HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2024-194 - Municipal Heritage Register Review May 2024 Update
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener
DATE OF MEETING: May 7, 2024
SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals,
519-741-2200 ext. 7070
PREPARED BY: Deeksha Choudhry, Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7602
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward
DATE OF REPORT: April 1, 2024
REPORT NO.: DSD-2024-194
SUBJECT: Municipal Heritage Register Review
May 2024 Update
RECOMMENDATION:
The pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or
interest be recognized, and designation be pursued for the following properties:
113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South
83-85 King Street West
87-91 King Street West
97-99 King Street West
148 Madison Avenue South
171-173 Victoria Street North
111 Ahrens Street West
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
The purpose of this report is to recommend pursuing designation under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act for nine properties that are currently listed as non-designated
properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal Heritage Register.
The key finding of this report is that the properties possess design/physical,
historical/associative, and contextual value and meet the criteria for designation under
Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22).
There are no financial implications.
Community engagement included consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee.
This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
st
On January 1, 2023 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) came into effect
through Bill 23, the More Homes Build Faster Act. One of the primary changes introduced
Municipal
Heritage Register to be evaluated to determine if they meet the criteria for heritage
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
st
designation before January 1, 2025. Listed properties are properties that have not been
designated, but that the municipal Council believes to be of cultural heritage value or
interest. The criterion for designation isestablished by the Provincial Government (Ontario
Regulation 9/06, which has now been amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22) and a
minimum of two must be met for a property to be eligible for designation.
A work plan to address these changes has been developed by Heritage Planning Staff with
th
consultation from the Heritage Kitchener Committee on February 7, 2023. Implementation
of the work plan has now commenced. This report contains a summary of the findings for
the properties recently reviewed, and recommendations for next steps.
Progress on Work Plan Implementation
As part of the work plan proposed in February 2023, Heritage Planning Staff committed to
the review of 80 properties listed on the Municipal Heritage Register prior to January 1,
2025. As of the date of this report, a review has been complete for 58 properties. 9 properties
are before the Committee as of the date of this report to be considered for designation. 22
properties have fully undergone the designation process. 14 properties are currently
undergoing the designation process and are at various stages of completion. 15 properties
have been reviewed and determined that no action should be taken at this time.
REPORT:
Ontario Regulation 569/22 (Amended from Ontario Regulation 9/06)
Among the changes that were implemented through Bill 23, the Ontario Regulation 9/06
which is a regulation used to determine the cultural heritage value or interest of a property,
was amended through Ontario Regulation 569/22 (O. Reg. 569/22). Where the original
regulation had three main categories design/physical, historical/associative and contextual
- with three (3) sub-categories for determining cultural heritage value, the amended
regulation now lists all nine (9) criteria independently.
The new regulation has been amended to the following:
1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
2. The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
3. The property has design value or physical value because it demonstrates a high
degree of technical or scientific achievement.
4. The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
5. The property has historical or associative value because it yields, or has the potential
to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture.
6. The property has historical value or associative value because it demonstrates or
reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is
significant to a community.
7. The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
8.The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark.
Also, among the changes brought about by Bill 23 are how properties can now be listed or
designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. They include:
Properties would wa
met one or more criteria of O. Reg 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22).
Properties could be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act if they meet
two or more criteria of O. Reg 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22).
The following nine properties were reviewed and meet the following criteria:
113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South
The subject property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188
Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (The Tannery) meets seven (7) of the nine (9)
criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has historical value or associative value because it yields, or has the
potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or
culture.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
The property has contextual value because it is a landmark.
83-85 King Street West
The subject property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West meets five (5) of the
nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
87-91 King Street West
The subject property municipally addressed as 87-91 King Street West meets five (5) of the
nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
97-99 King Street West
The subject property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West meets five (5) of the
nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
148 Madison Avenue South
The subject property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South meets seven (7)
of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has historical value or associative value because it yields, or has the
potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or
culture.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
The property has contextual value because it is a landmark.
171-173 Victoria Street North
The subject property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North meets three
(2) of the nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06 (amended through O. Reg. 569/22):
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has design value or physical value because it displays a high degree of
craftsmanship or artistic merit.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
111 Ahrens Street West
The subject property municipally addressed as 111 Ahrens Street West meets five (5) out
of nine (9) criteria of O. Reg. 9/06:
The property has design value or physical value because it is a rare, unique,
representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction
method.
The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct
associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution
that is significant to a community.
The property has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually or
historically linked to its surroundings.
The property has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or
supporting the character of an area.
The property is a landmark.
Heritage Kitchener Committee Options
Option 1 Pursuing Designation for this property
Should Heritage Kitchener committee vote to start pursuing designation for these properties,
staff will then contact the respective property owners to inform them and to start working
with them towards designation. Staff will then bring a Notice of Intention to Designate back
to the Committee to initiate the designation process. Should a property owner object to their
property being designated, they can submit an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT)
to rule on the decision. If the OLT determines that the property should not be designated but
remain listed, it will be removed from the Municipal Heritage Register on January 1, 2025.
Option 2 Deferring the Designation Process
Should Heritage Kitchener vote to defer the designation process for these properties, they
it will have to be removed. The process of designating these properties can be started at
any time until January 1, 2025.
Option 3 Not Pursuing Designation for these properties
Should Heritage Kitchener vote not to pursue the designation of these properties, they will
will be removed. Once removed, these properties will not be able to be re-listed for the next
five (5) years i.e. January 1, 2030.
It should be noted that, per the endorsed work plan, staff are currently undertaking
evaluations for high priority properties that are in located in areas of the City that are
experiencing significant redevelopment.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM This report has
the council / committee meeting.
CONSULT AND COLLABORATE The Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener)
have been consulted at previous meetings regarding the proposed strategy to review the
Municipal Heritage Register of Non-designated Properties and participated in the
assessment of the properties subject to this report.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
Heritage Kitchener Committee Work Plan 2022-2024 DSD-2023-053
Bill 23 Municipal Heritage Register Review DSD-2023-225
Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register Review August Update DSD-2023-309
Municipal Heritage Register Review January 2024 Update DSD-202-022
Municipal Heritage Register Review March 2024 Update DSD-2024-093
Municipal Heritage Register Review April 2024 Update DSD-2024-131
Ontario Heritage Act, 2022
REVIEWED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals
APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A-Updated Statement of Significance 131-151 Charles Street West/170-
188 Joseph Street/ 3-44 Francis Street South
Attachment B- Updated Statement of Significance - 83-85 King Street West
Attachment C- Updated Statement of Significance - 87-91 King Street West
Attachment D- Updated Statement of Significance - 97-99 King Street West
Attachment E- Updated Statement of Significance -148 Madison Avenue South
Attachment F- Updated Statement of Significance 171-173 Victoria Street North
Attachment G- Updated Statement of Significance 111 Ahrens Street West
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
113-151 Charles Street West/170-188 Joseph Street/3-44
Francis Street North
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Economic Value
Historical Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
Legal Description: Plan 375 Lot 110-116 Lot 131-138 Part Charles St 58R-6449 Part 1
Year Built: c. 1896 to c. 2012
Architectural Style: Industrial Vernacular
Original Owner: Reinhold Lang / Lang Tanning Company
Original Use: Industrial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N is
a complex of approximately 15 interconnected industrial buildings ranging in height from one to five
storeys built between 1896 and 2012 primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The
buildings are situated on a 3.95-acre parcel of land bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph and Victoria
Streets in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of
Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value are the industrial buildings.
Heritage Value
113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N is recognized for its design/physical,
historical/associative, contextual, and economic values.
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
th
demonstrates design or physical value as a good example of an early (20 century) complex of buildings
designed primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style that reflect the evolution of the tanning
industry (ERA Architects Inc., 2008). Simple brick detailing and durable finishes demonstrate the
functional and industrial history of the building use. The buildings have many intact heritage attributes
in good condition.
The oldest portions of the site were built between 1896 and 1904 and include: the former two- to three-
storey beam and currying house at Victoria Street and the two-storey leach house at the centre of the
site. The remaining buildings were constructed between 1904 and 1917, with significant alterations and
additions occurring between 1917 and 1925 and again between 2010 and 2012. The buildings that best
exemplify the Industrial Vernacular architectural style between 1904 and 1925 include: the former
administration and production buildings at the corner of Charles and Francis Streets; the former beam
and storage house along Charles Street; and, the former leach house along Joseph Street.
Front (North) Façade
The main entrance to the complex of buildings faces Charles Street West.
The five-storey building at the north east corner of the site is the former administration building of the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of doors and windows;
changes to the size of original openings; introduction of canopy signage; and, introduction of a barrier-
free access. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched
window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills; lionhead tie rods located on the brick pilasters at the
second-, third- and fourth-storey; and, decorative brickwork. The fifth-storey features: buff brick; 6/6 flat
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former tan yard building of the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; addition of a
new double doors; and, introduction of canopy and fascia signage with gooseneck lighting. The second-
storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills; and decorative brickwork.
The one-storey building west of the former tan yard building is a recent (c. 2010-12) addition to the
complex. It features contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on
the site. It features a shallow side-gable roof, beige and brown horizontal cladding, and lots of glazing.
