HomeMy WebLinkAboutDTS-07-020 - Demolition Control Application DC06/08/C/CB, 16-26 College St & 145 Duke St Wr ~_~
- -~-
I"~'C:~ I~-~~N~~_-
;'ct'rl[ o? Sc'Y t.'ic:?s
Report To: Development and Technical Services Committee
Date of Meeting: January 29, 2007
Submitted By: Jeff Willmer, Director of Planning (519-741-2325)
Prepared By: Jeff Bannon, Planner (519-741-2643)
Ward(s) Involved: Ward 1 -Bridgeport-Centre - J. Smola
Date of Report: January 23, 2007
Report No.: DTS-07-020
Subject: DEMOLITION CONTROL APPLICATION DC06/08/C/CB
16-26 College St & 145 Duke St W
Roland and Betty Lynn
.,
;
` a
Az,f
` ~~ r ~'
~,~- ~~~
~r-$,
~
,
1 1
~H ~4~,
~~ ~ 12~
~z113r~ .a:::v
That demolition control application DC06/08/C/CB requesting permission to demolish three
former residential buildings municipally addressed 16-18 College Street, 22 College Street and
26 College Street / 145 Duke St W, located at the South-West corner of College Street and
Duke Street in Downtown Kitchener, and legally described as Plan 374 Pt Lot A Pt Lot 155 Pt
Lot 156 be revised to exclude 26 College Street / 145 Duke St West and to be approved in
principle, subject to the following conditions:
1) That the owner obtain final site plan approval for a proposed development; and,
2) That the owner obtain a building permit for a proposed development.
Upon satisfaction of conditions (1) and (2), the Chief Building Official may authorize and
issue a demolition permit under Section 33(6) of the Planning Act. The demolition permit
will be subject to the following condition:
A. That in the event that construction of a new building is not substantially complete
within 2 years of the date that demolition is commenced, the City Clerk may
enter on the collector's roll, to be collected in like manner as municipal taxes,
$20,000 for each dwelling unit contained in the residential properties in respect
of which the demolition permit is issued and such sum shall, until payment
thereof, be a lien or charge upon the land in respect of which the permit to
demolish the residential property is issued.
BACKGROUND:
The subject properties are located at the South-West corner of Duke Street W and College
Street. The subject properties are located directly across from Kitchener City Hall, next to St.
John's Anglican Church at their rear lot lines and adjacent to a commercial /residential
development to the South.
The property at 26 College Street /145 Duke Street West currently contains a single detached
dwelling which has since been converted to an office use. The property at 22 College Street
contains a rooming house and the property at 16-18 College Street recently contained two
ground floor commercial units with commercial and residential space on the second level. The
owners are looking to prepare the lands for a possible interim parking lot. In the future, the
owners wish to develop the lands for residential purposes, which could include a seniors
housing facility. The subject properties are designated as Retail Core in the Municipal Plan and
are zoned Retail Core Zone (D-1) in the Zoning By-law.
REPORT:
Planning Comments:
Under the Planning Act, the purpose of Demolition Control is to maintain residential properties
within the municipality and to prevent their premature or unjustified removal, including
preventing demolition for reasons such as long-term redevelopment. Seven criteria, as outlined
in Council Policy I-1010 are used to evaluate the appropriateness of an application to demolish
a residential property in circumstances where no building permit will be issued for a new
building on the site:
1. Property Subject to the Ontario Heritage Act
The City's Heritage Planner advises that he would not necessarily consider any of the properties
to be candidates for heritage designation.
2. Architectural and Historical Value
The City's Heritage Planner advises that the properties at 22 College Street and 26 College
Street / 145 Duke Street West were likely built c. 1890 and that both buildings represent an
increasingly rare example of the former Town of Berlin urban fabric within the heart of the
Downtown. As such, the heritage planner is of the opinion that these two buildings should be
retained instead of being demolished for interim parking. At a minimum the Heritage Planner
would recommend the retention of 26 College Street / 145 Duke St West as the other properties
are of less architectural value and any additional parking spaces could be screened from the
view along Dukes Street with the retention of the corner building. There are no concerns with
the demolition of 16-18 College Street.
