HomeMy WebLinkAboutHeritage - 2008-05-06HERITAGE KITCHENER MINUTES
MAY 6, 200$ CITY OF KITCHENER
The Heritage Kitchener Committee met this date, commencing at 4:04 p.m.
Present: Mr. K. Kirby - Co-Chair
Ms. L. Brohman, Ms. E. Gallaher, Ms. S. Lauber and Messrs. J. Ariens, T. Benedict and I.
Mota.
Staff: R. Regier, Executive Director of Economic Development
L. Bensason, Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning
M. Wade, Heritage Planner
K. Anderl, Senior Planner
C. Goodeve, Committee Administrator
1. DTS-0$-067 - HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION HPA 200$-V-004
- 74 REX DRIVE (ST. MARY'S HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT)
- PROPOSED REAR ADDITION
The Committee considered Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-08-
067, dated April 22, 2008 regarding Heritage Permit Application HPA 2008-V-004 proposing
the construction of an addition at 74 Rex Drive, which is located in the St. Mary's Heritage
Conservation District (HCD).
Ms. M. Wade advised that the applicant is seeking permission to construct an L-shaped one-
storey 300 square foot addition, which would be attached to the rear of the existing addition
built in 2005. She added that while the L-shaped addition would extend approximately 3 feet
from the rear west corner of the existing house, the original principal fagade would be
maintained as the primary visual entity. She stated that in staff's opinion the proposed addition
would not detract from the heritage character of the St. Mary's HCD; and accordingly, staff are
recommending approval of HPA 2008-V-004.
Mr. John Westcott, Chicopee Craftsmen, circulated revised elevation drawings showing a
covered porch connecting the proposed addition to the original building at 74 Rex Drive. He
advised that the covered porch allows for the blending of the addition with the house, thereby
reducing its overall visual impact.
In response to questions, Ms. M. Wade stated that as the covered porch would not be visible
from the streetscape, staff have no objections to the revised elevation drawings.
On motion by Mr. J. Ariens -
it was resolved:
"That pursuant to Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application
HPA 2008-V-004, be approved to permit the construction of a 300 square foot addition
to the rear of the property at 74 Rex Drive, in accordance with the plans submitted at the
May 6, 2008 Heritage Kitchener meeting and subject to the final building permit
drawings being reviewed by Heritage Planning staff, prior to the issuance of a building
permit."
2. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 234 TILT DRIVE (PLAN OF SUBDIVISION)
- REVIEW OF THE BUILT HERITAGE ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT
The Committee considered the Built Heritage Assessment Preliminary Report for 234 Tilt
Drive, dated April 2008, prepared by Archaeologix Inc. in accordance with a condition of the
registration of Plan of Subdivision 30T-04208 to conduct a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA).
Mr. L. Bensason advised that the HIA was made a requirement of registration based on
evidence indicating that 234 Tilt Drive could be a log structure circa 1860s. He noted that
while 234 Tilt Drive is not designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, it is listed on Heritage
Kitchener's Inventory. He stated that the preliminary assessment recommends a partial
demolition and documented removal of layers of cladding so that the log structure can be seen
and more thoroughly assessed. He added that recommendations for conservation would then
be identified through the completion of the HIA, which would be presented at a future meeting
of Heritage Kitchener. He requested that members provide input and comments on the
preliminary assessment, which would be considered by staff when processing the HIA.
HERITAGE KITCHENER
MAY 6, 200$ -19 - CITY OF KITCHENER
2. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 234 TILT DRIVE (PLAN OF SUBDIVISION)
- REVIEW OF THE BUILT HERITAGE ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT
tCONT'D)
Mr. Dave Aston, MHBC Planning, advised that both the interior and exterior appearance of the
house have been significantly altered over its history. He added that except for glimpses of the
upper section of the back wall, visible from the attic of the oldest addition, the log structure is
now completely hidden beneath interior finishes and a sequence of exterior claddings. He
stated that Kieswetter Demolition Inc. has been retained to work with their heritage consultant,
Ms. Nancy Tausky, Archaeologix Inc., on the removal of materials from the two most northern
sections of the house. He added that a structural engineer would also be on site to provide
expertise on the structural integrity of the house during the demolition; so that it remains in a
form to provide opportunity to consider all options through the final HIA.