Behind the one-storey building is a four-storey building that once functioned as the leach house for the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and two buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. For
the most part, only the third- and fourth-storey are visible from the pedestrian level on Charles Street
West. The east bay of the third- and fourth-storey features a new single 6/6 flat head hung window
beside a perhaps former circular window opening with a brick surround on each storey. The west bay
of the third- and fourth-storey features two new side by side 6/6 flat head hung windows with a stone
header and a stone sill.
West of the one-storey addition is another one-storey vestibule addition and a central tower (c. 2010-
12) that connects the former leech house to the former beam and storage house. The vestibule and
central tower are of contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on
the site. It features a unique roof line that is like the shallow side gable roof of the one-storey building
addition but instead the side gable is inverted. The walls are clad with glazing.
The last building that fronts onto Charles Street is the three-storey former beam and storage house of
the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 15 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters.
The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows and doors;
addition of windows and doors; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey and third-storey
feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The second-storey features
-storey features: the new
municipal address nu-
pane design; and, backlit channel letter fascia signs of current tenants.
Side (East) Façade;
The east side façade faces Francis Street South. The five-storey building at the north east corner of the
site is the former administration building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five
buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of doors and windows; changes to the size of original openings; and, introduction of
a new exterior fire escape. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick;
segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; 4/4 wood windows with
segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally
arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick
voussoirs and stone sills; new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills; and, decorative brick work between the third- and fourth-storey. The fifth storey features: buff brick;
new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills; decorative brick work; and, painted signage that reads
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former production building of
the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 16 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters.
The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows;
alterations to window and door openings; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey
through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched
brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone
sills; 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; 1-pane flathead window
with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; decorative brickwork; and, painted signage that
THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE LEATHER
Side (West) Façade
The west side façade faces Victoria Street South. A one- and three-storey building directly abut the
sidewalk. The three-storey building is the former beam and storage house of the Lang Tanning Co..
This building has a flat roof and 5 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been
altered, including: painting of the brick; alterations to the size of window openings; and, replacement of
the windows. The second-storey and third-storey feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows
with stone sills. The second- and third-storey features an exterior fire escape. There are metal tie-rods
on the brick pilasters between the first- and second-storey as well as the second- and third-storey.
The side elevation of the former tan yard building is setback approximately 90 metres from Victoria
Street South. This building has a flat roof and two wide buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: using salvaged brick to enclose the building wall; adding
contemporary windows; adding a contemporary door; and, installing a channel letter fascia sign with
gooseneck lights. The second-storey features three new 6/6 flathead hung windows with stone sills.
The fourth-storey features painted signage that
Rear (South) Façade
The rear façade faces Joseph Street and features a one-storey building at the corner of Joseph Street
and Victoria Street South, the four-storey former leach house, new exterior courtyard, and the four-
storey former production building. The one-storey building has a flat roof and 17 buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The building has been altered, including: painting the brick; changes to the
size of door and window openings; new windows; new entrances; new exterior stairs; and, new canopy
signs. The four-storey former leach house has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick
pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the building; installation of new
windows in place of former shipping bay doors; and, installation of new 12/12 flathead hung windows
with stone sills. The second- through fourth-storey features new flathead 6/6 hung windows with stone
lintels and sills. The former production building has a flat roof and three buff brick bays separated by
brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the
windows; and, alterations to window and door openings. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey
feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills; new 12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; and, decorative
brickwork. West of the former production building is a four-storey concrete addition. The first-storey has
been altered, including: painted of the concrete; replacement of the windows; and, replacement of a
door. The second-storey features new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete
header and concrete sill. The third-storey features four different window designs (1/1; single lite; and,
6/6) all with segmentally arched concrete header and concrete sill. The fourth-storey features six new
6/6 hung windows with flatheads and stone sills.
Interior
The interior of the original buildings feature: generous floor to ceiling heights; wood beams and flooring;
wood staircases; exposed structural columns and mechanical systems; freight elevators with wood
gates; and, metal fire separation doors with original weights and pulleys.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
has historic/associative value due to its history and association with early settlement, the Six Nations,
Joseph Brant, Colonel Richard Beasley, Pennsylvanian German Mennonites, the first permanent non-
native settlement (now Kitchener), the German Company Tract, the Township of Waterloo, German
speaking immigrants, Berlin as the County seat for the County of Waterloo, the Grand Trunk Railway
(GTR) extension, the leather tanning industry, and Reinhold Lang. These values were extensively
documented in a Heritage Impact Assessment written by ERA Architects Inc. in 2008 and based on this
research are further described below.
The City of Kitchener was originally part of a large tract of more than 240,000 hectares of land granted
to the Six Nations by the British Crown in 1784. Between 1796 and 1798, the Six Nations led by Joseph
Brant sold off 38,000 hectares of land to Colonel Richard Beasley, a United Empire Loyalist. The land
now known as the City of Kitchener was located far inland and isolated from centres of commerce. As
a result, the land attracted the settlement of Pennsylvania German Mennonite farmers who were
attracted to the promise of inexpensive land and the guarantee of religious freedoms.
By the end of 1800, the first permanent non-native settlement was established in what is now the City
of Kitchener. Shortly after a group of Mennonites purchased all the unsold land from Beasley and
formed the German Company Tract (GCT). The GC
establishing a Pennsylvania Mennonite colony in Upper Canada.
In 1816 the GCT became the Township of Waterloo. This marked the beginning of steady migration of
German speaking Europeans to the area between the 1820s and 1870s. Population growth and
infrastructure improvements (e.g., road upgrades) helped establish the urban centre that became Berlin
(now Kitchener) in 1833. Twenty years later, in 1853, Berlin became the County seat for the County of
Waterloo and three years later the Grand Trunk Railway (GTR) was extended to Berlin. This opened
the area to future industrialization.
The skilled trades and industrial knowledge of t
Berlin from Baden, Germany. The Lang Tanning Company was founded in 1849. The business was
originally located at the northeast corner of King and Ontario Streets. This tannery made all classes of
leather required for saddlers and shoemakers. Unfortunately, this building was destroyed by fire in 1853.
Reinhold Lang rebuilt his business by purchasing a large piece of land at the corner of Francis and King
Streets. The property once featured several natural springs and a small creek that would provide a good
water supply for the tannery. His new single frame building was built on the corner of Charles and
Francis Streets and eventually grew into an industrial complex occupying nearly three city blocks. This
site reflects the organizational, technological, and market changes of the tanning industry.
Reinhold emerged as a prominent local resident as the industrial centre of Berlin continued to grow. In
1859, he was elected to Berlin Council where he was one of two businessmen proposing a motion for
inent and prosperous firms were aided by this policy.
st with the
passage of legislation. These families lived in the ward they represented, which contributed to an
enhanced sense of community. The Board not only supported industrial expansion, but it also
sponsored German cultural events throughout the late 1800s.
George W.) were also prominent figures in the community. In 1887, his son, John A. Lang built his home
at the northwest corner of Charles and Francis Streets to be close to the business in order to oversee
daily activities. His home was sold to company in 1897 to serve as offices until operations stopped in
1954. The home was demolished in the 1990s. Over the years, in addition to the tanning industry, the
Lang family was also involved in the insurance, banking, hydro and land use planning.
th
By the late 19 success has
been attributed to the industry and pride of the community. By 1904, the original Lang buildings started
to be replaced, expanded, or converted from frame to more permanent brick or iron construction. Berlin
It appears that some of the
changes to the
wartime supplies. World War One (WW1) caused anti-German sentiment, which resulted in the name
change to Kitchener, after a British General. During WW1, the Lang Tanning Co. became the largest
sole leather producer in the British Empire by producing huge amounts of saddle material. The Lang
Tanning Co. supplied sole leather and leather linings for aircraft gasoline tanks in World War Two
(WW2). Post WW2, modest changes to the complex were in the form of connections between buildings
to accommodate future uses. Operations declined after WW2 due to changes in the industry and in
1954 the company ceased operations as a tannery due to competition from synthetic materials. The 5-
acre site and, at the time, complex of 35 buildings continued to be owned by the Lang family until 1974.
When the company operations ceased
operating businesses (1849-1954).
Contextual Value
The contextual values relate to the contribution that the complex of buildings make to the continuity and
character of the adjacent streetscapes and the overall Warehouse District in the City of Kitchener. The
buildings are historically and visually linked to their surroundings, including: Lang Site B with the last
fully intact smokestack in Kitchener (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act), other
industrial buildings, former homes of industrial workers (including homes in the Victoria Park Area
Heritage Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act), the
railway line, and the Warehouse District. The complex of buildings is recognized as a significant
landmark reflec the development and growth of
leather tanning industry, the relationship to and political leadership of the Lang
family, the hardworking German community in establishing Berlin (now Kitchener). as an industrial
centre, and the overall industrial development of the City of Kitchener (ERA Architects Inc., 2008).
Other Values
Economic Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
has both historic- and present-day economic value. The historic/associative value section above
extensively details how the Lang Tannery Co., Reinhold Lang, and the Lang family supported the local
economy.
Ki
the evolution of the tanning industry. The site was rehabilitated and redeveloped in 2008 to support
ic development strategy focused on the creation
of an innovation district with high-tech companies. The Tannery boasts 306,564 square feet of office
space and 25, 810 square feet of retail uses. It is home to many innovated business and complimentary
uses such as restaurants and event space.
