HomeMy WebLinkAboutINS-2025-132 - Park Tree and Bench Dedication ProgramStaff Report
Infrastructure Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Community and Infrastructure Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: May 12, 2025
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff Silcox -Childs, Director, Parks & Cemeteries, 519-783-8877
PREPARED BY: Mark Parris, Manager, Parks and Open Space Design and
Development 519-783-8872
Cara Lozano, Associate Landscape Architect, 519-588-7908
WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards
DATE OF REPORT:
REPORT NO.:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
March 19, 2025
INS -2025-132
Park Tree and Bench Dedication Program
That the revised Park Tree and Bench Dedication Program be approved as outlined in
report INS -2025-132.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
• The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the tree and bench dedication program
assessment and present council with a modified dedication program informed by these
findings.
• The key finding of this report is that the previous programs were found to have several
shortcomings including inefficiencies in the administrative process, unsustainable pricing of
memorial items, lack of equitable dedication options, and lack of strategic location criteria
and placement of features.
• A newly introduced bench dedication program is intended to be cost neutral and is
proposed to consist of 10 -year plaque recognition periods on pre-exiting benches, 20 -year
plaque recognition periods with the donation of new benches, and a flexible memorial forest
program at a range of price points. In both programs, the City of Kitchener will retain
ownership of the bench and trees.
• The financial implications associated with the revised dedication program are tied to the
additional administrative functions required to oversee it. Administrative support will be
provided by an existing Operations Technologist approved through the 2025 budget. The
program itself is intended to be self funded without the need of additional capital budget.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
Page 631 of 673
• Engagement included efforts conducted as part of the parks master plan "Places & Spaces"
engagement and included community and Council feedback via a survey and internal staff
engagement on lessons learned from the previous program.
This report supports Cultivating a Green City Together: Focuses a sustainable path to a
greener, healthier city; enhancing & protecting parks & natural environment while
transitioning to a low -carbon future; supporting businesses & residents to make climate -
positive choices.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Kitchener operated an informal park bench and tree dedication program which was
put on hold in 2020 due to resource constraints and priorities associated with the COVID-19
pandemic response. The program allowed residents to dedicate trees, benches and other
amenities throughout the city's parks, trails and open spaces.
The program consisted of residents reaching out to pursue dedication features through either
phone or e-mail. The placement of dedication features was largely selected by the participating
resident, owned by the participant, and then maintained and replaced by the City in perpetuity.
The program was not resourced appropriately and resulted in inefficiencies and unanticipated
operational impacts.
On October 16th of 2023, City Council approved a motion for staff to review the tree and bench
dedication program and develop a new program. The motion directed staff to review the
following considerations:
• Current program strengths and weaknesses.
• Administrative efficiencies.
Best practices and lessons learned from other municipalities.
Resourcing, costs and costs recoveries.
Technology solutions to streamline process (online forms or portals).
In May 2024, work on the dedication program update was rescheduled to align with the
Sponsorship policy update. Following the confirmation of the Sponsorship policy update scope
of work in February 2025, Staff advanced the proposed tree and bench dedication program to
bring back to Council for approval alongside the consideration of the Parks Master Plan
(Places) approval.
REPORT:
The following is an overview of the findings of the review and recommended changes from the
informal program to the new programs for both bench and tree dedications. The full review
report is found in Attachment `A'
Existing Program
Through public consultation, internal interviews and feedback from Council, the existing
informal program was found to have critical shortcomings:
• Inefficiencies in the administrative process
• Unsustainable pricing of memorial items
Page 632 of 673
Lack of equitable dedication options
Lack of strategic location criteria specifically for benches
Inefficiencies of participant -owned single tree dedications leading to unsustainable
replacement rates
The recommendations proposed within this report respond to the October 2023 council motion,
address the inefficiencies and challenges that surfaced during the assessment, and provide
improved customer service through variable pricing and technological and access
improvements.
Bench Dedication Program
The proposed bench dedication program aims to re -align the expectations of bench ownership
in public parks and allow for bench locations to be selected in pre -identified parks, trails or
open space locations. There are also critical improvements to the application and payment
processes and offering more affordable bench dedication options. These key changes are
necessary to streamline operations, standardize offerings, and operate more equitably and
sustainably as a true cost -neutral program.
The revised bench dedication program will offer both the option for plaque leasing on existing
benches, and the possibility to pay for the installation of a new bench in pre -identified areas.
The table below compares the previous informal program and the new recommended program:
Category
Former Program
Recommended Program
Locations
Anywhere; requested by
Pre -determined existing benches
participant
Pre -determined locations for new
dedication bench installation
Lifecycle
In perpetuity
10 -year plaque recognition
period on existing benches
20 -year plaque recognition
period with the donation of a new
bench
Asset Ownership
Plaque — Program participant
Plaque — Program participant
Bench — Program participant
Bench — City of Kitchener
Costs
Standard Bench and Plaque -
A dedication plaque on existing
$1500 (2015 cost)
bench: $600
This included:
This covers:
• Wood bench
• Cost of plaque (including
• Concrete pad
shipping)
• Recognition plaque
• Cost of labour
Page 633 of 673
Category
Former Program
Recommended Program
Locations
Premium Bench and Plaque -
New memorial bench and
$2700 (2015 cost)
concrete pad: $6500
This included:
This covers:
• Premium bench
• Cost of park bench
• concrete pad
• Cost of concrete pad
• recognition plaque
• Cost of memorial plaque
Process
Program participant reaching
Online map of available locations
out to supervisor of parks
for both existing benches and
infrastructure
potential bench installation.
Supervisor of parks
Online portal for application
infrastructure conducting intake,
intake and payment
payment, consultation with
participant, and feature
COK staff to accept applications,
installation coordination
coordinate installation, handle
correspondence with participant
Mapping portal to be maintained
and updated by staff
Staff Responsible
Supervisor of Parks
Park Operations Technologist
Infrastructure
Tree Dedication Program - Memorial Forests
The implementation of a memorial forest program is intended to provide a unique and
environmentally focused way for residents to honour loved ones or events while reducing cost
barriers. The program will strategically align with the urban forest tree canopy targets. The
memorial forest program will offer dedication opportunities at a range of price points, where
donations towards the program contribute to our urban forest growth and stewardship. Rather
than plaques, donors will be recognized through a public online database.
