Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHeritage Permit Application HPA-2024-V-020, 466 Queen Street South (Joesph Schneider Haus) New Window Opening and New Wood Windows on 1987 Gallery AdditionStaff Report Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: October 1, 2024 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-741-2200 ext. 7070 PREPARED BY: Michelle Drake, Senior Heritage Planner, 519-741-2200 ext. 7839 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: September 9, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2024-418 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-V-020 466 Queen Street South (Joseph Schneider Haus) New Window Opening and New Wood Windows on 1987 Gallery Addition RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-V-020 be approved to permit the installation of one new window opening and two new wood windows on the 1987 gallery addition to the rear of the Joseph Schneider Haus on the property municipally addressed as 466 Queen Street South, in accordance with the supplementary information submitted with the application, subject to the following condition: 1. That the final building permit drawings be reviewed, and heritage clearance provided by Heritage Planning staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to present Heritage Planning staff's recommendation for the proposed installation of one new window opening and two new wood windows on the 1987 gallery addition to the rear of the Joseph Schneider Haus at the subject property municipally addressed as 466 Queen Street South. The key finding of this report is that the installation of one new window opening and two new wood windows will not negatively impact the heritage attributes of the subject property, the Queen Street South streetscape, or the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District. Note that according to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the demolition of any building or structure, or part thereof, on the property requires Council approval. There are no financial implications associated with this report. Community engagement included consultation with the City's Heritage Kitchener committee. • This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2024-V-020 seeking permission to install one new window opening and two new wood windows on the 1987 gallery addition to the rear of the Joseph Schneider Haus at the subject property municipally addressed as 466 Queen Street South. 55,E Figure 1. Location Map The subject property is located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD), which is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The subject property is identified as a Group `A' building in the VPAHCD. In the VPAHCD Study, it was noted as "Kitchener's most historic building." The circa 1816 building is described as, "A 2 - storey Mennonite Georgian style frame side -gabled farmhouse with full -width verandah and later rear additions to accommodate its museum functions. Enclosed by a picket fence, it is an outstanding example of conservation." The VPAHCD Plan indicates that major work requires a Heritage Permit Application. The installation of one new window opening and two new wood windows on the 1987 gallery addition located to the rear of the Joseph Schneider Haus is considered major work. The subject property is also a National Historic Site that operates as a museum owned by the Region of Waterloo. The National Historic Site status is only a commemorative status, and it does not provide statutory protection. REPORT: The subject property is located on the west side of Queen Street South between Courtland Avenue East and Schneider Avenue, within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District (VPAHCD). The original Joseph Schneider Haus was constructed circa 1816 in the Mennonite Georgian architectural style while the gallery addition was constructed in 1987. In 2009, Council approved the Development and Technical Services DTS-09-143 staff report which identified the subject property as a property of very high cultural heritage value or interest (Group A). The applicant is proposing to install one new window opening and two new wood windows on the 1987 gallery addition located to the rear of the Joseph Schneider Haus. The VPAHCD Plan indicates that major work requires a Heritage Permit Application (HPA), notes that work that irreversibly changes the building's historic fabric is considered major work, and identifies increasing the window profile and sizes as an example of irreversible changes considered major work requiring a HPA. Figure 2. Location of New Window Openings and New Wood Windows The VPAHCD Plan outlines building conservation guidelines for windows. These guidelines note that 1. "The position, shape and design of windows establish the historic style and character of a building. " And 2. "The Georgian style window is the earliest style and usually consists of six over six sash within a wood frame." The proposed new window opening will be four (4) feet high by six (6) feet wide located two (2) feet about the finished floor level. The proposed new wood windows will be paired with each individual window being four (4) feet high by three (3) feet wide. The proposed new wood windows will match the existing windows of the 1987 gallery addition in terms of colour (white) and design (6/6 single hung window). �- ------------------- c ---------- r I ME -Mi u Figure 3. Design Detail for New Window Opening and New Wood Windows The Federal "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada" and the "Province's Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties" both address conservation principles and standards related to designing additions and alterations to be distinguishable/identifiable from the cultural heritage resource and its heritage attributes. These documents did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; however, thought was given to developing a physically and visually compatible addition in terms of location, massing, architecture, materials, and design details. Further, in the past, the mission/vision for the Joseph Schneider Haus focused on restoring, rehabilitating, and interpreting the property to the year 1856. As a result of the aforementioned information, it is the opinion of Heritage Planning staff that the new window opening, and the two new wood windows do not need to be distinguishable from old because in this case "old" refers to a non -original 1987 gallery addition where the proposed new window opening, and the proposed new wood windows will match those of the 1987 gallery addition. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The subject property is located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District and therefore designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act; • For several decades, the mission/vision for the Joseph Schneider Haus focused on restoring, rehabilitating, and interpreting the property to the year 1856: o The 1987 gallery addition was built prior to the passing of the 1996 designating by-law for the VPAHCD and was guided by the mission/vision; o The Federal "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada" did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; o The Province's "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties" did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; o The proposal to install a new window opening and new wood windows will match the existing window openings and the existing windows of the 1987 gallery addition; • The proposal is in keeping with the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan building conservation guidelines for windows; and, A r I ME -Mi u Figure 3. Design Detail for New Window Opening and New Wood Windows The Federal "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada" and the "Province's Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties" both address conservation principles and standards related to designing additions and alterations to be distinguishable/identifiable from the cultural heritage resource and its heritage attributes. These documents did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; however, thought was given to developing a physically and visually compatible addition in terms of location, massing, architecture, materials, and design details. Further, in the past, the mission/vision for the Joseph Schneider Haus focused on restoring, rehabilitating, and interpreting the property to the year 1856. As a result of the aforementioned information, it is the opinion of Heritage Planning staff that the new window opening, and the two new wood windows do not need to be distinguishable from old because in this case "old" refers to a non -original 1987 gallery addition where the proposed new window opening, and the proposed new wood windows will match those of the 1987 gallery addition. In reviewing the merits of this application, Heritage Planning Staff note the following: • The subject property is located within the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District and therefore designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act; • For several decades, the mission/vision for the Joseph Schneider Haus focused on restoring, rehabilitating, and interpreting the property to the year 1856: o The 1987 gallery addition was built prior to the passing of the 1996 designating by-law for the VPAHCD and was guided by the mission/vision; o The Federal "Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada" did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; o The Province's "Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties" did not exist when the 1987 gallery addition was built; o The proposal to install a new window opening and new wood windows will match the existing window openings and the existing windows of the 1987 gallery addition; • The proposal is in keeping with the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District Plan building conservation guidelines for windows; and, The proposal will not detract from the character of the property, the integrity of the Queen Street South streetscape, nor the Victoria Park Area Heritage Conservation District. In accordance with the Heritage Permit Application form, the approval of any application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and Zoning By-law. In this regard, staff confirm that a Building Permit is required to install a new window opening. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT — The Heritage Kitchener committee has been consulted regarding the Heritage Permit Application. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Heritage Permit Application HPA-2024-V-020 2024 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS �—� Development & Housing Approvals .L 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor MNER Kitchener ON N2G 4V6 519-741-2426; plan ning@kitchener.ca PART A: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 10 The following requirements are designed to assist applicants in submitting sufficient information in order thal their Heritage Permit Application may be deemed complete and processed as quickly and efficiently as possible. If further assistance or explanation is required please contact heritage planning staff at heritage(a)kitchener.ca. 1. WHAT IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The Province of Ontario, through the Ontario Heritage Act, has enacted legislation to assist its citizens with the protection and conservation of cultural heritage resources. Once properties are designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, the