Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDTS-08-057 - 2007 Best Bets for Air Quality - Final ReportKrTC~~R Development & Technical Services REPORT Report To: Environmental Committee Date of Meeting: April 24, 2008 Submitted By: JeffWillmer, Director of Planning Prepared By: Alain Pinard, Manager of Long Range and Policy Planning X519-741-2319) Ward~s~ Involved: All Date of Report: April 18, 2008 Report No.: DTS-08-057 Subject: 2007 Best Bets for Air Quality: Final Report REC~MMENDATI4N: That Report ,DTS-08-057 X2001 Best Bets for Air Quality: Final Reporty be received for information. INTRODUCTION This report consolidates the final reports from various City departments on the 2007 Best Bets for Air Quality. BACKGROUND: In May 2006, the Environmental Committee presented a report entitled Air Quality in Kitchener to Kitchener Council, The report was the culmination of a year of deliberations by members of the Committee responding to direction from Council in November of 2004 to develop a long- term, "comprehensive plan" on the air quality in the city of Kitchener. The report included a series of X50+} Recommended Actions. In 2006 five of these actions Five Besf Befs} were put forward by the Committee far investigation by staff into their feasibility. Kitchener Council ratified this committee recommendation on July 4, 2006 and, in so doing, staff was directed to commence a consideration of the feasibility, and ways and means of implementing the Five Besf Bets. Final reports on the 2006 Best Bets were presented at the April 2007 meeting of the Environmental Committee. In 2007 five more Best Bets were put forward by the Committee and approved by Kitchener Council. The Council approved process for selecting and reporting on the five annual Best Bets includes a final report on the previous year's Best Bets at the April meeting of each year. This report constitutes the final report for the 2001 Best Bets for Air Quality. REPORT: On June 4, 2001 Kitchener Council approved the five Best Bets for 2001 that were recommended by the Environmental Committee. Interim reports from City staff were provided at various times during late 2007 and early 2008, and an update on budget implications was provided at the meeting of February 28, 2008. In accordance with the Council approved process, relevant staff were asked to provide final reports on the five Best Bets for 2001. The five Best Bets far 2001 and the responses received are provided below under each subsection. Best Bet #~ Su ort com act urban develo ment 1(a) Consider adopting approval processes which are supportive of compact urban development, including consideration of "fast -tracking" the necessary development approvals; Several initiatives that support compact urban development have been completed or are ongoing. Notable examples include the Design Brief for Suburban Neighbourhoods completed}, developing new zoning standards for Mixed Use Corridors ongoing}, the Kitchener Growth Management Strategy ongoing}, and several components related to the Official Plan Review (start up in 2008}. Design Brief for Suburban Neighbourhoods The Design Brief for Suburban Neighbourhoods was approved by Kitchener Council in 2001. The Design Brief clearly defines the City's design expectations for all new suburban development. Proponents of suburban development are required to develop a concept plan that addresses nine objet#ives at the outset of the development review process. The design objectives include walkability, transit supportive densities and complete communities. Senior Planner Brandon Sloan attended a meeting of the Environmental Committee in 2001 to provide an overview presentation of the Design Brief. The complete Design Brief and supporting documents are posted on the City's website. Mixed Use Corridors The City has identified seven mixed use corridors: Belmont Avenue, King Street East, King Street West, Lancaster Street, Queen Street South, Victoria Street North and Victoria Street South. Due to their location along major streets they have been identified as opportunities for significant redevelopment with the objective of creating attractive busy urban environments that are focal points for the local neighbourhoods. Planning staff is currently developing new zoning categories that will help promote the Mixed Use Corridor policies. The new zoning categories are expected to be in place by late 2008.Once in place, the new zoning is expected to be an incentive for investors to acquire, assemble and redevelop lands in locations which take advantage of existing infrastructure. Additional information on the Mixed Use Corridor initiative is posted on the City's website. Kitchener Growth Management Strategy Promoting compact development and intensification, and prioritizing greenfield development are two of the many objectives of the Growth Management Strategy. The Terms of Reference were z presented to the Environmental Committee in 2007 and the Committee is represented