In response to questions, Ms. N. Tausky advised that consideration had only been given to
using photographs to document the partial demolition and agreed to investigate the possibility
of also video taping the removal of materials. Mr. D. Aston stated that he would speak with
Kieswetter Demolition Inc. to determine the methods they have used in the past to video tape
demolitions and if those methods would be applicable for this project. Mr. Aston advised that
he anticipates reporting back to this Committee in June 2008 and extended an invitation to the
members to attend a site visit of 234 Tilt Drive once the partial demolition has commenced.
At the request of the Committee, Mr. L. Bensason agreed to arrange the site visit of 234 Tilt
Drive.
3. DTS-0$-06$ - 25 JOSEPH STREET (VICTORIA PARK PUBLIC SCHOOL)
- INSTALLATION CRITERIA FOR AIR CONDITIONERS & SATELLITE DISHES
The Committee considered Development and Technical Services Department report DTS-08-
068, dated May 5, 2008 regarding the installation of air conditioner units and satellite dishes at
25 Joseph Street (former Victoria Park Public School), which is designated under Part IV of the
Ontario Heritage Act.
Ms. M. Wade reviewed the criteria developed by staff in consultation with Kitchener Housing
Inc. to regulate the number and location of air conditioner units based on the window openings
of each elevation and the corresponding internal layout of residential units at 25 Joseph Street.
She stated that staff are of the opinion that the installation of air conditioner units at 25 Joseph
Street that comply with the criteria outlined in Report DTS-08-068, would not impair the
heritage character of the former Victoria Park Public School, and thus should not require the
submission of a Heritage Permit Application. She added that unlike air conditioner units, the
installation of satellite dishes may detract from the heritage attributes of the building. As a
result, a request to install a satellite dish at 25 Joseph Street would require the submission of a
formal Heritage Permit Application.
Ms. E. Gallaher suggested, and it was agreed that the staff recommendation be amended to
include a clause indicating that a request to install a satellite dish at 25 Joseph Street would be
subject to the formal Heritage Permit Application process as prescribed by the Ontario
Heritage Act.
On motion by Ms. E. Gallaher -
it was resolved:
"That the request of Kitchener Housing Inc. to permit the installation of air conditioner
units on the north (Joseph Street), east, and west (David Street) elevations of 25 Joseph
Street (former Victoria Public School), be approved subject to compliance with the
following criteria:
i. That only one air conditioner unit be permitted per residential dwelling unit; and,
ii. That the tenant be required to enter into an Operating Agreement with Kitchener
Housing Inc. prior to the installation of the air conditioner unit; and,
HERITAGE KITCHENER
MAY 6, 200$ - 20 - CITY OF KITCHENER
3. DTS-0$-06$ - 25 JOSEPH STREET (VICTORIA PARK PUBLIC SCHOOL)
- INSTALLATION CRITERIA FOR AIR CONDITIONERS & SATELLITE DISHES
tCONT'D)
iii. That the Kitchener Housing Inc. Operating Agreement for the installation of air
conditioners include the following conditions:
• the air conditioner unit must be professionally installed to the satisfaction
of Kitchener Housing Inc.;
• air conditioner units must be installed on a platform supplied and
constructed by Kitchener Housing Inc.;
• the platform on which the air conditioner is located shall be constructed of
wood and may not be physically fastened to the exterior of the building;
• the platform shall be painted to match the existing window;
• the installation of the air conditioner unit must be inspected by Kitchener
Housing Inc. to ensure the installation and use of the air conditioner
causes no physical damage to the building or its heritage attributes;
• the installation of air conditioner units shall be temporary, and units ma~
not be installed prior to May 1St and must be removed by September 30t
each year; and,
iv. That the permitted location of air conditioner units shall be in accordance with
the building elevation drawings attached as Appendix `A' to Development and
Technical Services Department report DTS-08-068; and,
v. That air conditioner units which do not meet these criteria, be subject to the
formal Heritage Permit Application process prescribed for under Section 33 of
the Ontario Heritage Act; and further,
That requests to install a satellite dish at 25 Joseph Street, be subject to the formal
Heritage Permit Application process prescribed for under Section 33 of the Ontario
Heritage Act."
4. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 36-50 FRANCIS STREET SOUTH
- DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS FOR FORMER LANG TANNING CO.
