Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DSD-2025-324 - Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-015 and HPA 2025-016 - 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North
Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: August 5, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-783-8922 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-783-8924 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 10 DATE OF REPORT: June 30, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-324 SUBJECT: Heritage Permit Applications HPA-2025-V-00 & HPA-2025-V-00 11 Roy Street & 68 Queen Street North Demolition of Two Single-Detached Buildings RECOMMENDATION: THAT pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015 to permit the demolition of the single-detached building located on the property municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street be refused; and further THAT pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-016 to permit the demolition of the single-detached building located on the property municipally addressed as 68 Queen Street North be refused. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to recommend refusal of the proposed demolition of two designated heritage resources located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District, identified as Group A and Group B buildings. The two resources are municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North. The key finding of this report is that while redevelopment could be feasible on the subject land, from a heritage perspective there are issues with specifics of this development proposal. The proposed demolition will result in harmful and permanent impacts to two protected heritage resources, the surrounding streetscapes, and the overall Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District as a whole. There is no demonstration within the submitted heritage permit application and supporting material that the proposal is consistent with any heritage planning policy framework, including the Heritage Ontario Act, Planning Act, Provincial Policy Statement, Kitchener Official Plan, or Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan. A comprehensive breadth of appropriate mitigation measures is not identified within the proposal to mitigate negative impacts. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 403 of 783 There are no financial implications associated with this report. Community engagement included consultation with the applicants and their retained architect and heritage professionals, as well as consultation with the Heritage Kitchener Committee. This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015 and HPA-2025-V-16 proposes the complete demolition of two protected heritage structures municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North. Both buildings are designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act, being located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District and identified within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan as a Group B building and Group A building, respectively. The demolitions are being proposed in advance of a conceptual future redevelopment that includes some supportive housing units that has not received any planning or building approvals. The proposed demolition is not consistent with provincial and municipal policies, including the Ontario Heritage Act, Planning Act, Provincial Planning Statement, Kitchener Official Plan, and Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan, does not include full consideration of the adverse impacts that may occur, and does not consider sufficient mitigation measures. As such, Heritage Planning staff can not recommend approval of the submitted Heritage Permit Applications. BACKGROUND: The Development Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA- 2025-V-015 and HPA-2025-V-016requesting permission to demolish the single-detached buildings located on a consolidated piece of land and municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, respectively. The subject lands are part of a consolidated parcel of land that also includes the property municipally addressed as 54 Queen Street North, commonly known as St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. The whole parcel of land is approximately 1.4 acres in size and is bound by Weber Street West to the north, Queen Street North to the east, and Roy Street to the south (Figure 1). The parcel of land contains three individual structures Î the three- storey place of worship (original buildings with additions), and the two single-detached former residential dwellings (one vacant and one used for office). The majority of the land is covered by asphalt parking, with minimal landscaping (Figure 2 and Figure 3). 11 Roy Street is located on the south side of Roy Street, between Queen Street North and Young Street. It has been in the ownership of St. Andrews Presbyterian Church since 1982, when the estate was granted to its Trustees. 11 Roy Street has been vacant since 2018. 68 Queen Street North is a corner property located adjacent to 11 Roy Street, with frontage onto the south side of Roy Street and west side of Queen Street North. The property was transferred to St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church by its Board and TrusteeÓs in 1989. 68 Queen Street North currently functions as an office space, with two law firms Î Maple Cameron Law and Harper Shelly Law Î leasing the space from St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. Page 404 of 783 Figure 1: Location Map with Subject Parcel of Land Outlined in Red. Figure 2: Aerial View of Subject Parcel of Land Showing Existing Conditions of Site. Buildings Proposed for Demolition Identified by Dashed Line. Page 405 of 783 Figure 3: Asphalt Parking on the Parcel of Land The parcel of land is designated as Strategic Growth Area A within the City of Kitchener Official Plan and is located just outside the boundary of the Urban Growth Centre. It is within a Protected Major Transit Station Area (PMTSA). It is zoned as Strategic Growth Area 2 (SGA-2) under Zoning By-law 2019-051. Within the Civic Centre District Heritage Conservation District Plan, it holds split designation, with the majority of the lands including the portion the Church is on being designated Community Institutional and the portions that 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street are on being designated Medium Density Commercial Residential. Heritage Value Both 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North are designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act, being located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (CCNHCD). The CCNHCD is an important historical residential neighbourhood with links to several key periods in the development of the City of Kitchener. There is a significant concentration of recognizable architectural styles and features within the buildings of the CCNHCD, and many are associated with historically important industrialists and community leaders. As a result of both the built environment and the landscape within the CCNHCD, it possesses a Page 406 of 783 distinct character. Per the CCNHCD Plan, key heritage attributes of the district include a wealth of well maintained, finely detailed buildings from the late 1800s and early 1900s that are largely intact; a number of unique buildings, including churches and commercial buildings, which provide distinctive landmarks within and at the edges of the District; and a significant range of recognizable architectural styles and features including attic gable roofs, decorative trim, brick construction, porches and other details, associated with the era in which they were developed. It should also be noted that, per the 2014 Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscape Study approved by Council in 2015, the Civic Centre Neighbourhood HCD is also identified as a cultural heritage landscape. The CCNHCD Plan categorizes the building stock of the CCNHCD into four different groups depending on their built form, physical condition, and heritage integrity. The Groups range from A, being the highest group, to D, being those properties which are not recognizable or distinct architectural styles, do not exhibit standards of construction prevalent during the development era of the district, are in poor condition, and which may not contribute significantly to the heritage environment of the CCNHCD overall. 11 Roy is identified as being a Group B building, meaning it is a fine example of a defined architectural style. 68 Queen Street North is identified as being a Group A building, meaning it is a very fine example of a defined architectural style. The first subject property (11 Roy Street) is a one-and-a-half storey single detached dwelling, constructed as a residential home in the berlin vernacular style with craftsman influences. These influences can be seen in elements such as the medium-pitch side-gabled roof with wide eave overhangs, full-width porch with doubled and tripled square porch columns, brick piers and shingle-clad balustrade, the grouped windows, and the shingled gable ends. In addition, the property is associated with the St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church, specifically the community outreach services which the Church provides. 11 Roy Street had for several years operated as the SOLO House, used first for a Vietnamese refuge family and th en later the Family and ChildrenÓs Services of Waterloo Region. Finally, the property possesses contextual value given that it is located in situ, maintains its historical, physical, and visual links to its surroundings, and continues to support the character of both the Roy Street streetscape and the Civic Centre Neighbourhood HCD as a whole. Page 407 of 783 Figure 4: Photograph of Front Façade of 11 Roy Street. Figure 5: Photographs of East and West Side Façades of 11 Roy Street. Page 408 of 783 The second subject property (68 Queen Street North) is a two-and-a-half-storey single- detached dwelling, constructed as a residential home in the Classic Revival architectural style. This can be seen in proportioning and balance of the massing of the building as well as its front facing gable, repetitive fenestration with large windows, and the inclusion of classical elements like the dentils around the roofline and the portico with doric columns flanking the front entrance. The building may have been designed by W.H.E Schmalz, a prolific local architect. Notable works he completed include the 1922 Kitchener City Hall (in conjunction with B.A. Jones through their firm Schmalz & Jones, dissolved in 1926), the fourth office of the Economical Mutual Fire Insurance Company at 16-20 Queen Street North (in conjunction with Charles Knechtel), the War Memorial Cenotaph, alterations to the Waterloo County Gaol, and several churches which remain at the time of this report in 2024. Through his work Schmalz contributed to the existing appearance of KitchenerÓs built landscape. In addition to his prolific architectural career, W.H.E.Schmalz was an engaged citizen who served with distinction on the board of many local community groups and held much interest in the CityÓs history and development. Finally, the property possesses contextual value given that it is located in situ, maintains its historical, physical, and visual links to its surroundings, and continues to support the character of both the Queen Street North and Roy Street streetscape and the Civic Centre Neighbourhood HCD overall. Section 6.7.1 of the CCNHCD Plan (Case Studies) identifies 68 Queen Street North as a preferred example of a commercial building conversion, where the exterior has been preserved and maintained or reasonable alterations and additions to the rear have been completed so the building may largely retain its original appearance and continue to contribute to the character of the street. Figure 6: Photograph of Front Facade of 68 Queen Street North. Page 409 of 783 Figure 7: Photographs of North and South Side Façades of 68 Queen Street North. Process th Heritage Planning staff were contacted on September 20, 2023 by Facet Design (Steve Burrows Architect) on behalf of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian inquiring about demolition of 11 Roy Street. Heritage Planning staff indicated that the property was designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act and that they would not be in support of demolition. Retention and integration of the existing structure into any potential redevelopment plans was strongly encouraged. Further conversations with Heritage Planning staff and other City staff regarding demolition occurred over the remainder of 2023 and into 2024. On behalf of the Owners, MHBC Planning submitted the heritage permit applications to the nd City on May 2, 2025. The applications to demolish the heritage buildings were made under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, as they are Part V Designated. A Heritage Impact nd Assessment dated May 2, 2025, and prepared by MHBC Planning, formed part of the submission. Heritage Planning staff reviewed the application and provided comments related to concerns for the overall application and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) on nd June 2, 2025. A meeting with City staff, the applicantÓs heritage consultants and the rd applicantÓs retained architect was held on June 3, 2025. A revised HIA was submitted on th June 24, 2025. A Notice of Receipt for both heritage permit applications was issued on July 14, 2025. REPORT: Proposal Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015 and Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025- V-016 are proposing the complete demolition of the two protected heritage resources located on the properties municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, respectively. Page 410 of 783 The intent of the proposed demolition is to facilitate a future redevelopment project for supportive housing, although no planning approvals have been issued to date. The conceptual plan for the potential redevelopment is a 6-storey mixed-use building with some supportive housing units, intended to include units for multigeneration families with adult children with disabilities, as well as some affordable housing units. The majority of the conceptual building is proposed to front onto Roy Street, with some frontage along Queen Street North. A design for the new building has not been proposed which incorporates the existing heritage homes in this location through means such as enveloping or stilting or adaptive reuse. Enveloping and stilting requires careful architectural designs which accommodate existing structures. The first approach involves developing a new structure around an existing one with limited setbacks, while the second involves a new structure over an existing one using linear supporting elements such as columns, beams, or cantilevers. Adaptive reuse would involve repurposing the two existing structures in a way that could be complementary to the intended redevelopment Î for example, constructing dwelling units in a new building behind and adjacent to the existing structures while using the spaces for the proposed amenity and creative uses. While the proposed site plan does not retain two of the three protected heritage resources on the land, it does retain a significant portion of the existing asphalt parking lot running along the west side. Access to the surface parking is proposed via Roy Street and Weber Street. Access to an underground parking structure is proposed via Queen Street North. Further detailed design of the new building, including exact massing, fenestration, and materiality, would be determined during the Site Plan process and would need to be in compliance with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Plan. Figure 8: Conceptual Site Plan of Possible Future Redevelopment. Page 411 of 783 Draft Heritage Impact Assessment ndth A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated May 2, 2025 and revised June 24, 2025, has been prepared by retained heritage consultants from MHBC Planning. The purpose of this HIA was to assess the proposed demolition against existing policy frameworks, determine what impacts to known cultural heritage resources may occur as a result, identify the most appropriate approach and make recommendations towards mitigative measures. The HIA concludes that the proposed demolition of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North will result in major impacts of destruction, minor impact of isolation of the heritage structure municipally addressed as 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Church), and minor adverse impacts to the Roy Street and Queen Street North streetscapes. Some consideration was given to alternative development options, including retaining all existing built features in-situ and integrating into the development, removing just 11 Roy Street and integrating 68 Queen Street North into the development, and relocating 68 Queen Street North. The HIA identifies that none of these approaches are feasible due to financial cost. It does identify that all alternatives would result in better outcomes for cultural heritage resources. To mitigate some of the adverse impacts, the HIA suggests that a Salvage and Documentation Plan be prepared and that a Phase II HIA be completed to analyze the design of the proposed new building for impacts to adjacent heritage resources and conformity with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Plan. A Structural Assessment Report has not yet been completed for either of the buildings. The HIA submitted as part of the heritage permit applications package identifies that an appraisal report entitled ÐHypothetical Short Narrative Appraisal of a Commercial Residential for 11 Roy Street, Kitchener, OntarioÑ was completed about seven years ago by Musso Appraisals & Consulting Inc for the first subject property, and that this report identified the building to be in average or dated condition with a complete renovation estimated to be between $78,000-$177,500. A copy of the assessment report has not been provided to City staff. Staff understand that no assessment has yet to be completed for 68 Queen Street North. Heritage Planning Policy Framework Ontario Heritage Act The Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) is the legislation within Ontario which provides the province and municipalities tools and authority to identify, evaluate, and protect properties of cultural heritage value or interest, recognizing the significance of such site to our communities. Section 41.1 (5) of the OHA establishes the required contents of a Heritage Conservation District Plan, identifying that it must include both a statement of the objectives to be achieved in designating the area as an HCD and policy statements intended to achieve the stated objectives and manage change within the HCD. Objectives of the CCNHCD Plan are identified in the section of this staff report titled Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan. Heritage Planning staff would note here however that said objectives speak against demolition. Section 41.2 (1) of the OHA states that ÐDespite any other general or special Act, if a heritage conservation district plan is in effect in a municipality, the council of the municipality shall not, (a) carry out any public work in the district that is contrary to the objectives set out in Page 412 of 783 the plan; or (b) pass a by-law for any purpose that is contrary to the objectives set out in the plan.Ñ It should also be noted that Section 41.2(2) states that, in the event of a conflict between a heritage conservation district plan and a municipal by-law that affects the designated district, the plan prevails to the extent of the conflict. Section 42(1) of the OHA states that no owner of property situated within a heritage conservation district that has been designated by a municipality shall demolish or remove any building or structure on the property or permit the demolition or removal of a building or structure on the property. The Planning Act Section 2 of the Planning Act identifies matters of provincial interest to be considered by authorities during the land use planning process. Section 2(d) specifically includes the conservation of features of significant architectural, cultural, historical, archaeological or scientific interest as being one such matter of provincial interest. Section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions of Council Ðsubject to a regulation made under subsection (6.1), shall be consistent with the policy statements issued under subsection (1) that are in effect on the date of the decisionÑ and Ðshall conform with the provincial plans that are in effect on that date, or shall not conflict with them, as the case may b e.Ñ Provincial Planning Statement The 2024 Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) provides policy direction within the province of Ontario on land use planning and development, addressing issues including but not limited to the efficient use and management of land and infrastructure, the provision of sufficient housing to meet changing needs, and conserving cultural heritage and archaeological resources. The PPS recognizes the complex inter-relationships among environmental, economic, and social factors in land use planning and is intended to provide a comprehensive, integrated, and long-term approach to planning which recognizes the links among the different policy areas. Policy 4.6.1 the PPS states that Ð Protected heritage property, which may contain built heritage resources or cultural heritage landscapes, shall be conserved.Ñ. It defines protected heritage property as follows: Ð Means property designated under Part IV or VI of the Ontario Heritage Act; property included in an area designated as a heritage conservation district under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act; property subject to a heritage conservation easement or covenant under Part II or IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; property identified by a provincial ministry or a prescribed public body as a property having cultural heritage value or interest under the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties; property protected under federal heritage legislation; and UNESCO World Heritage Sites.Ñ Under the definition of the PPS, 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North are considered protected heritage property. The PPS also provides the following definition of conserved: Page 413 of 783 Ð Means the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a conservation plan, archaeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment that has been approved, accepted or adopted by the relevant planning authority and/or decision-maker. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches should be included in these plans and assessments.Ñ Built heritage resources are defined as follows: Ð Means a building, structure, monument, installation or any manufactured or constructed part or remnant that contributes to a propertyÓs cultural heritage value or interest as identified by a community, including an Indigenous community.Ñ 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North meet the definition of built heritage resources. Per the first sentence of the definition of conserved, the cultural heritage value or interest of built heritage resources is to be retained. Demolition would not allow for retention of the cultural heritage value or interest of the two structures. It should also be noted that the HIA submitted as part of these heritage permit applications is in its draft stage. The PPS recognizes and acknowledges Official Plans as being the most important vehicle for implementation of the Provincial Planning Statement and for achieving comprehensive, integrated, and long-term planning. Kitchener Official Plan The Kitchener Official Plan (KOP) provides the long-term vision for land use planning and development within the City. It includes policies for heritage conservation, identifying the importance of cultural heritage resources to Kitchener. Some objectives within the KOP which relate to heritage conservation are as follows: 11.1.3. To create a built environment of human scale that respects and enhances cultural heritage resources, natural heritage features, community character and streetscape. 12.1.1. To conserve the cityÓs cultural heritage resources through their identification, protection, use and/or management in such a way that their heritage values, attributes and integrity are retained. 12.1.2. To ensure that all development or redevelopment and site alteration is sensitive to and respects cultural heritage resources and that cultural heritage resources are conserved. Section 11 of the KOP includes policies which require new developments to be designed in a manner which conserves cultural heritage landscapes. As identified in the section of this staff report titled Heritage Value, the subject land is located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Cultural Heritage Landscape. Page 414 of 783 11.C.1.35. New development or redevelopment in a cultural heritage landscape will: a) Support, maintain and enhance the major characteristics and attributes of the cultural heritage landscape further defined in the City's 2014 City of Kitchener Cultural Heritage Landscapes; b) Support the adaptive reuse of existing buildings; c) Be compatible with the existing neighbourhood, including but not limited to the streetscape and the built form; and, d) Respond to the design, massing and materials of the adjacent and surrounding buildings. Section 12 of the KOP is concentrated on cultural heritage resources. The following cultural heritage policies should be noted. 12.C.1.1. The City will ensure that cultural heritage resources are conserved using the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Environmental Assessment Act, the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act and the Municipal Act. 12.C.1.16. It is the intent that the features which give the area its distinctive character and contribute to the areaÓs merit as a Heritage Conservation District will be conserved through the adoption by by-law of a Heritage Conservation District Plan. 12.C.1.20. The City will make decisions with respect to cultural heritage resources that are consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, which require the conservation of significant cultural heritage resources. In addition, such decisions will be consistent with the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada. 12.C.1.21. All development, redevelopment and site alteration permitted by the land use designations and other policies of this Plan will conserve KitchenerÓs significant cultural heritage resources. The conservation of significant cultural heritage resources will be a requirement and/or condition in the processing and approval of applications submitted under the Planning Act. Within the KOP, conserved is defined as the identification, protection, management and use of built heritage resources, cultural heritage landscapes and archaeological resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained under Ontario Heritage Act. This may be achieved by the implementation of recommendations set out in a heritage conservation plan, archeological assessment, and/or heritage impact assessment. Mitigative measures and/or alternative development approaches can be included in these plans and assessments. This definition does not include consideration of demolition. As the subject land is within a Strategic Growth Area and a Protected Major Transit Station Area, the objectives and policies of Section 15 of the KOP also apply. Of particular note is the following. 15.2.6. To conserve our cultural heritage resources and ensure new development and redevelopment is sensitive to, enhances and reflects our past. 15.D.2.8. In a Heritage Conservation District, where there is a conflict between the policies in this land use designation and the Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Heritage Conservation District Plan will prevail. Page 415 of 783 15.D.2.29. All development or redevelopment will embrace, celebrate and conserve the Cultural Heritage Resources in the Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) and Protected Major Transit Station Areas, and will be subject to the Cultural Heritage Resources Policies in Section 12 and subject to any other supporting documents, adopted by Council, including Heritage Conservation District Plans. Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan The Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan (CCNHCD Plan) came into effect in 2008 through By-law No. 2008-38. It contains policies and guidelines intended to manage change within the CCNHCD, including demolitions. Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the CCNHCD Plan lay out the goals, objectives, and principals of the CCNHCD as a whole. These are the foundational components which inform the policies and guidelines within it, and which demonstrate that the value of the heritage conservation district lies not just in its individual parts but in the sum of its entirety. Relevant goals and principles are as follows: Recognize, protect, enhance and appreciate the Civic Centre NeighbourhoodÓs cultural heritage resources, including buildings, landscapes and historical connections, and value their contribution to the community by (È) encouraging the retention, conservation and adaptation of the DistrictÓs heritage buildings and attributes, as described in the Study and Plan, rather than their demolition and replacement; providing guidance for change so that the essential architectural and streetscape character of the District is maintained and, wherever possible, enhanced. Avoid the destruction and/or inappropriate alteration of the existing building stock, materials and details by (È) s trongly discouraging the demolition of heritage buildings and the removal or alteration of distinctive architectural details. Maintain and Repair - All buildings require some continuous methods of conservation as they are exposed to the constant deteriorating effects of weather and wear from use. Owners are encouraged to undertake appropriate repair and maintenance activities of heritage properties. Plans for alterations and restoration should also consider the amount and type of maintenance that will be required. Find a Viable Social or Economic Use - Buildings that are vacant or under-utilized come to be perceived as undeserving of care and maintenance regardless of architectural or historic merit. City Council and staff should actively encourage and support appropriate forms of adaptive reuse when necessary to preserve heritage properties. Section 3.3.4 of CCNHCD Plan speaks specifically to demolition within the HCD. It acknowledges that there are certain situations where demolition may be necessary, such as when partial destruction of a resource has occurred due to a catastrophic event, severe structural instability, or occasionally redevelopment that is in keeping with appropriate City policies. It also lays out the following policies. (a) The demolition of heritage buildings in the District is strongly discouraged. Page 416 of 783 (b) Any proposal to demolish a heritage building or portion of a heritage building that is visible from the street or other public space within the District shall require a heritage permit from the municipality. (c) Where demolition of a heritage building is proposed, the property owner shall provide supporting documentation demonstrating appropriate reasons for the demolition. (d) In situations where demolition is approved by Council, written and / or photographic documentation of any notable architectural features and construction techniques may be required to create a record of the building and its components. (e) Reclamation of suitable building materials such as windows, doors, moldings, columns, bricks, etc. for potential reuse in a new building on the site or as replacement components for other buildings in the neighbourhood which require repair and restoration over time is strongly encouraged if demolition is approved for any heritage buildings in the District. Heritage Conservation and Affordable Housing It is understood that the conceptual future development is intended to include supportive dwelling units for families with adult-children with disabilities, and will include some affordable housing. Heritage planning staff are not in objection to the proposed use of the redevelopment, and heritage policies do not regulate use. Objection stems from the conceptual design of the redevelopment, which has been created in a manner that proposes demolition of protected heritage resources. There are several examples of affordable housing developments that have been undertaken while also appropriately conserving heritage resources within the City of Kitchener alone. Photograph Address Details 307 Queen Part IV Street South, Designated Kitchener (Bread 66 affordable and Roses Co- units (21 in Operative retained Homes) heritage building) Page 417 of 783 25 Joseph Street Part IV (Historic Victoria Designated Public School) 100 subsidized units 35 & 40 Sheldon Part IV Avenue North Designated (oneROOF 44 affordable Youth Services) units Approved 2021 825 King Street Heritage West (St MarkÓs Kitchener Place) Inventory 43 affordable units Approved 2021 137 Queen Part V Street South / 15 Designated Church Street 21 affordable (Historic St. units Pauls) Conditional approval 2023 Page 418 of 783 49 Queen Street Listed on North (St. Peters Municipal Church Î Heritage Magnolia Register Apartments) 41 affordable units Approved 2023 97 Victoria Street Part IV North Designated 44 affordable units Approved 2024 There are further examples within the City of Kitchener where heritage resources have been retained, incorporated, and adaptively re-used in new housing developments of various scales, from additions which add a modest number of new units to large developments. Heritage Planning Comments Heritage Planning staff are not in support of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015 to demolish the designated structure on 11 Roy Street. Heritage Planning staff are not in support of Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-016 to demolish the designated heritage resource on 68 Queen Street North. In review the two applications, the following should be noted. All applicable provincial and municipal policies require the conservation of heritage properties. This includes the Ontario Heritage Act, the Planning Act, the Provincial Planning Statement, the Kitchener Official Plan, and the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan. This proposal to demolish 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North will result in the irrevocable loss of designated heritage properties and is not consistent with such policies. The protection of the CCNHCDÓs building stock, and avoidance of destruction, are express objectives of the CCNHCD Plan. The policies of the CCNHCD Plan aim to achieve these objectives, which is a statutory requirement identified by the OHA. In this case, Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed demolition intended to facilitate a redevelopment directly contravenes stated objectives and policies, does not treat conservation as a guiding and directive principle, and fails to demonstrate an integrated approach to design and execution as required by the heritage planning framework. Page 419 of 783 Supported demolition of contributing properties are limited by specific parameters set out in the CCNHCD Plan. At the time of this report, Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that these parameters do not apply to the two subject properties. Further, it is the opinion of Heritage Planning staff that supporting documentation demonstrating appropriate reasoning for demolition has not been provided, as required by Policy 3.3.4 (c) of the CCNHCD Plan. Further commentary outlining staffs concerns with the supporting documentation is provided in additional points within this section of the report. Heritage Planning staff are of the opinion that a balance of heritage conservation and development interests can be achieved on the subject properties without the complete demolition of two protected resources. The purpose of heritage conservation is not to stall growth and development, but to manage it in such a way that our existing and limited heritage resources are protected at the same time. This means that, when developing with a heritage resource, more careful and creative design may be required then what is demanded by properties within the City that do not contain heritage resources. The proposed redevelopment proposal is not under any planning application and has not been approved. Staff have been working with the Applicant on the proposed redevelopment. Staff are also concerned about the potential loss of the existing heritage resources without a replacement building ever being constructed. Approval of the demolition of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North may set a precedent for further demolitions of contributing properties within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District, or of other designated heritage buildings within the City. It may also set a precedent for demolition by neglect (11 Roy), where the intentional or unintentional deterioration of a building becomes a justification for demolition of a heritage resource. This may weaken the express intent and authority of the CCNHCD P lan and the CityÓs broader heritage policy framework. Heritage conservation can be achieved at the same time as affordable housing development. Examples which balance both planning objectives are included in the section of this staff report titled Heritage Conservation and Affordable Housing. Staff are willing to explore alternatives, zoning amendments or minor variances, off- site parking arrangement, and/or alternative design solutions to permit a redevelopment of a similar scale while retaining the existing built cultural heritage resources. A large portion of the consolidated parcel of land is asphalt parking lot. The conceptual plan proposes to locate a new 6-storey building where two of the three existing designated structures already stand, while maintaining much of the surface parking space. No evidence has been provided to the City that either 11 Roy Street or 68 Queen Street North are structurally unsound. o A site visit conducted from the street by City staff identified no major cracking or other notable damages on the exterior of 11 Roy Street. Some of the Page 420 of 783 shingles on the side gables may need to be replaced, and it is assumed that interior renovations and potentially new fixtures would be needed for the property to once again be habitable. The lower windows and the covered porch were boarded up sometime between 2020 and 2021. o 68 Queen Street North appears to be in good condition and is being actively used as office space. A site visit conducted from the street by City staff identified no obvious cracks in the exterior, or other areas of damage or disrepair. The draft Heritage Impact Assessment submitted as part of the application does not explicitly recommend demolition. As such, no qualified heritage professional has identified being in support of these proposals. Heritage Planning staff are in agreement with the submitted draft Heritage Impact Assessment conclusion that the proposed demolitions, if approved and proceed, will result in major adverse impacts to 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North. Heritage Planning staff are not in agreement with the submitted draft Heritage Impact Assessment conclusion that the demolition of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North will have only a minor adverse impact to Roy Street and Queen Street North streetscapes. Given that the demolitions will result in irreversible and permanent change and include the loss of original heritage fabric that composes part of the streetscapes, the impact will be at a minimum moderate. o The HIA states that the streetscape of Queen Street North is predominately institutional and identifies several buildings including the Kitchener Public Library and County of Waterloo Courthouse as examples. Both these buildings are located on the east side of Queen Street North and outside the boundaries of the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District. The east side of Queen Street is not included as part of the CCNHCD until north of Ellen Street East. Queen Street North, within the boundaries of the CCNHCD, contains a mix of building typologies including low-rise single-detached buildings originally constructed for residential purposes, a few modern high- rise apartment buildings, and another Place of Worship (church). o The HIA states that 11 Roy Street is sympathetic infill from 1923-1924, and as it does not date to the original period of construction for the streetscape its removal will result in only a minor impact. 