In 2011, The Tannery was awarded Mike Wagner Heritage Award in the category
of rehabilitation and adaptive reuse.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N resides in the
following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the design and physical value of the complex of Industrial Vernacular
buildings.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former administration building,
including:
o five-storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 4/4 wood windows with segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills;
o new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills
o 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o lionhead tie rods;
o decorative brickwork;
o
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former tan yard building, including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o decorative brickwork; and,
o
LEAT
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former leach house building,
including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows;
o window openings;
o former circular window openings with a brick surrounds; and,
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone lintels and stone sills.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former beam and storage house
building, including:
o three storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o
o two sets of clerestory windows with internal muntins reflecting a 6-lite design;
o exterior fire escape; and,
o metal tie rods.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former production building,
including:
o four storey height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 12-lite flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills;
o 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 1-lite flathead window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o decorative brickwork;
o painted signTHE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE
LEATHER
o four-storey concrete addition, including:
concrete construction;
window openings with segmentally arched concrete headers and concrete sills;
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete headers and
concrete sills; and,
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with concrete headers and concrete sills.
References
ERA Architects Inc. (2008). 36-50 Francis Street South Heritage Impact Assessment Lang Tanning
Co. A. ERA Architects Inc.: Toronto, Ontario.
Photographs
Aerial View of Lang Site A in the Foreground and Lang Site B in the Background
Front Elevation (North Façade) Former Administration and Tan Yard Buildings of the Lang
Tanning Co.
Front Elevation (North Façade) New Additions and the Former Leech House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Front Elevation (North Façade) Former Beam/Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (East Façade) Former Administration Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (East Façade) Former Production Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (West Façade) Former Beam and Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade)
Side Elevation (West Façade) Former Tan Yard Building (left) and New Additions (right) of the
Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) Former Leach House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) Former Production Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) New Courtyard
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
P. Ciuciura
113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis
Address: Recorder:
Lang Tannery
March 11, 2023
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
Page 16 of 23
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
Page 17 of 23
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
The subject property (commonly referred to as Lang Site A) is visually and historically connected to the
adjacent property (commonly referred to as Lang Site B) as well as the adjacent neighbourhoods (e.g.,
Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District) where many tannery works lived.
Page 18 of 23
Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee
Criteria
Interior: Is the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
interior
Yes
arrangement,
finish,
craftsmanship
and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
structure have
other original
outbuildings,
notable
landscaping or
external
features that
complete the
site?
Site Integrity:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the
Yes
structure
occupy its
original site?
* If relocated, is it
relocated on its
original site,
moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
building retain
most of its
original
materials and
design
features?
Please refer to
the list of
heritage
attributes
within the
Page 19 of 23
Statement of
Significance
and indicate
which
elements are
still existing
and which
ones have
been
removed.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Are there
Yes
additional
elements or
features that
should be
added to the
heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
the building in
Yes
good
condition?
*E.g. - Could be a
good candidate
for adaptive re-
use if possible and
contribute
towards equity-
building and
climate change
action.
Indigenous
History: Could
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
this site be of
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
importance to
Indigenous
heritage and
history?
*E.g. - Site within
300m of water
sources, near
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
distinct
Page 20 of 23
topographical
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
land, or near
cemeteries might
have
archaeological
potential and
indigenous
heritage
potential.
Could there be
any urban
Indigenous
history
associated
with the
property?
* Additional
archival work may
be required.
Function:
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Commercial
What is the
Commercial
Office Other ________________
present
Office Other -
function of the
________________
subject
property?
* Other may
include vacant,
social,
institutional, etc.
and important for
the community
from an equity
building
perspective.
Diversity and
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
Inclusion:
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
Does the
subject
property
contribute to
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
the cultural
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
heritage of a
community of
people?
Page 21 of 23
Does the
subject
property have
intangible
value to a
specific
community of
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo
Masjid (Muslim
Society of
Waterloo &
Wellington
Counties) was the
first established
Islamic Center
and Masjid in the
Region and
contributes to the
history of the
Muslim
community in the
area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Page 22 of 23
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
Page 23 of 23
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
83-85 King Street West
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Historical Value Economic Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 83-85 King Street West
Legal Description: Plan 380 Pt Lot 1 RP 58R3841 Part 3
Year Built: c. 1903
Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival
Original Owner: Unknown
Original Use: Commercial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
th
83-85 King Street West is a three-storey early 20-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in
the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.02-acre parcel of land
located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the
City Commercial Core planning area of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal
resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building.
Heritage Value
83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual
values.
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value
th
as an early and rare example of 20-century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic
Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes on the second and third floor
and is in fair condition. Features which represent the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style
include: nearly flat, low sloping roof; symmetrical façade; single bay red brick façade; highly decorative
brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; ornamental brick moulding along with red
brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi-circular window openings; semi-circular transom design; 1/1 hung
window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; flat head
window openings; and, rectangular transoms; 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and
continuous stone sills.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West has historical/associative value given
its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown
Kitchener. According to the 1898 Fire Insurance Plan, the subject property originally contained a
barn/shed associated with a livery. The December 20, 1900 edition of the Berliner Journal indicates
that improvements were made to the livery stable for a cost of $400. The December 24, 1903 edition of
the Berliner Journal suggests that the subject property, as it exists today, may have been built by Frank
Heiman. The description indicates that Frank Heiman built a 3-storey block with livery, stable and store
for $8,000.
Contextual Value
The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial
buildings that share the same Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical
heritage attributes. It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time, and designed
by the same person, and constructed by the same person. Collectively, the properties municipally
addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street West and 97-99 King Street West contribute
to the character of the Downtown and the King Street West streetscape.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 83-85 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style of
the building, including:
o nearly flat, low sloping roof;
o symmetrical façade;
o single bay red brick façade;
o highly decorative brick cornice,
o brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave;
o ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling;
o brick pilasters;
o semi-circular window openings;
o semi-circular transom design;
o 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and
continuous stone sills;
o flat head window openings;
o rectangular transoms; and,
o 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills.
References
Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Berliner Journal. (1900). New Buildings and Improvements. Berliner Journal: Berlin (now Kitchener),
ON.
Berliner Journal. (1903). . Berliner Journal: Berlin (now Kitchener), ON.
Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self-Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand
Twin-City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden:
n.p., ON.
-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON.
and Bridgeport Directory. (1907-1908). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1909). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1911). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
Photographs
Front Elevation (North Elevation) 83-85 King Street West
Third-storey details showing highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick
architrave; and, ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling 83-85 King Street West
Third-storey details showing semi-circular window openings; semi-circular transom design; and, 1/1
hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills
Second-storey details showing flat head window openings; rectangular transom design; and, 1/1
hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
Michelle Drake
83-85 King Street West
Address: Recorder:
Commercial façade; Brick construction; Classic
March 19, 2024
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener
Committee
Interior: Is the interior
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
arrangement, finish,
Yes
Yes
craftsmanship and/or
detail noteworthy?
Completeness: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure have other
Yes
Yes
original outbuildings,
notable landscaping or
external features that
complete the site?
Site Integrity: Does the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure occupy its
Yes
Yes
original site?
* If relocated, is it relocated on
its original site, moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
building retain most of its
Yes
Yes
original materials and
design features? Please
refer to the list of heritage
attributes within the
Statement of Significance
and indicate which
elements are still existing
and which ones have been
removed.
Alterations: Are there
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
additional elements or
Yes
Yes
features that should be
added to the heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is the building
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
in good condition?
Yes
Yes
*E.g. - Could be a good
candidate for adaptive re-use if
possible and contribute towards
equity-building and climate
change action.
Indigenous History: Could
this site be of importance
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
to Indigenous heritage
and history?
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
*E.g. - Site within 300m of water
sources, near distinct
topographical land, or near
cemeteries might have
archaeological potential and
indigenous heritage potential.
Could there be any urban
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous history
associated with the
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
property?
* Additional archival work may
be required.
Function: What is the
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Com
present function of the
mercial
Commercial
subject property?
Office Other -
Office Other -
________________
________________
* Other may include vacant,
social, institutional, etc. and
important for the community
from an equity building
perspective.
Diversity and Inclusion:
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the subject property
contribute to the cultural
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
heritage of a community
of people?
Does the subject property
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
have intangible value to a
specific community of
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim
Society of Waterloo &
Wellington Counties) was the
first established Islamic Center
and Masjid in the Region and
contributes to the history of the
Muslim community in the area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
87-91 King Street West
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Historical Value Economic Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 87-91 King Street West
Legal Description: Plan 380 Pt Lot 1 RP 58R6628 Parts 1 to 4 TOG WITH ROW
Year Built: c. 1898
Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival
Original Owner: Unknown
Original Use: Commercial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
th
87-91 King Street West is a three-storey early 20-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in
the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.08-acre parcel of land
located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the
City Commercial Core planning area of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal
resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building.
Heritage Value
83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual
values.
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value
th
as an early and rare example of 20-century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic
Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes and is in fair condition.
