Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDTS-08-136 - Heritage Permit App - 2008-IV-012, 100 Water St SREPORT Report To: Heritage Kitchener Date of Meeting: September 2, 2008 Submitted By: Leon Bensason, Coordinator Cultural Heritage Planning X741-2306) Prepared By: Michelle Wade, Heritage Planner (741-2839) Ward(s~ Involved: Ward 6 Date of Report: August 21, 2008 Report No.: DTS-08-136 Subject: HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION 2008-IV-012 100 WATER STREET SOUTH REPAIR OF CEDAR SHINGLE ROOF AND INSTALLATION OF COPPER EAVES TROUGH AND FLASHINGS RECOMMENDATION: That pursuant to Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, Heritage Permit Application HPA 2008-IV-012 be approved, to permit the repair of the cedar shingle roof; installation of galvanized steel eaves troughs and downspouts painted to match existing, and installation of copper flashings at 100 Water Street South, in accordance with the information submitted with the application. BACKGROUND: The Development and Technical Services Department is in receipt of Heritage Permit Application HPA 2008- IV-012. The applicant is seeking Council's permission to repair the cedar shingle roof and install copper eaves troughs, downspouts, and flashings, on the property municipally addressed 100 Water Street South. REPORT: The subject property is located on the west side of Water Street South in the Victoria Park planning community, and is subject to designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The designating by-law identifies the exterior of the building, excluding the rear fagade, as an important heritage attribute. The applicant proposes to repair the existing cedar shingle roof. The repair will include the installation of a full ice and water shield underlay to affected areas with new cedar shingles to match the existing. In addition, the applicant proposes to remove the existing aluminum eaves troughs, flashings, and downspouts associated with the front turret and replace with copper eaves trough, flashings, and downspouts. The applicant has obtained the following specifications for the new eaves trough, flashings, and downspouts: 5" k-style, 16 oz., s/s hangers, soldiered joints, approximately 8 inches per piece to fit curvature of roof, and 3 inch by 3 inch downspouts. The proposed work will facilitate the repair of the cedar shingle roof. The applicant has confirmed that the eaves troughs, flashings and downspouts were galvanized steel and replaced with aluminum within the last 20 years. The applicant has chosen to use copper due to its malleability and ability to contour the front turret as well as for its long term durability. In terms of style and scale, the house is a modest example of Queen Anne architecture. City staff are not aware of examples where copper eaves troughs and downspouts have been used on this style and scale of house. In the absence of information confirming the use of copper eaves troughs and downspouts on the Queen Anne architectural style, City staff are unable to support the application as proposed. City staff understand that the applicant has also obtained a quote for galvanized steel eaves troughs and downspouts. City staff support the use of galvanized steel for the eaves troughs and downspouts as it is durable and can be painted to match the existing historic colours of the building. In addition, galvanized steel is the preferred material recommended in the building conservation guidelines of the Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District Plan. As a result, the use of galvanized steel for eaves troughs and downspouts would be consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood. City staff support the repair of the cedar shingle roof, including the use of copper flashings, because the repairs will ensure the long term viability of the roof while the use of copper flashings is recognized as the best material to use with cedar shingle roofs. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CONCLUSION: In the absence of information confirming the use of copper for eaves troughs and downspouts on residential buildings built in the Queen Anne architectural style of a similar scale, City staff are unable to support the use copper for the eaves troughs and downspouts. However, City staff support the use of galvanized steel eaves troughs and downspouts because they are durable and can be painted to match the existing historic colours. The proposed repairs to the cedar shingle roof, including the installation of copper flashings, and the installation of galvanized steel eaves troughs and downspouts will not detract from the character of the building. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of HPA 2008-IV-012. Leon Bensason, MCIP, RPP, CARP Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning Att~chmPnt Heritage Permit Application 2008-IV-012 Michelle Wade, BES Heritage Planner 2