48% of the buildings along Roy Street were constructed in the late 1800Ós. The remaining 52% were constructed in the early 1900Ós, in or around the same time as 11 Roy Street. In Heritage Planning staff opinion, the full extent of the adverse impact of destruction is not appropriately considered within the Heritage Impact Assessment. The HIA does not clearly provide commentary on the severity and irreversibility of the impact, the length of time in which the impact would persist (indefinitely), the range and spatial distribution of the impact (effecting both the immediate area and the CCNHCD overall), and the rate of change. Page 421 of 783 o Further to this concern, Heritage Planning staff would also note that the HIA does not include consideration of impacts to the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District as a whole. The contextual value and the significance of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North are not limited to only adjacent properties and two streetscapes. Rather, the buildings within are part of a collective whole which forms the Heritage Conservation District, and consideration is required of the impact to the grouping overall in addition to the singular components. Heritage Planning staff would also note that very little information or explanation has been provided in the HIA to justify why alternative development options would not be feasible, beyond statements referencing financial constraints. Our cultural heritage resources are a repres entation of KitchenerÓs collective past, and provides opportunities for understanding past events and trends, fostering a holist identity, and creating a distinct sense of place. Heritage conservation can further advance environmental objectives by conserving embodied carbon, reducing material consumption, and diverting waste from landfills. Economically our heritage resources are capable of stimulating commercial and tourism activities or creating specialized industries. There are numerous, recognizable benefits to protecting cultural heritage resources that go beyond the aesthetic value. As such, it should be emphasised that heritage conservation within the City of Kitchener is an important part of planning for both current and future generations. Should Heritage Kitchener or Council wish to approve the demolition of either or both properties, it should be noted that the approval of an application under the Ontario Heritage Act is not a waiver of any of the provisions of any by-law of the City of Kitchener or legislation, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and KitchenerÓs Zoning By-law. Redevelopment of the subject properties, including the design and construction of a new building, will require an additional Heritage Permit Application and the consent of Council under the Ontario Heritage Act. Heritage Planning staff are not opposed to exploring intensification options on the subject lands and would be in support of the proposed housing use. However, from a heritage perspective, intensification which demands demolition cannot be supported. Intensification options should retain and incorporate the buildings, with preference being first to maintaining them in-situ and second to relocating them on site. Flexibility or compromise on other planning aspects, such as height, parking, or built form, could be explored to achieve both retention and redevelopment. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget Î The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget Î The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. Page 422 of 783 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM Î This report has been posted to the CityÓs website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT Î Heritage Kitchener will be consulted regarding the Heritage Permit Applications. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O 1990 Planning Act, R.S.O 1990 Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan, 2007 REVIEWED BY: Sandro Bassanese, Manager of Site Plan APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A Î Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015 (11 Roy Street) Attachment B Î Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-016 (68 Queen Street North) Attachment C Î Draft Heritage Impact Assessment, MHBC Planning, June 24, 2025 Page 423 of 783 Page 424 of 783 Page 425 of 783 Page 426 of 783 Page 427 of 783 Page 428 of 783 Page 429 of 783 Page 430 of 783 Page 431 of 783 PREPARED FOR: St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church 11 Roy Street, 54 & 68 Queen Street N HERITAGE Kitchener, Ontario File no. 2028A IMPACT 2, May 2025 2, May ASSESSMENT TT F | | MHBC - MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 T: 519 576 3650 F: 519 576 0121 Page 432 of 783 www.mhbcplan.com 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Table of Contents Project Personnel ....................................................................................................................... 5 Glossary of Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 5 ....................... Acknowledgement of Indigenous Communities ..................................................................... 6 ..................................... Other Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 6 .......................................................... 6 Client Information: ................................................................................................................................................................................... ...... 6 6 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 7 ...................................................................... ........................ 7 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................... 9 9 9 1.1 Project Overview and Purpose ...................................................................................................................................................................... ..... 9 1.2 Description of the Subject Lands ........................................................................................................................................10 ................... 1.4 Description of Surrounding Area ................................................................................12 ................................................................. 1.4.1. General ........................................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................12 1.4.2. Adjacent Properties ............................................................................................................................................................................ ........................15 1.5 Heritage Status ................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................19 1.5.1 Heritage Status of the Subject Lands ............of the Subject Landsof the Subject Lands............................................................................................19 1.5.2. Description and Heritage Statand Heritage Status of Adjacent Propertiand Heritage Status of Adjacus of Adjacent Properties ........................................20 2.0 Policy Framework ..........................................orkork.................................................................................................................................. .............................23 2.1 The Ontario Planning Act ..............................tario Planning Actario Pl................................................................................................................... .........23 2.2 Provincial Policy Statement (2024) vincial Policy Statement (2024)Policy Statement (2024).............................................................................23 ......................... 2.3 Ontario Heritage Act ....................................Ontario Heritage ActOntario Heritage Act..........................................................................................25 2.4 Ontario Heritage Toolkit 2.4 Ontario Heritage Toolkit2.4 Ontario Heritage Toolkit............................................................................................25 ................... . 2.5 Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2015) ............2.5 Region of Waterloo Official Pla2.5 Region of Waterloo Official Plan ..........................................................25 2.6 City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) 2.6 City of Kitchener Official Planer Official Plan..........................................................................26 2.7 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Secondary Plan ..........2.7 Civic Centre Neighb2.7 Civic Centre Neighbourh.....................................................28 2.8 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservati2.8 Civic Centre Neighb2.8 Civic Centre Neighbon District Plan (2007) ........................30 3.0 Historical Overview ......................................................................................................3torical Overviewtorical Overview1 3.1 Civic Centre NeighbouCentreCentrerhood Historical Context ............................................................31 3.2 Historical Evolution of the Subject Lands ....................................................................31 3.2.1 General Overview ...............................................................................................31 3.2.2 Detailed Overview of Subject Lands .....................................................................40 MHBC | i Page 433 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 3.2.2.1 11 Roy Street (The Zollner House/ SOLO House) ...............................................40 3.2.2.2 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) .................................42 3.2.2.3 68 Queen Street North (The Knell/ Rockel House) ..............................................49 4.0 Existing Conditions of the Subject Lands ........................................................................53 ................ 4.1 Built Features ..........................................................................................................53............................ 4.1.1 11 Roy Street ....................................................................................................53 ................................................5 4.1.2 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) ....................................55 ch)h)............................................................55 4.1.3 68 Queen Street North .......................................................................................56 ................................................................................. ...56 4.2 Landscape Features ..................................................................................................58 ........................................................................... ...........................58 5.0 Evaluation and Identification of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest ..................................60 Value oValue or Interest................................................................. 66 5.1 Evaluation of the Subject Lands .................................................................................60 ............................................................................... ... T 5.1.1. 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs PresbytewÓs Presbyterian Church)erian Church)rian Church) ...................................60 ...................... 5.1.2. 68 Queen Street North ......................................................................................61 ................................................................................. ............. 5.1.3. 11 Roy Street ...................................................................................................61 ............................................................................ ........................... 5.4 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value of the CCNHtage Value of the CCNHCDue of the CCNHCDCD ..................................................62 ...................................... F 6.0 Description of Proposed Development ..................Development.................................................................................................................................. 63 7.0 Impacts Analysis .........................................................................................................6........................................................................ .......................7 7.1 Classifications of Impacts ..............................of Impactsof Imp.......................................................................................................................... .....67 7.2 Impact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Qunalysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Stnalysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Queeneen Street North (Proposed for Removal) ..68 A 7.2.1. Adverse Impact of Destruction ..................Adverse Impact of Destructionerse Impact of Destruction.....................................................................................69 7.3 Impact Analysis for 54 Queen Street North (Smpact Analysis for 54 Queen Street North ysis for 54 Queen Street North t. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) .............72 7.4 Impact Analysis for Adjacent Heritage Properties .4 Impact Analysis for Adjacent Heritage .4 Impact Analysis for Adjac........................................................73 7.5 Impact Analysis for CCNHCD Streetscapes 7.5 Impact Analysis for CCNHCD 7.5 Impact Analysis for CCNHCD Stree..................................................................73 7.6 Summary 7.6 Summary.................................................................................................................74 ................................................. R 8.0 Consideration of Alternatives Development Options ..8.0 Consideration of Altern8.0 Consideration of Alternatives......................................................75 8.1 Alternative Development Options 8.1 Alternative Develop8.1 Alternative Developme...............................................................................75 8.1.1 Do Nothing ........................................................................................................75 8.1.1 Do Nothing8.1.1 Do Nothing.. 8.1.2 Retain All Existing Built Features In-Sit2 Retain All2 Retain Allu and Integrate into Development................75 8.1.3 Remove 11 Roy Street but Retain and Integrate Portion of 68 Queen Street North momo D into New Construction or Relocate 68 Queen Street North..............................................75 8.1.4 Relocate 68 Queen Street North ..........................................................................76 8.1.5 Summary...........................................................................................................76 MHBC | ii Page 434 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 9.0 Mitigation Measures .....................................................................................................77 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................78 11.0 Sources ....................................................................................................................79 Appendix A .......................................................................................................................................83 Map Figures ......................................................................................................................83 ............................ Appendix B .......................................................................................................................................................................84 8 Conceptual Site Plan and Elevations ....................................................................................84 ..................................................................84 Appendix C ............................................................................................................................................................................................ ...............85 85 Chain of Title ........................................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................85 85 Appendix D............................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................................86 88 HIA Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................................................................86 .......................... T Appendix E ............................................................................................................................................................................................ .87 11 Roy Street Group B Evaluation .......................................................................................87 ............................................................................ .................. Appendix F ............................................................................................................................................................................................ ..................................88 Property Evaluation Sheets ............................................................................................................................................................................ ........................88 F Appendix G .......................................................................................................................89 .................................................................. ......................... A R D MHBC | iii Page 435 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Tables: Table 1.0- Description of Properties within Subject Lands Table 2.0- Description of Adjacent Heritage Properties Table 3.0- Streetscape Characters Table 4.0- Inventory Summary of Subject Lands from CCNHCD Plan (2007) n (2007)n (2007) Table 5.0- Heritage Status of Adjacent Properties Table 6.0- Building Chronology (Construction and Renovation of 54 Queen St N) ation of 54 Queen St N) ation of Table 7.0-Building Morphology of 54 Queen Street North North North Table 8.0- Building Morphology of 68 Queen Street North treet North North T Table 9.0- Photos of Exterior Elevations of 11 Roy Street of 11 Roy Street Table 10.0- Photos of exterior elevations of 54 Queen Street N tions of 54 Queen Street Nons of 54 Queen Street N Table 11.0- Photos of Exterior Elevations of 68 Queen Street North Elevations of 68 Queen Street North s of 68 Queen Street North F Table 12.0-Photos of Landscape Features on Subject Lands dscape Features on Subject Landson Subject L Table 13.0- Grading of Impact for Built Heof Impact for Built Heritage and Historicof Impact for Built Heritage aritage and Historic Landscapes (ICOMOS) Table 14.0- Impact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North pact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Qpact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 6 A Table 15.0- Demolition Policies (CCNHCD Plan) Demolition Policies (CCNHCD Plan)molition Policies (CCNHCD Plan) Table 16.0- Impact Analysis16.06.0- Impact Analysis for 54 Queen StrImpact Analysis for 54 Queen Street North R D MHBC | 4 Page 436 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Project Personnel Dan Currie, MA, MCIP, RPP, Senior Review CAHP Rachel Redshaw, MA, HE Author, Fieldwork, Research eldwork, Reseldwor Dipl., CAHP Christy Kirwan, BA, Dipl. Co-Author oo--AuthorAutho CAHP-Intern Paul Lee Map Figures Map Figures Glossary of Abbreviations T CCNHCD HIA F HCD MCM MHBC A OHA OHTK HTKHTK O-REG 9/06 OO--REG 9/06R R PPS 2024 PPS 2PPS 2024 TPP PP D MHBC | 5 Page 437 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Acknowledgement of Indigenous Communities This Heritage Impact Assessment acknowledges that the subjectlands located at 11 Roy Street, 54 & 68 Queen Street North, Kitchener, Ontario which is situated within the traditional territory of the Anishinaabek , Haudenosaunee, Attiwandaronk, Mississauga, k, M Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation. These lands are part of the Dish with One Spoon h with Treaty between the Haudenosaunee and Anishinaabe peoples, an agreement to share, agreem protect resources and avoid conflict. The lands are also associated with the Haldimand Treaty with the Hald and the Simcoe Patent- Treat 4, 1793. This document takes into consideration the cultural heritage of indigenous communities tage ocommu including their oral traditions and history when available and related to the scope of work. and related to the scope of work Other Acknowledgements TTTTTT This Heritage Impact Assessment also acknowledges the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener owledges thetheGrace Schmidt Room, KitchGrace Sch Public Library and archival information from St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church for providing om St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church fos Presby relevant information. It also acknowledges the information provided by Robert Fewster, a dges the information provided by Roberdges the information provided long-time and dedicated member of the St. Anof the St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church he St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian ChudrewÓs Presbyterian Church congregation. FF Client Information: St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church an Church an Church 54 Queen Street North, Kitchener, Ontario rth, Kitchener, Ontario rth, Kitchener, O MHBC | 6 Page 438 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Executive Summary MHBC Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture was retained by St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church to undertake a Heritage Impact Assessment for the subject lands, which are comprised of the properties located at 11 Roy Street and 54 and 68 Queen Street 8 Q8 Q North, City of Kitchener. The subject lands consist of the St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church sbyterian byteria and two single detached dwellings. The dwellings located at 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen eet and 68 Queeet and Street North are proposed for removal for the future construction of a residence for a residence for a reside multigeneration families with adult children with disabilities. The properties are located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation hood Heritage Conservation hood Heritage Conserva District and therefore designated under Part V of the . As the proposal . As the proposal e propo includes the removal of buildings which are considered protected heritage properties, this protected heritage properties, thisprotected heritage properties, this HIA has assessed the following: 1) Impact on 11 Roy Street T o Demolition of existing building located at 11 Roy Street; g located at 11 Roy Street; at 11 Roy Str 2) Impact on 68 Queen Street North o Demolition of existing building louilding located at uildingcated at 68 Queen Street North; 68Queen Street NortQueen 3) Impact on 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Churcorth (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian 4) Impact on Surrounding Heritage Properties (Protected and Listed) as follows: Heritage Properties (Protected and Listede Properties (Protected and Liste 20 Weber Street East 73-77 Queen Street, North Waterloo County Gaol and et East 73-77 Queen Street77 Queen Street, , North WateNorth Wate F GovernorÓs House (Designated under Part IV o the OHA, Regionally House (Designated under Part IV o the ated under Part IV o the Significant Cultural Heritage Resource) nt Cultural Heritage Resource)nt Cultural Heritage Resource 83-85 Queen Street North, Kitchener Public Library Main Branch (Listed) 5 Queen Street North, Kitchener Public L5 Queen Street North, Kitchen 16 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 6 Roy Street6 Roy S(Designated under Part V oesignated under Pa 20 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 20 Ro20 Roy Street(Designated under Part VDesignated under Par A 23 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 23 Roy Street23 Roy Street(Designated under Pa(Designated under Pa 18 Weber Street West (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 18 Weber Street WestWeber Street(Designatesignat 74 Queen Street North (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 74 Queen Stre74 Queen Street North (Desig The following provides the impacts that were identified within The following provides the impactThe following provides the impacts tha Section 7.0 of this report: Major impact of destruction as it reMajor impact of destructionct of destructionlates to removal of 11 Roy Street; R Major impact of destruction as it relates to removal of 68 Queen Street North; Major impact of destrucof d Minor impact of isolation of St. AndrewÓs Church from its 11 Roy Street, which was Minor impact of isMinor impact of isola used for several years for outreach services as the SOLO House which served the used for several used for several y community. However, this impact is anticommunity. Hocommunity. Hocipated to be mitigated by the future construction of the new proposed development which is intended to continue the nstructionstructio ChurchÓs outreach services and will also have direct associations with St. Andrews hÓshÓs D and contribute to its intangible heritage tradition of service to the community; and Minor adverse impact to the Roy Street and Queen Street North streetscapes within the CCNHCD. MHBC | 7 Page 439 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Should the removal of these structures proceed as proposed, it is recommended that the following documents be prepared in advance of demolition: Complete a Salvage and Documentation Plan of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street 8 Quee8 Que North as per Official Plan policies which includes the identification of salvageable of salvageabof salv material, the repurposing of this material where feasible, or otherwise safe storage herwise safe storagherwise of material and documentation prior to demolition works (i.e. high-resolution e. highe. high--resolution resol photographs, architectural drawings); this should be completed prior to demolition; mpleted prior to demolition;pleted prior to dem This HIA is solely related to impacts resulting from the proposed removal of 11 Roy rom the proposed removal of rom the11 Roy 1 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North. It is recommended that a Phase II HIA be ommended that a Phase II HIA be ommended that a Pha prepared prior to the proposed future redevelopment to analyze the design of the development to analyze the design of thvelopment to analyze T proposed new building for impacts to adjaadjacent heritage resources and conforcent heritage resources and conformity t heritage reso with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Plan. the CCNHCD Plan.lan. F A R D MHBC | 8 Page 440 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Overview and Purpose MHBC was retained by St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church to undertake an HIA for the an HIAan HIAfor the subject lands, which are comprised of the properties located at 11 Roy Street and 54 and Roy Street and 54 and Roy Street 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener (see Figure 1). The properties are located within operties are located within operties are loca the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District (ÐCCNHCDÑ) and therefore t (ÐCCNHCDÑ) and therefore t (ÐCCNHCDÑ) and ther designated under Part V of the (ÐOHAÑ). This HIA is written to be )). . ThThisHIAis written to be n to be consistent with the Terms of Reference provided by the City of Kitchener Heritage Planning City of Kitchener Heritage Planning City of Kitchener Heritage Plannin Staff provided in Appendix ÒEÓ of this report. The proposal includes the removal of structures at 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street at 11 Roy Streett 11 Roy Streetand and 68 Queen Street 6 North for the future construction of a residence building for multigeneration families with ce building ding for multigeneration families for multige T adult children with disabilities as an outreach program of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church ach program of St. AndrewÓs Presbyteriaof St. And (54 Queen Street North) and its mission which is described by the Roy Street Task Force nn w which is described by the Roy Street Thich is described by the Mission Statement to: F The purpose of this HIA is to assess potentiaof thisof thisHIA is to assess potential impact assess potential impacl impact to the subject lands and surrounding A area as a result of the removal of the buildings at 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street esult of the removal of the buildings at t of the removal of the buildings at North. The following provides an outline of the potential impacts that will be assessed as The following provides an outline of the ng provides an outline of the part of this assessment: of this assessment:of this assessment: 5)5)5) Impact on 11 Roy Street Impact on act on 11 Roy Street11 Roy Street oo Demolition of existing buildinDemolitionemolitiof existingexisting located at 11 Roy Street; 6)6) Impact on 68 Queen Street North Impact on 68 Queen Stree68 Queen Stree R oo Demolition of existing building loDemolition of exlitioncated at 68 Queen Street North; 7)7)7) Impact on Surrounding Heritage Properties (Protected and Listed) as follows: Impact on Surroundurrou 20 Weber Street East 73-77 Queen Street, North Waterloo County Gaol and 20 WeberWebe GovernorÓs House (Designated under Part IV o the OHA, Regionally GovernGovern Significant Cultural Heritage Resource) SignSign 83-85 Queen Street North, Kitchener Public Library Main Branch (Listed) 88 D 16 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 20 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 23 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) 18 Weber Street West (Designated under Part V of the OHA) MHBC | 9 Page 441 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 74 Queen Street North (Designated under Part V of the OHA) This HIA and associated permits are solely related to the applications for demolitions. A pre-consultation meeting occurred on December 21, 2023, to review comments provided by City Heritage Planning Staff on December 14, 2023. This Heritage Impact Assessment is as ssessssess per the request of City of Kitchener Heritage Planning Staff. As per Section 42 (1) of the OHA, an owner of a property located within an HCD must thin an HCD must thin an H obtain a heritage permit from the municipality to alter a property, erect any building or erect any building or erect any buil structure, or demolish or remove a building or structure on the property. The purpose of e property. The purpose of property. The purpo this HIA is to supplement heritage permit applications as they relate to the proposed eyeyrelate to the proposed relate to the proposed demolitions. The details of the proposed building will be assessed assessed more thoroughly in a assessed more thoroughly in a more thoroughly in a second Heritage Impact Assessment accompanied by an additional Heritage Permit an additional Heritage Permit an add Application for new construction as part of the planning application process for Site Plan nning application processnning application procfor Site Plan n approval. T 1.2 Description of the Subject Lands ds The subject lands are bound by Queen Street North to the east, Roy Street to the north, Street North to the east, Roy Street to Street North to the east, R Weber Street West to the south and residential properties to the west (see residential properties to the westesidential properties to the wes(see Appendix A, Figure 1 and Figure 3). The subject properties are located within the Civic Centre bject properties are located within the Cproperties are located within the Neighbourhood within and to the north and west of the City Commercial Core. the north and west of the City Commercand west of the City Commerc Table 1.0 F provides a brief description of the built and landscape features on-site; a more detailed n of the built and landscape features onnd landscape features on review is provided in Section 4.0. ection 4.0. ection 4.0. A R D MHBC | 10 Page 442 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T Figure 1- e 11- Map of subject lands identified by red lines (MHBC, 2024). Map of subject lands Map of subject lands identified by red lin Table 1.0- Description of ProperTable 1Table 1.0- Description of PropertiesDescription of Proties within the Subject Lands Address Description ptPhotograph RRRRRRRRR 11 Roy Street 11 Roy 11 Roy Street One-and-a half storOey brick dwelling with front porch and medium-pitched gabled roof with open gabled dormer with returning eaves. Minimal DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD landscaped area along frontage and surface parking. MHBC | 11 Page 443 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 54 Queen Street North St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church which is a three-storey brick place of worship with addition on the east, west and north elevation. There is limited landscaping on the property including along Queen Street North. The majority of the property includes asphalt surface parking. 68 Queen Street North Two-and-a-half storey brick dwelling gg with boxed, medium-pitched gable ble ble roofline and asymmetrical entryway. ntryway. ntryway The building includes multiple ultiple TTTTT additions on the east elevation t elevation including an attached garage. The ached garage. The ached property includes a landscaped cludes a landscaped des a landscaped frontage with mature coniferous tree e with mature coniferousature coniferoustree tree FFFFFF and surface parking. surface parking.ng. 1.4 Description of Surrounding Area n of n of Surrounding Area Surrounding AAAAA 1.4.1. General ral The surrounding area is characterized by a range of uses and built form typical of an ounding area isarea ischaracterized by a rangcharacterized by a rang urbanized city centre (see nized city centrezed city centre(see (see Table 2.0TaTable 2.0). The Roy Street streetscape primarily includes low-). The R rise, house-form properties ranging from 1 1/2 Î 2 ď storeys in height. The northern se, se, househouse--formformproperties ranging from properties ran portion of this streetscape includes a treed boulevard. The Queen Street North and Weber portion of this streetscape includeportion of this streetscape includes a t Street West streetscapes very considerably inStreet West streetscapes very consStreet West streetscapes very cons use, scale, massing, architecture, setbacks RR and orientation as they include institutional, commercial, residential uses and range from anand orientation as they include ihey in historic to contemporary architectural built forms (see histohistoric to contemporary archric to contemporary Figure 2). To the east is the Kitchener Public Library, Waterloo County Gaol and GovernorÓs House the east is the Kitchethe east is the Kitch which are public institutional properties. To the south are high-rise commercial and are public instare public inst residential buildings including the 11-storey commercial office building at 50 Queen Street buildinbuildin North and 18-storey residential building at 57 Queen Street North. D MHBC | 12 Page 444 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON TTTTT FFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAA RRRR DD Figure 2- Visual analysis of built form in surrounding area (MHBC, 2024). MHBC | 13 Page 445 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Table 2.0- Streetscape Characters StreetPhotograph Queen Street North Looking southwards towards the subject ect Looking northwards towards subject Looking northwLooking northwards towards subje TTTTTTT lands. lands. lands. lands. Weber Street West FFFFFFFFFF Looking westwards towards the subject ooking westwards towards the subject ooking westwards towards the subject Looking eastwards towards the subject AAAAAAA lands. lands. lands.s Roy oy y Street StreetStreet RRR Looking westwards along Roy Street LookiLookiLooking eastwards along Roy Street DDDDDDDDDDDD (subject lands to the left) towards subject lands. MHBC | 14 Page 446 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 1.4.2. Adjacent Properties The City of Kitchener Official Plan defines adjacent as, Ð Figure 3rere and the following Table 3.0 identify and provide a brief description of the adjacent (non-contiguous) (non(non--coc properties that are subject to the assessment within this report as per the CityÓs Terms of the CityÓs Tethe Cit Reference. Table 3.0- Description of Adjacent Heritage Properties Address Description Photograph graph 20 Weber GovernorÓs House is a brick Street East institutional building with four storey ey TTTTTTT 73-77 tower and a Mansard Roof Queen described as mid-Victorian Italian Italian Street Village style. Waterloo County Gaol County Gaol County Gaol North is a 2 ½ storey Classical Revival assical Revival Reviv building constructed of granite, ructed of granite, nite, FFFFFFF Waterloo stone and brick trim. Waterloo brick trim.ick Waterloo oo County Gaol County Courthouse is a mid-century y Courthouse is a midy Courthouse is -century ntury and brutalist institutional building. utalist institutional building. utalist institutional b GovernorÓs Limited landscaping on-site within Limited landscaping oLimited landscaping on-site within House AAA the vicinity of these historic the vicinity of these historic the vicinity of these historic buildings including open green buildings including open green dings includ space and low-lying plantings. space and lowspace and low--lying plantingsy 83-85 8383-85 Three storey institutional building Three storey institutionhree storey institutio Queen QQueen with contemporary architectural with contemporaryconte RRRRRRRR Street StreeStreet style constructed c. 1962 including styleconstructcons North orthorth glazing and masonry veneer. glazing anzing a Property includes public surface PropePrope Kitchener erer parking lot and landscaping along papa Public Library ryry Queen Street North. Designed by DDDDDDDDDDD Main Branch architect Carl Reider. MHBC | 15 Page 447 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 16 Roy One-and-a-half storey dwelling with Street a Colonial Revival influence. Includes cross gable roofline with gabled dormers. Low-lying ornamental plantings. 