HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2024-269 - 948 Chapel Hill Court - A 2024-047
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment
DATE OF MEETING: June 18, 2024
SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals
519-741-2200 ext. 7765
PREPARED BY: Kirsten Hoekstra, Student Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7078
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 4
DATE OF REPORT: June 5, 2024
REPORT NO.: DSD-2024-269
SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2024-047 948 Chapel Hill Court
RECOMMENDATION:
That Minor Variance Application A2024-047 for 948 Chapel Hill Court requesting
relief from Section 4.14.4 d) of Zoning By-law 2019-051 to permit a rear yard setback
of 2.4 metres instead of the minimum required 4 metres, to permit the construction
of an unenclosed rear deck, greater than 0.6 metres in height, onto a detached
dwelling, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by Hickory Dickory
Decks, dated May 1, 2024, BE APPROVED.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
The purpose of this report is to review a minor variance application requesting a rear
yard setback of 2.4 metres rather than the minimum required 4 metres.
The key finding of this report is that the requested minor variance meets the four tests
of the Planning Act.
There are no financial implications.
Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising
that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the
application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property
Committee of Adjustment meeting.
This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located on the North side of Chapel Hill Court in the Doon South
neighbourhood, which is predominantly comprised of low rise detached residential uses.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Figure 1 - Aerial Photo of the Subject Property.
Community Areas Urban Structure and is
Low Rise Residential
Low Rise Residential Two Zone (RES-2-law 2019-
051.
The purpose of the application is to request relief from Section 4.14.4 d) of Zoning By-law
2019-051, to permit a rear yard setback of 2.4 metres instead of the minimum required 4
metres to facilitate the construction of an unenclosed rear deck, greater than 0.6 metres in
height. Approval of the variance will allow for the development of a functional deck due to
the irregular shape of the lot; the western portion of the deck is restricted by the existing
setback.
Figure 2 - Proposed Site Plan.
Planning Staff conducted a site visit on May 30, 2024
Figure 3 Site Photo of 948 Chapel Hill Court.
Figure 4 - Existing rear yard where the deck is proposed.
Figure 5 - Existing rear yard setback.
REPORT:
Planning Comments:
In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the
Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning Staff offers the following
comments:
General Intent of the Official Plan
The subject property is on Map 3 Land Use. The
intent of the Low-Rise Residential designation is to accommodate a diverse range of low-
rise housing types while maintaining the low-density character of the neighbourhood.
Official Plan policy 4.C.1.8 d), in regard to criteria that should be considered where a minor
variance is requested, specifies that: appropriate buffering or screening is to be provided
to mitigate any adverse impacts, particularly with respect to privacy. An existing vegetative
buffer is located along the rear property line. The requested reduced rear yard setback will
facilitate the construction of an unenclosed rear deck and maintains the general intent of
the Official Plan.
General Intent of the Zoning By-law
The general intent of the rear yard setback requirement is to ensure that there is an
adequate separation from adjacent properties with respect to privacy concerns, and that
there is functional appropriate amenity space for residents. Planning Staff is of the opinion
that the proposed 2.4 metre setback will still provide an adequate amenity area and
privacy from the rear adjacent property, as there is vegetative screening and sufficient
buffering between properties. In the opinion of Planning Staff, the requested variance to
permit a reduced rear yard to facilitate the construction of a functional unenclosed deck
meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law.
Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor?
Staff is of the opinion that the requested variance of a 2.4 metre rear yard setback is
minor, as any privacy concerns related to the adjacent property are minimal, and there are
not any expected significant adverse impacts to the character of the neighbourhood.
Additionally, staff note that much of the proposed deck appears near the required 4.0-
meter rear yard setback. Due to the subject properties irregular lot shape, the western
corner of the proposed deck is the only location that would meet the required setback.
Thus, staff is of the opinion that the effects of the proposed variance are minor.
Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land,
Building and/or Structure?
