Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2024-335 - Notice of Intention to Designate, 113-151 Charles Street West (Lang Site A)
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener
DATE OF MEETING: August 6, 2024
SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals,
519-741-2200 ext. 7070
PREPARED BY: Michelle Drake, Senior Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7839
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9
DATE OF REPORT: July 4, 2024
REPORT NO.: DSD-2024-335
SUBJECT: Notice of Intention to Designate 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-
180 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (Lang Site A)
RECOMMENDATION:
That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to
publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as
113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South as
being of cultural heritage value or interest.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
The purpose of this report is to request that Council publish a Notice of Intention to
Designate 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street
South (Lang Site A) under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
An updated Statement of Significance describing the cultural heritage value or interest
of 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South
(Lang Site A) was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on June 11, 2024. The
Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the
cultural heritage value or interest of 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180 Joseph
Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (Lang Site A) should be confirmed by pursuing
designation of the property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
The key finding of this report is that 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180 Joseph
Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (Lang Site A) meets (7) of nine (9) criteria for
designation under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario
Regulation 569/22) and has been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage
resource recognized for its design/physical and historical/associative values.
There are no financial implications.
Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the
agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener Committee meeting, providing written
correspondence to the property owner, and consulting with Heritage Kitchener. Should
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Council choose to give Notice of Intention to Designate, such notice shall be served
on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust.
This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph
Street / 3-44 Francis Street North (Lang Site A) is a complex of approximately 15
interconnected industrial buildings ranging in height from one to five storeys built between
1896 and 2012 primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The buildings are
situated on a 3.95-acre parcel of land bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph and Victoria
Streets in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within
the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value are
the industrial buildings.
Figure 1.0: Location Map of Subject Property (Lang Site A)
A full assessment of 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis
Street North (Lang Site A) has been completed, including: field evaluation and archival
research. The findings concluded that the subject property meets seven (7) of nine (9)
criteria for designation under Ontario Heritage Act Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario
Regulation 569/22). An updated Statement of Significance describing s
cultural heritage value or interest was presented to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on
June 11, 2024. The Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario
Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-
188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street North (Lang Site A) should be confirmed by
pursuing designation of the subject property under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.
This work was undertaken as part of the CityMunicipal Heritage Register (MHR) Review,
initiated in February of 2023 in response to amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act
introduced in January of 2023 through Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act. Bill 200,
the Homeowners Protection Act, 2024, extended the time municipalities have to designate
properties listed on their municipal heritage registers until January 1, 2027. The City
contacted owners of listed properties through an initial letter dated May 23, 2023, to inform
them of this undertaking. Owners of properties recommended for designation were
contacted via a second letter. The property owner for 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-
188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street North (Lang Site A) was contacted via second
letter sent by mail dated May 17, 2024. This letter was accompanied by the updated
Statement of Significance and a
prepared in June 2023. The letter invited property owners to con
Heritage Planner with any comments, questions, or concerns.
Per standard procedure, should Council support the Notice of Intention to Designate
(NOID), the property owner will be contacted a third time through a letter advising of the
served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and the newspaper ad is
posted, there will be a 30-day appeal period in which the property owner may object to the
designation.
Figure 2.0: Aerial View of Lang Site A in the Foreground
REPORT:
Identifying and protecting cultural heritage resources within our City is an important part of
planning for the future, and helping to guide change while conserving the buildings,
structures, and landscapes that give the City of Kitchener its unique identity. The City
plays a critical role in the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The designation of
property under the Ontario Heritage Act is the main tool to provide long-term conservation
of cultural heritage resources for future generations. Designation recognizes the
value or interest; encourages good stewardship and conservation; and, promotes
knowledge and understanding about the property. Designation not only publicly recognizes
and promotes awareness, but it also provides a process for ensuring that changes to a
property are appropriately manage
heritage value or interest.
113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street North (Lang
Site A) is recognized for its design/physical and historical/associative, values. It satisfies
seven (7) of nine (9) criteria for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act Regulation
9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22). A summary of the criteria that is or is not
met is provided in the table below.
Criteria Criteria Met
(Yes/No)
1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a Yes
rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type,
material, or construction method.
2. The property has design value or physical value because it Yes
displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit.
3. The property has design or physical value because it Unknown
demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific
achievement.
4. The property has historical value or associative value because it Yes
has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person,
activity, organization or institution that is significant to a
community.
5. The property has historical or associative value because it Yes
yields, or has the potential to yield, information that contributes
to an understanding of a community or culture.
6. The property has historical value or associative value because it No
demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist,
builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community.
7. The property has contextual value because it is important in Yes
defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area.
8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, Yes
functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings.
