HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIN-2026-098 - Savic Homes, 15 Dellroy Avenue - Section 20 Development Charges Complaint - Jurisdiction Hearing
Financial Services Department www.kitchener.ca
REPORT TO: Finance and Corporate Services Committee
DATE OF MEETING: March 9, 2026
SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning & Asset Management, 519-
904-9347
PREPARED BY: Ryan Hagey, Director of Financial Planning & Asset Management, 519-
904-9347
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward 2
DATE OF REPORT: February 25, 2026
REPORT NO.: FIN-2026-098
SUBJECT: Savic Homes, 15 Dellroy Avenue Section 20 Development Charges
Complaint Jurisdiction Hearing
RECOMMENDATION:
That the appeal to hold a hearing pursuant to section 20 of the Development Charges Act
with relation to the development taking place at 15 Dellroy Avenue be dismissed as the
complaint was not made within the appropriate timeframe.
REPORT HIGHLIGHTS:
The purpose of this report is to determine whether Committee has jurisdiction to hear a
complaint regarding development charges at 15 Dellroy Avenue.
The key finding of this report is the complaint was made outside the 90-day timeframe
spelled out in the Development Charges Act, so no hearing should be held.
This report supports the delivery of core services.
BACKGROUND:
A complaint was filed with the City of Kitchener regarding the development charges (DCs)
imposed for a development at 15 Dellroy Avenue. Complaints of this nature are permitted under
section 20 of the Development Charges Act (DCA). City of Kitchener Council has delegated
authority to hear these complaints to the Finance and Corporate Services Committee as part of
report COR-2022-498, Development Charges Section 20 Dispute and Hearing Process.
REPORT:
The complaint regarding DCs at 15 Dellroy Avenue was made after the timeframe spelled out in
the DCA
Section 20 (2) states that a complaint may not be made later than 90 days after the day the
development charge, or any part of it, is payable. The DC complaint regarding 15 Dellroy
Avenue was received on December 5, 2025.
*** This information is available in accessible formats upon request. ***
Please call 519-741-2345 or TTY 1-866-969-9994 for assistance.
A building permit for 15 Dellroy Avenue was issued by the City on March 17, 2025. Under the
DCA there are provisions to make payments for certain types of development at later dates, but
DCs become payable to the City at the time of building permit issuance. This means a formal
DC complaint would have to be made no later than June 15, 2025.
Given the complaint was made after the 90-day window afforded in Section 20 of the DCA, staff
recommended dismissing the complaint without holding a hearing.
UPDATE #1:
On January 5, 2026 Council approved an adjournment of this DC complaint so staff could meet
with Savic Homes and their representatives to discuss the complaint. This meeting took place
on January 15, 2026.
Despite ongoing requests from staff for a meeting agenda and specific details of the DC
complaint, none was provided in advance of the meeting. During the meeting representatives
for Savic Homes provided oral information regarding the nature of their complaint and said they
would provide the information in writing the following week (January 19-23). As of the time the
next staff report was prepared (January 28), the written information had not been received
After the meeting staff are still of the opinion the DC complaint should be dismissed as it was
not made within the appropriate timeframe.
UPDATE #2:
On February 9, 2026 Council approved a second adjournment of this DC complaint. Staff
received the written information promised previously from Savic Homes on February 6, 2026.
Staff have reviewed this information and are still of the opinion the DC complaint should be
dismissed and do not believe a further adjournment is in order.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:
This report supports the delivery of core services.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The recommendation has no direct impact on the Capital or Operating Budget.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
INFORM
council / committee meeting.
PREVIOUS REPORTS/AUTHORITIES:
COR-2022-498 Development Charges Section 20 Dispute and Hearing Process
FIN-2026-015 Adjournment of Development Charges Complaints 15 Dellroy Avenue
and 1438 Highland Road
FIN-2026-017 Savic Homes, 15 Dellroy Avenue Section 20 Development Charges
Complaint Jurisdiction
FIN-2026-071 Adjournment of Development Charges Complaints 15 Dellroy Avenue
and 1438 Highland Road UPDATE
FIN-2026-062 Savic Homes, 15 Dellroy Avenue Section 20 Development Charges
Complaint Jurisdiction UPDATE
APPROVEDBY: Jonathan Lautenbach, Chief Financial Officer, Financial Services
ATTACHMENTS:
DC Complaint Letter for 15 Dellroy Avenue from Loopstra Nixon
Steven C. Ferri*
*Steven C. Ferri Professional Corporation
Tel: (416) 748-4752
Email: sferri@loonix.com
BY EMAIL \[amanda.fusco@kitchener.ca\]
December 5, 2025
The Corporation of City of Kitchener
200 King St W
Kitchener, ON N2G 4V6
Dear Clerk,
RE: Development Charges Complaint
Complaint Made Pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act,
1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27
Complaint respecting 15 Dellroy Avenue, Kitchener, ON
Complaint On Behalf of Savic Homes
We are the solicitors for Savic Homes (“Owner”) the owner of 15 Dellroy Avenue, Kitchener, ON
(“Subject Lands”).
The Owner is in the process of redeveloping the Subject Lands for residential housing.
It is the Owner’s understanding that the City of Kitchener (“City”) intends to assess the Owner
development charges (“DCs”) pursuant to the redevelopment of the Subject Lands, despite the
existence of a Lot Levy Agreement between a previous owner of the Subject Lands and the City
dating from 1974 and the existence of residential units on the Subject Lands.
In addition, in our opinion, the Subject Lands qualifies as containing “legally established
residential units” for the purposes of section 6.10 of the Bylaw 2022-071 (“DC Bylaw”),
exempting said units from the assessment of development charges pursuant thereto.
The DC Bylaw governs DCs within the City. Section 6.10 of the DC Bylaw provides that:
6.10 Subject to the provisions of this section, where any redevelopment or re-use of land
replaces or changes a former or existing development and, in the case of demolition upon
proof of issuance of a demolition permit for the land being provided, the development charge
applicable to the redevelopment or re-use shall be reduced by a redevelopment allowance,
without interest, not to exceed an amount equal to the total of:
(a) the number and types of legally established residential units in the former or
existing development; and
(b) the legally established non-residential gross floor area of the former or existing
development,
1
as determined by the Chief Building Official, or his or her designate, at the rates
applicable to such units or gross floor area at the time the first building permit for the
re-development is issued.
\[Emphasis added.\]
The intent of section 6.10 is to reduce the DCs payable on a development where DCs have
already been paid with respect to a previously existing development.
The former development on the Subject Lands constitutes legally existing residential units for
the purposes of the DC Bylaw. This is evidenced by the submission of plans, the issuance of
building permits, and the existence of structures which were required to be subject to said plans
and permits.
Please accept this letter as a formal complaint on behalf of the Owner pursuant to section 20 of
the Development Charges Act, 1997, S.O. 1997, c. 27 (the “Act”) with respect to the
development charges imposed upon our client on the basis that:
1. The amount of the DCs is being incorrectly determined; and,
2. There is an error in the application of the City’s DC By-law.
On the basis that detailed grounds for the complaint will be provided in due course, we
respectfully request that the City proceed to schedule a hearing of this complaint before Council.
We would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this complaint with City staff in hopes of having
it addressed in advance of the hearing date.
Please contact the undersigned should you require any additional information. Otherwise, we
look forward to working together to rectify this matter.
Yours truly,
LOOPSTRA NIXON LLP
Per: Steven C. Ferri
2