HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIN-09-039 - 2009 Federal Budget Infrastructure Funding1
KITC~~R ' •
Financial Services
Report To: Mayor Carl Zehr and Members of Council
Date of Meeting: March 23, 2009
Submitted By: Dan Chapman, General Manager of Financial Services and
City Treasurer
Prepared By: Roger LeBrun, Manager of Financial Planning
Saleh Saleh, Senior Financial Analyst
Ward(s~ Involved: ALL
Date of Report: March 16, 2009
Report No.: FIN-09-039
Subject: 2009 Federal Budget Infrastructure Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT staff be directed to submit the following projects, in order of priority, for consideration for
funding through the Federal Infrastructure Stimulus Fund:
1. Infrastructure Remediation ($26.6 million)
2. Consolidated Maintenance Facility ($14.0 million)
3. Strasburg Road Industrial Project ($5.5 million)
4. Accessibility Improvements ($1.0 million)
THAT staff be directed to submit the following projects, in order of priority, for consideration for
funding through the Federal Green Infrastructure Fund:
1. Solar Retrofits ($1.2 million)
2. City Hall Lighting ($1.0 million)
3. Energy Management Systems ($1.5 million)
THAT staff be directed to submit the following projects, in order of priority, for consideration for
funding through the Federal Recreational Infrastructure Canada Fund:
1. McLennan Park Development ($3.0 million)
2. Bridgeport Community Centre ($2.1 million)
3. Aquatic Facility Upgrades ($5.0 million); and further
THAT the General Manager of Financial Services be directed to issue correspondence to all
area Members of Federal and Provincial Parliament to outline the City's infrastructure priorities
for potential funding through the 2009 Federal budget.
BACKGROUND:
On January 27, 2009, as part of an Economic Stimulus plan, the Federal Government
designated $6.4 billion over two years for provincial, territorial and municipal infrastructure
projects. The main purpose of this funding allocation is to stimulate the economy and at the
same time create a more modern and greener infrastructure that is the foundation of sustainable
long-term growth. The two main criteriafor projects to qualifyforfunding are:
1. Projects must be "shovel ready" and completed by March 31, 2011; and
2. Projects should be incremental to the City's existing 2009 capital forecast
The intent of this report is to inform Council of the funding components of the stimulus package
and to prioritize a list of projects that would be submitted for consideration under this program.
The current list identifies $60.9 million of new construction spending over the next two years,
which will result in over 500 new local jobs. This report has been developed in conjunction with
infrastructure asset managers from various City divisions and has been reviewed with the
Corporate Management Team.
REPORT:
COMPONENTS OF STIMULUS PACKAGE
The City of Kitchener will likely be eligible for funding through the following three components of
the federal infrastructure program:
1. Infrastructure Stimulus Fund- $4 billion is available over the next two years in this
category for infrastructure improvements such as Roads, Bridges and Sewers.
2. Green Infrastructure Fund- $1 billion is available over the next 5 years in this category to
support the creation of sustainable energy (e.g. modern energy transmission lines}
3. Recreational Infrastructure Canada Fund- $0.5 billion is available over the next two
years available in this category for arenas, tennis and basketball courts and sports fields,
etc.
The infrastructure funds will be allocated based on population, project merit and readiness as
construction must begin in the 2009 and 2010 construction seasons. The funds will cover up to
50% of the eligible projects costs with the balance to be provided by provincial and municipal
governments. The Federal Government has indicated that for any project put forward by
Municipalities, the funding formula would likely be 1/3 Federal, 1/3 Provincial and 1/3 Municipal.
For illustrative purposes, if an allocation was made on a per capita basis, the City of Kitchener
would be able to spend approximately $52 million on infrastructure works, with the City's 1/3
share representing approximately $17 million. If the City is in fact required to contribute 1/3 of
the allocation, staff would bring forward funding options for Council's consideration. The table
below illustrates the flow of potential funding.
Funding Partners A B
City of City of Recommended
Total 1/3 Federal 1/3 Provincial Kitchener's Kitchener's Prajectsfar (B-A)
Grant Fund Component Funding Available Share Share 1l3 Share Per Capita Share Consideration Variance
Infrastructure Stimulus $4,000,000,000 12,800,000 12,800,000 12,800,000 38,400,000 47,100,000 8,700,000
Green Infrastructure $1,000,000,000 1,280,000 1,280,000 1,280,000 3,840,000 3,700,000 (140,000)
Recreation Infrastructure Canada $500 000 000 3 237 413 3 237 413 3 237 413 9 712 239 10,100,000 387 761
Totals $5,500,000,000 17,317,413 17,317,413 17,317,413 51,952,239 60,900,000 8,947,761
2
PROJECT LIST AND PRIORITIES
The following projects are aligned with the goals of the infrastructure funding announced in the
Federal budget and are divided into the three categories outlined above.
INFRASTRUCTURE STIMULUS FUND PROJECTS (Cost Estimate: $47. ~ miNion)
This fund is primarily for "shovel ready" renewal and rehabilitation projects that enhance safety
and increase the economic life of assets. The proposed capitals projects below meet these
criteria and are listed in priority sequence.
Priority #1: Infrastructure Remediation Cost estimate: $26.6 million; Jobs created: 300)
The City of Kitchener has a $107 million backlog of infrastructure work associated with replacing
roads, sewers, water, sidewalks and bridges. Looking ahead for the next 25 years, this backlog
is expected to increase to $971 million in light of funding constraints. Key funding opportunities
for additional infrastructure programming exist in storm water management, drainage, roads and
sidewalks to reduce the existing backlog. The projects summarized in Table #1 below are
"shovel ready" and can be complete by 2010. This work is expected to cost $26.6 million and
generate 300 new jobs.
Table #1-Summary of Infrastructure Remediation Opportunities for 2009/2010
Infrastructure Remediation Category Project Merit
Stormwater Management ~SWM) and Address SWM and stormwater issues that
Drainage are currently being underfunded, and allocate
$7.OM toward the anticipated Victoria Lake
Remediation works
Wastewater/WaterAcce/erated Bismark Avenue reconstruction
Infrastructure Renewal Pro ram AIRP
Road Resurfacing and Road Renewal Replace asphalt and address 28km shortfall
in road resurfacin from last 5 ears
King Street Master Plan Expand the scope of the reconstruction of
downtown King Street surface features
including streetscape renewal, street
furniture, enhanced lighting, and pedestrian
amenities
Trenchless Sewer and Water Extend life of sewers and water mains by 20
Rehabilitation - 80 ears; deferrin reconstruction
Sidewalk Re lacement Address 12,600 outstandin sidewalk defects
A detailed list of projects is provided in Appendix #1.