on the Growth Management Task Force. The target completion date is December 2008. Additional information on Kitchener Growth Management Strategy is posted on the City's website. Fast Tracking Development Fast tracking development approvals that support compact development is not feasible if this means "stalling" the processing of certain applications and "speeding" up the processing of others. This approach would require a subjective decision as to what applications better support compact development when the objective is to encourage this built form in all cases. Most if not all future development applications should support compact development to some extent, because the new applications will either support an intensification proposal or greenfield development in accordance with the Design Brieffor Suburban Neighbourhoods. Furthermore, "fast tracking" implies that there is "excess capacity" in the system so that the City can pick and chose which applications it wishes to concentrate on. This is not the case. All City staff involved in development review have a full workload. All development applications that are deemed complete under the Planning Act must be processed by the City and there are prescribed maximum turnaround times or the applicant is entitled to appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board. Repor#ed by: Alain Pinard Manager, Long Range and Policy Planning 1tb} Pursue policies and implement actions that target the re-development of brownfield properties including establishing incentives financial and non- financial}and creating partnerships with other parties. The City of Kitchener's Brownfield Community Improvement Plan {CIP} has been in operation since November, 2003. The Program provides a financial incentive in the form of Tax Incremental Grant {TIG) to encourage private industry to clean up {remediate} and re-use contaminated properties for more productive urban uses. Since 2006, Staff have been working closely with the Region of Vvaterloo and sister municipalities to form one Brownfield Program which all municipalities in this Region can use. The features of the updated Brownfield program are: 1. Tax Incremental Grant (TIG) which includes both the City' and the Region's portion of the Property Tax Bill, whereas our current Program only includes the City of Kitchener portion. 2. An administration process modelled after the City of Kitchener Program, allowing both City and Regional Staff and Councils involvement with each application. 3. A comprehensive grantformulawhich accounts for all other credits {such as Development Charge credits and Study Grants}. 4. Better coordination between City and Regional efforts to promote clean up. To implement the new Program, the City of Kitchener needs to amend its existing Community Improvement Plan, pursuant to Sections 28 and 17 of the Plannr'ngAct. A public meeting will be held by the City's Development and Technical Services (DTS} Committee on June 16, 2001 to hear comments an the proposed changes to the City's Brownfield CIP. Approval of the CIP amendment is anticipated in 2008. 3 Reported by: Terry Boutilier Senior Business Development officer & Brownfield Co-ordinator Best Bet #2 -Seek continuous improvement from ICI , po t, sources by developing a tiered approach that includes incentives and flexible regulatory approaches Zia} Create an incentive program to promote naturalized landscape designs for industrial, commercial and institutional sites ~e.g. provide an award for best naturalized design through the City of Kitchener Urban Design Awards program}; The City's Urban Design Awards program recognizes a wide variety of design elements that include landscape design. Past award recipients have included projects with natural landscape designs and in one case, the naturalized landscape was the primary basis for the award. At the present time the Urban Design Awards Program does not have separate categories for different design elements. The program operates on a two year cycle and 2008 is a year in which awards will be given. The program is routinely reviewed prior to each award year. This year's program is already in place. The next award year is 2410. The City's Urban Design manual now recognizes xerophytic landscaping as an appropriate landscaping standard. No incentive program is being considered at this time, largely because natural landscape designs are increasing in popularity. Watering restrictions and concerns with lawn maintenance costs no doubt encourage this trend along with improved environmental awareness. Reported by: Brian Page Supervisor, Site Development 2(b} Implement LEED principles of site design, where feasible, on all new private and city- owned developments; 0n March 11, 2008 City Council approved a plan to implement a "green building" design and construction standard for all new and renovated City awned facilities. New major buildings will be designed and constructed to be LEED Gold certified and existing facilities will incorporate energy efficiency into all major retrofits. Staff from Facilities Management attended the Environmental Committee meeting of February 21, 2008 to explain the program in advance of the Council decision. Reported by: Mario Petrr'cevic Manager, Projects/Energy Facilities Management N~ ote: City staff have collectively concluded that at the present time, there is no authority to require the private sector to implement LEED principles. City staff will encourage the private sector to implement LEED principles where feasible. 