9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. Yes
Table 1: Criteria for Designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Amended by Ontario
Regulation 569/22)
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph
Street / 3-44 Francis Street North demonstrates design or physical value as a good
th
example of an early (20 century) complex of buildings designed primarily in the Industrial
Vernacular architectural style that reflect the evolution of the tanning industry (ERA
Architects Inc., 2008). Simple brick detailing and durable finishes demonstrate the
functional and industrial history of the building use. The buildings have many intact
heritage attributes in good condition.
The oldest portions of the site were built between 1896 and 1904 and include: the former
two- to three-storey beam and currying house at Victoria Street and the two-storey leach
house at the centre of the site. The remaining buildings were constructed between 1904
and 1917, with significant alterations and additions occurring between 1917 and 1925 and
again between 2010 and 2012. The buildings that best exemplify the Industrial Vernacular
architectural style between 1904 and 1925 include: the former administration and
production buildings at the corner of Charles and Francis Streets; the former beam and
storage house along Charles Street; and, the former leach house along Joseph Street.
Front (North) Façade
The main entrance to the complex of buildings faces Charles Street West.
The five-storey building at the north east corner of the site is the former administration
building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of doors and windows; changes to the size of original openings;
introduction of canopy signage; and, introduction of a barrier-free access. The second-
storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched window
openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone
sills; new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills; lionhead tie rods located on the brick
pilasters at the second-, third- and fourth-storey; and, decorative brickwork. The fifth-
storey features: buff brick; 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; decorative
brickw
Figure 3: Front Elevation (North Façade) Former Administration and Tan Yard
Buildings of the Lang Tanning Co.
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former tan yard
building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of the windows; addition of a new double doors; and, introduction of
canopy and fascia signage with gooseneck lighting. The second-storey through to the
fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills; new 12-
pane flathead windows with stone sills; and decorative brickwork.
The one-storey building west of the former tan yard building is a recent (c. 2010-12)
addition to the complex. It features contemporary design that is compatible with the
complex of historic buildings on the site. It features a shallow side-gable roof, beigeand
brown horizontal cladding, and lots of glazing. Behind the one-storey building is a four-
storey building that once functioned as the leach house for the Lang Tanning Co.. This
building has a flat roof and two buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. For the most
part, only the third- and fourth-storey are visible from the pedestrian level on Charles
Street West. The east bay of the third- and fourth-storey features a new single 6/6 flat
head hung window beside a perhaps former circular window opening with a brick surround
on each storey. The west bay of the third- and fourth-storey features two new side by side
6/6 flat head hung windows with a stone header and a stone sill.
West of the one-storey addition is another one-storey vestibule addition and a central
tower (c. 2010-12) that connects the former leech house to the former beam and storage
house. The vestibule and central tower are of contemporary design that is compatible with
the complex of historic buildings on the site. It features a unique roof line that is like the
shallow side gable roof of the one-storey building addition but instead the side gable is
inverted. The walls are clad with glazing.
The last building that fronts onto Charles Street is the three-storey former beam and
storage house of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 15 buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of the windows and doors; addition of windows and doors; and,
introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey and third-storey feature: buff brick and
new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The second-storey features painted
-storey features: the
reflecting a 6-pane design; and, backlit channel letter fascia signs of current tenants.
Side (East) Façade;
The east side façade faces Francis Street South. The five-storey building at the north east
corner of the site is the former administration building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This
building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey
has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of doors and windows;
changes to the size of original openings; and, introduction of a new exterior fire escape.
The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched
window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; 4/4 wood windows with segmentally
arched brick voussiors and stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally
arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally
arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched
brick voussoirs and stone sills; and, decorative brick work between the third- and fourth-
storey. The fifth storey features: buff brick; new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills;
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former production
building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 16 buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of the windows; alterations to window and door openings; and,
introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature:
buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and
stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills;
1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; 1-pane flathead
window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; decorative brickwork; and,
THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE
LEATHER
Side (West) Façade
The west side façade faces Victoria Street South. A one- and three-storey building directly
abut the sidewalk. The three-storey building is the former beam and storage house of the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 5 buff brick bays separated by brick
pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; alterations to
the size of window openings; and, replacement of the windows. The second-storey and
third-storey feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The
second- and third-storey features an exterior fire escape. There are metal tie-rods on the
brick pilasters between the first- and second-storey as well as the second- and third-
storey.
The side elevation of the former tan yard building is setback approximately 90 metres from
Victoria Street South. This building has a flat roof and two wide buff brick bays separated
by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: using salvaged brick to
enclose the building wall; adding contemporary windows; adding a contemporary door;
and, installing a channel letter fascia sign with gooseneck lights. The second-storey
features three new 6/6 flathead hung windows with stone sills. The fourth-storey features
Rear (South) Façade
The rear façade faces Joseph Street and features a one-storey building at the corner of
Joseph Street and Victoria Street South, the four-storey former leach house, new exterior
courtyard, and the four-storey former production building. The one-storey building has a
flat roof and 17 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The building has been altered,
including: painting the brick; changes to the size of door and window openings; new
windows; new entrances; new exterior stairs; and, new canopy signs. The four-storey
former leach house has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters.