Priority #2: Consolidated Maintenance Facility Cost estimate: $14.0 million; Jobs created:
200)
The Consolidated Maintenance Facility will move departments and equipment engaged in
providing water, sewer and road maintenance operations into one facility. Funding restrictions
have limited the scope of beneficial work that can be undertaken. With additional funding, this
work can be undertaken and is listed in Table #2 below. It is anticipated that the project will
create 200 new jobs.
3
Table #2 -Potential Consolidated Maintenance Facility Improvements for 2009/2010
Im rovement Benefit
Im roved salt story e structure Lon er asset life and lower o eratin cost
Building more interior roads Dust control and less wear/tear on vehicles
LEED Work Improve quality of mechanical, electrical, windows
and air systems to increase energy efficiency
Snow storage facility Increased storage capacity and ensuring a longer
facility lifespan
Im roved story e facilities Use vertical units to reduce foot rint inside
Slo ed floors and drains Reduce ever usa a to remove vehicle run-off
Priority #3: Strasburg Road Industrial Land Project Cost estimate: $5.5 million; Jobs created:
unknown}
The project involves the extension of McBrine Drive to Strasburg Road allowing for the creation
of approximately 29 acres of employment land which will be lotted for industrial uses. These
lots, when fully developed are estimated to create roughly 586 jobs based on a standard
employment density estimation of 50 jobs per hectare. In addition, the construction of the
subdivision will create jobs for approximately one year until such time as the land is serviced.
Priority #4: Accessibility Improvements to City of Kitchener Facilities (Cost estimate: $1.0
million; Jobs created: unknown)
The City of Kitchener has conducted an accessibility audit on all facilities. In preparation for
anticipated legislated requirements for built structures expected in the latter part of 2010, this
project would improve access to facilities, customer service, assembly areas, and washroom
facilities and will improve travel between floors. The project funding would allow the City to
meet anticipated legislated requirements ahead of time and provides better service to all
customers.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND PROJECTS (Cost Estimate: $3.7 million)
This fund is targeted to infrastructure that improves the quality of the environment and supports
the creation of sustainable energy. The City of Kitchener has identified three projects which are
ready for construction in 2009 and which can be completed in 2010. The proposed projects in
order of priority are as follows:
Priority #1: Solar Retrofits (Cost estimate: $1.2 million; Jobs created: unknown)
This project would install solar or thermal systems in aquatic centres and golf course
maintenance facilities. It would harness energy from the sun to heat pool water, re-charge golf
carts and operate the Golf Course maintenance centres. This reduces energy consumption and
is more environmentally friendly. Table #3 below lists the facilities that would benefit from the
solar retrofits.
Table #3 -Summary of Solar Retrofits for 2009/2010
Facilit Work
Breithau t Pool Solar Retrofit
L le Hallman Pool Solar Hot Water
4
Forest Hei hts Solar Retrofit
Idelwood OD Pool Solar Retrofit
Kin sdale OD Pool Solar Retrofit
Harr Class OD Pool Solar Retrofit
City Hall Solar DHW
Doors GC Solar Maintenance Building
Rockway GC Solar Maintenance Building
Priority #2: City Hall Lighting Cost estimate: $1.0 million; Jobs created: unknown}
At the June 16, 2008 Development and Technical Services Committee meeting, a modified
design for King Street streetscape ~DTS 08-105) was approved, which included the installation
of new and upgraded street lighting on King Street. Council also directed staff to investigate
how to improve lighting on Civic Square and around City Hall.
A study was undertaken by Sandwell Engineering Consultants to look at various lighting
options. Considering the recommendations of the consultant's report, staff are proposing
additional lighting be added to the perimeter of City Hall Young St, King St, College St and
Duke St}. The lighting upgrades would enhance the look of Civic Square and address some of
the perceived safety issues as well as highlight and showcase City Hall as one of the
outstanding architectural features of the City. Environmental benefits include replacing old
lighting technology with better energy efficient technology.
Priority #3: Energy Management Systems (Cost estimate: $1.5 million; Jobs created:
unknown}
Standardizing and upgrading the archaic Energy Management (EM) control systems throughout
the facilities (and installing them where they are currently absent) permits the building
environments to be controlled remotely for quicker response and provides access to data to
trouble shoot problems. EM systems allow better energy usage monitoring on individual
buildings and from a "trending" perspective. These allow for modifications that result in reduced
energy usage.
RECREATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE CANADA FUND PROJECTS (Cost Estimate: $10.1
million)
This fund is for construction of new recreational facilities and upgrades to existing facilities. The
City of Kitchener has identified three projects where construction can begin in 2009 and be
completed in 2010. The projects meeting these criteria are listed in priority sequence below.
Priority #1: McLennan Park Development (Cost estimate: $3.0 million; Jobs created: unknown}
McLennan Park is located at the corner of Ottawa Street and Strasburg Road. The McLennan
Park Master plan recommended that the park be developed with features that include a
community trail system, skateboard park, playground and multi-use court; comfort station;
downhill, BMX and cycling trails; public tobogganing; great lawn with concept for conversion to
sports field or skating oval; public parking; and leash free dog area. Due to funding constraints,
the development of the park was split into four phases. The infrastructure grant will allow the
development of the park to be accelerated.
5
Priority #2: Bridgeport Community Centre Expansion Cost estimate: $2.1 million; Jobs
created: unknown}
The Bridgeport Community Centre is being expanded to meet the increasing needs of the
Bridgeport Community. The business case identified additional needs such as a single
gymnasium, a medium sized meeting/activity room, additional storage, additional office space
and an improved lounge and lobby area. To help mitigate funding challenges, the expansion
was proposed in two phases, including a small expansion and renovation in the first phase, and
a larger expansion and renovation in a second phase when resources could be allocated.
Additional funding would permit the entire facility to be completed sooner and associated
benefits to be enjoyed by the community sooner.
Priority #3: Aquatic Facility Upgrade (Cost estimate: $5.0 million; Jobs created: unknown}
Several aquatic facilities require piping and filtration system upgrades. In addition, some
facilities require renovations such as the creation of family change rooms. The latter would
improve customer service and provide a safer environment for children. Table #4 below shows
the list of facilities that would be upgraded.