20 Roy One-and-a-half storey Tudor Revival Street cottage with asymmetrical roofline and composed of a combination of TTTTTT materials. Includes bay window, w, second storey overhang/jetty and ttyand Gothic inspired stone door surround. door surround. oor surround. Designed front yard with low-lying rd with lowlow--lying lying FFFF ornamental plantings and stone antings and stone tone pier. 23 Roy Two-and-a-half storey Queen Anne --andand--aa-half storey Queen Anne storey Queen Anne Street Revival buff red brick dwelling with Revival buff red brick dwelling with Revival buff red brick dwelling with projecting bay with boxed in gables projecting bay with boxedprojecting bay with boxediningablegables AAAAAA and hipped roofline. Decorative and hipped rooflined hipped roofl. Decorative rative brackets located on either side of brackets located on either sideets locat upper window opening. Low-lying upper window opeupper window opening. Lo plantings along front façade. plantings along front fantings along front RRRR DDDDDDD MHBC | 16 Page 448 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 18 Weber Two-and-a-half storey Queen Anne Street West Revival buff red brick dwelling with projecting bay with boxed gable and hipped roofline. Remaining land includes surface parking. 74 Queen One and half storey mid-century, Street ranch-stylebungalow constructed of North buff yellow brick with the use of TTTTT siding along the Queen Street North t North façade. Building includes a stone a stone a ston wall feature along the front façade. e front façade. ont façade. Includes an irregular roofline. ular roofline. ine. FFFF AAAAA RR D MHBC | 17 Page 449 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A RR DD Figure 3- Map identifying properties within the subject land and adjacent properties subject to impact assessment (MHBC, 2024) MHBC | 18 Page 450 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 1.5 Heritage Status In order to confirm the presence of cultural heritage resources which have been previously identified, several databases were consulted including (CRHP) and other local heritage inventories (i.e. Historic Building Inventory Kitchener, ding Inventory Kitcheneding Invent Heritage Inventory: Homes of Prominent Businessmen and Professionals, An Architectural ofessionalsofessionals, An Architectural , An A Survey of Berlin the Centre Area). The subject lands, adjacent properties, and streetscapes nt propertiesnt prop, and streetscapes nd stree identified in sub-section 1.4 are not identified as being within a Heritage Corridor or Canadian in a Heritage Corridor or in a Heritage Corridor or Canadian Can River watershed as per Map 9 of the Official Plan or identified as a scenic road and special dentified as a scenic road and special dentified as a scenic road and speci character streets by the Region of Waterloo. 1.5.1 Heritage Status of the Subject Lands T The subject lands are located within the CCNHCD and are designated under Part V of the NHCDand are designated under Part V are designat OHA. The following Table 4.0 reviews the applicable categories attributed to each property he applicable categories attributed to eaegories within the subject lands. Table 4.0- Inventory Summary for Subject Lands from CCNHCD Plan (2007) ary for Subject Lands from CCNHCDSubject Lands from CCNHCD F AddressGroupDescription Description 11 Roy Street Group B Group B Group B 1 ¾ storey brick vernacular building 1 ¾ constructed c. 1925. Not previously (fine example of a specific (fine example of a specific example of a specific listed. architectural style) architectural style)chitectural style) AAAAAAAAAAAAA 54 Queen Street North Group A ueen Street NorthrthGroup AGro3 storey, Gothic Brick Church and Parish Hall constructed in 1906. (very fine example of a specific (very f(very fine exam Previously listed. Known as Saint architectural style) architecturhitectu AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. RRRRRRRRRRRRRR 68 Queen Street North Group A 68 Queen Street North68 Queen Street NorthGr2 ½ storey, Georgian building constructed c. 1930. Previously (very fine example of a specific Listed. architectural style) DDDDDDDDDDDDD MHBC | 19 Page 451 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 1.5.2. Description and Heritage Status of Adjacent Properties The City has requested the assessment of the adjacent (non-contiguous) properties located at 20 Weber Street East/ 73-77 Queen Street North and 83-85 Queen Street North. Table 5.0 reviews the adjacent propertiesÓ heritage status and description. Table 5.0- Heritage Status of Adjacent Properties Address Description 20 Weber Street East/ The Waterloo County Jail and Governor's House, ty Jail and Governor's House, Jail and Governor's H 73-77 Queen Street located at 73 Queen Street North, is situated on ueen Street North, is situated on ueen Street North, is situated o North the south side of the street, north of Frederick de of the street, north of Frederick de of the street, north of Frederick Street and east of Weber Street, in downtown and east of Weber Street, in downtown and east of Weber Stre Waterloo County Goal Kitchener. Built in 1852, the site consists of a jail chener. Built in 1852, the site consists of a jner. Built in 1852, the and GovernorÓs House TTTTTTTT building, governor's house, four exercise building, goovernor's house, four exercise vernor's hou courtyards and stone walls (CanadaÓs Historic courtyards and stone walls (CanadaÓs stone w Places, 2024). PlacesPlaces, 2024). F 83-85 Queen Street No description in the municipal heritage register. No description in the mNo description in the m North Added June 30, 2014 (City of Kitchener, 2024). Added Added June 30, 201 Kitchener Public Library Library Library Main Branch AAAAAA Description De Designated under Part V Designated under Pa (CCNHCD)(CC RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 16 Roy Street 1616 Roy StreetTwo storey vernacular brick dwelling constructed in c. 1940. 20 Roy Street StreetStreetTwo storey Tudor dwelling constructed of stone in c. 1938 built for Dr. Lackner. DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD MHBC | 20 Page 452 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 23 Roy Street Two and half storey brick Queen Anne constructed ne ne in 1896. 18 Weber Street WestTwo and half storey brick vernacular building lf storey brick vernacular building lf storey brick vernacular building constructed in 1896 with decorative porch trim. cted in 1896 with decorative porch trim. cted in 1896 with decorative porch trim. Built by H. J. Bowman, Civil Engineer. t by H. J. Bowman, Civil Engineer.y H. J. Bowman, Civil TTTTT 74 Queen Street North One storey Ranch style brick dwelling constructed One storey Ranch style bricorey Ranch style bric FFF c. 1950. c. 1950. c. 1950. AAAAAA RRRRRRRRR DDDDDD MHBC | 21 Page 453 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A RR DD Figure 4- Map identifying heritage status of subject lands and adjacent properties (MHBC, 2024). MHBC | 22 Page 454 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 2.0 Policy Framework 2.1 The Ontario Planning Act The includes direction relating to a number of provisions respecting cultural respecting culturarespect heritage, either directly in Section 2 of the Act or Section 3 respecting policy statements ng policy statements ng policy st and provincial plans. In Section 2, the outlines 18 spheres of provincial interest pheres of provincial interest pheres of provinc that must be considered by appropriate authorities in the planning process. Regarding nning process. Regarding nning process. Regardin cultural heritage, Subsection 2(d) of the Act provides that: T The therefore provides for the overall broaovides for the overall broad consideratior the overall broad consideratiod consideration of cultural heritage F resources through the land use planning process. use planning process.proc 2.2 Provincial Planning Statement (2024)ningningStatement (202Statement (2024)4) In support of the provincial interest identifirovincial interest identified in Subsectionrovincial interest identified in Sed in Subsection 2 (d) of the Planning Act, and as provided for in Section 3, the Province has refined policy guidance for land use for in Section 3, the Province has refin for in Section 3, the Province has r planning and development matters in the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) (PPS). d development matters in the Provincial development matters in the Provincial A The PPS is Ðintended to be read in its entirety and the relevant policy areas are to be s Ðintended to be read in its entirety annded to be read in its entirety an applied in each situationÑ. Thd in each situationÑ. ationÑ. ThThis provides a weiis provides a weighting and balancing of issues within the planning process. When addressing cultural heritage planning, the PPS provides for the nning process. When addressing culturanning process. When addre following: followinfollowing: R D MHBC | 23 Page 455 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON The PPS defines the following terms: T F AAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD As the subject lands are included in a Heritage Conservation District (designated under Part V oft the OHA) they are considered Protected Heritage Properties; additionally the following adjacent properties, subject to assessment, are considered Protected Heritage Properties: 20 Weber Street East 73-77 Queen Street, North Waterloo County Gaol and MHBC | 24 Page 456 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON GovernorÓs House (Designated under Part IV o the OHA), 16 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA), 20 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA), 23 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA), 18 Weber Street West (Designated under Part V of the OHA), 74 Queen Street North (Designated under Part V of the OHA). HAHA 2.3 Ontario Heritage Act The , R.S.O, 1990, c.0.18remains the guiding legislation for the ding legislation for ding leg conservation of significant cultural heritage resources in Ontario. Preparation of this report Preparation of this reportPreparation o has been guided by the criteria provided with of the of the of the, , which outlines the criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest. The regulation value or interest. The regulation value or interest. The regu sets forth nine criteria. Section 2.0 of the directs the Ministry of directs the Ministry of Ministry Citizenship and Multiculturalism (ÐMCMÑ) to determine policies, priorities and programs for ne ne policies, priorities and programs for policies, priorities and programs fo the conservation, protection and preservation of the heritage of Ontario. Section 42 (1) f the heritage of Ontario. f the heritage of OntSection 42 outlines the requirement for a Heritage Permit Application to alter, or permit the alteration of Application to ication alter, or permit the alteratter, or T any part of the property, erect any building or structure on the property, demolish or remove or structure on the property, demolish oe on the prop or permit the demolition or removal of any attribute of the property that would affect a any attribute of the property that wof the p heritage attribute described in the heritage conservation district plan, demolish or remove a ritage conservation district plan,ritage conservation district plademoli building or structure on the property or permiterty or permit the demolition or removor permit the demolition or rem the demolition or removal of a building or structure on the property. F 2.4 Ontario Heritage Toolkit Toolkit The Province has published several resources containing information related to cultural blished several resources containing iblished several resources c heritage resources and compiled the information into the andandcompiled the information into thcompiled the information. This compilation is a collection of documents authored by thea collection of documents authored bya collection of documents authored MCM, which provide guidance related to a variety of cultural heritage plavariety of cultural heritage planning maariety of cultural heritage planning manning matters. The documents contained within A the Heritage Resources in the Land Use Planning Process compilation have specifically been age Resources in the Land Use Planningsources in the Land Use Planning referenced in the preparation of this report, tonced in the preparation of this report, tpreparation of this report, t ensure consistency with best practices. This document provides an outline of contents of an HIA as well as adverse impacts and mitigation cument provides an outline of contents oument provides an outline measures. measurmeasures. 2.5 Region of Waterloo Official Plan (2015) 22.5 Region of Waterloo OfficWaterloo Offic R Chapter 3, Section 3.G of the Regional Official Plan (ROP) provides policies regarding the Chapter 3, Section 3.G ofChapter 3, Section 3.G of the R conservation of cultural heritage resources as contributing to a unique sense of place, conservation of cultural hconservation of cultural her providing a means of defining and confirming a regional identity. The Regional Official Plan viding a means of deviding a means of de includes policies regarding the identification ofes policies regaes policies rega cultural heritage resources, including both built heritage and cultural heritage landscapes and the maintenance of such inventories. age and age and The policies also speak to the requirement of a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment to alsals D conserve municipal and regionally significant resources. This Heritage Impact Assessment assesses impact for the property located at 73 Queen Street North, Kitchener (Waterloo County Gaol & GovernorÓs House) which is a Regionally Significant Cultural Heritage Resource. MHBC | 25 Page 457 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 2.6 City of Kitchener Official Plan (2014) Section 12 of the Kitchener Official Plan provides the policies regarding the identification and conservation of cultural heritage resources, including inventoried, listed, designated, or otherwise protected properties, cultural heritage landscapes and heritage corridors. The ridorido conservation of the CityÓs cultural heritage resources is directed to be completed through pleted thrpleted Ðidentification, protection, use and/ or managementÑ. As part of these objectives, the objectives, the objectiv following provides the following in relation to development: T These policies are directly relevant to thvant to this proposal as it proposes devis proposal as it proposes development is proposal as it proposes dev F within an area protected under the OHA. In order to meet these objectives, the City nder the OHA. In order to meet these obIn order to meet these ob states the following: A R D This proposal includes the removal of buildings on subject lands which Protected Heritage Properties (Part V), and are to Protected Heritage Properties (Part V), to a non-designated property on the municipal heritage MHBC | 26 Page 458 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON register and to a Protected Heritage Property (Part IV). The subject lands are not along an identified heritage corridor as per Map 9 of the Plan. Section 12.C.1.13-12.C.1.16 of the Plan outlines policies related to Heritage Conservation Districts. The intent is that the HCD will be conserved through the the the adoption of an HCD Plan. This report uses the CCNHCD Plan to assess the impacts e impactse impa of the proposed removal of structures. The following policy outlines the he he requirements of the Heritage Impact Assessment and Heritage Conservation Plan nservation Plan nservation Pla used as a means to meet the objectives of this section, particularly as it relates to arly as it relates to arly as it relates to development: T The Terms of Reference for this report have been scoped by City Heritage Planning ort have been scoped by City Heritage ort have been scoped by City H Staff and are included in Appendix ÒDÓix ÒDÓDÓ of this report. of this report.of this report. Sections 12.C. 1.29-12.C.1.31 discusses heritage permit applications and the 31 discusses heritases heritage permit appge permit applic F information required to make ake this application including: this application including: tion including A The intention is that this HIA will include tention is that this HIA will include itemt this HIA items a and c, while an HIA Addendum will be subsequently drafted to include item b when details of the proposed development subsequently drafted to include item b wsubsequently drafted to inc are finalized. The above-mentioned information is intended to be provided as are finalized. Tare finalized. The abovehe above--mentioned menti supplementary information for the heritage permit application related to the proposed supplementary information for the hsupplementary information for the he demolitions. dedemolitions. R Sections 12.C.1.32.-12.C.1.36 review the demolition and damage of cultural heritage SectionSections 12.C.1.32.-12.C.1.312.C resources. This HIA assess the impact of the removal of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen sources. This HIA assesources. This HIA asse Street North in advance of future redevelopment. The following policies are provided North North in advanin advan in the context of removal: ntext of rentext of re D MHBC | 27 Page 459 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T 2.7 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Secondary Planhood Secondary PlanSecondary Plan The Civic Centre Neighbourhood Secondary Plan and zoning is currently under review. The ood Secondary Plan and zoning is currenary Plan and zoning is curren F general policies of the Plan are included in Section 13.1.1. of the CityÓs Official Plan. Based n are included in Section 13.1.1. of the Cn Section 13.1.1. of the C on Map 9, Civic Centre Neighbourhood Plan for Land Use, the subject lands are located Neighbourhood Plan for Land Use, the sNeighbourhood Plan for Lan within an area identified as Community Institutional and Medium Density Commercial ified as Community Institutional and Meified as Community Institution Residential (see Figure 5FigureFigure 5). ). A R D MHBC | 28 Page 460 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A R D Figure 5- Map Figure 9 showing Civic Centre Neighbourhood Plan for Land Use; subject lands identified approximately in black box (City of KitchenerÓs Official Plan). MHBC | 29 Page 461 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 2.8 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservation District Plan (2007) The CCNHCD Plan (2007) includes policies and guidelines that provide direction for the ction for ction fo management of change in the CCNHCD. The goals of the HCD Plan are as follows: as follows: as follo T F The Plan is based on the principles of: Preserve the Historic Context, Maintain and Repair, rinciples of: Preserve the Historic Conteeserve the Historic Conte Fina a Viable Social or Economic Use, PresEconomic Use, Preserve Traditional SettiEconomic Use, Preserve Traderve Traditional Setting, Preserve Original Decoration and Fittings, Restore to Authentic Limits, Employ Traditional Repair Methods, ngs, Restore to Authentic Limits, Employngs, Restore to Authentic Lim Respect Historic Accumulations, Make New Replacements Distinguishable. Accumulations, Make New ReplacementAccumulations, Make New Replace The policies in the Plan that are relevant to the development proposal include: development in the Plan that are relevant to the devn the Plan that are relevant to the dev A pattern, additions and alterations to existing buildings, new buildings, demolition and public additions and alterations to existing buils and alterations to existing buil realm. The Plan also outlines planning and implementation measures for the Plan including The Plan also outlines planning aThe Plan also outlines planning and imp applicable sections related to Site Plan Coapplicable sections related to Site Papplicable sections related to Site Plantrol, Demolition and the Heritage Permit Approval process. Demolition is Ðstrongly discouragedÑ, however, in situations where AApproval process. DDemolition is emolition is ÐÐss R demolition is permitted, the municipality may demolition is permitted, tdemolition is permitted, the muestablish conditions for demolition, Ð-such as the requirement for an approved site plan or a specific time frame for construction of a new the requirement for an athe requirement for an appr building onsiteÑ (Section 4.4, CCNHCD Plan). The Plan does acknowledge that there are lding onsiteÑ (Sectionlding onsiteÑ (Section times were demolition may be necessary such as, Ð-partial destruction due to fire or other were demolitionwere demolition catastrophic events, severe structural instabilithic eventhic eventy, and occasionally redevelopment that is in keeping with appropriate City policiesÑ. Lastapaply, the policies review the Heritage Permit D Approval process. As the proposed redevelopment is proposing the demolition of Protected Heritage Properties within the HCD, a Heritage Permit Application is required. MHBC | 30 Page 462 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 3.0 Historical Overview 3.1 Civic Centre Neighbourhood Historical Context thth The Civic Centre Neighbourhood was developed in the 19 and 20 centuries as a centuries as a centuries residential area adjacent to KitchenerÓs former industrial core located south of the railway, ated south of the railway, ated south of th providing homes for those who owned or work for businesses/factories in the area. The /factories in the area. The /factories in the area. earliest residential buildings date from the 1850s, with the majority constructed between majority constructed between majority constructed betwee 1880 and 1915. The area developed slowly, experiencing significant infillg significant infill in the late 1920s. g significant infill in the late 1920s. in the late 1920s The construction of apartment buildings dotted the neighbourhood beginning in the 1960s. neighbourhood begineighbourhood benning in the 1960s. 960s. The neighbourhood reflects the long development of the area from the 1850s to the recent t of the area from the 1850s to the recet of the area from the past with a variety of housing styles. Eagle Tannery was one of the largest industries, nnery was one of the largest industries,y was one of the la T established in 1850s by Louis Breithaupt at the north end of Margaret Avenue. A furniture the north end of Margaret Avenue. A fuend of Marg factory was constructed by Jacob Baetz Sr. at 264 Victoria Street North occupied the Sr. at 264 Victoria Street North occupieSr. at 264 Victoria Street majority of the block between Ellen Street and St. Leger Street. By WWI, approximately a Street and St. Leger Street. By WWI, aptreet and St. Leger Street. By W dozen factories were constructed along the railway between Weber and Lancaster Streets. along the railway between Weber and Lg the railway between Weber and F 3.2 Historical Evolution of the Subject Lands ion of the Subject Lands ubject Lands 3.2.1 General Overview ew ew The following sub-sections will provide a detailed review of each property within the subject sections will provide a detailed review sections will provide a detailed r lands. The subject lands have evolved significantly over time which is expected in an bject lands have evolved significantly ovebject lands have evolved significantly o A urbanized area such as the Civic Centre Neighbourhood. Larger versions of historical maps area such as the Civic Centre Neighboura such as the Civic Centre Neighbour and aerial photographs are included inal photographs are included inraphs are incl Appendix ÒAÓAppendAppend of this report. Mapping or aerial photographs that provide substantial informatioographs that provide substantial informagraphs that provide sun related to each specific site will be provided in each relevant sub-section. rovided in each relevant subrovided in each relevant sub--section. s The subject lands were originally part of Block 2 which consisted of 94,012 acres that were The subject lands were originally paThe subject lands were originally pa patented from the Crown on February 5, 1798, to Richard Beasley, James Wilson and St. patented from the Crown on Febpatented from the Crown on Feb R John Baptiste Rosseau (LRO). On July 24, 1805, 60,000 acres of Block 2 (comprising the John Baptiste Rosseau (LJohn Baptiste Rosseau (LRO). German Company Tract) was sold to Daniel and Jacob Erb (LRO). In 1805, 448 acres were German Company Tract)German Company Tract) w (Lot 3, G.C.T. and other lands) were sold to Jacob Hershey who in turn sold 224 acres of 3, G.C.T. and other3, G.C.T. and othe the land to Benjamin Eby in 1833. In 1840, 2d to Benjamind to Benjamin19 acres of this land were sold David Weber (LRO). Weber commissioned Plan 401 which also shows Lots 1, 2 & 3 north of Weber Street ber comber com and West of Queen Street as originally laid out by the Town Plot of Berlin (see QQ Figure 6). D In 1841, C. H. Ahrens purchased the subject lands and additional lands and commissioned the C.H. AhrenÓs Survey which included Lots 1-6 (Plan 360, February 1858) (LRO). The subject lands are part of Lots 1-4 of this survey (see Figure 7). Lot 1 was purchased by MHBC | 31 Page 463 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON George Davidson in 1858 who sold the land to the Trustees of St. AndrewÓs Church in 1862 (LRO). Lot 2 was sold to Henry Huber in 1858; this lot remained in the Huber Family until 1912 (LRO). Lot 3 and 4 were sold to Simon Roy in 1858; Lot 3 remained under his ownership until 1896 while 0.23 acres of 0.3675 acres of Lot 4 was sold to Jacob M. coco Staebler in 1879 (LRO). In the 1853 , the lands were under the ownership of C.H. Ahrens; nership of C.H. Ahrenership the Courthouse and Jail appears directly to the east and the Town Hall is situated to the Hall is situated to the Hall is situat south (see Figure 8). In the 1861 , the subject , the s, the subject lands appear just north of the area that is identified as urban; at this time the subject lands n; at this time the subject lands n; at this time the subject had been purchased from C.H. Ahrens for three years (see ee ee Figure 9FiguFigure 9). By 1875, within the ). By 1875,within the within t by Herman Brosius, there are five buildings that appear there are five buildings that appear there are five buildings that appear within the subject lands; one of the buildings is a church with a steeple at the corner of church with a steeple at the corner of church with a steeple Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs) and Weber Street West and two buildings facing Queen treet eet WestWesand two buildings facing Qutwo bu T Street North which appear to have rear addititions and a building, likely a stable to thons and a building, likely a stable to the rear. a building, lik At the time of the map, Roy Street is not depicted as part of this illustration (seedepicted as part of this illustration (sert of thise Figure 10). The 1879 by G.M. Hopkins shown in by yGG.M. Hopkins.M. Hopkinsshown in sho Figure 11Figure Figure 1 shows two buildings located within Lot 1, one of which is identified as the ÒPresbyterian ChurchÓ; Lot 2 one of which is identified as the hich is identified as the ÒPresbyPresby F includes a dwelling with rear addition located along Queen Street North as well as two ar addition located along Queen Street ated along Queen Street buildings to the rear, one of which is a stable. Lot 3 includes a dwelling fronting Queen ne of which is a stable. Lot 3 includes a ne of which is a stable. Lot 3 Street North with two buildings to the rear, one o buildings to the reo buildings to the rear, one oar, one of which is of which is a stable (this building is situated within the current Roy roadway) and Lot 4 appears vacant. The 1879 Map of Berlin t Roy t Roy roadwayr) andandLot 4 appears vacapears identifies St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church and the Waterloo County Gaol (see AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church and the AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church and the W Figure 12). A After 1879, the block and surrounding area experienced an increase in development; Roy the block and surrounding area experiee block and surrounding area experie Street was established which evolved the nature of this part of the block as dwellings were was established which evolved the naturshed which evolved the natur th constructed along this street within the late 19tructed along this street within the late ructed along this street century. By 1925, the Fire Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener shows that the church was By 1925, the Fire Insurance Plan By 1925, the Fire Insurance Plan of the situated on Lot 1 (see situsituated on Lot 1(see (see Figure 14Figure Figure 1414). A one-and-half-storey, brick, semi-detached dwelling ))A with one storey rear addition and two-and-a-half storey brick dwelling with rear wood with one storey rear addition andwith one storey rear addition and R addition and one storey brick auto garage wereaddition and one storey baddition and one storey brick located on Lot 2. A two-and-a-half storey brick dwelling with one storey side brick addition (68 Queen Street North), a two-storey rick dwelling with one storick dwelling with one s wood frame house with brick veneer on the first storey with front porch (11 Roy Street) d frame house withd frame house with and a two-and-half storey dwelling with wood frame rear addition (formerly 15 Roy Street) wowo--andand--half shalf s were located on Lot 3. Lot 4 included a two-storey brick dwelling with front verandah with ed on ed on on storey rear addition and detached auto garage (formerly 19 Roy Street). D Overall, the block of Lots 1-4 has evolved over time. The subject lands are now all under the ownership of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. Several properties in the block, over time have been purchased by the church and buildings have been removed including: 14 MHBC | 32 Page 464 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Weber Street West, 15 Roy Street (Shoemaker and Hett Homestead), 19 Roy Street, 62-64 Queen Street North (semi-detached Westminster House/ Youth House and 66 Queen Street North to facilitate church expansions (KW Record, ÒLetÓs ReminisceÓ, May 23, 1964). In 1962, the semi-detached building at 62-66 Queen Street North was still present (see ntnt Figure 16 and Figure 35). By 1980, this building had been removed (see e e Figure 17FiguFigure). Since 1980, there have been limited changes to the subject lands including some minor ding some minoding som removal landscaping to the rear of 11 Roy Street and along the northern frontage of 68 hern frontage of 68 hern fron Queen Street North (Figures 17 & 18). The remaining buildings present in the 1925 FIP within the subject lands include St. subject lands include St. subject lands include St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church, 68 Queen Street North and 11 Roy Street. St. AndrewÓs d 11 Roy Street.d 11 R St.AndrewÓs rewÓs Presbyterian Church has been consistently present at the corner of Queen Street North and the corner of Queen Street North and the corner of Queen Street North and Weber Street East since 1862 (albeit this has been an evolution of built forms); its presence ananevolution of built forms)evolution of built; its presencenc predates the existing buildings on-site and in the surrounding area with the exception of e surrounding area with the exceptsurrounding area wition T the Waterloo County Gaol. As mentioned previously, the subject lands have evolved continuously and St. Andrews nds have evolved ndscontinuously and continuoSt. A Church has undergone several phases of expansion during which time existing dwellings es of expansion during which time exists of expansion during which tim were often removed and replaced. Depictions of the phases of expansion of the subject d. Depictions of the phases of expansionpictions of the phases of expansio lands can be found in Section 3.2.2 n 3.2.2 below. Thus, the current proposal signifies a below.low. T hus, the current the current propospropos F continuation in the long-standing tradition of phases of demolition and expansion to anding tradition of phases of n of phases ofdemolitionmolition support the outreach efforts of St. Andrews as part of its mission statement and intangible forts of forts of St. Andrews St. Andrews as part of its missioas part heritage tradition. A R D MHBC | 33 Page 465 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T FF AA RR Figure 6- Excerpt of the Town Plot of Berlin (Plan 401)Excerpt of Excerpt of , County of Waterloo; circle identifying general location of subject lands (LRO). bjectbject D MHBC | 34 Page 466 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T FF AA RR D Figure 7- Excerpt of the Map of the town of Berlin, County of Waterloo showing location of subject lands (LRO). MHBC | 35 Page 467 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A R Figure 8-13ure ure 88--131 (above left) Excerpt of the 1853 Map of Berlin; (above right) Excerpt of the 1861 (above left) ve left) Tremaine Map of Waterloo County; (miine Map ofine Map ofWateWateddle left) Excerpt of the 1875 BirdÓs Eye View of Berlin; (middle right) Excerpt of the 1879 map of the Town of Berlin, Waterloo County, Ontario by G.M. Hopkins; erpt of theerpt of the (below left) Excerpt of the 1879 map of Berlin idExceExceentifying St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church and D Waterloo County Gaol; (below right) Plan of Lot 3 of the GCT which includes Lots 1-4 of Plan 360 (Courtesy of the University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre and LRO). MHBC | 36 Page 468 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON TT FFF AAAA R Figures 14-16FiFigures 14-16(above left) Excerpt of 1925 Fire Insurance Plan of Kitchener showing St. AndrewÓs (above left) Ee leftxcerp Presbyterian Church and 14 Weber Street West (sincePresbyterian Church and Presbyterian Church and 14 Web14 removed) and adjacent 18 Weber Street West to the north; (above right) Excerpt of 1925 Fire Insurance Plan of Kitchener showing the remaining the norththe north; (above right) Exceht) Ex buildings within the subject lands at the time including 15 Roy Street (Shoemaker and Hett dings within the subjecdings within the subje Homestead), 19 Roy Street, 62-64 Queen Street North (semi-detached Westminster House/ Youth stead), 19 Roy Ststead), 19 Roy St House and 66 Queen Street North; (middle) Historical photograph of the former 62-64 Queen Street d 66 Queed 66 Quee North (Westminster House). minsmins D MHBC | 37 Page 469 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A R D Figures 17 &18 (above) Aerial photograph from 1980 showing the subject lands in red box (Courtesy of Grace Schmidt Room, KPL); (below) Aerial photograph from 2024 showing the subject lands in red box (MHBC, 2024 & ESRI). MHBC | 38 Page 470 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 3.2.2 Phases of Expansion of the Subject Lands T F A R D MHBC | 39 Page 471 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 472 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 473 of 783 TTTTTTTT FFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 474 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 475 of 783 TTTTTTTTTT FFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 476 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 3.2.3 Detailed Overview of Subject Lands This section of the report is intended to provide a detailed history of the subject lands including the chronological history of the buildingsÓ development, such as additions and demolitions. The listing of owners of all properties within the subject lands compiled from mpmp the Land Registry Office, also known as the Chain of Title, is included in Appendix ÒCÓ ppendixppend of this report. 3.2.3.1 11 Roy Street (The Zollner House/ SOLO House) Lot 3 of C.H. AhrenÓs Survey (1858) was sold to Simon Roy in 1858 which included 0.49 858 which included 0.49 858 which included acres. In 1896, part of the lot was sold to Hannah Wilkinson who sold a portion of the who sold a portion of the who sold a portion of the property to Elizabeth Shoemaker (LRO). The remaining portion of the land was sold to ortion of the land was sold to ortion of the land was sold to George A. Bricker in 1902. Between 1902 and 1920, the property was owned by several he property was owned by several he property was owned by several owners with surnames including: Heller, Tracksell, Williams and Shantz (LRO). In 1922, Williams and Shantz (LRO). In 1922, Williams and Shantz Urias Shantz sold the property to Benjamin J. Zollner for $9,500 (LRO). The ollner for $9,500 (LRO). The ner for $9,500 (LRO) T completed in 1979 describes the property as, ÐA post war house of ribes the property as, Ðproperty as, ÐA post war house brown brick, two stories in height. Windows are typical multi narrow paned over one ws are typical multi narrow paned over multi na variety. Porch is original. Built circa 1920-1930Ñ. The Fire Insurance Plan of 1925 shows a 2020--1930193Ñ. The Fire Insurance Plan of 19nsuranc two-storey frame dwelling with one storey brick veneer and front porch (see e storey brick veneer and front porch (setorey brick veneer and front porc Figure 19) within the location of 11 Roy Street which is reet which is consistent with the existingich is consistent with the existingconsistent with the existing building. Based on F the purchase of the property in 1922 and its presence on the 1925 Fire Insurance Plan, the in 1922 and ditsitspresence presence oon the 1925 Fn the 1925 dwelling would have been constructed approximately between 1923 and 1924 around the n constructed approximately between 19constructed approximately between 19 time that the ZollnerÓs daughter, Mary Eleanor, was born. daughter, Mary Eleanor, was born. daughter, Mary Eleanor, was Based on the land registry records and the Vernon Directories, the Zollner Family lived in d registry records and the Vernon Directd registry records and the Vernon the house until 1981. In the 1945 VoterÓs List, several people are listed at the dwelling il 1981. In the 1945 VoterÓs List, severalil 1981. In the 1945 VoterÓs List, sever A including Benjamin, his wife, daughter and housekeeper (seeenjamin, his wife, amin, his wife, daughterdaughterand housekand housek Figure 23). In 1946, the property was granted from Benjamin to Ida y was granted from Benjamin to Ida andnted from Benjamin to Ida andand Mary E. Zollner, the same year that Benjamin passed away. His death certificate identifies that he was born in Carrolltown, amin passed away. His death certificateamin passed away. His d Pennsylvania, U.S.A and was an organist & muennsylvania, U.S.A and was an organist ennsylvania, U.S.A and was ansic teacher at St. MaryÓs Roman Catholic Church (Library and Archives Canada). In 1982,ChurcChurch(Library and Archives Canada)y and Archives Cana the estate of Mary Zollner was granted to the Trustees of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church (LRO). The Vernon Directories identify the the Trustees of St. AndrewÓs Presbthe Trustees of St. AndrewÓs Presb R property as ÐSolo Program Family and ChildrenÓs Services and Parking LotÑ in 1982. At this property as ÐSolo Prograproperty as ÐSolo Program Fam time the church purchased the house which they dubbed ÐSOLO HouseÑ. It was originally time the church purchasetime the church purchased t used for a Vietnamese Refugee Family (Vernon Directories identified N. Pham, a ed for a Vietnamese Reed for a Vietnamese R Vietnamese family) (see amese familyamese family) ) (se(se Figure 24). In 1985, it was occupied by The Family & ChildrenÓs Services of Waterloo Region. In 1996, the church waived the rental fee for the facility as of Waterloof Waterlo part of the outreach program. The facility has also been used for special events through the outreoutre D years. The building had been leased by the church until it was vacated in 2018. The building footprint has not changed since its construction in c. 1924, although there have been changes to its surrounding environment (see Figure 19 & 20). MHBC | 40 Page 477 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 2023 2023 1925 TTT FFF 1979 2024 A Figures 19-23-FFigures 19-23- (above left) Excerpt from 1925 Fire Insurance Plan of the City of Kitchener showing (above left) Excerpt fbove left) Excerpt f RRR the dwelling on the property (Courtthe dwelling on the propertthe dwelling on the property(Courtesy of the GSR, KPL); (above right) Aerial photograph showing current building footprint (Source: current building footprint (Scurrent building footprint (SourcGoogle Earth Pro, 2023); (middle left) Historical photograph from the 1979 Architectural Survey of Kitchener of 11 Roy Street (Courtesy of the GSR, KPL); (middle right) the 1979 Architectural Survthe 1979 Architectural Survey Current photograph of front façade of 11 Roy Strrent photograph of frorent photograph of froeet (MHBC, 2024); (below) Excerpt from the 1945 VoterÓs List for 11 Roy Street (Ls List for 11 Roy s List for 11 Roy ibrary and Archives Canada). D MHBC | 41 Page 478 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Figure 24- Historical photograph of Vietnamese refugee ugee family family (Pham Family) housed by St. AndrewÓs family (Pham Family) (Pham Familyhoused by St. And T Presbyterian Church in 11 Roy Street (Courtesy of the St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church). f theSt. AndrewÓs Presbyterian ChurchdrewÓs Presbyt). 