The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the building; installation of new
windows in place of former shipping bay doors; and, installation of new 12/12 flathead
hung windows with stone sills. The second- through fourth-storey features new flathead
6/6 hung windows with stone lintels and sills. The former production building has a flat roof
and three buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered,
including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; and, alterations to window
and door openings. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new
6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new
12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; and, decorative
brickwork. West of the former production building is a four-storey concrete addition. The
first-storey has been altered, including: painted of the concrete; replacement of the
windows; and, replacement of a door. The second-storey features new 6/6 flathead hung
windows with segmentally arched concrete header and concrete sill. The third-storey
features four different window designs (1/1; single lite; and, 6/6) all with segmentally
arched concrete header and concrete sill. The fourth-storey features six new 6/6 hung
windows with flatheads and stone sills.
Interior
The interior of the original buildings feature: generous floor to ceiling heights; wood beams
and flooring; wood staircases; exposed structural columns and mechanical systems;
freight elevators with wood gates; and, metal fire separation doors with original weights
and pulleys.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44
Francis St N has historic/associative value due to its history and association with early
settlement, the Six Nations, Joseph Brant, Colonel Richard Beasley, Pennsylvanian
German Mennonites, the first permanent non-native settlement (now Kitchener), the
German Company Tract, the Township of Waterloo, German speaking immigrants, Berlin
as the County seat for the County of Waterloo, the Grand Trunk Railway (GTR) extension,
the leather tanning industry, and Reinhold Lang. These values were extensively
documented in a Heritage Impact Assessment written by ERA Architects Inc. in 2008 and
based on this research are further described below.
The land now known as the City of Kitchener was located far inland and isolated from
centres of commerce. As a result, the land attracted the settlement of Pennsylvania
German Mennonite farmers who were attracted to the promise of inexpensive land and the
guarantee of religious freedoms.
By the end of 1800, the first permanent non-native settlement was established in what is
now the City of Kitchener. Shortly after a group of Mennonites purchased all the unsold
60,000 acres into 130 farmsteads thus establishing a Pennsylvania Mennonite colony in
Upper Canada.
In 1816 the GCT became the Township of Waterloo. This marked the beginning of steady
migration of German speaking Europeans to the area between the 1820s and 1870s.
Population growth and infrastructure improvements (e.g., road upgrades) helped establish
the urban centre that became Berlin (now Kitchener) in 1833. Twenty years later, in 1853,
Berlin became the County seat for the County of Waterloo and three years later the Grand
Trunk Railway (GTR) was extended to Berlin. This opened the area to future
industrialization.
The skilled trades and industrial knowledge of the German immigrants contributed to
Reinhold Lang came to Berlin from Baden, Germany. The Lang Tanning Company was
founded in 1849. The business was originally located at the northeast corner of King and
Ontario Streets. This tannery made all classes of leather required for saddlers and
shoemakers. Unfortunately, this building was destroyed by fire in 1853.
Reinhold Lang rebuilt his business by purchasing a large piece of land at the corner of
Francis and King Streets. The property once featured several natural springs and a small
creek that would provide a good water supply for the tannery. His new single frame
building was built on the corner of Charles and Francis Streets and eventually grew into an
industrial complex occupying nearly three city blocks. This site reflects the organizational,
technological, and market changes of the tanning industry.
Reinhold emerged as a prominent local resident as the industrial centre of Berlin
continued to grow. In 1859, he was elected to Berlin Council where he was one of two
businessmen proposing a motion for
prosperous firms were aided by this policy.
oard of Trade
Board to assist with the passage of legislation. These families lived in the ward they
represented, which contributed to an enhanced sense of community. The Board not only
supported industrial expansion, but it also sponsored German cultural events throughout
the late 1800s.
Jerome and George W.) were also prominent figures in the community. In 1887, his son,
John A. Lang built his home at the northwest corner of Charles and Francis Streets to be
close to the business in order to oversee daily activities. His home was sold to the
company in 1897 to serve as offices until operations stopped in 1954. The home was
demolished in the 1990s. Over the years, in addition to the tanning industry, the Lang
family was also involved in the insurance, banking, hydro and land use planning.
th
By the late 19
success has been attributed to the industry and pride of the community. By 1904, the
original Lang buildings started to be replaced, expanded, or converted from frame to more
permanent brick or iron construction. Berlin became a city in 1912 and was considered
War One (WW1) caused anti-German sentiment, which resulted in the name change to
Kitchener, after a British General. During WW1, the Lang Tanning Co. became the largest
sole leather producer in the British Empire by producing huge amounts of saddle material.