Table #4 -Summary of Aquatic Facility Upgrades for 2009/2010
Aquatic Facility Upgrade
Harr Class Pool Chan e house u rades
Harr Class Pool Deck Re lacement
Harr Class Pool E ox resurfacin
Breithau t Pool Filter s stem u rades
Wilson/Kin sdale Pool Add S lash Pad
Chico ee Pool Add S lash Pad
Kiwanis Pool Complete Overhaul
LOCAL BOARDS
Kitchener Public Library (Cost estimate: $5.6 million; Jobs created: unknown} and the Centre in
the Square (Cost estimate $1.2 million; Jobs created: unknown} have also submitted lists of
infrastructure projects for Council's consideration. These projects would most likely fit under the
Infrastructure Stimulus Fund category. Consistent with other projects put forward by local
boards in the past, Staff have not prioritized the requests from Kitchener Public Library and the
Centre in the Square. Staff seek Council's direction both in terms of whether or not to include
projects for local boards on the City's list and, if so, where they should be placed in the order of
priority.
With respect to the KPL central library project, construction will commence in 2010 with
completion of Phase 1 (parking) by December 2011 and Phase 2 (library building) by February
2013. The existing criteria for projects to be eligible for funding require that projects should be
completed by March 31, 2011. If Council decides to include this project for submission under
the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, there is a risk this project may not qualify.
Refer to Appendix #2 for the details of the requests from Kitchener Public Library and Appendix
#3 for Centre in the Square.
6
OTHER PROJECTS FOR CONSIDERATION
Staff have identified three additional projects that do not have completed business cases and
have not been brought forward to Council for approval previously. Given that funding may be
available through the Infrastructure Funding initiative, Staff felt it was important to list these
projects for Council's consideration at this point in time. The projects below have not been
prioritized.
1. Synthetic Fields - At an estimated cost of $3.9 million gobs created: unknown), Staff
are proposing that three synthetic soccer fields be built at Huron Farms to address
community needs and a waiting list for minor sports, adult sports and tournaments. With
current grass fields, the number of usage hours is restricted to 450 hours. Additional
wear and tear results infields being closed for longer durations during the season which
reduces field rental income. Synthetic fields will allow for 2000 hours of usage per
season and are also less costly to maintain when compared to traditional grass fields.
Cities of Mississauga, Toronto and Brampton have built these types of fields as well as
Wilfrid Laurier University and have enjoyed success in keeping them open for play
March through December.
2. Centennial Stadium - At an estimated cost of $5.0 million (Jobs created: unknown),
Staff are proposing that the existing track and field be redeveloped with an artificial eight
lane track which includes an irrigated infield, lighting and concrete pads for temporary
bleachers. A review of the current stadium and possible strategic alternatives has been
conducted by F.J. Galloway Associates Inc. The possible alternatives to be considered
are to close the current stadium, redevelop the current site or enter into a joint initiative
(at a different location) with the school boards.
3. CMF Solar Roof - At an estimated cost of $4.1 million gobs created: unknown}, Staff
are proposing that solar panels be added to the roof of the CMF allowing for the creation
of sustainable renewable energy. The City has the opportunity to use approximately
262,000 square feet of the CMF roof to generate electricity directly from the sun utilizing
photo-voltaic solar panels. A feasibility study by Arise Technologies has been
completed and an estimated payback for this project is 11 years. It is estimated that
605,460 kilowatts of electricity could be generated from the solar panels per year. The
Ontario Power Authority, on March 12, 2009, issued a new set of Feed in Tariffs FIT)
that would allow electricity generated by the CMF to be sold into the electrical grid and
compensated at a rate of $0.635 per kilowatt. This will result in ongoing revenue or cost
avoidance for the CMF with respect to electricity purchases. The environmental benefits
include reduction of greenhouse gases and intensification of urban land use.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Assuming a 1/3 cost sharing model between orders of government, it is estimated that the City
of Kitchener could complete $52 million worth of additional infrastructure projects in 2009 and
2010. The current prioritized list contains $60.9 million worth of projects, resulting in the
creation of over 500 new local jobs. If the City is in fact required to contribute 1/3 of the total
cost (approximately $17 million) staff would bring forward funding options for Council's
consideration.
7
COMMUNICATIONS:
Council's resolution and project details will be shared with area MP's and MPP's once adopted.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed capital projects will stimulate the local economy through the creation of over 500
new jobs while considerably improving the condition of the City's infrastructure resulting in long-
term benefits for the community.
Dan Chapman, MPA, CA
General Manager of Financial Services and Treasurer
Roger LeBrun, CMA
Manager of Financial Planning
Saleh Saleh, CPA, CGA
Senior Financial Analyst
8
J APPENDIX 1 _
~ ~
- pity of Kitchener
pity Hall, ADO King fit. Invest
Develop~nerrt& ~.~. Box ~ 118
~'ec~r~~~a~Serv~ces ~ Kitchener, ~N NAG 4C7
Date. March 17, ~g~8
T~: Dan Dhapman, general Manager Finances Services
~rom~ grant Murphy P.Eng.
Director Engineering services
Revised By: dreg McTaggart
Manager, Infrastructure Asset Planning
cc: Jeff llvlllmer, interim general Manager, Development and Technical services
dreg McTaggart, Manager Infrastructure Asset Planning
ub~ect: Infrastructure Renewal Funding.
In order to address questions raised by council regarding infrastructure renewal programming,
the Engineering Services Division have attempted to review infrastructure renewal requirements
from two perspectives, the current backlog of incomplete ar underfunded projects and the
projected deficit between the infrastructure needs and lank of sustainable funding to achieve the
targets. The second cor~ponent of this repor# is to identify capital pragrarrr ar projects that
could be advanced or added to the current ~~Q9 end ~D~ 4 capital infrastructure program.
Infras~ru~~ure Need
Uve considered the backlog of infrastructure work associated with replacing roads, sewers,
water, sidewalks and bridges over the past 5 years. If we were to play patch-up this would
amount to about ~ OEM worth of work. IJVe then looked ahead for the nest ~5 years we
estimated the amount of new funding that would be required ~abave v~rhat the ~it~ gill likely be
able to financially sustain} and this amounts to 71M. The areas of concern are identified in
Table #1 and our assumptions are stated below.
Table ~~ - overall .Infrastructure Renewal Requirements ~a~dditional fundin
Infrastructure category 5 Year Infrastructure ~5 Year Projected
~acklo Infrastructure Deficit
Stormwater Mara ement SIM & Drains a ~2.~M $~ ~4M
UvatewaterlUVater Accelerated Infrastructure 7~M ~ ~92M
Renewal Pro ram Al RP ~
Road Resurfacin and Road Renewal 1~ 8{~
Sidewalk Re lacement a~bM ~M
Trenchless Surer Rehabilitation - 1 ~9M
Trenchless IJVater Rehabilitation ~ GSM
Taal Estirr~ate = ~ D~I~I 97~ M
I~~~e~
~~ ~ and drainage ~etiv~t~es are currently being underfunded ~~ a ~ninit~~rn of ~~4~5 anuai~y since
the inception of the V~~i ~'o~ic~ in ~OO~.
