Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCA Agenda - 2025-02-18 Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Ella Francis, Student Planner, 519-783-8602 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: February 5, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-060 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-005 42 Hillcrest Lane RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-005 for 42 Hillcrest Lane requesting relief from Section 5.4, Table 5-2 of Zoning By-law 2019-051, to permit a driveway to be located 0.6 metres from a side lot line instead of the minimum required 1.2 metres, to facilitate a driveway widening to improve functionality of the driveway, BE APPROVED, subject to the following condition: 1. That the Owner provide payment to the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) in the amount of $300 for their Review fee of the Minor Variance Application. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review the minor variance application to permit a driveway to be located 0.6 metres from a side lot line instead of the minimum required 1.2 metres to facilitate a driveway widening to improve functionality of the driveway There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the east side of Hillcrest Lane, near the intersection of Hillcrest Lane and Woolwich Street, in the Bridgeport West neighbourhood. Figure 1 Location of subject property (outlined in RED) Community Areas Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential Low Rise Residential Two Zone (RES-2-law 2019- 051. The purpose of the application is to widen the existing driveway to be setback 0.6 metres from the side lot line instead of the required 1.2 metres. The existing driveway has a gravel section on the southmost side (see Figure 2). This variance would allow the gravel section to be paved to improve the functionality of the driveway (see Figure 3). Figure 2 Site Plan showing existing driveway with gravel section. Figure 3 Site Plan showing proposed widened driveway. Planning staff conducted a site visit on January 31, 2025. Figure 4 View of 42 Hillcrest Lane from the street. REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan intent of this designation is to encourage a range of different housing to achieve a low rise built form in the neighbourhood. Specifically, Section 13.C.8.4 of the Official Plan states: f) to result in aesthetically acceptable parking areas which blend into the general Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed widened driveway would blend into the streetscape and surrounding environment. The appearance of the driveway would not be significantly changed by paving the gravel section. Therefore, the requested variance meets the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law Section 5.4, Table 5-2 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 states that a driveway shall be no closer to the side lot line than the required side yard setback. This ensures that vehicles and their access do not encroach upon adjacent properties. Staff note that the gravel section of the existing driveway does not encroach onto the neighbouring property, and paving this section of the driveway will not present any encroachment issues. Section 5.4, Table 5-2 further states that the maximum width of a driveway with an attached private garage is the width of the garage or 50% of the lot width. As well, Section 5.4 f) states that no driveway shall exceed 8 metres in width. The proposed widened driveway would be in line with these requirements of the Zoning By-Law. Therefore, the proposed variance maintains the general intent of the Zoning By-Law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? The proposed variance will allow an existing gravel section of the driveway to be paved. As a result of this, staff anticipate only minor changes to the appearance and function of the driveway. Staff do not anticipate any significant or adverse impacts as a result of the driveway widening. Therefore, the effects of the proposed variance are minor in nature. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The proposed variance is desirable and appropriate for the use of the land because it will improve the functioning of the driveway. The proposed variance will bring the lower portion of the driveway in alignment with the upper paved portion. Therefore, the proposed variance is desirable and appropriate for the use of the land. Environmental Planning Comments: No environmental comments or concerns. I can advise that a portion of the property is regulated by the Grand River Conservation Authority (Reg 41/24) and a permit may be required to widen the driveway. Heritage Planning Comments: No concerns. However, the applicant is advised that the subject property is located adjacent to the Walter Bean Trail Cultural Heritage Landscape. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance. Engineering Division Comments: No concerns. Parks and Cemeteries/Forestry Division Comments: No requirements. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. GRCA Comments: GRCA has reviewed this application under the Mandatory Programs and Services Regulation (Ontario Regulation 686/21), including acting on behalf of the Province regarding natural hazards identified in Section 5.2 of the Provincial Planning Statement (PPS, 2024), as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 41/24, and as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Information currently available at this office indicates that the subject property contains an erosion hazard associated with the Grand River. The property also contains the regulated attached. Due to the presence of the above-noted features, most of the subject property is regulated by the GRCA under Ontario Regulation 41/24 Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits Regulation. Any future development or other alteration within the regulated area will require prior written approval from GRCA in the form of a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 41/24. It is understood that the proposed minor variance application requests a reduced driveway setback from the southerly side lot line to permit a wider driveway. The driveway expansion is minor and we do not anticipate impacts to the erosion hazard as a result of the proposed development. As such, the GRCA has no objection to the approval of this minor variance application. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM This of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises interested part Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025 via email GRCA File: A2025-005 42 Hillcrest Lane Marilyn Mills City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4O7 Dear Marilyn Mills, Re: Application for Minor Variance A 2025-005 42 Hillcrest Lane, City of Kitchener Robert Saunders Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted minor variance application. Recommendation The GRCA has no objection to the proposed minor variance application. GRCA Comments GRCA has reviewed this application under the Mandatory Programs and Services Regulation (Ontario Regulation 686/21), including acting on behalf of the Province regarding natural hazards identified in Section 5.2 of the Provincial Planning Statement (PPS, 2024), as a regulatory authority under Ontario Regulation 41/24, and as a public body under the Planning Act as per our CA Board approved policies. Information currently available at this office indicates that the subject property contains an erosion hazard associated with the Grand River. The property also contains the regulated allowance adjacent to the erosion hazard. mapping is attached. Due to the presence of the above-noted features, most of the subject property is regulated by the GRCA under Ontario Regulation 41/24 Prohibited Activities, Exemptions and Permits Regulation. Any future development or other alteration within the regulated area will require prior written approval from GRCA in the form of a permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 41/24. It is understood that the proposed minor variance application requests a reduced driveway setback from the southerly side lot line to permit a wider driveway. The driveway expansion is minor and we do not anticipate impacts to the erosion hazard as a result of the proposed development. As such, the GRCA has no objection to the approval of this minor variance application. review of this application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 519-621-2763 ext. 2228 or aherreman@grandriver.ca. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman, CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority Copy:Robert Saunders(via email) Author: ah Date: Jan 24, 2025 Legend Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Adiva Saadat, Planner, 519-783-7658 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: February 7, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-059 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-006 19 Carlin Avenue RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-006 for 19 Carlin Avenue requesting relief from the following sections of Zoning By-law 2019-051: i) Section 4.14.4 to permit a deck to be located 2.3 metres from the rear lot instead of the minimum required 4 metres; and ii) Section 7.3, Table 7-2, to permit a rear yard setback of 4.4 metres instead of the minimum required 7.5 metres; to facilitate the development of 2 Additional Dwelling Units (ADU) (Attached) in the existing Single Detached Dwelling generally in accordance with drawings prepared by Vesselin Vassilev, dated January 6, 2025, BE APPROVED. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review a minor variance application to permit the development of 2 attached additional dwelling units with a reduced rear yard setback. The key finding of this report is that the requested minor variance meets all four tests of the Planning Act. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property s website with the agenda in advance of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the north-eastside of Carlin Avenueand DixonStreet. It is in the Rockwayneighbourhood which is primarily comprised of low-rise residential uses. Figure 1: Location Map 19 Carlin Avenue(Outlined in Red) Community AreasUrban Structure and is Low Rise Residential Low Rise Residential TwoZone (RES-2-law2019- 051. The purpose of the application is to review minor variances to recognize the location of the existing building and deckto permit the development of 2 attached Additional Dwelling Units (ADU) (Attached) within the existing Single Detached Dwelling. Under the previous Zoning By-law 85-1the front lot line for a corner lot could be either lot line abutting a street. The single detached dwelling was constructed on the lot using Carlin Avenue as the front lot line. "Front Lot Line" means the lot line abutting a street with the following exceptions: b)in the case of a corner lot containing or proposed to contain a single detached, semi-detached or duplex dwelling, any lot line abutting a street except a lot line forming part of a corner visibility triangle, may be deemed to be the front lot line, only for the purpose of determining front, sideand rear yard requirements. The area now considered the rear yard was classified as an interior side yard because the front lot line was abutting the street Carlin Avenue. However, under the current Zoning By-law 2019-051, the front lot line on a corner lot cannot be either lot line and is instead defined as the shorter lot line abutting a street, which is Dixon Street. Lot Line, Front means the lot line abutting a street with the following exceptions: a) in the case of a corner lot, the shorter lot line abutting a street, not including the lot line forming part of a corner visibility triangle, shall be the front lot line. Where such lot lines are of equal length, the City may deem any of the lot lines abutting a street as the front lot line. As a result, the lot line farthest and opposite to the front lot line is now considered the rear lot line; therefore, the rear yard. This change has resulted in non-compliance with the rear yard setback. Therefore, minor variances are being requested to address the revised setback requirement to facilitate the conversion of the Single Detached Dwelling to a Triplex use. Variance for 2.3m deck Variance for 4.4 m rear yard setback Figure 2: Requested Variances Site Plan st Figure 3: Existing 1 Floor Plan st Figure 4: Proposed 1 Floor Plan Figure 5: Existing Basement Floor Plan Figure 6: Proposed Basement Floor Plan Planning Staff conducted a site visit on January 30, 2025 Figure 7: Existing Site Conditions as of January 30, 2025 Figure 8: Rear Yard of the Property Under By-Law 2019-051 REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan This designation emphasizes the importance of ensuring compatibility in building form with regard to massing, scale, and design, to facilitate the successful integration of diverse housing types while maintaining the low-density character of the neighbourhood. Policy 4.C.1.23 permit up to 3 additional dwelling units subject to meeting any other applicable policies in the Plan and zoning regulations. 4.C.1.23. The City may permit up to three additional dwelling units, attached and/or detached, on a lot which contains a single detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling or a street-townhouse dwelling as the principal use, unless otherwise limited by the policies of this Plan, and in accordance with the City's Zoning By-law, in order to provide additional housing options to Kitchener homeowners and residents. The proposed use of the property will conform to the Official Plan. Staff is in opinion that requested variances to be able to develop 2 Additional Dwelling Units (ADU)(Attached) within the existing Single Detached Dwelling meets the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The general intent of the rear yard setback requirement is to ensure adequate spacing on the property for open space and amenity area for the residents. The existing dwelling was developed in accordance with Zoning By-law 85-1 and met all the required setbacks. The existing rear yard setback of 4.4 metres will continue to function as an interior side yard and provide sufficient separation between the properties for access and air circulation. Additionally, the absence of windows on the left (north) side of the property prevents overlook and maintains the privacy of the neighbouring properties. The property maintains sufficient usable backyard space that was created under Zoning By-law 85-1. Therefore, Staff are of the opinion that the proposed variances meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? The reduced setback is minor in nature as the proposed additional dwelling units will be located within the existing structure with no exterior modifications which ensures any changes remain invisible from the streetscape. The appearance will remain compatible with adjacent viewpoints and visually consistent with its surroundings. Given that the existing built form remains unchanged, the existing setbacks will not negatively impact the neighbouring properties or the streetscape. