 � j o Z bA — Ln • 0 LnC wLnto p Q) n v o u ° �, i N M S aj O d O p in - o M a c ma) -Om V v o p a) E p V L N i a) Q C Y W Q L •L/ 11 M '--' i M O }' > Q ate, W N- p 0 rts E a� a) R N •U _Ein �, 0 N > i N C a) M o Ln M = > a) +� O bA -0 O E v to S E M ,n >, v '� �� � Q) O C O N M N-0 Q O N Q O-0 c a) n 'i 0- o o a a o 0 o m u c o D- p u a, a z a a, a0 '� a) bo v v v M, M L° M o v-0>° ,moo a u u W n^ o c °J E v Q v o o. p o a o p a) ° Q b o 0 vrta v ,n zu+ L M bA > C— � L W 0 C �--� c b rts c v p v +� a) p w i C p v N v D o r n .H o v -O E� v v o O p > N W O C > a o �, v -- O m O rts rts a) L c — ° — � - o > s w 0 in � � V > Q bA � O. O V E .� ;� F- co co 4- 0 N N N c6 0 L aJ b-0 R5 Q Q QJ co m Ln> bA Ln QJ O� o Q txo ° v QJ v }' > Q �' QJ Q E 0== v E ° E ao m Q v E a, 0 Ln >' Q - 'v Q v Q o w °�' > E = w }' ru �o aci �' `° `L° °U L O to °' o Q Ln °�' Ln O QJ L L v° O� C °—�' X ° v Lnbio v u Sao r �0 v E° Q U.)° r6 o Ln Q Nom. rn QJro C �Q) O boi — E V O U +-+ L C C rn Q C °o QJ Q1 QJ �O i r6 Q E �°— O m-0 `� E b0-0 o Q Q � O i-� L O U �' °' �+ O p I Ln C U Ln m E -OL Q O O O C •� o QJ O L > Q O 7 O ro - QJ QJ '•' bA QJ to o >> QJ mro Q E Ln u Q QJ O O ° txo p .0 4-- O 4-- O QJ rn v 4r- Ln QJ O N }' b0 > O O b0 C +' O >< Q to -2 ~ Ln O Q M O bA Q E LnLn U ° O w L rn w �' O C u ,� Eb Q �' C U C N O z rn C, .� n ° E u o Q p b.0 C� ro C O E `� aJ axi +�-' vi QJ t i ro w O QJ O v O ;�, E 5 5 w i ;_, ro -0 X L ru rn Q 7 Ln r-+ -- +�-' �O rp c to Q L N c ro ,�., w bA O C-0 N-0 O 0 '� v O Q bio O O r6 ��— O v '� .i > y0 Q Q-0 U Q — Q EMOMM to rte+ O Q 0 O 0 Z) O b0 p Q� 'L o X QJ rn u w .c QJ O O QJ V v Q C p C ,� Q Q �, w ° ?� Q ao v Ln a°o U C Q o= Q E v ao z vi •ro rra o C Q r" w ° Ln v E E E O QJ w i o ) E Q p O Q M � Ln O Q E O Z) Z) Y Q o O w-, w rb Q— = D— u� rb w Q a z O m Q W v�= o' o o v c v b0 U n Q U +' u ocf C OU -Fo>>_ > p Q = Q C p n O n 7 U Q Q D Om .- m v ruo Q Q)b0 Q) cr UC Q f6 O Q +' bio c QJ .c Q 7 b.0 O X E O C QJ +� C rn c O uLn U ru m COWEDt - D N OQJ -0 O QJ z'' > QJ M . � x i - O = C O QC UCQ m — LQJ E V4r+ � b vEM°--OoQv YQ ) CN O "6 in — � Q O u rn 4' QJ Q ,Lf) QJ i w O — �: >> Q QJ L Q +� Q U C 0 rn bioC r6 'Ln � ro r6 C O M Ln U > 0LnQ! QJ �' Q QJ Q !o ro •L Q C QJ 7 bA r-+ iJ p LJ Vl p r6 Q i QJ Ctxo i Q QJ d' i Q Q �, O Q —� Q — }' QJ C +� c O Q w C .— m E }' = U -- QJ QJ i ro v ro Q Q ro L _0 M O Q } Q O E — c E Q U QJ Vf Q o ° � Q i Q n rn - ro QJ QJ -CC L ro C L—f) QJ Q u O QJ p wO -C }' .z, c 0 u -0Qj o o O C ° O OU Q p rrn O QJ m Q O rn �Q••� QJ C Q LQJ C O O pc N NU Q >O ui = m QJj Y L H W p L >> Ln p r L QJ C Ln E p — V p j C Uj l l L Q C O U v E i� >, ro C O O C p a, �, C Q Q C rn C +� C C-O ro E u p C Z3 Q QJ of j a) N v Q UteCi Ep OQ =C U -Cip N 0 O Q,E U u O O _ z QJ Q O cU � Om ro OO �=O,crnu rn o QQQL - mQ EEC _o E oaa QQ i z w 0 Q Q LL F- co 8 liN N (D 0) c6 0- _ _ 2 ® m Q) ± / - g 0 5 = § 0 \ \ / § / \ n y a \ Q)/ _ / ° / 4 / » E 2 / C ƒ ± 2 ( % ° ) ± % \ \ ) \ / / m 2# 0 e e 0p _ = m = 5 _ 9 2 Q)/ ° \ \ ) \ 2 7 g § \ /- 2 M ro±_ 0— m e b,O to ru \ \ E \ \ Q) Q) J S = > \ \ 5 # o2 § _ _ \ #§ ) 2!,$ ° _ ° ru ° \ % $ Q)7 \ \ \ \ E \ e Q) a 4 2 7/ Z a/ E m{ m m Ebio /± = 0 2 6 # _ ( - g e. >. $ ƒ \ 2 2 \ 2 \ 2 \ e m N / { j $ \ ƒ� \ / ( \ Q) \ ƒ E \ \ \ \ 2 u E ± % ©_ > — / / S m / \ / % _ . = 0 z — 3 7( 7a\ j\ m 0 e m e m= m/» r / ® m m S 0 LO N N ¢ 2 n � a \ y c 6 o O O 3 c - Q U 51 co 5 4& u� N N (D 0) c6 0- N L ro Ln E 7 ro V V co co O ti N N o C O = Z3 N d w � � — C N Q C O = V � � V N V d _ s' N ra vra C — > Oi w O N C Qm Ln O m N •�>—, ro Ln C O N •2 LnLn -0 �--� N O O .Ln E -I bA O a rn +� Q) Ln O C V O .� o .� w m +' rQ) Q > f6 � i •C rn � p Q Q d C O •O in Q) i E r C N N V ro N ro L N 'ULn N N N Q C •F � C F C C O E — L O L E ra O V v E _0Ln U^ w H bA .E 7 v E V co co O ti N N -Fu Z3 N d N — C N >1 N N V N s' N vra C rO V N N •�>—, ro rM -0 �--� N O to O Z rn +� = ro V C V V D 00 +' Q w � +C' +� •O in �O E •C ro N ro N rn 'L Q u rn C N N `� > ro N Q)O E -N m W -0 N }' ro rn C N +o }' v E N w O N b-0 ura � CC O > i 0j E m i O C p N >v Qj Q w w N > p rn rn C N Z3 -0 Q Ln — rn rn C r6 L in N ro N m rD to u vi > O }' ro > •L >> N nO O N O N C L E : v Qj p C N -0 -0 N ro b.0 ro p •� C C — Vl Qj QJ .� o Ln E Ln N E 41 i N O N C N O ! E u N L i1 ,�., N to L to N O L Q b 0 }' Q O Ln O u — J aQj to Ln o — � p N O w v Qj CO •' ' aj Caj aj aj O O > O p > - m N � Qj C O —O>-wo mu OE QJ C MQjO p �-ON o ro ri N O v '� u N v QJ O O v E rho L N , rn > O QJ N N �j C c p C D� ro N Q p ?� E �A o O v Ln Qj m bb -0 ?' i O C v N >, .� i bA L O E L Ln r�ii C M m ro O C N ,�, C C n �_ H N rn (n — Q i n O O N ' a O — N C +' O p i bA Cc •v >, L, V M E N n N dj 0i N ro U ✓ L H rn b0 N -5 Fn L, QJ� N N � Q l/1 C O Qj O E � O C C ; C Q w .� ro Q u b�0 V N O ro i ro ro w ro N C C m —0� N O c Ln N C L,— C C O C i u ro C L 0 N N ro r^ O N c j 0 p— u N �O C N N rn L O ,�, ro C Ln bA N i ro •� N O Q E N L C V �, Ln i � ~ N i ?� �, O LQj �ro C— M i 7 rn - ~ 0- E_ �' C v N i O ro b�.0 N w QJ N bC.O Q N O i O L Ln E—M C bA O bA n bA C Qj bA Q O ro bio C N C ro N N C N O u L N ro �--� Q V V U- Cru p i C 2 C X O C X 7 Q w w O X-0 O� VI Q N p E -a N ro N-Q O O p O C w U rn 4j p N Ln C tA N Q O C N rte+ N Q E CO C w Q = L 7 Ln � bA N i rn ro �--� m a ro C C H w 0 p u- C G N L C H w -C .r^ O QJ O E co co O ti N N Ln 0 u c Q) E E 0 u N r_ O ■ A V 06 i ■0 W E E V L� 0 bo U L N bo ✓ N N '-' N N rn N L `- bo c rn i— - N o N +' O b�0 M 0 0 N ro 0 O L, u+ v i O L N n '� v p � �O �' v ra U Ln bA v, 0 c N— E L bA v U Q uy� i o a, S o ao o a, 0 Z3 >, .- oQ m w c v .� Q v o �i bA E O ro 0 L 0 c-0- E� > N o OL c °) ami " b 0 o� � u o co ro Ln m a) U r v ro > i=, O ✓ N ,� ° i rho i bA •� L ro N }' .Q .� T v v v> ro v v� v�� v ami E ro ria Q) Q v u " � v —— v T Q ra v E 'i O > � O Ln Q) 0N 'Z 0 0 o bo c p Q ami _ 0- 0 0 rn W� -0 -0 a0i v o 0 v }' °J c ro 7 m w c Q� w OU +=-' O 'rte--, 4-- rO aJ w m L raQ-O ,, U c c i v, }' bo r-=, c p Q 0 u- N ro 0 v > Q v '� v E Q v v�-ou v � o }' ro o a, °= '� E E D �Q) 0° O a��i v o ro g v ra v E .� v ° v o Ln o v o i o u O v n> M °' v Sao M E .— — v E 0== u v, p -Y U) V Qj Qj T O QJ L O N �' N c N p bA ~ LJ O .v, •L U V o •— X m m m v ° lfl p C i1 '>> ro N .- N N E Z3 OU Uj .0 N ro QJ 0 ro E V Q O Qj Q O 0 Qj � 0QJ U � 0 w 0 Q c u Ln Ln bio Qj o ° o 0 ro -0 Lnoo - ° E QQ 0- oW o v E w o� Q � ra L ° N�Q 0 V c-;-- 1 bo Ln ra 7 ro -Fa Ln th OQj N Q O O O0 .2 �_ O Q-0 E O v O E ra H b).0 O vO, OL OO bio = X M E O C o-= o m w Qj u N by v, - aUi v - U= ro W .E Q ro o ro Q w ra v E E o H .E N L N O N N t wwwc_ i i bA "6 -O c N N "p N Uj -0 v, r>6 N `� bA c c c N N N 0-0 T N ro ra o }' v U wUro m N O o O U -0N a v N 0 -Fu Ln N c O O N E o °r6 -, +' o o c �' c ra i N c ,=., �0J `� Ln c ro 6 > X O ra i iJ p N QJ Q u c N D v, bap L 7 r6 u O _ H c M —O U N }' O c N ro �0-, O 7 0 i N O ro v, ro Ln U ° N >, N c 1 p O v •� > > N N N-0 LQJM Q rn i 'i ✓ Q Ln � u N c O— N 7 > E p N w-0 �0., o U f6 u c •� -0 Q •L ra rn 0 U U �--� c N-0 •i N N c C U OJ 7 c N r6 +-' aJ u v 0 .w v, ro i -0 N ro N O0 Q 0 c i � -0 rn 0 c ro E c Q v W i i L i ra — . ro i O ro N p N "06 bA �, N •i - bo N ro N M ro N c o Ln QJ U 0 v ro o v U ao ao i> u� E 0 i E rn c _0 Q u -0 ro u c v x 0 v, v 0 c 0 axi 0 fl- o �° v v v c •� v L c ai 0 N N N v v Ln o v 0 Q c u u ra v Q rn Q v u-0 Qj p u W L N '� r�o w w C: � 'C N U N �j N }' N-0 c i c ro 0 Ou n O 6 O L L Q Qj rn p UC: Qj v= v ro i s v w �_ Q Q m o a� E c u E N L 0 N N � c o 7 v, O Ln T v � Q — Ou Q-0 u o °' rn M ;,; c w Q c-0 f6 o u .E �� p E v_, v E ro o 0 c -0> v o `° D E o o v o w v o m o v `a > c Q -0 v N N u rn N i bA O i .5 E -O .i m c -0 .i , ro i 7 c N Ln bAQj v .° v c Q �° u E M m E f6 ° c QJ _0 0 c D -0 o v> U 0 N O� > 0 0 •�, c ru p c 0 i ro to b.0 O c �, 4J N i -0 QJ N N i N E 0 �' c O 0 Ln c 'i L ro u l/1 > E 0- N N � o i �' - N }' =' -0 u 0 N N Ln ro .2 0 �' N 0 c �' ra rn L rn N 7 7 Q ro N i , c bA i •� N ro 'c ra oQ c E E Q o Of c o w .� r° '� a� ° ?' O u o bA vi v u v ro E E u ° '� c Ln c E Q v rn u> E c = c = o T U v U ro o c o v ro v ra o ro ro , �' v Ln QJ o -0 - .- U co COLN N (D 0) (6 0- Q) ro LnE ro U U u c O L u N LU C v u ro E U 0 _ O C O ro > N C O U N L i O to N C Q) .0 C ro ro c ro N O O N C N E C O in ro U v u Q U 0 Q L C CN C 7 U O 0 u C O uu Q, Lu C O Q C O u v V) rd ro C ro U Q N 0J bA C N b.0 Ln t to Q 00 It N r- 0 00 Q) N O N C E O N N Q) Q b0 C O N N u ra i N C N O N ro bA C O N C Q u O bA C C ro Q U ro u v C N L u Y to Q u L aJ C N u u Y 0 Z A o o v Qj co p N ro i !? O (fl •i 7 � d O D ro N 0 O v bA E 0-) I- "3: O i m O N o o _ 0 v N _ U N = ON _ N �..� O 0) Ln _ _ ro m u O Q ON C i rUo t Z +--' 7 U p C i O b0.0 �..� N> O Lfl N C7 U O N vii u O E Ln c > O a ro c 4J II C U L N Ln 0� C: � u wN u N U O Ln N O M O O ~ O N L N Ln N u O Ln ro QJ N i N U_ to to Q E r•. 7 N O C .0 O rn C O u U- U U i w 0 Q C O O 'Z, U r6 ro O 0 00 u n1 rn U fo N O Q rB ro Q to Y !_ N � N � w N E U i Q N 4J bA H = QJ I? 'u ro L > w O N ru • L ro rn1 0J D i C C r0 �..� U U 7 � J 'C N �..i .i d _ IO to 'L N� Ln O H O^ CD = N U bA 7 U N C N _ w rn Ern 00 O ro N N o c _;� i •- O N E N � Q u Q , O C ro to F --to to ro bA Ln ru O r V V1 O C N N 7 U' •L � u C No O N ro O o� =0 -O C O ro O b 0 N i ro ro W 4J b0 i C i N i bA w w O ro N - d Q 0= QE-oV Q = Q L')p r ro O O p O� - N O V1 N v+'i ro bA 0 H u C j n L w p i ro, C = Ln i ro, w _ C C 'i i C _ > > O N C �, C +-' rip N u U C u `� � m N O 00 Q u O O rn U O •c c N= 0- 0 O rn �0 Qj p ro 0J ^ L N I to O ro N N O) C O N > L O= O rn -O N E O M O �'' O ro O w O i O N C 'Z, O E .� N L N bA N O N 0J N rB N N C C u fl v v O i L> v p ro C v o > I o I C N u Z u Z �c Q aJ Q u > 00 -J w d1 Y mu QI 0 bA U i N l/1 i to 0 w 0O Li - Ln N toC !? = u N m E -_ E 6 C L e COU C r6 V p rn Op in L \ >� Z Z Q 3 (6 41 QJ > Z fo w v Q i M N U i N i1 +--1 N '-' N N i > O -O �--� C C - N l7 In N N i - 0 C N 7 Vl N V1 rn N N �--� � N i; U7 N N ro i 73 C) C j of N N 0 u = O OC) 7 N O' LnO E C X m C 4- Q 4J N N m :361 a N N O N L>' O u O of N Q i Q H OfN c O i d d u mm N r C NQ u 'E r6 N ro N w v v v v v > O ru N C C C C C C C u _ C N u u u u u N w N C71 w p C N •b.0 •b.0 •b.0 •b.0 •b.0 C v m .� • .7i Ln.0 � E d u 0 1 N L w O w O w O w O w � O i C C) N C Q) o C � aci aci aci aci aci N E E E E E o OQ) o Op N N N N N r6 � ^_ !? �_ C m0 ro ro ro ro ro O N "6 O O O N E CD- N N V1 V1 V1 V1 Ln N N ro N v E v u v M O N fl - O N N � r Qj ra N E V1 Ln VI V N Ln - Ln L _ u a N u = D V L �_ N N Ll 'z' N C C N 7 H Qj N N bA � u M V (0 m Li- Q) lN X Q LU a m X X Q) Y O O U c O C ro d bA C O O 0 C O Q M N � O N ro � u r L L a,o � � E }' v V LU N 06 M a) N 6 O . N V O Ln Ln � a i O V N Ln to N c J Q 4J I 7 Ln LnL N E N O U/ 0 0 x C N Q Q a co 8 4& cs_ (Y) N N Appendices Z M O N O N U c� a� Z CL w 0 LL0 w D N N w w 0 Cl) Z ti W � W Z N W Q W 2 F— X0 X 0 LU W W F- LU WLU LU U) 0 w Y 0 w CL Z M O N O N U c� a� Z CL w 0 LL0 w D N N w w ; $; \............. . $ WW!\!) . DO: ZZ: �\ /ww \ - » ` �e e/« Dm / __ 1. j , 2 \\j ^ LL ..............................................,;: - § §!\22 ) ! ! (\^ (.\:;; .;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; }\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ < ` i - ow - | : \ « \( ; §�. _:,, ,.................................... / )\\ ) ^ z~ o Z ag :L Lu HE IOH v =a o _ $ 3P Qo r W� f�D.�- ®®®"m"m"m E4 Sg"m"m K J ; e M; q ysp; a°awwc�itl= _ �a&:ye®eg i�'E,ee?a 5 k �oDNHu - Now�Oa OI—Ul% _ dim=SE 4"Y =k�'ok0000000k���H_ d€d �' �i " � Q W vi ~ G S� ♦�, w �� �d �� �'���s3klfitltlbY���' �yy� ; ¢' � � � - � �_ a d d` d Uz1H. af3aaa -I) lata-elrzr Nld (los A®1 ' err 133a1s�N33na ' I ! as _ � a (ereuvz al esn easr .xr�-.ca na a3N3rrex) 2°n...l,� 6i I I p I S al n O � a ¢ _ a 4 p A Z ! �I 3 tsz..ecxx cc,l w �m � U 1 5@ S M 4 5 O N V l d tl d I 91 I I I �I ` II (tOs Ns -Id tl]N315g3d ,iB �33at5.INON/i0/) 11 ------- 13 Adis olaviNo IL" a® N L Lu Z ag :HE SOy W 3� O - _$a§ 444 a o0 -o W, J ; e%M; E4 Sg q K� $(i� ysp; $a&:ye®eg a°awwc�itl= _ d i$'E,ee?a hyo `o NY! e e� � y sY Dopy � y�gZ, e�hy, R ray 'mrvy �. nm .a ilk: :�i'Fl3 ?S a S Mail 5 z 4n � E4Y€PYPYPP5444P 4 ¢ Po. h� � � X j oFQr�Oz ¢i—V1 � � z� oa �"N' � tltl MYYMtlXMtltlXtltltl tl tl �, C ����yb� 8 - �o � ai � � 5 s � 0�y gg. g���� qq$ � •• �- � w d ~Q WuiH6 % a W �,... se 5 des koldl2'�r "ea{ a daKdU¢ ffi: vih s z a j�,� (10� NMM 03b3(Sg3N A6J - �(`�)fl N33no 5 a ii tit" �-- "°^';pro a �••° �' "° S; ,�.., b �, �.r -.<.— --- s �! � � C Fapay 414 L d.4 Y � m Fido � a _ ._- ... I 3� O d hyo `o e e� � y sY Dopy � y�gZ, e�hy, R ray 'mrvy �. nm .a "ei4,I,��m Po. ws> w d L.L MRe o - ------------------ — __--_ ft o �I � nlw o 09= w 1. EF' — omo e mrv- 0. 00 T ZNI - =g 6 :l P:p y§s o o -I opo awm oF a H Ll o mo 11 ElEl 0o 11 lo Q U) 1 W 7 D 12 lloulo 11 o o 5 G w p o i NI ="$i' t - = Z I _ — o seg �wl Qo CD O Q — r� w w 0000s -2 go» o; N fNo a r W J " � HM ='=°'° o `3 a haw o o 30� - a o sw - w - - - ®®®®mmm o LL `g,; _ mo nr o mm a Iw Q p oo ®®®®���.T�.. ,w �T z E 133HIS N33no 31noa 3?JI3 inoeanonn daeoiinoe isp E- o I Nn Mro1N3 � ^h e - ------------------ — __--_ ft o �I � nlw o 09= w 1. EF' — omo e mrv- 0. 00 oo a - ¢ o �w� wo= �R o -I opo awm oF a H Ll o mo 11 ElEl 0o 11 lo Q U) 1 W 7 D 12 lloulo 11 o o p� I ol o L � m oe so ans 3..SZ bZ .BZN 3 _ 4a3� vis3o asp �i v 1® .O ft o �I � nlw 1. 1W IK W W U) 1 W 7 D 12 11 p� I ol o o �E '�. ', .• I L � m oe so ans 3..SZ bZ .BZN 3 _ 4a3� vis3o asp �i v . . . . . ... ... Lu Lu €'6' —of na sso ,,,, — ` ``✓J 8 — xo ! oo oo cn LU LL s`w" 133HIS N33no am ssoss - =z ssss� oz z�zY m m - 00 3 - `I LLm ® ® 10 -9je w a0, ala ur Li o -o Y I _ E 3 I v I L— — I�= �� m D rc �� 11I z a l I � I_ I I o � e a ae a z 00 a pw_o o - A . eso, 5 M. °�'I -wa; I - 8 I � W � I ios M. a��� aI of do dwva Ar- as I I - a 4 I ¢ o a I g` s,. w z f ;I �Aa _ �w o pq oll - f0 10 �' �nvnnr omoo� r . . wbesb 3.si bi "si lv AA A A = - nns LvzzE onv�o moe i+ n 1 oa LO Sb° ° : ani 3.04 b0.0EN m o : zo x xx ---------------- .41 o0 a a o7.0 =�� —- - �a I \ oory a -� 44 t 'i o'E� moi b I—�,,, IS o 30� o E o .sa 3Q - ��m=� I -- fi fq 10 -9je w a0, ala ur Li o -o Y I _ E 3 I v I L— — I�= �� m D rc �� 11I z a l I � I_ I I o � e a ae a z 00 a pw_o o - A . eso, 5 M. °�'I -wa; I - 8 I � W � I ios M. a��� aI of do dwva Ar- as I I - a 4 I ¢ o a I g` s,. w z f ;I �Aa _ �w o pq oll - f0 10 �' �nvnnr omoo� r . . wbesb 3.si bi "si lv AA A A = - nns LvzzE onv�o moe i+ n 1 oa W Wlit r Ege_ 4sr,B L �o� wop ZZ: N-on—gol ��//��� HIM QO K �� �V/ - - a ooec Niw 'Yw o oo Q Hm` " f s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z - o 000�m '� o> w ®®®o 3� J s'f'Sgpy a a a nzLL qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl .olE -611 ---------------- o o lo W. �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss __ _ } w sE,ee.a a w LO Sb 3.0440 v0EN fI I II I -------- a� _ _ a -WW" Ww ow mom— po o o. " o. o �a a w o lo wrr -� ° 3I J n�- w G ° Io ff aoo�d of NMOO dWVtl V � L I o lo o f.'u 6 W-1 SL I—E N a —WA eNIUS- IV— LobE Loos i+ W W r Ege eg8 L L J L J Icy W low D U)RIga °' — W oosl 0000000 �� a' loo 1NQ a f�°° `€ C Y an i Y 000 ®®®0�3rn °B°s - -- - - - Q L psESS& a —� nnss nn�v nnss ~a �— -} �a nz�_A LL Sa&aYe- i TTYTYTTT� ff a°aaww° J °° ` r �p10Q Z n —oJ�W d ios ��zl 3; a. zl fro - -_ p zv L� a �o o e m� o lo ® ml oJ�W a�Lo °� I� —J ^I �a _ r _ _ att ao � a a LL � w of I ❑ � IN z� �z o o rp p o d b , 3sibi esiN 0 00 m -e coca 1 op W W r Ege_ 4sr,B L r`ga E63'ol ....'`^^� lo WH ��//��� o" gI�� QO �V/ a M � — — <� — a ooec lvlw 'Yw � � oo s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z - o 000�m '� o > w ®®® o 3� J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss E�sE,ee.a a p o b a»>o a»>o Iwo »>o O10 F �� ol I _ � El sE 03 oc 19 00, __--rV I --—_`JD air—-—= � ❑ ml D- OJs I� D I �I a o — � E� a z I ®JN o Or. ❑ .6 wa oocI �°° o � �\ %61o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o "A5 '°II II II II II II II II � II II II II II II II II w bEsb 391I—IN llvwl C rc o - m -e coca I. o — op W W r Ege_ MiNklit ZZ: N-on—gol ��//��� HIM QO K �� �V/ - - a ooec Niw 'Yw o oo Q Hm` " f � 2 s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z - o 000�m '� o> -)) w ®®® d 3rn J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss __ _ } w E�sE,ee.a a V II II II I1� I ®v s,v s,v ®v • rW _— LL .olE -611 I El/ oc 19 ool o 0 n --r --_- 0 0 3I v ��`_-—— ❑ 3 zl ®JD z Or. -,wok -ar 0r�o °° o � xa n0 o 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 �A5 '°11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 s o 1 3siI—EN is —WA eNliS­ IV— m­e moe I. op W W r Ege_ MiNklit ZZ: N-on—gol ��//��� QO HIM Hm` " f � 2 DV/ - - a ooec Niw 'Yw o oo Q s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z - o 000�m '� o> ®®® o 3rn J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss __ _ } w E�sE,LL ee.a a ISI _ 2 Elooc 19oolF.om�lo I� �i 3 I ue 3 C al Iry ZI IZ wbEsb 3�siI—EN is rc 00 I^1 II I\ L®vim 0 I^1 II 11 L�v� 0 I^1 II 11 L�v� 0 I^1 II 11 L®uJZZ 0 Stl3 �Ol� I^1 II 11 nFl�v� 0 I^1 II 11 ��v� 0 Inl II 11 L®uJnnF 0 � � 11 oA ❑ - - _®JD w "=z Y = 0 EI 100 — _ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � �¢ A5 '°11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 00 op WW�o. V m SSS o 00 DN I8�;°I;e — _ 00000000 Eu®®® /*3�� nnss nn�v nnss e� ml Im o 3I o 3 oflo IN z� �z JIM test 3�91I—IN I� 00- 1119 rc 00 o� $ O r ae r O I n OOl9 o El o� z_ I "i � m�z U ¢ o oe o0 0 o I El EEHF o lI V rc li 4 0 0 Im . . . . ... . LU Lu Do zz: / - o o o w o D U) W, OR \22222 o u-ow. 02 LL i'T — -- — -- — -- — — — -- — -- — L ---------------------------------- -- d \ e --------------------------------- 0 o 0, 0�1 E. wl- 0 < < \ \ (< 7, -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — W-1 9E I-- ho� 96911 00960 1161 -9 IV- � \ �� 2� . y d� � \/� \. \�\\. III ITT1 � I I 1.1.111 ILII -I swl 111i!i!iIiie:!IE-.::: 11 —isOM1. ——— . i_Illlljllljjllljlljijll –1 HH11111011 .I 'illilis I illili °'i' .I ill�lie I HH111,1111 .I illilis .I i11i11L liillilias 1111 �!I1i1111in I 'i11111e 0111 I Mill 11011 .I HH1111111 .I i- I i1liieli_i .I illili'�Iis� .I illili�!Iiml .I iIIiIIiial .I illi�i'�Ii!1 ■I illil�.■?1 ■ I illiieiii_i �I illili'�Ii°11 .I illilieii'�i .I illilie 1111 .1 i11111s 1011 ■ I illilils .I i1111in .I illiliL .1 MUM 11.11 ..M1111111011 : M11111n 1011 .1 1i1 UM 11111 .I i1111is .I lillili II 1 i 11 i lei' m' �'il�1�a111:I11f1��11���11 '17 iM.1002.1 NONE 1.11 111MI ■"`"111=iiim��i��ii0i!�■i!�■i111 NOMINEES■ iiioiiil_�ii�iJii�iiill ■ iiiioiiiAliil.i!�ii!�iiill ■ 0 of 10 0 0 u in ■ ■1111■no NINE mlNONE ml■.!I0.■II ■1—mmI�JM�E�jBoom Mimi !"■.III ■11■■mmJ■■JLn.. mill ii jmi11 ■IIO■��J■■J■'iiiiJII�IIi11 ■1111■mmJ■■nI.iiii�■■Si■■111 ■1111■��LI■�L�Lit.■®i■.LEON � 1 1 ■i-■!1■■°�■■■�!�■�!i1i11 11■i.J■■�n■■�J��J�IiII IIi1..J■■J■■■■J■■J�IiII �e 1 1 MEN NINE -'\'f='Y� ■Ffi'mYPf�i'm�py®Ai1s. 1 1 ■Ii_�iiJ'iiii-�"iI�i1i11 ... rimer 1 1 ■iim�ila�.■■�!��■!�■1■11 11 ■..oi. 1■00°.'..i�n0 in 10 iii°liii'ii�iii'ii.■s�■.s�■.ii11 ■IIO■��J■■,L�.■A�■.gi■.ill ■11■■ssEnnhisir. m+i1!Ii1iI1 011■000J00mI1 0inMr !�II!illlll milmsomEsELlignmENEELl ■1111■..�i■■!i.■�■s�■■s■■■II ter• L �uv:.,T. -u- 0 ■1111■0ILl■■J iiil!�■■Si■■ill ■1111■omme I ��iJ■■J■■■II ■11■■��J■■�■■iiiJ■■�■■■II ...� •... ■nu■��!I�■!I �■■■!�■■ ��iliill I I I I loll 1 1 1 1■I 1 1 -- Ilil!fllllllllllllll�lllll .� 111111!IIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIII!!I!I!!! 1 1 RI 1 6 1! � i iii I it l i 1 1 f f i S I I �I I I 1 1 I I tl ljllll�IIIIIj!ll� IIIII�Iiili!�IiI!III!III�Ii!ijjj jll�lljjllljjlll�ll Ili�ii ' ' �l�Ill�llljll�llljjllljjlllllljjl ll l l l l i i i 1 1 i i ■_ = II 11 111 iiiii iiiiii iiiiii iiil i 11 ;Iii"Ili ill-� =■.,■■■■■�i�sn�ilil e .. iS■■u1■�9�11- . _ ■■mom -■IIIIiiL■■5■1n511511■1ilil S105111Jr■=' -■IIIIile■15■11151■5■■■eilii S100111��II- -■Illiie■15■11151■s■■■elli! 1S10011■5�1l- -■IIIIile■15■11151■9 I'm ■eiFi n e'n iS■■■11■5�11-� ■_ -■Illiie■■5■11151■5■■■el�i. I's,eS■ � n ;Iii■■111911-� ■. o�■5 -llliie■5■11151■'11011 1111 ■I n nn ■111J11-� ;IiiS■■� ■_ o� ■I ■151111,11511■elli -IIiiL5 11 1—S■■ .. IIii■11■911-� .. 1■■-- -■IIIiiL■■Sn11511511■Llli ;IiiS■■■1uL ■Illliie■■5■1n5ns11■eilil 11IiiS■00111911 ■IIIiIL■151111511911■Llli n n iS■■�■111911-� r7, ■_ o� 1111,11511■Llli -■IIIiiL■155 iS■■■11■ ■IIIiiL■151111511511ELI ilii .. ;IiiS■■■11■5�11-� . _-��� -■IIIIiIL■151111511511■Lllil ;IiiS■■■111911 ■IIIiiL■151111511511■Lili e ��� .. ;II151■■1119II- . _■��I I it -■IIIIIi1■151111511511■i5 Iii51■■11■911 HMO ■151111511911■elli '';IiiS■■1111911- -■IIIIiiLuS■111511s11■Lllil 0.100■■9 IiL■■5■■n51■9 I'm ■eilil ®. n� ■■ ' ■ _ oi51■■111911-�-■IIIIile■■1■11151■e '010 IF 'IiiS■11111911- -■IIIiiL1151111511s111eili ';Iii51■1111911- -■IIIiie■■51■n51■Sn■elli n ii1i .. ' 911-� . _ .;Iii5■111■■I -IIiIL■■5■1115119n■Lili ;Iii511■■1119II-' -■IIIIIL■111111-115111LIII 11 11— OF ;Iii51■■111911- ■ _ 1111011 -■1111ra■15!1- Iii51'Em 111911- -■IIIIiL■15■111511511■Llli Iii51111111i 11511115115111LIlii 11 ;IIe— .. i511■1111911-' . _■-- -■IIIIiL■151111511511■LIII n ii11i 9 n i5■■111 ■. o�� i -■IIIIL■151111511L11■LIII n ;IInn i511■ �■1119 ■_ o�� iL■15■111511L11■LIII n i ■ 1117111■■111911-' ■ _ o�� -■IIIIiL■15111151■5■1■LIli I e n' n ;Iii51111111911-� ■_ o� ■I -IIIiL1151111511L111L�lli n iii .. ;IIi511■1111911- ■ _ -■IIIIiL■1L1111L11L11■LIIIi 511■■1119 1IIIIiL01511115111111■LIII e e� n ;IIiL1111111911-' ■ _ r� -IIIiL■1L1111L11L- ■I 11■LIIiI ;IiiSe■■■11■911-� ■_ o�L -■IIIIie■■L■■■■,■■L■■ELI ili ;II15110011■911- -■IIIIiL■151111511L11■LIli I ='lili1i 11= =illlil"e�� !�� llil .•.•.I iia . "I II II €I =I II: II II II II II II VIII IFF1 �u .el Leel 0 II II II II CIINMI CI I a n 1€€MI €=1 _ i■u—,a■I =� .. 111111119 moll In 01,00■ IM1111 i I MINIM 1111 MINIM EMIIMIEM' iiiimm ligiom, gill llimim, iiiimm ligiol milli iiiimm MINIM 11111111 iiiimm MINIM 11111mil gill MINIM 1111111111 MINIM NN K11 11111111 HIlNM iiiimm iiiimm 1111111111 gill■m 11111111 MINIM milli iiiimm 11111111H MINIM MINIM= gig moll= ilm■ imilm 1111111111111110 NN1Ip1NM1 NUNN NNIP1111111111110 11110 HIlNM limilin 111111111 gill 1111111111 iiiimm milli iiiimm 11111111 iiiimm liginim 11111mil iiiimm limilim 11111111 MINIM liiisim 1111111111 iiiimm limill 111111 MINIM MINIM iiiimm 111111111 BONN millimil MINIM liiiiim millimil iiiimm limill millim MINIM liiiiim millimil iiiimm liginim 11111mil gill■M liiiiim 1111111111 iiiimm ligiol 1111111111 iiiimm HIS HN111111 bA O _N �X W Ca M N O N O O � O LL twO �+ O N O �X Z+ W r m X O � GJ � Q LL co co 4- 0 rn LO N (1) 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Project No. 24012 Draft report issued November 17th, 2023 Final report issued December 4th, 2023 Report Prepared by: WEN a IDDIDIKU ASSOCA1 ISS =--' CONSULTING EN Page 260 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existinq Facade Retention Proiect No. 24012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE....................................................................................................................1 3. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................1 3.1. Investigation..................................................................................................................................1 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards..................................................................................................2 3.3. Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 2 4. OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................................................................2 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs................................................................................................................3 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing..................................................................................................3 4.2.1 Columns................................................................................................................................ 3 4.2.2 Beams...................................................................................................................................4 4.3. Wall Assembly...............................................................................................................................4 4.3.1 Foundation Wall....................................................................................................................4 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall..................................................................................................5 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface........................................................................................................................6 4.5. Masonry Condition........................................................................................................................6 5. RETENTION APPROACH.................................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Sequencing...................................................................................................................................7 5.2. Temporary Bracing........................................................................................................................8 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays................................................................................8 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks............................................................................................................. 8 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Angle at Existing Floor Levels....................................................9 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices........................................................................................ 9 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing............................................................................ 9 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed....................................................................9 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes....................................................................................9 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition................................................................................................10 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams.............................................................................................10 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS...........................................................................................................11 APPENDIX A - SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS APPENDIX B - RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page i Page 261 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 1. INTRODUCTION John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar's intent is to retain the existing masonry facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), as construction of the latter progresses. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP, the draft version of which, dated June 23, 2023 and available to JCAL, requires "That the Owner's Consulting Engineer ... submit a Structural Assessment Report for 10 Duke Street West to be included within the Demolition and Stabilization Plan, ... advising on the means and methods to be used to safely remove portions of the existing building and to avoid causing structural damage to the historic portions of the front facades...". This report is intended to satisfy that requirement and be the basis to develop the design further. Designs indicated herein are not for construction but are intended to show concepts and intents that will be developed further and coordinated more closely with the new construction, during production of a set of shoring and sequencing drawings for the purposes of pricing and construction. JCAL was provided with some photographs of original drawings. These lacked several key details regarding the existing structure and JCAL first undertook an investigation to identify and confirm these details, along with condition of exposed elements that may impact the retention of the facades and the need for any restoration work that might be required in advance. This information was used in developing analytical models and the approach to the retention concept that is discussed herein. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. METHODOLOGY JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions, identified applicable codes and standards to be referenced, and completed analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in the temporary support of the fagade during the course of the new construction and retention. 3.1. Investigation Jonathan Dee, P.Eng., CAHP of JCAL made an initial visit to the site on September 6, 2023, accompanied by representatives from VanMar and mcCallumSather, the heritage architects who have completed a Heritage Impact Assessment and Conservation Plan for the subject property. Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, EIT revisited the site on October 18, 2023. Using hand -tools, investigatory openings were made in several locations where possible. Locations were identified for further investigatory openings, to be made using power tools and with the assistance of VanMar's forces. These further openings were completed by VanMar at JCAL's direction, and reviewed by Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, throughout the course of the day on October 30, 2023. The investigation included primarily of the use of a chipper to remove interior terra cotta tile and plaster wall finishes John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 262 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 to view the enclosed structural elements and details, and to remove brick from the interior side of the exterior walls, to determine the construction and condition of the existing wall assembly. 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards The primary codes, standards, and guidelines referenced during and applicable to the production of work described in this report and for further development of the retention design are as follows: • Ontario Building Code 2012, inclusive of latest effective amendments (the OBC) • Structural Commentaries of the National Building Code of Canada, including Commentary L: Application of NBC Part 4 of Division B for the Structural Evaluation and Upgrading of Existing Buildings • CSA A23.3-14 - Design of Concrete Structures • CSA A371-14 - Masonry Construction for Buildings • CSA S304-14 (R2019) - Design of Masonry Structures • CSA S16-14 - Design of Steel Structures • Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, published by Parks Canada. 3.3. Analysis The applicable wind load was calculated to OBC 2012, using a reduced importance factor of 0.75 for calculating loads for serviceability and deflections. It is our opinion that seismic loading may be neglected during construction, given the brief construction period relative to the 2500 -year return period for code -specified seismic loads. However, seismic considerations are relevant in the permanent attachment of the facades to temporary elements that may remain as part of the permanent structure. The applicable seismic load was calculated in accordance with OBC Article 4.1.8.18 for building elements and non- structural components. The applicable seismic loads were calculated, using seismic Site Class C as recommended in the geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.), and it was determined the above -noted wind forces govern design. Rigidity and stiffness requirements for the lateral support of the masonry generally governed design, and the limitations stipulated in CSA A371 were followed, of U600 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is perpendicular to the bed joints (i.e., for bending in the vertical direction of the wall) and L/300 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is parallel to the bed joints (i.e. for bending in the horizontal direction of the wall). Analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in retaining of the facades was carried out using procedures identified in the above -noted standards documents and using Bentley STAAD structural analysis software. 4. OBSERVATIONS Observations made during our investigation that relate to the retention of the existing facades are documented below. Sketches of key typical existing details are included in Appendix A. The building's structure consists of one-way flat concrete slabs, spanning on steel floor beams. These beams are supported on two interior east -west lines of structural steel columns and, on the load bearing exterior walls at the perimeter of the building. A further general description of the building is otherwise documented in the Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan and is not repeated here. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 263 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs The existing floor slabs were hammer drilled. While only a relatively small drill bit was available, these were measured as accurately as possible and found to be 127 mm (5") thick and are believed to be overlain with a bonded floor topping for leveling, which is assumed to be on average 25 mm (1 ") thick. The floor slabs span in the east -west direction, between floor beams. These slabs were not scanned for reinforcing steel, but we believe they would contain smooth reinforcing steel bars parallel to the span direction, and temperature steel reinforcement in the opposite direction. 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing 4.2.1 Columns The building's columns are generally clad with terra cotta tile and plaster. Occasionally this has been overclad with newer drywall and steel studs. Openings were made to expose the structural steel columns within, at • three locations above the Ground floor level, • two locations above the 2nd floor level, and • one location above the 31d floor level. The key findings are that the column steel is generally exposed behind the terra cotta tile, with no additional concrete encasing or coatings beyond the grey paint (see Fig. 1). A column splice, suspected to be present but not otherwise documented, was found at both openings made just above the 2nd floor level (see Fig. 2), and not at any of the openings on other floors. This splice location is believed to be typical at all columns and may act as a hinge in the column if not laterally supported in both directions at all times. 0 Fig 2: Typical column splice, above 2nd floor Below the splice, the columns were found to be wide flange profiles with welded top and bottom flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 225 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 19 mm, and the cover plates to be approx. 12 mm thick and 260 mm wide. These may be historic US 8" WF @ 58lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x71 sections, plus the cover plates as measured, which is a similar but conservative selection. Above the splice, at the 3rd floor opening the upper columns were found to be wide flange profiles with no flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 200 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 12 mm. These may be historic US 8" John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 264 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 WF @ 31 or 35 lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x46 sections, which is a similar but slightly conservative selection. 4.2.2 Beams The steel floor beams, present interior column lines and with an additional beam at the mid -span of each bay, were understood to bear on the exterior masonry walls. These beams are generally clad in metal lath and plaster with exposed steel beyond. Openings in the ceiling and wall finishes around a typical beam were made below the 3rd floor beam bearing on the south exteriorwall. Lath and plasterwas removed and the interior wythes of brick were removed adjacent to the beam (see Fig. 3). As expected based on available documentation, but of significant value to the project to definitively confirm, no steel column within the wall was located. A steel bearing plate is present below the beam, and the beam was found to bear approximately 200 mm (8"), or the full depth of the two interior wythes of backup brick (see Fig. 4). Additionally, the top flanges of the floor beams are noted to be embedded above the soffit of the slab. z� tee: Fig 3: Typical beam bearing on brick backup at exterior wall 4.3. Wall Assembly 4.3.1 Foundation Wall tx 4 h !_a.• a 9-:.. il? ! 1 J? i3 rl Fig 4: Typical beam bearing length on exterior wall The foundation wall assembly was investigated at the interior of the basement, toward the east end of the south foundation wall, by removing a portion of the interior plaster and terra cotta (see Fig. 5). The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, and the • concrete foundation wall. Naturally, the removals did not extend through the concrete wall, but the exterior is finished with limestone, which is presumably bearing on a ledge in the concrete foundation wall. Dovetail tracks were noted to be present on the interior face of the concrete foundation wall, and one dovetail anchor was found extending into the terra cotta tile (see Fig. 6). This may suggest that dovetail anchors were used on the exterior stone as well, and future masonry conservation work should be mindful of the fact that dovetail anchors from this period are prone to inconsistent placement and corrosion. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 265 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Fig 5: Opening in terra cotta tile at foundation wall, interior Fig 6: Looking down at opening, dovetail anchor 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall The above -grade load-bearing masonry walls were investigated from the interior, primarily with brick removals completed above the 2nd floor level, near the east end of the north wall, 2nd floor (see Figs. 7 and 8). The interior brick was very difficult to remove and therefore only one opening was made, and conditions were otherwise exposed during investigations of beam pocket and slab -wall interface. The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, • two wythes of concrete brick backup masonry, laid in common bond, and the • exterior wythe of clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The interior terra cotta tile was noted to be anchored to the backup brick by way of corrugated ties, as one of these was located in the removal area. No ties were noted between backup wythes or to the exterior brick, and the brick wythes are believed to be tied together solely by way of header bricks. Fig 7: Removals at above -grade masonry wall, interior Fig 8: Angled view of opening shown in Fig 7. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 266 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Determining the slab -wall interface is important to defining a removal methodology that will not impact the integrity of the existing walls and to determining a temporary and permanent approach to laterally securing these walls. Removal of the interior terra cotta to expose the interior side of the backup brick masonryjust above the slab was completed in two locations at the 2nd floor (see Figs. 9 and 10). The interior brick was removed in one location and the slab was noted to extend into the backup masonry. The terra cotta wall tile bears on the slab, and a topping appears to have been placed overtop of the slab. It's likely that the exterior brick wall was built up to the underside of slab level with the slab poured directly onto it. We do not believe that removing the existing slab from the exterior walls is necessary and that doing so may result in unnecessary damage to heritage fabric. Fig 9: Removals at slab level, S wall, above 2nd floor 4.5. Masonry Condition Fig 10: Add'I removals of interior finishes at slab level The backup brick masonry, consisting of the two interior wythes of concrete brick laid in common bond, where exposed in the above -noted investigatory openings, appeared to be in very good condition. Joints were well filled with mortar, including collar joints, the bricks and mortar were intact, and it was quite difficult to remove individual bricks. The exterior wythe of brick consists of an extruded clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The mortar joints are generally intact and in good condition, though there are localized areas of debonding and erosion. No signs of systemic delamination or outward displacement of the exterior wythe was noted, and it appears to be well bonded to the backup brick masonry. The vertical brick piers in the exterior wythe of brick project slightly towards the exterior. We suspect that this projection is created by simply thickening the collar joint between the exterior and backup wythes. There is also a continuous vertical mortar joint up each side of these piers where they interface with the adjacent brick masonry. While this might be cause for some concern, a header is present at every other course and this is believed to be a true header, tying the wythes together and no systematic separation is noted along these piers. See Figures 11 and 12. No investigation was carried out of the exterior stone cladding at cornices, foundation level, etc. Given the age of the building, these may be keyed into the backup masonry and/or anchored to the backup brick using strap or cramp anchors. Often in buildings of this age anchorage was only provided to the top of the stones. However, no systemic issues were observed of displacement of the stones, and no special care is believed to be required for these in terms of the retention. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 267 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 0-, Fig 11: Typical projection at brick pier 5. RETENTION APPROACH Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Fig 12_Typical continuous vertical joint at brick pier The overall approach to retaining the existing facades is to retain these in-situ while the new building is constructed within the footprint of the existing. In order to minimize retention costs and impact to exterior areas along the facades, the retention will make use of the existing structural steel framing along the walls to be retained. This will be supplemented with new temporary steel bracing and lateral support members. The existing floors will then be removed and replaced with new floors, at matching levels, at which point the lateral support of the existing walls may be transferred to these new floors. 5.1. Sequencing Careful sequencing of the work is a key factor in the successful retention of the existing facades in-situ and is necessary to ensure that overall stability and adequate lateral support of the facades to be retained is maintained at all times. The order of operations is anticipated to proceed generally as follows: 1. Remove existing terra cotta tile and interior finishes to enable access to backup masonry and enclosed structural steel elements that will be part of temporary bracing system. 2. Core or cut holes in the roof and floors at piers and install vertical strongbacks from above, using a crane, at the interior face of the existing walls to be retained, where indicated, with a. full -height (spliced) strongbacks at braced bays and b. partial -height strongbacks at unbraced bays 3. Install temporary steel framing, including a. diagonal bracing within existing structural bays where bracing is identified to be installed, b. lateral bracing in both directions at all existing column splices, where existing columns are identified to be retained, c. lateral support angles to interior face of backup masonry, above all floor levels, and which angles will ultimately become part of the permanent anchorage for these fagades. 4. Create separation cuts in the existing fagade walls, at points where the existing facades will no longer be retained. 5. Complete the demolition of the portions of the building not to be retained or temporarily to remain as part of the temporary support system, including the facades (salvaging any stone or other material indicated for such), and following an engineered demolition plan. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 7 Page 268 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. Construct the raft slab in the basement, encasing the base of the remaining existing columns within the raft slab and securing the raft slab to the exterior foundation wall. 7. Remove and replace floors along the interior of the facades to be retained, one at a time, by: a. anchoring the vertical strongback at the unbraced bays to the wall at the position indicated, centered on the slab to be removed, b. saw -cutting the existing concrete slab to be demolished to free it from the walls to be retained, c. temporarily shoring and then cutting close to the walls the existing steel beams bearing on the walls to be retained, d. placing the new structural slab, casting around the columns to be temporarily retained, e. securing the new slab to the lateral support angles placed above each floor level, and f. repeating at the next floor, above. 8. Remove temporary steel bracing and strongback members, leaving the now -permanently affixed lateral support angles. 9. Cut off existing columns that were temporarily retained above the top of the raft slab, remove the columns, and infill new slab openings around them. 5.2. Temporary Bracing The lateral support of the facades to remain during construction will make use of the existing structural steel, supplemented with temporary steel framing, as described below. 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays The existing column lines inboard of the fagade walls to be retained will remain in-situ until the walls are laterally supported by the new permanent structure. Several of these column bays will be braced, in both the north -south and east -west directions, with new diagonal bracing members installed between the 2nd and 3,d levels, and from the 3,d floor to the roof level. At unbraced bays, the existing and new slabs will act as diaphragms, to transfer lateral forces collected at these bays to the braced bays, noted above. The bracing approach, developed to minimize the amount of bracing that is required, relies on the column bases to be encased within the raft slab, effectively resulting in a fixed connection. 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks As confirmed during our investigation, there are no existing steel columns within the exterior walls to be retained. Vertical strongbacks, steel members placed against and anchored to the interior face of the walls, will be introduced at each column line along the walls to be retained, in order to serve the following functions: • resolve axial tension and compression forces at braced bays, especially in order to resist tension forces that would otherwise be induced in the masonry by the diagonal bracing, • bring forces collected by the lateral support angles at demolished floor levels to the diaphragms above and below the strongback, and • provide an attachment point for the lateral support members perpendicular to the wall that brace the column splices to permit removal of the 2nd floor slab. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 8 Page 269 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 The strongbacks will be installed from above, through vertical pockets cored or cut into existing slabs at the interior face of the exterior walls, directly adjacent to the existing floor beams on column lines. At braced bays, the strongbacks will be effective for the full height of the walls, with a splice between 2nd and V floor levels. At the base of the strongback, they will be vertically and laterally anchored to the raft slab and/or inside face of the existing foundation wall. At unbraced bays, the strongbacks will be set and repositioned as required to bridge from a removed floor to remaining and new floor diaphragms above and below, respectively. 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Anale at Existina Floor Levels An angle will be placed along the full lengths of the walls to be retained, directly above each existing floor level, and anchored to the interior face of the walls with HILTI HIT-HY 270 or similar adhesive anchors. The angle will span horizontally between vertical strongbacks on column lines. This angle is anticipated to be fairly large at L203x203x19, in order to meet stiffness requirements for lateral masonry support in this condition when slabs are removed. Upon completion of each new floor slab, this angle and its anchorage to the wall will remain and be secured to the new floor slab. 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices As noted in the observations section above, column splices were found above the 2nd floor level, at roughly the mid -height of the overall column, and this is believed to be typical of all existing columns. These splices will become unbraced upon removal of the 2nd floor. It is necessary to ensure that lateral support remains in place at these splices, until the new 2nd floor structure is completed and may restrain the column or, if lateral support from the 2nd floor is not possible, until the existing column is no longer required. The lateral bracing will consist of a horizontal steel member, spanning between all column splices along the column line parallel to the wall, and ultimately supported by a braced bay in that column line. In the direction perpendicular to the wall, the splice will be braced by a member that spans from the splice to the steel strongback at the interior face of the wall. The bracing member will be sized in accordance with the strength and stiffness requirements in steel handbook's procedure for bracing assemblies, in accordance with CSA S16 clause 9.2.6.2. 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing There are isolated conditions where the typical bracing pattern may not apply, or may conflict with vertical elements in the new construction, such as stair and elevator shafts. These details will be developed as the concept is pushed into further design and as comprehensive temporary framing drawings are produced. Further coordination with the overall building consultants will be required. We anticipate providing additional steel framing around these elements, or resizing of specific members to resist intermediate loads, should it not be possible to work around temporary framing, or where these new elements may not be relied upon to provide temporary lateral support. 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes The terra cotta wall tiles and interior plaster finishes, along with recent steel studs and gypsum board, as well as original and more recent ceiling finishes will need to be removed John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 9 Page 270 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 from most areas in order to install members needed for the temporary stabilization of the walls to be retained. These components are not load bearing, and they may be removed without impact to the balance of the wall assemblies or structural systems that must remain temporarily. Care must still be taken to make sure removal is completed safely, and to not leave sections of terra cotta tile vertically unsupported. 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition The portions of the existing facades to remain must be separated from those portions that are to be demolished, prior to demolition. We propose to make this separation by way of saw -cutting, at an appropriate mortar joint line in the exterior wythe, in a position that will not leave partial bricks or stone fragments with less than a 1:1 aspect ratio of length to course height. The saw cut will penetrate the full depth of the masonry wall assembly. Upon completion of the cutting, it will be necessary to consolidate the wall ends, by raking out any loose mortar and filling these and any existing voids with new mortar. Additional anchorage will also be provided to secure the cut ends of any stone units to the backup brick. Finally, we recommend temporarily capping the wall ends with plywood and a membrane, to mitigate water infiltration and any resulting damage until these ends are permanently tied into the building's wall envelope. 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams The portions of floor slabs to be demolished must be separated from those portions that will remain temporarily as part of the bracing system. We propose that this be achieved by saw -cutting, in continuation of the line of cutting in the walls. As the existing floor slabs and beams are pocketed into the facades to be retained, we propose to cut these free at the appropriate times, by saw -cutting along the slab edge near to the wall, and by cutting the beams free from the walls. The remaining stubs of slabs and beams would remain in the walls. While the slabs are concrete and pose little concern, the beam ends do carry the potential for future corrosion, causing future corrosion jacking of the masonry to be preserved. However, we note that where exposed, the embedded beam end showed only minimal surface corrosion, we noted no significant evidence of corrosion jacking at present. Additionally, the effort and impact to the heritage fabric from attempting to remove these beam ends now would be similar to the effort required to complete this work in the future, if it ever becomes required. For these reasons, we propose to retain the beam stubs within the walls. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 10 Page 271 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. 0 10016200 z1va -04-202E OF G� Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/id 24012/10 Duke - Structural Assessment Report John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 11 Page 272 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX A Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 12 Page 273 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK STEEL BEAM TC00A (lnIT A S1AU CbVNECTioAl - -ryp. CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB �4`u1Z ACS Page 274 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL =00A r n-r-rA 5j.46 - WACG C0 !V p,5C'► l 0A1 - 1?16f 1,l6 jv -T DNCRETE DIPPING CONCRETE SLAB 2011 hr , f6 w AZinv,& Page 275 of 688 STEEL COL 611raa111111 3ATA�• RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SLAB COW MN CONAGuT i ov - r YR CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB STEEL BEAM Boa r/ova Page 276 of 688 RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SPLICE PLATE LOWER STEEL COLUMN NOTE: TERRA COTTA, PLASTER FINISH, ETC. NOT SHOWN FOR SIMPLICITY. UPPER STEEL N G 0ztlr7iy 5 PL r Cl-:- ALU 2-4 FLOO R PLATES RING PLATE CONCRETE TOPPING 2ND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB jqpiz Page 277 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX B Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 13 Page 278 of 688 O O O �g X 0 oeti — —"d "d + 4 �I I I ^a I I goo I o os 7ii� �g a� 0 d e oa o -0 I I rllr'I o� I I I , w , �01 r� z o� I� I 0 J m I o o M I o � I o I lis z w IID w m� I �QIm�� I riN� I II p� 0 - ms - fi ale �= 0 I I �• ='o I a � I II I II� I I II �• � � � � C�' �� f _ _ I Mi lI I� #rl -- — — -- I I _MI = o� �o 3 030 s xtl I .I. - .Laa aw svo � I' I aNn;.irlado I I I r I I I I d n Q Q �� � ." �� � x= m� 14, 04 �� !� u _ xe= I — - - - E. o — _ : 0 3 5. � I 1 r I _`_ - _. _�_ a3 J� - - -L- - L---L--- �m oW o _ o o S I� v3 00 _ I I o � IIS 1 o�a - w - - - - -- --_ -1 7T7 — _F _—_-_—_---T I Q oho �e I � s�, _— � III I Fl um B w3 I ® o om 00 — 3G 1 I I zl 'I it it it it — ilI o �� � m � � o�s o� < <e Cp -F 4 T 0 0 wo ------------- 00 ------- ----------- L II wjj 'os lu -0 L —j- oe I III T- - - III III oI — — — — — — — — — — — Ise------ 0II2 0 II —WD 7TFFTl .1 oll 01 -E I, "g I IL I 40' U C-0111,11,11, e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m szt = 3 eese I I 00o �5 3 -- 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, Q QQ a gw g LU ' ❑ - ¢moo II ��° LL _ _OOo d> i _ Um — — — — O LL 0 I III — 5 o o oclo �o ooea �1 0m w'm ooeo °� �I 0m WIm os 0m �� pm� o �1111ii �Ilil, os� os— e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z ill �5 3 3aN— 0zo—o� 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z U J OO LL C) 2 Z LU N of 3 eese Y ❑ Q e m IxOx w¢�a-Urn � K w I i 5 1 — o Dost m 9A naso o W, 00.o os V � 9, LL �p ' 3 eese I i I so � _ _ z� uFi❑I H LL O w o A w¢ ❑ w a o� w U � w> KLL y N 011V �uo o. odea ooso!O Wlm Wlm 0— os Vo —III lov 91, 3 eese rLL K C7w ° ❑ �a wa wU O I I i 5 ml �g odeaooso00 �I Wim oI o Imo Wim ooee os I I ogroag— tj lov e m J QQ 91, 3 else ❑¢F- Um O �� K� H w z� O u~i❑ I ❑ (n LL iU O❑ �O s 1611 0 1 0- O 000z m i 10 n �Im Do e1' o�Im 00.o °gyp os o LL U J OO LL C) 2 Z LU N of 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Project No. 24012 Draft report issued December 15th, 2023 Final report issued December 15th, 2023 Report Prepared by: WEN a IDDIDIKU ASSOCA1 ISS =--' CONSULTING EN Page 284 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 1. INTRODUCTION Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP. The draft version of this approval, dated June 23, 2023 and provided to JCAL, included Heritage Planning Conditions which require [t]hat the Owner submits a Risk Management Plan, including a Vibration Monitoring Plan commenting on the means and methods that shall be usedto minimize vibration to 10 Duke Street West during grading, construction, servicing or other site development works to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner. This report is intended to satisfy the requirement for a Vibration Monitoring Plan. Further to other conditions in the Site Plan Application approval, JCAL has already completed an investigation of the subject site, including destructive exploratory openings, and prepared a Structural Assessment Report, dated December 4th, 2023. Design progress drawings for the new tower have been completed and reviewed by JCAL, to 75% progress at the time of this writing. A geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.) has been prepared and also reviewed by JCAL. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions at the subject site. Observations made during that investigation are more comprehensively described in our Structural Assessment Report. A summary of the relevant facts are included in the discussion below. The existing building is constructed predominantly of one-way concrete slabs, supported by steel beams, which are supported by interior steel columns and, at the building perimeter, load-bearing multi-wythe brick masonry exterior walls. The exiting building is a 3 -storey building plus a full -height basement level. The existing exterior walls are in good condition where visible on the exterior, and where exposed during investigatory openings made at the interior. The walls consist of an exterior wythe of clay brick with two backup wythes of concrete brick at the interior. These are bonded together with regular header bricks. Mortar joints remain generally intact, except for localized areas. and openings at the interior revealed a well -constructed wall assembly with solid mortar present in the head and collar joints. Stone masonry is included at details such as bands, sills, and surrounding the main entrance. Localized repointing and other conservation work will be required as part of the preservation and retention of the relevant portions of the existing facades, including at stone details and throughout the masonry. No bulging, significantly displaced stones, or excessively deteriorated or unstable John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 285 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 masonry was noted that would cause us to consider this building to be especially vulnerable to vibrations. Masonry conservation work is not expected to be required in advance of construction. One caveat is at the parapet which extends above the roof level. The interior face of the parapet is fully covered with metal flashing. While it was not possible to assess the masonry at arms -length from the exterior, and mortar joints here do appear to be generally intact, there is some efflorescence at the exterior of the parapet. This is an indication of high moisture content and migration, suggesting a higher likelihood of deterioration of masonry within the core of the wall. There is nothing to suggest a deviation from the course of action proposed herein, but the condition of this parapet will be monitored and assessed further, as work is ongoing on this project. 4. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION As noted in the Introduction section, above, the project includes the planned retention of a portion of the primary facades of the existing building at 10 Duke St W, for integration with a new tower to be constructed on the site. The project's intent is to retain the existing facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), floor by floor, as construction progresses. The interior finishes in the building are typically applied to a terra cotta tile backup placed with an approximately 25 mm gap to the interior wythe of backup brick. As part of the work to stabilize the fagade and to integrate it with new wall assemblies, it is proposed to remove this terra cotta tile and all finishes. As such, impact to plaster or other finishes are not a consideration in determining the vibration susceptibility of the building. The new tower will be constructed with a raft foundation, the base of which will be set close to the basement level of the current building. The raft will occupy much of the height of the current lower level of the building, and, aside from elevator pits, the occupiable space of the building will generally extend from approximately grade level and above. The geotechnical report indicates that native soil on the site consists generally of fine granular deposits and silty clay till. It is clear that rock will not be encountered for the proposed depth of excavation. As a result of the foundation and soil conditions, excavation is anticipated to be relatively minimal. It is further understood, as communicated by VanMar, that the limited excavation that will be required will proceed using sloped excavations. Certainly, no blasting or hoe ramming of rock is anticipated to be required. Currently, there is a basement mechanical/boiler room within the existing building that extends further below grade than typical conditions, approximately an additional floor level below grade. This room is located against the North (rear) wall of the building and extends for approximately 10m in each direction (about 1'/ structural bays). The brick chimney which extends up beyond the roof is quite visible and is located at the northeast of this room. It will be necessary to fill and level the subgrade prior to construction of the raft slab, and the geotechnical report provides two potential options for infilling at this room, to bring it flush with the remaining basement. The first is to place lean mix concrete for the height required, and the second is to place heavily compacted granular fill. VanMar have indicated that they will place lean mix concrete to fill this void, which would not result in significant vibrations being induced, as the costs are quite comparable between the options. Overall, vibration from excavation is expected to be relatively minimal. General vibration from other construction is expected to stem from miscellaneous construction equipment and activities, such truck traffic adjacent to the facades retained in-situ, and no special circumstances are anticipated to apply. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 286 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 671 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Localized vibration may be induced from demolition and construction activity near the masonry to be retained. The bracing and construction sequencing and the design of temporary lateral support for the existing masonry facades to remain in-situ are also being prepared by JCAL. Provisions for saw or torch cutting of masonry, concrete, and steel elements connecting to the masonry to be retained will be included. Specifically, • saw cuts will be introduced in masonry walls at the interface with masonry to be retained before demolition is to occur on portions that are not to be retained, • saw cuts will be introduced in the concrete slabs along the masonry walls to be retained, before those slabs are removed, • steel beams that are connected with elements to remain will be torch cut prior to removal, and • the use of chippers on elements that remain connected to the masonry to be retained will be limited to 12 Ib. electric models, unless a mock-up demonstrates that alternatives do not risk damaging masonry. VIBRATION LIMITS Vibration limits are not stipulated in the City's conditions, nor is there a municipal bylaw in effect to limit vibrations. The nearby City of Toronto has placed limits on construction vibrations, in their bylaw No. 514-2008, and those limits are indicated in Figure 1, below. Table t.0 "Prohibited Construction Vibrations" Frequency Vibration Peak of Vibration Particle Velocity [hertz] (mm/sec) Less than 4 8 4 to 10 15 More than 25 10 Fig 1: City of Toronto construction vibration limits The above -noted vibrations, while a good benchmark, are limits for any construction activity and are not necessarily applicable or appropriate to all projects. For historic buildings we typically recommend following the limits established in the DIN 4150-3 Standard, per line 3 of Table 1, included at Figure 2, below. The limits are • 3 mm/s for vibrations less than 10 Hz, • 3 to 8 mm/s for vibrations between 10 to 50 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, • 8 to 10 mm/s for vibrations between 50 to 100 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, and • 10 mm/s for vibrations above 100 Hz. We recommend proceeding with the limits indicated above in this case. These limits are quite low, and are intended to mitigate effects of vibration on historic buildings that might include deteriorated materials or sensitive finishes. The masonry facades to be retained on this building can be expected to be more resilient than many more delicate built historic structures. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 287 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention [4 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Though we do not anticipate exceedances even of these values given the understood nature of the adjacent construction, these limits could be re-evaluated should these limits be found to have significant impact on construction. Table 1: Guideline values for vibration velocity to he used when evaluating the effects of short-term vibration on structures Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 288 of 688 Guideline values for velocity, v,, in mm/s Vibration at the foundation vibration at Line Type of structure at a frequency of horizontal plane of highest floor 1 Hz to 10 Hz 10 Hz to 50 Hz 50 Hz to 100 Hz') at all frequencies 1 Buildings used for 20 201040 40 to 50 40 cornmercial purposes, industrial buildings, and buildings of similar design 2 Dwellings and buildings 5 5 to 15 15 to 20 15 of similar design and/or occupancy 3 Structures that, because 3 3 to 8 8 to 10 8 of their particular sensi- tivity to vibration. cannot be classified under lines 1 and 2 and are of great intrinsic value (e.g. listed buildings under preservation order) 'j At frequenc les above 100 Hz. the values given in this cofumn may be used as minimum values. Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 288 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 8- ,&------ - - Fig 3: Part South Elevation, indicating proposed locations of vibration monitors. 7. NOTIFICATION AND EXCEEDENCE PROCEDURE The vibration monitors must be connected for continual reporting of vibration events that result in exceedances of the vibration limits stipulated above. Exceedance events shall be reported by automated email to the Contractor, Owner, and appropriate Consultant(s). In the event of an exceedance the Consultant is to be contacted. If the exceedance is not the result of disturbing the vibration monitoring equipment or very localized activity around it (both of which are common causes of exceedances), and the Consultant considers the exceedance to be significant, the Consultant shall review on site for any damage that may have resulted from the exceedance. Future construction activity shall be modified to avoid further exceedances. In cases where this is not possible, and the exceedance was not observed to have had any impact to the structure, the Consultant may advise with respect to increased vibration limits. Note that this approach is intended to be generally consistent with the DIN 4150 standard, which states that "Exceeding the values in table 1 does not necessarily lead to damage; should they be significantly exceeded, however, further investigations are necessary." As noted above, it is our view that this building would likely tolerate vibration limits above those stipulated. 8. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 289 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. J. K, DEE 100' 62005 EC -15-202 'AtZ C]F O f fP' Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/jd 24012/10 Duke —Vibration Monitoring Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 290 of 688 Appendices F I ANN N6N\\\ Page 293 of 688 Page 294 of 688 n r'a'h g i SITE VISIT - JANUARY 2023, mCs 9 6m 1917 20220120 204210228 JOS 20220120 204322051 JOS 20220120 204420986 iOS 20220120 204456280 iOS 20220120 204726010 JOS 20220120 204754906 JOS 20220120 204800977 iOS 20220120 204814044 JOS 20220120 204820900 JOS 20220120 204822117 iOS IASI ; a_ r-, � 20220120 205651705 iOS 20220120 205655761 JOS 2022 0120 205658389 JOS 20220120 205659944 JOS 20 22 012 0 205704149 iOS Now" jig% oil r - ,drr- 20220120 205711359 JOS 20220120 205719102 JOS 20220120 205729294 iOS 20220120 205731229 iOS 20220120 205736733 iOS 20220120 205738559 JOS 20220120 205929790 JOS 20220120 205936794 JOS 20220120 210006562 JOS 20220120 210009202 iOS _ alolls 29220120 210011205 JOS 20220120 210013708 iOs 20220120 210014810 iOS 20220120 210016023 iOS 20220120 210018682 JOS Page 296 of 688 20220120 210021598 iOS 20220120 210023392 iOS 20220120 210055003 iOS 20220120 210057617 iOS 20220120 210103716 iOS jl 111111Hil liINL�� .11�L I 1 I i 20220120 210104839 JOS 20220120 210109696 JOS 20220120 210111515 JOS 20220120 210115184 iOS 20220120 210140026 JOS w WE6- iffl � 20220120 210142693 JOS 20220120 210242311 JOS 20220120 210243434 iOS 20220120 210245071 JOS 20220120 210248011 iOS 1:3 20220120 210249362 iOS 20220120 210250417 iOS 2022 0120 210251302 JOS 20220120 210252965 iOS 20220120 210253829 JOS 20220120 210255336 JOS 20220120 210256027 iOS 20220120 210257020 iOS 20 22 012 0 210402821 JOS 20220120 210439233 iOS s 2022 012 0 210441991 iOS 20220120 210444835 iOS 20220120 210447505 iOS 20 22 012 0 210509110 JOS 217220120 21051727{7 iOS 20220120 210522179 iOS 20220120 210531238 iOS 20220120 210536300 iOS 20 22 012 0 210608367 i0S 20220120 210623331 CS Page 297 of 688 20220120 210624200 JOS 20220120 210627779 iOS 20220120 210630911 JOS 20220120 210634332 iOS 20220120 210640529 iOS r, 20220120 210643236 iOS 20220120 210645121 iOS 20220120 210646712 JOS 20220120 210648424 iOS 20220120 210701551 JOS ON 74 20220120 210736258 JOS 20220120 210744509 iOS 20220120 2107532.35 fOS 20220120 210754919 JOS 20220120 210831459 JOS Ali20220120 210914214 iOS 20220120 210915080 iOS 2022 0120 210920858 iOS 20220120 210929212 iOS 20220120 210941385 JOS IE I 1 20220120 210944546 iOS 20220120 211011692 iOS 20220120 211013063 iOS 20220120 211014676 iOS 20220120 211020282 iOS w' 20220120 211040623 iOS 20220120 211048974 iOS 20220120 211055225 iOS 20220120 211056478 iOS 20220120 211058036 iOS 20220120 211110866 i0S 20220120 211146460 iOS 20220120 211'158872 iOS 20220120 211203374 iOS 20220120 211214257 iOS Page 298 of 688 F - w. 4 20220120 211216501 JOS 20220120 211226375 iOS 20220120 211438122 iOS 20220120 2110451074 iOS 20220120 211527922 iOS r 20220120 211529582 iOS 20220120 211535586 iOS 20220120 211535905 iOS 20220120 211539720 iOS 20220120 211543456 iOS 20220120 211548615 JOS 20220120 211555161 JOS 20220120 211559999 iOS 20220120 211605299 iOS 20220120 211620317 iOS 41a >. r1 1 d� 0 20220120 2/1627997 JOS 20220120 211634243 iOS 20220120 211639854 JOS 20220120 211741694 JOS 20220120 211902155 JOS 20220120 211930163 JOS 20220120 211931557 iOS 20220120 211932802 iOS 20220120 211936178 iOS 20220120 211937645 iOS WQ Jl 3 20220120 212015581 iOS 20220120 212017829 iOS 20220120 212129232 iOS 20220120 212131138 iOS 20220120 212132677 iOS Jim 20220120 212144398 JOS 20220120 212200461 JOS 20220120 212209177 JOS 20220120 212218861 iOS 20220120 212229879 iOS Page 299 of 688 - P �r 20220120 212237573 iOS 20220120 212243894 iOS 20220120 212258604 i0S 20220120 212259582 iOS 20220120 212300892 iOS Gig 20220120 212304607 iOS 20220120 212304890 10S 20220120 212309711 JOS 20220120 212315394 iOS 20220120 212329194 iOS F 20220120 212331519 iOS 20220120 212337130 iOS 20220120 212349992 IOS 20220120 212834235 iOS 20220120 212839245 iOS 20220120 212925918 iOS 20220120 213634000 IOS 20220120 213719508 iOS 20220120 214718317 iOS 20220120 214959010 iOS 20220120 215003184 iOS 20220120 215011143 iOS 20220120 215015754 iOS 20220120 215642153 iOS 20220120 215649624 iOS ,r 20220120 220011731 iOS 20220120 220331025 iOS 20220120 220347133 iOS 20220125 143502961 iOS 20220120 204114363 iOS Page 300 of 688 Appendices o � C it 3t i �/� v t F• is � �/(�J1 I-'. ` f� f. � ! .. t I I Y i ,• `t31 1 d _ r -r r 1 rr.'"�yY"� i>r'�j� d`�yF �,.�, ;,i 4�•f�}�{'�, d � t 1 f 1;'?p� 1 a�'yr�hf�i' .... .,.�a.,.14 14 k Fi o O Q fl Y Q 14 � W 3 _ ! 2 � Z • en L n � w O O otO SE i < I i f w d C W c` q rR Ga 0 N02 a go 04 ' zto ti - •'�' a N iA V al • H z m, w --- aI LI). to i t re.w" N FIF In N { z I 'c i rn R• ': w : t7 M M. 1 •�-� ,moi `i wp P. WWW 4 N a t� .ps co ------------- ., Il']in - �} 131 Cl) ILn v CN o 41 ~ Er, JX Q .0 11 d-# QI 3CV i tO N o M w Q C) O 0 z C1l II W I M F-, - aj i rc U z p ll C No - 04 - LL w � a G r i o 00 �z N w � I! z w p a. 1i z - is O I l.. [V -. I LA D 0 E m Z.oaSo 10 - a 'N N G9 U O s CL x.2 N a- _0 'p eS = Q V .L Os 0 "y *) .Q Q <L •Gi D 0 E m Z.oaSo 10 - a Y twi n P� N o i W F C z10 04 (13 4 d fll In o O O O U cq U I 69 -. I I w � a - i lu i i W j z 6o C7 I z z a3 a op - W D� I <m o oy cV �--- o r U u > �t o W z w z C*4 OD Al O i C14 I • Roil ! irk ..�"�' ' ��!!+'rt++"!"i�r�"�lij�����i`�p��������1����� . !�:1�d1 �G41,1.� F dd.�" H W r) W O +U -1 ; V I O U ro nz v W Z u � � [ \ E / % \ C3j a % a � / t \ E / � \ E g ® 0 \ D 2 ° 2 .� / = _ a® % a D u � ro u %// / ƒ 2 u 2 E $ S \ 2 £ \ / E 2 9 Q) qJ3 D c 0 » \ z + .+ ® L ƒ � 2 * $ / / ± / \ \E \ \ \ / \ \ \ c / '\ v mm � z /.\ � � ■ m m S 0 S (Y) ¢ 2 n � Introduction to the report Un 4—J � (3) 4—J C 0 U 4- 0 � � � � ql 2 e » k ƒ _ � ., o / E \ 140 0 ==3 kn / wU$ /ro � /C\u/ / ƒ x g m 3 LU — Ch e // T-/\ N 7\ m m//\ m ■ § / _% 2 £ 2 4-1 m// ° \ .g < g37\(A ■o00 s G e o'O ® » a I .g 41 \ / % 2 r » © 2 c a S og 4-1 \ 2 \ \ 2 /.g 2 2 2 0 \ $ 3 4-o § 7 a 2 G 0 — w m It Cli R R 3 3 \ \ » C D C ro k ) A j 2 \ I a c V) � o m 73 2 J 0 C \ �/2 to k/oo/ �/\ 0 — w m y y C .g 2 \ro 7 \ Q) D / / / / \ 0< / ® 0 \ E Q) 0 c.k� ° / % E 2 wy2 C Q 2 / / 0 -E � o / $ a 2 7 0 w � 4 ¥ § 2 § � / 0 / > { \ z / ° _ L ° 0 \ § \ ( u E [ 2 [ 41 ƒ $ / 2 of ?f ƒ $ 5 \ 2 0 — w m f ui 3 3 3 2 0 \ U U 0 ƒ 0 o < G 2 06 Rm= \ ro C \ E F c \ Q) ) e a z 3ff § \ < / m \ J 2 t » J 2 \ \ V) 6 \ E \ / LL \ £ 0 4— W C C / / = 3 ƒ \ ®ƒE2 \ \ \ o / 3 \ / \ / & 2 \ N 7 (A A // 2 c- 2/\£ 2 2 c e a= m 4- 0 2 a/ S o a m.g •2 t » E 0 (A a E' #/ t a o Sƒf0C)SG/�U/ E ® < e C¥ 6 G 6 2 06 2/ 2 2 ■ e LL o x x .x .x .x .x .5 M. -O 0 to 0 % % / / / / C V \ \ \ \ \ / \ \ 0 / 3 CL Q- k e 0- 0- W < < < < < d LU *O < < ql 2 e » k ƒ _ � ., o / E \ 140 0 ==3 kn / wU$ /ro � /C\u/ / ƒ x g m 3 LU — Ch e // T-/\ N 7\ m m//\ m ■ § / _% 2 £ 2 4-1 m// ° \ .g < g37\(A ■o00 s G e o'O ® » a I .g 41 \ / % 2 r » © 2 c a S og 4-1 \ 2 \ \ 2 /.g 2 2 2 0 \ $ 3 4-o § 7 a 2 G 0 — w m It Cli R R 3 3 \ \ » C D C ro k ) A j 2 \ I a c V) � o m 73 2 J 0 C \ �/2 to k/oo/ �/\ 0 — w m y y C .g 2 \ro 7 \ Q) D / / / / \ 0< / ® 0 \ E Q) 0 c.k� ° / % E 2 wy2 C Q 2 / / 0 -E � o / $ a 2 7 0 w � 4 ¥ § 2 § � / 0 / > { \ z / ° _ L ° 0 \ § \ ( u E [ 2 [ 41 ƒ $ / 2 of ?f ƒ $ 5 \ 2 0 — w m f ui 3 3 3 2 0 \ U U 0 ƒ co co 4- 0 co C7 N O) a v v to v-0 > C bA �° o +- v bA v 4- bA o v r6 - � Q i U Q) V O p N O L N C O �--+ N N L L C in 4+ L p i � O in V — _ r- N ru C rp p v N C r6 N c c = C O N O r0p N L V N r6 46 v V Qa Q 0 rr 4 O O UF - EY Q -0 v O> p O V rp O v 0 O CN° C (A —v ru Q Ll 4— O O O O Q — U Q 7 to N vi N C 2 Q N bA u C -0 N� r C O r= O 4- Q N C O to Q° p O C u '�-� O to N � O O O U C° O Q O N — ~ E v= a c boo D ) ru � 0 c V) ° Q) Q) V O j -° 4- C c v v Al- � .. ru O bA C N � = �, . to NN ru �' V _ � o ruo F c� ru vv u°CJ `^ v C a O 0 b-0 M O � N N C f0 ?j r6 N N L V +--+ 4- 4 i 4- o '� M �O 3 E N O O� bio (A C � N c N Q C Q (A � � 4+ N a L) N N � 0 � C N 'v N Q o � N C N ru E O � N •�, O = = ru V _ p U C C O C N O Mv N O 41 � O G V�r6 O O OC +-' V N to (A N O rp a_ o C N N Q in N in N in N o in C 0 SCA •� 0 L 41 tO E t = O •- � bA FO i > 4 N rr6 0 0 C .� O N� O O N O_0 4+ O N Q> O D '^ a E '� LD •� O Q a C 'E a C Q O 4' in O= t N ,- N N O +-+ O ^ >, a V � >, >, a in a +� w (A � v C U v v v U C U° C v C a) = C bo vQ=DMS > =v=ruFz0 c ) 0 •i N N 0 v O _� Q Q C r6 O O Q o Q N 0 vi � N 4- r6 — = N r6 N O V N 4- C N N in C .� Q V) i >� to N _0 C '+--' >ru N +- r6 C p N Q tOn rte-+ rte-+ V) Q N C Q O C N N Vl v1 C M Q C C M r6 C N °. r6 p 4_ O u E ru N O O C .- in C > > p ru i C l�/1 L _ � > rte--+ 0 C p N V V N U C �_ Q 0 > v Ln Q— 0 -0� V N O 0 U 0 .> 4- Q N 0 N Q 0 v U b00 r6 v ru + _ ru O '� to ro V r6 N C C N N m E C N i O rV C-0 .c C N C Q Y Q O N rp bA � to O in O Q N ru C O r - � i r-7 Q� � N V C rp L >, C N— O N v (A 4- b 0 O Q N Q) U1 C m N Q Q� C C N r--+ a 4- rr -0 p r6 N OC rte-+ O4Q1 Q QC 0 0N ruN ru C ru N nC V) ' > O= N I r6 v� ra r- rp vi 4J O 4- C to C C�4-z C Q Q � m r✓ o O C o o >% v °J .0 v ` 4- M D o p �C v ru C r 4- N > 4- 0 o N O N O to° .-. N � O N C O mru _ ro C°U Qo4- in C V U (p >n VNN v 4- N O L O — 0N in � 44 O O uv O N N C � C OC (A N bA in p � C ' rp (A O ON te-Y N C M m ° Q -0 V) 0 x in r6 rp -0 bA rp +- r- 4- i r - r0 -0 N in - m VN � vO 4-C0 in NV C E O N O N v1 > QN 70 N C 4-1 E ro �_0 rp`—Qo � NN -0 4- to L ( A - N O OV r6° C U > O ru •� Q = N F ruO U V) -0� O r C v OX toQ U i n E n O OW ro _00 p� ra m Q U 2 D D 4, r6 N V. rp V a V rp co co 4- 0 co C7 N O) a Introduction to the report Tw Q1 O n� W ry O V W In N O V 4--J m Q v O O o LU v O a --J z 'v E z � o v ru O 4 O ��ro - `U V)F " v I Eu D 0 U o @j Q a � L U i r--+ i J + ru O QJ C V �F C C rz N N i 00 J 2 r Oin O O Z O a) v D > i�V) U O U N> ro O� 0 — .� N r6Q L ro-0 L O N 0 r=+ ro O i J ro 0 "C O V7 i QJ � 4J i C O O cNN � 0 `o v V �.O ro 0 2 D c 0 Ln Ln .— Q 00 o� Q O • r kD .� � ro Ln Ln Ln v� X00 m v �0 c 0� c 73 c: Ln r6 - ON V ro C, C, v L Ln T— - Z > N 2 F -:Li (� Y F-- I— > Tw Q1 _= p p — p p v ro p ao co ro 'X > O > m 4-•� ro v 4-Q) 0 p ro � p D C p ro ro v 0 0 r✓ p p p E_jC (A +J u p O O 4-p C VA O O p 0 r✓ Vi C r✓ N Q C V 4- _0 p C p I O .-. O C 0 0 C O U - Q ' vvi � r- N p ao v :4 _ O 0 OV --v ro a 0 > O 4- Foc b0 ut C C p i E p� p C �O v p - Q ; p C Q L V O bAro O>, O p r� U-) I O E _ VI C ro p �O p bA p p ro X Q O OO p ro ao p p p O •�C-, p O p N ro O E O C) r= Qto C) Q vl r6 ro 4 `o vl rte-+ >> 0 OA p Q p -,E C E '^ p V) ao r✓ '� p 4- UE O Vt '� p OQ .� O LA N 0 � Q ro L O O L L VI C ro i — p bA IA — •M M C r6 N •C p Q p C �+' ,O p(o .— 4, ro p p-0 ropes r- p >�E p 4- -0 O bA rte-+ O Qb-0 p E p E p° p r✓ p to C -0 o C ao c Q Vt p v p p — O E >, C N N p N C C r6 p o p C L iii �' Vi p M r--+ O E N v N O r--+ O (A ut O V L 4- p bA +-' .Q p (A p C Q p •C >, ro C bA O? •�, E O Q p O •� m p C 4- - c L C Q bA ro O C '� N- i C ro - L ro - Q ro ro `- p p ro X Q) ro Q p to V L .r6 4- V VI 'X C C ro V C Ln ro O r- to C - 0 V p 3 E rO� i Q rte-+ Q) p 'i p j N C c O C O C — p b0 O .� +� p ro O V p p rte--+ rp E C O r--+ N C Q) a) , ro O ut 4- Z C ro Q) C O = p C N C O N OQ r_-+ v OV r� �O X a) 0 'LF—ro ro — rO O N r6 E V v p i- r �6 �, N~ DD 'C p Q p > O p E— ao .(A ro b0 O ro C >, + C p Vt p ra ro 4- p �' C ro r6 ro C C 4, +--� Q C V) Q) C 4- .� OrO C ao >> E O O ro r6 p VI C C O i L 4-> O� bc0 .r--+ D O U 4 C N I) w >, L� p b0 O N _' p �_ ro p C p C 0 u p_ i L N N b0 i Q— Q C O U i p Q .— C p C Q r6 D E 0 p C p iE r=Fo+ C V C C ?: to r✓ 2 . rp . . -0 ._ . E V r✓ 42 m ra p > . C o o o (Ap V Q:: O p m y OC p r--+ p E p Q r--+ 4, C ro - O �, 4--+ p C ro r--+ i N ro 0 V (A (A i( >, r--+ p p �, C O �Vl ro V i i p > v N 0- N O O C O E vt N 4 C O C p O C - C VI IA �+ Q Q L r--+ 'rte IA Vlro C p O 4--+ C C '-: O VI Vl Q V M Q V O C _0 O U V 4 O p E ro p -C N 4� O O N v a0 C O r�Qv E O p +- C •L) p i u >, ro V r6 - i' i ro VO 4--+ p _0 p +' •� l/I C p W _ L bA p p (A L C C bA N VI ro Q> i N C r6 L' 4- OQ Q C o C `� o a0o E p ro p _ u ao p Q) Q O r0 'r � r=+ O ro E ro .- r6 U M r--+ C O E= a `o D C o v ro i O C o ro i v E °J m V LIl = N C F � E E C C O C ro = 4- ro — N O *k C Q ,V v > C E p -0 O � 4 0 0 C O p O O �� p C> p i p bA L p C r6 C 0 C 0- 0 0 0 E N C— E Q Q) W .ro 0 'ro ro — ( 0 O C p C p -0 Q Ln p r6 O o C p N p '� p ut r6 r+6 Vt N V, (A Q E -0 v V p C 4- ro (A O c p o u c E c v Q +� 1p.J Vj C r6 bCA b -o rro D .� > r6 V p C O Q O p •� ro O V O VI C V) V p V Q) bA +--+ r6 C '^ p U o o E 4- 0 C� Oro u C ro 4- U E C •� O p D O C -0 Q 0 ro O O O ro Q) C ut O V rib 0 C i p p ut p C O V v p �, V N L N ao r6 V U b0 C C ro C C O C C ro C� '� C-0 p Q Q ro •C E .� O rte-+ N r-5 O C C •� C >O M ro rte--+ •i •v C N p .� C C ro � Q O O N 0 0 Q N Q� Q O p= Q :�) r= L C A'- apo v C Qro 0-0(A N(A rte- M p-0 _0 0 r6 C r6 p CL [op O O 0_0 O C p E p O 0 ro C p E O O L Vt � — 0 p (A •— bA ro V p (A V E E p C E p Q .0 �, - •� 'rJ p p V Q C 5- 0 Ud p p 0E Q o r - O p o o i 0- 2 0 O 0 r O QpOU Q N p v o 4- C 0 0 p v v � v p Q C Introduction to the report ƒ 3* (A Ul -C�/ z ®a e c \ o• \ 0© t 2 a y a* 2 c° \ 5 � > / '(A / \ y £ °° / e / v ° ° J 2§ a 4-- o% a J— o s 0 'G E=) �� 0° 2 a �? o E 2 y e § 3ƒ/° 2 \ 0-# o f \./ y/ c— o/\ ° m 0 0 \ y\ Q- :Ll3 / \ m \ \ /.ƒ / 4- / \ ? f 4- 0- (ƒ J / ƒ 2> c J 4- w E \._ u a:/ % m%\ o Q- / - 7 0 / / ƒ / / ƒ E / \ / \ \ / k � / \ * } \ a / / o \ / ® ? / 2 o� ° e o e — o 0 / a © .e o J w U o e 2 e §w 2 % = x c 2 m g o 0- o $/ m 0 s u (A c=/ o e c a= . 0 o ° e o u m ( / 2 u c \ f t o * k _ 2\ .g — o w 0 a y e o-0/ u o V) a e G o y o: m /\ % a 2/ 0 a o a » $ \ § f / 2 \ / a S % * y a o > o e_0 z e- 2 .R u— 0 2'e \/ //) § E a f/ 0ƒ a\ 2 e o ° ©©ro E»e* G =3$ £2 / c � / - C / \ E £ 2 - / e \ \ / e o ° t \ E \ a / 0 2 A c E 2 .- c * a 4- o E 2 2-0= e ) o ° \ ro � � � % / 3 ) 2 E 2 z / k 2 9</ E ©/ � E § t/ z 9 ro f / \ / 1 / » / 0 ( / \ C \ / / o S o » £ _ « / 2 ƒ ®� _ S » ° m o r= a > a£� / o o® 2 u/ e»° 0 3 >, Q) E o e 2 o 0 e = \ _ ® z m<®ƒ � c a m 0 o £ $ S ro u 2= � 7 � a® � \ t 7 \ e ro 2 u e% > a 2 % %£ o— ƒ @ c 2 3 0 2% / 0 E\ \ y ©\ a a S > 0 0> a/ a ///§ 7 0 o e c/ w 2\ 3 y ro e 2=° E o 0 E»° $ 0 2 7 \ E I± z ) 2 G m 4 e z 2\ \ a// 3<_ U° K / 3 Eƒ 12 0 E ¥ o G E\ p — � z y § \ \ ° / a @'z / t o(0@ 2# 2 4 @ 4- s 0* @ c o ƒ ƒ / < \ y \ ) F � £ 3 G £ .- ƒ / / § § ƒ § / O 4�', --,I IV co (D Ar"WI jw br am Am jo M W" " pr � 4w dw mw w Jw " w dw w OW W.1. —of r 4w —Tv 'A ls� 417 C:) 00 co co (D o 4-- 0 u N E N m (D 0) (U 0 cm cm < LU 0 0 u 0 C:) 00 Introduction to the Subject Site W r4—% V U t� V^ /1 W 4—J 0 4—J C 0 U 0 C 0 N rn CO C: Ln h /f u -O 0.2 o` ry 9 j O V CO -O }' +l ? & CC v T V/ � 0 c � o yy a o4 yam'. y 73 m >a) O)U t. w �r'�a�c4 O .O NI GO f • p � o� e, $sok 4. /' 'ti a `fie ��,. c c v O 2 v v Q y m O > Y L,) M o R' Q 7 5 y ti� CO Ln O O 04 O N } y Cid I -O O U CD y� L m N Q j N L O r-+ r, N -0 N 4- >� +� ta0 i N N p N _0 +� .N i p' N N N Q) 4-j + >ao OO N N _ 4+ N O L � Q D � i Q N r6 -0 O tzo F N C)- 0 Q _ N Ul � O N ro O ON O 0 O O v V C 3 ao Q-- N Q) � U.L o — v ao`o Q4 - N N bC0 i 00 .> N N N N Nv C N= V ao Q N C i r�6 — C 4- (A 61 r6 O O C N 4- r--+ Q) ro N 4-1 r6 4-� ' N 4 -to — r6 C C C N = C L X C V1 N N u Z C C a0 O N rte--+ b-0 0 r--+ C Qi ZN Q teV L— U to O M ro r-Qc: -0 ao � OO N- +- 4- rp ~C 0aC N C CC N LN O U N > V O ta0 r--' ro C Q) Q O Z O N r6 O Z C N Q iC 0 >' Lfl O C O Z r- +� C r6 i i vim_ 3'�' m a� v C.� z _0 — v O E U N i C C O N J J N N O v j ao O O aA O a(A N N ro � N Y — ro -0 U1 N .� � Z � N J C •� �� N N r6 w U 0 L '� N O C+ N i LU r N >� �' z 0 0 V N U �_ to ro ro C N vi + O N- i Q) N O N N p rte-+ N— 0 L 0 �' N— r- v ta0 LA N N N V) N r� r6 O r� to O N V) > Q D ro C ro O l/1 N C '> �= N Ul C N+ b1 4- N i O C C 0 O Q N > 0 Q) N .�. 0 0 61 O N U O Z N r--+ N - C N U pp +-' C N N N N N-0 � I O ro O � O � N O N Q OrYI i- 's ?: -'s?: cm �: -0 . . �O Introduction to the Subject Site v O N 0 N m v 0 v v 0 m v m LLo � N O Ln 7:F73 a m 73U 0) U E T,. 0 j p c v p v v c v (A -0 o v o v--2 M C N m � r6 La r6 C m � O M ro `n �: ro Ln - '- U N O N Q �' N r� 0 C O IA C O 0 ro O Ei) Q O C U r6 N C O = L N rte-+ C .v O .4- C N C w - C - (A•� O O = O v - O O 4--0 v Q) W Q o U ro -0 ., v QN ro Q) v C� v v � M V v V ro v ro ro r� U v M ro v V= v C r6 Q r+--+6 N 4--' b0 rte --+ N ro 0 C 0 (A00O +_ N N Q CO � N C N Q C •� ro V l�/1 O rp A N F- m O m C r6 rC-+ IA r6 '4+ � N O W i VI ( >, ro 'Q N C _0 _0 O l�-A N GJ r°_0-cr✓ rte -+ Q) _y >�E_ _ Q : C m r6 L - .L •� r6 = r r= to 0 N V C ro N to Q) C �_ N Q ro C Q Q _0 — ro C m C i > ro r6 ,0 Q � N � r6 N N O _0 C C W in in C '� O'> > V >, (A — >, -.0— N ro -0 N N Q C vi to Q C 0 C rp rO r6 C Ln V � '� C 4.d rp -_ Uj 4-4-J >, O '- X .ro i ro V)C r6 ro V V U roN Q•> U1 N v A (A C (A Q) C N C r6 -0 O '� C C p C N r6 X L m .� Q 0-0 i 4J > iQ� C to r� C ! ro- N N i O O Q r6 r6 to O D 4-O p� 'r✓ O � Q V) N v v �_ v�� v N v ro� -� N v E � "' -0> = v = ° C !E v 0 ro v F-- r✓ Ll-- M r✓ r✓ vi v O N 0 N m v 0 v v 0 m v m LLo � N O Ln 7:F73 a m 73U 0) U E T,. 0 F�A'11661 Ln v 73 0) iT co co 4- 0 m N ('7 N a U Q v �= � v iv iii v c 7C5v Q v 2 p o Y v v c ro v v v c O n 0) by c � o p v a ro iri N LO Y/ v = N ro - 'Y V ro bA > ro — bA _ ro O N Yom+ D X -0 '> N •p N N N ro Y+ — c O N c M Ln •p N ro (A Y ro V '� O Q) O .0 bLc) — C N c(A N j r r iri O N O 0 O= ro V - O .� O> - 4- N c> '� � N� F N ro 0 ro N O C D O ( N� ro VI c - � > VI ro N p 4--+ O N 0 c +--+ V Q ro 'i ^� v >� ro 4 v•- v-0 C° •E v� u v O v 0 bA in N Q— v Q 4a '^ = 7 N Y > p -Y v 4- ro N C 4- 0 ro ro +-' c p 0 vi Q 4� v c i N N ro bA -0 ro to N +�+ v N ++ >, p 0 0 c D p i .� L +-' C Q) i p i>(A Q �, . 4) ro b0 q -- i c r6 N N N N UV C ro E •4- 0 ro p 4- V L +- n N 4- iN aO - � r N n O O N i in N Vi Y4-0 ap in N N N ro Y O N> N o2 N in N _0N Y N —' ON • O o 4-O O p ro 4 + N- oN W > o te r-4J N c N pro i ro ro+ ro '+ ctD0 N D v v Y O O O 0 � O •� bp0 r6 i .� O v r6 D Y Y ro C .� V 4+ leLn C N Ol �> ro V E V i Q bA inro bA V r6 N p N p N ,>Q) O O Y+ O+ N O L Z L N 4- V N+ mLn r6 O O ro -0o r i b0 ro t.0 N to 2:1�N�^^ ��^ Y' ro ro p v O y 4-1 ro ro « N V `F— O > rY6 ro ro N O N Q '- Y « in ro to p N O .4 Ln � V-0 b.O p O v ro �Q) LL L - % V1 to ro ro O ro N �N/ LL �v/ LL — v U1 00 4- In ro CL i 4- CL v1 i N i� �O/ 00 LL N O �O � N Q i b0 >, p ro c L 4+ C C L to ro M N _ � �Q ni�ui�l�000i v co co 4- 0 m N ('7 N a Introduction to the Subject Site OF 1 !mi Iii I,��I I----`--------3 M CO CO d Oo � v ^m u v 2 N >v v v v 0 0 tao C= Q v_ C 6 6-0 d L D �E co co ro O 4- v� ° ro O rov Q) .0 v 4- Q - v v °) v O a-0 F °4- co v v v n c u 2 �; O Q ro N Yom+ O .in 4 4, Y+ ( p •Z, �' f6 4, Al- N ro i � >, ('7 N .'^ C i v N u O� pro - p -p M U O E p p r6 C in r6 V) Q Q) 4 r ro in b 0= O V C S N (A N O N C L 4-ro O p + L) -0 ro O C O Lfi N (A N ' N M U (A O 4O C C bA N C Y C vi bo c N 0 p C� ro D p � i N � O in O N C > O m u O t4 v -2 v U ai M y N a rp o v ° of O C S N c> N (A v bA v y LA Q - v Ln Ln C w v w C O v Wm _0 in v ra u ro ro M C o p u + 0 > O N X .0 41 y a+ C v a) ro > Q v C N O v C O O E O In 42 v i +-' C > i p C r6 v= 'v U C u N v v E N ' v i Q E m �' V J o o � O m O u `� o a D o 5 ro �- Q� X(a w m y >,-0 bA � �, v U= N v C N + i m Ln M O ro bA N -W C O C ~ N O0 O Q C Y O p m C ro of N in O . ro O Q O L ro •- to in +'' C Q N ro t L p N � =-0 E Q U O t p C v c v O O v U O v v D bA �O O O- Y' -0 O tA U C O CQ' � 0 A L) Y Q4-0 4-1 �+ n J ro O 'Y nQ G1 Ou ro O -0O N CL b -o -LA ro GJ p N N r� N W ro N C v i O O v 4- in N v v N Q G1 ro = N N N C C 'C U v C C O i v� ro C— ro N O D ro > M 2 ro D O ro Q d M= ro Ou .� in Q) in N p= - in p O v M CN C p 0, O 0 (n +J bA C � n • O ro ro te C +- ro 'bA CC b.0 N CO4- YN O C p bo Y Q4- N � +2 O O r6 O 'C ro C N N N bA tao OC Q roO C C vi N C N u N ro u C Q C (A C— N N=� O ro O bA N C -- O Q C ro C CbA O N C > ,0 to in C S C bA ro O C Q Y Q ra C i i Q `� C O N N ra C •� bA > N C C to � 3> N C C=� O �� O LLI O O bAu C bAN N Qin -0 O u V) i N N C c O O_ O — ro by X a •� Y-+ Yom+ O X Y' ro ro N O C C U C Q O v Q bA ro N v > i N 0 C N C p U C N u p 0> X N i C O ca L�z O 0 C O C N c o_ r V1 N Vn �. O O U O Y� p ro Q E O N 0 0 .� Y ro X O Q v o N to u = bA Y' (A N N O N N O � Q N O N C C N O in C r6 O 4- 'Y' ro 'in Q O •U C A O N O +-' 4- G1 C 'a — ro C .� Q N u in � ro O v C C u r--+ v u a) iii Q •� Q N -0 V -Y r0 > N 'E u N ' O O in N .� N M ro +J b0 Q- C(3) ro O N GJ Q •� C C N N .Q C N C N i U O Q C= Q C rte, N O > Y m O Y O Fz w Y 4.1 V) N C N ro N fu 41 C m in N Q 4- C N c O� to N C N Abp N U in 0 E O ' C ro O O Q CO L N .Q) iJ Q O N u O Y ro N C 0 .E 4-1 ro ro v o bio v c o u Q� 0 0 D v v Q v > ro o Q L •� N O r +-+ -a 4.1 in u O u C C 4.1 C N N Y� m N N Q r6 � _ � ✓ ra ra bA O O v N O N O o c— p p N N in bA Ul C a) vi C U C w �_ � i C« ro p ro r) N C ro C L i H in C IA 4-- C O N N ro +� VI U ro u > N C r--+ ro O fi O N (A U O N E O A � Oy O O >' ro ~ \ r6 N C Ou > uj 41 C N C Q IA O(A r6 u b0 ro r N bA C in >, ro + in N N 6 C w0 C > u i_0 r - u Q Q-0 4-v =N o Y . c o Q r Y/ OC o O o v ro 0 ro Fv E 0= ro 0 O Y o0 Introduction to the Subject Site U-) N v r. v D �oQ =.- W x- ( 5 v-0-0 Q o°' p (A o p 4 v OC ro `� bCO ) > �'ro 0 N D Q 0 N _ v F v Q p O C C N Q a O 4- Q Q ,� 4- O 0 r (A S O -0 Q °' E -0 o x Q - M C C 4- _ Q bA M Q Ln v, Q 0 X ro -0 -0 Q C C>ro o Q �'. C- p D= `a E C C Q o � 0 p N E Q Q b -o Q � E ro � �, v, � Q ao v v, Q �, C X 4, in Q Q +- Q O v, C Q, Q C D *-� >, 0 Q :1 Vi v o ro C 0 C Q V �' V x-0 5 Qin Q ro OA bA N Q m� 4- C -0 b -o Q p C E bo r�6 �o C Q — O C r--+ O = Q Q Vt = C Q Q b�0 Q Q bA �--' 4- ro r'4- O Vl V Q O ro C —_ i +--' i i >— C Q bA C (0 +--+ Q 4--+ to C 0 � C r--+ (o t).o Q O 4, C 0 L (0 V) 4- — Qj O_0 4- V) Q 3 C _0 V) Q •� C Vl �' M C C �6 Q C C O �o 'N Q Q Q O VI �6 �6 Vl Q Vt — Q ro rte-+ Q C iD 4- Q Q bA Q ra V C O Q — •C U Q O w •0 C� C O Q Q Vt r6 0 V 0 Q bA bCC p 4-V QV O v _ C V �o b.0 VA m '�--+ i Q C C Q Q O •4- Q L Q Q r--+ .0 ro C _ N Q �6 ut '� Q ro p 4--+ C ro C Q L O- i Q Q C rte-+ — V U L C bo ro +--' r--+ `� > . V) Q i C Q Q Q Q Q �o (�6 Q r--+ VI (A - O 0 Cro Q •O � Q >> 4- V C •� C C Q Q 0 VI Q Q Q V Q (6 Q v 4) VI U C Q '(A Q _0 b6-0 C Z3 C .- r= _0 ro E O C =_0 Q O �_ C •— U C OC i Q Q ro O C V U Q VI O (o r--+ C VI O Q C Q Q Q i r- ro FO Q C N Y Q C p •to Q Q r6 ro 0) - E C 00 v Q� C Q ( C 0 .Q O(� 0 Q � C CO Q (0C .� +--' bA Q Q- 0-0 bA p� Fz 3 bA Q Q p Q V Q •0 ) (o C V :� � �' J 0 Q N C r--+ Q rte--+ Q 4--' -e bA bA r6 N r--+ N U C Q O 0 Q N Z C- L r-- p� > Q Q Q I C X C V-0 ro r 1� O M r--+ Q i 00 > C O Q O ocUO v p Q Q 0.0 Q O-0 Q V_ C-0 O +- L O V p Q ro O OO OQ 4-r Q C — i 0 CO N V Q V M Q VI _Q i p C C E Q� -0M C M _C V� O V ,z O O O :� Q 4- 0 5 O Vr- v LJ u O ry) O Q Q vVt O O O 0 Q Vi C C Q O 0 44- O C (CA ro > DQ O 'C N O O w O Q b - 0 ro NCo O 4- IE p ro -o4 C O C U O O Q C Q Q C � V -V r F � `O' VO O r- LL OO V C o QL M O O ) r p •LA in _04.1 CU4-p C Q C - C o Cr6 o O � r0 0 n >' W N Ul V b0 ro Q Q O Ln -0 12- v Q Q Q O i X 0 C m > i O C-0 Q O Q r- Q Q-0 (o C=_0 o O QQQ' C6 io-Jo Q r - NQ Q• L/) C C ro 6 Q Q QNv'� � NI 0v1 N C Q C Y _0 O Q � N4-COQ M Q -0 0OV OC ro x O O n iC � NQ 0 Q Q) • 4- � . bo oQ r 00— ' Q 0 0H Q V I _ Q N VI ro C_0 p p r+ u E m LI)C E Q O C V (o LL C C -QQ Q (Ar' to ro N Q •� V W O E - 0 ro CZ3D Q) _0 Q 'Q - Q Q Q>m �V u tj O Q Q C '0 C C V Q >0• r✓ V 4Q O UMp '�, p •�+ C C C N Y S p ro _ � = C ro Ln > (o C Q Q Q.� W p O C rC-+ O IA Q Q C 0 0 0 0 Q �> F bA -0 s' C C .N to Q Q — V Vt 4' O x ro >O = i I Vt -0 Q r- Q Q Q •L r6 > r--+ V Q 0) Q U '+-' O O Fz Fz F 0 N .� Q F �- r- O ut C 0 ut C 0 O LL LL J J J U VI '� L 5 O f6 Q, ro 41 CC .r' i (0 Q ro Q C VI �_ �o Q Q .0 p V� C 4, Q 0 O O Q Q Q C C Q m-0 0 V m 0_0 00 LA 0(0 LL C 0 to Q Q Vt 0 U-) N v r. v D W E Ln LnW Ln N O m c_ O 4- O o V c v v 4 c a) _ (n 0ro �� C = o ro m E v (A � � � � v v � ro 4 o O - � — 'D L C N ro �, N r--+ C a' O 00 0-0 lin N N > -Q L c . FON N OQ ro +N oro� O ro O v" c� c O 0 �� N � — r v O � O C N 4, C C 0 Q v Q � c�ro vi taoC N - N 0 bb - O bA r6 C .bp N �— C in �, — ro N N N� >, N O 4- N _0 C ro C O in in Q N to 0 'Q �' in C L r6 C O C O r6 r� i ro N rC -0 Q N (A >C� v�0W4-M �v��� c D .�0 p0 N v'�i �, = V) C� O ro '� N -0 in 2 > 1 -0 -0 4- r6 - Q)i = v Q) O C r6 O � C N C +� U, C 4- N to V m to N N C N O � ro ro � V V rte--+ Y/ ro •ro 4J lVJ ro -0 L L i c O C bA r�6 ro '> > Nc r_ 4- > N r6 C N bA to QJ rte -+ � C ro C r6 O r, ro N Y 4- 0 N Q + O r6 — B O Oro N O :L' 0 0 ro N •� O C v-0 4- C N C C ro N N N to ~ bA C O r6 r--+ N O O O V �_ - C ° bA C +>� N— '4--+ r6 > N V O ro ra E '4- O > C N ro -C a O to N N N v C V V = C ro O X 00 O 4- (A 4- O-0-0 N V in p in (A bA N N 4-- X Q) O-0 N ro L _ _ f6 bA C C r6 vi N N O E N =� O N V= N N- - C i� _0 C C° V C V Y=—+ Y C O N N- N ro r- •� O N - N V— 4, C in N C to p N � O C i� C C O N C in O E V Q Q N ro ro •C t N N 0 v N ro ro N N N Q N � r c p O 0 bA Q '0 N N N >, bA C O r6 Q °> 4 + O ro O- 3 41 i= C 41 N 4J N O o- in O V in C LL i Y, Y, N 4- r6 bA bA to C r--+ N bb C L i to O r6 r--+ _0 C 0 C N O C N C N r--+ in +--' 3 in C •O Q Q _ •O .= 0 v Y=+ O N N .4--+ p Q F> C � - v O v r Q N-0 p N C O O N � in C C V p � ro N O ro 0 C C Q) J V) -C � 4- 0 Q)C r6 r0 ro .� N C .0 N 4O .� N ro V ro C r--+ O r--+ Q O N > �' r6 r6 O � O C > 0 O .L) �� C N 0 0 in O p C Q v� 0 N u ro N � 4- V •-- r6 N- = u 0 u ro .c N ro O ro E >O C N C E-0� � •� O C p Q) � C p r6 O O Y+ E O p N C N Q) OL ro ro O � in O .� in r-3 C O (A_0_0 o O N V 0 r ro O N(A 0 vi tao 0 r� vi C � C � C O N N 4--+ N C ro C ro 0 C O O N C V VO O V) r6 O � .2 � v v ro N ;� C > O to �_ J Y O to N ro Q N> Q .- r6 O N Q •� r6 •C r6 r6 O. C 0 - vl N N ro N in bA Q ro � Q N-0 N N N C C L r0 O V C D Nro .c >, U N X C V N C O O J ro — C J bA QJ - ro N v V DD 4- C r6 N O � lj O ff° C � bb C � + '- �- N ro �'� c N 4° v .— 4E= = , O �_ V) `' > Q) v •Z, v = 0 v r✓ U '� c V a o c � o c v , C c-0 O v N b.0 c ro ro -0-0 :bA O Y+ by in p C— Qj p N bA N N N V� C N FZ >, N � Y' c p N O CC N 0ro n C p N to n ro ro N-0 Q �bOC,A O A C (_) v LF— O O Q) > p p O- p ro C:0 ro C 4- C c C C O r N ro -0 O0-0 . b �roro -0 r ro O V O C Vin ° to C Q) O A Y N 6 m N bA 4- O N O v p ro r C ' ro •p X 0 4- Q) to . O O - r6 C-0 N `YQQ) O C Q) - . )N N > YO w � f0 T C O - i �- C 4- r V O N O ro Q) N r 4- C N r CQ 0 bLOQ�JA ro 7 N in N Y N > V) u C O0Q O L Y ro LQL V ro N C F, N = p 4- C N ON LL 0 in F-- ro F-- 0 = o Y+ -0 � to N = co co 4- 0 O ('7 ('7 N Building Condition Assessment U-0 r� Q .ro V) Q N Q •� Q •> ro lJ C ro ro Q4- rte--+ ro 4- � > i Q L r--+ VI to C VI Q Q C .••. V1 �6 Q Q Q Q Ln V1 Q C Q Q Q �o Q O V O C 'Y C O 4-V Y _ U O O r Q C � Q Q O Q O c E -6Q N ro O Q Q O Q 4- ro v> i )n C Q Q 4- - Q V r - C ro U Q r� bA ro r--+ O Q Q V r--+ C c Q C O � Q ro 0 ro vii U �o bA •� ut 0 0 0 0 ut Q O _ O M O '� Q c Y ro p O '� O -c Y+ Y+ r )n .� O Q O b 0 in O O Y Q O -0 N a (A p Q0 Q •� Q C Q ro -0-0 i Q v � C L/) O- C Q Q O b-0c� Q M C Q Q w-0 p v ro .0 ro Q ro (o r6 i, )n ro ro � _ U v Q V Q �' Q ut Q � -_ � �, C O rLo bA Q � ut � � c C Q � FZ ro 4_ V 0 Q � O> V) ro.- V V) Q V) Q a) to '- b-0 Q Fz i 0 V) '� Q i Q V) - FZ V) Q O Q > C Ln v O Q LA >, Q Q Q O IA Q Q b.0O� O O 'Y Y ro ut bA E r=+ �_ rO ro 4-Q V C O Y� L Q Q YO Qi C i Q 0--0E r-' L Q Q 4-Q M - O ro ro -0 Q (0 O z-0 4O 4--' = b.0 I- b.Q U Q 00 V C Q C V r"' > ro M ` X ro M L ~ Jc Q4 wo --C O bA Q r--+ LU .O C bA N= c N N Q O in O v v C Q Q N N bO fC z ut Q Q Y Q C Q _ Q •0 C -0 -0 �o _0 Q C ut ' >Q Q Q C-0 •- 3 b.0 Q V- - p >, Q O Q = Q M ut V in Q C Vt bA ro -0 Q � •omro-0F A r� YQ p (A ro N -0 N Q- Q Y' Q Q) 0Q Y' 0 0 V ro Q ro Q r--+ Y, +-+ p Q D r6 L 4-- 0-0 ro r- +� � M r� Q v O 0 -0 Q Q O Ln C ro O ) C i ro Q M N U O 4- r✓ 0 O - 4- 4, Q O Q Q D O O 4- N L, Q L C N i C C Q ro r6 i N V) bA CO 'r-=+ ut C �o O v O V + -0 Q � ro p .0 r- 0 O 4 N - 0 4O L v Q Q •VI D O Q Q rte--+ i C v N Yom+ C C 4- -LAro C > Q U - ro OLI) Ln N N Q r� N to V) r--+ Y >, • N Q r--+ lam/) � V V) ut -0 C Q Q Q Yom+ w O V O ro V rte --+ C Q V O V Q (o Q +--' Q O Q Q O Q C r6 L r- ut ~ +� Cro U Q Q i VIU Q 4- Q V) v - b-0ro Q O Q Q V) �o rte-+ � N b.0 ro >' V) - 4- - v O E Q O Q C7 O 0 C ro ) C .V) N Ln CLOQ) of ro Q O Q •0 C Q b00 C C C O � O= O - ro Q .� O -0 0O ro �o Q +- ro � V- Q = +-' •Ln C O c O O .E U bA ro .� ro Qin 0 ut C Y X Q O U Q-0 C Q 0 Q �o ut Q �_ v Q C O r--+ C ro V)� 4- L +-' Q •� 4- Q -c C C> ro O C �' VI ro E U U `� Q Q 0 O 3 C O - C Q= v � ro Q E O 'E ro � v CO Q LT ro bA c V O Q Q C -0 M Q Q bo C X O ro 0 rC C i CO v 0 Y+ OC C v^ O V i r-' -_ ro � D r"' Q v Q Q C O Q r� O Q Q Q)> D Q V U bALt X Q Q- Z +J Q �, Y- Q .N O--0 o >� ro Q X c i Q Q Q Q �6 Ln = rtero .t > Q Ln V D Q Q .- O w a V) V) Nd V) C O M O C C Q C V) O O a Q V C Q Q Q ro 4- V) r - Q O Q V) C O 4- a Q 00 ro Xro LL C LU Q Q X Q � Q c Q Q Q Q c co 00 co� Y M L (6 U Q 2 v N Q r. Q D 0 E N M co co 0 N m m N a Building Condition Assessment S F 2 L (� S W J 2 Z � L y ;J C6 LL rn v Y 0 0 .9-39 .s-.0 'au i owe ~o^ a - ,.7/ l 9141 Z 2 �U � N . 2 _ U � Z - K N f Z m = � 2 _ U U o El In ■ zf _ oz o IL - 2 � U d Z - U Building Condition Assessment N Ln v Y 0 0 s-39 A -IL d ki owe ~o^ a - ,.Z/l g,41 5.- �U 6-.L 2 U ❑z 2 U - m U - - - U K y ❑ O Eq U U F ..Z/ l 9,14 ❑ ❑ zz ' U 2 U N Ln v Y 0 0 co co 4- 0 m (Y) (Y) (1) c� a Building Condition Assessment M11111111MIMMI nolo €Is111111� €I®1 I€I €Is111111p �sIIIINT= Z fir _1 W W w W m N c c 4- 00 00 r- Y M ( ) 5 /^(6 u v v v v T,. Y 0 M � v co c c v x v ro (C) v v c v 4- x c 0 v O m r— 00 o a c taO (Y) aO N N iii N ro — ro � ° a � ° V) ro >> 0 0 c6 a°o ° O v -0 ro a) r > V) v ro (A c V' a -�e Cro rte-+ V Q ro a) tao'C L/-) ro ro a) r- V r6 = O -0a) 4- C ro V +� c p in Q i a) x >, § x ° � -0v C ro (A0 O O c v v x ao c ro o v Oc (A � c ' 4- m° C v 0 0-0 u vi '+ ro - O c in `- a) aO in c ,- O in -0 M a) -0 c .c v Q) v in v=-0 .c v N -> O O . °' °c Q) -o - o c c O � (0 �v o O in vO �•4� iic ro C i Q N 42Q ao v, v a) aO u ro c 0 c V � i C � > Cc 0 L •� a) Q)> r6 + a0 F- r6 4-O M 4 4- r6 ro N ° C a) -0 a) to in c c � Z E Q) C a) LL r6 rp N 3 a) a) Q '— N V1 ro N N .�_ C ro O in to _0 V a0 ro O O rp O � a) v — a) � r- rO L r--+ i L O Q N a0 �' �' U1 00 V7 CL CL Ul a) 00 a) in r6 v V � O .� N M -,t Ln l0 I-� 00 m U L a0 a) aj ' a) — a) -0 a0 a) -0 a) a) -0aj -0to ^ L V V a0 roa) L a) C_0 a) = a) i C W to V Q• + - a>) ro C v + - n rv+-i�� O M iN V) Q C a) a) O O Op4 �C a ) ' V ° - EQ O Q 42 Q O Ln coxin OO D Q) )Q a) te6 N — >4-1 Nr - VC LvQ r� Q- 4- Q� Q O O O vi c -Ca) a) N ro .-a) O - �r-+ � + O +- a0 Qa) C Q L r6 a) n�v] O N C �O — 4- 'r6 - p ro c Ln, Va) a C0 • C lj p C M a - C (A ro E , o QQ a) ° a) O� Q L c . LA Em = ro E C O C : C N 4- Q a) = O C O _O N O O O v V bC-0 0 c O a) O C N D O O - m p r6 •C Q O r--+ C r6 a) r6 a) ro C O _ v � r6 to +--' to C V a) a) C X V L +--' r--+ C C Q V a) a) _0 - O + C r--+ a) \ 0 (A .O N U1 N in (A (A � p � ao o C: O ro bb0 N O a) Q) v v 0 L u— 4-J C to O O C O Z O O Qro v 3 o x >,aov (A 4-- � v c m tO/f v x o a) c v c c o-0 ro� vi 4- C: >, Q N M 0 r6 N ao O-0 a) to 4, IA N C V a) C r6 O N� � ao �= v v ao o a0 = c o o ro °�' v c po a0 = '� o° v '� — m o ro `—' Ln D ado a) a) M M 0 4- -0 = O � in C N - N c _ �'1� d v v n Q' v x v .x '� v oro (o Q O ate) W C to C a) r6 a) rte--+ u > _ i i p Q) v —_ ro a) O Vi O vvi v M 4 c v ro M C, Q M Q a) c b.0 Ln D O L v v z r_ 1v, o p o° o- ° v v o ao O v n m 4- v n c `a c v b i i (0 `a M� c � a) x �, > m o o v 0 0 � c ao v> x p p O c a) O v v +� O c c a) r- O ra O m O ,� Q ro C ro O a) c V N w p 'i V N-0 c Q v v, ra ao V v E > x o v x x �1 U aQ) � aQ) ro a) .c o v O c cr v '; Q -0 TD L.L Nf O ro O Q) ,n — C v E o v v •N v v dJ v '^ o rO v E~ O Q v° ro x o v° O c 0- 0 Q O 0 O �, v v r✓ O '� O Q Q C-)- '� Q v 3 ro 0 v a0 O Q a) m -0 a) Na) a) Ln ro Q) v r0 to C Q C O N r-+ C x a) C N a) V CL Q ro 42 m VI Q p Q , ro > V7 C a) _0 a) Proposed Development Ln N c co 4- 00 00 V) Y ('7 ('7 v 5o (6 U v 2 v W v rte. v D N Y' O W >, O N Y' 0 C_0 O Q) (A 4- bA =--+ Q) Y' 4-' 4--+ C J--+ c r6 4-ru V i c 0 Q X 0 - O Ln xO N O Y N ru N Cw r6 N Q in O >� N N ru O ru V)_0 L Q rp .� 0 C rp 4- N Q) - >� O to - O N 0 OU C N w Y' M N >, V) -0 Y, rp C M b0 r6 y V C -0 _0 — rp in — •� 4- rp 4-+ C N O N Y+ � C v 0 0 N r6 O O C i Y+ m IA N O � O Oru 0 C 4- C ; OQ— r6 N M O >' C v V) v Yom+ Yom+ Y O 4J v 0 4' ru E'� — 4' ) v O N v z (A 4 v Q� N CO ra Q) X Y+ No C N O (A C C M Q — r6 N c c OV O vi N bA r6 r6 N O > M O C Lz 4- �, M C M C Q(A C rp 4,NO� C N > (A r _0 O ru CO D _0 0 to + N Q 'Y+ ro Q 4- C O (A 'r ru N C W � Y' > > � >, O r6 i Q = Q > C rp O� 00 rp C N O N rru d0 0ru N pp' - Y v N ruteNN Q N .O r r6 r- X W^ N N N A V O O Q to O (A bA � v X O v�' v X ru v N ru 4- p O by > O —> > b-0 C 0 O N 0 C z r6 Q) •�, r6 Q C C 0' W N Q 0 0 4-N X O b�0 r�-+6 . X -0 ro Y +� N vOi Q r C v C v > N v> X N X N V Q D C,6 lvn n S C r6 C X N N N N N +-' ) rp •�_ 4- C r6 in C LI C LI N V C C i+ C r6 r=--+ Yom+ _ N N +>,' .- — N M r6 0 c Q� v C O N O -0 ru ( Q 0 N C O (A N 0 TD O ru-0 O N- FZ 4- in C O rp -0 O rp rp >, C N O C O X Q ru (A 4-r6 Y a) N N L N �' O �> O- LA 4 N N A N -0 0 M w> Q N OV >> >c V r6 I� •V L N bA Y;0 C N r6 _0 N N bA ' W N r6 N> '4, v � N i N .- _0O C= � r�6 >N 0 > C 4 C C �O 0 r- C W_ >, 0 rp N N -YQ -0 4-v -0 N 00 r� bA C O v r6 C Q 0 to Cru N .� — ro C C O rp _0 C v .M 4- Ov1 ~ru Q H i �'v N 0 �, -0(A N 0 C N (ii Yom+ i c6 i Q Q U (Az bA C (AQ ru C C (A O O C C V ON C �, C N r6 0 4-7a N V N N j>N v N Ca r6 Q)v Q — °J C O Q)> i > v v �, Oru > p 7) v Z, Q v E O >, n v o o C C V Q) v °J O N -0 - C 'FO L-0 bb 0-0 C v O-0 = Y+ N v ra C rp >, D �(A O i ,� D ,� Cp 0 bA �, v� �, D. va O Oq O V o O O o ru v �, 6 c (A-0 r6 D o Q) V-0 -0 v d ro N ro o bA� N •C O Ln N r6 C C O > ru 70 ru c v°� O C Q) o� �v �' o= 0 �' >,o v� v v 0 v •� >= N> C N CY) in — 0 4- N ra 0 Y=+ C ro rb60 OC 0 in N N _CLO N i 4— j-7 C N( l0 00 O 4-C .- O N VI p O Q C -0 O N •_ O N rU bA in Y 4- N L Q M fYl 1 0 N C O Y' N0 C 0 •N r6 00 00 Q r6 V c Q 4- O- bA N N N L V C N ru j O V) _ N O C rp � N N � O Q in V N OLO Q) Q M Q 04 0 O 4N -0 (AO C�N N C 00 N N O -0 C C i`- C O O OO U 0 N Q 6 v O ra C bovin fu -0 N-0� in 4- C0 u D m LL Q (A C N > O N o• Cc ru rC>6 0 ° C N 4- 0 C7 N 0� O VN X r - V^ , ru_O ° .� QoOC-0 v o rp r6 QCS oobioo O ° ° v bb v ra � N (A v Q Q Y N >> vte>> , :t v° o ro ° °' °�'v � `o o 'xN c to Z a s F 6oi(A Y 0 4- 3: r+r-N Ln N c co 4- 00 00 V) Y ('7 ('7 v 5o (6 U v 2 v W v rte. v D rF5¢z 11 vooa 33� wQ 31noa 3aij 0 0 �d m NZVM301S'e 821f10 ZZOd 03N18W'/M 1f10821f10 M3N 030 �d32138 O11f10821f1 ONIISIX3 _ 11 ONI 21Vd dON IIVOM mm _ In 0 ll a'+'vt; I ILL 1 -------------------M - lu'O , am -- Z X �zu0 I N �azO , -O O= pl7 I 3 IvIF , c6 I illy lo I 1>=�w�_ 1 O Iz Q I 7 ,tet-Fa4a O � vo Iht7 I � 0<w I wzoNLL O� EE 1pK 1 E 1 o'^w00 1 I ,zW Iia , ,O .17G 7i� zo I a Z wvFL I � , Oo Q v 133NIS N33nt) 1w z w � 1 a a z 1 o z z IW l7 0 ow - z a n I Io ix1_ ------------------------------------------ ----- law} ¢ O , W w=- JLL _ IQ0 I >, I- { J __ --——— — — — — ——_ - - - - _ o O W I w , O w W ¢ +- 10 a I2�p I mm�_ E11 \ 1WZQ O I Q ®® Q Owl IF2<�w , ' se�ez>10 QJ ' W Lo 91, a ^ a p K 0 OOLL m \' w F , v ' O 3..011.110 XE N° 177 3 N w Q > , p v~ p U ONI 21Vd dON IIVOM mm _ - - - - -------------------M - -- l� O I i <o 3 _ `Ln¢a I Q £LZ6 illy b J- u O o O 6619 L', y c vo 79 LL Dol a ° O� EE omce u ow OO 2� I W - ~ L Eoo E000 zo 0 Z~ 0 3 LL I � bSs�L° v Wo 0. l O w 0 , - osL - ------�'I, F W w=- JLL 00 co Fn SLN I- { S W 10 7 0 � a 10 Q Owl I W.'. L D p K 0 OOLL o Q K U �Z W U' 0 3 �<0 , wwz 22 WOZ O W OJ �ttLL OF O p 2tt JU wQ UO 2 `�Z aw O}m00 w W OF o O Ho o_ a aw O N v w O ❑ ❑ o O 0 1 °o0 0 O 0 oO LL 2 yam DUB K ❑QOO tt - 8SZ Ob6£L O o� O S� S h ' m I F z l m 0 A -e Q N w w 0 O I i <o 3 _ `Ln¢a I Q £LZ6 illy b J- u O ZZOJ W�JO y ZZOJ W�JO y c C m 79 LL Dol a ° O� EE W � I W - ~ L z F I O o 0 Z~ 0 3 LL I � bSs�L° W Wo l O w 0 , W � IW�Nog�W I F O S� S h ' m l m 0 A -e Q <o _ �33.SZ.11Z.6Z toN 3 O ZZOJ W�JO y ZZOJ W�JO y c C m �� Dol a ° I W - z F I O o Z~ 0 3 LL I bSs�L° Wo l O w 0 , W � IW�Nog�W I F W w=- JLL co Fn SLN S W 7 0 � V i CIu L D J 0 3 o o v O S� S h ' m l m 0 A -e Q <o _ �33.SZ.11Z.6Z toN 3 O ZZOJ W�JO y ZZOJ W�JO omo �� C m Y 0 < Dol a ° z F I O o Z~ 0 3 LL I 1 Z� w p z I l O w 0 , N IW�Nog�W I W w=- JLL co co 0 4- 0 0 Proposed Development F O z w w w U) z w w 0 0 0 LL W_ > r v D 0 err=�- - Z I J o~ ¢ 0 I Ig a z 3 O Ivy m Q a g w l I� J ¢ > , F � a Iz m O a p a' I I� z IM , I� z m I J = z a I IJ a z0 1 13 z p 3 3 , I� z a Qa�°�°m' _ J I o ¢ ' O V F z 0 0 z LL o w V z < O x I o a w ' Q O . ' o O I 0 ¢ F I LL 0 I O O V x w F m O w ' w z a 1 z 2 O LL I o "o I a O z I a0 t ¢ a 0 ' Z z 0 V 3 a z W u F Ilbbllbbll habil I m N z z z I + z o � � z ' Z p I L ' o ' z z I ¢ z ,0ozz 1 z w O 'z aw 10 ' w X l 0 N x o 1 Oz O ILL O w a C w D ,� 0 1Q a wz Y z wu i i V J_,_ w wo m �3 _wok z F m m N O I U E EtZ K K w I I C Oh 0 Q Zi X w 3 0 z �1 rn 0 �w ¢ O .1 K 0 u ¢ O O of N O w OJ m O =' T p O O LL 2 ZI 6 o of a z C 07 n I � U z w 7 i - ¢ z z t0 O 1ZNo�l N r 1 p w z I N w z �' Q 'w txI o ' w = Z II > N ' m a OZOZ F' 6 I Q z z loo a �w m' O p d - I Q ' 0 0 w 3 1 O v z w z 1 ,a a a a a 1 0 z¢ a 1 w 2 Z , ' O a , o a w W ' O ~' E Vl O v~i a v' w a' t o o w ^ E o a 1 > o 'i O z 01 N Ol oocc P w ¢ i � I � 32�' z o I w C � o 4 4(� o L(7 � o Q O7 o iT Q co co 4- 0 N (Y) _ �w nN W N W O Lri v ru ru L Vt Vt ru N C L O O bA C X Q) aJ L 4- 4- 0 aJ Q) aJ C aJ VI ru (A Q) Q) ruv � V L i 42 0 c -0 -0 Q) Oru Q Q v Q) -0 -0 C C ru ru N ru V V O O co co 4- 0 ('7 N A N (6 O aj -0C N N (j) N N> aj aJ O m N > C r6 aj ut f6 v Fa p 'm 4- Q u—ru V) C: aJ O v •� v N N 4 O Y 4 - (0 r --+V bA i O D Q Y+ O 4+ +- aJ aJ L (n '- O O VI i Q C i aJ aJ N- N N O ff 0 O V) 14 7O Q) 4 .Q >> U Q O Q N +--+ C N f6 bA VI p ?j bA aJ N Oy i O -0 Y, V1 V� = r--+ V) f6 r6 ,O — 4---' to i Q N 0 0 — O aJ C ut r6 C O O O _0> > O Y r6 .0 ut Y , O 4 , E-0 f6 O O f6 0 O f0 O c v(u m ru Y, (Av Vi E v� ° v �, E v Q o °o E N ��--+ �, C C C Q f6 b.q ut C f6 Y+ C O O v c v O � ro N `� 0 Y v ut O O rp N C aJ ru -0Q O N ' O > >, 0- N ,� v Y �� C ru O � Y ru C N E A ,� Y� p 0 4+ N 4.1 O Q N Eru 0 E v -0-0 Ul ru �: � LnV X N v O v v v v p+ v C a) w -0 -0 C v C C -0 c N — o v C i C r>6 L '� ru v i f6 ro O u N� to Q N O O C — aJ ro 4- O i -0 -0 a) N ru N in •Q ut — ut FZ O = 4- i aJ C t N m N r6 V ro O O p O4-1 (Ar6 ++ _0f6 O Fz 'L ru in -07, X W �_ O '0 O O in 0 +_+ u Q-'� aJ +, V N � O� C .- = Q Y 4-- C O O V _0 N O O Ln C N O T O aJ O Co Y Y O V aJ i N O O ut N f6 O ' aJ O to bA N > �, aJ i M rp N > O aJ 'Y - >, C O f6 LL > V ut O O p Y N i 7 LA 4- fC `� >, i b0 C -0 w LL In F- 4,-J O C N—x N 00 0L c- CL U Q a) m O N aJ C 0= N bb C .ro p l_J c> C � 4- O C - aJ Vt C r6 N C aJ 4--+ V a) r6 +--� v'�i 'X aJ C +-+ � Q � 0 N D O Ln M Vj 4- V)V 0 p O C� •- N - C � V C L C C O N ru C— 0 4- > O ut N O C p O O N bp -O rp m Y O 4- f6 p O ' �-' rp i � •� O = �-+ + aJ �'' �-' �-+ C O �' - N C Q w Y+ w � nL�L �+ > i U, Y+ Q 0 aJ .0 O f6 f6 m >, aJ � p C f6 C v a) Q V D N fu .f- � O N c V VI V N VI L w = v a) ru 0 Q o� v Qv o ru v �0� Ul) —� C �� v N fo '� O fo -+ �, ru O >, O Y V O O O C Y in Y,r- >, Q ) N -0 > aJ V D O ut -Y V) by N V C to O ruv ru ut _ •� U')w _0 �� M L C0 f6 4- w 0 �> O a) f0 v +--' 0 C aJ V C O M C 'L m -0 O >, fp ut un Ul N C c r6 p N O C N Q •� bA Q) N O 0 �0 O fa b ru N >, N ut . U N Vi ut Q 142 aJ C 4.1 C r6 —_ v v : O C � 0-0 +--, ru 2 i v_0 v b � D >, _ � '� � V, v av v v 4— 0 v, r6 +--+ v O v •� N Ni 4- C — Y ut N bC-0 r u bA L a) 4- i C Q C p m p C i C C O i i� M Q-0 E a1 O� C V-0 p Q fo ( O E O 0 0 N - O 0 O ru O( C G O� v C v 4, V N to +- aJ Y+ 4 a) C a) i O VI C bA -� C rte-+ aJ Vl v N r 0 C D O0 aJ .- .E > — C 'f0 i Yom+ VVi — > 0 > rte--+ v 0 VV) O L r aJ �' N N Q O i Q O E i C C C v O U aJ Y' bA > ai C Q ai 0 aJ -0 r--+ v— 0 (� () aJ aJ v O C ru 4- v 0 C v 4- 4- i O V^ aJ M � i � Y' - O L � O r� bA 0 > C N p C« ~ p ut Y, rp aJ V p 4- .� O C Q __ aJ -0 C aJ Vt Y! b�-0 L O 0 Q ru 2 v N LA (b60 v =- V) N E V) N p v N Y! Y! i bA N 4- (AaJ ru i 4.1 0 LN fU C 0 L _ 0 0- in v ru ru L Vt Vt ru N C L O O bA C X Q) aJ L 4- 4- 0 aJ Q) aJ C aJ VI ru (A Q) Q) ruv � V L i 42 0 c -0 -0 Q) Oru Q Q v Q) -0 -0 C C ru ru N ru V V O O co co 4- 0 ('7 N Introduction to the report e ■ / « C ? § £ / U 6 2 % ƒ U 2 2 / � / \ G / ) / u f @ S / 0- / o » \ ) a § \ • a � � 2 = � % 7 § ƒ \ / S > ƒ f C / ƒ% E Q) °ƒ o f 2 u= ) 4/ \ o E 0 e (A Q) c e= 2 0 4- 8 £ ƒ / o�S� \ a e 2 > ° �2 ° ƒ Q) * 7 / ® / > 4- e = 4- o Lf) * y @ � ° / o U e E 2 e o c e o\ % / ° U D $ / e / E k y/ E • 0- 4-* 2 4- \ E / / / 4- \ \ / ƒ / / c 3 I) E w E //: 0 c\// $ 2 7 ° > © - / / $ / 3 � > o o _0 9 u > - 2 » \ % ƒ � a G 3 / f \ ƒ o 2 V) m e o 2° o/ƒ o s 2 ƒ 2 / § \ e / a \ o g e 2 — 2 2 2\ 4- \ @ 0 k //\ 4$$ § a 2 c* c � 0 a T 4 ro� O ro \ 4-/\ ƒ ƒ 3 e ^ w 2 Qƒ 0 2 c 0£ ro /\ Q V ƒ 2/$ y 2/ / E \ 0 2 k e = _ \ (A o � \ / / / % \/ 0 7/ // ° 2 7/ > £ o ƒ Q) rO * / tap U 2 e m ƒ � 3 0 § ƒ o / 3 ? 0 2 / / \ ƒ / / / � \ / o / ^% o% °� I>/ 2© /© 2 / m 2 u 2 // f o g J Lfi \ N $ / . E . E � a o f / / 0 ƒ § / 0 e ■ r — , _ / n LMA % / � 0 / E E E 0 ) 0 c R 0 f k # / 3 m m S 0 S 'IT co ¢ 2 n 0- § \ u \ ƒ ) 5 / � � ./ 0 0 / \ \ y 2 a \ ./ � v t 0 3 ./ / / 2 2 / / > / / i o E / E E \ � � 2 �> \ / / ƒ / j / \ \/j/ / 2 / 2 0 E 2 m a 4-- / m (A 0 \ / / \ 2 2 20 © o u m Ln -0 (A— E o © o 7 a LF- 0 4 w \ \ \ / 2 2 � 0 -0 _ > 2 2 2 0 U — 0- o 2 u : u .-f o o L'» — � / / 2 2 0 2 0 - u 2 6 a # # 0- E / o% .@ G o 0 0 3 0 u 0§ f f E LU / 3 # o o$ % u o t t L 2 ± I R E E£ G 3 LU . . . . . . . m m S 0 S 'IT co ¢ 2 n 0- § \ u \ ƒ Introduction to the report Q Q) Ln s U O E 0 rur E ru E Ln O U i O O -O i 0 > E s O O V C � r r.., � O >, C ru -0 L fu V LCn Q C a) a) I^ s In O O Q -0 7 .� a) Ln bO O C m U`" o W w N i Q) b�0 ru Qj LL > , 1 I 1 ! I 4 i I 1 5 I r I, 7 } t y 1 � 4 t CO CO /r f/ m m Oo Y M � 5) v r,. v D 0 1 I I I � I I'Q I Iml I= 1 _ I � I p a P 2 1 I.L I I J N I 1 ! r r I I_�g_ I I � I I � I I I � I _ J - l I I I � I I � I v I I I � I I — I I � I I a I I � I I N I I I I � I I a I I _ J Q Q) Ln s U O E 0 rur E ru E Ln O U i O O -O i 0 > E s O O V C � r r.., � O >, C ru -0 L fu V LCn Q C a) a) I^ s In O O Q -0 7 .� a) Ln bO O C m U`" o W w N i Q) b�0 ru Qj LL > , 1 I 1 ! I 4 i I 1 5 I r I, 7 } t y 1 � 4 t CO CO /r f/ m m Oo Y M � 5) v r,. v D 0 1 ' 1 I D I I d J I= 1 1 0 1 I p a P 2 1 I.L I I J N I 1 ! r r 1 1 1 i Q Q) Ln s U O E 0 rur E ru E Ln O U i O O -O i 0 > E s O O V C � r r.., � O >, C ru -0 L fu V LCn Q C a) a) I^ s In O O Q -0 7 .� a) Ln bO O C m U`" o W w N i Q) b�0 ru Qj LL > , 1 I 1 ! I 4 i I 1 5 I r I, 7 } t y 1 � 4 t CO CO /r f/ m m Oo Y M � 5) v r,. v D 0 v r,. v D 0 Q L i 4--+ Q Q Q N O Q ro (A C ro Q E O 4, O Q C ro r6 Q +- Y' v in V Q Q _ C Y+ C ro i r6 C i O 0 v Q r6 Q -,.e Q- � V Q (AC Q o QE ro L Q (A Q O 0 C - 4 O Y, Q C Q roC r 47+ � o C L ro 4- Vi bO Q Vi p p M Q C OQ Q C •� O 0 •� V O Y' ro C O Q C > ru Q QQ ro _ C +- Q) O Q V X vi L� > Q > V O L L bO Q Q V O Q C .� V •r--+ E Q Q O r6 Q -0v J 2 Q � o v o v Q C Q ro .L- Q) Yv ro bO ° Q r6 C Q V V O N ro C O rp '� O Q b0 C 4- _0 E Q Q 4-Q> 4- V C O V) 4-ro C V r--' > Q QQ in D -= Q E _0O Q C Q .2= Q 4-V Al—> E C ro C Q v 3 v oO Q ro E ro > —' Q 4- >C Q p > Q Q C Q D .a' E O > Q O Y' E M (A Q r6 Q p > Q rp C Q ++ •- (AbO 00 Q bO 4- rrO Q VA V� Vt Y+ o Q E C .� °J o ru Q>� °; Vt -0F � Q r6 ra (A v p >C V) 42 Q Q m L Vl V Q C V O> C i Q Q E Q O Q Q O ro p l% Or6 Q v, Q Q~ Q ,� ~ — w ~ Q E ro bO 0 L 4- (6 -6 C to C C (A4- Vt �ro ?� O i (Aro 4 N • (A •}-' Q Q Q E c O O= EYE ro 0 Q N Q i N O r6 Q V Q Q Q� C O VI E C C O 0 C bC-O tao C •� >' O ro b N r6 O •� r6 ut c C C -0 o Q= >O C roV ro ro Q in •ro E o v v v o v� b Q r6 E C: Q V) Q L v -0 b0 Q `? E - r6 Q a) -'-e L VI Y/ Q ro b0 Q r6 V, bO 4--+ E 4-Q .� r6 VI C -0 C Q C O r--+ E O 4--1 Q E V >' 0 Q C Q — Q rO (A O O Q Y IA r6 Q ro Y+` O -0 Q Q N V f— Yom+ O Q p Q 0 b0 C O Q 4- � b0 Q) C V1 Q ro O r6 Al- V1 — C r6 — L Y+ Vl C 4 C m >� FZ i C L Q to C v (A �'ru C E C E p !� 0 0 L Yom+ Q V C ro O r6 O ut O ut Q ru E i m Q v — E 4-� Q'° E C �'= p E o E �_� V V V O , 4-Q rp O (A Q4- (A Q Q v E ro ro C 4O � -0 i � C ro ro Q) c Vt Q V Q O ut O� ,m O Q C m Yom+ O -,-e ro Q c Q u Q bO E" Q C Z 4-v °'ru .0 V) cro bo C O O Q N LA a)V (A O C Y p ro V Q C r -0_0 O O O �O Q � LA r6 ro Q Vt c E r6 O (A C N O N ut N Q >' O LnO Ln ur)00 Q •0 � d _0r6 . Q Q V V r= (A co co O co 0) m 0- Introduction to the report Ln m CO CO (C)� 4- 00 Oo CO 5O (6 U v ao v x v W v T,. v 0 0 — E N N 0 N .L �;, N � Ll 0 Ll o E Ea v E C U N = 4--+ O —> V ro N V 0 '4- U {n f�. U > S Q C >, N `ti N C _ + N 0 0 U -0 U O Ll 4- N N N C > N N Q N N Q r6 N> OU -0 ro .� O C DLl fu N n. C° `^ >, i.. 4—� 4- D a o v Q) �•� 4-� m ro v m D 4- o a 0U v Q a Q ro v > x - D°o ° v c vz ° a v FO M_E a .� �. (A v 0 O 4- 4-v, Llo, O v_0 v a a o— E a-0 C C Ln aq s xa° O x Ci o v Z a 0 a o o Q - M c + Q) N E in �'� 0 0) � in v v N .4- v U o o.�'� M a -a o a aoQ) = U °�,' O 'a Ll Ll avo Q o x s� QJ fu Q O x rOEv as Qoj N°J .0 O O -O N IA Q oj ro 4- ro v • �o :5 a- o � v°c��v o o, a a0m .c Q Q° QJ 0 ro � °Q a.44 O 4--0° 4- a a 4- a Q >, F N N a N O �_ Q Ll o� (A v -°vi vFZ ro > ° = n " �, v, ro . o°��Q)� x� o, o U° E U Ev N a0 ~ i N C O N c: FU vi a4 O CC Q 0 'a ro Q 4 v v ao-0 V aq � L Nr6 �> v r""' v M +--+ a0 04- > v 0 � >, - O O N i mmO Q L.fl ra > N L r--+ r--+ � . C ro o -0 i, v a Q) O = q--, 0 in ' - a tao v 4 c v v .- C axo N C 0 N >, N Q)�- -- -0 V1 O C V ro / N O N _ -- V N ° N S O C i ro N 4+ � O ro C Q� C N C � i M L O O- N N r� r--+ w O N V O 1 a0� C U V i v v ro a '- N i CO N(A N O Q a0 C O N �-+ C O p OU V Ea E V� °�� > O_0 Q O C Ln O O _ a O C ro O ° O m C Q Q U $ �, N ° o E v bA — M° 0 >, E Ev V) 4- v U c V � x c ro IA 0 N O O E O M U Q) .1 E 0 v C .0 LA � �' Q V) Qb0 N 0i .iCQn 4- N N OOO'n Q N v O U O A -rob0 O 0 B EQ° Qo U Ln m CO CO (C)� 4- 00 Oo CO 5O (6 U v ao v x v W v T,. v 0 0 (A E � � � � � m > m (A 4- 0 � 0 � � � > � N r L(i m m S 0 O LO q ¢ 2 n � Q) r r r r \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V) V) V) V) (A (A (A (A / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / .0tao .0tao .0tao .0tao .0 .\ .\ .\ w t t to ro roQ- / o / 0ro / 0ro / 0ro / Qro / Qro / Qro / - - - 2 ro 2 ro e ro e ro 2 ro 2 ro 2 ro 2 ro 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 / 2/ 2/ 2/ 2 / 2 / 2/ 2/ 2 \ c c c c y c yyy c c cyyyy 0 u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u -j 2 0 2 o s o s o 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 o s o s o s o a o a o s o s o a \\\ \ \ \\\a 0 a % . E% . E% . E% . E % . E % . E% . E% . E 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 a < D < D < / < D < D < / < D < D » » » » » » \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 3 3 3 3 3 ( ( 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 3 3 $ $ $ 3 a tao tao tao tao to tao tao tao tao tao tao ? ? a a a a a a 0 0 < < < < < a < 70-a \ u o 0 0 o e o 2 2 \ \ \ \ \ \0 \ j / / / / / / £ £ £ £ £ £ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / O } } * * 0 / z % 0 e e e / / 0 E ro / / 0 g c 0 o z Qm a $ » 2 / / / / u 0 0 a 0 '7 ° g »— V) o ° LA \ o ero o u3C: G / § = c £ £ E u c 2 2 0 0 \ 2 / % ° E ° ƒ \ § c \ / Q)ro ® \: \ e 0 0 9 0 G s o e % E N m # 2 e » 00 m m S 0 O LO q ¢ 2 n � Heritage Conservation Measures �o Q U m LL W S 0 u U ' � N O � N C vi �v Q) 0 E � C X w • o t y4J O t r'•. N 0 C U U N m 6 N N O o U Q E v m 0 3 v C . c N N 41 U- m +--' C Q) +- � C Vt (A w w N V) >� N `� N N m N N C i C bA p - p C C b0 v i i° C b0 b0 O ro ro N r0 _ L N i •� •L -0 N O rp N V) N Q 0 C C i ut C N N N i 0 '� V N N ro O O V) O ro in 4 > 'L- N N N N Nro -0 C> N �' > OV C V) N Q) +-' C L) 4- � N O •Z, bo C+ N p p N N r° > E VI ro N rtao , V D V O V r6 N _ N C U^ LF- Q) � lJ N .i N C rte-+ O V) N (A N `6 '� ,� ro N 0- O i N N L C O C C 0p Op bA N bA C v � O O >, 0rpbAC O ro p 0 r r6 N p >, b> 0 0 M 4 O O ro C- N � �J: 0 •� ro � N O N O C N OC = —bA M N O C V) O O Q 4- ro N •- C p U p bA p i C U N > N Q ro C O N ro -0 C O N N_0 N N C W r6 > bA + i +--' b0 C bA r--+ N C r6 � N C r'"' VI C V^ Ln w'� O p C ro ro p Q 0, O N N ro Q V) 'x v 0 .� v E E O O Q v o 42 Q) v v Q� v o c v �o� o v o M v v O p C O W v 0 A C N N O M ro O ro bA i .� � C p ro p C � +- + w O V M Q= C 0 ro m N O ro O N ut C 4-1 ru C ro c `~ N N Sn w C M (A +-, C� ro N x O M bA = C C N O Q-,— C O (A O N _L C O N (A•� .� N r� O N 3 N C N r6 C V N C N C r--+ V i �-+ •�, C E C C r--+ L N U*) Z) N Q V r6 p N ° ro O i i i i b0 p bA N ° N dro i v rib r� bA rte-+ �J VI O N O V) L u7 '� '�, C r6 �, > 0 r0 C C C N V ut ro 03 ro ut O� O Q U N� p � O rte- 1 L bA r--+ c Q ro i N i bA •V c� C E E V V .- = C i >, (A V d 0 ro V C r6 C O C v v ro C bA 0 0 p i N — ro N Vl C O >� N p i 4- C i C Q -0 bA O Q j i p N rp �_ N 00 C C° C Q s' C N V N L �O 4O r6 '4+ V) rte-+ ro N rte--+ +�-' O C o �°_vV v o�c° v-0 o v 0 ov � o � v O Q) o ro V) � vov 0 0 cC v°J c co 4- 00 00 -/�- Lo > 5 0 (U U v VI W v v Y D 0 co co 0 N LO m (D 0) m 0- aJ -0 v= (3) O aJE 4- o = = — 4- = >, a) _0 m c 0= c c >, Q) C •- rU ro v c x aO +- v ao v vi O ,,- c WrO C in C �, p p E 0 v C p N 0- v v C N �_ aJ Q O 0 p N C Q r° Q p Y O C V) Q Y C p V p v Q) r p w m Q >, 0 ro > v O Q _ N v O C m O p L Q paJ aJ b0 C> = (6 Q a) w W N VI Y C i6 O ro i by �, i � X � _ a X Y, LA C Q) C rp ro O rC-+' Q)V C l� 2O � N Q) w Q O . .-L- E Q) c V-0 V in u = Cp- O N E Q •C v C v C � � � Q°-0° aQ O ^ o c v r- v O c ° n v O a, N wul °Q V ro N� °' cv ��v°� to X n v F 0 c v Q° Y v c ni ni aJ O o N Q) V i 0 V •�' O b0 O rte--+ C Ul .- i a� Q �0 •� C C w aJ 7 v p N O r N O V Y v O m 0 O N C ii 4-1 4 in ru 0 ro Q O— ro to > V 1-1 C.� Ul p U ro T C i M i LC -E -0 c N O-0 ' CQ�— p� ro ca�, ° a) 0 v O N rL C L E O X V r v C C v ro ro p N Q ro i Q)C �.0 r6 = i (A C O D D I- ro r� N Z N O N M Ul W M Ul W bp0 a ro v L >, � v w- bp0 C� c O� �' ro ra o?j = O p O ro •Z, ro c c = E c a •- ra •- ° o o 4- E (A c " v bio ° bio ° O O >> C r� (A C r- aA .� C v b0 Y a) a c in C Q Q v c •r6 Q� •ro - O O N O E 4- `6 ro Q V) x co x co �+ C C Y ro ro C C O 0 E r--+ aJ aJ r6 E Q U •Vl W N W N ro Y+ O aJ i �6 C M , aJ L r r6 O O r6 w N O N O iJ N ,+--' r-; N i ro > r--+ C i C y0 C a) r r--+ w O V O V O N Q +--' >, N C Q -�, C m _ Q b0 r� l7 l7 N +-' V ro a) r- VI i ,0 �--, C O C �-' f6 C C C O V) Q C x Q ; N �, - v Q fC a C a> V O p 2 a-0 aJ > aJ v= O Q a) E cq o Introduction to the report 0 0 0 C Q c Fz O v v 4- C 0 C aJ Q x 0 O Q Ln ro 4- - aQo m y v Q , v to x ° ro E c° •Q ro Q ro >, W Q ro - w x ro x Q E bA ro 0 � WFz o v mro V, Q _0 ro v, v Q v 4- o .x m C Q c, 4- IA bA x FU Q Q .v, o � U a) Q 'v, O x '^ M > v Q x m Q' ._ ro Q Q C Q= Q V, ro > E v° c v Q x V O� a) O E •� v > Q c Q ° x > V, Q ro Q O ° Q °o Q L Q) bn v .- M x i Q o O W U X C Q-0 (A Q O ro Q x in x - ° ,- Q 'rp E xo i^ ro m v� ro c v M.- ro ° �_ v v Q= U � Q ro x o x— V° Q (A '^ Q x a) 3 v p c +� (, ro O Q '� a) v > .�, ro O Vt ro Q r--+ Q ro E m 0+ m a) Q � ro E IA C = p v'— W v v 0 -0 v Q) c_° v O o l7 Q) av �ro°v °J 4.1 oQ) cV) tO o E E oO c c Q S C OVo Q r� ro x xC (A C Q �r CL Q Q o V O_ c OQv Q Vi�O ro m Q o`Q oO 4.1 0c v> Q Q oQ Q m V C V C f6 O O ro �O 401 ro O r6 N Q ro O '� Q m Q a) O o �_ ° `� '� D bb � v �0 '� Q) E o Q) v Ln Q) E Vt Q V O V° Q L E O � �-+ O �% L a) Q i r--+ m C� �-' C N ro ro LF- CO 0 C m,� �+ O .� Q 2 Q N M C i EO C C .� = 0 O� -0 C Q V) aJ .- C r O 0 -0Vt ro p ro Vt 'ro ��-, + Vt Q in O bb Q O ro r�6 Q Q.1 Q r6 a w .�E_ ate) vl ry6 Q r6 Q C> C> a) 0 r6 C 4, — O Vi -0 X O a) O Y c N ro-0 Q M 0 in ro Q O 4 C� ro O C Q v+ -'i Vi 4- '0 N '� 'N vvi C �O ° a) N C O Q Q Q U O C rOro � > v •� ro O ro co Co0 D OE O 4 C Q ' QE O OO •E:� Q U Q Q>, VC) Q) m> °QC bb .o�Q x 4- C ro Lo O Vl w n (0 Q O. -L/) -0vx LL °'v '� VQ c= V)v 0 (A vv V, Q) Q) >, o Q 04- (A O N ro Q ) ro ro cQ V) C Q o -Q x Q Q) V) Qo = O MvQ�°o Q � M� V a) to 0 c .� Q v, x E Q -0 ro4-C Ln O Ox �Q'—QE Q a) °° •o c L � v° O >,v �4' Q ro Q 4-- cv o Q ° x 05-o co M L°Q Q Q o °Q� N -0 b.0 0O M Q bA ro > Vi V C Q �' tao Q) )a) V N E Q C .Q O ro C IA X .� C ro O ro Q bA E `� c X o v Ax V O-0 V) Q� Q V rte--+ V) C Q° N° Q > Q bA C >, r�Ln ut (A= O 4-- Q ro O C C ro 0° V Q ate) ro (A C rO�( �O O O a) M 4O V_ ro v Q a) i bA ro O r6 v Q Q Q ro Q) O U Y V) `~ i - i � C V ro ,C bA a) C �' r6 V C r--+ r6 bA L r6 Q Q Q Q x E 0 —yx Q m m Q Q '^ x Q .x o Q U i +� v i V ut O Q r6 H Q x O C O +J Q x° Q V v �' >, v V, x Q to o Q o M o" Q ,o Q Q 3 vin C Q a) Q-0 O C L C° M� 4- E C C E C Q i V •+-+ p m r6 a C O I Q QIA ro C xro Qro O v, Q c v 'Q �' o C v v v, �° .o ro CT v Q° N Q N C ° V) °) ut V Q •C '� v Q r6 •�Ln r� — ro N i C b�0 v ro Q)C Ln C ut > ro i O° Q O O C Q C G y C > + ro >� O ro 4. r6 V Q O vii vii > vii �_ Qro O N a M C Q LA m O �a) C_ O O c Q Q o m E Q v ro 6 m m m CO CO 4 00 m L> cY (Uu 11Q v x v v v T,. v 0 Q) Q) :L- c C ao -0 c C °J E- v V) -0 v ao = O ro V) co ,- L in O O� .� .�ro c 0 .� o v N ,- V C c Q C v r V N co c v ro �_ 'x V - , N -0 C ro v 0 O N ro o E2 E o ao ro ro i O in � L O '^ v N m N N to in M v- Y O C in- o> c E � O C C .- N CE o ,� c ro D D a) —(A o= r6 r� C Yom_ v C p � 0 v V rp 41 O V ro r6 a) a O Sao — 'x c 0 Q Y' Q i E v rp Q v ru Q a0 r6 ao c LO C7 V v r- v v v v ro= ro Q N v c c V L C Y' N Q) ro 4- 4- . C O 4- a) >,O Y, 4✓ -0 c c p 4- ro Y'0 4.1 C�.� Q) Q = D o ro ; V) (A ro V) J N 0) O?: 0 V O> NO N ro_0 O NUl In Q p N N c (6 Q N V N b0 N~ N (Aro O C Q (A v V _0 ro N +-+ x i ro N p ro Y '� C C - +� O Q — b0 to C4- Q ro r6 C N ro C -0O N IA> v N N N 0 C E v1 40 N N E -0 O N ro ro r--+ Y' O r6 a- O F — O � O r6 • O ro � � Lp r, L.L Ln N -0� C -0 r, O 00 S C rp C C ro O= + p- O 0- C N bA C N N rp ro C-0 Q) ro ro V 4- ?: O C ro N i O N ro N O Q N Q �,O -0 r6 0 '� b0 '� N ro o- C (A ro — L O> toro 7 C >, Y' N C C (A to N Q Q v p r- c O H _0.0 raj r N b0 O L vi N N O X ro N N E C C E rte--+ C C p B N N 4- N Q ro '� = L O •� O N bA V O .� 0 O C L o O L X Y Y C N_ ro V N C C p in v � C> N V = Y+ ro Y+ O� j N-0 to 4, C C: b0 O r p -0 rp C N L�- N bhp YQ) C 0 N iJ L `� O +� i O Q N N N = Q) N 3 Y 0 3 N C L. .L Y+ X Q p in ro c '� O Y, N N Y= C X to v. O Y� ro C O O V N p p ro � ~ O to to ro C QJ O C C r=+ — C LF— E p .� vi m N N C p0O �_ - N C N ro (Aro N _C - L r6 C N �Oo v 'V — N N V N N 0 •C ro � N ro 4--+ C-0 m N rte--+ to .� N `� 00 E V ro N .� N .- v Q m= > in O Q Q ro N Y N L> N p � Q L r6 O N U, C O O O ro V ro b0 v E 0 C N N0 N to O N Y Q> ro O r6 C N E OV � NUl -0 V O O V +-0 p rte-+ N N , C N C V E C D m ro—�' C V C C '- L .� X O m N E O >> �> ; O UO C r >_ •V r, N V � .� J > — V Q �! > V �-' > Z In U N Q > In �--+ Qj 0-0 N N C _0 -0 N V) O C C ro V) Y> ro O N in m p M p Ln Y� N > V C •� C i N r N N v ro �_ > V - , N -0 C ro ro 0 O N N -0V r6 Q ro i O in L to C p p N m N N to in M O Y O C in- O C V C C .- N CE ro O C 0ro;o �' o= r6 r� C Yom_ v C p � 0 N Q rp 41 O V ro CN Q N i E r� rp Q v ru Q N ro 00 'ro Q v In `� r- N ro v N O N ro= Q N >� V N O V L C Y' N Q r6 rp to O Y, 0 b0 Y'0 4.1 ra D o ro ; Q) ro V) J ro C vii -0 O NO Q O NUl In N V Nro to ro c C = N _0 M M 4--> O C m > ro ro'rte N In Inul V) a N VI v O V X r6 N NQ >-' C L U Q N N ro -0 O -0 O N N > N N V V r--+ N V r--+ Q -0C r6 a- v C r--+' F — O � L. N-0 r6 • O ro � N l J Lp r, L.L Ln ro -0 -0� -0 S C rp C O c ro N C Q m 0- C r6 to > m m 0- E E N Introduction to the report ru ro `n v O ro Qto Q) � _0 v C CE 4' v b `^ E (A > _ m — 'A M r--+ -- O ) >' Vt Vt O) v O Q LA Q-0 C ro V >, Q Q N 4, U -) N C 4- O +--+ b0� C 'C v N 4- W r6 N o4 N VI (A— r6 r6 E Q Q' —_ > ro --j Q C !n C O U V C Q (A ro r--+ O b 0 Q N Q (A = N 4, (A - Q O Q — v OL Q C ro Q E C 0 ru ~ Q O v 0 Q E ro v C(A O C Q L i m t� L V C 4' V M roQ Q -0 I Q i Q +--+ ro C +--+ O Q m — V V— C Q N V 0 E�C �u�D •5 O ro Q ,v�� C Q V) ro Q N VO>I v �>NU v N of DCO M H E b ro >� C -le o E- m a o Q Q Q V O 0 o O ro O> O O N O 3 O Q v Q E W `^ Q ro V 4--' Q C 4--' Q - O a in �� Q Q EQ) Q QJ '� b�0ro (AO N C rte-+ Q N ra r6 d Q C Ln C C C Q C (A C C rz C C 4.1 rte-+ ) CL O O N ro N Q r6 C O E ru O > >, C V (A Q Q .- r6 C Q +' V 0 C +--+ V Q E i Q C ru iJ > Q O) 4. Q i ro N ra� O WbbO ro Q Ln— C r� p Q Q Q Q W Q> O E `� m c Q° ro Q E O�m La Q _ (A Q) teQ U r6E > V Qro U 1 QO o r - V LnO Q tfo Q°' r- — V v - Q Q V, O , OE O o QO = Q > QQ rte+ ULn -0 Q ro V O O W O4 Q V C Q .L O Q bA Q bA 4- Q Q r--+ r6r6 C r6 O ru ; W0 r6 Q) O VI Q ut >, O Q �O ut E r r6 ro Q Vl O D VA Q — V U Q (A ro ru N 4O Q W -0 rO 4 v = V, Q O ro a E ro Q m C Q D C= c ro V, E ro Q ,� L Q V o Q ro Q �--+ ro > '^ ut •`� C Q O C E Q V — — W bA C .- r6 •C � ro Q V, Q C tao C Q C C N ro •ut V Q _ C 'L C C Q-0 N_ Q O ro bA 4--+ Cr- — C bA .� Q Q Q O V Q V) (A C V) ro- ro ro .E V) bA Q m Q O Q N Q) N O 'V C C C .0 4-F Q •>: > VC, w N Q C vl N Q) .0 E VIro O L C Ln C7 C O 4-.v, O 4O `� v Q E Q Z)ro V Q Q O v 0 r6 O ro U Q C ro 0Q) Q Q r--+ Q E C ,� 4-+--+ � Q Q ) C C O r6 >, U— Q- av,' - Q C Vt _ O r- O ro Q ro Q O C 4- Q C ut �> i ra Q Q O ro _FZ ro � E Q E' O ut -0 Q O v Q Q Q� Q Q Q� C v C v ro E C �� 0 Q) ro Q) Q ) Q o °' - r✓ Q 0 ro O C O-0 C >' C ro O ro O C 3: m Q) C��=� O E V c v +-' ro O � Q +-' N ,'moi, N r6 bA ro . LJ -0 0 Q> O C Q Ln N U1 N U N Ut •� Q L O C .� ;� Q Q --0 C C C bA E C Q> O Q i Q C E O C C 4- � 0 O v Q� v, C.- Q ro Q p Q E Q v, 0-Z) ro � Q� ro N Q O Q O , - D O0 W Q) �, Q > Q Q O V — Q 4- 4- ro L Q 4- j Q 4- Q r� O C OJ N O Q- QO O ro 0 ro roLn .E 0' Q = ro ut Q O 0-ru O Q 'E Eaj C ut .0 ro O C Q O 4IA W 4' 0 Q C •O rte-+ •� ro 2° C C E C E ��� v V L_ V, E o- QL `^ v `� E `^ U ro � v C •C O C ro �+ ro E v v v m bA Q r6 O > .Q ro C V) L O ro E rte -+ U V Q) ut C V Q L •� i E O Q Q D O r6 Q C•� N v4- O �> r= rC6 rC Q WO Q to Ln O 0 Q O u V)O v Q U Q� L, Ln Q Q W :a Q C — r✓ , � O`>A M IA N S 'X ,C 0 O 0 E Q bA. r" C O vN Q N Q i C Q > Q m Q Q Q Q • LA > O W fC O Q '� Q V •C r6 Q V .0 C r6 r6 Q ro O C ro C ro C ro Q bA V, N 4.1 W Q Q Q Q Q C Q .