~~ .~~,~`s target of 8,67k~ annua~i verses the actual amount accomplished in the first 5 years o~ f the
program. ~n the next 2~ years, tie d i f f 'ere~e betu~ee~ ~, ~7k and 5.3~Cn~ ar~r~ua~~~ at rite o f ,4SI ~e~
~ adjusted for iflatio~ at ~,~°l~ over this period.
~~ load resurfacing includes u~orl~ related to replacing the top layer of asphalt ar~d there is approi~nate~
28 lane iCilon~etres in the last 5 dears,, u~ith ~4S ~ ~hort~ fa~~ in the next 2~ nears, based ors eurret~t rates of
f urtdig. ~~~ s~crface recostr~ctior~ ir~c~udes replacing asphalt, curb, getter artd sidea~ks aiortg a street,
~} ~ideaI replacer~et programs is intended to address trip and fa~1 hazards that pose a potential liability
to the pity, There are currently estimated to be over ~2,~00 or~tstanding defects in the system and at the
c~crrent rate of frtd~~tg ~~~ take over D dears to cop~ete~ for a total of $~1.
~ Trertchless rehabilitation of seers and crater in order to extend the ~~fe of tie i~astr~ccture over the
r~et ~5 years is approxirnatel y 10~rns annually for a total o f a p proi~ate~ ~~Om.
pue to the time constraints within which we have had #o respond, these requirements are
estimates at~d will undoubtedly change as we have more time to review the asset infrastruc#ure
needs and more information becomes available,
pecifio Infrastructure Pro~ram_~pportunitie for ~~Q9 and ~Q1o
The key funding opportunities for additional infrastructure programing to be completed in the
~001~0~ 0 tir~eframe, exist `rn stormwater management, drainage, roads and sidewalks and are
summarized in Table #~. These opportunities represent the must doable projects, given the tight
frames to execute the work and hire necessary resources to complete it in the ~~091~~~ ~
timeframe, This additional work totals approximately ~,M in ~o~9i~~ 0 and projects are
listed in detail later in the report,
Table 2 ~ summary of Infrastructure Program opportunities for X00
-- ,
Infrastructure category _ Funding
Re uirerr~ent
tormwater Mana ement UUM 8~ praina e ~ ~ ~ o,oDO,~~~
Uvastewater~vllater Accelerated Infrastructure Renewal
Pro ram AIRP ~~~~~~ ~ ~55,~~~
Road Resurfacin and Road Renewal ~ ~ 9,~0~,3g5
Kin Street ~reetsca e & Master Plan ~ ~ ~,~~4,OOo
sidewalk Re lacement ~ ~ ,00,000
Trenchless fewer Rehabilitation ~ ~ $1,50,000
Trenchles 1Jllater Rehabilitation ~ ~ 1,25o,DOo
Total Estimate for 2001~0~ 0 = ~~,590,395
This will result in more city infrastructure being rerr~ediated in shorter time frame than what
existing budgets for these programs currently allow for, and directly contribute tv the reduction
of the pity's existing "infrastructure deficit",
APPENDII~ ~
~NLUSI~N:
Utilising the Federation of Canadian I~Ilunicipalitiec ~FM} infrastructure calculator, an
approximation of the number of new jobs has been estimated. If the 1 ~~M backlog of
infrastructure projects were fully funded there could b an additional 1 ~~0 jabs created. if the
g7~ of the projected infrastructure deficit needs were fully funded then there could be an
addi#ianal ~Og~ new jabs created. For a total of '! 1t1~0 new jabs created due to an influx of
1,~8 in infrastructure renewal funding.
In the ~~~91~~~~ timeframe, with approximately ~~,IIII in infras#ructure funding from the
federal and provincial governments, this would generate about ~a~ new jobs in and around the
pity of ~Citchener. This grant funding will allav~r the city to accelerate its infrastructure
rehabilitation pragrarrt, resulting in additional infrastructure rernediatian work being
accomplished in a charter time frame than originally planned, without additional costs being
incurred by the city.
Appendix - Additianl ~pital Infrastructure Programming in ~~Q1~~ a
Table A -Additional Stormwater Mara ement a ital Pro'ecte far 2g~1201 ~
Infrastructure Location Activity Est
date ~ Estimate
1atercaurce151M Victoria Lake Lake Remediation 7,~81,~~0
and Retrofit
wl1~ Pond Lackner Blvd by feller Dr~ Pond Retrofit and ~~ O,~~Q
Remediation
UI~M Pand Boundbraak fires. and Fdenbridge PI. Pond Retrofit and ~,~~~
Remediation
M Pond Sutherland Vllalk Pond Retrofit and ~,~~
Remediation
SwM Pand Kilkerran fires. Pond Retrofit and 34,~~
Remediation