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable for The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? Planning staff is of the opinion that the variances are desirable for the appropriate development of the lands. Recognizing the location of the existing building and deck will allow for the construction of two additional dwelling units within the existing building and Pledge. Environmental Planning Comments: No comments or concerns. Heritage Planning Comments: No comments or concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permit for the two attached additional dwelling units is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division at building@kitchener.ca with any questions. Engineering Division Comments: No comments or concerns. Parks and Cemeteries/Forestry Division Comments: Advisory comment: There are three existing City-owned Street trees within the boulevards on Carlin Avenue and Dixon Street and these trees should be protected to City standards throughout construction as per Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law. Transportation Planning Comments: No comments or concerns. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises i Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Eric Schneider, Senior Planner, 519-783-8918 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: February 6, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-073 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-007 864 King Street West RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-073 for 864 King Street West requesting relief from Section 19, Site-Specific Provision (415) e) of Zoning By-law 2019-051, to permit the physical separation of the 7th storey of a proposed multiple dwelling to be setback from the east property line 3.1 metres instead of the minimum required 4.2 metres to facilitate the development of the site with a 45 storey building in accordance with Site Plan Application SP24/069/K/ES, BE APPROVED. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review a Minor Variance Application to facilitate the development of the subject lands with a 45 storey multiple residential building. The key finding of this report is that the requested variance meets the 4 tests of the Planning Act. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property s website with the agenda in advance of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the northeast corner of King Street West and Pine Street. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. The subject property is identified as a Protected Major Transit Station Area Strategic Growth Area C Land Use in the -law Amendment to Zoning By-law 2019-051 is currently both Zoning By-law 85-1 and Zoning By-law 2019-051 are in effect. The property is zoned High Intensity Mixed Use Corridor Zone (MU-3) in Zoning By-law 85-1, and Growth Zone (SGA--law 2019-051. Figure 1 Location Map: 864 King Street West The purpose of the application is to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands with a 45- storey tower. The applicant is proposing to develop the lands with a 45-storey multiple dwelling building. -phase build- th out of the lands. On October 28, 2024, the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee approved Zoning By-law Amendment application ZBA24/022/K/ES. The application was to th be ratified at the following City Council Meeting on November 18, 2024. At the November th 18, 2024 Council Meeting, the applicant requested changes to the concept based on building structural needs that resulted in changes to the site specific zoning provision requested as part of the Zoning By-law Amendment. City Council approved the changes requested by the applicant. Through review of the subsequent Site Plan Application (SP24/069/K/ES), Staff determined that a request for reduction in physical separation of the east property line was not included in the requested changes to Council, and relief from Zoning is required. Site Plan Application SP24/069/K/ES is currently under review. Figure 2 Location Map: View of Site from King Street West (January 29, 2025) Figure 3 Site Plan Drawing Figure 4 Site Plan Drawing (requested variance shown) REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan generally centrally located within Intensification Areas and/or represent redevelopment opportunities at higher density. The request for a reduction in physical separation for the th 7 storey of the parking podium facilitates the redevelopment of the lands with high density and achieves the intent of the Official Plan designation. Planning Staff are of the opinion that the proposed development meets the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The requirements for physical separation are intended to control the massing and building placement of development and redevelopment, to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to surrounding lands, and that the redevelopment potential of abutting lands is not frustrated or compromised by development of the subject lands. The requested variance for a reduction in physical separation is for a portion of the building used as parking garage and will not contain dwelling units and balconies like in the tower portion of the building. Staff anticipate this will result in lesser impacts in regards to privacy, overlook, and sufficient physical separation. The requested variance for physical separation is only th applicable to the 7 storey (top floor) of the parking podium, as the first 6 storeys comply to current zoning. Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance meets the general intent of the Zoning By-law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? Staff note that the as-of-right permissions for the subject property allow for the first 6 floors of the structure to have a 0 metre interior side yard (Section 6.6 a), vii)), as the subject lands are on a Priority Street (King Street) in Appendix G of Zoning By-law 2019-051. The th requested variance is for the 7 storey only, which will be used as a parking structure. Planning Staff are of the opinion that the effects of the variance are minor. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The subject lands are zoned and designated for high density development and the requested variance will facilitate the redevelopment of the lands for high density use. Planning Staff are of the opinion that the variance is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the land. Environmental Planning Comments: Environmental comments being addressed through Site Plan Application SP24/069/K/ES. Heritage Planning Comments: No heritage concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance. Engineering Division Comments: No Engineering concerns. Parks and Cemeteries/Forestry Division Comments: Park Planning concerns including any street tree protection or required park dedication will be addressed through Site Plan application SP24/069/K/ES. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 85-1 and 2019-051 DSD-2024-467 (ZBA24/022/K/ES) ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Site Plan Drawings January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Tim Seyler, Senior Planner, 519-783-8920 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: February 5, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-058 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-008 1035 Ottawa St. N. RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-008 for 1035 Ottawa Street North requesting relief of the following Sections of Zoning By-law 2019-051: i) Section 4.14.3 to permit a canopy to be ground supported, project 1.5 metres into the front yard and be located 0 metres from the street line, whereas a canopy cannot be ground supported, have a maximum projection of 1.8 metres and be located 0.6 metres from the street line; ii) Section 5.6 Table 5-5 to permit 53 parking spaces, (a parking rate of 0.74 parking spaces per dwelling unit inclusive of visitor parking) instead of the minimum required 72 parking spaces (a parking rate of 0.9 parking spaces per dwelling unit and 0.1 visitor parking spaces per dwelling unit); iii) Section 8.3, Table 8-2 to permit a side yard setback of 5.3 metres abutting a residential zone instead of the minimum required 7.5 metres; iv) Section 8.3, Table 8-2 to permit a rear yard setback of 3.9 metres instead of the minimum required 7.5 metres; v) Section 8.3, Table 8-2 to permit 0% non-residential gross floor area instead of the minimum required 20% non-residential gross floor area; vi) Section 8.3, Table 8-2 to permit a minimum ground floor street façade building height of 4.0 metres and 3.0 metres instead of the minimum required 4.5 metres; and vii) Section 8.3, Table 8-2, to permit a minimum 35% and 10% street line façade openings instead of the minimum required 50%; to facilitate the construction of a new affordable housing development consisting of 71 dwelling units, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by ABA Architects Inc., dated September 2, 2024, BE APPROVED. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review a minor variance application to facilitate the construction of an affordable housing development with 71 residential dwelling units. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property and this report was posted to th Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the east side of River Road near the intersection of Ottawa Street North and River Road East. Figure 1: Location Map: 1035 Ottawa Street North City Node Urban Structure and is on Map 3 The property is Mixed Use Three Zone (MIX-3) with Site-Specific Provision (49) in Zoning By-law 2019-051. The subject development is being proposed in partnership with the City of Kitchener and is a project supported by the Housing Accelerator Fund. The proposed affordable housing development consists of a 6 storey, 53-unit apartment adjacent to River Road East and three 3-storey, 6 unit stacked townhouse buildings, for a total of 71 residential units. The units will offer a range of unit types including 1, 2, 3 and 4 bedroom units. It should also be noted that through the annual Zoning By-law update, the variances for the parking rate reduction, and the reduction in non-residential gross floor area, are no longer required for ublic Service Uses within the By-law. These updates were approved by Council in January 2025 and are currently within the appeal period. The variances were included within this application to ensure that the development can move forward should there be an appeal to the updated By-law. Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Figures 3 and 4: Current site conditions 1035 Ottawa St. North REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan The subject lands are designated (Map 3). The Mixed Use land use designation is designed to achieve an appropriate mix of commercial, residential and institutional uses on the designated lands. It is also intended to be flexible and responsive to land use pattern changes and demands and permit a broad range of uses at different scales and intensities. Permitted residential uses may include those medium and high rise residential uses which includes special needs housing. Staff is of the opinion that the variances meet the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law Canopy The intent of the canopy regulations for projections, setbacks and ground supporting, are to ensure that a canopy does not encroach into the road and sidewalk right of way. The intent of the proposed canopy along River Road is to enhance the streetscape and provide refuge space along that portion of the proposed building. Staff have reviewed initial concepts of the proposed canopy and have no concerns with the canopy being ground supported, project 1.5 metres and have a 0 metre setback, and all can be considered minor. Parking The intent of the Zoning By-law parking rate is to ensure that there is sufficient parking available for residents and visitors within the development. The intended use of the new development is affordable and supportive housing which the proposed parking rate is expected to be appropriate as not every resident may have access to a personal vehicle. The property is adequately serviced by a number of bus routes in close proximity to the subject property. There are also adequate services within walking distance with Stanley Park Mall directly adjacent to the property. Further, changes to the By-law have now exempted ublic Service from the minimum parking requirements. Transportation staff are also supportive of the reduction in parking rates, and to the change within the By-law. Appropriate bicycle parking and barrier-free parking will continue to be applied to the site. Side yard setback abutting residential and rear yard setback The intent of both the side yard setback abutting a residential zone and rear yard setback is to ensure there is adequate separation and no adverse impacts to the adjacent residential properties. The development will be setback 5.3 metres from the adjacent residential apartment building, which still provides adequate separation. Further, because the property has frontage on both River Road and Holborn Court, the City considers the front yard to be along River Road. The rear yard setback would apply to Holborn Court, and the proposed stacked townhouse is closer than the 7.5 metres required. The area between the building and Holborn Court is considered to also be more of a front yard space and not intended to be used as rear yard space. The reduction to 3.9 metres is appropriate for the development and staff will ensure adequate landscaping is provided at the site plan stage. Minimum ground floor street façade building height and openings The intent of the minimum ground floor building height and façade opening regulation is to ensure a ground floor space that can accommodate active uses on the ground floor of the building and adequately address and enhance the streetscape. Staff acknowledge that there is no commercial on the ground floor of the buildings and the applicant is providing adequate glazing and enhancements to the front façade to ensure an appropriate streetscape along both River Road and Holborn Court. The reduction of façade building height of 0.5 meters along River Road, and 1.5 metres along Holborn Court is minimal, and the reduction of openings to 35% and 10% and will not have any impact in the overall building design. Non-residential use The intent of the percentage of non-residential use with the By-law is to ensure that mixed use properties provide an adequate portion of the development towards non-residential uses. The intended use is a public use and through the update to the Zoning By-law it was proposed that these types of uses do not require non-residential uses within the development. City staff provided recommendations to City Council which ultimately approved the recommendations. Flexibility has been provided within the By-law in order for the ublic Service to be successful in its development. Staff is of the opinion that the variances meet the general intent of the Zoning By-Law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? Staff is of the opinion that the requested variances are minor as the variances that are requested are to enhance an approved development. The proposed variances will not present any significant impacts to adjacent properties or the overall streetscape and neighbourhood. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The proposed variances are desirable and appropriate for the development and use of the land as their approval will facilitate the construction of a new affordable housing development within a mixed use area. Environmental Planning Comments: No environmental concerns. Tree Management will be addressed through the Site Plan Application process. Heritage Planning Comments: No heritage planning concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permits for the apartment building is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division at building@kitchener.ca with any questions. Engineering Division Comments: Engineering division has no concerns. Parks and Cemeteries/Forestry Division Comments: Park Planning concerns including any street tree protection or required park dedication will be addressed through a future Site Plan application. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services have assessed the parking supply review that was submitted (December 20, 2024) by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. and are in support of the proposed parking supply of 53 to 57 spaces. Transportation Services have reviewed the TDM plan submitted (December 20, 2024) by Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. and are in support of the TDM plan. The plan notes that bike parking will be provided to meet zoning requirements, sidewalks are provided on the surrounding road network and existing GRT stops within a 5-minute walk from the site. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM dvance of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises ailing the Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority Eva Zach February 13, 2025 Reg: Committee of Adjustments Application for Minor Variance No. A 2025-008 To Whom it may concern, As a resident owner of a property on Holborn Court, I do not support the proposed changes. Holborn Court is a tiny street that already handles more traffic that it was designed to handle. The proposed changes will create even more traffic and noise pollution. I also believe that the present Zoning By-Laws were formulated to protect residents and the environment. Yours truly, Eva Zach Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Sean Harrigan, Senior Planning Technician, 519-783-8934 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: February 7, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-071 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-009 775 Queen St. S. RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-009 for 775 Queen Street South requesting Permission under section 45(2)(a)(ii) of the Planning Act to permit the enlargement or extension of a legal non-conforming use, a Single Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (Attached), to facilitate the addition of an Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) with 2 dwelling units for a total of 4 dwelling units on the subject property, generally in accordance with the plan received on January 22, 2025, prepared by Craig Dumart, BE APPROVED. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review the request for permission to expand a legal non-conforming use at 775 Queen Street South. The key finding of this report is that staff are satisfied that expanding the legal non- conforming use is in the public interest and does not create unacceptable impacts on abutting properties. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property s website with the agenda in advance of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located within the Mill-Courtland neighbourhood and is situated on the northeast corner of the intersection of Queen Street South and Highland Road East. The property has approximately 15 metres of frontage on Queen Street South and 30 *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. metres frontage on Highland Road East and currently contains a Single Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (Attached) which is a legal non-conforming use. Figure 1: Location Map - 775 Queen St. S. (Outlined in Red) Community Areas Urban Structure and is on Map 3 Land Use The property --law 2019-051. The property also falls Established Neighbourhood Ar-law 2019-051. The purpose of this permission application is to expand the legal non-conforming use, a Single Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (Attached), to facilitate the construction of an Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) with two dwelling units for a total of four dwelling units on the property. Staff note that the current MIX-1 zone permits a dwelling unit but only within a mixed use building where at least one permitted non- residential is located on the ground floor along the entire length of the street line façade. Neither the existing building nor proposed Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) contain a ground floor non-residential use. In addition to the permission application, a building permit and Zoning Occupancy Certificate is required before the Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) can be constructed. The Zoning Occupancy Certificate process will ensure the proposed structure is zoning compliant with respect to such regulations as setbacks, building height, minimum landscaping, minimum parking, and maximum driveway width. The applicant has yet to submit a Zoning Occupancy Certificate which means staff cannot confirm the proposed structure is completely zoning compliant. However, staff noticed during a site visit that the existing driveway extends beyond the garage on both sides as shown in Figure 4 below and is approximately 13 metres wide. As per Zoning Section 5.1, whenever there is an increase in gross floor area on a lot, such as adding an Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached), the provisions of Section 5 shall apply. This means the driveway must be reduced in width to comply with the current maximum permitted driveway width of 8 metres or otherwise permitted by a minor variance application before the Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) can be zoning compliant. Any necessary driveway modifications will be managed as part of the Zoning Occupancy Certificate process. Figure 2: Site Plan for Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) Figure 3: Front of Existing Single Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (Attached) Figure 4: Existing Driveway Figure 5: Proposed Location for Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) in Rear Yard REPORT: Planning Comments: Case law sets out the tests to be applied by the Committee of Adjustment in considering applications under Section 45(2)(a)(ii). It should be noted that the test to be applied is not the four-part test for minor variances under Section 45(1) but rather whether the approval of the application: 1. Is in the public interest; and 2. Creates unacceptable or adverse impact upon abutting properties. Is Approval in the Public Interest? Staff are satisfied that request for permission to expand the legal non-conforming use to facilitate the construction of an Additional Dwelling Unit (Detached) with two dwelling units is in the public interest. The City of Kitchener is currently experiencing a housing crisis and is looking for opportunities to facilitate residential development wherever appropriate, such as the proposed intensification on the subject property. Any Adverse or Unacceptable Impacts? The proposed expansion of the legal non-conforming use, a Single Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (Attached), does not create any unacceptable or adverse impacts on abutting properties. The abutting property to the north is also zoned MIX-1 and as mentioned above, a dwelling unit is a permitted use provided the dwelling unit is located within a mixed use building with at least one ground floor non-residential use which abuts the entire street line façade. Since a dwelling unit is a permitted use, the other permitted uses within the MIX-1 are contemplated to be within close proximity of dwelling units. As such, adding more dwelling units to the subject property should not have unacceptable impacts on the abutting property to the north. The other abutting property to the east is Woodside Park which will not be negatively impacted by the expansion of the legal non-conforming use. Environmental Planning Comments: Environmental Planning has no concerns with this application. Heritage Planning Comments: The subject property is located adjacent to the Victoria Park Neighborhood Heritage Conservation District, and to 20-30 Woodland Road East, which is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proposed development is not anticipated to have any adverse impacts to the adjacent protected cultural heritage resources. Thus, staff have no concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided a building permit for the two detached additional dwelling units is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division at building@kitchener.ca with any questions. Engineering Division Comments: Applicant will need to Permit stage. Parks and Cemeteries/Forestry Division Comments: Although no construction is proposed along Queen Street, there is an un-inventoried tree along the Queen Street Sout frontage that is likely a shared boundary tree and should be protected to required City standards throughout construction as per Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law. I would also note that the existing driveways are wider than what is shown on the mark-up survey. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Arwa Alzoor, Planner, 519-783-8903 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 5 DATE OF REPORT: January 24, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-043 SUBJECT: Consent Application B2025-002 - 685 Fischer Hallman Road RECOMMENDATION: That Consent Application B2025-002 for 685 Fischer Hallman Road to facilitate a Lease Agreement in excess of 21 years in favour of , for an existing restaurant with a drive-through, BE APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. associated fees for the Certificate of Official to the satisfaction of the Secretary-Treasurer and City Solicitor, if required. 2. That the Owner shall obtain a tax certificate from the City of Kitchener to verify that there are no outstanding taxes on the subject property(ies) to the 3. That the owner provides a digital file of the deposited reference plan(s) prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor in PDF and either .dwg (AutoCad) or .dgn (Microstation) format, as well as two full size paper copies of the plan(s). The digital file needs to be submitted according to the City of Kitchener's Digital 4. That the Owner verify, in writing, whether the Lease Agreement, is affected by any required or existing easements and/or restricted covenants, to confirm the necessary arrangements for servicing, shared parking and access are in place. 5. That the Owner verify, in writing, that the subject property has been developed in accordance with the Approved Site Plan Agreement, and if necessary, the Site Plan Agreement is to be amended to include any required revisions and/or *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. updates. 6.That the Owner verify, in writing, that the Lease Agreement complies with and fulfils all pertinent provisions of the Ontario Planning Act. 7. That the Owner/Developer submit a copy of the signed mutual access agreement for both severed and retained parcels to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review an application requesting consent to enter into a long-term lease exceeding 21 years for a restaurant and drive-through located on the lands addressed as 685 Fischer Hallman Road. The building is existing, and no new development is proposed. The key finding of this report is that the long-term lease be approved as it will not impact or restrict the existing and ultimate development of the subject lands There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property advance of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located within a commercial plaza at the southwest corner of Fisher Hallman Road and Ottawa Street South. The subject property is identified as a City Node Urban Structure and is on Map 3 -2) with Site-Specific Provision (35) in Zoning By-law 2019-051. Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Zoning Map The purpose of the applicationis to request alease agreement apply to the area shown in the red-highlighted area lease sketch, shown inFigure 3below, submitted with the application. This area is 706.4B- through. The owner of a commercial plaza located at 685 Fischer-Hallman Road is requesting consent, as per Section 50 (3) of the Ontario Planning Act, to permit the execution of a long- term lease (agreement) with for a period exceeding 21 years in duration. The building is existing, and no new Gross Floor Area (GFA) is proposed. Site Plan Application SP01/06/FGR to permit the development of the commercial plaza, having 4 buildings and 209 parking spaces, was approved, and a Section 41 Agreement was registered on July 11, 2002. The site has been fully developed and, according to City records, there are no outstanding site matters to address. The site was planned and developed comprehensively as a plaza complex with all the buildings utilizing and sharing the parking areas, walkways, and two approved accesses for the site via Ottawa Street South and Fischer Hallman Road. Application B2023-020 and B2023-034 are two previously approved long-term lease applications for the subject property for Buildings A and D, which were approved by the Committee of Adjustment. Figure 3: Site plan- Wendy's Restaurant and Drive-through Figure 4: st Planning staff visited the site on January 31, 2025 Figure 5: Picture of the restaurant Drive-through Figure 6: Picture from the side of the drive-through and the abutting lot access REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering all the relevant Provincial legislation, Regional and City policies and regulations, Planning staff offer the following comments: Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan (ROP): As the proposal is to facilitate a long-term lease of existing Building for a period greater than 21 years, no lots are being created or lot lines being adjusted, and no physical changes opinion that no sections of the PPS or Regional Official Plan are specifically relevant, and that the application would conform to these plans and policies. With respect to the Official Plan, no new parcels will be created through this application. The consent will not frustrate the planned function or ability of the site to operate (with shared access and parking) or appear to impede the outcome of any future planning processes. The use of property is in conformity with the In considering that the intent of the proposal is to facilitate an administrative consent required by the Planning Act and that no changes are proposed to the existing, permitted commercial development on th adversely impact any policies of the Official Plan. Zoning By-law 2019-051 -law the use of the subject lands for a commercial is a permitted use COM-2, and the site as developed comprehensively complies with the Zoning By-law with respect to setbacks and parking. The long-term lease would not negatively impact the remainder of the commercial plaza, and no minor variances are required as a result of the long-term lease. Planning Conclusions/Comments: The long-term lease will not impact or restrict the existing and ultimate development of the subject lands and is considered to be appropriate and in accordance with the policies of the Official Plan and the criteria set out in Section 51 (24) of the Planning Act. Environmental Planning Comments: No comments. Heritage Planning Comments: No concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed consent. Engineering Division Comments: No comments. Parks/Operations Division Comments: No requirements. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. Region of Waterloo Comments: The lands are designated Built-Up Area within the Urban Area Boundary in the ROP, The subject lands are located at the corner of Ottawa St S (RR#4) and Fischer-Hallman Rd (RR#58), with access to both Regional Roads. To allow for the continued use of the existing access(es), a copy of a signed mutual access agreement for both the severed and retained parcels is required by the Region as a condition of approval. Grand River Conservation Authority Comments: Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications. The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes. The properties are not subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24 and, therefore, a permission from GRCA is not required. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan (ROP) Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES th 150 Frederick Street, 8floor Kitchener Ontario N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca Erica Ali W. Phone: 226-751-3388 File: D20-20/25 KIT January 31, 2025 VIA EMAIL Connie Owen Administrative Clerk, Legislative Services City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Re: Comments on Consent Applications: B2025-002 to B2025-004 Committee of Adjustment Hearing February 18, 2025 City of Kitchener Please accept the following comments for the above-noted Consent applications to be considered at the upcoming Committee of Adjustment Hearing. AM File No: B 2025-002 Address: 685 Fischer-Hallman Rd Location: TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LOT 47 RP 58R13851 PT 1 Owner: 1465762 Ontario Ltd c/o Sharon Shaw (Kingsley Property Management) Applicant: CTS Planning & Land Development c/o Chris Stoyanovich Owner/applicant is seeking consent to sever part of parcel to register lease over 21 years for landslocated at the corner of regional roads, Ottawa St S and Fischer Hallman. This amends the existing lease between the tenant (PPFWEN Restaurant Inc) and the property owner (1465762 Ontario Ltd). The consent is for an irregular shaped part of land with restaurant/ drive-thru (706.4 sqm) within the commercial shopping plaza (15, 226 sqm). There is no proposed change to land use or site alteration. The lands are designated Built-Up Area within the Urban Area Boundary in the ROP, designated Commercial in the City’s Official Plan, and zoned COM 2(35) “Neighbourhood Shopping Centre”. Regional Road Access The subject lands are located at the corner of Ottawa St S (RR#4) and Fischer-Hallman Rd (RR#58), with access to both Regional Roads.To allow for the continued use of the existing access(es), acopy of a signed mutual access agreement for both the severed and retained parcels isrequired by the Region as condition ofapproval. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provideduntil such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands, and one record associated with the adjacent property at 1425 Ottawa St S, identifying a high-levelthreat (Kitchener- Wilmot Hydro Inc -Electrical Utility Site). In summary, Regional Staff has no objectionto this application subject to the following condition(s): 1.That the Owner/Developersubmit a copy of the signed mutual access agreement for both severed and retained parcels to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-003 Address: 180 Ahrens St W Description: PLAN 75 PT LOT 1 PT LOT 2 Owner: David Craig Dumart Applicant: David Craig Dumart Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever to create new residential lot; being severed lot - 318 sqm area with 14.8m frontage on Wilhem St; and retained lot – 372 sqm area with 13.7m frontage on Ahren St W and 24m frontage on Wilhem St. The application states existing lot is vacant (partially completed foundation with building permit), proposes future single detached dwelling on each lot.. The lands are designated Built- up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-004 (lot creation); B2025-005 (easement) Address: 86 Florence Ave Description: PLAN 308 LOT 110 PT LOT 109 PT LOT 111 PT LOT 116 Owner: Knezevic Mirko Applicant: Bobicon Ltd C/O Boban Jokanovic Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever for new lot creation and access easement. Severed lot is proposed 582.59sqm area with 9.91m frontage; retained lot is 512.73 sqm area with 10.52m frontage; and easement is 70.71sqm area, with 48.77m depth and 1.45m width. Redevelopment is proposed for a single detached dwelling with 4 units on each lot. Access easement is proposed for shared drive to access rear parking located on both lots. The lands are designated Built-up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. General Comments Any submission requirements may be subject to peer review, at the owner/ Owner/Developer’s expense as per By-law 23-062. If any other applications are required to facilitate the application, note that fees are subject to change and additional requirements may apply. Any future development on the lands subject to the above-noted consent applications will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Prior to final approval, City staff must be in receipt of the above- noted Regional condition clearances. Please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the staff reports, decisions and minutes pertaining to each of the consent applications noted above. Should you require Regional Staff to be in attendance at the meeting or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you, Erica Ali RPP Planner, Regional Growth, Development and Sustainability Services Regional Municipality of Waterloo January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority From:LANDUSEPLANNING To:Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:Kitchener - 685 Fischer Hallman Road - B 2025-002 Date:Thursday, January 30, 2025 1:49:19 PM Hello, We are in receipt of your Application for Consent, B 2025-002 dated 2025-01-23. We have reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. Our preliminary review considers issues affecting Hydro One’s 'High Voltage Facilities and Corridor Lands' only. For proposals affecting 'Low Voltage Distribution Facilities’ the Owner/Applicant should consult their local area Distribution Supplier. Where Hydro One is the local supplier the Owner/Applicant must contact the Hydro subdivision group at subdivision@Hydroone.com or 1-866-272-3330. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: Stormcentre (hydroone.com) Please select “Search” and locate the address in question by entering the address or by zooming in and out of the map. If you have any further questions or inquiries, please contact Customer Service at 1-888-664-9376 or e-mail CustomerCommunications@HydroOne.com to be connected to your Local Operations Centre If you have any questions please feel free to contact myself. Thank you, Dennis De Rango Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Department Hydro One Networks Inc. Tel: (905)946-6237 Email: Dennis.DeRango@HydroOne.com Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 21, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Evan Wittmann, Senior Planner, 519-783-8523 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: February 5, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-045 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-010 180 Ahrens St. W. Consent Application B2025-003 180 Ahrens St. W. RECOMMENDATION: Minor Variance Application A2025-010 That Minor Variance Application A2025-010 for 180 Ahrens Street West requesting relief from Section 7.6 of Zoning By-law 2019-051 to permit a Front Yard setback of 4.5 metres instead of the required 9.7 metres, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by David Craig Dumart, dated January 21, 2025, BE APPROVED. Consent Application B2025-003 That Consent Application B2025-003 requesting consent to sever a parcel of land having a lot width of 14.8 metres, a lot depth of 20.8, metres and a lot area of 318 square metres, BE APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. That Minor Variance Application A2025-010 receive final approval. 2. and associated fees for the Certificate of Official to the satisfaction of the Secretary- Treasurer and City Solicitor, if required. 3. That the Owner shall obtain a tax certificate from the City of Kitchener to verify that there are no outstanding taxes on the subject property(ies) to the 4. That the Owner provides a digital file of the deposited reference plan(s) prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor in PDF and either .dwg (AutoCad) or *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. .dgn (Microstation) format, as well as two full size paper copies of the plan(s). The digital file needs to be submitted according to the City of Mapping Technologist. 5. That the existing foundation be removed Manager, Development Approvals and Chief Building Official. 6. That the Owner shall: a) Prepare a Tree Preservation Plan for the Severed and Retained lands, in by the demolition, grading, servicing, tree removal or the issuance of building permits. Such plans shall include, among other matters, the identification of a proposed building envelope/work zone, a landscaped area and the vegetation to be preserved. If necessary, the plan shall include required mitigation and or compensation measures. b) That the Owner further agrees to implement the approved plan. No changes to the said plan shall be Manager, Site Plans. c) Maintain the lands, in accordance with the approved Tree Preservation and Enhancement Plan, for the life of the development. 7. That the Owner pay to the City of Kitchener a cash-in-lieu contribution for park dedication of $11,892.00. 8. The Owner shall enter into an agreement with the City of Kitchener, to be prepared by the City Solicitor, which shall acknowledge that the severed lands are un-serviced and shall provide for the installation of services and service connections to the severed lands to be completed prior to any future development of the severed lands. The agreement shall further require the Owner to include a notice provision in all future Agreements of Purchase and Sale for the severed lands advising potential Purchaser(s) that the severed lands are unserviced. The said agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services and the City Solicitor and shall be registered on title to the severed lands. 9. That the Owner submit the Consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review and recommendations with respect to the Minor Variance and Consent applications for 180 Ahrens Street West. Staff recommend that the applications be approved. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is a corner lot located at the northwest of the intersection of Ahrens Street West and Wilhelm Street in the Mt. Hope Huron Park neighbourhood. The subject property currently features a foundation for a single detached dwelling, which is no longer under construction. The lot was consequently sold before construction was completed. The new owner is pursuing a minor variance and consent application rather than completing the plan of the previous owner. Figure 1: Aerial view of the subject property Figure 2: The subject property, view from Ahrens Street W (taken January 30, 2025) Community Areas2 Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential on Map 3 Low Rise Residential Four Zone (RES-4)-law 2019- 051. The purpose of the application is to reduce the required front yard setback to 4.5 metres D) of Zoning By-law 2019-051, requiring the front yard setback of the subject property to be calculated usi one metre. The established front yard is calculated by taking the average of the existing front yard setback of the property on either side of the subject property. The resulting established front yard is roughly 10.7 metres, resulting in a minimum front yard setback requirement of 9.7 metres. This variance would apply to the severed parcel of Consent Application B2025-010, a consent application for the same property. No variances are requested or required for the retained parcel. Figure 3: Proposed consent and variance sketch REPORT: Planning Comments Minor Variance Application A2025-010: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan The subject property is designated in the Official Plan. Section 15.D.3 of the Official Plan provides policy direction on lands under residential designations. Policy 15.D.3.3 provides urban design principles regarding the integration of new development in low rise residential areas: a) compatibility of building form with respect to massing, scale, design; b) the relationship of housing to adjacent buildings, streets and exterior areas; c) adequate and appropriate parking areas are provided on site; and, d) adequate and appropriate amenity areas and landscaped areas are provided on site. Policy 15.D.3.4 provides additional direction for new residential buildings in predominately low density neighbourhoods, such as the one surrounding the subject property. All new residential buildings, additions and/or modifications to existing residential buildings and conversions in predominantly low density neighbourhoods should be compatible with and respect the massing, scale, design and physical character of the established neighbourhood and have both appropriate landscaped areas and parking areas provided on site. The severed parcel meets all lot size requirements; however, in establishing a future building envelope, the setbacks required as-of-right limit development potential. The proposed reduced front yard setback would align the severed parcel building envelope with the exterior side yard setback of the retained parcel, creating a consistent built form edge, which is generally in keeping with the street. The requested variance is required to meet the intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law abutting the subject property on both sides. The intent of this approach is to maintain a generally consistent built form in the older and more established neighbourhoods of the City. The property abutting to the east, 110 Wilhelm Street, is set back considerably (roughly 17.5 metres) from Wilhelm Street. By basing the established front yard on this measurement, a greater than normal front yard setback is required on the subject property. The properties along Wilhelm Street are generally setback between 4 and 6 metres. The front yard setback of 110 Wilhelm is anomalous to the area and by using this yard in the established front yard calculation, an additional property that is not consistent with the area would be created, being the severed parcel. Additionally, the retained parcel has a minimum exterior side yard setback of 4.5 metres. The exterior side yard is the Wilhelm Street frontage, and as a result, by reducing the required front yard setback to 4.5 metres, a consistent built form edge will be created. This would maintain the intent of the Zoning By-law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? A common approach to determine if the effect of a variance is minor is to consider the impacts on the surrounding area. The proposed 4.5 metre setback is generally consistent with the neighbourhood and would align with the exterior side yard setback of the abutting retained lot. By reducing the required front yard setback no impacts are anticipated and the variance would be considered minor. Figure 4: Lot and building fabric of the surrounding area Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The creation of an appropriately sized lot in a low rise residential neighbourhood is an example of gentle intensification that is supported by City staff. The severed lot meets the Zoning By-law requirements for size and area but is limited by the calculation of the established front yard and large setback of the abutting property. By reducing the front yard setback, a developable parcel can be created with no other variances required. As such, the variance will establish a desirable use of the land. Additionally, the decreased front yard setback will reduce the paved area of the severed parcel, as a driveway will have less distance to cover to connect the roadway to the future dwelling. A lesser amount of paved area is a desirable lot condition. Planning Comments Consent Application B2025-003: In considering all the relevant Provincial legislation, Regional and City policies and regulations, Planning staff offer the following comments: Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Staff are satisfied that the proposed severance application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement in general and as it relates to housing policies in Chapter 2 regarding intensification and facilitating housing options. The creation of a new parcel contributes to gentle intensification, with the potential to contribute Additional Dwelling Units to further add further housing options. Section 2.2 1 (b) of the PPS 2024 states that Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing options and densities to meet projected needs of current and future residents of the regional market area by permitting and facilitating all housing options required to meet the social, health, economic and well-being requirements of current and future residents, can remain achievable. The proposed consent application will contribute towards housing needs and is therefore consistent with this policy direction. Regional Official Plan (ROP): the Urban Area. The subject propertyfallsis- Up housing in terms of form, tenure, density, and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic, and personal support needs of current and future residents within these designations. The neighbourhood provides for the physical and community infrastructure required for residential development, including transportation networks, municipal water and wastewater systems, and a broad range of social and public health services, conforming with Policy 2.D.1 of the ROP. Staff are satisfied that the proposed severance applications adhere to these policies and conforms to the ROP. on Map 2 Urban Structure and is on Map 3 Policy 3.C.2.50 of the Official Plan establishes the intent for Community Areas: The planned function of Community Areas is to provide for residential uses as well as non- residential supporting uses intended to serve the immediate residential areas. The proposed consent in conformity with this policy. The retained and severed lots will continue to provide residential uses. Policy 3.C.2.52. provides direction regarding intensification in Community Areas: Limited intensification may be permitted within Community Areas in accordance with the applicable land use designation on Map 3 and the Urban Design Policies in Section 11. The proposed development must be sensitive to and compatible with the character, form and planned function of the surrounding context. The following Sections of the Official Plan are applicable to this application in implementing Policy 3.C.2.52.: 15.D.3.8. The Low Rise Residential land use designation will accommodate a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi-detached dwellings, street townhouse dwellings, townhouse dwellings in a cluster development, low-rise multiple dwellings, special needs housing, and other forms of low-rise housing. 15.D.3.9. The City will encourage and support the mixing and integrating of innovative and different forms of housing to achieve and maintain a low-rise built form. The proposed consent will create one additional parcel for low rise residential use. This use is permitted in the Low Rise Residential land use designation, which will contribute to maintaining a low-rise built form in the area, conforming to the above noted policies. Section 17.E.20.5 of the Official Plan implements Section 51 of the Planning Act and contains policies regarding infill development and lot creation (Consent Policies).These policies state the following: Applications for consent to create new lots will only be granted where: a) the lots comply with the policies of this Plan, any Community Plan and/or Secondary Plan, and that the lots are in conformity with the Zoning By-law, or a minor variance has been granted to correct any deficiencies; b) the lots reflect the general scale and character of the established development pattern of surrounding lands by taking into consideration lot frontages, areas, and configurations; c) all of the criteria for plan of subdivision are given due consideration; d) the lot will have frontage on a public street; e) municipal water services are available; f) municipal sanitary services are available except in accordance with Policy 14.C.1.19; g) a Plan of Subdivision or Condominium has been deemed not to be necessary for proper and orderly development; and, h) the lot(s) will not restrict the ultimate development of adjacent The proposed consent conforms with the above noted policy. The retained and severed lots meet the requirements of the Zoning By-law, except the provision where a minor variance is requested. In satisfying 17.E.20.5.b), a mix of lot fabrics are found in the area. The proposed lots are generally reflective of the lotting pattern of the area, particularly when compared to those at the intersection of Ahrens Street West and Wilhelm Street. Zoning By-law 2019-051 RES-4-law 2019-051. The following table outlines the RES-4 zone requirements and conformity of the retained and severed parcels for single detached dwellings: Zone Retained Lot Severed Lot Provision Requirement Provided Conformity Requirement Provided Conformity 2222 Minimum 235 m 372 m Y 235 m 318 m Y Lot Area Minimum 12.8 m 13.7 m Y 9.0 m 14.8 m Y Lot Width Minimum 6.5 m 7 m Y 9.75 m 4.5 m N Front Yard Maximum 8.5 m 7 m Y 11.75 4.5 m Y Front Yard Minimum 7.5 m 7.5 m Y 7.5 m 7.5 m Y Rear Yard Minimum 1.2 m 1.2 m Y 1.2 m 1.2 m Y Interior Side Yard Minimum 4.5 m 4.5 m Y 4.5 m NA NA Exterior Side Yard Maximum 55% < 55% Y 55% < 55% Y Lot Coverage As demonstrated, only one variance is required to facilitate the proposed consent, being the minimum front yard for the severed parcel. Planning Conclusions/Comments: With respect to the criteria for the subdivision of land listed in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, staff is satisfied that the creation of the severed lots are desirable and appropriate. Environmental Planning Comments: To complete a Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan prior to demolition/building permit/grading/servicing, etc. for both the severed and retained parcels. Heritage Planning Comments: The Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study (CHLS) dated December 2014 and prepared by The Landplan Collaborative Ltd. was approved by Council in 2015. The CHLS serves to establish an inventory and was the first step of a phased Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL) conservation process. The property municipally addressed as 180 Ahrens Street West is located within the Mount Hope/Breithaupt Neighbourhood CHL. The proposed front yard setback is not anticipated to have any major impacts on the cultural heritage value of Mt. Hope/Breithaupt Neighborhood. As such, staff have no concerns. Staff would, however, encourage that any new development be compatible with the surrounding character of the neighborhood in terms of setbacks, massing, and materials. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed consent. Region of Waterloo and Area Municipalities' Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services (DGSSMS) allows only one service per lot. Building permit(s) will be required for the construction of the new residential buildings. Engineering Division Comments: That the Owner shall enter into an agreement to be prepared by the City Solicitor which shall acknowledge that the severed lands are un-serviced and shall provide for the installation of services and service connections to the severed lands to be completed prior to any future development of the severed lands. The agreement shall further require the Owner to include a notice provision in all future Agreements of Purchase and Sale for the severed lands advising potential Purchaser(s) that the severed lands are un-serviced. The said agreement shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and the City Solicitor and shall be registered on title to the severed lands. Parks/Operations Division Comments: There are no inventoried City tree assets that will be impacted by the proposed development. Cash-in-lieu of park land dedication will be required prior to deed endorsement of the severed parcel as 1 new development lot will be created. The cash-in-lieu dedication required is $11,862. Park Dedication is calculated at 5% of the new development lots only, with a land valuation calculated by the lineal frontage of 14.8 m at a land value of $36,080 per frontage meter with a per unit cap of $11,862. Transportation Planning Comments: A2025-010 Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. B2025-003 Transportation Services have no concerns with this application. Region of Waterloo Comments: A2025-010 No concerns. B2025-003 The Owner/Applicant proposes consent to sever to create new residential lot; being severed lot - 318 sqm area with 14.8m frontage on Wilhem St; and retained lot 372 sqm area with 13.7m frontage on Ahren St W and 24m frontage on Wilhem St. The application states existing lot is vacant (partially completed foundation with building permit), proposes future single detached dwelling on each lot. The lands are designated Built-up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. GRCA Comments: GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications. The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes. The properties are not subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24 and, therefore, a permission from GRCA is not required. Hydro One Comments: We are in receipt of your Application for Consent, B2025-003 dated 2025-01-23. We have reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. Our preliminary review considers issues Facilities and Corridor Lands' only. consult their local area Distribution Supplier. Where Hydro One is the local supplier the Owner/Applicant must contact the Hydro subdivision group at subdivision@Hydroone.com or 1-866-272-3330. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: Stormcentre (hydroone.com) Please entering the address or by zooming in and out of the map. If you have any further questions or inquiries, please contact Customer Service at 1-888- 664-9376 or e-mail CustomerCommunications@HydroOne.com to be connected to your Local Operations Centre. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan (ROP) Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES th 150 Frederick Street, 8floor Kitchener Ontario N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca Erica Ali W. Phone: 226-751-3388 File: D20-20/25 KIT January 31, 2025 VIA EMAIL Connie Owen Administrative Clerk, Legislative Services City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Re: Comments on Consent Applications: B2025-002 to B2025-004 Committee of Adjustment Hearing February 18, 2025 City of Kitchener Please accept the following comments for the above-noted Consent applications to be considered at the upcoming Committee of Adjustment Hearing. AM File No: B 2025-002 Address: 685 Fischer-Hallman Rd Location: TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LOT 47 RP 58R13851 PT 1 Owner: 1465762 Ontario Ltd c/o Sharon Shaw (Kingsley Property Management) Applicant: CTS Planning & Land Development c/o Chris Stoyanovich Owner/applicant is seeking consent to sever part of parcel to register lease over 21 years for landslocated at the corner of regional roads, Ottawa St S and Fischer Hallman. This amends the existing lease between the tenant (PPFWEN Restaurant Inc) and the property owner (1465762 Ontario Ltd). The consent is for an irregular shaped part of land with restaurant/ drive-thru (706.4 sqm) within the commercial shopping plaza (15, 226 sqm). There is no proposed change to land use or site alteration. The lands are designated Built-Up Area within the Urban Area Boundary in the ROP, designated Commercial in the City’s Official Plan, and zoned COM 2(35) “Neighbourhood Shopping Centre”. Regional Road Access The subject lands are located at the corner of Ottawa St S (RR#4) and Fischer-Hallman Rd (RR#58), with access to both Regional Roads.To allow for the continued use of the existing access(es), acopy of a signed mutual access agreement for both the severed and retained parcels isrequired by the Region as condition ofapproval. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provideduntil such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands, and one record associated with the adjacent property at 1425 Ottawa St S, identifying a high-levelthreat (Kitchener- Wilmot Hydro Inc -Electrical Utility Site). In summary, Regional Staff has no objectionto this application subject to the following condition(s): 1.That the Owner/Developersubmit a copy of the signed mutual access agreement for both severed and retained parcels to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-003 Address: 180 Ahrens St W Description: PLAN 75 PT LOT 1 PT LOT 2 Owner: David Craig Dumart Applicant: David Craig Dumart Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever to create new residential lot; being severed lot - 318 sqm area with 14.8m frontage on Wilhem St; and retained lot – 372 sqm area with 13.7m frontage on Ahren St W and 24m frontage on Wilhem St. The application states existing lot is vacant (partially completed foundation with building permit), proposes future single detached dwelling on each lot.. The lands are designated Built- up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-004 (lot creation); B2025-005 (easement) Address: 86 Florence Ave Description: PLAN 308 LOT 110 PT LOT 109 PT LOT 111 PT LOT 116 Owner: Knezevic Mirko Applicant: Bobicon Ltd C/O Boban Jokanovic Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever for new lot creation and access easement. Severed lot is proposed 582.59sqm area with 9.91m frontage; retained lot is 512.73 sqm area with 10.52m frontage; and easement is 70.71sqm area, with 48.77m depth and 1.45m width. Redevelopment is proposed for a single detached dwelling with 4 units on each lot. Access easement is proposed for shared drive to access rear parking located on both lots. The lands are designated Built-up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. General Comments Any submission requirements may be subject to peer review, at the owner/ Owner/Developer’s expense as per By-law 23-062. If any other applications are required to facilitate the application, note that fees are subject to change and additional requirements may apply. Any future development on the lands subject to the above-noted consent applications will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Prior to final approval, City staff must be in receipt of the above- noted Regional condition clearances. Please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the staff reports, decisions and minutes pertaining to each of the consent applications noted above. Should you require Regional Staff to be in attendance at the meeting or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you, Erica Ali RPP Planner, Regional Growth, Development and Sustainability Services Regional Municipality of Waterloo January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority From:LANDUSEPLANNING To:Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:Kitchener - 180 Ahrens Street West - B 2025-003 Date:Thursday, January 30, 2025 1:50:49 PM Hello, We are in receipt of your Application for Consent, B 2025-003 dated 2025-01-23. We have reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. Our preliminary review considers issues affecting Hydro One’s 'High Voltage Facilities and Corridor Lands' only. For proposals affecting 'Low Voltage Distribution Facilities’ the Owner/Applicant should consult their local area Distribution Supplier. Where Hydro One is the local supplier the Owner/Applicant must contact the Hydro subdivision group at subdivision@Hydroone.com or 1-866-272-3330. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: Stormcentre (hydroone.com) Please select “Search” and locate the address in question by entering the address or by zooming in and out of the map. If you have any further questions or inquiries, please contact Customer Service at 1-888-664-9376 or e-mail CustomerCommunications@HydroOne.com to be connected to your Local Operations Centre If you have any questions please feel free to contact myself. Thank you, Dennis De Rango Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Department Hydro One Networks Inc. Tel: (905)946-6237 Email: Dennis.DeRango@HydroOne.com Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: February 18, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Evan Wittmann, Senior Planner, 519-783-8523 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 2 DATE OF REPORT: February 5, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-046 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-011 - 86 Florence Avenue Minor Variance Application A2025-012 - 86 Florence Avenue Consent Application B2025-004 - 86 Florence Avenue Consent Application B2025-005 - 86 Florence Avenue RECOMMENDATION: A. Minor Variance Application A2025-011 (Proposed Severed Parcel) That Minor Variance Application A2025-011 for 86 Florence Avenue requesting relief from the following Sections of Zoning By-law 2019-051: i) Section 4.12.2.g) to permit a lot width of 9.9 metres instead of the minimum required 10.5 metres; ii) Section 7.6 to permit a front yard setback of 7.9 metres instead of the required 9.65 metres; iii) Section 5.3.3.a) vi) to permit a driveway width of 10 metres instead of the maximum permitted 8 metres; and, iv) Section 5.4.d) to permit a driveway width of 1.5 metres instead of the minimum required 2.6 metres; to permit the redevelopment of the severed parcel proposed to be created through Consent Application B2025-004, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by BOBICON LTD., dated January 3, 2025, BE APPROVED. B. Minor Variance Application A2025-012 (Proposed Retained Parcel) That Minor Variance Application A2025-012 for 86 Florence Avenue requesting relief from the following Sections of Zoning By-law 2019-051: *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. i) Section 7.6 to permit a minimum front yard of 7.9 metres instead of the minimum required 11.6 metres; ii)Section 5.3.3.a)vi)to permit a driveway width of 9 metresinstead of the maximum permitted 8 metres; and, iii) Section 5.4.d) to permit a driveway width of 2.1 metres instead of the minimum required 2.6 metres; to permit the redevelopment of the retained parcel proposed to be created through Consent Application B2024-004, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by BOBICON LTD., dated January 3, 2025, BE APPROVED. C. Consent Application B2025-004 (Proposed Severed Parcel and Easement) That Consent Application B2025-004 requesting consent to sever a parcel of land having a lot width of 9.9 metres, a lot depth of 48.7 metres and a lot area of 582.5 square metres, including an easement with a width of 4.3 metres, depth of 48.6 metres, and area of 96.9 square metres BE APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. That Minor Variance Applications A2025-011 and A2025-012 receive final approval. 2. That Consent Application B2025-005 receive final approval. 3. and associated fees for the Certificate of Official to the satisfaction of the Secretary- Treasurer and City Solicitor, if required. 4. That the Owner obtains Demolition Control Approval, in accordance with the -law, to the satisfDirector, Development and Housing Approvals. 5. That the Owner obtains a Demolition Permit, for the existing single detached dwelling proposed to be demolished, to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official, and removes the existing dwelling prior to deed endorsement. 6. That the existing garage and fencing Director, Development and Housing Approvals. 7. That the Owner shall obtain a tax certificate from the City of Kitchener to verify that there are no outstanding taxes on the subject property(ies) to the 8. That the owner provides a digital file of the deposited reference plan(s) prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor in PDF and either .dwg (AutoCad) or .dgn (Microstation) format, as well as two full size paper copies of the plan(s). The digital file needs to be submitted according to the City of Mapping Technologist. 9. That the Owner make arrangement for financial compensation in the amount of $3,600 Parks and Cemeteries. 10. That the Owner pay to the City of Kitchener a cash-in-lieu contribution for park dedication of $11,862.00. 11. That the Owner shall: a) Prepare a Tree Preservation Plan for the Severed and Retained lands, in Manager, Site Plans, and where necessary, implemented prior to any grading, servicing, tree removal or the issuance of building permits. Such plans shall include, among other matters, the identification of a proposed building envelope/work zone, a landscaped area and the vegetation to be preserved. If necessary, the plan shall include required mitigation and or compensation measures. b) That the Owner further agrees to implement the approved plan. No changes to the said plan shall be granted except with the prior approval c) Maintain the lands, in accordance with the approved Tree Preservation and Enhancement Plan, for the life of the development. 12. That the Owner provides a servicing plan showing outlets to the municipal servicing system to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering Services. 13. That the Owner submit a Development Asset Drawing (digital AutoCAD) for the site (servicing, SWM etc.) with corresponding layer names and asset information prior to deed endorsement. 14. That the Owner makes financial arrangements for the installation of any new service connections to the severed and/or retained lands to the satisfaction of the City's Director of Engineering Services. 15. That any new driveways are to be built to City of Kitchener standards at the 16. That the Owner provides confirmation that the basement elevation can be of Engineering Services. If this is not the case, then the owner will need to pump the sewage via a pump and forcemain to the property line and have a Director of Engineering Services. 17. That the Transfer Easement document(s) required to create the Easement(s) being approved herein shall include the following, and shall be approved by the Applications: a) a clear and specific description of the purpose of the Easement(s) and of the rights and privileges being granted therein (including detailed terms and/or conditions of any required maintenance, liability and/or cost sharing provisions related thereto); and b) a clause/statement/wording confirming that the Easement(s) being granted shall be maintained and registered on title in perpetuity and shall not be amended, released or otherwise dealt with without the express written consent of the City. 18. Easement(s) and to immediately thereafter provide copies thereof to the City Solicitor be provided to the City Solicitor. 19. That the Owner submit the consent review fee of $350 per consent application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. D. Consent Application B2025-005 (Proposed Easement) That Consent Application B2025-005 requesting an easement having a width of 3.4 metres, a depth of 48.7 metres, and area of 111.7 square metres BE APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. That Minor Variance Applications A2025-011 and A2025-012 receive final approval. 2. That Consent Application B2025-004 receive final approval. 3. associated fees for the Certificate of Official to the satisfaction of the Secretary- Treasurer and City Solicitor, if required. 4. That the Owner shall obtain a tax certificate from the City of Kitchener to verify that there are no outstanding taxes on the subject property(ies) to the 5. That the owner provides a digital file of the deposited reference plan(s) prepared by an Ontario Land Surveyor in PDF and either .dwg (AutoCad) or .dgn (Microstation) format, as well as two full size paper copies of the plan(s). The digital file needs to be submitted according to the City of Mapping Technologist. 6. That the Transfer Easement document(s) required to create the Easement(s) being approved herein shall include the following, and shall be approved by the a) a clear and specific description of the purpose of the Easement(s) and of the rights and privileges being granted therein (including detailed terms and/or conditions of any required maintenance, liability and/or cost sharing provisions related thereto); and b) a clause/statement/wording confirming that the Easement(s) being granted shall be maintained and registered on title in perpetuity and shall not be amended, released or otherwise dealt with without the express written consent of the City. 7. Easement(s) and to immediately thereafter provide copies thereof to the City Solicitor be provided to the City Solicitor. 