The Committee considered Cadan Inc.'s Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for 36-50 Francis
Street South (former Lang Tanning Co.), dated April 21, 2008, prepared by E.R.A. Architects
Inc. in accordance with the submission of a Site Plan Control Application for the rehabilitation
of part of the former Lang Tanning Co. complex.
Mr. L. Bensason advised that the former Lang Tannery property is not designated under the
Ontario Heritage Act, but is listed on Heritage Kitchener's Inventory and was short listed by the
Evaluation Sub-Committee for inclusion on the Municipal Heritage Register. He stated that
members are requested to provide comments on the HIA, which would be considered by staff
in processing the Site Plan Control Application.
Ms. Lana Sherman, Cadan Inc. and Messrs. Roland Rom Colthoff, Raw Design and Michael
McClelland, E.R.A. Architects, presented the HIA for the former Lang Tannery Co. complex.
Ms. Sherman advised that the Lang Tannery site is an industrial complex that occupies 5.5
acres on two city blocks bound by Charles Street West, Joseph Street, Francis Street South
and Victoria Street South. She stated that Lang Tanning Co. Site `A' contains approximately
15 interconnected industrial buildings from one to five storeys in height built between circa
1896 and 1956. She added that Site B' occupies most of the adjacent block and contains
several single-storey brick warehouse and utility buildings and an 80 foot tall chimney
constructed in 1917. Mr. Colthoff reviewed the proposed site alterations and stated that the
intent of the proposed application is to adaptively reuse the Lang Tanning Co. Site `A' as a
HERITAGE KITCHENER
MAY 6.200$ - 21 - CITY OF KITCHENER
4. HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR 36-50 FRANCIS STREET SOUTH
- DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS FOR FORMER LANG TANNING CO.
tCONT'D)
mixed-use heritage precinct featuring retail, office, and light industrial uses. He added that the
conservation strategy of this site is to maintain it as a complex of vernacular industrial buildings
and rehabilitate portions of the site to accommodate new uses. Mr. McClelland advised that by
conserving the heritage attributes of the site, this development application would maintain the
Lang Tannery as an important industrial landmark and interpret the Tannery's significant role in
the industrial development of Berlin / Kitchener. He added that this redevelopment would have
a positive impact on the cultural heritage value of the site as it would introduce new uses while
providing for the continued preservation of the site's history and past activities.
In response to questions, Ms. L. Sherman advised that the HIA focuses on the development of
Site `A', noting that a separate HIA for Site `B' would be prepared in conjunction with the future
development of that site. She stated that as indicated in the HIA, it is assumed that this
property would be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and suggested that
would most likely occur once Site `B' has been developed; as opposed to staging the
designation sometime during the development process. She further advised that the Tannery
was inspected and it was determined that only the portion of land located in the area of the old
oil tanks would require remediation. She stated that parking issues would be addressed
through a minor variance application, which is anticipated to go before the City's Committee of
Adjustment in May 2008; and, noted that it might be possible to pursue underground parking
for Site `B'.
Several members spoke in support of the proposed adaptive reuse of the former Lang Tanning
Co. complex, noting how the concept for rehabilitation demonstrates great respect for the
historical significance of the site.
5. HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION HPA 200$-IV-005
- 1754 OLD MILL ROAD (HOMER WATSON HOUSE & GALLERY)
- REPLACEMENT OF CLERESTORY WINDOWS &CEDAR-SHINGLED ROOF
The Committee was in receipt this date of Heritage Permit Application HPA 2008-IV-005
proposing alterations to 1754 Old Mill Road (Homer Watson House and Gallery), which is
designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and subject to a Heritage Conservation
Easement Agreement. In addition, the Committee was in receipt of correspondence between
City staff and the Ontario Heritage Trust regarding the proposed alterations to the Homer
Watson House and Gallery.
Mr. L. Bensason advised that as documented in the correspondence, the proposed alterations
involve the repair of the cedar shingled roof and the replacement of the clerestory windows to
resolve a problem with water leaking into the gallery. He added that under the terms of the
Easement Agreement the owner, being the City of Kitchener, is required to seek the approval
of the Ontario Heritage Trust for proposed alterations to that property. He stated that at the
request of the Trust, the original plans were revised to relocate and reduce the number
of proposed roof vents. He noted that on April 24, 2008, formal written approval of the
proposed alterations was received from the Trust. Mr. Bensason advised that as approval has
been received from the Trust and given that the proposed alterations represent good heritage
conservation strategy, staff are recommending approval of HPA 2008-IV-005.