M Pond Huron Business Park -Pond 3 Pond Retrofit and ~14,~~
Remediation
w~l Pand Huron Business Park ~ McBrine PI. Pend Retrofit ar~d ~,~0
Remediatian
VII Pond Huron Business Park 'Pand #~ Pand Retrofit 94,~0~
wl~ Pond Su ar a le And Huddle Pond Retrafkt ~ ~ fi,~~~
wl~ Pand Penlo a Dr Pand Retroft ~ 57,000
SVIIM Wand Il~estforet Tr Pond Retrofit ~~ O,DOQ
U1~l~ Pand Resurrection Dr Pond Retrofit 1 ~,~00
wM Pand ll~anchecter~Forfar Pond Retrofit ~,~~~
SWIM Pond ~ timists' Pand Pond Retrofit ~94,0~~
Storm Sewer Baxter Place Storm Sewer cutlet tarm fewer 40,000
Re lacernent
Storm Sewer ~ Lirnerick Dr., Stirling Ave., Craig Dr., Drainage $42,000
~raina a Fairway Rd,, Sunrise Cdr., rear yard
~ Improvements&
Im ravements flood relief at multi le locations Storm Flooding Relief
~^~ ~ ~'~~4~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~fVVVfV~V
APPENDIX I
Tabie B -J~Idditional AIRP capital ~roleot for X009
In~rastr~cture
date o Location Activity host
Estimate
evuerJater Bismarck street AIRP 555,OOo
AIRS dub-total for ~0~ ~~ 55~~D~
Table -Additional F~II Surface Reconstruction apitai Proiect for2o0~12010
Infratru~t~re Location Activity vst
date o Estimate
Roads Otto t Fu~~ surface ~~,~Oo
Reconstruction
Roads Heiman t ~H~g~land to Mill} ~ul~ surface ~~~,~~~
l~ecor~str~,~tion
Roads Hi~h~and Rd ~tiriing to Hoffman} Fufi surface ~ ~g~,o~0
Reconstruction
Roads ~Vottingharn Rd ~ttaa to Lyndf~urt} Fu~~ surface ~ 5~,0~0
Reconstruction
Roads parson Ave Natchez to confederation} Fu~~ Surface ~ ~5;00~
Reconstruction
Roads Reconstruction dub-total for X009 ~ ~,~~,0~~
Tale D -Additional Re-surfacing capital Project for 2~~~I~o~ ~ priority order
TI~EET
LIMITS CAST
EsTIIVIATE
KEVG~ PL VIIABANAKI DR-GUL-DE-SAG 53,5GD
E~RD AVE R~SBY DR-HIDKB~N DR ~~~,~~fi
SHERBGURNE AVE MDKEN~lE AVE-END $39,535
AGNE T UVALTER T-ICING ST UI~ $9,~Sfi
GIRGA DR VIJELLINGTN T N~END $58,595
DAYMAN ART 1NET~IV~GD DR-CUL-DE-SAD $51,313
UvEIDHEL T ~ BELT~N DR-I'CCARN T ~ 38,~p3
FAIRFIELD AVE FLGYD T-RIDGEVIJaGD AVE $34,084
T LEGER ST VITGRIA ST N-BREI~"HAUPT ST $59,511
DHANDARIA PL GGGDRIH DR-END 74,5
FAIRFIELD AVE MARGARET AV£-1OGDIIVARD AVE 5,303
FOREST HILL DR . BIRCHLIFF AVE-BUTT~NV~IOGD ~R X51,687
FRET H I LL DR B~JTT~NI~~D DR-DEERPARK CREB X8,465
H~LB~RN DR LAMBERT PL-~ARNABY ORES X19,851
H~LB~RN DR ~VENTRY DR-MELVERN ART ~ 3~,96~
MAYII~O~D RD GERARD AVE-VII~~DHAVEN RD X85,711
PELT2 AVE M~GRE AVE-DEI~CAY T X64,588
SUMMIT AVE TH~RNRIDGE ORES-LARKSPDR ORES $54,83
EDEN AVE VI~OOD T-MT HOPE T $3,911
ELM RIDGE DR HILLBR~GKGRES-QUEENS BLVD X91,3$1
FAIRFIEI.D AVE RIDGEl1vD~D AVE-ST LEER T $1,454
FOREST HILL DR SUMMIT AVE-BIRCHLIFF AIIE $9,964
FRET HILL DR I~ARREN RD-SPRINGBANIC RE $9,298
~PP~NDIX 1
GENEVA CRES SELKIRK DR-SELKIRK pR ~~~1,4fi5
KARN ST BRYBEKCRES-BEL~NTAVE $4~,8~~
LANG ORES SPRINGDALE pR-HORIZON CRT ~ 8~,44~
LYNDHURST DR NOTTINGHAM AVE-DEERFIELD AVE ~~,5~
OVERLEA DR RALGREEN CRES-OVERLEA CRT X17,978
SELKIRK CRT SELKIRK DR~CUL~DE-SAC ~ 43,~~4~
SUMMIT AVE LARKSPUR CRES-FOREST HILL DR 3~,98D
SUMMIT AVE LARKSPUR CRES-THORNRIDGE CRES 81,81
ADAM ST MARGARET AVE~EIVD 3~~36
BYRON AVE MAYVIf~OD RD IIVOODHAVEN RD 13~,~8~
FOREST HILL DR GRAYSTONE AVE~SPRINGBANK ORES X40,451
FOREST HILL DR SPRINGBANK CRES-U~ESTMOUNT RD E X85,950
FOREST HILL DR pEERPARK CRES-DEERPARK CRES X98,505
GOODRICH DR VIIILSON AVE-CHANDARIA PL X18,50
GREENFIELDAVE 11VOODHAVEN RD-MUNROE ST X29,589
GREENFIELDAVE EIGHTH AVE~NINTHAVE X88,331
HILLSBOROUGH CRES PINEDALE DR-PINEDALE DR X92,848
HOLBORN DR CARNABY CRES-COVENTRY pR X15,131
OVERLEA DR KELLY DR~RALGREEN CRES X21,300
SHELpON AVE N EDMUND RD-VIfEBER ST E 1,48
SOU~'HI~OOR DR YAGER AVE~YAGER AVE X90,840
CROSBY pR CHARLOTTE PL-CHARLOTTE CRES X4,534
EDlI1IIN ST ELISABETH ST-UNION ST X111,814
ELM RIDGE DR SILVER ASPEN ORES-HICKORY HEIGHTS CRE $18,548
FOREST HILL DR SPRINGBANK CRES-GRAYSTONE AVE 15 848
FOREST HILL DR UPLANDS DR-SUMMIT AVE fi0,302
GREENFIELD AVE CARROL ST-OODHAVEN RD $34,084
HARTINGOD AVE V1fATERLGO BOUNDARY-ELLIS AVE 2D,9~4
LYLE PL HICKSGN DRyCUL-DE-SAC X88181
LYN~HURST DR ARCHER PL-NOTTINGHAM AVE $53,550
NATCHE~ RD MATTHEIJ~ ST-CARSON DR X98,133
NORFOLK CRES ST GLAIR AVE-ST GLAIR AVE X85,895