� ro Q C > Q Q 0 Q C Q Q Q Q C Q c6 0 > V 42 Q 0 W Q -0 V 0 V V D O V > > 0 rte. Q D 0 ao c O ro ro Q) ro N Q ro V !n C ro C O Q) 4- O 4- ro ro Q ro N to O Q- 0 O Q LA N D a Q) ao ro L Q) El N ro V v Q) b N w Q) 4- O c O ro V O N !n O Q- 0 O Q N 4- 0 C ro Q) Q ro V (n C ro J Q) !n O Q- 0 O Q v Q) Q) N to ro N ro O Q) L/) K6119- V) (A v Q) 4- V ro N 4- 4- 0 - 4--+0 Q ro N V rli !n 4- ro _0 _0 c Q) ro to Q O N V = N 4, V) O C i O N 4, ro D V N O = v 4- ro v � C7 v ro — ME Q) D C7 ro Q N L 4- 4- 0 - O V) C Q) 4- c O V N !n O Q- 0 O L Q N L to N V N ao ro Q ao c 0 0 4 Q) co co 4- 0 m LO (Y) (1) c� a Heritage Conservation Measures M a c co 4- 00 00 ti- L > ('7 v 5o ^(6 U v 2 >v W v r. v p 0 E '0 -0 E OJ > O O +� C O +� 00 a �_ D s= O O s= O rn 0 U W _ In O C O O U Q Ln *'E O p �y a C7 v L E CO c v L O 00 L � +�+ m U i N — U L 0 O O ca CLO E O O Q 7O p C 3:O O i N CLO 0 LL 0 — � -0 LL U E 'Z O m - Q _ O O to C OJ Q O 'O OJ Q tom , 0 E - n cO v > +c O U v U U La O �, �n = �n Z ca � C cc Q N�1 S.G is •L ro U U C = M0 O N L c:Q O O Q C +' (B VI > = LE U 5 CLO E (a VI (B i U i E ns c E r O O 00 `n OCcJ Q to L i Q 0 t U — N MM W Z C F A LLJ—ii1 _ _ `� O t U C O U C O fD O O fC _ - V) C N t N LF -2 fD O aJ 7 t M Q v ~ E a, 06 = a, �' -0 W c •� Q v aJ *'v 'a W U C Q m E v C) N c� G 16 U O U O teN N w N O O O � v VD 00 N W 0 L 00 iL U 0 E 0 = L U L -a Y _ V _0 O Q C C p �, fD LL Y aJ ns ns 'a U F 0 O O u Ln C c o v O ~ E w0 m > C O .E VI O 'a Y m 00 l" O > C UO O CLO O ca N ns v O Q) > C E �>— 0 =3 .> v a, O ° O E 0 2 v Y Y c% LU c Q E _0 Y v O +, O- O U O •0 aJ a, ns U CLO - 7 E cc c v a -0 cc X E C D Q- • V OJ O L Q OJ v O N O C U ° v c U U v 0 Q t a �n a L H O +J ca 'a O U w H �, O ca C LF -O C L O m �� •�• I;!, 00 a aJ a, O t ns O 0 =3 O t c -I ^ w Q- C =8 O � iJ C aJ c 00 0 •� U j 1 I C ns r N fD E E W N �O n OJ z a ) ., 0 •E W O -`^ 0 OJ — O a a-+ U U >j O U L C o W N > 7 a a a H0 Z a :, V) 0 O M a c co 4- 00 00 ti- L > ('7 v 5o ^(6 U v 2 >v W v r. v p 0 Q) Q� = vi vi •� 0 V) C v rte- N ro �O I in 00 N .� Q M C bA >; bA v 0 0 O 4-� O v_0 N=.o U v 4- in co v V o ro o C U +-' M ro -0 C> C7 M N r6 `' 4- � N O C=v -0 N O O E m N r6 O (A v ��� 4--v c6 o E N p S C O Q >,V ro C O N N C V to v N v 4Q O (A O NV O� v vN X' 0-0 O N>4- >, O � n N CON V) w � Qa) •V O N O ru .— O N Q) ro ro N Q rte-+ E N E •� i C O Q _ -0V O N-0 Ln N N V O �--+ o V QJ ro -0 O�j Q O Q m p ro N Q) ro O � C to N p to N p V to inM p�Q):� V � r Q O Nr uO —>rO : Q N N CteQ 0� O Q i C = N '� v U> 0 U O V O O� v_VI -0 O C 0—iv-0 _0 O F § OO C p 4 Nro = NA O 0iNo O -0 ° _ 0 U '4�- ro � O C: N D -0 ro N ro = - C _0 N ro Q-0 O _0 O Q N C v OV N N � C Q rp-+ = 0 N j ro •0 N Q E r6 >> .� V N L C% C u M C v bp0 N N N C C O_ p_0 v V r Q C r= E X N r� N E Q E E D D m CO Q) O I vpi v� v N C ro U C OV O f0 N O C> C(— N D N C ro _0 O 0-0 4- LL ro N N Q (A -0 �_0 -0� >;o v >, o E-0� �� _0 Q) V) CD rro r C N — � '� O rp-, O >, 4' 4' ro ro +-' ro ro O 0 p V C O E O in N ro ro N 4— O � O - o N r6 r6 N in N >, r6 O .� _ V N C O O Q) v �, C �_ = in v ��vQ) v -0 4- ro a) V �� —°J� E N ro — O — — Q)i C E Q N ro p �' N in N C �� Q bA v to N ro r6 Q ro V Q C to O to N v N V) (L) - �= — ro�vov °E�4�° c ro O f c °J ro v o vii U °�' v ro 0 � N bA N N ro o N D .0 N E � � � N � ro 'i �- N � N L V r QJ rte-+ .v N N � 0 v r6 C O N C r6 Q v N N '� ro ro 'D N N ro `- ro v= C �' p +� 0- N p > r6 rte) 0 >, (J) 4- M N N� - 4 � N�� N Q to r0 4-O '0 0 — 0 a' _0 r= ro OV V Q) C ro bb..0 E ro 0- .— N i in Q N v C •�, N p N to C C N C N C 0 E o V C C'o f a) Q) v ro o N .� D C N vi '� O C ro .� ro N to N p ?� ro +� O N v (/) to ro ro N = C v O V C rp 0 N -0 = Q � E iv O V v o �.0 (A ro E ro c O v N v> v >� bA O C m O � i C v � i ro E p ro r6 O V C v 0 0 ro C C C in C .p v p N p� N bA 0 V) N ON O 0 4- Mb.0 O CQ p C N o i �:E O C4v n N O�r6 ro �n >DE, 0 NQ> �n r0 MO -0p C -0 0 4- — roCQ0 A N w N C ro • N O NV vQro O C D 0-_p =C � �O O to o ro v to C _ N � � v4, ro v W r - L O v C 0 p ro v ro V '� p = 0 C C dj p ro C p v N r C N bA N IA V >_ C>— O 4- > r6 N p E ro E Q r--, ro C C J .� N r0 N p in roro E �' N — .� N E V N O '= bA v U- Q ro o W `n V o_ �' c C c E v C v= 0 E ro 0 Q W.0 Q) Mro 0 0 N O� v O N > 'Oro N 0 C N bA O N 4' O bA �' •— N C r6 ) N C i O C b.0 > bb i— N J o v C� C o v r6 E ro °' C 0� v N i C o) M v v V Q o v ,n c C o .� E >, C E C a) v Q °J ro Q) O C Al ro = O � ro ro � ° ro ro � ro ° = � C 4- LA � = E O . � �, in O L 4, 1 V Q ro C -0 ro -0 ro in O Heritage Conservation Measures _0 Q 4- 4-4->, c Q(A c Q Q — `4--Q Q-0 Q C Q Q v Q ro Q m Q V)bA C N S 1-C O0 O 4-M +�--+ O C U1 N Q j >O b0 bA (6 _ V) Q O '� aJ C (6 C Q— O V Q Q 'r--+ N O bA p bA J Q ro r6 C OL- C i V •� i VI C Q '� i� ru 4--+ 4O C Q > N 0 r6 C � aJ > w aJ Q w Q O C 'D bA aJ .� to C bA V Q bA aJ L 4--+ > +�--+ �' N Q O (6 C E N > ro Q O v V i° O+ (A Q aJ +� - aJ N N V :� Q C >, O Q V Q C 0- Q Q 4-1 Q in N in bA _ i aJ r6 0 Q aJ (7 O �J VQ ° wQN N N QaJ --0 O� U C 4- C Q O r6� 4 N 4 C bo in O O C V (ApO C •QVQ��—QQ Q4- a) ro b>Qo ' bA Qi C>c O _ o mc ' Q bA o — O-0 = o=c v Q O (A vrovro Q.c bc�XQbXA a`o •� c ov o Q ?`n �E• Q c Q Q QxO aVc C 4- Q (A = O o> Q4- o 0 ° ao c°O>V) > c; Oc v _0 o , :E ro 0 t Q (A 4-; Q Oo Q >(A O •c _ c ao bA v c c > r 0 Q O>)4J v 0 >Q Q L + Q > n o m M OL CLO C ro Q O � vO 0o x� C Q O cm p c +-+-aJ a+- Q� >, 4-�i� O 4-(6 4-�o +' = 0 +- 'Z+ b0 X (A v _tao L Vv t (A C 0 -00 aJ �O O .� �, N — O bo X N N ro O > C Q aJ O C L c C W C 0 •C Q 4_ V= to V V aJ •0 > C ro 0 O C Q C aJ �' (A �' .�+ U C Q -0 to Q V � 4� E � r6 E V j.d aJ p '0 (6 (6 r6 3 QO to Q � C Q +'' 0 -0 ro N (6 •O 0 in CU ro ro b0 N 'in Q _0 J •� -0 4-� O .( O O V O (6 Q (p a) 4- aJ >, Q i i C V Q bA .0 O C Q Ln V�1 C 'C 0 'p w bQA v>i ; O ro N O= 4+ Q 0 ro bA bp0 i Q Q V �' �+ (6 > i Q Q Q i 'i �i (A Q bA VI W N aJ C aJ 0 v �' v v ago Q) (L) E° °J — U Q= Q Q � v ii ° N .� Q C O ro U N O x x ro C = V == O ao ro N ro V) aJ - L (A >, -0 a) -0 w w Q w -0 w L aJ +- aJ = c c c Q c —c Q W +- E Q Q Oc 4- r 44-ro O ro ro ro ro O O C Q p C= Q) (A 4- nQ ro Q 0o v Q b v CE v c a+-'ro oQ0 E °J =° ro E v'Q C c a Q >, 3 v a' E v, c bA = U v-0 V) > Q 4 C +- Q in O 'r6 c 4-' O V 0 C o f v_0 m C v �O r6 O ro '� V) N O c E 4- aJ O bA N Q)j v •� a) Q OLn V ro Q O— '� ` N Q bA � V ro i C Q o E ro v °>' 0 0 = E Q (n v (A Q L i n C C Q, aJ 4+ M Q O 4ro Q) 4, c Q Q a Q— Q O ro bo }, Q ro o D N 4- ° ro C V^ O M to (A V^ N to '4 ( 5-6 o - v) _c ao c > C b'o� �' E o > in c I• c V) � +� Q c C Q o x o ." c° Q �' E a� b0 a' Q Q t bA — 4- 'Z 'ro Q C >, 4- vi c Q (o to j V •+- +-' C i C (6 vii aJ v 0 `� c C r6 '� •+-+ O N N in O N in V ro b�0 C° 0� '� Q V c= x Q �, c� (a E Q �� Q ro E E Q Q'aQE �c ro -0_a v 0 E Q>c 4- (a Cv o nc c 4- ro NO °a ° Q +NQ Cao oQ) n c cE D = Qrc O O ON Q c uc . c O ro v 0 4 v 4 D Q — co C7 '� O V ro �, in V ro Q C (6 bA m° DC v Q Qvc - O3�'c-0o-ao a'v i a' � •c a a' Q— E Q =_ ) 4- o c Q Q" v Q c o ro to o o '� Q V Q c 4- .- O ao = V) (6 E Q �, o ro — N-0> � c 4- Q (o c c +- � E >, c v E g Q .� c c c U v rO ro 0" E c E c~ os ro Q i ro c> Q) Ew Q Q (a 4' �, 'v, � E Q c Q �— c c Q to 0— liLD IA bo ao � 0 v C Q O c 0 C> Q �:Ll v c c o c ° E v Q p ) 'ro Q c c a) Q V O ap = ro � ro Q) C C+ 0 Q C C c c� co 4- 0 0 00 ()) 4� C� N (6 U � v bA v 2 v v v T,. v 0 Conclusion O . N U C O U 0 Q6 N - i (A �;, +- i bo C O ro V C° N ro ro i N C rru + C +_ C O i N bo ro QN V to N Q N C C C C .� N ro a 0 v' V ao x E bov c �� U v N OC O N r6 N Q O i — N C vl 00 N O O N Q Ln C Q)O ,� > .� v p E v c v V 3 ) C N O N � C C Ov 3 UI to O bo f6 C bo O C i to O C C rO C _ C to i N i L � ro r6 ° bo ro v'�i p r� N (A � � � C i O � C C E CO bA c N v 0 O ro N N C 0 C in O +J C •�--+ V C Q � C N• O O N N O p C ° C V w bo v �, V c _� O U v � p C ,C � .E O C C C •i 30 C C bo i 0 O O C- N_0 ro u E N O p vi N C apo E = fu> O C v C c a) 4, C ro c o— v— a c° C ro V +--' ro bo 7 N r--+ s' N N 4 N v 4T bo v C ro tVJ 0 � O c E v ro �_ V bo ro p O v i i . N N N to in V 'in bo bo C in v C E U ro N C— N O +' O O � V Q v i bo= N v i0 LA O D E v ru ru to O (A p E C Q O C V N � N Q)bo O '� fuC p � '� N i roC O � p M ro L �° N O C bo .� - p M bo bo U v u N �' Q N ro i C ro C C C s' C _ +� Q) ro L — N C N bo N E N r6 >� J i r6 r6 vi N c v, V) w ° E ro r6 n c m L v O C 4- \ O v C ro M V C Ln > v -,-em (A v LAQ U . o a Ln U V) 4- v v ro rou i -y VI VI C V ro C V (A p V. C U�c +- bo ro O N V)Ov NC - V v - O °' b0 v o o VE Q v- CQ v • EQ EU ro N°O O6 p Z) _Q ro 0 0 to CA N O N >p+ - O O O C • 4- Q O y nC �O in O O V) �v ( iQ� °O 0 vU V O (AOF I v p c _Ev IA N V oQ v O v LU ro >, c 0 ro ro QQ w 0 QD v ro.� j, ru ro Q ao O Z, 0 U^ in V) 0 Q v bo v o `a E v '^ v= 4 v- c o v vi Q)— c: Q) UI � 0 E — O�EE °c= . v o vv4O ro O O c Qm ro Uo-. 0 ro 0 N N �-0 N C Nwo O C � C i V bo p V o 4-• ° o bo v c ro 4- ro E 0 O �- N N C C N v •2 E � N bo � in 0 v v O p t bA C v N ° N C O by (0 C> C V O' -_0 4.1 i C N>4.1 C N C 0 N m= E bo O N��°� ��� N N V) O >; c a rroo — ° c ro ro E Q CO c to C° Q ro r6 O N H°° O O r r� 4J bo E 0 v > _0 O D m C0 -0 O C- (A i bhp .� •N ro O Q) 4- 0 C � E ro ro O c O t> E Q 0 0 Q '— ° M ro O D U +J � U N ro v v v c— QC °�' C: O N �/I D L!I a. A N O N c c4-4- M 0 o 4- v c p Q� 'c (= C Q_ v ro v (A c +J v v rO 0 E ro °+' v ra v t `� v 0 c — L rte--+ a -N �Q d (A Q 0 CO CO 4 O O Appendices \\ : � K.1 C: 3 '� / % a / \ / w e .g / I 2 / ±- e % y / \ 2 ƒ /: y 4/ ) /0 � % * % \# 7 \ y 2 e I c & 0 @ 7 _ / $ 9 § » 4 �� d ©© / s # % \ 3 f / > C 0 C: f \ ) Ln $2 2 g % § y * y \ / / * f / / / 2 ƒ j ± f 4 // \ c / e S e 2 ° $ % e $ g @ o = £ > D § 2 ƒ \ / a $ % \ \ \ ) \ k $ 0 0 § 0 / f § § \ § 2 Ln / / 2 • S # w \ = 2 G ¢ 'c ) .� / 0 ro £ f / / \ / ro \ D = \ / / > ƒ 2 U § § C / o \ / Al-ro / \ / m / L / 9 2 y •® 'O 2 2 Ln R g@ { / u to § \ F § ƒ / \ \ 2 ƒ / % - 2 / / / ± o ƒ g R \ \ g � / / _ / \ / § / / o / / a � � % / Q Q c % e s y I w � 2 0 - .- m % e / § o o y o V) 2\ � c o # \ t ...= z 7<# § i /\ 2 y R 2 t / ro 2 7 £ E & E (A 0 ® / 4 / e / / E 2 § 2 ° \ J E ° * 0 ) 'E 6 E - 2 0 G e % \ ° 2 2 . 2 0� 2 R S t- O\ c 9 —@ e° 6 16- I > o ° I # » / # © 9 o » 9 » o- # , e R d .2 � / 5 \ ° ƒ / / 2 / Q S g w e s g w S w a» S w E w - a a/ w E o w' e co co 4- 0 N C7 N zo zo !ql ---- 4' � ----jl 111-------- Appendices E c c N IE>, 1= O d l 1 1 J 1----ri---11 1 1 � N U d I IL^JL_ILJJJ II ' I l k J ' 1 b 1 1 J 1----ri---11 1 1 I IL^JL_ILJJJ II 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------------ �1 0 I / I I� I I - -I 000 ' O0 ' Mw I M 0i O ' � I iCD C,4 I C,4 a O I I � I O ` N 2 I I I I 11 11 I 1 I d 000c) I I -o p0o I C (ham I I I mJi IM pO � I � c I 10 N� ' 10 � N I I N I W E I I I O m � , z as I 0 N Io F/7 I -O I>1 1 N1 U ICI I L 11 I O I � I I � I I L I 11 vo I I •Q 1 1 Q) I I 2) 0 N Io m 0 N I N cc E� I o 2 w l I N a l I C I O I c 0N 1 I �' I O C, , E I , Q C I I U w � , a E I ~ JJ `-r 1 Y 1 I O 1 1 O 1 L 1 1131 1 p I � I 1 E 1 I I U I , � 1 N I Up IIiEI , (U II 0 1 , 4� II N I /4� 111� I I WAt N I I I (3)II O I C� I 'a�llal Q 1 0 1 ' •�� 111 �� II N I VJ W III � 1 � I , 4� II Y I IQ II Q I I � I N 1a 1 ^W' , A I I MC Ln I , L --II (6 I , � I�^I I a I , v I II I � I ' (3) Z3 II I Z3 0 N Io m 0 N I N cc E� I o 2 w l I N a l I C I O I c 0N 1 I �' I O C, , E I 1 Y 1 I O 1 1 O 1 L 1 1131 1 p I � I 1 E 1 I I U I , � 1 N I Up IIiEI , (U II 0 1 , 4� II N I /4� 111� I I WAt N I I I (3)II O I C� I 'a�llal Q 1 0 1 ' •�� 111 �� II N I VJ W III � 1 � I , 4� II Y I IQ II Q I I � I N 1a 1 ^W' , A I I MC Ln I , L --II (6 I , � I�^I I a I , v I II I � I ' (3) Z3 II I Z3 � I z 00 00 I I N I I I I > I IIS i IOI U 01 I � IIw1 LL I 'o' �I L NI IiE1 0 a1 II 7 � I I O I II Q II 7 F ��1 I OQ2 I I� Iia W N^ I I Q I I A •� ' I � I I � u L ,I uI I I U Q I Y N cl cI 06 -': (4 i N aI 4:- ,4� V(3) (�3)^ �.�+./ � I 11 N 11 Z3 (10 CD (3) ~I OI = Z UJ 00 00 F ---- o -, coo MM i iM Oi N ' O N ' ,O N�-(gt�l N d ON 1 i i O ` N 2 ' 1-1 Ellillili=-��i�o Will Millim —ml 0 CL d a O � 0 0 O a) Ln � CL 0 a a) O ai y O O a3 �Y C C O C O d 2 U a) d O C E > m U _ U O_ d In N O_ a 0 o a m CL o aU O In as a) .O In a O a o a)O a > > o fl o o_ E � a a3 O C q > O i O a3 O a O Z w a) a O a O O �E� E a��� E g a0 y EoE a v I >-0� 0O � In Q > m a E o E > a) O a) E . O a5 O O a3 Y U Oo Y w O o C Y N a3 L a o o In O a E o a0 a) o T (n J O O O U 0E O O O (n y 00 N O y w Z 3 m e O o Q O o w E O E w mw of O 0 w 0 a E � a ME M." Y d m Q 0 0 U) a � E _ w Q) 0 o Z o ° o > w E a OU O a T - O U w n LLJ a O N a) O m U LO CE U N o a) r O m EL > NLLJ d O LL N o 2 I': E oo a 6 L E J J 00 00 ----Lo-- 00o 0 o O N c N ) N d NN 0= o' Z ) IM Oli E NII D M I � I OI I .� C o O --gI U O N OI I O 4� E L U N �I EI of i1 O N yl N O L O Ln N I 0 I > yl II N li U w o LL y � ILII I4 -+ Z3 al o aI I i O I z of �� I O Y U (13 4- I C I Y I I S I N 45 4- N N ~I L I I N 4- N O 'N D Ali D wl Q Z 0 0 O U a3 �y oc aU O as a) � co 3 > o o o_ E � J � m q > O i O a3 9 O E C o 0 m U 3 O C) E > o E g a0 y w a v o 0O E — -' OT cn O > a) O a) E . O a5 O O a3 Y U Oo Y w o U Y U p m C > O_ t0/! N a3 L Y U � o o In O a E o a0 a) 0 Ina) a � J O O O U O U) O O O y U LL, a3 O U mIn N O U O L o Z m Z O o o O 0 w 0 o E a) E Q a _ O a 0 w U) Z a) O O a) OO E E O U O O O a O N a) O m U()'— o a) r i a LLJ a o a N o N 2)In LLJ Jin L E J J 2 N M 4.-2)2 (O 00 00 ----Lo-- 00o 0 o O N c N ) N d NN 0= o' Z ) IM Oli E NII D M I � I OI I .� C o O --gI U O N OI I O 4� E L U N �I EI of i1 O N yl N O L O Ln N I 0 I > yl II N li U w o LL y � ILII I4 -+ Z3 al o aI I i O I z of �� I O Y U (13 4- I C I Y I I S I N 45 4- N N ~I L I I N 4- N O 'N D Ali D wl Q Z O E I Ili I O U m 4� 0 OI z �0 , L D NodI � U 4••+ �? O I (n •�J I L 4- N N L--0 I 4 U N N', � W, L 0 0 co I W I I--- I I 1 � I M 1 � 1 O_ CL o a o; T> 1,N o a o o a 0 I ��1 � O 1 Ln C I 'O I ' ^ LI I I M m CL a ib m l o l I 10 I �' I O I I Q u I I it I I 1 I M QV IIW^^ I C a I_ ^' I a r J N 0 0 co I W I I--- I U M � O_ CL o a I W I I--- I 00 00 1 N I I > 1 � 1YI O O • V I I � I > OI O N1 1�1 LU o � Nq V II11oI1 °Illy z °IIIoI EI1� 1 OQ 1 I � L: 0 1111 a 11 11 p 1 f1•C Y U V 11 M 4-1 d 11 COL 1 1Y �I1Ilo)I1 I� 01j��1 I� �11I��11 1 4- N 11 wM1 1 N � I,I1 a) Cc: 4. U 1I a 1 Ln o h n 3 O 0 E LL di L I I I Q lit Z 1 __1 U M � O_ CL o a U i o o a 0 a O �N o Ln M E m CL a ib m > Y O orf -0 E U M J C Sa c a 3m O N C O y In o a O M a E CA C o C Y O L O U 6 M o > a) E E r m O Q U) O d — M a Y w a O o O a o > L m o Y O � o °' M In U U O m M E° U 3 C O_ O a O N M w U Y a a U O O � w w M � O M M _ O � U) a7 'E o m W z a a 0 O OaN O U o � , o y0 U Q U E - O E m in N O U N i C c -M o E a r o ?j E OU > O o E a) -a 0 z — 0 U) L ) m O o c.3 O aU m z O o o m m a �_ ° m o a a m E° E o OO U O N O 0 U X CLd (J U o a E W a N a a N U)U CL M p N z N o CL o f o O U O J i U) L a O J a L W o m M " a QN °) L E a O N O E H U > O CL O) J a) Q C M W E m 2 0 ao 6 00 00 1 N I I > 1 � 1YI O O • V I I � I > OI O N1 1�1 LU o � Nq V II11oI1 °Illy z °IIIoI EI1� 1 OQ 1 I � L: 0 1111 a 11 11 p 1 f1•C Y U V 11 M 4-1 d 11 COL 1 1Y �I1Ilo)I1 I� 01j��1 I� �11I��11 1 4- N 11 wM1 1 N � I,I1 a) Cc: 4. U 1I a 1 Ln o h n 3 O 0 E LL di L I I I Q lit Z 1 __1 M O_ U i o 0 a O �N o M E J m > Y O orf -0 E U M J C � m � 3m O N C O y m a O M a E m o M a r o o E c Q U) > Y w a O o O O 0 d L m o Y O a U In U U O m M U N C O_ O m d C O a) M mca c M a w M 0)E c o U) a7 'E o m W O a 0 L OaN M o 3 CL E Y O z O m a o w o c -M o E a r o o In E o a E Q > 0 a — 0 C c> o W M � '0)w 'y E m m 0) a �_ z m am m E° E o OO U O N O 0 U X CLd (J U .- o — a) W a N a N C7 O > M U - LO E m M U O J i U) L a) > N Y O J W 2 N M V w 3 00 00 1 N I I > 1 � 1YI O O • V I I � I > OI O N1 1�1 LU o � Nq V II11oI1 °Illy z °IIIoI EI1� 1 OQ 1 I � L: 0 1111 a 11 11 p 1 f1•C Y U V 11 M 4-1 d 11 COL 1 1Y �I1Ilo)I1 I� 01j��1 I� �11I��11 1 4- N 11 wM1 1 N � I,I1 a) Cc: 4. U 1I a 1 Ln o h n 3 O 0 E LL di L I I I Q lit Z 1 __1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION W m 0 Ow H T- LD o OO UW Wp U CU O a Q z I=mo N O W Z H Y p o C0 z s XO g CD W U W m 0 Ow H T- LD o OO UW Wp U NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION w H Q w Uw X_j wm. 0 z� Q � c� z Z w H 73 cow Xco wQ m 00 2� w 0 CU z z ='= �y F- 0 0 a Q W Y J Q O � W X CD p W w H Q w Uw X_j wm. 0 z� Q � c� z Z w H 73 cow Xco wQ m 00 2� w 0 NOTFORCONSTRUCTION CD p rn c� a W Z J Y U sCD�C �mz J Q O� LL (� (Dz z�- w W w MOO J H0 zWLL O<w QO QQ 0LL J w J (� Q Q co z LLl oll� 411- 4e oll NOTFORCONSTRUCTION CD ='= N m Q �y WJ J fn Q s D a� W Q W J m in Q Z J � J 00 00 J 0 LL Z 0 D z OQ �m J W Ct) 0 73 w w NOTFORCONSTRUCTION LU � LUcn CD G a �= am w Y U 0 M o LU s co Co cl z Qm J Q J J H Z Q 0< H 0 W Z Z D Z 0LL 0 wz z� J J Q o �U U Z C NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I�N LU LU z a a p N LU LU LU LU fn Z + zCD0 J r J LU LL 0 z0 co W Q m J O J~O J W Q Wz H z w LL 0 C0 0 W p H Wd < O z2� z oz W Ll NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION L CD F- cn z LU 0 D CD Cli) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Go CD N i Cl) w 04 0 0 D 0 w LL V.1 W z < co 0 0 LL cl z C\j 0 w cl NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION |%\ § CD § } § S �~ D ; L « Cz� . ( } a cm })))} �< o(1) a2 R/ _ w w 0 i -i e \ �D -i o WWW //o m73 \w CQZ zZ < NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION loN F- cn w LL D CD z 0 7-> w cl cl z m in w 0 0 -i LL cl z C\j w D 0 0- u NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Co a J cn W L) D LL z W C-4 > NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I�N J N W LU H a Q �y cn _jJ W Y LLL Q s o �C pp W Q N H Q �OC9 UUP Z OOOQO LL LL LL C) �,.� W � W W Z W W 73 pOW LL W NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ct) OZ 2 7—> w D C) —i 0 < TO 00 0 LL LL-i C) oz w C\j M (9 w z D �- O_ x w L: cn w LL D _� NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION W Z w 0 0 -i LL cl w Cl) w D 0 0- Ct) z 0 0 cl z Ll J cn wL) D LL w W Z w 0 0 -i LL cl w Cl) w D 0 0- Ct) z 0 0 cl z Ll NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LU LL LU F - o F- 00 0 cn —J LU —i 0 D F- LU cf) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION cl z LL 0 0 w 3: w z 14 z cn LU LL o D F- 0 C0 Appendices Z M O N O N U c� a� Z CL w 0 LL0 w D N N w w 0 Cl) Z ti W � W Z N W Q W 2 F— X0 X 0 LU W W F- LU WLU LU U) 0 w Y 0 w CL Z M O N O N U c� a� Z CL w 0 LL0 w D N N w w ; $; \............. . $ WW!\!) . DO: ZZ: �\ / - » `\ �e e/« Dmww / __ 1. j , 2 \\j ^ LL ..............................................,;: - § §!\22 ) ! ! (\^ (.\:;; .;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; }\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ < ` i - ow - | : \ « \( ; §�. _:,, ,.................................... / )\\ ) ^ z~ o Z ag :L Lu HE IOH ry =a o _ $ 3P Qo r W� f�D.�- ®®®"m"m"m E4 Sg"m"m K J ; e M; q ysp; a°awwc�itl= _ �a&:ye®eg i�'E,ee?a 5 k �oDNHu - Now�Oa � Q W vi ~ G S� ♦�, w �� �d �� �'���s3klfitltlbY���' �yy� ; ¢' � � � - � �_ a d d` d Uz1H. af3aaa -I) lata-elrzr Nld (los A®1 ' err 133a1s�N33na ' I ! as _ � a (ereuvz al esn easr .xr�-.ca na a3N3rrex) 2°n...l,� 6i I I p I S al n O � a ¢ _ a 4 p A Z ! �I 3 tsz..ecxx cc,l w �m � U 1 5@ S M 4 5 O N V l d tl d I 91 I I I �I ` II (tOs Ns -Id tl]N315g3d ,iB �33at5.INON/i0/) 11 ------- 13 Adis olaviNo IL" a® m L Lu Z ag :HE SOy W 3� O - _$a§ 444 a o0 -o W, J ; e%M; E4 Sg q K� $(i� ysp; $a&:ye®eg a°awwc�itl= _ d i$'E,ee?a hyo `o NY! e e� � y sY Dopy � y�gZ, e�hy, R ray 'mrvy �. nm .a ilk: :�i'Fl3 ?S a S Mail 5 z 4n � E4Y€PYPYPP5444P 4 ¢ Po. h� � � X j oFQr�Oz ¢i—V1 � � z� oa �"N' � tltl MYYMtlXMtltlXtltltl tl tl �, C ����yb� 8 - �o � ai � � 5 s � 0�y gg. g���� qq$ � •• �- � w d ~Q WuiH6 % a W �,... se 5 des koldl2'�r "ea{ a daKdU¢ ffi: vih s z a j�,� (10� NMM 03b3(Sg3N A6J - �(`�)fl N33no 5 a ii tit" �-- "°^';pro a �••° �' "° S; ,�.., b �, �.r -.<.— --- s �! � � C Fapay 414 L d.4 Y � m Fido � a _ ._- ... I 3� O d hyo `o e e� � y sY Dopy � y�gZ, e�hy, R ray 'mrvy �. nm .a "ei4,I,��m Po. ws> w d L.L MRlo o - ------------------ — __--- ft o �I � nlw o 09= w 1. EF' — omo e mrv- O� ZN= °o€=4'se a° o o -I opo awm oF a H Ll o mo 11 Elo El EIE1[a 11 lo — Q U) 1 W 7 D 12 lloulo 11 o o 5 WFG o i Ng ="$i' t = '�. ', .• I — seg �go» Qo Q CD O Q — rwl w w 0000s -2 o; N fNo a r W J " ° HM ='=°'° o `3 a haw o o 30� - a o sw - w - - - ®®®®mmm o � LL `g,; _ mo nr o mm a Iw Q p oo ®®®®���.T�.. ,w �T z E 133HIS N33no 31noa 3?JI3 inoeanonn daeoiinoe isp E- o I Nn Mro1N3 � e - ------------------ — __--- ft o �I � nlw o 09= w 1. EF' — omo e mrv- 0. 00 oo a - ¢ o �w� wo= �R o -I opo awm oF a H Ll o mo 11 Elo El EIE1[a 11 lo Q U) 1 W 7 D 12 lloulo 11 o o p� I ol o L � m oe so ans 3..SZ bZ .BZN 3 _ 4a3� vis3o asp �i v 1® .O ft o �I � nlw 1. 1W IK W W U) 1 W 7 D 12 11 p� I ol o o �E '�. ', .• I L � m oe so ans 3..SZ bZ .BZN 3 _ 4a3� vis3o asp �i v . . . . . ... ... Lu Lu €'6' —of na sso ,,,, — ` ``✓J 8 — xo ! oo oo cn LU LL s`w" 133HIS N33no am ssoss - =z ssss� oz z�zY m m - 00 3 - `I LLm ® ® 10 -9je w a0, ala ur Li o -o Y I _ E 3 I v I L— — I�= �� m D rc �� 11I z a l I � I_ I I o � e a ae a z 00 a pw_o o - A . eso, 5 M. °�'I -wa; I - 8 I � W � I ios M. a��� aI of do dwva Ar- as I I - a 4 I ¢ o a I g` s,. w z f ;I �Aa _ �w o pq oll - f0 10 �' �nvnnr omoo� r . . wbesb 3.si bi "si lv AA A A = - nns LvzzE onv�o moe i+ n 1 oa LO Sb° ° : ani 3.04 b0.0EN m o : zo x xx ---------------- .41 o0 a a o7.0 =�� —- - �a I \ oory a -� 44 t 'i o'E� moi b I—�,,, IS o 30� o E o .sa 3Q - ��m=� I -- fi fq 10 -9je w a0, ala ur Li o -o Y I _ E 3 I v I L— — I�= �� m D rc �� 11I z a l I � I_ I I o � e a ae a z 00 a pw_o o - A . eso, 5 M. °�'I -wa; I - 8 I � W � I ios M. a��� aI of do dwva Ar- as I I - a 4 I ¢ o a I g` s,. w z f ;I �Aa _ �w o pq oll - f0 10 �' �nvnnr omoo� r . . wbesb 3.si bi "si lv AA A A = - nns LvzzE onv�o moe i+ n 1 oa W W r Ege_ 4sr,B L �o� wop lo ��///��� o" g QO K �� DVa WHIM � — — <� — a ooec Niw 'Yw � � oo s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z o> w ®®® d 3� J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss E�sE,ee.a a w LO Sb 3.0440 v0EN fI I II I -------- a� _ _ a .oll -611 ---------------- o o lo -Ww" Ww ow Nor - o ff"�. o o.�a o o a W w rr -�> olo w° G ff ff ° o -o, of NMOO dWVtl V L I e -Uh� �y I 0 V 6 W-1 SL I—I N a —WA eNIUS- IV— LobE Loos i+ W W r Ege eg8 L L J L J Icy Dl1) F aB— — _ =C C= — pooaENw �"o - W e ga °' - W 0001 000lo 0000 a' LL 1NQ a f�°° `€ C Y an i Y ®®®0000 �W 3rn 1: JA LL Sa&aYe- i TTYTYTTT� ff a°aaww° J °°10 ` r 11 c��Q Z n _ K —oJHW d 10, ��zl 3; a. zl =v L� a �o o e m� o lo ® ml oJ�W a�Lo °� I� —J ^I �a _ r _ _ att ao � a a LL � w of I ❑ � IN z� �z o o rp p o d test 3�91I—IN 0 00 m -e coca 1 op W W r Ege_ 4sr,B L r`ga E63"'^''^^.'`^^� ��//�� � o" gI�� QO K �� DV/ a WHIM � — — <� — a ooec lvlw 'Yw � � oo s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z o> w ®®® o 3� J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss E�sE,ee.a a .oll -611 p o b a»>o a»>o Iwo »>o O10 F �� ol I _ � El �o sE 03 oc 19 00, __--rV I --—_`JD air—-—= � ❑ ml D- OJs I� D I �I a o — � E� a z I ®J� o Or. ❑ wa oocI �°° o � �\ %61o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o "A5 '°II II II II II II II II � II II II II II II II II w bEsb 391I—IN llvwl C rc o - m -e coca I. o — W W r Ege_ 4sr,B L �o� wop lo ��///��� o" g QO K �� �Va WHIM � — — <� — a ooec Niw 'Yw � � LLoo Q s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z — o 000�m '� o> .WQ �a w ®®® d 3rn J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss E�sE,ee.a a V II II II I1� I ®v s,v s,v ®v • rW .oll -611 IME - _- I � 1 ❑ Ors___= 0 n ®r0 oc 19 oc 19 --r ool ——_- 0 TI oo IE o 3I vo ��`_-—— ❑ 3 --'IN a 0 r� o EI 1°° LL� Er n0 \�� ioec o� I o 11 11 1 11 11 11 11 11 �A5 '°11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 � � s test 3,91�IIN is —WA eNIUS- IV— m- e Z016I. op W W r Ege_ MiNklit ZZ: N-on—gol ��//��� QO K �� DV/ `gib - - - a ooec Niw 'Yw o oo Q Hm` " f � 2 s;➢p,x;ea 3N =� C=z - o 000�m '� o> ®®® o 3rn J s'f'Sgpy a a a nz qgawe_�n. L a°aww° tl �a&:Y ee ap nnss nn�v nnss __ _ } w E�sE,LL ee.a a ISI _ 2 Eloool IHom�lo I� �i 3 I ue 3 C al Iry ZI IZ wbEsb 3�siI—EN is rc 00 I^1 II I\ L®vim 0 I^1 II 11 L�v� 0 I^1 II 11 L�v� 0 I^1 II 11 L®uJZZ 0 Stl3 �Ol� I^1 II 11 nFl�v� 0 I^1 II 11 ��v� 0 Inl II 11 L®uJnnF 0 � � 11 oA ❑ - - _®JD w "=z Y = 0 EI 100 — _ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � �¢ A5 '°11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 00 op WW�o� V SSS . . ... . o 00 DN I8�;°I;e — _ 00000000 Eu®®® /*3�� nnss nn�v nnss e� ml Im o 3I o 3 oflo IN z� �z JIM test 3�91I—IN I� 00- 1119 rc 00 o� $ O r ae r O I n OOl9 o El o� z_ I "i � m�z U ¢ o oe o0 0 o I El EEHF o lI V rc li 4 0 0 Im . . . . ... . LU Lu Do zz: / - o o o w o D U) W, OR \22222 o u-ow. 02 LL i'T — -- — -- — -- — — — -- — -- — L ---------------------------------- -- d \ e --------------------------------- 0 o 0, 0�1 E. wl- 0 < < \ \ (< 7, -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — W-1 9E I-- ho� 96911 00960 1161 -9 IV- � \ �� 2� . y d� � \/� \. \�\\. III ITT1 � I I 1.1.111 ILII -I swl 111i!i!iIiie:!IE-.::: 11 —isOM1. ——— . i_Illlljllljjllljlljijll –1 HH11111011 .I 'illilis I illili °'i' .I ill�lie I HH111,1111 .I illilis .I i11i11L liillilias 1111 �!I1i1111in I 'i11111e 0111 I Mill 11011 .I HH1111111 .I i- I i1liieli_i .I illili'�Iis� .I illili�!Iiml .I iIIiIIiial .I illi�i'�Ii!1 ■I illil�.■?1 ■ I illiieiii_i �I illili'�Ii°11 .I illilieii'�i .I illilie 1111 .1 i11111s 1011 ■ I illilils .I i1111in .I illiliL .1 MUM 11.11 ..M1111111011 : M11111n 1011 .1 1i1 UM 11111 .I i1111is .I lillili II 1 i 11 i lei' m' �'il�1�a111:I11f1��11���11 '17 iM.1002.1 NONE 1.11 111MI ■"`"111=iiim��i��ii0i!�■i!�■i111 NOMINEES■ iiioiiil_�ii�iJii�iiill ■ iiiioiiiAliil.i!�ii!�iiill ■ 0 of 10 0 0 u in ■ ■1111■no NINE mlNONE ml■.!I0.■II ■1—mmI�JM�E�jBoom Mimi !"■.III ■11■■mmJ■■JLn.. mill ii jmi11 ■IIO■��J■■J■'iiiiJII�IIi11 ■1111■mmJ■■nI.iiii�■■Si■■111 ■1111■��LI■�L�Lit.■®i■.LEON � 1 1 ■i-■!1■■°�■■■�!�■�!i1i11 11■i.J■■�n■■�J��J�IiII IIi1..J■■J■■■■J■■J�IiII �e 1 1 MEN NINE -'\'f='Y� ■Ffi'mYPf�i'm�py®Ai1s. 1 1 ■Ii_�iiJ'iiii-�"iI�i1i11 ... rimer 1 1 ■iim�ila�.■■�!��■!�■1■11 11 ■..oi. 1■00°.'..i�n0 in 10 iii°liii'ii�iii'ii.■s�■.s�■.ii11 ■IIO■��J■■,L�.■A�■.gi■.ill ■11■■ssEnnhisir. m+i1!Ii1iI1 011■000J00mI1 0inMr !�II!illlll milmsomEsELlignmENEELl ■1111■..�i■■!i.■�■s�■■s■■■II ter• L �uv:.,T. -u- 0 ■1111■0ILl■■J iiil!�■■Si■■ill ■1111■omme I ��iJ■■J■■■II ■11■■��J■■�■■iiiJ■■�■■■II ...� •... ■nu■��!I�■!I �■■■!�■■ ��iliill I I I I loll 1 1 1 1■I 1 1 -- Ilil!fllllllllllllll�lllll .� 111111!IIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIII!!I!I!!! 1 1 RI 1 6 1! � i iii I it l i 1 1 f f i S I I �I I I 1 1 I I tl ljllll�IIIIIj!ll� IIIII�Iiili!�IiI!III!III�Ii!ijjj jll�lljjllljjlll�ll Ili�ii ' ' �l�Ill�llljll�llljjllljjlllllljjl ll l l l l i i i 1 1 i i ■_ = II 11 111 iiiii iiiiii iiiiii iiil i 11 ;Iii"Ili ill-� =■.,■■■■■�i�sn�ilil e .. iS■■u1■�9�11- . _ ■■mom -■IIIIiiL■■5■1n511511■1ilil S105111Jr■=' -■IIIIile■15■11151■5■■■eilii S100111��II- -■Illiie■15■11151■s■■■elli! 1S10011■5�1l- -■IIIIile■15■11151■9 I'm ■eiFi n e'n iS■■■11■5�11-� ■_ -■Illiie■■5■11151■5■■■el�i. I's,eS■ � n ;Iii■■111911-� ■. o�■5 -llliie■5■11151■'11011 1111 ■I n nn ■111J11-� ;IiiS■■� ■_ o� ■I ■151111,11511■elli -IIiiL5 11 1-S■■ .. IIii■11■911-� .. 1■■-- -■IIIiiL■■Sn11511511■Llli ;IiiS■■■1uL ■Illliie■■5■1n5ns11■eilil 11IiiS■00111911 ■IIIiIL■151111511911■Llli n n iS■■�■111911-� r7, ■_ o� 1111,11511■Llli -■IIIiiL■155 iS■■■11■ ■IIIiiL■151111511511ELI ilii .. ;IiiS■■■11■5�11-� . _-��� -■IIIIiIL■151111511511■Lllil ;IiiS■■■111911 ■IIIiiL■151111511511■Lili e ��� .. ;II151■■1119II- . _■��I I it -■IIIIIi1■151111511511■i5 Iii51■■11■911 HMO ■151111511911■elli '';IiiS■■1111911- -■IIIIiiLuS■111511s11■Lllil 0.100■■9 IiL■■5■■n51■9 I'm ■eilil ®. n� ■■ ' ■ _ oi51■■111911-�-■IIIIile■■1■11151■e '010 IF 'IiiS■11111911- -■IIIiiL1151111511s111eili ';Iii51■1111911- -■IIIiie■■51■n51■Sn■elli n ii1i .. ' 911-� . _ .;Iii5■111■■I -IIiIL■■5■1115119n■Lili ;Iii511■■1119II-' -■IIIIIL■111111-115111LIII 11 11- OF ;Iii51■■111911- ■ _ 1111011 -■1111ra■15!1- Iii51'Em 111911- -■IIIIiL■15■111511511■Llli Iii51111111i 11511115115111LIlii 11 ;IIe- .. i511■1111911-' . _■-- -■IIIIiL■151111511511■LIII n ii11i 9 n i5■■111 ■. o�� i -■IIIIL■151111511L11■LIII n ;IInn i511■ �■1119 ■_ o�� iL■15■111511L11■LIII n i ■ 1117111■■111911-' ■ _ o�� -■IIIIiL■15111151■5■1■LIli I e n' n ;Iii51111111911-� ■_ o� ■I -IIIiL1151111511L111L�lli n iii .. ;IIi511■1111911- ■ _ -■IIIIiL■1L1111L11L11■LIIIi 511■■1119 1IIIIiL01511115111111■LIII e e� n ;IIiL1111111911-' ■ _ r� -IIIiL■1L1111L11L- ■I 11■LIIiI ;IiiSe■■■11■911-� ■_ o�L -■IIIIie■■L■■■■,■■L■■ELI ili ;II15110011■911- -■IIIIiL■151111511L11■LIli I ='lili1i 11= =illlil"e�� !�� llil .•.•.I iia . "I II II €I =I II: II II II II II II VIII IFF1 �u .el Leel 0 II II II II CIINMI CI I a n 1€€MI €=1 _ i■u—,a■I =� .. 111111119 moll In 01,00■ IM1111 i I MINIM 1111 MINIM EMIIMIEM' iiiimm ligiom, gill llimim, iiiimm ligiol milli iiiimm MINIM 11111111 iiiimm MINIM 11111mil gill MINIM 1111111111 MINIM NN K11 11111111 HIlNM iiiimm iiiimm 1111111111 gill■m 11111111 MINIM milli iiiimm 11111111H MINIM MINIM= gig moll= ilm■ imilm 1111111111111110 NN1Ip1NM1 NUNN NNIP1111111111110 11110 HIlNM limilin 111111111 gill 1111111111 iiiimm milli iiiimm 11111111 iiiimm liginim 11111mil iiiimm limilim 11111111 MINIM liiisim 1111111111 iiiimm limill 111111 MINIM MINIM iiiimm 111111111 BONN millimil MINIM liiiiim millimil iiiimm limill millim MINIM liiiiim millimil iiiimm liginim 11111mil gill■M liiiiim 1111111111 iiiimm ligiol 1111111111 iiiimm HIS HN111111 Appendices 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Project No. 24012 Draft report issued November 17th, 2023 Final report issued December 4th, 2023 Report Prepared by: WEN a IDDIDIKU ASSOCA1 ISS =--' CONSULTING EN Page 418 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existinq Facade Retention Proiect No. 24012 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE....................................................................................................................1 3. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................1 3.1. Investigation..................................................................................................................................1 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards..................................................................................................2 3.3. Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 2 4. OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................................................................2 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs................................................................................................................3 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing..................................................................................................3 4.2.1 Columns................................................................................................................................ 3 4.2.2 Beams...................................................................................................................................4 4.3. Wall Assembly...............................................................................................................................4 4.3.1 Foundation Wall....................................................................................................................4 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall..................................................................................................5 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface........................................................................................................................6 4.5. Masonry Condition........................................................................................................................6 5. RETENTION APPROACH.................................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Sequencing...................................................................................................................................7 5.2. Temporary Bracing........................................................................................................................8 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays................................................................................8 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks............................................................................................................. 8 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Angle at Existing Floor Levels....................................................9 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices........................................................................................ 9 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing............................................................................ 9 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed....................................................................9 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes....................................................................................9 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition................................................................................................10 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams.............................................................................................10 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS...........................................................................................................11 APPENDIX A - SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS APPENDIX B - RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page i Page 419 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 1. INTRODUCTION John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar's intent is to retain the existing masonry facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), as construction of the latter progresses. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP, the draft version of which, dated June 23, 2023 and available to JCAL, requires "That the Owner's Consulting Engineer ... submit a Structural Assessment Report for 10 Duke Street West to be included within the Demolition and Stabilization Plan, ... advising on the means and methods to be used to safely remove portions of the existing building and to avoid causing structural damage to the historic portions of the front facades...". This report is intended to satisfy that requirement and be the basis to develop the design further. Designs indicated herein are not for construction but are intended to show concepts and intents that will be developed further and coordinated more closely with the new construction, during production of a set of shoring and sequencing drawings for the purposes of pricing and construction. JCAL was provided with some photographs of original drawings. These lacked several key details regarding the existing structure and JCAL first undertook an investigation to identify and confirm these details, along with condition of exposed elements that may impact the retention of the facades and the need for any restoration work that might be required in advance. This information was used in developing analytical models and the approach to the retention concept that is discussed herein. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. METHODOLOGY JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions, identified applicable codes and standards to be referenced, and completed analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in the temporary support of the fagade during the course of the new construction and retention. 3.1. Investigation Jonathan Dee, P.Eng., CAHP of JCAL made an initial visit to the site on September 6, 2023, accompanied by representatives from VanMar and mcCallumSather, the heritage architects who have completed a Heritage Impact Assessment and Conservation Plan for the subject property. Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, EIT revisited the site on October 18, 2023. Using hand -tools, investigatory openings were made in several locations where possible. Locations were identified for further investigatory openings, to be made using power tools and with the assistance of VanMar's forces. These further openings were completed by VanMar at JCAL's direction, and reviewed by Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, throughout the course of the day on October 30, 2023. The investigation included primarily of the use of a chipper to remove interior terra cotta tile and plaster wall finishes John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 420 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 to view the enclosed structural elements and details, and to remove brick from the interior side of the exterior walls, to determine the construction and condition of the existing wall assembly. 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards The primary codes, standards, and guidelines referenced during and applicable to the production of work described in this report and for further development of the retention design are as follows: • Ontario Building Code 2012, inclusive of latest effective amendments (the OBC) • Structural Commentaries of the National Building Code of Canada, including Commentary L: Application of NBC Part 4 of Division B for the Structural Evaluation and Upgrading of Existing Buildings • CSA A23.3-14 - Design of Concrete Structures • CSA A371-14 - Masonry Construction for Buildings • CSA S304-14 (R2019) - Design of Masonry Structures • CSA S16-14 - Design of Steel Structures • Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, published by Parks Canada. 3.3. Analysis The applicable wind load was calculated to OBC 2012, using a reduced importance factor of 0.75 for calculating loads for serviceability and deflections. It is our opinion that seismic loading may be neglected during construction, given the brief construction period relative to the 2500 -year return period for code -specified seismic loads. However, seismic considerations are relevant in the permanent attachment of the facades to temporary elements that may remain as part of the permanent structure. The applicable seismic load was calculated in accordance with OBC Article 4.1.8.18 for building elements and non- structural components. The applicable seismic loads were calculated, using seismic Site Class C as recommended in the geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.), and it was determined the above -noted wind forces govern design. Rigidity and stiffness requirements for the lateral support of the masonry generally governed design, and the limitations stipulated in CSA A371 were followed, of U600 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is perpendicular to the bed joints (i.e., for bending in the vertical direction of the wall) and L/300 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is parallel to the bed joints (i.e. for bending in the horizontal direction of the wall). Analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in retaining of the facades was carried out using procedures identified in the above -noted standards documents and using Bentley STAAD structural analysis software. 4. OBSERVATIONS Observations made during our investigation that relate to the retention of the existing facades are documented below. Sketches of key typical existing details are included in Appendix A. The building's structure consists of one-way flat concrete slabs, spanning on steel floor beams. These beams are supported on two interior east -west lines of structural steel columns and, on the load bearing exterior walls at the perimeter of the building. A further general description of the building is otherwise documented in the Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan and is not repeated here. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 421 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs The existing floor slabs were hammer drilled. While only a relatively small drill bit was available, these were measured as accurately as possible and found to be 127 mm (5") thick and are believed to be overlain with a bonded floor topping for leveling, which is assumed to be on average 25 mm (1 ") thick. The floor slabs span in the east -west direction, between floor beams. These slabs were not scanned for reinforcing steel, but we believe they would contain smooth reinforcing steel bars parallel to the span direction, and temperature steel reinforcement in the opposite direction. 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing 4.2.1 Columns The building's columns are generally clad with terra cotta tile and plaster. Occasionally this has been overclad with newer drywall and steel studs. Openings were made to expose the structural steel columns within, at • three locations above the Ground floor level, • two locations above the 2nd floor level, and • one location above the 31d floor level. The key findings are that the column steel is generally exposed behind the terra cotta tile, with no additional concrete encasing or coatings beyond the grey paint (see Fig. 1). A column splice, suspected to be present but not otherwise documented, was found at both openings made just above the 2nd floor level (see Fig. 2), and not at any of the openings on other floors. This splice location is believed to be typical at all columns and may act as a hinge in the column if not laterally supported in both directions at all times. 0 Fig 2: Typical column splice, above 2nd floor Below the splice, the columns were found to be wide flange profiles with welded top and bottom flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 225 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 19 mm, and the cover plates to be approx. 12 mm thick and 260 mm wide. These may be historic US 8" WF @ 58lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x71 sections, plus the cover plates as measured, which is a similar but conservative selection. Above the splice, at the 3rd floor opening the upper columns were found to be wide flange profiles with no flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 200 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 12 mm. These may be historic US 8" John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 422 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 WF @ 31 or 35 lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x46 sections, which is a similar but slightly conservative selection. 4.2.2 Beams The steel floor beams, present interior column lines and with an additional beam at the mid -span of each bay, were understood to bear on the exterior masonry walls. These beams are generally clad in metal lath and plaster with exposed steel beyond. Openings in the ceiling and wall finishes around a typical beam were made below the 3rd floor beam bearing on the south exteriorwall. Lath and plasterwas removed and the interior wythes of brick were removed adjacent to the beam (see Fig. 3). As expected based on available documentation, but of significant value to the project to definitively confirm, no steel column within the wall was located. A steel bearing plate is present below the beam, and the beam was found to bear approximately 200 mm (8"), or the full depth of the two interior wythes of backup brick (see Fig. 4). Additionally, the top flanges of the floor beams are noted to be embedded above the soffit of the slab. z� tee: Fig 3: Typical beam bearing on brick backup at exterior wall 4.3. Wall Assembly 4.3.1 Foundation Wall tx 4 h !_a.• a 9-:.. il? ! 1 J? i3 rl Fig 4: Typical beam bearing length on exterior wall The foundation wall assembly was investigated at the interior of the basement, toward the east end of the south foundation wall, by removing a portion of the interior plaster and terra cotta (see Fig. 5). The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, and the • concrete foundation wall. Naturally, the removals did not extend through the concrete wall, but the exterior is finished with limestone, which is presumably bearing on a ledge in the concrete foundation wall. Dovetail tracks were noted to be present on the interior face of the concrete foundation wall, and one dovetail anchor was found extending into the terra cotta tile (see Fig. 6). This may suggest that dovetail anchors were used on the exterior stone as well, and future masonry conservation work should be mindful of the fact that dovetail anchors from this period are prone to inconsistent placement and corrosion. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 423 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Fig 5: Opening in terra cotta tile at foundation wall, interior Fig 6: Looking down at opening, dovetail anchor 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall The above -grade load-bearing masonry walls were investigated from the interior, primarily with brick removals completed above the 2nd floor level, near the east end of the north wall, 2nd floor (see Figs. 7 and 8). The interior brick was very difficult to remove and therefore only one opening was made, and conditions were otherwise exposed during investigations of beam pocket and slab -wall interface. The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, • two wythes of concrete brick backup masonry, laid in common bond, and the • exterior wythe of clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The interior terra cotta tile was noted to be anchored to the backup brick by way of corrugated ties, as one of these was located in the removal area. No ties were noted between backup wythes or to the exterior brick, and the brick wythes are believed to be tied together solely by way of header bricks. Fig 7: Removals at above -grade masonry wall, interior Fig 8: Angled view of opening shown in Fig 7. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 424 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Determining the slab -wall interface is important to defining a removal methodology that will not impact the integrity of the existing walls and to determining a temporary and permanent approach to laterally securing these walls. Removal of the interior terra cotta to expose the interior side of the backup brick masonryjust above the slab was completed in two locations at the 2nd floor (see Figs. 9 and 10). The interior brick was removed in one location and the slab was noted to extend into the backup masonry. The terra cotta wall tile bears on the slab, and a topping appears to have been placed overtop of the slab. It's likely that the exterior brick wall was built up to the underside of slab level with the slab poured directly onto it. We do not believe that removing the existing slab from the exterior walls is necessary and that doing so may result in unnecessary damage to heritage fabric. Fig 9: Removals at slab level, S wall, above 2nd floor 4.5. Masonry Condition Fig 10: Add'I removals of interior finishes at slab level The backup brick masonry, consisting of the two interior wythes of concrete brick laid in common bond, where exposed in the above -noted investigatory openings, appeared to be in very good condition. Joints were well filled with mortar, including collar joints, the bricks and mortar were intact, and it was quite difficult to remove individual bricks. The exterior wythe of brick consists of an extruded clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The mortar joints are generally intact and in good condition, though there are localized areas of debonding and erosion. No signs of systemic delamination or outward displacement of the exterior wythe was noted, and it appears to be well bonded to the backup brick masonry. The vertical brick piers in the exterior wythe of brick project slightly towards the exterior. We suspect that this projection is created by simply thickening the collar joint between the exterior and backup wythes. There is also a continuous vertical mortar joint up each side of these piers where they interface with the adjacent brick masonry. While this might be cause for some concern, a header is present at every other course and this is believed to be a true header, tying the wythes together and no systematic separation is noted along these piers. See Figures 11 and 12. No investigation was carried out of the exterior stone cladding at cornices, foundation level, etc. Given the age of the building, these may be keyed into the backup masonry and/or anchored to the backup brick using strap or cramp anchors. Often in buildings of this age anchorage was only provided to the top of the stones. However, no systemic issues were observed of displacement of the stones, and no special care is believed to be required for these in terms of the retention. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 425 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 0-, Fig 11: Typical projection at brick pier 5. RETENTION APPROACH Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Fig 12_Typical continuous vertical joint at brick pier The overall approach to retaining the existing facades is to retain these in-situ while the new building is constructed within the footprint of the existing. In order to minimize retention costs and impact to exterior areas along the facades, the retention will make use of the existing structural steel framing along the walls to be retained. This will be supplemented with new temporary steel bracing and lateral support members. The existing floors will then be removed and replaced with new floors, at matching levels, at which point the lateral support of the existing walls may be transferred to these new floors. 5.1. Sequencing Careful sequencing of the work is a key factor in the successful retention of the existing facades in-situ and is necessary to ensure that overall stability and adequate lateral support of the facades to be retained is maintained at all times. The order of operations is anticipated to proceed generally as follows: 1. Remove existing terra cotta tile and interior finishes to enable access to backup masonry and enclosed structural steel elements that will be part of temporary bracing system. 2. Core or cut holes in the roof and floors at piers and install vertical strongbacks from above, using a crane, at the interior face of the existing walls to be retained, where indicated, with a. full -height (spliced) strongbacks at braced bays and b. partial -height strongbacks at unbraced bays 3. Install temporary steel framing, including a. diagonal bracing within existing structural bays where bracing is identified to be installed, b. lateral bracing in both directions at all existing column splices, where existing columns are identified to be retained, c. lateral support angles to interior face of backup masonry, above all floor levels, and which angles will ultimately become part of the permanent anchorage for these fagades. 4. Create separation cuts in the existing fagade walls, at points where the existing facades will no longer be retained. 5. Complete the demolition of the portions of the building not to be retained or temporarily to remain as part of the temporary support system, including the facades (salvaging any stone or other material indicated for such), and following an engineered demolition plan. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 7 Page 426 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. Construct the raft slab in the basement, encasing the base of the remaining existing columns within the raft slab and securing the raft slab to the exterior foundation wall. 7. Remove and replace floors along the interior of the facades to be retained, one at a time, by: a. anchoring the vertical strongback at the unbraced bays to the wall at the position indicated, centered on the slab to be removed, b. saw -cutting the existing concrete slab to be demolished to free it from the walls to be retained, c. temporarily shoring and then cutting close to the walls the existing steel beams bearing on the walls to be retained, d. placing the new structural slab, casting around the columns to be temporarily retained, e. securing the new slab to the lateral support angles placed above each floor level, and f. repeating at the next floor, above. 8. Remove temporary steel bracing and strongback members, leaving the now -permanently affixed lateral support angles. 9. Cut off existing columns that were temporarily retained above the top of the raft slab, remove the columns, and infill new slab openings around them. 5.2. Temporary Bracing The lateral support of the facades to remain during construction will make use of the existing structural steel, supplemented with temporary steel framing, as described below. 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays The existing column lines inboard of the fagade walls to be retained will remain in-situ until the walls are laterally supported by the new permanent structure. Several of these column bays will be braced, in both the north -south and east -west directions, with new diagonal bracing members installed between the 2nd and 3,d levels, and from the 3,d floor to the roof level. At unbraced bays, the existing and new slabs will act as diaphragms, to transfer lateral forces collected at these bays to the braced bays, noted above. The bracing approach, developed to minimize the amount of bracing that is required, relies on the column bases to be encased within the raft slab, effectively resulting in a fixed connection. 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks As confirmed during our investigation, there are no existing steel columns within the exterior walls to be retained. Vertical strongbacks, steel members placed against and anchored to the interior face of the walls, will be introduced at each column line along the walls to be retained, in order to serve the following functions: • resolve axial tension and compression forces at braced bays, especially in order to resist tension forces that would otherwise be induced in the masonry by the diagonal bracing, • bring forces collected by the lateral support angles at demolished floor levels to the diaphragms above and below the strongback, and • provide an attachment point for the lateral support members perpendicular to the wall that brace the column splices to permit removal of the 2nd floor slab. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 8 Page 427 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 The strongbacks will be installed from above, through vertical pockets cored or cut into existing slabs at the interior face of the exterior walls, directly adjacent to the existing floor beams on column lines. At braced bays, the strongbacks will be effective for the full height of the walls, with a splice between 2nd and V floor levels. At the base of the strongback, they will be vertically and laterally anchored to the raft slab and/or inside face of the existing foundation wall. At unbraced bays, the strongbacks will be set and repositioned as required to bridge from a removed floor to remaining and new floor diaphragms above and below, respectively. 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Anale at Existina Floor Levels An angle will be placed along the full lengths of the walls to be retained, directly above each existing floor level, and anchored to the interior face of the walls with HILTI HIT-HY 270 or similar adhesive anchors. The angle will span horizontally between vertical strongbacks on column lines. This angle is anticipated to be fairly large at L203x203x19, in order to meet stiffness requirements for lateral masonry support in this condition when slabs are removed. Upon completion of each new floor slab, this angle and its anchorage to the wall will remain and be secured to the new floor slab. 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices As noted in the observations section above, column splices were found above the 2nd floor level, at roughly the mid -height of the overall column, and this is believed to be typical of all existing columns. These splices will become unbraced upon removal of the 2nd floor. It is necessary to ensure that lateral support remains in place at these splices, until the new 2nd floor structure is completed and may restrain the column or, if lateral support from the 2nd floor is not possible, until the existing column is no longer required. The lateral bracing will consist of a horizontal steel member, spanning between all column splices along the column line parallel to the wall, and ultimately supported by a braced bay in that column line. In the direction perpendicular to the wall, the splice will be braced by a member that spans from the splice to the steel strongback at the interior face of the wall. The bracing member will be sized in accordance with the strength and stiffness requirements in steel handbook's procedure for bracing assemblies, in accordance with CSA S16 clause 9.2.6.2. 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing There are isolated conditions where the typical bracing pattern may not apply, or may conflict with vertical elements in the new construction, such as stair and elevator shafts. These details will be developed as the concept is pushed into further design and as comprehensive temporary framing drawings are produced. Further coordination with the overall building consultants will be required. We anticipate providing additional steel framing around these elements, or resizing of specific members to resist intermediate loads, should it not be possible to work around temporary framing, or where these new elements may not be relied upon to provide temporary lateral support. 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes The terra cotta wall tiles and interior plaster finishes, along with recent steel studs and gypsum board, as well as original and more recent ceiling finishes will need to be removed John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 9 Page 428 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 from most areas in order to install members needed for the temporary stabilization of the walls to be retained. These components are not load bearing, and they may be removed without impact to the balance of the wall assemblies or structural systems that must remain temporarily. Care must still be taken to make sure removal is completed safely, and to not leave sections of terra cotta tile vertically unsupported. 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition The portions of the existing facades to remain must be separated from those portions that are to be demolished, prior to demolition. We propose to make this separation by way of saw -cutting, at an appropriate mortar joint line in the exterior wythe, in a position that will not leave partial bricks or stone fragments with less than a 1:1 aspect ratio of length to course height. The saw cut will penetrate the full depth of the masonry wall assembly. Upon completion of the cutting, it will be necessary to consolidate the wall ends, by raking out any loose mortar and filling these and any existing voids with new mortar. Additional anchorage will also be provided to secure the cut ends of any stone units to the backup brick. Finally, we recommend temporarily capping the wall ends with plywood and a membrane, to mitigate water infiltration and any resulting damage until these ends are permanently tied into the building's wall envelope. 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams The portions of floor slabs to be demolished must be separated from those portions that will remain temporarily as part of the bracing system. We propose that this be achieved by saw -cutting, in continuation of the line of cutting in the walls. As the existing floor slabs and beams are pocketed into the facades to be retained, we propose to cut these free at the appropriate times, by saw -cutting along the slab edge near to the wall, and by cutting the beams free from the walls. The remaining stubs of slabs and beams would remain in the walls. While the slabs are concrete and pose little concern, the beam ends do carry the potential for future corrosion, causing future corrosion jacking of the masonry to be preserved. However, we note that where exposed, the embedded beam end showed only minimal surface corrosion, we noted no significant evidence of corrosion jacking at present. Additionally, the effort and impact to the heritage fabric from attempting to remove these beam ends now would be similar to the effort required to complete this work in the future, if it ever becomes required. For these reasons, we propose to retain the beam stubs within the walls. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 10 Page 429 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. 0 10016200 z1va -04-202E OF G� Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/id 24012/10 Duke - Structural Assessment Report John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 11 Page 430 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX A Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 12 Page 431 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK STEEL BEAM TC00A (lnIT A S1AU CbVNECTioAl - -ryp. CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB �4`u1Z ACS Page 432 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL =00A r n-r-rA 5j.46 - WACG C0 !V p,5C'► l 0A1 - 1?16f 1,l6 jv -T DNCRETE DIPPING CONCRETE SLAB 2011 hr , f6 w AZinv,& Page 433 of 688 STEEL COL 611raa111111 3ATA�• RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SLAB CO W MN CON AG uT i ov - r YR CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB STEEL BEAM Boa I lvl�� Page 434 of 688 RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SPLICE PLATE LOWER STEEL COLUMN NOTE: TERRA COTTA, PLASTER FINISH, ETC. NOT SHOWN FOR SIMPLICITY. UPPER STEEL N G 0ztlr7iy 5 PL r Cl-:- ALU 2-4 FLOO R PLATES RING PLATE CONCRETE TOPPING 2ND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB jqpiz Page 435 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX B Structural Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 13 Page 436 of 688 O O O I la o. la I I a I I o + 4 I I 7ii� ^a I o s goo o �g a� =_ o _ d -0 e I rllr'I w , I I �01 r� o� I Z l0 i o� 0 J m i I o AM I =' /riN v �.e mg s I� I a Mi _� r — —_ - _ _ _ �_� —— — -- -- _= = 3 030 s� I xt - .I� L' as aw svo - n Q Q �� � ." �� � x= m� 14, 04 �� !