Single tree dedications with plaques are available through Kitchener Cemeteries tribute
program which includes several memorial options including memorial benches and trees.
The table below compares to the previous park tree dedication program and the new
recommended program:
Category
Former Program
Recommended Program
Locations
Anywhere; requested by
participant
Memorial forest; location to align
with Urban Forestry Strategy
Page 634 of 673
Category
Former Program
Recommended Program
Lifecycle
In perpetuity
In perpetuity
Asset Ownership
Program participant
City of Kitchener
Costs
$850 (2015 cost)
Donation minimum of $50
Process
Program participant reaching out
Online portal to provide program
to supervisor of parks
information, receive donations,
infrastructure
and recognize donors
Supervisor of parks infrastructure
conducting intake, payment,
consultation with participant, and
feature installation coordination
Staff Responsible
Supervisor of Parks
Park Operations Technologist
Infrastructure
The revised bench and tree dedication programs will provide opportunity to rebrand the
programs to include both dedications and celebrations within the City's parks and open spaces.
Memorial programs continue to be offered through Kitchener Cemeteries.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports Cultivating a Green City Together: Focuses a sustainable path to a
greener, healthier city; enhancing & protecting parks & natural environment while
transitioning to a low -carbon future; supporting businesses & residents to make climate -
positive choices.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget.
Operating Budget — Additional administrative functions are part of the new Operations
Technologist position approved through the 2025 budget.
It is anticipated that following the initial program implementation requiring approximately 20%
capacity of the position that the ongoing administration would account for approximately 10-15%
of time allocation.
The tree and bench dedication programs are intended to be self-funded with no additional capital
budget required.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
Page 635 of 673
INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the
council / committee meeting.
CONSULT — Engagement contributing towards the assessment of the tree and bench dedication
program occurred internally and with the broader community through the City of Kitchener's
parks master plan, and through consultations with relevant internal stakeholders and council
members. For an in-depth summary of this engagement, please refer to Appendix A.
Community members provided insight about dedication type, dedication location, lifespan of a
dedication feature, costing, and more. Many themes emerged regarding making a dedication
program that is fair, equitable, inclusive, and accessible to everyone, including community,
anti -capitalism, cost-sharing options, and naming suggestions for parks.
Internal engagement for tree and bench dedication consisted of internal stakeholder meetings
through Places and Spaces, and through separate additional meetings with representative's
form Parks Operations, Forestry, Equity Anti -Racism and Reconciliation (EARR) and
Technology Innovation Services (TIS).
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter
APPROVED BY: Denise McGoldrick, General Manager of Infrastructure Services
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A — City of Kitchener Dedication Program; Program Analysis and
Recommendations
Page 636 of 673
j w
14 TwOlOWil ", It w
PROGRAM ANALYSIS AND RECOMMEND A IFIONS
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT
PARKS AND CEMETERIES
Page 637 of 673
1 CONTENTS
2 Notice of Motion - P. Singh - Park Dedication Program Review............................................................3
3 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................4
4 Analysis
..................................................................................................................................................6
4.1
Evaluation of Current Dedication Program's strengths and weaknesses...................................6
4.1.1
Community Engagement.........................................................................................................6
4.1.2
Internal Engagement...............................................................................................................7
4.1.3
Feedback from Council............................................................................................................8
4.2
Analysis of Previous Administrative Procedures.........................................................................9
4.2.1
Memorial Options and Dedication Requests..........................................................................9
4.2.2
Price Breakdown and Inclusion...............................................................................................9
4.2.3
Lifecycle and Maintenance Costs..........................................................................................10
4.2.4
Challenges and Bottlenecks..................................................................................................10
4.2.5
Suggestions for Moving Forward..........................................................................................10
4.3
Examination of Best Practices...................................................................................................11
4.3.1
Standard Tree and Bench Dedication Programs...................................................................11
4.3.2
Memorial Forest Programs...................................................................................................12
4.4
Assessment of Resource Allocation to Ensure Equity and Sustainability..................................12
4.4.1
Equity and sustainability.......................................................................................................12
4.4.2
Resource Allocation...............................................................................................................12
4.5
Exploration of Technological Solutions.....................................................................................12
4.6
Summary....................................................................................................................................13
5 Recommendations...............................................................................................................................14
5.1
Revise The Bench Dedication Program with Key Changes........................................................14
5.1.1
Summary...............................................................................................................................14
5.1.2
Recommendations................................................................................................................14
5.1.3
Rationale...............................................................................................................................15
5.2
Implementing a Memorial Forest..............................................................................................16
5.2.1
Summary...............................................................................................................................16
5.2.2
Rationale...............................................................................................................................16
5.3
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................17
6 Appendix..............................................................................................................................................18
1
Page 638 of 673
6.1 Dedication Feature Request Form.............................................................................................18
6.2 Best Practice Notes....................................................................................................................21
6.2.1 Standard Tree and Bench Dedication Programs...................................................................21
6.2.2 Memorial Forest Programs...................................................................................................23
6.3 Park Dedication Program Survey for Council............................................................................26
2
Page 639 of 673
2 NOTICE OF MOTION - P. SINGH - PARK DEDICATION PROGRAM REVIEW
WHEREAS, the City of Kitchener has a long-standing informal park dedication program that allows
citizens, organizations, and businesses to dedicate trees, benches, and other amenities throughout our
city's parks, trails, and public spaces;
WHEREAS, the current dedication process may involve unnecessary complexities, leading to delays and
inefficient management of resources;
WHEREAS, the Places and Spaces strategy development underway includes a review of the dedication
program and community engagement has demonstrated support for a formalized dedication program;
WHEREAS, the review of the dedication program will ensure that the dedication process is streamlined,
transparent, and accessible, maximizing citizen participation and satisfaction;
WHEREAS, the dedication of trees, benches, and other objects under this program holds significant
value for commemorating loved ones, celebrating accomplishments, and fostering community
engagement;
WHEREAS, it is essential for the City of Kitchener to maintain an efficient and effective dedication
program that aligns with our commitment to sustainability, inclusive community development, the City's
strategic initiatives and goals, and responsible resource management;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to conduct a thorough review of the dedication
program, with a key focus on the dedication process for trees, benches, and other commemorative
donations;
FURTHERMORE, this review shall include, but not be limited to, the following aspects:
1. Evaluation of the current dedication program's strengths and weaknesses, including feedback from
Council, citizens, program participants, and relevant community stakeholders,
2. Analysis of the administrative procedures involved in the dedication process, aiming to identify
potential bottlenecks and areas for improvement,
3. Examination of best practices and lessons learned from other municipalities with successful dedication
programs for similar amenities;
4. Assessment of resource allocation and cost recovery mechanisms related to dedications, ensuring
sustainability and equitable access for all community members;
5. Exploration and recommendation of technological solutions, such as online platforms or mobile
applications, that could streamline the dedication process while ensuring transparency and
accountability,
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the staff shall present their findings and recommendations to City Council
in spring of 2024, along with an implementation plan for any proposed changes to the dedication
program.
