HomeMy WebLinkAboutFinance & Corp - 2001-11-30 SFINANCE & CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
NOVEMBER 30, 2001CITY OF KITCHENER
The Finance and Corporate Services Committee met this date in special session, commencing at 9:07
a.m., chaired by Councillor J. Ziegler with the following members present: Mayor C. Zehr and Councillors
C. Weylie, M. Galloway, G. Lorentz, J. Smola. Councillor B. Vrbanovic entered the meeting shortly after
its commencement.
Others Present: Ms. P. Houston, Ms. G. Luciantonio, Ms. D. George, Ms. S Henderson, Ms. S.
McDonald, Ms. R. Upfold, Ms. C. Ladd, Ms. F. Currier, Ms. D.Gilchrist, and Messrs, J.
Fielding, R. Pritchard, F. Pizzuto, G. Sosnoski, N. Kuntz, S. Gyorffy, B. Stanley, O.
den Ouden, M. Grummett, L. Proulx, S. Saleh, L. Lynch, D. Mansell, J. McBride, D.
Quinn, R. Gosse, B. MacDonald, D. Hergott, K. Baulk and B. Trushinski.
1.
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET & 10 YEAR CAPITAL FORECAST
The purpose of this special meeting was to review the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Capital
Forecast (2002 – 2011) as recommended by the Administrative Review Committee.
Ms. P. Houston provided an overview of the Capital Budget and Forecast noting that staff had
used the following percentages: Assessment Growth – 1% (2002) and 2% (2003 – 2011); inflation
– 2% (2002 – 2011); interest on Debt (ten year term) 7%. Ms. Houston noted the interest rate has
been reduced from 8% used in previous Forecasts, resulting in an increased capacity in the
Forecast of $140,000. per year. She then reviewed the City’s Capital Policy and the impact of the
proposed budget on the average tax payer, noting that a 2% increase translates into a $3.69 tax
increase based on average market values. Ms. Houston then advised that the City’s per capital
debt in 2000 was $91.00 compared to $38.00 in Cambridge and $638.00 in Waterloo.
Mayor Zehr requested a comparison of reserves to debt for the three municipalities, and Ms.
Houston advised that she will obtain the requested information.
Ms. Houston advised that the departments’ submissions resulted in an overall short fall $19M.
Following the Administrative Review, the Capital Budget proposed today will have a surplus of
$12M; however, some consideration needs to be given to moving or reconsidering some of the
projects in the first two years of the Capital Forecast, as these two years are currently in a short fall
position.
Ms. Houston reviewed the Capital Pool for the 10 Year Forecast, by year, including capital from
current, debenture issue, gas and the Hydro Capital Investment Reserve.
Ms. Houston noted that the Capital Forecast by department results in a total expenditure for 2002
of $421M, following Administrative Review. She then advised that of the capital surplus for 2001,
$100,000. can be allocated to the 2002 Capital Budget.
Ms. Houston then reviewed the Development Charges Reserve for 2001 – 2006 noting a $1.6M
surplus for 2001, but the reserve being in a deficit position by 2006. She noted that the money
from the Impost Reserve Fund has been transferred to the Development Charges Reserve Fund.
She pointed out the priority projects to be funded from development charges noting that the first
four projects are totally committed, the rest to be completed if funds are available.
Ms. Houston proceeded to review highlights of the 10 Year Capital Forecast, department by
department, advising that if the Committee requests any further information, staff will provide it on
or before Budget Day. She again pointed out there are short falls in certain areas that need to be
addressed.
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Development and
Technical Services Department, beginning with the Fire Service.
Councillor G. Lorentz questioned where the new fire station, proposed in 2005, will be located.
Mr. N. Kuntz noted that in 2005 only the cost of land is included in the Capital Forecast, and stated
it is proposed to be located in the vicinity of Huron Road and Fischer-Hallman Road, and is timed
for the development at the Activa subdivision. He advised that discussions have commenced with
the developer for a location.
Councillor Lorentz questioned whether the developer will support a community centre in
1.
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET & 10 YEAR CAPITAL FORECAST (CONT’D)
FINANCE & CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
NOVEMBER 30, 2001- 133-CITY OF KITCHENER
conjunction with the fire station, as was done in Forest Heights. He directed staff to pursue such
discussion with the developer and report to the Community Services Committee.
Ms. Houston next reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for Roads, the City’s
Share of Regional Roads and Sanitary Sewers.
Mayor Zehr questioned the Region’s timing for the Grand River South Sewage Study and Grand
River Trunk. Mr. D. Mansell advised that all proposed sanitary sewer works will be required and in
place prior to the Region finalizing the Grand River Trunk. Once the Grand River Trunk has been
constructed, there are seven or eight pumping stations that could come off-line, resulting in
operating savings of approximately $25,000. per year per station. Mr. Mansell also advised that a
consultant will be hired to estimate upgrade needs of all the City’s pumping stations. Mayor Zehr
directed that before such a review is undertaken and
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for Storm Sewers, Street
Improvements and Business and Planning Services.
Councillor Weylie questioned the 911 project and Mr. B Stanley advised that a report will be
brought forward in this regard early in the new year.
On motion by Councillor G. Lorentz -
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Development and Technical
Services Department be approved as recommended.”
This meeting of the Finance and Corporate Services recessed at 10:20 a.m. and reconvened
at 10:50 a.m. with all members present.
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Corporate
Services Department.