Features which represent the Classic Revival architectural style include: nearly flat, low sloping roof;
two-bay red brick façade; highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave;
ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi-circular window
openings; semi-circular transom design; 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood
moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills; ribbon of three flat head window opening; flat head
window openings; rectangular transoms; and, 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and
continuous stone sills.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 87-91 King Street West has historical/associative value given
its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown
Kitchener. According to the 1898 (revised 1904) Fire Insurance Plan, the subject property was to be a
3-storey brick building for Pearl Steam Laundry. However, by 1901 Pearl Steam Laundry advertised
Berlin and Waterloo, 1901-1903). The 1908 (revised 1925) Fire Insurance Plan identifies the subject
property as a 3-storey brick building housing the Express Office. The Express Office is associated with
early (1865) railway companies (Express Company Operations, date unknown).
directories reference either the Canadian Express Company or the Canadian National Express
Company between 1908 and c. 1932.
Contextual Value
The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial
buildings that share the same Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical heritage attributes.
It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time by the same builder. Collectively,
the properties municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street West and 97-99
King Street West contribute to character of the Downtown and the King Street streetscape.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 83-85 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Classic Revival architectural style of the building,
including:
o nearly flat, low sloping roof;
o two-bay red brick façade;
o highly decorative brick cornice,
o brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave;
o ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling;
o brick pilasters;
o semi-circular window openings;
o semi-circular transom design;
o 1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and
continuous stone sills;
o ribbon of three flat head windows in one large window opening;
o flat head window openings;
o rectangular transoms; and,
o 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills.
References
Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Express Company Operations. (date unknown). Retrieved from:
https://www66.statcan.gc.ca/eng/1922-23/192207150643_p.%20643.pdf \[Accessed on: 2024, April
10).
Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self-Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand
Twin-City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden:
n.p., ON.
-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON.
and Bridgeport Directory. (1907-1908). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1909). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1911). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
Photographs
Front Elevation (North Façade) 87-91 King Street West
Detailing of brick frieze, stone and brick architrave and ornamental brick moulding along
with red brick corbelling
Detailing of third-storey semi-circular window openings; semi-circular transom design;
1/1 hung window design featuring decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and
continuous stone sills
Detailing of second-storey with a ribbon of three windows in the first bay; two flat head
window openings in the second bay; rectangular transoms; and, 1/1 hung window
design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
Michelle Drake
87-91 King Street West
Address: Recorder:
Commercial façade; red brick; Classic Revival
March 19, 2024
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener
Committee
Interior: Is the interior
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
arrangement, finish,
Yes Yes
craftsmanship and/or
detail noteworthy?
Completeness: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure have other
Yes
Yes
original outbuildings,
notable landscaping or
external features that
complete the site?
Site Integrity: Does the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure occupy its
Yes
Yes
original site?
* If relocated, is it relocated on
its original site, moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
building retain most of its
Yes
Yes
original materials and
design features? Please
refer to the list of heritage
attributes within the
Statement of Significance
and indicate which
elements are still existing
and which ones have been
removed.
Alterations: Are there
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
additional elements or
Yes
Yes
features that should be
added to the heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is the building
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
in good condition?
Yes
Yes
*E.g. - Could be a good
candidate for adaptive re-use if
possible and contribute towards
equity-building and climate
change action.
Indigenous History: Could
this site be of importance
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
to Indigenous heritage
and history?
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
*E.g. - Site within 300m of water
sources, near distinct
topographical land, or near
cemeteries might have
archaeological potential and
indigenous heritage potential.
Could there be any urban
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous history
associated with the
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
property?
* Additional archival work may
be required.
Function: What is the
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Com
present function of the
mercial
Commercial
subject property?
Office Other -
Office Other -
________________
________________
* Other may include vacant,
social, institutional, etc. and
important for the community
from an equity building
perspective.
Diversity and Inclusion:
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the subject property
contribute to the cultural
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
heritage of a community
of people?
Does the subject property
N/A Unknown No Yes
N/A Unknown No Yes
have intangible value to a
specific community of
Additional Research Required
Additional Research Required
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim
Society of Waterloo &
Wellington Counties) was the
first established Islamic Center
and Masjid in the Region and
contributes to the history of the
Muslim community in the area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
97-99 King Street West
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Historical Value Economic Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 97-99 King Street West
Legal Description: PT LT 1, 9 PL 380 KITCHENER PT 1, 58R6305; T/W 969401
Year Built: c. 1904
Architectural Style: Vernacular Classic Revival
Original Owner: Unknown
Original Use: Commercial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
th
97-99 King Street West is a three-storey early 20-cenutry brick building. The building is constructed in
the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.08-acre parcel of land
located on the south side of King Street West between Gaukel Street and Ontario Street South in the
City Commercial Core planning area of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal
resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building.
Heritage Value
83-85 King Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative and contextual
values.
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West demonstrates design or physical value
th
as an early and rare example of 20-century, commercial brick building built in the Vernacular Classic
Revival architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes and is in fair condition.
Features which represent the Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style include: nearly flat, low
sloping roof; symmetrical façade on the second- and third-storey; two bay red brick façade; highly
decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave; ornamental brick moulding along
with red brick corbelling; brick pilasters; semi-circular window openings; semi-circular transom design;
1/1 hung window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and continuous stone sills;
flat head window openings; and, rectangular transoms; 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs
and continuous stone sills.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 97-99 King Street West has historical/associative value given
its direct association with early development of King Street West in what is now referred to as Downtown
Kitchener. According to the 1898 Fire Insurance Plan, the foundation for a 3-storey building was built c.
1904. By 1908, the Fire Insurance Plan shows a three-storey building with a tailor on the second floor.
It is not clear who built the building or who the original tenants were. J. D. Miller & C. H. Hohmeier
founded their dry goods business in 1912. The business operated at 97-99 King Street West (formerly
63 King Street West) from c. 1912 to c. 1936. And later moved to 58 King Street East until 1961 when
J. D. Mill retired.
Contextual Value
The contextual value of the property relates to its location and proximity to adjacent commercial
buildings that share the same Vernacular Classic Revival architectural style and almost identical
heritage attributes. It is likely that these buildings were constructed around the same time by the same
builder. Collectively, the properties municipally addressed as 83-85 King Street West, 87-91 King Street
West and 97-99 King Street West contribute to character of the Downtown and the King Street
streetscape.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 97-99 King Street West resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Classic Revival architectural style of the building,
including:
o nearly flat, low sloping roof;
o symmetrical façade on the second- and third-storey;
o two bay red brick façade;
o highly decorative brick cornice, brick frieze, and stone and brick architrave;
o ornamental brick moulding along with red brick corbelling;
o brick pilasters;
o semi-circular window openings;
o semi-circular transom;
o 1/1 hung window design with decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and
continuous stone sills;
o flat head window openings;
o rectangular transoms; and,
o 1/1 hung window design with brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills.
References
Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Tiessen, P. (1979). Berlin, Canada: A Self-Portrait of Kitchener, Ontario Before World War One. Sand
. (1913). Vernon Directories
Limited: Hamilton, ON.
n Directories
Limited: Hamilton, ON.
Waterloo Historical Society. (1961). Waterloo Historical Society:
49(63).
Photographs
Front Elevation (North Façade) 97-99 King Street West
Detailing of brick frieze, stone and brick architrave and ornamental brick moulding along
with red brick corbelling 97-99 King Street West
Detailing of second-storey showing semi-circular window openings; semi-circular
transom; 1/1 hung windows; and, decorative brick hood moulds with keystones and
continuous stone sills
Detailing of second-storey showing flat head window openings; rectangular transoms;
1/1 windows; and, brick voussoirs and continuous stone sills
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
Michelle Drake
97-99 King Street West
Address: Recorder:
Commercial façade; brick construction; Classic Revival
March 19, 2024
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener
Committee
Interior: Is the interior
N/A Unknown No
N/A Unknown No
arrangement, finish,
Yes
Yes
craftsmanship and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure have other original
Yes
Yes
outbuildings, notable
landscaping or external
features that complete the
site?
Site Integrity: Does the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure occupy its original
Yes
Yes
site?
* If relocated, is it relocated on its
original site, moved from another site,
etc.
Alterations: Does this building
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
retain most of its original
Yes
Yes
materials and design features?
Please refer to the list of
heritage attributes within the
Statement of Significance and
indicate which elements are
still existing and which ones
have been removed.
Alterations: Are there
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
additional elements or
Yes
Yes
features that should be added
to the heritage attribute list?
Condition: Is the building in
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
good condition?
Yes
Yes
*E.g. - Could be a good candidate for
adaptive re-use if possible and
contribute towards equity-building
and climate change action.
Indigenous History: Could this
site be of importance to
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous heritage and
Yes
history?
Additional Research
Additional Research Required
Required
*E.g. - Site within 300m of water
sources, near distinct topographical
land, or near cemeteries might have
archaeological potential and
indigenous heritage potential.
Could there be any urban
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous history associated
Yes
with the property?
Additional Research
Additional Research Required
Required
* Additional archival work may be
required.
Function: What is the present
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Com
function of the subject
mercial
Commercial
property?
Office Other -
Office Other -
________________
________________
* Other may include vacant, social,
institutional, etc. and important for
the community from an equity
building perspective.
Diversity and Inclusion: Does
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
the subject property
Yes
contribute to the cultural
Additional Research
Additional Research Required
heritage of a community of
Required
people?