Approved unanimously on October 16th, 2023
Page 640 of 673
3 INTRODUCTION
Until the height of the Covid pandemic in 2020, the City of Kitchener operated a long-standing yet
informal park bench and tree dedication program. It allowed residents to dedicate new trees, benches,
and other amenities in parks and open spaces to specific individuals. The informal program was put on
hold in 2020 due to resource constraints and priorities associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
response.
On October 16th of 2023, City Council unanimously approved a motion for staff to review the tree and
bench dedication program and develop a new program. In response to the October 2023 motion, park
staff conducted an evaluation of the previous dedication programs strengths and weaknesses by:
• Analyzing the associated administrative procedures
• Examining best practices from surrounding municipalities
• Assessing resource allocation for sustainability and equity, and
• Exploring technological solutions to easier facilitate a revised dedication program
This process identified key shortcomings of the previous program. Those include:
• Inefficiencies in the administrative process
• Unsustainable pricing of memorial items
• Lack of equitable dedication options
• Lack of strategic location criteria specifically for benches, to align with strategic and operational
considerations for dedication features
On May 28th, 2024, Parks Staff provided a brief memo and 5 -minute presentation of the findings and
recommended options to address Council's motion. CLT discussed the pros and cons of:
1) revising the bench dedication program with key changes,
2) implementing a memorial forest and
3) supporting existing cemeteries programs.
The session concluded with direction that the new dedication program be further developed and then
brought forward from options 1 and 2: a revised bench dedication program with key changes, and a
memorial forest. Work on the dedication policy update was rescheduled to align with previous CLT and
Council goals to in coordination with the Sponsorship policy update.
Following the confirmation of the Sponsorship policy update scope of work in February 2025, Staff
advanced the proposed formal program to bring back to Council for approval alongside the
consideration of the Parks Master Plan (Places) approval.
Through this process, the recommendations for the dedication policy moving forward are:
• A revised bench dedication program that honors the city's tradition of allowing citizens to
commemorate loved ones in public spaces while addressing identified shortcomings.
4
Page 641 of 673
• The implementation of a memorial forest program that aims provide a unique and
environmentally forward way for residents to honour loved ones while reducing cost barriers
and aligning with the Urban Forestry Strategy's tree canopy targets.
Making strategic improvements to the bench dedication program paired with implementing a memorial
forest both maintains the historic dedication program in a more functionally sustainable way and adds a
new, innovative, and environmentally friendly dedication option.
The following report includes an analysis that follows the format of the councils' directives, and
recommendations informed by the information gathered.
Page 642 of 673
4 ANALYSIS
4.1 EVALUATION OF CURRENT DEDICATION PROGRAM'S STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
Evaluation of the current dedication program's strengths and weaknesses, including feedback from
Council, citizens, program participants, and relevant community stakeholders.
4.1.1 Community Engagement
As part of Places and Spaces- the City of Kitchener's parks strategy, engagement was conducted with
both the community and with internal stakeholders.
The summary of community engagement from places and spaces is as follows:
• What: Nearly two thirds of respondents (63%) liked the idea of both single and collective
dedications, while nearly one third (30%) did not want to see dedications at all.
• Where: Just over half of respondents agreed that dedications should be allowed in legacy parks
(57%), city parks (57%), community parks (57%) and neighbourhood parks (50%).
• When: Nearly half of respondents (47%) think a dedication should not last forever, with 36%
thinking the dedication should last the lifespan of the item and 11% thinking the dedication
should last for a fixed term.
• How: When asked if dedicated benches/tables would discourage their use, most respondents
(64%) answered "never", and one quarter (24%) answered "sometimes".
• Who Pays: 48% of respondents believe the resident requesting the dedication should pay the
full cost, while 26% believe the cost should be shared between the resident and the city. Most
respondents (54%) were not willing to pay anything for dedications, and 29% of respondents
were agreeable to paying $1,000. Among those willing to pay any amount of money,
respondents expected the fee to cover materials (87%), installation (78%), maintenance (57%)
and replacement at the end of the lifespan (17%). Respondents who support cost sharing to pay
for dedications referred to equity as a reason to cost share, and suggested creative solutions
such as a lottery system to determine who gets the next dedication space, income -adjusted
payment options, and a grant system to support dedications.
• Sponsorships: Respondents were most agreeable to sponsorship in exchange for naming park
buildings and park amenities (59% somewhat to agreed in both cases). Respondents were least
agreeable to sponsorships in exchange for naming parks (54% somewhat to disagreed). In terms
of naming parks, many respondents suggested reflecting Indigenous land in park names or
asking Indigenous people what name to give to the land. Some respondents suggested naming
parks after the associated street or neighbourhood. In terms of naming park spaces, many
respondents suggested naming parks after the natural features unique to the park itself.
Examples provided include birds, plants, trees, geographical features, and bodies of water.
Page 643 of 673
Many themes emerged regarding making a dedication program that is fair, equitable, inclusive, and
accessible to everyone, including community, anti -capitalism, cost-sharing options, and naming
suggestions for parks. These themes are expanded on below.
• Inclusion & Belonging: Respondents reflected a desire for park spaces to build community and
reflect the community itself with a caution to avoid naming spaces after individuals with
potentially prejudiced histories.
• Equity& Equality: While some respondents recognized that sponsorships and dedications are a
reasonable fundraising method, many mentioned the connection to dedications and
sponsorships as a method of negatively perpetuating capitalism.
• Sustainability: As a sustainable alternative to built dedications, respondents suggested planting
trees as dedications.
• Education & Information: One respondent suggested offering dedication information to funeral
homes, especially those that commonly service historically marginalized communities.
