Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2025-300 - A 2025-062 - 124 Tupper Crescent Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: July 15, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Jade McGowan, Student Planner, 519-707-4759 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: July 2, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-300 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-062 124 Tupper Crescent RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-062 for 124 Tupper Crescent requesting relief from Section 5.3 a) of Zoning By-law 2019-051, to not require a visual barrier to be provided and maintained between a parking lot and a lot line abutting a residential zone, whereas a minimum 1.8 metre high visual barrier is required in this location, to facilitate the addition of 2 new dwelling units within the existing building for a total of 25 dwelling units, in accordance with Site Plan Application SP24/049/T/AP, BE APPROVED. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to recommend approval of a Minor Variance Application for relief from parking space and parking lot provisions related to visual barriers abutting a residential zone. The key finding of this report is that the requested variance meets the 4 tests of the Planning Act There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received, notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property Committee of Adjustment meeting. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the southeast corner of Tupper Crescent and Confederation Drive, in the Heritage Park Planning Community. The property currently contains a three-storey multiple dwelling and associated paved parking lot at the rear of *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. the building. The lands immediately surrounding the subject property are comprised of low rise and high rise residential uses, including detached dwellings a multiple dwellings. It should be noted that the three (3) properties that directly abut the rear yard parking lot contain multi-storey multiple dwellings, as follows: 301 Heritage Drive: 6-storeys 144 Confederation Drive: 5-storeys 116 Tupper Cres: 3-storeys Figure 1: Location Map Outlined in Red on Map 2 Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential Zone (RES-5-law 2019- 051. The property is subject to Site Plan Application SP24/049/T/AP, which was conditionally th approved July 26, 2024. The Site Plan Application is to convert the three storey multiple dwelling building from 23 dwelling units to 25 dwelling units within the interior of the existing building (i.e., creating 2 new dwelling units). The purpose of the Minor Variance Application is to request relief for there not to be a visual barrier around the existing parking lot adjacent to a residential zone, where a 1.8 metre visual barrier is required. The visual barrier is required to bring the property into compliance with current zoning regulations with the addition of 2 new dwelling units. Relief is required as a Bell easement is located on the subject property and the provision of a visual barrier would otherwise impede access to the utilities within the easement. The easement projects approximately 1.5 metres (5 feet) onto the property along the southeastern interior side lot line and approximately 1.2 metres (4 feet) along the northeastern interior side lot line. It should be noted that the visual barrier is shown on the approved Site Plan drawing (Figure 2) and will be amended to remove the visual barrier, subject to Committees decision on the subject Minor Variance Application. Figure 2: Site Plan Figure 3: Property Survey Showing the Bell Easements Planning Staff visited the site on June 25, 2025. Figure 4: Street View of 124 Tupper Crescent Figure 5: Rear parking lot and landscaped area on the abutting property REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan The intent of the Low Rise Residential land use designation is to accommodate a full range of low density housing types, including the existing multiple dwelling use. The Low Rise Residential designation encourages the mixing and integrating of different forms of housing to achieve and maintain a low rise built form. Section 15.D.3.4 of the Official Plan also provides direction that additions and/or modifications to existing residential buildings in predominantly low density neighbourhoods should be compatible with and respect the massing, scale, design and physical character of the established neighbourhood and have both appropriate landscaped areas and parking areas provided on site. The requested variance to allow for no visual barrier will facilitate the construction of two new dwelling unitswithin the existing building, which maintains a low-rise form of development and is compatible with the neighbourhood scale and design. Therefore, Planning Staff are satisfied that the variance maintains the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The intent of the visual barrier regulation is to ensure that parking lots are adequately screened and buffered from adjacent residential uses. Section 5.3(a) of the Zoning By-law states that where a parking lot is situated on a lot and abuts a residential zone, a visual barrier shall be provided and maintained between the parking lot and such abutting residential zone lot line in accordance with Section 4.18, which states that where a visual barrier is required it shall be a minimum height of 1.8 metres. The visual barrier minor variance is required because of a Bell easement along both the rear lot line and the interior side lot line. Installing a visual barrier in these areas would obstruct access to the utilities within the easement. The property maintains a minimum of approximately 10 metres of landscaped area between the parking lot and the neighbouring multiple dwellings on two different properties along the rear lot line to the southeast. To the northeast, there is approximately 4 metres of landscaped buffer between the parking lot and the abutting property. This landscaping provides an adequate buffer between the parking lot and the neighboring residential uses. It should be noted that there is a chain link fence along the eastern portion of the southeastern interior side lot line, however this fence is located on the abutting property. Planning Staff are satisfied that the variance meets the general intent of the Zoning By- law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? The proposed relief will not result in any substantial negative impact on neighboring properties. As such, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the effects of the requested variance is minor in nature. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The requested variance would facilitate the construction of two additional dwelling units within the existing multiple dwelling, providing a form of gentle intensification. It will also allow unobstructed access to the existing Bell easement. As such, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable and appropriate for the subject property. Environmental Planning Comments: No comments. Heritage Planning Comments: No comments or concerns. Building Division Comments: No concerns. Engineering Division Comments: No concerns. Parks Planning Comments: Parkland dedication is not required for this application as it will be charged to the Applicant during the Site Plan Application Process. Parkland dedication of $7,660.00 will be required. Transportation Planning Comments: No concerns. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. A notice of the application was mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 Approved Site Plan Application SP24/049/T/AP June 24, 2025 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting June 15, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 062 – 124 Tupper Cresent – No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 063 – 55 Shoemaker Street – No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 064 – 82 Brunswick Avenue (Future Severed) – No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 065 – 82 Brunswick Aveune (Future Retained) – No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 066 – 508 New Dundee Road – No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 067 – 38 Fifth Aveune (Side A) – No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 068 – 38 Fifth Aveune (Side B) – No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 069 – 439 Alice Aveune (Side A) – No Concerns 9) A 2025 – 070 – 439 Alice Aveune (Side B) – No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Document Number: 5014252 5014252 Yours Truly, Joshua Beech Falshaw Transportation Planner jbeechfalshaw@regionofwaterloo.ca Document Number: 5014252 June 30, 2025via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 DearMarilyn Mills, Re:Committee of Adjustment Meeting July15, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-062124 Tupper Crescent A 2025-06355 Shoemaker Street A 2025-064& A 2025-06582 Brunswick Avenue A 2025-066508 New Dundee Road A 2025-067& A 2025-06838 Fifth Avenue A 2025-069& A 2025-070439 Alice Avenue Applicationsfor Consent B2024-031829 Stirling Avenue South Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff havereviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications. The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes.The properties arenot subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24and,therefore,a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman, CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority From:Jenna Auger To:Committee of Adjustment (SM); Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:RE: ACTION REQUIRED - Committee of Adjustment Application Review - July 15, 2025 Meeting Date:Monday, June 23, 2025 10:07:35 AM Attachments:image001.png Good morning, Metrolinx is in receipt of the following Committee of Adjustment agenda for Kitchener. Upon review, we note that no applications fall within the Metrolinx review zone. As such, Metrolinx issues no comments for this agenda. Best Regards, Jenna Auger (She/Her) Project Analyst, Adjacent Construction Review (ACR) Development & Real Estate Management T: (416)-881-0579 20 Bay Street | Toronto | Ontario | M5J 2W3 **Adjacent Construction Review (ACR) was formerly Third-Party Projects Review (TPPR)** From: Committee of Adjustment (SM) <CommitteeofAdjustment@kitchener.ca> Sent: June 19, 2025 12:20 PM To: Committee of Adjustment (SM) <CommitteeofAdjustment@kitchener.ca> Subject: ACTION REQUIRED - Committee of Adjustment Application Review - July 15, 2025 Meeting EXTERNAL SENDER: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe. EXPÉDITEUR EXTERNE: Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe à moins qu’ils ne proviennent d’un expéditeur fiable, ou que vous ayez l'assurance que le contenu provient d'une source sûre. Hello, Please be advised the applications for the City of Kitchener Committee of Adjustment meeting scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2025, have been loaded and circulated through ShareFile. You should have already received the necessary link. If you wish to make comments, provide advice, or request the imposition of any conditions on any of these applications, please provide the Committee with a written report. Please note: If you have comments, your written report must be sent to CofA@kitchener.ca no later than 12 noon on Monday, June 30, 2025. If you have no comments for the Committee's consideration, you do not need to respond. Connie Owen Administrative Clerk | Legislated Services | City of Kitchener 519-741-2203 | TTY 1-866-969-9994 | cofa@kitchener.ca This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the e-mail together with any attachments. From:Nembhard, O"Neil (MTO) To:Committee of Adjustment (SM) Subject:Committee of Adjustment Application Review - July 15, 2025 Meeting Date:Wednesday, June 25, 2025 2:15:43 PM Attachments:image001.png Good day, Please see MTO comments related to the Committee of Adjustment Application Review - July 15, 2025, Meeting: MTO has no objection to these applications. The subject properties are located beyond MTO Permit Control Area (PCA) and therefore MTO review, approval and permits will not be required. 1.A 2025-062 Variance Application – 124 Tupper Crescent 2.A 2025-063 Minor Variance (Zoning) - 55 Shoemaker Street 3.A 2025-064 Minor Variance (Zoning) - 82 Brunswick Avenue 4.A 2025-065 Minor Variance (Zoning) - 82 Brunswick Avenue 5.A 2025-066 Minor Variance (Zoning) – 508 New Dundee Rd 6.A 2025-0669 Minor Variance (zoning) – 439- A Alice Ave 7.A 2025-0670 Minor Variance (zoning) – 439- B Alice Ave 8.B 2025-021 – Consent – 546 Courtland Ave E 9.A 2025-067 and A 2025-068 - 38 Fifth Ave. Side A and Side B. The subject property does fall within MTO permit control area, however based on the modifications to site proposed, MTO permits, approval, review will not be required. Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments. Regards, O’Neil Nembhard Corridor Management Planner | Operation West | Operations Division Ministry of Transportation Ontario | Ontario Public Service 548-388-2571 | o’neil.nembhard @ontario.ca Taking pride in strengthening Ontario, its places and its people Please note the Ministry no longer accepts Land Development review requests though its email system. All Land Development Review requests to the Ministry must be submitted to the Ministry of Transportation through the Highway Corridor Management Online portal at: https://www.hcms.mto.gov.on.ca/landdev/en/land-development The Land Development Review module is designed to better serve stakeholders through