Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
DSD-2026-001 - Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/026/W/EW - 7 Wimbleton Crescent
Staff Report J IKgc.;i' r� R Development Services Department www.kitchener.ca REPORT TO: Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee DATE OF MEETING: January 5, 2026 SUBMITTED BY: Garett Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approval, 519-783-8922 PREPARED BY: Evan Wittmann, Senior Planner, 519-783-8523 WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 1 DATE OF REPORT: December 19, 2025 REPORT NO.: DSD -2026-001 SUBJECT: Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/026/W/EW 7 Wimbleton Crescent RECOMMENDATION: That Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA25/026/W/EW for 7 Wimbleton Crescent for BDRP Inc. be APPROVED in form of the `Proposed By-law', and `Map No. 1' attached to Report DSD -2025-035 as Attachments 'Al' and `A2'. REPORT HIGHLIGHTS: • The purpose of this report is to evaluate and provide a planning recommendation regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment Application for the subject lands located at 7 Wimbleton Crescent. It is planning staff's recommendation that the Zoning By-law Amendment Application be approved. • Community engagement included: o Circulation of a postcard to property owners and residents within 240 metres of the subject site; o Installation of a large billboard notice sign on the subject site; o Virtual Neighbourhood Meeting held on November 25, 2025 o Follow-up one -one -one correspondence with members of the public; o Notice of the public meeting was published in The Record on December 12, 2025; and, o Postcard advising of the statutory public meeting was circulated to all residents and property owners within 240 metres of the subject site. • This report supports the delivery of core services. • This application was deemed complete on October 15, 2025. The applicant can appeal this application for non -decision beginning January 13, 2025. *** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. *** Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance. Page 139 of 183 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Up Consulting, the applicant on behalf of the Owner of Wimbleton Crescent (the "Subject Site"), BDRP Inc., is proposing to amend Zoning By-law 2019-051 to change the zoning of the subject site from the 'Low Rise Residential Two Zone (RES -2)' to the 'Low Rise Residential Four Zone (RES -4)' to permit the redevelopment of the site with a Semi - Detached Building with two (2) dwelling units per side, for a total of four (4) units. The `RES -2' zone does not permit Semi -Detached Dwellings, and as such an amendment is required to facilitate the proposal. No site-specific provisions to the regulations are required. Staff are recommending that the application be approved. The subject site contains a Single Detached Dwelling, with one Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) (Attached), both of which are unoccupied due to fire damage REPORT: The City of Kitchener received a Zoning By-law Amendment ("ZBA") application for a development concept consisting of a semi-detached building containing a total of four dwelling units (two units per side). The applicant was informed that the subject site could remain as a single detached dwelling and be developed to contain four units as -of -right with no development application necessary. The applicant maintained their desire to build a semi-detached building which could be severed should the ZBA get approved. Site Context The subject site is 411 square metres in area, with a lot width of 16.1 metres and depth of 30.4 metres. The subject site contains a Single Detached Dwelling, with one ADU (Attached), both of which are unoccupied due to fire damage. The subject site is located in the Grand River North neighbourhood of the City and is the second property north of the intersection of Wimbleton Crescent and Lorraine Avenue on the west side of Wimbleton Crescent. Figure 1: Subject Site Page 140 of 183 The surrounding area generally consists of low rise neighbourhoods to the north, east, and south. A short distance west of the subject site (approximately 100 metres) is a higher density node, with commercial uses at the intersection of Lorraine Avenue and Heritage Drive and mid and high rise developments surrounding. Wimbleton Crescent generally features single detached houses one and two storeys in height. There are no other active planning applications in the area. Figure 2: Surrounding Area Aerial Proposal The proposal for the subject site consists of a Semi -Detached Dwelling, with one attached ADU (Attached) on each side, for a total of four units. The "primary" unit is proposed to be three bedrooms and occupy the main and lower levels of the building. The ADU (Attached) is proposed to be a two bedroom unit and will be located on the upper level. This arrangement is mirrored on the two sides of the semi-detached building. Each side of the building features a driveway and garage, offering two parking spaces for each side (1 parking space per dwelling unit) in a tandem arrangement. A rear yard is provided for each side, being 7.5 metres in length. Page 141 of 183 f �-.V°MAsI Y „1". � WfFf fJl ti+n1A''f ON4 U un nrcwcwur�nr r i�� — — mwAHA rlt IN, M l,ra W, { jutltl�;°A'uSe�V'tl IY it OM .:r f-1 E rld fu I umrY'r e � 5 ,tw7 &dNidnPOHa � ��y� r�ao.�. e�4 � v beard Ix "„„,mms�m,m m "''',."; I m u r r G- ,W m" m W,m ,. r' r l rnuw,inrcm n, 'DRu, F ,k I u..b I W . ,,. Ir 1011 1Lialfi I' �0 Ff Bd I ` � �• I I b gDF 1� SIJ i, I I h . /�_ _ Wim. _ d na;a�� Figure 3: Existing Conditions (Left) And Site Plan (Right) Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13.25 Section 2 of the Planning Act establishes matters of provincial interest and states that the Minister, the council of a municipality, a local board, a planning board and the Tribunal, in carrying out their responsibilities under this Act, shall have regard to, among other matters, matters of provincial interest such as: f) The adequate provision and efficient use of communication, transportation, sewage and water services and waste management systems; g) The minimization of waste; h) The orderly development of safe and healthy communities; j) The adequate provision of a full range of housing, including affordable housing; k) The adequate provision of employment opportunities; Page 142 of 183 p) The appropriate location of growth and development; q) The promotion of development that is designed to be sustainable, to support public transit and to be oriented to pedestrians; r) The promotion of built form that, (i) Is well-designed, (ii) Encourages a sense of place, and (iii) Provides for public spaces that are of high quality, safe, accessible, attractive and vibrant; s) The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and adaptation to a changing climate. These matters of provincial interest are addressed and are implemented through the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, as it directs how and where development is to occur. The City's Official Plan is the most important vehicle for the implementation of the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 and to ensure Provincial policy is adhered to. Provincial Planning Statement The Provincial Planning Statement (PPS), 2024 is a streamlined province -wide land use planning policy framework, replacing both the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020 and A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2019, while building upon housing -supportive policies from the two documents. The PPS 2024 came into force on October 20, 2024. According to the Province, the PPS 2024 provides municipalities with the tools and flexibility they need to build more homes. It enables municipalities to: • plan