4.1.2 Internal Engagement
4.1.2.1 Places and Spaces
The internal stakeholder meeting as part of places and spaces addressed a multitude of concerns and
insights. As a summary:
• Information about the current/ previous dedication program was confirmed; it was
administered by one Parks Supervisor and offered a range of memorial items, the values
assigned to the items did not reflect their actual costs, and previous contracts allowed donors to
have memorial items in perpetuity.
• Moving forward, we heard from internal stakeholders a need for a reassessment on pricing
(closer to $5500 for a bench and concrete pad), a pre-set list of eligible dedication spots
strategically located based on park amenity needs/gaps, and a "leasing' system to remove the
option of permanent dedications.
• Stakeholders also voiced a need for better -defined nomenclature; "memorial", "Dedication (not
in perpetuity), "Donor Recognition", sponsorship of an asset, etc. Furthermore, the distinction
between memorialization and dedication; (Memorialization: cemeteries, site specific)
(dedication — can be celebratory) & Corporate Sponsorship.
• Based on experiences in other municipalities, staff also discussed lease agreements and the
lease of plaques only.
• Final thoughts from this engagement include a need for yearly assessment of the program, and
exploration about what do with current permanent dedications.
• The most important considerations identified through internal engagement included:
o Staffing and resources to implement
o Well defined program
o Equity
o Not a resource intensive program
o Donate instead of purchasing
o Properly funded (more money or resources)
o Resources
o Are we moving forward with donor recognition, donate vs. purchase,
Page 644 of 673
o Non -object options
4.1.2.2 Internal Feedback
Internal discussions regarding the current dedication program and considerations for future programs
have highlighted several key themes. These were costing, location, design and alternatives, lifecycle,
best practice, and administration and staffing.
Costing
There is a consensus that programs should be self-funded, encompassing the cost of the bench,
replacements, and staff time. Suggestions include allocating a percentage of the cost to a maintenance
fund and offering different pricing options to ensure accessibility and effectiveness. Equity
considerations have also been emphasized, with proposals for holding back a portion of funds for
distribution to equity -deserving groups or providing cheaper alternatives for those unable to afford
higher -priced options.
Location
Regarding location availability parameters, suggestions include limiting the number of benches in
specific areas, creating a list of parks needing more benches, and building an inventory of available spots
to strategically place dedications.
Design and Alternatives
There is a desire to explore alternative dedication methods such as naturalization gardens or dedication
forests. Concerns have also been raised about the theft of bronze plaques, and plaque alternatives as a
response to the issue. The idea of QR code -based e -memorial pages has been proposed as a modern
alternative to explore.
Lifecycle
Maintenance and lifecycle considerations have also been prominent. It has been suggested to establish
clear maintenance protocols regarding the longevity and upkeep of dedication pieces, specifically
pertaining to fixed dedication terms, and replacement guidelines for stolen or damaged assets.
gest Practice
Best practices from other programs, such as Waterloos previous program, have been cited for reference,
emphasizing the importance of learning from successful models.
Administration and staffing
Staff capacity and administrative challenges have also been acknowledged, with recommendations for
dedicated resources or staff to oversee the program.
Other
Finally, there has been a call to differentiate between dedication programs in parks and cemeteries to
ensure clarity in program identity and implementation.
4.1.3 Feedback from Council
On April 30th of 2024, members of council were emailed a survey that sought their feedback on their
vision for a dedication program (Appendix 3).
From their responses, there remains a demand for a dedication program despite one not currently being
active. From resident feedback, councillors relay a want for the program to be more accessible, and with
Page 645 of 673
more options for placing trees and benches. Going further, councillors expressed the belief that
accessibility, plaque options by trees, and ability for participants to select locations special for them
should be prioritized. When asked about other municipal programs that they would like us to look
towards, one councillor suggested we look towards Kincardine's dedication program, and the
dedications along Elmira's Covered Bridge. Lastly, of the five elements being considered as part of the
updated dedication program, councillors were asked to identify those that aligned with their vision for
the program. The items most important from the feedback received are:
Ease of application (ex. online application and payment options)
Provide accessible tree and bench dedication options across all income levels.
Provide communal memorial forest option with City annual event for family members (Equitable
-- open to all regardless of ability to pay).
4.2 ANALYSIS OF PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES
Analysis of the administrative procedures involved in the dedication process, aiming to identify
potential bottlenecks and areas for improvement.
As part of analyzing the administrative procedures of the previous dedication program, an interview was
conducted with the city's operations supervisor. The following questions were asked:
1. Please explain the existing procedure for securing a memorial item, and what type of memorial
items have been installed.
2. For the existing memorial items, how was pricing for the items determined at time of purchase
and what is included in purchase?
3. Approximately how much does the memorial item cost the municipality (including install,
purchase, and maintenance) over the span of its life?
4. In your opinion, what were the largest challenges and bottlenecks with this set up?
S. Moving forward, what suggestions do you have for improving the dedication program?
4.2.1 Memorial Options and Dedication Requests
If pursuing the purchase of a memorial item from the previous program, a dedication request (appendix
1) form was provided to be filled out. In it, a selection of 4 memorial features; Rock and Tree, Premium
Bench and Plaque, Standard Bench and Plaque, and Table with Pad and Plaque. The dedication request
form indicates an availability of pre -determined locations to chose from approved by City of Kitchener
Landscape Architects. Through discussion, this was determined to not be the practice. Site selection
primarily consisted of site visits between the interested party and a member of Parks Operations staff.
4.2.2 Price Breakdown and Inclusion
The dedication request form prices the previous dedication pieces at the following prices:
Rock and Tree - $850
Premium Bench and Plaque - $2700
Standard Bench and Plaque - $1,500
Table with Pad and Plaque - $1,800
Page 646 of 673
Importantly, these prices from 2015 no longer accurately represent the cost of their respective items
and new calculations must be done according to the current market. Furthermore, pieces obtained
during the previous dedication program were maintained in perpetuity and not for fixed terms. For the
cost of the item, residents could establish a dedication piece in a park that was permanently maintained
and replaced by the city.
4.2.3 Lifecycle and Maintenance Costs
Due to the perpetual nature of the previously purchased memorial items, determining an exact number
for the cost of an item during its lifespan is not realistic. Benches purchased through this program were
still considered city benches and were thusly maintained at the same frequency; maintenance and
replacements being conducted annually. Separately from annual maintenance, making replacements
due to vandalism occurred as needed.