2~c} Implement pollution prevention and eco-efficiency measures ~e.g. LEED, LEED-EB principles} to retrofits of existing city facilities and proposed new facilities; The City's "green building" design program described under 2 (b) includes the proposed measures. 4 2(d~ Seek to have industrial development designed to accommodate the use of bicycles, walking, showers etc. (e.g. currently industrial landslbusiness parks do not have sidewalks or destinations to walk to); The Engineering Division is currently reviewing Kitchener's Sidewalk Policy for new development. It is anticipated that this will be completed in the fall of 2008. The City also operates a sidewalk installation program for existing urbanized areas. This program supports the City's Pedestrian Charter and recommended action 2.8 of the Air Quality in Kifchenerreport. Council renewed its commitment to the program with the approval of report DTS-08-036 on April 7, 2008. Reported by: Binu Korah, Manager, Development Engineering Greg McFaggart, Manager of Engineering Asset Plannr"ng The City's Urban Design Manual requires bicycle parkinglstorage equal to ~ 0% of required automobile parking on new industrial sites as part of the site plan approval process. Reported by: Brian Page Supervisor, Site Development Note: The City does not have the authority to require industrial businesses to provide showers on site but can encourage this practice. The Cycling Master update described under Best Bet #3 also responds to this Best Bet. 2(e~ Include plans and opportunities for continuous support of new and retrofitted green practices and technologies; Actions taken in response to 2a), 2b}, 2d also respond to this Best Bet 2(f~ Advocate for management of emissions from ICI point sources in conjunction with local air quality initiatives; and, Note: There is no specific action or program underway at this time but opportunities for implementation of Best Bet 2(f} will be explored as we more forward with the updated Strategic Plan for the Environment and the Local Environmental Action Fund (LEAF}. The Environmental Committee participated in these major initiatives during the past year and is aware that both give a high priority to local air quality issues. Z(g~ Develop business assistance and recognition programs to encourage businesses to adopt pollution prevention and eco-efficiency measures (e.g. LEED incentives. As with Best Bet (2fl, implementation of Best Bet 2 (g) will be explored as we more forward with the updated Strategic Plan for the Environment and the Local Environmental Action Fund (LEAF). Best Bet #3 -Facilitate Modal Shift to Bic cle Trans ortation 3(a) Revisit the "Bikeway Study" and have the cycling community (including WRCCy, participate in the update, set a timeline, and determine budget and staff 5 requirements necessary to implement the updated recommendations. In so doing, staff should tie in this update with the transportation demand management initiative being undertaken by the~City; and, 3(b} Review the Transportation Demand Management (TDM} study and the revised "Bikeway Study" to look for gaps and integrate them (e.g. the City should ensure that pedestrian crossings and cycling issues at roundabouts are addressed in any TDM study and or updated "Bikeway Study"}. Transportation Planning staff are currently midway through the Transportation Demand Management study. This study will develop a specificwork program to start shifting travel choices away from the single occupant vehicle to other more sustainable modes of transport, including transit, cycling, walking, carpooling, etc. The study is anticipated to be completed in mid 2008 with a TDM Coordinator seconded for a one year placement upon completion of the study. It is our intent to have the Cycling Master Plan updated as part of our TDM program. We anticipate that this will be undertaken in 2009, once the initial TDM initiatives are up and running. We will also be looking at instituting a Kitchener Cycling Advisory Committee to assist and provide direction in the development of a mare comprehensive cycling network in the City and we intend to have this committee formed around June 2008. In addition to the above, we intend to develop a Municipal Transportation Master Plan in 2010 that will help to more clearly define our overall transportation network and a more appropriate division between auto traffic and other modes. This will be tied into, and be supportive of, the Regional Transportation Master Plan. Reported by: John McBride Director, Transportation Planning Best Bet #4 -Enhance Green S ace Mana ement 4(a} Adopt a regulatory process to ensure natural features (e.g. unevaluated wetlands, hedgerows, woodlots etc.