Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Agenda - 2025-08-25Council Meeting Agenda Monday, August 25, 2025, 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers - Hybrid City of Kitchener 200 King Street W, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 People interested in participating in this meeting can register online using the delegation registration form at www.kitchener.ca/delegation or via email at delegation kitchener.ca. Please refer to the delegation section on the agenda below for registration in-person and electronic participation deadlines. Written comments received will be circulated prior to the meeting and will form part of the public record. The meeting live -stream and archived videos are available at www.kitchener.ca/watchnow *Accessible formats and communication supports are available upon request. If you require assistance to take part in a city meeting or event, please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994.* Pages 1. COMMENCEMENT The meeting will begin with a Land Acknowledgement given by the Mayor and the singing of "O Canada." 2. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL Minutes to be accepted as circulated to the Mayor and Councillors (regular meeting held June 23, 2025, and special meetings held June 23, 2025 and August 11, 2025) - Councillor S. Stretch. 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF Members of Council and members of the City's local boards/committees are required to file a written statement when they have a conflict of interest. If a conflict is declared, please visit www.kitchener.ca/conflict to submit your written form. 4. COMMUNICATIONS REFERRED TO FILE - NIL 5. C: PRESENTATIONS 5.1 Award Presentations 5.1.a Growing Together • 2025 CNU Charter Award by the Congress of New Urbanism • 2025 Canadian Award for Planning Excellence by the Canadian Institute of Planners 5.1.b City Hall Service Centre • 2025 Peter J. Marshall Innovation Award by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario 5.2 Strategic Plan 2023-2026 — Compass Kitchener 2024 Report Card, CAO -2025-366, listed as item 11.2.a 5.2.a Rodney Gill and Judy Stephen Wells, Compass Kitchener DELEGATIONS Pursuant to Council's Procedural By-law, delegations are permitted to address the Committee for a maximum of five (5) minutes. All Delegations where possible are encouraged to register prior to the start of the meeting. For Delegates who are attending in-person, registration is permitted up to the start of the meeting. Delegates who are interested in attending virtually must register by 5:00 p.m. on August 25, 2025, in order to participate electronically. 6.1 Official Plan Amendment Application OPA25/005/F/AP, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/001/F/AP, 132 Fairway Road North, Maxwell Building Consultants Ltd., DSD -2025-310, listed as Item 7.3.d 6.1.a Gary Smith 6.1.b Jenna Wenzel, GSP Group and Peter Maxwell 6.2 Notice of Motion - D. Chapman - Responsible Growth and Opposition to Elements of Bill 5, listed as item 9.5 6.2.a Alex Latta, Waterloo Region Climate Collaborative 6.3 Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-015 and HPA-2025-016 - 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, DSD -2025-324. listed as item 7.1.a 6.3.a Judy Hight 6.3.b Andrew McVicar 6.3.c Christina Hall, Developmental Services Ontario 6.3.d Lisa Reitzel, Elmira District Community Living 6.3.e Dan Currie, MHBC Planning, Steve Burrows, Facet Design Studio and Page 2 of 112 Robert Fewster 7. REPORTS OF COMMITTEES 7.1 HERITAGE KITCHENER - AUGUST 5, 2025 7.1.a Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-015 and HPA-2025-016 - 11 14 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, DSD -2025-324 That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-015, as outlined in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-324, to permit the demolition of the single -detached building located on the property municipally addressed as 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North be refused; and further, That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA-2025-V-016 to permit the demolition of the single -detached building located on the property municipally addressed as 68 Queen Street North be refused. 7.1.b Notice of Intention to Designate 14 Irvin Street Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2025-279 That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 14 Irvin Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-284. 7.1.c Notice of Intention to Designate 18 Irvin Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2025-284 That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 18 Irvin Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-284. 7.1.d Notice of Intention to Designate 2219 Ottawa Street South & 808 Bleams Road under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2025- 243 That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate property described as Part 1 of Lot 129 German Company Tract within a submitted draft Reference Plan, and currently municipally addressed as 2219 Ottawa Street South / 808 Bleams Road as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Page 3 of 112 Department report, DSD -2025-243. 7.1.e Notice of Intention to Designate 35 Roos Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2025-302 That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 35 Roos Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest, as outlined in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-302. 7.2 FINANCE AND CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE - AUGUST 11, 2024 7.2.a Idlewood Greenway, INS -2025-321 That 2026 funding of $5.36M be reallocated from the Middle Strasburg Naturalization project to the Idlewood Greenway project, as outlined in Infrastructure Services Department report INS -2025-321; and further, That the Idlewood Greenway funding in 2026 be preapproved for tender in 2025. 7.2.b Property Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing - Union Co-operative, FIN -2025-323 That the draft by-law attached to report Financial Services Department report FIN -2025-323 as Appendix "A", allowing units qualifying as a Municipal Housing Project Facility (as defined in By- law 2024-152) located at 475-477 Lancaster Street West to participate in the Regional Municipality of Waterloo's Municipal Housing Facility Property Tax Exemption program and therefore exempting them from the City's portion of the property tax levy, be approved. 7.2.c Strategic Plan Check-in Report - Insights and Adjustments at the Midway Mark, CAO -2025-312 "That the following adjustments be made to initiatives contained within the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan as outlined in the jointly authored report between the City of Kitchener and KerrSmith Design, titled Kitchener's Strategic Plan Check-in: Insights and Adjustments at the Midway Mark, dated July 24, 2025 and attached to Chief Administrative Officers report CAO -2025-312: (1) Sport and Recreation Master Plan, (2) City -led Recreation & Leisure Program Review be referred and revisited as part of the development of the 2027-2030 Page 4 of 112 Strategic Plan, (3) Make it Kitchener 2.0 Scoped Refresh — Supporting Economic Resiliency, (4) Implementation of the Downtown Safety & Security Action Plan — be added; and further, That staff be directed to take the following actions aimed at addressing additional strategic plan midway check-in insights, including: (1) further exploring the theme of social resilience, (2) supporting innovative and cost-effective service delivery through targeted Lean training and prioritized Innovation Lab projects, and (3) improving strategic goal reporting via refined indicators." 7.2.d Kitchener Indoor Recreation Facility Public Artwork Commission, DSD -2025-263 That the commission and installation of a new artwork "Gidinawendimin" by Jackie Traverse, at the City of Kitchener's new indoor recreation complex at RBJ Schlegel Park, be approved, as outlined in the Development Services Department report DSD -2025- 263; and further, That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to implement an agreement, satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with the artists' representative, Highness Global Inc., outlining the obligations of the facility public art commission. 7.3 PLANNING AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES COMMITTEE - AUGUST 11, 2025 7.3.a Private Street Naming — 15 - 105 Mooregate Crescent, DSD -2025- 325 That the City of Kitchener acknowledge that the Regional Municipality of Waterloo intends to name a private street: 'Mooregate Way' within a multiple residential development located at 15 - 105 Mooregate Crescent, as shown in Attachment 'D' of Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-325; and further, That the City's Legal Services Division be directed to proceed with the required advertising, preparation, and registration of the necessary By-law for the naming of 'Mooregate Way'. Page 5 of 112 7.3.b Draft Plan of Subdivision Modification Application (Stage 4, 30T- 08204), Official Plan Amendment Application OPA24/015/T/AP, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA24/010/T/AP, 468 Trussler Road, Activa Holdings Inc., DSD -2025-039 That the City of Kitchener, pursuant to Section 51 (44) of the Planning Act R.S.O. 1990, Chapter P 13, as amended, modify the conditions of draft approval for Draft Plan of Subdivision Application 30T-08204, in the City of Kitchener, for Activa Holdings Inc., for the property municipally addressed as 468 Trussler Road, in the form shown in the Third Modification to Conditions of Draft Approval, attached to Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-039 as Attachment `A'; and, That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA24/015/T/AP for Activa Holdings Inc. be approved, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Report DSD -2025-039 as Attachment `B'; and further, That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA24/010/T/AP for Activa Holdings Inc. be approved in the form shown in the Proposed By-law and Map No. 1, attached to Report DSD -2025-039 as Attachment `C'. 7.3.c Official Plan Amendment Application OPA25/004/L/BB, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/009/L/BB, Block 1, 58A-711 - Sandra Springs Subdivision, 2597316 Ontario Corp., DSD -2025-286 That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA25/004/L/BB for 2597316 Ontario Corp. requesting to change the Land Use on Map 3 from `Mixed Use' to `Low Rise Residential', for Block 1, 58A-711 - Sandra Springs Subdivision, be approved, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-286 as Attachments 'Al', and `A2'; and further, That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/009/L/BB to change the zoning from `MIX -1' to `RES -5' be approved in the form shown in the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. 1', attached to Report DSD -2025-286 as Attachments `131' and `B2'. 7.3.d Official Plan Amendment Application OPA25/005/F/AP, Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/001/F/AP, 132 Fairway Road North, Maxwell Building Consultants Ltd., DSD -2025-310 That Official Plan Amendment Application OPA25/005/F/AP for Maxwell Building Consultants Ltd. for the property muncipally addressed as 132 Fairway Road North, requesting to add Specific Page 6 of 112 Policy Area 83 to permit a multiple dwelling with a Floor Space Ratio of 1.33 on the parcel of land specified and illustrated on Schedule `A', be approved, in the form shown in the Official Plan Amendment attached to Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-310 as Attachment `A'; and, That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA2/011/F/AP for Maxwell Building Consultants Ltd. for the property municipally address as 132 Fairway Road North, be approved in the form shown in the Proposed By-law and Map No. 1 attached to Report DSD -2025-310 as Attachment `B'; and further, That the Revised Urban Design Brief, prepared by GSP Group Inc., dated July 2025, attached as Attachment `C' to report DSD -2025-310, be endorsed, and that staff be directed to implement the Revised Urban Design Brief through a future Site Plan Application Approval process and, at the discretion of the City's Director of Development and Housing Approvals, significant changes to the Revised Urban Design Brief will be to the satisfaction of Council. 7.3.e Kitchener 2051 - Preferred Growth Scenario, DSD -2025-318 That the Preferred Approach to Growth as presented in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-318 be used to inform the development of a draft Official Plan (Kitchener 2051). 7.3.f Parkland Acquisition Strategy, DSD -2025-331 That staff be directed to develop a Parkland Acquisition Strategy and report back to Council prior to March 31, 2026, as outlined in Development Services Department report, DSD -2025-331; and further, That staff be directed to identify government owned properties of interest in each ward for repurpose to potentially address parkland deficits in identified Critical Needs Areas and circulate this data to Council prior to the end of 2025. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - NIL 9. NEW BUSINESS 9.1 - MAYORAL BUSINESS AND UPDATES - MAYOR B. VRBANOVIC 9.2 Notice of Motion - M. Johnston - Dog Designation Process Enhancements Councillor M. Johnston has given notice to introduce the following motion for consideration this date: Page 7 of 112 "WHEREAS the City of Kitchener Municipal Code ("the Code") Chapter 420 "Dog — Designations" provides for the designation of dogs as "dangerous" and "prohibited" and Chapter 421 "Dog — Responsible Ownership" provides for the role of the Animal Services Provider, the Humane Society of Kitchener Waterloo and Stratford Perth ("Humane Society"); and, WHEREAS the City contracts services to the Humane Society to respond and investigate complaints of dog incidents, including issuing orders to dog owners to designate dogs as "dangerous" and "prohibited"; and, WHEREAS the dogs' owner may appeal the order to the Dog Designation Appeal Committee, which has powers under Chapter 420 to affirm, modify, substitute, or rescind the animal services provider's designation of the dog as potentially dangerous, dangerous, restricted, or prohibited, as the case may be; and, WHEREAS a number of serious dog incidents have recently come to the attention of City Council; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the staff be directed to investigate and report back by September 29, 2025 process enhancements including but not limited to, • Notification from By-law Enforcement Staff to the Ward Councillor, Mayor, Office of Mayor and Council staff when the Humane Society issues a "dangerous" or "prohibited" dog order, • Periodic reports from By-law Enforcement staff to Council on actions and investigations undertaken by the Humane Society to ensure Owners of designated dogs are complying with the designation requirements; • Revising content on the city's website to clearly direct search inquiries on reporting dangerous dogs to the Humane Society; • Collaborating with the Humane Society on a process to share permitted information once a complaint has been received, in accordance with the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act; and, • Legislative challenges with the Dog Owners Liability Act (DOLA) that would improve the city's ability to obtain an interim order permitting the Humane Society to hold a dog seized under a warrant in a pound until the DOLA hearing." Page 8 of 112 9.3 Notice of Motion - S. Davey - Postage Advocacy Councillor S. Davey has given notice to introduce the following motion for consideration this date: "WHEREAS Postage costs have seen significant increases, including 25% in 2025 alone, WHEREAS paper billing has a further environmental cost in both materials (trees) and transportation, WHEREAS paper billing is increasingly being displaced by environmentally friendly and cost-efficient e -billing, WHEREAS the Municipal Act indicates the right to a paper bill, and cost -recovery fees for paper billing for tax, and utility bills are unclear, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Kitchener City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Municipal Act to permit municipalities the ability to grandfather -out paper billing as the default option, and to permit municipalities to establish fees for paper billing for new accounts that opt for this method of delivery. THEREFORE BE IT FINALLY BE RESOLVED that a copy of this motion be sent to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the Premier of Ontario, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and housing, all other municipalities within Ontario for their consideration and possible endorsement." 9.4 Notice of Motion - D. Chapman - Responsible Growth and Opposition to Elements of Bill 5 Councillor D. Chapman has given notice to introduce the following motion for consideration this date: "WHEREAS the Government of Ontario has enacted Bill 5: Protecting Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, 2025, which proposes substantial changes to environmental planning frameworks, including replacing the Endangered Species Act and the creation of Special Economic Zones that may override local planning authority and environmental oversight; and, WHEREAS the City of Kitchener is committed to increasing housing supply across the continuum and to economic prosperity but believes that this must be balanced with responsible growth Page 9 of 112 and environmental sustainability; and, WHEREAS the City of Kitchener has taken proactive steps to streamline development processes while upholding environmental responsibility and public accountability; and, WHEREAS Bill 5 risks weakening protections for natural heritage systems, undermining biodiversity, and diminishing the ability of municipalities to manage growth in a manner consistent with local priorities and long-term planning objectives; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Kitchener Council: 1. Opposes the provisions in Bill 5 related to special economic zones that reduce environmental protections or override municipal planning authority; 2. Urges the Province of Ontario to support housing and infrastructure development in ways that align with sound environmental planning and empower municipalities to develop local planning tools; 3. Calls on the Province to engage in meaningful consultation with municipalities, Indigenous communities, and environmental stakeholders before implementing measures that affect local governance and environmental integrity; 4. Directs that a copy of this resolution be sent to: • The Honourable Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario; • The Honourable Rob Flack, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; • The Honourable Todd J. McCarthy, Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; • The Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO); • The Ontario Big City Mayors (OBCM); • All Ontario municipalities." 9.5 Notice of Motion - P. Singh - Kitchener Connect Festival Councillor P. Singh has given notice to introduce the following motion for consideration this date: Page 10 of 112 "WHEREAS the City of Kitchener is committed to fostering a welcoming, inclusive, and engaged community for all residents — both new and long-standing; and, WHEREAS the City has seen significant success in engaging members of the community through the many events and festivals it organizes and supports; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT as part of the Special Event & Festival action plan which is being developed in 2025, staff be directed to consider the addition of a new annual festival known as "Kitchener Connect" which could include the following elements: • Showcase City Services: Provide information booths and interactive sessions with representatives from various City departments (e.g., Planning, Parks, Bylaw, and others) to answer questions and distribute resources. • Support Local Not -for -Profit Organizations: Offer exhibition space for local organizations to highlight their services, recruit volunteers, and engage with residents. • Promote Volunteerism: Host a volunteer fair to connect residents with opportunities to contribute to the community and support local causes. • Deliver Interactive Learning Experiences: Include workshops, presentations, and hands-on activities related to City initiatives, bylaws, and strategic plans to enhance residents' understanding of local governance. • Foster Community Connection: Create a lively and inclusive atmosphere with entertainment, cultural performances, food vendors, and activities for all age groups to encourage engagement and participation." 10. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 11. STAFF REPORTS 11.1 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 11.1.a Notice of Intention to Designate 69 Agnes Street and Notice of 17 Intention to Designate 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, DSD -2025-363 11.2 FOR INFORMATION 11.2.a Strategic Plan 2023-2026 — Compass Kitchener 2024 Report Card, 60 Page 11 of 112 CAO -2025-366 11.2.b Summary of Bid Solicitations Approved by the Chief Procurement 88 Officer (Apr 1, 2025 — Jun 30, 2025), FIN -2025-307 11.2.c 2025 June Variance Report, FIN -2025-365 93 12. BY-LAWS 12.1 THREE READINGS 12.1.a Being a by law to provide for the widening of part of Pinnacle Drive as a public highway in the City of Kitchener. (By-law 2025-086) 12.1.b Being a by-law to name a private road as Bridlewood Crescent, in the City of Kitchener. (By-law 2025-087) 12.1.c To further amend By-law No. 2019-113, being a by-law to regulate traffic and parking on highways under the jurisdiction of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener. (By-law 2025-088) 12.1.d Being a by-law to designate the property municipally addressed as 241-247 Duke Street West and 55 Victoria Street North, in the City of Kitchener as being of historic and cultural heritage value or interest. (By-law 2025-089) 12.1.e Being a by-law to designate the property municipally addressed as 1865 Huron Road, in the City of Kitchener as being of historic and cultural heritage value or interest. (By-law 2025-090) 12.1.f To further amend By-law No. 2010-190, being a by-law to prohibit unauthorized parking of motor vehicles on private property. (By-law 2025-091) 12.1.g To further amend By-law No. 2008-117, being a by-law to authorize certain on -street and off-street parking of vehicles for use by persons with a disability, and the issuing of permits in respect thereof. (By-law 2025-092) 12.1.h To further amend By-law No. 88-171, being a by-law to designate private roadways as fire routes and to prohibit parking thereon. (By-law 2025-093) Page 12 of 112 12.1.1 To confirm all actions and proceedings of the Council for August 25, 2025. (By-law 2025-101) 12.2 LATE STARTER BY-LAWS TO BE ADDED TO THE AGENDA, PENDING APPROVAL OF THE REPORTS OF THE COMMITTEES 12.2.a Being a by-law to provide a property tax exemption for certain qualifying Municipal Housing Project Facilities located at 475-477 Lancaster Street West pursuant to section 110(9) of the Municipal Act, 2001. (By-law 2025-094) 12.2.b Being a by-law to adopt Amendment No. 67 to the Official Plan - 468 Trussler Road. (By-law 2025-095) 12.2.c Being a by-law to amend By-law No. 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — Activa Holdings Inc. — 468 Trussler Road. (By-law 2025-096) 12.2.d Being a by-law to adopt Amendment No. 65 to the Official Plan - Block 1, 58M-711 - Sandra Springs Subdivision, Lackner/Keewatin. (By-law 2025-097) 12.2.e Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener - WM. J. Gies Construction Limited, Block 1, 58M-711, Sandra Springs Subdivision, Lackner/Keewatin. (By-law 2025-098) 12.2.f Being a by-law to adopt Amendment No. 66 to the Official Plan - 132 Fairway Road North. (By-law 2025-099) 12.2.g Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — Maxwell Building Consultants Ltd. —132 Fairway Road North. 13. ADJOURNMENT (By-law 2025-100) Page 13 of 112 Church Board Mayor Berry Vrbanovic Directors City of Kitchener949 Helga McDonald, Chair Susan Dietrich, vice -Chair Dear Mayor Vrbanovic, Joan Hartwig, Secretary Roland Wolff, Treasurer On behalf of the Board and the congregation of St. Peter's Lutheran Church, we David Hartwig wish to express our deep support for St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church's proposed Erica Holz affordable and inclusive housing project for adults with disabilities at Queen Street Kris McGee Margaret Mueller and Roy Street in Kitchener. This timely and needed initiative is rooted in the values Carolyn Warnica of dignity, community and compassion, and recognizes the critical need for accessible housing solutions thatfoster independence and belongingfor some of Pastor the most vulnerable members of our community. Rev. Dr. Mark Ehlebracht Kitchener, like many Canadian cities, is facing a growing demand for affordable, Director of Music supportive housing. As you know, St. Peter's Church has made a similar Vladimir Soloviev commitment to create affordable and supportive housing in our downtown neighbourhood. While our project at 49 Queen Street will serve the underhoused, Office Administrator St. Andrew's project has an enhanced goal - to address a need for independent Andrea Fischer living among a community of adults with development disabilities. Adults with disabilities are particularly at risk of housing insecurity and social isolation. We see the St. Andrew's project clearly aligning with the City of 'nadaNel..org Kitchener's Housing for All strategy and the Region of Waterloo's Affordable GN,6"g .40 s%mgskw Housing Framework. This housing project will contribute to both the City's and the To Donate On -Line Region's goals and objectives to help ensure that every resident, regardless of www.canadahelps.org ability, has the opportunity, regardless of income or circumstance, to thrive and to participate fully in community life. The St. Andrew's initiative will create a safe, welcoming environment where adults with disabilities can access support services, build relationships, live independently and lead fulfilling lives. Thank you to the City of Kitchener for considering this proposal and to all the members, partners and supporters of the St. Andrew's KW Housing Initiative Corporation. We wholly support the vision and ................. 111-1-1-1.1111111111111".. leadership of St. Andrew's in creating this much needed infrastructure to house and In Alission support adults with disabilities, which will foster dignity, choice and independence for Utters for this community. Sincerely, Q� Helga Donald Chair, Board of Directors. St. Peter's Lutheran Page 14 of 112 O'k�r Andrw"b� -i—ec iy August 20, 2025 Mayor Vrbanovic, Councillor Chapman, Councillor Stretch, Councillor Michaud 200 King Street West, Kitchener, Ontario RE: St. Andrew's Housing Initiative St. Andrew's Kitchener 54 Queen St. N. Kitchener, ON N2H 2H2 519-578-4430 standrewskw.com We are faced with a pressing and urgent challenge: many individuals in our community - particularly people with developmental, physical, and intellectual disabilities -are struggling to find a place to live. They are often excluded from the housing market, and many are forced to remain in institutions, live with aging parents, or endure unsafe or unsuitable accommodations. At St. Andrew's, we are working to develop safe, affordable, and community-based housing, where people with differing abilities can live independently with dignity and the supports they need. St. Andrew's K -W Housing Initiative Corp. is moving forward with plans to develop safe, affordable, community-based housing on our existing property that will allow residents to live independently with the support they need. As you know, our property is located within the Civic Centre Neighbourhood Heritage District. Ultimately, the project requires the removal of heritage -designated buildings, a step that was not taken lightly. The organization explored a range of adaptive reuse options but ultimately determined that the structures could not be modified to meet modern accessibility and safety standards required. For example, we thoroughly explored options to preserve the existing buildings on site. Unfortunately, the design and condition of these structures make them unsuitable for the accessibility, safety, and support programming required for this purpose. Retrofitting would have added millions in cost and sacrificed critical features like barrier -free design, communal spaces, and on-site programming. We have applied for Heritage Permits to allow the demolition and these permits were discussed at the August 05 meeting of Heritage Kitchener. Following the discussion with Heritage Kitchener, we have crafted a proposal that we believe is a middle ground and addresses concerns expressed by the Heritage Committee. At the Council meeting on August 25, when the Heritage Permits come forward for Council consideration, we will be asking Council to approve the resolution below rather the recommendation by City staff. I believe that the resolution below addresses many concerns because it ensures that the demolition would not occur until the design of the new building has been approved by Council and all necessary planning applications have been approved. 19 Page 15 of 112 Proposed Resolution St. Andrew's Kitchener 54 Queen St. N. Kitchener, ON N2H 2H2 519-578-4430 standrewskw.com That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Heritage Permit Applications be approved to permit the demolition of the existing detached buildings located at 11 Roy Street and 68 Queen Street North, subject to the following conditions: That a Salvage & Documentation Plan in accordance with the measures outlined in the Phase I HIA be completed to the satisfaction of City Heritage Planning Staff prior to the final issuance of a Heritage Permit; and, That the owner complete a Phase II Heritage Impact Assessment and obtain heritage approval under the Ontario Heritage Act and a Building Permit under the Building Code for the proposed replacement building prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. I am seeking your support for this resolution and hope that you will assist in advancing it for consideration. Thank you in advance, Dr. Robert Fewster President, St. Andrew's K -W Housing Initiative Corp. W3Page 16 of 112 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Council Meeting DATE OF MEETING: August 25, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-783-8922 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-783-8924 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: August 14, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD -2025-363 SUBJECT: Notice of Intention to Designate 69 Agnes Street and Notice of Intention to Designate 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest; and further, That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to request that Council direct the Clerk to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the properties municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street and 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The key finding of this report is that the built structures on the two subject properties meet the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and have been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource. Both possess design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value. A Notice of Intention to Designate was published on January 24, 2025, and the mandated 120 -day period in which the designating by-law is to be passed has elapsed. The Notice of Intention to Designate is to be re -issued. There have been no changes to the property from the time of review and approval at the beginning of the year. There are no financial implications associated with this report. Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Council meeting and, previously, providing written correspondence to the property owners dated May 23, 2023, October 7, 2024 (for 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street), November 6, 2024 (for 69 Agnes Street), and in January 2025. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served to the Owner and Ontario Heritage Trust again. This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 17 of 112 REPORT: Notice of Intention to Designate for the properties municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street and 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act were brought forward to Heritage Kitchener on January 7, 2025, and Council on January 20, 2025. On this date, Council passed the following motions: "That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD -2025-013, as being of cultural heritage value or interest. " and "That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street, as outlined in Development Services Department report DSD -2025-014, as being of cultural heritage value or interest." The Notice of Intention to Designate for the properties was published in the Waterloo Regional Record, being a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Kitchener, on January 24, 2025. Under Section 29(8) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the designating by-law must be passed within 120 days after this date of publication. The 120 -day timeline has lapsed without a designating by-law being presented to be passed by Council due to a technical error. As such the process is now being re-initiated and a new Notice of Intention to Designate must be issued. During the first process when contacted, the Owners of 69 Agnes Street indicated that they had no concerns with the proposed designation. No response was received by the City from the Owners of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street. Copies of the previous staff reports as well as copies of the Statement of Significance for each property has been attached to this report. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT — Heritage Planning staff have consulted with the Heritage Kitchener Committee regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. As part of the initial Municipal Heritage Register Review Project process, property owners were invited to consult via two separate letters dated May 23, 2023, and October 7t", 2024 (80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street) and November 6th, 2024 (69 Agnes Street). Further letters were sent in January 2025, as part of the formal Notice of Intention to Designate process. As discussed in the Background section of this report, a response Page 18 of 112 was received from the Owner of 69 Agnes Street who indicated no objections with the proposed designation, and no response from the Owner of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street. Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving notice of its intention to designate a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be noted that should Council decide not to proceed with a Notice of Intention to Designate, that the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2027, after which it will be removed according to the changes enacted by Bill 23. Once removed, it cannot be re -listed on the Register again for five (5) years, i.e. January 1, 2032. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act • DSD -2025-013 Notice of Intention to Designate 69 Agnes Street • DSD -2025-014 Notice of Intention to Designate 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A— DSD -2025-013 Notice of Intention to Designate 69 Agnes Street Attachment B — Statement of Significance for 69 Agnes Street Attachment C — DSD -2025-014 Notice of Intention to Designate 80-86 Union Boulevard/571 York Street Attachment D — Statement of Significance for 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street Page 19 of 112 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-783-8922 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-783-8924 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: December 6, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2025-013 SUBJECT: Attachment A - Notice of Intention to Designate - 69 Agnes Street - DSD-2025-013.docxthe Ontario Heritage Act RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to request that Council direct the Clerk to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. • An updated Statement of Significance on the property's cultural heritage value was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on November 5, 2024. On this meeting date, the Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 69 Agnes Street be recognized, and designation pursued. • The key finding of this report is that the property municipally addressed as 69 Agnes Street meets the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and has been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource. The property is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value. • There are no financial implications with this recommendation. • Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting, providing written correspondence to the property owners dated May 23, 2023 and November 6, 2024, and consulting with Heritage Kitchener. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served to the Owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 20 of 112 69 Agnes Street is a two-storey institutional building constructed in the Art Deco architectural style. The building is situated on am irregularly shaped 1.15 acre parcel of land located on the east side of Agnes Street between Dominion Street and Park Street in the Cherry Hill Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the institutional building. Figure 1: Location Map of Subject Property A full assessment of 69 Agnes Street has been completed and included a field evaluation and detailed archival research. The findings concluded that the subject property meets the criteria for designation. An updated Statement of Significance on the property's cultural heritage value was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on November 5t", 2024. On this meeting date, the Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 69 Agnes Street be recognized, and designation pursued. This work was undertaken as part of the City of Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register (MHR) Review, initiated in February of 2023. The MHR Review is the City's response to amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act introduced in January of 2023 through Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act. Bill 200, the Homeowners Protection Act, 2024, extended the time municipalities have to designate properties listed on their municipal heritage registers until January 1, 2027. The City contacted owners of listed properties through an initial letter dated May 23, 2023, to inform them of this undertaking. Owners of properties recommended for designation in November 2024 were contacted via a second letter dated November 6t", 2024, and invited to contact the City's Heritage Planner with any comments, questions, or concerns. No response was received to either letter. Per standard procedure, should Council support the Notice of Intention to Designate, Owners will be contacted a third time through a Notice of Intention to Designate (NOID) Letter. An ad for the NOID will also be published in a newspaper. Once the letter is served and the ad posted, there will be a 30 -day appeal period in which Owners may object to the designation. Page 21 of 112 REPORT: Identifying and protecting cultural heritage resources within the City of Kitchener is an important part of planning for the future, and helping to guide change while conserving the buildings, structures, and landscapes that give the City of Kitchener its unique identity. The City plays a critical role in the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The designation of property under the Ontario Heritage Act is the main tool to provide long-term protection of cultural heritage resources for future generations. Designation recognizes the importance of a property to the local community; protects the property's cultural heritage value; encourages good stewardship and conservation; and promotes knowledge and understanding about the property. Designation not only publicly recognizes and promotes awareness, but it also provides a process for ensuring that changes to a property are appropriately managed and that these changes respect the property's cultural heritage value and interest. 69 Agnes Avenue is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. It satisfies five of the nine criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22). A summary of the criteria that is met or not met is provided in the table below. Page 22 of 112 Criteria Criteria Met Yes/No 1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a Yes rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, material, or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because it No displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design or physical value because it No demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it Yes has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or associative value because it yields, Yes or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or associative value because it Yes demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value because it is important in No defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, Yes functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. No Page 22 of 112 Figure 2: Front Facade of Subject Property Figure 3: Close-up of Northern Section of Front Fagade Page 23 of 112 Figure 4: Close up of Central Section of Front Fagade Design/Physical Value The design value of the subject property relates to the architecture of the institutional building, specifically the red brick portion constructed in 1927 with some alterations that have occurred over a period of years. 