4.2.4 Challenges and Bottlenecks
It was expressed that the previous system of allowing donors to select their spots was not realistic and
instead provided additional work and conflict. Furthermore, allowing them to pick their own spots
meant areas highly saturated with benches (e.g.: around the lake at Victoria Park). The program itself
was incredibly onerous and required admin from the beginning to the end of the process so that
information and tasks didn't fall through the cracks. As a result, it was an incredible amount of work.
The supervisor responsible for the program further emphasized a need for an administrator or
dedicated member(s) of staff if the program was to be resurrected. When asked if there were memorial
features previously offered that are unrealistic to move forward, both memorial rocks and picnic tables
were said to pose problems. The stones: often placed along trails (for visibility) but then frequently in
the way of maintenance vehicles. The accessible picnic tables: seldom purchased and vulnerable to
unique damage from water wells due to the placement of the plaque.
4.2.5 Suggestions for Moving Forward
Seating was still considered a need in parks, though it was strongly suggested to limit the available
memorial items and furthermore, to have bench and plaque standards that eliminates complications
associated with customization. This echoes feedback received from other sources.
Along with the removal of memorial rocks, picnic tables, and premium benches from the available
features, memorial trees (where the tree features a plaque dedicated to a specific person) was
identified as problematic by forestry staff, as trees and their growth can often be unpredictable and
frequent tree replacements has been an issue in the past.
A conversation specifically relating to Victoria Park and the suggestion from other parties to stop
offering memorial features at this park was had. This interview yielded that there is still a demand a
need for benches in Victoria Park, but measures must be taken to promote other locations not around
the lake where the most demand had been in the past.
10
Page 647 of 673
The bench adoption/ sponsorship angle is recommended, where the asset would remain municipal
property, but the plaque could be purchased and then affixed to the bench for a period before returning
to them at the end of the term. This would a) make the program more affordable and b) eliminate the
logistic issues that come with the entire asset being owned by a program participant. For the
replacement of plaques after a 5 or 10 -year period to be realistic, they would need to be surface
mounted. When asked about the theft aspect, it was stated that the occasional vandalism that affects all
parks assets was more of an issue that the theft of the bronze plaques.
Additionally, that the supervisor and assistant supervisor of parks operations should be consulted when
determining possible dedication bench locations.
4.3 EXAMINATION OF BEST PRACTICES
Examination of best practices and lessons learned from other municipalities with successful dedication
programs for similar amenities.
4.3.1 Standard Tree and Bench Dedication Programs
Within the immediate area, it should be noted that, at the time of writing this report, the Cities of
Waterloo and Guelph have both paused their tree and bench dedication programs. Per the City of
Cambridge website, their bench dedication program is currently suspended due to excessive orders and
expected late deliveries this year. Through an exploration of municipalities with active dedication
programs, a few key themes can be used to categorize their practices. Those being 1) item design and
availability, 2) pricing 3) location selection 4) administration and dedication applications, and 5) lifecycle
and maintenance. Notes pertaining to these themes and specific municipalities can be found in
Appendix 2.
In examining various municipalities' approaches to standard tree and bench dedication programs,
several common practices have emerged. These include providing a preset list of available locations
where dedications can be made, typically within designated participating parks. Additionally,
municipalities often establish annual application deadlines and installation dates to streamline the
process. A maintenance period is commonly stipulated, during which the city agrees to replace the
dedication, if necessary, usually limited to a single replacement or a predetermined number over the
period. Furthermore, municipalities typically implement a set contract duration, commonly ranging from
five to ten years, to ensure the longevity of the dedication.
In addition to these common practices, other notable approaches have been identified that enhance
their dedication programs. These include administrative approaches such as dedicated e-mail addresses
to handle and manage inquiries efficiently and holding the right to first refusal of renewal at the end of
the initial contract period. Other notable practices include enforcing specific guidelines regarding
memorial items, such as prohibiting the placement of wreaths, flowers, candles, etc., reserving the right
to remove or relocate benches with prior notification to participants, and placing the onus of
maintaining up-to-date contact information on program participants.
11
Page 648 of 673
4.3.2 Memorial Forest Programs
In addition to these common practices, certain memorial forest programs implement notable strategies
to enhance their impact and sustainability. For instance, strategic planting of assets is undertaken to
fulfill various ecological objectives such as naturalization, windbreaks, wildlife corridors, screening, and
reforestation, maximizing the environmental benefits of the program. Furthermore, some programs
establish a development or maintenance fund utilizing a portion of the donations, ensuring ongoing care
and stewardship of the memorial forests for future generations. Tax receipts have also been provided
for donations to the program, incentivizing contributions and facilitating financial transparency.
Additionally, information brochures are made available to the public, offering comprehensive details
about the program's mission, objectives, and how individuals can participate, promoting awareness and
engagement within the community.
4.4 ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCE ALLOCATION TO ENSURE EQUITY AND SUSTAINABILITY
Assessment of resource allocation and cost recovery mechanisms related to dedications, ensuring
sustainability and equitable access for all community members.
4.4.1 Equity and sustainability
A meeting was conducted with the City of Kitchener's Equity, Anti -Racism, and Reconciliation team
(EARR) regarding equitable approaches to dedication and possible ways to emphasize EDI principles in
our recommendations moving forward. Through discussion we were informed that a typical dedication
program that consists of residents paying to put names on items in public spaces could not be done
equitably. Both the payment piece and the naming piece would make equity an unrealistic goal. When
approached with the memorial forest alternative, the consensus was that this would be a more
equitable approach.
4.4.2 Resource Allocation
The allocation of staff to this program was a repeated concern throughout our analysis. Internally, our
forestry and operations departments both expressed the onerous nature of the previous program and
the staffing it would require to properly administer a program. In many cases, it has been recommended
to have a member or members of staff dedicated to program administration and implementation so
that issues of staff capacity can be mitigated.
4.5 EXPLORATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS
Exploration and recommendation of technological solutions, such as online platforms or mobile
applications, that could streamline the dedication process while ensuring transparency and
accountability.
Opportunities for technological solutions for the dedication program were addressed during
consultation with a representative from the City's Technology Innovation and Services division. Primarily
the two key pieces of payment collection and mapping/ asset tracking. Both an online payment process
and interactive mapping are both viable options with our current technical abilities.
12
Page 649 of 673
4.6 SUMMARY
The analysis of the City of Kitchener's dedication program uncovered several key challenges and areas
for improvement, informed by engagement with stakeholders, engagement with community, an
examination of best practices, and examination of administrative procedures.