Does the subject property
N/A Unknown No Yes
have intangible value to a
N/A Unknown No
specific community of people?
Yes
Additional Research Required
Additional Research
* E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim
Required
Society of Waterloo & Wellington
Counties) was the first established
Islamic Center and Masjid in the
Region and contributes to the history
of the Muslim community in the area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated
under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
148 Madison Avenue South
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Historic/Associative Value Economic Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 148 Madison Avenue South
Legal Description: Plan 395 Part Lot 1, 2 & 7
Year Built: 1930 & 1952
Architectural Style: Romanesque
Original Owner:
Original Use: Religious
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
The property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South is a mid-20th century brick church
built in the Romanesque architectural style. The church is situated on a 0.68 acre parcel of land located
on the north west corner of Courtland Avenue East and Madison Avenue South in the Mill Courtland
Woodside Park Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The
principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the church.
Heritage Value
The property municipally addressed as 148 Madison Avenue South is recognized for its
design/physical, historic/associative, and contextual values.
Design/Physical Value
th
The property demonstrates design/physical value as a rare and unique example of a mid-20 century
church built in the Romanesque architectural style. The building has many intact heritage attributes in
good condition.
Front (South) Façade
The front façade of the building faces Madison Avenue South and is comprised of three irregular bays.
The centre bay projects forward and features: a front-facing ridged gable roofline; rose window; ribbon
of three window openings with semi-circular arches containing stained glass windows that are
separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; the windows are
surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; the upper half of the façade is stone while the
lower half is semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; there are two one-storey buttresses at each end of the
centre bay primarily constructed with buff (yellow) brick with stone at top; decorative stone crosses are
inset within the semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; the main entrance features primarily plain archivolts
with one decorative floral arch resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and
a simple base; a pair of stained glass windows with semi-circular arches flank each side of the main
entrance and are surrounded stone; and, a wide concrete/stone staircase with metal railings leads to
the main entrance.
The left (west) bay is setback from the centre bay and features: an octagon plan with only six visible
sides; a flat roof with copper trim; semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; one flat head stained glass window
with a stone lintel, quoins and sill; a pair of windows with semi-circular arches containing stained glass
windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and
surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone foundation.
The right (east) bay is setback from the centre bay and features: square plan; flat roof; prominent square
bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi-circular arches
that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded
by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); stone and semi-rugged buff (yellow)
brick; semi-circular stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; flathead stained
glass window and window opening with stone surround; a pair of windows with semi-circular arches
containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals
and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone
foundation.
Side (West) Façade
The side façade . Only a partial view of the side façade
is visible from the public realm. The most prominent feature is the protruding octagon with only six
visible sides, which features a flat roof with copper trim; semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; flat head
stained glass windows with a stone lintels, quoins and sills; pairs of windows with semi-circular arches
containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals
and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; and, a rusticated stone
foundation. Other visible heritage attributes include: the flat roof with copper trim; semi-rugged buff
(yellow) brick; flat head stained glass windows with a stone lintels, quoins and sills; large semi-circular
stained glass windows and window openings with stone surrounds; and, a rusticated stone foundation.
Side (East) Façades
The side façade faces Madison Avenue South and is comprised of several irregular bays.
The left (south) bay features: square plan; flat roof with copper trim; prominent square bell tower
(decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with small stone dentils; a pair of semi-circular arches that are
separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and surrounded by stone;
heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone dentils); stone and semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
flathead stained glass window and window opening with stone surround; semi-circular stained glass
window and window opening with stone surround; side entrance with plain archivolts resting on round
embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; and, a rusticated stone
foundation.
The central bay is inset and features: gable roof with copper trim; semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; semi-
circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone surround; flat head 1/1 basement
windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, rusticated stone foundation.
The right (north) bay features: prominent gable with copper trim; a plain vertical stone rectangle with
stone surround (perhaps once a cast stone gable vent); a pair of windows with semi-circular arches
containing stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals
and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill; flat head 1/1 basement
windows and window openings with stone lintels and sills; and, rusticated stone foundation. To the right
of the gable is a one-storey section that features: flat roof with copper trim; flat head stained-glass
windows and window openings with stone surround; entrance door with rectangular stone surround;
and, rusticated stone foundation.
The Parish House also faces Madison Avenue South and features: hip roof with a cross on the front;
brick construction; symmetrical façade with a central main entrance door and window above flanked by
a single window and a pair of windows on both the first and second storey; front door and door opening
with side lites; flat head 1/1 windows and window openings with stone sills; and, concrete foundation.
Rear (South) Façade
The rear (north) façade faces the Parish House and only a portion of this façade is visible from the
public realm. The prominent feature on this façade is the semi-circular plan with round copper dome.
Other heritage attributes include: semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick; flat head stained-glass windows and
window openings with stone sills; flat head basement windows with stone lintels; and, rusticated stone
foundation.
Historical/Associative Value
The historical and associative values relate to the original owner, congregation, original pastor, architect
and builder. The St. Joseph website (https://stjosephkitchener.org/history) contains a detailed Parish
th
Timeline, history of Priests of St Joseph, 50 Anniversary Booklet (1980), 60 Years Working Together
(1990), 75 Year Directory Our History (2005), and 85 Year Directory Our History (2015). Most of the
following information was obtained from the St. Joseph website.
The lands were secured from the school board in 1930 for $3000. The congregation was formed in
1930 when Monsignor Reuben M. Haller was assigned the task of building a church due to the growing
d Sacred Heart. The first mass was held on October 26, 1930 in the St.
priest of the City to be made a Monsignor while serving the community; and, the first living person to
have a new separate school named in his honour. Construction of the basement began in the fall of
1930 with church services being held in the basement by Christmas. Due to a steel shortage during the
depression the remainder of the church was not built until 1952. The church was dedicated on April 12,
1953 by Bishop J.F. Ryan of Hamilton and the cornerstone was laid on July 20, 1952 by Monsignor A.
article in the
Haller was unveiled in 1980, the sanctuary was renovated in 1986, some brickwork was redone in 1988
and some of the brick on the tower was replaced with stone in 1996.
The church was designed by Bernal A. Jones. B.A. Jones attended the Toronto Technical School and
worked as a draftsman for Frank Darling, in the office of Darling and Pearson, between 1908 and 1922.
B.A. Jones moved to Kitchener in 1922 and worked with W.H.E. Schmalz until opening his own office
in 1926. During that time B.A. Jones assisted W.H.E. Schmalz design the 1922-23 Kitchener City Hall.
B.A. Jones is also responsible for the design of several other important buildings in Kitchener such as
the 1932 Public Utilities Building and the 1936-37 Church of the Good Shepherd.
The church was constructed by Ball Brothers Ltd. Ball Brothers Ltd. were general contractors formed
by the partnership of Harold and Frank Ball in 1923. Ball Brothers Ltd. was a local based company but
and Grand River Hospital; Centre in the Square; various buildings at Conestoga College, Wilfrid Laurier
University, the University of Waterloo and the University of Guelph; the former Budd automative plant
(demolished); and, the Kitchener railway barns (demolished). The company is now known as Ball
Construction.
Contextual Value
The contextual values relate to the contribution that the building makes to the continuity and character
of the Courtland Avenue East and Madison Avenue South streetscapes. The church and parish house
are physically, functionally, visually and historically linked to each other. The church is physically,
visually and historically linked to the former . The prominence of the church
on a corner lot with a grand square bell tower make the building a recognizable neighbourhood
landmark.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 148 Madison Avenue South resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the design/physical value of the church built in the Romanesque
architectural style, including:
o All elements of the front (south) façade, including:
three irregular bays;
the centre bay that projects forward and features:
a front-facing ridged gable roofline;
rose window;
ribbon of three window openings with semi-circular arches containing
stained glass windows that are separated by round stone columns with
Corinthian capitals and a simple base;
windows surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill;
stone and semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
two one-storey buttresses at each end of the centre bay primarily
constructed with buff (yellow) brick with stone at top;
decorative stone crosses are inset within the semi-rugged buff (yellow)
brick;
main entrance features primarily plain archivolts with one decorative floral
arch resting on round embedded stone columns with Corinthian capitals and
a simple base;
pair of stained glass windows with semi-circular arches flanking each side
of the main entrance and stone surround; and,
wide concrete/stone staircase with metal railings.
the left (west) bay that is setback from the centre bay and features:
octagon plan with only six visible sides;
flat roof with copper trim;
semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
one flat head stained glass window with stone lintel, quoins and sill;
pair of windows with semi-circular arches containing stained glass windows
that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a
simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill;
and,
rusticated stone foundation.
the right (east) bay is setback from the centre bay and features:
square plan;
flat roof;
prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with
small stone dentils; a pair of semi-circular arches that are separated by
round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and
surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone
dentils);
stone and semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
semi-circular stained-glass window and window opening with stone
surround;
flathead stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround;
pair of windows with semi-circular arches containing stained glass windows
that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a
simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill;
and,
rusticated stone foundation.