3.2.3.2 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) ndrewÓs Presbyterian Church)ndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) In 1854, the first Presbyterian services were held in the homes of residents of Kitchener, vices were held in the homes of residens were held in the homes of resid then Berlin, who were primarily of Scottish descent (y of Scottish descent (ish descent (3). F Eventually services were conducted at a schoolhouse by Reverend Pirie who was the nducted at a schoolhouse by Reverend schoolhouse by Reverend minister of Doon Presbyterian Church (5). In 1885, the St. AndrewÓs Berlin and Chalmers terian Church (erian Ch5). In 1885, the St. AndrIn 1885, the St. Andr Presbyterian Winterbourne (of Woolwich Towourne (of Woolwich Township) jointly esourne (of Woolwich Townshinship) jointly established a congregation which was orchestrated by George Davidson, Waterloo CountyÓs first Sheriff. In 1855, the trated by George Davidson, Waterloo Cotrated by George Davidson, Wate first church building, consisting of brick seating 175 people, was erected on the present site lding, consisting of brick seating 175 pelding, consisting of brick seating 175 for the cost of $4,500 (4). The parcel of laof $4,500f $4,500(4). The parcel he parcel of land was sof land was snd was sold to the congregation by George A Davidson although his purchase of this lot (Lotn although his gh his purchase of this lot (Lot 1purchase of this lot (Lot 1 1) as part of the C.H. AhrenÓs Survey was not registered until 1858 for Lot 1. The official transaction between Davidson and the egistered until 1858 for Lot 1. Tgistered until 1858 for he officia Trustees of St. AndrewÓs Church was registered in 1862. In 1885, two transepts were added ustees of St. AndrewÓs Church was regisustees of St. AndrewÓs Churc to the sanctuary due to overcrowding. In 1888, members departed joining a new to the sanctuary due to overcrowdto the sanctuary due to overcrowding. congregation in Waterloo, Knox Waterloo. congregation in Waterloo, Knox Wacongregation in Waterloo, Knox Wa R D MHBC | 42 Page 479 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F Figures 25-27- (above left) Excerpt from the 1879 BirdÓs ove left) Excerpt from ove left) Excerpt fromthe 1879 BirdÓs Eye VieBirdÓsEye View of Berlin showing building form of the former St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church; (above drewÓs Presbyterian Church; (above right)drewÓs Presbyterian Church; (above right)right) Historical postcard of former St. AndrewÓs His Presbyterian Church (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church); (below) Historical photograph of hurch (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian urch (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian AA former St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church (CouAndrewÓs Presbyterian Church (Courtesy of StwÓs Presbyterian Church (Courtesy of Strtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church). In April 1906, due to rising membership, the construction of a new church building was pril 1906, due to rising membership, theril 1906, due to rising m approved with a budget of $25,000 and $2000 for a pipe organ (see pproved with a budget of $25,000 and $pproved with a budget of $25 Figures 28 & 29). The cornerstone of the church was laid in October of 1906 by the oldest member of the The cornerstone of the church wasThe cornerstone of the church was laid congregation, Mrs. James Potter (5). On September 8, 1907, the church was officially congregation, Mrs. James Potter (congregation, Mrs. James Potter (55 R dedicated (7). The new building included the circular stained glass Rose Window dedicated deddedicated(7). The new buildingew b to the Davidson Family as well as Sheriff Dato the Davidson Family ato the Davidson Family as wevidson clock and other items from the original church. On January 21, 1925, the congregation voted to remain Presbyterian rather than hurch. hurch. On January 21, 19On January 21, joining the newly formed United Church; Figure 30 shows the footprint of the church at the ng the newly formng the newly form time (8). In 1939, the sanctuary was renovated which included new lighting, re-seating in . In 1939, t. In 1939, t the balcony, carpets and repaintiy, cary, carng of the interior (10). Nine years later, the sanctuary was D renovated with a new Cassavant organ which was a dedication to the soldiers from the congregation who died during WWI and WWII; the organ has since had major revisions in 1963, 2001, 2004 and 2005 (12). MHBC | 43 Page 480 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T FF Figures 28-30- (above left) Coloured postcard of St. Andr(above left) (aboveColoured postcard of St. Andrewred postcard of St. AndreewÓs Presbyterian Church published in 1911 (Courtesy of the GSR, KPL PB4); (above right) Historical photograph of the interior of the church the GSR, KPL PB4); (above right) Historical phGSR, KPL PB4); (above right) Historical ph AAAA including pipe organ (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church); Excerpt from 1925 Fire Insurance pipe organ (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyten (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyte Plan (Courtesy of the GSR, KPL). ourtesy of theGSR, KPLGSR, KPL).). In 1954, Iona Hall was built which replaced the Sunday School; the project was known as n 1954, Iona Hall was n 1954, Iona Hall wbuilt which replacbuilt whi ÐIona I ProjectÑ (13). The Hall included church offices, Christian Education facilities and ÐIona I ProjectÑ (13). The Hall incluÐIona I ProjectÑ (13). The Hall include completion of St. AndrewÓs Chapel. In 1955, the church held the largest Presbyterian completion of St. AndrewÓs Chapelcompletion of St. AndrewÓs Chapel RRRR congregation in Canada with 1900 members and 1061 children enrolled in Sunday School congcongregation in Canada with 19ada w (14). In 1961, the worship services were aired on CKCO (CTV News) as St. AndrewÓs (14). In 1961, the worsh(14). In 1961, the worship s Television Ministry (14). In 1967, the ÐIona II Prlevision Ministry (14). levision Ministry (14).ojectÑ was initiated with the construction of the Covenant Chapel, the Heather Room, library, offices and educational space; the ovenant Chapel, ovenant Chapel, dedication for these facilities occurred in 1969 (15). In 1968, the church opened St. n for thesn for thes AndrewÓs Day Care which operated until 1992 (16). In the 1970s, the St. AndrewÓs ÒOpen ayCayC D DoorÓ philosophy resulted in more than 3000 people using the churchÓs facilities as a form of local outreach (18). Beginning in the 1970s, the church sponsored several families from around the world including Vietnam, Guatemala, San Salvador, Somalia and Afghanistan (18). In 1971, the churchÓs Thrift Shop opened under the LadiesÓ Aid (WomenÓs MHBC | 44 Page 481 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON association). Beginning in 1975, Noon Hour Recitals began at the church which continue to this day (20). T FF Figures 31-33- (above) Historical photograph of Iona I Prove) ove) Historical photograph of Iona I Project (Historical photograph of Iona I oject (Iona Hall) which is the existing west wing of the church (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church); (below left) Excerpt of news article h (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Chuh (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian C for the Iona II Project including Covenant Chapel (Source: KW Record, February 1968); (below right) Project including Covenant Chapel (Project including Covenant Chapel (Source: KSource: K A Historical photograph of the opening of Iona Phase II project (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian hotograph of the opening of Iona Phase II praph of the opening of Iona Phase II pr Church). R D MHBC | 45 Page 482 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Basement Floor r TT Ground Floor Plan Goor Pla FF AAAAAA First Floor Plan RRRRR D Figures 34-36- (above) Basement floor plan; (middle) Ground floor plan showing that semi-detached dwelling at 62-64 Queen Street North is still present; (below) First floor plan (Courtesy of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church). MHBC | 46 Page 483 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON In 1980, the Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario, the Honorable Pauline McGibbon, was in attendance to commemorate the founding of the congregation. In 1982, the church purchased 11 Roy Street which was used to house a refugee family and for FACS of Waterloo Region as SOLO House. In 1988, the Covenant Ó88 Campaign resulted in the ed ed installation of an elevator, exterior ramp, climate-controlled sanctuary, renovated church ovated covated spire which were dedicated in October 1989 (24). In 1995, a day camp and outreach and outreach and ou ministry called Camp Kummoniwannago debuted (27). Between 2000 and 2001, the roof of 0 and 2001, the roof 0 and 20 the sanctuary, office and upper halls areas were replaced (30). In 2002, a stained-glass n 2002, a stainedn 2002, a staine-glass window dedicated to Douglas HaasÓ music ministry and in memory of his mother, Marjorie mory of his mother, Marjorie mory of his mother, M Gosselin. In 2004, the church established an archive, started the ÒOut of the ColdÓ program, ed the ÒOut of the ColdÓ program, ed the ÒOut of the ColdÓ prog ththth which continued until 2014, and established the Garden of St. AndrewÓs for the 150of St. AndrewÓs for the 150of St. AndrewÓs for the 150 anniversary project (31). In 2005, flooring and additional lighting in the choir loft were onal lighting in the choir loftonal lighting in thwere e installed in Iona Hall (31). T The following Tables 6.0 and 7.0 provide a review of the major construction and review of the major construction and of the major co renovations on the property related to the exise existing building onting building on-site and a chronology of the ng on--sitesanda chrono built form. Table 6.0- Building Chronology (Construction & Renovations of 54 Queen St N) Construction&Renovationso FFF Year Construction/ Renovation tion/ Renovation 1906 Original church building constructed replacing earlier Original church building constrOriginal church bui church constructed in 1855 church churconstructed in 1855ructe 1939 Sanctuary renovations (new lighting, re-seating in balcony, Sanctuary renovationsSanctuary renovatio AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA carpets and repainting) carpets and repaincarpets and repain 1948 New Cassavant organ added to sanctuary (later revisions New Cassava 1963, 2001, 2004, 2005) 1963, 200 1954 Iona Hall (Iona I Project) including church offices, 1951954Iona Ion education facilities and St. AndrewÓs Chapel eded RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 1967-1968Iona II Project including Covenant Chapel, Heather Room, 19671967-1968 library, offices and educational space 1988 Installation of elevator, exterior ramp, climate-controlled sanctuary and renovated church spire DDDDDDDD 2000-2001Roof of sanctuary, office, upper halls were replaced 2005 Flooring and additional lighting in the choir loft in Iona Hall MHBC | 47 Page 484 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Original Building Footprint Current Building Current Bui in 1925 Footprint 2024 Footprint FFFFFFFF Table 7.0- Building Morphology of 54 Queen Street North Morphology of 54 Queen St Section ÒAÓ ------Original Building Footprint ------ (1906) AAAAAAAAA Section ÒBÓ -------n ÒBÓ-------- Iona I Project (Addition) (1954) Section ÒCÓ -------SectioSection ÒCÓ Iona II Project (Addition) (1967) RRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ItÓs important to note that the Church has a history of expansion, including phases which s important to note thas important to note th required the demolition of nearby structures, in order to facilitate its outreach efforts with red the demolitiored the demolitio the community. Flexibility in size and configurmunity. Flemunity. Fleation of Church facilities has historically supported the intangible heritage tradition of service to the community, and this proposal heinhein DDDDD represents a continuation of that tradition. MHBC | 48 Page 485 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 3.2.3.3 68 Queen Street North (The Knell/ Rockel House) Lot 3 of C.H. AhrenÓs Survey (1858), Plan 360 was sold to Simon Roy in 1858 which included 0.49 acres. In 1896, part of the lot was sold to Hannah Wilkinson who sold a portion of the property to Elizabeth Shoemaker (LRO). The remaining portion of the land ofof was sold to George A. Bricker in 1902. Between 1902 and 1920, the property was owned by rty was orty was several owners with surnames including: Heller, Tracksell, Williams and Shantz (LRO). In Shantz (LRO). Shantz 1921, the property was granted to Henry Knell who granted it to his sister Annie M. Knell sister Annisister Ane M. Knell shortly thereafter (LRO). Documents indicate that the building was constructed soon after as constructed soon after as constructed s the purchase of the land by the Knell family and possibly designed by local architect W.H.E. gned by local architect W.H.E. gned by local architect Schmalz, who designed several public and private buildings within the area; depending on if s within the area; depending on if s within the area; depending it was constructed in 1921 or 1922, the design may have been under the partnership of e been under the partnership of e been under the partnership of 111 Schmalz and Jones Architects which was established in 1922 with Bernal A. Jones (28)in 1922 with Bernal A. Jonesin 192(28)). . . The Classical design of the building is reflective of SchmalzÓ fascination with Beaux-Arts f SchmalzÓ fascination with BeauxSchmalzÓ fascination -Arts design. In the 1925 Fire Insurance Plan, a 2 ½ storey brick dwelling with one storey ½ storey brick dwelling with one storey rey brick dwelling T addition is shown on the plan. Based on the ace acquisition of the property in 1921 by quisition of the propertyn of the pro in 1921 by the Knell Family and local directories, the building was likely constructed c. 1921-1922 in the waslikelyconstructed c. 1921ucted c-1922in Classical Revival Style for Henry and Annie Knell. The Annie Knell. The Annie Knell originally identified the date of construction as 1870, however, documents date of construction as 1870, however, of construction as 1870, howeve indicate that there was a previous building located on the site which was replaced by the ous building located on the site which wing located on the site which w F existing 68 Queen Street North. orth. The 1931 Federal Census identifies Henry Knell living at 68 Queen Street North who is sus identifies Henry sus identifiesKnell Knell living at 68 Qulivi identified as a real estate agent with a brick house with 8 rooms valued at $15,000; the estate agent with a brick house with 8 restate agent with a brick house census also indicates that he lived with his sister Annie who is identified as a ÒhomemakerÓ cates that he lived with his sister Annie cates that he lived with his sister An (Library and Archives Canada). Prior to moving to 68 Queen Street North, Henry lived at Archives Canada). PrioArchives Canada). Prior to moving to 68r to moving to 68 A 109 Queen Street North (1911 Census). The Architectural Survey of Kitchener of 1979, n Street North (1911 Census). The Archet North (1911 Census). The Arch describes the building as follows: es the buildingingas follows:as follo R Based on land registry records and the Vernon Directories, the building remained under the on land registon land regist ownership of the Knell Family until 1950 when the property was willed to the Waterloo of the of the Trust & Savings Corporation. In 1953, the property was granted to Dr. Albert C. and Gladys D Rockel. Albert Conrad Rockel was born in Saskatchewan and graduated from the University MHBC | 49 Page 486 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON of Saskatchewan in 1934 (see Figures 37 & 38). Gladys was born in 1913 in Winnipeg, Manitoba and moved to Kitchener in 1944. T Figures 37 & 38- (left) Photograph of Albert Conrad Rockel from the Greystone, University of h of Albert Conrad Rockel from the Greystonet Conrad Rockel from the Greystone F Saskatchewan Yearbook of 1934 (ancestry.ca); (right) Photograph of Albert Conrad Rockel taken in 1934 (ancestry.ca); (right) Photograph of Albert C(right) Photograph of Albert (Source: Waterloo Region Generations). nerations). A R Figures 39 & 40-res res 39 & 4039 & 40-- (left) Photograph from 1978; (right) Historical photograph from the 1979 (left)(left) Architectural Survey of Kitchener of 68 Queen Street North (Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, tural Survey otural Survey o Kitchener Public Library). ublic Liublic Li D MHBC | 50 Page 487 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Photographs taken in 1978 and 1979 as part of the compilation of inventories of historical buildings in Kitchener, show that there has been limited change to the building since then (see Figures 39 & 40). The Vernon Directories associate the property with Dr. A. Rockel and his family practice from the early 1950s into the 1980s. By a 1980 aerial photograph, phph the addition and attached garage appear to the north of the building (see Figure 41Figure 4Figure). T F Figure 41-Aerial photograph from 1980 of subject lands erial photograph from 1980 of subject lands idial photograph from 1980 of subject lands ididentifying the presence of attached garage A and addition (Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library). n (Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitctesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitc In 1989, Dr. Albert Rockel passed away (Library and Archives Canada). In 1997, Gladys 989, Dr.89, Dr.AlbertARockelRockelpassed awayp(Lib Rockel transferred the property to St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church by its Board and ockel transferred the property to St. Andockel transferred the property Trustees (LRO). Gladys passed away three years later (The Leader Post, September 6, Trustees (LRO). Trustees (LRO). Gladys passed away tGladys passed aw 2000, 29). In 2010, the house was renamed from the Rockel House to the Knell House in 202000, 29).In 2010, the house was0, the house was R recognition of the original owner Henry Knell (28). Since then, the building has been leased recognition of the originarecognition of the original owne to several businesses; the current business leasing the building is Harper Shelly Law Office. to several businesses; thto several businesses; the cu The original footprint of the building has been sloriginal footprint oforiginal footprint oightly altered with an addition on the north elevation towards the rear of the building and an attached garage which faces Roy Street on towards thon towards th (see Table 8.0e 8.0e 8.0 for review of building morphology). Based on observations, it appears that fofo th these additions were made in the late 20 century. D MHBC | 51 Page 488 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON TTTT Original Building Footprint t Current Building Footprint ntBuild in 1925 in 2024 in 202 Table 8.0- Building Morphology of 68 Queen Street North Queen Street North FFFFF Section A ----------------- Original Building Footprint (c. Or 1921) Section B-------on Bon B-------- North Addition (c. 1980) AAAAAAAAAAA Section C -------Section Con C-------------- Attached Garage (c. 1980) RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DD MHBC | 52 Page 489 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 4.0 Existing Conditions of the Subject Lands 4.1 Built Features 4.1.1 11 Roy Street The building is composed of a brick and wood frame structure with cedar shake cladding hhcedar shake cladding cedar shake nd (2 storey) with a gabled asphalt roofline with deep returning eaves/ eave overhangs and a eaves/ eave eaves/overhangs and a overhan front gabled dormer. The building has a stone foundation and stone window headers and nd stone window headers and nd stone window headers a sills along the first storey and wood frames along the upper storey (see pper storey (seepper sto Table 9.0Table 9.00 for for for exterior elevations). The north (front) elevation of the building includes a projecting medium-pitched gabled des a s a projectingprojmediummediu-pitchedgabled attic dormer centred on the western side of the roof with deep cornicing and returning the roof with deep cornicing and returniwith deep corn T eaves. The gable is clad in cedar shakes within a window gallery composed of four window within a window gallery composed of fow gallery openings and roundel window opening below thg below the pitch of the gable. An exteng below the pitch of the gablee pitch of the gable. An extended gabled roof line dually acts as the roof to the porch which is supported by brick piers with concrete he porch which is supported by brick piporch which is supported by bri bases and caps and wood columns what suppomns what support the porch roof structuat support the porch roof structurt the porch roof structure. Clapboard sections intersect the brick piers along the porch with wood lattice along the underskirt of iers along the porch with wood lattice ahe porch with wood lattice F the porch. The west and east elevations include painted wood clapboard within the medium-pitched levations include painted evations include painted wood clapboarwoo half storey with deep returning eaves. The eneep returning eaves. The entry to the peep returning eaves. The entry totry to the porch is located off of the east elevation. The east elevation includes four window openings within the upper storey and east elevation includes four window opeast elevation includes four window o A one door and two window openings on the firsnd two window openings on the first stotwo window openings on the first stot storey (with additional two sill windows). The west elevation includes four window openings in the upper storey including two small st elevation includes four window openinn includes four window openin windows within the gable eaves, a window gallery composed of four windows and the dual ows within the gable eaves, a window gows within the gable ea window opening below the gable. The first storey includes two narrow window openings, a indow opening below the gable. The firsindow opening below the gab dual window opening towards the rear of the house; there are also two sill windows. dual window opening towards the dual window opening towards the rear The south (rear) elevation includes a medium-pitched gabled dormer clad in wood The south (rear) elevatioThe south (rear) elevationincludd R clapboarding with returning eaves. Below the gable is a small window opening, small clapboarding with returnclapboarding with returning ea window opening and gallery window opening with four windows. The first storey includes a window opening and galwindow opening and galler small porch supported by a brick pier with stll porch supported bll porch supported one cap and base and two window openings. An appraisal report entitled, ÐHypothetical isal reporisal reporShort Narrative Appraisal of a Commercial Residential for 11 Roy Street, Kitchener, OntaororrioÑ was completed in September of 2018 by D Musso Appraisals & Consulting Inc. This report identified some ceiling repairs and peeling paint, asbestos, some parging repair and masonry lintel painting and cedar siding painting, minimal water deterioration along masonry. The report states, ÐThis building is in average/ MHBC | 53 Page 490 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON dated conditionÑ. It also concludes that the estimated cost of complete renovation would range between $78,000-$177,500.00 Table 9.0- Photos of exterior elevations of 11 Roy Street TTTTTTT FF AAAAAA RRRR DDD MHBC | 54 Page 491 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 4.1.2 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) The exterior of the building consists of brick and stone masonry; in addition to the rustic limestone foundation, the building also includes a variety of stone accents including stone banding, windowsills and headers, stone door surrounds with medallion motifs (Queen s (s ( Street North primary entry) foundation sill, cornicing and pilaster capping and arches along nd nd archarc the arcade along the north elevation of the church. Covenant Chapel is solely constructed solely construcsolely c of stone masonry and includes similar features such as stone window surrounds, pilasters w surrounds, pilastersw surroun with capping, and parapet. Decorative brick details include brick cocorbellingcorbellingrbelling and cornicing and cornicing and c and decorative brick banding, including patterned crosses, and brick window voussoirs, brick window brick window voussoirsvousso, lancet hood mouldings, pilasters, parapets, hexagonal turrets and square plan towers, and ets ets and andsquare plan towers, owers, and church spire. Woodwork is used minimally, particularly the vestibule located within the the vestibule located within the the vestibule located within the central bay of the original church building along Queen Street North which includes a en Street North which includes a en Street North w lychgate inspired overhang and wood frame window gallery. ow gallery. ow gall T The building reflects several Gothic architectural elements including ogee and lancet ural elements including ogee and lancetments including window openings, Gothic window tracery with stained glass and louvered third storey tower with stained glassassand landouvered third st windows. Aside from the platform roof lines of the majority of the later additions, a lineslinesofthe majority of the later additioof the l combination of roof cladding is used. Asphalt shingling is used for the Covenant Chapel d. Asphalt shingling is used for theAsphalt shingling is used for theCov and front vestibule along Queen Street North. A standing seam metal roof is used for the n Street North. A standing seam metal roNorth. A standing seam metal r F main church roof except for the roof of the church spire and tower roofs which include an the roof of the church spire and tower rhe church spire and tower octagonal metal shingling. The church spire and The church spire and towers displayThe church spire and towers displaytowers display Gothic GGinspired finials. See Table 10.0 for exterior elevations. r elevations.r elevations Based on a review of the condition of the building it appears that there are limited w of the condition of the building it appew of the condition of the building deficiencies: A Appearance of efflorescence along limestone foundation walls (Section A); Appearance of ence of efflorescence along florescence along limestlimest Minor drainage issues along windowsills along south elevation (Section A) Minor drainage issuesMinor drainage issues along windowsi Minor discolouration due to drainage/ efflorescence along the east and north Minor discolouration Minor discolouration due to drainadu elevation of the church spire bay particularly below the louvered window openings elevation of the church spire bation of the church sp along the second storey and stone cornicalong the second storey andsecond storey aning and below the stone cornicing along the first level (Section A) the first levelel(Section A)(Section A) R Minor discolouration along northern tower along east elevation below roofline Minor discolouration aurat (Section A) ((Section A) Minor discolouration along parapet of Chapel entry (particularly the northern side) Minor discolourMinor discoloura (Section C) (Section C)(Section C) Moderate discolouration along north side of chapel along parapet and pilasters deratederate (Section C). D The building appears to overall be in good condition including the exterior walls, foundation and roof cladding. MHBC | 55 Page 492 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Table 10.0- Photos of exterior elevations of 54 Queen Street North TT F AAAAA RRRRR DD 4.1.3 68 Queen Street North The building is constructed of red brick with stretcher brick coursing with the exception of rowlock coursing below the first storey window openings. The building has a low-pitched MHBC | 56 Page 493 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON pedimented boxed in gable roofline with intermittent brackets along the soffits. The gable roof consists of asphalt shingles and includes a prominent brick chimney shaft along the northern elevation. Above the second storey is deep cornicing which is lined by brackets along the soffits. The building includes a poured concrete foundation and window openings with brick voussoirs and keystones. The building includes several additions along the north along talong elevation including an attached garage which faces Roy Street. The east (front) elevation includes a symmetrical placement of window openings with ow openings with ow openin keystones and wooden shutters. The pediment gable includes a semi-arched window emiemi--arched window arched win opening with keystone and wooden shutters. The asymmetrical primary entry includes a al primary entry includes aal primary entry includ Classical aedicule with pedimented portico, Doric columns with modewith modest architrave, frieze with modest architrave, friezst architrave, frieze and cornice brandishing dentil mouldings. The door opening has sidelights with a semi-ning ning hashasidelights with asemisemi-- elliptical fanlight transom and six-panel wood door. This elevation also includes an addition his elevation also includes an addhis elevation also includes an addition ition with a low-pitched roof and deep cornicing. This elevation includes a door entry with levation includes a door entry with levation includes a do sidelight and window opening. The north elevation of the house includes three interconnected brick additions with three interconnected brick additions witonnected b concrete foundations. The addition to the west of the facade includes to gallery window he west of the facade includes to galleryhe west of the facade inclu openings including three windows facing Roy Street with a low-pitched roof line and cing Roy Street with a lowing Roy Street with a low--pitched roof pitch extended eaves. The addition to the east extends keystone and extended eaves further he east extends keystone and extendedast extends keystone and extend north and includes a human door entryway with a keystone; this addition is connected to oor entryway with a keystone; this additway with a keystone; this addit an attached garage. The south elevation includes a gallery window with three windows, a human door entry ludes a gallery window with three windoudes a gallery window with with overhang and singular window opening. The upper storey includes various three ingular window opening. The upper storingular window opening. The window openings with keystones. The west (rear) elevation of the building includes a with keystones. The west (rear) elevatiwith keystones. The west (rear) reflection of the boxed pediment gable with brackets on the front façade with a semi-e boxed pediment gable with brackets oe boxed pediment gable with bracket arched window opening with keystone within the gable. The first storey includes three dow opening with keystone within the gaw opening with keystone within the ga various window openings, and the upper storey includes three window openings and door window openings,openings,and the upper storey and the upper storey opening. There is also a brick chimney shaft along this elevation. ng. There is also a brick chimney shaft a. There is also a brick The building appears to be in good condition except for some masonry staining below he building appears to be in good condhe building appears to be in go windowsills likely due to drainage and somewindowsills likely due to drainagewindowsills likely due to drainageand discolouration along the foundation sill. MHBC | 57 Page 494 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Table 11.0- Photos of exterior elevations of 68 Queen Street North TTTT FFF AAAAAA RRRRRR DDDDD 4.2 Landscape Features Most of the subject lands consists of asphalt surface parking. There is a small strip of sod along the frontage of 11 Roy Street and landscaped front yard along the frontage of 68 Queen Street North which consists of some coniferous plantings along the façade. There is MHBC | 58 Page 495 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON a large, mature coniferous tree along the front yard of 68 Queen Street North. There is a community/ church garden (the Garden of St. AndrewÓs established in 2004) located on the north side of the church by the church hall which includes low-lying plantings, a few tree plantings, pedestrian pathway and stone installation. Table 12.0-Photos of Landscape Features on the Subject Landsnds TTTTTTT FFF AAAAAA RRR DDDD MHBC | 59 Page 496 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 5.0 Evaluation and Identification of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest 5.1 Evaluation of the Subject Lands The Terms of Reference included in Appendix D of this report requires a high-level quires a highquires a high-level evaluation of the subject lands. All properties located on the subject lands were determined bject lands were determined bject lands were de to exhibit Cultural Heritage Value or Interest (CHVI). The findings are summarized below, dings are summarized below, dings are summarized be and the full evaluation charts can be viewed in Appendix Fx Fx F of this report. of this report.of t 5.1.1. 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) erian Churcherian C) St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church was determined to meet at least 6 of the Ontario d to meet at least 6 of the to meet at least 6 of Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria for determining CHVI. It is a representative example of Gothic It is a representative example of Gothia representative e T revival architecture, is displays a high degree ofee of craftsmanship, it craftsmanship, it is directly associated with manship, it is directly associ the theme and belief of the Presbyterian Church, it does can yield information that n Churchn C, it does can yield information tan yield contributes to an understanding of a community or culture such as vital statistics including community or culturecommunity osuch asuch asvital statv births/ baptisms, marriages, deaths and infohs and information ond information onrmation on the social, cultural, economic the social, cthe social, culturaultu evolution of the community, it is functionally, visually and historically linked to its is functionally, visually and historically nally, visually and historically F surroundings, and it is considered a landmark by the community. sidered a landmark by the community.mark by the community. More research would be required to determine whether the building demonstrates or reflect be required to determine whether the bbe required to determine wh the work or ideas of an architect, artist, buildeof an architect, artist, builder, designer oof an architect, artist, builder, dr, designer or theorist who is significant to a community, as this information is not currently confirmed. this information is not currently confirmthis information is not currently conf A Heritage Attributes: ttributes:utes: Exterior rior or Existing footprint of the original chEExisting footprint of the original cting footprint of the ourch building and later additions, Exterior elevations including decorative maExterior elevations including dlevations includingsonry, parapets, turrets, towers, spire and original openings and associated surrounds; original openings and assonings and asso R Voussoirs and hood mouldings; Voussoirs and hood mohoo Stained glass windows and Gothic tracery; SStained glass windos win Original rooflines; OOriginal rooflinesriginal rooflines Date stone DDate stone ate stone Interior (Part V designation does not artVartVapply to interior features) D Main sanctuary including Cassavant organ Circular stained glass window in dedication of the Davison Family; Vaulted ceilings MHBC | 60 Page 497 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Crown moulding and decorative millwork Lighting 5.1.2. 68 Queen Street North The building was determined to meet at least 3 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria for on 9/06 criteria on 9/06 determining CHVI. It is a representative example of a Classical revival dwelling, it was likely al dwelling, it was likeal dwelling designed by W.H.E. Schmalz, who is a locally renowned architect, and it supports the , and it supports the , and it supports character of the area. More research would be required to determine whether has a direct association with a has a direct association with a has a direct association with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a institution that is significant to a institution that is significant to a community. Heritage Attributes: T Original footprint of the dwelling including original northeast addition including original northeast additionincluding original northea Low-pitched pedimented boxed in gable rooflied in gable roofline and associated brackd in gable roofline and associatne and associated brackets and soffits; Decorative brick work including voussoirs and keystones; uding voussoirs and keystonesvoussoirs and key; Asymmetrical primary entry including Classical aedicule with pedimented portico; ntry including Classical aedicule with peding Classical aedicule with pe F Doric columns and dentil mouldings; entil mouldings;gs; Primary door opening with sidelights and ning with sidelights and semining with sidelights and semsemi-elliptical fanlight transom and six--elliptical f panel door; Existing window and door openings and remaining frames. ndow and door openings and remainingndow and door openings and rem *The later addition on the north-west corner and attached garage are not considered to dition on the northdition on the north--west corner and attwest corner and att A exhibit CHIV and are excluded from the heritage attributes. HIV and are excluded from the heritage d are excluded from the heritage 5.1.3. 11 Roy Street . 