Challenges Identified:
• Administrative Burden: The program was deemed cumbersome for staff, indicating
inefficiencies in administrative processes and resource allocation.
• Financial Sustainability: Pricing of memorial items was considered too low, resulting in financial
losses for the city and highlighting the need for revised pricing structures.
• Equity Concerns: Limited mechanisms existed to maintain equity within the program, raising
accessibility and inclusivity issues for community members.
• Lack of Defined Opportunities Excessive freedom in selecting dedication pieces and locations
led to inconsistencies as well as maintenance and administrative challenges.
Key Feedback:
• Staffing: Stakeholders emphasized the need for dedicated administrative staff to manage the
program effectively.
• Equity: Community members stressed the importance of ensuring equitable access to
dedication opportunities, advocating for measures to support underserved communities and
address participation disparities. Importantly, internal discussions with EDI highlighted the
unrealistic nature of incorporating equity in a standard tree and bench dedication program.
• Memorial Alternatives: Stakeholders expressed interest in exploring alternative dedication
methods, such as establishing a memorial forest. This alternative was viewed favorably for its
environmental sustainability, potential for creating a unique tribute space, and more equitable
principles.
In conclusion, the analysis revealed significant challenges related to administrative burden, financial
sustainability, and equity within the dedication program. Addressing these challenges will be crucial in
enhancing program effectiveness, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring the long-term viability of
dedication opportunities in the City of Kitchener. Additionally, exploring alternative dedication methods
and drawing upon best practices from other municipalities will enrich the city's approach and contribute
to program success.
13
Page 650 of 673
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 REVISE THE BENCH DEDICATION PROGRAM WITH KEY CHANGES.
5.1.1 Summary
This recommendation aims to revitalize the dedication program by focusing on bench dedication in
identified areas. Key changes are necessary to streamline operations, standardize offerings, and operate
more sustainably. The revised bench dedication program will offer both the option for plaque leasing on
existing benches, and the possibility to pay for the installation of a new bench in pre -identified areas.
5.1.2 Recommendations
5.1.2.1 Admin Process Improvement
• Dedicated Administrative Staff: Administrative responsibilities associated with the oversight of
the program to be incorporated into the responsibilities of a full time Operations Technologist
position. This position has been approved through the 2025 Budget. Administrative staff to
manage the program ensures efficient operation, timely processing of dedications, and effective
communication with stakeholders.
• Admin Process to include (but not limited to):
o Request intake
o Request Review
o Payment Processing
o Work order prep for install.
o Maintenance of records,
o Correspondence with relevant parties
o Updating list of available dedication benches
• Resident Responsibilities:
o To keep contact and payment information up to date and accurate and inform
administration staff upon any changes.
5.1.2.2 Lifecycle and maintenance
Dedication plaque recognition period
Providing a recognition period for ten-year terms provides a sustainable revenue stream for the program
and allows for easier maintenance. At end of term, participant to be offered a renewal at the discretion
of the program administrators. Plaque will be returned to the resident if lease not renewed. Factors
influencing offer of renewal include availability of dedication locations and demand for dedication items.
Flowers and wreathes
Memorial features such as flowers, wreathes, stuffed animals, candles, and others are not permitted to
be kept on dedication benches and will be removed by parks operations staff. This practice will aim to
preserve dedication benches as usable public assets.
14
Page 651 of 673
Plaque replacements
Clear policy regarding replacements during the recognition period to be implemented (e.g. one plaque
replacement may be covered with additional replacements paid for by the participant.)
Bench maintenance and replacements
The bench remains an asset owned by the City of Kitchener and will be maintained and replaced through
the standard bench maintenance and replacement schedule. This remains true of new benches that are
installed through the program.
5.1.2.3 Design of dedication items
Plaques available for benches only
Dedication trees, stones, and picnic tables have been identified as being costly and difficult to maintain.
The recommendation moving forward is to limit dedication features to benches with plaques. By
discontinuing plaques on other features, the program can better focus its resources. Dedication forests,
as opposed to individual dedication trees, will be considered to offer a tree dedication option.
Standardization for consistency
Standardizing the design and details of dedication benches and plaques ensures consistency across
dedications, simplifies the selection process for citizens, and facilitates maintenance and
implementation for staff.
5.1.2.4 Placement of dedication items
Determine eligible bench locations
Through consultation and assessment done by staff, specific benches and locations for future benches
can be pre -determined and made available for dedication. This ensures that dedications are in a visually
appealing place while responding to seating needs.
5.1.3 Rationale
5.1.3.1 Maintains Tradition with Improvements:
Revising and improving the dedication program honors the city's tradition of allowing citizens to
commemorate loved ones in public spaces while addressing identified shortcomings. By making key
changes to the program structure and administration, we can ensure its sustainability and effectiveness
for future generations.
15
Page 652 of 673
5.2 IMPLEMENTING A MEMORIAL FOREST
5.2.1 Summary
The implementation of a memorial forest program will aim to:
• Appropriately resource the oversight of the memorial forest program.
• Provide opportunities for community involvement including tree planting.
• Consider cost through an equity lens.
• Align with current tree canopy and Forestry goals through tree placement criteria and
maintenance by the City's Forestry division.
• Recognize donors through a shared online database rather than specific features (individual
trees, benches, stones, etc.)
• Direct funds from donors towards planting trees and maintaining a memorial forest.
• Provide scalable cost options to support an equity approach to program participation.
5.2.2 Rationale
Making strategic improvements to the bench dedication program paired with implementing a memorial
forest both maintains the historic dedication program in a more functionally sustainable way and adds a
new, innovative, and environmentally friendly dedication option.
5.2.2.1 Alignment with Sustainable Urban Forest Strategy canopy target
In January of 2022, City Council supported and approved a tree canopy target of 30% in each ward by
2050 and 33% across Kitchener by 2070 as part of the Sustainable Urban Forestry Strategy. This strategy
includes recognizing the value of current trees, sustaining existing canopy, growing canopy, and
communicating with and involving neighbourhoods. Supporting a memorial forest program as an option
for dedication both supports the growth of the urban canopy and supports community involvement.
5.2.2.2 Expert management far success
Employing dedicated staff to oversee the bench dedication and memorial forest programs ensures
proper management and maintenance for both initiatives. By collaborating with the Forestry Division
and following established criteria for tree planting and maintenance, the City can ensure the success and
longevity of the memorial forest.