Planning Staff is of the opinion that the variance to reduce the minimum rear yard setback
is appropriate for the desirable use of the lands as it will facilitate the expansion of outdoor
amenity space, increasing the functionality and desirability of the residential property. Staff
also recognize that allowing the variance will allow a consistent deck width which will
further improve its functionality and enhance the design.
Environmental Planning Comments:
No concerns.
Heritage Planning Comments:
The property is located adjacent to the Caryndale Neighborhood Cultural Heritage
Landscape. The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (CHLS) dated December
2014 and prepared by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd. was approved by Council in 2015.
The CHLS serves to establish an inventory and was the first step of a phased Cultural
Heritage Landscape (CHL) conservation process. Staff have no comments or concerns
regarding this application.
Building Division Comments:
The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permits
for the deck for the single detached dwelling is obtained prior to construction. Please contact
the Building Division at building@kitchener.ca with any questions.
Engineering Division Comments:
No comment.
Parks/Operations Division Comments:
No comment.
Transportation Planning Comments:
Transportation Services have no concerns with this application.
GRCA Comments:
GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above application.
Region of Waterloo Comments:
No concerns.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM
of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property
advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises
Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30
metres of the subject property.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
Planning Act
Provincial Policy Statement (PPS 2020)
A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2020
Regional Official Plan
Official Plan (2014)
Zoning By-law 2019-051
May 29, 2024
Connie Owen
City of Kitchener File No.: D20-20/
200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN
P.O. Box 1118 (7, 8) 64/ 45 TO 75 CHARLES STREET EAST
Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP
Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting June 18, 2024, City of Kitchener
Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and
have the following comments:
1) A 2024 - 044 160 Webster Road No concerns.
2) A 2024 - 045 3 Ivy Lane Court No concerns.
3) A 2024 - 046 59 Cartier Drive No concerns.
4) A 2024 - 047 948 Chapel Hil Court No concerns.
5) A 2024 - 048 101 Breckenridge Drive There are no concerns/conditions for
this application. However, the applicants are advised that the subject lands are
located within the outer 6km of the airport zoning-regulated area and specifically
under the takeoff approach surface. Accordingly, the lands are subject to all
provisions of airport zoning.
6) A 2024 - 049 174 Wellington Street North There are no conditions for the
above application. However, the applicants are advised that there would be
impacts from road noise & railway noise/vibration to the existing and the proposed
dwellings/building. The applicants are responsible for ensuring no environmental
noise impacts from/to the proposed development.
7) A 2024 - 050 51 Charles Street East No concerns.
8) A 2024 - 051 75 Charles Street East No concerns.
5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ bǒƒĬĻƩʹ ЍЏВЋАЉЋ tğŭĻ Њ ƚŅ Ћ
Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the
provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor
thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these
developments prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site
is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply.
Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the
undersigned.
Yours Truly,
Joginder Bhatia
Transportation Planner
C (226) 753-0368
CC:
Mariah Blake, City of Kitchener
CofA@Kitchener.ca
Katrina Fluit, Region of Waterloo FYI only.
5ƚĭǒƒĻƓƷ bǒƒĬĻƩʹ ЍЏВЋАЉЋ tğŭĻ Ћ ƚŅ Ћ
2
June3, 2024via email
Mariah Blake
Secretary-Treasurer
Committee of Adjustment
City of Kitchener
200 King Street West
Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7
DearMariahBlake,
Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting June 18, 2024
Applications for Minor Variance
A 2024-044160 Webster Road
A 2024-0453 Ivy Lane Court
A 2024-04659 Cartier Drive
A 2024-047948 Chapel Hill Court
A 2024-048101 Breckenridge Drive
A 2024-049174 Wellington Street North
A 2024-050to 05147-75Charles Street East& 40-50 Eby Street South
Applicationsfor Consent
B 2024-010578 Guelph Street
B 2024-011 to 01247-75Charles Street East & 40-50 Eby Street South
Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted
applications.
GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do
not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or
valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a
permission from GRCA is not required.
Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519-
621-2763 ext. 2228.
Sincerely,
Andrew Herreman,CPT
Resource Planning Technician
Grand River Conservation Authority