The Lang Tanning Co. supplied sole leather and leather linings for aircraft gasoline tanks
in World War Two (WW2). Post WW2, modest changes to the complex were in the form of
connections between buildings to accommodate future uses. Operations declined after
WW2 due to changes in the industry and in 1954 the company ceased operations as a
tannery due to competition from synthetic materials. The 5-acre site and, at the time,
complex of 35 buildings continued to be owned by the Lang family until 1974. When the
operating businesses (1849-1954).
Contextual Value
The contextual values relate to the contribution that the complex of buildings make to the
continuity and character of the adjacent streetscapes and the overall Warehouse District in
the City of Kitchener. The buildings are historically and visually linked to their
surroundings, including: Lang Site B with the last fully intact smokestack in Kitchener
(designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act), other industrial buildings, former
homes of industrial workers (including homes in the Victoria Park Area Heritage
Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act), the
railway line, and the Warehouse District. The complex of buildings is recognized as a
the
leather tanning industry, the
relationship to and political leadership of the Lang family, the hardworking German
community in establishing Berlin (now Kitchener). as an industrial centre,and the overall
industrial development of the City of Kitchener (ERA Architects Inc., 2008).
Other Values
Economic Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph
Street / 3-44 Francis Street North has both historic- and present-day economic value. The
historic/associative value section above extensively details how the Lang Tannery Co.,
Reinhold Lang, and the Lang family supported the local economy.
es in the area
that reflects the evolution of the tanning industry. The site was rehabilitated and
development strategy focused on the creation of an innovation district with high-tech
companies. The Tannery boasts 306,564 square feet of office space and 25, 810 square
feet of retail uses. It is home to many innovated business and complimentary uses such as
restaurants and event space.
In 2011, The Tannery was awarded t
in the category of rehabilitation and adaptive reuse.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-188 Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis
Street North resides in the following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the design and physical value of the complex of Industrial
Vernacular buildings.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former administration
building, including:
o five-storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 4/4 wood windows with segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills;
o new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills;
o new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills
o 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and
stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and
stone sills;
o lionhead tie rods;
o decorative brickwork;
o
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former tan yard
building, including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o decorative brickwork; and,
o
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former leach house
building, including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows;
o window openings;
o former circular window openings with a brick surrounds; and,
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone lintels and stone sills.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former beam and
storage house building, including:
o three storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o
o two sets of clerestory windows with internal muntins reflecting a 6-lite design;
o exterior fire escape; and,
o metal tie rods.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former production
building, including:
o four storey height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and
stone sills;
o new 12-lite flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills;
o 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 1-lite flathead window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills;
o decorative brickwork;
o THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS
& SOLE LEATHER
o four-storey concrete addition, including:
concrete construction;
window openings with segmentally arched concrete headers and
concrete sills;
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete
headers and concrete sills; and,
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with concrete headers and concrete
sills.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM
of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting.
CONSULT Heritage Planning staff have consulted with the Heritage Kitchener committee
regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Property owners were invited to
consult via two separate letters dated May 23, 2023 and May 17, 2024.
Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal
Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving Notice of Intention to Designate
(NOID) a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of
this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via
circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council.
Should Council choose to proceed with a NOID, such notice will be served on the property
owner, the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record).
Once notice has been served, the property owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario
Land Tribunal (OLT). Should Council decide not to proceed with a NOID then the building
will remain on the Cit7, after
which it will be removed in accordance with the legislative changes enacted by Bill 23 and
Bill 200. Once removed from the MHR, it cannot be re-listed on the MHR for five (5) years
(i.e., January 1, 2032).
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
Ontario Heritage Act, 2022
Ontario Regulation 9/06 (Amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22)
Bill 23 Municipal Heritage Register Review (DSD-2023-225)
Municipal Heritage Register Review August 2023 Update (DSD-2023-309)
Municipal Heritage Register Review January 2024 Update (DSD-2024-022)
Municipal Heritage Register Review February 2024 Update (DSD-2024-056)
Municipal Heritage Register Review March 2024 Update (DSD-2024-093)
Municipal Heritage Register Review April 2024 Update (DSD-2024-131
Municipal Heritage Register Review May 2024 Update (DSD-2024-194)
Bill 200, Homeowners Protection Act, 2024
Municipal Heritage Register Review June 2024 Update (DSD-2024-250)
APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A Statement of Significance for 113-151 Charles Street West / 170-180
Joseph Street / 3-44 Francis Street South (Lang Site A)
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
113-151 Charles Street West/170-188 Joseph Street/3-44
Francis Street South
Summary of Significance
Design/Physical Value Social Value
Economic Value
Historical Value
Contextual Value
Environmental Value
Municipal Address: 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
Legal Description: Plan 375 Lot 110-116 Lot 131-138 Part Charles St 58R-6449 Part 1
Year Built: c. 1896 to c. 2012
Architectural Style: Industrial Vernacular
Original Owner: Reinhold Lang / Lang Tanning Company
Original Use: Industrial
Condition: Good
Description of Cultural Heritage Resource
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St Nis
a complex of approximately 15 interconnected industrial buildings ranging in height from one to five
storeys built between 1896 and 2012 primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style. The
buildings are situated on a 3.95-acre parcel of land bounded by Charles, Francis, Joseph and Victoria
Streets in the City Commercial Core Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of
Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value are the industrial buildings.