8. That the Owner submit the consent review fee of $350 per consent application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review and make recommendations with respect to the two minor variance applications, lot creation, and two easement applications for 86 Florence Avenue. Staff recommend that the applications be approved. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the north side of Florence Avenue, between Huber Street and Walker Street. Two street trees are located along the frontage of the subject property, one of which will need to be removed to construct the shared driveway for the retained and severed parcels. Figure 1: The subject property, view from Florence Avenue (taken January 30, 2025) Community Areas Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential The subject Low Rise Residential Four Zone (RES-4)By-law 2019-051. The purpose of the application is to create a new parcel and implement an easement on both the retained and severed parcels for a shared access driveway. Minor variances are required for both the retained and severed parcels, which address the shared driveway, front yard setback, and lot width for only the severed lot. These applications facilitate the redevelopment of the subject property for one fourplex on each the retained and severed parcels. Functionally, this will be implemented as one primary dwelling and three attached Additional Dwelling Units. A consolidated access is proposed with parking spaces located at the rear of the retained and severed parcels. Figure 2: Aerial view of the subject property Figure 3: Proposed site plan REPORT: Planning Comments Minor Variance ApplicationsA2025-011 and A2025-012: As six of the seven variances between applications A2025-011 and A2025-012 are for the same zone provisions, the two applications will be addressed in the below sections. In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan 15.D.3 of the Official Plan provides policy direction on lands under residential designations. Policy 15.D.3.3 provides urban design principles regarding the integration of new development in low rise residential areas: a) compatibility of building form with respect to massing, scale, design; b) the relationship of housing to adjacent buildings, streets and exterior areas; c) adequate and appropriate parking areas are provided on site; and, d) adequate and appropriate amenity areas and landscaped areas are provided on site. Policy 15.D.3.4 provides additional direction for new residential buildings in predominately low density neighbourhoods, such as the one surrounding the subject property. All new residential buildings, additions and/or modifications to existing residential buildings and conversions in predominantly low density neighbourhoods should be compatible with and respect the massing, scale, design and physical character of the established neighbourhood and have both appropriate landscaped areas and parking areas provided on site. The surrounding area features a mix of lot sizes and dwelling types, including single detached, semi-detached, and multiple residential dwellings. Regarding lot size, the retained parcel is deficient in minimum lot width, and both parcels are deficient in minimum front yard setback. The existing front yard setbacks in the surrounding area generally vary in size. The request for a front yard setback of 7.92 metres would not be out of character for the area. The proposed lot arrangement provides a consolidated central driveway which allows for appropriate landscaped areas in the front yard. The requested variances meet the intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The subject RES-4 By-law 2019-051. The RES-4 zone permits lots with a single detached dwelling to be a minimum 9 metres in width. The requirement to be 10.5 metres comes from the location of the subject property, as it is identified as being within a Central Neighbourhood on Appendix C of the Zoning By-law. Where properties within Central Neighbourhoods are further than 800 metres from a Major Transit Station Area, such as the subject property, the minimum lot width is increased to 10.5 metres rather than the typical 9 metreswhere two or three Additional Dwelling Units are present. The minimum lot width requirement is used to ensure properties remain wide enough to feasibly develop, which is maintained by the proposed lot and driveway arrangement. The requirement for a minimum front yard of 9.6 and 11.6 metres is based on the the properties abutting the subject property on both sides. The intent of this approach is to maintain a generally consistent built form in the older and more established neighbourhoods of the City. The proposed 7.9 metre setback is generally consistent with the abutting corner property with a large setback to Florence Avenue. The variances regarding the driveway width are due to the shared nature of the driveway. Although the minimum width of the driveway is within the Zoning By-law permissions, the Zoning By-law must be applied to each individual lot. As the driveway straddles the proposed property line, the portion of the driveway on each lot is required to have a variance. The intent of the Zoning By-law is to maintain widths that are wide enough to comfortably support vehicles, but not so wide as the over-pave a property. This is maintained through the proposed development. The driveway is 3.47 metres, which is a permitted width. The dividing property line results in the requirement for a variance and otherwise would not be required. Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? A common approach to determine if the effect of a variance is minor is to consider the impacts on the surrounding area. The variances to the driveway width are to facilitate the creation of a shared driveway, straddling the property line between the retained and severed parcels. By placing this driveway centrally, no impacts are anticipated to neighbouring properties. The proposed front yard setbacks are generally consistent with the surrounding area and allow for landscaping in the front yard. A reduced front yard setback is not anticipated to have a negative impact. The width of the severed lot requests a reduction of 0.6 metres, from 10.5 metres down to 9.9 metres. Due to the creation of a shared driveway, the boundaries of the severed and retained lots are less defined than in circumstances where each lot has their own driveway. The non-curb cut portion of the severed lot remains consistent with properties in the area that have their own individual driveway, and no negative impacts are anticipated. Are the Variances Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The proposed variances represent a form of gentle intensification that is generally supported by planning staff. The consolidated driveway is a desirable solution to enable parking at the rear of the properties. This arrangement decreases the paved area in the front yard of the retained and severed lots, while having the parking areas screened from public view. The variances facilitate the desirable redevelopment of the subject property. Planning Comments Consent Applications B2025-004 and B2025-005: In considering all the relevant Provincial legislation, Regional and City policies and regulations, Planning staff offer the following comments: Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Staff are satisfied that the proposed severance application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement in general and as it relates to housing policies in Chapter 2 regarding intensification and facilitating housing options. The creation of a new parcel contributes to gentle intensification, with the total of six Additional Dwelling Units adding further housing options to the area. Section 2.2 1 (b) of the PPS 2024 states that Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing options and densities to meet projected needs of current and future residents of the regional market area by permitting and facilitating all housing options required to meet the social, health, economic and well- being requirements of current and future residents, can remain achievable. The proposed consent application will contribute towards housing needs and is therefore consistent with this policy direction. Regional Official Plan (ROP): - ROP. Regional policies require municipalities to plan for a range of housing in terms of form, tenure, density, and affordability to satisfy the various physical, social, economic, and personal support needs of current and future residents within these designations. The neighbourhood provides for the physical and community infrastructure required for residential development, including transportation networks, municipal water and wastewater systems, and a broad range of social and public health services, conforming with Policy 2.D.1 of the ROP. Staff are satisfied that the proposed severance applications adhere to these policies and conforms to the ROP. Community Areas Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential Policy 3.C.2.50 of the Official Plan establishes the intent for Community Areas: The planned function of Community Areas is to provide for residential uses as well as non- residential supporting uses intended to serve the immediate residential areas. The proposed consent in conformity with this policy. The retained and severed lots will continue to provide residential uses. Policy 3.C.2.52. provides direction regarding intensification in Community Areas: Limited intensification may be permitted within Community Areas in accordance with the applicable land use designation on Map 3 and the Urban Design Policies in Section 11. The proposed development must be sensitive to and compatible with the character, form and planned function of the surrounding context. The following Sections of the Official Plan are applicable to this application in implementing Policy 3.C.2.52.: 15.D.3.8. The Low Rise Residential land use designation will accommodate a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, semi-detached dwellings, street townhouse dwellings, townhouse dwellings in a cluster development, low-rise multiple dwellings, special needs housing, and other forms of low-rise housing. 15.D.3.9. The City will encourage and support the mixing and integrating of innovative and different forms of housing to achieve and maintain a low-rise built form. The proposed consent will create one additional parcel for low rise residential use. This use is permitted in the Low Rise Residential land use designation, which will contribute to maintaining a low-rise built form in the area, conforming to the above noted policies. Section 17.E.20.5 of the Official Plan implements Section 51 of the Planning Act and contains policies regarding infill development and lot creation (Consent Policies).These policies state the following: Applications for consent to create new lots will only be granted where: a) the lots comply with the policies of this Plan, any Community Plan and/or Secondary Plan, and that the lots are in conformity with the Zoning By-law, or a minor variance has been granted to correct any deficiencies; b) the lots reflect the general scale and character of the established development pattern of surrounding lands by taking into consideration lot frontages, areas, and configurations; c) all of the criteria for plan of subdivision are given due consideration; d) the lot will have frontage on a public street; e) municipal water services are available; f) municipal sanitary services are available except in accordance with Policy 14.C.1.19; g) a Plan of Subdivision or Condominium has been deemed not to be necessary for proper and orderly development; and, h) the lot(s) will not restrict the ultimate development of adjacent The proposed consent conforms with the above noted policy. The retained and severed lots meet the requirements of the Zoning By-law, except the noted provisions where variances are requested. In satisfying 17.E.20.5.b), a mix of lot fabrics are found in the area. The existing lot is generally larger than those observed in the area, and the proposed lots are generally reflective of the lotting pattern of the area, particularly the narrowerproperties along Huber Street. Figure 4: Consent sketch Zoning By-law 2019-051 RES-4-law 2019-051. The table below outlines the RES-4 zone requirements and conformity of the retained and severed parcels: This review of the Zoning By-law confirms that the request variances are required to facilitate the proposed development. The request to amend both minimum and maximum driveway width is due to the driveway being shared between the two properties, with roughly being on each the severed and retained lot. The maximum also requires a Zone Retained Lot Severed Lot Provision Requirement Provided Conformity Requirement Provided Conformity 2222 Minimum 360 m 512 m Y 360 m 582 m Y Lot Area Minimum 10.5 m 10.5 m Y 10.5 m 9.9 m N Lot Width Minimum 11.65 m 7.92 m N 9.65 m 7.92 m N Front Yard Maximum 13.65 m 7.92 m Y 11.65 7.92 m Y Front Yard Minimum 7.5 m 16.4 m Y 7.5 m 16.4 m Y Rear Yard Minimum 1.2 m 1.2 m Y 1.2 m 1.2 m Y Interior Side Yard Minimum 4.5 m N/A N/A 4.5 m N/A N/A Exterior Side Yard Maximum 55% < 55% Y 55% < 55% Y Lot Coverage Minimum 2.6 m 2.02 m N 2.6 m 1.45 m N Driveway Width Maximum 8 m 9.0 m N 8 m 9.83m N Driveway Width Easement Applications B2025-004 and B2025-005 also include the creation of an easement. This is a reciprocal easement providing each lot with access rights over the area of the shared driveway. This is necessary as half the width of the driveway is on each property, and a car cannot traverse the driveway without being on the other lot. Transportation Services recommends a slight adjustment to the easement area, as reflected in their comments below. Where the applicant intends for the easement to cover just the primary width of the access driveway, Transportation recommends slightly expanding the area at the rear parking area to provide greater flexibility to vehicles entering and exiting these parking spaces. The revised easement area is reflected in the recommended approval. Planning Conclusions/Comments: With respect to the criteria for the subdivision of land listed in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, staff is satisfied that the creation of the severed lots are desirable and appropriate. Environmental Planning Comments: The owner will enter into an agreement to complete a Tree Preservation/Enhancement Plan prior to demolition/building