for and support development, and increase the housing supply across the province • align development with infrastructure to build a strong and competitive economy that is investment -ready • foster the long-term viability of rural areas • protect agricultural lands, the environment, public health and safety Policy 2.1.6 directs planning authorities to support the achievement of complete communities by: a) accommodating an appropriate range and mix of land uses, housing options, transportation options with multimodal access, employment, public service facilities and other institutional uses (including schools and associated child care facilities, longterm care facilities, places of worship and cemeteries), recreation, parks and open space, and other uses to meet long-term needs; b) improving accessibility for people of all ages and abilities by addressing land use barriers which restrict their full participation in society; and c) improving social equity and overall quality of life for people of all ages, abilities, and incomes, including equity -deserving groups. The proposed development would contribute to the range and mix of housing options in the area, which is currently predominantly single detached houses. The duplex arrangement of the proposed development creates options for a future homeowner to rent the second unit in the development, resulting in a more attainable home ownership alternative. Policy 2.3.1.3 provides further direction regarding settlement areas, the area of the City in which the subject site is located. Planning authorities shall support general Page 143 of 183 intensification and redevelopment to support the achievement of complete communities, including by planning for a range and mix of housing options and prioritizing planning and investment in the necessary infrastructure and public service facilities. Section 2.2 of the PPS establishes the policies regarding housing. Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing options and densities to meet projected needs of current and future residents of the regional market area by: b) permitting and facilitating: 1. all housing options required to meet the social, health, economic and wellbeing requirements of current and future residents, including additional needs housing and needs arising from demographic changes and employment opportunities; and 2. all types of residential intensification, including the development and redevelopment of underutilized commercial and institutional sites (e.g., shopping malls and plazas) for residential use, development and introduction of new housing options within previously developed areas, and redevelopment, which results in a net increase in residential units in accordance with policy 2.3.1.3; c) promoting densities for new housing which efficiently use land, resources, infrastructure and public service facilities, and support the use of active transportation; and The proposed development is particularly aligned with Policy 2.2.b.2), as a new housing option would be created in an already developed area and result in a modest net increase of residential units (from 2 units to 4 units). The redevelopment would efficiently use the land in a manner that would otherwise be permitted as -of -right if the land division to facilitate the semi-detached nature of the development was not pursued. A further discussion of this as -of -right near alignment is provided in the Zoning By-law Amendment section of this report. Lorraine Avenue, which is just to the south of subject site, contains bike lanes, and two GRT bus routes have stops within a five minute walk of the subject site. Planning staff are of the opinion that the Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the PPS. Region of Waterloo Official Plan The Region of Waterloo is an upper -tier municipality without planning responsibilities. The More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022, amended the Planning Act by transferring planning responsibilities from upper -tier governments across the Province, including the Region of Waterloo to local municipalities. The Region is responsible for commenting on the infrastructure and service delivery that the Region of Waterloo delivers to the community, such as public health and paramedic services, affordable housing, source water protection, water and wastewater infrastructure, transit and transportation, waste management, and the Region of Waterloo International Airport. As a result, the Region no longer has an Official Plan (ROP) as it is now an Official Plan for area municipalities who are responsible for implementation of the ROP until it is repealed through a future Area Municipal planning exercise. Page 144 of 183 For purposes of this application, Regional staff have provided their comments which have been consideration in the formation of the planning recommendation of the Zoning By-law Amendment application. The subject site is designated "Urban Area" and "Built -Up Area" on Schedule 3a of the ROP. Urban Area policies of the ROP identify that the focus of the Region's future growth will be within the Urban Area. Policy 2.F establishes minimum intensification targets within the delineated Built -Up Area, which the proposed development will support the achievement of. Growth is directed to the Built -Up Area of the Region to make better use of infrastructure that can assist in transitioning the Region into an energy efficient, low carbon community. Furthermore, intensification within the Built -Up Area assists the gradual transition of existing neighbourhoods within the Region into 15 -minute neighbourhoods that are compact, well connected places that allow all people of all ages and abilities to access the needs for daily living within 15 minutes by walking, cycling or rolling. The Region of Waterloo have indicated they have no objections to the proposed application (contained in Attachment `C'). Planning staff are of the opinion that the Zoning By-law Amendment application is in conformity to the ROP. City of Kitchener Official Plan In accordance with the provisions of the Planning Act, the City of Kitchener is required to prepare and update its Official Plan (OP). The OP is a legal document that contains goals, objectives and policies to manage and direct physical and land use change and their effects on the cultural, social, economic and natural environment within the city. This Plan provides a framework for decision-making and plays a number of essential roles in the future planning of the city. Section 3 of the OP establishes an Urban Structure for the City and provides policies for directing growth and development within this structure. The subject site is identified on Map 2 — Urban Structure as `Community Areas'. The OP states that "The planned function of Community Areas is to provide for residential uses as well as non-residential supporting uses intended to serve the immediate residential areas." This urban structure component allows for limited intensification in accordance with the applicable land use designation and the Urban Design Policies in Section 11. In addition, "development must be sensitive to and compatible with the character, form and planned function of the surrounding context." The proposed development is consistent with the intent of Community Areas. Section 4 of the OP establishes the Housing policies for the City. Policy 4.C.1.6. states: "The City will identify and encourage residential intensification and/or redevelopment, including adaptive re -use and infill opportunities, including additional dwelling units, attached and detached, in order to respond to changing housing needs and as a cost effective means to reduce infrastructure and servicing costs by minimizing land consumption and making better use of existing community infrastructure." The proposed development contains one ADU (Attached) on