69 Agnes Street is an example of the Vernacular architectural style with Art Deco influences. The building is in good condition and features: a two storey building with an asymmetrical composition; red brick construction; exposed concrete foundation, central two storey tower and smaller tower near south end of front fagade; concrete banding below the parapet with concrete motifs; 4/4 and 1/1 windows arranged in groups of two, three, four, seven and eight with concrete sills; the north entrance features a one -storey glazed entranceway will terrazzo floor; and, the south entrance features an unclosed entranceway with roof. The influences of the Art Deco style can be seen in the streamline design of the building, repetition of elements, and the use of geometrical shapes broken up by ornamental motifs. Front Fagade The front fagade of the building is asymmetrical in its design and massing, though many of the architectural features make use of symmetry and repetition. There are two projecting towers which vertically divide the building into three major sections; the first section is north of the first tower, the central section is between the two towers, and the third section is to the south of the second tower. The northern end section can be further divided vertically into five parts. The first four are comprised 4/4 and 1/1 windows arranged into groups of three or four, with the ground floor windows having concrete sills and being separated from the second -storey windows by Page 24 of 112 decorative panels above. There is a parapet with two concrete motifs and concrete banding, and the roofline is flat and staggered. A one -storey glass vestibule projects out from the northern end sections and abuts the first tower. Above the glass vestibule there is a group of seven windows with a concrete sill. The first tower is greater in height then the adjacent sections, with a flat concrete roof. It contains a group of three -by -three 1/1 windows, the bottom row is capped by a concrete sill, and the top row is crowned with vertical cladding. The central recessed section can be vertically divided into six parts, five of which are comprised of groups of three 4/4 and 1/1 windows. As with the northern end section, the ground floor windows have concrete sills and there are decorative panels underneath the second -floor windows. The parapet is this section possesses the same concrete banding and one concrete motif, and the roofline again has some variation in its height. There is a one -storey brick addition that abuts the first tower, and it contains two groups of two 1/1 windows with concrete sills on the front and one group of two 1/1 windows on the side. The second tower is similar in appearance to the first, possessing the same grouping of three -by -three 1/1 windows with the bottom row having a concrete sill. The second tower lacks the vertical cladding that can be found in the first tower and contains one window of glass blocks on the ground floor. The southern end section of the 1927 portion of the building contains a covered entranceway with a flat roof on the ground floor, and a single group of eight windows with concrete sill on the second. The parapet contains the concrete banding but no additional motifs. Modifications The two towers, as well as the vestibule, 1 -storey ground floor addition, and roof over the second entrance do not appear to be original to the building but instead were added on sometime after then 1955 fire. Exact construction dates for these components are unknown, though a building map from 1976 show they were present. The additions utilize the same red brick and similar groupings of windows, making them compatible with the design of the original building. Other modifications include alterations to some windows, and the removal of a third central entranceway, the removal of the "Granite Club" sign that was embedded into the parapet, and changes to the decorative panels on the front fagade. Historical/Associative Value The subject property has historic and associative due to the original landowner and historic tenants as well as its association with the sport of curling and badminton with the Region. It also has the potential to contribute to an understanding of the development and progression of sports and sport associations / clubs within Kitchener and Waterloo. The sport of curling has a long history within Kitchener, with the first games being played on a rink at the corner of Gaukel and Charles Street in the early 1880's. After an initial joint venture between curling clubs from Waterloo and Kitchener failed in the mid 1920's, the Athletic Association of Kitchener and Waterloo was incorporated on August 20th, 1927. They purchased the site on Agnes Street from Kaufman Rubber Co. Ontario Ltd. in September 1927 for $2, 500. Three additional land purchases were made by the group Page 25 of 112 over the next several years to form the current holdings. The original building that was constructed on the land contained five curling ices, a dining room and kitchen, a board room, locker room, furnace room, ice equipment room, and was reported to have cost over $32,000. The K -W Granite Club official opened its doors on December 30th, 1927. In 1928 the first addition — a one -storey wooden structure — was added to the south side of the building. The addition houses more changing rooms, toilet facilities, and an expanded kitchen. In 1931 another addition was added to accommodate the badminton club. This addition provided five badminton courts, a lounge, and locker rooms and later a dining room. The sport of badminton dates to the 1920's in Kitchener, with the first reported game being played in the Kitchener Park Pavilion. The Granite Badminton Club was officially established in 1931, after two years of discussion with the Athletic Association of Kitchener and Waterloo. Though the badminton club experienced some difficulties with funding over the years, it was only ever formally closed once for a period of time during the Second World War. In 2023, the Granite Badminton assumed ownership of 69 Agnes Street, purchasing the building the club had operated out of for over 80 years. Both the curling section and badminton section of the club has played host to provincial, national, and world competition, and have boasted members who won titles at national championships. Canadian badminton championships were held at the club in 1957 and 1966, while the curling section has hosted numerous provincial championships as well as national events (the Brier 1962 and 1989, the Canadian Mixed 1969 and 1975, World Junior Championship 1980). As such the building is associated with the history of both sports at both a national and international scale. On May 8, 1955, a fire broke out which destroyed a large portion of the 69 Agnes, gutting the badminton section and causing damage to the north-east corner of the curling section. 44 days after this disaster, plans were approved for the rebuilding process. 69 Agnes Street has additional cultural heritage value due to the architect of the original building, the contractor who constructed the original building, and the architect of the major renovation that occurred after the fire in 1955. The original 1927 structure and the additions that were added between 1928 and 1952 were designed by Bernal Ambrose Jones. A native of Toronto, Jones moved to Kitchener in 1922 where he worked with Kitchener local and architect William Herbert Eugene Schmalz, establishing the firm of Schmalz & Jones Architects. It is likely the two met during their time at the Toronto firm of Darling & Pearson, where Jones worked as a draftsman and Schmalz served an apprenticeship. Their first notable work together was the 1923 Beaux-Arts Kitchener City Hall, later demolished in 1973 except for the clock towner and cupola, which stand in Victoria Park as of the date of 2024. In 1926 Schmalz & Jones Architects was disbanded and Jones commenced work under his own name. He is responsible for the design of several important or prominent buildings within Kitchener, including the 1932 Public Utilities Building (former), Church of the Good Shepherd, Olivet Evangelical United Brethren Church (now the Rockway Mennonite Church), St. John's Roman Catholic Church, and St. Mark's Lutheran Church. He was also greatly involved in the undertaking of a building programme for Freeport Hospital, initiated by the Board of Directors of the Waterloo County Health Association which was incorporated in 1920 to Page 26 of 112 manage and operate the sanitorium. He provided his architectural services to the Board, and designed the main treatment building (1929-1930), portions of the Nurses Residence (1933, 1940), and the new Medical Superintendent Residence (1938-1939). The 1927 was built by the Dunker Brothers (William, Albert, and Frederick), who inherited the Dunker Construction company (established 1887) from their father Henry Dunker. Dunker Construction was a well known and respected local building company that was in operation until 1974. The company was responsible for the construction or alteration of several notable buildings within Kitchener, including Berlins #2 Fire Hall (1913), alterations to the Kitchener Auditorium (1927-28), the Registry Theatre (1938-39), and the first K -W Rotary Crippled Childrens Centre on King Street (1957-58). Dunker Construction also aided in the advancement of construction machinery within the area — the 1937 Dunker Steam Shovel was used to excavate the million -gallon reservoir for the Kitchener Water Commission at Lakeside Park. This was the former Shoemaker Pumping Station (now Greenbrook Pumping Station in 2024), which was the first water pumping station in Kitchener. In addition to operating Dunker Construction, the brothers were active participants in the community. William Dunker, president of Dunker Construction, also served on the Kitchener Planning Board and Kitchener Relief Board. His brother Albert, president of Dunker Investments Ltd and Chairman of the Board of Directions for Dunker Construction, was Chairman of the Kitchener Water Commission for 18 years, and a member for over 26. The rebuilding of 69 Agnes Street after the 1955 fire was overseen by the local architecture firm of Jenkins and Wright. Established in 1945, Jenkins and Wright are known for work such as the 1952 restoration of `Woodside', the home on William Lyon Mackenzie King located on Welling Street North within the City, as well as the Memorial Auditorium. Contextual Value 69 Agnes Street is physically, visually, historically, and functionally linked to its surrounding. The building remains in-situ and maintains its original institutional use as a recreational complex, though in 2023 it was purchased by the K -W Badminton Club. The K -W Badminton Club had leased space from and operated within the building for over 80 years. Social Value 69 Agnes Street has social value to the surrounding community as well as the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo as a whole. Recreational facilities such as 69 Agnes Street provides a space that supports better mental and physical health, as it enables social interactions to occur and connections to be built. It also provides opportunities for different fitness activities. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 69 Agnes Street resides in the following attributes: ■ All elements related to the Art Deco architectural style, including: o two storey asymmetrical massing and composition; o red brick construction; Page 27 of 112 o central two-storey tower and smaller tower near south end of front fagade; o concrete banding below the parapet with concrete motifs; o fenestration pattern and window openings with concrete sills; o decorative paneling between the first and second storey windows; o the appearance of 4/4 multi -pane and/or single -hung windows o the north entrance featuring a one -storey glazed entranceway will terrazzo floor; and, o the south entrance featuring an unclosed entranceway with roof. ■ All elements related to the contextual value, including: o Location and orientation of the buildings along Agnes Street. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT— Heritage Planning staff have consulted with the Heritage Kitchener committee regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Property owners were invited to consult via two separate letters dated May 23, 2023 and November 6th, 2024. As discussed in the Background section of this report, no response from the Owner was received. Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving notice of its intention to designate a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be noted that should Council decide not to proceed with a Notice of Intention to Designate, that the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2027, after which it will be removed according to the changes enacted by Bill 23 and Bill 200. Once removed, it cannot be re -listed on the Register again for five (5) years, i.e. January 1, 2032. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 Municipal Heritage Register Review — November 2024 Update (DSD -2024-444) APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Statement of Significance for 69 Agnes Street. Page 28 of 112 C�'l I-,' (; HE R,uTe,f11 L L� STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value 69 AG N ES STREET ®Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 69 Agnes Street Legal Description: Plan 324 Lot 4 to 7 Part Lot 1, 2, 3 & 8 Plan 377 Part Lot 489 Year Built: 1927 / 1955 Architectural Styles: Art Deco Original Owner: KW Granite Club Original Use: Institutional (Sport Centre) Condition: Good Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 69 Agnes Street is a two-storey institutional building constructed in the Art Deco architectural style. The building is situated on an irregularly shaped 1.15 -acre parcel of land located on the east side of Agnes Street between Dominion Street and Park Street in the Cherry Hill Planning Community of the City of Kitchener within the Region of Waterloo. The principal resource that contributes to the heritage value is the institutional building. Page 29 of 112 Heritage Value 69 Agnes Street is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value. Desi_gn/Physical Value The design value of the subject property relates to the architecture of the institutional building, specifically the red brick portion constructed in 1927 with some alterations that have occurred over a period of years. 69 Agnes Street is an example of the Vernacular architectural style with Art Deco influences. The building is in good condition and features: a two storey building with an asymmetrical composition; red brick construction; exposed concrete foundation, central two storey tower and smaller tower near south end of front fapade; concrete banding below the parapet with concrete motifs; 4/4 and 1/1 windows arranged in groups of two, three, four, seven and eight with concrete sills; the north entrance features a one -storey glazed entranceway will terrazzo floor; and, the south entrance features an unclosed entranceway with roof. The influences of the Art Deco style can be seen in the the streamline design of the building, repetition of elements, and the use of geometrical shapes broken up by ornamental motifs. Front Fagade The front fagade of the building is asymmetrical in its design and massing, though many of the architectural features make use of symmetry and repetition. There are two projecting towers which vertically divide the building into three major sections; the first section is north of the first tower, the central section is between the two towers, and the third section is to the south of the second tower. The northern end section can be further divided vertically into five parts. The first four are comprised 4/4 and 1 /1 windows arranged into groups of three or four, with the ground floor windows having concrete sills and being separated from the second -storey windows by decorative panels above. There is a parapet with two concrete motifs and concrete banding, and the roofline is flat and staggered. A one -storey glass vestibule projects out from the northern end sections and abuts the first tower. Above the glass vestibule there is a group of seven windows with a concrete sill. The first tower is greater in height then the adjacent sections, with a flat concrete roof. It contains a group of three -by -three 1/1 windows, the bottom row is capped by a concrete sill, and the top row is crowned with vertical cladding. The central recessed section can be vertically divided into six parts, five of which are comprised of groups of 3 4/4 and 1/1 windows. As with the northern end section, the ground floor windows have concrete sills and there are decorative panels underneath the second -floor windows. The parapet is this section possesses the same concrete banding and one concrete motif, and the roofline again has some variation in its height. There is a one -storey brick addition that abuts the first tower, and it contains two groups of two 1/1 windows with concrete sills on the front and one group of two 1/1 windows on the side. The second tower is similar in appearance to the first, possessing the same grouping of three -by - three 1/1 windows with the bottom row having a concrete sill. The second tower lacks the vertical cladding that can be found in the first tower and contains one window of glass blocks on the ground floor. Page 30 of 112 The southern end section of the 1927 portion of the building contains a covered entranceway with a flat roof on the ground floor, and a single group of eight windows with concrete sill on the second. The parapet contains the concrete banding but no additional motifs. Modifications The two towers, as well as the vestibule, 1 -storey ground floor addition, and roof over the second entrance do not appear to be original to the building but instead were added on sometime after then 1955 fire. Exact construction dates for these components are unknown, though a building map from 1976 show they were present. The additions utilize the same red brick and similar groupings of windows, making them compatible with the design of the original building. Other modifications include alterations to some windows, and the removal of a third central entranceway, the removal of the "Granite Club" sign that was embedded into the parapet, and changes to the decorative panels on the front fagade. Historical/Associative Value The subject property has historic and associative due to the original landowner and historic tenants as well as its association with the sport of curling and badminton with the Region. It also has the potential to contribute to an understanding of the development and progression of sports and sport associations / clubs within Kitchener and Waterloo. The sport of curling has a long history within Kitchener, with the first games being played on a rink at the corner of Gaukel and Charles Street in the early 1880's. After an initial joint venture between curling clubs from Waterloo and Kitchener failed in the mid 1920's, the Athletic Association of Kitchener and Waterloo was incorporated on August 20th, 1927. They purchased the site on Agens Street from Kaufman Rubber Co. Ontario Ltd. in September 1927 for $2, 500. Three additional land purchases were made by the group over the next several years to form the current holdings. The original building that was constructed on the land contained five curling ices, a dining room and kitchen, a board room, locker room, furnace room, ice equipment room, and was reported to have cost over $32,000. The K -W Granite Club official opened its doors on December 30th, 1927. In 1928 the first addition — a one -storey wooden structure — was added to the south side of the building. The addition houses more changing rooms, toilet facilities, and an expanded kitchen. In 1931 another addition was added to accommodate the badminton club. This addition provided five badminton courts, a lounge, and locker rooms and later a dining room. The sport of badminton dates to the 1920's in Kitchener, with the first reported game being played in the Kitchener Park Pavilion. The Granite Badminton Club was officially established in 1931, after two years of discussion with the Athletic Association of Kitchener and Waterloo. Though the badminton club experienced some difficulties with funding over the years, it was only ever formally closed once for a period of time during the Second World War. In 2013, Granite Badminton assumed ownership of 69 Agnes Street, purchasing the building the club had operated out of for over 80 years. Both the curling section and badminton section of the club has played host to provincial, national, and world competition, and have boasted members who won titles at national championships. Canadian badminton championships were held at the club in 1957 and 1966, while the curling section has hosted numerous provincial championships as well as national events (the Brier 1962 and 1989, the Canadian Mixed 1969 and 1975, World Junior Championship 1980). As such the building is associated with the history of both sports at both a national and international scale. Page 31 of 112 On May 8, 1955, a fire broke out which destroyed a large portion of the 69 Agnes, gutting the badminton section and causing damage to the north-east corner of the curling section. 44 days after this disaster, plans were approved for the rebuilding process. 69 Agnes Street has additional cultural heritage value due to the architect of the original building, the contractor who constructed the original building, and the architect of the major renovation that occurred after the fire in 1955. The original 1927 structure and the additions that were added between 1928 and 1952 were designed by Bernal Ambrose Jones. A native of Toronto, Jones moved to Kitchener in 1922 where he worked with Kitchener local and architect William Herbert Eugene Schmalz, establishing the firm of Schmalz & Jones Architects. It is likely the two met during their time at the Toronto firm of Darling & Pearson, where Jones worked as a draftsman and Schmalz served an apprenticeship. Their first notable work together was the 1923 Beaux-Arts Kitchener City Hall, later demolished in 1973 except for the clock towner and cupola, which stand in Victoria Park as of the date of 2024. In 1926 Schmalz & Jones Architects was disbanded and Jones commenced work under his own name. He is responsible for the design of several important or prominent buildings within Kitchener, including the 1932 Public Utilities Building (former), Church of the Good Shepherd, Olivet Evangelical United Brethren Church (now the Rockway Mennonite Church), St. John's Roman Catholic Church, and St. Mark's Lutheran Church. He was also greatly involved in the undertaking of a building program for Freeport Hospital, initiated by the Board of Directors of the Waterloo County Health Association which was incorporated in 1920 to manage and operate the sanitorium. He provided his architectural services to the Board, and designed the main treatment building (1929-1930), portions of the Nurses Residence (1933, 1940), and the new Medical Superintendent Residence (1938-1939). The 1927 was built by the Dunker Brothers (William, Albert, and Frederick), who inherited the Dunker Construction company (established 1887) from their father Henry Dunker. Dunker Construction was a well known and respected local building company that was in operation until 1974. The company was responsible for the construction or alteration of several notable buildings within Kitchener, including Berlins #2 Fire Hall (1913), alterations to the Kitchener Auditorium (1927-28), the Registry Theatre (1938-39), and the first K -W Rotary Crippled Childrens Centre on King Street (1957-58). Dunker Construction also aided in the advancement of construction machinery within the area — the 1937 Dunker Steam Shovel was used to excavate the million -gallon reservoir for the Kitchener Water Commission at Lakeside Park. This was the former Shoemaker Pumping Station (now Greenbrook Pumping Station in 2024), which was the first water pumping station in Kitchener. In addition to operating Dunker Construction, the brothers were active participants in the community. William Dunker, president of Dunker Construction, also served on the Kitchener Planning Board and Kitchener Relief Board. His brother Albert, president of Dunker Investments Ltd and Chairman of the Board of Directions for Dunker Construction, was Chairman of the Kitchener Water Commission for 18 years, and a member for over 26. The rebuilding of 69 Agnes Street after the 1955 fire was overseen by the local architecture firm of Jenkins and Wright. Established in 1945, Jenkins and Wright are known for work such as the 1952 restoration of `Woodside', the home on William Lyon Mackenzie King located on Welling Street North within the City, as well as the Memorial Auditorium. Page 32 of 112 Contextual Value 69 Agnes Street is physically, visually, historically, and functionally linked to its surrounding. The building remains in-situ and maintains its original institutional use as a recreational complex, though in 2013 it was purchased by the K -W Badminton Club. The K -W Badminton Club had leased space from and operated within the building for over 80 years. Social Value 69 Agnes Street has social value to the surrounding community as well as the City of Kitchener and Region of Waterloo as a whole. Recreational facilities such as 69 Agnes Street provides a space that supports better mental and physical health, as it enables social interactions to occur and connections to be built. It also provides opportunities for different fitness activities. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 69 Agnes Street resides in the following attributes: ■ All elements related to the Art Deco architectural style, including: o two storey asymmetrical massing and composition; o red brick construction; o central two-storey tower and smaller tower near south end of front fagade; o concrete banding below the parapet with concrete motifs; o fenestration pattern and window openings with concrete sills; o decorative paneling between the first and second storey windows; o the appearance of 4/4 multi -pane and/or single -hung windows o the north entrance featuring a one -storey glazed entranceway will terrazzo floor; and, o the south entrance featuring an unclosed entranceway with roof. ■ All elements related to the contextual value, including: o Location and orientation of the buildings along Agnes Street. Photographs Page 33 of 112 Page 34 of 112 Close-up of Architectural Detailing on Central Section Including Concrete Motifs and Decorative Panels Page 35 of 112 Second Tower and Southern End Section (Front Fagade) Page 36 of 112 CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 69 Agnes Street Address: Institutional — recreational complex Description: Photographs Attached: Jessica Vieira e r: October 16, 2024 ❑X Front Facade ❑ Left Facade X❑ Right Fagade ❑ Rear Facade ❑X Details ❑ Setting Designation Criteria Recorder — Heritage Heritage Kitchener Committee Planning Staff 1. This property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it is a Yes x❑ Yes ❑ rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it Yes ❑ Yes ❑ displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it Yes ❑ Yes ❑ demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. * e.g., constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. Page 37 of 112 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. * Additional archival work may be required. N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes N N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ 5. The property has historical or associative N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it yields, Yes ❑X Yes ❑ or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E.g - commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes 0 Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. * Additional archival work may be required. Page 38 of 112 7. The property has Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is important Yes ❑X Yes ❑ in defining, maintaining N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external Yes ❑ or supporting the features that complete the site? character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is physically, Yes ❑X Yes ❑ functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. * Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship N/A ® Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ and/or detail noteworthy? Yes ❑ Completeness: Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external Yes ❑ features that complete the site? Page 39 of 112 Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its original site? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑x * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ materials and design features? Yes Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Tower additions, vestibule, one - Significance and indicate which storey addition, window elements are still existing and alterations which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or features that should be N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ added to the heritage attribute list? Yes Concrete foundation Condition: is the building in good condition? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 0 *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to N/A ❑ Unknown ® No ❑ Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Indigenous heritage and history? ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required El Additional Research Required *E.g. -Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ the property? N/A ❑ Unknown © No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required * Additional archival work may be ❑ Additional Research Required required. Function: What is the present Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercia function of the subject property? Commercial ❑ 1 ❑ Office ❑ Other © Office ❑ Other ❑ - * Other may include vacant, social, Institutional —recreational complex institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ the subject property contribute to ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required the cultural heritage of a ❑ Additional Research Required community of people? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Page 40 of 112 Does the subject property have N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No © Yes ❑ Additional Research Required intangible value to a specific ❑ community of people? ❑ Additional Research Required * E.g.- Waterloo Masfid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification Notes Page 41 of 112 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals, 519-783-8922 PREPARED BY: Jessica Vieira, Heritage Planner, 519-783-8924 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: December 6, 2024 REPORT NO.: DSD -2025-014 SUBJECT: Attachment C - Notice of Intention to Designate - 80-86 Union Boulevard - DSD-2025-014.docx RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 80- 86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street as being of cultural heritage value or interest. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to request that Council direct the Clerk to publish a Notice of Intention to Designate the property municipally addressed as 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. • An updated Statement of Significance on the property's cultural heritage value was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on October 1 st, 2024. On this meeting date, the Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street be recognized, and designation pursued. • The key finding of this report is that the property municipally addressed as 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street meets the criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22) and has been confirmed to be a significant cultural heritage resource. The property is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual value. • There are no financial implications with this recommendation. • Community engagement included informing residents by posting this report with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting, providing written correspondence to the property owners dated May 23rd, 2023, and October 7t", 2024, and consulting with Heritage Kitchener. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served to the Owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust. • This report supports the delivery of core services. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 42 of 112 BACKGROUND: 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street contains two mid -20th century apartment buildings. The buildings are situated on a 0.25 acre parcel of land located on the western corner of the intersection at York Street and Union Boulevard, within the K -W Hospital Planning Community of the City of Kitchener in the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value of the property are the two apartment buildings. u li o�7imil ti'.v;uwu—, 01 dy 7 )t4 Y xk2 Trvk€4 G. Ir 4'�frna.ev. ��rwttredrN T/w A full assessment of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street has been completed and included a field evaluation and detailed archival research. The findings concluded that the subject property meets the criteria for designation. An updated Statement of Significance on the property's cultural heritage value was taken to the Heritage Kitchener Committee on October 1 st, 2024. On this meeting date, the Committee recommended that pursuant to Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the cultural heritage value or interest of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street be recognized, and designation pursued. This work was undertaken as part of the City of Kitchener Municipal Heritage Register (MHR) Review, initiated in February of 2023. The MHR Review is the City's response to amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act introduced in January of 2023 through Bill 23, the More Homes Built Faster Act. Bill 200, the Homeowners Protection Act, 2024, extended the time municipalities have to designate properties listed on their municipal heritage registers until January 1, 2027. The City contacted owners of listed properties through an initial letter dated May 23, 2023, to inform them of this undertaking. Owners of properties recommended for designation in October 2024 were contacted via a second letter dated October 7th, 2024, and invited to contact the City's Heritage Planner with any comments, questions, or concerns. No response was received to either letter. Page 43 of 112 Per standard procedure, should Council support the Notice of Intention to Designate, Owners will be contacted a third time through a Notice of Intention to Designate (NOID) Letter. An ad for the NOID will also be published in a newspaper. Once the letter is served and the ad posted, there will be a 30 -day appeal period in which Owners may object to the designation. REPORT: Identifying and protecting cultural heritage resources within the City of Kitchener is an important part of planning for the future, and helping to guide change while conserving the buildings, structures, and landscapes that give the City of Kitchener its unique identity. The City plays a critical role in the conservation of cultural heritage resources. The designation of property under the Ontario Heritage Act is the main tool to provide long-term protection of cultural heritage resources for future generations. Designation recognizes the importance of a property to the local community; protects the property's cultural heritage value; encourages good stewardship and conservation; and promotes knowledge and understanding about the property. Designation not only publicly recognizes and promotes awareness, but it also provides a process for ensuring that changes to a property are appropriately managed and that these changes respect the property's cultural heritage value and interest. 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street is recognized for its design/physical, historical/associative, and contextual values. It satisfies five of the nine criteria for designation under Ontario Regulation 9/06 (amended by Ontario Regulation 569/22). A summary of the criteria that is met or not met is provided in the table below. Page 44 of 112 Criteria Criteria Met Yes/No 1. The property has design value or physical value because it is a Yes rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, material, or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical value because it Yes displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design or physical value because it No demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it No has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. 5. The property has historical or associative value because it yields, Yes or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. 6. The property has historical value or associative value because it No demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. 7. The property has contextual value because it is important in Yes defining, maintaining or supporting the character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value because it is physically, Yes functionally, visually, or historically linked to its surroundings. 9. The property has contextual value because it is a landmark. No Page 44 of 112 Photo 1: Front Facade Design / Physical Value The design value of the subject property relates to the architecture of the apartment building. The building is a unique example of the Art Moderne architectural style with Art Deco influences. The buildings are three and a half storeys in height, with a raised basement and the third floor being composed of dormer additions. They feature varied roofline, curved building corners, varied brick colour, concrete banding, projecting central front bay, main entrance framed by glass blocks with stone face surround; signage above the main entrance that reads "UNION APTS" with decorative leaf motifs; symbol with the letter's `U' and `A'; and, parged concrete foundation. The buildings also have a range of different windows and window openings including 1/1 windows with concrete headers and sills, 6/6 windows with concrete sills, and glass block windows with concrete sills. The Art Moderne architectural style emerged during the 1930's and developed out of the Art Deco architectural style. It is characterized by its use of simple geometric shape, long horizontal lines and banding, curved sides and corner windows, and glass block windows as seen in 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street. The Art Deco influences can be seen in the decorative detailing that adorn the building, such as the leaf motifs above the entrance of the carved UA symbol, or the more dramatic and ornate front entrance surround. Front Facade The front fagades of the buildings are symmetrical in their design and massing. They can be divided vertically into three sections; while all sections are approximately the same width, the northern -most and southern -most sections are recessed back from the central section and contain angled corners with glass block windows and concrete sills and headers. The side sections also contain three single hung windows with concrete sills and headers. The projecting central section contains the single front -entrance, which is framed Page 45 of 112 by glass blocks and a stone -faced surround. A stone sign which reads "UNION APTS" with decorative leaf motifs is located within this surround, and above the sign there is a single lantern. Above the front entrance there are two single hung windows framed by concrete sills and headers and glass blocks to the side, as well as a decorative UA symbol just below the roofline. The roofline of the central section is square and stepped, and distinctive from the slope of the rest of the roof. The building is also divided horizontally by concrete banding which delineates the raised basement, first, and second floor. The third floor is distinguished by the roofline and dormers which do not appear to be original and are clad with white horizontal siding. Historical/Associative Value The historic and associative value of the apartment buildings relate to their potential to contribute towards an understanding of development patterns in the late 1930's to the 1960's. This time period saw a marked change is housing, as Canada regained its economic and social footing following the second world war and opened its doors to new immigrants. As such a construction boom of apartments occurred, as they were an efficient and economical means to create a sufficient supply of housing. In 1928 14 apartments existed within Kitchener and Waterloo (Vernon's Directory, 1928). By 1945 there were 66 apartment buildings, and by 1955 there were 109 (Vernon's Directory, 1945 and 1955) 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street was one of the first of several low-rise apartment buildings constructed in the Art Moderne style between the time period of 1944-1954 within the Waterloo Region. The Art Moderne style was an appropriate choice for such developments, as it was a response from designers which sought to meet the needs of ordinary citizens while proving that mass production / quantity and quality were not mutually exclusive. The resulting apartments were sensible and were still of a small enough scale as to allow a community -centric experience to residents. Contextual Value The contextual values relate to the contribution that the apartment building makes to the continuity and character of the Union Boulevard and York Street streetscapes and the surrounding area. The property is located within the Westmount East & West Neighbourhood Cultural Heritage Landscape, and boarders the Union Street & Union Boulevard Cultural Heritage Landscape. The Westmount CHL is a neighbourhood with a unique urban form inspired by the City Beautiful Movement. One of its more distinguishable features are the slightly curvilinear alignment of the roads and the 6 -metre -wide medians planted with high branching trees and elegant light fixtures. The residential dwellings within the neighbourhood are a concentrated mixture of recognizable architectural styles from the 1920's -1940's, largely constructed from high quality material and displaying fine details. A number of these homes are historically associated with important city builders, businesspeople, and community leaders including A.R. Kaufman, E.O. Weber and E.F. Seagram. While slightly larger in height and massing than the typically 1.5 and 2 -storey single detached dwellings predominate in the neighbourhood, the overall design, form, setbacks, and materials used in the construction of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street are compatible and complimentary to adjacent and surrounding properties. The garden beds and mature trees Page 46 of 112 in and around the property further integrate it into the well-maintained Westmount neighbourhood. The apartment buildings at 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street are also physically, visually, historically, and functionally linked to their surroundings as they remain in-situ and maintain their original multiple residential use. Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street resides in the following attributes: ■ All elements related to the Art Moderne with Art Deco influences architectural style, including: o varied roofline; o angled building corners; o varied brick colour; o concrete banding; o window openings with concrete headers and sills; o glass blocks framing window openings and entrance openings; o glass block windows with concrete headers and sills; o projecting central front bay with main entrance; o stone faced surround; o sign that reads "UNION APTS" with leaf motifs; o light fixture above main entrance; o symbol with the letters `U' and `A'; and, o parged concrete foundation. • All elements related to the contextual value, including: o Location and orientation of the buildings and the contribution that they make to the continuity and character of the Union Boulevard and York Street streetscapes. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the Heritage Kitchener committee meeting. CONSULT— Heritage Planning staff have consulted with the Heritage Kitchener committee regarding designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. Property owners were invited to consult via two separate letters dated May 23rd, 2023, and October 7t", 2024. As discussed in the Background section of this report, no response from the Owner was received. Page 47 of 112 Section 29(2) of the Ontario Heritage Act requires Council to consult with the Municipal Heritage Committee (Heritage Kitchener) before giving notice of its intention to designate a property. Heritage Kitchener will be consulted via circulation and consideration of this report (see INFORM above). Members of the community will be informed via circulation of this report to Heritage Kitchener and via formal consideration by Council. In addition, should Council choose to give notice of its intention to designate, such notice will be served on the property owner and the Ontario Heritage Trust, and published in the local newspaper (The Record). Once notice has been served, the owner has the right of appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal. It should be noted that should Council decide not to proceed with a Notice of Intention to Designate, that the building will remain on the City's Municipal Heritage Register until January 1, 2027, after which it will be removed according to the changes enacted by Bill 23 and Bill 200. Once removed, it cannot re -listed on the Register again for five (5) years, i.e. January 1, 2032. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Ontario Heritage Act, 2022 • Municipal Heritage Register Review — October 2024 Update (DSD -2024-413) APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Statement of Significance for 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street. Page 48 of 112 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 80-86 UNION BOULEVARD / 571 YORK STREET "' Summary of Significance ®Design/Physical Value ®Historical Value ®Contextual Value ❑Social Value ❑Economic Value ❑Environmental Value Municipal Address: 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street Legal Description: Plan 203 Lot 140 Part Lots 115, 138, 139 & 140 Year Built: 1944 Architectural Styles: Mid -Century Vernacular Original Owner: A. Kraus Original Use: Residential (multiple dwelling) Condition: Very Good Page 49 of 112 Description of Cultural Heritage Resource 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street contains two mid -20th century apartment buildings. The buildings are situated on a 0.25 acre parcel of land located on the western corner of the intersection at York Street and Union Boulevard, within the K -W Hospital Planning Community of the City of Kitchener in the Region of Waterloo. The principal resources that contribute to the heritage value of the property are the two apartment buildings. Heritage Value 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street is recognized for its design/physical, historic/associative, and contextual values. Design/Physical Value The design value of the subject property relates to the architecture of the apartment building. The building is a unique example of the Art Moderne architectural style with Art Deco influences. The buildings are three and a half storeys in height, with a raised basement and the third floor being composed of dormer additions. They feature varied roofline, curved building corners, varied brick colour, concrete banding, projecting central front bay, main entrance framed by glass blocks with stone face surround; signage above the main entrance that reads "UNION APTS" with decorative leaf motifs; symbol with the letter's `U' and `A'; and, parged concrete foundation. The buildings also have a range of different windows and window openings including 1/1 windows with concrete headers and sills, 6/6 windows with concrete sills, and glass block windows with concrete sills. The Art Moderne architectural style emerged during the 1930's and developed out of the Art Deco architectural style. It is characterized by its use of simple geometric shape, long horizontal lines and banding, curved sides and corner windows, and glass block windows as seen in 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street. The Art Deco influences can be seen in the decorative detailing that adorn the building, such as the leaf motifs above the entrance of the carved UA symbol, or the more dramatic and ornate front entrance surround. Front Fagade The front fagades of the buildings are symmetrical in their design and massing. They can be divided vertically into three sections; while all sections are approximately the same width, the northern -most and southern -most sections are recessed back from the central section and contain angled corners with glass block windows and concrete sills and headers. The side sections also contain three single hung windows with concrete sills and headers. The projecting central section contains the single front - entrance, which is framed by glass blocks and a stone -faced surround. A stone sign which reads "UNION APTS" with decorative leaf motifs is located within this surround, and above the sign there is a single lantern. Above the front entrance there are two single hung windows framed by concrete sills and headers and glass blocks to the side, as well as a decorative UA symbol just below the roofline. The roofline of the central section is square and stepped, and distinctive from the slope of the rest of the roof. Page 50 of 112 The building is also divided horizontally by concrete banding which delineates the raised basement, first, and second floor. The third floor is distinguished by the roofline and dormers which do not appear to be original and are clad with white horizontal siding. Historical/Associative Value The historic and associative value of the apartment buildings relate to their potential to contribute towards an understanding of development patterns in the late 1930's to the 1960's. This time period saw a marked change is housing, as Canada regained its economic and social footing following the second world war and opened its doors to new immigrants. As such a construction boom of apartments occurred, as they were an efficient and economical means to create a sufficient supply of housing. In 1928 14 apartments existed within Kitchener and Waterloo (Vernon's Directory, 1928). By 1945 there were 66 apartment buildings, and by 1955 there were 109 (Vernon's Directory, 1945 and 1955) 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street was one of the first of several low-rise apartment buildings constructed in the Art Moderne style between the time period of 1944-1954 within the Waterloo Region. The Art Moderne style was an appropriate choice for such developments, as it was a response from designers which sought to meet the needs of ordinary citizens while proving that mass production / quantity and quality were not mutually exclusive. The resulting apartments were sensible and were still of a small enough scale as to allow a community -centric experience to residents. Contextual Value The contextual values relate to the contribution that the apartment building makes to the continuity and character of the Union Boulevard and York Street streetscapes and the surrounding area. The property is located within the Westmount East & West Neighbourhood Cultural Heritage Landscape, and boarders the Union Street & Union Boulevard Cultural Heritage Landscape. The Westmount CHL is a neighbourhood with a unique urban form inspired by the City Beautiful Movement. One of its more distinguishable features are the slightly curvilinear alignment of the roads and the 6 -metre -wide medians planted with high branching trees and elegant light fixtures. The residential dwellings within the neighbourhood are a concentrated mixture of recognizable architectural styles from the 1920's -1940's, largely constructed from high quality material and displaying fine details. A number of these homes are historically associated with important city builders, businesspeople, and community leaders including A.R. Kaufman, E.O. Weber and E.F. Seagram. While slightly larger in height and massing than the typically 1.5 and 2 -storey single detached dwellings predominate in the neighbourhood, the overall design, form, setbacks, and materials used in the construction of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street are compatible and complimentary to adjacent and surrounding properties. The garden beds and mature trees in and around the property further integrate it into the well-maintained Westmount neighbourhood. The apartment buildings at 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street are also physically, visually, historically, and functionally linked to their surroundings as they remain in-situ and maintain their original multiple residential use. Page 51 of 112 Heritage Attributes The heritage value of 80-86 Union Boulevard / 571 York Street resides in the following attributes: ■ All elements related to the Art Moderne with Art Deco influences architectural style, including: o varied roofline; o angled building corners; o varied brick colour; o concrete banding; o window openings with concrete headers and sills; o glass blocks framing window openings and entrance openings; o glass block windows with concrete headers and sills; o projecting central front bay with main entrance; o stone faced surround; o sign that reads "UNION APTS" with leaf motifs; o light fixture above main entrance; o symbol with the letters `U' and `A'; and, o parged concrete foundation. • All elements related to the contextual value, including: o Location and orientation of the buildings and the contribution that they make to the continuity and character of the Union Boulevard and York Street streetscapes. Photographs Page 52 of 112 : «y' Page 53 0 112 Page 54 of 112 CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION FORM 80-86 Union Blvd Address: Apartments Description: Photographs Attached: ❑X Front Facade ❑ Left Facade Jessica Vieira e r: August 19, 2024 ❑ Right Fagade ❑ Rear Facade ❑X Details ❑X Setting Designation Criteria Recorder — Heritage Heritage Kitchener Committee Planning Staff 1. This property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it is a Yes x❑ Yes ❑ rare, unique, representative or early example of a style, type, expression, material or construction method. 2. The property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it Yes ❑X Yes ❑ displays a high degree of craftsmanship or artistic merit. 3. The property has design value or physical N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it Yes ❑ Yes ❑ demonstrates a high degree of technical or scientific achievement. * e.g., constructed with a unique material combination or use, incorporates challenging geometric designs etc. Page 55 of 112 4. The property has historical value or associative value because it has direct associations with a theme, event, belief, person, activity, organization or institution that is significant to a community. * Additional archival work may be required. N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ 5. The property has historical or associative N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ value because it yields, Yes ❑X Yes ❑ or has the potential to yield, information that contributes to an understanding of a community or culture. * E.g - commercial building may provide an understanding of how the economic development of the City occured. Additional archival work may be required. 6. The property has historical value or N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ associative value Yes ❑ Yes ❑ because it demonstrates or reflects the work or ideas of an architect, artist, builder, designer or theorist who is significant to a community. * Additional archival work may be required. Page 56 of 112 7. The property has Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is important Yes ❑X Yes ❑ in defining, maintaining N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external Yes ❑ or supporting the features that complete the site? character of an area. * E.g. - It helps to define an entrance point to a neighbourhood or helps establish the (historic) rural character of an area. 8. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is physically, Yes ❑X Yes ❑ functionally, visually or historically linked to its surroundings. * Additional archival work may be required. 9. The property has contextual value N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑X N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ because it is a Yes ❑ Yes ❑ landmark. *within the region, city or neighborhood. Notes Additional Criteria Recorder Heritage Kitchener Committee Interior: Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship N/A ® Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ and/or detail noteworthy? Yes ❑ Completeness: Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ notable landscaping or external Yes ❑ features that complete the site? Page 57 of 112 Site Integrity: Does the structure occupy its original site? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑x * If relocated, is it relocated on its original site, moved from another site, etc. Alterations: Does this building retain most of its original N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ materials and design features? Yes Please refer to the list of heritage attributes within the Statement of Dormers seem like new Significance and indicate which additions, new double single - elements are still existing and hung or single -hung windows which ones have been removed. Alterations: Are there additional elements or features that should be N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ added to the heritage attribute list? Yes Light fixture above entrances look like they could be ori nal Condition: is the building in good condition? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes 0 *E.g. - Could be a good candidate for adaptive re -use if possible and contribute towards equity -building and climate change action. Indigenous History: Could this site be of importance to N/A ❑ Unknown ® No ❑ Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Indigenous heritage and history? ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required El Additional Research Required *E.g. -Site within 300m of water sources, near distinct topographical land, or near cemeteries might have archaeological potential and indigenous heritage potential. Could there be any urban Indigenous history associated with N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ the property? N/A ❑ Unknown © No ❑ Yes ❑ Additional Research Required * Additional archival work may be ❑ Additional Research Required required. Function: What is the present Unknown ❑ Residential ® Unknown ❑ Residential ❑ Commercia function of the subject property? Commercial ❑ 1 ❑ Office ❑ Other © Office ❑ Other ❑ - * Other may include vacant, social, Multiple dwelling institutional, etc. and important for the community from an equity building perspective. Diversity and Inclusion: Does N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ® Yes N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ the subject property contribute to ❑ ❑ Additional Research Required the cultural heritage of a ❑ Additional Research Required community of people? N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Page 58 of 112 Does the subject property have N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No © Yes ❑ Additional Research Required intangible value to a specific ❑ community of people? ❑ Additional Research Required * E.g.- Waterloo Masfid (Muslim Society of Waterloo & Wellington Counties) was the first established Islamic Center and Masjid in the Region and contributes to the history of the Muslim community in the area. Notes about Additional Criteria Examined Recommendation Does this property meet the definition of a significant built heritage resource, and should it be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act? (Does it meet two or more of the designation criteria?) N/A ❑ Unknown ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X If not, please select the appropriate action for follow-up ❑ Keep on the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Remove from the Municipal Heritage Register ❑ Additional Research Required Other: General / Additional Notes TO BE FILLED BY HERITAGE PLANNING STAFF: Date of Property Owner Notification Notes Page 59 of 112 Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Chief Administrator's Office www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: August 25, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Margaret Love, Director, Strategy & Corporate Performance PREPARED BY: Sloane Sweazey, Senior Policy Advisor WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: August 20, 2025 REPORT NO.: CAO -2025-366 SUBJECT: 2023-2026 Strategic Plan— Compass Kitchener Report Card #1 RECOMMENDATION: For information. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • Attachment A to this report presents the Compass Kitchener Advisory Committee's evaluation of projects completed in 2024 under the City of Kitchener's 2023-2026 Strategic Plan (the "report card"). • Compass Kitchener evaluated two completed projects: Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals and Advance Truth and Reconciliation. Both projects evaluated exceeded expectations. • There are no financial implications associated with this report. • This report supports implementation of the 2023-2026 City of Kitchener Strategic Plan. BACKGROUND: Since 2003, a key role of the Compass Kitchener Advisory Committee is to evaluate the City's implementation of the Strategic Plan, and to prepare and present report cards to Council and the community of their assessment on a regular basis. The report card for 2024 is provided in Attachment A of this report. Compass Kitchener members will present their evaluation to Council, as outlined in Attachment B. REPORT: The committee assessed two completed strategic actions in 2024: (1) Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals, and (2) Advance Truth and Reconciliation. Both were rated as exceeding expectations. The business approvals project demonstrated strong coordination, practical service improvements, and responsiveness to the needs of local entrepreneurs. The committee recommends the City expand its work beyond the downtown core, deepen its engagement with equity -seeking business communities, and continue tracking and reporting on long-term outcomes. The Truth and Reconciliation work reflected a commendable shift from time -bound *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 60 of 112 deliverables to an ongoing, relationship -centered commitment, aligned with the City's evolving role as a respectful partner. The committee encourages the City to remain guided by Indigenous leadership, communicate progress in ways that elevate Indigenous voices, and embed reconciliation as a cross -organizational priority rather than a standalone initiative. The report also includes reflections on the development and implementation of the current strategic plan. Compass Kitchener commends the City for adopting an adaptive planning model, broadening public engagement, and beginning to track outcomes alongside outputs. The committee encourages continued clarity around Compass Kitchener's role in engagement processes like the Resident Panel and urges the City to share outcome data and estimated budget information to strengthen future evaluations. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports implementation of the 2023-2026 City of Kitchener Strategic Plan. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. COLLABORATE — Compass Kitchener members collaborated throughout the development of this report. All members contributed meaningfully to the report included and approve of its contents. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: CAO -21-005 Compass Kitchener Strategic Plan Evaluation CAO -2023-250 Strategic Plan 2019-2022 — Compass Kitchener Report Card CAO -2024-305 Strategic Plan 2019-2022 — Compass Kitchener 2023 Report Card APPROVED BY: Dan Chapman, Chief Administrative Officer ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Strategic Plan 2023-2026 — Compass Kitchener Report Card #1 Attachment B — Compass Kitchener Report Card Presentation Page 61 of 112 /vaam uuuuu uuuum uuuuu II. uuuum »»»»» uuuuuuw Oiaina,, r rraarm; w»»u�i,,,,, rr aiIiIr1r1a/ivii%io�p�/� " »»;lli/��!/� �lnr,. uuluiiurrIl�il/1Qli uuuuuum �%/iii� iaimi//�� Vi /r r r%rrriii�J�t � % m uuuur, 0 uuuuuuu J�u��! umuuumwm um°uur,,, uiuvuu'auru// uuuu�� uuuuu iwwuu ��Jruuui ��r iwmWir( uuu"mri� �� /r pil� �gJllllir luumuuu mui0 � �uinnmpr!lf�� mw1Jlll��� �� ma��ll uwgJ///� � � � II Projects e Completed 2024 and Reflections on the Development and Implementation of the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan compaSS Itchener' of / r � ll�rr % mmunit . vision . venues . pnorities r %� "I'vefel Page 62 of 112 III xeCU[t "ive SIxII"iIIIIIr„ m CUrll�ass kite lener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� This Report Card presents Compass Kitchener's evaluation of projects completed in 2024 under the City of Kitchener's 2023-2026 Strategic Plan. As a citizen -led advisory committee, Compass Kitchener provides this assessment to City Council and staff to support transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in the City's strategic planning and implementation efforts. The committee assessed two completed strategic actions in 2024: (1) Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals, and (2) Advance Truth and Reconciliation. Both were rated as exceeding expectations. The business approvals project demonstrated strong coordination, practical service improvements, and responsiveness to the needs of local entrepreneurs. The committee recommends the City expand its work beyond the downtown core, deepen its engagement with equity -seeking business communities, and continue tracking and reporting on long-term outcomes. The Truth and Reconciliation work reflected a commendable shift from time -bound deliverables to an ongoing, relationship -centered commitment, aligned with the City's evolving role as a respectful partner. The committee encourages the City to remain guided by Indigenous leadership, communicate progress in ways that elevate Indigenous voices, and embed reconciliation as a cross -organizational priority rather than a standalone initiative. The report also includes reflections on the development and implementation of the current strategic plan. Compass Kitchener commends the City for adopting an adaptive planning model, broadening public engagement, and beginning to track outcomes alongside outputs. The committee encourages continued clarity around Compass Kitchener's role in engagement processes like the Resident Panel and urges the City to share outcome data and estimated budget information to strengthen future evaluations. In closing, Compass Kitchener offers this report in the spirit of partnership and progress, with the shared goal of making Kitchener a more inclusive, responsive, and connected city for all. The committee extends heartfelt gratitude to City staff for their cooperation, openness, and responsiveness throughout the evaluation process - their collaboration has been instrumental in helping the committee understand the work underway and provide informed, constructive feedback. To build on this momentum, the committee encourages the City to (1) continue strengthening outcome -based evaluation and sharing progress transparently; (2) provide budget information, including internal costs, to support more comprehensive assessments; (3) clarify Compass Kitchener's role in public engagement initiatives such as the Resident Panel; and (4) embed Truth and Reconciliation throughout the organization in alignment with the spirit of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action. z Page 63 of 112 I able of Carrte�,its Executive Summary m CUfT1�ass kitchenel/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� 2 Compass Kitchener 4 Project Status Overview 5 Evaluation Approach 6 Evaluation Rating 7 2024 Project Evaluations 8 CREATING AN ECONOMICALLY -THRIVING CITY TOGETHER 8 Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals 8 FOSTERING A CARING CITY TOGETHER 10 Advance Truth and Reconciliation 10 Overall Observations and Looking Ahead 12 In Closing 3 16 Page 64 of 112 ° viii,. III ass Ill i. Illheri ilii, m COFT1�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� Compass Kitchener consists of community volunteers and serves as an advisory committee appointed by and reporting to Kitchener City Council. It serves as a liaison between the City of Kitchener and residents, providing advice to Council on the community's vision and priorities during the development of the city's strategic plan. The committee also delivers a regular report to Council evaluating the implementation of the strategic plan with advice and recommendations. This report has been prepared by the following members of the Compass Kitchener Advisory Committee: Troy Glover (Chair) James J. Young (Vice -Chair) Carlos Abarca Kim Brabazon Srihasya Kandala Rodney Gill Judy Stephens -Wells Lee -Anne Thompson Linda Terry Lori Trumper 11 Page 65 of 112 11 Rro,� ect Status Overview m 001111" ass kItCii2ne��; 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� Page 66 of 112 Results of Cam pass Kitchener's Evaluation of All Completed and Reviewed 2023-2026 Strategic Plan Projects Overall Evaluation of Completed Projects PROJECT Exceeded Met Did Not Meet Expectations Expectations Expectations Planned Start* Planned Completion* Current Status GOAL Building a Connected City Together Housing For All Implementation Jan. 2025 Dec. 2025*** On Track Localized Transportation Safety Improvement ProgramJan. 2025 Dec. 2025*** On Track City -Wide Active Transportation Routes Apr. 2024 Sept. 2025 On Track Official Plan Comprehensive Update Jan. 2025 Dec. 2025*** On Track Cultivating a Green City Together Corporate Climate Action Plan 2.0 Jan. 2024 June 2025*** On Track Clean Energy Transition Strategy Jan. 2024 Dec. 2025*** On Track District Energy Business Case Jan. 2024 Mar 2025 On Track High Performance Development Standards Feb 2024 Dec. 2025 On Track Implement Tree Canopy Target Plan Jan. 2024 Dec.2025*** On Track Implement Actions from Parks Master Plan Jan 2025 Jun. 2026*** On Track Parkland Acquisition Strategy Jun 2024 Dec. 2025 On Track Grand River Park Strategy Oct 2023 Dec. 2025*** On Track Creating an Economically Thriving City Together Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals ✓ Sep. 2023 Apr. 2024 COMPLETE Implement Health/Medical Technology Innovation Jan 2025 Dec. 2025*** Campus On Track Creative Industries School Jul. 2024 Dec. 2025*** On Track Special Events & Festivals Action Plan Oct. 2025 Dec. 2026 Not Started Entertainment Venue Management Feb. 2024 Dec. 2025 On Track Implement Arts & Creative Industries Action Plan Oct. 2025 Dec. 2026 Not Started Fostering a Caring City Together Advance Truth and Reconciliation / Jan. 2024 Dec. 2024 COMPLETE Municipal Newcomers Strategy Jul. 2024 Dec. 2025*** On Track Enhance City's Engagement Practices Jan. 2025 Dec. 2025*** On Track Community Centre Operating Model Apr. 2024 Aug. 2025*** On Track City -led Recreation &Leisure Program Review Jul. 2024 Dec. 2025 On Track Sport and Recreation Master Plan Sep. 2025 Sep. 2026 Not Started Community Grants Review May 2024 Aug.2025 On Track Stewarding a Better City Together Digital Kitchener Strategy Jan 2025 Jun. 2026 On Track Implement City-wide Data Strategy May 2024 May 2025*** On Track Strengthen Employer Identity/Value Proposition Jan 2024 Jun 2025*** On Track Support a Psychologically Safe Workplace Jan 2025 Dec. 2025*** On Track Procurement Innovation Jan 2024 Mar. 2025 COMPLETE** TOTAL 2 0 0 LEGEND Dates as reflected in the Strategic Plan Implementation Update (Spring 2025) * Completed in 2025 and will be evaluated by Compass Kitchener in its next report card when all Strategic Plan projects completed in 2025 are reviewed. ** Over half of the City's strategic plan initiatives are multi-year projects, with phased deliverables. This date represents the end date of the current phase and not necessarily the end date of the project (note: some projects extend beyond the term of this 4 -year strategic plan). To explore the latest progress on each project—including links to project pages and detailed updates shared with Council—visit: www.kitchener.ca/en/council-and-city-administration/2023-2026- strategic-plan-progress. Page 66 of 112 m CUrll�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� Compass Kitchener approached this evaluation as interested community members and considered timing, impact, accountability, and budget criteria in its assessment. Compass Kitchener considered evaluation criteria for the strategic actions developed in consultation with Kitchener's Corporate Leadership Team. The following statements guided the evaluation: 1. Responsible Project Delivery: This criterion focuses on how well project goals, budgets and timelines are managed. It emphasizes the importance of monitoring and tracking progress to ensure projects are completed efficiently and effectively, achieving goals within financial constraints and deadlines. • Note: Given that the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan is intended to be adaptive, responsible project delivery also recognizes that timelines may shift due to shifting priorities and needs. 2. Impact/Public Value: This criterion assesses how the impact of the project will be tracked and evaluated, and the extent to which a project creates, or has the potential to create, positive outcomes for the community and contributes to the goal(s) of the Strategic Plan. 3. Transparency bt Communication: This criterion focuses on the dissemination of information through staff reports and other channels. It emphasizes the importance of relevant, clear, timely, and accessible communication to the community, ensuring that project goals, progress, challenges, and outcomes/impacts are openly shared. 4. Public Engagement: This criterion evaluates how well a project involves the community and/or relevant parties in its planning and execution. Equity Lens Using the definition of equity outlined in Kitchener's Equity, Inclusion Ft Anti -Racism policy, Compass Kitchener will also incorporate an equity lens to underpin the evaluation of all projects. "An equity approach creates the conditions for fair and equal access and opportunity for everyone, by addressing discriminations, exclusions and barriers experienced by distinct groups. Equity is not the same as equality, nor is it the same an inequality." 0 Page 67 of 112 m Corry ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� Compass Kitchener will evaluate each project using the following rating scale: exceeds expectations, meets expectations, and does not meet expectations. The evaluation rating will be determined based on the extent to which all applicable evaluation criteria are met, recognizing that some criteria may not be applicable to each project. Each individual criterion will be assigned a rating, and based on the ratings of all applicable criteria, Compass Kitchener members will determine an overall rating through a consensus vote. The three ratings are as follows: Exceeds MeiAs Des Nlot MeiA Page 68 of 112 2024, Illi iiii,mo. t iatiaiiiis r IIS III ..( 111.111 I III III ."' III III III III �' Ilh 111III III 111 III'° III III I Ill I llh 111Ill llh m Corrlpass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� We use our collective strengths to grow an agile and diverse local economy powered by talented entrepreneurs, workers, and artists. We work together to create opportunities for everyone and a resilient future that propels our city forward. Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals Accelerate Commercial Business Approvals Report Card Project Description: Facilitate streamlined business process and approvals for brick -and - mortar retail business across the City. veiirallIlf..:..' al atiiion: IExceeds IEIll ectadour�s Highlights Responsible Project Delivery: meet expectations • Delivered within the planned timeline (Sept 2023 - Mar 2024); • Defined scope and methodology via a robust Terms of Reference and Lean process involving cross -departmental collaboration; and • Appointed a dedicated internal Project Manager to oversee implementation. Impact / Public Value: exceeds expectations • Identified 55 process improvements, 65% of which were classified as "quick wins" to streamline approvals and enhance customer service; • Introduced practical tools such as a business roadmap guide, pre -application process, and digital permit review systems; and • Explored options for tracking and impact evaluation (e.g., satisfaction surveys and reduced processing times) are underway. • Introduced coordinated onsite meetings where City staff from multiple departments visit business locations together to review the full scope of approvals, streamlining the process and improving clarity for business owners. • Ensured the availability of online language translation and interpretation services during onsite visits thereby improving accessibility and support for business owners whose first language is not English. • Further details on the "Outcomes of `Accelerating Commercial Business Approval' Review" can be read Iheire. ....................... Transparency and Communication: exceeds expectations • Provided project updates to Council through regular strategic plan reporting cycles; final report publicly available; and • Sent closure emails with report links to participating business owners as a gesture of accountability and transparency. 0 Page 69 of 112 m CorTl�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� Public Engagement: exceeds expectations • Conducted 12 interviews with business owners and followed up with surveys and updates to maintain engagement; and • Employed user -focused methods such as empathy mapping and process mapping in cross - departmental workshops. Notes for the Future • Consider expanding the project's scope beyond downtown Kitchener to assess applicability and effectiveness across the city. • Revisit the project in a future evaluation cycle to assess long-term outcomes and public value, once more implementation and impact data are available. • Continue to collect and share outcome data, including satisfaction rates, reduced approval timelines, and cost savings for businesses. • Broaden communications efforts to publicly highlight improvements and promote awareness of new business -friendly tools and processes. • Contemplate further engagement with underrepresented or equity -seeking business communities to ensure inclusive benefit from improvements. 0 Page 70 of 112 S......�III�� III IIIA^ aA A I. IIIA��� C ..MIL... I G m Corllpass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� We welcome residents of all ages, backgrounds and lived experiences. We work together on the decisions that matter to us and have a meaningful influence in our community. We're healthy and thriving as we easily access the diverse and inclusive programs and services we need to succeed. Advance Truth and Reconciliation Compass Kitchener recognizes Truth and Reconciliation (TEtR) as a critical priority and commends the City for actively advancing it through numerous initiatives. We appreciate the significance of the City's decision to move away from a time -bound, metrics -driven approach and instead embrace Truth and Reconciliation as an ongoing, relational commitment—a remarkable shift that reflects deep learning and responsiveness. As such, in reporting to Compass Kitchener on the advancement of Truth and Reconciliation (TEtR), staff focused primarily on one individual project as an example to provide insights into the renewed overall direction and approach to advancing TEtR. This broader approach was what Compass Kitchener chose to evaluate. Compass Kitchener also acknowledges the thoughtful way staff continue to learn, adapt, and refine their approach to strengthen relationships and achieve meaningful progress. For these reasons, we believe the City's work in advancing T&R. exceeds expectations. Compass Kitchener understands that advancing TEtR is not a conventional municipal project, but rather a foundational and ongoing commitment that must be embedded across the City's work. Accordingly, to be consistent with the equity lens the committee applied to this report, the committee has chosen a narrative format for this assessment, recognizing that traditional evaluation frameworks rooted in Western paradigms are often ill-suited to the complex, relational, and long-term nature of reconciliation work. The assessment that follows focuses solely on the City's role and efforts; it does not assess or speak on behalf of the Indigenous partners involved in this work. In reviewing the City's actions, Compass Kitchener was encouraged by the depth of the City's commitment and its evolving understanding of the respectful role it must play. This role was particularly evident in initiatives such as the Wiinjindamaan project, an Indigenous land stewardship initiative co -developed with Conestoga College and Indigenous -led organizations. The committee views this project not as a City -led undertaking, but as a community -led partnership in which the City is a respectful participant. In this and other initiatives, leadership is shared across partners, and success is measured not by deliverables alone, but by the depth of relationships, mutual trust, and shared purpose they cultivate. Importantly, Compass Kitchener commends the City's humility in its communication approach, particularly its decision to resist the impulse to publicly spotlight its role in reconciliation projects where such visibility could overshadow Indigenous voices or compromise fragile trust. This restraint reflects a maturity of intent and a recognition that reconciliation requires shifting power, not seeking credit. Even so, the committee encourages the City to find appropriate, partner -informed ways of communicating progress to the broader public. Doing so can raise awareness, foster understanding, and encourage others in the community to engage meaningfully with reconciliation efforts, so long as the narrative elevates Indigenous leadership and maintains a focus on collective, rather than institutional achievement. 10 Page 71 of 112 m Corll�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� In sum, Compass Kitchener affirms the City's role as a committed, learning partner in the journey of reconciliation. The success of this work should not be assessed by traditional performance metrics, but by the strength of the relationships it fosters and the integrity with which the City walks alongside Indigenous communities. As the City continues this work, Compass Kitchener encourages it to remain guided by Indigenous leadership, to foster collective ownership of projects, and to communicate progress in ways that elevate Indigenous voices while preserving the trust and partnerships that have been so carefully built. More information on Indigenous -led Community Initiatives can be found Ihir.� 11 Page 72 of 112 11, Observatians and . Ill �ii iiia Ahead DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2023-2026 STRATEGIC PLAN m CUrll�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� Compass Kitchener commends the City for adopting a thoughtful, adaptive, and resident - centred approach to the development and implementation of the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan. The process reflected important [earnings from past cycles and demonstrated the City's commitment to broad engagement, responsible project delivery, and continuous improvement. Public engagement reached new heights, with the Resident Panel standing out as a particularly innovative and inclusive initiative. Participants reported feeling heard and valued, and the variety of engagement formats—both online and in-person—helped diversify participation and strengthen legitimacy. Going forward, the City should clarify Compass Kitchener's role in relation to the Resident Panel, specifically whether committee members are expected to serve as facilitators, contributors, or simply observers in the process. The plan's adaptive structure, which introduces actions in phases rather than all at once, represents a welcome shift. It enables flexibility to respond to changing community needs and allows for more realistic planning. As implementation proceeds, Compass Kitchener encourages the City to maintain transparency by clearly communicating changes and new project additions to the public. The introduction of project charters, the assignment of dedicated project managers, and the inclusion of a midpoint check-in all suggest a maturing strategic planning culture. These changes support accountability, responsiveness, and better coordination across departments. Compass Kitchener commends the city on responding to its previous request to gather more data to support evidence -informed decision-making. The committee appreciates the city's work to developing strategic indicators and commitment to implement a city-wide data strategy. The committee appreciated being included in the all -committees midpoint review and supports this practice continuing in future plans. The new Strategic Plan Indicators webpage enhances public transparency and offers a valuable tool for tracking progress. The committee encourages continued efforts to ensure these data remain accessible and user-friendly, particularly for non-technical audiences. Recommendations for Future Planning • Deepen engagement with equity -seeking communities and continue to innovate in participatory methods. • Ensure clear public communication of new or revised actions under the adaptive model. • Strengthen storytelling to help residents connect with the plan and see its relevance to daily life. • Expand public education on how strategic indicators are used and what they reveal. 12 Page 73 of 112 m COFT1pass kite lener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� Overall, the 2023-2026 plan reflects a more agile and collaborative direction. Compass Kitchener encourages the City to carry this momentum forward as it begins to envision the next strategic planning process. UPDATE ON PROJECTS FROM THE 2019-2022 STRATEGIC PLAN While Compass Kitchener has not previously reported on incomplete projects, the committee recognizes the importance of doing so for transparency and accountability, particularly as this year will be the final report card focused on the 2019-2022 Strategic Plan. Residents deserve to understand the status of projects that remain underway or delayed, and this section aims to provide that clarity based on the most current information available. The following provides an update on those projects, based on available information: Downtown Protected Cycling Network Original Target: 2022 (Completion noted in 2024 report) Now completed. The network was opened in late 2024, with final touches on Duke Street completed in Spring 2025. More information on bike infrastructure can be found Iir. Incubator and Accelerator Project Original Target: 2019-2021 (Reported as incomplete in 2024) The it !Jy.e IH_ u_1� It 4A _a�ulk is fully leased. A food incubator business case will be submitted in Q3 2025. Build -out of the Small Business Centre in the Innovation Arena is expected by early 2026. City -Owned Property Review Original Target: 2020 (Reported as ongoing in 2024) Now complete. The City has adopted a land disposition framework based on this review and can be found Faire. Downtown Innovation District (Bramm Yards) Vision Original Target: 2021 (Reported as incomplete in 2024) Council approved the revised vision and development principles for the Bramm Yards Master Plan, which can be found her. Procurement Services and Realty Services were authorized by council to implement a competitive land disposition process, based on the vision and development principles, through the issuance of a public request for proposals (RFP) seeking a Master Developer who would acquire the Bramm Yards and lead a multi - phased redevelopment of the property, including the creation of a Master Plan. The timing of the issuance of an RFP will be subject to real estate market conditions. A Master Plan for the site will be completed by the successful developer. Read the full report heire. 13 Page 74 of 112 Rosenberg Community Centre Business Case Original Target: 2021 (Reported as incomplete in 2024) m COFT1�ass kitchener/ 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrrmra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///��y. i,ion values priorit �� Now complete. Business case and design work have concluded. Construction of the joint school and community centre is underway as of fall 2024. More information can be found Iheire. ........................ Open Space Strategy Original Target: 2021 (Reported as incomplete in 2024) The first phase, "Spaces", is now complete and can be read Ihnir. The final phase ("Places") is scheduled to be presented to Council in May 2025 as part of the Places It Spaces strategy. Arts and Culture Master Plan (Project has been renamed "Implement Arts and Culture Action Plan") Original Target: 2021 (Reported as incomplete in 2024) Development of the plan (now retitled Arts and Creative Industries Action Plan) is underway, with completion targeted for 2025 and implementation to begin 2026-2028. This initiative is now included in the 2023-2026 Strategic Plan under Creating an Economically Thriving City Together. Project progress can followed on the 292h. .gi_!�....P..! irn....Pirg irp .g . Compass Kitchener appreciates the City's continued transparency in reporting the status of these projects. In several cases, projects have been carried forward and integrated into the current strategic plan, illustrating the City's adaptive approach. The committee encourages continued clear communication on revised timelines and evolving scopes as the City moves forward. General comments: In last year's report card, Compass Kitchener encouraged the City to continue prioritizing three complex and interrelated challenges: housing, social isolation and loneliness, and climate change. Housing and climate change are identified as priorities in the current strategic plan, and we encourage the City to sustain and deepen its work in these areas. While social isolation is not explicitly referenced in the plan, it remains a growing concern in our community and merits greater attention. We understand that these are multifaceted issues that require collaboration across levels of government, sectors, and communities. At the same time, residents and the committee would like to see clearer progress and tangible solutions within the City's sphere of influence. As we approach the next planning cycle, we encourage the City to carry these priorities forward and communicate how its efforts contribute to addressing them. Compass Kitchener remains committed to supporting the City in this work. 14 Page 75 of 112 m 001111" ass kItCiiener�; 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� In addition, as a follow up from last year's report card, Compass Kitchener urges the City to prioritize the Arts and Culture Master Plan, given the enormous challenges currently faced by the arts sector in Kitchener and the critical role that sector plays in enhancing well-being, building community and strengthening the city's economic vibrancy. With respect to improving future evaluations, Compass Kitchener notes that budget information, including estimated internal costs, has not been provided to the committee as part of the project evaluation process. Access to this information would support a more comprehensive assessment of whether a project has met expectations relative to its scope and resource allocation. The committee commends the City for its recent efforts to begin tracking outcomes, rather than solely reporting on outputs. Compass Kitchener was pleased to contribute to the identification of outcome indicators as part of this shift. However, it remains unclear how this work is being advanced. The committee encourages the City to continue building its capacity for outcome evaluation and to ensure progress is shared transparently with Compass Kitchener and the broader public. As Compass Kitchener continues to evolve its approach to evaluation, the committee has begun to reflect on the limitations of focusing primarily on completed projects rather than tracking progress toward the broader strategic goals that guide them. While assessing specific initiatives provides tangible insights, it may not fully capture the long-term impact or alignment with the City's overarching priorities. Given the City's recent shift toward outcome -based reporting and impact measurement, Compass Kitchener welcomes the opportunity to engage in a broader conversation about how the committee's future work might be realigned to support and evaluate progress at the level of strategic goals. We see value in this potential shift and look forward to working with the City to strengthen accountability, learning, and shared purpose. Finally, Compass Kitchener extends its heartfelt gratitude to City staff for their thoughtful cooperation, openness, and responsiveness throughout this evaluation process. Their collaboration has been instrumental in helping the committee understand the work underway and offer informed, constructive feedback. 15 Page 76 of 112 Sustain the Shift Toward Outcome -Based Evaluation m 001111" ass kItCiiener�; 1l�rrrrrJJlJlai/rr�r�rratirirrirrrrrrrrry. i,ion values priorit mra�a��rrrrrrrrrrrrr�/r�r��arl���//t��O///���� Compass Kitchener strongly supports the City's emerging focus on measuring outcomes rather than outputs. This shift enhances accountability and helps evaluate the true public value of strategic initiatives. The committee encourages the City to continue building this capacity and to share its progress openly with Compass Kitchener and the broader community. Ensure Transparency Around Resources and Budget The absence of budget information — including estimated internal costs — has made it difficult to assess the efficiency and scale of completed projects. Going forward, Compass Kitchener encourages the City to include resource data in project summaries to better contextualize performance and delivery. Embed Truth and Reconciliation Across the Organization Compass Kitchener commends the City for approaching Truth and Reconciliation as a long-term, relational commitment rather than a time-limited initiative. To build on this foundation, the committee encourages the City to continue embedding Truth and Reconciliation across all levels of its organizational culture, policies, and practices. Doing so aligns with the spirit of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Calls to Action, which emphasize the need for sustained institutional change through education, collaboration, and accountability. Embedding this work into core municipal functions—not isolating it as a standalone item—is essential to continuing to ensure reconciliation is lived, not just stated. As always, Compass Kitchener offers this report in the spirit of collaboration and continuous improvement, with the shared goal of helping Kitchener become a more connected, responsive, and inclusive city for all. 16 Page 77 of 112 v U — � O � Q J J J IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII III L (Jill) N - U11111) > O Q Ln roCL L- � O o0 fa 0 E O IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII -C: „�o�o -- N cn cn ca C: Ln O C +� O c6 4-j V a -j V Q � x Q N X Ln w N +�-+ Qj U W G +•+ N V =3 O > � V a -J OLn4J U Q E 0 r -I N N E 4-0O in • ffN FLi O a--+ U E E U N E 4A t1A W Wo - ,- .Q > O 4A (6 Q O N mummlo to O U V) T (3) 0- Q Illll0000000io a-; N NCL iu000000 a..� a_+ N u U L 5 aA = O QJ N -0 N 4A O.� .m U O :3Lr) U U lD cn cn _O � � I .= �_ O }, 4-1 U O � �> CU > O � -0 � Ov MEN"c�i� cu � N Q. cn cn � -0E v O +:+ M O U i � ate) U m +J c � n E 0--o O to FJ� N O vi I ..... ........ w X +I- � .– Ln � c� > E � to O � - v v VIII W O Ln . — bn •— ca ca M au au O�; }' v N� U E O E .v W .. C) L N z Q O + > -0 Ln Illlluuuuuuuum ull uuuuuuuu0000000 m000000i i .a • • • • • • (6 Q N o.fa a) Y X Lu =3nOC -0 — -0 � L O cu � — O 4- O 4-j `— v -C i I v � 0 (� N N to O i O� O � Q) > Ln O U f6 v Q :3 O wo v > _I_- +� Ul Ul U _x F — UD s ro c6 — Lo N V bn m can +� � +�-+ `� 2 - � O V UA m U O 4J � CL VIII X _N F v O Q� N • (U (U VIII °° UJ 0 O i� co , , o E — U .- CU U O X W o x " s W O o uiii u U O U w U +� Y V U 4A ++ .................... Ilm Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Financial Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: August 25, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Scott, Chief Procurement Officer PREPARED BY: Ryan Scott, Chief Procurement Officer WARD(S) INVOLVED: N/A DATE OF REPORT: July 3, 2025 REPORT NO.: FIN -2025-307 SUBJECT: Summary of Bid Solicitations Approved by the Chief Procurement Officer (April 1, 2025 — June 30, 2025) RECOMMENDATION: For Information REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to provide a quarterly update on Procurements that have been approved through delegated authority in accordance with the Procurement By-law 2022-109. • There were thirty (30) bid solicitations approved in this quarter. • This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: In accordance with Procurement By-law 2022-109 (Chapter 170 Municipal Code), section 27.1. "The CPO must submit quarterly procurement information reports to Council to provide the following information about the City's procurement activities: a) The circumstances and details of approved procurements exceeding $133,800 in value, under delegated authority of the CPO; and b) the circumstances and details of any emergency purchase(s) with a procurement value exceeding $133,800." REPORT: Attachment 1 is a listing of the approved bid solicitations for Council's information. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 88 of 112 STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: All bid solicitations awarded by the Chief Procurement Officer, were within approved budgets, or were approved in accordance with the budget control policy. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter. APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lautenbach, Chief Financial Officer, Financial Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Listing of Approved Bid Solicitations April 1, 2025 — June 30, 2025 Page 89 of 112 i. Ln N O N O M i 7 I Ln N O N r Q N U O U) m Q Q O y J T^^ wY W V _ .-. x LO O O � U O CU * 4 N` I 4. -xi CO co 'O * U N O Cl) LO 0(0= ti O �ocoN(D�� coM O cop C _E O 00 LO Vr�o0 Q CO f- CO co Z) N co co �} CO � Z) P7 co .a .y CN 'Zi K-? -O K} K? V> 00 _0 6F> L 3 69- 6> a) fi} a) 3x o O O O � O O tf O E O }, a+ O O C) OL'QO O O 'QO OL O O M LC) Co U ;t COCO O N Co U ti 00 CN Q CO m a- U O co U CO Q Lf) E!} V> r Efl CCj O Efl .o U .o LL m� co L Q M ^ O 4-- .�od O�JU'C UL U CM o V � � C V i o Q 'i IS ' C Qo oC�. i OQ oC'oa) C co O 0 as > -OU oma_O-0 0J0 'L �O .—O C C DO�- .N ca � C 5O X Jcn o�a)wOoa)�- O L C � L cn L O C oO oO U L L >Coa) L ca W��o�M L U0 O L C U C•) oa) U 00 U :E a) (B C (6 W= U Q a U ^ 41 O L a) LU E a) w 00 C O (D� N J a) Lu m(DL) C6 )EDS L) CB ��0YDM2Y2U >+ U C U L U 2Lo�Q�U O CU6 C U co U- U>�Y U L O U C ^ (B E U a) C6 •0 ++ L �. C) O C a) O O C C6 a) p Q �' "- EO> c O Ua)) O E C6 U- _: Z p C OO ZCDL (a W E� rV C: U M65 co M O O O C� U u) i °� U N L C N o 0 E E O � E C o U O c� i � j� 2� a) V CO +U C Cu m i 0 U a) F O L m a) (n 0 O I (6 V 0 CN -a O > V O Cn 1U LU o m C N 3 O U NQ 0- (B C o o U �+ o O+�'N� N 0 U)N -t LO ` a) O U Q a a) co O— �2 — 2 CB d m 20-C m O O m20-0� a) O O�U O a) O 0(if UU o C m d(A(A C O NT O N N LO N N M r-- M O � N It CO It O Lf) N Cfl V O O O O O O O O O O O .O 6 � A � 6 � 6 A � 6 L6 0 N N N N N N N N N N N O O M N O It O C)) co O rL C� M O r LO N N O O Op LO f� O 00 N N f` O CD C O O O O O r r 4 co CD Z ti LO N O I- ti CD O r �} 00 00 N M M N O N f— N Ef} H} ff? 69 Ef} Ef? O O O C O O O O O O O O O p Cl O O O O O O O O�i CD r M O O CD O co M � b9 C O N M H? 60- 601 r EH r (f} (f} LL LF? Q O Q cp } _O O Q _0 O O Ca m OL C OJO L p ca pJ O OL _ UO'O L C = x . L a N p p x =) aO a .'O• p p O L Qp mp O . Q U L L O L O ca ve OE OC CO O O CD Op0 cC (U N >+T L N � � >p ULL � 0 C cn v 0 LaO O cr 0 10 C L cn O 2 N Q~O UN O O 0- U) JCn � (Loo 0QNH_ COO UCnJ�QHQ � cnU� JOLO O L Co Co E O N O O C _ (a O L L (n > N O L (a U O cn L a)a) co U E 0 0 fn UrL Cn O O CU Q " O CL > CO �. f� CU O U ca a) Cn -p U CO U -a O a) C O O CD U Ca L U% O O L C — > N O QC LO N O m o L a) U L � U U 0 L U ,� C rn O L O N— — L I L LO O7 >, N N fU4 OL > O > V O 2 0) a_ LL c ZLL OLCaa) Q a)L Q U a Q coo 00 c Q ?) Cu L cn U U c O 'O O N C = A a U) O O cc O i co N >, 3:'O ~ N 'O C (a Ca OL UQLO N O a Q > C= C2 L (U It �m' C= r C= QD C1 -O N CU O LLU)0- L �� O U2 _O CLUNCLCnQUCniJLO(0-)(n O L> Ca CU p 0 L ca ti CD O O r— M 00 r O CD Ln OO O r O f— m O O N O ti Lf) 00 Ln co co 0 C� N N N LO Cn LO LO O LO O LO LO O 0 ry LL 0 LL 0 a U - vi N cB N O a a� a� a cls J O U U (Q CO N 2D 0 O co O Cl co �^� T T ic 41 U O � Lf) f- LO 07 .art y N T co T fl_ T Lc) O O LO(D ti 0 ti N O co 00 I` co G O 07 LO N c o 'T O r _ T LO i N e7 T T ce) It N 69 Z) LO 69. 69- 6g 644 6g 69. 69 L6 N O O O O O O O O E O O O ON O_ 00 O O C) O co O 00 O O O O 4 -- L O co co T co Ln Na) Q- Lf) 60} 61} Ef} 610,b9 6F} 61) O LL_ O O O U > a) O a U.°E O Jo cLa =3O O a)O ,,nn Z a) O = .0 Ucu m co L a (6 ca o co Z J ( O�C LJ OO O A oU) 0 o0 OQ N U+ U O L O U C °o ° - C > U LL MaO �o 0 CD m >00°'° o� ° ° � � �c �Q� ui - � a) ° �Y��dd�YJYLo � u) <Lu o�� Cjd- 2U) U) ° CL C o 0 0) 06 a) o� /=5 V > a) cQ > L a) Y 6 p0 O)C: m o � U : p a U �m/°� L LL U a) a) �� m �� a) O C: a) > W `i V) a) U O m U �_ Qi s' L0 L :3a'.I �/-� V J C a) C o ai C O Vi }' U L D U U L L y""i UYcao Cj i1 J 4-- _0Lo ° U C O L MO �� O o a d >o y -- N N > > ++ m c a) U CD o �� E >= a) a o =U cu C U 0 C ;� C O � ca m > i ca 0> p '° Q COM U o 0 � an d OL c0 O C 4-- C cQ Q0� °Q- O >. cnC Q n EC (a C V CE C62, m O >1 C O (a oE� C C C E ca Q T° o (n M ' -0 c+6 C Q Q Q a) ca C O_ m JUCjUU> 0 O L c>Q U) N TCj — �� >(Q a) O� >�U(n � U) L 0- M W U O N ,;T 0') T N cD � ti O T O 0') O O T T N O O N T T T T T N LO LO d Un Ln Ln 6 A O vi N cB N O a a� a� a cls J O U U (Q CO N 2D 0 O co O Cl co N T T O N O7 0) cli � a_ �O 4 Q co N a N i L O vi N cB N O a a� a� a cls J O U U (Q CO N 2D 0 O co O Cl co Staff Reort � ) Financial Services Department www. kitchen er.ca REPORT TO: Committee of the Whole DATE OF MEETING: August 25, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning & Asset Management, 519-904-9347 PREPARED BY: Debbie Andrade, Manager of Budgets, 519-904-9344 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All Wards DATE OF REPORT: August 20, 2025 REPORT NO.: FIN -2025-365 SUBJECT: 2025 June Variance Report RECOMMENDATION: For information. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to provide an update on financial results for City operations. • Tax supported operations are projecting a positive variance of $326,000. • All enterprise operations (non -tax supported business lines) are projecting positive variances. • This report supports the delivery of core services. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is the first variance report to Council regarding the City's financial performance versus the 2025 budget. The report and attached schedules include information regarding: • Tax supported operations Rate supported enterprises/utilities, and Supplementary information related to investment income REPORT: Overall staff is projecting the City's tax supported results for 2025 will be a positive variance to budget of $326,000. The major contributors to the overall positive variance are Gapping savings and higher than usual accounts receivable balances in Penalties and Interest which is offset in part by negative variances in Engineering and Planning, which have seen *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 93 of 112 revenue shortfalls due to slower than budgeted development. More details about each of the City's tax supported divisions are provided in the report below and in Schedule 1. The City's enterprise (non -tax supported business lines) results to the end of June show all of the enterprises are projecting results that are better than budgeted. More details about each of the City's enterprises are provided in the report below and in Schedules 2-8. Operating Fund — Tax Base (Schedule 1) Staff is projecting the City's tax supported results for 2025 will be a positive variance of $326,000. Significant projected tax supported variances (over $200,000) are summarized below. Additional details are provided in Schedule 1 for projected variances that exceed $100,000. Significant Proiected Variances (over $200, 000) Community Services Department: • Neighborhood Programs and Services is projecting a negative variance of $230,000 due to higher than budgeted Leisure Access fee assistance. • Sport is projecting a negative variance of $267,000 due to higher than budgeted snow removal charges. Development Services Department: • Engineering is projecting a negative variance of $767,000 due to lower than anticipated site plan and new subdivision revenue. • Planning is projecting a negative variance of $883,000 due to lower than anticipated site plan revenue as many large projects are on hold with the current residential housing market slowdown, increased cost of materials, and global economic uncertainty of supply chains and tariffs. General Expense: • Gapping is projecting a positive variance of $1,800,000 due to staff savings resulting from regular vacancies. General Revenue: • Penalties and Interest is projecting a positive variance of $1,111,000 due to increased property tax receivable balances. Infrastructure Services Department: • Parks and Cemeteries is projecting a negative variance of $201,000 due to increased costs in the downtown core and maintenance of playgrounds. Enterarises — (Schedules 2 to 8 All of the City's enterprises are projecting year-end positive variances to budget. Details of each enterprise are noted below. Page 94 of 112 Building Enterprise (Schedule 21 The Building Enterprise is projecting a positive variance to budget of $677,000 due to an increase in new single detached dwelling permits and staff vacancies. Golf Enterprise (Schedule 3) The Golf Enterprise is projecting a positive variance to budget of $112,000 due to higher than anticipated revenues with a successful start to the golf season. Parking Enterprise (Schedule 4) The Parking Enterprise is projecting a positive variance to budget of $328,000 due to better than anticipated monthly and daily parking demand. Water Utility (Schedule 5) The Water Utility is projecting a positive variance to budget of $2,472,000 due to increased volume of water sold as a result of the warmer weather. Sanitary Sewer Utility (Schedule 61 The Sanitary Sewer Utility is projecting a positive variance to budget of $5,340,000 due to higher than budgeted revenues, which is consistent with increased volume sales also noted in the Water utility. Stormwater Utility (Schedule 71 The Stormwater Utility is projecting a positive variance to budget of $30,000 due to higher revenues from increased development offset in part by increased maintenance costs. Gas Utility (Schedule 8) The Gas Utility (Total) is projecting a positive variance to budget of $1,160,000. • Gas Delivery is projecting a positive variance to budget of $1,405,000 due to higher volumes of gas sold because of the colder winter. • Other Programs (Rental Water Heaters and KU Dispatch) is projecting a positive variance to budget of $372,000 due to higher rental revenues. • Gas Supply is projecting a negative variance to budget of $617,000 due to higher volumes of gas purchased. Investment Report (Schedule 91 All investments made were in accordance with the City's investment policy. Short-term investment yields to date have averaged 4.29% which is lower than the average interest rate of 5.84% for all of 2024. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. Page 95 of 112 FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Financial implications are discussed above and detailed in the attached schedules. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: There are no previous reports/authorities related to this matter. APPROVED BY: Jonathan Lautenbach, Chief Financial Officer ATTACHMENTS: • Schedule 1: Statement of Operations — Tax Supported Services • Schedule 2: Statement of Operations — Building • Schedule 3: Statement of Operations — Golf • Schedule 4: Statement of Operations — Parking • Schedule 5: Statement of Operations — Water • Schedule 6: Statement of Operations — Sanitary Sewer • Schedule 7: Statement of Operations — Stormwater • Schedule 8: Statement of Operations — Gas • Schedule 9: Investment Report Page 96 of 112 a M O m Ln co Lf1 M LD N Ln 00 M M LD r1 0 00 00 f0 U O N LLI U U 00 111 -a Q N ci W N � 3 0r1i0 00 �O CL QJ o a � V) m a� N Ln i f� 3 O N N r- O � N W F- o � n O UCu Ln a 3 N N O •L � � Lu N � d > Q1 O G ca LT Ln lT N > > N 00 Ln i 3 Lrj M N 3 U � .+ va) I'D N Q N fC LL CA fC N N J N 00 �+ S= Ln tuD m m o N mcv O C O N > Q f0 tT O + Ln CU 'O ++ ° a yam., N m N � 3 m ai QJ m M Ncu a M O m Ln co Lf1 M LD N Ln 00 M M LD r1 0 00 00 06 LLI U U 00 0) ci O 0r1i0 00 v Z6.00 LU QJ o U Q. Z U U V) m0 U C r- O oOf N W F- O^1 1.0 M U 00 01 Q a)Ln N O) Lu > d > Q1 O G > QJ pA p lT N > > M QJ L > 7 Q Q! Z � .+ va) W .� tao M LL O N J bD N C W O Q of CL O C O C L > Q -6i CL � + 'O ++ ° a yam., N LO tDo 0) ai QJ = a M Ncu O N N M M M LD O LPI o0 rl o� N o- M M of a) v w 0--0 OL Q o n r� -0 C= L.O LD -0a N l0 m C M c +� Ln c c v 1-1 00 y., + C L M + : Q1 C S C fO c C Ql Qj > (1) Q) N QJ UO O Q1 L.O w L rl L � '- L -0 CO C O) .� LO O v, : Ln U O U ro U - L N M O ::� O O 00 't O c I O 00 ON 00 00 I N rl M Lo r, M rl Ln N O1 Lr) 11 lz� m ,-A Lnrq c CD O O O O Ln N 00 M oo n -i l0 LO 00 00 06 LLI U U 00 LU ci r- 0r1i0 00 Z6.00 LU U Q. Z U a m0 N r- O oOf N W F- O^1 1.0 M N 00 01 00 a)Ln O W O2 O) Lu 'n d H O G W p lT N M ^ Q U Z Z W c -I M LL li w LU W O Q of .L^ O Q O > Q Q CL � w (D ° a N m LO r" 0) a --I = a M O -1 Ln M M M LD O LPI M rl LD N M M M O rl w Ln O -Zt n r� LD L.O LD IZF N l0 rf Ln Ln N I:F 1-1 00 rl M 1:T N w N a) O Lr) L.D L.O w M rl O N O) M LO O Ln O N M 00 't M L.f) 00 O 00 00 LL) Lr) N rl M O1 r, N rl Ln 00 O1 Lr) Ln m 00 Ln oo Ln N m Lr O 00 19 N W ZF 00 M O O1 m 00 00 00 0 rl rl r -i r, Ln ri m Ln r, r, rl (14 Q) O N LT I:T w ri o Lri o r N M ,:1- 00 00 n O N G) Lr) 00 O n O N N rl N M M lD Lf) Ln 00 n .--I Lf) Ln 00 LA W Ln N N .--� O (.6 O IZF r-1 N r -z O1 LT m r1 00 m rl rl rl 00 m r, O N LD M O n r -I N Lr) O 00 Ln rl M .--I M rl N M N r'n LD _o W z 06 LLI U U LU LU Z6.00 LU U Q. Z U a N N o oOf H W F- cc U z i Lu SZ W ULn In O W O2 O) Lu 'n d H O G W p U 06 Q U Z U Z Z W LU cc Ln LL li w LU W O Q of .L^ O Q O > Q Q CL � w (D ° a O N o m o LU = a o z Ln W 06 LLI U U Ln LU CC W Z U U Of N N D H W F- Z U z i Lu SZ 9= Q Z Q O inc! C J d Q O G W Q 2 = 2 o O O 0 0 0 Lu Z 0 m N E E O u L+ � O O O O f0 U O l0 (r1 00 LM Q N om rl � W N � 3 > (6 N rl Cl 0 ; Q Z 00 CD a..+ aU+ v+�+ Z_ •O CL v Ln � N V a � V) C ;t �o m 00 1.0 rn U v -1 Ln co � Ln 3 M v v N N N � rn o ZT 00 C co +' 0 � o 0 cu o o o � �' z o_ U v� N Q � Lmr� O O Ln LPA 3 n O O lD O •L N � rl 00 N � cC z O Ln r -I -1 o0 W GJ C r, m —i Ln N 3 3 n � n -1 Ln m N N O u N Q O J a W m U a w CZ C a J m Ln n -t a o -i o u O ++ Ndp m M Lin 00 0 00 aoi O m O N m +, a u m oc z> f > f0 z u o Z a a a B u z w O O LU it > LLQ dA -1 Ln 00 -1 Nm Z Q Z Q J J Co W Z u o W N r -I N M Ch DO LD 0 Ln M n n 0 14 O w N M n 0 14 00 O -I � cc LD m m -1 Q)° N C U N -1 -1 o U C � U v C > om rl � > � > (6 N rl Cl 0 ; Q Z 00 CD a..+ aU+ v+�+ Z_ m m bD v 0 v Ln � N V ri ri C ;t �o m 00 1.0 rn ri rn U U U U m 1:31 0) co � ° ca 0000 0- m r, C v Cl Ln LD t�0 Q00 00 -- s c rn o ZT 00 C co +' 0 c co o 0 cu o o v �' z o_ U v� U Q � O O O O rnm N WWC Ln m lD 00 00 N rl 00 N 00 O -I � cc LD m m -1 N �D O Ln -1 -1 o om rl � �D kD N rl Ol 00 Z 00 CD Z_ m m � m Ln � N V ri ri C ;t �o m 00 1.0 rn ri rn N N r- 00 O m 1:31 0) 0000 0- m r, rn � o o Ln LD t�0 Q00 00 00 n rn o ZT 00 rn Z LD O1 N 00 00O N 14 O 0 Ln 00 o� N O oD LD N O LD a Ln Lq ;:z N N m m N M m N r -I Ict 't N Ln 0) 00 00 00 L.0 Ln N 00 tLn Ln —A Ln N N 00 iD o m 00 m r -I Ln rn A V) ++ w _U > H U Z_ N V z v U z w> Lei L- o z o_ > W u z Q � Q1 Ln Lu O N WWC z z U ~ H N w O LLJ 0- z O � C W W z O LLI J O LL' O J a W a U a w CZ C a J o a a o -i o u O o 0 z o N a N s u z a u J oc z> f > z u o Z a a a B u z w O O LU it > LLQ o> LU (D a a> LLJ Z Z Q Z Q J J W Z u o W N O U Lu 0 Z w J a Lu v, W o H LL Q LL Lam\ F- 1 C W Z 0 N O N W a o = M V Lu r � Y W V LL z c O E X 25 s V � w N E E O U L � 02! O f0 � U 47 111 Q N v v U N W W N � 3 0Z ++ Z Z Z Ln W W •O CL a � V) O Ql Z U N LA 2 3 m � O N N W U � > (A Z Ln z W Q< NO m o a rl coo Cu U Ln r- r- a Ln r m -C:� N N N •� o 7, E > GJ Q Q W F- � W X W LL O O !? w cC LO m r- N 0Ln N Ln C 3 a W N O ami N U Lu J g a0 LX N LL � o r- m 00 m N Ln dA m 00N a Ql m N mis J L) Q N z Q of U Ln f0 rN O _q m 0000 •� -a cu Z O -1 m LO m 00 01 Ln co m00m rl 00 m N Ln m Z W z N W J W j Co c Lo v > a H Z Z 06 02! O v v U N W 0Z ++ Z Z Z Ln W W t!I � U U 0>G W W Q' Z f= L) N Z � > W U > (A Z Ln z W Q< a Z Z � a LU N OA > v o = Ln Q LL o 7, E > GJ Q Q W F- W X W LL O O !? w H W W W LL OW ♦- a W LL � J Z Q Q -, a Lu J g a0 LX m LL � LL' 2 (D Z ~ N LU a o Ln LL J L) Q V) z Q of U Ln (D W •� � qA Z O z z J W or W Lu H ♦- 11 Z W z N W J W j Q c Lo v > a H Z Z z o Q a cc Z m a Q 2 a x Q Z H z U v� o W LL a o a O 0 ' O x 00 O W o O LL Q N = O 0 0 m co O v C) (D 0 00 W H w rA rI 1 0 ' o 7.- o 75- m N ri 00 1, L.6 Ln N O O LD L6 00 � m ri O r4 r -I r -Iv ri 1, ri m Ln o m o -1 Ln r i 00 Oo r1 m Ln Ln 00 O N m O N M — N 0 00 m 0 M O r, Ln N Lr M 00 LT -1 � LT OItt ^ O a) 00 LO N O ri m -::TM N m Orn 00 Ol r -I Nr -I r -I' LD N N � n r -I rn co Ln 00 Co N M .-I O L�i1 110 O Ol 00 I� O N m N O Ln r N m N N O M N N 1l n 1, ri lD -1 Ln -:T O Ln 00 N v r -I c -I 00 1n N Ln 't O � u1 O O 00 ri zte-I O O O LD ("I00 LD ll O N N Il 00 <D m N M n O mO 00 OLn It It N � 00 O) LO � In N 00 m ri LO ri Lr 00 r1i It lD c -I Z r -I Ll1 N N N Ol O � 06 02! N W 0Z ++ Z Z Z Ln W W t!I 0>G W W Q' Z f= L) N Z Lii W U w (A Z Ln z W Q< a Z Z � a LU o = Ln Q LL o w > GJ Q Q W F- W X W LL H W W W LL OW ♦- a W W CC J Z Q Q -, a Lu J g a0 LX m 0 LL' 2 (D Z ~ N LU a J L) Q V) z Q of U Ln (D W •� Z Z O z z J W or W Lu H ♦- 11 Z W z N W J W j Q Q d > a H Z Z z o Q a cc Z m a Q 2 a x Q Z H z W o W LL a o a O LL a x a W o W LL Q LL W = = H 0 0 m co V v v C) (D 0 0 W W H w II v V; D(1) -0 u v V � C c6 N fL6 � N OJ � N E OX Q E �m -0 v +� O U v Q C) 0 0 Q a C: (3) N U L O U O f0 U O� O L11 N N � W 3 0 CL L- L- U 111 2 3 O .�—� M fY1 N v '' N � � o � Lr) Ul CD 00 G1* Lf1 O M LO ULn N C r^i M ll N .L l > CA c -I N O M rn N M N P, _ C O O r -i N r -i M O LA f0 3 Ql LO1 L!1 r -I N Ln l 14 N +�+ N � N 00 N N n CO LD O M M r� N 00 U N Q Lfl � r- � N N c -I N O N 00 W ri OQ M O O IIR I rmi l0 Ln 3 M O1 N N N N N O M W N oc 00 r -I r -I I:t N Lvi v ni r4 op m w 0 o r1 m r1 r1 Czr N O Ln N m lzt Ln �+ O m Ln 00 I- C r -I Lfl Ln N w cc It lD W rl N m o m't w w v ci V) c Q. W W 2 O LU cc W L U LU LU V) z O Z LU z z > O N O L-ujw x oC J = O J Q W J .T Lu J } a J W f— W f— LU W Q O W a ' W > o W (7 O z V W O v LU 0 z H o W a � U.) W O W H II x Q F- 1 C W Z 0 N O N W a o = M V Lu CC ; F- '13 Y W V 6L Z c Q E x `r 5 s V � w -0 1= l0 N C +J D + O f0 •L La .N •L C > > > O Vf a) '� > s Cl) S° > v) a) +� > Ww E^ C:f4 C L f0 C a) O Y `~ y >� L bb U aj � U v a�Lo-0 v v n Q O to u E}+ OV) L O L v 46 fl_ O_ � a) fu w Q Q cu Ln .� o a)U a) •� Ln 0 O M 0 0 U +� O_ O O v U ++ -0 O N 1= O U a-+ O ca 17- O O O O O O O O y O� O 00 N M 111 � -a Q c I -1 N N O N � W O O CL L- L- 0 N U W l0 I� M N O l0 Ln f0 m O v v m m m tG O N N > o m m rn m m rl � n 4J N lItD M Ch 14 M NO f0 M 00 N M lN0 cC N 0 0 i n 00 qr G1 u1 Ql V1 M O lA Q1 O _ LA f6 O 3 � n .r -i Ol 00 ca qr N M N N LD U06 N 06 06 N o a LM N Ln 1A GJ M N ^O lD t0 M N O 00 m N Q1 N dp m m rn -i14 O Nm 00 ^ .�-i N f0 O 1- ' -1 u1 MCD ' N O `r' *' o Ln dA v � rn° N ry� N Ln m06 z o Ln o .0 W 0LU ~ i v Ow oc J OC Wa v z w LU cn U p O Q zLu N 2 U I=J p V1 U �U w 0 _O H U co I --W CA U .T 1= Q z w =LL � Q LL Z U Q w w a Q a LL Z� Z O Q N z fLLI LL 2E LL O fA �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln `Ww Y I Z O W Z V a z W W W ~ �, N 0 N M ; Y C7 W Q1 LL Z Z N 0 p Q e N m m s V Co N N �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln 0 LD O �o N 00 v en M Ln O G1 O N c O N o 'D++ 3 � — N m m Ln N a aJ N N aJ ^ 3 Ln Ln CO Ln m C � O N C O fD z Ln (O s N M M d > wc > Ln v m > , O v > j y p QJ Q UA p C Q V -6 O 6 f6 p aJ '� a cn r" w> v v 3 m �: v r o c � o V) m o m C ri m Ln y Q o '�, a -0 v ri lD �.� N C:-0 O N l0 l0 �y.� io a) V a-+ N m aJ bA = U m a O O O U -0 O O O L O O O O O O O 00 00 Ol Ol n U (14 N r14 M lzT M 1:T rl� M W LMV C C 4l r f0 N 45 U LLJ L > .G) > O a 0 0 0 �oo o 0) v o v Ln Ln m , o "' m m Ln f0 N i N H �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln �t LD O �o N 00 o M Ln O G1 O N dQ O N LA 'D++ 3 M N m m Ln N u N N N ^ 3 Ln Ln CO Ln m (U O N �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln �t LD 0 �o N 00 o M Ln O Ln N dQ O N O 'D++ Ln N N m m Ln N Ln N y N ^ 3 Ln �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln �t LD m �o N 00 Ln M Ln O Ln lD > O O O Ln i Ln N N M 04 Ln N Ln N y N ^ 3 Ln Ln CO Ln m (U O N �o rl io LD Il to LD I� N M I-� 1- Ln Ln M ZT m rIA rlj Ln ,-I �t LD O �o N 00 M M Ln O Ln lD > O O O Ln i Ln N N lzT l0 1 N Ln N y l0 ^ Ln Ln Ln Ln m r" N O N ccz O Ln z Ln w w N M M d U wc v O Inc O w y cn r" w m o r � oc m o m m Ln y ri lD O N N O N l0 l0 �y.� io N m m = ,-I �t LD O �o N 00 M 00 O 00 lD O O O Ln i Ln 00 N lzT l0 1 N Ln Itt N l0 ^ Ln Ln Ln G ; L N ccz z v CD w II w 2 Q Ln O N 0 ro m C CD =5 OL U C a1 N W (1 CD L N ccz z v CD w w i i > N d wc v O Inc O w II w 2 Q Ln O N 0 ro m Z rI W WLU2L" Z NJ N 0 N W H Y LLW O W ~ Z a V Q o o LL _oar V 0 > O O L o +� o v _ v o � v _ rD Q W V L �j C >M ro (3) ro O O > V �, V)7 O v v an ra Ln � ca c a, o CU O u MM 00 ba u v vi on O N aJ C Q bn C O ,� m E � � L i L a) U N U t 0 p > +' ba U V rU v U v °; > 0 v w° =1 .� (D Q O 4- Q o O a) v -0 a C t ruru =3c aJ -0 6 a) F L v�� ai 1 0 v� v - v a) U N a) Q� � 7 Z5 O v O E O Z3 N U- O O U- .S� O d Ln O L O O C L O O fC O O O O Ln Ln O � eN-I U O O � ei LM C c I r N U LLJ L GJ � � O a o O 0 0 U N N .--� Ol OR M N N O O m N Ln N Ln i N 41 >M N O r4 c N Lr)v ' Fr4 GJ lfl lfl 00 n N 00 n U Lr) �r'n Lr)a-I �r <D N r) Ln N > N 00 00 LO N lD ' Ol G1 M Cl lD ^ 0 r ei Y LA 3 N N Ol m I Q rV to to N .--I N -6 O U N Q � H v Y N N ' lD lfl O v GJ � b0 N 00 Ln Ln � � Ln N dQ � m o O "a 4, ri ri r r i N = m m N Y O s 0 O O CND 0000 Lr) O O m m lD rh I� Lrl m O v dA m m r r c rV O N ry M N N N M @ N � m .3 U o E i O C L w a u ai X v Q `n U U y w In LU 40 o p L F- V, 3 i 3 > > LU C � L L � w � C v tY Z U > v Z a v >_W�� .� CL ci Z v � 0 H� w z CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD 4- 0 ri 00 W Z Q0 W Z d W W O " N W 2 V W � Z W Q W o c ° Y pp 3 o LCL O Z Z Q C o Y � X s va> � •,� 3 CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD 4- 0 ri 00 O m N 000 .m-1 O O n Q0 r-1 M QJ � `n I� (3N) N LA pp 3 o N 3 — m o u � N tin � � •,� 3 o tin CG C O v n: � � . r-1 1 O N N Ol O O N O EZ a LA eV 01 N .Z N O 0) O O^ E N 0 m .Z Q-0 � cr) +' ^—' X 41 � O Q U C 10 O Q N O W Z O U C: C ++ C 7 QJ M W C 7 y In a)LL O L 3 1 Q7 N dA S nA C L L -0 W E U C C O u U U u > m N L ns U N ca a7 i O ca caa ca ca U > > > > v a s — 'Z,0 a) �; ro a) z W 0 > ra > C 0 > Z,U +� ca QJ v a +� to a) E +� co oD Q C oA b4 a) WU (a w [a a1 > CL L C C U� C:++ C C C a� v C LJ O v V) C L U > U O 0_ U +� O 00 O O O Lr) } Vrn M M O N N M LM C C QJ r f0 N 45 U LLJ L .Q) > > O a O 1 � 1 N QJ1 V QJ al 0) u') Lr) N Ln i 3 O t.6O nj M cn Ln M N 'i N > N m CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD -1 (14 N ri 00 O m N 000 .m-1 O O n Q0 r-1 M QJ � `n I� (3N) N LA pp 3 L1r) N 3 — m N u � N N 3 o Q) CG � n: CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD -1 (14 N r -I 00 O m N 000 .m-1 O O n Q0 r-1 M QJ N `n I� (3N) N LndA pp .r v r-1 — o N m � Lr N 3 o Q) CG CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD -1 (14 N n 00 O m N 000 .m-1 O O n ri r-1 M Ol 00 I� (3N) N LndA N .r v r-1 — o O N I Lr N 3 o Q) CG � CD v > CD cc 0 v 0 lD 00 lD -1 (14 N -1 0) 00 O m N 000 .m-1 O O n ri r-1 M Ol Lr) I� (3N) N r-1 N .r v r-1 — `M. 0 00 (Z �t lD O Cl Lr) O) O N zT m 1" N m m 00 N ri 00 1- N lD lD lD Lr) O m N 1.0 1.0 1, m LJi m 00 lD m N 1- ri In N O In Lr) O m 110 m —1 ri O m N 000 .m-1 O O n N 4' Mo ri ri " 0 Y 0Lrl 00 `� r�-1 I� o -0 cI rI m .r v U v I o � . r-1 1 O N N Ol O O N O m 1-1 m LA eV 01 N .Z N O 0) O O^ <D <D N 0 m r i r i cr) +' ^—' 00 lD m N 1- ri In N O In Lr) O m 110 m —1 ri O O -:T In r- N 4' Mo ri ri " II a U I o � . LA L LL N C +' N X 41 � aJ Q N W U C: C y In a)LL O L 3 1 > aJ W nA C L L -0 W > Z U N z a7 i 0 0 ro z W 0 � 0 Lu II a Z `I II 2 2 Q 00 �n NLn rq0 O m W o 0 W Z W `>- W L" O " N Tal Y � V L `O} r V Lu Z Q > E s `o 8 II 2 2 Q 00 �n NLn rq0 O m o 0 E a, o °�; 0 E o -0 _0 O > aJ V .ca s O -O Q) •L (U .� coo aJ > E s a) ro O > a) v > N v 3 E x > W o O v +, 3 > v > .Q o . G7 -a 0 a a1 a, V � ra s a v >_ -O o Cl ro v v 0 (D3 0 E ra E v v +, v v> +, V U N la .� > O U U i N U ++ N U a) m O bA > .� O .� O V) CD- 0 +' a O O a o In -a v 7 aA v -0 v � -0 v C m aJ N C Z C 7 c s 'L aJ v C: v Qi L,L to !A s o3 U-0 V, U U s a 0 U-0 fC O O O O O O L.0 l0 O N } V O lD N LM 4l f0 r45 W L N U � GJ > O a o N a o Qj V 4J O �--I O N l0 C1 00 ^ t.6N Ill r -I 'i N O N ri ro N 00 0 Ln LO -1 M r, 00 111 r i Ql n W Ln N N N O 00 N 1D T O •L N N e -I N � > N N Lfl n r- 0) N 00 ei m j. G1 IliN V1 00 L' LA f0 i 3 00 O 00 N r- N N tz M y O N 3 O r- 1:T M -1 rn en -0 p u N iC M M Ln —1 Lo n —1 06a) M Q ai l0 O t0 O rl NM ^ N G1 O N N ri 0�0 000 � 00 rn l0 rr)rq T-iLn 00 M 0M n O N dQ -a N rn r, Ln � � 00 Ln , 3 a -+N f0 N N —1.-i ^ N 00 Lm 0 LD � O 0) O O� —1.1 -6 Cri M M O 01 00 00 Ill ai -i m 00 Lnrn r1i ro (.0r- v � � N f�0 O N 3 000 of to ri Ln ri 0i z ri ri M c 12 N CG Ln LD N i (0 - U .3 0 E ,_ ar v Ln � C: C v - a X v v a CD =5C O ra s C U y X O1 a) > W " L O �'C 110 to OJ > CD a1 f)f CL c w > oc Z } c Z aj ai � ro a) 0 0- w Z u 0 3: z II 2 2 Q 00 �n NLn rq0 O m CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N r, O O QJ M N O Lr) N z o0 � WG Z r = W cW W � , N N W V W a ~ o N o m L Y Lazy 0 � V Q L Fx aa� +� a) N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln V cn > w CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N r, O O QJ M N O Lr) N Q) o0 N aIQ O LA CU 4' 3 00 N o m L O u ++ o o a O m o It +� a) N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln o � LD N _y Y o ar ar n: LUU > LN d b.0O O E :n N > tp O i LU -�� m O zr 00 ri o O l0 N 0 kD I� N M Ol m O Ol Q1 M Ln O N v o 3 v F N v o ro o > > ri Ln � N N m Ln LD > > _0- t O .0 Q o cc V) w �Lu I� I� N CL � m 01 O N .2 v t' O i N O aJ co -O —1 Q7 ^ 3 Q- - 41 u = � .... �' v W O T u as QJ 3 O Il 't —A N rl -6 to 3 'i a) ' � O0 N a) N U °�' > -6 V U a) u a! s N 0 t6 a--� > ro C N O U t � a) qA i O t +' O O +>— L fl ro 'O aJ Q U LQ+J O a -0 a) E ro c a Q coo *' m }'aj a) an �U+ Lo U f0 3\ U 3 C v ++ Ln O Q) ro v a a) v L co Q .� v w a) O O Y U O O O O O O O ro �M (�,) c�o -I -1 M ri lD lD Ln QJ f0 45 N U LL L QJ � •O > a N M QJ L1 00 00 O 00 N 06 O 06 � m N � i N 41 > H CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N r, O O QJ M N O Lr) N Q) o0 N aIQ O LA CU 4' 3 00 N m m m O u ++ o l0 c -I r4 O m o It m N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln LD N _y Y o ar ar n: LUU CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N r, O O QJ M N O Lr) N I, l4 o N aIQ O O CU 4' 4, I� N m m m O N � lfl l0 c -I r4 O m o It m N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N 0 O O 0 N O Lr) N I, l4 o O m Ln CU 4' 0 a) 04 O N � lfl l0 c -I r4 O m o It O l0 l0 Q1 M -1 o o ri Lr n N N N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln LD N _y Y o ar ar O LUU CD v CD rY 0 v l0 00N Lr"f - IZ N O O 1.0 Lli N O Lr) N I, l4 O m e» � U Q l0 c -I r4 O m o It O l0 l0 Q1 M -1 o o ri Lr n N N N Cl Ln Ln 00 m Ln LD N _y Y o ar ar O LUU > LN d b.0O :n 0 C i LU z O zr 00 ri o O l0 N 0 kD I� N M Ol m O Ol Q1 M Ln O N CY) M m N a)kD a) F N v o r- m ri Ln � N N m Ln LD _0- t o o cc V) w �Lu I� I� N 0 0 I, o m l0 M m M � m 01 O N .2 v I� lD O 01 N N —1 00 —1 O I, 41 .... Il 't —A N rl +Z II 0 w 2 Q O O Ln N O m tin v � U Q m O LUU > LN d b.0O :n 0 C i LU z (6(6 a) Z a) LU += LU _0- o o cc V) w �Lu II 0 w 2 Q O O Ln N O m III F- _ Z Z ba - LU Z J D W L 3k W LLI < Q � 2 j Y L ] LL 0 Z Q ) � V 0 � Q >) § _ f III \ 3k 0 \ $ _ c .g - z \}k\ \\7u 0 ro ° \ ° 0 w ( 2) ® o e / / \§ E/' / § a 2 2 9= z Q 2 i> \ \ > g 'E ± w » m > - � / u a) CL \ w w / ƒ ( ƒ / ) / Z. / _ / \ 2 \ \ 3 n \ y = G _ 0 k C) / ƒ � m rn k e jQ LLI m N 2 » a \ \ \ ■\ u ■ > m c c d § 2 2 j N M � ■ 2- 00 m o # # � r -I00/ Lr) > q \ \ \ Rt \ \ \ ■ C LM -ra / / k \ g � m � U 6 Lr� w 2/ 7/ « � ■ \/ \ \ \\0) j \ c 4 Ln % c a w e \ w& , /Q m g m \/ , ¥ Lr�¥ 6 / " § m / \ \ \ � \ } \ \ ■ Ln % w 3 m » Q¥ a, S $ o m / $ p } N� k Q S ® r ® 2 W m � \ k ( c - g 7 u ( L k [ R 2 x J § 7 \ j E 2 E E/ & k \ § 2 * \ ( ) B \ o \ ± k / \ 0 nf & I III CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD z aj N t0 W 0 W Z Lrl W N O N W 2 aIQ a o m c Y � V v LL o�a0 m Z L O U W u _aa� V C7 > w CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD � O , aj N t0 GJ 0 Ln Lrl G1 L 0 0 N aIQ ° � N LA CU 4' 3 N N m v O N O U W V 4J t N Q (n ro vl N Mm 00W H V of M Lr) r -I U') .—I CO o N N CO 00 O ro dA N -O m O' Lrl I� ro > v O v ULU L Ln rI rI aJ L > (n > > ZbA a"'F- -6 a E y i a1C E C L a o I c o Z rra a) Ev a' N LU_0 v > W c � °p Ln � toO L u t _ U ri v O v 00 I, r" a1 d0 � o o O O O ra " lzz O t Q O N Q O N � N 00 m O -0 aJ O n O a1 rr rro n ro ra —i ^ m :0 C NL W bD QJ i v N 0A L -C i U u O O O O O O O O } -1 00 ON O N O O LM u VLn � Ln � W rZa f0 N U LU L � O i a CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD � O , r -I N t0 GJ 0 Ln Lrl G1 r -I N aIQ m N LA CU 4' 3 M N m m N O U W LT N Q � N Mm 00W H V of M Lr) r -I U') .—I CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD � O , ri N t0 GJ 0 Ln Lrl ` m N aIQ m N O CU 4' 41 I� N m m N O Z W LT N CA m rr CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD � O , ri N t0 00 Lr) Lrl ` m m N m m Ln CU 4' O ON dA m O Z W LT N CA 00 rr Mm 00W m V of M Lr) r -I U') .—I CD c v CD cc LL 0 v ri lD � O , O N t0 I� Lr) Lrl ` m m N m m N N ON Mm r-I I:Z rl m -1 W cl N N 00 rr Mm 00W LOn s V of M Lr) r -I U') .—I CO o LO� OM 0000 N ZtN I� Lr) Lrl ` m m U N I N o ON Mm r-I I:Z rl 17 It a- I Y N Lr) 00 rr o0 O LOn s Q of M Lr) r -I U') .—I CO o N N CO 00 O N -O m O' Lrl I� ro c v ULU L N rI rI m L v > > LULr) a"'F- -6 y i a1C C L W Z rra a) Z t N LU_0 W c m Ln � toO m N ri m-1 00 I, r" 0 � o o O O N lz: rl lzz M N � N 00 m O n O r -I0 rr rro n M N —i ^ m :0 LO� OM 0000 N ZtN I� Lr) Lrl ` m m U N I o ON � rm-I 00 It 't N v N Lr) 00 rr o0 O LOn s Q of —A N Lr) r -I U') .—I m Ln .M... II 0 2 Q M 0 Ln N rIj O ro a a U N I o >_ °1 1 L Q +- v x S LL v a 7 x c ULU L 3 L O > > LULr) a"'F- -6 y i a1C C L W Z rra a) Z t N LU_0 W c (10 0 � o o w z" II 0 2 Q M 0 Ln N rIj O ro a CD 10 O O O O O O N N I� M Cl) O Z O o N W O i W Z W W O " N W 2 V m a o m c Y N V v LL o�a� O Z� L LPI 3 O 00 Ol 41 00 00 00 rl ~ -1 O e'I u _aa� a) > aJ IZT IT TT CD 10 O O O O O O N N I� M Cl) O 41 O o N LPI O i a1 W 00 o0 00 m W C N N C � fD � N O O M 00 LPI 3 O 00 Ol 41 00 00 00 rl c -1 O e'I > s N a) > aJ IZT IT TT 00 00 .Z' LPI O ++ E Ln r -i n O c L Ln Ln Ln Ln E .--I PVm a Q N O L U S � o s m Q O c � C: +, c � v � U � O O O L O O O co Ln m VM M LM r45 c Ql f0 N U LN L > O i a CD 10 O O O O O O N N I� M a1 Cl) O 41 O o N LPI O i Ln 61 W 00 o0 00 m W C N N N N O O M 00 LPI 3 O 00 Ol 41 00 00 00 rl 00 n -1 O e'I > s N LPI f6 3 IZT IT TT 00 00 Lr LPI O ++ N 3 N Ln r -i n r,�, n Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf) .--I PVm N m Q N N m a1 Cl) O 41 O N N LPI O i Ln 61 W 00 o0 00 m W C N 0) O 00 Ol M M Lr i � > N O 00 Ol 41 00 00 00 rl 00 n -1 O e'I > s a1 LPI f6 3 IZT IT TT 00 00 Lr LPI Y 0 N 3 N Ln r -i n r,�, n Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf) .--I PVm -0 Q N 49 =5 c N N > v w CD cc z v w s> v O nf Q X LU tin In C: w V) C6 z w Q a 0 w a1 F L c a, a X aJ 3 � c 0)aj s � c 4, aj Z II 0 2 M O Ln N O m O N N N N O i w N m 0000 oo0 m 0000 r, C C 0) O 00 Ol M M Lr i 4 O lD l0 -1 1-1 Ln NdQ � m rml Lr LLr Lr 47 ; N m N n ri LP) Lf) =5 c N N > v w CD cc z v w s> v O nf Q X LU tin In C: w V) C6 z w Q a 0 w a1 F L c a, a X aJ 3 � c 0)aj s � c 4, aj Z II 0 2 M O Ln N O m O 00 00 w N m 0000 oo0 m 0000 r, C C M 00 i r�I i =5 c N N > v w CD cc z v w s> v O nf Q X LU tin In C: w V) C6 z w Q a 0 w a1 F L c a, a X aJ 3 � c 0)aj s � c 4, aj Z II 0 2 M O Ln N O m z 0 W LU] Z LLI F W 2 2 Q) � LLJ 2 Y V E LL 0 Z Q ) k � Q Q u f ) C: _0 % 0 2 \ ° 2 Q) m m a g ) ) C: _0 In 2 0 2 % > / > » u = / m > / $ a § = f % E E 0 = 2 / _ / E = 2 ® m = 2 > _®7 \ _ ® » § a » aj a » Q 2 k a 2§ @ k . ¥ g »2®F2 § p . ¥ �2 _ & \ \ » \ E \ k ® e \ = 2 e = (u t W 8 5® t$ v® QJ M p E \ } / p \ u / 2 / C J \ C / 3 & k 0 0 / / k LM § 00 G w w w �g�� N 2 m » a @ r r § \ /en � � � M � 3 3 7 7 7 2 / / m m o § Ln / , E p ƒ w ' � w a > " ■ @ - - 7 7 a c Lm & & J a , $ $ Q @ ¢ \ U % k � N m a) � � ■ \ \ \ \ a m \ ■ 0) 4 c w w a w ce N%� 2 2 $ g Q\ C-4 -1 -1 � N M \ m \ \ \ \ / \ L Ln % w w 3 3 \ $ $ g G $ C / / ƒ ƒ a 2 � m � \ aj ( LAk 7 ( k k RLU\ a 2! E 2 \ g aj _ } \ Qai LU > + t \ o b k / a, ao ro CL 0) aJ 7 a) t U O CL Ln � N EO N � O > M L � s M u CAM L` O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ln 5 Ln � � M O N O rr—I O u1 Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O oLr� oU� oU� oU� oU� o Lr) �t �t M M N N r—I r—I 0 0 U m_ U 0 L U U o V � V � i o E 4� Q+, (10 E N 0 > N U C U 4A @I a, ao ro CL 0) aJ 7 a1 t U @I ............................................................................................................................................................................. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 Y / 0 0 0 O O Q r O O 00 W Om r r Ln 0 rn O O O f� O CO P.-� v Cfl N 00 O O O M O 4 � II Ll'1 II N N M M N Ln N to WN a a cn in LL,0 �d o 0 0 i 0 o O o 0 0 0 V ++ o1 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O r Oo O O o f` Nt } a v O O O r O r CO r r E 6L N V -+ 6L M a m V 0 = W 0 ) a' ) a' 0000000000 Lu O O O O t O N LO N m H w V r co r CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rIt > a 0000000000 C o M E a Q O O M W I� l0 Ln -tl- M N r -I O @I w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O r O O 00 W Om r r O O O f� O CO P.-� Cfl O O O M O 4 M N N M M N a a cn in LL,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 V ++ o1 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O r Oo O O o f` Nt r O N N O O O r r CO r r E 6L N -+ 6L M m 4-4LL aA 0 = W 0 Lu O O O O t O N LO N m H w V r co r CO m Z cvi rIt > a L C o M E a Q O C' � 2 ti O fl-rl- cn O W 4J m O N Cfl O O M N co 00 ECA O� � ~U Zm 0 N cn dA = c m <n U > LO c c —Jto CN c c �n U/}{ N (6 /V0 c co LCL i C4 m= ,max vi 8 CO) L U C ,��( W Q �W _ U �20_ C U m N U C 4) U U~ °d (6 C U Cl Z U CA Cn Q w a>> " C U L - i+ w a> C L O Q L to U C a� U) U) a� �� o0 @I