o All elements of the side (West) façade, including:
protruding octagon with only six visible sides, including:
copper trim;
semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
flat head stained-glass windows with stone lintels, quoins and sills;
pairs of windows with semi-circular arches containing stained-glass
windows that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals
and a simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single
sill; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
other visible heritage attributes include:
the flat roof with copper trim;
semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
flat head stained glass-windows with stone lintels, quoins and sills;
large semi-circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone
surrounds; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
o All elements of the side (East) façade, including:
several irregular bays;
the left (south) bay features:
square plan;
flat roof with copper trim;
prominent square bell tower (decorative floral stone motifs; cornice with
small stone dentils; a pair of semi-circular arches that are separated by
round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base and
surrounded by stone; heavy cornice beneath the bell with larger stone
dentils);
stone and semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
flathead stained-glass window and window opening with stone surround;
semi-circular stained-glass window and window opening with stone
surround;
side entrance with plain archivolts resting on round embedded stone
columns with Corinthian capitals and a simple base; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
The central bay is inset and features:
gable roof with copper trim;
semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
semi-circular stained-glass windows and window openings with stone
surround;
flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and
sills; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
The right (north) bay features:
prominent gable with copper trim;
plain vertical stone rectangle with stone surround (perhaps once a cast
stone gable vent);
pair of windows with semi-circular arches containing stained-glass windows
that are separated by round stone columns with Corinthian capitals and a
simple base and surrounded by stone arches, quoining and a single sill;
flat head 1/1 basement windows and window openings with stone lintels and
sills; and,
rusticated stone foundation;
to the right of the gable is a one-storey section that features:
flat roof with copper trim;
flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone
surrounds;
entrance door with rectangular stone surround; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
the Parish House features:
hip roof with a cross on the front;
brick construction;
symmetrical façade with a central main entrance door and window above
flanked by a single window and a pair of windows on both the first and
second storey;
front door and door opening with side lites;
flat head 1/1 windows and window openings with stone sills; and,
concrete foundation.
o All elements of the rear (South) façade including:
semi-circular plan with round copper dome;
semi-rugged buff (yellow) brick;
flat head stained-glass windows and window openings with stone sills;
flat head basement windows with stone lintels; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
References
Ball Brothers. (1957). . City of Kitchener:
Kitchener, ON.
Ball Construction. (2013). History. Retrieved from http://www.ballcon.com/index.php/about-us/history/
on October 21, 2013.
Hill, R. (2009). Biographical Dictionary of Architects in Canada 1800-1950. Retrieved from
http://www.dictionaryofarchitectsincanada.org/architects/view/173 on October 4, 2013.
th
1930-1990: Celebrating Our 60 Anniversary.
St. Joseph Parish Roman Catholic Church. (2010). . Retrieved from
http://stjosephkitchener.org/parishlife/history.htm on October 21, 2013.
https://stjosephkitchener.org/history on April 12, 2024.
Photographs
Front Elevation (South Façade) & Side Elevation (East Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Front Elevation (South Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Front Elevation Entrance (South Façade) Bell Tower
Side Elevation (East Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Side Elevation (East Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Side Elevation (East Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Side Elevation Entrance (East Façade) 148 Side Elevation Window Detail (East Façade)
Madison Avenue South 148 Madison Avenue South
Rear Elevation (North Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
Side Elevation (East Façade) 148 Madison Avenue South
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
148 Madison Avenue South
Michelle Drake
Address: Recorder:
March 26, 2024
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
Page 13 of 20
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
Page 14 of 20
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Page 15 of 20
Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee
Criteria
Interior: Is the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
interior
Yes
arrangement,
finish,
craftsmanship
and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
structure have
other original
outbuildings,
notable
landscaping or
external
features that
complete the
site?
Site Integrity:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the
Yes
structure
occupy its
original site?
* If relocated, is it
relocated on its
original site,
moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
building retain
most of its
original
materials and
design
features?
Please refer to
the list of
heritage
attributes
within the
Page 16 of 20
Statement of
Significance
and indicate
which
elements are
still existing
and which
ones have
been
removed.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Are there
Yes
additional
elements or
features that
should be
added to the
heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
the building in
Yes
good
condition?
*E.g. - Could be a
good candidate
for adaptive re-
use if possible and
contribute
towards equity-
building and
climate change
action.
Indigenous
History: Could
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
this site be of
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
importance to
Indigenous
heritage and
history?
*E.g. - Site within
300m of water
sources, near
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
distinct
Page 17 of 20
topographical
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
land, or near
cemeteries might
have
archaeological
potential and
indigenous
heritage
potential.
Could there be
any urban
Indigenous
history
associated
with the
property?
* Additional
archival work may
be required.
Function:
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Commercial
What is the
Commercial
Office Other - Religious
present
Office Other -
function of the
________________
subject
property?
* Other may
include vacant,
social,
institutional, etc.
and important for
the community
from an equity
building
perspective.
Diversity and
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
Inclusion:
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
Does the
subject
property
contribute to
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
the cultural
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
heritage of a
community of
people?
Page 18 of 20
Does the
subject
property have
intangible
value to a
specific
community of
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo
Masjid (Muslim
Society of
Waterloo &
Wellington
Counties) was the
first established
Islamic Center
and Masjid in the
Region and
contributes to the
history of the
Muslim
community in the
area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
St. Joseph Facebook Page has excellent photos of the interior of the church
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Page 19 of 20
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
Page 20 of 20
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
171-173 Victoria Street North
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Historical Value Economic Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 171-173 Victoria Street North
Legal Description: Plan 374 Lot 78
Year Built: c. 1887
Architectural Style: Italianate
Original Owner: Unknown
Original Use: Residential
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
th
The property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North is a two-storey late 19 century
brick building built circa 1887 in the Italianate architectural style. The building is situated on a 0.23-acre
parcel of land located on the south side of Victoria Street North between Ahrens Street West and
Margaret Avenue in the Civic Centre planning community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of
Waterloo. The subject property is also located adjacent to the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage
Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The principal
resource that contributes to the heritage value is the building.
Heritage Value
171-173 Victoria Street North is recognized for its design/physical and historical/associative values. The
building was part of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD) Study.
As part of the study, the boundaries were refined to exclude certain properties primarily fronting onto
regional roads; however, the CCNHCD Plan identified 171-173 Victoria Street North as a Group A
building worthy of designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. Specifically, the CCNHCD Plan
notes the following: a pair of prestigious semi-detached residences; the building is in very good
condition; the masonry is in good repair and exhibits the contrasting colours of red and buff (yellow)
brick; presence of decorative wood details in the roof eaves and brackets; porches have been replicated
using good skill and judgment; the windows appear to be original double hung; and, the front doors
have maintained the transom window design.
Design/Physical Value
th
The property demonstrates design/physical value as rare example of a late 19 century prestigious
semi-detached dwelling built in the Italianate architectural style. The building has many intact heritage
attributes in good condition.
Front (North) Façade
The front façade of the building faces Victoria Street North and is comprised of four bays (two bays for
each half of the semi-detached dwelling). Each half of the semi-detached dwelling features: a projecting
bay with a front gable; roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with
highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; a semi-circular window opening in the
front gable end with a red brick voussoirs and stone sill; a pair of segmentally arched window openings
on both the the first- and second-storey with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; the design of the double
hung 1/1 wood windows on the first- and second-storey; and, a rusticated stone foundation. Between
the projecting bays are the entrances to the building. Each half of the semi-detached dwelling features:
a hip roof; roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative
paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; a segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs
on the second-storey; a verandah on both the first- and second-storey; the verandah on the second-
storey displays a top and bottom rail with turned balusters; the verandah on the first-storey displays a
half turned post on each end with highly decorative brackets and scroll work along with a full central
turned post in the middle with highly decorative brackets and scroll work; and, the first-storey has two
entrances and both display a front door opening with a segmentally arched transom with red brick
voussoirs and simple side lites.
Side (West & East) Façades
The side façades of the building are virtually identical. They face the side lot lines and adjacent
buildings. The side facades are comprised of the side of the projecting bays, two bays divided by a
chimney and a rear addition. In general, the second-storey side façades feature: a hip roof displaying
plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff
(yellow) and red brick; segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills at
both the first- and second-storey; double hung 1/1 window design; chimneys that project above the
roofline and divide the façade into two bays; two basement windows with red brick voussoirs and stone
sills; and, a field stone foundation. The rear addition is one-and-one-half-storeys with a gable roofline;
covered verandah; segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs: a segmentally arched
window opening with red brick voussoirs; and, a circular window with a red brick border located above
the verandah. The first-storey covered verandah features: a top and bottom rail with turned balusters;
turned posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work; and, vertical skirting.
Rear (South) Façade
The rear façade faces a laneway in the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District.
This façade features portions of the two-storey building and the one-and-one-half-storey addition. The
portions of the two-storey building feature: a hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze
board along with highly decorative paired brackets; buff (yellow) and red brick; segmentally arched
window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills at both the first- and second-storey; and,
double hung 1/1 window design. The one-and-a-half-storey addition features: gable roofline; two bays
separated by a chimney; buff (yellow) and red brick; plain fascia, soffits and frieze; segmentally arched
window openings of varying sizes on both the first- and second-storey with red brick voussoirs and
stone sills; double hung 1/1 window design; and, rusticated stone foundation.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 171-173 Victoria Street North has historical/associative value
due to its history and association the late Ian MacNaughton and his planning firm MHBC
MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited.