permit/grading/servicing, etc. for both the severed and retained parcels. Heritage Planning Comments: No concerns. Building Division Comments: A2025-011: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permits for the single detached dwelling with 3 attached additional dwelling units is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division @ building@kitchener.ca with any questions. A2025-012: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance provided building permits for the single detached dwelling with 3 attached additional dwelling units is obtained prior to construction. Please contact the Building Division at building@kitchener.ca with any questions. B2025-004: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed consent. Region of Waterloo and Area Municipalities' Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services (DGSSMS) allows only one service per lot. Separate building permit(s) will be required for the demolition of the existing building, as well as construction of the new residential buildings. B2025-005: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed consent. Engineering Division Comments: B2025-004: Severance of any blocks within the subject lands will require separate, individual service connections for sanitary, storm, and water, in accordance with City policies. The owner is required to make satisfactory financial arrangements with the Engineering Division for the installation of new service connections that may be required to service this property, all prior to severance approval. Our records indicate sanitary, storm and water municipal services are currently available to service this property. Any further enquiries in this regard should be directed to christine.goulet@kitchener.ca Any new driveways are to be built to City of Kitchener standards. All works are at the building. A servicing plan showing outlets to the municipal servicing system will be required to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division prior to severance approval. Every effort is to be made to avoid impacting existing City owned trees in the right-of-way. A Development Asset Drawing (digital AutoCAD) is required for the new site infrastructure with corresponding layer names and asset information to the satisfaction of the Engineering Division prior to severance approval. The owner must ensure that the basement elevation of the building can be drained by gravity to the municipal sanitary sewer. If basement finished floor elevations do not allow for gravity drainage to the existing municipal sanitary system, the owner will have to pump the sewage to achieve gravity drainage from the property line to the municipal sanitary sewer in the right of way. B2025-005: Every effort must be made to design the site to not impact existing City owned street trees. Parks/Operations Division Comments: B2025-005: Cash-in-lieu of park land dedication will be required prior to deed endorsement of the severed parcel as 1 new development lot will be created. The cash-in-lieu dedication required is $11,862. Park Dedication is calculated at 5% of the new development lots only, with a land valuation calculated by the lineal frontage of 9.91m at a land value of $36,080 per frontage meter with a per unit cap of $11,862. There are existing City-owned street trees that will be impacted by the proposed development. Forestry staff have considered the proposed design and compensation for the tree located in the middle of the existing lot will be accepted in the form of cash-in-lieu. The cash-in-lieu required for the removal of tree #10037950 is $3600.00 and required prior to deed endorsement of B2025-004, B2025-005 or building permit issuance which ever occurs first. The City owned street tree located at the southwest corner of the property should be protected in place to City standards throughout all demolitions and construction. Please see image below and https://www.kitchener.ca/en/water-and- environment/tree-bylaws-and-management.aspx. Transportation Planning Comments: A2025-011: Transportation Services can support the requested driveway width of 1.45m, provided that a mutual access agreement be registered on title. See the red hatched area below. A2025-012: Transportation Services can support the requested driveway width of 2.02m, provided that a mutual access agreement be registered on title. See the red hatched area below. Region of Waterloo Comments: Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of the fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Any submission requirements may be subject to peer review, at the owner/ Owner/Devel-law 23-062. If any other applications are required to facilitate the application, note that fees are subject to change and additional requirements may apply. Any future development on the lands subject to the above-noted consent applications will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Prior to final approval, City staff must be in receipt of the above-noted Regional condition clearances. GRCA Comments: Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications. The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes. The properties are not subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24 and, therefore, permission from GRCA is not required. Hydro One Comments: We are in receipt of your Application for Consent, B2025-004 and B2025-005 dated 2025- 01-23. We have reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. Our preliminary review considers issues affecting consult their local area Distribution Supplier. Where Hydro One is the local supplier the Owner/Applicant must contact the Hydro subdivision group at subdivision@Hydroone.com or 1-866-272-3330. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: Stormcentre (hydroone.com) entering the address or by zooming in and out of the map. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan (ROP) Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Proposed Site Plan Attachment A - Proposed Site Plan PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES th 150 Frederick Street, 8floor Kitchener Ontario N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 Fax: 519-575-4449 www.regionofwaterloo.ca Erica Ali W. Phone: 226-751-3388 File: D20-20/25 KIT January 31, 2025 VIA EMAIL Connie Owen Administrative Clerk, Legislative Services City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Re: Comments on Consent Applications: B2025-002 to B2025-004 Committee of Adjustment Hearing February 18, 2025 City of Kitchener Please accept the following comments for the above-noted Consent applications to be considered at the upcoming Committee of Adjustment Hearing. AM File No: B 2025-002 Address: 685 Fischer-Hallman Rd Location: TRACT GERMAN COMPANY PT LOT 47 RP 58R13851 PT 1 Owner: 1465762 Ontario Ltd c/o Sharon Shaw (Kingsley Property Management) Applicant: CTS Planning & Land Development c/o Chris Stoyanovich Owner/applicant is seeking consent to sever part of parcel to register lease over 21 years for landslocated at the corner of regional roads, Ottawa St S and Fischer Hallman. This amends the existing lease between the tenant (PPFWEN Restaurant Inc) and the property owner (1465762 Ontario Ltd). The consent is for an irregular shaped part of land with restaurant/ drive-thru (706.4 sqm) within the commercial shopping plaza (15, 226 sqm). There is no proposed change to land use or site alteration. The lands are designated Built-Up Area within the Urban Area Boundary in the ROP, designated Commercial in the City’s Official Plan, and zoned COM 2(35) “Neighbourhood Shopping Centre”. Regional Road Access The subject lands are located at the corner of Ottawa St S (RR#4) and Fischer-Hallman Rd (RR#58), with access to both Regional Roads.To allow for the continued use of the existing access(es), acopy of a signed mutual access agreement for both the severed and retained parcels isrequired by the Region as condition ofapproval. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provideduntil such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands, and one record associated with the adjacent property at 1425 Ottawa St S, identifying a high-levelthreat (Kitchener- Wilmot Hydro Inc -Electrical Utility Site). In summary, Regional Staff has no objectionto this application subject to the following condition(s): 1.That the Owner/Developersubmit a copy of the signed mutual access agreement for both severed and retained parcels to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-003 Address: 180 Ahrens St W Description: PLAN 75 PT LOT 1 PT LOT 2 Owner: David Craig Dumart Applicant: David Craig Dumart Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever to create new residential lot; being severed lot - 318 sqm area with 14.8m frontage on Wilhem St; and retained lot – 372 sqm area with 13.7m frontage on Ahren St W and 24m frontage on Wilhem St. The application states existing lot is vacant (partially completed foundation with building permit), proposes future single detached dwelling on each lot.. The lands are designated Built- up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. AM File No: B2025-004 (lot creation); B2025-005 (easement) Address: 86 Florence Ave Description: PLAN 308 LOT 110 PT LOT 109 PT LOT 111 PT LOT 116 Owner: Knezevic Mirko Applicant: Bobicon Ltd C/O Boban Jokanovic Owner/applicant proposes consent to sever for new lot creation and access easement. Severed lot is proposed 582.59sqm area with 9.91m frontage; retained lot is 512.73 sqm area with 10.52m frontage; and easement is 70.71sqm area, with 48.77m depth and 1.45m width. Redevelopment is proposed for a single detached dwelling with 4 units on each lot. Access easement is proposed for shared drive to access rear parking located on both lots. The lands are designated Built-up Area within the Urban Area boundary in the ROP, designated Low Rise Residential in the City Official Plan, and zoned RES-4. Threats Inventory Database The following information is provided in the interim, until such time as access to the Threat Inventory Database (TID) has been transferred to the Area Municipality. On review of the Threat Inventory Database, there are no records associated with the subject lands or adjacent lands. Regional Fees Regional staff have not received the fee for consent review of $350 per application. The payment of fee will be required as a condition of approval. In summary, Regional Staff has no objection to this application subject to the following condition(s): 1. That the Owner/Developer submit the consent review fee of $350 per application to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. General Comments Any submission requirements may be subject to peer review, at the owner/ Owner/Developer’s expense as per By-law 23-062. If any other applications are required to facilitate the application, note that fees are subject to change and additional requirements may apply. Any future development on the lands subject to the above-noted consent applications will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof. Prior to final approval, City staff must be in receipt of the above- noted Regional condition clearances. Please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the staff reports, decisions and minutes pertaining to each of the consent applications noted above. Should you require Regional Staff to be in attendance at the meeting or have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank you, Erica Ali RPP Planner, Regional Growth, Development and Sustainability Services Regional Municipality of Waterloo January 27, 2024 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 005 – 42 Hillcrest Lane - No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 006 – 19 Carlin Avenue - No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 007 – 864 King Street West - No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 008 – 1035 Ottawa Street North - No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 009 – 775 Queen Street South - No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 010 – 180 Ahrens Street West - No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 011 – 86 Florence Avenue (retained) - No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 012 – 86 Florence Avenue (severed) - No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 4880325 28935 Yours Truly, Katrina Fluit Transportation Planner (226) 753-4808 CC: Connie Owen, City of Kitchener CofA@Kitchener.ca Document Number: 4880325 January 31, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting February 18, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-00619 Carlin Avenue A 2025-007864 King Street West A 2025-0081035 Ottawa Street North A 2025-009775 Queen Street South A2025-010180 Ahrens Street West A 2025-01186 Florence Avenue A 2025-01286 Florence Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B 2025-002685 Fischer Hallman Road B 2025-003180 Ahrens Street West B 2025-00486 Florence Avenue B 2025-00586 Florence Avenue Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff has reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications.The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman,CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority From:LANDUSEPLANNING To:Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:Kitchener - 86 Florence Avenue - B 2025-004 and B 2025-005 Date:Thursday, January 30, 2025 1:51:51 PM Hello, We are in receipt of your Application for Consent, B 2025-004 and B 2025-005 dated 2025-01-23. We have reviewed the documents concerning the noted Plan and have no comments or concerns at this time. Our preliminary review considers issues affecting Hydro One’s 'High Voltage Facilities and Corridor Lands' only. For proposals affecting 'Low Voltage Distribution Facilities’ the Owner/Applicant should consult their local area Distribution Supplier. Where Hydro One is the local supplier the Owner/Applicant must contact the Hydro subdivision group at subdivision@Hydroone.com or 1-866-272-3330. To confirm if Hydro One is your local distributor please follow the following link: Stormcentre (hydroone.com) Please select “Search” and locate the address in question by entering the address or by zooming in and out of the map. If you have any further questions or inquiries, please contact Customer Service at 1-888-664-9376 or e-mail CustomerCommunications@HydroOne.com to be connected to your Local Operations Centre If you have any questions please feel free to contact myself. Thank you, Dennis De Rango Specialized Services Team Lead, Real Estate Department Hydro One Networks Inc. Tel: (905)946-6237 Email: Dennis.DeRango@HydroOne.com