11 Roy Street11 Roy St The building was determined to meet at least 3 of the Ontario Regulation 9/06 criteria for he building was determined to meet at he building was determined to determining CHVI. It is a representative exdetermining CHVI. It is a representdetermining CHVI. It is a representativample of a bungalow with Arts & Crafts influences, it is associated with St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church and outreach services infinfluences, it isassociated with St. sociated with St. R from the time it was purchased in 1982 and used for several years as the SOLO House from the time it was purcfrom the time it was purchased which served the community, and it supports the historic stock of buildings in the which served the commuwhich served the community surrounding area. rroundingrroundinarea. Heritage Attributes: e Attributes:e Attributes: Original footprint of the dwelling including front porch and supporting structure; nalnal D Medium-pitched gabled roofline, including front dormer, with deep returning eaves; Existing window and door openings and remaining frames. MHBC | 61 Page 498 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 5.4 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value of the CCNHCD Key heritage attributes of the CCNHCD are outlined in Section 2.4 of the CCNHCD Plan (2007). These attributes are the defining factors of the heritage district. Key attributes are described in the physical geography and configuration of similar original buildings and their dingding direct relationship to the surrounding businesses and factories and original land l land l land development pattern of the City. It also describes the progression of architecture and rchitecture and rchitect building technology exhibited by houses and other buildings, in particular the unique form cular the unique form cular the of Queen Anne Style specific to the City of Kitchener dubbed ÐBerlin VernacularÑ. ÒFineÓ rlin VernacularÑ. ÒFineÓ rlin VernacularÑ. examples of these are categorized by Group ÒAÓ or ÒBÓ; three quarters of the properties (147 uarters of the properties (147 uarters of the propertie properties) are categorized as Group ÒCÓ which exhibit the standard construction and are in standard construction and are in standard construction and ar a condition of repair and potential restoration. The following is a list of the key attributes of owing is a list of the key attributes of owing is a list of the key attributes o the CCNHCD as defined in the District Plan (2007): T F A R D MHBC | 62 Page 499 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 6.0 Description of Proposed Development This initial phase of redevelopment includes the removal of structures at 11 Roy Street and Roy SRoy S 68 Queen Street North for the future construction of a residence building for for for multigeneration families with adult children with disabilities as an outreach program of St. each program of Seach pr AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. The following provides an overall description of the escription of theescription of redevelopment: 11 Roy Street (Group B) Removal of existing building. 68 Queen Street North (Group A) Removal of existing building. T Future New Construction The redevelopment proposal includes the future construction of a residential building cludes the future cludes tconstruction structioof a resid intended as a residence for multigeneration families with adult children with multigeneration families with adult childultigeneration families with adult disabilities. F St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church sbyterian Churchrch The St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church will s Presbyterian Church will continue its cs Presbyterian Church will cocontinue its current use which includes service, administration, worship and commercial space. nistration, worship and commercial spacnistration, worship and comm This HIA focuses on the impacts as a result of the proposed removal of structures. es on the impacts as a result of the proes on the impacts as a result of the Impacts as a result of the redevelopment proposal will be assessed subsequently in a a result of the redevelopment proposal result of the redevelopment proposal A separate Phase 2 HIA Addendum. However, a preliminary site plan is provided below (see Phase 2 HIA Addendum.e 2 HIA Addendum.However, a prHowever, a p Figures 42-45res 42-45 and and nd Appendix GAppendAppendix G of this report). of this repo R D MHBC | 63 Page 500 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F Figure 42: Conceptual site plan for the proposed future development of the subject al site plan for the proposed future devel site plan for the proposed f lands. (Facet Design Studio Ltd., 2025). n Studio Ltd.n Studio Ltd., 2025)., 2 A R D MHBC | 64 Page 501 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A R D MHBC | 65 Page 502 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T F A nd Figures 43-45:43-45:5: Proposed conceptual site plans for the basement, ground floor, and 2Proposed conceptual site plansProposed conceptual site plans floor levels of the proposed development. It is important to note that the current proposal evels of the proposed development. It iproposed development. It i is conceptual, and additional details of the conceptual, and additional details of theconceptual, and additionaproposed future development are intended to be determined through the approval procesbe determined through the appbe determined through the approval prs. (Source: Facet Design Studio Ltd.) R D MHBC | 66 Page 503 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 7.0 Impacts Analysis 7.1 Classifications of Impacts The impacts of a proposed development or change to a cultural heritage resource may occur eritage resource may occureritage resourc over a short or long-term duration, and may occur during a pre-construction phase, g a prea p-construction phase, structio construction phase or post-construction phase. Impacts to a cultural heritage resource may a cultural heritage resource may a cultural heritage resource also be site specific or widespread, and may have low, moderate or himoderate or high levels of physical moderate or high levels of physigh levels of physical impact and may be beneficial or adverse. According to the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, the g to the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, the g to the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit, the following constitutes negative impacts which may result from a proposed development: result from a proposed development: result from a propose Destruction: of any, or part of any or features; or features T Alteration: that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, with the historic fabric and c, or is incompatible, with the historic fapatible, w appearance: Shadows: created that alter the appearance of a r the appearance of a he appearance or change the viability of a natural feature or plantings, such as a garden; ure or plantings, such as a garden;plantings, such as a garden; Isolation: of a from its surrounding environment, context or a from its surrounding envifrom its surrounding enviro F significant relationship; ship;p Direct or Indirect Obstructionrect Obstructionrect Obstru: of significant views or vi: of significant views of signifistas within, from, or of built and natural features; tural features;tural features; A change in land usee in land usee in la: such as rezoning a battlefield from open space to : such as rezoning a battlsuch as rezoning a residential use, allowing new development or site alteration to fill in the formerly ntial use, allowing new development or ntial use, allowing new development or A open spaces; en spaces;ces; Land disturbances:Land disturbances:urbances: such as a change in grade that alters soils, and drainage such as a chanhan patterns that adversely affect a cultural heritage resource. patterns that adverselpatterns that adversely affect a cultu Furthermore, this report utilizes guides published by the Furthermore, this report utilizes guiFurthermore, this report utilizes guide Council of UNESCO, from the World Heritage Convention of January of Council of UNCouncil of UN R 2011. The grading of impact is based on ÐGui2011. The grading of im2011. The grading of impact de to Assessing Magnitude of ImpactÑ as a framework for this report: framework for this reportframework for this report: Table 13.0- Grading of Impact for Built Heritage and Historic Landscapes le 13.0Gradin (ICOMOS) MOS) Description Major Change to key historic building elements that contribute to the DDDDDDDDD cultural heritage value or interest (CHVI) such that the resource is totally altered. Comprehensive changes to the setting. Moderate Change to many key historic building elements, such that the resource is significantly modified. MHBC | 67 Page 504 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Changes to the setting of an historic building, such that it is significantly modified. Minor Change to key historic building elements, such that the asset is slightly different. Change to setting of an historic building, such that ing, suing, s is it noticeably changed. Negligible/ Slight changes to historic building elements or setting that hardly tting that hardly tting th Potential affect it. No change No change to fabric or setting. The following sub-sections are intended to review the proposed removal of structures he he proposed removal of structuresproposed remov within the context of the CCNHCD Plan (2007) in addition to assessing the subject lands n addition to assessing addition to assessing the subject lands and adjacent listed and protected heritage properties based on the Ontario Heritage Toolkit operties based on the Ontario Heritage s based on the O TTTTTTTT and ICOMOS severity graduation as reviewed above. The policies in the CCNHCD Plan that wedabove. The policies in the CCNHCD he policies are particular to the assessment of compatibility within the CCNHCD Plan include policies mpatibility withmpatiinthe CCNHCD Plan inclue CCNHC for demolition (Section 3.3). Please note, the subject lands and adjacent properties are not note, the subject lands ote, the subjeand adjacent prd adjac included in a site-specific area identified in the CCNHCD Plan, nor do they include properties entified in the CCNHCD Plan, nor do thed in the CCNHCD Plan, nor do th designated under Part IV of the OHA and he OHAand development is proposed wd development is proposed wdevelopment is proposed within the HCD FF boundaries and not adjacent thereto, thereforent thereto, therefore Policies 3.3.5, 3.3.refore Policies 3.3.5, 3.3.e Policies 3.3.5, 3.3.7 and 3.3.8 are not applicable. The following sub-section 7.5 will review the Streetscape Design Guidelines in ng subg sub--section 7.5 will review the Streetsection 7.5 will review Section 7.0 of the CCNHCD Plan. CNHCD PlanCNHCD Plan. . 7.2 Impact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North act ct Analysis for 11 Roy Street andAnalysis for 11 Roy Street and A (Proposed for Removal) sed for Removal)Removal) Table 14.0- Impact Analysis for 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North able able 1414.00- Impact Analysis for Impact Analysis for 11 Roy Stre11 11 Roy Street 68 11 Roy Streoy StreQueen Street North Destruction D of any, or or RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR part of any, heritage part attributes or features;attribu The proposed development will The proposed development will remove remove the built heritage feature on-the built heritage feature on-site and site and all associated heritage all associated heritage attributes will be attributes will be removed. removed. Alteration that is not that is that is sympathetic, or is DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD The heritage resource will be The heritage resource will be removed. incompatible, with the removed. historic fabric and appearance of a building; MHBC | 68 Page 505 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Shadows created that obscure heritage attributes or change the The heritage resource will be The heritage resource will be removed. viability of the associated removed. cultural heritage landscape; Isolation of a heritage resource or part thereof The heritage resource will be from its surrounding The heritage resource will be removed. ritage resource will be removed.ritage resource will b removed. environment, context or a significant relationship; Direct or Indirect Obstruction of Views of, within, or from The heritage resource will be The heritage resource will be removed. gge resource will be removed individual cultural removed. heritage resources; TTTTTTTTTTTT A Change in Land Use where the change affects The heritage resource will be urce will be urcThe heritage resource will be removed. The heriThe heritage resource w the propertyÓs cultural removed. heritage value; and Land Disturbances FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF such as a change in The heritage resource will be The heritage resource will be grade that alters soils, The heritage resource will be removed. removed. removed. and drainage patterns that adversely affect a cultural heritage resource. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 7.2.1. Adverse Impact of Destruction dverse Impact of Destructionpact of Destr The proposed removal of 11 Roy Street is considered a major adverse impact of destruction proposed removal of 11 Roy Street is coproposed removal of 11 as the proposed redevelopment will remove all identified heritage attributes of this built s s the proposed redevelopmentthe proposed redevelopmentwill remo heritage feature which is considered a supporting feature (Group B) in the CCNHCD Plan. heritage feature whichheritage feature which is considered aonsidere RRRRRRRRRRRRRR D MHBC | 69 Page 506 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON T Figure 43- Photograph of 11 Roy Street looking south-westking southking-west from south side of Roy Street (MHBC, 2024) from south side ofsouth sidRoy Street The proposed removal of 68 Queen Street North is considered a major adverse impact of n Street North treet North is considered a major adis considered a major destruction as the proposed redevelopment will remove all identified heritage attributes of development will remove all identified hement will remove all identified he F this built heritage feature which is considered a very fine example of an architectural style hich is considered a very fine example oered a very fine example (Group A) in the CCNHCD Plan. D Plan. Plan. A R Figure 44- Photograph of 68 Queen Street North looking south-west from west side of Queen Street D North. (MHBC, 2024) The Plan does acknowledge that there are times when demolition may be necessary such as, Ð-partial destruction due to fire or other catastrophic events, severe structural instability, MHBC | 70 Page 507 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON and occasionally redevelopment that is in keeping with appropriate City policiesÑ (CCNHCD Plan, 3.8). Section 3.3.4 of the Plan provide policies regarding demolition reviewed in the following Table 15.0. Table 15.0- Demolition Policies (CCNHCD Plan) (a) The demolition of heritage buildings in The redevelopment proposes to remove the oposes to remove oposes the District is strongly discouraged. existing building at 11 Roy Street which is 11 Roy Street which is 11 Roy Stre considered a Group B building and 68 up B buildingup B buildingand 68 an Queen Street North which is considered a North which is considered a North which is conside Group A building. The proposed ldinglding. The proposed . redevelopment is not feasible without this pment is not feasible without this pment is not feasible without this removal. al. al. (b) Any proposal to demolish a heritage This Heritage Impact Assessment is the This Heritage Impact Assessment is the is Heritage Impact As building or portion of a heritage building supplementary information for a Heritage supplementary information for a Heritlementary inform TTTTTTT that is visible from the street or other Permit Application intePermit Application intended to be sApplication nded to be submitted to the municipality for the proposed to the municipality for the proponicipality public space within the District shall require q demolition of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen demolition of 11 Roydemolition of 11 Roy Streeta a heritage permit from the municipality. ity. Street North. StreetStreet North. (c) Where demolition of a heritage building ding The removals are required to enable the The removals are reqe removals are re FFF is proposed, the property owner shall construction of affordable housing construction of affoconstruction of affo provide supporting documentation cumentatioassociated with the Church. assoassociated with demonstrating appropriate reasons for the opriate reasons demolition. (d) In situations where demolition is ns where demolition A Salvage and Documentation Plan will be A SaA Salva approved by Council, written and / or Council, written and / or recommended for the existing buildings at recomrecom AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA photographic documentation of any notable documentation of any notable 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North 1111 architectural features and construction ures and coto document the structures and identify techniques may be required to create a hniques may be requiredany salvageable material that could be repurposed. record of the building and its components. record of the building and its c (e) Reclamation of suitable building (e) Reclamation of suitable buildinAs noted above, a Salvage Plan will identify materials such as windows, doors, materials such as windows, doopotential reclaimed material to be reuse on- RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR moldings, columns, bricks, etc. for potential moldings, columns, bricsite or sold/ donated. reuse in a new building on the site or as reuse ding replacement components for other placement componen buildings in the neighbourhood which ings in the neigh require repair and restoration over time is repair and strongly encouraged if demolition is ncour DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD approved for any heritage buildings in the District. MHBC | 71 Page 508 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 7.3 Impact Analysis for 54 Queen Street North (St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church) The following Table 16.0 evaluates the impact the proposed demolition of the existing he ehe e buildings at 11 Roy Street and of 68 Queen Street North will have on the existing cultural existing cuexisting heritage resources located at 54 Queen Street North, which is proposed to be retained in d to be retained d to be situ. Table 16.0- Impact Analysis for 54 Queen Street North 54 Queen Street North Destruction of any, or part of any, heritage attributes or features; St. AndrewÓs Church and its heritageits heritage attributes ar attributes are not proposed for destruction or removal. Demolition activities will be confined to 11 Roy Demolition activities will b Street and 68 Queen Street North. eet North TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT Alteration that is not sympathetic, or is incompatible, Alterations to the Church are not prto the Church are not proposed as part of to the Church are not propooposed as part of the proposed with the historic fabric and demolition activities on the subject lands. on activities on the subject lands.on activities on the subject lands. appearance of a building; Shadows created that obscure . FFFFFFFFFFFFF heritage attributes or change the viability of the associated The removal of buildings on the subject lands will not create additional The removal of buildings on the subject cultural heritage landscape;e; shadows which were not previously present. shadows which were not Isolation of a heritage age age resource or part thereof from its hereof from its hereof f The Church has direct associations with 11 Roy Street, which is proposed The Church has direct assThe Church has direct asso surrounding environment, vironment, vironme AAAAAAAAAA for demolition. It was purchased by the Church for demolition. Itfor demolition. Itwas pwas pin 1982 and used for context or a significant significant nificant several years for outreach services as the SOLO House which served the several yearsseveral yearsfor outrfor outr relationship;hip; community. The new proposed development is intended to continue the community. The ne ChurchÓs outreach services and will also have direct associations with St. ChurchÓs outreac Andrews and contribute to its intangibleAndrews and heritage tradition of service to the community. Therefore, the impacts of isolation are considered to be minor comcommunity in nature. in nain natur Direct or Indirect D RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Obstruction of ViewsOb of, of, within, or from individual within, or from individual The built feature was designed for the intersection of Queen Street North cultural heritage resources;cultural heritage resources;g and Weber Street which is reflected by historic photography and other ephemera. While the CCNHCD Plan (2007) does not identify views or vistas specific to the church, the iconic view of the church from the intersection will not be altered. A Change in Land Use LaLa where DDDDDDDDDDDD the change affects the The property will continue to function as an institutional property. The propertyÓs cultural heritage additional residential use will not negatively impact the value of the value; and property and may be beneficial to the associative value of the place of worship. MHBC | 72 Page 509 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Land Disturbances such as a change in grade that alters soils, The Church is located approximately 8 metres from the area where and drainage patterns that demolition activities are proposed to take place. Provided normal adversely affect a cultural construction best practices are followed, impacts from land disturbances land d heritage resource. are not anticipated as a result of the proposed demolition.lition. 7.4 Impact Analysis for Adjacent Heritage Properties tiesties No adverse impacts are anticipated to the following adjacent designated and listed ent designated and listed ent designated and listed properties: 20 Weber Street East 73-77 Queen Street, North Waterloo County Gaol and eetet, , North Waterloo County Gaol and North Waterloo Co GovernorÓs House (Designated under Part IV o the OHA, Regionally Significant r Part IV o the OHA,rt IV o the OHA,Regionally SignificaRe TTTTT Cultural Heritage Resource) 83-85 Queen Street North, Kitchener Public Library Main Branch (Listed) chener Public Library Main Branch (Listebrary M 16 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) under Part V of the OHA)under Part V of the OHA) 20 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) ted under Part V of the OHA)under Part V of the OHA) 23 Roy Street (Designated under Part V of the OHA) gnated under Part V of the OHA)under Part V of the OHA F 18 Weber Street West (Designated under Part V of the OHA) West(Designated under Part V of the Onated under Part V of the O 74 Queen Street North (Designated under Part V of the OHA) et North (Designated under Part V of thet North (Designated under Part V of th No alterations, additions, or construction acitions, or construction activities are pitions, or construction activittivities are proposed to take place on these properties. The proposed demolitions will be confined to solely the subject lands. All adjacent proposed demolitions will be confined to proposed demolitions will be confine properties are located a sufficient distance from e located a sufficient distance from demolocated a sufficient distance from demdemolition activities that impacts as a result A of land disturbances and/or vibrations arsturbances and/or vibrations are not bances and/or vibrations are not e not anticipated cause any potential adverse impacts. s. 7.57.7.55 Impact Analysis for CCNHCD Streetscapes Impact Analysis for Impact Analysis for CCNHCC As described in Section 1.4.3 of this report, the characteristics of Queen Street North As As described in Section 1.4.3ection of thisof this includes a variety of built forms, setbacks, orientations and location. The proposed incincludes a variety of built forms, f built R demolition is primarily located along Roy Street and Queen Street North. The removal of 11 demodemolitionis primarily locatedy loc Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North are anticipated to have a minor adverse impact on oy Street and 68 Queen oy Street and 68 Queen the identified heritage attributes of the CCNHCD which include: dentified heritage adentified heritage D MHBC | 73 Page 510 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON However, as the streetscape of Queen Street North includes predominantly institutional buildings, many of which date from a later construction period such as the Kitchener Public Library and the County of Waterloo Courthouse, the removal of the structure at 68 Queen Street for future construction is considered to be minor, provided the CCNHCD policies are D pD p followed during new construction. Additionally, the property located at 11 Roy Street is Roy StreeRoy Str sympathetic infill from 1923-1924 and does not date to the original period of construction od of constructod of c for the streetscape. Therefore, its removal and later replacement with a sympathetic th a sympathetic th a symp structure which adheres to the CCNHCD policies is considered a minor impact. minor impact.minor impact. Additionally, much of the existing property of the subject lands is currently comprised of nds is currently comprised of nds is currently comprised surface parking. The future redevelopment of the site will provide an opportunity for the l provide an opportunity for the l provide an opportunity for the enhancement of the streetscape through the removal of surface parking and addition of of surface parking and aof surfddition of n of trees and other landscaping elements which better suit the character of the area. suit the character of the area.suit the character of T 7.6 Summary In summary, the following adverse impacts have been identified: acts have been identified: acts have been identified: Major impact of destruction as it re as it relates to removal of 11 Roy Streeit relates to removal of 11 Roy Slates to removal of 11 Roy Street; Major impact of destruction as it relates to removal of 68 Queen Street North; ion as it relates to removal of 68 Queent relates to removal of 68 Queen Minor impact of isolation of St. AndrewÓs Church from its 11 Roy Street, which was on of St. AndrewÓs Church from its 11 RndrewÓs Church from its 11 F used for several years for outreach services as the SOLO House which served the ars for outreach services as the SOLO Hh services as the SOLO H community. However, this impact is antiwever, this impact is anticipated to be mwever, this impact is anticipatcipated to be mitigated by the future construction of the new proposed development which is intended to continue the f f the new proposed development the new proposed developwhich ChurchÓs outreach services and will also have direct associations with St. Andrews utreach services and will also have direcutreach services and will also hav and contribute to its intangible heritage tradition of service to the community; and tribute to its intangibtribute to its intangible heritage tradle heritage tradition Minor adverse impact to the Roy Street and Queen Street North streetscapes within r adverse impact to the adverse impact to the Roy Street and QRoy Street and Q A the CCNHCD. CCNHCDHCD. . R D MHBC | 74 Page 511 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 8.0 Consideration of Alternatives Development Options 8.1 Alternative Development Options The following have been identified as a range of development alternatives that may be ernatives that may be ernatives that m considered as part of the heritage planning process. These options have been assessed in tions have been assessed in ons have been asse terms of impacts to cultural heritage resources as well as balancing other planning policies alancing other planning policies alancing other planning pol within the planning framework. These options could be selected individually or combined as selected individuallselectedy or combinedmbinedas a hybrid. The following are alternative development options which have been considered in options options which have been considered in ered in an attempt to minimize impacts to the subject lands and streetscapes of the CCNHCD. dsdsand streetscapes of the CCNHCDand streetscapes o. 8.1.1 Do Nothing T This option results in no redevelopment of the f the site and retention of all existing busite and retention of all existing buildings on-retention site in-situ. Currently, the building at 11 Roy Street is vacant and a large portion of the site 1 Roy Street is vacant and a large porti1 Roy Street is vacant and a consists of surface parking. If redevelopment does not proceed, it may impact the financial velopment does not proceed, it may impopment does not proceed, it ma support needed to continue to protect and conserve St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church rotect and conserve St. AndrewÓs Presbyand conserve St. AndrewÓs Presb which is a key contributor to the CCNHCD. Although all built heritage features which are the CCNHCD. Although all built heritageD. Although all built herita F tangible cultural heritage assets of the Church, will be maintained, the continued mission of assetsof the Churchurch, will be maintaine, will be maintainedd outreach will be impacted, which will subsequently impact the intangible cultural heritage of ted, which will subsequently ted, which will subsequently impactthe the Church which has supported the community for over 115 years. as supported the community for over 11as supported the community f 8.1.2 Retain All Existing Built Features In-Situ and Integrate into Development l Existing Built Features Inl Existing Built Featur-Situ and Inteand In A This option results in the retention of existing buildings (in whole) in-situ and would retain results in the retention of existing buildsults in the retention of existing build the heritage value and attributes associated with the buildings at 11 Roy Street and 68 tage value and attributes associated wite and attributes associated wit Queen Street North. The Church has advised that the retention of all buildings and n Street Northn Street N. The Church has advisedThe Ch integration within the redevelopment will not be economically feasible which will result in tegration within the redevelopment will tegration within the redevelo the ÒDo NothingÓ option.the ÒDo NothingÓ optiothe ÒDo NothingÓ option. 8.1.3 Remove 11 Roy Street but Retain and Integrate Portion of 68 Queen Street North into 88.1.3 Remove 11 Roy Street but oy Street but R New Construction or Relocate 68 Queen Street North New Construction or ReloNew Construction or Relocate This option results in the integration of a portion of 68 Queen Street North within the new This option results in theThis option results in the in construction. This option was explored by the Church and it was ultimately deemed not structionstructio. This options optio feasible due to the cost involved, which would result in the inability of the Church to offer e due to the coe due to the co the proposed housing at an affordable cost. sed housed hou D The integration of a portion of the existing building at 68 Queen Street North was deemed challenging as it is setback further from the street than the proposed new building and its composition of 2.5 storey brick poses a challenge for its integration into a new built form. Additionally, in order to avoid entry along Roy Street, which is consistent with the guidance MHBC | 75 Page 512 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON in the CCNHCD Plan, the vehicle access must be on Queen Street North, which limits the ability to integrate the existing house. 8.1.4 Relocate 68 Queen Street North The relocation of 68 Queen Street North on-site has also been explored, including the ludingluding relocation northeast to the corner of Roy Street and Queen Street North, and the relocation and the reloand th adjacent to 23 Roy Street. However, the Church has concluded that this has a significant hishishas a significanthas economic impact on the redevelopment and challenges its feasibility. ty.ty. 8.1.5 Summary All of the alternatives would result in better outcomes for cultural heritage resources. cultural heritage resources. cultural heritage resources. However, due to the cost of integrating or moving either of the buildings at 11 Roy Street er of the buildings at 11 Roy Street er of the buildings at 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, the proposed development is not financially viable for the ent is not financially viablent is not financiale for the Church. Therefore, all of the described alternatives result in the Do Nothing alternative. es result in the Do Nothing alternative.s result in the Do Not T F A R D MHBC | 76 Page 513 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 9.0 Mitigation Measures To address the identified adverse impacts, the following recommendations are provided: re prore pr Complete a Salvage and Documentation Plan of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street t and 68 Queen Street and 68 North as per Official Plan policies which includes the identification of salvageable fication of salvageable fication of salv material, the repurposing of this material where feasible, or otherwise safe storage e, or otherwise safe storage or otherwise safe of material and documentation prior to demolition works (i.e. high-resolution orks orks (i.e. high(i.e-resolution olution photographs, architectural drawings); this should be completed prior to demolition; be completed prior to demolition;be completed prior to demolitio This HIA is solely related to impacts resulting from the proposed removal of 11 Roy ing fromng fromthe proposed removal of oposed11 Ro Street and 68 Queen Street North. It is recommended that a Phase II HIA be recommended that mmended that a Phase II HIA be a P T prepared prior to the proposed future ree redevelopment to analyze the development to analyze the design of the opment to anadesign o proposed new building for impacts to adjas to adjacent heritage resources and concent heritage resources and conformity eritage r with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Plan. of the CCNHCD Planof the. F A R D MHBC | 77 Page 514 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 10.0 Conclusions and Recommendations This HIA has concluded that the proposed demolition of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street 68 Qu68 Qu North will result in the following impacts: Major impact of destruction as it relates to removal of 11 Roy Street; Street;Street; Major impact of destruction as it relates to removal of 68 Queen Street North; Queen Street North;Queen Street N Minor impact of isolation of St. AndrewÓs Church from its 11 Roy Street, which was s 11 Roy Street, which was 11 Roy Street, whi used for several years for outreach services as the SOLO House which served the OLO House which served the OLO House which served community. However, this impact is anticipated to be mitigated by the future be mitigated by the future be mitigated by the future construction of the new proposed development which is intended to continue the which which is intended to continue the e the ChurchÓs outreach services and will also have direct associations with St. Andrews direct associations with St. Andrews direct associations with St. Andrews and contribute to its intangible heritage tradition of service to the community; and adition of service to the communityadition of service to th; and Minor adverse impact to the Roy Street and Queen Street North streetscapes within and Queen Street North streetscapes wQueen Street Nort T the CCNHCD. Should the removal of these structures proceed as proposed, it is recommended that the s proceed as proposed, it is recommends proceed as proposed, it is r following documents be prepared in advance of demolition: n advance of demolition:dvance of dem F Complete a Salvage and Documentation Plan of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street and Documentation Plan of 11 Roy Strentation Plan of 11 Roy Stre North as per Official Plan policies which includes the identification of salvageable cial Plan policies which ial Plan policies which includes the idenincludes the iden material, the repurposing of this material where feasible, or otherwise safe storage epurposing of this material where feasibepurposing of this material w of material and documentation prior toand documentation prior to demolition wand documentation prior to dem demolition works (i.e. high-resolution photographs, architectural drawings); this phs, architectural drphs, architectural drawings); this sawings); this shouldshould be completed prior to demolition; A This HIA is solely related to impacts resuThis HIA is solely related to impacts resus solely related to impacts resulting from the proposed removal of 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North. It is recommended that a Phase II HIA be Street and 68 Queen Street and 68 Queen Street North. It i prepared prior to the proposed future redevelopment to analyze the design of the prepared prior to the prprepared prior to the proposed futu proposed new building for impacts to adjaproposed new building forproposed new building for impaccent heritage resources and conformity with the policies and guidelines of the CCNHCD Plan. with the policies and guidelinepolicies and guideli R D MHBC | 78 Page 515 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 11.0 Sources , 1906. 1875. (KMZ). Courtesy of the University of esy of the Universiesy of t Waterloo Geospatial Centre. Bloomfield, Elizabeth and Linda Foster. Waterloo County Councillors: A CollectA Collective Biography. Caribout A Collective Biography. Cive Biography. Caribout Imprints, 1995. Bloomfield and Foster. . Caribou Imprints, 1995. . Caribou Imprints, 1995. Caribou Imprints, 1995 Blumenson, John. . T Fitzhenry and Whiteside, 1990. City of Kitchener. , 2006. City of Kitchener, By-law No. 81-105, F (January 1981). ((January 198January 19 Collishaw, Wendy. 1978-1979. Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt 191978-1979. C Room, Kitchener Public Library (720.9713459). blic Library (720.9713459). blic Library (720.9713459). Cornish, C.R. 1979. Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt A Room, Kitchener Public Library (728.0971345 Corni). hener Public Library (728.0971345 Corner Public Library (728.0971345 Corn 1930, 1945-47, 1955, 1963, 1966. Geospatial Centre | Library | University of eospatial Centre | Library | University oeospatial Centre | Library | UnWaterloo (uwaterloo.ca) Accessed April 10, 2024. Eby, Ezra. y, Ezra. y, Ezra.. Kitchener, ON: Eldon D. Weber, 1971. Kitchener, ON: Eldon D. Kitchener, ON: Eldon D. Weber, R English, John and Kenneth McLaughlin. John and Kenneth McLauJohn and Kenneth McLa. Robin Brass Studio, 1996. Facet Design Studios. tudios. tudios. . (PDF) May 1, 2022. D Google Maps & Google Earth Pro. 11 Roy Street and 54 and 68 Queen Street North, Kitchener, Ontario. 2023-2024. Government of Canada. Parks Canada. . 2010. MHBC | 79 Page 516 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Hayes, Geoffrey. Waterloo Historical Society, 1997. Heritage Resources Centre. . University of Waterloo, 2009. 22 (P009731 KPL, P005082 09731 KPL, P0009731 WHS, P000341, MC60 P000747 KPL,) Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Room, Kitchener PubRoom, K Library. Hopkins, G.M. 1879. Scale 4 chains per inch. (KMZ). Courtesy of the University of Waterloo Geospatial of the University of Waterloo of the UGeospatial Geospat Centre. Kitchener LACAC. 1990. 1990. Courtesy of Court T the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library (728.370.971.345 Local). Library (728.370.971.345 Local).8.370.971.34 KW Record. Ð$240,000 Parish Hall Approved: Congregation of St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church Oks Congregation of St. AndrewÓs PresbyterCongregation of St. AndrewÓs DriveÑ. March 23, 1953. 3. F KW Record. ÐAdditions to St. AndrewÓs is Under WayÑ. ewÓs is Under WayÑ. WayÑ October 1967. OctobeOctobe KW Record. ÐChurch Wing OpensÑ. pensÑ. pensÑ. September 14, 1968. September 14, 1968ptemb ththth KW Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs celebrates 25wÓs celebrates 25wÓs celebrates 25 anniversary of televised servicesÑ. anniversary of televanniversary of teNovember 15, 1986. A KW Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs Mark Century of ProgressÑ. ÐSt. AndrewÓs Mark Century of ProgressÑt. AndrewÓs Mark CenNovember, 1954. KW Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs AddsÑ. cord. ÐSt. AndrewÓs AddsÑ. cord. ÐSt. AndrewÓs AdFebruary 1968. KW Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs Now Largest in CanadaÑ. W Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs Now Largest W Record. ÐSt. AndrewÓs Now January 1956. R Land Registry of Ontario (LRO #58). gistry of Ontario (LRO #5gistry of Ontario (LRO # Library and Archives Canada. . Ottawa, Ontario, DD Canada. Library and Archives Canada. . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. MHBC | 80 Page 517 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON 1879. Scale 15 chains to 1 inch. (KMZ). Courtesy of the University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre. May 1859. Courtesy of the Land sysy Registry Office No. 58. Mills, Rych . Arcadia Publishing, 2002. Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. . . Queens Printer for Ontario, 2006. Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. es. es. , 2006 T Moyer, Bill. . Windsor Publications (Canada) . Win. Windsor Publicatio Ltd., 1979. Musso Appraisals & Consulting Inc. ÐHypothetical Short Narrative Appraisal of a Commercial ÐHypothetical Short Narrative Apprahetical Short Narrative Appra F Residential for 11 Roy Street, Kitchener, OntarioÑ. September 2018 (PDF).et, Kitchener, OntarioÑ. September 2018OntarioÑ. September 2018 n/a. , Jubilee Souvenir. 1897. venir. 1897.venir. 1897. Parks Canada. ÐWaterloo County Jail and GovernorÓs HouseÑ. rloo County Jail and GovernorÓs HouseÑrloo County Jail and GovernorÓs HouAccessed May, 2024.HistoricPlaces.ca - HistoricPlaces.caHistoricPlaces.ca istoricPlaces.ca - - HistoricPlaces.caHistoricPlaces.ca A Scale 3 chains to 1 inch. Courtesy of the Land Registry Office No. 58. e Land Registry Office No. 58.e Land Registry Office No. 58 Region of Waterloo. gion of Waterloo. gion of . (PDF) Heritage Conservation R Toolbox - Region of WaterlooToToolbox - Region of WaterlooWat Accessed March 12, 2024. A Schofield, M.C. , M.C. , M.C. 1853-1854. Scale 8 chains to the inch. (KMZ). Courtesy of the University of Waterloo Geospatial Centre.y of the Univey of the Unive Schofield & Hobson. D (certified in 1858). Scale 80 links to 1 inch. Courtesy of the Land Registry Office No. 58. MHBC | 81 Page 518 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. 1974, 1979-1980, 1987-1988,1993, 2001).Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, ce Schmice Schm Kitchener Public Library St. AndrewÓs Presbyterian Church. ÐSt. AndrewÓs History Part (2): The Day Our Church Came Tumbling DownÑ. mbling DownÑ. mbling December 1, December 1, cember 1969. Stantec Inc. T (PDF).August 2007. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Libraryublic LibraryLibrary F Tremaine, George. . 1861. Courtesy of the Ontario . 1861. . 1861. Historical County Maps Project. Ontario Historical County Maps (arcgis.com) . Accessed April Project. Ontario Historical County Maps (roject. Ontario Historical County Maps ( 25, 2024. UnderwriterÓs Survey Bureau. Bureau. Bureau March 1925. Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library. om, Kitchener Public Library. m, Kitchener Public Library. A Uttley, W.V. (Ben), (Ben), Ben), . The Chronicle Press: Kitchener, 1937. .T W. V. Uttley and Gerald Noonan. ley and Gerald Noonan. ey and Gerald Noonan. ., Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1975. . 1911-1912, 1920, 1924-1925, 1930, 1936, . 1911-1912, 1920, 19241912, 1920, 19241940, 1945, 1950, 1956, 1960, 1965, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995, 2000. Courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985,1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1 RR Public Library including digital copies. HistoricPublic Library including dPublic Library including digitaal Vernon City Directories Mapped | Geospatial Centre | University of Waterloo (uwaterloo.ca). Accessed April 2024. entre | University of Watentre | University of Wa Waterloo Region Generations. on Generaton GeneratWaterloo Region Generations (regionofwaterloo.ca) Accessed April 20, 2024. April 20April 20 D MHBC | 82 Page 519 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix A Map Figures MapMap Figu T F A R D MHBC | 83 Page 520 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix G CVs T F A R D MHBC | 89 Page 521 of 783 TTTTT FFFFF A R DDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 522 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 523 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 524 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 525 of 783 F A DDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 526 of 783 F A DDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 527 of 783 F A DDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 528 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 529 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 530 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 531 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 532 of 783 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Page 533 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix B Conceptual Site Plan and Elevations nd Elevatind El T F A R D MHBC | 84 Page 534 of 783 Page 535 of 783 TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD PARKING MECH. ACCESS RAMP TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ARTS FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ACTIVITY, ATHLETICS & ARTS LIFE & & & NUTRITIONTIONTION AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACTIVITY & ACTIVITY ACTIVITY & GATHERING GATHERING GATHERING RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR AREA BREAKDOWNS -BASEMENT LEVEL LEGENDD 2 ARTS:3,685FT ARTSARTS 2 ACTIVITY & ATHLETICS: 2,768FT ACTIVITY & ATHLETICSY& 2 LIFE & NUTRITION:780FT DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDD 2 ACTIVITY & GATHERING:1,667FT LIFE & NUTRITION 2 TOTAL:8,900FT ACTIVITY & GATHERING Page 536 of 783 4 BED 3 BED 3 BED CO-HOUSING COMMERCIAL CO-HOUSINGCO-HOUSING GARB. 4 BED4 BED4 BED4 BED ACCESS RAMPRAMP ACTIVITY & GATHERING TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ARTS FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ACTIVITY & GATHERING AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR AREA BREAKDOWNS -GROUND LEVEL LEGENDD 2 ARTS:530FT ARTSARTS 2 ACTIVITY & ATHLETICS: 0FT ACTIVITY & ATHLETICSY& 2 LIFE & NUTRITION:0FT DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2 ACTIVITY & GATHERING:4,113.5FT LIFE & NUTRITION 2 TOTAL:4,643.5FT ACTIVITY & GATHERING Page 537 of 783 4 BED 3 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED CO-HOUSINGCO-HOUSING 1 BED 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED 2 B TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 2 3670 FT DAAAYYYY AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA CCAARREE RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR AREA BREAKDOWNS -2ND FLOOR LEVEL LEGENDD 2 ARTS:0FT ARTSARTS 2 ACTIVITY & ATHLETICS: 0FT ACTIVITY & ATHLETICSY& 2 LIFE & NUTRITION:0FT DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2 ACTIVITY & GATHERING:0FT LIFE & NUTRITION 2 TOTAL:0FT ACTIVITY & GATHERING Page 538 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix C Chain of TitleChainChain of T T F A R D MHBC | 85 Page 539 of 783 Page 540 of 783 Indian Reserve ship of Waterloo BloBlo ΑΑ TTTTTTTT T Acres 2 as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 8887.0.0 22 ВЍͲЉЊЋ !ĭƩĻƭ Α .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ DƩğƓķ wźǝĻƩ £8887.0.0 ВЍͲЉЊЋ !ĭƩĻƭ Α .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ DƩğƓķ wźǝĻƩ Α Comprising the Town Value / Land / RemarksValue / Lan 94,01£ 94,012Com lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk B.B. DERDER AM D WILLIA Y, RICHARDY, RICHA AU, ST. ON, JAMESON, JAM 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SLEY, RICHARD of OSSEAU, ST. JOHNEASLE 1 BEASLEY, RICHARD WILSON, JAMES ROSSEAU, ST. JOHN B. SMITH, DAVID WILLIAM CLAUSE, WILLIAM STEWART, ALEXANDER .9!{\[9Ͳ wL/I!w5 ЏЍͲЎВЉ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ ƚŅ .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ wh {{9! Ͳ WhIb .!tL{9 ЋЏͲБЏЉ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ ƚŅ .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ .9!{\[9Ͳ wL/I!w5 ЋЏͲБЏЉ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ ƚŅ .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ .9!{\[9Ͳ wL/I!w5 ЊЌͲЍЌЉ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ ƚŅ .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ .9!{\[9Ͳ wL/I!w5 ВЍͲЉЊЋ !ĭƩĻƭ Α .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ SMITH, DAVID WILLIAMCLAUSE, WILLIAMSTEWART, ALEXANSTEWART, ALEXAN BEASLEY, RICHARD ROUSSEAU, JOHN BROUSS BEASLEY, R Page STE ISTE RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR HN BAPTISTE Y, RICHARDY, RICHARD ON, JAMESON, JAMES TH, DAVID WILL USE, W WART SEPH BRAN From To Value / Land / Remarks CROWN (In Trust) WILSON, JAMES ROUSSEAU, JOHN BAPTISTE ROSSEAU, JOHN BAPTISTE WILSON, JAMES ROSSEAU, JOHN BAPTISTE & ROSSEAU, JOHN BAPTwife wifewife JOSEPH BRANT, CHIEF WARRIOR OF THE MOHAWK WARRIOR OF THWARRIOR OF THE MOHAWKOR FIVE NATIONS INDIANS OR FIVE NATIONS IOR FIVE NATIONS INDIAN SMITH, DAVID WILLCLAUSE, WILLIAM CLAUSE, WILLIAMSTEWART, ALEXANDERSTEWART, AL DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD Mar 1804Mar 1804 Date 4 Jul 1952 19 Feb 1801 WILSON, JAMES 19 Feb 1801 BEASLEY, RICHARD 10 Mar 1804 ROSSEAU, JOHN BAPTISTE & 23 Jul 1805 SMITH, DAVID WILLIAM 23 Jul 1805 && of of LRO 58 Waterloo Patent 5 Feb 1798 Mortgage 20 Jul 1798 BEASLEY, RICHARD Deed of Partition Deed of Partition Deed of Bargain & Sale Quit Claim 12 Mar 1804 JOSEPH BRANT, CHIEF Release of Mortgage & Reconveyance Instr. No. Type Registration B-46291 10 31 33 100 101 122 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 541 of 783 of the Township Indian Reserve Part of Blo see Mesee Α by the Town Plot Α Α L Α s No. 10 TTTTT Ahrens as in 13324 000 Acre Waterloo e German Co Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 ЏЉͲЉЉЉ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ ƚŅ .ƌƚĭƉ Ћ Α ĭƚƒƦƩźƭźƓŭ the German Company Tract ƚŅ ğƷĻƩƌƚƚ Α ƭĻĻ aĻƒƚƩźğƌ bƚ͵ ЊЋЋ Ǟŷźĭŷ discharges No. 10 ЍЍБ !ĭƩĻƭ Α \[ƚƷ Ќ D͵ /͵ ͵ ε ƚƷŷĻƩ ƌğƓķƭ North of Weber St 60,000 Acresthe German Company Tr of Waterloo discharges No. 10 448 Acres 224 lan 360lan 360 and West of Queen Street as FFFFFFFFFFFFFF of Berlin & purchased by C. H. Plan 401 creates Roy St & also y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk originally laid out shows Lots 1- 2 -3 North of Weber St EY, JACO R, DAVID 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA of ERSHEY, JACOB 2 ERB, JACOB HERSHEY, JACOB EBY, SAMUEL EBY, BENJAMINEBY, BENJAM WEBER, DAVID AHRENS, CHAAHREN Page RRRRRRRRRRR N ERB, JACOB WEBER, DAVIDWEBER, DD 24 Jul 1805 BEASLEY, RICHARD & wife ERB, DANIEL LRO 58 Waterloo Deed of Bargain & Sale B & S 25 Jul 1805 ERB, DANIEL . ε { Б Wǒƌ ЊБЊБ I9w{I9Ͳ W!/h. 9.Ͳ {!a 9\[ ЋЋЍ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ D͵ /͵ ͵ . ε { ЋЉ !ƦƩ ЊБЌЌ I9w{I9Ͳ W!/h. 9.Ͳ .9bW!aLb ЋЋЍ !ĭƩĻƭ Α ĻƭƷ tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ D͵ /͵ ͵ . ε { ЋВ WğƓ ЊБЍЉ 9.Ͳ .9bW!aLb 9.9wͲ 5!L5 ЋЊВ !ĭƩĻƭ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷƭ Ћ ε Ќ D͵ /͵ ͵ . ε { ЋЌ CĻĬ ЊБЍЊ 9.9wͲ 5!L5 !Iw9b{Ͳ /I!{͵ I͵ \[ƚƷƭ Њ Α Ћ Α Ќ Α ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {ƷƩĻĻƷ ε 123 127 298 235 281 LOTS ON BERLIN MAP 98 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 542 of 783 Indian Reserve Lot 2 Α TTTTTTTTTT T as in 13324 LAN DA Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 Љ͵ЍЋБ !ĭƩĻƭ Α \[ƚƷ Ћ bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ 0428Acres\[ƚƷ Ћ Α Љ͵ЍЋБ !ĭƩĻƭ \[ƚƷ Ћ Α Љ͵ЍЋБ !ĭƩĻƭ 1/6 interest \[ƚƷ Ћ Α Љ͵ЍЋБ !ĭƩĻƭ Ώ ЊΉЏ źƓƷĻƩĻƭƷ \[ƚƷ Ћ Α Љ͵ЍЋБ !ĭƩĻƭ Ώ ЊΉЏ źƓƷĻƩĻƭƷ Lot 2 NE ½ Lot 2 and Right of Way on Lane b9 ч \[ƚƷ Ћ Α {ǒĬƆ Ʒƚ ƩźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ǞğǤυЎͲЉЉЉ Α { ч \[ƚƷ Ћ ε ƩźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ǞğǤ υВАЎЉ Α { ч \[ƚƷ Ћ ε ƩźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ǞğǤ tƩĻƒźƭĻƭ ΑwźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ğǤ Ώ wĻĭźƷğƌƭ lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk 9b{ { THOMAS NRY JOHNR, BARBARA 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA of 3 HUBER, HENRY FAIR, JOHN ANDERSON, THOMAS O. SCULLY, JOHN M. SCULLY, JOHNHUBER, BARBARA HUBER, EDWIN HUBERHUBER, MARTHA J. HUBERSNYDER, FREDERICK W. (in trust) KNELL, HENRY WIEGAND, WILLIAM B. WIEGAND, WILLIAM B. Page etux RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ALLEN I hC 9.9w { t\[!b ЌЏЉ Α /͵ I͵ !Iw9b{ { w9 Α t\[!b 5!95 C9.w !w ЊБЎБ iving Extr & Devise LL, HE h. ust of HENRY S. HUBE UBER, MARTUBER, EXRS OF C. H. AHRENS HUBER, HANNAH FAIR, JOHN Assignee of A. HUBER ANDERSON, THOMAS O. etux SCULLY, JOHN M. HUBER, ALLEN Surviving Extr & Devisee in trust of HENRY S. HUBER HUBER, EDWIN HUBER, EDWINBachelor BacheloHUBER, MARTHA J. HUBER, CHARLES HUBER, CHARLESHUBER, EDWIN Bach. KNELL, HENRY SNYDER, FREDERICK W. SNYDEWIEBAND, WILLIAM B. SNYDER, FREDERICK W. WIEWIE DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 2 02 19 Dec 193 15 Apr 1858 4 Jan 1879 26 Feb 1879 13 Apr 1880 13 Apr 1880 1907 09 23 1907 09 23 1912 02 19 22 Feb 1924 24 May 1933 4 May26 Dec 1934 LRO 58 Waterloo B & S Release of Dower Deed Conveyance Conveyance B. Sale B. Sale B. Sale Grant Grant Release of Right of Way ALL OF LOT 2 WEST OF QUEEN ST & NORT 801 4287 4357 4649 4650 22319 22320 27571 51297 69063 70686 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 543 of 783 Indian Reserve Wit NE ½ Lot 2NE ½ ΑΑ TTTTTTTTTTTT T S ½ Lot subj to Α 00 Α as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 of Way ğǤ Α ƭǒĬƆ Ʒƚ \[źŅĻ \[ĻğƭĻ { ч \[ƚƷ Ћ Α źƷŷ ε {ǒĬƆĻĭƷ Ʒƚ wźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ğǤ /ğƭŷ Ώ υЎЎЉЉ Α aƚƩƷŭğŭĻ υЋАͲЎЉЉ υЊ͵ЉЉ Ώ b9 ч \[ƚƷ Ћ Α ǞźƷŷ ε ƭǒĬƆĻĭƷ Ʒƚ tğƩƷǤ Wall agreement & Right of Way - Recitals $12,500 of Way $1.00 Way S ½ LotCas lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk W. \[͵ υЊ͵ЉЉ Α { ч \[ƚƷ Ћ ǞźƷŷ ε wĻƭĻƩǝźƓŭ wźŭŷƷ ƚŅ ERT E.ERT E. M OHN W. EES OF ST. ANDRE AND, JA 21 AAAAAAA GAND, JANET L. MENT, EDWIN ARTIN of LEME IRKLAND, JOHN W. 4 .whha9Ͳ !\[.9w 9͵ υЊЋͲЎЉЉ Α b9 ч \[ƚƷ Ћ źƷŷ ε wĻƭĻƩǝźƓŭ ƩźŭŷƷ NAINE, LOUIS M. SIMS, WILLIAM H. SMYTH, JAMES H. CLEMENT, EDWIN W. TRUSTEES OF ST. ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH KIRKLAND, JOHN W. SMYTHE, JAMES H. CLEMENT, EDWIN W. MARTIN, WILSON A. TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF ST. ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH KITCHENER KNAINE, LOUIS M.SIMS, WILLIAM H.SIMSSMYTH, JAMES H.SMYTH, JAMCLEMENT, EDWIN TRUSTEES OF ST. ANDREWPRESBYTERIAN CHURCPRESBYTERIAN CHURC KIRKLAND, JOHNKIRKSMYTHE, JAMSMYTCLEMENT, MARTINTRUSTRUCC Page RRRRRRR TE OF ALBERT E. TE OF ALBERT E. Ļķ Α ROOMEROOME Trustee BROOME MARGUERITE S. BROOME MARGUERITE S. BROOMARGUERITE S. BROOME Executrix ExecExecutrix DDDDDD !ǒƷƚƒğƷĻķ Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ƓƚƷ ƦƩƚǝźķĻķ ŅƚƩ ƩĻǝźĻǞ LRO 58 Waterloo Grant 15 May 1935 SNYDER, FREDERICK W. etux Grant 18 Dec 1940WIEGAND, WILLIAM B. WIEGAND, JANEGrant 2 Jun 1953 WIEGAND, JANET L. KIRKLAND, JOHN W. Grant 6 Nov 1963 ESTATE OF ALBERT E. 71071 8921 115427 266126 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 544 of 783 Indian Reserve Queen Que TTTTTTTTTTTTTT West of PLAN DATED FEBRPLAN D as in 13324 Conveyed from Con Α ΑΑ 22 Lot 1 West of Queen & N of Weber Street & other land υЊͲЋЉЉ Α { ЊЉ ŅƷ ƚŅ \[ƚƷ Њ Lot 1 etc. Lot 1 West of Lot 1 West of Qother land $1,200 as as lan 360lan 360 ΑΑ FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk eber St Iw9b{ { w9 Iw9b{ of Weber St ATION O GEORGE Lot 1 West of Queen & N of Weber Street CHENER , GEORGE, GEOR H TEES OF ST. ANDREWS 21 CORPORATION OF THE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA blic highway STEES OF ST. ANDREWS widening widening rr of HURCH 5 CHURCH THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER a public highway THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER THE CITY OF KITCHENER FoFoa public highway THE CORPORATION OTHE CORPORATION OCITY OF KITCHENERCITY O Page ener f Kitchener RRRRRRRRRRRR S RESBYTERIAN RESBYTE Parcel Register EES OF ST. WS PWS P RCHRCH wI hC 9.9w { t\[!b ЌЏЉ Α /͵ I͵ !Iw9b{ { w9 Α t\[!b 5!95 C9.w !w ЊБЎБ ğƷĻķ Α PRESBYTERIAN ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DDDDDDDDD !ǒƷƚƒğƷĻķ Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ƓƚƷ ƦƩƚǝźķĻķ ŅƚƩ ƩĻǝźĻǞ LRO 58 Waterloo B & S 15 Apr 1858 EXRS OF C. H. AHRENS DAVIDSON, B & S 31 Jan 1862 DAVIDSON, GEORGE, etux TRUSTEES OF ST. ANDREWS Grant 1 Sep 1955 TRUSTEES OF ST. ANDREWS .ǤΏ\[ğǞ ЋЏ WǒƓ ЊВЏЌ .ǤΏ\[ğǞ ЍВЏВ /źƷǤ ƚŅ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ CƚƩ ǞźķĻƓźƓŭ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ Α ğƭ Agreement 29 Dec 1967THE TRUSTEES OF ST. PART OF LOT 1 WEST OF QUEEN ST & NO 799 1287 130064 258241 363097 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 545 of 783 Indian Reserve TTTTTTTTTTTTT T West of Que Lo DATED as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ Α ĻƷ ğƌ Weber St of Weber St Weber St Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St Weber St Weber St Lot 3 West of Queen Lot 3 West of Q Part We PLAN DATED FEBRUARY Α lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk { { w9 { { w HANNAH NN 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA PORATION TOWN OF PORATION TOWN OF of ERLIN 6 BERLIN SCHOEMAKER, ELIZABETH Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of BRICKER, GEORGE A. A. $1,275 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North HELLER, MARY C. Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of BRICKER, GEORGE A. A. BRICKER, MOSES M. ASSURANCE CO. TRACKSELL, EDWIN M.Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of WILKINSON, HANNAH A. SCHOEMAKER, ELIZABETHSCHOEMAKER, ELIZABETH BRICKER, GEORGE A. ABRICKER, GEORGE A. A HELLER, MARHELLE BRICBRICBB Page !b ЌЏЉ Α /͵ I͵ !Iw9b{ { w9 Α t\[!b 5!95 C9.w !w ЊБЎБ AH A., RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR N, HANNAH A., LER, MLER, A LLER, ALTON ACKSE RICKER, GEORGE A. A.RICKER, GEORGE A. A spinster spinster BRICKER, MOSES M. BRICKER, MOSES M.BRICKER, MOSES M. HELLER, MARY C.HELLER, MARY C.HELLER, ALTON H. HELLER, ALTON H. BRICKER, MOSES M.BRICKER, MOSES HELLER, MARY C.HELLER, ALTON H. HELLER, ALTON TRACKSEL DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ay 14 1913 Feb 13 BRICKER, MOSES M. THE DOMINION LIFE 1913 Feb 131913 Feb 13 1913 Oct 8 1915 May 251915 Ma LRO 58 Waterloo . ε { ЊЎ !ƦƩ ЊБЎБ 9w{ hC /͵ I͵ !Iw9b{ whͲ {Lahb \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ Α Љ͵ЍВ !ĭƩĻƭ By-Law 29 Apr 1896 Geo. Schler et al CORPORATION TOWN OF B & S 27 Nov 1896 EXOR SIMON ROY WILKINSON, HANNAH A.Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of B & S 2 Apr 1897 WILKINSON, HANNAH A., B & S 30 May 1902 WILKINSON, HANNAH A., B & S 1912 May 14 BRICKER, GEORGE A. A. Mortgage 1912 May 14 HELLER, MARY C. Assignment of Mortgage B. Sale 1913 Oct 8 HELLER, MARY C. B. Sale 1915 May 25 TRACKSELL, EDWIN M., etux WILLIAMS, GERTRUDE M. Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of PART OF LOT 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St PL 802 12589 12874 13069 15711 27991 27992 29487 30902 34004 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 546 of 783 Indian Reserve West of TTTTTTTT T as in 13324 t Lot 3 W Conveyed from Con ΑΑ Part Lot 3 West of 22 Weber St Weber St Weber St North of Weber St ͻaǤ ŷƚƒĻƭƷĻğķ bƚ͵ ЊЎ wƚǤ {ƷƩĻĻƷͼ West of Queen St & North of Weber St. North of Weber St $5,200 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St Part Lot 3 West of QueenWeber StWeber St Weber St Part LoWeb of Weber St lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk IN M.IN M RY abso , URIAS B., URIAS 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ELL, of 7 TRACKSELL, EDWIN M.Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of SHANTZ, URIAS B. Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of KNELL, HENRY Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of HETT, MARY ANN SHOEMAKER, SARAH E. To them absolutely \[!/Yb9wͲ D9hwD9 C͵ υЎͲЋЉЉ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε LACKNER, HENRY G. KNELL, HENRY KNELL, HENRYKNELL, HEN HETT, ELIZABETH C.HETT, ELIZABETH C.HETT, MARY ANNHETT, MSHOEMAKER, SASHOTo them To the KNELL, Page XTR tux , RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR KER, ELIZABETH KNER, GEORGE ANTZ, TATE OF EL m/w ASSURANCE CO. Etux SCHOEMAKER, ELIZABETH HETT, ELIZABETH C. KNELL, HENRYKNEL ESTATE OF ELIZABETH SHOEMAKER SHOEMAKERSHOEMAKERHENRY G. LACKNER, XTR HENRY G. LACKNERHENRY G. LACKNER LACKNER, GEORGE SHANTZ, U 1 DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD un 1921 Jun 1921 1920 May 15 THE DOMINION LIFE 3 Sep 1919 8 Apr 1920 23 May 1921 29 Aug 192115 Nov 192215 Nov LRO 58 Waterloo B. Sale 1916 Mar 15 WILLIAMS, GERTRUDE M., Conveyance under Power of Sale Grant 1921 Jan 12 SHANTZ, URIAS B. DƩğƓƷ ЊЉ ağǤ ЊВЋЊ {I!bͲ wL!{ .͵Ͳ ĻƷǒǣ Yb9\[\[Ͳ I9bw υЋͲЏЉЉ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε Probate, Will & Codicil DƩğƓƷ ЌЊ ağǤ ЊВЋЊ Yb9\[\[Ͳ I9bw Yb9\[\[Ͳ !bbL9 a͵ υЊ͵ЉЉ Α ƓķźǝźķĻķ ч źƓƷĻƩĻƭƷ źƓ Ћ tğƩƷƭ \[ƚƷ Ќ Grant 30 Jun 1921 ESTATE OF ELIZABETH Grant 29 Aug 1921 LACKNER, GEORGE F., etux LACKNER, GEORGE F. Grant 15 Nov 1922 SHANTZ, URIAS B., etux ZOLLNER, BENJAMIN J. $9,500 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North 35147 42401 43945 44591 9083 44729 44888 45154 47875 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 547 of 783 Indian Reserve Part Part Lot 3 West oPa TTTT T --Α ber St as in 13324 250 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 of Weber St North of Weber $1.00 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber $1.00 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber $1.00 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber - covenants $2,250 of Weber St $2,250 North of W $ lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk M.M. , ALBERT, GLAD L ER, LAU E 21 WATERLOO TRUST &AAAAAAAAAAAAA KKELK of ACKNER, LAURA M. 8 LACKNER, LAURA M. $2,250 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North \[!/Yb9wͲ \[! w! a͵ υЋͲЋЎЉ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε ZOLLNER, MARY E. SAVINGS CO. ROCKEL, ALBERT C. ROCKEL, GLADYS RHODES, NORMA M. KIRKLAND, J. W. SMYTH, J. H. ZOLLNER, IDAZOLLZOLLNER, MARY E.ZOLLNER, M THE WATERLOO TRUST &SAVINGS CO.SAVINGS C ROCROCROCROC Page RRRRRRRRRRRRRR M. & l T& l WATERLOO TRUST AND WATERLOO TRUS J J GE E. ODES, NORMA M ACKENZIE, MA & AVIGS COMPANY, EXTR AVIGS COMPANY, EXT OHN G MUMFORD, MARY A. SURV EXTRS OF HENRY G. LACKNER NELLIE E. MORE ANNIE A. WINN, et al SAVIGS COMPANY, EXTR HENRY KNELL HENRYHENRY KNELLKNELL, ANNIE M., spinster KNELL, ANNIE M., spinsterKNELL, ANNIE M., spinsterMACKENZIE, ALLAN A. MACKENZIE, ALLAN A.MACKENZIE, ALLAN A.MACKENZIE, MARY C. MACKENZIE, MARY C. BAYLISS, LAURA M.BAYLISS, LAURA WidowWidowWidow RHODES, NORMA Mm/w m/wJUDGE E. W. COLMAN JUDGE E. W. CV & J & l THOMPSON V & JOHN G. MARTIN JOHN G DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 19631963 29 Mar 29 Mar 29 Jun 1966 LRO 58 Waterloo Grant 21 Oct 1936 LACKNER, HENRY M. Grant 31 Mar 1943 EXRS OF GEORGE F. LACKNER Grant 12 Dec 1946ZOLLNER, BENJAMIN ZOLLNER, IDA Will 19 Aug 1950 KNELL, ANNA M. THE WATERLOO TRUST & Grant 8 Jun 1953 THE WATERLOO TRUST AND Grant 29 Mar 1963 BAYLISS, LAURA M. Grant 29 Jun 1966 RHODES, NORMA M. 72875 83070 92294 18028 115374 253533 326629 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 548 of 783 Indian Reserve recitalsrec - - TTTTT Part Lot 3 West ofPart -- as in 13324 00 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 $1.00 - Part Lot 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber - recitals Land in 696373- recitals & covenants tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ bƚƩƷŷ $1.00 of Weberof Weber Land in 696373 lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk ZOLLNERZOLLN LLNERLLNER YTERIAN CHURCH Board of Trustees TEES OF ST. ANDREWS TEES OF ST. ANDREWS 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAA URCH ESBYTERIAN CHURCH of 9 a.k.a. MARY E. ZOLLNER TRUSTEES OF ST. ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CHURCH By its Board of Trustees {͵ !b5w9{ tw9{.9wL!b {͵ !b5w9{ tw9{.9wL!bCHURCHBy its Board of Trustees Page RCEL REGISTER NO RRRRRR { {͵ !b5w9{ tw9{.9wL!b MATILDA ESTATE OF MARY ZOLLNER a.k.a. MARY E. ZOLLNER OMATE DD ! ha!95 Α t!w/9\[ w9DL{9w bh twhL595 Chw w9L9 LRO 58 Waterloo Quit Claim 20/01/81 REINHARDT, Grant 12/07/82 ESTATE OF MARY ZOLLNER Transfer 10 Apr 1997 ROCKEL, GLAD 696873 729393 GEOWAREHOUSE: 1332412 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 549 of 783 Indian Reserve TTTTTTTTTTT T West of Que DATED as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 \[ƚƷ Ѝ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ Α Љ͵ЌЏАЎ !ĭƩĻƭ0.23 Acre - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber 0.23-0-0 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber 0.23-0-0 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber $2,000 - 0.23-0-0 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF F y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk { { w ER, JACO N , J 21 BLER AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA OFFAT RPO of ROY, SIMON STAEBLER, JACOB M. OBERHOLTZER, JACOB D. MCDOUGALL D. MCDOUGJ. MOFFAT Trustees TrusteesBRITISH MORTGAGE LOAN CO. BRITISOF ONTARIO OF OCORPORATION TOWN OF BERLIN BEREDEN, JOHN R. EDEN, JOHN R. WILKINSON, HANNAH A. 10 Page ЌЏЉ Α /͵ I͵ !Iw9b{ { w9 Α t\[!b 5!95 C9.w !w ЊБЎБ ux RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR OUGALL MOFFAT R SIM ustees RITISH MORTGAGE L RUSTEES ST. EXRS OF C. H. AHRENS ROY, SIMON STAEBLER, JACOB M., etux OBERHOLTZER, JACOB, etux D. MCDOUGALL JNO MOFFATT Trustees GEO. SCHLER ET AL GEO. SCHLER ET ALTRUSTEES ST. ANDREWS CHURCH BERLIN CHURCH BERLINBRITISH MORTGAGE LOAN COY. EXOR SIMON ROY DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD 1896 ul 16 Aug 1862 8 Sep 1879 12 Mar 1881 20 May 1881 15 Oct 1881 29 Apr 1896 24 Jul 1896 17 Sep 1896 127 Nov 1896 27 No LRO 58 Waterloo B & S B & S B & S B & S B & S By-Law Quit Claim Deed Quit Claim Deed B & S PART OF LOT 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St PLAN 1359 4465 4864 4949 5048 12589 12703 12766 12874 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 550 of 783 Indian Reserve 0 - 0 P - TTTTTTTTTTTTTT T 0 - 0 - as in 13324 3 Conveyed from Con orth of Webe ΑΑ 22 0.23-0-0 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber $2,300 - 0.23-0-0 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber .23 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber- $1.00 .23 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber- $1.00 .23 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber - $1.00 $12,000 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber $24,000 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk UST C , ANNA NN LLEN H. IRENE B. 21 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA USSL of BOEHMER, AUGUST C. WEIR, ELLEN H. BERGMANN, ANNA ERNST, SAMUEL R. ERNSWEIR, IRENE B. TRUSSLER, HAROLD W. TRUTRUSSLER, FLORENCE TRUSSTRUSSLER, HAROLD W. TRUSSLER, FLORENCE TRUERNST, DAVID S. ERNST, CATHARAN M. GOUDIE BUILDINGS LIMITED 11 Page SAM S OF JOHN J. RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR , Widow of RY, OLD E R, IRENE B. DA ER KIN, HELEN MNST EIR, MA urviving EDEN, JOHN R., etux BOEHMER, AUGUST C. WILKINSON, HANNAH A. Spinster BERGMANN, ANNA BERGMANN, GEORGE EXRS & TRUSTEES OF JOHN J. A. WEIR et al WEIR, IRENE B., Widow WEIR, CARL H., etux WEIR, CARL H., etuxWEIR, JOHN N., etux WEIR, JOHN N., etuxASKIN, HELEN M., m/w WEIR, MARY, widow VORMECK & HAROLD ERNST, VORMECK & HAROLsurviving Extrs of SAMUEL R. ERNST HAROLD ERNST as Extr of FREDA ERNSTTRUSSLER, HAROLD W. TRUSSLTRUSSLER, FLORENCE TRU DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ul 1956 15 Oct 1897 7 Apr 1902 1904 Dec 281906 Oct 03 5 Oct 1945 6 Sep 1949 20 Jul 1949 4 Jul 1950 4 Jul 9 Jul 1956 LRO 58 Waterloo B & S B & S B & S B & S Grant Grant Quit Claim Deed Grant Grant 13343 15617 17904 20698 88771 100358 100511 103470 142616 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 551 of 783 Indian Reserve TTTTTTTTTTTT T Sly 13 ft as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 υЍЉЉ Α {ƌǤ ЊЌ ŅƷ \[ƚƷ Ѝ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε North of Weber North of Weber$1,000 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber .23 Acres - $30,000 - Part Lot 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber - Recitals As a public highway υЊ͵ЉЉ Α tğƩƷ \[ƚƷ Ѝ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ of Weber lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF F y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk H TION O RKLAND CHENE , CATHARAN M.EES OF THE 21 T, DAVI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SON A. MARTIN of or wid THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER ERNST, DAVID S. ERNST, CATHARAN M. JOHN W. KIRKLAND JAMES H. SMYTH LEWIS M. NAIRN LEWEDWIN W. CLEMENT EDWIN W. WILSON A. MARTIN, TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF ST. CONGREGATION OF STANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN ANDRECHURCH, CITY OF KITCHENER CHUFor widening part of Weber St JOHN W. KIRKLAND JOHJAMES H. SMYTH JAEDWIN W. CLEMENT WILSON A. MARTIN TRUSTEES OF THE CONGREGATION OF ST. ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH KITCHENER 12 Page RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Law 4969 City of Ki NST, CATHAR - GOUDIE BUILDINGS LIMITED GOUDIE BUILDINGS LTD.GOUDIE BUILDINGS LTD.By-Law 4969 City of Kitchener ByERNST, DAVID S. ERNST, DAVID S.ERNST, CATHARAN M. DDDDDDD 6 Sep 1956 29 Sep 1958 28 Feb 1963 26 Jun 1963 1 Oct 1963 LRO 58 Waterloo Grant Grant Grant By-Law Grant 144911 175152 252178 258241 264030 Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ ofilmed copies Page 552 of 783 cannot be relied Indian Reserve TTTTTT T as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 g lan 360lan 360 FFFFFFFF y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk QUEEN n has be FOR TH Α Information has been OUSE 21 - - AAAA of 13 Deeds have not been prinDeeds have not been p Α Α Page h!w9Ih {9 Α ЏБ v 99b {͵ bhwI Α !{ Lb ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ formation to compile this Chain o Please notePlease note - 4 g the information to compile this Chain oult to read ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷĻķ źƓķźǝźķ R ficult to read ƌƚƷƭ ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷĻķ źƓķźǝźķǒğ źƭ ƦğƩƷ ƚŅ ĬƚƷŷ ğźƭ Ʀğ Α Ɠ ЌЏЉ Ɠ ЌЏЉ PARCEL REGISTER(S) NOT PROVIDED FOR THIS SEARCH tƌğƓ ЌЏЉtƌğƓ ЌЏЉ D tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ƌƚƷƭ ƦƩĻƭĻƓƷĻķ źƓķźǝźķǒğƌƌǤ ŅƚƩ ĭŷğźƓ ƚŅ ƷźƷƌĻ \[ƚƷ Ќ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ źƭ ƦğƩƷ ƚŅ ĬƚƷŷ ğķķƩĻƭƭĻƭ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ƭğƒĻ ƦƩźƚƩ ƷźƷƌĻ \[ƚƷ Ќ\[ƚƷ Ќ LRO 58 Waterloo LAST TRANSFER IN LOT 3 IS AS NOTED ON GE 9͵ ε h͵ 9͵ Α /ƚƒƦƌĻƷĻķ ĬǤ t͵\[͵t͵ źƷƌĻƭ \[Ʒķ͵ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ЊЍ !ƦƩ ЋЉЋЍ Ώ tƌĻğƭĻ ƓƚƷĻ Ώ LƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓ ŷğƭ ĬĻĻƓ ŭğƷŷĻƩĻķ ŅƩƚƒ hƓΏ\[źƓĻ aźĭƩƚŅ ƷŷĻ hƌķ LƓķĻǣ .ƚƚƉƭ Α 5ǒĻ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ķźŅŅźĭǒƌƷǤ ƚŅ ğƓğƌǤƭźƓŭ ƷŷĻ źƓŅƚƩƒğƷźƚƓ Ʒƚ ĭƚƒƦźƌĻ Ʒŷźƭ /ŷğźƓ ƚŅ źƷƌĻ Ώ /ƚƒƦƌĻƷĻ !ĭĭǒƩğĭǤ ǒƦƚƓ Ώ bğƒĻƭ ε 5ğƷĻƭ ε wĻŭźƭƷƩğƷźƚƓ bǒƒĬĻƩƭ ğƩĻ ķźŅŅźĭǒƌƷ Ʒƚ ƩĻğķ Α 5ĻĻķƭ ŷğǝĻ ƓƚƷ ĬĻĻƓ ƦƩźƓƷĻķ ƚƩ ķĻƭĭƩźƦƷźƚƓƭ ƦƌƚƷƷĻķ Α Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ Page 553 of 783 Indian Reserve T as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 lan 360lan 360 F y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk 21 A of 14 Page R D LRO 58 Waterloo Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ e rv ese n R a Page 554 of 783 i d n I Indian Reserve m the 2412 as in 13324 Conveyed from Con ΑΑ 22 lan 360lan 360 y Pt of Blk y Pt of Blk Originally Pt Α . .T C 2121212121 . ff ofoooooofooooooof of Α 1515151515 360 ee gegggggggeggggeggggge 0055 aaaaaaaaa - Page PaPPPaPaPPPPPaPa 6 1 223 Pt of Blk 3 in the G y ister g 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan t o reviousl t L P arcel Re P - P Α - rlin 60 e 1 0 - f B o n a l oooo P o lolololollo s rr St., Kitchener Ʃ eereeeeeerey t ister 22316 aatatatataaa West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan eeeeeeeeeegee WWWWW 4 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Webe 8 lllllllll & &&&&&&&&&&&&& 5585858 eeeeeeeeleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeleeel d 3 3333333 ccccccccccccccc rrcrrrcrrrrcrcrrc OOOOOOOOOOOvi ,,,,,,, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa .k.a. 11 Ro 1 aPaPPaPaPPPPPPPaPaPPPPPaPaPaPPPPPa LRO 58 Waterloo LRLLRLRLR Da ts f ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ - LoLLLL NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN LLELELE f f fffff Tt Ntttttt tt ITITIT ooooooo Pt o SSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTT y nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Pt eneeeeneneeeeeeeeneneee OFOFOFO eeeeeeeeee & ueen ueuuuuuuuuuuuuuueuuuuuuue nnnnnn ii 2 QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ aaiaiaiaaaiaaaaa t hhhhhhhhreviousl 4 88888888888888888888888888888 oo Chain OF TITLE - ChCChChChChChCЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 5Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LoLLLLLLoLLLoLLLLLLLLLoЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 66666666686666666666666666666666866668686668tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻP e rv ese R nnnnn anaaaaaa Page 555 of 783 i d n I Indian Reserve m the 2412 ed from eyeee as in 13324 ConvCon ΑΑ 22 lan 360lan 360 tt of Blk t of Blk PPPPPPPP yy llyl ll al iin iig Or Α . .T 21 .C G of Α e hh 16 th 360 n ii 0055 - 3 Page 6 1 lklklk B ff 223 of t P ister llyl g us 3 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan iio t o ev t L Pr arcel Re P - P Α - iin ll rl 60 1 Be 0 - ff f D o nn aanaaa llllllllllllllll PlPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP oo ss ssss rl St., Kitchener st of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan rƩrr ey t eeeee ister 22316 a gbbebbbebbbbbb WeWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Ro eeeee 444444444444444444444444444 1 11111111111 W 11111111111 WeWeWWWWWWWWWWWWWeWWW & &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 58 ddddddddddddd 3333 3333333333333333333333333333iiiiiii Ovvvvivvvvvvvvi , arcel Re .k.a. aaaaaaaaa 11111111111111111111111111 R aP LRO 58 Waterloo L DDaDDDDDDDaD sssssssssssssssss tsttttttttsttttststtttststst ffffffffff ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ - oooooo ofooooof E LLoL NNN t tttttttt f f ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff t t N PPPP ooooooooooo SS yyyyyy ttttttttttttttttt llyllllyllllll F TITL PtPtPPPPPPtPPPPtPPPPPtPP sss en usuuuusuus O &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&& oooooooo ueuuuuuuueen iiiiiiiiioiiiiiii in 2 22222222222222222222222222222222222222 vvvvv QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ a t ttttttttttttttttttttt eeveeee hrrrr 48 o Chain OF TITLE - CЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 5Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 6tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻPPPPrPPPPr eee veveve r ereerereererererer eseeseseeseseseses RRRRRRRR nnn ananananananan Page 556 of 783 dddddididdididididid nnn InInInInInInInIn Indian Reserve eeeeeeeee hhh thththththtththththth 22222222 mmmm mmm m m 1 41444441414141414141 rorrororororororororo ffffffffffff THE INDIAN RESERVE T 222222222 from as conveyed by Blocks as conv 32333332323232 d ededededed 131131311313 eyeeyeyeyey n nnnn n n iiiiii nvnnvnvnvnv asasasaasasas CoCCoCoCoCoCCCCoCoCoCo ΑΑΑΑ 222222222 0 kkkkk 6060660606060606066060606060 lklklklklklk 3333333333333 BBBBBBBBBBBB aaananananananananaaaaa ofoofofofofofofofof llllllllllll tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt PlPPPPPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPl PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP .... yy StStStStStSt lylylylylyly l r rrrr alaalalal nn inininin bebbbbebebebe g igigigigig r WeWWeWeWeWe OrOrOOrOrOr f f f ff ΑΑΑΑ oooooo ... hhh T thttththth .T.T.T.T CCC 21 ooooror .C.C.C.C GGGGGG NNNNNNN of 000000 ΑΑΑΑΑ eeeeeee &&&&&&& 66 hhh 55 17 ttt thtthththth 3636363636 555555555555 StSStStStSt n nn n n nn nnn iiiiiiii nnnnn ananananan 0000000000 --- e 333 Page PlPPlPlPlPl 666666eeeeeeeeeeee . . . . 1 uuuu lklklklklklklk 31313131 BBBBBBBB QuQQuQuQuQuQu StSSStStSt 2 f f ff ff f r rr r r 2222222222 ofofofofof oooooooo rrrrrr ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt tt t bebebebbebett e ststsststst PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP tetetetettete eeeeeeee s yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy isiisisisisis lyllllllyllylylylylylylylylylylylylylylylylyly WeWWeWeWeW gg ssssssssss WWWeWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWeWWWWWWeWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWeWWWeWWeWWeWeWWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWWWWeWeWeWeWWWeWe f ff f ff f f egegeegegegeeg usuuususuusus ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 3 3333333333333333333333333333333333 3 3333333 3333 3 33 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR o ioiiioioio tttttttt lllllllllllllllllllhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh thtthththtttthtttthththththththththththththththththththththththth ototototototot eleeeeeeeeleeeeeeeleeeleleeleleeleleleleeelelel r evevevevev LLLLL ccc r ororoororor rcrcrcrcrc t PrPrPrPrPr a NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN PtPtPtPtPtPt -- PaPaPa ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ ---- &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& nnn iniiininin ttt rlrrlrlrlrl StStSSStStStSt ererererer60606060606060 11111 nn nnnnnn BeBBeBeBeBeBeBBe 01000000000000010010101001010101010101010101 eneenenenen e -------------------- f ffffff f hhh D eeeeeeeeeeeeeee 666666666666666666666666666 chchchchchch ooooooo uuuuuuu 111 t ititititi 3131313131313131 QuQuQuQuQuQuQu KKKKKK aanaanananananananan 22 f ff ff ll ,, ooooo 22222222222 .,.,.,.,., oooooooooooo PlPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPlPPPlPlPPPlPlPl ttt oo rrrr rr lololololo t StSStStStStStSt s ssssssss s ss ss s ss ss r ee ststststststst tetetetetetetete ƩrƩrƩƩƩƩƩ ererererery yyyyyyyy y y yy ee s t ee oisiiisisisisisisisisis atatatatatat ggbebebebebebebebbbebebe WeWWWWeWeWeWeWe RoRRRRRRRRoRRoRoRRRo egegegegegegegegegegegegee WWWWWWW 4 4444 44 1 111 11 RRRRRRRRRR 111111 WeWWeWeWeWeWeWe l & && & & & & 585858585858 eleleelelelelelelelel ddddddd a.aaa.a.a. 3 3 3 33 3 ccc . rcrcrcrcrcrcrcrcrc OOOOOOOOvivvvvvvivivivivivi ,,,,, k.kkk.k.k. aaa aa 1111111 RRR a.aaaa.aa.PaPPaPaPaPaPa LRO 58 Waterloo LRLRLRLR DaDDaDaDaDaDa s tsttststts ----- ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ oooooo ofofofofofofof LoLoLoLoLo NNNNNNNNNNNN LELLELLELLELELE t ttt t t fff f f TTt ttttttttt PPPPPPPPPPPP ITITITITIT ooooooo SSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTT t lylylylylylyly nnn FF PtPPPPtPPtPtPtPtPtPt s enenenenenenenenenenenenen usuuuuususuusususus OFOOFOFOFOF eeee & &&&& & & oo ueueueueueueuueueuuueueue ioiioioioioioiioio nnnnn 2 2 2222 v QQQQQQQQQQQQQ aiaaaaiaiaai t tttt t eveveveevevevevevev rrr 48888 ooooo Chain OF TITLE - CChChChChChChChЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 55454545454Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LLoLLoLoLoLoЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 68668686868686868tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻPPrPrPPrPrPrPrPr Page 557 of 783 Indian Reserve HISTORICAL ATLAS 21 A of 18 Page R D LRO 58 Waterloo Chain OF TITLE - ЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 ЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻ e rv ese RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR nnnnnnnnnnn an Page 558 of 783 didddd n InIInIIIIIInInInIn Indian Reserve eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee hhhh th 222222222 m m 4444444444444444414414144444414144414414414 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrorrr ffffffffffffffffff 22222222222222 323233323232323232323232323232323232 33 ededededededededededededededededededededed 13131313131313131313131313131313131313 yyyyyyyyyy T eyeyeyeyey n nnnnnnnnnnnnn iiiiii nvnn sss asasasaasasasasas CoCo ΑΑΑΑΑ 22222222222222222222222222222222 6060606060606060666060606060 333333333333333333 n aaananananaananananananaaaaaaaaaaaa of Blk of Blk ll ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt PlPlPlPlPPPPlPlPPPPPP F PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP . ttttt yy StStSStStSt r rrrr ally n iniinininininininininiininininininin bebbbbbbebbbebbbbbbebbbbb gggggggggg e ig WeWWeWeWeWWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWe Or f ffffffffffffffff ooooooooooooooooooooo Α . h thtthththtththtththth .T r 21 orororooooroooorooror .C.. A GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN of 000000000000000000000000000000 ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ eeeeeeeee &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 6666666666666666 19 th 36 in t an 0055 - 33333333333 Page PlP 6een St 1 Qu f 223 o R ister g usly Pt of Blk 3 West ioii vvvvvvv ot ev LL Pr arcel Re PtP - P PLAN 401 Α - rlin 60 e 1 0 - f B D o n a l oooooooooooooooooo ., Kitchener P o lo StSSSStSSStStSSSStStStSt s st of Queen St & North of Weber St. ter 22316 Ʃ ereeey yyyyyyy yyyy yy yyy tt is atatatatatataatatatatatatatatatatatat g WWWe Ro WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 4 4444444444444 Webe & &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 58 d 3 333333333333333333 Ovi , arcel Re .k.a. 11 111111111111 RRRRR aP LRO 58 Waterloo LLLRLLRLR Da ssssss tstttttststtstststs f ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ - ooooo E LoLoLoLoLoLoLLoLoLLoLoLoLo NNN L fffff ffff t t N ITIII oooooooo Pt o SS TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT y tttttttt FFFFF PtPPtPtPtPtPtPtPt en OFOFOOFOFOOF & &&&&&&&&&& ueuuuuueen in 2 2222222 QQQQQQQQQQQQQ a t tttt reviousl 44444444448 oo Chain OF TITLE - CChЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 54Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LoLoLLoLLoLoLoLoLoЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 6tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻP eeeeeeeeeeee vevevvvvvvevevvevevvevvvevvevevvvvevevveveveveve rrrrrrrrrrr eeeereeeeereeeerereeereeererereer ssssssssss eseseseseeeeeeeeseseseseseeseeeeeeeeseseseses RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR nnnnnnnnnn anaaaaanaanaaanan Page 559 of 783 iiiiiiiii ddddddidididdidi nnnnnnnnn InIInIIInInInInIn Indian Reserve eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh ththtttttttttththtttthttthththththt 2222222222222222 m mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 11111 ooooooooooooooooo 414444444444444444414444141414444441414444441 rororo ffffff 222222 3233333332333232 ddddddddddddddd 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 edededeeedeedeeedeeedeedeeedededeeedededededed 11111111111111111311111111111313111111111111 yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy eeyeeeeeeeeyeyeeyeeeeeeyeyeyeeeeeyeyeeeeyee nn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn iiiiiiiiiiiii vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv nnnnnnvnnvnvnvnvnvnvnnnvnvnvnnn s aaaaaaaaaaaasasaaaaoooooooooooooooooo CCCCCCoCoCoCCoCCCCCoCoCoCoCCoCoCCCCCCCCCoCCoCCCoCCCCoCCCoCoCoCoCoCCCoCo ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ 2222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 6666066660606060606060606606060606666660666606060666060606060606660606060660 lllllklklllklklklklklllll 3333333333 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ffffffffffffffff aananaanaanaaaa ofooooofofooooofofofofofoooofooooooooofoofofofofof lllll tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPlPlPPlPlPl PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP ......... ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy SSSSSSStStSSSSSStSSSSStStSSSSStSSSSStSSSSSSSSStSSSSStStSSSStSS llllllllllllllyllylyllllyllllylyll lllllllllllllll rr rrrr alaalala e nnnn iniiiiiiiiininin bebbbebbe gggggggggggggggggggg eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee iiiigigigigigigiigiigiiigigigiiigiii rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr WeWWWeWeWWWWeWWe OrOOOOOOrOOOOrOrOOOOOOOrOOOOOOOOOrOOOOOOrOOrOOOOrOrOOOrOr f fffffffffffffffffffffffff ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ... hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT ththth .T.T.T.T CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 21 orooorooro .C.C.C GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN of 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 ΑΑΑΑ eeeeeeeeeeeeee &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 66666666666666666666666 hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 5555555555555555 20 ttttt tthththtthtttththththththththth 3633333333333333333336333363333633333336363333336333636363636363363636 5555555555555555555555555555555555 StStStStStS nn nnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnn 0000000000000000000000nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaananaaanaaaaaaaaaanaananananananan 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 llllllllll ----- eeeee 333333333333333333333333333333333333 Page PlPPPPPlPPPPPPPPPlPPPlPlPlPlPlPlPPPPPlPlPPlPPPPPlPlPlPlPl 666666666666666666666666666666eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ... . .. 111111111111 uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu lklklkllklklklklklkl ttttttttttttt 3133331313313313131333313333313131313131333331 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB QQQQQQQQQQQQQQuQQQQQQQuQQQQuQuQQQQuQuQQQQQQuQuQuQQQQQuQuQuQu StSSSStSSSStStSSStSStSSSSStSStStSStStStStSSSSStStStSStStStStSSStSt 2222 ffffffffffffffffff ffffff fffffffffff fffffffffffff r rr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 oooofofoooooooooooooooofofofofofofof ooooooooooo eeeeeeeeeeeee rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr tttttttttttttttttt tt bebbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbebebebbebebbbbebebbbebebbebebebbbebebebebebbbebebetttttt eeeee ststssssssssssssstst PPPPPPPPP eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ttetttetetetetetttetetettetett eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ssssssssssssssssss yyyyy iiiiiiiiiiiisiiisisiisisisisisisiii lylllylllyllly WeWWWeWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWeWWWWWWeWeWeWWWWWWWWWeWWWWWWWWWeWeWWWWWWWWeWWWWWeWWWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWWWeWWWeWWeWeWeWeWe ggggggggggggggggggggggggggg sssssssssssssssssssssss WeWWWeWeWWeWeW ffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffff egegeeeeeeeeeegeeeeeeeeegeegeeegeeeeegegegeeg usuususuuusuusuuuuuusuuusuu ooooooooo 33333333333333333333333333333 3 3333333 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ooooooo ioioioio tttttttttt hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh thttttttttttttttttttttttttththttttttttttttttttttththtthth otoooooooootototoot eleeeelel rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr eveeveveevevev LLLLLLLLLLLL cccc rrrrr orooooororoororoor rrrcrrrrcrrcrrrrrrcrrcrrcrrrrrrrcrcrcrcr PrPPPrPPrPrPrPrP aaaaaaaaaaaaa NNNNN PtPPPt ---- PaPaPaPPPPPPaPPPaPPPPPaPPPPaPaPaPPaPPaPP ΑΑ ------ &&&&&&& nnnnnnn ininininininin rrrrrrrrrrrrrt00000000000000 lllll rl SSSSStStStSt ereeeeeereeeeeeereerererer6060 e nnnnnnnnnnnnn nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn B 0101 eneneneneeneen eeeeeeeeee - ffffffffff fffff fffffffff f h D eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 666 cchcchcccccchccccccccccccccccccccchchchchch oooooooooooooooo uuuuuuuuuu 111 tttttttttttttttt itiiitiiitiiititititiitiiiitiit 33333133333333331313333313131313133nn QuQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQuQQuQuQuQuQuQuQuQuQuQuQQuQuQuQuQQQQu KKKKKKKKKKKK aan 2222222222 ff ffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffff ,,,,,,, oooooo 222222222222222222222 ..,....... ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo PlPl tttttttttttt oooooooo rr r r llllllolololololllllllll tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt SStSSSSStSSSSStStStStSStStStSStStStSSSStStStStSSSSStStSt s rrrr eeeeeee sstssstssstssssssssstsssssstsstststssststsstststsststssst tetttettttttttetetete ƩrrrrrrrƩƩƩrƩƩƩƩƩƩr erereeeeereereererererereyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyy yyyyyyyyyyyyyy eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ssssssssssssssssssssssssssss tttttttt eeeeeeeeeeee ooooooooooooooisiiiiiiisiisiisisiisiiii atataatatatataat ggggggggggggggggggggggggggbbbebbbbebbbbbbbbebebbbbbbbbebbbbebebebebbbbbbbebebbbbbbbebebbebbbbb WWWWWeWWWWWWeWWWWWeWWWWeWeWWWeWWeWeWeWeWWWeWeWWWWWWWeWeWeWWWWWeWeWWWWWWWeWeWeWeWeWeWeWWeWeWeWWWeWeWeWeWWeWeWeWeWeWeWWWe RoRRRRRRRoRRoRoRoRoRRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRoRo eeeeeegeeeeeeeeeeeeegeegeeegeeegegegegegeegeegegegegegeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW 444444 4444444444444 44444444 444444444444444 4444 1111111111111111 111111 1111 1 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 11111111111111111111111111 WWWeWWWeWWWWWeWWWWeWWWWWWWeWeWWeWeWWeWWWWWWW 888888 llllll &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& ... 5855855858585855858 eeeeeeeeeleeeeeeeeeeleeleeleeleeeeeleleel dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd aaaaaaaaaaa.aaa.aa.aa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 333333333333 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33333333333 3iiiiiiiiii ccccccccc .. rcrrrrcrrcrcrcrrrrrcrcrcrcrc OOOOOOOOOOvivvvvvvvvvvvivivivvvivivivivivi ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, kk.kkk.kkkkkk.k.kkkkkkk.k.kkkkkkkkk.kkkkkkk.k.kkkk aaaaaaa ...... aaa 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 RRR aa.aaaaaaaaaa.a.aaa.aaa.aaaaaaaaaaaPaPPPaPPaPa LRO 58 Waterloo LRLRLLRLR DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDaDDDDDDDDDDDDDDaDaDDDDDDDDDDDaDaDDD ssss tttsts -- fffffffffffffffffff ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ ooooooooooooooooooooo ofoooooofoooooofofoofoooofoofoofofofofofof LLLLLLoLLLLoLLLoLLLoLLLoLLoLLLLoLoLLLLLoLLLoLoLoLLLLLLLoLLoLLLLLoLLLLoLLLoLoLoLLoLLL NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN LELLLLELLL ttt t tttttttttttttttttttt f ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ff ff TTTTTtttttt tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt ttttttttttttttt PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP ITITITITITI ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS TTTTTTTTTTT yyyyyyyyyy tttttttttttt llllllllllllylyll nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn PPPPtPPPtPtPtPtPtPtPPPtPtPPtPtPtPtPtPPtPtPPtPtPtPPtPtPtPtPtPPPtPtPtPPPtPtPP ss eneneneeneneneneneneneneneneeeeeneneeeeeeeeneeeeneneeenenenenenenene uus OOOFOFOFOF eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee &&&&& &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& && ooooo ueueuuueueueueuuuueuuuuuuueuuueueueueueueuu ioiioiioioioioio nnnnn i 2222222222222222222 22222 22222 2 vvvv QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ aiaaiaiaiai t tttttttttt ttt ttt t eveeeveveeveeveveveveeveveveevev hhhrrrrrr 44444444444448888888 oooooooooooo Chain OF TITLE - CCCCCCCChChCCCChChChChЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 54555454545545454Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LoLoLLoLLoLoLLoLoLoLLoLoLoLoLoLLoLoLoLoЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 6868668686868668686 tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻPrPrPrPPr Plan MBP2BERMIS Plan of Lot 3 German Company Tract veveveve r ereeeerereerer ssss eseeeeeeeeseeseeseseses RRRRRRRRRRRRRR n anananan Page 560 of 783 i dididi n InInIn Indian Reserve eeeeeeeeeeeeeee hhhhh thtththththtthththth 2222222 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 11 oooooo 414444414141 rororrorororo ffff 2222 32323232 dd edeeedeededeededed 13113 eyeyeyeyeyeyey n n iii v nvnnnvnvnv s asasas CoCoCoCoCCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCo ΑΑΑΑ 222222222222 0 kkkkkkkk 660606666060 lklklklklk 333333333 BBBBBBBBBBBB ffff aanaanaaa ofoofofofofofofofofoofoofofof lll ttttttttt PlPPlPlPl PPPPPPPPPPPPPPP ... yy StStStSt lylylylylly r rrrr alaalaalalal n inininininin bebbebebbe e igigigigiigigig rrr WeWWeWeWW OrOrOOrOrOr f fff ΑΑΑΑΑ ooo .. hh TTT thththththth .T.T.T.T r CCCCC 21 oror .C.........C.C.C GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG NNN of 000000 ΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑΑ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee &&&& 6 hhhhhhhh 55555555555 21 thththththththth 363636 5555555555 StStStSt n n nnn 0 iiiiii nnnn anan 00000000000 -- 3333333 Page PlPPl 666666eeeeeeee k . . 1 lklklklklkl 313131331 BBBBBBBB QuQQ StSSt 2 f f ff r rrr 2222222222 ofofofofofoofof eee o rrrrr t ttttt bebe e stss PPPPPPP e ttetettet ss isisisiiiis lylylylylyly WeWeWWWeWeWeWeWe WeWWWeWWWe f f ff egegegegegeg usususususus ooooo 3 33 RRRRRRRRRR ioioioiiioi t ll v ththth o eeelelelel eveeveveevee L ororor rcrrcrcrcrc PrPPrPPrPrPr a NN PtPt -- PaPPPaPaPaPa ΑΑ -- && n ininininin rr rrlrrlrlrrlrl StSSSt eeeerer606660 e n nnnn BeBBBeBeBeBeBe 01010 enenenen e - f f ffffff hhhhhh D eeeeee 6666 chchchch oooooooooo 1 itititiitititit 3131 QuQu KKKKKK ananaanana f f ll oooooo 2222 .,., oo PlPPPlPlPlPPl o r r lollololololo StSStSSSStStSt s sssssss rr stst ttetete Ʃrrrrr erererereryyyyy ss tt oisis atataat bebebebe WeWWWe RoRRoRoRRRRRoRo egeeegee WWWW 4 444444444 4444444444444 444444 44 11111 1 1 RRRRRR 11111111 WeWWWeWeWeWeWWWWWWWeWeWeWe 888 &&&&&&&& 58 eleeeeeeeeeeleeeeeeeeeleeeeeeeleeeeel dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd a.a.a.a. 33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 33 3 33iiiiiiiiii ccccccccccccccccccccc rrrcrrrrcrcrcrrcrcrcrcrcrrcrcrcrcrcrc OOOvvvvvivvvvvivvvvvivivivivvvivi ,,, k.k aaa aaaaa 1111 a.aaPaPaPaPaPa LRO 58 Waterloo LRLRLR DaDa ss ts -- f ΑΑΑΑ ofooof LoLL NNNNN LELLE t tt f f TTTt t t t PPPP IT o SSSSS TT y t lylyly PtPtPtPt enenenene us OFOFOF & &&&& oo ueueueueueue io nnn 2 22 2 QQQQQQ aiaiai t tt eevev hrr 8 o Plan 360 Chain OF TITLE - ChChChЎЍ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α ğ͵Ɖ͵ğ͵ ЊЊ wƚǤ {Ʒ͵Ͳ YźƷĭŷĻƓĻƩ Ώ tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЉЎЎ Α 545454Lot 2 & Pt of Lots 1, 3 & 4 West of Queen St & North of Weber St. Plan 360 LoLoLoЏБ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ b Α tğƩĭĻƌ wĻŭźƭƷĻƩ ЋЋЌЊЏΏЉЊЏЉ Α tƷ \[ƚƷ Ќ ĻƭƷ ƚŅ vǒĻĻƓ {Ʒ ε bƚƩƷŷ ƚŅ ĻĬĻƩ {Ʒ͵ tƌğƓ ЌЏЉ Α ğƭ źƓ ЊЌЌЋЍЊЋ 686866tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ 5ğǝźķ ĻĬĻƩƭ tƌğƓ ƚŅ .ĻƩƌźƓ Ώ tƩĻǝźƚǒƭƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ќ źƓ ƷŷĻ D͵/͵͵ Α hƩźŭźƓğƌƌǤ tƷ ƚŅ .ƌƉ Ћ /ƚƓǝĻǤĻķ ŅƩƚƒ ƷŷĻPr 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix D HIA Terms of Referenceof Refereof Re T F A R D MHBC | 86 Page 561 of 783 City of Kitchener Development Services Department - Planning Division 54-68 Queen Street North & 11 Roy Street Heritage Impact Assessment - Terms of Reference 1.0 Background A Heritage Impact Assessment is a study to determine the impacts to known and potential cultural own and potential cultuown and p heritage resources within a defined area proposed for future repair, alteration or development. , alteration or development. , alteration or d The study shall include an inventory of all cultural heritage resources within the planning esources within the planning sources within the application area. The study results in a report which identifies all known cultural heritage ifies all known cultural heritage fies all known cultural h resources, evaluates the significance of the resources, and makes recommendations toward d makes recommendations toward d makes recommendations to mitigative measures that would minimize negative impacts to those resources. A Heritage Impact to those resources. A Heritage Impact to those resources. A Heritage Impa Assessment may be required on a property which is listed on the CityÓs Heritage Advisory s listed on the CityÓs Heritage Advisorys listed on the CityÓs Heritage Advisory Committee Inventory; listed on the CityÓs Municipal Heritage Register; designated under the l Heritage Register; designated under tl Heritage Register; designated under t Ontario Heritage Act; or where development is proposed adjacent to a protected heritage property posed adjacent to a protected heritage prosed adjacent to a prote (i.e. designated property). The requirement may also apply to unknown or recorded cultural ay also apply to unknown or recorded o apply to unkno T heritage resources which are discovered during the development application stage or during the development application e developm construction. The subject lands are municipally addressed as 54-68 Queen Street North and 11 Roy Street. All dressed as 54essed as 54--68 Queen Street North and68 Queen Street Nort the properties are designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act and are located within the er Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act and at V of the Ontario Heritage Act and Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage Conservaeritage Conservation DistrictConservation Districttion District (CCNHCD) as well as the Civic (CCNHCD(CCNHCD F Centre Neighbourhood Cultural Heritage Landscape (CHL). 54 Queen Street North and 68 Queen al Heritage Landscape (CHLandscape (CHL)). 54 Queen S54 Queen Street North are both properties classified as being District Significance A, meaning they are very erties classified as being District Significanties classified as being District Significan fine examples of a specific architectural style.ecific architectural style. 11 Roy Street ecific architectural style. 11 11 Roy Street is classified as being District Significance B, meaning it is a fine example of a sing iting itis a fine example of a specific archis a fine example of a sppecific architectural style. In addition to being adjacent to other Part V designated heritage resoPart V designated heritage resources inclPart V designated heritage resoururces including 16 Roy Street, 20 Roy Street, 23 Roy Street , 18 Weber Street West, and 74 Queen Street North, the subject lands are also 18 Weber Street West, and 74 Queen S18 Weber Street West, and 74 Quee located adjacent to: ent tont to: : A 20 Weber Street East/73-77 Queen Street North, known as the Waterloo County Gaol 20 Weber Street EastStreet East//737-77 Queen StreeenStre and Governors House and designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act; and and Governors Houseand Governors House and designated 83-85 Queen Street North, known as the Kitchener Public Library Main Branch and listed 8383--85 Queen Street North, known as85 Queen Street No as a non-designated property of cultural heritage value or interest on the Municipal as a nonnon--designated property odesignated pro Heritage Register Heritage RegisterRegist Please note that this Terms of Reference has been prPlease note that this TermPlease note that this Terms of Refe R epared specifically for a site plan application. It is heritage planning staffs understanding that a heritage permit application for the demolition of It is heritage planning stafIt is heritage planning staffs und 11 Roy Street may be submitted prior to the submission of a site plan application. Heritage 11 Roy Street may be s11 Roy Street may be subm planning staff would be open to discussion with the renning staff would be opnning staff would be optained heritage consultant regarding dividing the Heritage Impact Assessment into two phases, with the first phase focused on the demolition eritageeritageImpact Aspact As and the second phase focused on the proposed new development. It should also be noted that second phassecond phas heritage planning staff are not supportive of the demolition of 11 Roy Street and would not anning anning recommend demolishing the structure prior to the submission of a site plan application as, should demdem D unforeseeable circumstances arise and the proposed development fall through, a valuable heritage resource will have been lost for no reason. Page 562 of 783 2.0 Heritage Impact Assessment Requirements It is important to recognize the need for Heritage Impact Assessments at the earliest possible stage of development, alteration or proposed repair. Notice will be given to the property owner and/or their representative as early as possible. When the property is the subject of a Plan of of of Subdivision or Site Plan application, notice of a Heritage Impact Assessment requirement will equiremequirem typically be given at the pre-application meeting, followed by written notification. The notice will ion. The notiion. The inform the property owner of any known heritage resources specific to the subject property and subject property asubjec provide guidelines to completing the Heritage Impact Assessment. The following minimum requirements will be required in a Heritage Impact Assessment: ritage Impact Assessment:tage Impact Asses 2.1 Present owner contact information for properties proposed for development and/or site oposed for development and/or site oposed for development and/or alteration. 2.2 A detailed site history to include a listing of owners from the Land Registry Office, and a wners from the Land Registry Office, andwners from the Land Registry Office, and history of the site use(s). T 2.3 A written description of the buildings, structures and landscape features on the subject , structures and landscape features on tand landsca properties including: building elements, buildiments, building materials, architectural ng materials, architectural and interior material finishes, natural heritage elements, and landscaping. The description will also include a nts, and landscaping. The description wilnts, and landscaping. The des chronological history of the buildingsÓ development, such as additions and demolitions. uildingsÓ development, such as additionsdingsÓ development, such as add The statement shall also address the value and significance of adjacent protected heritage the value and significance of adjacgjgj properties including 16 Roy Street, 20 Roy Street, 23 Roy Street , 18 Weber Street West, Roy Street, 20 Roy Street, 23 Roy Street ,, 20 Roy Street, 23 Roy Street , FF and 74 Queen Street North, and adjacent listed properties including 20 Weber Street t North, and adjacent listed properties inadjacent listed properties East/73-77 Queen Street North and 83-85 Queen Street North. Street North and 8383--85 Queen Street Nor85 Queen Street Nor 2.4 Documentation of the subject properties to include: current photographs of each elevation n of the subject properties to include: currn of the subject properties to in of the buildings, photographs of identified heritangs, photographs of identified heritage angs, photographs of identified hege attributes and a site plan drawn at an appropriate scale to understand the context of the buildings and site details. ate scale to understand the context ate scale to understand the cont Documentation shall also include where availmentation shall also include where avaientation shall also include where avaable, current floor plans, and historical AA photos, drawings or other available and relevant archival material. tos, drawings or other availabledrawings or other availableand relevand relev 2.5 A summary of applicable heritage conservation principles and how they will be used must A summary of applicable heritage conseA summary of applicab be included. Conservation principles may be found in online publications such as: the be included. Conservatbe included. Conservation principles Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Parks Standards and GuidelinesStandards and Guidelines for the Canada); Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Heritage Properties (Ontario Canada); Eight Guiding Principle; Eight Guiding Princ Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturalism); and the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and MCitizenship and M Ministry of Citizenship and Multiculturlaism). Ministry of Citizenship andtizens R 2.5.1 A summary of applicable policy frameworks is also required. This included the 22.5.1A summary ofmary Planning Act, the Provincial Policy StatemPlanning Acning Aent, the Regional Official Plan, and Kitchener Official Plan, and the CCNHCD Plan. Kitchenerchener 2.6 An outline of the proposed demolition and development, its context, and how it will impact tlintlin D the properties (subject property and adjacent heritage properties previously identified) and surrounding streetscape including buildings, structures, and site details including landscaping. In particular, the potential visual and physical impact of the proposed work on the identified heritage attributes of the properties, and the setting and character of Roy Page 563 of 783 Street, Queen Street North, and Weber Street West, shall be assessed and the overall impact of the integrity of the CCNHCD shall be evaluated. The Heritage Impact Assessment must consider potential negative impacts as identified in the Ministry of Citizenship and MulticulturalismÓs Ontario Heritage Tool Kit. Negative ol ol impacts may include but are not limited to: repair/alterations that are not sympathetic or ot sympot sym compatible with the cultural heritage resource; demolition of all or part of a cultural heritage of a cultural hof a cul resource; etc. The outline should also address the influence and potential impact of the potential impact opotenti development on the setting and character of the subject properties and adjacent protected es and adjacent protectes and adja heritage property. Additional negative impacts informed by new research, understanding, ew research, understanding, ew research, un and best practices should also be considered. 2.6.1 Proposed demolitions must be justified and explained including discussion on any plained including discussion on any plained including discussion on loss of cultural heritage value and impact on the property, streetscape, and ct on the property, streetscape, and ct on the property, streetscape, an neighbourhood. Conclusions or statementments regarding structural or generalments regarding structural or generas regarding structural or general condition shall be supported by reports and cost estimates prepared by qualified s and cost estimates prepared by qualifis and cost estimates prepared by qualifi individuals. 2.6.2 A Shadow Impact Analysis shall be conducted and used to help inform building allbe conducted and used to help inforucted and u design and articulation. 2.6.3 A discussion and assessment of the proposed building materials, proposed sessment of the proposed building massment of the proposed buildin setbacks and step backs with respect to the surrounding neighbourhood is required. acks with respect to the surrounding neighbith respect to the surrounding neigh A discussion and assessment of functional considerations such as the location of assessment of functional considerations ent of functional considerations landscape features amenity space, pedestrian and vehicle movements, fire access ures amenity space, pedestrian and vehicspace, pedestrian and vehic and garbage collection should be provided. collection should be provided.ollection should be provided 2.7 Development alternatives shall be provialternativesalternativesshall be providedshall be provideded and shall include an explanation on how and shal different options may allow the significant cultural heritage resources to be better ptions may allowptions may allowthe significant culturaficant conserved or mitigate impacts. Methods of ddor mitigate impacts. Methods of mitigator mitigate impacts. Methods of mitmitigation may include, but are not limited to, preservation/conservation in situ, adaptive re-use, integration of all or part of the heritage rvation/conservation in situ, adaptive revation/conservation in situ, adaptive re--usu resource, relocation. Each mitigative measure should create a sympathetic context for the ource, relocation. Each mitigative measuree, relocation. Each mitigative measure heritage resource. eritage resource. source. 2.8 The HIA should include a recommendation identifying the preferred development The HIA should include a recomThe HIA should inclu alternative. A full justification for the identified option shall be included. Recommendations alternative. A full justificatioalternative. A full justification for the for mitigation measures to identified impacts shall also be provided. for mitigation measures to identation measures to ide 2.8.1 Recommendations shall be consistent2.8.1Recommendations men with applicable CCNHCD Plan policies, goals, and guidelines, including but not limited to Section 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.3.5.2, 6.6, goals,and guidelind g and 6.9.4 and with recognized heritage conservation principles and practices, and 6.9.49.4anda including the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in including theding th Canada (Parks Canada); Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Built Canada (nada ( Heritage Properties (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture Industries); HeritagHeritag and the Ontario Heritage Tool Kit (Ministry of Heritage, Tourism, Sport, and Culture and and Industries). InIn 2.8.2 Recommendations shall be as specific as possible, describing and illustrating locations, elevations, materials, landscaping, etc. Page 564 of 783 2.9 The qualifications and background of the person(s) completing the Heritage Impact Assessment shall be included in the report. The author(s) must demonstrate a level of professional understanding and competence in the heritage conservation field of study. The professional should be registered with the Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) and in good standing. The report will also include a reference for a a any literature cited, and a list of people contacted during the study and referenced in the referenrefere report. 3.0 Summary Statement and Conservation Recommendations ss The summary statement should provide a full description of: n of:n of: The significance and heritage attributes of the subject properties. An evaluation the suevaluati under Ontario Regulation 9/06 is not required for the subject properties as they are uired for the subject properties as they are already designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act, but profile sheets he Ontario Heritage Act, but profile shee which include the identification of specific cific heritage attributeheritage attributes should be provided. gg The identification of any impact the proposed demolition and development will the proposed demolition androposed demolitidevelopm TTTTTT have on the heritage attributes of the subject properties, adjacent heritage utes of the subject pro properties identified in 2.3, the Roy Street, Queen Street North, and Weber Street yueen St West streetscapes, and the integrity of the CCNHCD; and he integrity of the CCNHCD; anda An explanation and justification of what conservation or mitigative measures, or stificationificationof what conservation or mitigaof what conservation or alternative development, or site alteration approaches are recommended. ment, or site alteration approaches are recor site alteration approaches are r FFFFFFFF 4.0 Approval Process One (1) digital pdf copy shall be provided to Heritage Planning staff. The digital copy shall df copy shall be provided to Heritage Plandf copy shall be provided to He be marked with a ÐDRAFTÑ watermark background. The Heritage Impact Assessment will h a ÐDRAFTÑ watermark background. Theh a ÐDRAFTÑ watermark backg be reviewed by City staff to determine whether all requirements have been met and to d by City staff to determine whether all rd by City staff to determine whet review the preferred option(s). Following the review of the Heritage Impact Assessment he preferred option(s). Following the reviehe preferred option(s). Following the r by City staff, one (1) digital copy of the final Heritage Impact Assessment (ÐDRAFTÑ y staff, one (1) digital copy of the final y staff, one (1) digital copy of the fina AAAA watermark removed) will be required. The final Heritage Impact Assessment will be ermark removed) will be required. The ark removed) will be required. The considered by the Director of Planning. Note that Heritage Impact Assessments will be onsidered by the Director of Planning. Nby the Director of Planning. N circulated to the CityÓs Heritage Kitchener Committee for information and discussion. circulated to the CityÓs circulated to the CityÓs Heritage Kitchen Heritage Impact Assessments may be subject to a peer review to be conducted by Heritage Impact AssessmHeritage Impact Assessments m a qualified heritage consultant at the expense of the City of Kitchener. The applicant a qualified heritage consultaned heritage consult will be notified of StaffÓs comments and acceptance, or rejection of the report. An will be notified of StaffÓs coified of StaffÓs co accepted Heritage Impact Assessment will become part of the further processing accepted Heritage Impacritag R of a development application under the direction of the Planning Division. The of a development appmen recommendations within the final approved version of the Heritage Impact recommendations wation Assessment may be incorporated into development related legal agreements Assessment maAssessment may between the City and the proponent at the discretion of the municipality. between the Cibetween the Ci D Page 565 of 783 Appendix ÒEÓ- Evaluation of 11 Roy Street Application of Group B Criteria for 11 Roy Street The property has previously The property was not previously designated prior gg been designated under the to the Plan. Ontario Heritage Act The property is a particularly The building is identified as ÒvernacularÓ in the as ÒvernacularÓ in the as Òvernacula fine example of an CCNHCD Study which is not demonstrative of a is not demonstrative of a s not demonstrati particularly fine example of an architect style. ample of an architect style. ample of an architect sty architectural style, whether well restored, aged and weary, or partially concealed by reversible alterations; The property exhibits unique The property does not exhibit unique qualities or property does not exhibit unique qualitierty does not exhi TTTT qualities or details that make details that make it a landmark. It is currently etails that make it make it a laa landmark. It is curr placed between a laneway and surface parking placed between a lanewplaced between a laneway and surfac it a landmark; area. area.area. The property is a particularly The property is a particularly well-maintained The property is a particularly The property is a particularly FFF well-maintained example of a example of a modest architectural style. example of a modest arcexample of a modest arch modest architectural style; e; The age of the building lding The building was constructed c. 1921 which is The building was e buil contributes to its heritage ts heritconsidered infill as the majority of the considered infisidere concentration of development in the CCNHCD concentrationtrat values but is not the principal not the principal AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA determinant; was between 1880 and 1915. A building should was betwwas betw not be considered to have cultural heritage value notbnot b simply due to its age. sim There is a significant known There is a significant known There is no significant known event or person event or person associated event or person associaassociated with the house. The church had RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR with the house; woperated out of the building as part of their outreach ministry which is the purpose of this proposal. The property contributes to roperty contri The property does not contribute to the Roy the streetscape because it is tscape streetscape as it is not part of a sequence, grouping or unique location that was designed. part of an unusual sequence DDDDDDDDDDDDD of grouping or is in a unique The former removal of the buildings located at 15 and 19 Roy Street, the removal of the location. building at 76 Queen Street North and Page 566 of 783 Appendix ÒEÓ- Evaluation of 11 Roy Street replacement with a circa1960s built form (currently at 74 Queen Street North) and later mid-century infill development immediate adjacent (non-contiguous) at 16 and 20 Roy 22 Street, disjoints this property from the built form m the bum the b and fluid streetscape that formerly would have merly would hamerly w been present. TT F A R D Page 567 of 783 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix F Property Evaluation Sheets uation Sheuation T F A R D MHBC | 88 Page 568 of 783 Ʊư=£XX?XX6 ?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N| Kitchener, Ontario iïđ¨ąÕöxÀÌĖè¨đÕöïȖʊȍȓ $XJŖA|XX¨Nґ£TXJƯX¨MN ?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N|JT;J|,Jґґ constructed in 1906. The building is representative of the Gothic Revival architectural style whichRevival is demonstrated through its use of lancet and ogee shaped window and door openings, Gothicwindow a tracery and high-pitched church spire, stone details such as parapets and stone capping crestings parapet \\ö¶¨đÕöï pilasters. $XJŖ The property does display a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit in itsegree of craftsmanshi decorative use of masonry, such as brick corbelling and window and door surrounds; windowelling and window and doo tracery and stained glass windows. $XJŖThe property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical or scientificot demonstrate a high degree of technical achievement. $XJ¥Ŗ The property is directly associated with the theme and belief of the Presbyteriandirectly associated with the theme and belief of the P Church. In 1955, the church held the largest Presbyterian congregation in Canada with 1900ch held the largest Presbyteria members and 1061 children enrolled in Sunday School . The church supported the communityenrolled in Sunday Schoo Current aerial photograph T through a number of organizations and local outreach programs which are significant to theons and local outr N£¨ŗ$|£N|JN¥XNґ£TXTŔM£¦XXґXTŔ?ŗ TX¦Ś#¨?N£AŔed, but were #¦X$£MJT?N£ŔN£¨XJґzJJTX¥XŔA|Z?|Ŕ?ŗ TX¦Ś&J¨bs and Scouts, community meal prog IÕĉđöąÕ¶¨èLî¨ÌÀĉ $JXŔ?ŗ TX¦Ś*Xґґ¦|$ґ£MŔN|£N|NNŔFXŚ5J¨?NX¨ŔFXŚ TX¦Ś*Xґґ¦|$ґ£MŔN|£N|NN NJŔ$£ґXŚ$ґ£MŔ£NXNJґŭ6,£>XNJґŮŔ$J1£¦JJzŔJTŔ$£ґXŚ$ґ£MŔ£NXNJґŭ6,£ youth programs, youth house, sponsorship of families from around the world. One of the membersams, youth house, sponsorship of families from of this church community was former Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King. The St.h community was former Prime Minister F TX¦ŚAXґX¥5¨zJMXzJJґNJґJ$1$8ŭ$AE6X¦ŮƭƳҒƭT£Xvision Mprogram began at loca significance to the community. In 1980, the Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario, the Honorablethe community. In 1980, the Lie Pauline McGibbon, was in attendance to commemorate the founding of the congregation; at thisPauline McGibbon, was in atte event a mural was presented which symbolized the connection between the church universal andevent a mural was presente the creative arts in the Kitchener community, this mural was presented to the Centre in thethe creative arts in the K Square.uare. 1925 Fire Insurance Plann $XJ¥Ŗ$XJ¥ŖThe property does can yield information that contributes to an understanding of aThe property does A community or culture. The church has been and continues to be a social hub for the community. Itcommunity or culture. The c can provide information related to vital statistics including births/ baptisms, marriages, deaths butcan provide information also the social, cultural, economic evolution of the community. $XJ¥Ŗ The property may demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. bui $XJ¥Ŗ$X The property supports the late Victorian and early Edwardian character of the area within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood.withi RR $XJ¥ŖThe property is functionally, visually and historically linked to its surroundings. $XJ§ŖThe property is considered a landmark by the community. 1911 photograph otograp ?£J¨ The property is designated under Part V of the OHA and considered a Protected Heritage Property. ,XJzXJM£XŖ ((§X) existing footprint of the original church building and later additions, exterior elevations including decorative masonry, parapets, turrets, towers, spire and original openings and associated surrounds, voussoirs and hood mouldings; stained glass windows D and Gothic tracery; original rooflines; date stone (.XŬ Main sanctuary including Cassavant organ, circular stained glass window in dedication of the Davison Family, vaulted ceilings, crown moulding and decorative millwork, lighting (Part V designation does not apply to interior features). xÀËÀąÀï¶Àĉ Vernon Directories, City of Kitchener Various related documents, including historic photographs courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library Fire Insurance Plan of Kitchener, 1925 1990 photograph Aerial Photographs of Kitchener: 1930, 1945, 1955, 1963, 1980, 1985, 1990, Page 569 of 783 1995 ?