Ian Mac Naugh
in 1968 and went on to pursue his MA in Regional Planning and Resource Development in 1971. He
founded MHBC in 1973 with a vision to create a planning firm built on innovation, integrity, strategic
thinking, problem solving and excellent service (MHBC Planning Urban Design & Landscape
Architecture, 2024).
highest recognition a land use planner can achieve. Sadly, Ian passed away on Saturday, October 7,
contributions to the planning field and community:
through his vision, leadership and big picture
thinking. Throughout his life, Ian demonstrated qualities that set him apart as a leader, mentor and
innovator and he had a unique ability to inspire and motivate those around him. Based on his knowledge
and expertise he was appointed as a member of numerous Provincial, Regional and Local task forces
including the Provincial Smart Growth Central Ontario Strategy Sub-Panel, the Greenbelt Task Force
and the Province of Ontario Advisory Group on Energy and Economic Development. Ian was also
selected as a special advisor to the Ontario Stone, Sand and Gravel Association and assisted numerous
municipalities with restructuring, governance, waste management and housing strategies.
ts, Ian championed causes close to his heart, giving back to the
community and making a positive impact on countless lives. This included the University of Waterloo,
Canadian Technology Triangle, Rotary, Homewood, Breslau Park and Recreation Association and the
The subject property was MHBCs Kitchener office from 1986 to 2009. Over the past 50 years, what
began as a local planning firm, MHBC has grown to be a large company with over 100 staff located at
five regional offices (Barrie, Kitchener, London, Woodbridge and Burlington) providing planning services
across Ontario. Today, the firm provides a full range of services, including: urban and rural planning;
urban design; landscape architecture; cultural heritage; and, resource management.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 171-173 Victoria Street North resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the design and physical value of the semi-detached dwelling built in the
Italianate architectural style, including:
o two-storey height;
o square plan with rear addition;
o hipped roofline;
o the front façade:
four bays (two for each half of the dwelling);
projecting bays with front gables (one for each half of the dwelling);
roofline displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly
decorative paired brackets;
buff (yellow) and red brick;
semi-circular window opening in the front gable ends with a red brick voussoirs and
stone sills;
segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills;
the design of the double hung 1/1 wood windows;
segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs on the second-storey;
second-storey verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters;
first-storey verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters and
turned posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work;
segmentally arched transom with red brick voussoirs and simple side lites on the
first-storey;
front door openings; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
o the side facades:
hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly
decorative paired brackets;
buff (yellow) and red brick;
segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone sills;
double hung 1/1 window design;
chimneys that project above the roofline and divide the façade into two bays;
two basement windows with red brick voussoirs and stone sills; and,
field stone foundation.
o the rear addition features:
one-and-one-half-storey height;
gable roofline;
covered verandah;
segmentally arched door opening with red brick voussoirs;
segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs;
circular window with a red brick border located above the verandah; and,
covered verandah displaying a top and bottom rail with turned balusters, turned
posts with highly decorative brackets and scroll work, and vertical skirting.
o the rear façade:
this façade features portions of the two-storey building and the one-and-one-half-
storey addition;
the portions of the two-storey building feature:
a hip roof displaying plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along
with highly decorative paired brackets;
buff (yellow) and red brick;
segmentally arched window openings with red brick voussoirs and stone
sills; and,
double hung 1/1 window design.
the one-and-a-half-storey addition features:
gable roofline;
two bays separated by a chimney;
buff (yellow) and red brick;
plain fascia, soffits and frieze;
segmentally arched window openings of varying sizes with red brick
voussoirs and stone sills;
double hung 1/1 window design; and,
rusticated stone foundation.
References
City of Kitchener. (2007). Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan. Stantec in
association with Nexus Architects, ecoplans limited, and Michael Baker, Historian: Kitchener, Ontario.
Berlin Fire Insurance Map. (1894 revised 1904). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
Kitchener Fire Insurance Map. (1908 revised 1925). Kitchener Public Library: Kitchener, ON.
https://www.mhbcplan.com/about/ \[Accessed April 15, 2024\].
https://www.mhbcplan.com/team/in-memory/ \[Accessed April 15, 2024\].
Twin-City Directory and Official Guide of the Towns of Berlin and Waterloo. (1907). Watts & Bowden:
n.p., ON.
-
-1903). Vernon Directories Limited: Hamilton, ON.
-1908). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1909). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
-1911). Vernon Directories Limited:
Hamilton, ON.
Photographs
Front Elevation (North Façade) 171-173 Victoria Street South (former semi-detached dwelling
converted to offices)
Side Elevation (West Façade) 171-173 Victoria Street North
Side Elevation (East Façade) 171-173 Victoria Street North
Front Elevation (South Façade) 171-173 Victoria Street North (Rear Addition)
Detailing of projecting gable with plain fascia, soffits and decorative frieze board along with highly
decorative paired brackets
Detailing of door openings with transom and side lites, and detailing of verandah with turned posts,
turned balusters and decorative brackets and scrollwork
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
171-173 Victoria Street North
Michelle Drake
Address: Recorder:
Former semi-detached dwelling, Italianate style
March 25, 2024
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
Page 10 of 17
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
Page 11 of 17
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Page 12 of 17
Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee
Criteria
Interior: Is the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
interior
Yes
arrangement,
finish,
craftsmanship
and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
structure have
other original
outbuildings,
notable
landscaping or
external
features that
complete the
site?
Site Integrity:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the
Yes
structure
occupy its
original site?
* If relocated, is it
relocated on its
original site,
moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
building retain
most of its
original
materials and
design
features?
Please refer to
the list of
heritage
attributes
within the
Page 13 of 17
Statement of
Significance
and indicate
which
elements are
still existing
and which
ones have
been
removed.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Are there
Yes
additional
elements or
features that
should be
added to the
heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
the building in
Yes
good
condition?
*E.g. - Could be a
good candidate
for adaptive re-
use if possible and
contribute
towards equity-
building and
climate change
action.
Indigenous
History: Could
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
this site be of
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
importance to
Indigenous
heritage and
history?
*E.g. - Site within
300m of water
sources, near
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
distinct
Page 14 of 17
topographical
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
land, or near
cemeteries might
have
archaeological
potential and
indigenous
heritage
potential.
Could there be
any urban
Indigenous
history
associated
with the
property?
* Additional
archival work may
be required.
Function:
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Commercial
What is the
Commercial
Office Other ________________
present
Office Other -
function of the
________________
subject
property?
* Other may
include vacant,
social,
institutional, etc.
and important for
the community
from an equity
building
perspective.
Diversity and
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
Inclusion:
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
Does the
subject
property
contribute to
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
the cultural
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
heritage of a
community of
people?
Page 15 of 17
Does the
subject
property have
intangible
value to a
specific
community of
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo
Masjid (Muslim
Society of
Waterloo &
Wellington
Counties) was the
first established
Islamic Center
and Masjid in the
Region and
contributes to the
history of the
Muslim
community in the
area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Page 16 of 17
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
Page 17 of 17
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
111 Ahrens Street West
Summary of Significance
Social Value
Design/Physical Value
Economic Value
Historical Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 111 Ahrens Street West
Legal Description: Plan 376 Part Lot 222 58R-2921
Year Built: 1887
Architectural Styles: Vernacular Industrial
Original Owner: Hartman Krug
Original Use: Industrial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
th
111 Ahrens Street West is a late 19 century building built in the Industrial Vernacular architectural
style. The building is situated on a 1.06-acre parcel of land located on the south side of Breithaupt Street
between Weber Street West and Ahrens Street West in the Mt. Hope Huron Park Planning Community
of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the
heritage value are the industrial buildings.
Heritage Value
111 Ahrens Street West is recognized for its design/physical, historic/associative, and contextual
values.
Design/Physical Value
The existing building spans an entire block and is a representative example of an early Industrial
Vernacular architectural style in Kitchener. The building is in good condition with many intact original
elements including, but not limited to yellow brick construction, flat-roof, parapet walls, stone
foundations, and shallow buttressing between windows.
The original Krug Furniture Building was built in 1887 and was initially 2 storeys in height. By 1889, a
third storey was added and by 1908, a fourth storey was added to increase the floor space to more
than 130,000 square feet. The building was most added onto with a second structure adjoining the
original structure sometime after 1908. The 1924/25 Fire Insurance Map identifies four sections of the
H. Krug Furniture Co. Ltd. Including: 1. Office, Show room and storage; 2. Shipping, Upholstery and
storage; 3. Woodworking, Finishing and Storage; and 4. Machine Room, Bench Room, Finishing and
Storage. The 1924/25 First Insurance Map also identifies two buildings, which are now part of the
Krug property. These buildings were the J.M. Card Lumber Co. and the Alpha Chemical Co. With the
building occupying a whole city block, it was believed that this was the largest furniture plant in the
British Empire at the time covering a floor space of 80,000 square feet. Today, the building is 4-
storeys in height with a U building footprint , with a flat roof and a decorative cornice.
