HomeMy WebLinkAboutDTS-09-143 - Indentification of Properties of High Heritage Value or Interest - Vic Park HCD
MITI E~
fJevePopment &
Technical Services
REPORT TO: Heritage Kitchener Committee
DATE OF MEETING: October 6, 2009
SUBMITTED BY: Alain Pinard, Interim Director of Planning
PREPARED BY: Michelle Wade, Heritage Planner (519-741-2839)
WARD(S) INVOLVED: Ward # 6
DATE OF REPORT: September 22, 2009
REPORT NO.: DTS-09-143
SUBJECT: IDENTIFICATION OF 31 PROPERTIES WITHIN THE
VICTORIA PARK HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
AS PROPERTIES OF VERY HIGH CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST
RECOMMENDATION:
That the following properties located within the Victoria Park Heritage
District, be identified as a properties of very high cultural heritage value
the purpose of enforcement under the Property Standards By-law:
^ 54 Benton Street (St. Matthew's Lutheran Church);
^ 90 Benton Street (Benton Street Baptist Church);
^ 11 Courtland Avenue East;
^ 22-38 Courtland Avenue East (Nelson's Terrace);
^ 25 Courtland Avenue East;
^ 101 David Street;
^ 107 David Street;
^ 125 David Street;
^ 133 David Street;
^ 71 Heins Avenue;
^ 15-17 Hilda Place;
^ 15 Joseph Street (Bullas Glass Co.);
^ 5 Michael Street (Charles A. Ahrens Shoe Company);
^ 1 Oak Street;
^ 4 Park Street;
^ 8 Park Street;
^ 54 Park Street;
^ 103 Queen Street South;
^ 137 Queen Street South (St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church);
^ 149 Queen Street South;
^ 189 Queen Street South;
Conservation
or interest, for
^ 226 Queen Street South;
^ 251 Queen Street South;
^ 279 Queen Street South;
^ 379 Queen Street South (Buena Vista);
^ 464-466 Queen Street South (Joseph Schneider Haus);
^ 33 Roland Street;
^ 37 Roland Street;
^ 93 Water Street South;
^ 109 Water Street South; and,
^ 113 Water Street South.
BACKGROUND:
On June 23, 2008 City Council passed By-law 2008-124 amending Chapter 665 of the City of
Kitchener Municipal Code (Property Standards). This by-law enables the City to enforce
minimum acceptable standards to identified heritage attributes in vacant designated heritage
property, as necessary to prevent and protect against the deterioration of heritage attributes. A
copy of By-law 2008-124 is attached as Appendix `A' to this report.
By-law 2008-124 defines heritage property as property designated under Part IV of the Ontario
Heritage Act (individually designated); and property designated under Part V of the Ontario
Heritage Act (located within Heritage Conservation Districts) identified as being of very high
cultural heritage value or interest. This includes property referred to as a Group `A' building or
structure in either a heritage conservation district study or plan. Where such property is not
specifically identified in a heritage conservation district study or plan, the by-law makes
provision for such property to be determined by Council upon consideration of the
recommendation of a heritage planner and any comments that may be provided by the property
owner. Property of very high cultural heritage value or interest is defined as property which is a
particularly fine example of an architectural style; exhibiting unique qualities or details that make
it a /andmark,~ of an age that contributes to its heritage value; associated with a significant
known historic event or person; or contributing to the streetscape because it is part of an
unusual sequence, grouping, or situated in a unique location.
At the time of Council's consideration of By-law 2008-124, City staff advised that neither the
Victoria Park Heritage Conservation District Study or Plan specifically included an evaluation
system that identified Group `A' property or property of very high cultural heritage value or
interest. Consequently, Council directed staff to identify properties located within the Victoria
Park Heritage Conservation District which may be of very high cultural heritage value or interest.
REPORT:
City staff have undertaken an evaluation of properties located within the Victoria Park Heritage
Conservation District, and in applying the definition included in By-law 2008-124, identified 32
properties of very high cultural heritage value or interest. Consideration of the significance of
one of these properties (the property municipally addressed 393-411 Queen Street South and
commonly known as the Barra Castle), has already been dealt with by City Council. This report
addresses the significance of the remaining 31 properties identified by staff. A copy of a
completed Cultural Heritage Evaluation Form for each property is attached as Appendix `B' to
this report.
City staff have prepared a written description for each property, which explains how each
property meets the definition of a property of very high cultural heritage value as defined in the
Property Standards By-law. A copy of the written description for each property, including a
photograph, is attached as Appendix `C' to this report.
Implications of identifying the above-noted properties as properties of very high cultural
heritage value or interest
The identification of the above-noted properties as being of very high cultural heritage value or
interest would not impact the existing designation applied to the properties under Part V of the
Ontario Heritage Act. The policies and guidelines of the Victoria Park Heritage Conservation
District Plan would continue to apply. However, the identification of the properties as being of
very high cultural heritage value or interest may have implications and impose specific heritage
property standards obligations.
The Property Standards By-law requires every owner of vacant heritage property (as defined in
By-law 2008-124), to maintain and repair the heritage property as necessary to protect and
prevent deterioration of its heritage attributes. These obligations apply should the property be
deemed to be vacant or become vacant (i.e. is or appears to be vacant, partially vacant or
unoccupied for more than 90 days); and should its heritage attributes not be maintained in a
manner that conserves the character and integrity of such attributes, and therefore the cultural
heritage value of the property.