SHELDON AVE N ROSEDALEAVE-EDMUND RD $28,840
SUMMIT AVE ~ FISCHER HALLMAN RD-LARKSPUR ORES X33,334
1JIJILFRED AVE KENNETH AVE-ROSS AVE ~~,~~~
AGNES ST PARK ST-DOMINION ST ~ . 39,81
BELLEVIEUV AVE KENIIVOOD DR-CHELSEA RD X48,891
BELLEVIEVIf AVE SUFFOL~C AVE-KENl00D DR ~ 4,949
CHANDLER DR ELMSDALE DR'LEACREST CRT X49 898
CROSBY DR SEORD AVE-OTTAl1VA ST N X23,222
CROSBY DR LINTON PL-SECORD AVE 53,18
CROSBY DR CHARLOTTE CRES-LINTON PL X15,480
ED1IN ST FAIRFIELpRVE-LEONARD ST X15}854
ELM RIDGE DR HICKORY HEIGHTS ORES-HILLBROOK CRES 1~~0fi3
HARBER AVE BYRON AVE-SI EBERT AVE 81 X51
INADALE.CRT IESTINOOD DR~CUL~DE-SAC ~ $41,942
KARN ST LAI~URENCE AVE~BRYBECK ORES $11531
APP~NDI~ 1
KENNETH AVE ~ INILFREDAUE-TRAFALGAR AVE 38,~~3
LANG RE BRIDGEPORT RD-PRlNGDALE DR ~~~,388
MAPLE AVE UNIDN T-DUL-DE-BAS $80,92
ALICE AVE ViTRIA T -KARN T 95,5~D
~LGVER PL END-FERGU AVE 23F~g
YPRU DR RIPPLEVIIGGD GREB-RUET PL 5,171
FAIRFIELDAVE T LEGER T-B~EHMERT X31,829
HARBER AVE BRGADMDGR AVE-BYRGN AVE X79,778
HEARTH REB ~ RAYLENE DR~HAHN PL 41,94
HEIMAN BT HUGD ARE-HIGHLAND RD E 73,03
MARGARET AVE UNION TyVIfATERLG~ BG~JNDARY X38,412
PALM E R AVE H U RAT AVE-END 1 ~, 004
PALMER AVE END-~GURTLAND AVE E 58,9
RENNIE DR KENNETH AVE-ANTHGNY PL ~ 11,784
E~GND AVE GNNAUGHT T-KINGVIIAY DR X149,818
HERBGURNE AVE EAST AVE-MKENZiE AVE 40,74
TRACER AVE ~ FAIRVIfAY RD N-UI~INDGM RD ~ $80,73
UPLANDS DR DLGVERDALE REB-BIRHCLIFF AVE X9,214
ARCHER PL LYNDHURT DR-DRAY ARE X31,528
BRGADLEAF PL MEADGI~V RE-UL-DE-A~ $54,683
CHANDLER DR B~NFIELD PL-ELMDALE DR X44,113
ELM RIDGE DR HILLBROGKRE-HILLBR~QKRE $33,709
ERIE AVE ~ VANIER DR-MABEY AVE $35,331
FARRIER DR FARRIER PL-~JPPER CANADA DR X88,392
FERNVIfG~D PL VI~ETI~UDDD DR-CUL-DE-SAC $43,447
FGRET HILL DR FIBCHER HALLMAN RD-UPLANDB DR $35,207
HALLIVI~ELL DR ~V1#EN AVE~CHRITINE CREW $32,585
HEARTH CREW HEARTH DREB-RAYLENE DR 2~,2gg
HEiMAN T CUL-DE-FAQ-HI~GC RE $111,597
H~LB~RN DR ARNABY CREW-MAYFAIR CRT 33,7p~
KENIJUOCD DR LYNDHURT DR~BELLEVIE AVE X48,591
KIN~IE AVE TRACER AVE-GRULKE T X43,073
LARKBPUR RE UMMITAVE-SUMMIT AVE $125,098
LIMERICK DR ~ KING T.E-EDGEHILL DR X14,274
MAYGCD RD BYRDN AVE-GERARD AVE 3071 ~
PALMER AVE KENNEDY AVE-HURT AVE $27}633
HERIIVOGD AVE SUFFOLK AVE-KRUG ST 77,~p5
SOUTH DR GLEN RD-QUEENS BLVD 8p,527
SOUTHMOOR DR STIRLING AVE -PAGER AVE X34,833
T LEGER T BREITHAUPT T-I~IIELLINTQ~I T N 44,~~~
SYCAMORE PL MEADOW ORES-UL-DE-A X36,997
VALLEYVIEVII RD VIfINDALE RE-~UL~DE-SAC 57,3p5
ADMIRAL RD FARNHAM AVE^MARLB~R~UGH AVE $143 325
BORDEN PKY MEIN~INGER AVE-PATTAND~N AVE $29,631
BORDEN PKY PATTANDON AVE-MILL ST 37,871
BRYBE~KRE INESTM~UNTRDI~U-KARN T 275,29
BURLINGTON DR TANGLE~IVOOD AVE-AVON RD 58,428
AFFENDII~ 1
HARLDTTE ORES CROSBY DR-CROSBY DR $124,349
ELI RlDOE DR IL11ER ASPEN ORES-SlL11ER ASPEi~I ORES ~,~~~
FRET HILL DR DEERPARK ORES-vI~ARREN RD X31,628
OERARD Al1E I~AYWOOD RD-vIfOODHAVEN RD 10,046.
REENFIELD AVE NINTH AVE~CARRL ST 29,fi31
HALLIVI~ELL DR D1NEN AVE-HICKSOI~ DR X42,323
LI{~ERICK ~R EaEHILL DR-HELEN AVE 32,2
_ Roads Resurf~airr u~^tata~ far
~~~~~~010 =
l,Ol~~9~
Table E-Additional Enhancements To The l~in~ street tree~ca~e Project, 20~120~0
Infrastructure
Cate v location Activity Cost
Estimate
Roads ~ Ki n~ street Enhancern~nt~ t~ the $1, 534, ~~~
#ree#cape existing King greet
Master Plan for Full
surface Reconstruction $~
treetsca e U rades
I~i~ trot u~-tatsl for ~00~~20~ ~ ~ ~~534,~~0
Table F -Additional idevuslk Replacement capital Pra~ec# fvr20D9~2D~D
Infrastructure Location Activity Cyst
Category ~ ~stirnate
248
sidewalk grid areas ~~ to 85, ~ ~~ to 1D, ~ ~ to sidewalk Replacement ~ ,250,OOD
~ - replacer~nt of 2004 sidewalk
defects in 2009
sidewalk grid areas 1 X4,178 to 182,1 ~, 22~ to idewall~ Repiacement X1,254,000
~~, 285 to 258, ~~~ to ~~~ -
replacement of 244 sidewalk defects in
2049
sidewalk Re ~a~ement dub-totai for ~~~91~~1 ~ = ~~,0~,~~~
Table ~ -Additional Trenchless Water and fewer Rehabalitat~on Capital Pra~ect for 204~l241 ~
Infrastructure
Categary ~,oction Activity Cost
Estimate
2D~8
fewer Zone 1-Bounded By Fischer-Hallman RdlHighland Trenchless 1 254 000
t ~
Rd~Conestoga Plcyf~tta~a tJMill #}. 5.1 km of Rehabilitation
_
sanitary sewer vain S~ services structural re-lining.