Heritage Value
113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N is recognized for its design/physical,
historical/associative, contextual, and economic values.
Design/Physical Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
th
demonstrates design or physical value as a good example of an early (20 century) complex of buildings
designed primarily in the Industrial Vernacular architectural style that reflect the evolution of the tanning
industry (ERA Architects Inc., 2008). Simple brick detailing and durable finishes demonstrate the
functional and industrial history of the building use. The buildings have many intact heritage attributes
in good condition.
The oldest portions of the site were built between 1896 and 1904 and include: the former two-to three-
storey beam and currying house at Victoria Street and the two-storey leach house at the centre of the
site. The remaining buildings were constructed between 1904 and 1917, with significant alterations and
additions occurring between 1917 and 1925 and again between 2010 and 2012. The buildings that best
exemplify the Industrial Vernacular architectural style between 1904 and 1925 include: the former
administration and production buildings at the corner of Charles and Francis Streets; the former beam
and storage house along Charles Street; and, the former leach house along Joseph Street.
Front (North) Façade
The main entrance to the complex of buildings faces Charles Street West.
The five-storey building at the north east corner of the site is the former administration building of the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of doors and windows;
changes to the size of original openings; introduction of canopy signage; and, introduction of a barrier-
free access. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; segmentally arched
window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills; lionhead tie rods located on the brick pilasters at the
second-, third- and fourth-storey; and, decorative brickwork. The fifth-storey features: buff brick; 6/6 flat
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former tan yard building of the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows; addition of a
new double doors; and, introduction of canopy and fascia signage with gooseneck lighting. The second-
storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills; and decorative brickwork.
The one-storey building west of the former tan yard building is a recent (c. 2010-12) addition to the
complex. It features contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on
the site. It features a shallow side-gable roof, beige and brown horizontal cladding, and lots of glazing.
Behind the one-storey building is a four-storey building that once functioned as the leach house for the
Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and two buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. For
the most part, only the third- and fourth-storey are visible from the pedestrian level on Charles Street
West. The east bay of the third- and fourth-storey features a new single 6/6 flat head hung window
beside a perhaps former circular window opening with a brick surround on each storey. The west bay
of the third- and fourth-storey features two new side by side 6/6 flat head hung windows with a stone
header and a stone sill.
West of the one-storey addition is another one-storey vestibule addition and a central tower (c. 2010-
12) that connects the former leech house to the former beam and storage house. The vestibule and
central tower are of contemporary design that is compatible with the complex of historic buildings on
the site. It features a unique roof line that is like the shallow side gable roof of the one-storey building
addition but instead the side gable is inverted. The walls are clad with glazing.
The last building that fronts onto Charles Street is the three-storey former beam and storage house of
the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 15 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters.
The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows and doors;
addition of windows and doors; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey and third-storey
feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills. The second-storey features
-storey features: the new
-
pane design; and, backlit channel letter fascia signs of current tenants.
Side (East) Façade;
The east side façade faces Francis Street South. The five-storey building at the north east corner of the
site is the former administration building of the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and five
buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the
brick; replacement of doors and windows; changes to the size of original openings; and, introduction of
a new exterior fire escape. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick;
segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone stills; 4/4 wood windows with
segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally
arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick
voussoirs and stone sills; new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills; and, decorative brick work between the third- and fourth-storey. The fifth storey features: buff brick;
new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills; decorative brick work; and, painted signage that reads
The four-storey building west of the former administration building is the former production building of
the Lang Tanning Co.. This building has a flat roof and 16 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters.
The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the windows;
alterations to window and door openings; and, introduction of canopy signage. The second-storey
through to the fourth-storey feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched
brick voussoirs and stone sills; new 12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone
sills; 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; 1-pane flathead window
with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills; decorative brickwork; and, painted signage that
THE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE LEATHER
Side (West) Façade
The west side façade faces Victoria Street South. A one- and three-storey building directly abut the
sidewalk. The three-storey building is the former beam and storage house of the Lang Tanning Co..
This building has a flat roof and 5 buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The first-storey has been
altered, including: painting of the brick; alterations to the size of window openings; and, replacement of
the windows. The second-storey and third-storey feature: buff brick and new 9/6 flat head hung windows
with stone sills. The second- and third-storey features an exterior fire escape. There are metal tie-rods
on the brick pilasters between the first- and second-storey as well as the second- and third-storey.
