Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2025-424 - A 2025-107 - 904 Isaiah Place Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Committee of Adjustment DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Tina Malone-Wright, Manager, Development Approvals 519-783-8913 PREPARED BY: Jade McGowan, Student Planner, 519-707-4759 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 9 DATE OF REPORT: October 8, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD-2025-424 SUBJECT: Minor Variance Application A2025-107 904 Isaiah Place RECOMMENDATION: That Minor Variance Application A2025-107 for 904 Isaiah Place requesting relief from 7.3, Table 7-2, of Zoning By-law 2029-051 to permit a year yard setback of 6.4 metres instead of the minimum required 7.5 metres to facilitate a sunroom addition onto the rear of the existing detached dwelling, generally in accordance with drawings prepared by Greywall Designs, BE APPROVED. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: The purpose of this report is to review and make a recommendation with respect to the Minor Variance Application to facilitate the construction of a sunroom addition in the rear yard of 904 Isaiah Place. The key finding of this report is that the requested variance meets the 4 tests of the Planning Act. There are no financial implications. Community engagement included a notice sign being placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received and this report was Adjustment meeting. Notice of the application is also mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property, however given the Canada Post Strike this was not possible. This report supports the delivery of core services. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on the northeastern side of Isaiah Place, between Isaiah Drive and Activa Avenue, in the Laurentian West Planning Community *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Figure 1: Location Map (subject property outlined in Red) Community Areas Urban Structure and is Low Rise Residential Land Use Low Rise Residential Three Zone (RES-3-law 2019- 051. The purpose of the application is to facilitate the construction of a sunroom addition to the existing dwelling in the rear yard. The proposed sunroom would be in the location of an existing deck and will provide additional amenity space. A minor variance is required to allow a rear yard setback of 6.4 metres where 7.5 metres is required. rd A site visit was completed by Planning Staff on October 3, 2025. Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Figure 3: Street view of subject property Figure 4: Proposed sunroom addition REPORT: Planning Comments: In considering the four tests for the minor variances as outlined in Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990 Chap. P 13, as amended, Planning staff offers the following comments: General Intent of the Official Plan The intent of the Low Rise Residential land use designation is to accommodate a full range of low density housing types. The proposed rear yard sunroom addition is a natural extension of the existing detached dwelling that will be used for amenity area in the form of indoor rather than outdoor amenity area. Therefore, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent of the Official Plan. General Intent of the Zoning By-law The intent of the Zoning By-law rear yard setback regulation is to provide sufficient amenity area in the rear yard and mitigate privacy concerns from neighbouring dwellings. The proposed addition maintains the required rear yard setback at the northeastern corner of the addition but due to the irregular shape of the property, a variance is required to address the setback to the southeastern portion of the addition. I adequate amenity area for the dwelling will be maintained in the northern and southern portions of the rear yard. The proposed sunroom will also function as an indoor amenity area for residents, and Staff do not anticipate any privacy concerns. Therefore, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance maintains the general intent of the Zoning By-law. Is/Are the Effects of the Variance(s) Minor? The proposed sunroom addition will be in the location of an existing deck and will generally be a smallerfootprint, allowing a portion of the existing deck to be maintained. Staff do not anticipate any significant or adverse impacts resulting from the new addition and proposed reduced rear yard setback. Therefore, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the effects of the requested variance are minor in nature. Is/Are the Variance(s) Desirable For The Appropriate Development or Use of the Land, Building and/or Structure? The proposed sunroom addition will provide additional interior amenity space for the existing dwelling and will maintain a low-rise built form. Therefore, Planning Staff are of the opinion that the requested variance is desirable and appropriate for the use of the land. Environmental Planning Comments: No natural heritage features/functions as there are no trees and no Tree Management Policy compliance issues. No concerns. Heritage Planning Comments: No comments or concerns. Building Division Comments: The Building Division has no objections to the proposed variance. A revision will be required to the original building permit. Engineering Division Comments: No concerns. Parks Planning Comments: No concerns, no requirements. Transportation Planning Comments: Transportation Services has no concerns with this application. Region of Waterloo: No concerns. Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA): No objections. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM of the Committee of Adjustment meeting. A notice sign was placed on the property advising that a Committee of Adjustment application has been received. The sign advises Planning Division. Notice of the application is also mailed to all property owners within 30 metres of the subject property, however given the Canada Post Strike this was not possible. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: Planning Act Provincial Planning Statement (PPS 2024) Regional Official Plan Official Plan (2014) Zoning By-law 2019-051 Septmeber 29th, 2025 Connie Owen City of KitchenerFile No.: D20-20/ 200 King Street West VAR KIT GEN P.O. Box 1118 Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Subject: Committee of Adjustment Meeting October 21, City of Kitchener Regional staff has reviewed the following Committee of Adjustment applications and have the following comments: 1) A 2025 – 076 – Sydney Street South – No Concerns 2) A 2025 – 101 – 199 Breithaupt Street – No Concerns 3) A 2025 – 102 – 282 Tremaine Cresent – No Concerns 4) A 2025 – 103 – 129 Saint George Street – No Concerns 5) A 2025 – 104 – 23 Donnenwerth Drive – No Concerns 6) A 2025 – 105 – 1010 Copper Leaf Cresent – No Concerns 7) A 2025 – 106 – 43 Maurice Street – No Concerns 8) A 2025 – 107 – 904 Isaiah Place – No Concerns 9) A 2025 – 108 – 32 & 42 Windom Road – No Concerns 10) A 2025 – 109 – 29 Ednad Street – No Concerns 11) A 2025 – 110 – 600 Queen Street South – No Concerns 12) A 2025 – 111 – 396 Southill Drive – No Concerns 13) A 2025 – 112 – 54 Mount Hope & 509 Park Street – No Concerns Please be advised that any development on the subject lands is subject to the provisions of the Regional Development Charge By-law 19-037 or any successor thereof and may require payment of Regional Development Charges for these developments prior to the issuance of a building permit. Document Number: 5085291 The comments contained in this letter pertain to the Application numbers listed. If a site is subject to more than one application, additional comments may apply. Please forward any decisions on the above-mentioned Application numbers to the undersigned. Yours Truly, Joshua Beech Falshaw Transportation Planner jbeechfalshaw@regionofwaterloo.ca Document Number: 5041192 October 3, 2025 via email Marilyn Mills Secretary-Treasurer Committee of Adjustment City of Kitchener 200 King Street West Kitchener, ON, N2G 4G7 Dear Marilyn Mills, Re: Committee of Adjustment Meeting October 21, 2025 Applications for Minor Variance A 2025-101 199 Breithaupt Street A 2025-102 282 Tremaine Crescent A 2025-103 129 St.George Street A 2025-104 23 Donnenwerth Drive A 2025-105 1010 Copper Leaf Crescent A 2025-106 43 Maurice Street A 2025-107 904 Isaiah Place A 2025-108 32 & 42 Windom Road A 2025-109 29 Edna Street A 2025-110 600 Queen Street South A 2025-111 396 Southill Drive A 2025-112 509 Park Street & 54 Mount Hope Street Applications for Consent B 2024-031 829 Stirling Avenue South B 2025-026 96 Third Avenue B 2025-027 60 Gage Avenue B 2025-028 62 Gage Avenue B 2025-029 64 Gage Avenue B 2025-030 66 Gage Avenue B 2025-031 509 Park Street & 54 Mount Hope Street Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) staff have reviewed the above-noted applications. GRCA has no objection to the approval of the above applications. The subject properties do not contain any natural hazards such as watercourses, floodplains, shorelines, wetlands, or valley slopes. The properties are not subject to Ontario Regulation 41/24 and, therefore, a permission from GRCA is not required. Should you haveany questions, please contact meataherreman@grandriver.caor 519- 621-2763 ext. 2228. Sincerely, Andrew Herreman, CPT Resource Planning Technician Grand River Conservation Authority