} of greenfields are protected and preserved in such areas prior to the approval process for development of projects thereon; In 2007, the Planning Division canvassed several Ontario municipalities and researched case law in order to gain an understanding of the various regulatory options. We are currently analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the different options and plan to bring forward a recommendation in 2008. Reported by: Alain Pinard Manager, Long Range and Policy Planning 4(b} Investigate partnerships to educate residents of the environmental benefits of trees in general, but particularly native species, and provide incentives for planting trees such as re-introducing the Trees for our Future program with an aggressive promotional campaign; 6 Two existing programs with broader mandates already address the objectives of this Best Bet, albeit in a modest way. However, the opportunity exists to give tree planting a higher priority within the existing frameworks of those programs. The Community Environmental Improvement Grant Program which is administered through the Environmental Committee gives out grants up to $3,000 on an annual basis to organizations that undertake environmental stewardship projects. Some past projects have included tree planting, but it is possible to target projects that directly implement this Best Bet, including the objective of giving preference to native tree species. Kitchener's Natural Area's Program (KNAP) is a new program developed by the Community Services Department with local partners for the City's natural areas. The program includes a wide range of stewardship and educational opportunities that include tree planting. For example, as part of Earth Week festivities, on Sunday, April 26 at Huron Natural Area, individuals and families will have opportunities to plant trees, participate in guided nature walks and learn about natural area restoration. David Schmitt, Environmental and Forest Project Manager gave an overview of the Program at the Environmental Committee meeting of March 20, 2008. Additional information is also available on the City's website. Furthermore, there will be opportunities to explore other opportunities to implement this Best Bet as we more forward with the updated Strategic Plan for the Environment and the Local Environmental Action Fund (LEAF}, Reported by: Alain Pr'nard Manager, Long Range and Policy Planning 4(c} Consider implementing a regulatory process whereby lots in new residential developments are mandated to have, at a minimum, one tree at the front of each dwelling with native species being used where appropriate; and, The Design Brief for Suburban Neighbourhoods that was approved by Kitchener Council in 2001 includes a tree planting standard for new greenfield development. Proponents of development are required to provide at least 1 street tree for each residential dwelling unit and at least 3 street trees for each flankage lat. It is recognized that this requirement applies to public road allowances and not private lands as proposed. However, this approach is considered a viable alternative in achieving the Bets Bet objective because the municipality is better able to control the fate of stree# trees and many new urban lots are too small for significant trees. There may be opportunities to further implement this Best Bet as we more forward with the updated Strategic Plan for the Environment and the Local Environmental Action Fund (LEAF}. Reported by. Alain Pinard Manager, Long Range and Policy Planning The Community Services Department is looking at developing an approved master tree list for tree planting, It will include native species but will not be limited to that. In a number of cases non-native species are better suited to the site conditions additionally depending on what benefits you want to get from the trees -non-native species may outperform native species. Reported by: David Schmitt Environmental and Forest Project Manager 7 4(d~ Provide incentives to encourage homeowners to naturalize their front yards (e.g. turf alternative landscape designs. Staff are still exploring opportunities to implement this Best Bet. The value of developing an incentive program that is funded by the City will have to be given serious consideration given that there is anecdotal evidence that increasingly more homeowners are choosing to naturalize their front yards without incentives. The Region of Waterloo offers seminars on naturescaping that feature renowned expert Lorraine Mennen, The seminars held in Kitchener are reportedly well attended. Additional information on the seminars and naturesacaping in general is posted on the Region of Waterloo website. Note: The City's Street