The side elevation of the former tan yard building is setback approximately 90 metres from Victoria
Street South. This building has a flat roof and two wide buff brick bays separated by brick pilasters. The
first-storey has been altered, including: using salvaged brick to enclose the building wall; adding
contemporary windows; adding a contemporary door; and, installing a channel letter fascia sign with
gooseneck lights. The second-storey features three new 6/6 flathead hung windows with stone sills.
The fourth-storey feature
Rear (South) Façade
The rear façade faces Joseph Street and features a one-storey building at the corner of Joseph Street
and Victoria Street South, the four-storey former leach house, new exterior courtyard, and the four-
storey former production building. The one-storey building has a flat roof and 17 buff brick bays
separated by brick pilasters. The building has been altered, including: painting the brick; changes to the
size of door and window openings; new windows; new entrances; new exterior stairs; and, new canopy
signs. The four-storey former leach house has a flat roof and five buff brick bays separated by brick
pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the building; installation of new
windows in place of former shipping bay doors; and, installation of new 12/12 flathead hung windows
with stone sills. The second- through fourth-storey features new flathead 6/6 hung windows with stone
lintels and sills. The former production building has a flat roof and three buff brick bays separated by
brick pilasters. The first-storey has been altered, including: painting of the brick; replacement of the
windows; and, alterations to window and door openings. The second-storey through to the fourth-storey
feature: buff brick; new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone
sills; new 12-pane flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills; and, decorative
brickwork. West of the former production building is a four-storey concrete addition. The first-storey has
been altered, including: painted of the concrete; replacement of the windows; and, replacement of a
door. The second-storey features new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete
header and concrete sill. The third-storey features four different window designs (1/1; single lite; and,
6/6) all with segmentally arched concrete header and concrete sill. The fourth-storey features six new
6/6 hung windows with flatheads and stone sills.
Interior
The interior of the original buildings feature: generous floor to ceiling heights; wood beams and flooring;
wood staircases; exposed structural columns and mechanical systems; freight elevators with wood
gates; and, metal fire separation doors with original weights and pulleys.
Historical/Associative Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
has historic/associative value due to its history and association with early settlement, the Six Nations,
Joseph Brant, Colonel Richard Beasley, Pennsylvanian German Mennonites, the first permanent non-
native settlement (now Kitchener), the German Company Tract, the Township of Waterloo, German
speaking immigrants, Berlin as the County seat for the County of Waterloo, the Grand Trunk Railway
(GTR) extension, the leather tanning industry, and Reinhold Lang. These values were extensively
documented in a Heritage Impact Assessment written by ERA Architects Inc. in 2008 and based on this
research are further described below.
The City of Kitchener was originally part of a large tract of more than 240,000 hectares of land granted
to the Six Nations by the British Crown in 1784. Between 1796 and 1798, the Six Nations led by Joseph
Brant sold off 38,000 hectares of land to Colonel Richard Beasley, a United Empire Loyalist. The land
now known as the City of Kitchener was located far inland and isolated from centres of commerce. As
a result, the land attracted the settlement of Pennsylvania German Mennonite farmers who were
attracted to the promise of inexpensive land and the guarantee of religious freedoms.
By the end of 1800, the first permanent non-native settlement was established in what is now the City
of Kitchener. Shortly after a group of Mennonites purchased all the unsold land from Beasley and
formed the German Company Tract (GCT). The GC
establishing a Pennsylvania Mennonite colony in Upper Canada.
In 1816 the GCT became the Township of Waterloo. This marked the beginning of steady migration of
German speaking Europeans to the area between the 1820s and 1870s. Population growth and
infrastructure improvements (e.g., road upgrades) helped establish the urban centre that became Berlin
(now Kitchener) in 1833. Twenty years later, in 1853, Berlin became the County seat for the County of
Waterloo and three years later the Grand Trunk Railway (GTR) was extended to Berlin. This opened
the area to future industrialization.
The skilled trades and industrial knowledge of t
Berlin from Baden, Germany. The Lang Tanning Company was founded in 1849. The business was
originally located at the northeast corner of King and Ontario Streets. This tannery made all classes of
leather required for saddlers and shoemakers. Unfortunately, this building was destroyed by fire in 1853.
Reinhold Lang rebuilt his business by purchasing a large piece of land at the corner of Francis and King
Streets. The property once featured several natural springs and a small creek that would provide a good
water supply for the tannery. His new single frame building was built on the corner of Charles and
Francis Streets and eventually grew into an industrial complex occupying nearly three city blocks. This
site reflects the organizational, technological, and market changes of the tanning industry.
Reinhold emerged as a prominent local resident as the industrial centre of Berlin continued to grow. In
1859, he was elected to Berlin Council where he was one of two businessmen proposing a motion for
inent and prosperous firms were aided by this policy.
st with the
passage of legislation. These families lived in the ward they represented, which contributed to an
enhanced sense of community. The Board not only supported industrial expansion, but it also
sponsored German cultural events throughout the late 1800s.