City is enabled to manage physical change to the cultural heritage resources as a means of protection. The principal mechanism of management is the Heritage Permit Application process, which allows the municipality to review site-specific applications and determine if proposed changes will beneficially or detrimentally affect the reasons for designation and heritage attributes. As a general rule, the preferred alterations to heritage properties are those that repair rather than replace original heritage attributes, and those that do not permanently damage cultural heritage resources and their heritage attributes. Where replacement of materials or new construction is necessary, these should be compatible with the original. Reversibility is also preferable as this allows for the future reinstatement of heritage attributes. According to the Ontario Heritage Act, no owner of designated property shall alter the property or permit the alteration of the property if the alteration is likely to affect the property's heritage attributes, unless the owner applies to the council of the municipality and receives written consent. This consent is obtained through the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Heritage Permit Applications are applicable for all individually designated properties (under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act) and all properties located within the boundaries of Heritage Conservation Districts (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act). 2. WHEN IS A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED? Under the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, any new construction or "alteration" to a property designated under Part IV of the Act (individually designated property) or a property designated under Part V of the Act (within a Heritage Conservation District) requires a Heritage Permit Application. "Alteration" is defined as: "to change in any manner and includes to restore, renovate, repair or disturb." In addition, the approval of a Heritage Permit Application is required for any demolition of a property designated under Part IV or V of the Act. Please contact Heritage Planning staff directly to confirm if your specific project requires the approval of a Heritage Permit Application. Below are some examples of typical Part IV alterations that may require a Heritage Permit Application: • Addition and/or alteration to an existing building or accessory building • Replacement of windows or doors, or a change in window or door openings • Change in siding, soffit, fascia or roofing material • Removal and/or installation of porches, verandahs and canopies • Removal and/or installation of cladding and chimneys • Changes in trim, cladding, or the painting of masonry Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 • Repointing of brick Page 2 of 10 Note: Heritage Permit Application requirements differ between Part V designations depending on the policies and guidelines of the respective Heritage Conservation District Plans. Please refer to the City of Kitchener's website at www.kitchener.ca/heritage to download a copy of the relevant Heritage Conservation District Plan (Civic Centre Neighbourhood, St. Mary's, Upper Doon, and Victoria Park Area). 3. WHAT INFORMATION IS REQUIRED WITH A HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? The information required varies with each application. The intent of the application is to ensure that Heritage Planning staff and, where required, the Heritage Kitchener committee understand the specific details of any proposed changes in order to be sufficiently informed so they may offer advice to the applicant and, where required, to City Council. An incomplete application cannot be processed and the official notice of receipt (as required under the Ontario Heritage Act) will not be issued until all of the documents have been submitted. Failure to provide a complete application may result in deferral by Heritage Planning staff or the Heritage Kitchener committee in order to secure additional information, which will delay final approval. At minimum, the following information is required: Heritage Permit Application Form The applicant must provide a complete original copy, including signature of the owner, of the Heritage Permit Application Form. Written Description The applicant must provide a complete written description of all proposed work. The description should complement drawings, detailed construction plans, photos and any other sketches or supporting information submitted with the application. The written description must include a list and the details of all proposed work including, but not limited to, proposed colours, materials, sizes, etc. Construction and Elevation Drawings Along with construction elevation drawings (drawn to scale) the applicant may also, but not in lieu of, submit a sketch of the proposed work made over a photograph. Drawings must be drawn to scale and include: a) Overall dimensions b) Site plan depicting the location of existing buildings and the location of any proposed new building or addition to a building c) Elevation plan for each elevation of the building d) Specific sizes of building elements of interest (signs, windows, awnings, etc.) e) Detailed information including trim, siding, mouldings, etc., including sizes and profiles f) Building materials to be used (must also be included in the written description) g) Construction methods and means of attachment (must also be included in the written description) Some of the above components may be scoped or waived at the discretion of Heritage Planning staff following discussion with the applicant. Photographs Photographs of the building including general photos of the property, the streetscape in which the property is located, facing streetscape and, if the property is located at an intersection, all four corners. Photos of the specific areas that may be affected by the proposed alteration, new construction, or demolition must be included. Electronic copies of construction and elevation drawings, sketches, and photographs, along with hard copies submitted with the application, are encouraged. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 Samples Page 3 of 10 It is recommended that applicants bring samples of the materials to be used to the Heritage Kitchener meeting when their application is to be considered. This may include a sample of the windows, brick, siding, roofing material, as well as paint chips to identify proposed paint colours. Other Required Information In some circumstances Heritage Planning staff may require additional information, such as a Heritage Impact Assessment or Conservation Plan, to support the Heritage Permit Application. The requirement for additional information will be identified as early on in the Heritage Permit Application process as possible. Pre - consultation with Heritage Planning staff before formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application is strongly encouraged. 4. WHAT CAN I DO IF MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION IS DENIED? City of Kitchener Heritage Planning staff and the Heritage Kitchener committee endeavour to come to solutions for every Heritage Permit Application submitted. Discussions with the applicant and revisions usually result in successful applications. However, if the municipality refuses your application and you choose not to resolve the issue with a revised application, you have the option of appealing the decision to the Conservation Review Board (for alterations to designated properties under Part IV) or the Ontario Municipal Board (for demolition of property designated under Part IV or for any work to designated property under Part V). 5. IMPORTANT NOTES Professional Assistance Although it is not a requirement to obtain professional assistance in the preparation of this information, the applicant may wish to seek such assistance from an architect, architectural technologist, draftsperson or others familiar with the assessment of buildings and the gathering together of building documents. Building Codes and Other By-laws It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure compliance with all other applicable legislation, regulations and by-laws. These items include the Ontario Building and Fire Codes, and the City's zoning and property standards by-laws. 2024 Heritage Permit Application Submission Deadlines 2024 Heritage Kitchener Meeting Dates November 24, 2023 January 9, 2024 December 29, 2023 February 6, 2024 January 26, 2024 March 5, 2024 February 23, 2024 April 2, 2024 March 29, 2024 May 7, 2024 April 26, 2024 June 4, 2024 - No July Meeting June 28, 2024 August 61 2024 July 26, 2024 September 3, 2024 August 23, 2024 October 1, 2024 September 27, 2024 November 5, 2024 - No December Meeting Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 Page 4 of 10 6. HOW DO I PROCEED WITH SUBMITTING MY HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION? a) Heritage Planning Staff are available to meet with applicants and review all documentation prior to formal submission. Often Heritage Planning staff can assist you with historical and architectural information that might help with your proposed changes. b) Formal submission of a Heritage Permit Application with all supporting documentation (written description, construction drawings, sketch plans, scale drawing, photographs) to Heritage Planning staff are due approximately five (5) weeks prior to a Heritage Kitchener meeting (see schedule for submission deadlines and committee meeting dates). c) Upon confirmation of the submission of a complete application, including the owner's signature and all supporting documentation, Heritage Planning staff will issue a Notice of Receipt, as required by the Ontario Heritage Act, to the Applicant. d) Heritage Planning staff determine whether the Heritage Permit Application may be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and/or Council. Where Heritage Permit Applications can be processed under delegated authority approval without the need to go to Heritage Kitchener and Council, Heritage Planning staff will endeavour to process the application within 10 business days. e) Where Heritage Permit Applications are required to go to Heritage Kitchener, Heritage Planning staff prepare a staff Report based on good conservation practice and the designating by-law, or the guidelines and policies in the Heritage Conservation District Plan. Preparation of the staff Report may require a site inspection. f) Heritage Kitchener Meeting Agenda, including staff Report, circulated to Committee members prior to Heritage Kitchener meeting. Staff Report circulated to applicant prior to meeting. g) Heritage Permit Application is considered at Heritage Kitchener meeting. Heritage Planning staff present staff Report and Recommendations to Heritage Kitchener. Applicants are encouraged to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting in order to provide clarification and answer questions as required. Failure to attend the Heritage Kitchener meeting may result in a deferral in order to secure additional information, which would delay consideration of the Heritage Permit Application. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff, and Heritage Kitchener support the Heritage Permit Application, the application may be processed under delegated authority and approved by the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning. Where the applicant, Heritage Planning staff and/or Heritage Kitchener do not support the Heritage Permit Application, the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation will be forwarded to Council for final decision. h) Where the staff report with recommendation and Heritage Kitchener recommendation are forward to Council for final decision, Council may: 1. Approve the Heritage Permit Application; 2. Approve the Heritage Permit Application on Terms and Conditions; or, 3. Refuse the Heritage Permit Application. i) Within 30 days of receiving Notice of Council's Decision, the applicant may appeal the decision and/or terms and conditions to the Conservation Review Board or Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT). 7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DESIGNATED PROPERTY Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should indicate an understanding of the reasons for designation and heritage attributes of the designated property and, if applicable, the surrounding area, including the following: Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 Page 5 of 10 Setting 1. Positioning of the heritage building or structure on the property 2. Lot size related to building size 3. Streetscape (relationship to other properties and structures on the street) Building Details 1. Proportion and massing 2. Roof type and shape 3. Materials and detailing 4. Windows and doors: • Style • Proportions • Frequency or placement 5. Relationship of the heritage building to other buildings on the lot and to the streetscape Heritage Attributes The following applies where a Heritage Permit Application includes work on heritage attributes: Windows and Doors The applicant should consider in order of priority: 1. Repairing or retrofitting the existing units (information on how to make older windows more energy efficient is available from Heritage Planning staff) 2. Replacing the units with new units matching the originals in material, design, proportion and colour 3. Replacing the units with new units that are generally in keeping with the original units If historic window units are proposed to be replaced the application should include the following: • Description of the condition of the existing units • Reasons for replacing the units • Description of the proposed new units If approval to replace historic window units is given, the following action should be considered: • A sample of a window removed should be stored on site in case a future owner wishes to construct a replica of the original • The masonry opening and/or door framing should not be disturbed • Exterior trim should match the original Roofing The application should include: • Description of proposed roofing material to be applied • If there is a request to install a different roofing material, the applicant may wish to investigate what the original material might have been Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 Page 6 of 10 Masonry Work The application should include: A description of the proposed work, materials (type/style of brick, type of mortar mix, etc.) and methods of repair and application • Outline the reasons for the work Signage The application should include: • A general written description of the proposed signage to be installed A scale drawing of the signage with dimensions, materials, methods of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between historic masonry units or into wood building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable Awnings The application should include: • A sketch view of the proposed awning — perhaps over a photo A scale drawing of the awning on the building with dimensions, materials, operating mechanism, method of construction, colours and means of attachment (the means of attachment should be arranged to anchor into joints between masonry units or into wooden building elements) • Type of illumination, if applicable. 8. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR DEMOLITION Information presented in the Heritage Permit Application should describe the existing conditions, including the existing setting and existing heritage attributes, of the designated property and the surrounding area, specifically as they relate to the building proposed for demolition. The Heritage Permit Application should provide a detailed rationale for the demolition, including an assessment of the current condition of the building, and a cost comparison identifying the difference in cost to repair and restore the building versus cost to demolish and construct a new building. 9. HERITAGE CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES The Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work (e.g., alteration, new construction or demolition) is consistent with the designating by-law for individual properties (Part IV) or the Heritage Conservation District Plan for properties within a Heritage Conservation District (Part V designation). In addition, the Heritage Permit Application must demonstrate how the proposed work is consistent with the Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (available at www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx). For more information on Heritage Planning in the City of Kitchener please contact our heritage planning staff at heritage(o-)-kitchener.ca. Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION & SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS �—� Development & Housing Approvals .L 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor MNER Kitchener ON N2G 4V6 519-741-2426; plan ning@kitchener.ca STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Accepted By: Application Number: H PA - PART B: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 1. NATURE OF APPLICATION ❑ Exterior ❑ Demolition 2. SUBJECT PROPERTY Municipal Address: ❑ Interior ❑ Signage ❑ New Construction ® Alteration 466 Queen Street S., Kitchener, ON, N2G 1W7 Legal Description (if know): Schneider Haus National Historic Site Page 7 of 10 ❑ Relocation Building/Structure Type: ❑ Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial ® Institutional Heritage Designation: ❑ Part IV (Individual) ® Part V (Heritage Conservation District) Is the property subject to a Heritage Easement or Agreement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 3. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Stephen Key, Region of Waterloo Address: 150 Frederick Street City/Province/Postal Code: Kitchener, Ontario, N2H 21-9 Phone: 226-749-0113 Email: skey@regionofwaterloo.ca 4. AGENT (if applicable) Name: Kelvin Lugo Company: Greystone Design Inc. Address: 156 King Street, East City/Province/Postal Code: Cambridge, ON, N3H 3M4 Phone: 519-896-1010 Email: kelvin.lugo@greystoneinc.ca Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 5. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION Page 8 of 10 Provide a written description of the project including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. See attached document 6. REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: See attached document Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: See attached document Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (www.historicplaces.ca/en/pages/standards-normes.aspx): See attached document 7. PROPOSED WORKS Sept, 2024 October, 2024 a) Expected start date: Expected completion date: b) Have you discussed this work with Heritage Planning Staff? M Yes ❑ No - If yes, who did you speak to? Michelle Drake c) Have you discussed this work with Building Division Staff? - If yes, who did you speak to? Jennifer Young ® Yes ❑ No d) Have you applied for a Building Permit for this work? ® Yes ❑ No e) Other related Building or Planning applications Application number, #24 119399 Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Page 9 of 10 The undersigned acknowledges that all of the statements contained in documents filed in support of this application shall be deemed part of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that receipt of this application by the City of Kitchener - Planning Division does not guarantee it to be a `complete' application. The undersigned acknowledges that the Council of the City of Kitchener shall determine whether the information submitted forms a complete application. Further review of the application will be undertaken and the owner or agent may be contacted to provide additional information and/or resolve any discrepancies or issues with the application as submitted. Once the application is deemed to be fully complete, the application will be processed and, if necessary, scheduled for the next available Heritage Kitchener committee and Council meeting. Submission of this application constitutes consent for authorized municipal staff to enter upon the subject property for the purpose of conducting site visits, including taking photographs, which are necessary for the evaluation of this application. The undersigned acknowledges that where an agent has been identified, the municipality is authorized but not required to contact this person in lieu of the owner and this person is authorized to act on behalf of the owner for all matters respecting the application. The undersigned agrees that the proposed work shall be done in accordance with this application and understands that the approval of this application under the Ontario Heritage Act shall not be a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation including but not limited to the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning By-law. The undersigned acknowledges that in the event this application is approved, any departure from the conditions imposed by the Council of the City of Kitchener or from the plans or specifications approved by the Council of the City of Kitchener is prohibited and could result in a fine being imposed or imprisonment as provided for under the Ontario Heritage Act. Signature of Owner/Agent: �� K Date: Aug 22, 2024 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: 9. AUTHORIZATION If this application is being made by an agent on behalf of the property owner, the following authorization must be completed: I / We, Stephen Key, Region of Waterloo owner of the land that is subject of this application, hereby authorize Greystone inc to act on my / our behalf in this regard. Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: Aug 22, 2024 Signature of Owner/Agent: Date: The personal information on this form is collected under the legal authority of Section 33(2), Section 42(2), and Section 42(2.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The information will be used for the purposes of administering the Heritage Permit Application and ensuring appropriate service of notice of receipt under Section 33(3) and Section 42(3) of the Ontario Heritage Act. If you have any questions about this collection of personal information, please contact the Manager of Corporate Records, Legislated Services Division, City of Kitchener (519-741-2769). Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community 2024 Application Number: Application Received: Application Complete: Notice of Receipt: Notice of Decision: 90 -Day Expiry Date: PROCESS: ❑ Heritage Planning Staff: ❑ Heritage Kitchener: ❑ Council: STAFF USE ONLY Working together • Growing thoughtfully • Building community Page 10 of 10 G Greystone Cambridge Toronto Edmonton 154 King St. East 522 Mount Pleasant 12227 107 Ave, Unit 200 Cambridge, ON N3H 3M4 Road, Suite 200 Edmonton, AB T5M 1Y9 T: (519) 896-1010 Toronto, ON M4S 2M3 T: (780) 652-1648 info@greystoneinc.ca. T: (416) 440-0058 www.g reystonei nc.ca August 22, 2024 Schneider Haus National Historic Site 466 Queen Street South Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1W7 Attn.: Development & Housing Approvals Heritage Permit Application & Submission 200 King Street West, 6t" Floor Kitchener, Ontario N2G 4V6 To whom it may concern, This letter is in additional submission to the noted Heritage Permit Application & Submission Requirements dated August 23rd, 2024 on the above noted project. Our response for each of the items is as follows: ITEM #5 WRITTEN DESCRIPTION' Provide a written description of the project, including any conservation methods proposed. Provide such detail as materials to be used, measurements, paint colours, decorative details, whether any original building fabric is to be removed or replaced, etc. Use additional pages as required. Please refer to the City of Kitchener Heritage Permit Application Submission Guidelines for further direction. Comment: The proposed work involves alteration to the existing Schneider Haus National Historic Site. The proposed alteration includes partial removal of the existing exterior wall in order to satisfy a new opening for provided window. This alteration is designed to retain all existing physical elements of the building and match existing window characteristics and colour selection. The proposed work is comprised of demolition and installation including: • Remove existing portion of exterior non -load bearing wall with rough opening size of (4'- 0"H and 6'-0"W at 2'-0" above finished floor). • Maintain existing power outlet below. • Dispose of existing construction & existing materials. • Patch and repair adjacent walls to match existing construction and exterior finish • Patch and repair any damaged floor and ceiling to match existing construction. • Place new 3'-0"W x 4'-0"H single hung window mounted at 2'-0" from finished floor. Greystone is a Division of Greystone Design Group Inc. Building Permit Page 1 of 4 • Place new window frame on interior side of building. • Wall to be re -painted after window installation. • Spray foam to fill necessary gaps. • Place new flashing to the rough opening on the exterior with new sill, jamb and Blueskin type membrane to tie into air barrier. • Exterior trim colour to match existing window trims throughout the building. The proposed construction of the window assembly wall will be as followed • Existing top and bottom plate within the wall assembly to remain. • Cut into existing 2x6 wood studs and toe nail into new lintel. • Built-up new lintel consisting of (3) 2x8 plywood & (2) 1/2" plywood spacers. • Existing sheathing to be refastened to new framing from outside with (2) 1/2" common wire nails. • Built-up (2) 2x6 jack studs & (2) 2x6 king studs either side of opening. • Cut into existing 2x6 wood studs and install new built-up (2) 2x6 plywood sill on top. See Appendix A for photographs of existing conditions & Appendix B for detailed drawings of proposed work. ITEM #6 REVIEW OF CITY OF KITCHENER HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMISSION GUIDELINES' Describe why it is necessary to undertake the proposed work: Comment: The proposed work is necessary to bring natural outdoor light inside to the existing use of an institutional children's classroom. The current lack of windows in this space does not bring enough ample lighting for the space's use. Describe how the proposal is consistent with the part IV individual designating by-law or the Part V Heritage Conservation District Plan: Comment: The proposed work will carry out the consistency in keeping the original architectural farmhouse style of the building by allowing for minimal style adjustment. The new double placed single - hung window will be wood configured which will tie into the building's 19 -century vernacular design including its rectangular massing, modified neo-classical exterior design and detailing with pitched roof, and large verandah. Evidence of heavy -timber construction and wood finishing materials throughout the building defines the proposed selection of the new window. It is proposed that the city can select a colour from the different colour options provided by the window distributor. Describe how the proposal is consistent with Parks Canada's Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. Greystone is a Division of Greystone Design Group Inc. Building Permit Page 2 of 4 Comment: The design approach involves minimal intervention and in conjunction to Part 3: The Standards for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada; by taking into consideration of recognizing the historic importance and maintaining the character -defining elements by using standard materials. Indicated in part 4.3.5 of the standards and guidelines, statement shows that windows are integral to the exterior wall assembly and in addition to their function — providing light, views, and fresh air. The proposed work will consist of longevity assembling parts containing weatherstripping, adjusting hardware, sealed openings, joints, and energy efficiency. Protecting adjacent character -defining elements from accidental damage will be crucial during construction work. See attached Appendix A & Appendix B for photographs and documented drawings of the proposed work. We trust that these satisfy the comments & application requirements. Please do not hesitate to contact should you have any further questions. Kelvin Lugo Intermediate Architectural Technologist kelvin.luao@arevstoneinc.ca Stefano Racco Key Account Manager stefa n o. ra cco @ a reysto n e i n c. ca Greystone is a Division of Greystone Design Group Inc. Building Permit Page 3 of 4 Appendix A (Photographs of existing building & characteristics) Greystone is a Division of Greystone Design Group Inc. Building Permit Page 4 of 4 � $133818■llna f f m : � ® 2 4-01XI � $133818■llna f f m : � ® < \ - j C) f ƒ srm ) ` \ \ ;9 is \}\\\\,\�/ _ ;F�- y\�� \( �- - - - ---------- - - - �\ � / ƒ \ C) 0 �� o w w _ o W z N NO,Ella a a€F ■ n -EE _ - M M 3€ G a 0 0 0v 0 0 0~ (� en ------------ mA girls girls a e osm� i m X r) e Z g LU e¢y e91 a_