� u _ xe= I — - - - E. o — _ : 0 3 5. � I 1 r I _`_ - _. _�_ a3 J� - - -L- - L---L--- �m oW o _ o o S I� v3 00 _ I I o � IIS 1 o�a - w - - - - -- --_ -1 7T7 — _F _—_-_—_---T I Q oho �e I � s�, _— � III I Fl um B w3 I ® o om 00 — 3G 1 I I zl 'I it it it it — ilI o �� � m � � o�s o� < <e Cp -F 4 T 0 0 wo ------------- 00 ------- ----------- L II wjj 'os lu -0 L —j- oe I III T- - - III III oI — — — — — — — — — — — Ise------ 0II2 0 II —WD 7TFFTl .1 oll 01 -E I, "g I IL I 40' U C-0111,11,11, e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m szt = 3 eese I I 00o �5 3 -- 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, Q QQ a gw g LU ' ❑ - ¢moo II ��° LL _ _OOo d> i _ Um — — — — O LL 0 I III — 5 o o oclo �o ooea �1 0m w'm ooeo °� �I 0m WIm os 0m �� pm� o �1111ii �Ilil, os� os— e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z ill �5 3 3aN— 0zo—o� 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z U J OO LL C) 2 Z LU N of 3 eese Y ❑ Q e m IxOx w¢�a-Urn � K w I i 5 1 — o Dost m 9A naso o W, 00.o os V � 9, LL �p ' 3 eese I i I so � _ _ z� uFi❑I H LL O w o A w¢ ❑ w a o� w U � w> KLL y N 011V �uo o. odea ooso!O Wlm Wlm 0— os Vo —III lov 91, 3 eese rLL K C7w ° ❑ �a wa wU O I I i 5 ml �g odeaooso00 �I Wim oI o Imo Wim ooee os I I ogroag— tj lov e m J QQ 91, 3 else ❑¢F- Um O �� K� H w z� O u~i❑ I ❑ (n LL iU O❑ �O s 1611 0 1 0- O 000z m i 10 n �Im Do e1' o�Im 00.o °gyp os o LL U J OO LL C) 2 Z LU N of 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Project No. 24012 Draft report issued December 15th, 2023 Final report issued December 15th, 2023 Report Prepared by: WEN a IDDIDIKU ASSOCA1 ISS =--' CONSULTING EN Page 442 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 1. INTRODUCTION Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP. The draft version of this approval, dated June 23, 2023 and provided to JCAL, included Heritage Planning Conditions which require [t]hat the Owner submits a Risk Management Plan, including a Vibration Monitoring Plan commenting on the means and methods that shall be usedto minimize vibration to 10 Duke Street West during grading, construction, servicing or other site development works to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner. This report is intended to satisfy the requirement for a Vibration Monitoring Plan. Further to other conditions in the Site Plan Application approval, JCAL has already completed an investigation of the subject site, including destructive exploratory openings, and prepared a Structural Assessment Report, dated December 4th, 2023. Design progress drawings for the new tower have been completed and reviewed by JCAL, to 75% progress at the time of this writing. A geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.) has been prepared and also reviewed by JCAL. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions at the subject site. Observations made during that investigation are more comprehensively described in our Structural Assessment Report. A summary of the relevant facts are included in the discussion below. The existing building is constructed predominantly of one-way concrete slabs, supported by steel beams, which are supported by interior steel columns and, at the building perimeter, load-bearing multi-wythe brick masonry exterior walls. The exiting building is a 3 -storey building plus a full -height basement level. The existing exterior walls are in good condition where visible on the exterior, and where exposed during investigatory openings made at the interior. The walls consist of an exterior wythe of clay brick with two backup wythes of concrete brick at the interior. These are bonded together with regular header bricks. Mortar joints remain generally intact, except for localized areas. and openings at the interior revealed a well -constructed wall assembly with solid mortar present in the head and collar joints. Stone masonry is included at details such as bands, sills, and surrounding the main entrance. Localized repointing and other conservation work will be required as part of the preservation and retention of the relevant portions of the existing facades, including at stone details and throughout the masonry. No bulging, significantly displaced stones, or excessively deteriorated or unstable John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 443 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 masonry was noted that would cause us to consider this building to be especially vulnerable to vibrations. Masonry conservation work is not expected to be required in advance of construction. One caveat is at the parapet which extends above the roof level. The interior face of the parapet is fully covered with metal flashing. While it was not possible to assess the masonry at arms -length from the exterior, and mortar joints here do appear to be generally intact, there is some efflorescence at the exterior of the parapet. This is an indication of high moisture content and migration, suggesting a higher likelihood of deterioration of masonry within the core of the wall. There is nothing to suggest a deviation from the course of action proposed herein, but the condition of this parapet will be monitored and assessed further, as work is ongoing on this project. 4. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION As noted in the Introduction section, above, the project includes the planned retention of a portion of the primary facades of the existing building at 10 Duke St W, for integration with a new tower to be constructed on the site. The project's intent is to retain the existing facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), floor by floor, as construction progresses. The interior finishes in the building are typically applied to a terra cotta tile backup placed with an approximately 25 mm gap to the interior wythe of backup brick. As part of the work to stabilize the fagade and to integrate it with new wall assemblies, it is proposed to remove this terra cotta tile and all finishes. As such, impact to plaster or other finishes are not a consideration in determining the vibration susceptibility of the building. The new tower will be constructed with a raft foundation, the base of which will be set close to the basement level of the current building. The raft will occupy much of the height of the current lower level of the building, and, aside from elevator pits, the occupiable space of the building will generally extend from approximately grade level and above. The geotechnical report indicates that native soil on the site consists generally of fine granular deposits and silty clay till. It is clear that rock will not be encountered for the proposed depth of excavation. As a result of the foundation and soil conditions, excavation is anticipated to be relatively minimal. It is further understood, as communicated by VanMar, that the limited excavation that will be required will proceed using sloped excavations. Certainly, no blasting or hoe ramming of rock is anticipated to be required. Currently, there is a basement mechanical/boiler room within the existing building that extends further below grade than typical conditions, approximately an additional floor level below grade. This room is located against the North (rear) wall of the building and extends for approximately 10m in each direction (about 1'/ structural bays). The brick chimney which extends up beyond the roof is quite visible and is located at the northeast of this room. It will be necessary to fill and level the subgrade prior to construction of the raft slab, and the geotechnical report provides two potential options for infilling at this room, to bring it flush with the remaining basement. The first is to place lean mix concrete for the height required, and the second is to place heavily compacted granular fill. VanMar have indicated that they will place lean mix concrete to fill this void, which would not result in significant vibrations being induced, as the costs are quite comparable between the options. Overall, vibration from excavation is expected to be relatively minimal. General vibration from other construction is expected to stem from miscellaneous construction equipment and activities, such truck traffic adjacent to the facades retained in-situ, and no special circumstances are anticipated to apply. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 444 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 671 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Localized vibration may be induced from demolition and construction activity near the masonry to be retained. The bracing and construction sequencing and the design of temporary lateral support for the existing masonry facades to remain in-situ are also being prepared by JCAL. Provisions for saw or torch cutting of masonry, concrete, and steel elements connecting to the masonry to be retained will be included. Specifically, • saw cuts will be introduced in masonry walls at the interface with masonry to be retained before demolition is to occur on portions that are not to be retained, • saw cuts will be introduced in the concrete slabs along the masonry walls to be retained, before those slabs are removed, • steel beams that are connected with elements to remain will be torch cut prior to removal, and • the use of chippers on elements that remain connected to the masonry to be retained will be limited to 12 Ib. electric models, unless a mock-up demonstrates that alternatives do not risk damaging masonry. VIBRATION LIMITS Vibration limits are not stipulated in the City's conditions, nor is there a municipal bylaw in effect to limit vibrations. The nearby City of Toronto has placed limits on construction vibrations, in their bylaw No. 514-2008, and those limits are indicated in Figure 1, below. Table t.0 "Prohibited Construction Vibrations" Frequency Vibration Peak of Vibration Particle Velocity [hertz] (mm/sec) Less than 4 8 4 to 10 15 More than 25 10 Fig 1: City of Toronto construction vibration limits The above -noted vibrations, while a good benchmark, are limits for any construction activity and are not necessarily applicable or appropriate to all projects. For historic buildings we typically recommend following the limits established in the DIN 4150-3 Standard, per line 3 of Table 1, included at Figure 2, below. The limits are • 3 mm/s for vibrations less than 10 Hz, • 3 to 8 mm/s for vibrations between 10 to 50 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, • 8 to 10 mm/s for vibrations between 50 to 100 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, and • 10 mm/s for vibrations above 100 Hz. We recommend proceeding with the limits indicated above in this case. These limits are quite low, and are intended to mitigate effects of vibration on historic buildings that might include deteriorated materials or sensitive finishes. The masonry facades to be retained on this building can be expected to be more resilient than many more delicate built historic structures. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 445 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention [4 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Though we do not anticipate exceedances even of these values given the understood nature of the adjacent construction, these limits could be re-evaluated should these limits be found to have significant impact on construction. Table 1: Guideline values for vibration velocity to he used when evaluating the effects of short-term vibration on structures Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 446 of 688 Guideline values for velocity, v,, in mm/s Vibration at the foundation vibration at Line Type of structure at a frequency of horizontal plane of highest floor 1 Hz to 10 Hz 10 Hz to 50 Hz 50 Hz to 100 Hz') at all frequencies 1 Buildings used for 20 201040 40 to 50 40 cornmercial purposes, industrial buildings, and buildings of similar design 2 Dwellings and buildings 5 5 to 15 15 to 20 15 of similar design and/or occupancy 3 Structures that, because 3 3 to 8 8 to 10 8 of their particular sensi- tivity to vibration. cannot be classified under lines 1 and 2 and are of great intrinsic value (e.g. listed buildings under preservation order) 'j At frequenc les above 100 Hz. the values given in this cofumn may be used as minimum values. Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 446 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 8- ,&------ - - Fig 3: Part South Elevation, indicating proposed locations of vibration monitors. 7. NOTIFICATION AND EXCEEDENCE PROCEDURE The vibration monitors must be connected for continual reporting of vibration events that result in exceedances of the vibration limits stipulated above. Exceedance events shall be reported by automated email to the Contractor, Owner, and appropriate Consultant(s). In the event of an exceedance the Consultant is to be contacted. If the exceedance is not the result of disturbing the vibration monitoring equipment or very localized activity around it (both of which are common causes of exceedances), and the Consultant considers the exceedance to be significant, the Consultant shall review on site for any damage that may have resulted from the exceedance. Future construction activity shall be modified to avoid further exceedances. In cases where this is not possible, and the exceedance was not observed to have had any impact to the structure, the Consultant may advise with respect to increased vibration limits. Note that this approach is intended to be generally consistent with the DIN 4150 standard, which states that "Exceeding the values in table 1 does not necessarily lead to damage; should they be significantly exceeded, however, further investigations are necessary." As noted above, it is our view that this building would likely tolerate vibration limits above those stipulated. 8. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 447 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. J. K, DEE 100' 62005 EC -15-202 'AtZ C]F O f fP' Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/jd 24012/10 Duke —Vibration Monitoring Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 448 of 688 I I \1 co co 4- 0 rn N c6 Appendices rn rn E a� 0 z V u a� u U Q m Ln Co Co Oo O Lo �v 0 o (6 u �v ao v x v v v v Y 0 0 o aD C w O — > :5 a� w � u l'( I U N P Q) O O U- w co co 0 LO 0) ^(U LL Appendices ZI F I ANN N6N\\\ Page 454 of 688 Page 455 of 688 n r'a'h g i SITE VISIT - JANUARY 2023, mCs 9 6m 1917 20220120 204210228 JOS 20220120 204322051 JOS 20220120 204420986 iOS 20220120 204456280 iOS 20220120 204726010 JOS 20220120 204754906 JOS 20220120 204800977 iOS 20220120 204814044 JOS 20220120 204820900 JOS 20220120 204822117 iOS IASI ; a_ r-, � 20220120 205651705 iOS 20220120 205655761 JOS 2022 0120 205658389 JOS 20220120 205659944 JOS 20 22 012 0 205704149 iOS Now" jig% oil r - ,drr- 20220120 205711359 JOS 20220120 205719102 JOS 20220120 205729294 iOS 20220120 205731229 iOS 20220120 205736733 iOS 20220120 205738559 JOS 20220120 205929790 JOS 20220120 205936794 JOS 20220120 210006562 JOS 20220120 210009202 iOS _ alolls 29220120 210011205 JOS 20220120 210013708 iOs 20220120 210014810 iOS 20220120 210016023 iOS 20220120 210018682 JOS Page 457 of 688 20220120 210021598 iOS 20220120 210023392 iOS 20220120 210055003 iOS 20220120 210057617 iOS 20220120 210103716 iOS jl 111111Hil liINL�� .11�L I 1 I i 20220120 210104839 JOS 20220120 210109696 JOS 20220120 210111515 JOS 20220120 210115184 JOS 20220120 210140026 JOS w WE6- iffl � 20220120 210142693 JOS 20220120 210242311 JOS 20220120 210243434 iOS 20220120 210245071 JOS 20220120 210248011 iOS 1:3 20220120 210249362 iOS 20220120 210250417 iOS 2022 0120 210251302 JOS 20220120 210252965 iOS 20220120 210253829 JOS 20220120 210255336 JOS 20220120 210256027 iOS 20220120 210257020 iOS 20 22 012 0 210402821 JOS 20220120 210439233 iOS s 2022 012 0 210441991 iOS 20220120 210444835 iOS 20220120 210447505 iOS 20 22 012 0 210509110 JOS 217220120 21051727{7 iOS 20220120 210522179 iOS 20220120 210531238 iOS 20220120 210536300 iOS 20 22 012 0 210608367 i0S 20220120 210623331 CS Page 458 of 688 20220120 210624200 JOS 20220120 210627779 iOS 20220120 210630911 JOS 20220120 210634332 iOS 20220120 210640529 iOS r, 20220120 210643236 iOS 20220120 210645121 iOS 20220120 210646712 JOS 20220120 210648424 iOS 20220120 210701551 JOS ON 74 20220120 210736258 JOS 20220120 210744509 iOS 20220120 2107532.35 fOS 20220120 210754919 JOS 20220120 210831459 JOS Ali20220120 210914214 iOS 20220120 210915080 iOS 2022 0120 210920858 iOS 20220120 210929212 iOS 20220120 210941385 JOS IE I 1 20220120 210944546 iOS 20220120 211011692 iOS 20220120 211013063 iOS 20220120 211014676 iOS 20220120 211020282 iOS w' 20220120 211040623 iOS 20220120 211048974 iOS 20220120 211055225 iOS 20220120 211056478 iOS 20220120 211058036 iOS 20220120 211110866 i0S 20220120 211146460 iOS 20220120 211'158872 iOS 20220120 211203374 iOS 20220120 211214257 iOS Page 459 of 688 F - w. 4 20220120 211216501 JOS 20220120 211226375 iOS 20220120 211438122 iOS 20220120 2110451074 iOS 20220120 211527922 iOS r 20220120 211529582 iOS 20220120 211535586 iOS 20220120 211535905 iOS 20220120 211539720 iOS 20220120 211543456 iOS 20220120 211548615 JOS 20220120 211555161 JOS 20220120 211559999 iOS 20220120 211605299 iOS 20220120 211620317 iOS 41a >. r1 1 d� 0 20220120 2/1627997 JOS 20220120 211634243 iOS 20220120 211639854 JOS 20220120 211741694 JOS 20220120 211902155 JOS 20220120 211930163 JOS 20220120 211931557 iOS 20220120 211932802 iOS 20220120 211936178 iOS 20220120 211937645 iOS WQ Jl 3 20220120 212015581 iOS 20220120 212017829 iOS 20220120 212129232 iOS 20220120 212131138 iOS 20220120 212132677 iOS Jim 20220120 212144398 JOS 20220120 212200461 JOS 20220120 212209177 JOS 20220120 212218861 iOS 20220120 212229879 iOS Page 460 of 688 20220120 212237573 iOS 20220120 212243894 iOS 20220120 212258604 i0S 20220120 212259582 iOS 20220120 212300892 iOS Gig 20220120 212304607 iOS 20220120 212304890 JOS 20220120 212309711 JOS 20220120 212315394 iOS 20220120 212329194 JOS F 20220120 212331519 iOS 20220120 212337130 iOS 20220120 212349992 JOS 20220120 212834235 iOS 20220120 212839245 JOS 20220120 212925918 iOS 20220120 213634000 IOS 2022 0120 213719508 iOS 20220120 214718317 iOS 20220120 214959010 JOS 20220120 215003184 iOS 20220120 215011143 iOS 20220120 215015754 iOS 20220120 215642153 iOS 20220120 215649624 iOS ,r 20220120 220011731 JOS 20220120 220331025 iOS 20220120 220347133 iOS 20220125 143502961 JOS 20220120 204114363 iOS Page 461 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Project No. 24012 Draft report issued November 17th, 2023 Final report issued December 4th, 2023 Revised report issued March 28th, 2024 Report Prepared by: d0011 a CIDIDEL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 462 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention TABLE OF CONTENTS Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE....................................................................................................................1 3. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................................................1 3.1. Investigation..................................................................................................................................1 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards..................................................................................................2 3.3. Analysis......................................................................................................................................... 2 4. OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................................................................2 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs................................................................................................................3 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing..................................................................................................3 4.2.1 Columns................................................................................................................................ 3 4.2.2 Beams...................................................................................................................................4 4.3. Wall Assembly...............................................................................................................................4 4.3.1 Foundation Wall....................................................................................................................4 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall..................................................................................................5 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface........................................................................................................................6 4.5. Masonry Condition........................................................................................................................6 5. RETENTION APPROACH.................................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Sequencing...................................................................................................................................7 5.2. Temporary Bracing........................................................................................................................8 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays................................................................................8 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks............................................................................................................. 8 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Angle at Existing Floor Levels....................................................9 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices........................................................................................ 9 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing............................................................................ 9 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed....................................................................9 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes....................................................................................9 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition................................................................................................10 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams.............................................................................................10 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS...........................................................................................................11 APPENDIX A - SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS APPENDIX B - RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES APPENDIX C — 02 03 44 — SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES APPENDIX D — 02 41 10 — SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page i Page 463 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 1. INTRODUCTION John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar's intent is to retain the existing masonry facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), as construction of the latter progresses. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP, the draft version of which, dated June 23, 2023 and available to JCAL, requires "That the Owner's Consulting Engineer ... submit a Structural Assessment Report for 10 Duke Street West to be included within the Demolition and Stabilization Plan, ... advising on the means and methods to be used to safely remove portions of the existing building and to avoid causing structural damage to the historic portions of the front facades...". This report is intended to satisfy that requirement and be the basis to develop the design further. Designs indicated herein are not for construction but are intended to show concepts and intents that will be developed further and coordinated more closely with the new construction, during production of a set of shoring and sequencing drawings for the purposes of pricing and construction. JCAL was provided with some photographs of original drawings. These lacked several key details regarding the existing structure and JCAL first undertook an investigation to identify and confirm these details, along with condition of exposed elements that may impact the retention of the facades and the need for any restoration work that might be required in advance. This information was used in developing analytical models and the approach to the retention concept that is discussed herein. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. METHODOLOGY JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions, identified applicable codes and standards to be referenced, and completed analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in the temporary support of the fagade during the course of the new construction and retention. 3.1. Investigation Jonathan Dee, P.Eng., CAHP of JCAL made an initial visit to the site on September 6, 2023, accompanied by representatives from VanMar and mcCallumSather, the heritage architects who have completed a Heritage Impact Assessment and Conservation Plan for the subject property. Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, EIT revisited the site on October 18, 2023. Using hand -tools, investigatory openings were made in several locations where possible. Locations were identified for further investigatory openings, to be made using power tools and with the assistance of VanMar's forces. These further openings were completed by VanMar at JCAL's direction, and reviewed by Jonathan Dee and Andrew Azinovic, throughout the course of the day on October 30, 2023. The investigation included primarily of the use of a chipper to remove interior terra cotta tile and plaster wall finishes John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 464 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 to view the enclosed structural elements and details, and to remove brick from the interior side of the exterior walls, to determine the construction and condition of the existing wall assembly. 3.2. Applicable Codes and Standards The primary codes, standards, and guidelines referenced during and applicable to the production of work described in this report and for further development of the retention design are as follows: • Ontario Building Code 2012, inclusive of latest effective amendments (the OBC) • Structural Commentaries of the National Building Code of Canada, including Commentary L: Application of NBC Part 4 of Division B for the Structural Evaluation and Upgrading of Existing Buildings • CSA A23.3-14 - Design of Concrete Structures • CSA A371-14 - Masonry Construction for Buildings • CSA S304-14 (R2019) - Design of Masonry Structures • CSA S16-14 - Design of Steel Structures • Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, published by Parks Canada. 3.3. Analysis The applicable wind load was calculated to OBC 2012, using a reduced importance factor of 0.75 for calculating loads for serviceability and deflections. It is our opinion that seismic loading may be neglected during construction, given the brief construction period relative to the 2500 -year return period for code -specified seismic loads. However, seismic considerations are relevant in the permanent attachment of the facades to temporary elements that may remain as part of the permanent structure. The applicable seismic load was calculated in accordance with OBC Article 4.1.8.18 for building elements and non- structural components. The applicable seismic loads were calculated, using seismic Site Class C as recommended in the geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.), and it was determined the above -noted wind forces govern design. Rigidity and stiffness requirements for the lateral support of the masonry generally governed design, and the limitations stipulated in CSA A371 were followed, of U600 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is perpendicular to the bed joints (i.e., for bending in the vertical direction of the wall) and L/300 for unreinforced masonry where flexural stress is parallel to the bed joints (i.e. for bending in the horizontal direction of the wall). Analysis of the existing and new temporary components to be used in retaining of the facades was carried out using procedures identified in the above -noted standards documents and using Bentley STAAD structural analysis software. 4. OBSERVATIONS Observations made during our investigation that relate to the retention of the existing facades are documented below. Sketches of key typical existing details are included in Appendix A. The building's structure consists of one-way flat concrete slabs, spanning on steel floor beams. These beams are supported on two interior east -west lines of structural steel columns and, on the load bearing exterior walls at the perimeter of the building. A further general description of the building is otherwise documented in the Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan and is not repeated here. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 465 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 4.1. Existing Concrete Slabs The existing floor slabs were hammer drilled. While only a relatively small drill bit was available, these were measured as accurately as possible and found to be 127 mm (5") thick and are believed to be overlain with a bonded floor topping for leveling, which is assumed to be on average 25 mm (1 ") thick. The floor slabs span in the east -west direction, between floor beams. These slabs were not scanned for reinforcing steel, but we believe they would contain smooth reinforcing steel bars parallel to the span direction, and temperature steel reinforcement in the opposite direction. 4.2. Existing Structural Steel Framing 4.2.1 Columns The building's columns are generally clad with terra cotta tile and plaster. Occasionally this has been overclad with newer drywall and steel studs. Openings were made to expose the structural steel columns within, at • three locations above the Ground floor level, • two locations above the 2nd floor level, and • one location above the 31d floor level. The key findings are that the column steel is generally exposed behind the terra cotta tile, with no additional concrete encasing or coatings beyond the grey paint (see Fig. 1). A column splice, suspected to be present but not otherwise documented, was found at both openings made just above the 2nd floor level (see Fig. 2), and not at any of the openings on other floors. This splice location is believed to be typical at all columns and may act as a hinge in the column if not laterally supported in both directions at all times. Fig 2: Typical column splice, above 2nd floor Below the splice, the columns were found to be wide flange profiles with welded top and bottom flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 225 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 19 mm, and the cover plates to be approx. 12 mm thick and 260 mm wide. These may be historic US 8" WF @ 58lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x71 sections, plus the cover plates as measured, which is a similar but conservative selection. Above the splice, at the 3rd floor opening the upper columns were found to be wide flange profiles with no flange cover plates. The wide flange profile was measured to have a depth of approx. 200 mm and a flange thickness of approx. 12 mm. These may be historic US 8" John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 466 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 WF @ 31 or 35 lbs/ft sections per the 1946 US Steel catalogue. For the purposes of analysis, these were conservatively analysed as modern W200x46 sections, which is a similar but slightly conservative selection. 4.2.2 Beams The steel floor beams, present interior column lines and with an additional beam at the mid -span of each bay, were understood to bear on the exterior masonry walls. These beams are generally clad in metal lath and plaster with exposed steel beyond. Openings in the ceiling and wall finishes around a typical beam were made below the 3rd floor beam bearing on the south exteriorwall. Lath and plasterwas removed and the interior wythes of brick were removed adjacent to the beam (see Fig. 3). As expected based on available documentation, but of significant value to the project to definitively confirm, no steel column within the wall was located. A steel bearing plate is present below the beam, and the beam was found to bear approximately 200 mm (8"), or the full depth of the two interior wythes of backup brick (see Fig. 4). Additionally, the top flanges of the floor beams are noted to be embedded above the soffit of the slab. z� tee: Fig 3: Typical beam bearing on brick backup at exterior wall 4.3. Wall Assembly 4.3.1 Foundation Wall tx 4 h !_a.• a 9-:.. il? ! 1 J? i3 rl Fig 4: Typical beam bearing length on exterior wall The foundation wall assembly was investigated at the interior of the basement, toward the east end of the south foundation wall, by removing a portion of the interior plaster and terra cotta (see Fig. 5). The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, and the • concrete foundation wall. Naturally, the removals did not extend through the concrete wall, but the exterior is finished with limestone, which is presumably bearing on a ledge in the concrete foundation wall. Dovetail tracks were noted to be present on the interior face of the concrete foundation wall, and one dovetail anchor was found extending into the terra cotta tile (see Fig. 6). This may suggest that dovetail anchors were used on the exterior stone as well, and future masonry conservation work should be mindful of the fact that dovetail anchors from this period are prone to inconsistent placement and corrosion. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 467 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 Fig 5: Opening in terra cotta tile at foundation wall, interior Fig 6: Looking down at opening, dovetail anchor 4.3.2 Above -Grade Masonry Wall The above -grade load-bearing masonry walls were investigated from the interior, primarily with brick removals completed above the 2nd floor level, near the east end of the north wall, 2nd floor (see Figs. 7 and 8). The interior brick was very difficult to remove and therefore only one opening was made, and conditions were otherwise exposed during investigations of beam pocket and slab -wall interface. The wall assembly was found to consist of, from the interior: • plaster, • 76mm (3") terra cotta tile, • approx. 13 mm (1/2") gap, • two wythes of concrete brick backup masonry, laid in common bond, and the • exterior wythe of clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The interior terra cotta tile was noted to be anchored to the backup brick by way of corrugated ties, as one of these was located in the removal area. No ties were noted between backup wythes or to the exterior brick, and the brick wythes are believed to be tied together solely by way of header bricks. Fig 7: Removals at above -grade masonry wall, interior Fig 8: Angled view of opening shown in Fig 7. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 468 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 4.4. Slab -Wall Interface Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 Determining the slab -wall interface is important to defining a removal methodology that will not impact the integrity of the existing walls and to determining a temporary and permanent approach to laterally securing these walls. Removal of the interior terra cotta to expose the interior side of the backup brick masonryjust above the slab was completed in two locations at the 2nd floor (see Figs. 9 and 10). The interior brick was removed in one location and the slab was noted to extend into the backup masonry. The terra cotta wall tile bears on the slab, and a topping appears to have been placed overtop of the slab. It's likely that the exterior brick wall was built up to the underside of slab level with the slab poured directly onto it. We do not believe that removing the existing slab from the exterior walls is necessary and that doing so may result in unnecessary damage to heritage fabric. I iy V. 1XVIlluvaia OL aiau icvci, . vvau, auwc c 11UU1 4.5. Masonry Condition Fig 10: Add'I removals of interior finishes at slab level The backup brick masonry, consisting of the two interior wythes of concrete brick laid in common bond, where exposed in the above -noted investigatory openings, appeared to be in very good condition. Joints were well filled with mortar, including collar joints, the bricks and mortar were intact, and it was quite difficult to remove individual bricks. The exterior wythe of brick consists of an extruded clay brick, laid in Flemish bond. The mortar joints are generally intact and in good condition, though there are localized areas of debonding and erosion. No signs of systemic delamination or outward displacement of the exterior wythe was noted, and it appears to be well bonded to the backup brick masonry. The vertical brick piers in the exterior wythe of brick, project slightly towards the exterior. We suspect that this projection is created by thickening the collar joint between the exterior and backup wythes. There is also a continuous vertical mortar joint on the outer wythe, up each side of these piers where they interface with the adjacent brick masonry. Ajoint like this could create a weak point along a wall where the sections may separate more easily, as vertical masonry joints in general tend to be more poorly filled with mortar compared to horizontal joints. While this typically may be cause for some concern, a header is present at every other course and this is believed to be a true header, offering ample ties between the wythes. Additionally, no systematic separation is noted along these piers suggesting the wall is performing well. See Figures 11 and 12. No investigation was carried out of the exterior stone cladding at cornices, foundation level, etc. Given the age of the building, these may be keyed into the backup masonry and/or anchored to the backup brick using strap or cramp anchors. Often in buildings of this age anchorage was only provided to the top of the stones. However, no systemic issues were observed of displacement of the stones, and no special care is believed to be required for these in terms of the retention. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 469 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 0-, Fig 11: Typical projection at brick pier 5. RETENTION APPROACH Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 Fig 12_Typical continuous vertical joint at brick pier The overall approach to retaining the existing facades is to retain these in-situ while the new building is constructed within the footprint of the existing. In order to minimize retention costs and impact to exterior areas along the facades, the retention will make use of the existing structural steel framing along the walls to be retained. This will be supplemented with new temporary steel bracing and lateral support members. The existing floors will then be removed and replaced with new floors, at matching levels, at which point the lateral support of the existing walls may be transferred to these new floors. 5.1. Sequencing Careful sequencing of the work is a key factor in the successful retention of the existing facades in-situ and is necessary to ensure that overall stability and adequate lateral support of the facades to be retained is maintained at all times. The order of operations is anticipated to proceed generally as follows: 1. Remove existing terra cotta tile and interior finishes to enable access to backup masonry and enclosed structural steel elements that will be part of temporary bracing system. 2. Core or cut holes in the roof and floors at piers and install vertical strongbacks from above, using a crane, at the interior face of the existing walls to be retained, where indicated, with a. full -height (spliced) strongbacks at braced bays and b. partial -height strongbacks at unbraced bays 3. Install temporary steel framing, including a. diagonal bracing within existing structural bays where bracing is identified to be installed, b. lateral bracing in both directions at all existing column splices, where existing columns are identified to be retained, c. lateral support angles to interior face of backup masonry, above all floor levels, and which angles will ultimately become part of the permanent anchorage for these fagades. 4. Create separation cuts in the existing fagade walls, at points where the existing facades will no longer be retained. 5. Complete the demolition of the portions of the building not to be retained or temporarily to remain as part of the temporary support system, including the facades (salvaging any stone or other material indicated for such), and following an engineered demolition plan. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 7 Page 470 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. Construct the raft slab in the basement, encasing the base of the remaining existing columns within the raft slab and securing the raft slab to the exterior foundation wall. 7. Remove and replace floors along the interior of the facades to be retained, one at a time, by: a. anchoring the vertical strongback at the unbraced bays to the wall at the position indicated, centered on the slab to be removed, b. saw -cutting the existing concrete slab to be demolished to free it from the walls to be retained, c. temporarily shoring and then cutting close to the walls the existing steel beams bearing on the walls to be retained, d. placing the new structural slab, casting around the columns to be temporarily retained, e. securing the new slab to the lateral support angles placed above each floor level, and f. repeating at the next floor, above. 8. Remove temporary steel bracing and strongback members, leaving the now -permanently affixed lateral support angles. 9. Cut off existing columns that were temporarily retained above the top of the raft slab, remove the columns, and infill new slab openings around them. 5.2. Temporary Bracing The lateral support of the facades to remain during construction will make use of the existing structural steel, supplemented with temporary steel framing, as described below. 5.2.1 Bracing Within Existing Structural Bays The existing column lines inboard of the fagade walls to be retained will remain in-situ until the walls are laterally supported by the new permanent structure. Several of these column bays will be braced, in both the north -south and east -west directions, with new diagonal bracing members installed between the 2nd and 3,d levels, and from the 3,d floor to the roof level. At unbraced bays, the existing and new slabs will act as diaphragms, to transfer lateral forces collected at these bays to the braced bays, noted above. The bracing approach, developed to minimize the amount of bracing that is required, relies on the column bases to be encased within the raft slab, effectively resulting in a fixed connection. 5.2.2 Vertical Strongbacks As confirmed during our investigation, there are no existing steel columns within the exterior walls to be retained. Vertical strongbacks, steel members placed against and anchored to the interior face of the walls, will be introduced at each column line along the walls to be retained, in order to serve the following functions: • resolve axial tension and compression forces at braced bays, especially in order to resist tension forces that would otherwise be induced in the masonry by the diagonal bracing, • bring forces collected by the lateral support angles at demolished floor levels to the diaphragms above and below the strongback, and • provide an attachment point for the lateral support members perpendicular to the wall that brace the column splices to permit removal of the 2nd floor slab. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 8 Page 471 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 The strongbacks will be installed from above, through vertical pockets cored or cut into existing slabs at the interior face of the exterior walls, directly adjacent to the existing floor beams on column lines. At braced bays, the strongbacks will be effective for the full height of the walls, with a splice between 2nd and V floor levels. At the base of the strongback, they will be vertically and laterally anchored to the raft slab and/or inside face of the existing foundation wall. At unbraced bays, the strongbacks will be set and repositioned as required to bridge from a removed floor to remaining and new floor diaphragms above and below, respectively. 5.2.3 Horizontal Lateral Support Anale at Existina Floor Levels An angle will be placed along the full lengths of the walls to be retained, directly above each existing floor level, and anchored to the interior face of the walls with HILTI HIT-HY 270 or similar adhesive anchors. The angle will span horizontally between vertical strongbacks on column lines. This angle is anticipated to be fairly large at L203x203x19, in order to meet stiffness requirements for lateral masonry support in this condition when slabs are removed. Upon completion of each new floor slab, this angle and its anchorage to the wall will remain and be secured to the new floor slab. 5.2.4 Lateral Support at Column Splices As noted in the observations section above, column splices were found above the 2nd floor level, at roughly the mid -height of the overall column, and this is believed to be typical of all existing columns. These splices will become unbraced upon removal of the 2nd floor. It is necessary to ensure that lateral support remains in place at these splices, until the new 2nd floor structure is completed and may restrain the column or, if lateral support from the 2nd floor is not possible, until the existing column is no longer required. The lateral bracing will consist of a horizontal steel member, spanning between all column splices along the column line parallel to the wall, and ultimately supported by a braced bay in that column line. In the direction perpendicular to the wall, the splice will be braced by a member that spans from the splice to the steel strongback at the interior face of the wall. The bracing member will be sized in accordance with the strength and stiffness requirements in steel handbook's procedure for bracing assemblies, in accordance with CSA S16 clause 9.2.6.2. 5.2.5 Other Conditions, Miscellaneous Framing There are isolated conditions where the typical bracing pattern may not apply, or may conflict with vertical elements in the new construction, such as stair and elevator shafts. These details will be developed as the concept is pushed into further design and as comprehensive temporary framing drawings are produced. Further coordination with the overall building consultants will be required. We anticipate providing additional steel framing around these elements, or resizing of specific members to resist intermediate loads, should it not be possible to work around temporary framing, or where these new elements may not be relied upon to provide temporary lateral support. 5.3. Disconnecting Material to be Demolished/Removed 5.3.1 Terra Cotta Tile and Interior Finishes The terra cotta wall tiles and interior plaster finishes, along with recent steel studs and gypsum board, as well as original and more recent ceiling finishes will need to be removed John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 9 Page 472 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 from most areas in order to install members needed for the temporary stabilization of the walls to be retained. These components are not load bearing, and they may be removed without impact to the balance of the wall assemblies or structural systems that must remain temporarily. Care must still be taken to make sure removal is completed safely, and to not leave sections of terra cotta tile vertically unsupported. 5.3.2 Wall Cutting and Demolition The portions of the existing facades to remain must be separated from those portions that are to be demolished, prior to demolition. We propose to make this separation by way of saw -cutting, at an appropriate mortar joint line in the exterior wythe, in a position that will not leave partial bricks or stone fragments with less than a 1:1 aspect ratio of length to course height. The saw cut will penetrate the full depth of the masonry wall assembly. Upon completion of the cutting, it will be necessary to consolidate the wall ends, by raking out any loose mortar and filling these and any existing voids with new mortar. Additional anchorage will also be provided to secure the cut ends of any stone units to the backup brick. Finally, we recommend temporarily capping the wall ends with plywood and a membrane, to mitigate water infiltration and any resulting damage until these ends are permanently tied into the building's wall envelope. 5.3.3 Removal of Slabs and Beams The portions of floor slabs to be demolished must be separated from those portions that will remain temporarily as part of the bracing system. We propose that this be achieved by saw -cutting, in continuation of the line of cutting in the walls. As the existing floor slabs and beams are pocketed into the facades to be retained, we propose to cut these free at the appropriate times, by saw -cutting along the slab edge near to the wall, and by cutting the beams free from the walls. The remaining stubs of slabs and beams would remain in the walls. While the slabs are concrete and pose little concern, the beam ends do carry the potential for future corrosion, causing future corrosion jacking of the masonry to be preserved. However, we note that where exposed, the embedded beam end showed only minimal surface corrosion, we noted no significant evidence of corrosion jacking at present. Additionally, the effort and impact to the heritage fabric from attempting to remove these beam ends now would be similar to the effort required to complete this work in the future, if it ever becomes required. For these reasons, we propose to retain the beam stubs within the walls. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 10 Page 473 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 6. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. 4: IKDEE 1001620D5 AR -28-202 Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/id 24012/10 Duke - Structural Assessment & Retention Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 11 Page 474 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX A Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 SKETCHES OF TYPICAL EXISTING KEY DETAILS John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 12 Page 475 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK STEEL BEAM TC00A (lnIT A S1AU CbVNECTioAl - -ryp. CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB �4`u1Z ACS Page 476 of 688 SINGLE WYTHE RED CLAY BRICK CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL =00A r n-r-rA 5j.46 - WACG C0 !V p,5C'► l 0A1 - 1?16f 1,l6 jv -T DNCRETE DIPPING CONCRETE SLAB 2011 hr , f6 w AZinv,& Page 477 of 688 STEEL COL 611raa111111 3ATA�• RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SLAB COW MN CONAGuT i ov - r YR CRETE PING CONCRETE SLAB STEEL BEAM Boa r/ova Page 478 of 688 RIVET FASTENER CONNECTIONS SPLICE PLATE LOWER STEEL COLUMN NOTE: TERRA COTTA, PLASTER FINISH, ETC. NOT SHOWN FOR SIMPLICITY. UPPER STEEL N G 0ztlr7iy 5 PL r Cl-:- ALU 2-4 FLOO R PLATES RING PLATE CONCRETE TOPPING 2ND FLOOR CONCRETE SLAB jqpiz Page 479 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX B Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 RETENTION FRAME CONCEPT SKETCHES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 13 Page 480 of 688 O O O I la o. la I I a I I o + 4 I I 7ii� ^a I o s goo o �g a� =_ o _ d -0 e I rllr'I w , I I �01 r� o� I Z l0 i o� 0 J m i I o AM I =' /riN v �.e mg s I� I a Mi _� r — —_ - _ _ _ �_� —— — -- -- _= = 3 030 s� I xt - .I� L' as aw svo - n Q Q �� � ." �� � x= m� 14, 04 �� !� u _ xe= I — - - - E. o — _ : 0 3 5. � I 1 r I _`_ - _. _�_ a3 J� - - -L- - L---L--- �m oW o _ o o S I� v3 00 _ I I o � IIS 1 o�a - w - - - - -- --_ -1 7T7 — _F _—_-_—_---T I Q oho �e I � s�, _— � III I Fl um B w3 I ® o om 00 — 3G 1 I I zl 'I it it it it — ilI o �� � m � � o�s o� < <e Cp -F 4 T 0 0 wo ------------- 00 ------- ----------- L II wjj 'os lu -0 L —j- oe I III T- - - III III oI — — — — — — — — — — — Ise------ 0II2 0 II —WD 7TFFTl .1 oll 01 -E I, "g I IL I 40' U C-0111,11,11, e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m szt = 3 eese I I 00o �5 3 -- 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, Q QQ a gw g LU ' ❑ - ¢moo II ��° LL _ _OOo d> i _ Um — — — — O LL 0 I III — 5 o o oclo �o ooea �1 0m w'm ooeo °� �I 0m WIm os 0m �� pm� o �1111ii �Ilil, os� os— e — 3 I J o W Y Hw G U Jw W z I S Jw r (7Z Z0 Z U❑ aUZ 7E x Z — — Opp O J LL V W — } s o 1,611 Dose m ooee oa Q xlm xlm w, WI oo OH 10 0 m U LU A Fro, 3 o O try r qa 2 p r w w U Sim ZK ZZ Z o ¢Uz 7Eo HSI 0 O I I LJL J o Q z N l I oe rc o o- 5 ooea �� pose, ooee os xim xim Des w — o4, w w 19o, . •........ .....� > > O� WY rw KLL U w z w° O O LL H11 0— oll, cQ G I I II nF g o oooea ooso m N ooee os o m a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z ill �5 3 3aN— 0zo—o� 3za53 o �5a��wNmwarcoa310, a Z O U W z z O U m Q CO LU z e Y ❑ Q 3 eese m _ SOIx H�H¢ O Un wJ ��I LL ❑ o z0 2° w° LL p O o� O w o I 5 LL Dost �� oa90 oose �p os �0, •^/ e I i ' 3 eese I l/ V oQF- m z x U) �� O _ az �& Qm Zz L LL O Q LL O w wa -Z - U - - —O❑ UU - - - - - LU W �ui ♦/ / Qe rc N rc oclo `m N e oosot 10 os o, lm o 0ooo m W Wlm wlm —III —. W -- - UUQmJQ �III oe U�Qmww> nN 00o J> isC❑w=❑LL7 LL 2O LL O - �< ooQ - LU g oOH o 'om ooa w;m oose w;m oo. os J of 3 "9,e Yr U m az w 7z U) O J LL J 2O �a U❑ KO ❑ Q LL > O L� Li U O❑ �O Z - s O LL ooez m In oo � e o�w ooEE o °gy os o p Im 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX C Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 02 03 44 — SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 14 Page 486 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 03 44 JCAL Project No. 24012 SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 1 General 1.1 RELATED REQUIREMENTS Section 02 41 19 — Selective Structure Demolition. 1.2 REFERENCES Definitions 1 Bracing: temporary support installed in an excavation or a structure to stabilize against deformations or failure. (Resisting lateral loads). .2 Dead Shoring or Vertical Shoring: a vertical member with a head plate, sole plate and a means of adjustment for tightening and easing the shore. Used to support dead loads which act vertically downwards. .3 Heritage Materials: Elements of historic significance or character defining features of a historic place, which document the history of the related building assembly, built feature or constructed element, as defined in the Project Documents. .4 Shoring: temporary support installed in an excavation or a structure to relieve loads. .5 Soldier pile: a vertical member which takes the side thrust from horizontal sheeting and which is supported by struts across an excavation. A vertical member used to prevent the movement of formwork; is held in place by struts, bolts, or wires. .2 Reference Standards .1 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) .1 ASTM F1667-18, Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes and Staples. .2 ASTM F3125/F3125M-21, Specification for High Strength Structural Bolts, Steel and Alloy Steel, Heat Treated, 120 ksi (830 MPa) and 150 ksi (1040 MPa) Minimum Tensile Strength, Inch and Metric Dimensions. .2 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) .1 CAN/CSA 086-14, Engineering Design in Wood. .2 CSA G40.20 -13/G40.21-13 (R2018), General Requirements for Rolled or Welded Structural Quality Steel/Structural Quality Steel. .3 CSA 0151-17, Canadian Softwood Plywood. .4 CSA 516-14, Design of Steel Structures. .5 CSA W59-13, Welded Steel Construction (Metal Arc Welding). .3 Deutsches Institut fur Normung E.V. (DIN) 1 DIN EN 16031, 2012 Edition, September 2012 - Adjustable telescopic aluminum props. .4 Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) .5 National Lumber Grades Authority (NLGA) Page 487 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 03 44 JCAL Project No. 24012 SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 2 1 NLGA Standard Grading Rules for Canadian Lumber 2022. 1.3 ACTION AND INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS 1 Provide submittals in accordance with Section 01 33 00 - Submittal Procedures. .2 Shop Drawings 1 Submit drawings stamped and signed by Professional Engineer registered or licensed in Province of Ontario. .2 Shop drawings to indicate shop and erection details in accordance with performance criteria in 2.2. .3 Submit shoring, bracing, and temporary framing detail drawings signed by Professional Engineer registered or licensed in Province of Ontario. .4 Provide details on how to avoid introducing stress and damage at the point of contact of shores or bracing with heritage materials. 1.4 DELIVERY, STORAGE AND HANDLING 1 Deliver, store and handle in accordance with Section 01 6100 — Common Product Requirements. Part 2 Products 2.1 MATERIALS 1 Structural wood members: timber and built-up timber, grade No. 1/No. 2. .1 Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified. 1 Lumber: .1 FSC certified. .2 NLGA certified. .2 Structural steel members to CSA G40.21 .1 Grade 350 for WWF, Rolled W (Wide Flange), and HSS members .2 Grade 300 for all rolled shapes and plates. .3 Class C for HSS members. .4 Type W. 3 Aluminum or steel adjustable telescopic shoring props to DIN EN16031, with braces and connections to have sufficient capacity to resist loads shown on Drawings and in accordance to Consultant instructions. .4 Wood connections: Canadian soft wood plywood to CSA 0151 sheathing grade. 1 Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified. 1 Lumber: .1 FSC certified. .2 NLGA certified. .5 Steel connections: steel gusset plates, angles to CSA G40.21, grade 300, type W. 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 03 44 JCAL Project No. 24012 SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 3 6 Nails to ASTM F1667. 7 Wood lag screws, nuts and washers to CAN/CSA 086.1. 8 High -tensile bolts: to ASTM F3125. 9 Welding materials: CSA W59. 2.2 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA 1 Ensure that materials, equipment and procedures: .1 Safely support existing structure and construction live loads. .2 Allow work to be accomplished. .3 Minimize risk of damage to historic elements to remain or be salvaged. 2.3 SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL 1 Timber identification: by grade stamp of an agency certified by Canadian Lumber Standards Accreditation Board. .2 Plywood identification: by grade mark in accordance with applicable CSA standards. Part 3 Execution 3.1 EXAMINATION 1 Before starting work, verify existing conditions and variations from original Contract Documents and notify Consultant in writing, prior to start of Work. 3.2 PREPARATION 1 Before disturbing any building components, verify that a Designated Substance Report (DSR) has been properly prepared. .2 Remove machinery installations, services, furnishings, partitions, and stored materials from building. .3 Before beginning shoring, brace window and door openings as indicated on Drawings. .4 Before beginning shoring and bracing, protect historic fabric and elements to remain or be salvaged in direct contact with bracing and shoring components. Request review by Consultant. 1 Provide protection between shoring and bracing to prevent transfer of rust stains to historic fabric. .5 Before beginning shoring and bracing, perform structural repairs to facilitate shoring and bracing, such as masonry conservation and treatment of corroded steel. Report any loose masonry or corroded steel elements to Consultant. 3.3 INSTALLATION - GENERAL 1 Begin work in accordance with Consultant's instructions. .2 Obtain approval from Consultant, before execution, for alteration to bracing and shoring systems. Page 489 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 03 44 JCAL Project No. 24012 SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 4 Support individual elements that become loose during shoring and bracing installation. .4 Erect structural timber to CAN/CSA 086.1. Erect structural steel work to CAN/CSA S16 and CAN/CSA S136. Weld to CSA W59. 3.4 BRACING OF STRUCTURES Compensate for unevenness of wall surfaces by installing packing as required, and upon review by Consultant. .2 Install and relocate bracing as indicated on the Drawings, and in accordance with the sequence of construction indicated on the Drawings. Coordinate bracing of structure and elements to remain with the new construction, to maintain the sequence indicated on the Drawings. 4 Remove bracing only upon completion and connection of new construction that is intended to provide the necessary support to the element being shored. 3.5 SHORING OF STRUCTURES For stone or brick masonry, dismantle as necessary to facilitate raking or flying shores. Consolidate masonry around perimeter of opening. Carefully mark and remove masonry elements to be salvaged and reset in accordance with Consultant instructions. .2 Compensate for unevenness of wall surfaces by installing packing as required, and upon review by Consultant. Install and relocate shoring as indicated on the Drawings, and in accordance with the sequence of construction indicated on the Drawings. .4 Coordinate shoring of structure and elements to remain with the new construction, to maintain the sequence indicated on the Drawings. 3.6 ADJUSTMENT Monitor performance of bracing and shoring systems and maintain their effectiveness by retightening as required, making adjustments, until support is completion of project. .2 If adjustments are frequent, repetitive, or exceed 6 mm, notify Consultant. 3.7 SHORING AND BRACING REMOVAL OR RELOCATION Shoring and bracing shall only be removed upon completion and connection of new construction that is intended to provide the necessary support to the element being temporarily braced or shored. .2 Remove or relocate temporary shoring and bracing only when the Consultant has given written approval. Examine contact interface of shoring and bracing with historic fabric in the presence of Consultant. Where the historic fabric has been damaged, restore damaged area to replicate the adjacent comparable finishes to the satisfaction of the Consultant and at no additional cost to the Owner. Page 490 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 03 44 JCAL Project No. 24012 SHORING AND SUPPORT OF PERIOD STRUCTURES Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 5 4 Remove temporary shoring bracing from site upon completion of shoring and bracing sequence indicated on Drawings, and upon written approval of Consultant. END OF SECTION Page 491 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX D Structural Assessment & Retention Plan Proiect No. 24012 02 41 19 — SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 15 Page 492 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 1 Part 1 General 1.1 SUMMARY .1 This Section includes the following: .1 Demolition and removal of selected portions of exterior building components or structural elements. .2 Demolition of mechanical and electrical equipment. .3 Demolition and removal of selected site elements. .4 Repair procedures for selective demolition operations. .2 This section does not include the following: .1 Removal of hazardous materials or asbestos abatement. .2 Demolition of interior building components and finishes. .3 Drawings contain details that suggest directions for solving some of the major demolition and removal requirements for this project; Contractor is required to develop these details further by submitting a demolition plan prepared by a professional engineer employed by the Contractor. 