George W.) were also prominent figures in the community. In 1887, his son, John A. Lang built his home
at the northwest corner of Charles and Francis Streets to be close to the business in order to oversee
daily activities. His home was sold to company in 1897 to serve as offices until operations stopped in
1954. The home was demolished in the 1990s. Over the years, in addition to the tanning industry, the
Lang family was also involved in the insurance, banking, hydro and land use planning.
th
By the late 19 success has
been attributed to the industry and pride of the community. By 1904, the original Lang buildings started
to be replaced, expanded, or converted from frame to more permanent brick or iron construction. Berlin
It appears that some of the
changes to the
wartime supplies. World War One (WW1) caused anti-German sentiment, which resulted in the name
change to Kitchener, after a British General. During WW1, the Lang Tanning Co. became the largest
sole leather producer in the British Empire by producing huge amounts of saddle material. The Lang
Tanning Co. supplied sole leather and leather linings for aircraft gasoline tanks in World War Two
(WW2). Post WW2, modest changes to the complex were in the form of connections between buildings
to accommodate future uses. Operations declined after WW2 due to changes in the industry and in
1954 the company ceased operations as a tannery due to competition from synthetic materials. The 5-
acre site and, at the time, complex of 35 buildings continued to be owned by the Lang family until 1974.
When the company operations ceased
operating businesses (1849-1954).
Contextual Value
The contextual values relate to the contribution that the complex of buildings make to the continuity and
character of the adjacent streetscapes and the overall Warehouse District in the City of Kitchener. The
buildings are historically and visually linked to their surroundings, including: Lang Site Bwith the last
fully intact smokestack in Kitchener (designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act), other
industrial buildings, former homes of industrial workers (including homes in the Victoria Park Area
Heritage Conservation District, which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act), the
railway line, and the Warehouse District. The complex of buildings is recognized as a significant
landmark reflec the development and growth of
leather tanning industry, the relationship to and political leadership of the Lang
family, the hardworking German community in establishing Berlin (now Kitchener). as an industrial
centre, and the overall industrial development of the City of Kitchener (ERA Architects Inc., 2008).
Other Values
Economic Value
The property municipally addressed as 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N
has both historic- and present-day economic value. The historic/associative value section above
extensively details how the Lang Tannery Co., Reinhold Lang, and the Lang family supported the local
economy.
Ki
the evolution of the tanning industry. The site was rehabilitated and redeveloped in 2008 to support
ic development strategy focused on the creation
of an innovation district with high-tech companies. The Tannery boasts 306,564 square feet of office
space and 25, 810 square feet of retail uses. It is home to many innovated business and complimentary
uses such as restaurants and event space.
In 2011, The Tannery was awarded Mike Wagner Heritage Award in the category
of rehabilitation and adaptive reuse.
Heritage Attributes
The heritage value of 113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis St N resides in the
following heritage attributes:
All elements related to the design and physical value of the complex of Industrial Vernacular
buildings.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former administration building,
including:
o five-storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o segmentally arched window openings with brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 4/4 wood windows with segmentally arched brick voussiors and stone sills;
o new 4/4 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 4/4 flathead hung windows with stone sills
o 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 8-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o lionhead tie rods;
o decorative brickwork;
o
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former tan yard building, including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o new 12-pane flathead windows with stone sills;
o decorative brickwork; and,
o
.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former leach house building,
including:
o four storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows;
o window openings;
o former circular window openings with a brick surrounds; and,
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with stone lintels and stone sills.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former beam and storage house
building, including:
o three storey building height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 9/6 flat head hung windows with stone sills;
o
o two sets of clerestory windows with internal muntins reflecting a 6-lite design;
o exterior fire escape; and,
o metal tie rods.
All elements related to the design and physical value of the former production building,
including:
o four storey height;
o flat roof;
o buff brick;
o bays separated by brick pilasters;
o window openings;
o new 6/6 flat head hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o new 12-lite flathead windows segmentally arched brickwork and stone sills;
o 1/1 hung windows with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o 1-lite flathead window with segmentally arched brick voussoirs and stone sills;
o decorative brickwork;
o painted signTHE LANG TANNING CO. LIMITED. HARNESS & SOLE
LEATHER
o four-storey concrete addition, including:
concrete construction;
window openings with segmentally arched concrete headers and concrete sills;
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with segmentally arched concrete headersand
concrete sills; and,
new 6/6 flathead hung windows with concrete headers and concrete sills.
References
ERA Architects Inc. (2008). 36-50 Francis Street South Heritage Impact Assessment Lang Tanning
Co. A. ERA Architects Inc.: Toronto, Ontario.
Photographs
Aerial View of Lang Site A in the Foreground and Lang Site B in the Background
Front Elevation (North Façade) Former Administration and Tan Yard Buildings of the Lang
Tanning Co.