On motion by Mr. J. Ariens -
it was resolved:
"That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and in accordance with the
written approval provided by the Ontario Heritage Trust dated April 24, 2008, as required
by Heritage Conservation Easement Agreement (Instrument No. 1067748, registered
February 1, 1991), Heritage Permit Application HPA 2008-IV-005, be approved to
permit the replacement of the gallery clerestory windows, the cedar shingle roof and
associated flashings and rain water disposal system at 1754 Old Mill Road (Homer
Watson House and Gallery)."
HERITAGE KITCHENER
MAY 6.200$ - 22 - CITY OF KITCHENER
6. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE STANDARDS FOR DESIGNATED HERITAGE PROPERTIES
Mr. L. Bensason advised that at the March 31, 2008 Development and Technical Services
Committee (DTS) meeting staff presented a report recommending amendments to Kitchener
Municipal Code Chapter 665 (Property Standards for Maintenance and Occupancy), which
would establish minimum maintenance standards for properties designated under the Ontario
Heritage Act. He stated that at that meeting, concerns were raised regarding the degree of
public consultation that had been undertaken with the owners of designated heritage
properties. He noted that consequently, consideration of the proposed amendments was
deferred to the May 12th DTS meeting and staff were directed to hold a Public Information
Session to which all affected property owners were to be invited. Mr. Bensason advised that
the public meeting was held on April 17, 2008 and was attended by approximately 15 property
owners. At that meeting, concerns were expressed regarding the punitive nature of the
proposed amendments and it was suggested that the City should offer financial support to
heritage property owners to assist with maintenance costs. In addition, it was suggested that
owners be provided with the contact information of contractors specifically skilled in repairing
heritage properties. He noted that a majority of the property maintenance issues involving
occupied heritage properties can be addressed through the existing standards contained in
Chapter 665. He stated that as such, staff have decided to revise the proposed amendments
to focus solely on vacant /unoccupied designated heritage properties. Accordingly, at the May
12, 2008 DTS meeting, staff will be requesting that this matter be deferred until June 2008 to
allow for additional time to prepare the revised amendments and obtain feedback regarding the
revisions from owners of designated heritage properties.
In response to questions, Mr. L. Bensason advised that while it might not be feasible to have
something in place by June 2008, staff are examining the issue of providing financial
assistance to heritage property owners. He estimated that none of the property owners who
attended the April 17, 2008 meeting would be impacted by the revised amendments.
7. 200$ MIKE WAGNER HERITAGE AWARDS
The Committee was in receipt of the 2008 Mike Wagner Heritage Awards Nomination Form.
Ms. M. Wade advised that the Mike Wagner Heritage Awards were established in 1997 to
recognize and pay tribute to property owners and businesses who have contributed to the
conservation of the City's heritage resources. She stated that an individual can nominate any
property including his or her own, noting that all nominations must be submitted to the City's
Planning Division by no later than May 12, 2008.
8. DESIGNATION OF THE CIVIC CENTRE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT UPDATE
Mr. L. Bensason advised that a notice of objection to the passage of By-law 2008-039 (being a
by-law to designate a Heritage Conservation District, and adopt a Heritage Conservation
District Plan for the area of the municipality known as the Civic Centre Neighbourhood) was
recently filed with the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). Accordingly, finalization of the Civic
Centre Neighbourhood's designation under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act is postponed
until the subject OMB appeal has been resolved.
9. MUNICIPAL HERITAGE REGISTER UPDATE
At the request of Ms. M. Wade, Messrs. J. Ariens and T. Benedict, as well as Ms. E. Gallaher
and Mr. I. Mota agreed to pair together to form two additional Municipal Heritage Register Field
Teams. She noted that as the last time a property was added to the Register was in 2006,
staff are planning on hold a strategy session with Council to reintroduce to them the process
for adding properties to the Municipal Heritage Register.
10. ADJOURNMENT
On motion, this meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
Colin Goodeve
Committee Administrator