1.2 RELATED REQUIREMENTS Section 02 03 44 — Shoring and Support of Period Structures. .2 Section 04 03 43.19 — Period Stone Dismantling. 3 Section 04 03 21.19 — Clay Brick Conservation Treatment. 4 Section 3123 33 — Excavation, Trenching and Backfilling. 1.3 REFERENCES 1 Definitions: .1 Alternate Disposal: reuse and recycling of materials by designated facility, user or receiving organization which has valid Certificate of Approval to operate. Alternative to landfill disposal. .2 Deconstruction: systematic dismantling of structure in a manner that achieves safe removal/disposal of hazardous materials and maximum salvage/recycling of materials. 1 Ultimate objective is to recover potentially valuable resources while diverting from landfill what has traditionally been significant portion of waste system. .3 Demolish: Detach items from existing construction and legally dispose of them off site, unless indicated to be removed and salvaged or removed and reinstalled. .4 Demolition: rapid destruction of structure with or without prior removal of hazardous materials. Page 493 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 2 .5 Existing to Remain: Existing items of construction that are not removed and that are not otherwise indicated as being removed, removed and salvaged, or removed and reinstalled. .6 Hazardous Materials or Hazardous Substances: dangerous substances, dangerous goods, hazardous commodities and hazardous products, include but not limited to: poisons, corrosive agents, flammable substances, ammunition, explosives, radioactive substances, or materials that endanger human health or environment if handled improperly as defined by the Federal Hazardous Products Act (RSC 1985) including latest amendments. .7 Integrated Pest Management Program (IPM): is a pest control strategy which implements environmental health and safety approaches to minimize the use of toxic pesticides and minimize their exposure to humans and the environment. .8 Recycle: process by which waste and recyclable materials are transformed or collected for purpose of being transferred into new products. .9 Recycling: process of sorting, cleansing, treating and reconstituting solid waste and other discarded materials for purpose of using in altered form. 1 Recycling does not include burning, incinerating, or thermally destroying waste. .10 Remove and Salvage: Detach items from existing construction and deliver them to Owner ready for reuse. .11 Remove and Reinstall: Detach items from existing construction, prepare them for reuse, and reinstall them where indicated. .12 Reuse: repeated use of product in same form but not necessarily for same purpose. Reuse includes: Salvaging reusable materials from remodelling projects, before demolition stage, for resale, reuse on current project or for storage for use on future projects. .2 Returning reusable items including pallets or unused products to vendors. .13 Salvage: removal of structural and non-structural materials from deconstruction/disassembly projects for purpose of reuse or recycling. .14 Source Separation: acts of keeping different types of waste materials separate, beginning from first time they became waste. .2 Reference Standards: .1 Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) CCME PN 1326-2008, Environmental Code of Practice for Aboveground and Underground Storage Tank Systems for Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products. .2 Canadian Standards Association (CSA) CSA G40.20/G40.21-13 (R2018), General Requirements for Rolled or Welded Structural Quality Steel/Structural Quality Steel. .3 CSA Group (CSA) CSA 5350 M1980 (R2003), Code of Practice for Safety in Demolition of Structures .4 Dangerous Goods Transportation Act (DGTA), R.S.O. 1990, c. D.I. Page 494 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 3 .5 Department of Justice Canada (Jus) Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA), 2012. .2 Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), 2012 1 SOR/2003-2, On -Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations .2 SOR/2006-268, Regulations Amending the On -Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations .3 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act (TDGA), 1992, c. 34 .4 Motor Vehicle Safety Act (MVSA), 1995 .5 Hazardous Materials Information Review Act, 1985 .6 Ontario Building Code 2012 (Part 8) .7 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) NFPA 241 13, Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations 1.4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Demolition Meetings: 1 Convene pre -demolition meeting 2 weeks prior to beginning on-site removals, with Contractor's Representative and Consultant, in accordance with Section 01 31 19 - Project Meetings to: 1 Verify project requirements. .2 Verify existing site conditions adjacent to demolition work. .3 Co-ordinate with other construction subtrades. .4 Verify locations where temporary shoring is required, prior to start of demolition in these locations. .2 Hold project meetings every week. .3 Ensure key personnel, site supervisor, project manager, and subcontractor representatives attend. 1.5 ACTION AND INFORMATIONAL SUBMITTALS Submit in accordance with Section 0133 00 - Submittal Procedures. .2 Submit pre -demolition audit and deconstruction/disassembly plan prior to starting work in accordance with Section 0135 73 - Procedures for Deconstruction of Structures. Comply with the requirements of Section 02 6133 - Hazardous Materials. 4 Prior to start of Work on site, verify that a Designated Substance Report (DSR) has been completed for the structure. In the event that a DSR is not available, coordinate with the Owner to arrange for such reports to be compiled immediately before building components are disturbed. Workers, haulers and subcontractors must possess current, applicable Certificates of Approval and/or permits to remove, handle and dispose of wastes categorized Provincially or Municipally as hazardous. .1 Provide proof of compliance within 24 hours upon request of Consultant. Page 495 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 4 Demolition Plan: Submit a plan of demolition area indicating extent of temporary facilities and supports, methods of removal and demolition prepared by a professional engineer in accordance with requirements of Authority Having Jurisdiction, and as follows: .1 Proposed Dust Control and Noise Control Measures: Submit statement or drawing that indicates the measures proposed for use, proposed locations, and proposed time frame for their operation. .2 Inventory: Submit a list of items that have been removed and salvaged after selective demolition is complete. .3 Landfill Records: Indicate receipt and acceptance of hazardous wastes by a landfill facility licensed to accept hazardous wastes. .4 Pre demolition Photographs: Submit photographs indicating existing conditions of adjoining construction and site improvements prior to starting Work. Include finish surfaces that may be misconstrued as damage caused by selective demolition operations. .5 Demolition/deconstruction drawings, diagrams or details showing sequence of demolition/deconstruction work and supporting structures, and means and methods to be employed to carry out the work indicated on the Demolition Drawings. .6 Temporary bracing and shoring, stamped by a qualified Professional Engineer, registered in the Province of Ontario. Indicate material specifications, all details and information necessary for assembly and erection of temporary shoring, including anchorage to existing building. .2 Show all superimposed service dead, live and lateral loads, for which the temporary shoring is designed. .7 A protection plan and methodology to protect adjacent elements designated to remain, from weather related damage, until such time as these elements are permanently protected from weather related damage. .8 Provide proof and review of approval of shoring erection by a Professional Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario. Maintain the shoring in a satisfactory condition for the duration of the work. .9 Prior to removal of metal flashings/decorative details or items of historical significance, record existing profiles and details accurately. Provide copy of these measurements to the Consultant. 1.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE Regulatory Requirements: Ensure Work is performed in compliance with CEPA, CEAA, TDGA, and applicable Provincial and Municipal regulations. .2 Project supervisor with previous deconstruction experience must be present on site throughout demolition/disassembly procedure. 1.7 SITE CONDITIONS Environmental Protection: Page 496 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 5 .1 Ensure Work is done in accordance with Section 01 35 43 - Environmental Procedures. .2 Ensure Work does not adversely affect adjacent watercourses, groundwater and wildlife, or contribute to excess air and noise pollution. .3 Fires and burning of waste or materials is not permitted on site. .4 Do not bury rubbish or waste materials. .5 Do not dispose of waste or volatile materials including but not limited to: mineral spirits, oil, petroleum based lubricants, or toxic cleaning solutions into watercourses, storm or sanitary sewers. Ensure proper disposal procedures are maintained throughout project. .6 Do not pump water containing suspended materials into watercourses, storm or sanitary sewers, or onto adjacent properties. .7 Control disposal or runoff of water containing suspended materials or other harmful substances in accordance with authorities having jurisdiction. .8 Protect trees, plants and foliage on site and adjacent properties and streetscape to remain. .9 Prevent extraneous materials from contaminating air beyond application area, by providing temporary enclosures during demolition work. .10 Cover or wet down dry materials and waste to prevent blowing dust and debris. Control dust on all temporary roads. .2 Structural Vibration Limits 1 If any of the vibration limits are exceeded, or any other demolition procedure is observed to have a negative impact on the building masonry/structure, stop all work until the situation is remedied and an effective mitigation is submitted and reviewed by the Consultant. .2 Below are the structural limits for the excavation and demolition on this project. Dominant Frequency Range (Hz): Peak Limit Vibration (mm/s): <10 3.0 10 to 50 3.0 to 8.0 (interpolated linearly) 50 to 100 8.0 to 10.0 (interpolated linearl ) >100 10.0 1.8 EXISTING CONDITIONS If material resembling spray or trowel applied asbestos or other substance listed as hazardous be encountered in course of demolition, suspend work, take preventative measures, and notify Consultant immediately. Proceed only after written instructions have been received from Consultant. .2 Structures to be demolished are based on their condition on date that tender is accepted. .1 Remove, protect and store salvaged items as directed by Consultant. Salvage items as identified by Consultant. Deliver to Owner as directed. Page 497 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 6 Part 2 Products 2.1 EQUIPMENT Equipment and heavy machinery: .1 On -road vehicles to: CEPA-SOR/2003-2, On -Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations. .2 Leave machinery running only while in use, except where extreme temperatures prohibit shutting machinery down. Where possible use water efficient wetting equipment/trucks/attachments when minimizing dust. .4 Demonstrate that tools are being used in manner which allows for salvage of materials in best condition possible. Shoring materials to CSA G40.20/G40.21, Grade 300. Limit loads imparted on all existing structural slabs by equipment and machinery as follows: 1 Concentrated loads on structural slabs cannot exceed 5.0 kN. Spacing must not be less than 1.2 in apart. .2 Uniform area loads cannot exceed 4.8 kPa at Ground Floor level. Uniform area loads cannot exceed 2.4 kPa on all other floors. .3 Refer to Drawings for loading limitations specific to selected areas of the structure. Equipment or machinery that will apply loads to existing structural slabs must be reviewed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario, for conformance with the load limits, prior to use or installation on site. Equipment or machinery that will apply loads to any elements other than existing structural slabs must be reviewed by a professional engineer licensed in the Province of Ontario, prior to use or installation on site. Temporary Shoring: All materials used for temporary shoring must meet the material standards noted in the reviewed shoring drawings. Substitutions will not be accepted without the stamped approval of the Engineer who prepared the shoring drawings. 10 Maximum permissible weight for jackhammers adjacent to existing elements to remain is 7 kg. Modify weight of equipment if necessary, in order to prevent damage to concrete which is to remain in place. Sawcut in advance of breaking concrete wherever possible, and as indicated on Drawings. 11 Minimum distance between any two operating jackhammers or chipping hammers is three (3) metres or as directed by the Consultant. Part 3 Execution 3.1 PREPARATION Protection of in-place conditions: Page 498 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 7 .1 Work in accordance with Section 0135 43 - Environmental Procedures. .2 Prevent movement, settlement or damage to adjacent structures, services, paving, trees, landscaping, adjacent grades, adjacent properties, and all parts of existing building to remain. 1 Provide bracing, and shoring as required and as indicated on the Drawings. .2 Repair damage caused by deconstruction, as directed by Consultant. .3 Support affected structures and, if safety or stability, in whole or in part, of structure being demolished, adjacent structures, services, or parts of existing building to remain appears to be endangered, take preventative measures, stop Work and immediately notify Consultant. .4 Protect existing building structure, systems, windows, services and equipment, which are to remain. .5 Prevent debris from blocking surface drainage system, elevators, mechanical and electrical systems which must remain in operation. .6 Keep noise and dust to a minimum. .7 Verify the location of utilities and services designated to remain intact, locations of utility caps to be installed, or designated for removal during demolition in coordination with the Consultant. Allow sufficient time and effort to coordinate with the Consultant to identify such systems and properly trace and label in order to protect and preserve systems during and post demolition process. Repair and make good any damage to any utilities, infrastructures, mechanical and electrical systems designated to remain intact, at no additional cost to the Contract. .8 Cutting torches or other high heat equipment will not be allowed may be allowed if permits are in place. Note there is a severe risk of sparks from demolition operations leading to smoldering and combustion especially of very dry wood elements. Maintain a fire watch following any hot work and take all necessary precautions to minimize risk of fire from work. .9 Install vibration monitors at locations identified by Consultant. Connect monitors to Consultant computer network to allow monitoring of exceedances. .2 Site and Surface Preparation: 1 Inspect site with Consultant and verify extent and location of items designated for removal, disposal, recycling, salvage and items to remain. .2 Disconnect electrical and telephone service lines entering buildings to be partially demolished. Locate, protect and post warning signs on electrical and communication lines and equipment which must remain energized to serve other parts of the site or other properties during period of demolition. .3 Disconnect and cap designated mechanical services and utility services, in accordance with authorities having jurisdiction. 1 Natural gas supply lines: remove in accordance with gas company requirements. .2 Sewer and water lines: remove in accordance with authority having jurisdiction. Page 499 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 8 .3 Other underground services: remove and dispose of as directed by Consultant or appropriate authority having jurisdiction. 3 Removal of Hazardous Waste .1 Prior to start of deconstruction work remove contaminated or hazardous materials from site as directed by Consultant and dispose of in safe manner in accordance with TDGA and other applicable regulatory requirements, in accordance with Section 02 6133 - Hazardous Materials. 4 Do not disrupt active or energized utilities traversing premises or designated to remain undisturbed. Where applicable, utilize demolition activities to expose but not damage utility and service lines. 5 Arrange for temporary lifting and removal of existing equipment installed on roof decks. These include but are not limited to mechanical equipment, vent stacks, soil stacks and other sundry items. Before lifting this equipment, coordinate with Owner. 6 Furnish all supervision, labour, materials and equipment necessary to accomplish the monitoring, trapping, proper disposal, chemical control for the pest and rodent removal component as per the site specific IPM Plan. The implementation of the IPM will be required from the start of the contractor mobilization, during demolition activities up to the turnover of the site to the owner at project completion. 7 Remove all loose building materials and contents. 3.2 SHORING ERECTION 1 Supply and install the shoring sufficient to carry out the scope of work identified on the drawings. .2 Set shoring anchors in horizontal masonry joints only. DRILLING INTO THE FACE STONE/CLAY BRICK IS NOT PERMITTED. Repointing of masonry joints as shoring is removed will be carried out as part of the masonry contract. .3 Provide proof of review and approval of shoring erection by a Professional Engineer, licensed in the Province of Ontario. .4 Maintain the shoring in a satisfactory condition for the duration of the work. 3.3 DISASSEMBLY 1 Demolition/disassembly work in accordance with Section 01 56 00 - Temporary Barriers and Enclosures. .2 Refer to Section 04 03 43.19 - Period Stone Dismantling and Section 04 03 21.19 - Clay Brick Conservation Treatment for procedures when historic stone or brick is designated for salvage. Prior to start of Work remove contaminated or hazardous materials as directed from site and dispose of at designated disposal facilities in safe manner and in accordance with TDGA and other applicable requirements. 4 Except as indicated, materials removed from structure to be demolished are property of Contractor. Page 500 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 9 Throughout course of deconstruction, pay close attention to connections and material assemblies. Employ workmanship procedures which minimize damage to material to be salvaged or removed and reused, and of elements and material to remain. Ensure workers are briefed to carry out work in accordance with appropriate deconstruction techniques and those indicated in the Drawings and Specifications. Workers must utilize adequate fall protection. Project supervisor with previous deconstruction experience must be present on site throughout demolition procedure. Deconstruct in accordance with the Ontario Building Code, Part 8 and applicable safety standards. 10 Temporary shoring must be approved in writing by the Engineer who prepared the reviewed shoring drawings, prior to proceeding with the demolition. 11 Blasting operations are not permitted during deconstruction. 12 Remove all utilities, piping, mechanical and electrical equipment/systems and associated structures completely from areas and assemblies designated to be demolished unless otherwise noted. 13 Systematically remove finishes, furnishings, building contents, mechanical and electrical equipment of value, and for which suitable reuse and recycling opportunities exist. 14 Disassemble only in sequence indicated on Drawings and in reviewed Demolition Plan only. 15 Carefully remove windows and doors from structure where these are not designated to remain. 16 Disassemble non-loadbearing interior partitions and remove materials from structure. 17 Wherever possible, transfer material assemblies from heights to ground level for easier disassembly. Take appropriate measures to ensure safety. 18 Remove and store materials to be salvaged, in manner to prevent damage. .1 Store and protect in accordance with requirements for maximum preservation of material. .2 Handle salvaged materials as new materials. .19 Where existing materials are to be re -used in Work, use special care in removal, handling, storage and re -installation to assure proper function in completed work. .20 Remove broken or decayed wood components, and corroded steel structural members which Consultant deems to require replacement. .21 Do not disturb items designated to remain in place. .22 Maintain structural integrity of structure designated to remain. .23 Extent of demolition and deconstruction and procedure for deconstruction are shown on Drawings. .24 Deconstruct to minimize dusting. Keep materials wetted as necessary or as directed by Consultant. Page 501 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 10 .25 Remove existing equipment, services, and obstacles where required for refinishing or making good of existing surfaces, and replace as work progresses. .26 At end of each day's work, leave Work in safe and stable condition. .27 Demolish masonry and concrete walls in sections suitable for reuse as specified. .28 Remove structural framing. .29 Contain fibrous materials to minimize release of airborne fibres while being transported within facility. .30 Remove and dispose of demolished materials except where noted otherwise and in accordance with authorities having jurisdiction. .31 Use natural lighting to do Work where possible. .1 Shut off lighting except those required for security purposes at end of each day. 3.4 REMOVAL OF CONCRETE SLABS Prior to the removal of portions of concrete slabs, perform ground penetration radar scanning of the existing slab. Provide 48 hours advance notice of Testing to Consultant and arrange to perform scanning in presence of Consultant. Based on the results of the scan, the Consultant will decide on the measures in order to minimize structural effect on the existing slabs. .2 Maintain integrity of existing structure at all times. 3 Demolish Concrete by methods which do not create impact loads on items that are not to be demolished. Jackhammer or other impact operations that involve breaking up the slabs into small portions will not be permitted. 4 Remove existing reinforced, cast -in-place concrete floor slabs from areas as indicated. Sawcut the existing concrete slabs and remove only as required. If beams, slab thickening or other structural elements are encountered, stop work and notify Consultant. Do not proceed until written direction has been received from Consultant. 5 Sawcut the concrete slabs free from surrounding structure and remove in small sections from above. Uncontrolled dropping of any removed portions of slabs to spaces below will not be permitted. 6 Utilize wet cut saws only. Control dust and prevent from spreading to surrounding areas. Control the slurry generated from cutting operations in the areas of cutting and in the spaces directly below. Operate wet vacuums continuously during cutting operations. Equipment: Wet Cut, walk behind core cut saw. Provide saw with blade diameter capable of cutting through existing concrete slabs in a single pass. Equip saw with built-in water supply system approved by Consultant. As work progresses, protect openings in floors with protective barriers and guard rails in accordance with Health and Safety Requirements. Remove all debris to exterior immediately after removal. Stockpiling of removed materials will not be permitted inside of building at any time. 10 At the end of each day's work, leave Work in safe and stable condition. Page 502 of 688 10 Duke St. W, Kitchener, ON Section 02 41 19 JCAL Project No. 24012 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION Issued for Heritage Permit — March 2024 (NOT FOR TENDER OR CONSTRUCTION) Page 11 3.5 SHORING REMOVAL Remove shoring after completion of the work and dispose off site. Provide additional reinforcing to existing slab before removal of shores if directed by Shoring Engineer. Make good all damage to existing finishes, after shoring is removed. 3.6 MAKING GOOD Make good materials and finishes which are damaged or disturbed during the process of additions and reconstruction under the Contract. .2 Where existing work is to be made good, match new work exactly with the old work in material, form, construction and finish unless otherwise noted or specified. Protect work in the existing building, as completely as possible to hold the replacing of damaged work to a minimum. 4 Preparation for New Finishes .1 Remove existing finishes, including painting. .2 Fill cracks and depressions with suitable filler and finish smooth, as recommended by the manufacturer of the new finishes. .3 Grind protrusions level with substrates and finish smooth. .4 Remove all evidences of existing adhesive, grease, oil, soil and other encrustations of foreign material by washing, scraping and grinding if necessary. .5 Clean and prepare substrates to receive new work. 3.7 CLEANING 1 Waste Management: separate waste materials for reuse or recycling. .1 Remove recycling containers and bins from site and dispose of materials at appropriate facility. .2 Stockpile materials designated for alternate disposal in location which facilitates removal from site and examination by potential end markets, and which does not impede disassembly, processing, or hauling procedures. .1 Label stockpiles, indicating material type and quantity. 3 Keep processing area clean and free of excess debris. .4 Upon completion of project, remove debris, trim surfaces and leave work site clean. Backfill areas as indicated in accordance with Section 3123 33 — Excavation, Trenching and Backfilling. Upon completion of project, reinstate landscaped areas, walkways, light standards, affected by Work to condition which existed prior to beginning of Work or otherwise to condition which is indicated on the documents. END OF SECTION Page 503 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Heritage Risk Assessment Report Project No. 24012 Draft report issued March 27th, 2024 Final report issued April 4th, 2024 Report Prepared by: MOld IEIDIDVU CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 504 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention TABLE OF CONTENTS Heritage Risk Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE.......................................................................................................................... 1 3. OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................................................... 1 4. IDENTIFICATION OF RISKS.....................................................................................................................1 5. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITES.................................................................................................................... 2 6. RISK ASSESSMENT TABLE......................................................................................................................3 7. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS.................................................................................................................9 8. APPENDIXA—VIBRATION MONITORING PLAN ..................................................................................10 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page Page 505 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 1. INTRODUCTION Heritage Risk Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary facades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP, the draft version of which, dated June 23, 2023 and available to JCAL, requires "That the Owner submits a Risk Management Plan, including a Vibration Monitoring Plan, commenting on the means and methods that shall be used to minimize vibration to 10 Duke Street West during grading, construction, [etc.]". This report is intended to satisfy the requirement for a Risk Management Plan for the heritage fagade elements that are to be retained during the redevelopment project. JCAL has already produced a Vibration Monitoring Plan, dated December 15, 2023, and revised for March 27th, 2024, which provided parameters for vibration limits and monitoring to mitigate the effects of vibration on the existing facades. That Vibration Monitoring Plan is attached here to as Appendix A. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL's proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023, and Additional Service Agreement No. 1 (ASA -01), dated March 22, 2024. The general scope of this report is intended to satisfy the outline provided by Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planning, City of Kitchener, in her e-mail dated March 20, 2024, as follows: • Risk Identification - Construction activities, vibration, weather, fire etc. • Risk Response - How will the risks be mitigated, what will the response be if damage does occur, what standards/guidelines are applied. • Implementation - Roles and responsibilities, monitoring, and reporting. 3. OBJECTIVES This Risk Management Plan is only intended to identify and address physical risks to the heritage fabric to be retained (the historic facades) over the course of the proposed construction period. This plan is not intended to identify any other risks that might be associated with construction such as health and safety aspects, labour shortages, cost, and schedule overruns, etc. In this report, potential risks to the heritage fabric are identified. For each such risk, mitigation measures are presented, followed by descriptions of how each risk can be mitigated and managed throughout the project and the responsibilities of the parties involved. 4. IDENTIFICATION OF RISKS During the retention and partial demolition of the existing heritage building, as well as the construction of the new building, the possible risks to the historic facade that may be encountered are categorized as follows: John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 506 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Heritage Risk Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 • Construction Activities - risks associated with construction and demolition activities. • Vibration — risks to the heritage fabric due to vibrations from the proposed construction. • Weather — risks posed by the elements that are increased by the proposed construction. • Other — risks that do not fall into the above categories. A detailed breakdown of each risk and the impacts that it could have on the historic facade, along with the recommended response for each identified risk, are presented in the Risk Assessment Table in Section 6 below. 5. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITES The parties involved in the proposed project are categorized within this report into several roles, as follows: Subtrades — All Subcontractors and trades retained by the General Contractor for carrying out specific aspects of the new construction including the selective demolition and temporary bracing of the Heritage Building, as well as the construction, of the new building. They are responsible for their specific scope of work and any direct impacts that may occur to heritage fabric during their construction activities. All communications by the Subtrades are assumed to be made directly to the Contractor. Contractor — VanMar and/or any parties representing them, acting as "Constructor" or General Contractor, and responsible for the overall construction activity on the site. They are responsible for the management of the project as a whole and to communicate relevant information between the Subtrades and the Heritage Consultant. Heritage Consultant — The member of the project team responsible for consulting on the heritage elements that were or may be affected by the construction of the new building (whether architectural or structural). They are responsible for advising on the specific methodologies that are required for the retention, repair, and preservation of the heritage elements in question. Heritage Subcontractor — A Subcontractor retained for their specific and demonstrated experience working with heritage materials and on heritage buildings. They are responsible for completing any repairs specific to the existing heritage fabric, as specified by the Heritage Consultant. Each of the above noted parties has a role to play in the implementation of the risk management for the historic facades. The roles of each party with respect to the identified risks are presented in the Risk Assessment Table in Section 6. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 507 of 688 a O n r•1 L J r L r Z W W J Ca G r W U) Z a U) W Al 0) N acts a� a� 0 0 CO L y Q) U U O N U C N "- a) Q CO c Co a E L L CtS U N as L co O Q N C ?� N " Cts Q) L co O Q) N CO 0 a -0 "a Q) EU -0 0) Co O– U c E co Ns Cts •EY a))"� c_ 'L Q)a) E >+ co a) ��==—a m E ctc0 Q) > C_ co c � E L O O O >,- E L Q) L N 0 > Y) aN (V CO L.1_ U c N co �1 7 0 . Q) N N=a (n� a.V 0) co E co to co co •U •O O c L >,� Cts > •� Q) a > E 1 Q) L Q) Co E s co -0 V) o ll� cn L a O o o -0 0 E a Q .. 0 Co N a) Q) +" U - N (n .2 O 7 C QC+-'Q� U O .O CO O 7 ON 006 �-0U N 0) O 0 Q_ y L N O> N Co Nd p0 0) 0_ Q) .. Cts 0 Q) ... Q) E Q) Q) 0 L p U U a Cn O Q)Q- co coQ) Z a a� O C a v0)Q) ..pc O� U > 0 cucoa c L 0 Q) V)0 L CL N U .� L c U E `� U d Y Q O N 0,O p cu ;- Q y •Cn L .= O a) -a N 0) L 0 C.) L N �-- L E UCO cu QN) ' " CU Cs Cs a 0Q6E LL � a) yCs >1 a) L a U r 2 O �L Oa)a) a O Cs OU .-O U cu p) U Q) cu cu 5 -a E vi _Q) O m" E m m 0 t� L CO N E Q) C) O Cts A? -a a) Q) E •L t� CO � .a U � CO �_ L Q Q) U U Q) D C) Q) .� L E Q) Q) N o) -a E Q) Cts Ocu c c U "' o) = O Q) i cu L "a -a O) CO _ Q i p) a CO E 7 L Q -0 Q) O cu "E p L Q) > Q) i O O T .Q) a E N o •E .cu a L p p Q U U O Q p .� .� O Q) Q cu O- � E CO E U Cts U Q) Q) Y) E O Q) Q) U L O O L CU 0) p >, Q) LCU L 0 p C C C U U' `� U L cu Cn U Q" O L Q >1 Ec N `�>, a Q) +� U Qcu ,L Q�� Q)� �O -p O U O m N Ucts Q) � L - QV) .� Q) i N •� L O L Q .`� N Q Q L U N a N _ >1 M cu a O Q Q v _ C _ _ — C p -CO) -0 C 0 0 () Q O U E Cts E cu :5 U Cts ++ Ctf E Q Q Cts v) ++cm L Cts Ctfcu a a -0 Q) ++ � U O O O o . + a cu i Cts Cts '� =' Q) Q 6. *a i Cts aQ) Cts E cu E = -a QQ) N CL Q) Q 7 Cn 0) _ O N O (n E t3 UO UO y U Q' L Q' E O o V Q) L z U U a o) -a u Q) m L m -a m -o r CU a N .N L CO Q) O L a) O o :.i a 7 'a fA N N L a O t) O a 0 U C Q) 7 "a fA ? �. N U L t O U O �- ci 0 N ++ OCU O !- N ++ CO CO °) `- N CO CO Ctf c E Ctf E E as E as o Ctf Ctf L � 75 E � a� c Ctf c � � +r °? � LLL = V)i' rr 2 = cu - vQi L *a iL . Cts 7 O N N 7 O N N 7 O N N U 2 2 N U 2 2 N U 2 0) N acts a� a� 0 0 CO L y Q) U U O N U C N "- a) Q CO c Co a E L L CtS U N as L co O Q N C ?� N " Cts Q) L co O Q) N CO 0 a -0 "a Q) EU -0 0) Co O– U c E co Ns Cts •EY a))"� c_ 'L Q)a) E >+ co a) ��==—a m E ctc0 Q) > C_ co c � E L O O O >,- E L Q) L N 0 > Y) aN (V CO L.1_ U c N co �1 7 0 . Q) N N=a (n� a.V 0) co E co to co co •U •O O c L >,� Cts > •� Q) a > E 1 Q) L Q) Co E s co -0 V) o ll� cn L a O o o -0 0 E a Q .. 0 Co N a) Q) +" U - N (n .2 O 7 C QC+-'Q� U O .O CO O 7 ON 006 �-0U N LE W, LL J N Q) Eu U O N Q 06 Q) Y O O 0U C L O co co 0 co 0��•1 L !! }a}-){� V/ 0) O 0 Q_ y Q Q) U co O> N Co Nd p0 0) 0_ Q) .. Cts 0 Q) ... Q) E Q) Q) 0 L p U U a Cn O Q)Q- co coQ) a a� O C a v0)Q) ..pc O� U :3 a) cucoa c L 0 X �� W E N V)0 X•= W E�0 L "a E �' .� L c U E `� c o Cts (n Cts LE W, LL J N Q) Eu U O N Q 06 Q) Y O O 0U C L O co co 0 co 0��•1 L !! }a}-){� V/ 'C N O C2 O N O oZ E v � N N O V Q Y Ad C O N � C �N co co cc Lo U Co U :3 co f ) o) a E N Cp N ' — > > L a) U C O C co coot O N Co0 U U C Co a"a N C Co "E oaU r� �� O O _ L (li �'�aco EoEooL)a) "= O L 0) U 0 C O C C L A C E 0 .� 0 yL+ y O O C (n N N O X p " C > EQ .cO=oU Uo aEia)o �_ W �o W� tZ 0 CL O CotO .� D to U 0= O QdQ'UD O ,L 0 O 0 0 N� 70 co O i N U ._ Co CO Q� C co co co N O S= >+ p L N 4— N O y-+ d 0 Co 0) •� 2 Q o L O C C..) o 0 C1 N -o C (v o. U C _ U Q Co N y Co _cu y .--� - O a) .L -a Co E O Q N N 7 (n O N L C C -0O L U N -p Co N N .q) o E C L O Co 0 > O L Co >, CN> -a -0U -0 N CCU U U Co N 0 N 0 +�- O N 0) 0 C OU "Q N := Q U CE OCcu 0 Z O Z NU Z p OO o p NN L s> N L oO NO 06 L E 0 O Z O C U �p O L c oCU cuCo E Q O3: OL U U 2 C C O N V O N -0 N V O N 0 N V N +- . O O N C7 O V N c (n U L D Co Q' C— to Co L O N U O U N 7 co L U O t/1 O U 7 CO y L N t/1 o p O 7 U co L N N O O Co -� U o o •� 3 0 cu co — U u o u 3 d d .� d U +� �= d d a� co � � L C1 cC cC L L cC cC L a) L (� CC CC L _ L M Q N ++ = -L = Z ++ LL = m C AL = L *a N *. Co C L L = o � ' Co � U L = � U L 7 N N 7 N N 7 N N 7 N N �0 co v = = �0 co v = = �0 co v = = �0 co C cn N >N Co C Co i) Y � = N C O cu U Co p 's= O O "- C O N — O .0 N yam+ �O C O O �O O Co O y) OU NC C O U Q '> CU CL Co U Co L 0-0 "-' L N NC OL S N L N E 5 N == N >, Q N N C1 CU� N Co C N CU N Ccu CU O U C "' N o Co U = O N o` .. E o Y �. L •� '� Q Co Ln � O U N L 7 O p E O Cao Q 0) L C R O C Ucu ov-a N t3 C p L t3 N �.N�cu 2�2 Co- Q Co o U o Co E N � C E co co cc Lo U N U :3 co f ) o) a E N Cp O -o pC C O - -o N N E E —6-5 C coot O N Co0 U 7 0 �CXcoO.OcLo. a�� Q .0 o 4-. 7 E~ O N oaU r� �� O N Co _ L (li �'�aco EoEooL)a) "= O L Co L C Q 0) U 0 C O C C L A C E 0 .� 0 yL+ y O O C (n N N -p X p Co N C L X p p C U U C7 U— N U O C O C aEia)o �_ W �o W� U cn°?o co a) coa�oo OQ'U LL D U D to U 0= O QdQ'UD \I a� co d co co 0 4- 0 rn 0 LO (o C O C a) a) Co a) C> Co a) 0) 0 N O LU r L '0 O Co C L Q Co L Z� a) E > U O O Co O L a) �,cu C _0 Co . p N cm N O _ C C1 C3 N L O a) Co a) cu U O 0) 0 co c a) U a) 0 0 L U N E c Co Co O a) a) -2 4--o E E (n o CU a) o a) U a) L — C3 Co U .� C3 U O Co Q Co U E w -0 Co E a) = 0 ,L Co L � 0) Co a) i N O t� Co C O Co L Co "O L a) N 0 Co Lp Co Q � a) E 0 cu a) a) L CU 0) O N = co a) O a) > L C -0 p Co y C O Q Co U cu cu 3 Co Q U 0) +L- U O Q (n Co a) +' Q a) a) Co N2 r- Q a) "-" a) , Co + " Co a) L_ Q' E �, 0-o) N� a) 0 E� -0 0 'E a) a) Q' O N = Q a) �O U 0 0 cu (n (n O i 0 Co a) Co O N CC co — O �� Q L O - .--- � CC +L+ "a N CB O a) O O = O Co Q L Q *' Cc E a E O 7 >, O 0 " C U +fC+ Co ++ L 0 0 Q' r- 0 Co � N p 0 .L 7 >, O CZ C L O O 7 Q) a) � Co N 0) u a) iii O p U -0 N ' Q' — U� i 0 L N .r 4, O L Lcu O O O 7 Co CL CC CC E L •- a) O ov + E+ N cn U 2 2 7 O N N N U 2 2 U N L O N Q O 0 CU U p Co Cao Cao L C CU O L L CU C.) Co 0) CU cu E p O L p Q 0) C N V CU :� "O O V L D 0 •U —U)V a) O a) C1 a) L Cao >> cu Y Q N a) Co a) p 0 E Q 0 EO "= Q N 'L Lia) O > U a) H00co3a)0(n 0) a).o 0) a) Co Cao c v Cooc Q L Co a) L ((n N -a U � O� L� Q U Co 0 Co •"_ E 0 0 Q) Q) a) C ---� co-0Co 0) (n 0) Co Cao Co 0 O 0 Co a) CV L Co a) °3 CE6 N L L 075-0-0 075:3 0 -0 i F. O O O a) 0 a) O L O CL � O U co a) 0) � Co N Co a) C ---� co-0Co Co � cu N U L O> Co C X 2 E 0 a) 'C N 0 Q U U Q' CM c Lp) E O O L O CoE p) UCL 0) O CU0) 70 a)L 0) i O a 'c: C) - _ cu �> LO O � (2) CU • �CaL-o -) -cu U N p E c O O L co "O a E cd 0 C) U L- a) O Co = C" 0 CU O O U o L o `E a)U : r C E a) a)� o > O N a) ., Co .� Cco N > 0 .) N N p U > 0 Co > y) ++ E N L U O�� 0 a) L 0 a)2 O N> c 0 cQ =' O N co O — a— Co L 7 U "= >, r C LLLa LL C) aa)i0 c 0 O N c 0 in0 � N CU N 00)—X� ++ L- N a) Co c)o o -a N U: O CU �0-00 �OEacu Ccc:_a) �U >U �2— cu-aCo > E co v x L O c 0) O a E Co NCo C ._ 7 p y+ i O OU N CoC O Q O > coo > a) U U) > Co co c a) OL.�. Co N 7 ,N __ to > L Co O V Na N O X co Co w E E W, d J Coco U O N Q 06 Y O O U 0 C L O co co 0 o_^ V ! 0) m 0- 'C N O Q CD N O a) z vEi a) O L Q Y a) C) co 'L 2 C O co co 0 LO (D 0) m 0- C O x E a C O O L O O Ca O L O Q O 1 a) - cu N p� a) C a L C Co N L CU C U CU _ L �' O CU C 0 Q _ Q _ O 2 O> CU C O L 2 •J O C O -C a) C- t3 O L >, �' N a) Q .0- O a) O a� E .� O O O a) 0 a) Q U U Q' = a) a) CO Q CU c a) 0) O Q C-) U Q' p- >, a) X_ 0) O Q a) a) L . E a) p) CU E cu L p C� >, � Q' a) . cu cu a C N O OQ CU O5 U O a C C Q O a)U !C1C a) c cu o O O dOcu Cam) aL a - a a O a 70 O O CU E OL L LU a. O a CE � O -. aNCLa_�)) ..CNCa�U C L a aU C C C •— > O �+O O E CO O OCU J EE Q a) ' _ CU U Z - CU OE 2 cu2( U O O UCCC U C O E O Z 0 T ED ) �4-- O C CU "y CCCU 0 > C C O Ocu u O CU CU L p pU) CL 0 _ O O O CpN > o > f� a) 2> � .- 7t=! 3: a0 O — a >C NC " E a O 0a C p O 0 -0 D ch 0) z' O ch V O -0L 0 O LL U cuQ)0 0=V 3 0 U C CU L L a) 0 U O N O 7cu N p a) U L co CA CU CU O C) - X C) co -E y cLo - o X cu VQ) .. O CO -E w 'a C� Co 0 Cu N Cu 5 V N V N a) CU CU 0a" UCU ��">,E a�;?•- N 0) C-) CLc �a�0 }' coo CL°p�p �OECCU �' �� *' CU o -0C U > U CU }' 2 CU -o CC U *' CU E m U *' CU }' "O U i 4� U L 4, L }' U O U C Z_ CU "O = O N N 7 O N 3 O 0 y co U 2 2 co U = N = = 1 cu � Q O a) C p .� O E U O a O CB -p 4?0' C S C O-� cu O 0 >, C a)--aawEa) U -a cu ._ L a) X a) t7) C1 CU.L C C C a) � U L•� U O O 0 . � CU CU U O N O a) •C C N ---' a) p) CO L O p -OC O O CU L "- '= Q) CU CU a) —0 U � a) •� 0) CUcuCU CU O N E L O L OC..) > E CU. E SEE U .9 (n L (n CV ��COC>� w E L a) 0 N OU C1 0U �. N (n U a) O � O a)U t� E a) Q) CU E N CU C C a) O "0 N La) a) U r. Q _ U C 0 c � N U O O N C C C O CU C L •V C C D N CU O CU 0)O 0 O C D U cu >CU cu O =cu X 0 L' L— U -0)L L U LLJ� >ax >cE >E co co 0 LO (D 0) m 0- 'C N O — C1 O N O �Z E v a) o V) Q Y N Ad a O C a) a) U co Co U 0) 7 0 N OWX r co co 4- 0 N_ LO (}1-){� V/ LL o >, L Ea) > �__ O _ Co O _ O Co Co N O L a Co o Co U CU O 0 L > Co Q y+ i .-" N Co Co Co "a C E N OU c L E-0 Q Cn L 7 yL+ O a) �-" cu a N L N .: Co N i 70 (n cu a CU 0 O + OU O L O Co O Co O O O L CCO Q O O)O p CL a "a a a0 0)�L cu -a O Q y+ 0 O N OC O a) a) co E �_ Co 0) N a N co E c � E U cu N yQ+ 'cu U O -O 0 L O OU U) yQ+ 'cu y" Q a) >, CO CO a) C1 Q C Co V) C1 _x = W U L Q yam-+ CU E Q N E -� Co L Co N "O N C L a) a) �_ L L O 0 0 a) CU L U Co L y+ a) L U O •L E (n >> �0L OQ O �T Z O .� 0 U coa OQ >,=U•N QO a ++ V Co Q E N ++ t� t� N cu N a) cu ++ Q L CC N Co +L+ .�_" r CC L +cu L+ Q' CC '� CU 'a +L+ .��" 'C "� O CC p Co Q V) 0) ?' Q N u a) ?> Ua > CB > yam+ Na ch a Z CU oa) U co Y ch -0 aa)i a)0 E o vi o U A? co o t/1 0 U co t/! O p E o U aL�) N N u o N t/! 0 U O U a) > O .� V V> 'a Y V ,C= N .L N O 'a "'' U Co cu N C C2 v a) �:� U CC CC L o cu �� a Q �U CC U o N L L cm cu E CC O Q Co E L = Co �L +' Co = �L = �L +' ?j � � a Co �L = Co �L }' U +' Co .� � � = U U �L N N 7 O N N 7 O N N 7 O N 2 2 co U 2 2 co U 2 2 N U 2 Q O Co O_ N Co (n L N U O (n CV (n 0 U O C ,CO U_ Q a) N Q 0)CU N ._ s c E Co a) 3 U Co L Co .-" i o (n C Q O L p a) 0) Q cu Co CU L (n Co L N N E � 49—' a) Co O� c*= L O O S Co c O N U to a)c ) N C) 0) O acu r- 0 O a) '� O L C Q N Co Co E 0) Mn cu a)O t) L C c O O i 0 E0"a cucuc c a) 0) 3 E E La c 0) a) -a N N N .� O O N N c .r cu X i r L U ._ Co C Q Co L Co N +-' L W Co •� "a E.N d (nom > 0 co co 4- 0 N_ LO (}1-){� V/ LL 0 7 G I 0 § \\ ƒ \ 7E \: 27 /d / 0 e / fco a33 o £ ee= \ \ � \" / a) / % � / ° q E 7� k /� / 2f $ -0 -0 a/ ) C), a) E\m % \) \ 0 0 % § E E 0 \ o E •- \ § CU e o _$ 0 20$ m cu— \ / \ -a a) -0 \ E CL cu 7 z .. % / m ± e % .. /a &3=@\ § \� o u e = 7 @ E: 2 r- / f k\\ E a e £ 0� \ 7®�° 2� �$k� ch §0 co d °dkk �§� k f2 \\/J\ 2 % co\ I _ =a/e\ _ _ = 2 co \ 2 G o 0 / 0 § 3 Z- :3 Co _ $ _\C of m o 0 0 = Q) o = = o �:t:�°tg cu 2E ƒ \00 c / I m m S 0 m LO ¢ 2 n 0- 10 Duke Steet West Heritage Risk Assessment Report Existing Fagade Retention Project No. 24012 7. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. �aFrssrtr, J. K DEE, PR-04-2024 —f> Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/id 24012/10 Duke - Structural Assessment & Retention Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 9 Page 514 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention APPENDIX A Vibration Monitoring Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Heritage Risk Assessment Report Proiect No. 24012 Page 10 Page 515 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Project No. 24012 Draft report issued December 15th, 2023 Final report issued December 15th, 2023 Revised report issued March 27th, 2024 Report Prepared by: ZOOK IE CCUF- ASSOCHATIBS 7,71Da CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 516 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 1. INTRODUCTION Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP. The draft version of this approval, dated June 23, 2023 and provided to JCAL, included Heritage Planning Conditions which require [t]hat the Owner submits a Risk Management Plan, including a Vibration Monitoring Plan commenting on the means and methods that shall be usedto minimize vibration to 10 Duke Street West during grading, construction, servicing or other site development works to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner. This report is intended to satisfy the requirement for a Vibration Monitoring Plan. Further to other conditions in the Site Plan Application approval, JCAL has already completed an investigation of the subject site, including destructive exploratory openings, and prepared a Structural Assessment Report, dated December 4th, 2023. Design progress drawings for the new tower have been completed and reviewed by JCAL, to 75% progress at the time of this writing. A geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.) has been prepared and also reviewed by JCAL. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions at the subject site. Observations made during that investigation are more comprehensively described in our Structural Assessment Report. A summary of the relevant facts are included in the discussion below. The existing building is constructed predominantly of one-way concrete slabs, supported by steel beams, which are supported by interior steel columns and, at the building perimeter, load-bearing multi-wythe brick masonry exterior walls. The exiting building is a 3 -storey building plus a full -height basement level. The existing exterior walls are in good condition where visible on the exterior, and where exposed during investigatory openings made at the interior. The walls consist of an exterior wythe of clay brick with two backup wythes of concrete brick at the interior. These are bonded together with regular header bricks. Mortar joints remain generally intact, except for localized areas. and openings at the interior revealed a well -constructed wall assembly with solid mortar present in the head and collar joints. Stone masonry is included at details such as bands, sills, and surrounding the main entrance. Localized repointing and other conservation work will be required as part of the preservation and retention of the relevant portions of the existing facades, including at stone details and throughout the masonry. No bulging, significantly displaced stones, or excessively deteriorated or unstable John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 517 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 masonry was noted that would cause us to consider this building to be especially vulnerable to vibrations. Masonry conservation work is not expected to be required in advance of construction. One caveat is at the parapet which extends above the roof level. The interior face of the parapet is fully covered with metal flashing. While it was not possible to assess the masonry at arms -length from the exterior, and mortar joints here do appear to be generally intact, there is some efflorescence at the exterior of the parapet. This is an indication of high moisture content and migration, suggesting a higher likelihood of deterioration of masonry within the core of the wall. There is nothing to suggest a deviation from the course of action proposed herein, but the condition of this parapet will be monitored and assessed further, as work is ongoing on this project. 4. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION As noted in the Introduction section, above, the project includes the planned retention in full for the existing south and east facades, and partial retention of the existing west fagade, for the building at 10 Duke St. W., for integration with a new tower to be constructed on the site. The project's intent is to retain the existing facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load- bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), floor by floor, as construction progresses. The interior finishes in the building are typically applied to a terra cotta tile backup placed with an approximately 25 mm gap to the interior wythe of backup brick. As part of the work to stabilize the fagade and to integrate it with new wall assemblies, it is proposed to remove this terra cotta tile and all finishes. As such, impact to plaster or other finishes are not a consideration in determining the vibration susceptibility of the building. The new tower will be constructed with a raft foundation, the base of which will be set close to the basement level of the current building. The raft will occupy much of the height of the current lower level of the building, and, aside from elevator pits, the occupiable space of the building will generally extend from approximately grade level and above. The geotechnical report indicates that native soil on the site consists generally of fine granular deposits and silty clay till. It is clear that rock will not be encountered for the proposed depth of excavation. As a result of the foundation and soil conditions, excavation is anticipated to be relatively minimal. It is further understood, as communicated by VanMar, that the limited excavation that will be required will proceed using sloped excavations. Certainly, no blasting or hoe ramming of rock is anticipated to be required. Currently, there is a basement mechanical/boiler room within the existing building that extends further below grade than typical conditions, approximately an additional floor level below grade. This room is located against the North (rear) wall of the building and extends for approximately 10m in each direction (about 1'/ structural bays). The brick chimney which extends up beyond the roof is quite visible and is located at the northeast of this room. It will be necessary to fill and level the subgrade prior to construction of the raft slab, and the geotechnical report provides two potential options for infilling at this room, to bring it flush with the remaining basement. The first is to place lean mix concrete for the height required, and the second is to place heavily compacted granular fill. VanMar have indicated that they will place lean mix concrete to fill this void, which would not result in significant vibrations being induced, as the costs are quite comparable between the options. Overall, vibration from excavation is expected to be relatively minimal. General vibration from other construction is expected to stem from miscellaneous construction equipment and activities, such truck traffic adjacent to the facades retained in-situ, and no special circumstances are anticipated to apply. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 518 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 671 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Localized vibration may be induced from demolition and construction activity near the masonry to be retained. The bracing and construction sequencing and the design of temporary lateral support for the existing masonry facades to remain in-situ are also being prepared by JCAL. Provisions for saw or torch cutting of masonry, concrete, and steel elements connecting to the masonry to be retained will be included. Specifically, • saw cuts will be introduced in masonry walls at the interface with masonry to be retained before demolition is to occur on portions that are not to be retained, • saw cuts will be introduced in the concrete slabs along the masonry walls to be retained, before those slabs are removed, • steel beams that are connected with elements to remain will be torch cut prior to removal, and • the use of chippers on elements that remain connected to the masonry to be retained will be limited to 12 Ib. electric models, unless a mock-up demonstrates that alternatives do not risk damaging masonry. VIBRATION LIMITS Vibration limits are not stipulated in the City's conditions, nor is there a municipal bylaw in effect to limit vibrations. The nearby City of Toronto has placed limits on construction vibrations, in their bylaw No. 514-2008, and those limits are indicated in Figure 1, below. Table 1.0 "Prohibited Construction Vibrations" Frequency Vibration Peak of Vibration Particle Velocity (hertz) (mm/sec) Less than 4 8 4 to 10 15 More than 25 10 Fig 1: City of Toronto construction vibration limits The above -noted vibrations, while a good benchmark, are limits for any construction activity and are not necessarily applicable or appropriate to all projects. For historic buildings we typically recommend following the limits established in the DIN 4150-3 Standard, per line 3 of Table 1, included at Figure 2, below. The limits are • 3 mm/s for vibrations less than 10 Hz, • 3 to 8 mm/s for vibrations between 10 to 50 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, • 8 to 10 mm/s for vibrations between 50 to 100 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, and • 10 mm/s for vibrations above 100 Hz. We recommend proceeding with the limits indicated above in this case. These limits are quite low, and are intended to mitigate effects of vibration on historic buildings that might include deteriorated materials or sensitive finishes. The masonry facades to be retained on this building can be expected to be more resilient than many more delicate built historic structures. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 519 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention [4 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Though we do not anticipate exceedances even of these values given the understood nature of the adjacent construction, these limits could be re-evaluated should these limits be found to have significant impact on construction. Table 1: Guideline values for vibration velocity to be used when evaluating the effects of short-term vibration on structures Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 520 of 688 Guideline values for velocity, r, in mm/s Vibration at the foundation Vibration at Line Type of structure at a frequency of horizontal plane of highest floor 1 Hz to 10 Hz 10 Hz to 50 Hz 50 Hz to 100 Hz') at all frequencies 1 Buildings used for 20 20 to 40 40 to 50 40 commercial purposes, industrial buildings, and buildings of similar design 2 Dwellings and buildings 5 5 to 15 15 to 20 15 of similar design and/or occupancy 3 Structures that, because 3 3 to 8 8 to 10 8 of their particular sensi- tivity to vibration, cannot be classified under lines 1 and 2 and are of great intrinsic value (e.g. listed buildings under preservation order) At frequencies above 100 Hz, the values given in this column may be used as minimum values. Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 520 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Fig 3: Part South Elevation, indicating proposed locations of vibration monitors. 7. NOTIFICATION AND EXCEEDENCE PROCEDURE The vibration monitors must be connected for continual reporting of vibration events that result in exceedances of the vibration limits stipulated above. Exceedance events shall be reported by automated email to the Contractor, Owner, and appropriate Consultant(s). In the event of an exceedance the Consultant is to be contacted. If the exceedance is not the result of disturbing the vibration monitoring equipment or very localized activity around it (both of which are common causes of exceedances), and the Consultant considers the exceedance to be significant, the Consultant shall review on site for any damage that may have resulted from the exceedance. Future construction activity shall be modified to avoid further exceedances. In cases where this is not possible, and the exceedance was not observed to have had any impact to the structure, the Consultant may advise with respect to increased vibration limits. Note that this approach is intended to be generally consistent with the DIN 4150 standard, which states that "Exceeding the values in table 1 does not necessarily lead to damage; should they be significantly exceeded, however, further investigations are necessary." As noted above, it is our view that this building would likely tolerate vibration limits above those stipulated. 8. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 521 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. IK,DEE 10016HO5 AR -27-202 Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/jd 24012/10 Duke —Vibration Monitoring Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 522 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Kitchener, Ontario Existing Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Project No. 24012 Draft report issued December 15th, 2023 Final report issued December 15th, 2023 Report Prepared by: MOld 1EIDIDVU CONSULTING ENGINEERS Page 523 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 1. INTRODUCTION Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. (JCAL) was retained by VanMar Developments Inc. (VanMar) to provide consulting structural engineering services as it relates to the retention of portions of the primary fagades of the existing building at 10 Duke Street West, in Kitchener, Ontario, for incorporation of these facades with a planned redevelopment on the site. The redevelopment will include the construction of a new tower that occupies much of the footprint of the existing building presently on the site. VanMar received conditional approval of their Site Plan Application - SP22/104/D/AP. The draft version of this approval, dated June 23, 2023 and provided to JCAL, included Heritage Planning Conditions which require [t]hat the Owner submits a Risk Management Plan, including a Vibration Monitoring Plan commenting on the means and methods that shall be usedto minimize vibration to 10 Duke Street West during grading, construction, servicing or other site development works to the satisfaction of the Manager of Development Review and the City's Heritage Planner. This report is intended to satisfy the requirement for a Vibration Monitoring Plan. Further to other conditions in the Site Plan Application approval, JCAL has already completed an investigation of the subject site, including destructive exploratory openings, and prepared a Structural Assessment Report, dated December 4th, 2023. Design progress drawings for the new tower have been completed and reviewed by JCAL, to 75% progress at the time of this writing. A geotechnical report (File no. G21270, Chung & Vander Doelen Engineering Ltd.) has been prepared and also reviewed by JCAL. 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The scope of work for John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is based on JCAL proposal P23208, dated September 18, 2023. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS JCAL completed an investigation of existing conditions at the subject site. Observations made during that investigation are more comprehensively described in our Structural Assessment Report. A summary of the relevant facts are included in the discussion below. The existing building is constructed predominantly of one-way concrete slabs, supported by steel beams, which are supported by interior steel columns and, at the building perimeter, load-bearing multi-wythe brick masonry exterior walls. The exiting building is a 3 -storey building plus a full -height basement level. The existing exterior walls are in good condition where visible on the exterior, and where exposed during investigatory openings made at the interior. The walls consist of an exterior wythe of clay brick with two backup wythes of concrete brick at the interior. These are bonded together with regular header bricks. Mortar joints remain generally intact, except for localized areas. and openings at the interior revealed a well -constructed wall assembly with solid mortar present in the head and collar joints. Stone masonry is included at details such as bands, sills, and surrounding the main entrance. Localized repointing and other conservation work will be required as part of the preservation and retention of the relevant portions of the existing facades, including at stone details and throughout the masonry. No bulging, significantly displaced stones, or excessively deteriorated or unstable John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 1 Page 524 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 masonry was noted that would cause us to consider this building to be especially vulnerable to vibrations. Masonry conservation work is not expected to be required in advance of construction. One caveat is at the parapet which extends above the roof level. The interior face of the parapet is fully covered with metal flashing. While it was not possible to assess the masonry at arms -length from the exterior, and mortar joints here do appear to be generally intact, there is some efflorescence at the exterior of the parapet. This is an indication of high moisture content and migration, suggesting a higher likelihood of deterioration of masonry within the core of the wall. There is nothing to suggest a deviation from the course of action proposed herein, but the condition of this parapet will be monitored and assessed further, as work is ongoing on this project. 4. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION As noted in the Introduction section, above, the project includes the planned retention of a portion of the primary facades of the existing building at 10 Duke St W, for integration with a new tower to be constructed on the site. The project's intent is to retain the existing facades by primarily making use of the steel frame of the existing load-bearing masonry and steel -framed building, supplemented by temporary bracing and supports as necessary, until the fagade may be secured to the new permanent structure (designed by other consultants), floor by floor, as construction progresses. The interior finishes in the building are typically applied to a terra cotta tile backup placed with an approximately 25 mm gap to the interior wythe of backup brick. As part of the work to stabilize the fagade and to integrate it with new wall assemblies, it is proposed to remove this terra cotta tile and all finishes. As such, impact to plaster or other finishes are not a consideration in determining the vibration susceptibility of the building. The new tower will be constructed with a raft foundation, the base of which will be set close to the basement level of the current building. The raft will occupy much of the height of the current lower level of the building, and, aside from elevator pits, the occupiable space of the building will generally extend from approximately grade level and above. The geotechnical report indicates that native soil on the site consists generally of fine granular deposits and silty clay till. It is clear that rock will not be encountered for the proposed depth of excavation. As a result of the foundation and soil conditions, excavation is anticipated to be relatively minimal. It is further understood, as communicated by VanMar, that the limited excavation that will be required will proceed using sloped excavations. Certainly, no blasting or hoe ramming of rock is anticipated to be required. Currently, there is a basement mechanical/boiler room within the existing building that extends further below grade than typical conditions, approximately an additional floor level below grade. This room is located against the North (rear) wall of the building and extends for approximately 10m in each direction (about 1'/ structural bays). The brick chimney which extends up beyond the roof is quite visible and is located at the northeast of this room. It will be necessary to fill and level the subgrade prior to construction of the raft slab, and the geotechnical report provides two potential options for infilling at this room, to bring it flush with the remaining basement. The first is to place lean mix concrete for the height required, and the second is to place heavily compacted granular fill. VanMar have indicated that they will place lean mix concrete to fill this void, which would not result in significant vibrations being induced, as the costs are quite comparable between the options. Overall, vibration from excavation is expected to be relatively minimal. General vibration from other construction is expected to stem from miscellaneous construction equipment and activities, such truck traffic adjacent to the facades retained in-situ, and no special circumstances are anticipated to apply. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 2 Page 525 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention 671 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Localized vibration may be induced from demolition and construction activity near the masonry to be retained. The bracing and construction sequencing and the design of temporary lateral support for the existing masonry facades to remain in-situ are also being prepared by JCAL. Provisions for saw or torch cutting of masonry, concrete, and steel elements connecting to the masonry to be retained will be included. Specifically, • saw cuts will be introduced in masonry walls at the interface with masonry to be retained before demolition is to occur on portions that are not to be retained, • saw cuts will be introduced in the concrete slabs along the masonry walls to be retained, before those slabs are removed, • steel beams that are connected with elements to remain will be torch cut prior to removal, and • the use of chippers on elements that remain connected to the masonry to be retained will be limited to 12 Ib. electric models, unless a mock-up demonstrates that alternatives do not risk damaging masonry. VIBRATION LIMITS Vibration limits are not stipulated in the City's conditions, nor is there a municipal bylaw in effect to limit vibrations. The nearby City of Toronto has placed limits on construction vibrations, in their bylaw No. 514-2008, and those limits are indicated in Figure 1, below. Table 1.0 "Prohibited Construction Vibrations" Frequency Vibration Peak of Vibration Particle Velocity (hertz) (mm/sec) Less than 4 8 4 to 10 15 More than 25 10 Fig 1: City of Toronto construction vibration limits The above -noted vibrations, while a good benchmark, are limits for any construction activity and are not necessarily applicable or appropriate to all projects. For historic buildings we typically recommend following the limits established in the DIN 4150-3 Standard, per line 3 of Table 1, included at Figure 2, below. The limits are • 3 mm/s for vibrations less than 10 Hz, • 3 to 8 mm/s for vibrations between 10 to 50 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, • 8 to 10 mm/s for vibrations between 50 to 100 Hz, to be interpolated linearly, and • 10 mm/s for vibrations above 100 Hz. We recommend proceeding with the limits indicated above in this case. These limits are quite low, and are intended to mitigate effects of vibration on historic buildings that might include deteriorated materials or sensitive finishes. The masonry facades to be retained on this building can be expected to be more resilient than many more delicate built historic structures. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 3 Page 526 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention [4 Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Though we do not anticipate exceedances even of these values given the understood nature of the adjacent construction, these limits could be re-evaluated should these limits be found to have significant impact on construction. Table 1: Guideline values for vibration velocity to be used when evaluating the effects of short-term vibration on structures Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 527 of 688 Guideline values for velocity, r, in mm/s Vibration at the foundation Vibration at Line Type of structure at a frequency of horizontal plane of highest floor 1 Hz to 10 Hz 10 Hz to 50 Hz 50 Hz to 100 Hz') at all frequencies 1 Buildings used for 20 20 to 40 40 to 50 40 commercial purposes, industrial buildings, and buildings of similar design 2 Dwellings and buildings 5 5 to 15 15 to 20 15 of similar design and/or occupancy 3 Structures that, because 3 3 to 8 8 to 10 8 of their particular sensi- tivity to vibration, cannot be classified under lines 1 and 2 and are of great intrinsic value (e.g. listed buildings under preservation order) At frequencies above 100 Hz, the values given in this column may be used as minimum values. Fig 2: DIN 4150-3 guideline on vibration limits for various structure types VIBRATION MONITORING AND MONITOR PLACEMENT We recommend that vibration monitoring be implemented with the placement of two tri -directional digital seismographs to be securely affixed to the fagade. See Figure 3. • The first monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the concrete foundation wall below the fagade, just above the level of the raft slab, within the central third of the South (front) elevation wall. See red star in Fig 3. • The second monitor is to be affixed to the interior face of the fagade, immediately above the first monitor, within 600 mm of the underside of the roof level. See blue star in Fig 3. Existing interior finishes and terra cotta tile are to be removed from the wall prior to installation, such that the monitors can be affixed to the underlying concrete or backup brick masonry. The monitors and associated reporting are to continue through the course of construction on the project, or until such time as major vibration inducing construction activities have been completed, there are no regular vibration exceedances, any potential for damage from vibration is not anticipated, and the Consultant advises that they may be removed. The vibration monitors are to be supplied and installed by a specialized firm that has experience providing such monitors for the duration of construction projects. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 4 Page 527 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 Fig 3: Part South Elevation, indicating proposed locations of vibration monitors. 7. NOTIFICATION AND EXCEEDENCE PROCEDURE The vibration monitors must be connected for continual reporting of vibration events that result in exceedances of the vibration limits stipulated above. Exceedance events shall be reported by automated email to the Contractor, Owner, and appropriate Consultant(s). In the event of an exceedance the Consultant is to be contacted. If the exceedance is not the result of disturbing the vibration monitoring equipment or very localized activity around it (both of which are common causes of exceedances), and the Consultant considers the exceedance to be significant, the Consultant shall review on site for any damage that may have resulted from the exceedance. Future construction activity shall be modified to avoid further exceedances. In cases where this is not possible, and the exceedance was not observed to have had any impact to the structure, the Consultant may advise with respect to increased vibration limits. Note that this approach is intended to be generally consistent with the DIN 4150 standard, which states that "Exceeding the values in table 1 does not necessarily lead to damage; should they be significantly exceeded, however, further investigations are necessary." As noted above, it is our view that this building would likely tolerate vibration limits above those stipulated. 8. DISCLAIMER & LIMITATIONS This report is based on and limited to information supplied to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. by VanMar Developments Inc. personnel and representatives, and by observations made during walk- through inspections of the subject property. Only those items that are capable of being observed and are reasonably obvious to John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. or have been otherwise identified by other parties and detailed during this investigation can be reported. The work reflects the Consultant's best judgment in light of the information reviewed by them at the time of preparation. There is no warranty expressed or implied by John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. that this investigation will uncover all potential deficiencies and risks of liabilities associated with the subject property. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. believes, however, that the level of detail carried out in this investigation is appropriate to meet the objectives as outlined in the request. We cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of information supplied by any third party. John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 5 Page 528 of 688 10 Duke Steet West Existinq Facade Retention Vibration Monitoring Plan Proiect No. 24012 John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. is not investigating or providing advice about pollutants, contaminants, or hazardous materials. This report has been produced for the sole use of VanMar Developments Inc. and cannot be reproduced or otherwise used by any third party unless approval is obtained from John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. No portion of this report may be used as a separate entity; it is written to be read in its entirety. We trust this report covers the scope of work as outlined in our Terms of Reference. Should there be any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. JOHN G. COOKE & ASSOCIATES LTD. J. K, DEE 100' 62005 EC -15-202 'AtZ C]F O f fP' Jonathan Dee, P. Eng., ing., CAHP Principal JD/jd 24012/10 Duke —Vibration Monitoring Plan John G. Cooke & Associates Ltd. Page 6 Page 529 of 688 Staff Report r NJ :R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Michelle Drake, Senior Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7839 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: April 12, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-195 SUBJECT: Notice of Intention to Designate 131 Victoria Street South under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 369 Frederick Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to request that Council publish a Notice of Intention to Designate 131 Victoria Street South Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. • An updated Statement of Significance describing the cultural heritage value or interest of 131 Victoria Street South was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on March 5, 2024. The Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 131 Victoria Street South should be confirmed by pursuing designation of the property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. • The key finding of this report is that 131 Victoria Street South meets seven (7) of nine (9) criteria for designation under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and has been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting, providing written correspondence to the property owner, and consulting with Heritage Kitchener. Should Council choose to give Notice of Intention to Designate, such notice shall be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust. • This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 530 of 688 BACKGROUND: 131 Victoria Street South is an early 20th century building displaying a modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.22 -acre parcel of land located on the east side of Victoria Street South between Theresa Street and Michael Street in the Victoria Park Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the main church building. The property is located adjacent to the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District, which contains the circa 1952 church rectory (49 Michael Street) and 1972 parish centre (15 Michael Street). Figure 1: Location Map of Subject Property (131 Victoria Street South, Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration) A full assessment of 131 Victoria Street South has been completed, including: field evaluation and archival research. The findings concluded that the subject property meets seven (7) of nine (9) criteria for designation under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22). An updated Statement of Significance describing the property's cultural heritage value or interest was presented to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on March 5, 2024. The Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 131 Victoria Street South should be confirmed by pursuing designation of the subject property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. This work was undertaken as part of the City's Municipal Heritage Register (MHR) Review, initiated in February of 2023. The MHR Review is the City's response to amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act introduced in January of 2023 through Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act. The City contacted owners of listed properties through an initial letter dated May 23, 2023, to inform them of this undertaking. Owners of properties recommended for designation were contacted via a second letter. The property owner for 131 Victoria Street South was contacted via second letter sent by mail dated March 13, 2024. This letter was accompanied by the updated Statement of Significance and a "Guide to Heritage Designation for Property Owners" prepared in June 2023. The letter invited property owners to contact the City's Senior Heritage Planner with any comments, questions, or concerns. Page 531 of 688 Per standard procedure, should Council support the Notice of Intention to Designate (NOID), the property owner will be contacted a third time through a letter advising of the City's NOID. An ad for the NOID will be published in a newspaper. Once the letter is served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and the newspaper ad is posted, there will be a 30 -day appeal period in which the property owner may object to the designation. REPORT: Identifying and protecting cultural heritage resources within our City is an important part of planning for the future, and helping to guide change while conserving the buildings, structures, and landscapes that give the City of Kitchener its unique identity. The City plays a critical role in the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The designation of property under the Ontario Heritage Act is the main tool to provide long-term protection of cultural heritage resources for future generations. Designation recognizes the importance of a property to the local community; protects the property's cultural heritage value or interest; encourages good stewardship and conservation; and, promotes knowledge and understanding about the property. Designation not only publicly recognizes and promotes awareness, but it also provides a process for ensuring that changes to a property are appropriately managed and that these changes respect the property's cultural heritage value or interest. Figure 2: Front Elevation (West Facade) of the Subject Property — 131 Victoria Street South (Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration) 131 Victoria Street South is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, contextual, and social values. It satisfies seven (7) of nine (9) criteria for designation under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22). A summary of the criteria that is or is not met is provided in the table below. Page 532 of 688 Table 1: Criteria for Designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) Design /Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 131 Victoria Street South demonstrates design/physical value as a rare and unique example of an early 20th century religious building displaying a modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in good condition including: clerestory windows, bronze pear-shaped dome, rooftop cupola topped by a cross; front hipped gable roof; cross plan; red brick construction; brick dentils below the eaves; round window with stained glass; semi -circular window openings displaying paintings; semi -circular window openings with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch; brick voussoirs with drip molds; stone sills; semi -circular double front door entrance with stone surround; rose window; and, a 1926 stone datestone. Various additions have been added to the church building (1938, 1947, 2015) and adjacent to the building (1952, 1955, 1971- 72). Front (West) Fagade The front of the building faces Victoria Street South and is comprised of three bays including a centre projecting bay. The most prominent feature of the building is the bronze pear- shaped dome with rooftop cupola topped by a cross. The centre bay features brick dentils Page 533 of 688 Criteria Criteria Met (Yes/No) 1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a Yes rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, material, or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because it Yes displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design or physical value because it No demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it Yes has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or associative value because it Yes yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or associative value because it No demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value because it is important in Yes defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, Yes functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. Yes Table 1: Criteria for Designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) Design /Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 131 Victoria Street South demonstrates design/physical value as a rare and unique example of an early 20th century religious building displaying a modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in good condition including: clerestory windows, bronze pear-shaped dome, rooftop cupola topped by a cross; front hipped gable roof; cross plan; red brick construction; brick dentils below the eaves; round window with stained glass; semi -circular window openings displaying paintings; semi -circular window openings with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch; brick voussoirs with drip molds; stone sills; semi -circular double front door entrance with stone surround; rose window; and, a 1926 stone datestone. Various additions have been added to the church building (1938, 1947, 2015) and adjacent to the building (1952, 1955, 1971- 72). Front (West) Fagade The front of the building faces Victoria Street South and is comprised of three bays including a centre projecting bay. The most prominent feature of the building is the bronze pear- shaped dome with rooftop cupola topped by a cross. The centre bay features brick dentils Page 533 of 688 at the roofline, a large round stained-glass window with brick surround, a semi -circular stone door surround, and paneled double doors with a decorative semi -circular transom. The end bays each feature semi -circular window openings, brick voussoirs with drip molds, and stone sills. The windows in these openings have been removed and replaced with Byzantine paintings. The left bay (when looking at the front of the building) also features a 1926 stone datestone. The current exterior stairs were constructed in 1993 and provide access from the north and south. These stairs feature four brick piers of varying heights with stone caps. Between each brick pier is an angel stone wall capped with concrete. Two brick piers with concrete caps have been added to the front of the building along with an angel stone wall capped with concrete. The centre bay of the angel stone wall displays a cross. Four additional brick piers create a brick and iron fence that extends south along the property line (parallel to Victoria Street). A portion of the cross -building plan on the south side also faces Victoria Street South. This section of the building was constructed in 1938 as the original church rectory. This elevation is setback approximately 11.5 metres (52.2 feet) from the front fagade and is two storeys high. This elevation features a rose window, two 1/1 hung windows with flat lintels and stone sills on the first storey, two 1/1 hung windows with semi -circular lintels and stone sills on the second story (these windows appear to be altered with exterior trim or storm windows displaying flat lintels), a slightly inset semi -circular wood door with brick voussoirs, two lights flanking the door, the municipal address "131" above the door, and concrete stairs with a metal hand railing. A rusticated stone foundation is partially exposed above ground. An alteration to the cross -building plan on the north side also faces Victoria Street South. This section has been altered twice. First, in 1947, when the original building was lengthened by 20 feet, and again, in 2015. As it exists today, this elevation is a new addition with a flat roof constructed in 2015. It appears that windows from the original building were salvaged and reused in the addition. The addition features a semi -circular window opening with decorative transom, brick voussoirs with drip molds, and stone sills. Beneath the main window is a square window that matches other basement windows around the building. This square window has no brick voussoir but it does have a stone sill. This window opening is cut into a portion of the partially exposed parged concrete foundation as well as the red brick. The red brick is not original and not an exact match to the original. Side (North) Fagade The north side fagade features three bays; however, used to feature four bays. This section has been altered twice. First, in 1938, when the building was lengthened by 20 feet, and in 2015 with a building addition that increased the height and depth of the building. The fourth bay was covered by the 2015 building addition. Each bay features a large semi -circular window opening with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Beneath two of the bays is a square window opening with what appears to be a non -original window with no voussoirs and a stone sill. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed rusticated stone foundation as well as the red brick. Beneath one of the windows is a modern metal man door. The primary building material is brick. The eaves, soffits and fascia are plain apart from a discrete bracket at the southwest corner of the roofline. Page 534 of 688 The side gable of the north side fagade was altered by the 2015 building addition which increased the height of the gable and extended the depth of the cross gable on the north along with a square addition with a flat roof. The side gable of the north fagade features a single bay with a round rose decorative detail and a large semi -circular window opening with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Two modern lights flank the window. The foundation is parged concrete. The flat roof addition is red brick with no other significant architectural features. Side (South) Fagade The south side fagade features three bays. Each bay features a large semi -circular window with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Beneath two of the windows is a square window opening with what appears to be a non -original window with no voussoirs and a stone sill. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed rusticated stone foundation as well as the red brick. The primary building material is red brick. The eaves, soffits and fascia are plain apart from a discrete bracket at the southwest corner of the roofline. The side gable of the south side fagade features two bays divided by a chimney that extends above the roofline. The two bays are not symmetrical. Each bay of the first storey displays two 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The second storey displays three windows of different size but similar style. The style again is 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The third storey is symmetrical with two 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The rusticated stone foundation is partially exposed above ground. Rear (East) Facade The rear of the church is an addition that was built in 1947 to lengthen the church and hall by 20 feet. As it exists today, the end gable at the rear of the building is comprised of three unseparated bays. The third storey of the centre bay features a semi -circular window opening with brick voussoir, drip mold and stone sill. It appears that the original windows have been removed and replaced with Byzantine paintings. The second story features semi- circular window openings with brick voussoirs, drip molds and stone sills. These window openings also contain Byzantine paintings. Beneath each of the second storey windows are square window openings with no voussoirs or sills. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed foundation as well as the red brick. The rear fagade was altered again in 2015 with a building addition that increased the height of the gable and extended the depth of the cross gable. This addition features a new barrier - free building entrance. The entrance is covered by a small gable roof with supports that lead to modern doors made with metal and glass. The red brick is not original and not an exact match to the original. Interior The interior of the church was painted in 1949 by a St. Catherine's artist Mr. L. Scott Young who was unable to complete the project due to his unexpected death (Wynnyckyj, 1987). The project was finished by an unknown artist in 1951 (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Major renovations to the interior of the church were initiated in 1977, including: refurbishing the walls, pews, and woodwork; replacing the altars; installing a 15 -foot -high wood iconostasis - a lattice Page 535 of 688 screened between the nave and the sanctuary - covered by 18 painted icons in the Byzantine style (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Another project to paint the interior of the church in the Byzantine style began in 1983 and was completed in 1986 (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Historical /Associative Value The subject property has historical and associative value due to its history and association with Ukrainian immigrants, Kitchener's industrial history; the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration and Mykola Bibniak. In the early 1900s immigrants from Ukraine started to arrive and sponsor Masses in the Eastern Rite at local Roman Catholic churches. They were drawn to the area by the industrial activity (Gesza, 2010), especially the rubber, machinery and tannery industries (Hamara, 1987). Many worked for prominent industries such as the Huck Glove Factory, the Lang Tannery, and the Kaufman Rubber Company. The parish beginning's date to the early 1920s when five Ukrainian families broke away from the local chapter of the Ukrainian Labor and Farm Temple Association (ULFTA) (Hamara, 1987). At the same time, other Ukrainians in the ULFTA became trade union activists in Kitchener's rubber, machinery and tannery industries (Hamara, 1987). By 1922, the non -communists in the community (Hamara, 1987) organized their own parish and in 1924 named it The Church of the Transfiguration of Our Lord Jesus Christ (Wynncyckyj, 1987). Land to construct the church was acquired in 1925 for a cost of $1,160.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987). Mr. Zomer who lived at the corner of Victoria Street and Oak Street acquired a mortgage (Gesza, 2020). These immigrants completed the construction of the church building in 1926 for a cost of $11,400.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The cornerstone was laid on December 5, 1926 and blessed by His Excellency, Bishop Nykyta Budka, the first bishop for the Ukrainian Catholics in Canada (Wynncyckyj, 1987). In the beginning, Mass was performed by visiting priests from larger centres such as Toronto or Brantford. In 1938, the parish built an addition at the cost of $3,635.00 to the church to serve as a rectory, which ultimately attracted the first resident priest — Father Charny (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The home adjacent to the church building was purchased in 1952 to house the members of the order of Sister Servants of Mary Immaculate (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The church building was a focal point for Ukrainians. In the 1940s, at least 52 families lived within a 5 -block radius of the church building (Gesza, 2010). The hall beneath the church hosted numerous activities such as dances, concerts, performances, English language instruction, etc. (Gesza, 2010). By the end of 1977, significant interior heritage attributes — the iconostas- were added to the interior of the church building. The iconostas were 12 -feet high and carved in wood by V. Barach. Within each of the iconostas, 18 icons were painted by Mykola Bidniak. Mykola lost his hands as a teenager and went on to learn how to paint with his mouth (K -W Record, 1979). He studied at the Ontario College of Art and in 1978 he was commissioned to "write" 18 Byzantine icons at a cost of $20,000 (K -W Record, 1979). Bidniak's icons are fine examples of the inspiration and challenge of the iconographer's art (The Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration, date unknown). Additional wall paintings were added in 1949 by Mr. L. Scott Young (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Young was a church mural artist who painted more than three dozen churches in Canada (Unknown, 1994). Today, his artwork is only present in four churches, including the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration Page 536 of 688 (Unknown, 1994). Additional icons were painted on the walls and ceilings in 1984 by Rev. Theodore Koufos, a Tortonto-based Greek orthodox priest. Contextual Value The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to the church rectory, parish centre, on-site park and local industries. The home adjacent to the church building was purchased in 1952 to house the members of the order of Sister Servants of Mary Immaculate (Wynncyckyj, 1987). In more recent years, this home has served as the church rectory. This home is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as it is located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District. Lands for the parish centre, the Ukrainian Catholic Centre at 15 Michael Street, were purchased in 1963 for the sum of $19,500.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987) and the building was constructed in 1971-1972 to provide the congregation with a large, combined auditorium - gymnasium and some classroom space (K -W Record, 1972). The cornerstone was laid in November 1971 along with the burial of a time capsule (K -W Record, 1972). The opening ceremonies were held in May of 1972 and participants included Most Rev. Isidore Borecky (Ukrainian bishop of Eastern Canada), Rev. Russel Chyz (parish priest), and an official opening by Donna Sawicky (Miss Canada) (K -W Record, 1972a; K -W Record, 1972b). In 2010, the parish planned the installation of a park on the south side of the church building to include an open wrought iron gate and walkways leading to a granite monument and landscaped with flowers, trees and benches (Gesza, 2010). Social Value The social value of the property relates to the parish, church building, rectory and parish centre. The parish and church building were the original focal point of the Ukrainian community. The church building not only held worship services but also dances, concerts, dance and theatrical performances, choir practices and English language classes (Gesza, 2010). In 1971, the parish held it's first annual East Egg Festival sponsored by the Ukrainian Catholic Women's League (Denney, 1986). This tradition continued for at least 21 years (Koza, 1992). Heritage Attributes All elements related to the construction and modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style, including: • Cross -building plan; • front hipped gable roofline with plain eaves, soffits and fascia as well as discrete brackets; Page 537 of 688 • red brick laid in a running bond, including brick dentils at the roofline on the front (west) elevation; • rusticated stone foundation; • the number, placement and details of bays on each elevation; • clerestory windows below bronze pear-shaped dome with rooftop cupola topped by a cross; • windows and window openings, including: o the large round stained-glass window with brick surround; o semi -circular windows with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill; o semi -circular window openings featuring brick voussoirs with drip molds and stone sills; o semi -circular window openings featuring decorative paintings; o the rose window; 0 1/1 hung windows with flat lintels and stone sills; 0 1/1 hung windows with semi -circular lintels and stone sills; o Square window openings with flat lintels and stone sills; • doors and door openings, including: o a semi -circular stone door surround displaying double paneled wood doors with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights; o semi -circular wood door with brick voussoirs, two lights flanking the door, the municipal address "131" above the door, rusticated stone stairs with metal/iron hand railing; • 1926 datestone; and, • round rose decorative detail. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT— Heritage Planning staff have consulted with the Heritage Kitchener committee regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Property owners were invited to consult via two separate letters dated May 23, 2023 and March 13, 2024. Page 538 of 688 Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving Notice of Intention to Designate (NOID) a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. Should Council choose to proceed with a NOID, such notice will be served on the property owner, the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the property owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). Should Council decide not to proceed with a NOID then the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register (MHR) until January 1, 2025, after which it will be removed in accordance with the legislative changes enacted by Bill 23. Once removed from the MHR, it cannot be re -listed on the MHR for five (5) years (i.e., January 1, 2030). PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 • Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) • Bill 23 — Municipal Heritage Register Review (DSD -2023-225) • Municipal Heritage Register Review — August 2023 Update (DSD -2023-309) • Municipal Heritage Register Review — January 2024 Update (DSD -2024-022) • Municipal Heritage Register Review — May 2024 Update (DSD -2024-194) APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Statement of Significance for 131 Victoria Street South Page 539 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 131 Victoria Street South Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Social Value ®Historical/Associative Value DEconomic Value ®Contextual Value DEnvironmental Value Municipal Address: 131 Victoria Street South Legal Description: Plan 378 Part Lot 552 Year Built: 1926 Architectural Style: Modest Vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style Original Owner: Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration Original Use: Religious Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 131 Victoria Street South is an early 20th century building displaying a modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.22 -acre parcel of land located on the east side of Victoria Street South between Theresa Street and Michael Street in the Victoria Park Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the main church building. The property is located adjacent to the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District, which contains the circa 1952 church rectory (49 Michael Street) and 1972 parish centre (15 Michael Street). Page 540 of 688 Heritage Value 131 Victoria Street South is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, contextual, and social values. Desi_gn/Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 131 Victoria Street South demonstrates design/physical value as a rare and unique example of an early 20th century religious building displaying a modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in good condition including: clerestory windows, bronze pear-shaped dome, rooftop cupola topped by a cross; front hipped gable roof; cross plan; red brick construction; brick dentils below the eaves; round window with stained glass; semi -circular window openings displaying paintings; semi -circular window openings with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch; brick voussoirs with drip molds; stone sills; semi -circular double front door entrance with stone surround; rose window; and, a 1926 stone datestone. Various additions have been added to the church building (19387 19477 2015) and adjacent to the building (1952, 19557 1971-72). Front (West) Facade The front of the building faces Victoria Street South and is comprised of three bays including a centre projecting bay. The most prominent feature of the building is the bronze pear-shaped dome with rooftop cupola topped by a cross. The centre bay features brick dentils at the roofline, a large round stained- glass window with brick surround, a semi -circular stone door surround, and paneled double doors with a decorative semi -circular transom. The end bays each feature semi -circular window openings, brick voussoirs with drip molds, and stone sills. The windows in these openings have been removed and replaced with Byzantine paintings. The left bay (when looking at the front of the building) also features a 1926 stone datestone. The current exterior stairs were constructed in 1993 and provide access from the north and south. These stairs feature four brick piers of varying heights with stone caps. Between each brick pier is an angel stone wall capped with concrete. Two brick piers with concrete caps have been added to the front of the building along with an angel stone wall capped with concrete. The centre bay of the angel stone wall displays a cross. Four additional brick piers create a brick and iron fence that extends south along the property line (parallel to Victoria Street). A portion of the cross -building plan on the south side also faces Victoria Street South. This section of the building was constructed in 1938 as the original church rectory. This elevation is setback approximately 11.5 metres (52.2 feet) from the front facade and is two storeys high. This elevation features a rose window, two 1/1 hung windows with flat lintels and stone sills on the first storey, two 1/1 hung windows with semi -circular lintels and stone sills on the second story (these windows appear to be altered with exterior trim or storm windows displaying flat lintels), a slightly inset semi -circular wood door with brick voussoirs, two lights flanking the door, the municipal address "131" above the door, and concrete stairs with a metal hand railing. A rusticated stone foundation is partially exposed above ground. An alteration to the cross -building plan on the north side also faces Victoria Street South. This section has been altered twice. First, in 1947, when the original building was lengthened by 20 feet, and again, in 2015. As it exists today, this elevation is a new addition with a flat roof constructed in 2015. It appears that windows from the original building were salvaged and reused in the addition. The addition features a semi -circular window opening with decorative transom, brick voussoirs with drip molds, and stone Page 541 of 688 sills. Beneath the main window is a square window that matches other basement windows around the building. This square window has no brick voussoir but it does have a stone sill. This window opening is cut into a portion of the partially exposed parged concrete foundation as well as the red brick. The red brick is not original and not an exact match to the original. Side (North) Facade The north side facade features three bays; however, used to feature four bays. This section has been altered twice. First, in 1938, when the building was lengthened by 20 feet, and in 2015 with a building addition that increased the height and depth of the building. The fourth bay was covered by the 2015 building addition. Each bay features a large semi -circular window opening with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Beneath two of the bays is a square window opening with what appears to be a non -original window with no voussoirs and a stone sill. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed rusticated stone foundation as well as the red brick. Beneath one of the windows is a modern metal man door. The primary building material is brick. The eaves, soffits and fascia are plain apart from a discrete bracket at the southwest corner of the roofline. The side gable of the north side facade was altered by the 2015 building addition which increased the height of the gable and extended the depth of the cross gable on the north along with a square addition with a flat roof. The side gable of the north facade features a single bay with a round rose decorative detail and a large semi -circular window opening with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Two modern lights flank the window. The foundation is parged concrete. The flat roof addition is red brick with no other significant architectural features. Side (South) Facade The south side facade features three bays. Each bay features a large semi -circular window with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill. Beneath two of the windows is a square window opening with what appears to be a non -original window with no voussoirs and a stone sill. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed rusticated stone foundation as well as the red brick. The primary building material is red brick. The eaves, soffits and fascia are plain apart from a discrete bracket at the southwest corner of the roofline. The side gable of the south side facade features two bays divided by a chimney that extends above the roofline. The two bays are not symmetrical. Each bay of the first storey displays two 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The second storey displays three windows of different size but similar style. The style again is 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The third storey is symmetrical with two 1/1 hung windows with a flat lintel and a stone sill. The rusticated stone foundation is partially exposed above ground. Rear (East) Facade The rear of the church is an addition that was built in 1947 to lengthen the church and hall by 20 feet. As it exists today, the end gable at the rear of the building is comprised of three unseparated bays. The third storey of the centre bay features a semi -circular window opening with brick voussoir, drip mold and stone sill. It appears that the original windows have been removed and replaced with Byzantine paintings. The second story features semi -circular window openings with brick voussoirs, drip molds and stone sills. These window openings also contain Byzantine paintings. Beneath each of the second Page 542 of 688 storey windows are square window openings with no voussoirs or sills. These window openings cut into a portion of the partially exposed foundation as well as the red brick. The rear facade was altered again in 2015 with a building addition that increased the height of the gable and extended the depth of the cross gable. This addition features a new barrier -free building entrance. The entrance is covered by a small gable roof with supports that lead to modern doors made with metal and glass. The red brick is not original and not an exact match to the original. Interior The interior of the church was painted in 1949 by a St. Catherine's artist Mr. L. Scott Young who was unable to complete the project due to his unexpected death (Wynnyckyj, 1987). The project was finished by an unknown artist in 1951 (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Major renovations to the interior of the church were initiated in 1977, including: refurbishing the walls, pews, and woodwork; replacing the altars; installing a 15 -foot -high wood iconostasis - a lattice screened between the nave and the sanctuary - covered by 18 painted icons in the Byzantine style (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Another project to paint the interior of the church in the Byzantine style began in 1983 and was completed in 1986 (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Historical/Associative Value The subject property has historical and associative value due to its history and association with Ukrainian immigrants, Kitchener's industrial history; the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration and Mykola Bibniak. In the early 1900s immigrants from Ukraine started to arrive and sponsor Masses in the Eastern Rite at local Roman Catholic churches. They were drawn to the area by the industrial activity (Gesza, 2010), especially the rubber, machinery and tannery industries (Namara, 1987). Many worked for prominent industries such as the Huck Glove Factory, the Lang Tannery, and the Kaufman Rubber Company. The parish beginning's date to the early 1920s when five Ukrainian families broke away from the local chapter of the Ukrainian Labor and Farm Temple Association (ULFTA) (Namara, 1987). At the same time, other Ukrainians in the ULFTA became trade union activists in Kitchener's rubber, machinery and tannery industries (Namara, 1987). By 1922, the non -communists in the community (Namara, 1987) organized their own parish and in 1924 named it The Church of the Transfiguration of Our Lord Jesus Christ (Wynncyckyj, 1987). Land to construct the church was acquired in 1925 for a cost of $1,160.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987). Mr. Zomer who lived at the corner of Victoria Street and Oak Street acquired a mortgage (Gesza, 2020). These immigrants completed the construction of the church building in 1926 for a cost of $11,400.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The cornerstone was laid on December 5, 1926 and blessed by His Excellency, Bishop Nykyta Budka, the first bishop for the Ukrainian Catholics in Canada (Wynncyckyj, 1987). In the beginning, Mass was performed by visiting priests from larger centres such as Toronto or Brantford. In 1938, the parish built an addition at the cost of $3,635.00 to the church to serve as a rectory, which ultimately attracted the first resident priest — Father Charny (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The home adjacent to the church building was purchased in 1952 to house the members of the order of Sister Servants of Mary Immaculate (Wynncyckyj, 1987). The church building was a focal point for Ukrainians. In the 1940s, at least 52 families lived within a 5 - block radius of the church building (Gesza, 2010). The hall beneath the church hosted numerous activities such as dances, concerts, performances, English language instruction, etc. (Gesza, 2010). Page 543 of 688 By the end of 1977, significant interior heritage attributes — the iconostas- were added to the interior of the church building. The iconostas were 12 -feet high and carved in wood by V. Barach. Within each of the iconostas, 18 icons were painted by Mykola Bidniak. Mykola lost his hands as a teenager and went on to learn how to paint with his mouth (K -W Record, 1979). He studied at the Ontario College of Art and in 1978 he was commissioned to "write" 18 Byzantine icons at a cost of $20,000 (K -W Record, 1979). Bidniak's icons are fine examples of the inspiration and challenge of the iconographer's art (The Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration, date unknown). Additional wall paintings were added in 1949 by Mr. L. Scott Young (Wynnyckyj, 1987). Young was a church mural artist who painted more than three dozen churches in Canada (Unknown, 1994). Today, his artwork is only present in four churches, including the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration (Unknown, 1994). Additional icons were painted on the walls and ceilings in 1984 by Rev. Theodore Koufos, a Tortonto-based Greek orthodox priest. Contextual Value The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to the church rectory, parish centre, on-site park and local industries. The home adjacent to the church building was purchased in 1952 to house the members of the order of Sister Servants of Mary Immaculate (Wynncyckyj, 1987). In more recent years, this home has served as the church rectory. This home is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as it is located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District. Lands for the parish centre, the Ukrainian Catholic Centre at 15 Michael Street, were purchased in 1963 for the sum of $19,500.00 (Wynncyckyj, 1987) and the building was constructed in 1971-1972 to provide the congregation with a large, combined auditorium -gymnasium and some classroom space (K -W Record, 1972). The cornerstone was laid in November 1971 along with the burial of a time capsule (K- W Record, 1972). The opening ceremonies were held in May of 1972 and participants included Most Rev. Isidore Borecky (Ukrainian bishop of Eastern Canada), Rev. Russel Chyz (parish priest), and an official opening by Donna Sawicky (Miss Canada) (K -W Record, 1972a; K -W Record, 1972b). In 2010, the parish planned the installation of a park on the south side of the church building to include an open wrought iron gate and walkways leading to a granite monument and landscaped with flowers, trees and benches (Gesza, 2010). Social Value The social value of the property relates to the parish, church building, rectory and parish centre. The parish and church building were the original focal point of the Ukrainian community. The church building not only held worship services but also dances, concerts, dance and theatrical performances, choir practices and English language classes (Gesza, 2010). In 1971, the parish held it's first annual East Egg Festival sponsored by the Ukrainian Catholic Women's League (Denney, 1986). This tradition continued for at least 21 years (Koza, 1992). Heritage Attributes All elements related to the construction and modest vernacular example of the Ukrainian Baroque architectural style with influences from the Byzantine architectural style, including: Page 544 of 688 • Cross -building plan; • front hipped gable roofline with plain eaves, soffits and fascia as well as discrete brackets; • red brick laid in a running bond, including brick dentils at the roofline on the front (west) elevation; • rusticated stone foundation; • the number, placement and details of bays on each elevation; • clerestory windows below bronze pear-shaped dome with rooftop cupola topped by a cross; • windows and window openings, including: o the large round stained-glass window with brick surround; o semi -circular windows with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights under the main arch with brick voussoirs and drip molds along with a stone sill; o semi -circular window openings featuring brick voussoirs with drip molds and stone sills; o semi -circular window openings featuring decorative paintings; o the rose window; 0 1/1 hung windows with flat lintels and stone sills; 0 1/1 hung windows with semi -circular lintels and stone sills; o Square window openings with flat lintels and stone sills; • doors and door openings, including: o a semi -circular stone door surround displaying double paneled wood doors with modest tracery, consisting of a plain circle with two rounded lancet lights; o semi -circular wood door with brick voussoirs, two lights flanking the door, the municipal address "131" above the door, rusticated stone stairs with metal/iron hand railing; • 1926 datestone; and, • round rose decorative detail. References Denney, F. L., (1986). Easter Egg Festival Celebrates 15th year. K -W Record: Kitchener, Ontario. Gesza, C. (2010). Presentation for the Heritage Kitchener Committee. Kitchener, Ontario. K -W Record. (1971). Will lay cornerstone. Kitchener, Ontario. K -W Record. (1972a). Ukrainian Catholics to inaugurate unit. Kitchener, Ontario. K -W Record. (1972b). Centre Opening. K -W Record. (1979). Handless artist paints icons. Kitchener, Ontario. Koza, R. (1992). Pysanky eggs. K -W Record: Kitchener, Ontario. Unknown. (1994). L. Scott Young, Artist. Waterloo Historical Society: 82(1994): 26-30. Cober Printing: Kitchener, Ontario. Wynnyckyj, I. L., (1987). Milestones. A History of the Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration. Ukrainian Catholic Church of the Transfiguration: Kitchener, Ontario. Page 545 of 688 Photographs -. 0 Front Elevation (West Facade) (City of Front Elevation (West Facade) (City of Kitchener, 2009) Kitchener, 2024) r Rear Elevation (East Facade) Rear Elevation (City of Kitchener, 2024) Page 546 of 688 Page 547 of 688 Z `s- Photograph of monument located in the Entrance to south garden from Victoria south garden (City of Kitchener, 2009 Street (City of Kitchener, 2024 Page 547 of 688 Page 548 of 688 ' ■ Photograph showing the details on the Photograph showing a window opening north 2015 building addition (City of replaced with a painting (City of Kitchener, 2009) Kitchener, 2009 Page 548 of 688 ' r, Photograph showing the 1926 View from Ukrainian Catholic Centre datestone (City of Kitchener, 2009) looking west on Michael Street towards the rectory and church (City of Kitchener, 2024 Page 548 of 688 Page 549 of 688 1 K!TCR CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 131 Victoria Street South Address: Year Built — 1926; Architectural Style — Ukrainian Baroque Description: (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: Michelle Drake Recorder: February 9, 2023 Date: NFront Facade N Left Facade N Right Facade N Rear Facade N Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Heritage Kitchener Committee Recorder- Heritage Planning Staff 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑x because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes N because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No N physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. Page 550 of 688 1 KITCR * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑x because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑x because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E.g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occurred. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑x associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist Page 551 of 688 1 K!TCR who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑x important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑x physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑x landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Page 552 of 688 1 K!TCR Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Planning Staff Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 craftsmanship and/or Yes ❑ detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this structure have N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 other original Yes ❑ outbuildings, notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 original site? Yes ❑ * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 its original materials and Yes ❑ design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 features that should be Yes ❑ added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in good N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 condition? Yes ❑ *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Page 553 of 688 1 K!TCR Indigenous History: Could this site be of N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ importance to ❑ ❑x Additional Research Required Indigenous heritage and ❑ Additional Research Required history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes 0Additional Research Required Could there be any ❑ urban Indigenous history associated with ❑ Additional Research Required the property? *Additional archival work may be required. Function: What is the Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ present function of the Commercial ❑ Commercial ❑ subject property? Office ❑ Other ❑ - Office ❑ Other ❑x Religious * Other may include vacant social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑x No ❑x Yes ❑ Does the subject ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required property contribute to ❑ Additional Research Required the cultural heritage of a community of people? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑x Yes ❑ Does the subject N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required property have intangible ❑ value to a specific community of people? ❑Additional Research Required * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Page 554 of 688 Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Interior: See description in the Statement of Significance; Completeness: Park on south side with granite monument; Indigenous History: Located within 300 metres of water; Diversity and Inclusion: Ukrainian immigrants and their descendants Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: March 13, 2024 Page 555 of 688 Staff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: April 24, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-210 SUBJECT: DSD -2023-416 - Notice of Intention to Designate 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79- 87 Scott Street/66-82 Weber Street East as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to request that Council direct the Clerk to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The key finding of this report is that two buildings on the subject property, addressed as 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East, meet the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and have been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource. 87 Scott Street possesses design/physical and contextual value, while 82 Weber Street East possesses design/physical and historical/associative value. A Notice of Intention to Designate was published on October 27, 2023 and the mandated 120 -day period in which the designating by-law is to be passed has elapsed. The Notice of Intention to Designate is to be re -issued. There have been no changes to the property from the time of review and approval in October. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener meeting, consulting, and collaborating with the owner regarding the recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), and consultation with Heritage Kitchener. In addition, should Council choose to *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 556 of 688 give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served to the Owner and Ontario • This report supports the delivery of core services. REPORT: A Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act was brought forward to Heritage Kitchener on October 3, 2023 and Council on October 16, 2023. On this date, Council passed the following motion: "That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79-87 Scott Street,166-82 Weber Street East as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD -2023-416." The Notice of Intention to Designate was published in the Waterloo Regional Record, being a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Kitchener, on October 27, 2023. Under Section 29(8) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the designating by-law must be passed within 120 days after this date of publication. The 120 -day timeline has lapsed, and a designating by- law was not presented to be passed by Council, and the process is now re-initiated. The Owner remains in support of designation. Therefore, a new Notice of Intention to Designate must be issued. 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East was subject to a Site Plan Application that was submitted to the City of Kitchener in 2018 (SP18/108/S/BB). Designation of the property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act was a condition of Site Plan Approval. No changes have been made to the subject property or the Notice of Intention to Designate that was brought forward in October of 2023. A copy of the previous staff report has been attached as Attachment A to this report. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT and COLLABORATE — Heritage Planning staff have consulted and collaborated with the applicant and owner regarding designation under the Ontario Page 557 of 688 Heritage Act. Designation was made a condition of site plan approval, subject to consideration by the Municipal Heritage Committee and Council. Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving notice of its intention to designate a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be noted that should Council decide not to proceed with a Notice of Intention to Designate, that the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2025, after which it will be removed according to the changes enacted by Bill 23. Once removed, it cannot re -listed on the Register again for five (5) years, i.e. January 1, 2030. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 • Notice of Intention to Designate 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East (DSD -2023-416) APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Notice of Intention to Designate 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East (DSD -2023-416) Page 558 of 688 Staff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: October 3, 2023 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Manager Development Review, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7291 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: September 12, 2023 REPORT NO.: DSD -2023-416 SUBJECT: Attachment A - Notice of Intention to Designate - 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East - DSD-2023-416.docx East Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79- 87 Scott Street/66-82 Weber Street East as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to request that Council direct the Clerk to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The key finding of this report is that two buildings on the subject property, addressed as 87 Scott Street and 82 Weber Street East, meet the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and have been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource. 87 Scott Street possesses design/physical and contextual value, while 82 Weber Street East possesses design/physical and historical/associative value. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener meeting, consulting, and collaborating with the owner regarding the recommendations of the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), and consultation with Heritage Kitchener. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served to the Owner and Ontario • This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 559 of 688 BACKGROUND: There are three roads that run along the boundaries of the subject property; the southern property line borders Weber Street East, the western property line borders Scott Street, and the northern property line borders Pearl Place. 17 Pte'17 Gam' ,•.. a���� � II 164 l b X30 134' 2261 168 20l 1A r11� 125 27 G Figure 1: Location of Subject Property s;l n z D 5 I/t I71 225 1 1(14 213 17. I I 2:17 .1 The submission and approval of a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) was made a requirement of a Site Plan Application that was submitted to the City of Kitchener in 2018 for a development located at 66-82 Weber Street East, 79-87 Scott Street, and 15-29 Pear Place (SP18/108/S/BB). The assessment was required as 82 Weber Street East and 87 Scott Street were listed as non -designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register. The site plan proposed the construction of an 11 -storey building on the lands while retaining 82 Weber Street East and 87 Scott Street. The resulting HIA was prepared by MHBC Planning Ltd. and is dated October 17, 2018. The final version of the HIA was given approval by the Director of Planning on February 7, 2020. The assessment confirmed that the existing buildings meet criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06. At the time the HIA was completed the Ontario Heritage Act required only one criterion to be met for a property to be eligible for designation. Ontario Regulation 569/22, introduced in January 2023, changed this requirement so that a minimum of two criteria needed to be met for a property to be eligible for designation. The subject properties still satisfy this current criterion for designation, with 87 Scott Street meeting two of nine criteria and 82 Weber Street East meeting four of nine criteria. A summary of the evaluation for each building, as included in the HIA, is provided below. Page 560 of 688 Ontario Regulation 9/06 87 Scott Street 4. Design/Physical Value iv. Rare, unique, representative Representative example of late Italianate architecture in the City of or early example of a Kitchener style, type, expression, material or construction method No. v. Displays high degree of No. craftsmanship or artistic merit vi. Demonstrate& high degree No. of technical or scientific No achievement S. Historical/associative value iv. Direct associations with a No. theme, event, heIief, person, activity, organization, institution that is significant v. Yields, or has potential to No. yield information that contributes to an understanding of a Community or Culture vi, Demonstrates or reflects the No work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer, or theorist who is significant to the community. 6. Contextual value iv. Important in defining, The building at 91 Scott Street mirrors 87 Scott Street. Together, maintaining or Bath buildings create a frame for Pearl Place. supporting the character of an area v. Physically, functionally, No. visually, or historically linked to its surroundings vi. Is a landmark No. Page 561 of 688 Ontario Regulation 9/06 87 weber Street East 1. Design/Physical Valale i. Rare, unique, representative Yes. The building represents the modernist movement in the City or early example of a of Kitchener and reflects future civic structures in the City.. style, type, expression, material or construction method ii. Displays high degree of No craftsmanship or artistic merit iii. Demonstrates high degree No.. of technical or scientific achievement 2. H istorica Vassociative value L Direct associations with a theme, event, belief, Directly associated with Horton & Ball architects who designed the person' activity, 1966 Waterloo Public Library and 1969 Stanley Park Mall.. organization, institution that is significant ii. Yields, or has potential to Yes. It provides information on the modernist movement in cities yield' information that in south western Ontario and the transition from architectural contributes to an understanding of a styles coming out of the Cold war. community or culture iii. Demonstrates or reflects the Yes. It reflects the work of Horton & Ball Architects. James Ball was work or ideas of an a former president of the Ontario Architectural Association- Grand architect, artist, builder, designer, or galley Chapter. The firm designed several buildings in the Region of theorist who is waterloo and continues todayas Walter Fedy. significant to the community. 3. Contextual value L Important in defining, No, maintaining or supporting the character of an area ii. Physically, functionally, � No. —01 visually, or historically linked to its surroundings iii. Is a landmark No. Per the assessment of the HIA and the conditions of the approved site plan, the Owner has agreed to allow the City to pursue designation of the property. As part of the Site Plan application, a Conservation Plan was also prepared for the property. The Conservation Plan guided the rehabilitation of the building, including but not limited to the repair or replacement of cracked masonry, window and door frames, wood columns, handrails and decking on the front verandah, and the repair of the tooth fascia detailing. The work undertaken did not substantially alter the character defining elements or heritage attributes of the building and original building material was retained where feasible. Page 562 of 688 REPORT: Identifying and protecting cultural heritage resources within the City of Kitchener is an important part of planning for the future, and helping to guide change while conserving the buildings, structures, and landscapes that give the City of Kitchener its unique identity. The City plays a critical role in the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The designation of property under the Ontario Heritage Act is the main tool to provide long-term protection of cultural heritage resources for future generations. Designation recognizes the importance of a property to the local community; protects the property's cultural heritage value; encourages good stewardship and conservation; and promotes knowledge and understanding about the property. Designation not only publicly recognizes and promotes awareness, but it also provides a process for ensuring that changes to a property are appropriately managed and that these changes respect the property's cultural heritage value and interest. The property municipally addressed as 79-87 Scott Street and 66-82 Weber Street East has been identified as having two heritage resources; the building addressed as 87 Scott Street and the building addressed as 82 Weber Street East. 87 Scott Street is recognized for its design/physical and contextual value, while 82 Weber Street East is recognized for its design/physical and historical/associative value. 87 Scott Street Design/ Physical Value 87 Scott Street is a representative example of the Italianate architectural style. This style of architecture was popular in then -Berlin until the early 1890's, particularly for domestic buildings due to its relation to the earlier regency style and its complement Gothic and Queen Anne architecture. The design elements of Italianate architecture, including the signature overhanding eaves, brackets, and tall segmentally arched windows, also lent itself to various building sizes, making it an accessible style for the domestic class. The building has been rehabilitated, with repairs or replacements complete that maintained the character defining elements of the home. Two storeys in height and square in massing with a 1 '/2 storey addition at the rear south fagade, 87 Scott Street displays the following architectural details: • Buff brick walls and rubble stone foundation; • Hip shaped roof with wide overhanging eaves; • One remaining chimney between main building and rear addition; • Signature Italianate brackets and fascia; • Narrow, double -pane windows with basic trim; • Asymmetrical front door; • Front porch with pediment brick pillars; Further, the building contains both an upper and lower unit. The duplex design reflects the building's history as a boarding housing in the 1930's. Page 563 of 688 .10 Figure 2: 87 Scott Street After Rehabilitation (Front Elevation) Figure 3: 87 Scott Street After Rehabilitation (West Side Fagade) Page 564 of 688 Figure 4: 87 Scott Street After Rehabilitation (East Side Fa(;ade) Contextual Value The contextual value of 87 Scott Street relates to the contributions the building makes to the continuity and character of the Scott Street streetscape. Though the removal of the residential building adjacent to the southwest (83 Scott Street) partially isolated 87 Scott Street, the low-density residential character of the rest of the street remains. 87 Scott Street acts as the beginning mark to the consistent pattern of low-rise homes located with minimum setbacks lining Scott Street, this type of pattern was a signature planning technique of the era. Further, though the houses on the street do not necessarily display a singular architectural style, there are notable consistencies when considering their scale, massing, orientation to the street, and materials used that 87 Scott Street also displays. Page 565 of 688 Figure 5: North-East View Down Scott Street The contextual value of 87 Scott Street also relates to its relationship to 91 Scott Street, the building located across Pearl Place to the northeast. While the architectural style of the homes on the rest of the street varies, 91 Scott Street is also a representative example of the Italianate architectural style, and mirrors 87 Scott Street in terms of fenestration and other design elements. The two buildings together provide a distinctive and balanced frame to the entrance of Pearl Place, and the visual impact of the totality is significant. Figure 6: 87 Scott Street and 91 Scott Street Page 566 of 688 Heritage Attributes The HIA has identified the following as being heritage attributes of the buildings: • Materials: Buff Brick (Walls), Rubble Stone (Foundation); • Hip shaped roof with wide overhanging eaves; • Italianate brackets and fascia ; • Detailing on front porch pediment; • Windows: Narrow, double -pane windows with basic trim, bay window, Italianate circular window on western elevation; • Doors: Asymmetrical front door on south elevation; • Design/ physical value representative of Italianate architecture; • Contextual value in association with 91 Scott Street as they `frame' the entrance to Pearl Place. 82 Weber Street East Design /Physical Value 82 Weber Street East is an excellent example of modern or modernist architecture within the Waterloo Region. The modernist style is characterized by the use of construction materials such as glass, steel, and reinforced concrete and was a signature type of architecture for institutional and corporate buildings from the 1920's into the 1980's. Figure 7: 82 Weber Street East (Front Elevation) Page 567 of 688 Obw Figure 8: 82 Weber Street East (West Side Elevation) The expression of the exterior walls of the building are of note, as the cast -in-place concrete material used forms of rough sawn hemlock boards to create a textured surface. This technique displays the contemporary interest of using texture from natural materials to give greater character to concrete, which originated from Le Corbusier's experiments in baton -brut in the late 1940's. The textured concrete is complimented by the wooden sunscreens that shield the windows of the fagade that fronts onto Weber Street. The left corner of the front fagade of the building is also of architectural interest. It contains a circular disk decorative motif, with two others located along the northwestern side fagade. The decorative motifs along the side fagade are interceded by a perpendicular branch of windows. The final element of architectural interest in the building includes the rough sawn hemlock doors, which add some interest to an otherwise unassuming entrance. Page 568 of 688 Figure 9: 82 Weber Street East Facade Detailing The building materials primarily consist of concrete. As such, the building possesses a high level of durability and is in good condition with very little alteration. Page 569 of 688 Historical /Associative Value The historic and associative value of the building relates to its association with Horton & Ball Architects, the firm hired to design the building. Founded in 1959 by locals Tony Horton and David James Ball, this architecture firm is responsible for the design of several notable buildings within the Region of Waterloo, including the Waterloo Public Library (1966) and the Stanley Park Mall (1969). In 1971 Horton & Ball joined engineering firm Walter, Fedy, McCargar, Hachborn, which still operates to this day as Walter Fedy. The building was constructed by Oscar Wiles and Sons Ltd, established in 1927 as Oscar Wiles General Contractor. This contracting company has built a number of houses, churches, schools, and factories within the area, with their first job being the construction of the former KW Record building located at the intersection of Duke and Queen Street. The building also has historical value as it contributes to the understanding of the modernist movement in southwestern Ontario and yields information on the transition in architectural styles that occurred after the Cold War. Heritage Attributes The HIA has identified the following as being heritage attributes of the building: • Cast -in-place concrete walls; • Decorative modern details; • Rough sawn hemlock door; • Wooden sun screen; • Windows; • Historical/ Associative Value with Horton & Ball Architects. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT and COLLABORATE — Heritage Planning staff have consulted and collaborated with the applicant and owner regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Designation was made a condition of site plan approval, subject to consideration by the Municipal Heritage Committee and Council. Page 570 of 688 Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving notice of its intention to designate a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be noted that should Council decide not to proceed with a Notice of Intention to Designate, that the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2025, after which it will be removed according to the changes enacted by Bill 23. Once removed, it cannot re -listed on the Register again for five (5) years, i.e. January 1, 2030. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Page 571 of 688 Staff Report r NJ :R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Deeksha Choudhry, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7602 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward DATE OF REPORT: April 1, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-194 SUBJECT: Municipal Heritage Register Review May 2024 Update RECOMMENDATION: The pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest be recognized, and designation be pursued for the following properties: • 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South • 83-85 King Street West • 87-91 King Street West • 97-99 King Street West • 148 Madison Avenue South • 171-173 Victoria Street North • 111 Ahrens Street West REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to recommend pursuing designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act for nine properties that are currently listed as non -designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register. • The key finding of this report is that the properties possess design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value and meet the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22). • There are no financial implications. • Community engagement included consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: On January 1St, 2023 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) came into effect through Bill 23, the More Homes Build Faster Act. One of the primary changes introduced was the imposition of a new timeline which requires "listed" properties on the Municipal Heritage Register to be evaluated to determine if they meet the criteria for heritage *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 572 of 688 designation before January 1St, 2025. Listed properties are properties that have not been designated, but that the municipal Council believes to be of cultural heritage value or interest. The criterion for designation is established by the Provincial Government (Ontario Regulation 9/06, which has now been amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22) and a minimum of two must be met for a property to be eligible for designation. A work plan to address these changes has been developed by Heritage Planning Staff with consultation from the Heritage Kitchener Committee on February 7t", 2023. Implementation of the work plan has now commenced. This report contains a summary of the findings for the properties recently reviewed, and recommendations for next steps. Progress on Work Plan Implementation As part of the work plan proposed in February 2023, Heritage Planning Staff committed to the review of 80 properties listed on the Municipal Heritage Register prior to January 1, 2025. As of the date of this report, a review has been complete for 58 properties. 9 properties are before the Committee as of the date of this report to be considered for designation. 22 properties have fully undergone the designation process. 14 properties are currently undergoing the designation process and are at various stages of completion. 15 properties have been reviewed and determined that no action should be taken at this time. REPORT: Ontario Regulation 569/22 (Amended from Ontario Regulation 9/06) Among the changes that were implemented through Bill 23, the Ontario Regulation 9/06 — which is a regulation used to determine the cultural heritage value or interest of a property, was amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22 (O. Reg. 569/22). Where the original regulation had three main categories — design/physical, historical/associative and contextual - with three (3) sub -categories for determining cultural heritage value, the amended regulation now lists all nine (9) criteria independently. The new regulation has been amended to the following: 1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or physical value because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or associative value because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or associative value because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. Page 573 of 688 7. The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. Also, among the changes brought about by Bill 23 are how properties can now be listed or designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. They include: • Properties would warrant being listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register if they met one or more criteria of O. Reg 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22). • Properties could be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act if they meet two or more criteria of O. Reg 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22). The following nine properties were reviewed and meet the following criteria: 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South The subject property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (The Tannery) meets seven (7) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has historical value or associative value because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. • The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. 83-85 King Street West The subject property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West meets five (5) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. Page 574 of 688 • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. 87-91 King Street West The subject property municipally addressed as 87-91 King Street West meets five (5) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. 97-99 King Street West The subject property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West meets five (5) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. 148 Madison Avenue South The subject property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South meets seven (7) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has historical value or associative value because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. Page 575 of 688 • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. • The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. 171-173 Victoria Street North The subject property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North meets three (2) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22): • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 111 Ahrens Street West The subject property municipally addressed as 111 Ahrens Street West meets five (5) out of nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06: • The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. • The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. • The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. • The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. • The property is a landmark. Heritage Kitchener Committee Options Option 1 — Pursuing Designation for this property Should Heritage Kitchener committee vote to start pursuing designation for these properties, staff will then contact the respective property owners to inform them and to start working with them towards designation. Staff will then bring a Notice of Intention to Designate back to the Committee to initiate the designation process. Should a property owner object to their property being designated, they can submit an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) to rule on the decision. If the OLT determines that the property should not be designated but remain listed, it will be removed from the Municipal Heritage Register on January 1, 2025. Option 2 — Deferring the Designation Process Should Heritage Kitchener vote to defer the designation process for these properties, they will remain listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2025, after which Page 576 of 688 it will have to be removed. The process of designating these properties can be started at any time until January 1, 2025. Option 3 — Not Pursuing Designation for these properties Should Heritage Kitchener vote not to pursue the designation of these properties, they will remain listed on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2025, after which it will be removed. Once removed, these properties will not be able to be re -listed for the next five (5) years i.e. — January 1, 2030. It should be noted that, per the endorsed work plan, staff are currently undertaking evaluations for high priority properties that are in located in areas of the City that are experiencing significant redevelopment. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT AND COLLABORATE — The Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) have been consulted at previous meetings regarding the proposed strategy to review the Municipal Heritage Register of Non -designated Properties and participated in the assessment of the properties subject to this report. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Heritage Kitchener Committee Work Plan 2022-2024 — DSD -2023-053 • Bill 23 — Municipal Heritage Register Review — DSD -2023-225 • Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register Review — August Update — DSD -2023-309 • Municipal Heritage Register Review — January 2024 Update — DSD -202-022 • Municipal Heritage Register Review — March 2024 Update — DSD -2024-093 • Municipal Heritage Register Review — April 2024 Update — DSD -2024-131 • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Page 577 of 688 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A- Updated Statement of Significance — 131-151 Charles Street West/170- 188 Joseph Street/ 3-44 Francis Street South Attachment B- Updated Statement of Significance - 83-85 King Street West Attachment C- Updated Statement of Significance - 87-91 King Street West Attachment D- Updated Statement of Significance - 97-99 King Street West Attachment E- Updated Statement of Significance -148 Madison Avenue South Attachment F- Updated Statement of Significance 171-173 Victoria Street North Attachment G- Updated Statement of Significance 111 Ahrens Street West Page 578 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 113-151 Charles Street West/170-188 Joseph Street/3-44 Francis Street North VC223 C304 121 F' C317 42 � C]30 0414 pQ C400B 0729 44 -�I I 163 , Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value ❑Social Value ®Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N Legal Description: Plan 375 Lot 110-116 Lot 131-138 Part Charles St 58R-6449 Part 1 Year Built: c. 1896 to c. 2012 Architectural Style: Industrial Vernacular Original Owner: Reinhold Lang / Lang Tanning Company Original Use: Industrial Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N is a complex of approximately 15 interconnected industrial buildings ranging in height from one to five storeys built between 1896 and 2012 primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The buildings are situated on a 3.95 -acre parcel of land bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph and Victoria Streets in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value are the industrial buildings. Page 579 of 688 Heritage Value 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, contextual, and economic values. Desipn/Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N demonstrates design or physical value as a good example of an early (20th century) complex of buildings designed primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style that reflect the evolution of the tanning industry (ERA Architects Inc., 2008). Simple brick detailing and durable finishes demonstrate the functional and industrial history of the building use. The buildings have many intact heritage attributes in good condition. The oldest portions of the site were built between 1896 and 1904 and include: the former two- to three- storey beam and currying house at Victoria Street and the two-storey leach house at the centre of the site. The remaining buildings were constructed between 1904 and 1917, with significant alterations and additions occurring between 1917 and 1925 and again between 2010 and 2012. The buildings that best exemplify the Industrial Vernacular architectural style between 1904 and 1925 include: the former administration and production buildings at the corner of Charles and Francis Streets; the former beam and storage house along Charles Street; and, the former leach house along Joseph Street. Front (North) FaQade The main entrance to the complex of buildings faces Charles Street West. The five -storey building at the north east corner of the site is the former administration building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of doors and windows; changes to the size of original openings; introduction of canopy signage; and, introduction of a barrier - free access. The second -storey through to the fourth -storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; new 12 -pane flathead windows with stone sills; lionhead tie rods located on the brick pilasters at the second-, third- and fourth -storey; and, decorative brickwork. The fifth -storey features: buff brick; 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; decorative brickwork; and, painted signage that reads "LANG'. The four -storey building west of the former administration building is the former tan yard building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; addition of a new double doors; and, introduction of canopy and fascia signage with gooseneck lighting. The second - storey through to the fourth -storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; new 12 -pane flathead windows with stone sills; and decorative brickwork. The one -storey building west of the former tan yard building is a recent (c. 2010-12) addition to the complex. It features contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on the site. It features a shallow side -gable roof, beige and brown horizontal cladding, and lots of glazing. Behind the one -storey building is a four -storey building that once functioned as the leach house for the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and two buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. For the most part, only the third- and fourth -storey are visible from the pedestrian level on Charles Street West. The east bay of the third- and fourth -storey features a new single 6/6 flat head hung window beside a perhaps former circular window opening with a brick surround on each storey. The west bay of the third- and fourth -storey features two new side by side 6/6 flat head hung windows with a stone header and a stone sill. Page 580 of 688 West of the one -storey addition is another one -storey vestibule addition and a central tower (c. 2010- 12) that connects the former leech house to the former beam and storage house. The vestibule and central tower are of contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on the site. It features a unique roof line that is like the shallow side gable roof of the one -storey building addition but instead the side gable is inverted. The walls are clad with glazing. The last building that fronts onto Charles Street is the three-storey former beam and storage house of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 15 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows and doors; addition of windows and doors; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second -storey and third -storey feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The second -storey features painted signage that reads "The Lang Tannery Company Limited". The third -storey features: the new municipal address number "151"; two sets of clerestory windows with internal muntins reflecting a 6 - pane design; and, backlit channel letter fascia signs of current tenants. Side (East) FaQade; The east side fagade faces Francis Street South. The five -storey building at the north east corner of the site is the former administration building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of doors and windows; changes to the size of original openings; and, introduction of a new exterior fire escape. The second -storey through to the fourth -storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; 4/4 wood windows with segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills; new 12 -pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 8 -pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; and, decorative brick work between the third- and fourth -storey. The fifth storey features: buff brick; new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills; decorative brick work; and, painted signage that reads "LANG". The four -storey building west of the former administration building is the former production building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 16 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; alterations to window and door openings; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second -storey through to the fourth -storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 12 -pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; 1 -pane flathead window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; decorative brickwork; and, painted signage that reads "THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE LEATHER." Side (West) Facade The west side fagade faces Victoria Street South. A one- and three-storey building directly abut the sidewalk. The three-storey building is the former beam and storage house of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 5 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; alterations to the size of window openings; and, replacement of the windows. The second -storey and third -storey feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The second- and third -storey features an exterior fire escape. There are metal tie -rods on the brick pilasters between the first- and second -storey as well as the second- and third -storey. Page 581 of 688 The side elevation of the former tan yard building is setback approximately 90 metres from Victoria Street South. This building has a flat roof and two wide buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: using salvaged brick to enclose the building wall; adding contemporary windows; adding a contemporary door; and, installing a channel letter fascia sign with gooseneck lights. The second -storey features three new 6/6 flathead hung windows with stone sills. The fourth -storey features painted signage that reads "THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED HARNESS AND SOLE LEATHERS". Rear (South) FaQade The rear fagade faces Joseph Street and features a one -storey building at the corner of Joseph Street and Victoria Street South, the four -storey former leach house, new exterior courtyard, and the four - storey former production building. The one -storey building has a flat roof and 17 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The building has been altered, including: painting the brick; changes to the size of door and window openings; new windows; new entrances; new exterior stairs; and, new canopy signs. The four -storey former leach house has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the building; installation of new windows in place of former shipping bay doors; and, installation of new 12/12 flathead hung windows with stone sills. The second- through fourth -storey features new flathead 6/6 hung windows with stone lintels and sills. The former production building has a flat roof and three buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first -storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; and, alterations to window and door openings. The second -storey through to the fourth -storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 12 -pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; and, decorative brickwork. West of the former production building is a four -storey concrete addition. The first -storey has been altered, including: painted of the concrete; replacement of the windows; and, replacement of a door. The second -storey features new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete header and concrete sill. The third -storey features four different window designs (1/1; single lite; and, 6/6) all with segmentally arched concrete header and concrete sill. The fourth -storey features six new 6/6 hung windows with flatheads and stone sills. Interior The interior of the original buildings feature: generous floor to ceiling heights; wood beams and flooring; wood staircases; exposed structural columns and mechanical systems; freight elevators with wood gates; and, metal fire separation doors with original weights and pulleys. Historical/Associative Value The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N has historic/associative value due to its history and association with early settlement, the Six Nations, Joseph Brant, Colonel Richard Beasley, Pennsylvanian German Mennonites, the first permanent non- native settlement (now Kitchener), the German Company Tract, the Township of Waterloo, German speaking immigrants, Berlin as the County seat for the County of Waterloo, the Grand Trunk Railway (GTR) extension, the leather tanning industry, and Reinhold Lang. These values were extensively documented in a Heritage Impact Assessment written by ERA Architects Inc. in 2008 and based on this research are further described below. The City of Kitchener was originally part of a large tract of more than 240,000 hectares of land granted to the Six Nations by the British Crown in 1784. Between 1796 and 1798, the Six Nations led by Joseph Brant sold off 38,000 hectares of land to Colonel Richard Beasley, a United Empire Loyalist. The land now known as the City of Kitchener was located far inland and isolated from centres of commerce. As Page 582 of 688 a result, the land attracted the settlement of Pennsylvania German Mennonite farmers who were attracted to the promise of inexpensive land and the guarantee of religious freedoms. By the end of 1800, the first permanent non-native settlement was established in what is now the City of Kitchener. Shortly after a group of Mennonites purchased all the unsold land from Beasley and formed the German Company Tract (GCT). The GCT divided it's 60,000 acres into 130 farmsteads thus establishing a Pennsylvania Mennonite colony in Upper Canada. In 1816 the GCT became the Township of Waterloo. This marked the beginning of steady migration of German speaking Europeans to the area between the 1820s and 1870s. Population growth and infrastructure improvements (e.g., road upgrades) helped establish the urban centre that became Berlin (now Kitchener) in 1833. Twenty years later, in 1853, Berlin became the County seat for the County of Waterloo and three years later the Grand Trunk Railway (GTR) was extended to Berlin. This opened the area to future industrialization. The skilled trades and industrial knowledge of the German immigrants contributed to Berlin's industrialization. Leather tanning became Berlin's first major industry. In 1848, Reinhold Lang came to Berlin from Baden, Germany. The Lang Tanning Company was founded in 1849. The business was originally located at the northeast corner of King and Ontario Streets. This tannery made all classes of leather required for saddlers and shoemakers. Unfortunately, this building was destroyed by fire in 1853. Reinhold Lang rebuilt his business by purchasing a large piece of land at the corner of Francis and King Streets. The property once featured several natural springs and a small creek that would provide a good water supply for the tannery. His new single frame building was built on the corner of Charles and Francis Streets and eventually grew into an industrial complex occupying nearly three city blocks. This site reflects the organizational, technological, and market changes of the tanning industry. Reinhold emerged as a prominent local resident as the industrial centre of Berlin continued to grow. In 1859, he was elected to Berlin Council where he was one of two businessmen proposing a motion for a "factory" policy that would provide exemptions and bonuses to new and expanding business. Many of Berlin's most prominent and prosperous firms were aided by this policy. Industry and politics were linked with Berlin's Council relying heavily on it's Board of Trade for advice. Many of Berlin's industrial families sat on local ward committees set up by the Board to assist with the passage of legislation. These families lived in the ward they represented, which contributed to an enhanced sense of community. The Board not only supported industrial expansion, but it also sponsored German cultural events throughout the late 1800s. Reinhhold's sons (George, William, John and August) and grandsons (Louis L, Reinhold, Jerome and George W.) were also prominent figures in the community. In 1887, his son, John A. Lang built his home at the northwest corner of Charles and Francis Streets to be close to the business in order to oversee daily activities. His home was sold to company in 1897 to serve as offices until operations stopped in 1954. The home was demolished in the 1990s. Over the years, in addition to the tanning industry, the Lang family was also involved in the insurance, banking, hydro and land use planning. By the late 19th century, Berlin was a major industrial centre in Canada and it's economic success has been attributed to the industry and pride of the community. By 1904, the original Lang buildings started to be replaced, expanded, or converted from frame to more permanent brick or iron construction. Berlin became a city in 1912 and was considered Canada's German capital. It appears that some of the changes to the complex of buildings were a result of the company's involvement in the production of Page 583 of 688 wartime supplies. World War One (WW1) caused anti -German sentiment, which resulted in the name change to Kitchener, after a British General. During WW1, the Lang Tanning Co. became the largest sole leather producer in the British Empire by producing huge amounts of saddle material. The Lang Tanning Co. supplied sole leather and leather linings for aircraft gasoline tanks in World War Two (WW2). Post WW2, modest changes to the complex were in the form of connections between buildings to accommodate future uses. Operations declined after WW2 due to changes in the industry and in 1954 the company ceased operations as a tannery due to competition from synthetic materials. The 5 - acre site and, at the time, complex of 35 buildings continued to be owned by the Lang family until 1974. When the company operations ceased, the Lang Tanning Co. represented one of Kitchener's longest operating businesses (1849-1954). Contextual Value The contextual values relate to the contribution that the complex of buildings make to the continuity and character of the adjacent streetscapes and the overall Warehouse District in the City of Kitchener. The buildings are historically and visually linked to their surroundings, including: Lang Site B with the last fully intact smokestack in Kitchener (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act), other industrial buildings, former homes of industrial workers (including homes in the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act), the railway line, and the Warehouse District. The complex of buildings is recognized as a significant landmark reflecting Kitchener's Industrial Vernacular architecture, the development and growth of Berlin's (now Kitchener) leather tanning industry, the relationship to and political leadership of the Lang family, the hardworking German community in establishing Berlin (now Kitchener). as an industrial centre, and the overall industrial development of the City of Kitchener (ERA Architects Inc., 2008). Other Values Economic Value The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N has both historic- and present-day economic value. The historic/associative value section above extensively details how the Lang Tannery Co., Reinhold Lang, and the Lang family supported the local economy. At present, "The Tannery" (151 Charles Stret West) is located within the warehouse district of Kitchener's downtown. It is one of the largest remaining industrial complexes in the area that reflects the evolution of the tanning industry. The site was rehabilitated and redeveloped in 2008 to support adaptive new uses. The uses support the City's economic development strategy focused on the creation of an innovation district with high-tech companies. The Tannery boasts 306,564 square feet of office space and 25, 810 square feet of retail uses. It is home to many innovated business and complimentary uses such as restaurants and event space. In 2011, The Tannery was awarded the City of Kitchener's Mike Wagner Heritage Award in the category of rehabilitation and adaptive reuse. Page 584 of 688 Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N resides in the following heritage attributes: • All elements related to the design and physical value of the complex of Industrial Vernacular buildings. • All elements related to the design and physical value of the former administration building, including: o five -storey building height; o flat roof; o buff brick; o bays separated by brick pilasters; o segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone sills; 0 4/4 wood windows with segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills; o new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; o new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills 0 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; o new 8 -pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; o new 12 -pane flathead windows with stone sills; o new 12 -pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; o lionhead tie rods; o decorative brickwork; o painted signage that reads "LANG'. • All elements related to the design and physical value of the former tan yard building, including: o four storey building height; o flat roof; o buff brick; o bays separated by brick pilasters; o window openings; o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; o new 12 -pane flathead windows with stone sills; o decorative brickwork; and, o painted signage that reads "THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED HARNESS AND SOLE LEATHERS". • All elements related to the design and physical value of the former leach house building, including: o four storey building height; o flat roof; o buff brick; o bays separated by brick pilasters; o new 6/6 flat head hung windows; o window openings; Page 585 of 688 o former circular window openings with a brick surrounds; and, o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone lintels and stone sills. • All elements related to the design and physical value of the former beam and storage house building, including: o three storey building height; o flat roof; o buff brick; o bays separated by brick pilasters; o window openings; o new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; o painted signage that reads "The Lang Tannery Company Limited" o two sets of clerestory windows with internal muntins reflecting a 6 -lite design; o exterior fire escape; and, o metal tie rods. • All elements related to the design and physical value of the former production building, including: o four storey height; o flat roof; o buff brick; o bays separated by brick pilasters; o window openings; o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; o new 12 -lite flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; 0 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; 0 1 -lite flathead window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; o decorative brickwork; o painted signage that reads "THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE LEATHER"; o four -storey concrete addition, including: ■ concrete construction; ■ window openings with segmentally arched concrete headers and concrete sills; ■ new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete headers and concrete sills; and, ■ new 6/6 flathead hung windows with concrete headers and concrete sills. RPfPYPn! PC ERA Architects Inc. (2008). 36-50 Francis Street South Heritage Impact Assessment Lang Tanning Co. A. ERA Architects Inc.: Toronto, Ontario. Page 586 of 688 Photographs Front Elevation (North Fagade) — Former Administration and Tan Yard Buildings of the Lang Tanning Co. Page 587 of 688 Front Elevation (North Facade) — New Additions and the Former Leech House of the Lang Tanning Co. f I# tMp Front Elevation (North Fagade) —Former Beam/Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co. 11 Page 588 of 688 Page 589 of 688 f9 Side Elevation (West Fagade) — Former Beam and Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co. ITMOMMIR i _ RJR�.® FIX Rear Elevation (South Fagade Page 590 of 688 RANG H,A, R 1yN G CQ LE LEATHERS IRM 4 I' Side Elevation (West Fagade) — Former Tan Yard Building (left) and New Additions (right) of the Lang Tanning Co. F I ru � 77 -F .fir ROOM -6. Rear Elevation (South Fagade) — Former Leach House of the Lang Tanning Co. Page 591 of 688 Page 592 of 688 ii li r - j 1 y AF , 9fi � Ina ■fi �. .■ IM m • I r� N nrinunnIftnn 1nnnti1s1unnI �� s,� iunnnm n1 1nu1IMMI a tlltli{IlIn11111 I ,= Rear Elevation (South Fagade) — New Courtyard Page 593 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis Address: Recorder: Lang Tannery Description: (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade Date: P. Ciuciura March 11, 2023 ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder— Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑X Yes ❑X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 16 of 23 Page 594 of 688 1 KrT HENER scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑X Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑X Yes ❑X because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or Page 595 of 688 1 KrT HES ER reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑X Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑X Yes ❑X landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes The subject property (commonly referred to as Lang Site A) is visually and historically connected to the adjacent property (commonly referred to as Lang Site B) as well as the adjacent neighbourhoods (e.g., Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District) where many tannery works lived. Page 18 of 23 Page 596 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Criteria Interior: Is the interior N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ arrangement, Yes ❑ finish, craftsmanship and/or detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X structure have Yes ❑X other original outbuildings, notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X structure Yes ❑X occupy its original site? * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X building retain Yes ❑X most of its original materials and design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Page 19 of 23 Page 597 of 688 1 KrT HEN�R Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X additional Yes ❑ elements or features that should be added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X good Yes ❑X condition? *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re- use if possible and contribute towards equity - building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ this site be of ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required importance to Indigenous heritage and history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Page 20 of 23 Page 598 of 688 1 KrTcHEN�R topographical ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with the property? * Additional archival work may be required. Function: Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑X What is the Commercial X Office X Other ❑ present Office ❑X Other ❑ - function of the subject property? * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Inclusion: ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required Does the subject property contribute to N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ the cultural ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required heritage of a community of people? Page 21 of 23 Page 599 of 688 1 KITCHE�ER Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register Page 22 of 23 Page 600 of 688 ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 23 of 23 Page 601 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE a9 97 ;- 95 93 83-85 King Street West Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value ❑Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 83-85 King Street West Legal Description: Plan 380 Pt Lot 1 RP 58R3841 Part 3 Year Built: c. 1903 Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival Original Owner: Unknown Original Use: Commercial Condition: Good Descriotion of Cultural Heritaae Resource 83-85 King Street West is a three-storey early 20th-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.02 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the Page 602 of 688 City Commercial Core planning area of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building. Heritage Value 83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual values. Desipn/Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value as an early and rare example of 20th -century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes on the second and third floor and is in fair condition. Features which represent the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style include: nearly flat, low sloping roof; symmetrical fagade; single bay red brick fagade; highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi -circular window openings; semi -circular transom design; 1/1 hung window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; flat head window openings; and, rectangular transoms; 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. Historical/Associative Value The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West has historical/associative value given its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown Kitchener. According to the 1898 Fire Insurance Plan, the subject property originally contained a barn/shed associated with a livery. The December 20, 1900 edition of the Berliner Journal indicates that improvements were made to the livery stable for a cost of $400. The December 24, 1903 edition of the Berliner Journal suggests that the subject property, as it exists today, may have been built by Frank Heiman. The description indicates that Frank Heiman built a 3 -storey block with livery, stable and store for $8,000. Contextual Value The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial buildings that share the same Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical heritage attributes. It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time, and designed by the same person, and constructed by the same person. Collectively, the properties municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street West and 97-99 King Street West contribute to the character of the City's Downtown and the King Street West streetscape. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 83-85 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes: All elements related to the construction and Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style of the building, including: o nearly flat, low sloping roof; o symmetrical fagade; o single bay red brick fagade; o highly decorative brick cornice, o brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; o ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; Page 603 of 688 o brick pilasters; o semi -circular window openings; o semi -circular transom design; 0 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; o flat head window openings; o rectangular transoms; and, 0 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. Rnfnrnnrnc Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Berliner Journal. (1900). New Buildings and Improvements. Berliner Journal: Berlin (now Kitchener), ON. Berliner Journal. (1903). Berlin's Best Year. Berliner Journal: Berlin (now Kitchener), ON. Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self -Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand Hills Books, Inc.: St. Jacob's, ON. Twin -City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden: n. p., ON. Vernon's Berlin and Waterloo. (1901-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1907-1908). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1908-1909). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1910-1911). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Page 604 of 688 Photographs !li pA Front Elevation North Elevation — 83-85 King Street West Third -storey details showing highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave-, and, ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling — 83-85 King Street West Page 605 of 688 f i - Li Third -storey details showing semi -circular window openings; semi -circular transom design; and, 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills Second -storey details showing flat head window openings; rectangular transom design; and, 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills Page 606 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM Address: Description - 83 -85 King Street West Commercial fagade; Brick construction; Classic (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: Recorder: Date: Michelle Drake March 19, 2024 ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder— Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No X physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 607 of 688 1 KrT HES ER scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or Page 608 of 688 1 KrT HES ER reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Page 609 of 688 1 KrTcHEN�R Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, N/A ❑x Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown 0 No ❑ craftsmanship and/or Yes ❑ Yes ❑ detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this structure have other N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X original outbuildings, Yes ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ original site? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ original materials and Yes ❑ Yes ❑X design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X features that should be Yes ❑ Yes ❑ added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in good condition? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑X *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if Page 610 of 688 possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to Indigenous heritage and history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with the property? * Additional archival work may be required. Function: What is the present function of the subject property? * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does the subject property contribute to the cultural heritage of a community of people? Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Other ❑ - N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required 1 KrT HENv R N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Com mercial ❑X Office ❑ Other ❑ - N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Page 611 of 688 1 KrT HENER and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 612 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 87-91 King Street West 22 Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value 73 ❑Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 87-91 King Street West Legal Description: Plan 380 Pt Lot 1 RP 58R6628 Parts 1 to 4 TOG WITH ROW Year Built: c. 1898 Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival Original Owner: Unknown Original Use: Commercial Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 87-91 King Street West is a three-storey early 20th-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.08 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the City Commercial Core planning area ofthe City of Kitchenerwithin the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building. Page 613 of 688 Heritage Value 83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual values. Desi_gn/Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value as an early and rare example of 20th -century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes and is in fair condition. Features which represent the Classic Revival architectural style include: nearly flat, low sloping roof; two -bay red brick facade; highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi -circular window openings; semi -circular transom design; 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; ribbon of three flat head window opening; flat head window openings; rectangular transoms; and, 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. Historical/Associative Value The property municipally addressed as 87-91 King Street West has historical/associative value given its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown Kitchener. According to the 1898 (revised 1904) Fire Insurance Plan, the subject property was to be a 3 -storey brick building for Pearl Steam Laundry. However, by 1901 Pearl Steam Laundry advertised their business as being located at 9 Queen Street South, and later at 90 Queen Street South (Vernon's Berlin and Waterloo, 1901-1903). The 1908 (revised 1925) Fire Insurance Plan identifies the subject property as a 3 -storey brick building housing the Express Office. The Express Office is associated with early (1865) railway companies (Express Company Operations, date unknown). Various Vernon's directories reference either the Canadian Express Company or the Canadian National Express Company between 1908 and c. 1932. Contextual Value The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial buildings that share the same Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical heritage attributes. It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time by the same builder. Collectively, the properties municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street West and 97-99 King Street West contribute to character of the Downtown and the King Street streetscape. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 83-85 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes: • All elements related to the construction and Classic Revival architectural style of the building, including: o nearly flat, low sloping roof; o two -bay red brick fagade; o highly decorative brick cornice, o brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; 0 ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; o brick pilasters; o semi -circular window openings; Page 614 of 688 o semi -circular transom design; 0 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; o ribbon of three flat head windows in one large window opening; o flat head window openings; o rectangular transoms; and, 0 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. References Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Express Company Operations. (date unknown). Retrieved from: https://www66.statcan.gc.ca/eng/1922-23/192207150643 p.