3. Condition of the Dwelling
A City Building Inspector examined the subject properties and found the building at 16-18
College Street to be in good repair. The Inspector estimates that the building would require
some upgrading to all doors and windows totalling approximately $50,000. The building at 20
College Street was determined to need more extensive repairs and the rear addition did not
appear to be structurally sound. New windows and a roof are needed and the interior would
require significant upgrades. The estimated repair costs are in excess of $200,000. The
building at 26 College Street / 145 Duke Street West requires extensive interior upgrades to the
heating, electrical and plumbing system but the exterior of the building is in good repair. The
estimated renovation costs are approximately $50,000.
4. Impact of Demolition on Abutting Properties, Streetscape, and Neighbourhood Stability
Planning Staff advise that prior to final approval of this demolition control application and
issuance of a demolition permit, a site plan application could be considered in order to achieve
appropriate building location and massing, and to ensure safety, attractiveness and compatibility
of the redevelopment with the surrounding area. Staff also advise that in order to ensure timely
redevelopment of the site a maximum time limit could be required. The potential negative
outcome of the proposed demolition should also be considered. The intent of demolition control
is to prevent the premature demolition of a dwelling for reasons such as long-term
redevelopment. In this case, the applicant is proposing demolition for this reason. Permitting
the demolition of the subject property without a redevelopment proposal would cause a gap in
the streetscape that would not be filled within a definite timeframe.
5. Timeframe of Redevelopment
The owner has stated that there is an intention to re-develop the property with an interim
parking lot although there is no formal redevelopment proposal at this time. From the
applicant's viewpoint, redevelopment of the subject lot is definite and forthcoming, although the
timing and specific proposal is undecided. Planning staff advise that in certain cases premature
preparation of a site for redevelopment is unavoidable and acknowledge that a maintained
vacant property is favoured over a derelict building.
6. Proposed Use In Terms of Zoning and Compatibility with Adjacent Properties
The subject application states that the subject lot would be graded, sodded, and maintained as
a vacant site until such time as redevelopment occurs. A specific proposal and timeline for
redevelopment of the property have not been provided to the City and, therefore, compatibility of
a proposed use with adjacent properties cannot be determined at this time. Due to their
excellent location, however, Staff acknowledge that the subject property along with the adjacent
properties are well-suited to a future comprehensive residential redevelopment.
7. Department /Agency and Public Input
With the exception of the concerns noted by the City's Heritage Planner noted above, no
objections were received as part of the circulation.
Conclusion:
Planning Staff advise that the subject demolition, as proposed, is premature, because the City
has not yet received or approved a redevelopment application and, therefore, has no assurance
of the design and timeframe for redevelopment. Consequently, Staff advise that prior to final
approval of this demolition control application and issuance of a demolition permit, a site plan
application could be considered in order to achieve appropriate building location and massing,
and to ensure safety, attractiveness and compatibility of the redevelopment with the surrounding
area. Staff also advise that in order to ensure timely redevelopment of the site a maximum time
limit could be required. These proposed requirements could be made conditions for final
approval of the subject application. Also, after understanding the concerns of the City Heritage
Planner, the applicant has verbally agreed that the corner building at 26 College Street / 145
Duke Street West could be retained at this time. As such, Planning Staff recommend that
demolition control application DC06/08/C/CB requesting permission to demolish three
residential buildings located at 16-18 College Street, 22 College Street and 26 College Street /
145 Duke Street West and legally described as Plan 374 Pt Lot A Pt Lot 155 Pt Lot 156, be
revised to exclude 26 College Street / 145 Duke St West and be approved in principle, subiect
to conditions outlined in the recommendation section of this report.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
COMMUNICATIONS:
Preliminary circulation of the demolition control application was undertaken on August 30, 2006
to internal agencies and all property owners within 60 metres of the subject property. Three
comments were received from the internal circulation and no comments were received from
property owners.
Jeff Bannon, B.A. Della Ross, MCIP, RPP
Planner Manager of Development Review
Jeff Willmer, MCIP, RPP
Director of Planning
Attachments:
• Appendix "A" -City staff comments