LQCations include:
Re~c Dr. -Queen's Blvd to glen Rd.
Barclay Ave -Queen's Blvd to glen Rd.
Bmscarkh Rd ~ Barclay to Pleasant
Brant fires ~ All
Olen Rd Pleasant Ave to p~dlna Rd.
Pleasant Ave. - queen"s Blvd to 1st IH south Df
Olen Rd.
~~~~11~~
Narfalk fires. -All
Highland Rd.E. - ueeri's Elvd to Stirling Ave.
Highland Rd.E - Heiman to Hoffman
St. Ciarir -All
Larne ~r -Ali .
Seneca fir. -All
Lorne Ave. Stirling Ave. to ottscheer fit.
Slueridge - C~ueen"s Blvd to Lakeside Dr.
Perth -South Dr. to Pleasant Ave.
Stirling Ave. - IUlauserave. to Hameratson Blvd.
Village fires. -Alf
leer Park fires, All
C rus Ave. -All
Vllater Zone ~ - Bounded lay Fischer-Hallrr~an I~dlHighland Trench~ess ~ ~~~ ~~~
Rd~Cor~estvga Pkwyl~ttawa Stlli~ial Std. ~.krn of Rehahilitati~n
water main structural re-lining.
Locations include:
Highland - Stirling tv Haffrnan
~reenE~rook - vVarren to 13irchcliff
Silvers ring Ores -All
Binscarth Rd. -All
Villa a fires -All
fewer V#~ater Trenohfes R~h~b. uh~total for ~~,~D~,~O~
OO~~~o~o =
APPENDIX ~
KPI~
KITCHENER
PUBLIC
LIBRARY
Report T~: Mayor Zehr and Members of Council
Date of Nfeetin: March ~, ~~~
submitted By: Kitchener Public Library Board
Prepared B: Bonin Lewis, E~, Kitchener Public Library
Ward(s) Involved: All
Date ~f Report: March ~ ~, ~~~9
ub~ect: INFRATRUTURE FUND1lV 1=~R CENTRAL LIBRARY PROJECT
RED~M~IEND~TI~hf:
That the City of Kitchener"s request for infrastructure funding available through the federal
government's economic stimulus plan include up to 4,OOD for the Central Library project.
BAC~CRUND:
In September ~~~ the Kitchener Public Library Board presented Council with a revised plan for
renovating and expanding the h~ain Library at a total estimated cast of ~~9,8~~,~~~. In FIN-~S-
~7 City and Library staff identified and evaluated eleven patential funding options fvr the
Central Library project, A companion report from the KPL Board dated September 17, ~0~~
outlined the Board's recommended funding strategy. At its meeting held on Monday, October ~,
~~~8 City Council approved, a strategy to fund the central library project
Detailed design far the central library project will get underway in ~~0~. Construction will tr# in
~Q~ ~. Completion of phase 1 ~par~ing} is expected by December 2~~ ~ and phase ~ library
building} by ~~~
RE PART:
The central library funding strategy approved by Council includes a preliminary capital budget of
~,8'1~,0~0 funded from City of Kitchener sources including the Economic Development
Investment Fund, development charges, and the capital forecast, as well as ~,a04,a~~ to be
raised by the Kitchener Public Library Board Pram a capital fundraising campaign,
the funding strategy included a proposal to advance the central library operating budget
increase to offset the cast of phasing construction. This would contribute $~ ,~34,~D~ to the
APPENDIX ~
$,81 ~,~a0 to be funded ~y the pity. As this approach would result in apre-cammitr~ent to the
levy increase, auncil directed staff to identify passible alterna#ives. Dne such alternative is to
use infrastructure funds from the federal government's economic stimulus package.
The funding s#rategy also includes 4,OaD,~~~ to be raised fram a capital fundraising campaign.
This target was established on the basis of a fundraising feasibility study undertaken in 2~~
during the Cen#re Block project. The study acknawledged that fundraising would be challenging
a KPL lacks a significant history of ma~ar capital campaigns. Given this limitation and the
recent downturn in the econorny, this report proposes using federal government infrastructure
funds as an alternative to raising funds ar as a means of reducing the fundraising #rget. -This
approac#~ would reduce or eliminate the element of risk or uncertainty related to the ultimate
attainment of the campaign goal.
F~~~~~~L ~l~~L~~aT~ru:
Total estimated costs for the central library project are $~9,8~~,~00, as approved by council in
October ~00~. The original funding strategy included ~1,~4,~~a from advancing the operating
budget increase and 4,aa~,~a0 fram fundraising. This report proposes using federal
government infrastructure funding as an alternative to these two funding sources. This would
result in the following funding strategy:
Funding sources
Ecanam~c Develo ment investment Fund ~,~~~,~~~
Deferral of Other KPL a ital Pro'ect 1, ~ ~0,~0~
Devlo meet char es ~~8,~p~
Federal Oavernment Infrastructure Funds ~,~34,~00
Total Fundin 39,8 ~,00~
operating Budget
Advancing the operating budget increase would result in an approximate ~.9°l~ increase to the
Oity's ~~~ D levy. This could be avoided if infrastructure funding was used as an alternative.
OI~l~UNI~ATI~~V:
~{,q
~~NLUI~N:
Aviablefunding strategy is critical tothe success of the central library project. Acquiring
infrastructure funding would reduce the risks related to fundraising and relieve same pressure
fram the City's ~~1D budget. Far these reasons the Kitchener Public Library Board
recommends that Council include the central library project in its request far federal governr~nt
infrastructure funding
Sonia Lewis
thief E~cecutive officer, Kitchener Public Library
2
~~~~IY~~
1~1 Queen street North
~itc~zener, ~~nta~io ~~~ G~'?
Tell 5~9 5756~D ~ax~ X19 578~9~3~
~~ww, c en tre~~t~ are, co ~n
~~rch ~ ~, 209
Tai pity oftchener
Frain; Centre ~n The Square
apitai Froj eats for provincial Fur~di~g
~elcw is a list cf pry j acts t~~t aauld genet the ap~~~ion ~f The e~#re ~~ The Square
taut were unfunded during budget px~paration l'or 209:
~A bite ~pg~rades 7S,S2
~'A.C ~iien t Upgrades 23,1 a0
CIT~ Amphitheatre $ 52,20 -
Cnat ~ec~ upgrade $ 47,17
Environment ~'pgrades ~ 28,500
~lacring, Theatre ~a~Ohies 277,OOO .