each side of the semi-detached dwelling, contributing a cost effective and efficient use of land, aligning with Policy 4.C.1.6. Page 145 of 183 The subject site is located within an existing neighbourhood. Policy 4.C.1.9 directs for residential intensification and/or redevelopment in these areas to be designed to respect existing character. A high degree of sensitivity to surrounding context is important in considering compatibility. The proposed development is two storeys in height, consistent with neighbouring low rise properties, which are generally bungalow, side split, and two storey dwellings. The OP provides specific policy direction regarding the provision of Additional Dwelling Units (attached), through policy 4.C.1.23: "The City may permit up to three additional dwelling units, attached and/or detached, on a lot which contains a single detached dwelling, a semi-detached dwelling or a street -townhouse dwelling as the principal use, unless otherwise limited by the policies of this Plan, and in accordance with the City's Zoning By-law, in order to provide additional housing options to Kitchener homeowners and residents." The duplexing of each side of the semi-detached is a permitted arrangement, contributing additional housing options in a low rise form. Section 15 of the OP establishes the land use designation policies for the City. The subject site is identified as being designated "Low Rise Residential" on Map 3 — Land Use. The Low Rise Residential land use designation is intended to accommodate a full range of low density housing types which may include single detached dwellings, additional dwelling units, attached and detached, and semi-detached dwellings. The proposed development is consistent with the intended function of the Low Rise Residential land use designation. Of particular relevance to the Zoning By-law Amendment application is policy 15.D.3.9: "The City will encourage and support the mixing and integrating of innovative and different forms of housing to achieve and maintain a low-rise built form." The RES -2 zone is in place for the areas to the east and south of the subject site, resulting in a neighbourhood where only single -detached houses are permitted. Expanding the permissions of the subject site to permit a semi-detached dwelling will contribute to the mix of housing options in the area, while maintaining low rise built form. This further implements housing policy 4.C.1.12, which states "The City favours a land use pattern which mixes and disperses a full range of housing types and styles both across the city as a whole and within neighbourhoods." Planning staff are of the opinion that the Zoning By-law Amendment application is in conformity to the OP. Draft City of Kitchener Official Plan (Kitchener 2051) A draft of the new City of Kitchener Official Plan (Kitchener 2051) has been prepared by the City of Kitchener and is within the public commenting period. In this draft, the subject site is identified as being "Neighbourhood Growth Area" on the Urban Structure Map, and "Neighbourhood" on the Land Use Designations Map. This emerging policy direction continues to enable a range and mix of housing options in these areas, and to plan for more people to support mobility choices and shops and services closer to home. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is to change the zoning from the 'RES -2' Zone to the 'RES -4' Zone, with no site-specific provisions to the regulations required. The change is requested to permit a semi-detached dwelling. Semi-detached dwellings and Page 146 of 183 single -detached dwellings commonly co -exist across the City, both being low rise -built forms, and three (3) of the four (4) urban `RES' Zones permit both housing types. The `RES -2' Zone setback requirements for a single -detached dwelling are the same as the setback requirements for a semi-detached dwelling in the `RES -4' Zone. The built form proposed is consistent with what is currently permitted by the `RES -2' Zone; with the exception in meeting the regulations being the future land division. While Wimbleton Crescent is currently developed with single detached dwellings, the surrounding area has a greater variety in built form and residential uses. Less than 100 metres to the west of the subject site, at the intersection of Lorraine Avenue and Heritage Drive, is a commercial plaza, with a 9 -storey development abutting to the north, and semi- detached houses beyond this further north. The current `RES -2' zoning regulations for the subject site permit a four unit building (Single -Detached Dwelling with three attached ADUs) as -of -right. Essentially, the exact same building could be constructed with only a building permit (with small adjustments such as a consolidated driveway and garage), with the caveat that the property could not be severed in the future. The proposal only differs from as -of -right permissions by a party wall and future land division. Should this application be approved, the Owner will apply for a Consent Application to divide the property into two, facilitating the independent functioning of each side of the semi-detached dwelling. An emerging development trend in the City is for semi-detached dwellings to feature four units per side, for a total of eight. This would not be possible on the subject site, as the zoning regulations for a Semi -Detached Dwelling with more than one ADU (Attached) requires a wider lot width than can be provided by the subject site (10.5 metre width for a site total of 21 metres, where the subject site is 16.1 metres wide), and additional regulations, such as additional parking, could not be met. The Owner has advised that they intend to build two semi-detached duplexes rather than one four unit building to provide greater flexibility to future owners. A future owner could potentially live in one unit and rent the other unit, rather than selling the site as a four unit building to one owner. Department and Agency Comments Circulation of the Zoning By-law Amendment Application was undertaken to all applicable City departments and other review authorities. The comments are included in Attachment `C'. The following Reports and Studies were considered as part of this proposed Zoning By- law Amendment Application: Architectural Package Prepared by: SRM Architects, September 24, 2025 Planning Justification Report Prepared by: Up Consulting, September 29, 2025 Page 147 of 183 Tree Management Plan Prepared by: Hill Design Studio, September 18, 2025 Topographic Survey Prepared by: Stantec, June 10, 2025 Community Input and Staff Responses Staff received written responses from four community members with respect to the proposed development. The comments received are included in Attachment `D'. A Neighbourhood Meeting was held on November 25, 2025. A summary of what we heard and staff responses are noted below. 427 households (occupants and property owners) were circulated and notified. 