Front Elevation (North Façade) New Additions and the Former Leech House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Front Elevation (North Façade) Former Beam/Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (East Façade) Former Administration Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (East Façade) Former Production Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Side Elevation (West Façade) Former Beam and Storage House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade)
Side Elevation (West Façade) Former Tan Yard Building (left) and New Additions (right) of the
Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) Former Leach House of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) Former Production Building of the Lang Tanning Co.
Rear Elevation (South Façade) New Courtyard
CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM
P. Ciuciura
113-151 Charles St W/170-188 Joseph St/3-44 Francis
Address: Recorder:
Lang Tannery
March 11, 2023
Description: Date:
(date of construction, architectural style, etc)
Photographs Attached:
Front Facade Left Façade Right Façade Rear Facade Details Setting
Recorder Heritage Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff
Designation Criteria
Committee
1. This property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it is a rare,
unique,
representative or
early example of a
style, type,
expression, material
or construction
method.
2. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes
Yes
physical value
because it displays a
high degree of
craftsmanship or
artistic merit.
3. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
design value or
Yes Yes
physical value
because it
demonstrates a high
degree of technical or
Page 16 of 23
scientific
achievement.
* E.g. - constructed with a
unique material
combination or use,
incorporates challenging
geometric designs etc.
4. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it has direct
associations with a
theme, event, belief,
person, activity,
organization or
institution that is
significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
5. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it yields, or
has the potential to
yield, information
that contributes to an
understanding of a
community or
culture.
* E.g - A commercial
building may provide an
understanding of how the
economic development of
the City occured.
Additional archival work
may be required.
6. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
historical value or
Yes Yes
associative value
because it
demonstrates or
Page 17 of 23
reflects the work or
ideas of an architect,
artist, builder,
designer or theorist
who is significant to a
community.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
7. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes Yes
because it is
important in defining,
maintaining or
supporting the
character of an area.
* E.g. - It helps to define
an entrance point to a
neighbourhood or helps
establish the (historic)
rural character of an area.
8. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is
physically,
functionally, visually
or historically linked
to its surroundings.
* Additional archival work
may be required.
9. The property has
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No
contextual value
Yes
Yes
because it is a
landmark.
*within the region, city or
neighborhood.
Notes
The subject property (commonly referred to as Lang Site A) is visually and historically connected to the
adjacent property (commonly referred to as Lang Site B) as well as the adjacent neighbourhoods (e.g.,
Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District) where many tannery works lived.
Page 18 of 23
Additional Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee
Criteria
Interior: Is the
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
interior
Yes
arrangement,
finish,
craftsmanship
and/or detail
noteworthy?
Completeness:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
structure have
other original
outbuildings,
notable
landscaping or
external
features that
complete the
site?
Site Integrity:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does the
Yes
structure
occupy its
original site?
* If relocated, is it
relocated on its
original site,
moved from
another site, etc.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Does this
Yes
building retain
most of its
original
materials and
design
features?
Please refer to
the list of
heritage
attributes
within the
Page 19 of 23
Statement of
Significance
and indicate
which
elements are
still existing
and which
ones have
been
removed.
Alterations:
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
Are there
Yes
additional
elements or
features that
should be
added to the
heritage
attribute list?
Condition: Is
N/A Unknown No N/A Unknown No Yes
the building in
Yes
good
condition?
*E.g. - Could be a
good candidate
for adaptive re-
use if possible and
contribute
towards equity-
building and
climate change
action.
Indigenous
History: Could
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
this site be of
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
importance to
Indigenous
heritage and
history?
*E.g. - Site within
300m of water
sources, near
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
distinct
Page 20 of 23
topographical
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
land, or near
cemeteries might
have
archaeological
potential and
indigenous
heritage
potential.
Could there be
any urban
Indigenous
history
associated
with the
property?
* Additional
archival work may
be required.
Function:
Unknown Residential Unknown Residential Commercial
What is the
Commercial
Office Other ________________
present
Office Other -
function of the
________________
subject
property?
* Other may
include vacant,
social,
institutional, etc.
and important for
the community
from an equity
building
perspective.
Diversity and
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
Inclusion:
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
Does the
subject
property
contribute to
N/A Unknown No Yes N/A Unknown No Yes
the cultural
Additional Research Required Additional Research Required
heritage of a
community of
people?
Page 21 of 23
Does the
subject
property have
intangible
value to a
specific
community of
people?
* E.g.- Waterloo
Masjid (Muslim
Society of
Waterloo &
Wellington
Counties) was the
first established
Islamic Center
and Masjid in the
Region and
contributes to the
history of the
Muslim
community in the
area.
Notes about Additional Criteria Examined
Recommendation
Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it
be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the
designation criteria?)
N/A Unknown No Yes !
If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up
Page 22 of 23
Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register
Additional Research Required
Other:
General / Additional Notes
TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF:
Date of Property Owner Notification:
Page 23 of 23