Tea, eati~~, iovse and fired ~ 290000
~f#iic~ righting etro~it 74,ODo
audio Retrofit 3~4,0~0
Descriptions afprcjects are as follows; ~ -
A Meal Site Irr~prover~ents ~ I~e~r access road rt~rming parallel ~ queen t with
con~olied access; paratlel paxldng for 12 vehicles, to providevisitor and staff pa~i~ing for
Art gallery and also drop o~`f area as veil. dscap,g changes will also be dart of~the
pro ject. ~ ~ ~ .
~"~ Ellen t External i ~sta~ a r~e~v 4 sided, gated garbage holding pen for Art
ailery adjacent to loading dock off Eller~i t to fold ~ garbage bins ,etc. This is
currently an eyesore and needs to beaddressed. -
CYT An~phithea~e - Ad~aent to entice on south side of huildir~g, on green space, to .
create a~- outdoor perfarir~g arts space utilin art warlC and existing greener; add
natural products that enhance and blend with IT site; seating far 204 to 300 peop~e;~
plug and play space
Li
4
1
~~~~~~i~
CST Coat Check Upgrade ~ remove n~a~or portion of existing coat check and tnod~~y the
lobby with a new look; space will accomn~adate merchandise and gild s~~es;possible
r~llfaad space,
~ACr ~nvironrntal upgrades ~ upgrade and new madificat~on tv l~eptroic systems
and waterldrainae systems far Art Gallery and areas tha# are Curren#~~ services y
envirQnn~en# systems,
Theatre far Thea#re Lobbies - ren~o~er old carpets and install new tiles in all lobby areas.
Theatre Seating ~ loose ar~d fired - remove l 1~ year v1d seating and install new,
CATS Gffice ~xghting Retrofit -- re~no~e T 1 ~ lig~i-ta~g and ins#a11 T8 and T5 energy
efficient lighting to all once areas of bur~din.g~
~tu~~a ennva~an ~ra~~t
Centre ~ The Square is seeking funding to renovate the Stadia space in our building, ~urrentl~r
the Studio is used ~~ a rehearsal venue far the Ifitchener~warlao yrnphony end other
orgauixations that use the theah~e, ~enovatians to the Stadia will allow Centre ~ The Square #o
utilize the space as a performance venue. The Stadia is approxirr~ately 4,0~~ square feet ol~prime
space that is not beir-g used to its full potential, once renovated the audio would offer a second
perforrnanca space to compliment the main theatre far srxaaller cornrnunity groups, corporate
rentalS~ educational seminars, barque#sl~ve~din~s, and discussianltown hall forums The Studio
would became a multi-purpose space used far performances, receptions, rehearsals and private
functions. These renovations would also allow us to exarr~ine the possibility ofniv~ving our Great
Canadian l~la~r series to a Stadia as the main 2,047 seat theatre is tea large for these artistically
riskier and less carnrnercially viable p~ductions, ~ addition the Studio renova#ions will allow
local theatre gxoup's access to Centre ~n The Square to present their perfoances~ Too open
locat theatm gaups era economically unable to utili the main theatre. Therefore, by renovating
the gtudio, Centre In The Square can offer afirst-class performance space and support our
coinn~unity partners. ~ are committed to partnering with other arts organitions to offer a
diversity of programming and to strengthen and build arts and cults in our community,
As a leader in the co~nrnunity, The Cen~e is eager to embark on new ver~tuxe that will bring new
e~periitces to performers, crew, Centre staff, as well as our patrons. By proceeding with these
renovations Cen~e In The Square can attrac# new performance partners. one such opportunity is
currently being discussed. The 'f Space, a local ethnic theatre company and Cent In The
Square exploring the passibili~es ofestablishing the Canadian Centre i~ar ~ntercultur~.l
p~rforrnances ~~~'}.This project would require the alterations that we are proposing for the
Stadia as it currently does not meet the heeds as a performance space,
Yrnmedlate Ugar~-dest_ Tuta1 projected Cosh
mfi~bish~re+fiaish fiaorslpaint etc X27,504
replace old drapeslsa~ goods $55,44
~f ~~~111
upgrade power distribution
additional i, fixtures - oreate permanent
hawse hang and audience L, hang
portable d~uni~g~cabl~g etc
audit ~pkrslrna~titars - mieslsplitter etc
~1ew audio board
use current portable L~ console
S chai~a motors
18U feet of trussing
upgrade lobby area
Cabarct Tables ~~~ $~OU}
Portable stage ~ ~ ~' ~ ~a'}
~nstallatian
contingency
Administration
TOTAL
$~ 5,40
$5,aa0
i7,~~
1,44
~~~,75~
$~
$~11,~00
1~,'~5~
$35,70
~11,4i~0
$10,040
$x,040
$3t0~
$14,000
~3b3 775
The follavring table illustrates the revenue potential for the stadia as a performance space.
brass ~oteatlaZ (enlel Capacity Ticket Price Cross
Ticket Sales files CRF and 11~ CST} ~~~ 6,~~ ,?4~~Sa
het Gross ~ b,"~0~,50
~D ~T
Artist Fees
Crew Casts
Box ~f~ice ~,~°lo for maybe in the future
~ t~~t~}
F~k~lRecptianlecur~ty
SCCAN ~%}
Advortisin
NiiselCatering
RENT
T,~-I~ E~l'~N~
PROFIT
1,~~D,~4
3~8.d~
$ 5~5~1~4
~~ ~ ~~~
$ ~,a4~~a4
$ f 04.00
125 ~00
5,~~~.~~
$1 ~1~~79
~f Centre In The Square booked ~ perfaa~ces per year that v~rould atherwis~ f~ave used another
venue the revenue generated v~auld be $25, 19,00,
Cen~e ~ The Square is proud tv be unique in affer~t~g programs to enhance the quality Qf lift far
individuals ~ the Region of V~atertao and beyvnd~ The renovations to the Stadia will benefit
these coxr~u~lty programs as smaller ads organir~tions and presenters ofculturally diverse
programming would have a praf$ssionsl caliber perfarrr~ar~ce venue that would allo~r them to
inease the artistic values oftheir performances,
i
i
t
r
4
APPENDI?~ ~
~s d~~cussed earlier, the collaboration be#ween ~en#re In Tie ~ua~e and'The NAT space
{Canadian centre ~`or lntercuitural Per~orrnances} cuid dive aoc to cultural diverge
pra~rai~ at ~enhe In ~`he square that was previously ur~a~vaiaahte dv to the sheer sire cfthe
rain #hea~e diving cui~ural gou~~ ~ ha~ne in high to perform.