%20643.pdf [Accessed on: 2024, April 10). Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self -Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand Hills Books, Inc.: St. Jacob's, ON. Twin -City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden: n. p., ON. Vernon's Berlin and Waterloo. (1901-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1907-1908). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1908-1909). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1910-1911). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Page 615 of 688 Photographs Front Elevation (North Fagade) — 87-91 King Street West Detailing of brick frieze, stone and brick architrave and ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling Page 616 of 688 Detailing of third -storey semi -circular window openings-, semi -circular transom design-, 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills Detailing of second -storey with a ribbon of three windows in the first bay-, two flat head window openings in the second bay-, rectangular transoms; and, 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills Page 617 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM Address: Description: 87-91 King Street West Commercial fagade; red brick; Classic Revival (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade Recorder: Date: Michelle Drake March 19, 2024 ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder— Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No X physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 618 of 688 1 KrT HES ER scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or Page 619 of 688 1 KrT HES ER reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Page 620 of 688 1 KrTcHEN�R Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown 0 No ❑ craftsmanship and/or Yes ❑ Yes ❑ detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this structure have other N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X original outbuildings, Yes ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ original site? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ original materials and Yes ❑ Yes ❑X design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X features that should be Yes ❑ Yes ❑ added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in good condition? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑X *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if Page 621 of 688 possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to Indigenous heritage and history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with the property? * Additional archival work may be required. Function: What is the present function of the subject property? * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does the subject property contribute to the cultural heritage of a community of people? Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Other ❑ - N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required 1 KrT HENv R N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Com mercial ❑X Office ❑ Other ❑ - N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Additional Research Required Page 622 of 688 1 KrT HENv R and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 623 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 97-99 King Street West Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value ❑Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 97-99 King Street West Legal Description: PT LT 1, 9 PL 380 KITCHENER PT 1, 58R6305; T/W 969401 Year Built: c. 1904 Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival Original Owner: Unknown Original Use: Commercial Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 97-99 King Street West is a three-storey early 20th-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.08 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the Page 624 of 688 City Commercial Core planning area of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building. Heritage Value 83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual values. Desipn/Physical Value The property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value as an early and rare example of 20th -century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes and is in fair condition. Features which represent the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style include: nearly flat, low sloping roof; symmetrical facade on the second- and third -storey; two bay red brick fagade; highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi -circular window openings; semi -circular transom design; 1/1 hung window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; flat head window openings; and, rectangular transoms; 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. Historical/Associative Value The property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West has historical/associative value given its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown Kitchener. According to the 1898 Fire Insurance Plan, the foundation for a 3 -storey building was built c. 1904. By 1908, the Fire Insurance Plan shows a three-storey building with a tailor on the second floor. It is not clear who built the building or who the original tenants were. J. D. Miller & C. H. Hohmeier founded their dry goods business in 1912. The business operated at 97-99 King Street West (formerly 63 King Street West) from c. 1912 to c. 1936. And later moved to 58 King Street East until 1961 when J. D. Mill retired. Contextual Value The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial buildings that share the same Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical heritage attributes. It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time by the same builder. Collectively, the properties municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street West and 97-99 King Street West contribute to character of the Downtown and the King Street streetscape. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 97-99 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes: • All elements related to the construction and Classic Revival architectural style of the building, including: o nearly flat, low sloping roof; o symmetrical fagade on the second- and third -storey; o two bay red brick fagade; o highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; o ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; Page 625 of 688 o brick pilasters; o semi -circular window openings; o semi -circular transom; 0 1/1 hung window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; o flat head window openings; o rectangular transoms; and, 0 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills. Rnfnrnnrnc Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self -Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand Hills Books, Inc.: St. Jacob's, ON. Vernon's City of Berlin and Town of Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1913). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's City of Kitchener and Town of Waterloo (Ontario) Directory. (1935). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Waterloo Historical Society. (1961). "Kitchener's oldest merchant retires." Waterloo Historical Society: 49(63). Page 626 of 688 Photographs Detailing of brick frieze, stone and brick architrave and ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling — 97-99 King Street West Page 627 of 688 Detailing of second -storey showing semi -circular window openings-, semi -circular transom-, 1/1 hung windows-, and, decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills Detailing of second -storey showing flat head window openings-, rectangular transoms; 1/1 windows-, and, brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills Page 628 of 688 1 6 "1'1*11 61 10k CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM Address: Description: 97-99 King Street West Commercial fagade; brick construction; Classic Revival (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: Michelle Drake Recorder: — Date: March 19, 2024 ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder— Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes 0 because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes 0 because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No 0 physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. Page 629 of 688 * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist Page 630 of 688 who is significant to a Recorder Heritage Kitchener community. Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, *Additional archival work N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ craftsmanship and/or detail Yes ❑ Yes ❑ may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, N/A ❑x Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ craftsmanship and/or detail Yes ❑ Yes ❑ noteworthy? Page 631 of 688 Completeness: Does this structure have other original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X outbuildings, notable Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ site? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ materials and design features? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X features that should be added Yes ❑ Yes ❑ to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in good condition? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑X *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes Indigenous heritage and Yes ❑ ❑ history? ❑ Additional Research ❑ Additional Research Required Required *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Page 632 of 688 1 KrR Could there be any urban N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown X No ❑ Yes Indigenous history associated Yes ❑ ❑ with the property? ❑ Additional Research ❑ Additional Research Required * Additional archival work may be Required required. Function: What is the present Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Coin function of the subject Commercial ❑ mercial ❑X property? Office ❑ Other ❑ - Office ❑ Other ❑ - * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does the subject property contribute to the cultural heritage of a community of people? Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No Yes ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No Yes ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required N/A ❑ Unknown X No ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register Page 633 of 688 ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 634 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 148 Madison Avenue South Summary of Significance Mac Maple Grove School ®Design/Physical Value ❑Social Value ®Historic/Associative Value ❑Economic Value ®Contextual Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 148 Madison Avenue South Legal Description: Plan 395 Part Lot 1, 2 & 7 Year Built: 1930 & 1952 Architectural Style: Romanesque Original Owner: St. Joseph's Catholic Church Original Use: Religious Condition: Good 138 Page 635 of 688 Description of Cultural Heritage Resource The property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South is a mid -20th century brick church built in the Romanesque architectural style. The church is situated on a 0.68 acre parcel of land located on the north west corner of Courtland Avenue East and Madison Avenue South in the Mill Courtland Woodside Park Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the church. Heritage Value The property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South is recognized for its design/physical, historic/associative, and contextual values. Desi_gn/Physical Value The property demonstrates design/physical value as a rare and unique example of a mid -20th century church built in the Romanesque architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in good condition. Front (South) Facade The front fagade of the building faces Madison Avenue South and is comprised of three irregular bays. The centre bay projects forward and features: a front -facing ridged gable roofline; rose window; ribbon of three window openings with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; the windows are surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; the upper half of the fagade is stone while the lower half is semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; there are two one -storey buttresses at each end of the centre bay primarily constructed with buff (yellow) brick with stone at top; decorative stone crosses are inset within the semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; the main entrance features primarily plain archivolts with one decorative floral arch resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; a pair of stained glass windows with semi -circular arches flank each side of the main entrance and are surrounded stone; and, a wide concrete/stone staircase with metal railings leads to the main entrance. The left (west) bay is setback from the centre bay and features: an octagon plan with only six visible sides; a flat roof with copper trim; semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; one flat head stained glass window with a stone lintel, quoins and sill; a pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone foundation. The right (east) bay is setback from the centre bay and features: square plan; flat roof; prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi -circular arches that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); stone and semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; semi -circular stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; flathead stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; a pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone foundation. Page 636 of 688 Side (West) FaQade The side facade faces the former St. Joseph's Catholic School. Only a partial view of the side facade is visible from the public realm. The most prominent feature is the protruding octagon with only six visible sides, which features a flat roof with copper trim; semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; flat head stained glass windows with a stone lintels, quoins and sills; pairs of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone foundation. Other visible heritage attributes include: the flat roof with copper trim; semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; flat head stained glass windows with a stone lintels, quoins and sills; large semi -circular stained glass windows and window openings with stone surrounds; and, a rusticated stone foundation. Side (East) Facades The side facade faces Madison Avenue South and is comprised of several irregular bays. The left (south) bay features: square plan; flat roof with copper trim; prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi -circular arches that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); stone and semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; flathead stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; semi -circular stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; side entrance with plain archivolts resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; and, a rusticated stone foundation. The central bay is inset and features: gable roof with copper trim; semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; semi- circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surround; flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, rusticated stone foundation. The right (north) bay features: prominent gable with copper trim; a plain vertical stone rectangle with stone surround (perhaps once a cast stone gable vent); a pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, rusticated stone foundation. To the right of the gable is a one -storey section that features: flat roof with copper trim; flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surround; entrance door with rectangular stone surround; and, rusticated stone foundation. The Parish House also faces Madison Avenue South and features: hip roof with a cross on the front; brick construction; symmetrical fagade with a central main entrance door and window above flanked by a single window and a pair of windows on both the first and second storey; front door and door opening with side lites; flat head 1/1 windows and window openings with stone sills; and, concrete foundation. Rear (South) FaQade The rear (north) fagade faces the Parish House and only a portion of this fagade is visible from the public realm. The prominent feature on this fagade is the semi -circular plan with round copper dome. Other heritage attributes include: semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone sills; flat head basement windows with stone lintels; and, rusticated stone foundation. Page 637 of 688 Historical/Associative Value The historical and associative values relate to the original owner, congregation, original pastor, architect and builder. The St. Joseph website (https://stmosephkitchener.org/history) contains a detailed Parish Timeline, history of Priests of St Joseph, 50th Anniversary Booklet (1980), 60 Years Working Together (1990), 75 Year Directory — Our History (2005), and 85 Year Directory — Our History (2015). Most of the following information was obtained from the St. Joseph website. The lands were secured from the school board in 1930 for $3000. The congregation was formed in 1930 when Monsignor Reuben M. Haller was assigned the task of building a church due to the growing congregation at St. Mary's and Sacred Heart. The first mass was held on October 26, 1930 in the St. Joseph's School hall. Monsignor R.M. Haller was the first diocesan priest to serve Kitchener; the first priest of the City to be made a Monsignor while serving the community; and, the first living person to have a new separate school named in his honour. Construction of the basement began in the fall of 1930 with church services being held in the basement by Christmas. Due to a steel shortage during the depression the remainder of the church was not built until 1952. The church was dedicated on April 12, 1953 by Bishop J.F. Ryan of Hamilton and the cornerstone was laid on July 20, 1952 by Monsignor A. J. O'Brien of Hamilton assisted by Rev. R.M. Haller and Rev. H.B. Smith. According to an article in the KW Record (April 11, 1953) the church was "built to match the design of the Pope's private chapel in Rome." The rectory was built on Madison Avenue South in 1958, a plaque in memory of Monsignor Haller was unveiled in 1980, the sanctuary was renovated in 1986, some brickwork was redone in 1988 and some of the brick on the tower was replaced with stone in 1996. The church was designed by Bernal A. Jones. B.A. Jones attended the Toronto Technical School and worked as a draftsman for Frank Darling, in the office of Darling and Pearson, between 1908 and 1922. B.A. Jones moved to Kitchener in 1922 and worked with W.H.E. Schmalz until opening his own office in 1926. During that time B.A. Jones assisted W.H.E. Schmalz design the 1922-23 Kitchener City Hall. B.A. Jones is also responsible for the design of several other important buildings in Kitchener such as the 1932 Public Utilities Building and the 1936-37 Church of the Good Shepherd. The church was constructed by Ball Brothers Ltd. Ball Brothers Ltd. were general contractors formed by the partnership of Harold and Frank Ball in 1923. Ball Brothers Ltd. was a local based company but known across the province. Local examples of their work include: large portions of St. Mary's Hospital and Grand River Hospital; Centre in the Square; various buildings at Conestoga College, Wilfrid Laurier University, the University of Waterloo and the University of Guelph; the former Budd automative plant (demolished); and, the Kitchener railway barns (demolished). The company is now known as Ball Construction. Contextual Value The contextual values relate to the contribution that the building makes to the continuity and character of the Courtland Avenue East and Madison Avenue South streetscapes. The church and parish house are physically, functionally, visually and historically linked to each other. The church is physically, visually and historically linked to the former St. Joseph's Catholic School. The prominence of the church on a corner lot with a grand square bell tower make the building a recognizable neighbourhood landmark. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 148 Madison Avenue South resides in the following heritage attributes: Page 638 of 688 • All elements related to the design/physical value of the church built in the Romanesque architectural style, including: o All elements of the front (south) facade, including: ■ three irregular bays; ■ the centre bay that projects forward and features: • a front -facing ridged gable roofline; • rose window; • ribbon of three window openings with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; • windows surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; • stone and semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • two one -storey buttresses at each end of the centre bay primarily constructed with buff (yellow) brick with stone at top; • decorative stone crosses are inset within the semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • main entrance features primarily plain archivolts with one decorative floral arch resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; • pair of stained glass windows with semi -circular arches flanking each side of the main entrance and stone surround; and, • wide concrete/stone staircase with metal railings. ■ the left (west) bay that is setback from the centre bay and features: • octagon plan with only six visible sides; • flat roof with copper trim; • semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • one flat head stained glass window with stone lintel, quoins and sill; • pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, • rusticated stone foundation. ■ the right (east) bay is setback from the centre bay and features: • square plan; • flat roof; • prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi -circular arches that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); • stone and semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • semi -circular stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround; • flathead stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround; Page 639 of 688 • pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, • rusticated stone foundation. o All elements of the side (West) fagade, including: ■ protruding octagon with only six visible sides, including: • copper trim; • semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • flat head stained-glass windows with stone lintels, quoins and sills; • pairs of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained-glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, • rusticated stone foundation. ■ other visible heritage attributes include: • the flat roof with copper trim; • semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • flat head stained glass -windows with stone lintels, quoins and sills; • large semi -circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surrounds; and, • rusticated stone foundation. o All elements of the side (East) fagade, including: ■ several irregular bays; ■ the left (south) bay features: • square plan; • flat roof with copper trim; • prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi -circular arches that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); • stone and semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • flathead stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround; • semi -circular stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround; • side entrance with plain archivolts resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; and, • rusticated stone foundation. ■ The central bay is inset and features: • gable roof with copper trim; • semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; • semi -circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surround; Page 640 of 688 • flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, • rusticated stone foundation. ■ The right (north) bay features: • prominent gable with copper trim; • plain vertical stone rectangle with stone surround (perhaps once a cast stone gable vent); • pair of windows with semi -circular arches containing stained-glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; • flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, • rusticated stone foundation; ■ to the right of the gable is a one -storey section that features: • flat roof with copper trim; • flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surrounds; • entrance door with rectangular stone surround; and, • rusticated stone foundation. ■ the Parish House features: • hip roof with a cross on the front; • brick construction; • symmetrical fagade with a central main entrance door and window above flanked by a single window and a pair of windows on both the first and second storey; • front door and door opening with side lites; • flat head 1/1 windows and window openings with stone sills; and, • concrete foundation. o All elements of the rear (South) fagade including: ■ semi -circular plan with round copper dome; ■ semi -rugged buff (yellow) brick; ■ flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone sills; ■ flat head basement windows with stone lintels; and, ■ rusticated stone foundation. RPfPrPnr_Pc Ball Brothers. (1957). Building Permit #20928, St. Joseph's Parish House. City of Kitchener: Kitchener, ON. Ball Construction. (2013). History. Retrieved from http://www.balIcon.com/index.php/about-us/history/ on October 21, 2013. Hill, R. (2009). Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada 1800-1950. Retrieved from http://www.dictionaryofarchitectsincanada.org/architects/view/l73 on October 4, 2013. Page 641 of 688 St. Joseph's Roman Catholic Church. (1990). St. Joseph's Parish Community Kitchener, Ontario 1930-1990: Celebrating Our 60th Anniversary. St. Joseph Parish Roman Catholic Church. (2010). The History of St. Joseph's Parish. Retrieved from http://stmosephkitchener.org/parishlife/history.htm on October 21, 2013. St. Joseph Parish Roman Catholic Church. (date unknown). "History of St Joseph." Retrieved from https://stmosephkitchener.org/history on April 12, 2024. Photographs - t _ I MOW f f Hit A I � 1oo Front Elevation South Fa ade & Side Elevation East Fa ade — 148 Madison Avenue South Page 642 of 688 a y. J 4` a SO iZI t Front Elevation (South Fagade) — 148 Madison Avenue South Page 643 of 688 w 1 j i Front•(South• i We Page 643 of 688 F Side Elevation (East Fagade) — 148 Madison Avenue South - i Side Elevation (East Fagade) — 148 Madison Avenue South Page 644 of 688 Page 645 of 688 ►�iiiui�► jriiulii�i �y �& �■l�riii►Ji�f w s ■ i ■ '14 Side Elevation Entrance (East Fagade) — 148 Side Elevation Window Detail (East Fagade) — Madison Avenue South 148 Madison Avenue South Page 645 of 688 i� Rear Elevation (North Fagade) — 148 Madison Avenue South r VAi 'Ail i Side Elevation (East Fa�ade) — 148 Madison Avenue Sou Page 646 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 148 Madison Avenue South Address: St. Joseph's, 1930 &1952, Romanesque Description: (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade Michelle Drake Recorder: — Date: March 26, 2024 ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder— Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown X No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 13 of 20 Page 647 of 688 1 KrT HENER scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or Page 14 of 20 Page 648 of 688 1 KrT HES ER reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑X landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Page 15 of 20 Page 649 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Criteria Interior: Is the interior N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X arrangement, Yes ❑ finish, craftsmanship and/or detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X structure have Yes ❑ other original outbuildings, notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X structure Yes ❑ occupy its original site? * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X building retain Yes ❑ most of its original materials and design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Page 16 of 20 Page 650 of 688 1 KrT HEN�R Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ additional Yes ❑ elements or features that should be added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X good Yes ❑ condition? *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re- use if possible and contribute towards equity - building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ this site be of ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required importance to Indigenous heritage and history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Page 651 of 688 1 KrTCHEN�R topographical ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with the property? * Additional archival work may be required. Function: Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ What is the Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Other X - Religious present Office ❑ Other ❑ - function of the subject property? * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X Inclusion: ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required Does the subject property contribute to N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown X No ❑ Yes ❑ the cultural ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required heritage of a community of people? Page 18 of 20 Page 652 of 688 1 KITCHE�ER Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined St. Joseph Facebook Page has excellent photos of the interior of the church Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register Page 19 of 20 Page 653 of 688 ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 20 of 20 Page 654 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 171-173 Victoria Street North Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ❑Contextual Value ❑Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 171-173 Victoria Street North Legal Description: Plan 374 Lot 78 Year Built: c. 1887 Architectural Style: Italianate Original Owner: Unknown Original Use: Residential Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource The property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North is a two-storey late 19th century brick building built circa 1887 in the Italianate architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.23 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of Victoria Street North between Ahrens Street West and Margaret Avenue in the Civic Centre planning community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The subject property is also located adjacent to the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building. Page 655 of 688 Heritage Value 171-173 Victoria Street North is recognized for its design/physical and historical/associative values. The building was part of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD) Study. As part of the study, the boundaries were refined to exclude certain properties primarily fronting onto regional roads; however, the CCNHCD Plan identified 171-173 Victoria Street North as a Group A building worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Specifically, the CCNHCD Plan notes the following: a pair of prestigious semi-detached residences; the building is in very good condition; the masonry is in good repair and exhibits the contrasting colours of red and buff (yellow) brick; presence of decorative wood details in the roof eaves and brackets; porches have been replicated using good skill and judgment; the windows appear to be original double hung; and, the front doors have maintained the transom window design. Desipn/Physical Value The property demonstrates design/physical value as rare example of a late 19th century prestigious semi-detached dwelling built in the Italianate architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in good condition. Front (North) FaQade The front fagade of the building faces Victoria Street North and is comprised of four bays (two bays for each half of the semi-detached dwelling). Each half of the semi-detached dwelling features: a projecting bay with a front gable; roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; a semi -circular window opening in the front gable end with a red brick voussoirs and stone sill; a pair of segmentally arched window openings on both the the first- and second -storey with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; the design of the double hung 1/1 wood windows on the first- and second -storey; and, a rusticated stone foundation. Between the projecting bays are the entrances to the building. Each half of the semi-detached dwelling features: a hip roof; roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; a segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs on the second -storey; a verandah on both the first- and second -storey; the verandah on the second - storey displays a top and bottom rail with turned balusters; the verandah on the first -storey displays a half turned post on each end with highly decorative brackets and scroll work along with a full central turned post in the middle with highly decorative brackets and scroll work; and, the first -storey has two entrances and both display a front door opening with a segmentally arched transom with red brick voussoirs and simple side lites. Side (West & East) Facades The side fagades of the building are virtually identical. They face the side lot lines and adjacent buildings. The side facades are comprised of the side of the projecting bays, two bays divided by a chimney and a rear addition. In general, the second -storey side fagades feature: a hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills at both the first- and second -storey; double hung 1/1 window design; chimneys that project above the roofline and divide the fagade into two bays; two basement windows with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; and, a field stone foundation. The rear addition is one -and -one -half -storeys with a gable roofline; covered verandah; segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs: a segmentally arched window opening with red brick voussoirs; and, a circular window with a red brick border located above the verandah. The first -storey covered verandah features: a top and bottom rail with turned balusters; turned posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work; and, vertical skirting. Page 656 of 688 Rear (South) Facade The rear fagade faces a laneway in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District. This fagade features portions of the two-storey building and the one -and -one -half -storey addition. The portions of the two-storey building feature: a hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills at both the first- and second -storey; and, double hung 1/1 window design. The one -and -a -half -storey addition features: gable roofline; two bays separated by a chimney; buff (yellow) and red brick; plain fascia, soffits and frieze; segmentally arched window openings of varying sizes on both the first- and second -storey with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; double hung 1/1 window design; and, rusticated stone foundation. Historical/Associative Value The property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North has historical/associative value due to its history and association the late Ian MacNaughton and his planning firm MHBC — MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited. Ian Mac Naughton graduated from the University of Waterloo's Urban and Regional Planning program in 1968 and went on to pursue his MA in Regional Planning and Resource Development in 1971. He founded MHBC in 1973 with a vision to create a planning firm built on innovation, integrity, strategic thinking, problem solving and excellent service (MHBC Planning Urban Design & Landscape Architecture, 2024). He was honoured as a "Fellow" by the Canadian Institute of Planners, which is the highest recognition a land use planner can achieve. Sadly, Ian passed away on Saturday, October 7, 2023. MHBC's website (2024) contains an "In Memory" page that further describes Ian and his contributions to the planning field and community: "Ian was passionate about the betterment of Ontario through his vision, leadership and big picture thinking. Throughout his life, Ian demonstrated qualities that set him apart as a leader, mentor and innovator and he had a unique ability to inspire and motivate those around him. Based on his knowledge and expertise he was appointed as a member of numerous Provincial, Regional and Local task forces including the Provincial Smart Growth Central Ontario Strategy Sub -Panel, the Greenbelt Task Force and the Province of Ontario Advisory Group on Energy and Economic Development. Ian was also selected as a special advisor to the Ontario Stone, Sand and Gravel Association and assisted numerous municipalities with restructuring, governance, waste management and housing strategies. Beyond Ian's professional achievements, Ian championed causes close to his heart, giving back to the community and making a positive impact on countless lives. This included the University of Waterloo, Canadian Technology Triangle, Rotary, Homewood, Breslau Park and Recreation Association and the Grand River Conservation Foundation." The subject property was MHBCs Kitchener office from 1986 to 2009. Over the past 50 years, what began as a local planning firm, MHBC has grown to be a large company with over 100 staff located at five regional offices (Barrie, Kitchener, London, Woodbridge and Burlington) providing planning services across Ontario. Today, the firm provides a full range of services, including: urban and rural planning; urban design; landscape architecture; cultural heritage; and, resource management. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 171-173 Victoria Street North resides in the following heritage attributes: Page 657 of 688 • All elements related to the design and physical value of the semi-detached dwelling built in the Italianate architectural style, including: o two-storey height; o square plan with rear addition; o hipped roofline; o the front fagade: ■ four bays (two for each half of the dwelling); ■ projecting bays with front gables (one for each half of the dwelling); ■ roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; ■ buff (yellow) and red brick; ■ semi -circular window opening in the front gable ends with a red brick voussoirs and stone sills; ■ segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; ■ the design of the double hung 1/1 wood windows; ■ segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs on the second -storey; ■ second -storey verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters; ■ first -storey verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters and turned posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work; ■ segmentally arched transom with red brick voussoirs and simple side Iites on the first -storey; ■ front door openings; and, ■ rusticated stone foundation. o the side facades: ■ hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; ■ buff (yellow) and red brick; ■ segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; ■ double hung 1/1 window design; ■ chimneys that project above the roofline and divide the fagade into two bays; ■ two basement windows with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; and, ■ field stone foundation. o the rear addition features: ■ one -and -one -half -storey height; ■ gable roofline; ■ covered verandah; ■ segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs; ■ segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs; ■ circular window with a red brick border located above the verandah; and, ■ covered verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters, turned posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work, and vertical skirting. o the rear fagade: ■ this fagade features portions of the two-storey building and the one -and -one -half - storey addition; ■ the portions of the two-storey building feature: • a hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; Page 658 of 688 • buff (yellow) and red brick; • segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; and, • double hung 1/1 window design. ■ the one -and -a -half -storey addition features: • gable roofline; • two bays separated by a chimney; • buff (yellow) and red brick; • plain fascia, soffits and frieze' • segmentally arched window openings of varying sizes with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; • double hung 1/1 window design; and, • rusticated stone foundation. References City of Kitchener. (2007). Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan. Stantec in association with Nexus Architects, ecoplans limited, and Michael Baker, Historian: Kitchener, Ontario. Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON. MHBC Planning Urban Design & Landscape Architecture. (2024). "About Us." Retrieved from https://www.mhbcplan.com/about/ [Accessed April 15, 2024]. MHBC Planning Urban Design & Landscape Architecture. (2024). "In Memory." Retrieved from https://www.mhbcplan.com/team/in-memory/ [Accessed April 15, 2024]. Twin -City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden: n. p., ON. Vernon's Berlin and Waterloo Directory. (1897-1899). Vernon's Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin and Waterloo. (1901-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1907-1908). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1908-1909). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport Directory. (1910-1911). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON. Page 659 of 688 Photographs civ -rr JI � 1 Front Elevation (North Fagade) — 171-173 Victoria Street South (former semi-detached dwelling converted to offices Page 660 of 688 40, aAl 4 ar. Side Elevation (West Fagade) — 171-173 Victoria Street North tSide7EIevation (East Fagade) — 171-173 Victoria Street North Page 661 of 688 Page 662 of 688 r A leg . 3 IA Ij O MWWOJ V, 14 NFAr-AON 11 KVIO 0 • I l I t { I I' 'i 1 + I ` Detailing of door openings with transom and side lites, and detailing of verandah with turned posts, turned balusters and decorative brackets and scrollwork Page 663 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 171-173 Victoria Street North Address: Former semi-detached dwelling, Italianate style Description: (date of construction, architectural style, etc) Photographs Attached: ❑Front Facade ❑ Left Fagade ❑ Right Fagade Michelle Drake Recorder: — Date: March 25, 2024 ❑ Rear Facade ❑ Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder– Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes X because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No X physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 664 of 688 1 KrT HENER scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical o r N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g - A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or Page 11 of 17 Page 665 of 688 1 KrT HES ER reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 7. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑ important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑ physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Page 12 of 17 Page 666 of 688 1 KrTMh,!R Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Criteria Interior: Is the interior N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ arrangement, Yes ❑ finish, craftsmanship and/or detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ structure have Yes ❑ other original outbuildings, notable landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X structure Yes ❑ occupy its original site? * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X building retain Yes ❑ most of its original materials and design features? Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Page 13 of 17 Page 667 of 688 1 KrT HEN�R Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ additional Yes ❑ elements or features that should be added to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X good Yes ❑ condition? *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re- use if possible and contribute towards equity - building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ this site be of ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required importance to Indigenous heritage and history? *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Page 14 of 17 Page 668 of 688 1 KrTcHEN�R topographical ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with the property? * Additional archival work may be required. Function: Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑X What is the Commercial X Office X Other ❑ present Office ❑X Other ❑ - function of the subject property? * Other may include vacant, social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ Inclusion: ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required Does the subject property contribute to N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ the cultural ❑ Additional Research Required ❑ Additional Research Required heritage of a community of people? Page 15 of 17 Page 669 of 688 1 KITCHE�ER Does the subject property have intangible value to a specific community of people? * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register Page 16 of 17 Page 670 of 688 ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page of Y Page 671 of 688 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 111 Ahrens Street West I61 - 183 �lZ 156 179 - 157 * L�� 154 73 153 G L� 162 C' 156\ 150 146 1E 140 t 38 143 155 149 351 141 � 145 139 .1351 135 \ ML HOPE HURON PARK 133 131 126 186 -..... 137 135 124 100 178 _ 193 1 122 0�1 129 198 202 4�1N 181 127 118 - 183 184 1924 175 �EGjo P� 116 186 188 - N�JF 180 203 1176 .197 .199 `L CANAO(AN NAT 185 140 150 5 r 130 rrrr h0 rr U7ti .114---.. \. 160 -- \ 102 126 150 , 125 \ `\ VrRail sub." 0 `\ 1Ik 15 113 A 151 CIVIC I. -,ENTRE 94 .123 .(N.'�r? FNS+ .,f,Za n45���OWQ, 127 - 103. - sTtk Summary of Significance ® Design/Physical Value ❑Social Value ® Historical Value ® Economic Value ® Contextual Value ❑ Environmental Value Municipal Address: 111 Ahrens Street West Legal Description: Plan 376 Part Lot 222 58R-2921 Year Built: 1887 Architectural Styles: Vernacular Industrial Original Owner: Hartman Krug Original Use: Industrial Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 111 Ahrens Street West is a late 19th century building built in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The building is situated on a 1.06 -acre parcel of land located on the south side of Breithaupt Street between Weber Street West and Ahrens Street West in the Mt. Hope Huron Park Planning Community Page 672 of 688 of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value are the industrial buildings. Heritage Value 111 Ahrens Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historic/associative, and contextual values. Design/Physical Value The existing building spans an entire block and is a representative example of an early Industrial Vernacular architectural style in Kitchener. The building is in good condition with many intact original elements including, but not limited to yellow brick construction, flat -roof, parapet walls, stone foundations, and shallow buttressing between windows. The original Krug Furniture Building was built in 1887 and was initially 2 storeys in height. By 1889, a third storey was added and by 1908, a fourth storey was added to increase the floor space to more than 130,000 square feet. The building was most added onto with a second structure adjoining the original structure sometime after 1908. The 1924/25 Fire Insurance Map identifies four sections of the H. Krug Furniture Co. Ltd. Including: 1. Office, Show room and storage; 2. Shipping, Upholstery and storage; 3. Woodworking, Finishing and Storage; and 4. Machine Room, Bench Room, Finishing and Storage. The 1924/25 First Insurance Map also identifies two buildings, which are now part of the Krug property. These buildings were the J.M. Card Lumber Co. and the Alpha Chemical Co. With the building occupying a whole city block, it was believed that this was the largest furniture plant in the British Empire at the time covering a floor space of 80,000 square feet. Today, the building is 4 - storeys in height with a "U" building footprint , with a flat roof and a decorative cornice. The building almost retains its original fenestration pattern on all elevations and has many door openings on the ground floor. On the northern elevation, the fagade can be divided into 25 bay sections, with brick buttresses between each bay. The first nine (9) sections of the fagade include two 6 -over -6 double hung -windows with stone headers and sills on each storey. The rest of the sections contain triple 6 -over -6 double -hung windows with stone headers and sills. On the south elevation of the earlier portion of the building (towards the intersection of Ahrens Street West and Breithaupt Street), The west elevation is divided into 6 sections with brick buttresses, with each storey containing two double -hung 6 -over -6 windows with stone headers and sills on the upper storeys. Some windows on the second storey have been replaced. The ground level includes an entrance, a garage that had been modified and filled in and now has a triple window. There are also remnants of the original sign banding that read " H. Krug Furniture Co.", the fagade can be divided into section due to the shallow buttresses, with each section containing two 6 -over -6 double hung windows with decorative stone headers and sills on each storey. This fenestration pattern continues towards the other end of fagade, where the windows change to triple 6 -over -6 double hung windows with decorative stone headers and sills separated by buttresses on each storey. There is also a small three-storey addition with a parapet and flat roof, which contains slightly arches windows separated by buttresses on it's front fagade, and other numerous window openings that have been boarded up on the side fagade. The original sign banding of the furniture company can be seen in three places on this fagade — on either end of the fagade, and one in the center of the fagade between the third and fourth storey. There is also a brick chimney between the smaller addition and the main portion of the building. Page 673 of 688 The buildings that were formerly a part of the Alpha Chemical Co. are of brick construction that has been painted white but were not historically part of the original Krug Furniture building. The Alpha Chemical Co. was founded by brothers William John and David Moody on Foundry Street (Ontario Street) making stove and harness polishes. The company moved to the Breithaupt Street location in 1897. In 1957 the company manufactured more than 60 products including: soaps, cleaners, polish, dubbin, ink, antiseptics, mucilage, enamels, sewing machine oil, silver cream, wax tile, compounds and abrasives. The H. Krug Furniture Co. purchased the Alpha Chemical Co. building on Breithaupt Street in 1979. Historical Value The historic and associative values relate to original building owner Hartman Krug. Hartman Krug was born in 1853 in the Township of Wilmot to John Henry Krug and his wife Sophia Schultz. He learned the furniture trade at Poth's cabinet shop in New Dundee and gained further experience in carpentry and furniture manufacturing after coming to Berlin in the 1870s before starting his own business. He worked for the Simpson's Furniture Factory on King Street West. Krug then partnered with Albert Ruby to establish his company in the early 1880s. In 1887, H. Krug opened his furniture factory at Ahrens Street and Breithaupt Street across the Grand Trunk Railway Station. In addition to the original structure at the intersection of Ahrens and Breithaupt Street, a second structure was added to the factory complex during its early development and was located across from the original factory, on Breithaupt Street. At one point, the plant took up two city blocks, most of the streetscape from Ahrens Street to Weber Street and originally included a lumberyard, dry kilns, and large storage warehouses where the dry lumber supply was stored before being transformed into furniture. Hartman Krug was also one of the most prominent and influential businessmen at the center of industrial boom taking place in Berlin in the later 1800s. He was identified as being involved with several other Berlin companies and served on the Separate School Board and Town Council for a number of years. He was also a charter member of the Interior Hardwood Company, and in 1916 purchased the Doon Twine plant and brought it into the City. Krug married Annie Teresa Dunn in 1880 and had five sons and five daughters. Three of his sons — Rudolph, Henry and John — succeeded to the presidencies of both the H. Krug Furniture Company and the Doon Twines Limited. Henry became the president of Doon Twines Limited in 1927. Hartman Krug was active in the company until his death in 1933. The H. Krug Furniture Company initially produced frames, dining room sets, and rockers. The company manufactured all types of furniture including hard -carved household furniture. The factory continued to explant its product line and was soon making upholstered items and a line of hand -carved home furniture. Although the company offered a variety of products, it first found its niche in chair making, and then office furniture. The Krug Furniture Company has seen immense success since its founding and still continues to be a prominent furniture company in Ontario. In 1980, the company purchased the 75 -year-old Imperial Furniture Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Of Stratford from Howard Hemphill. The new acquisition, also known as the Imperial Furniture division of Krug Furniture Co., has about 185,000 square feet of floor space and manufactured dining room, bedroom and made-to-order furniture. In 1984, still needing more space, the company purchased the former Coppercraft building on Manitou Drive in Kitchener to set up its veneer shipping and warehousing business. In May of 2000, Krug bought the Kaufman business Page 674 of 688 based in Collingwood, Ontario. It is understood that this purchase brought together two of the most respected furniture companies in the industry and ensure Krug Inc. a primary place in the market. Contextual Value 111 Ahrens Street West has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings. The building exists in its original location, and still occupies a whole city block. The building is still being used for furniture production by Krug Furniture. The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of the area. The property is within the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL), which has been identified as a high priority cultural heritage resource. The Warehouse District CHL is significant because it includes a number of buildings that were instrumental to the development and progress of Kitchener's economy, making it the center of industrial growth in Canada at the turn of the 20th century. Due to the size and architectural style of the building, this building is very prominent and well-known within the community. Additionally, due to its location at the corner of Ahrens Street West and Breithaupt Street near the train tracks, this building is easily recognizable and is a landmark within the community. Other Values Economic Value 111 Ahrens Street has economic value as it significantly contributed to Berlin's, and then Kitchener's economic development. At one point, the Krug Furniture Plant was considered the largest furniture plant in the British Empire. Additionally, Hartman Krug was a prominent and influential businessman, who was very involved in the community, Heritage Attributes The heritage attributes of 111 Ahrens Street West resides in the following heritage attributes: ■ All elements related to the construction and Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the original portion of the Krug Furniture building, including: o Location, orientation and massing of the building; o roof and roofline, including: ■ flat roof; ■ parapet wall; o door openings; o window and window openings, including: ■ tripled 6/6 double hung windows per bay; ■ stone headers and sills; o yellow brick construction; o stone foundation (original building); o shallow buttressing between windows; o decorative cornice; o sign banding on the west and south elevations; and, o chimney. All elements related to the contextual value of the original portion of the Krug Furniture building, including: Page 675 of 688 o Its original location on Ahrens and Breithaupt Streets and its contribution to the Breithaupt Street and Ahrens Street West landscape. Page 676 of 688 ine ALAVIPL— -1 01; 111011diw i 4 111 Ahrens Street West — North elevation .4.:.J'MAIL• w ,. r - ; - r'. 111 Ahrens Street West —South Elevation Page 678 of 688 WELLLV'GT01V E3Fl�/THAU. No. r e --- � • 'o y I i 89 � �Lo h vJ � a T �,N Q 1 92s�� - - Y/C OR/ASEE SHEE�' tt �� s•�". I 111 Ahrens Street West — Fire Insurance Maps —1924/1925 Page 679 of 688 References Glover, Robert A. (2013), Old Factory Smoke Berlin, Ontario, University of Waterloo Bookstore, accessed via Kitchener Public Library Archives, pp. 245-247. Town of Berlin Fire Insurance Maps — 1924/25 Vernon, H. & Son. (1910). Vernon's Berlin, Waterloo and Bridgeport: Street, Alphabetical, Business and Miscellaneous Directory. For the Years 1910-1911 (8th Ed.). Hamilton, ON: Griffen & Richmond. Waterloo Historical Society, 1987, Volume — 75, Kitchener Ontario, accessed via Kitchener Public Library Archives Webb, L. 2008., Krug, A Global Name in Furniture, Waterloo Historical Society, Vol. 97, Kitchener, Ontario accessed via Kitchener Public Library Archives Page 680 of 688 CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 111 Ahrens Street West Address: Industrial Description: Photographs Attached: ❑x Front Facade Deeksha Choudhry Recorder: April 15, 2024 — Date: ❑ Left Fagade ❑x Right Fagade ❑x Rear Facade ❑x Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder — Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff Committee 1. This property has design value or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it is a rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X physical value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates a high degree of technical or Page 681 of 688 scientific achievement. * E.g. - constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. 4. The property has historical value or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑X because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. *Additional archival work may be required. 5. The property has historical or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E. g -A commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. Page 682 of 688 *Additional archival work Recorder Heritage Kitchener may be required. Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, 7. The property has N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ contextual value N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is Yes ❑ Yes ❑X physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. *Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑X landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, N/A ❑x Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑X No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ Page 683 of 688 craftsmanship and/or detail noteworthy? Completeness: Does this structure have other original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑x N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ outbuildings, notable Yes ❑ Yes ❑X landscaping or external features that complete the site? Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its original N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ site? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its original N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ materials and design features? Yes ❑ Yes ❑X Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Significance and indicate which elements are still existing and which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X features that should be added Yes ❑ Yes ❑ to the heritage attribute list? Condition: Is the building in good condition? N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑X *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to N/A ❑X Unknown ❑ No ❑ Y N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Indigenous heritage and es ❑ X Additional Research Required history? ❑ Additional Research Required *E.g. - Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Indigenous history associated X Additional Research Required with the property? Page 684 of 688 * Additional archival work may be required. N/A ❑x Unknown ❑ No ❑ Y es ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required Function: What is the present Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Com function of the subject Commercial ❑ mercial ❑ property? Office ❑ Other ❑ Church Office ❑ Other ❑X - Industrial * Other may include vacant social, institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does N/A ❑ Unknown ❑x No ❑ Y N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No X Yes ❑ the subject property es ❑ contribute to the cultural ❑ Additional Research ❑ Additional Research Required heritage of a community of Required people? Does the subject property N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ have intangible value to a N/A ❑ Unknown ❑x No ❑ Y specific community of people? es ❑ ❑Additional Research Required * E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim ❑ Additional Research Society of Waterloo & Wellington Required Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑x If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register Page 685 of 688 ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General /Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification: Page 686 of 688 Page 687 of 688 0m C U L m N C � O N w C O_ ❑ O 0 06 O N X O r O L a a n O L 05 U Y O F -I C O C> C O N > E O 7 E VO a O0 O E E a c CY O O .O � N C a ` w0U Q o o lot v d � Y Q � U 0 G/1 0000 �� �� o »» � V N W N co ao 0 co 0 7 c0 0000 O L� y ,W� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ cow❑ C4 � y V' � � V N � o U a Q a w v y � U w O L E O O N D_ U '0'0 N (n a (n L w N y N In N E Y C N W MO N ❑ W O N OW M M O yy O O O O co y O O O O O m z 7 o000 7 7 7 7 0 N a N N a a N N a a xxxx x r N M �p r a0 O r N M i0 1� a0 O) r O N N N N M N N N i0 N N O) N 01 01 O M M