HomeMy WebLinkAboutCSD-05-161 - Leisure Facilities Master Plan Priorities, 2006
Report To:
Date of Meeting:
Submitted By:
Prepared By:
Ward(s) Involved:
Date of Report:
Report No.:
Subject:
~
Community Services Committee
December 5, 2005
Ann Pappert, General Manager, CSD
Kathleen Woodcock, Special Projects Officer (x2597) and
Greg Hummel, Manager, D&D, Operations (x2598)
All
November 30, 2005
CSD-05-161
LEISURE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN PRIORITIES, 2006
RECOMMENDATION:
· That, subject to 2006 capital budget deliberations, Council approve proceeding
with the following LFMP actions in 2006: Rec. 19, A (Victoria Hills); Rec. 19, B
(Chandler Mowat); Rec. 23, D (woodworking centre); Rec. 25 (sport tourism
strategy); Rec. 29, A (Victoria Park master plan); Rec. 29, B (McLennan Park, All.
B); and Rec. 29, C (Kiwanis Park master plan); and,
· That, subject to 2006 capital budget deliberations, Council approve the
reallocation of funding currently in the 10 year capital forecast to an LFMP 2006
envelope of $213,000 as identified in CSD-05-161 in order to begin work on a
selection of the following LFMP actions: Rec. 6 (data analysis/collection); Rec. 10
(community investment strategy/community grants program review); Rec. 13 (use
of business case rationale strategy); Rec. 19, C (Mill Courtland business plan);
Rec. 23 (seniors strategy development); Rec. 30, B (volunteer strategy
development) and Rec. 31 (youth services strategy); and further,
· That Council approve pausing the following unfunded LFMP actions in 2006: Rec.
27, E (Grand River corridor development); Rec. 28, L (land acquisition/under-
serviced areas); Rec. 28, N (tennis court assess/review); Rec. 27, B (develop
unfinished trail linkages); Rec. 28, H (skateboard facilities); Rec. 33, A (implement
Building Condition study); and Rec. 33, B (Centennial Stadium short term bridging
response).
BACKGROUND:
At a special meeting on 7 November 2005 (CSD-05-17) Council deferred a decision for moving
forward with implementation of the Leisure Facilities Master Plan (LFMP) pending additional
Report No. CSD-05-161
information regarding implications on an individual project basis within the context of the Capital
Budget process.
REPORT:
Staff developed criteria to establish priorities for 2006. Those criteria were:
a) addresses identified gaps in current internal systems
b) project pre-approved by Council, underway, and/or in budget system
c) pre-planning component to facilitate immediate and future positioning
d) if a proposed project is also aligned with recommendations in another corporate
strategy.
Staff reviewed and assessed the actions that were included in the Leisure Facilities Master Plan
to be implemented in 2006 based on the criteria developed. Three (3) categories of actions
resulted:
1. Proceed in 2006 & fundinG in the 10 vear caoital forecast
· Rec. 19, A Victoria Hills expansion
· Rec. 19, B Chandler Mowat
· Rec. 23, D Implement woodworking centre
· Rec. 25 Sport tourism strategy
· Rec. 29, A Victoria Park master plan
· Rec. 29, B McLennan Park, Alternative B
· Rec. 29, C Kiwanis Park master plan
2. Pause in 2006 & no fundinG in the 10 vear caoital forecast
· Rec. 27, E Grand River corridor development plan
· Rec. 28, L Land acquisition/under-serviced areas
· Rec. 28, N Tennis court assess/review
· Rec. 27, B Develop unfinished trail linkages
· Rec. 28, H Skateboard facilities
· Rec. 33, A Implement Building Condition study
· Rec. 33, B Centennial Stadium short term bridging response
3. Pause in 2006 & fundinG in the 10 vear caoital forecast
· Rec. 27, A Trails system marketing program
· Rec. 20, A Queensmount decommissioning
Staff have added some actions that, in their opinion, must move forward in 2006 to set the stage
for implementation of other initiatives in the future. These reprioritized actions are:
· Rec. 6 Data analysis/evaluation/mapping
· Rec. 10 Community investment strategy/community grants program review
· Rec. 13 Use of business case rationale strategy
· Rec. 19, C Mill Courtland business plan
· Rec. 23 Seniors strategy development
· Rec. 30, B Volunteer strategy development
· Rec. 31 Youth services strategy
Report No. CSD-05-161
Staffing Requirements
Rec. 13, Business case rationale and Rec. 6 Data analysis/evaluation combined will require a
total of 1 FTE resource for completion. Staff will request a secondment from the Departmental
Seconded Program for Special Projects (FIN-05-040) to accommodate this operating cost.
Funding for the reprioritized actions is to be enveloped as per Financial Implications section.
Matters related to the Kingsdale Community Centre and Twin Pad projects have proceeded to
Council under separate reports.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The funding that is currently in the 10 year capital forecast is adequate for the majority of the
actions staff are recommending to proceed with in 2006. However, the addition of the
reprioritized projects has necessitated some repositioning of capital funds and staff resources.
Subject to 2006 capital budget deliberations, staff suggests the reallocation of a total of
$213,000 from the "paused & funding in the system" actions, namely:
· Rec. 27, A Trails system marketing program $5,000
· Rec. 20, A Queensmount decommissioning $73,000
In addition, staff examined previously unspent capital projects and has identified $135,000 from
2002 previously allocated to McLennan Park.
This reallocation of $213,000 will fund an envelope to begin work on a selection of the following
LFMP actions:
· Rec. 6 Data analysis/evaluation/mapping
· Rec. 10 Community investment strategy/community grants program review
· Rec. 13 Use of business case rationale
· Rec. 19, C Mill Courtland business plan
· Rec. 23 Seniors strategy development
· Rec. 30, B Volunteer strategy development
· Rec. 31 Youth services strategy
If the staff request for a secondment from the Departmental Seconded Program for Special
Projects (FIN-05-040) is unsuccessful, staff will accommodate these resource costs within the
reallocated funding envelope.
Financial Services staff has reviewed this reallocation proposal.
COMMUNICATIONS:
Media releases will occur with the assistance of the Communications Division. Notification to
staff and the community regarding opportunities for input will be provided as required.
CONCLUSION:
The Leisure Facilities Master Plan has provided a foundation for the development of leisure
facilities and services that will assist the Community Services Department in providing, "A mixed
Report No. CSD-05-161
array of accessible leisure participation opportunities that support our diverse community and
encourage community capacity building, resident health and well-being and strengthen the city's
neighbourhoods." One of the challenges to implementing such a complex and far-reaching
report is establishing priorities in a manner that balances outcomes with resources. The actions
recommended in this report to proceed will move the Department forward in implementation of
the LFMP. The actions paused in this report will benefit from further considerations and
assessment.
Ann Pappert, General Manager
Community Services Department