Tree Inventory Program is a major initiative that relates to the objectives of Best Bet #4 in general. An update of this project was presented at the Environmental Committee meeting of March 20, 2008. Once more data have been collected, Community Services staff will provide the Environmental Committee with an update that will include information on how street trees improve air quality in the city. Reported by: David Schmi#t Environmental and Forest Project Manager Best_Bet #5 -Incentives for Energy.Efficient Development 5~a) Investigate the possibility of providing incentives to encourage a developer to undertake alarge-scale, energy efficient marketable demonstration project utilizing clean, energy efficient space hea#ing (e.g. low-energy-use building and operations, community energy systems and alternatives to fuel combustion such as geo-exchange, solar applications etc. all intended to reduce emissions of particulate matter, criteria air contaminants and greenhouse gases). This past winter Building Division staff visited Reid's Heritage Homes' LEED certified house in Guelph. In this model home the builder chose to utilize many new products to achieve a platinum level LEED certification. By using simple modifications to typical construction such as increased wall stud spacing and pre engineered floor and roof systems, the builder consumed 30% less lumber and reduced product waste by l1 % of typical home construction. Incorporating geothermal heating, solar panels installed on the roof, the use of grey water for non-potable systems and increased insulation values throughout the home reduces the reliability of the home on city services. This in return reduces the negative impact on the environment and provides annual cost savings to the homeowner. The LEED home incorporated recycled paint and carpet, energy efficient appliances and light bulbs, dual flush toilets, 50 year fiberglass roof shingles and bamboo hardwood floors to utilize a few of the recycled and environment friendly products that are already readily available today. With simple modifications to a typical house Reid's Heritage Homes has shown how easily you can achieve a home that will help protect the environment and function more efficiently. One of our local builders, Eastforest Homes, is experimenting with new and innovative designs and materials in the City of Kitchener. Eastforest Homes introduced a new termite and mold resistant lumber called BluWood to the city in 2001 as an option to buyers. BluWood has a reduced moisture content compared to conventional lumber. With less moisture in the lumber at the time of installation, the chance of lumber shrinkage after construction is minimized. 8 At the start of 2008, Eastforest Homes marketed a project in Kitchener titled "Discovery Home". The Discovery Home has involved much more planning and design consideration than the average house in terms of "green" initiatives. The construction drawings and details address all framing, plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems. The house will be framed with 24 inch centre in-line framing din lieu of 16"-less wood & increased insulation}, consisting of pre engineered roof trusses and floor jois#s. Utilizing better planning and pre-engineered lumber systems, Eastforest Homes is significantly reducing material waste and problems which would typically arise on site. This model home will also serve as a learning tool to local trades and students showing different methods of typical construction. The goal of the Discovery Home is to achieve an Energy Star Rating for its construction. Currently Eastforest Homes have achieved twelve homes in the Region with Energy Star ratings. fur builders including Eastforest Homes are continuously trying to find better and more efficient ways of constructing to create better neighbourhoods in our city. Unfortunately the City of Kitchener Building Division is not able to offer any incentives for "green" construction or to obtain Energy Star ratings; however we do provide our services to discuss any upcoming projects and Building Code compliance. We have found builders are utilizing Energy Star and other environmentally friendly issues as part of their marketing to consumers and this is proving to be successful. Reported by: Mike Selling, Director, Building Services Martina Schneider, Supervisor, Permits, Building Services Jenny Taylor, Munr"cipal Building Official Chris Gowing, Municipal Building Official FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None COMMUNICATIONS: No external communications were required in order to prepare this report. Information on the Air Quality in Kitchener report and each year's five Best Bets is available on the City's website. CONCLUSION: This report outlines numerous municipal initiatives that implement the 2001 Best Bets for Air Quality. Alain Pinard, MA, MCIP, RPP Manager, Lang Range and Policy Planning Jeff Willmer, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning 9