5.2.2.3 Flexibility and adaptability
Providing the opportunity to record dedications in a shared database as an extension of the memorial
forest program rather than attaching plaques to specific features provides increased flexibility in
placement, replacement and maintenance, and cost requirements. This approach accommodates
changing needs and preferences while ensuring that dedications remain meaningful and accessible to
donors and their families. The "plaque' component could be an online resource or, alternatively, a
singular dedication wall with a display of remembered names.
16
Page 653 of 673
5.2.2.4 Innovative and sustainable approach
Pursuing a memorial forest program as an alternate dedication method offers a unique and
environmentally friendly way for citizens to honor loved ones. By using funds for tree planting and
maintenance, the City can create a lasting tribute that enhances the natural beauty of the city and
contributes to its overall sustainability.
5.2.2.5 Maintains tradition with improvements
The previous dedication program allows citizens to commemorate loved ones in public spaces. By
making key changes to the program structure and administration, the City can ensure its
sustainability and effectiveness for future generations.
5.3 CONCLUSION
The assessment of the City of Kitchener's dedication program highlights several areas for improvement,
including administrative efficiency, pricing sustainability, equity, and level of involvement.
The proposed options offer distinct paths forward, each with its own set of recommendations to address
the identified limitations. These recommendations aim to address the identified shortcomings of the
previous dedication program while aligning with the overarching goals and priorities of the City of
Kitchener. By carefully weighing the benefits and considerations of each option, Council can make an
informed decision that best serves the interests of The City of Kitchener and its residents.
Regardless of the option pursued, there should be regular evaluations of the program to assess
effectiveness and address emerging issues, to monitor its financial sustainability (and adjust pricing and
resource allocation as needed).
17
Page 654 of 673
6 APPENDICES
6.1 DEDICATION FEATURE REQUEST FORM
In
Page 655 of 673
II'J-1'(.',HENER Work Order Number
(office use only)
City of Kitchener
Dedication Feature Request Form
The Dedication Feature Program invites the public to pay tribute to a person, group or occasion by purchasing a
dedication feature for installation in a public park. Please complete the Dedication Feature Request Form,
submit along with payment to the location below.
Donor Name (Person or Organization):
Address:
Phone: Email:
Please indicate your preference:
Qty
Feature
Rock and Tree Feature
Armourstone and native tree, with plaque affixed to rock
Cost $850
Premium Bench & Plaque (Victoria Park ONLY)
Premium bench on a concrete pad with recognition plaque
Cost $2,700
Standard Bench and Plaque
Wood bench on a concrete pad with recognition plaque
Cost $1,500
Table with Pad and Plaque
Permanent 4 -seat table with accessibility option, with recognition plaque affixed to table
Cost $1,800
Feature Location (Park Name)
(Note: City staff will complete a site visit with you to ensure the correct location within the park is chosen.)
Signature:
19
Date:
Page 656 of 673
Wording to Appear on Plaque(s)
Plaque Orders
• The recognition plaque can accommodate the following combination of text:
Upper case text, 0.25" high
20 letters per line
3 lines max.
• The dedication feature costs above include the standard 2" x 8" plaque. Plaques with additional lettering or
that exceed these measurements will be subject to an additional fee.
• Due to dimensions of wood slats, Operations staff reserves the right to limit the size of the plaque.
• Plaque to be mounted onto front side of wood slat of back rest on benches.
• Wording for the plaque should be respectful and tasteful (avoiding profanity, advertisements, vulgar
statements, etc.) and must meet the approval of the City of Kitchener.
• Operations staff reserves the right to limit the number of plaques dedicated to an individual or group.
• Plaque orders generally take 8-10 weeks for fabrication, delivery, and installation from the time the final proof
approval is signed. However, installation times may vary based on bench style, availability and weather
conditions.
Feature Locations
• Bench location per selection of site locations pre -determined by C of K landscape architect.
• The approved location of a planting site or bench installation depends on proposed future development within
a park, the location of trees, underground utilities, and other site restrictions. Some parks may already be at
capacity and therefore a tree or bench may not be made available for such a park.
Dedication feature orders may be submitted in person at the Kitchener Operations Facility. Please ensure you
include payment with the application form. Prior to your order can be placed, we must have a cheque for the
full amount, payable to the "City of Kitchener".
Kitchener Operations Facility
131 Goodrich Drive
Kitchener, ON
Thank you for your participation in this noteworthy program!
20
Page 657 of 673
6.2 BEST PRACTICE NOTES
6.2.1 Standard Tree and Bench Dedication
Programs
A few key themes categorize best practices
from municipalities with active dedication
program. These are: 1) item design and
availability, 2) pricing 3) location selection 4)
administration and dedication applications, and
5) lifecycle and maintenance.
6.2.1.1 Toronto
Pricing
• Tree and bench dedications are
considered donations to the city and
are therefore a tax deductible.
Location Selection
• Provides a preset list of available
locations which applicants can apply for
• Clearly communicate their parks that
have "reached capacity' and no longer
accept applications.
Admin and Dedication Applications
• Applications taken annually.
• Dedicated e-mail address used for
dedication applications.
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• They have a warranty period on their
dedications. Toronto pays for
replacements and maintenance during
the maintenance period. After that, it's
on the donor of the feature.
6.2.1.2 Oakville
Location Selection
• You can apply to adopt an already
existing bench.
• You take a picture of the bench you
want and send that in with application.
21
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• They operate on a 5 -year contract
where the price includes the product,
care during that time, and the plaque.
• Set renewal fee of $755 + tax after
those 5 years.
• The city has first right to refusal for
renewal.
Other
• Memorial wreathes, flowers, candles
etc. are not permitted.
6.2.1.3 Port Hope
Item Design and Availability
• They have a few dedication options
including benches, trees, paver stones,
athlete wall of honour, and veteran
banners.
Admin and Dedication Applications
• They do all their installs in the spring,
and they have a strict deadline of
March 15th for applications.
6.2.1.4 St. Catharine's
Item Design and Availability
• Due to the varying aesthetics in
different parts of the city, the design of
dedication benches must follow the
design choices of the park its in. Prices
for pieces vary accordingly.
Location Selection
• Applications can request from pre -
approved locations.
• Non -participating parks are clearly
listed.
Admin and Dedication Applications
Page 658 of 673
• They have 2 application deadlines (1 for
spring 1 for fall) April 1 and September
1
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• Their bench contract is 10 years.
6.2.1.5 Windsor
Item Design and Availability
• Benches only
• bench options of different prices
Location Selection
• Bench location to be decided by the
manager of parks operations.
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• Donations accepted for bench
maintenance.
6.2.1.6 London
Item Design and Availability
• Their dedication items include
benches, trees, and memory wall.
Benches
Pricing
• $4500
Location Selection
• From preapproved locations
Admin and Dedication Applications
• City holds the right to move or
remove bench but will first notify
the donor.
• 20 applications accepted a year.
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• 10 -year contract
• They will replace if within that year + 1
free plaque if vandalized. Additional
22
replacements to be covered by
participant.
Other
• Participant's responsibility to keep
contact info up to date.
Trees
Pricing
• $550
Location Selection
• Non -participating parks are clearly
listed.
• Species of tree are preapproved by
forestry.
• Applicant can request a location that's
not from a preapproved list.
Admin and Dedication Applications
• 20 applications accepted a year.
Lifecycle and Maintenance
• 5 -year contract
• Replacement if fails within first 2 years.
Memory Wall
Pricing
• $1500
• Partial funds go to the arboretum.
Location Selection
• Names engraved on a memorial wall at
a local arboretum.
Admin and Dedication Applications
• Participants apply for an engraving.
• 20 applications accepted annually.
• All engravings happen in the fall.
Page 659 of 673
6.2.2 Memorial Forest Programs
Information about memorial forest programs,
taken from their websites.
6.2.2.1 Wall-Custance Memorial Forest (Guelph
Arboretum)
From:
pi_/lg uc fn fl........................................................... _: i.i
yt!2.s/ lVCseirvice
..........................................................................
"The Memorial Forest is a partnership began in
1989 with the Wall-Custance Funeral Home and
Chapel in Guelph. For each donation to the
Wall-Custance Memorial Forest Program, a tree
or shrub is planted in the Memorial Forest using
16 species of native trees and 10 species of
native shrubs as part of reforestation efforts
across The Arboretum. These forested areas
serve as windbreaks, screening, wildlife
corridors and habitat for many species. Ten
percent of each donation to the Memorial
Forest program is added to The Arboretum
Endowment Fund to support development and
maintenance.
Individual names are listed at the Wall-Custance
Funeral Home & Chapel website and on
memorial plaques at the dedication grove. Since
1989, over 18,000 trees and shrubs have been
planted in memory of loved ones. For more
information, please visit the Wall-Custance
website or call the Wall-Custance Funeral Home
& Chapel at (519) 822-0051, or The Arboretum
at (519) 824-4120 ext. 52113."
23
6.2.2.2 Grey Souble
From:
t ps:!/www. ire�sau�ble.on.calfoundadon/me
rnq.iriia.11. f2ir W
"The vision began in 1995, planting a tree in
memory of a loved one — creating a forest. In
1997, utilizing property owned by Grey Sauble
Conservation, the Foundation initiated a
Memorial Forest Program. Trees can be planted
in memory of a loved one, friend or neighbour
at one of three available sites in the watershed
(Pottawatomi, Griersville and Big Mud Lake).
Each year, a plaque is added to the sign listing
the names of the loved ones that have had a
tree planted in their memory. These signs are
located at the memorial forest sites.
Each year, in June, a Commemorative
Ceremony is held at the Administration Centre
to recognize all those who have had a tree
planted in their memory. An invitation to this
Ceremony is extended to you and family of the
loved one. The cost is $75.00 per tree.
To support and enhance this program,
donations are encouraged to help maintain and
expand the Memorial Forest properties. As
memorial trees have been planted every year
since 1997, the properties are nearing capacity,
and the GSCF are in the early stages acquiring
new properties to accommodate future tree
planting throughout the watershed."
Page 660 of 673
Brochures and further information are available
6.2.2.3 Upper Thames River from any of the partners involved.
From:
htt s: Lharne.sr'wer.on.ca landowner- rants -
s: rry Irdslhi..p/ff it stir. tires ....I .in .i..... nn r.ir.i...........
fgarestsl(
.._ ............................
"The Memorial Forest program provides a
natural, lasting tribute to loved ones. The
UTRCA is involved in four memorial forests
across the watershed:
London with Logan and Evans Funeral Homes,
519-433-6181 or 519-451-9350
St. Mary's and Area with Andrew L. Hodges
Funeral Home and the St. Mary's Ministerial
Association
Thamesford/Zorra Township with the Township
of Zorra, 519-485-2490
Woodstock with the City of Woodstock, 519-
539-1291, and Brock and Visser Funeral Home
Burial and Cremation Services, 519-539-8831
Anyone may contact the UTRCA directly and
have a tree planted in the memorial forest of
their choice.
The family of the deceased receives an "In
Memorium" card notifying them that a tree will
be planted in memory of their loved one. A
dedication service is held each fall at the
London, St. Mary's, and Woodstock Memorial
Forests.
The cost varies depending on where the tree is
planted and the tree species:
London — $50 per tree, an income tax receipt
will be issued by the UTRCA.
St. Mary's & Area — $50 per tree
Thamesford/Zorra Township — $40 per tree
Woodstock — $20 per tree
24
Page 661 of 673
6.3 PARK DEDICATION PROGRAM SURVEY FOR COUNCIL
I Required
1. Enter Full name
2. Have you heard from any constituents who participated in the previous dedication
program?
Yes
No
3. Based on feedback from area residents, what aspects of the current program do they most
appreciate, and what aspects would they like to see improved?
4. Based on feedback from area residents, what do you believe should be prioritized in a new
tree and bench dedication program?
5. Are you aware of dedication programs . jr turn Other municipalities and that you would like
Kitchener staff to evaluate as part Of this update? I
& The following elements are being considered as part of updated tree and bench
dedication program in park. Please check all that you agree with
Ease of application lax, online application and payment options)
Provide accessidio tiee and parch drxficalion options across all income levels
Provide tq-r bounded dedicar,r, options (10y, aq,eempnh with ,ability to renew (i e, not in ri
provide communal memorial forest option with City annual event for family members (Equitable open to all
regardlass of ability to Pay)
The program is intended to be cost -neutral
Other (Pleaso list,)
26
Page 662 of 673