6 people/households provided comments by email or telephone. A City -led virtual neighbourhood meeting was held on November 25 2025 and approximately 6 different users logged on. aa, What We Heard Staff Comment Are sufficient parking spaces provided? The Zoning By-law establishes the required parking rate for residential development. For a Semi -Detached Dwelling, one parking space is required for the primary unit, with an additional parking space being required for the ADU (Attached). Each side of the semi- detached dwelling has a garage and driveway, resulting in each side having two parking spaces, meeting the requirements of the Zoning By-law. The parking spaces being in tandem is permitted by the both the Planning Act and Zoning By-law. Will this application set a precedent for the Every development application is reviewed neighbourhood? on its own merit. Each development application submitted can involve different study requirements, site characteristics, Page 148 of 183 Will there be impacts to sun/shadows? The postcard notice for the neighbourhood information meeting did not indicate that there were four units proposed. proposal details, and planning frameworks and policies that will need to be assessed. It should be noted that up to four dwelling units are permitted on residential properties, which can be accommodated by the existing `RES -2' zoning. The proposal is two storeys in height, which is generally consistent with the neighbouring properties, and is a height permitted by the Zoning By-law. As such, a shadow study was not deemed a submission requirement, and adverse impacts due to shadows are not anticipated. The postcard notice indicated that the application was for a `Semi -Detached Dwelling'. Ultimately, this is the zone permission being requested. Adding a second unit to a semi-detached (and up to four units should the zone category allow) is permitted and can be done outside of a Planning Act application where no notice would be given. The postcard notice for the Planning and Strategic Initiatives Committee meeting, the Statutory Public Meeting, was revised to state that four units are proposed. Further, the ad in the newspaper stated: "a Semi -Detached Dwelling to facilitate the construction of semi-detached building with two dwelling units per side". As per the requirements of the Planning Act, proper notice was provided to the public. Page 149 of 183 How is the proposal compatible with the The area surrounding the subject site neighbourhood? generally contains single detached dwellings, with denser built forms being located at the intersection to the west. Although semi-detached dwellings are not prominent in the area, semi-detached dwellings, particularly at two storeys of height as proposed, are largely consistent in appearance as single -detached dwellings. The `Low Rise Residential' land use designation contemplates the use of semi-detached dwellings on residential lands, and the lot is of a sufficient size to accommodate this type of intensification without the need for site-specific zoning regulations. Concern with loss of green space, tree One street tree will need to be removed to canopy, and environmental concerns facilitate the proposed development. The City will require compensation to be paid for the loss of this tree, which will be used to plant five trees. Three private trees will need to be removed, which will be reviewed as per the City's Private Tree By-law. There is concern that the current landlord Property maintenance matters such as is absent and negatively impacts site snow clearing, parking, noise, and property management. standards are ultimately outside of the planning approval process and are governed by other City By-laws, rather than the Zoning By-law. By-law Enforcement can and should be contacted when by-laws are not followed. Will my property value decrease due to this Property values are complex and are application? impacted by a great variety of factors. MPAC assessments outline that up to 200 factors generally account for a property's assessed value; however, there are five primary factors: location, lot dimensions, exterior square footage, quality of construction, and age of building, adjusted for any major renovations or additions. Generally, the proposed development does not impact these five primary factors. Page 150 of 183 Is the school bus stop at the corner of The Waterloo Region District School Board Wimbleton Crescent and Lorraine Avenue was contacted to confirm if there were of concern? concerns with the proposal as it relates to the school bus stop location. The WRDSB confirmed that there were no concerns. Too many occupants will be permitted. The Building Code establishes that maximum occupancy of a building is two people per bedroom. As the proposal consist of two three-bedroom dwelling units and two two-bedroom dwelling units, the hypothetical maximum occupancy is 20 people. The Building division does not have concerns with the number of occupants. Planninq Conclusions In considering the foregoing, staff are supportive of the Zoning By-law Amendment Application. Staff are of the opinion that the application is consistent with policies of the PPS, conforms to the ROP and the OP, and represents good planning. Staff recommends that the application be approved. The proposed application represents an opportunity to provide gentle intensification that helps to address a need for housing in our community. STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT: This report supports the delivery of core services. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: Capital Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Capital Budget. Operating Budget — The recommendation has no impact on the Operating Budget. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: INFORM — This report has been posted to the City's website with the agenda in advance of the council / committee meeting. CONSULT — If applicable. PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES: • Plannina Act. R.S.O. 1990. c.P.13 • Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 • Region of Waterloo Official Plan • City of Kitchener Official Plan • Draft City of Kitchener Official Plan (Kitchener 2051) • City of Kitchener Zoning By-law 2019-051 Page 151 of 183 REVIEWED BY: Tina Malone -Wright, Manager of Development Applications APPROVED BY: Justin Readman, General Manager Development Services Department ATTACHMENTS: Attachment Al — By-law to amend Zoning By-law 2019-051 Attachment A2 — Map No. 1 Attachment B — Newspaper Notice Attachment C — Department and Agency Comments Attachment D — Public Comments Attachment E — Site Plan Page 152 of 183 PROPOSED BY — LAW ,2025 BY-LAW NUMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER (Being a by-law to amend By-law 2019-051, as amended, known as the Zoning By-law for the City of Kitchener — Christopher Michael Haliburton — 7 Wimbleton Crescent) WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend By-law 2019-051 for the land specified above; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener enacts as follows: 1. Zoning Grid Schedule Number 226 of Appendix "A" to By-law Number 2019-051 is hereby amended by changing the zoning applicable to the parcel of land specified and illustrated as Area 1 on Map No. 1, in the City of Kitchener, attached hereto, from Low Rise Residential Zone 2 (RES -2) to Low Rise Residential Zone Four (RES -4). PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this day of , 2025. Mayor Clerk Page 153 of 183 \z W LL, W Z W ON W 0 Z W 0 O Z Q Z O N N O z N O Z O N W� N W O N N 0 of D LU > U > W D _H Q� I.- O LL J w Q Ow H �QQQQa w N Z Q Z O W Z Z Z Z W �j W N W. W W W W _ J 0 Z O w U 0 of W W D (W a W W W W W D 0 0 o O D 0 D D 0 cn Z w w o� CO Z Of 2 H w N c� X Lu (.9 W Q O � z 0 0 0 0 0= N c N N M V 1p W O W = (U) w w w w w CO) QRLL im 0����of � O Q Z Q LO w Q W U Z IWiNQZ � ow0� Wwa- °cUn0Y > w m a Q �i X W LUC14 E. LL N a m N w J } cn �co N � p m cc Z - O Lu Lu a Q w L0 N U Z I � O uuuuuuuuumuuuuuuu I `w ti i z N O CO O H L Q% 0 N W N Q � ' z `�� d j Z w � w Z a � Z ppppppplll LC) IIII�� LL w V 0 0 z ; " Z W Illllllluuuuuuuuuuwuuu°uuuuulmllVm� W (' Q Q O� z Q ¢Q_� �U) m a C� Q Z U Q Z LL p OLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII N O 0 N W� O -UiA-� w b N O N Id Hl2IOMSabOM LU 104 cli to w w O W' O w I ti CiGWLLJ LLJ U 5'CO� � o LLJ Z OCG m ° 4 cU o i �� ��0�� uulllllluuupl uuulllupp0u IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�I,, Z I� O �� � uulllluuuuuuw � I� m �"� Illllllluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum umuuml IIVVuppIIIIIIIIIIpWluullllllll J � Illlul°uuu" XI r _ Lu Lu I I Ci' � O J w Q U Z I � O uuuuuuuuumuuuuuuu I `w ti i Z 2 U O H I umImullllu I S v�� I III Lu m � ' z `�� d Q � w i um it ullllum IIII�I , luulllllllllllluuuu � � 2 � ppppppplll LC) IIII�� LU i IIVI .III N IIIIIIIII Ocy Illllllluuuuuuuuuuwuuu°uuuuulmllVm� U NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING for a development in your neighbourhood 7 Wimbleton Crescent Concept Drawing ow II �Ju s e II o P e nii °id "1: a I :°i 1.� i C, 1,1111 I )well ll hng. Have Your Voice Heard! Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee Date: January 5, 2026 Location: Council Chambers, Kitchener City Hall 200, King Street West orV'irtual Meeting, Go to kitchener.ca/meetings and select: • Current agendas and reports (posted 10 days before meeting) • Appear as a delegation • Watch a meeting To learn more about this project, including information on your appeal rights, visit: www.kitchenenca/ PlanningApplications or contact: Evan Wittmann, Senior Planner evan.wittmann@ kitchener.ca 519.783.8523 The City of Kitchener will consider a Zoning By-law Amendment Application to amend Zoning By-law 2019-051 to change the Zone Category from `Low Rise Residential Two Zone (RES -2)' to `Low Rise Residential Four Zone (RES -4)' to permit a Semi -Detached Dwelling with one Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) (Attached) on each side, for a total of four units on the subject property. Page 155 of 183 City of Kitchener PRE -SUBMISSION CONSULTATION COMMENT FORM Comments Of: Transportation Commenter's Name: Dave Seller Email: Dave.Seller@kitchener.ca Phone: (519) 783-8152 Date of Comments: October 21, 2025 Address: 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) I plan to attend the meeting (questions/concerns/comments for discussion) 1. Site Specific Comments and Issues: • Ensure that internal garage dimensioning adheres to city requirements and is noted on the plan. • Parking space length should be noted as 5.5 m. 2. Plans, Studies and Reports to submit as part of a complete Planning Act Application: • N/A. 3. Anticipated Requirements of full Planning Application Approval: • N/A. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Urban Design Manual S. Anticipated Fees: • N/A. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 156 of 183 Project Address: 7 Wimbleton Crescent Application Type: Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA25/026/W/EW Comments of: Environmental Planning — City of Kitchener Commenter's Name: Carrie Musselman Email: carrie.musselman@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-783-8940 Date of Comments: October 28, 2025 1. Plans, Studies and Reports submitted as part of a complete Planning Act Application: • 7 Wimbleton Crescent, City of Kitchener, Tree Management Plan, Sheet L1, prepared by Hill Design Studio, dated Sept 18, 2025. 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: I have reviewed the plan noted above to support a zoning bylaw amendment that would permit a semi- detached dwelling with two units per side on the property, and note: • There are five trees located on the subject property and one within the boulevard in front of the property. The tree within the boulevard across the street was also included in the inventory. • Tree ID #4 (White Spruce, Fair Condition) and #5 (Black Walnut, Fair Condition) both located in the rear yard are recommended to remain. Remaining trees will be required to have tree protection fencing installed to protect them during construction. • To facilitate the redevelopment of the property three of the five trees are recommended to be removed, they are: • Tree ID #2 (Colorado Spruce, Excellent Condition) located in the front yard (dripline was not shown on plan). • #3 (Cherry Species, Fair Condition) located in the rear yard close to the proposed building. • #7a (White Spruce, Fair Condition) located in the front yard against the current building. Environmental Planning staff can support the Zoning By Law Amendment. To compensate for tree loss it is recommended that replacement trees be installed once construction/site grading has been completed. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community Page 157 of 183 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form Address: 7 Wimbleton Crescent Owner: Christopher Michael Haliburton Application: ZBA25/026/W/EW Comments Of: Park Planning Commenter's Name: Simon Latam Email: simon.latam@kitchener.ca Phone: 519-783-8030 Date of Comments: October 29, 2025 1. Documents Reviewed: A Zoning By-law Amendment is proposed to rezone 7 Wimbleton Crescent to a low rise, residential zone that permits semi-detached dwellings. This application is required to facilitate the construction of a semi-detached building with two units per side. • Architectural Package dated September 24, 2025 • Tree Management Plan dated September 18, 2025 2. Site Specific Comments & Issues: Parkland Dedication • In accordance with the Planning Act, City of Kitchener Bylaw 2022-101 and the Park Dedication Policy, Parkland Dedication will not be required for the application. • When the severance occurs, and a new parcel is established, Parkland Dedication will be required for the subject site on that new parcel. • Because a severance will be required, the parkland dedication requirement will be deferred at the Zoning By-law Amendment application(s) and assessed at a future Consent or Building Permit Application. Parkland dedication will be assessed based on the land use class(es) and density approved through the ZBA and required as a condition of Site Plan Approval. Parkland dedication will be taken as cash -in -lieu of land. • Dedication requirements are subject to the Park Dedication Bylaw, Policy and rates in effect. • If any questions regarding parkland dedication, please contact the above -noted Parks staff for clarification. 3. Comments on Submitted Documents • There is an existing City -owned street tree located on Wimbleton Crescent that will be impacted by the proposed development. The one City tree (#1 in the TPEP; City TREEID4189705) requires removal due to the significant encroachment into its tree protection zone. While alternative designs were considered, none were feasible to preserve the tree, and as a result, Forestry has approved its removal. A City for Everyone Working Together — Growing Thoughtfully — Building Community PAA of 183 City of Kitchener Zone Change / Official Plan Amendment Comment Form • The replacement ratio for a tree of this size (measured at 48 cm DBH) is 5:1. The compensation rate is $1,800 per replacement tree, therefore, the total cash in lieu compensation required is $9,000. These funds will be allocated to plant 5 City trees to compensate for the loss of local canopy cover. Applicants are also required to cover the cost of the physical tree removal, stumping, and disposal. Tree removal must be carried out prior to construction and must be completed by a contractor certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), or approved equivalent qualification. • The compensation will be deferred at the Zoning By-law Amendment application(s) and due at a future Consent or Building Permit Application. 4. Policies, Standards and Resources: • Kitchener Official Plan • City of Kitchener Park Dedication Bylaw 2022-101 and Park Dedication Policy • City of Kitchener Development Manual • Cycling and Trails Master Plan (2020) • Chapter 690 of the current Property Maintenance By-law • Places & Spaces: An Open Space Strategy for Kitchener • Multi -Use Pathways & Trails Masterplan • Urban Design Manual 5. Anticipated Fees: • Parkland Dedication paid as cash in lieu of land prior to Consent or Building Permit Application according to the Parkland Dedication Bylaw and Policy in effect. • Forestry compensation for the City owned tree in the amount of $9,000.00 will be due at time of future Consent or Building Permit Application. A City for Everyone Working Together— Growing Thoughtfully— Building Community P-_aw "`2A9 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: Nolan Beatty Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 3:45 PM To: Evan Wittmann Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) Attachments: Agency Circulation Letter - 7 Wimbleton Crescent.pdf Hey Evan, Engineering has no formal comments/concerns/requirements for this application (ZBA25/026/W/EW). The ZBA application proposal aligns with the pre -submission application submitted earlier this year. For note, the standard Engineering request for a Functional Servicing Report and Water Distribution Report has been waived, as the proposal aligns with the newly implemented City Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to enable up to four dwelling units on residential lots in Kitchener. This has been confirmed with Kitchener Utilities (water) and the Sanitary and Stormwater Utility (sanitary). Engineering will implement conditions through Committee of Adjustment (Severance), at a later date. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Nolan Beatty, CET Engineering Technologist, Development Engineering I Engineering Division I City of Kitchener 1-519-783-8307 1 TTY 1-866-969-99941 nolan.beatty(akitchener.ca Evan Wittmann From: Tierra Henhawk <acmaa@sixnations.ca> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 10:31 AM To: Evan Wittmann Cc: Christine Kompter Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) You don't often get email from acmaa@sixnations.ca. LL....earan..°�a..1.���...:!;his>....ii.�r...a%irr:n..r�.a..;pr!. zar..�:V; Sge:no/Hello Evan, Given the heavily developed and previously disturbed nature of the site, an archaeological assessment is deemed unnecessary. Please ensure the archaeological warning clause is referenced in the file. Nya:weh! /Thank You! Sincerely, Tierra Henhawk Archaeology Community Monitor Administrative Assistant Six Nations of the Grand River (SNGR) Lands and Resources Department 2498 Chiefswood Road, Ohswel<en ON (T) 519-445-2205 ext: 5465 Lands & Resources Department (T) 519-753-0665 acini aa@sixinaboin .ca Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain private and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or this information has been inappropriately forwarded to you, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original. From: Tierra Henhawk Sent: October 28, 2025 10:04 AM To: 'evan.wittman@kitchener.ca' Cc: 'Christine Kompter' Subject: RE: Circulation for Comment - 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) Sge:no/Hello Evan, Given the heavily developed and previously disturbed nature of the site, an archaeological assessment is deemed unnecessary. Please ensure the archaeological warning clause is referenced in the file. Page 161 of 183 Nya:weh! /Thank You! Sincerely, Tierra Henhawk Ara�IhaeoVogy Comirn:anirty Monitor Aaf riliriiisf ra U:ive Assistant Six Nations of the Grand River (SNGR) Lands and Resources Department 2498 Chiefswood Road, Ohswel<en ON (T) 519-445-2205 ext: 5465 Lands & Resources Department (T) 519-753-0665 w: cir a@siixinadoin .c Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain private and confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or this information has been inappropriately forwarded to you, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original. Evan Wittman Senior Planner City of Kitchener 200 King Street West, 6th Floor P.O. Box 1118, Kitchener, ON N2G 4G7 Dear Mr. Wittman, PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT & LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 150 Frederick Street, 8th floor Kitchener Ontario N2G 4J3 Canada Telephone: 519-575-4400 Fax: 519-575-4449 Re: Zoning By-law Amendment ZBA25/026/W/EW 7 Wimbleton Crescent BDRP Inc. c/o Up Consulting Ltd. City of Kitchener www. reg io nofwaterloo.ca File: C14/2/25026 November 17, 2025 Regional staff have received a zoning by-law amendment (ZBA) application pertaining to lands at 7 Wimbleton Crescent in the City of Kitchener. The applicant proposes to demolish an existing fire -damaged duplex and redevelop the property with a side -split semi-detached dwelling that includes secondary (one -bedroom basement) units on each side. Four units in total are proposed with four parking spaces provided, inclusive of garage space. The subject lands are located in the Urban Area and Delineated Built Up Area in the Regional Official Plan (ROP); designated Low Rise Residential in the City's Official Plan; and zoned Low Rise Residential Two (RES -2). The ZBA seeks to amend the zoning from RES -2 to RES -4 to permit the semi-detached built form in absence of any site-specific provisions. Regional staff provided comments on the related pre -submission application in April 2025, and have now had the opportunity to review the formal application. The following technical comments are provided for consideration by the City and applicant. Hydrogeology and Source Water Protection The subject lands are located in a Wellhead Protection Sensitivity Area (WPSA) as denoted on Map 6 of the ROP, and within a source protection area identified in the Clean Water Act 2006 and 2025 Grand River Source Protection Plan, but not within an area where a Risk Management Plan or prohibition policies implemented by the Region Document Number: 5115240 Version: 2 Pa-#g`i afg of 183 apply. A Notice of Source Protection Plan Compliance (Section 59 Notice) is not required for this application. In accordance with the Region's Council -endorsed position on geothermal energy, vertical closed-loop geothermal energy systems are prohibited at this location. At pre- submission, it was indicated that vertical open -loop systems may be permitted subject to the Region's acceptance of a satisfactory hydrogeological study assessing risk to nearby municipal drinking water supply wells as part of a complete ZBA application. As no hydrogeological study has been submitted with this application, Regional staff request that the prohibition on open -loop geothermal energy systems be written into the amending zoning by-law for the subject property alongside the vertical closed-loop prohibition. Please note that shallow horizontal geothermal design is permitted at this location. Required wording for the prohibition is as follows: Geothermal wells are prohibited on-site. A geothermal well is defined as a vertical well, borehole or pipe installation used for geothermal systems, ground -source heat pump systems, geo-exchange systems or earth energy systems for heating or cooling; including open -loop and closed- loop vertical borehole systems. A geothermal well does not include a horizontal system where construction or excavation occurs to depths less than five meters unless the protective geologic layers overlaying a vulnerable aquifer have been removed through construction or excavation. Water & Wastewater Services Please note that the proposed application is still under review by the Region's Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Management team. Further comments will follow as soon as possible. Grand River Transit (GRT) — Advisory The subject property is well -served by transit. GRT Route 204 operates nearby on Lackner Boulevard (Regional Road No. 54), with bi-directional stops located 230-240 metres from the subject lands. GRT has no transit requirements associated with this application. Waste Management (Collections) — Advisory Regional staff have reviewed the proposal in relation to waste collection services delivered by the Region. As the semi-detached structure is proposed to have two driveways and contains fewer than six residential units, all new dwelling units referenced in this application would be eligible to receive curbside waste collection provided by the Region. Should the applicant have further questions about the eligibility of these proposed properties, please feel free to reach out to Regional Waste Coordinator Phil Barakoski at pbarakoski(a)regionofwaterloo.ca. Document Number: 5115240 Version: 2 Pao- 164 of 183 Environmental Threats — Advisory For the City's awareness, the Region's Threats Inventory Database identifies no potential threats of contamination on or adjacent to the subject lands associated with documented land uses on the site. Fees In accordance with Regional Fees By-law 24-052, Regional staff acknowledge receipt of the required $3,000 ZBA review fee from the applicant (received October 27, 2025). No additional fees are required. Conclusions & Next Steps As per the foregoing, the Region requests that City of Kitchener Council does not consider the proposed application until such as time as Regional Water and Wastewater Services comments have been provided. These will follow as soon as possible. Please be advised that any future development on the lands subject to the above -noted application will be subject to the provisions of Regional Development Charge By-law 19- 037 or any successor thereof. Please accept this letter as our request for a copy of the decision pertaining to this application. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Yours truly, Will Towns, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner Cc: Chrisopher Haliburton, BDRP Inc. (Owner) David Galbraith, Up Consulting Ltd. (Applicant) Document Number: 5115240 Version: 2 p4gq 3165 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: Planning <planning@wcdsb.ca> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 9:32 AM To: Evan Wittmann Subject: Fw: Circulation for Comment - 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) Good morning, The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has reviewed the subject application and based on our development circulation criteria have the following comments/conditions: 1. That any Education Development Charges shall be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). Thankyou. Kind regards, Isabelle Lung Ler I Planning Technician P 519-578-3677 x 2355 1 wcdsb.ca Waterloo Catholic �1 DDistrict School Board t�.n,ilu(y lur6sq,i�r�� G tiEVr C4a ��itri C'�Stac ifita� From: Planning Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2025 9:30 AM To: evan.wittman@kitchener.ca Subject: Fw: Circulation for Comment - 7 Wimbleton Crescent (ZBA) Good morning, The Waterloo Catholic District School Board has reviewed the subject application and based on our development circulation criteria have the following comments/conditions: 1. That any Education Development Charges shall be collected prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). Thankyou. i Page 166 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: You don't often get email from Dear Evan, Friday, November 28, 2025 1:53 AM Evan Wittmann Fw: Formal letter of Concern Regarding Proposed Development at 7 Wimbleton Cr. Kitchener Follow up Flagged Learn why this is important Further attending the neighbourhood meeting held on November 25th I am writing to express formal concern regarding the proposed development application at 7 Wimbleton Cr. Kitchener. My husband and myself reside at 0 Wimbleton Cr. and have a vested interest in the character, safety and infrastructure of the surrounding neighbourhood. While we support growth within the City of Kitchener, the current proposal, which requires a Zoning By -Law Amendment to change the designation from Zone 2 to Zone 4, raises several specific issues that we believe must be addressed before approval is granted: 1) Discrepancy in Public Notice Documentation The initial public notice of development circulated to the neighbourhood indicated that the proposal involved a semi-detached dwelling. Not until attending the zoom meeting was it advised that the application proposes a four -unit structure with a legal occupancy of up to 20 people. This significant discrepancy in the documentation provided to residents is concerning, as it misled the community regarding the true scope and density of the development being planned under the requested Zone 4 designation. We request clarification on why this contradictory information was disseminated and request confirmation that new notices accurately reflecting the proposed four -unit structure be sent to the neighbourhood. 2) Zoning Incompatibility and Massing (Zone 2 to Zone 4) The proposed change in zoning from the current Zone 2 (low-density residential to the requested Zone 4 (multi -unit/higher density) is fundamentally inconsistent with the established side split and two- storey detached character of the immediate area and sets a concerning precedent. Specifically: Zoning Change Justification: We strongly question the planning rationale for amending the zoning to Zone 4, which enables a density and scale that conflicts with the low-rise character established by Zone 2 in the surrounding neighborhood. Building Height: The proposed height at 7 Wimbleton Cr. will result in significant shadowing, loss of privacy, loss of sunlight for neighbouring Zone 2 properties. Page 167 of 183 • Setbacks: The proposed setbacks from the property line do not appear adequate under a Zone 4 designation to maintain a comfortable visual and spatial separation from the existing Zone 2 homes. 3. Property Boundary and Easement Discrepancy We have concerns regarding the accuracy of the proposed property line shown in the application documentation, specifically concerning the boundary shared with our property. An existing fence at side property line may be encroaching, and we are concerned that the plans do not fully account for or acknowledge a potential easement or right-of-way discrepancy affecting the buildable area. We request that a formal survey be conducted and reviewed by the Planning Department to confirm the exact property line and resolution of any potential easement issues before permits are considered. 4. Parking and Site Access The current provision for 2 shared single driveways for on-site parking spaces is insufficient for a development of this size and will inevitably lead to increased overflow parking on our street We request a reassessment of the parking ratio, including consideration for visitor parking and electric vehicle charging capacity. 5. Loss of Green Space, Tree Canopy, and Environmental Impact The plan involves a removal of existing trees, on the private property, a mature blue spruce in the front yard. Furthermore, the proposal requires the removal of a City -owned boulevard tree to facilitate the site access/driveway. We urge the Planning Department to consider the significant cumulative loss of mature tree canopy and the resulting environmental impact, including: 6. Site Management and Maintenance Precedent We have serious concerns about the long-term management of a high-density Zone 4 property based on the applicant's history as an absentee landlord/owner of the current residential property. The previous lack of due diligence in essential property maintenance, such as timely snow removal, general landscaping, upkeep of the existing two -unit structure], creates a lack of confidence that the applicant can adequately manage the increased complexity and demand of a much larger multi- unit building, potentially leading to blight and ongoing maintenance issues that negatively impact the streetscape. City of Kitchener records will reflect numerous infractions over several years with complaints from surrounding neighbours. 7. Devaluation of Surrounding Property Values The significant shift in density and scale necessitated by the Zone 4 designation, particularly the proximity of a large multi -unit building to existing Zone 2 detached homes, is highly likely to negatively impact the market value and desirability of surrounding properties. The cumulative effects of increased noise, traffic, shadowing, and loss of privacy directly contribute to this devaluation. We request the Planning Department explicitly evaluate the financial externalities this proposed change imposes on current property owners. We request the opportunity to review the updated plans and provide further input once these critical concerns have been addressed. We also request to be notified of any public meetings or Planning Committee dates related to this file. Page 168 of 183 Thank you for considering our concerns regarding this significant development proposal. We look forward to your detailed response and confirmation of our involvement in the next stages of the review process. Sincerely, Kim & Rod Cornish Page 169 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: Blake Schwartz < > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2025 2:06 PM To: Evan Wittmann Cc: Scott Davey Subject: Concurred - Formal letter of concern - Re proposed Development at 7 Wimbleton Cres Kitchener Attachments: Development on Wimbletonjpeg; Develp. Wimbleton 2jpeg Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Some people who received this message don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Evan Wittmann And Scott Davey, Hello gentlemen, Seems to be some inaccurate information that was brought to my attention regarding the development at 7 Wimbleton Cres. Kitchener. The unit to be built is not a semi-detached building as reflected on the notice, but a 4 unit building with shared parking. Attached is a statement I concur with. Todays date: November 29, 2025. Regards, Blake Schwartz Page 170 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: Erika Strauss < > Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2025 7:03 PM To: Evan Wittmann Subject: Proposed Development at 7 Wimbleton cr Kitchener Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Erika Stauss ( Dear Evan I live on JVimbleton Cr and I very much concerned about this proposal. First the notice I received stated that this will be a SEMI now the proposal is a QUAD.This is a big discrepancy and not acceptable. Since this proposal will call for a rezoning what does this mean for my property as well as taxes. My concern is the density ,parking,water run off after heavy rain.There will not be sufficient ground to soak up the Water. Snow removal is also a problem.The side walk is not attended . The owner does not live there and with this proposal he will be an absentee landlord. Visually it is not compatible with the established side split bungalows and two storey houses. would like to be informed of any updates and plans of revision. Sincerely, Erika Strauss i Page 171 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: from Sheri < > Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2025 9:38 PM To: Evan Wittmann; Scott Davey Subject: Re: Concurred - Formal letter of concern - Re proposed Development at 7 Wimbleton Cres Kitchener Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important Good evening, I am also concerned with the negative impact this development will have. Sheri Schwartz From: Blake Schwartz Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2025 2:06:32 PM To: evan.wittmann@kitchener.ca Cc: scott.davey@kitchener.ca Subject: Concurred - Formal letter of concern - Re proposed Development at 7 Wimbleton Cres Kitchener Evan Wittmann And Scott Davey, Hello gentlemen, Seems to be some inaccurate information that was brought to my attention regarding the development at 7 Wimbleton Cres. Kitchener. The unit to be built is not a semi-detached building as reflected on the notice, but a 4 unit building with shared parking. Attached is a statement I concur with. Todays date: November 29, 2025. Regards, Blake Schwaitz Page 172 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: holly hollingsworth < > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2025 5:46 AM To: Scott Davey; Evan Wittmann Subject: Response to proposed development at 7 Wimbleton Cres. Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Scott & Evan; am writing to express my concerns about the proposed development at 7 Wimbleton Crescent in Kitchener. I am particularly concerned that this property will go from the original plan of a single family home to a four plex. This will be 4 times the residents than the area was planned for. Will the plan include sufficient parking spots for the 4 units? As manyto most families have 2 vehicles does the plan include 8 parking spots or will they be adding to the parking issue on the street. I ask because with winter coming it weighs heavy on my mind that there could be issues with street parking effecting the clearing of snow. Should this plan be approved, will it set a precedent for others on the street to follow suit? Could this would lead to 4 times the people on our little crescent. Children often play on our quiet road. More people coming and going could steal away from them a place to play, and form a community. How will the height of the building change the sunlight and shades to the neighbours. Getting light is a form of luxury in especially during the winter months. Could this proposed plan steal light from the other homes in the area? If the home owner wants to tear down and rebuild, the replacement could be a legal duplex for 2 families, as it was before. Thanks for considering my thoughts, Holly & Thomas Hollingsworth Jason Lord Get Outlook for iOS Page 173 of 183 Evan Wittmann From: holly hollingsworth < Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2025 7:41 AM To: Evan Wittmann Subject: Questions Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good morning Evan; Thank you for sharing the recording of the meeting. It was very informative. Did you knowwhere the consultant, Up Consulting if located. I am asking as I am struggling with the parking situation. It is my experience that most families have one vehicle. We will now have the potential for 2 families to share parking spaces behind one another. So for convenience, one will end up parking on the street. On our section of Wimbleton, many homes have grown children which means more cars and juggling of parking. One neighbour yelled at me at I dared to park on his spot on the street! It is my experience that most families have multiple vehicles. How long should the project take to complete? In the presentation, you stated that the area is currently res -2 and to change to res -4. What is a res -3? The presentation stated that the building code allows for 2 people per bedroom. How would you know how many are per bedroom? What would be the consequence if this regulation is broken? Is the current home a legal duplex? Given the recent fire in Brampton, I feel many people are concerned and on edge about the number and safety of multiple unit structures. Thanks for your time, Holly Hollingsworth Get Outlook for iOS Page 174 of 183 W `e U � T v U � K c s m d N a0.r d y m ~ O r p 5 E N _ n E 3.110oZS I,6 I wBF OE 3NIlA1N3— r-.._._.—._.—._..—. _.—. —.._.— — - — - — - —- — —._. _— _.—. _ — — • 5 31321ONOO 3JN3j NlV-14 F ,....-- 1 �313TJONOO t I O a'> w , Z. J �w a w ma x� m_ m w _ z J31NM,d IIS w � o .w w a o LL� e , wwa a E o mo i m LL¢ x I w °'o 1�3 o ml o � IIS L— — — —� — 313EJONO0 4' L - — - — - — -3 6460 ZS N.601--weC0€ w K 3NIl A1L3dOtld — - — - — - — - - — - — -------- 30N33 r w c� Y 3.66.60„ZS N.00L wg00£ 3NIl A1M3dOLd • I Nalk ^ zvm3nlaa 'I �iFg€ m m tt uY1 • I e r q h I N Iz 3NIlklH3dONd 3dH05©Ntll � '� vimea vn L Uh I� Atl NNlbM �. t4 c $—r4 i 3.110oZS I,6 I wBF OE 3NIlA1N3— r-.._._.—._.—._..—. _.—. —.._.— — - — - — - —- — —._. _— _.—. _ — — • 5 31321ONOO 3JN3j NlV-14 F ,....-- 1 �313TJONOO t I O a'> w , Z. J �w a w ma x� m_ m w _ z J31NM,d IIS w � o .w w a o LL� e , wwa a E o mo i m LL¢ x I w °'o 1�3 o ml o � IIS L— — — —� — 313EJONO0 4' L - — - — - — -3 6460 ZS N.601--weC0€ w K 3NIl A1L3dOtld — - — - — - — - - — - — -------- 30N33 r w c� IL C14 ON :5 E Z Lu 5E ci LU LU N 3" :5 E LU CL 0 2,vo