The Committee questioned the City Hall renovations, and Mr. G. Sosnoski advised that the
renovations are in fact to take place in the office space at the Duke Street parking garage, in
order to accommodate Enforcement staff. He advised that a report will be presented to this
Committee, in this regard, in early January.
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic –
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Corporate Services
Department be approved as recommended.”
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Financial
Services Department.
Following extensive discussion with regard to the potential of combining meter reading
functions with Kitchener-Wilmot Hydro Inc., staff of Utilities were again requested to work with
Hydro on a collaboration for meter reading.
With respect to the water utility, staff advised that they are reviewing infrastructure
requirements and will provide a report prior to Budget Day.
On motion by Councillor C. Weylie –
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Financial Services Department
be approved as recommended.”
1.
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET & 10 YEAR CAPITAL FORECAST (CONT’D)
FINANCE & CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
NOVEMBER 30, 2001- 134-CITY OF KITCHENER
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Strategic
Services Department.
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic –
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital & 10 Year Forecast for the Strategic Services Department be
approved as recommended.”
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the City’s General
Expenses.
Ms. Houston noted the inclusion of an actuarial study on the City’s post-retirement liability being
required by the City’s Auditor. Following discussion, Ms. Houston agreed to find out if this
information could be obtained and provided to the Auditors by a different method.
On motion by Councillor C. Weylie –
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital & 10 Year Forecast for General Expenses be approved as
recommended.”
Ms. Houston then reviewed highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Community
Services Department.
Several Committee members advised of their disagreement with moving the Chandler-Mowat
Community Centre to 2005 and the Community Centre for the south end of Kitchener 2009.
Councillor Galloway noted the extensive community involvement in planning for the Chandler-
Mowat Community Centre and its use to the point that program space must be obtained
elsewhere. He asked that the timing of future community centres be highlighted for Budget Day.
Councillor J. Smola voiced strong opposition for funding traffic signals which he felt should be paid
for by the Region. It was pointed out by staff that the City will be reimbursed for a large portion of
the cost of these signals, once they are warranted by the Region. Councillor Smola gave the
opinion that the Region should be prepared to be flexible in their warrant policy, if these traffic
signals are a necessary measure.
Mayor Zehr advised of his agreement with Councillor Smola position; however, noted that if he
were to take this request to the Region, it would have to compete with similar requests for other
municipalities.
Councillor J. Smola asked to be recorded as being an opposition to including the cost of the three
traffic signals; Fischer-Hallman Road, Bleams Road at Century Hill and Lackner Blvd, in the
Capital Budget & Forecast.
It was generally agreed that the matter of Regional Council’s policy on warrants with traffic signals
be raised with Kitchener’s representatives on Regional Council, and that this issue be raised again
on Budget Day.
The Committee then reviewed the Capital Budget and Forecast for Parking, and Mayor Zehr
questioned whether there was any opportunity for flexibility in the 55/45 funding split between the
tax base and parking fees. Ms. Houston advised that she will review this funding split and report
to the Committee on Budget Day.
The Committee next reviewed the Capital Budget & Forecast for Streetlights. Councillor Weylie
requested that the Capital costs of downtown street lighting be included in this Capital Budget and
Forecast, with Streetlighting to be highlight for Budget Day.
Ms. Houston then reviewed the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Golf Courses.
1.
2002 CAPITAL BUDGET & 10 YEAR CAPITAL FORECAST (CONT’D)
FINANCE & CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
NOVEMBER 30, 2001- 135-CITY OF KITCHENER
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic -
it was resolved:
“That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Community Services Department
be approved as recommended.”
Ms. Houston outlined highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Centre in the Square
noting that no changes are proposed.
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic -
it was resolved:
That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Centre in the Square be
“
approved as recommended.”
Ms. Houston outlined highlights of the Capital Budget and Forecast for the Kitchener Public
Library. She noted that a new Library Headquarters is being included in the Forecast, without
funding.
Following discussion on the need to budget for a new Library Headquarters and the Main Branch
Auditorium upgrade, Ms. Houston advised that a feasibility study is to be undertaken before the
library proceeds with a new Headquarters.
Councillor B. Vrbanovic put forward a motion to approve the Kitchener Public Library Capital
Budget and Forecast, subject to removal of the new Headquarters.
Mayor Zehr questioned the allocation for “Book Reserve”, and how it is progressing. Ms. Walshe
advised that, to date staff have targeted the most vulnerable areas of the library, and looked at
electronic replacements as much as possible. She cautioned that the exchange rate for the
American dollar has increased and she anticipates a dramatic increase in the cost of paper.
Mayor Zehr then questioned the need to budget $100,000. annually when expenditures over that
last two years have only been $30,000. to $40,000. And asked that this item be highlighted for
2003 Capital Budget and Forecast discussions.
On motion by Councillor B. Vrbanovic –
it was resolved:
That the 2002 Capital Budget & 10 Year Forecast for the Kitchener Public Library be
“
approved as recommended, subject to removal of ‘New Library Headquarters’.”
Ms. Houston advised that she had concluded the presentation of the Capital Budget and Forecast,
and reminded the Committee that there is still a shortfall of $1.7M in 2002 and $1.9M in 2003.
Councillor Ziegler directed staff to circulate a list of projects which could be moved or removed
from the 10 Year Capital Forecast.
2.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion, the meeting adjourned at 1:20 p. m.
Dianne H. Gilchrist
Committee Administrator