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N| N|¥Jґ>XNT ƭƭ>¨?XX Kitchener, Ontario Zollner/ SOLO House iïđ¨ąÕöxÀÌĖè¨đÕöïȖʊȍȓ $XJŖ The property includes a two-storey dwelling constructed 1923-1924 which isng const representative of a bungalow with influences of the Arts and Crafts Movement.and Craf \\ö¶¨đÕöï $XJŖThe property does not display a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit.egree of craftsmansh $XJŖThe property does not have design value or physical value because it demonstrates asign value or physical value beca high degree of technical or scientific achievement.hievemen $XJ¥ŖA|XX¨JNJXT¦|?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N|JT£XJN|NJXT¦|?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N|J services from the time it was purchased in 1982 and used for several years as the SOLO Houseurchased in 1982 and used for several years as the SO which served the community.. $XJ¥: The property does not have potential to yield, information that contributes to anes not have potential to TT understanding of a community or culture.r culture. Current aerial photograph $XJ¥Ŗ The property does not demonstrate or reflect the work or ideas of an architect, artist,monstrate builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. designer or theorist who is significant to a c IÕĉđöąÕ¶¨èLî¨ÌÀĉ $XJ¥ŖŖ The property supports the historic stock of buildings in the surrounding, however, is The property supports the historic stock of b not consistent with the architectural styles reflected in the immediate area.nt with the architectural styles reflected in F $XJ¥ŖThe property is not physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to itshe property is not physically, f surrounding area. Formerly there was a functional linkage to the church was has ceased since itssurrounding area. Formerly t ¥JNJN¨ŗ ґ|£z|¦|JJXJZґJ|NM£ґTzN Ŕ|XM£ґTzŚґNJvacancy. Although it is w between surface parking negates its visual linkage along the street. There is no significantbetween surface parking historical linkage of the property to the surrounding area.historical linkage of the pro $XJ§Ŗ$XJ§Ŗ The property is not considered a landmark by the community. The property is no A 1925 Fire Insurance Plan ?£J¨?£J¨ The property is designated under Part V of the OHA and considered a Protected Heritage Property.,XJzXJM£XŖ Original footprint of the dwelling including front porch and supporting structure, medium-pitched gabled roofline, including front dormer, with deep returning eaves. Existing window and door openings and remaining frames. e RR xÀËÀąÀï¶Àĉ 1979 photograph h Vernon Directories, City of Kitchener D Images courtesy of Grace Schmidt Various related documents, including historic photographs courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library Room (GSR) Kitchener Public Library Fire Insurance Plan of Kitchener, 1925 Aerial Photographs of Kitchener: 1930, 1945, 1955, 1963, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 ?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N| N|¥Jґ>XNT Page 570 of 783 Ғғ=£XX?6 Kitchener, Ontario Knell/ Rockel House iïđ¨ąÕöxÀÌĖè¨đÕöïȖʊȍȓ $XJŖThe property includes a two and half storey building constructed in c. 1921 in theey buildi Classical Revival Style based on features such as the pediment gable, front entry aedicule withthe pedimen \\ö¶¨đÕöï Doric columns and semi-elliptical fanlight. $XJŖThe property does not display a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. a high degree of craftsmanship o $XJŖ The property does not demonstrate a high degree of technical or scientificnot demonstrate a high degree of techn achievement. $XJ¥Ŗ It is unknown if the property has a direct association with a theme, event, belief,if the property has a direct association with a theme, XŔJN¥¨ŔzJ©J£|JzZNJJN£¨ŗ*X¦XŚation or institution that is sign include the Knell and Rockel Families. Albert Conrad Rockel and his wife Gladys operated ackel Families. Albert Con practice out of the building for several decades.r several decades. TT Current aerial photograph $XJ¥ŖThe property does not have potential to yield, information that contributes to anhave pot understanding of a community or culture.anding of a community or culture. IÕĉđöąÕ¶¨èLî¨ÌÀĉ $XJ¥Ŗ¥ŖSome records indicate that the house was designed by W.H.E. Schmalz, locallySome records indicate that the house w renowned architect although this is not indicated in the Biographical Dictionary of Architects ind architect although this is not indicated in t Canada. F $XJ¥ŖThe property supports the character of the area due to its dating and built form whichThe property supports the characte is reflective of the surrounding building stock. the surround $XJ¥Ŗ$X The property is not physically, functionally, visually or historically linked to itse prope surroundings. Adjacent historic buildings immediately to the west have since been demolished andsurroundings. Adjacent hi the immediate surrounding area contrasts with the architecture and use of the building. Itsthe immediate surroundin orientation and location distances it from the overall CCNHCD character.orientation and location dist A 1925 Fire Insurance Plan (GSR)lan (GS $XJ§ŖJ§Ŗ The property is not considered a landmark by the community. The prope ?£J¨ The property is designated under Part V of the OHA and considered a Protected Heritage Property.Pr,XJzXJM£XŖ Original footprint of the dwelling including original north east addition, low-pitched pedimented boxed in gable roofline and associated brackets and soffits,add decorative brick work including voussoirs and keystones, asymmetrical primary entry including d RR Classical aedicule with pedimented portico, Doric columns and dentil mouldings; primary door opening with sidelights and semi-elliptical fanlight transom and six-panel door; rxisting window and door openings and remaining frames. (§Nҏ£TX later addition on the north-west corner and attached garage. 1979 aerial photograph (GSR)hotograph (GSR xÀËÀąÀï¶Àĉ Vernon Directories, City of Kitchener DD Various related documents, including historic photographs courtesy of the Grace Schmidt Room, Kitchener Public Library Fire Insurance Plan of Kitchener, 1925 Aerial Photographs of Kitchener: 1930, 1945, 1955, 1963, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 ?ŗ TX¦Ś;XM¨XJ$|£N| N|¥Jґ>XNT 1934 photograph of Albert Rockel Page 571 of 783 (ancestry.ca) 11 Roy Street & 54 and 68 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener, ON Appendix E 11 Roy Street Group B Evaluationp B p B EvaluaEv T F A R D MHBC | 87 Page 572 of 783 Education University of Waterloo Dan Masters of Arts (Planning) University of Waterloo Bachelor of Environmental Studies Currie University of Saskatchewan BA, BES, MA, MCIP, RPP, CAHP CAHPCAHP Bachelor of Arts (Art History) Dan Currie, a Partner and Managing Director of MHBCÓs Cultural Heritage ing Director of MHBCÓs Cultural Heing Director of MHB Division, joined MHBC Planning in 2009, after having worked in various ng in 2009, after having worked in varing in 2009, after having w positions in the public sector since 1997. Dan provides a variety of ector since 1997. Dan provides a variety ector since 1997. Dan provides Professional Associations planning services for public and private sector clients including a wide ublic and private sector clients including a ublic and private sector clients includ range of cultural heritage policy and planning work including strategic eritage policy and planning work including seritage policy and planning work including Registered Professional Planner planning, heritage policy, heritage conse policy, heritage consere policy, heritage conserervation district studies and plans, vation district studiesvation district studies heritage master plans, cultural heritage evaluations, heritage impact ter plans, cultural heritage evaluations, heplans, cultural herita Full Member, Canadian Institute of assessments and cultural heritage landscape studies. ts and cultural heritage landscape studies. ltural heritage la T Planners (CIP) Selected Project Experience lected Project Experiencelected Project Ex Full Member, Ontario Professional Planners Institute (OPPI) Heritage Conservation District Studies and Plans Heritage Conservation District Studies aeritage Conservation District Stu Professional Member, Canadian Streetsville Heritage ConservatiStreetsville HeritaStreetsville Heritage Conservation ge Conservation on District Plan (underway) Association of Heritage Professionals F Amherstburg Heritage Conservation District Plan (underway) Amherstburg Heritage ConserAmherstburg Heritage Conserva Melville Street HeritageMelville Street Heritage ConMelville Street Heritage Con Conservation District Plan (underway) Stouffville Heritage ConservaStouffville Heritage Consouffville Htion District Plan (2022) Alton Heritage Conservation District Study, Caledon (2021) Alton Heritage Consern Her Contact Port Stanley Heritage Conservation District Plan (2021) Port Stanley HeritaStanle Port Credit Heritage ConservationPort Credit Herredit H District Plan, Mississauga (2018) 200-540 Bingemans Centre Drive e Drive Town of Cobourg Heritage Conservation District Plan updates Town of CTown of C Kitchener, ON A N2B 3X9 (2016) (2016)(2016) Rondeau Heritage Conservation District Plan, Chatham Kent (2016) Ronde T: 519 576 3650 x744 x744 Barriefield Heritage Conservation BaDistrict Plan Update, Kingston C: 519 404 6894 894 (2015) dcurrie@mhbcplan.com mhbcplan Victoria Square Heritage Conservation District Study, Markham www.mhbcplan.com mhbcplan (2015) RRR Bala Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, Township of Muskoka Lakes (2015) Brooklyn and College Hill Heritage Conservation District Plan, Guelph (2014) Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan, Toronto (2014) Downtown Meaford Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan D (2013) Heritage Master Plans and Management Plans City of Guelph Cultural Heritage Action Plan (2020) Town of Cobourg Heritage Master Plan (2016) Burlington Heights Heritage Lands Management Plan (2016) City of London Western Counties Cultural Heritage Plan (2014) Page 573 of 783 2 Cultural Heritage Evaluations Township of Tiny Heritage Register Review (on going) City of Barrie Heritage Register Review (2024) Aurora Heritage Register Review (2022) MacDonald Mowatt House, University of Toronto (2020) Designation of Main Street Presbyterian Church, Town of Erin (2019) Designation of St. Johns Anglican Church, Norwich (2019) Cultural Heritage Landscape evaluation, former Burlingham Farmstead, Prince Edward County (2018) ward County (2018)ward Co City of Kitchener Heritage Property Inventory Update (2016) Niagara Parks Commission Queen Victoria Park Cultural Heritage Evaluation (2016) (2016) (2016) Heritage Impact Assessments Redevelopment of former amusement park, Boblo Island (2022) Mount Pleasant Islamic Centre, Brampton (2020) Demolition of former farmhouse at 10536 McCowan Road, Markham (2020) Markham (2020)Markha Redevelopment of former Goldie and McCullough factory, Cambridge (2019) ry, Cambridge (2019)Cambridge (2019) Redevelopment of historic Waterloo Post Office (2019) 9)T Redevelopment of former industrial facility, 57 Lakeport Road, Port Dalhousie (2018) akeport Road, Port Dalhousie (2018)rt Dalhou Redevelopment of former Brick Brewery, Waterloo (2016) erloo (2016)erloo Homer Watson House Heritage Impact Assessment, Kitchener (2016) essment, Kitchener (2016)ssment, Kitche Expansion of Schneider Haus National Historic Site, Kitchener (2016) Historic Site, Kitchener (2016)c Site, Kitchener (20 Heritage Impact Assessment for Pier 8, Hamilton (2015) r 8, Hamilton (2015)on (2 F Redevelopment of former American Standard factory, Cambridge (2014) an Standard factory, Cambridge (2014)ctory, Cambridge (2014) Heritage Assessments for Infrastructure Projects and Environmental Assessments astructure Projects and Environmental Aastructure Projects and Envir Edgerton Bridge Assessmsment, Scugog (2024)sment, Scugog (202ent, Scugog (2024) Heritage and Cultural Heritaal Heritage Landscape Assessment of Twentyal Heritage Landscape Assessment of Twge Landscape Assessment of Twenty Mile Creek Arch Bridge, Town of Lincoln (2021) Heritage Evaluation of Deer River, Burnt Dam antion of Deer River, Burnt Dam and MacIntosh on of Deer River, Burnt Dam and MacIntoshd MacIntosh Bridges, Peterborough County (2021) A Heritage Assessment of 10 Bridges within Roessment of 10 Bridges within Rockcliffe Speciaent of 10 Bridges within Rockcliffe Speciackcliffe Special Policy Area, Toronto (2019) Blenheim Road Realignment CollectRoad Realignment Collector Road EA, Cambrinment Collector Road EA, Cambrior Road EA, Cambridge (2014) Badley Bridge EA, Elora (2014) Bridge EA, Elora (2014)Bridge EA, Elora (2014) Black Bridge Road EA, Cambridge (2013) ck Bridge Road EA, Cambridge (2013)ck Bridge Road EA, Cambridge (2 Conservation Plans ervation Plans ervatio Conservation Plan for Log house, Burgetz Ave., Kitchener (2020) Conservation Plan for Log hoConservation Plan for Log house, Burg R Conservation and Construction Protection Plan - 54 Margaret Avenue, Kitchener (2019) Conservation and ConstructioConservation and Construction Prot Black Bridge Strategic Conservation Plan, Cambridge (2013) ack Bridge Strategic Conservaack Bridge Strategic Conser Tribunal Hearings: rings: rings: Redevelopment 18 Portland Street, Toronto (OLT) (2023) ent 18 Poent 18 Po Redevelopment 292 Main Street, Grimbsy (OLT) (2023) t29t29 D Redevelopment 1919 to 1949 Devonshire Court, Windsor (OLT) (2023) Redevelopment 9 Dee Road, Queenston (OLT) (2023) Redevelopment 18314 Hurontario Street, Caledon Village (OLT) (2023) Redevelopment 217 King Street S, Waterloo (OLT) (2022) Redevelopment 147 Main Street, Grimsby (OLT) (2022) Redevelopment of 12 Pearl Street, Burlington (OLT) (2021) Page 574 of 783 3 Designation of 30 Ontario Street, St. Catharines (CRB) (2021) Designation of 27 Prideaux Street, Niagara on the Lake (CRB) (2021) Redevelopment of Langmaids Island, Lake of Bays (LPAT) (2021) Redevelopment of property at 64 Grand Ave., Cambridge (LPAT) (2019) Youngblood subdivision, Elora (LPAT) (2019) Demolition 174 St. Paul Street (Collingwood Heritage District) (LPAT) (2019) Port Credit Heritage Conservation District (LPAT) (2018) Brooklyn and College Hill HCD Plan (OMB) (2015) Rondeau HCD Plan (OMB) (2015) Designation of 108 Moore Street, Bradford (CRB) (2015) Downtown Meaford HCD Plan (OMB) (2014) Master Plans, Growth Management Strategies and Policy Studies Township of West Lincoln East Smithville Secondary Plan (2022) Town of Frontenac Islands Maryville Secondary Plan (2021) Niagara-on-the-Lake Corridor Design Guidelines (2016) Cambridge West Master Environmental Servicing Plan (2013) 13)13) Meadowlands Conservation Area Management Plan (2013) 13) T Township of Tiny Residential Land Use Study (2012) ) Port Severn Settlement Area Boundary Review (2012) 2012) Ministry of the Environment Review of the D-Series Land Use Guidelines (2012) Series Land UseSerieGuidelines (2012)nes (201 Ministry of Infrastructure Review of Performance Indicators for the Growth Plan (2011) mance Indicators for theance IndicatorGrowth Plan (2011)wth Plan Township of West Lincoln Intensification Study and Employment Land Strategy (2011) n Study and Employment dy and Employment Land Strategy (201Land Strategy (20 City of Kawartha Lakes Growth Management Strategy (2010) agement Strategy (2010)trategy (2010) F Development Planning Provide consulting services for municiunicipal and private sector clients for: unicipal and private sector clientpal and private sector clients for: Secondary Plans Draft plans of subdivision ivisionivision Consent A Official Plan Amendment Amendmentdment Zoning By-law Amendment ylaw Amendmentment Minor Variance Varianceariance Site Plan PlanPlan R D Page 575 of 783 Education University of Turin, The Rachel International Training Centre of the ILO, UNESCO Master of Arts World Heritage and Cultural Projects Redshaw ww for Development 2014 BA. MA, H.E. DIPL., CAHP Saint Francis Xavier University Rachel Redshaw, a Heritage Planner and Associate with MHBC, joined nernerandandAssociateociatewithwMHBC,join Bachelor of Arts the firm in 2018. Ms. Redshaw has a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology wwhashasaaBacheloroffArtsArtsininAnthropology Joint Advanced Major in Celtic and Celtic Studies and a Master of Araster of Artaster ofts in World Heritage and Cultural s in WorldHeritageritageandaCultural Studies and Anthropology Projects for Development. Ms. Redshaw completed her MasterÓs in Turin, nt.nt.Ms.Ms.RedshawcompletedherMasterÓsMasterinT 2012 Italy; the MasterÓs program was estarogram warogram s established by UNESCO in conjunblished by UNESCO in conjunction n conju Sabhal Mór Ostaig, University of with the University of Turin and the International Training Centre of the tytyofofTurinTuandtheInternationalInterTrainingCenen the Highlands and Islands ILO. Ms. Redshaw is a professional haw wis is a professionaa professional l member of the Canadian Association memmember of the Canadia Higher Education Diploma Cultural of Heritage Professionals. Professionals.onals. Development/ Gaelic Studies T 2011 Ms. Redshaw provides a variety of heriedshaw provides a variety of heritage planninvariety otage planning services for public and private sector clientd private sector clied private sector clients. Ms. Redshnts. Ms. Redshaw has. Ms. Redshaw has worked for years completing s wor Professional Associations cultural heritage planning in a municipal setting. She has worked in culturalturalheritageheritageplanningplinamunicipalmunicipasetti municipal building and planning municipalnicipabuildinguildingandandplanningplandepartments and also completed departmeepartme Member, International Council on contract work for the private sectorcontractactworkwfortheheprivateprivatesectorsect to gain a diverse knowledge of too Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) F building and planning in respect to how they apply to cultural heritage. buildinggandandplanninganninginirespectespecttoto Professional Member, Canadian Professional History Professionalession Histo Association of Heritage Professionals ls (CAHP) Associate/ Senior Heritage PlannerAssociate/Associate/ S Seniorenr Heri, MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited Clarkson Planning Clarkson Planning Limi (2024 Î Present) (20(2024Î Presentnt) ) A Contact Senior Heritage PlannerSeniorSeniorrr H Heritaerita, MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited (2022 Î 2023) Planning LimLim 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, Unit #200 Heritage PlannerHeritag, MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Kitchener, ON ON Limited (2018 Î 2022) Limite N2B 3X9 Building Permit CoordinatorB, Township of Wellesley, Regional T: (519) 576-3650 519) 57Municipality of Waterloo (2018) RRR C: 226-868-3443 6-868-34 Building Permit Coordinator, RSM Building Consultants (20) rredshaw@mhbcplan.com w@mhbc www.mhbcplan.com plan.com Deputy Clerk, Township of North Dumfries, Regional Municipality of Waterloo (2017-2018) Building and Planning Clerk, Development Services, Township of North Dumfries, Regional Municipality of Waterloo (2015-2017) D Page 576 of 783 2 Professional Experience Experience in all facets of cultural heritage studies including cultural heritage evaluation reports, heritage impact assessments, conservation plans, salvage and documentation plans, cultural heritage screenings and heritage conservation districts and general consultation services. Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports Completion of fieldwork to determine property conditions and context Historical research to determine previous ownership and historical associations Documentation and review of architectural design of built features and landscape featuresfeaturesfeature Determine cultural heritage value or interest by evaluating the property under the prescribed the prescribed the prescri Prepare a Statement of Cultural Heritage Value or Interest and heritage attributes;attributes;ttribut Provide further recommendations for cultural heritage studies as needed;edededed;; Assist with designation processes including the drafting of designation by-laws.ation byation by-laws. Heritage Impact Assessments and Heritage Permit Applications onsons Review proposed development plans and provide a preliminary minary review of potential impacts;minary review of potentiareview of potential impacts; Assess impacts to identified heritage attributes; T Provide mitigation and conservation measures as necessary;necessary; Assist in the completion of heritage permit applications and notice of intention to demolish.plications and notice of intention to demoliof intensh Conservation Plans (including Temporary Protection Plans) rotection Plans)tection Plans Review proposed alterations within the context of the Sthe context of the Standards and xt of the Standards and andards and Guidelines for the Conservation of HistoricGuidelines foines fo Places in Canada and other guiding conservation principles;ng conservation principles;on principles; F Coordinate with the project team appropriate approaches to conservationam appropriate appproaches to conservationproaches to conservation Prepare temporary protection plans which may include coon plans which may include coordination of don plans which may include coorordination of demolition, stabilization and vibration monitoring plans; Prepare risk management plans;ment plans;ment pl Facilitate the overseeing of seeing of conservation works and provide conseeing of conservation works and provideconservation works and provide consultation as needed. A Salvage and Documentation Plans mentation Plans tation P Complete necessary fieldwork to docute necessary fieldwork to document and identeldwork to document and identment and identify salvageable items; Coordinate architectural drawings as necessary;dinate ardinate archichitectural drawings as necessarytectural drawings; Develop plan for the extraction, storagevelop plan evelop plan for the for the extraction, stoextraction, storage and rerae and re-use of salvageable material. Cultural Heritage Screenings, Assessment and Baseline Condition Reports ural Heritage ural HeScreenings, Assessment ings, Assessment aa Complete screening baseComComplete screening based on the sed od on the MCMÓs CriteriaMC R .. Prepare a description of the existing repare a drepare aescription of the exof the baseline cultural heritage conditions; Identification of potential project-tification of potential prtification of potential pspecific impacts and recommendations of preliminary mitigation measures. Heritage Conservation District Studies and Plans rvation Distrvation Dist Undertaking preliminary review of historic relimrelimcontext and completing historical research; D Conduct and inventory of existing resources within the Study Area; Classifying the inventory of existing contributing resources within the Study Area and proposed HCD boundary; Prepare policies and guidelines appropriate for the proposed HCD; Facilitate public consultation including consultation with the municipal heritage committee for the Study and Plan. Page 577 of 783 3 Interpretation Plans Prepare commemorative text to commemorate the cultural heritage value of the site (s); Design the layout of the interpretative panel; Design the integration of interpretative panels and other interpretative features (i.e. art installation, landscaping). Selected Project Experience Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments 386 Wilcox Street, Hamilton (Former Stelco Site) Promenade at Clifton Hill, Niagara Falls (Niagara Parks Commission) 16-20 Queen Street North, Kitchener (Former Economical Insurance Building) Peterborough Lift Lock and Trent-Severn Waterway (TSW), National Historic Sites, Development for 380 Armourc Sites, Development for 380 Ac Sites, Developm Road, City of Peterborough 47 and 67 Village Drive, Kingston Middlesex County Court House, National Historic Site, for development at 50 King Streetent at 50 King Streetent at McDougall Cottage and National Historic Site, for development at 93 Grand Avenue South, City of Kitchenert 93 Grand Avenue South, City of Kitchenert 93 Grand Avenue South, City of Kitch City of Waterloo Former Post Office, Development for 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo, Phase IIKing Street North, City of Waterloo, Phase IIKing Street North, City of Waterloo, Phase II ConsumersÓ Gas Station B, Development for 450 Eastern Avenue, City of Torontovenue, City of Torontovenue, City of Toronto 290 MacPherson Avenue, Hydro Station, Toronto, Ontariooo 82 Weber Street and 87 Scott Street, City of Kitchenerr T 39 Wellington Street West, City of Brampton 543 Ridout Street North, City of London 34 Manley Street, Village of Ayr, Township of North DumfriesNorth DumfriesNor QuinteÓs Isle Campark, 558 Welbanks Road, Prince Edward County (OLT)d, Prince Edward County (OLT), Prince Edward County (OLT) 174 St. Paul Street, Town of Collingwood (OLT)d (OLT)OLT) 45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener 383-385 Pearl Street, City of Burlingtonngton F St. PatrickÓs Catholic Elementary School, (SPCES), 20 East Avenue South, City of Hamiltony School, (SPCES), 20 East Avenue South, CitS), 20 East Avenue South, Cit 250 Allendale Road, City of CambridgeCambridgeambridg 249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughanof Vaughanof Vaughan 1395 Main Street, City of CambridgeofofCambridgeCambridge 10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markhamnedy Road, City of Markhamnedy Road, City of Ma 10159 McCowan Road, Markham (OLT)Road, Markham (OLTRoad, Markham (OLT)) A Cultural Heritage Screenings and Cultural Heritage Study: Existing Conditions and Preliminary Impact ge Screenings and Cultural Heritage Studngs and Cultural Heritage Stud Assessment Kelso Conservation Area, Halton Countyelso Conservation Area, Halton Countyelso Conservation Area, Halton Cou 5th Side Road, County Road 53, Simcoe County5th Side Road, County Road 53, Simcoe5th Side Road, County Road 53, Simcoe Cou Waterdown Trunk Watermain Twinning Project, City of HamiltonWaterdown Trunk Watermain Twinning PWaterdown Trunk Watermain Twinning P West Caledon Transmission WeWest Caledon Transmission Main andssion Main and Storage Facility Class EA Screening Report R Napanee Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) NapanNapanee Battery Energy Storage StoSProject Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports Heritage Evaluation RepoHeritage Evaluation Re 200 Collip Circle, Western Unllipllip Circle, CirclWesternWesterniversity, London, Ontario 52 King Street North, City of Kitchenertreet North, treet North, Sarnia Collegiate Institute aniate Iniate Ind Technical School (SCITS), 275 Wellington, City of Sarnia (Municipal contingency D study) 10536 McCowan Road, City of Markham Former Burns Presbyterian Church, 155 Main Street, Town of Erin (Designation Report) Former St. PaulÓs Anglican Church, 23 Dover Street, Town of Otterville, Norwich Township (OLT) 6170 Fallsview Boulevard, City of Niagara Falls Page 578 of 783 4 Conservation Plans and Temporary Protection Plans 37-43 Mill Street West, Elora, Ontario City of Waterloo Former Post Office, 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo 82 Weber Street East, City of Kitchener 87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener (Awarded a municipal award) 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener 1395 Main Street, City of Kitchener 10379 & 10411 Kennedy Road, City of Markham 16-20 Queen Street North, Kitchener 12 & 54 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener 45 Duke Street, City of Kitchener 82 Weber Street West and 87 Scott Street, City of Kitchener 660 Sunningdale Road, London Documentation and Salvage Reports Gaslight District, 64 Grand Avenue South, City of Cambridge 16-20 Queen Street North, City of Kitchener 57 Lakeport Road City of St. Catharines 242-262 Queen Street South, City of Kitchener 721 Franklin Boulevard, City of Cambridge T Heritage Permit Applications 16-20 Queen Street North, Kitchener 43 Mill Street West, Elora 35-41 King Street North, City of Waterloo (Old Post Office), Phase II (alteration to building with a municipalerloo (Old Post Office), Phase II (alteration tod Post Office), Phase II (alteration to heritage easement, Section 37, OHA)HA) F 50-56 Weber Street West & 107 Young Street, City of Kitchener (demolition and new construction within HCD)7 Young Street, City of Kitchener (demolition aCity of Kitchener (demolition a 30-40 Margaret Avenue, City of Kitchener (new construction within HCD)of Kitchener (new construction within HCD)of Kitchener (new construction within HCD) 249 Clarence Street, City of Vaughan (alteration within HCD)of Vaughan (alteration within HCD)of Vaughan (alteration within HC 174 St. Paul Street, Town of Cown of Collingwood (demolition within HCD)wn of Collingwood (demolition witllingwood (demolition within HCD) Heritage Conservation District/ Heritage Character Study on District/ Heritage Character Studyn District/ Heritage Character Study A Melville Street Heritage CoreetHeritage Conservation District Studyage Conservation District Studynservation District Study Stouffville Heritage Conslle Heritage Conservation District Studynservation ervation District Study Elgin, Central and Memorial Neighbou, Central and Memorial Neighbourhoods, Mun, Central and Memorial Neighrhoods, Municipality of Clarington Town of Aurora Heritage Register Updateown of Aurora Heritage Register Updateown of Aurora Heritage Register U R D Page 579 of 783 Education Willowbank School of Christy Restoration Arts Diploma in Heritage Conservation 2024 Messors Field School Kirwan Art Conservation and Cultural Heritage Landscapes Workshop BA, Dipl., CAHP-Intern Completed 2023 Christy is a Heritage Planner with MHh MHBC MHBC BC who joined the firm in 2023. She whojoined the firm in 202joined t holds a Diploma in Heritage Conservation from the Willowbank School of Conservation from the Willowbank SchooConservation from the Willo University of California: Santa Restoration Arts and a BachelorÓs Degree in History from the University of helorÓs Degree in History from the University helorÓs Degree in History from th Cruz California: Santa Cruz where she graduated where she graduated where s with Department with Departwith D Bachelor of Arts in History 2010 Honours and College Honours. Christy has experience in research and e Honours. Christy has experience in reseae Honours. Christy has experience in rese report writing for both public and privboth public and private sector clients. She hasboth public and private sector clients. She hasate sector clients. She has completed historical research, inventory work, and evaluation on a variety of projects, arch, inventory work, and evaluation on a varieh, inventory work, and e Professional Associations including cultural heritage landscapes, cultural heritage evaluation reports, ultural heritage ritage landscapes, landscapescultural heritage e T and heritage impact assessments. She currently serves on the Provincial ritageimpact assessments. sessmentsShe currently serv Intern Member, Board of Directors of the Architectural Conservancy of Ontario. d of Directors of the Architectural Conservancd of Directors of the Architectu Canadian Association of Heritage Professionals (CAHP) Prior to joining MHBC, Christy gained Prior to joining MHBC, Christy gained experieor to joining MHBC, Christy gained exexperience as a Heritage Intern for the Town of Grimsby. She has also received hands-on training from the the Town of Grimsby. She has also receiTown of Grimsby. She has also rece Provincial Board Director at Large Messors Field School in art and monument restoration and previously Messors Field School in art and monors Field School in art and mon and Education Committee Member, F worked in the skilled worked in the skilled in the skilled trades restorind trades restorintrades restoring heritage buildings and fine furniture. Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (ACO) Professional History Professional Histssion Emerging Professional Member, Heritage PlannerHeritage PlanneHeritage Planner, MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning , Mac International Council on Limited Limited Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) COMO (2023 Î Present) (20(202323 Î Presentnt) ) A Member, Heritage Carpentry ApprenticeHeritage CarHeritage Car, Bruce Chambers Period Furniture Canadian Association for Ltd. Ltd. Conservation of Cultural f Cultur (2023) (2023) Property (CAC) AC) Heritage InternHer, Town of Grimsby (2023) (2 Heritage Contractor, DJ McRae Heritage Restoration RRRRR (2022) Contact 540 Bingemans Centre Drive ntre Drive Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 9 DDD T: 519 576 3650 ckirwan@mhbcplan.com www.mhbcplan.com Page 580 of 783 2 Project Experience Cultural Heritage Landscapes DoctorÓs Lane, King City and Old King Road, Nobleton, Township of King Municipal Heritage Inventories Township of Tiny, 31 properties City of Barrie, 13 properties Cultural Heritage Impact Assessments 43 Mill Street West, Elora 7631 Creditview Road, Brampton 473 Ontario Street, Cobourg 230 North Centre Road, London 3563 Bostwick Road, London 1930-1934 Sideroad 5, Bradford West Gwillimbury 260 Main Street West, Grimsby T 185 Third Street, Collingwood 228 McNeilly Road, Hamilton 1069 Highway 8, Hamilton 119 Sideroad 19, Fergus Mount Zion United Church, 473 Ridgewood Crescent, London ewood Crescent, Londonrescent, London F 66 Banfield Street, Paris 1940 Fischer-Hallman Road, Kitchener Kitchener 141 Laurel Street, Cambridge gege 5480 Major Mackenzie Drive, Markham Drive, MarkhamDrive, Markham 193, 195, 197 & 199 College Avenue, London College AvenueCollege, London, Lon 63 Courtland Avenue East, Kitchener nue East, Kitchenernue East, Kitchener 300-306 King Street West, Hamilton Street West, Hamiltonreet West, Hamilton A 35 Elgin Street, Collingwood reet, Collingwoodlingwoo 743 Richmond Street, London hmond Street, LondonLondon 11 Roy Street & 68 Queen Street North, Kitchener oy Street & 68 Queen Street North, Kitcheneroy Street & 68 Queen Street 145-152 Central Avenue, London 4545--152 Central Avenue, London152 Central Avenue, London 96 Main Street East, Hamilton 96 Main Street East, Ham96 Main Street East, Hamilton 273 Main Street North, Brampton 273 Main Street North, Bram273 Main Street North, Brampton R The London ChildrenÓs Museum, 21 Wharncliffe Road South, London The London ChildrenÓs MuseThe London ChildrenÓs Museum, 21 W 531 Talbot Street, 535-537 Talbot Street/105 Kent Street, 101 Kent Street, London 531531Talbot Street, 535Ta-537 Talbot537 T Cultural Heritage Evaluation Reports itage Evaluation Ritage Evaluation R 8 St Andrews Avenue, Grimsby ws Avenuews Avenue 12 St Andrews Avenue, Grimsby s Aves Ave D 934322 Airport Road, Mono 986 Powerline Road, Brant 53 St. Laurent Drive, Richmond Hill Conservation Plans Page 581 of 783 3 18 Portland Street, Toronto 19 East Mill Street, Elora Documentation & Salvage Plans 3078 Regional Road 56, Binbrook, Hamilton 5515 Garrard Road, Whitby Heritage Assessments for Infrastructure Projects and Environmental Assessments tsts Edgerton Road Municipal Bridge No. 11, Blackstock, Township of Scugog Warminster Sideroad, Township of Oro-Medonte Shoreline Drive, Township of Oro-Medonte Heritage Permit Applications 43 Mill Street West, Elora 7631 Creditview Road, Brampton 2051 Davis Drive, Whitchurch-Stouffville Heritage By-law Peer Reviews St. Mary's Ukrainian Catholic Church, 3625 Cawthra Road, Mississauga hra Road, Mississaugasauga Trinity Anglican Church, 26 Stavebank Road, Mississauga MississaugaMissi New Apostolic Church, 160 Margaret Avenue, Kitchener nue, Kitchenere, Kitchener 2 Guelph Street, Georgetown, Halton Hills Hills Hands-On Conservation Projects St. Paul's Anglican Church, CoulsonÓs CoulsonÓs Hill, Bradford West Gwillimbury, OntoulsonÓs Hill, Bradford West Gwillimbury, OntHill, Bradford West Gwillimbury, Ontario o Restoration and painting of 1887 Gothic doors painting of 1887 Gothic doorspainting of 1887 Gothic doors Byzantine Rupestrian Cave Frescoes, Alta Murgia, Italy Cave Frescoes, Alta Murgia, ItalyCave Frescoes, Alta Murgia, Italy o Mechanical frescoe cleaning frescoe cleaningfrescoe o Cellulose poultice frescoe cleaning e poultice frescoe cleaninge poultice frescoe cleaning o Plaster infilling and consolidation ter infilling and consolidationfilling and consolidation Burwash Hall, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Hall, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontariorsity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario o Stone masonry conservation Stone masonry conservaStone masonry conservation ooo Window installation Window installationWindow installation Cathedral of St. Alban the Martyr, Toronto, Ontario Cathedral of St. Alban the Martyr, TorCathedral of St. Alban the Martyr, Toronto, O oo Cathedral window woodwork restoration Cathedral window woodwork restowindow woodwork res 16 Elm Avenue, Branksome Hall, Toronto, Ontario 16 Elm Avenue, Branksome Hall, Toron16 Elm Avenue, Branksome Hall, Toron oo Brick masonry restoration Brick masonry restorationestor Bishop Strachan School, Toronto, Ontario Bishop Strachan School, ToroBishop Strachan School, Toronto o Window restoration and reglazing oo Window restoration aWindow restoration St. Mark's Cemetery, Niagark's Cemetery, Niagark's Cemetery, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario o Headstone monument conservation Headstone moHeadstone mo Willowbank National Historic Site, Queenston, Ontario NationaNationa o Decorative plaster repair titi o Wood window restoration o Historic flooring restoration o Stonework crack repair o Historic painting Page 582 of 783 Education Fanshawe College Paul Jae GIS and Urban Planning 2020 University of Seoul, South Korea Bachelor of Urban Planning Woong Lee LeeLe 2005 BE Contact Paul Jae Woong Lee, a Technician with MHBC, joined the firm in 2022 and n with MHBC, joined the firm in 202n with MHBC, joined 540 Bingemans Centre Drive, provides a variety of technical design and drafting services for public and design and drafting services for public a design and drafting servic Unit #200 private sector clients. Kitchener, ON N2B 3X9 Prior to working for MHBC, Paul received his GIS & Urban Planning MHBC, MHBC,Paul receivedhis GIS& Urban Pl& Urban Diploma from Fanshawe College in 2020 and worked as a draft technician shawe shawe College in 2020 and worked as a draft tCollege in 2020 and worked as a draft t T: (519) 576-3650 at a consulting firm. firm.rm. C: 226-868-3443 pjwlee@mhbcplan.com T Before Paul came to Canada, he also ul came to Canada, he also Canada, he alsoreceived a bachelorÓs degree in urban receiveda bachelor www.mhbcplan.com planning from the University of Seoul and worked as an urban planner in g from the University of ersity of SSeoul and worked as Korea. He is in the process of becoming a member of the Canadian ea. He is in the process of becoming a mea. He is in the process of b Association of Certified Planning Technicians. Association of Certified Planning Technicians.sociation of Certified Planning Techn F Professional History Professional Historyfessional History Planning & Design TechnicianPlanning g& Design Technic& Des, MacNaughton Hermsen Britton Clarkson Planning Limited (2022 Î Present) Clarkson PlanninClarkson Planning Limited ( Drafting TechnicianDrafting TechnicDrafting Technician, GeoPro Consulting Limited (2020 Î 2021) GIS Technician (Co-Op Student)GIS Technician (GIS Technician (, Aamjiwnaang First Nation (2019) A PlannerPlannernner, Dongbu Engineering Co., Ltd., DonDon (South Korea) (2016-2017) PlannerPlanner, JU Engineering Co., Ltd. (South Korea) (2014-2016) PlannerPlan, DOHWA Engineering Co., Ltd. (South Korea) (2005-2014) RRR D Page 583 of 783