The building almost retains its original fenestration pattern on all elevations and has many door
openings on the ground floor. On the northern elevation, the façade can be divided into 25 bay
sections, with brick buttresses between each bay. The first nine (9) sections of the façade include two
6-over-6 double hung-windows with stone headers and sills on each storey. The rest of the sections
contain triple 6-over-6 double-hung windows with stone headers and sills. On the south elevation of
the earlier portion of the building (towards the intersection of Ahrens Street West and Breithaupt
Street),
The west elevation is divided into 6 sections with brick buttresses, with each storey containing two
double-hung 6-over-6 windows with stone headers and sills on the upper storeys. Some windows on
the second storey have been replaced. The ground level includes an entrance, a garage that had
been modified and filled in and now has a triple window. There are also remnants of the original sign
b, the façade can be divided into section due to the shallow
buttresses, with each section containing two 6-over-6 double hung windows with decorative stone
headers and sills on each storey. This fenestration pattern continues towards the other end of façade,
where the windows change to triple 6-over-6 double hung windows with decorative stone headers and
sills separated by buttresses on each storey. There is also a small three-storey addition with a parapet
and flat roof, which contains slightly arches windows separated by buttresses on its front façade, and
other numerous window openings that have been boarded up on the side façade. The original sign
banding of the furniture company can be seen in three places on this façade on either end of the
façade, and one in the center of the façade between the third and fourth storey. There is also a brick
chimney between the smaller addition and the main portion of the building.
The buildings that were formerly a part of the Alpha Chemical Co. are of brick construction that has
been painted white but were not historically part of the original Krug Furniture building. The Alpha
Chemical Co. was founded by brothers William John and David Moody on Foundry Street (Ontario
Street) making stove and harness polishes. The company moved to the Breithaupt Street location in
1897. In 1957 the company manufactured more than 60 products including: soaps, cleaners, polish,
dubbin, ink, antiseptics, mucilage, enamels, sewing machine oil, silver cream, wax tile, compounds and
abrasives. The H. Krug Furniture Co. purchased the Alpha Chemical Co. building on Breithaupt Street
in 1979.
Historical Value
The historic and associative values relate to original building owner Hartman Krug. Hartman Krug was
born in 1853 in the Township of Wilmot to John Henry Krug and his wife Sophia Schultz. He learned
and furniture manufacturing after coming to Berlin in the 1870s before starting his own business. He
Krug then partnered with Albert Ruby
to establish his company in the early 1880s. In 1887, H. Krug opened his furniture factory at Ahrens
Street and Breithaupt Street across the Grand Trunk Railway Station. In addition to the original structure
at the intersection of Ahrens and Breithaupt Street, a second structure was added to the factory complex
during its early development and was located across from the original factory, on Breithaupt Street. At
one point, the plant took up two city blocks, most of the streetscape from Ahrens Street to Weber Street
and originally included a lumberyard, dry kilns, and large storage warehouses where the dry lumber
supply was stored before being transformed into furniture.
Hartman Krug was also one of the most prominent and influential businessmen at the center of industrial
boom taking place in Berlin in the later 1800s. He was identified as being involved with several other
Berlin companies and served on the Separate School Board and Town Council for a number of years.
He was also a charter member of the Interior Hardwood Company, and in 1916 purchased the Doon
Twine plant and brought it into the City. Krug married Annie Teresa Dunn in 1880 and had five sons
and five daughters. Three of his sons Rudolph, Henry and John succeeded to the presidencies of
both the H. Krug Furniture Company and the Doon Twines Limited. Henry became the president of
Doon Twines Limited in 1927. Hartman Krug was active in the company until his death in 1933.
The H. Krug Furniture Company initially produced frames, dining room sets, and rockers. The company
manufactured all types of furniture including hard-carved household furniture. The factory continued to
explant its product line and was soon making upholstered items and a line of hand-carved home
furniture. Although the company offered a variety of products, it first found its niche in chair making, and
then office furniture.
The Krug Furniture Company has seen immense success since its founding and still continues to be a
prominent furniture company in Ontario. In 1980, the company purchased the 75-year-old Imperial
Furniture Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Of Stratford from Howard Hemphill. The new acquisition, also known
as the Imperial Furniture division of Krug Furniture Co., has about 185,000 square feet of floor space
and manufactured dining room, bedroom and made-to-order furniture. In 1984, still needing more
space, the company purchased the former Coppercraft building on Manitou Drive in Kitchener to set up
its veneer shipping and warehousing business. In May of 2000, Krug bought the Kaufman business
based in Collingwood, Ontario. It is understood that this purchase brought together two of the most
respected furniture companies in the industry and ensure Krug Inc. a primary place in the market.
Contextual Value
111 Ahrens Street West has contextual value because it is physically, functionally, visually and
historically linked to its surroundings. The building exists in its original location, and still occupies a
whole city block. The building is still being used for furniture production by Krug Furniture. The property
has contextual value because it is important in defining, maintaining or supporting the character of the
area. The property is within the Warehouse District Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL), which has
been identified as a high priority cultural heritage resource. The Warehouse District CHL is significant
because it includes a number of buildings that were instrumental to the development and progress of
th
center of industrial growth in Canada at the turn of the 20 century.
Due to the size and architectural style of the building, this building is very prominent and well-known
within the community. Additionally, due to its location at the corner of Ahrens Street West and Breithaupt
Street near the train tracks, this building is easily recognizable and is a landmark within the community.
Other Values
Economic Value
economic development. At one point, the Krug Furniture Plant was considered the largest furniture
plant in the British Empire. Additionally, Hartman Krug was a prominent and influential businessman,
who was very involved in the community,
Heritage Attributes
The heritage attributes of 111 Ahrens Street West resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the construction and Industrial Vernacular architectural style of the original
portion of the Krug Furniture building, including:
o Location, orientation and massing of the building;
o roof and roofline, including:
flat roof;
parapet wall;
o door openings;
o window and window openings, including:
tripled 6/6 double hung windows per bay;
stone headers and sills;
o yellow brick construction;
o stone foundation (original building);
o shallow buttressing between windows;
o decorative cornice;
o sign banding on the west and south elevations; and,
o chimney.
All elements related to the contextual value of the original portion of the Krug Furniture building,
including:
o Its original location on Ahrens and Breithaupt Streets and its contribution to the Breithaupt
Street and Ahrens Street West landscape.
Photos
111 Ahrens Street West south elevation
111 Ahrens Street West North elevation
111 Ahrens Street West South Elevation
111 Ahrens Street West Fire Insurance Maps 1924/1925
References
Glover, Robert A. (2013), Old Factory Smoke Berlin, Ontario, University of Waterloo Bookstore, accessed
via Kitchener Public Library Archives, pp. 245-247.
Town of Berlin Fire Insurance Maps 1924/25
Vernon, H. & Son. (1910). , Waterloo and Bridgeport: Street, Alphabetical, Business and
th
Miscellaneous Directory: For the Years 1910-1911 (8 Ed.). Hamilton, ON: Griffen & Richmond.
Waterloo Historical Society, 1987, Volume 75, Kitchener Ontario, accessed via Kitchener Public Library
Archives
Webb, L. 2008., Krug, A Global Name in Furniture, Waterloo Historical Society, Vol. 97, Kitchener, Ontario accessed via Kitchener
Public Library Archives
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
Deeksha Choudhry
111 Ahrens Street West
Address: Recorder:
Industrial
April 15, 2024
Description: Date:
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes
Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No
N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener
Committee
Interior: Is the interior
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
arrangement, finish,
Yes
Yes
craftsmanship and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness: Does this
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure have other original
Yes
Yes
outbuildings, notable
landscaping or external
features that complete the
site?
Site Integrity: Does the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
structure occupy its original
Yes
Yes
site?
* If relocated, is it relocated on its
original site, moved from another site,
etc.
Alterations: Does this building
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
retain most of its original
Yes
Yes
materials and design features?
Please refer to the list of
heritage attributes within the
Statement of Significance and
indicate which elements are
still existing and which ones
have been removed.
Alterations: Are there
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
additional elements or
Yes Yes
features that should be added
to the heritage attribute list?
Condition: Is the building in
N/A Unknown No
N/A Unknown No
good condition?
Yes
Yes
*E.g. - Could be a good candidate for
adaptive re-use if possible and
contribute towards equity-building
and climate change action.
Indigenous History: Could this
site be of importance to
N/A Unknown No YN/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous heritage and
Additional Research Required
es
history?
Additional Research
Required
*E.g. - Site within 300m of water
sources, near distinct topographical
land, or near cemeteries might have
archaeological potential and
indigenous heritage potential.
Could there be any urban
N/A Unknown No Yes
Indigenous history associated
Additional Research Required
with the property?
N/A Unknown No Y
* Additional archival work may be
es
required.
Additional Research
Required
Function: What is the present
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Com
function of the subject
Commercial
mercial
property?
Office Other Church
Office Other - Industrial
* Other may include vacant, social,
institutional, etc. and important for
the community from an equity
building perspective.
Diversity and Inclusion: Does
N/A Unknown No YN/A Unknown No Yes
the subject property
es
contribute to the cultural
Additional Research Required
Additional Research
heritage of a community of
Required
people?
Does the subject property
N/A Unknown No Yes
have intangible value to a
N/A Unknown No Y
specific community of people?
Additional Research Required
es
Additional Research
* E.g.- Waterloo Masjid (Muslim
Required
Society of Waterloo & Wellington
Counties) was the first established
Islamic Center and Masjid in the
Region and contributes to the history
of the Muslim community in the area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated
under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification: