Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDSD-2025-371 - Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement PlanStaff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: December 1, 2025 SUBMITTED BY: Rosa Bustamante, Director, Planning and Housing Policy/City Planner, 519-783-8929 PREPARED BY: Oluseyi Ojurongbe, Project Manager (Planning), 519-783-8941 Elyssa Pompa, Planner (Policy), 519-783-8943 WARD(S) INVOLVED: All wards DATE OF REPORT: November 20, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD -2025-371 SUBJECT: Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the proposed By-law establishing a Community Improvement Project Area incorporating all lands within the municipal boundaries of the City of Kitchener, in the form shown in Attachment `A' to report DSD -2025-371 be approved; and, That the proposed Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan By-law, be approved in the form shown in Attachment 'B' to report DSD -2025- 371; and further, That the General Manager of Development Services or their designate be authorized to execute all agreements and other related documentation, subject to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, which may be required to administer the Missing Middle Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval to establish a Community Improvement Project Area and associated Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (CIP) to create grants for missing middle housing forms including affordable housing in alignment with the City's commitments through the Housing Accelerator Fund. • In recognition of the successes of the City's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) initiatives, the City of Kitchener was awarded an additional $4.2M in HAF funding in March 2025 to establish a CIP. • A CIP is a tool available to municipalities under the Planning Act, that enables cities to carry out projects in a particular area that improve community needs. The City of *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 157 of 271 Kitchener has implemented CIPs in the past including brownfield development and downtown renewal. The proposed CIP consists of two incentive program streams to address barriers associated with missing middle housing: Additional Dwelling Units Grant and the Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant. o The Additional Dwelling Unit Grant offers flexible options to achieve affordable housing, energy efficiency measures to reduce utility bills and barrier -free unit design to provide accessible housing that can support people living with mobility limitations. This program aligns well with the CMHC design catalogue which offers full technical designs for various ADU formats with options for enhanced energy efficiency and barrier -free design. With cost and time savings on the design and approvals, coupled with incentives to reduce development charges, the CIP can support uptake on catalogue designs. o The Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant offers opportunities for integration of affordable housing in more missing middle housing forms including in mixed use buildings and multiple dwellings up to eight storeys. It also encourages collaboration to provide housing to priority needs groups. There are financial implications arising from this report. The proposed CIP is funded through HAF funding including the $4.21 million awarded in March for the purpose of establishing a CIP and a reallocation of $2 million of funding from the initial $42 million grant. The program will be delivered by existing staff to applicants which will have workload implications which are monitored over the next year. Community engagement included meetings with the development industry, virtual and in-person engagement events with the public, an engagement webpage and a workshop with builders. This report supports Building a Connected City Together: Focuses on neighbourhoods; housing and ensuring secure, affordable homes; getting around easily, sustainably and safely to the places and spaces that matter. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Staff is recommending approval of the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (CIP). A CIP is a Planning Act tool that allows a municipality to carry out projects in a particular area that improve community needs such as addressing housing needs through various mechanisms including financial incentives. The proposed CIP includes two program streams that focus on missing middle housing forms: 1. Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) Grant, offering full or partial grants to offset development charges for ADUs 2. Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant, offering grants to cover upfront costs of developing affordable housing units in a missing middle housing form including multiple dwellings and mixed-use buildings with a minimum of five dwelling units and a maximum of eight -storey built form. The CIP will be funded through the federal Housing Accelerator Fund with a proposed allocation of $6.21 million. Through the CIP, the City has committed to a goal of at least 98 units by October 31, 2026 (building permit issuance) and 500 over a 10 -year period. Of the 98 units, at least 49 are expected to be affordable housing and at least 49 be within 1500 metres of rapid transit. This report introduces the proposed CIP and outlines the Page 158 of 271 background, planning analysis and community and development industry engagement that have informed the proposed CIP. BACKGROUND: In March 2025, the City was awarded an additional funding through the Housing Accelerator Fund to create at least 98 units by October 2026 (building permits issued) and 500 units over a 10 -year period through the establishment of a Missing Middle and Affordable Housing CIP. The City has proposed a CIP to incentivize a range of affordable and missing -middle housing types to the housing market by removing some of the financial barriers that stand in the way of financial feasibility. It builds on and reinforces housing studies and initiatives to address the urgent need for diverse and affordable housing options including: • Enabling Missing Middle and Affordable Housing (2023) • Enabling Four Units Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments (2024) • Growing Together Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw amendments (2024 and 2025) • Population & Employment Forecast Update & Housing Needs Assessment technical background study for Kitchener 2051 (2025) The Enabling Missing Middle and Affordable Housing study made several layered recommendations to support the construction of new missing middle housing including establishing a CIP as a mechanism to enable financial incentives, coupled with streamlined approvals and flexible zoning rules including parking reductions and allowing more units on a property. Changes to zoning through both Enabling Four Units and Growing Together deliver on recommendations to allow for more units through more flexible zoning rules. In alignment with these recommendations, the Enabling Four Units amended the zoning rules throughout the city to allow up to four units where a single detached, semi-detached or street fronting townhouse unit is permitted. Growing Together introduced new Strategic Growth Area zoning that enables unlimited height and density permissions in key areas along with broader permissions for missing middle housing forms. Several process improvements at a staff level have been undertaken and continue to advance streamlining of development approvals. As part of Kitchener 2051 technical background studies, a housing needs assessment was prepared which identified priority groups in highest need of affordable housing. It also identified a CIP as a mechanism to support housing through grants and fee waivers. The proposed CIP is the next lever that staff recommend with the support of HAF funding to break down barriers to unlocking affordable and missing middle housing as detailed in this report. REPORT: Kitchener's housing market is under increasing pressure from rapid population growth, rising costs, and limited affordable options. The City's Strategic Plan, Official Plan, and Housing for All Strategy recognize the importance of using a broad range of tools to advance critical housing objectives. Page 159 of 271 What is a CIP? Community Improvement Plans identify specific projects that need to be carried out in a particular area to improve the quality of life and the built environment in an area, setting out the course of action for the redevelopment, rehabilitation or improvement of the area. Community Improvement Project Areas may be established by Council and designated by by-law, in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. Establishing a Community Improvement Project Area The Planning Act requires the establishment of a Community Improvement Project Area to delineate the geographic location of where a CIP applies. The Official Plan identifies that all lands within the municipal boundaries may be included in a CIP. Staff recommend that all lands within the City of Kitchener's municipal boundaries be included because there is a need for a broader mix of housing typologies and affordable housing throughout the city, as identified through the City's Housing Needs Assessment. The Community Improvement Project Area bylaw is attached to this report as Attachment W. Program Development Staff evaluated three program options to select one or more of the most impactful approach(es) for long-term housing outcomes: 1. Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) Grants- Construction or development charge grants to reduce upfront costs for building Additional Dwelling Units. 2. Office -to -Residential Conversion Grants — Provide funding to convert unused office spaces into residential housing. 3. Affordable Housing Developer Grants — Extend financial incentives to developers and not -for -profits who incorporate affordable units into their projects As background research, staff engaged with other municipalities that have similar CIPs to understand their program design and gain insights on challenges and lessons learned. The municipalities selected were in comparable population size or were operating similar programs to those under evaluation. Additionally, staff collected feedback from various subject matter experts and the community through a series of interviews and engagement events. A summary of community engagement feedback is detailed later in this report. Staff also retained a third -party consultant to provide staff with an economic analysis of the proposed program. Staff further reviewed the findings of the Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) completed to inform Kitchener 2051 earlier this year. The HNA identified that priority groups face a lack of suitable, affordable housing to meet the needs of those with low incomes. They often face multiple challenges in securing housing. Priority groups include individuals who identify with the following: women and women -led households; LGBTQ2S+; seniors; young adults aged 18-29; Indigenous Peoples; visible minorities/racialized people; recent immigrants (especially refugees); people with physical health or mobility challenges or developmental disabilities; people with mental health and addictions issues; veterans; and, people experiencing homelessness. To address this significant finding from the HNA, staff have intentionally designed the program to support housing solutions for priority groups. Page 160 of 271 Proposed CIP The proposed CIP bylaw includes the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (Attachment `B' to this report). The CIP outlines the two program streams as well as eligibility criteria, and program administration details. First, general program considerations applying to both streams are outlined such as eligible applicants, the definition of affordable housing, and property ownership. Prioritization of projects that support achievement of the City's HAF commitments is also identified as follows: o Projects located within 1500 metres of rapid transit o Projects that incorporate affordable housing units o Projects that have a plan to achieve building permit issuance by October 31, 2026 The programs may limit the number of units funded that do not align with one or more of these priorities. Table 1 provides a summary of the two program streams: Program Stream Grant Details Additional Dwelling Units Grant • Grants for the first and second ADU covering 100% of the cost of Why it matters: development charges (DCs) for • Makes it easier and cheaper for property applicable educational DCs. owners to add rental units, increasing • Grants for the third ADU covering: housing supply, mix of unit types, and • 50% of City, Regional and affordability in Kitchener's neighborhoods. educational DCs; or • DCs were identified as a barrier to . 100% of City, Regional and building ADUs which has led to some educational DCs for units that property owners choosing not to build commit to providing one of the ADUs. following: • Supports affordability including lower o a minimum of one affordable energy costs housing unit; or • Encourages uptake of the CMHC design o energy efficiency measures; or catalogue by incentivizing high energy performance and accessible designs. o a minimum of one barrier -free unit Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant Why it matters: • Makes it cheaper for developers to include affordable housing • Increases the mix of housing supply formats and affordability in neighborhoods. • Focuses on priority groups that are identified to have the highest needs for affordable housing as reflected in Kitchener's housing needs assessment. • Encourages collaboration and partnerships to unlock more affordable housing. Grants of up to $25,000 per affordable unit to a maximum of $500,000 for affordable housing units in a missing middle format including multiple dwellings and mixed-use buildings with a minimum of 5 units and a maximum of 8 storeys. Helps offset the upfront costs associated with planning, designing and achieving approvals Page 161 of 271 Stream 1. Grants for Additional Dwelling Units This stream provides grants to help offset all or a portion of the cost of development charges associated with building Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs). The program is proposed to be applied across the city, accounting for varying DC rates while prioritizing HAF commitments. Program details include: • Grants for the first and second ADU associated with a single detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling or street fronting townhouse dwelling shall cover 100% of the cost of development charges for applicable educational DCs. • Grants for the third ADU associated with a single detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling or street fronting townhouse dwelling: • 50% of City, Regional and educational DCs as base incentive; or • 100% of City, Regional and educational DCs for units that commit to providing one of the following: o a minimum of one Affordable Housing Unit for a prescribed affordability period (5 years). o energy efficiency measures (a combination of two or more of the following that exceed the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code: heat pump, energy recovery ventilator (ERV), triple - pane windows, solar panels, and other innovative building systems that support efficiency to the satisfaction of the City); or o a minimum of one barrier -free unit (per specifications of the Ontario Building Code) Why it matters: This grant makes it easier and more cost-effective for property owners to add rental units, increasing housing supply, mix of unit types, and affordability in Kitchener's neighborhoods. Development charges were identified as a barrier to building additional dwelling units which has led to some property owners choosing not to proceed with as many ADUs (or none at all) despite enabling zoning regulations. Staff has heard this through the engagement conducted for the CIP as well as through feedback received through the Enabling Four Units One Year Follow Up report (DSD -2025-411) and through staff discussions with customers through building permit review. While only educational development charges apply to the first and second ADU at a rate of $5,187 as of December 1, 2025, this cost can be a barrier to homeowners adding ADUs - particularly those that support multigenerational families such as aging parents or adult children with disabilities. Development charges for the third ADU (fourth unit) range from $39,483 in the Central area (in the main dwelling) to $80,058 in the Suburban area (in a backyard home). A fourplex format has been more common than backyard homes in 2024 and 2025 with development charges for the fourth unit ranging from $39,483 to $44,727 in this format. Three options to obtain a grant to cover the full development charge amount are proposed. The first option requires one affordable unit for a minimum of 5 years. The second option that requires energy efficiency measures supports affordability by reducing utility bills while Page 162 of 271 supporting the City's climate goals. The final option encourages barrier -free unit design to provide accessible housing that can support people living with mobility limitations - a priority group identified through the Housing Needs Assessment. The ADU grants align well with the CMHC design catalogue which offers full technical designs for various ADU formats with options for enhanced energy efficiency and barrier -free design. With cost and time savings on the design and approvals, coupled with incentives to reduce development charges, the CIP can support uptake on catalogue designs. This program allows for the creation of affordable, smaller -scale rental units, benefiting tenants across diverse income levels and enhancing community inclusivity. By providing a grant to offset the cost of development charges, the CIP can encourage property owners to contribute directly to housing supply within existing neighborhoods. This initiative could also help address the difficulty some owners are facing in paying or financing development charges, which in some cases has resulted in units not being brought to the rental market. Stream 2. Grants for Missing Middle Affordable Housing This stream provides grants of up to $25,000 per affordable unit to a maximum of $500,000 to help offset the upfront costs associated with planning, designing and achieving approvals for affordable housing units in a missing middle format in either a multiple dwelling or a mixed-use building with a minimum of 5 units and a maximum of 8 storeys. • Awarded projects must maintain Affordable Units for a minimum of 25 years from the date of first occupancy. • Priority is given to special programs designed to provide Affordable Units to one or more identified priority groups. • Priority will be given to projects that incorporate Affordable Units that are a minimum of two bedrooms in size and include a variety of unit sizes including three - and four-bedroom units which is a recognized need for key priority groups through the City's housing needs assessment. Why it matters: This grant makes it easier and more cost-effective for developers and not -for -profits to add affordable housing units in a missing middle format, increasing mix of housing supply formats and affordability in neighborhoods. This grant focuses on priority groups that are identified to have the highest needs for affordable housing, as reflected in Kitchener's housing needs assessment. It supports upfront costs to advance affordable housing to construction, at which point applicants may apply for CMHC to finance construction costs. A CIP allows for a broad range of applicants to provide affordable housing units in our community. The Enabling Missing Middle and Affordable Housing study (2023) identified the importance of financial incentives to unlock affordable and missing middle housing. This program builds upon the Not For Profit Affordable Rental and Co-op Housing Incentive launched last year. It incentivizes more affordable housing in the Kitchener community which may be constructed by a broader range of developers including for-profit and non-profit organizations. It will encourage partnerships with the not-for-profit sector by prioritizing special programs designed to provide housing for identified priority groups through the Housing Needs Assessment. Page 163 of 271 Summary of CIP Engagement This report has been posted on the City's website with the agenda in advance of the committee meeting and on the project webpage, engagewr.ca/cip. Staff and agencies: City divisions involved in the development of this program included Finance, Planning and Housing Policy (including zoning services), Development and Housing Approvals, Building, and Legal Services. Staff also consulted with the Region of Waterloo's Housing Services team. Community and development industry engagement: Staff held interviews during the summer of 2025 with subject matter experts in the building industry, such as developers, ADU specialists, and urban planners, to refine program design and enhance uptake. On August 27, 2025, staff held a builders' workshop to share information about the CIP and gather feedback. Further insights were obtained from the Kitchener Developers Liaison Committee on September 12 and October 17, 2025. An engagement session took place on October 4, 2025 at the Kitchener Market, followed by a virtual meeting on October 7, 2025, to discuss the proposed program and gather public feedback. In September, the project webpage posted an online public survey asking which incentive program would be most effective. Summary of feedback received: • As it relates to grants for Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) and grants for larger projects: o Builders of ADUs identified development charges as a major barrier, especially for the fourth unit; o More financially accessible to a broader population of property owners; o Supportive that ADUs increase neighborhood density organically and help retain affordable housing options within established communities; o Grants could help address the difficulty some owners are facing in paying or financing development charges, which in some cases has resulted in units not being brought to the rental market; • Strong appreciation for the policy directive and overall ADU goals; o ADU builders expressed motivation to develop ADUs and willing to modify projects to meet zoning requirements; o Residents appreciated the increased housing options, affordability and support for multi -generational families; o Concerns about unexpected costs such as consultant fees, tree removal, servicing connections and additional approvals like Grand River Conservation Authority and Committee of Adjustment; o Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) financing for rental housing requires a minimum of 5 units. There is an affordable housing component of this financing that could work in alignment with a CIP to support more affordable housing. Page 164 of 271 o Developers of larger projects surveyed expressed concern about meeting the fall 2026 timeline, however, some developers are considering affordable units in their projects; and o ADU construction is ongoing, even in market slowdown. • As it relates to exploring an Office to Residential Conversion program: o Majority of developers state this option is not feasible in today's market and are not likely to meet the fall 2026 timeline; and o Potential to explore this option if market improves in the future. Planning Rationale Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25 Section 106(1) of the Municipal Act prohibits municipalities from offering bonuses to businesses, including financial aid, lending municipal property, guaranteeing loans, or selling property below market value. Exceptions are specified in Section 106(3) for municipalities using powers under Section 28 of the Planning Act and Section 365.1 of the Municipal Act, which allow for financial incentive programs in designated community improvement areas. A municipality may take the following actions within a designated community improvement project area: • Prepare a CIP for the project area (Section 28(4)). • Make grants or loans, in conformity with the approved CIP, to the registered owners, assessed owners and tenants of lands and buildings, and to any person to whom such an owner or tenant has assigned the right to receive a grant or loan, to pay for the whole or part of the eligible costs of the CIP (Section 28(7) Under Section 28 of the Planning Act, municipalities can designate community improvement project areas for redevelopment activities, such as acquiring land, creating improvement plans, and offering grants or loans for eligible costs, including environmental remediation and affordable housing. Section 365.1 further allows property tax assistance for such areas. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13 25 Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as, Q) the adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; (1) the protection of the financial and economic well-being of the Province and its municipalities; (p) the appropriate location of growth and development Section 28 allows municipalities to identify areas in need of revitalization and reinvestment by designating Community Improvement Project Areas (CIPAs). Once a CIPA is established and an appropriate Official Plan policy framework is approved and in place, the municipality may prepare and adopt a Community Improvement Plan (CIP) that outlines goals and strategies for the physical, economic, and/or social improvement of the area. CIPs directly support provincial interests by enabling municipalities to: Page 165 of 271 • Plan for the development, rehabilitation, and redevelopment of key areas, including provisions for energy efficiency improvements and affordable housing (s.28(1), 28(1.1); • Facilitate land acquisition, preparation, and disposition, supporting intensification and redevelopment in strategic urban locations (s.28(3),(6)); • Encourage a public to private partnership through financial tools such as grants and loans for support of environmental remediation, rehabilitation, and development (s.28(7), (7.1)); • Support housing renewal and repair, contributing to the supply and diversification of housing (s.28(7), s.32(1)). Through the implementation of CIPs, municipalities are empowered to provide direct investment into areas that align with provincial objectives: downtown cores, adaptive reuse of underutilized lands, and integration of affordable housing into established communities. Additionally, they promote the efficient use of land and existing infrastructure and support provincial goals for economic sustainability and coordinated infrastructure planning. Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 The Provincial Planning Statement (PPS) provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. Section 2.2.1 of the 2024 PPS promotes all types of residential intensification, and sets out a policy framework for sustainable, healthy, livable, and safe communities. The PPS promotes efficient development and land use patterns, as well as accommodating an appropriate mix of affordable and market-based residential dwelling types with other land uses, while supporting public health, and safety. Provincial policies promote the integration of land use planning, growth management, transit -supportive development, intensification, and infrastructure planning to achieve cost-effective development patterns, optimization of transit investments, and standards to minimize land consumption and servicing costs. The PPS supports the goals of Community Improvement Plans (CIPs) by enabling municipalities to align local planning with evolving demographic and economic needs: • Designate and protect sufficient residential land for future development while maintaining a minimum supply of serviced, zoned units to meet projected growth; • Promote intensification and infill, particularly in underutilized areas and transit - oriented nodes, to support compact, efficient development that aligns with community needs and employment trends; • Coordinate with Service Managers to implement comprehensive housing strategies that include support for vulnerable populations and homelessness initiatives; and • Encourage flexible redevelopment, allowing for a range of housing types and land uses that respond to local market conditions and long-term growth projections. Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 The City of Kitchener's Official Plan (2014) provides the vision for long-term land use in Kitchener. This is further articulated and implemented through guiding principles, goals, objectives and policies set out in the Plan. The vision strives to build an innovative, vibrant, attractive, safe, complete and healthy community that contributes to an exceptional quality of life for all. A complete community creates and provides access to a mix of land uses including a full range and mix of housing, including affordable units. To achieve this vision, Page 166 of 271 the Official Plan outlines several implementation tools such as Zoning By-laws, Community and Block Plans, Heritage Conservation District Plans, and Community Improvement Plans. In Section 17.E.9, Community Improvement Plans identify specific projects that need to be carried out in a particular area to improve the quality of life and the built environment in an area, setting out the course of action for the redevelopment, rehabilitation or improvement of the area. Community Improvement Project Areas may be established by Council and designated by by-law, in accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act. Through the implementation of CIPs, the City may: Identify specific areas in need of physical, economic, social, or environmental enhancement; Offer funding mechanisms such as grants, loans, and financial incentives to support local improvement efforts; Coordinate cross -sectoral initiatives that address redevelopment priorities and infrastructure needs within designated neighborhoods or corridors. As detailed in Official Plan Section 17.E.9.1 and 17.E.9.2, all lands within the municipal boundary of Kitchener are eligible to be designated as a Community Improvement Project Area, contingent upon meeting one or more criteria. The proposed CIP addresses the following three criteria: b) there are old residential, industrial and commercial buildings and properties that are in need of upgrading, rehabilitation, or replacement; c) the area contains an inappropriate range of housing types and densities; j) there are opportunities for intensification and redevelopment of under-utilized sites The proposed CIP meets the vision set out in the Official Plan's Community Improvement Plan policies, encouraging higher density development within a 1500 metre radius of rapid transit, facilitating efficient land use and intensification, as referenced above. The CIP supports diverse housing options, while encouraging accessibility to a broader range of transit options. Housing Needs Assessment, 2025 The Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) reported the city's current market and non -market housing profile and trends. Through this work, the HNA identified several key findings. While the city has averaged 2,250 new residential building permits annually since 2013 in increasingly high-density built forms, affordability has declined sharply since 2018. Resale prices and rents have increased, with primary apartment rents rising 48% and condominium apartment rents by 40% between 2017 and 2023. About 40% of households are renters, and demand for rental housing is expected to grow to 45% by 2051. Affordability remains a major concern for renters as only 5% of the city's housing stock is non -market, around 5,300 units. To meet future needs, the City anticipates requiring 13,100 new affordable rental units and 4,600 new affordable ownership units by 2051. There is also an increased need to provide affordable housing for priority groups who face elevated housing insecurity. Page 167 of 271 Kitchener is responding with strategies like the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan, which is designed to support the creation of diverse and affordable housing by addressing financial barriers to development. Program Administration & Monitoring This CIP will be administered by the City's Planning and Housing Policy, Building and Finance Divisions. Applications will be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Housing Policy Division with the support of other divisions. To meet the City's HAF commitments, program launch is planned for January 2026. Staff will develop a communications strategy that addresses target audiences of each program stream with will include a webpage with information regarding the application process and eligibility criteria. The program will be reevaluated after one year. Staff may recommend incorporating additional program streams or modifying elements of the program structure. Legal agreements will be used to secure affordability and other commitments which may be registered on title of the lands. Conclusion Staff recommend approval of the proposed Missing Middle and Affordable Housing CIP and associated Community Improvement Project Area. The staff recommendation has regard for matters of Provincial interest, is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and implements the objectives and policies of the Kitchener Official Plan and represents good planning. The CIP will expand on established programs, such as Enabling Four Units zoning, and existing HAF-backed grant programs that support non-profit housing providers. These foundational programs offer a springboard for the CIP, upon the conclusion of HAF funding, may be incorporated as long-term City initiatives. However, program continuance beyond HAF funding would be subject to council approval. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports Building a Connected City Together: Focuses on neighbourhoods; housing and ensuring secure, affordable homes; getting around easily, sustainably and safely to the places and spaces that matter. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed CIP is funded through HAF funding totalling $6.2 million comprised of: $4.2 million in additional funding awarded in March for this program. $2.0 million in reallocated funding. In evaluating the initial $42 million HAF grant, staff determined that there is an opportunity to reallocate $2 million from other HAF initiatives. This reallocation will bolster the CIP, allowing for the two grant streams proposed and improving the City's capacity to support missing middle and affordable housing. The program will be delivered through existing staff resources which will be monitored over the next year. Annual monitoring is planned to report on program uptake recommending modifications if needed. Once the HAF-funded budget is depleted, programs will be paused Page 168 of 271 subject to funding availability from other sources (such as through other orders of government). Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • DSD -2023-160 Enabling Missing Middle and Affordable Housing • DSD -2024-066 Enablina Four Units OPA23/020/K/KA & ZBA23/035/K/KA • DSD -2024-128 Growing Together — Protected Major Transit Station Area Land Use and Zoning Framework • DSD -2025-411 Enablina Four Units — One Year Follow -UD • Municipal Act, 2001 • Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 • Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 • City of Kitchener Official Plan, 2014 • Population & Emalovment Forecast & Housina Needs Assessment. 2025 REVIEWED BY: Janine Oosterveld, Manager of Customer Experience and Project Management, Development Services APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager, Development Services ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Community Improvement Project Area bylaw Attachment B — Community Improvement Plan bylaw Attachment C — Public Notice Advertisement Attachment D — Community Engagement Comment Matrix Page 169 of 271 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to designate a Community Improvement Project Area in the City of Kitchener for the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan) WHEREAS Section 28(2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, (the "Planning Act") empowers the Council of a municipality in which an Official Plan is in effect to designate the whole or any part of the municipality covered by the Official Plan as a Community Improvement Project Area; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener has adopted an Official Plan which covers all the land within its boundaries and which contains provisions relating to community improvement in the City of Kitchener; AND WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener deems it in the interest of the municipality to designate all of the lands within the City of Kitchener as a Community Improvement Project Area to be known as the "Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Project Area"; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. That pursuant to subsection 28(2) of the Planning Act, all of the lands within the City of Kitchener are hereby designated as a Community Improvement Project Area for the purpose of preparing and adopting the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan, and shall be known as the "Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Project Area"; and, 2. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of final passing thereof. PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this XXth day of December, 2025. Mayor Clerk Page 170 of 271 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to adopt a Community Improvement Project Plan in the City of Kitchener known as the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan) WHEREAS section 28 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, C.P. 13, as amended, (the "Planning Act") provides for the designation of Community Improvement Project Areas and the adoption of Community Improvement Plans; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener has designated all of the lands within the City of Kitchener as a Community Improvement Project Area by By-law Number passed by Kitchener City Council on 2025; AND WHEREAS the public notice provisions set out in subsection 28(5) have been complied with; AND WHEREAS the within community improvement plan is exempt from Ministerial approval in accordance with Ontario Regulation 525/97, as amended; NOW THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. That the document entitled "City of Kitchener Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan", attached hereto as Schedule "A" and forming a part of this By-law, is hereby adopted as a community improvement plan for the City of Kitchener Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Project Area; 2. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to notify the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing of the passing of this By-law to establish the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan; and, 3. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the date of final passing thereof; Page 171 of 271 PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this XXth day of December, 2025. Mayor Clerk Page 172 of 271 Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan Prepared by City of Kitchener, Development Services Date approved by Council: X 9 Page 173 of 271 In March 2025, the City was awarded an additional $4,214,000 of funding through the federal Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) to establish a Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (the "CIP") with the purpose of enabling at least 98 units by October 2026 (building permits issued) and 500 units over a 10 -year period. The CIP is intended to bring a range of affordable and missing -middle housing types to the housing market by addressing some of the financial barriers that stand in the way of a project's financial feasibility. It will build on and reinforce existing housing initiatives to address the urgent need for diverse and affordable housing options. The CIP expands on established City programs, such as the "Enabling Four Units" zoning initiative, which allows property owners to have up to three Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs) on properties that allow a single detached, semi-detached or street - fronting townhouse dwelling unit; and the existing affordable housing fee waiver and HAF-backed grant program that support non-profit housing providers. These foundational programs offer a springboard for the CIP which, upon the conclusion of HAF funding, may be incorporated as long-term City initiatives. The CIP is informed by the findings of the City's Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) and aligned with Kitchener's commitment to the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) objectives: creating more housing supply and fostering inclusive, equitable, and diverse communities. The purpose of the CIP is to: • Encourage the development of affordable and attainable housing options to support equitable, inclusive and diverse communities throughout the city. • Facilitate new affordable housing that addresses the needs of priority groups identified through the Housing Needs Assessment. • Facilitate the creation of new units in missing middle formats from additional dwelling units up to eight -storey apartments to broaden the mix of housing types in the city. • Facilitate the creation of new residential units in proximity to rapid transit to support affordable, healthy transportation options including active transportation and public transit to keep household costs low. Further to the purpose of the CIP, the City's commitment through the federal Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF) is to facilitate at least 98 units by October 2026 (building permits issued) and 500 units over a 10 -year period. Of the first 98 units, approximately 49 of this target should be affordable housing and 49 should be located within 1500 metres of rapid transit including the Kitchener GO station per Attachment A. Il Page 174 of 271 i • a Section 28 of the Planning Act allows municipalities to identify areas in need of revitalization and reinvestment by designating Community Improvement Project Areas (CIPA) and establishing Community Improvement Plans. Enabling policies in Kitchener's Official Plan, 2014, identifies that all lands within the municipal boundary of Kitchener are eligible to be designated as a CIPA, contingent upon meeting certain criteria (Official Plan Section 17.E.9.1). The policies enable the establishment of a CIP if the area satisfies one of more criteria as outlined in Section 17.E.9.2. This CIP addresses more than one of these criteria because: the city lacks the range of housing types and densities including insufficient affordable housing (Section 17.E.2.c) to meet the demand of current and future residents, particularly certain priority groups, as identified through the Housing Needs Assessment; and, there are opportunities for intensification and redevelopment of underutilized sites (Section 17.E.2.j) as identified through several analyses including the Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Study, and Enabling Four Units and Growing Together zoning changes to support a mix of housing typologies within certain zones. The Official Plan recognizes that CIPs may be undertaken in conjunction with other orders of government. In this case, the CIP is undertaken with the initial support of the federal government through the Housing Accelerator Fund. The Missing Middle and Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan applies to all lands situated within the City of Kitchener municipal boundary as supported by Official Plan Section 17.E.9.1. through the adoption of a by-law that identifies the Community Improvement Project Area (CIPA). The CIPA is adopted by by-law concurrent to adoption of this Plan. Amendments to its geographic boundaries to which this CIP applies will be administered through amendments to the enabling by-law establishing the CIPA. The CIP includes two incentive program streams to addressing barriers associated with two formats of missing middle housing: 1. Additional Dwelling Units Grant, offering full or partial grants to offset development charges for ADUs 2. Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant, offering grants to cover upfront costs of developing affordable housing units in a missing middle housing form 5 Page 175 of 271 including multiple dwellings and mixed-use buildings with a minimum of five units and a maximum of eight -storey built form. Both grant programs focus on the upfront costs of advancing missing middle housing typologies, particularly affordable housing units as detailed in the following sections. ■ ••i"�in, NOW The following criteria apply to all grant programs in the CIP. Additional criteria specific to each grant will be further outlined in subsequent sections for each grant program. Location: The subject property must be located within the designated CIPA which includes all lands within the municipal boundaries of the City of Kitchener. Property Ownership: Eligibility is restricted to registered or assessed owners of private or public land and buildings, as well as those people or organizations who have legal authority from the property owner to construct the proposed dwelling units on the subject lands. Applicant and/or owners must not have any outstanding property tax arrears or other obligations to the City, or utility payment arrears related to the subject property at the time of application and throughout the duration of the financial incentive agreement. Eligible Applicants: Eligible applicants generally include: • Private developers or property owners; • Non-profit housing organizations; and • Housing co-operatives. For equitable distribution of funds, the number of qualifying units or properties per applicant may be capped at the discretion of the General Manager of Development Services. Affordable Housing Units: Affordable Housing Units approved for grant funding must meet the definition of Affordable Housing as defined by the City's Official Plan or most current Provincial Planning Statement for the minimum period of affordability defined by the applicable program stream. Affordable Housing Units must remain as rental units during the agreement period. New units: Incentives may only apply to the creation of new dwelling units where building permits have been issued to create the units on or after the date of program launch. All proposed dwelling units must meet the definition of a dwelling unit per the Zoning By-law and meet applicable zoning regulations and the requirements of the C.1 Page 176 of 271 Ontario Building Code. Funded dwelling units must be used as dwelling units and may not be primarily used for short-term rental purposes. Program priorities: Priority will be given to projects that achieve goals associated with funding the program from other orders of government. Initial funding for the CIP was through the federal government's Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF). To achieve the City's commitments through HAF, projects that meet one or more of the following criteria will be prioritized: o Projects located within 1500 metres of rapid transit as delineated in Appendix A o Projects that incorporate Affordable Housing Units o Projects that have a plan to achieve building permit issuance by October 31, 2026 The programs may limit the number of units funded that do not align with one or more of these priorities. Complete application: Applications for a financial incentive(s) in this CIP must be complete for the City to proceed to review. The complete application requirements will be outlined on the application form and will include a completed application form and may include supporting materials as required by the City, such as work plans, cost estimates and contracts, a concept plan and any additional information required at the discretion of the City to evaluate the proposal. Compliance with bylaws: Projects must comply with the Ontario Building Code and all other relevant planning policies, by-laws and standards. The subject properties shall not be in a position of tax arrears, litigation or other debts with the City of Kitchener. Legal Agreement: An agreement between the City and the owner, non -owner applicants who have received approval from the property owner to construct the project will be executed to the satisfaction of the City, for any of the incentives offered by the CIP and may incorporate the following: o The agreement may be registered on title to the property (at the discretion of the City Solicitor). o The agreement will indicate the required affordability period for qualifying affordable housing units. If commitments are not met for the affordability term, full or partial repayment of any grants, together with any applicable costs and interest may be required. o The agreement may establish a deadline for building permit issuance for each eligible unit beyond which a project is no longer eligible to receive the approved grant funding. Tenant Occupancy: Proof through a lease or other documentation may be required by the applicant to the City to demonstrate that affordable dwelling units that received 7 Page 177 of 271 funding are occupied by a tenant for the term of any incentive offered by this Plan. The property owner will select the tenant household. What it is: Grants to help offset all or a portion of the cost of development charges associated with building Additional Dwelling Units (ADUs). Why it matters: This grant makes it easier and cheaper for property owners to add rental units, increasing housing supply, mix of unit types, and affordability in Kitchener's neighborhoods. Development charges were identified as a barrier to building additional dwelling units which has led to some property owners choosing not to proceed with as many ADUs (or none at all) despite enabling zoning regulations. It also supports affordability including lower energy costs and the CMHC design catalogue by incentivizing high energy performance and accessible designs. Additional Dwelling Unit grants help offset the total cost of development charges including applicable City, Region and education development charges per the following program details: Grants for the first and second ADU associated with a single detached dwelling, semi-detached dwelling or street fronting townhouse dwelling shall cover 100% of the cost of development charges for applicable educational DCs. Grants for the third ADU associated with a single detached dwelling, semi- detached dwelling or street fronting townhouse dwelling: • 50% of City, Regional and educational DCs as base incentive; or • 100% of City, Regional and educational DCs for units that commit to providing one of the following: o a minimum of one Affordable Housing Unit for a prescribed affordability period (5 years); or o energy efficiency measures (a combination of two or more of the following that exceed the minimum requirements of the Ontario Building Code: heat pump, energy recovery ventilator (ERV), triple - pane windows, solar panels, and other innovative building systems that support efficiency to the satisfaction of the City); or o a minimum of one barrier -free unit (per specifications of the Ontario Building Code) Within the geographic boundaries of the CIPA, the amount of the grant may vary to cover 50% or 100% of the total development charges (per the program details above) within Suburban and Central areas as delineated in the City's Development Charges By-law, accounting for varying Development Charge rates. N Page 178 of 271 4.2.2. Eligibility Criteria In addition to Section 4.1, the following criteria also apply to the Additional Dwelling Units Grant Program: • ADU formats include those permitted by the City's Zoning By-law including ADUs attached and detached. • Qualifying ADUs may take the form of: o Adding new floor space to create one or more ADUs (attached or detached). o Converting an existing space (e.g., basement, garage, attic) to create one or more ADUs (attached or detached). • Eligible projects may include up to three new ADUs associated with a single detached, semi-detached or street fronting townhouse dwelling unit. • Eligible projects may include legalizing units that were previously established without required permits. • Family members are eligible tenants. UNUMBLOOM - ' • •.• - � • What it is: Grants of up to $25,000 per affordable unit to a maximum of $500,000 to help offset the upfront costs associated with planning, designing and achieving approvals for affordable housing units in a missing middle format with a minimum of 5 units and a maximum of 8 storeys. Why it matters: This grant makes it easier and cheaper for developers to add affordable housing units in a missing middle format, increasing mix of housing supply formats and affordability in neighborhoods. This grant focuses on priority groups that are identified to have the highest needs for affordable housing as reflected in Kitchener's housing needs assessment. Missing Middle Affordable Housing grants help offset the upfront cost of associated with planning, designing and achieving approvals for affordable housing units in a missing middle format per the following program details: • Up to $25,000 per Affordable Unit to a maximum of $500,000 per project to offset the pre -construction planning, design and approvals costs for affordable housing in a missing middle format. • Qualifying costs include the following and other similar costs: o Municipal and agency fees and charges (including applicable development charges), o Consultant service fees (such as planning, design, legal, property appraisal, environmental, engineering) �7 Page 179 of 271 4.3.2. Eligibility Criteria In addition to Section 4.1, the following criteria also apply to the Missing Middle Affordable Housing Grant Program: • Projects must include a minimum of 5 dwelling units in either a multiple dwelling or a mixed-use building and have a maximum height of eight storeys, as defined by the City's zoning bylaw. • With the exception of the Additional Dwelling Unit Grant, projects may concurrently qualify for this program and to other City incentives, however, eligible expenses may only be attributed to one City incentive program. • Awarded projects must maintain Affordable Units for a minimum of 20 years from the date of first occupancy. • Priority is given to special programs designed to relieve hardship or economic disadvantage by providing Affordable Units to one or more of the following key priority groups identified in the City's housing needs assessment: o Women and women led households o LGBTQ2S+ o Seniors 65+ o Young adults aged 18 to 29 o Indigenous Peoples o Visible minorities/racialized people o Recent immigrants, especially refugees o People with physical health or mobility challenges or developmental disabilities o People with mental health and addictions issues o Veterans o People experiencing homelessness • Priority will be given to projects that incorporate Affordable Units that are a minimum of two bedrooms in size and include a variety of unit sizes including three- and four-bedroom units which is a recognized need for key priority groups through the City's housing needs assessment. • Funding will be distributed at key pre -construction project milestones including but not limited to complete application submissions and approvals and building permit issuance or fundraising milestones. 10 Page 180 of 271 • This CIP will be administered by the City's Planning and Housing Policy division in collaboration with Building, Finance, Legal, and other divisions as needed. • An application form created by the City's Planning and Housing Policy division will be completed by applicants and submitted with applicable supporting documentation as identified in the application form. • Applications will be reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning and Housing Policy or designate. • The General Manager, Development Services, their designate, or their successor in title, is authorized to execute all agreements and other related documentation subject to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor which may be required to administer the CIP. • The CIP program will be administered until all available funding has been awarded at which time it may be continued or discontinued based on available funding sources. The CIP is expected to be implemented over ten years, beginning in 2026 ending in December 2036. City Council may extend or shorten this period as needed, subject to an approved budget. • The City may implement any of financial incentives outlined in this Plan during the implementation period, depending on the availability of City funds and/or other resources. • For 2026 and 2027, HAF funding will be assigned to support the achievement of the City's HAF targets. • Subject to assigning all allocated HAF funding, starting for the 2028 budget year, as part of the annual City budgeting exercise, a CIP budget will be identified for financial incentives that be put into effect for that year, if any, and the maximum value established for that period. Where available, funding from other orders of government may be used to supply this budget. • In effort to ensure an equitable distribution of funding, the City may impose maximum unit caps per project or per applicant that is eligible for funding through the CIP, at the discretion of the General Manager, Development Services. • Financial incentives may be accepted on a first-come, first-served basis until funding for that year is exhausted, strategic targets have been achieved, or at the discretion of the Director of Planning and Housing Policy. As an alternative approach, the Director of Planning and Housing Policy may set deadlines for 11 Page 181 of 271 application submissions, with all applications evaluated according to that deadline considered program priorities. • Funding for the CIP from other orders of government may also include restrictions on timing, level and advancement of funds, which may be imposed by the discretion of the General Manager, Development Services. • If an approved project has not proceeded within one year of the financial incentive being approved, or per any CIP funding eligibility criteria from another order of government, the applicant will no longer be eligible. The City may grant discretionary extensions when justified, however, undue delay beyond an agreed timeframe may result in the grant or loan allocation being revoked. • Actual costs for which the financial incentive has been provided may be subject to audit by the City or the City's approved consultant (at the applicant's cost). • In the event of the sale, conveyance, transfer or entering into of any agreement of purchase and sale or other transfer of the title of the subject property by the owner, the City shall have absolute discretion to request the full repayment of any financial incentive. -309U• • p • The CIP is monitored to track progress relative to achieving housing targets associated with goals of this Plan, addressing the key priorities of the City's ongoing housing needs assessments, and commitments through funding by other orders of government including the program's initial funding through the federal Housing Accelerator Fund. • The effectiveness of the CIP will be reviewed and reported annually to Council based on established monitoring indicators. • City staff may recommend incorporating additional program streams or other amendments to the program structure identified through monitoring. 1 • Minor and technical amendments, such as the correction of typographical errors, revisions to definitions and administrative details of specific programs, may be made by City staff with the approval of the City's General Manager of Development Services or their successor in title, • Amendments that may be required by other orders of government funding programs may also be made by City staff with the approval of the City's Manager of Development Services or their successor in title. • The City's General Manager of Development Services, their delegate or their successor is authorized to approve all City policies, applications, further eligibility `1K Page 182 of 271 criteria, and documents required to fully implement the programs set out in this CIP. Formal amendments to this Plan or the CIPA are required in the following instances in accordance with the Planning Act which require passing of a bylaw to adopt such amendments: • Modifications to the CIPA, as set out in the City -approved by-law; • To introduce new financial incentives to the CIP that has not been adopted by a City -approved by-law; • To make changes to the types of eligible projects or eligibility criteria for the program streams which have been adopted by a City -approved by-law with the exception of any additional criteria being added in accordance with section 5.6.1 above; • To make changes to the value or calculation of grants as adopted by a City - approved by-law; and • City Council may also discontinue any of the programs contained in this Plan without an amendment. 13 Page 183 of 271 Attachment A. Priority Locations: Properties within 1500 metres of rapi# transit including GO train service Page 184 of 271 J, $1 1" FT Mck 000 and!Ril 7 ✓ x, Black Ir L1108 op A15 I/, 751.; -7� 5V At, . . . . . . ..... kO S p�a W "Al Z �A, by 11:1,1VIrrels within 1500 m of ILRT Stators and C-70 Static n Light Rall Transit (LIRT) Staton Kitchener GID Station Grand Mwer Page 184 of 271 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING Affordable Housing Community Imarovement Plan Have Your Voice Heard! Planning Date:1 • on: Councit Chambem Kitchener City Halt if King Street e o. a Go to kitchen er.ca/m eeti ngs and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more, visit: www.engagewr.ca/cip or contact: Elyssa Pompa, Planner (Policy) PlanningPM@ kitchener.ca 519.741.2345 Kitchener is growing and more homes are needed to meet the needs of existing and future residents. In accordance with Section 28 of the Planning Act, the City of Kitchener will consider a by-law for all lands within the City's municipal boundary to introduce the Affordable Housing Community Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP will help facilitate more housing that people with different incomes can afford. The CIP proposes grant programs to offset some of the upfront costs of constructing new "missing middle" dwelling units such as grants to offset the cost of development charges for additional dwelling units. This plan is supported by the federal Housing Accelerator Fund (HAF), which aims to increase housing supply and build inclusive, diverse communities. Page 185 of 271 The City's commitment through this CIP is to facilitate at least 98 units (half of this target is for affordable units) by October 2026 and 500 units over a 10 -year period. E bA m W E E V c O +- N O O a a O L N d O Z viCU E vi N o o (D ai CL) 70 o �- 70 —,,eM Q �_ °�' =' *' m Q= _N O U N E C N E N 'aA w C _0 0 O w U N — _ Q Q N .N O +� 00 +. N N p .� O .�--� NE 7 C N -p L 0 U O cn co _0 U _ N O O p C O = - L10 O Q C O p N + p to cB E � Q N N Q N C U L U +� .� O E --� U N >� nA _ N a""' > U U U L N X ,M U O _O p O O i Q co O + U+ p N a= N i 70 p O0 -0 E N o >+ N O UI1 � U +� Q C cc } N MM N Q 0 !E N O — N U C+ cn N N M cB N m E *' -p _� O O + +�-' 0 p b�A C O bA m p o co o O O O CL -0 a Y a -0 i }a>> Q Q p Q Q (n C O - 0w p — mm— O a c6 U + U C N p U 01 Oto p N U A rCZ C U C OC — CU U O ID C O C [6 a--� f6 C C a-- (6 ED- O C -0 bA jo cn Q N aU-� O CD "O Z5 p— p 0 a p s Cn m Co E .N (B U � o c6 (n + s v, O o C p to c0 Om Co O 0 U 7 N O �_ U .p p N � b0 O N , O U U E E p E Q m _ � O p ff., C cB czN Q> O cn C6 +� O u m O O O H N C O U •� N N N E j N O N U 2 N > O O N m O co w tko z m (n Q o O -0 O O W - j O O 0 Uc OC N U cB O O O >p cn >ca U >c D D Q D Q Q C L E EE O O Li Z a1 N M >1 d g, �O > C LO bA N ` UA C C i aUi 0_ �- c 0 >, o> m M c 'U caCD o� '� N o 'cv - no U U O cB N �_ o 6 0 O V � = o0- o N N a� ? s o t x +- O U N +� o o -a o co .� O a -0 N O� -0 o w o i U +� _ a C _o CD O U_ _ U C O O O Q =D O O O O O O T N U N = Q(n N U CC O N N OJ> .� L N xNCD O O C) U N Ci E Op > 0 O UQ -0 O =3 L Od 'Op w LL N O C-0 E Y U N z O N O bOA O O O y Q C O N .� O Ocz 1 }U p CD O _ OQ0 �cn a UCD O E B O b O E �' c > c C -0 v"i O CD -0U CO C coN ?> O o cc O O O by Q O U i O U .� O U c6 O .V +; > +�-• O p Q� O U Op C d 6 _ tNcapaA o N O Mc/) O N O b co +J EUE -0 a p aj w bNA C_ C' CCfl O O.L -0 _ EC U C C o C) � o � bA Q 70 E W N> C6 '� -> Q 0 ) � C 0 0 L U 7 N ca n cu o 0 0 > 'CLOa� a� -0 -- > � o cc o a U o u o C° E- Z 0+ 'E a) s o ,N 7 O '+-� N U Q C N U Cp � _o- O E 'C p O c6 -0 ,n C p a Q N _ C > av c6 � E O O O N C Y U iB +CD C E-4 N O O O U > U0 [6 b.0 N C O O O Q E O N 0O N C N� C O 0 E V a �_ N W N N +� m +- E E E +' > O o 7 E a�U O 7 O O O C O O � E cu O C } p O O x O N O a� N C E /0 U m U U .E H ED Q cn w a w O O L L > > m m Q 0 Q LD CI. 0 -q o U C -0 Q CU O 0 Q a) �-3 U) O O O C A � I C V O O C 0 N cu C D 0 C ¢ L 7� E O co I C O O 2 a a) + cu+ a) o o aa)) C co N O =� cn O tan E Q 0- +, pcu +� C X a) V) O N Q0 'n a) +- U o O o a) U o c C a) c6 Coa) N OO w N a O _ L O .� a' C O 4 C + N Q O a, O a +J Q c6 O C + N-0 E O cB U C O O '> a coU bOA a) M + 7 O .> C C a C �A X a) a) U m m U cn 0 aa)) O Oa) O o o cn E� O cn cn Cc0 oJ wo v�oo vcO O o75 �os Q NU a a O CIO oM Q M -0 L> C +N o U—,-0 ¢ p — O o CD Q o cB o p cv a) o o cn Q> C C =' C L o a) Q nn bl) C Q> C9 } (n a) C a) } J on C } C Q C �, U Q o ca C C CB C L U O cB p � — Z cn a) C -- o a) L 70 U.0 O N a) a) -00 ZoO LL C C T¢ LI) bA -0 fn }0. aQ) coA C �bA �O Y O aU) cu zo a) C CIO CI O M — 70Ct6 O •p_ V O 0 > bpA caO O co OnE � Q �!6 � C O N c6 'U O Y Q C-. � N d C p a) C CD Q c6 C c6 bA O 0 C O Q0 Q a) a) U o C w o 'vo o c6 + N O >> O N O U M A C O O d C O Q N s ¢ N p — M a) w U SZ C c6 In N ('7 6 p O Cc N a) a) V) 02 CO a) Cw O co E U C U sz a) >+Cl cB cB to i U N O O CO OC 0C7 a > Q ao Q o C a) X OQ Q O > 0 cu N o E }n U U Q/V O O a) a) >cu (n >c D Q ¢ cm I� +J C Q o 0 o0 Q c cv cn _ o_ o o o cn ai L c C o Co •� o U °� N 0 C o •� cz cco (n a) U a) M Q X U C a Q _ C 'O "O YiA C _ N O O cr C cn Ca U_ a) a) _ 'O > E Op 7 U CL o 0 L on cn cn -0a) 0 a a) a) a) L_0 L a) W CL u cn� •> L C Q U O +., O a) cB o In c o f > O a) o L o cu E a) cn c) p c6 a) O > U C -0 a) i i C a) U) Y a) a) bLp C- v } m +� '�, -0 cc > CI. L c0 cn cu � m +� a) >. fE bD CU C N f6 a) O (6 O CE C > C a) 0U E > a1 Q- C i C U C O O +� a) a7 to Cn a) L O a) +, +� E O -0 a) U — cz o C ca c ' C C .N cn C + N E N co N f6 C a) -0 La - a) '� s u) N ) 0 =5_ Q > a) a a)i v )A CO a U a) L N -O o N can co N a O O 00 N>+O C6 a -•C a+ a)O O O pO O Ua) CD O • oC Ucn -C O > O O O O O Q O hJ Cz "� WCa — O CL O N - U O O>> "Of U cu p o ca. a U~ -0 L cn L ca a) C L (O N L W C C6 U O > N U Q L a) C O C c6 +--� C O O N cB Q O O N vi >� L O Q C ca E C6 fE nOD L vii C6 > L O - a) > 2 O co L fn W a) a) <% o m L a) C v L (n L ca c L L U cn L M O O a) C O a) o a) M +� N p U N cz o Q co O_ (•,) >w c6 o N � O U taA U > Q a ia cu C (D �O O� �}Ca -0 a ) Q ai m o u a >s a L O b.A Q 'tB L O O O L N C6 �O o.- N a) cUE c�'6 CbA C O C o O— U T N +, c6 O O C L + O O N Q +� o 70 a) a) >_ O O N U C Ocn a) 'C > E — cv N + cu +� E O _ O UA C E C +� C6 cn cn C L Y)0 O O CO 1D C.. i N _ a) o a) a) y > cn o N cu • p O +� .� cn o O i co - L i N > w by c o a) O -0 L C C > N O U *— N C a) N a) C O = O cu OU U + L L O Z U + co Co > co O O O O D in Q in Q p Q p Q O c� CO 6) c -I c -I N O wo a) cn > O O a) oA Q �_ .� "O_ -0 C ca -r-O C Lo U C O L U N N O co , a) O >, O + Q co 76 —CU co U a) a) 'L +•• V) U p Q 4) C6 =3E_ U c>6 Q aU UD CO C C a) X O O UA C N + s 5 E> O c- O .0 " O E a••' }' = n - U Y O VO) ca ca •� a) w - E C C6 C C-. En a p Cl' O O Q m O O +Co � cc a) L Y a) E N M V) a) C/)O O > bA wa) d+ vl cB O cc 4) >, O dCUC > O •+� a) a) C O O Q O a) cn C d O d vv)i a) c6 *' N +� +� U L +' cn a) > C 'L +� C v U U C6 7 U•p c6 p0 v) a) +-' a) N cn C6 E cv •L cB L N cB N N C n O o>s -0 > Bn -1- _ +N4.) a) L) a O 6 O p U 0 6 -2 O O )a �vO N O a) E Q0 +0 _ - O +cv O Ca7)n, p aQN a) cu O C U C L C -O coN p Om Q N U a0 O 3:a)c a) C a) � � > C � � � cu {{} C — � ca Q C U a) � O Y C +J C O 9 0 O co cE U p a) •C C � v) cn Co co = + * cu U _ C m O E +r bA p � '-' C N cma vi +� >. C U C _ O c0 a) Q a) O O U a) O C }' > O a) +-- U N > Q- cB CE C 6 O }Q a) C U U om C L c0 to N a) 4) o o bA C a) +� c6 0-0 — U OO C-- O O O = V) CL y > O o _ C � O co C +-� = '� " bA CB (6 (a p CZ aCL C .i �_ _0 E cn CL a) p L a) +� +� C ?� N -0 m Q M X i L a) V) a) in a) E CD- a) ca- C6 c6 O' +� >j �C +� CLn C`• N C O v) +1 c!) L ca uo Q) U L U a) O 4- f6 cn > o p— L '� E m E o > o E IE m w N O N C O a) Q N U O V) C C N Q> Q-0 S a--� a•' E N C m O O CN 'N U U O O N V) O p N p N Ucu a) N = 00 O O N cB E + C ca O > ca O CU -0 O C Q_0 >% Q cc 0 m O LO O CL -0 O O O o¢ o o Q Q N co I:T ri I r -I b ® 7 3 CU k / \ s u 7 o 2 = a% 0 2 2\ o a t \/ 5 %= c o m a \ / _ & 2 3 = 2 = CID o £ 7 / § / / \ t 2 2 » \ s / 2 n � 4 ° • _ \ % / _ E u / _ � « _ _ \ / / - E \ o 2 U) 7 ? c « x= m 7 0 3 3 0 \ / o= _ 0 G @ 2 = /� 7 G= C{ a 0 J 3 E 2� ° w ® > = E \ E = e ' m o ± _ n m _ / / _ 0 \ / / k / 3 °CD / f / / § ® o ® CO \ 2 _ ? > _ & E . / \ _ _ ± u e » = E / / § » S / \ _ / / / / / \ f / $ / Co k / / \ 7 E 3 % ± / E G f = § % \ Cl. E G f / c § \ 2 - k \ = o f \ 2/ 2§ ) 2 2/ 0 7 /»/\* 0 \ % ƒ % % $ / / E e $ % % E R / R 3 / § \ \ � § cu\ _\ cn / \ / 0 0- m 3 [ & 0 \ w E / co 7 E / § c § / / \ 70 2 \ / % j 0 \ 0 / 0 / f / \ j 2 2± 2 2 { \ \� 2 > $ �% / c x ^ \ o § / > o\ < o \ k G 2 / o ° 2 0 3 ' o k k 7 p r°\ m \ \ § / / / # § CU { a _ = u % � 3 g \ / \ 0 k° E ° o G) � o # 3 L g=/ o > _ c \ a 2 (3.) 2 \ CL 7 § / > ƒ 2 CID $ t / 7 m '§ a @ m e 2 z a o = _ _$ m E n 0- 3= e = ® m _9m = 0 0 0 m 70 < \ / k / \ \ m m @ E a 5 / / / / / / / / / / k / / / \ / \ / 0 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 G 2 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< 2< \ % % \ % \ N U U a) 0 +� 0 N U +� O U C O N N O pCl. N O U N N 0 O L N N O C N a--• •N N �_ N J O co O N U O c0 U) � N '� *� C c0 V) C d U N .N Q '� �`• +� L Q 'V O O N O U 2 I 0 I �i N N U U N a--• cn N p U CO O i U L N c� • -a -a UfJ C N > M "O cB C ca C cc > cn bA C- ap m O > O O 0 0 C O _O U V i Q U o O O cn C Q U C >A, ea N c4 i L C N > U -0 O >� N N U :3— cn U 7 N U X N Q C D N N L (n • > C6 c6 C C-0 C O � _ 0 C O N p U c6 � O N p Q O L L O co O U i Q N Nco U C o ?_ o n a) U •- L U n U c0 L UJp 'N "p a•' N c6 O-0 O N fB L E X d O Q _0 p cE ca C Cl N U cE 7 O c0 4J O U } O OU U-0 C a O & pU L -p � ca Y d 'ao *' OC)— C 0 L-O U o O co 1 0 a) O C ca cc C cin L} C 0 O C +•' •— L C L U N C d) c6 •� = p O N>_ i p N ate' C tw C O •> co— > a cn O +--� C6 L i U c6 w +-• [0 N > U 0 Q O C N > O 0 , O C N O O U c0 O _ O 6 L O > d cn O _ N m E N o (B L N L c6 U C _ M N L O O U N CSE i N O M+ U +-• _0= O_0 • O . d _0 L UA N c6 L C ipp d O s > cn 0 O C N to C O U U O+-' H O -p U L a c6 O a-=• U m Cr a--• cc L L N N O Q m co } > Q x co E } N 0 U C E N ~cz E b0 '+- O • J O DO .E O cz CQODN U OC _ > C > OOL O bA > O CN co a)L > p N V1 C C i E p Q Q > cB U O O U p U O C CL E O a--• C (n L +� •� U 7 U C 0= •bA L Q p U O d N C MQ d C6 O L L U L Z3_ Q L C � 0 t�,p m }' O U a) Q a) -0 X d - N C 'aA L_ C U > �+ _ N = }• a% '� N m C= N (B T }• � L O -pcc i N U ap-• CD - E cu 0-U c6 } co V) N N U E m O cB U L O N C N N U w a•' V1 c6 O 0 C6 U_ O Q .0 0 E .0 O N C } N O '� '+J co >' +� . E N N N p S C6 C CL C C N O C0 7 � Q Q > c6 a)7 Z C 0 i Z L Z O O O O M > M O Q D Q D Q in Q r -i N co I�T N N N N ca 0 o o c6 a> �n U O U 3 0 0 *' ca o o ca 0 CLo 0 a� cv 0Ca C Q v M? m 0 cn n} O_ 'c� o a� Q cn ami � cn E a� E u' = CZ p oU _0 n W m w ' co cv O +� c6 U O U } y bn O E 0 Q L U -itZ5 i E E +J cu E '� O cn O O D � 0 fl- >O co N E _ E > D O oU U (�• nA O U p O E .� O U O p o f cv Q +� -0 i O Q Q > E' U O U O cz C ,� no L �a, co > cl• <6 • +� Q CB O E O cu a -- CU N O a--� cu U CU N E bA > ?� } E i O >` d O N E O O O j O j O O c0 '� O j O >, O -0 � >+ C > C 9 a CE L > a--. C -0 Q a--� _ ca C O >+ N O w U _ U bA 0)U N N U U m L O c6 •--� N U = > >, O O f6 N OU U O cn +--� ui C670 N U Cp O N N N N N N +m O dj E 0 00 O N U 7 > p N O O N } O c6 N cn O N CD m a) a)N L_ i a cu o LO O Ocn N N � A i+- NQ ca N O O U c6 U) 0- yUA •NU O O 4> O cB U cUv O N OO N O Q 2 U Q O _bN O O 6O > > N -0 N U U E0 N 0 E C w 0 U (D U •O C >O = O_ O O O i O ,� c N O _0 O L � E N OvO) O L +J E O 0- '- -0 O vi E = U E + = `n o +- _O U O-0 ca y i O J N O vi w C C— O O +' cv bA E J E Cll U X U C6 U p O O O E 'V -0 > a) U� O OLu N >EO O� ba.0 Co C> J bo OO O Oa OOy O O tf � CD O -0 p > Co O O U O d N *O CZ O ca) pE Q Cu J .�-� a•'' U O cn U cn U cn O Q }, O cn C6 'O Q Cll by y C O U O L c a) C C6 O U N >, CU O O cu O +r cn _a) O N U N [moo UO0 0 O }, C U N _ N "a O O 0 N C O }, N cv N N O N Q fn CTa) M 2 -g--C fn ,N N W N O cc "O 0 O O O O N tv N C '-' U O O +' N *' E m O N Q� 7 Q y cn cn bA cn O cn U v Q +J +� _ O N O O N cB +� � .N O E Q U_ E 0 �' N cu cv O a'n a O 0> � N E O O _ O� M x O O cv � O E cv ca U a� cv Q U cn =co co O O O O O >> >> >> >> >> M > > M p Q p Q p Q p Q p Q Un c.0 00 m N N N N N 0 / \ /.\ \ n 2 E c ° _ ° & ƒ 2 ) / Ek \ � CL� 0 _ / f 0 \ 7 I co 5 ± * $ _ \ •§ / E v / « f® 3 7 E c\ o \ ° _ / \ _ ƒ / f / 7 m \ \ E \ / f ± E 5 m @ ® ° 3 j 2 / § o g \ ) \co / 2 / \ 2 / / f 7 / / / m 0 2 cu §: 2 U C k � § \�\ / « 2 < \ / 2 = \ E 0 § 2 / ? k \ >1 / _ / 2 \ c = o us � 0 cn 0 / 0 z \ 9 / / k / ƒ \ ° t _ = u u § / $ 5 2 E 0 / \ /.\ \ n 2 E c ° _ ° & ƒ 2 ) / Ek \ � CL� 0 _ / f 0 \ 7 I co 5 ± * $ _ \ •§ / E v / « f® 3 7 E c\ o \ ° _ / \ _ ƒ / f / 7 m \ \ E \ / f ± E 5 m @ ® ° 3 j E ( U G g ) m u 2 = \ 2 / / f 7 / / / m 0 2 U 2 U � \ k 0 § jLn / « 2 < \ / co a 2 C) / / >1 7 0 / \ /.\ \ n 2 E c ° _ ° & ƒ 2 ) / Ek \ � CL� 0 _ / f 0 \ 7 I co 5 ± * $ _ \ •§ / E v / « f® 3 7 E c\ o \ ° _ / \ _ ƒ / f / 7 m \ \ E \ / f ± E 5 m @ E E / / k / / / \ / 0 2 U 2 U 2 G 2 2 « 2 < 2 « 2 < / C O O O N > O a) U a O Cll U UO C ca"i7 N > c N Y c N 'C U O CB Cll fB C6 j bA U O N U bA O C C� C i U N} N N O cu O L � cn CU a) •tfpLC zs p a) co CL C) > En .2 O� UI CC N Z: =N NCy C+�C' E y O YN bA Ln b -O CO O O X Op U U I-- � A E N QvOi NX O > N E C U Q O CL O O O U O pO OO CiUA N O C �C6D O v�CL Q .p O O Q m C O O O m O O U c6 + M C U v� d CO bOD +, O O O d i +�- Cn ) nA > N co T p U O T cv > O O p 0 O U X O C6 C -0 CL> C C -0 Q >� > C d > C C6 C O •� p () tw C U d dcn N a CO Q L U C cv > � > Q O N - N O C O O > O s C N p •U M U N 'N-' C N N N N CO ID- Cu �_ C O U O -O _ O (co N i i C O O Z5 U O bA m > s 2 E _ C Q CU 76 LD U f�E Cll oa'.' d N — O C a Ln U O M > O -0 > N a) O O U O C c6 E N E O s= C p _0O O cn bA C O C w C CSE Q C6 U C }, + b1J C L C U N bA O O C > c6 c a) C cB C .� O O +� C cu C = � Q O;C Cll E N ca U U) U •E to > o c Cll N Q O a E O +� N >, Vi i p U U U ~ O O U >+ CB N O i > U Cll — O cn N CML N D O E > O U i N fn OU � O Q Q H O O O O O >> >> >> >> >> D Q in Q in Q o Q in Q LO CD I- CO co co Co co co _ _ @ ? � ? R § 7\ k k / k u e c « 2 ° // = 2 _ ° _ _ cc = 2 5 ' _ % / 0 0 3 / 5 t \ ± _ / § 3 CL \ ƒ \ { § ¥ 2 \ / 0 0 u u cc \ 0§@ m x\ m m 5 E ƒ f\ \\ \ 2 E 2° e# \ 0 0- 5 E 4 °°) E 3 Cc m \ / \ 7 / \ f / [ k % CD 0= E m=)= o 2 5 a 3 E/ s 2 a/ o e 0 2= \ g>= q E §»/ /§/ c E® ±_ / 3 / CL E % = 2 2 E o u / / \ \ f / \ 7 / % / @ \ \ \ \ 0 \ 2 7 \ \ 7 f § k \ 2 k § 2 / G \ ƒ m / \ / y E G ƒ \ / E \ / ƒ \ 7 i / 0 2 4 2 E \ R / ¢ \ / § / / $ 7 % k \ -E5 ƒ \ ƒ 3 k 5 Co » u > / 2 0 E mcc o E \ k & 5 e § \ = m m § / g J § m a a % { \ § u 0 3 \ = 2 g ® 0 n ° ° m o 0 = /CZ � » CZ - } / \ / 7 z \ / k c 2 E cz _ * a = 3 2 °2 z± s / / 0 2 / \ & CO E 7 3 f 2 / k\ / 5 / ' » o u o m ± = 0 0 / $ z § = 2 ± a m -0 / $ 2 > / 2 @ E = 7 2= ±± 3 0=/ 0 W / J E \ ` � $\ = / 0 _ ° \ E % 0 7 = = ® o 2 ± / ? / / E 2 \ $ \ f § ƒ 0 0 2 m E > / / o @ _ § / § U)E % ) � ® o . \ ƒ / § 0 0 2 7 0 J G / 7/ 3§ m a 7/ U m m 5 E 5 / / / / / / / / / / / / / \ / 0 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 G 2 2« 2« 2« 2« 2« % ? T- q 0 m a m D _ � /( / cn / / u \ \ . / E m ) \ @ o ® = U)= ° g = e @ o \ -0 # e u E / ) + 0 / §\ \ ¢ \ ± ° ® § E » CL m / 2 / 2 § Z\ M �% k\/ Cc R\ 2\ m 0 2 0 0 2 7 = 2 u k / / \ ) \ \ \ / � / \ / k = e 7 o CZ m•- _ § m= a± t ± o ƒ u = 2 \ \ / 2 \ c / u / 2 t § ® / f \ $\ \ / 2 G A 2 / § 2 E / / 2 % § 2 a E u = / w c = o _ / ± 3 >1 � § / 5 < \ / / / / % E \ Z w = ± _ = e _ 3 0 o /. ' _ - m �= G e m _ 2 = - k e 2° E®_ c « = E _ _ • = 7 k e = o / \ 7 / / \ / / / / \ / / 2 \ ) / \ / ƒ « 7 § E $ 3 / 2 § ¢ / R / _ ._ % ± k \ / § / / \ 3 / \ � \ � * C3 » _9 \ n / n m \ \ / 7 e § e q o(n ± / \ / / a) k ca ° 2 c w 2 % = % / - \ E /� f » ) ± ® f ƒ ƒ \ / \ � ± U ( } \ % < 2 \ / R k / / 7 4 --:5E \ m $ / / \ e E \ q / / 2 f cu \ \ 2 ® % / / / ƒ \ / /m % ® m o / / ƒ m 70§ ® 7 = o a > \ J m @ E m § / / / / / / / k / / / / / / / 0 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 2« 2< 2< 2< 2< J \ ? \ \ � q 0 00 a m D _ � E � ƒ = k \ / 0 2 \/ u m g o / 7 # 2 / \ ) U E @ LU CU to Co �¥ / 7 % c cn Co -0 \ f \ ƒ f 2%� m / _ E / / \ e \ / / ƒ E \ k % / o > (n_ E o/ & 7 7 0 E \ / > �ƒ _ } R 2 / § = o & ± m CL e o 2 a m c=± co e = 3® � 2 & o e 0 m 9 2\ m ° 2 = m t G = w \ / k u # ®/ f E o t m= u 2/ k \ / 5 f u E\ Q 0 2 m/\/ ± m ± m \ $ \ \ $ $ 0 R 0 / 2 m / (f) 2 k 2 k / V) 2 p m 2 2 \ > 0 \ > / 9 / � q 0 00 a m D _ � O O , T U L U) O a N T CION Cl) d O N a p L V) N C O L')U C O O� O C6 N cu > O CZ N co -E CL 0> ,+T' _� �_ p q) O O U.0 U N O CD a O 7 +�' O >7 +� O T �O cu CCS > U mcu "6 C6 � p 0 Q = +0- N Q) p m O' O 3:U p O �= 0-Q LL Q O j - O O C) O C'. 'r i O O m � N U) U O U O O a--� Q N o Oo w O N C V N H Lr O W O N N L N Q N ,U O Y CD U N O= O Q "p � O in C i p O ^J O O p + Cll Q O O O Q (ll W O O Q) +� C +� -0 p M -0 Cn i > Cll CO cn :3 E O "a a) O > L C j �O E � p Q 00 .S Z O O0 7 O c I- M +J Q C O (ll Q- p O 00 Q) p O= w O Cll a) C C 'v7 +� -0 co + CoA p i 'N .0 CO U cn N .� O Q -p O N Cll Q o O U O b�A Cll NO U_ U "C3 cB Co U O Q U > O O i O Q O 1 C� _ Q) UA O= O a CCD C L O O a > + a) O_ O U = O p O O o O a) O C O O N O .O = �� = Q Q a H !\ V} L Cn O bA U O } b�0 O p m O} p CL Q p O Oj '+ + O a J Q) Q a O Q cts U � = O CTS •p m w •O N U C2 Cll T N C2 -0 = O C U CS) Cn N •O O s= Co LA N ca O .t O � CZ � p 0 p O N C[S O OC N N OJ (ll 0) T O O O_ O t1•p O E O • 6 i a--� N O .O ''' O — C6 _0 d.1 •� 110 cn d N > a -- i O U .0 CD >+ S2 O .= O v1 a -- O N C +� i-' w '"- +T' +N CCS E —0 cu > N mQ> O CS) O U O cn N bA CB v7 N "a 'T .�-, 00 y X CU ON OU O U N O O O O N U C +' i Cl) O O N U Q CE i. V "6_ q) +� O Cll N (U CB O cj7 O E }, N all n O O m O -0C :F C Q CS -0 U > OC p 0OO p nS C(n � U A O U ll > U O E U ll O _ C6 a) N T Q O co Cll O O � O -00 O � 'i L UA cn — O d fn Q U a) C O n O O O N = O CD '++ O Q -0 O + a U U)0 '' Cll Cll Co > O N C� Q O = U c iyp U a) O wO a) Z >, ca -0 anz) Z5 o� o >, a) 70 co C) � ao ycnca >Q U 3: o U , W " o U n3 a) O C M U �. 0 N, o cu a) 7 C Y- O o o �. o o _o 65- N U O H N O O a) +. > O~ � V O - a1 a) a) "p D 0 N O N cu "6 Q cz N a) cu -� C O O O m O a j fB L >+ N UA O v O O N Iz C -r-O � N O U U a) O O E j O cn OC — O ON Q � Oo yc Z 0 O LO o C) U 6 "a C O O C O i ul C a) 0)c6 O ca O Y a) p + cc a O O O * L O > C >j C cz a) cB C a) = U�0 u co N N 7 a aC U E cu O=C + - N -�1+O Op L 0 caaCOa cu O M - 4 OE )) O O N 70 C W > U -0 :3 � Uc w yUOn NMOCa) 'LLOCU a E a = c a) a 79 E � O C U OOC V - O O O C — — U a a) U MO O Q_ c6 3: > cn M CL �n -0 O O OmInY m a) u paU rn m y O OL U) 10 El U o c i p o o� W 0 ooi CD En a) N to C C C O N 00 c6 *' i cc N .+�-' .+�_' Z N U C C uj C6 + O > E a) a cn ' N >� p J"O J O a ) CD O 2 0 CD _O CD N Fu U o C6 Co CB> O Q j a -- C a) ca U cc > 0 N p C Y O C O p Q U 6 O O OQ O N0 C V E a) o (n _ O Q O U O -0CO — a) C Q 2 O O —U W Y O L A a) Q OO O O O a O Z Q+ C cn—imoocin C C cE f4 CD C C O O O + C U L O +� C U i U N U -0 N C F C O U O cc U Cl) LO