Should City Council approve the identification of these properties as being of very high cultural
heritage value or interest, an inspection will be undertaken to confirm whether the properties are
vacant and if so, an inspection will be undertaken to confirm whether the condition of the
heritage attributes of the properties are deemed to be in compliance with the Property
Standards By-law. If the heritage attributes are deemed not to be in compliance, then an order
under the Property Standards By-law will be issued. Once an Order is issued, it is subject to the
normal provisions of the Building Code Act, which is the legislation that dictates the
administration and enforcement processes for property standards. As such, the issuing officer
has discretion to provide the appropriate timelines on each Order as may be deemed by the
individual circumstances. Also, the property owner has the avenue of appeal to the Property
Standards Committee if they choose to challenge the Order or its timelines.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Property that does not comply with the Property Standards By-law may be required to be
repaired at the owner's expense, to ensure that the character and integrity of the designated
heritage attributes are maintained. Should an owner choose not to comply with a property
standards Order and exhaust avenues of appeal, the City may choose to have the work done to
meet the Order at the City's expense and seek to recover costs on the tax roll.
COMMUNICATIONS:
In accordance with By-law 2008-124, Council shall consider any comments made by the
property owner before it determines whether the subject property is of very high cultural heritage
value or interest. In this regard, staff provided notice of the City's consideration of the
identification of the properties as being of very high cultural heritage value or interest to the
owner by registered mail on September 17, 2009. Such notice included a copy of By-law 2008-
124 (attached as Appendix `A'); staff report DTS 08-096 which originally accompanied the by-
law; a cultural heritage resource evaluation form completed April 15, 2009 (attached as
Appendix `B'); a written description, which explains how each property meets the definition of a
property of very high cultural heritage value as defined in the Property Standards By-law
(attached as Appendix `C'); the heritage property report on file (attached as Appendix `D'); and a
cover letter explaining the reason for the notice, the implications of Council identifying the
property as being of very high cultural heritage value or interest, and the ways in which the
owner can communicate with staff, Heritage Kitchener and Council (attached as Appendix `E').
As of the date of this report, staff have not received any communication or comment from the
property owners regarding the notice.
CONCLUSION:
The following properties have been evaluated by City staff and are recommended to be
identified as properties of very high cultural heritage value or interest:
^ 54 Benton Street (St. Matthew's Lutheran Church);
^ 90 Benton Street (Benton Street Baptist Church);
^ 11 Courtland Avenue East;
^ 22-38 Courtland Avenue East (Nelson's Terrace);
^ 25 Courtland Avenue East;
^ 101 David Street;
^ 107 David Street;
^ 125 David Street;
^ 133 David Street;
^ 71 Heins Avenue;
^ 15-17 Hilda Place;
^ 15 Joseph Street (Bullas Glass Co.);
^ 5 Michael Street (Charles A. Ahrens Shoe Company);
^ 1 Oak Street;
^ 4 Park Street;
^ 8 Park Street;
^ 54 Park Street;
^ 103 Queen Street South;
^ 137 Queen Street South (St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church);
^ 149 Queen Street South;
^ 189 Queen Street South;
^ 226 Queen Street South;
^ 251 Queen Street South;
^ 279 Queen Street South;
^ 379 Queen Street South (Buena Vista);
^ 464-466 Queen Street South (Joseph Schneider Haus);
^ 33 Roland Street;
^ 37 Roland Street;
^ 93 Water Street South;
^ 109 Water Street South; and,
^ 113 Water Street South.
If Council approves the staff recommendation, these properties will be subject to the heritage
provisions of the City's Property Standards By-law. These provisions impose protective
measures that must be taken by the property owner when the building is vacant, to protect the
heritage attributes of the building.
REVIEWED BY:
Leon Bensason, Interim Manager of Long Range and Policy Planning
ACKNOWLEDGED BY: Jeff ~Ilmer, Interim General Manager
Development and Technical Services Department
List of Attachments:
Appendix `A': By-law 2008-124.
Appendix `B': Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation forms completed on April 15, 2009.
Appendix `C': Written description and photograph of each property.
Appendix `D': Heritage property reports on file.
Appendix `E': Sample letter from City staff to the owner dated September 17, 2009 and sent by
registered mail.
APPENDIX 'A' - BY-LAW 2008-124
BY-LAW NUMBER ,~ fl ~~` 1 ~,
OF THE
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KITCHENER
{Being a by-law to amend Chapter 665 of The Gity of
Kitchener Municipal Code with respect to Property Standards
for Maintenance and Occupancy.)
WHEREAS it is deemed expedient to amend Chapter 665 of The City of
Kitchener Municipal Code as adopted by By-law 88-100;
NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kitchener
enacts as faNows:
1. Article 1 of Chapter 665 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Cade is hereby
amended by adding the following definitions in alphabetical order thereto and
renumbering the sections as required:
"City" shall mean The Corporation of the City of Kitchener unless the context
requires otherwise.
"Council" shall mean the Council of the City.
"heritage attributes" shall include all features of a heritage property that are of
significant cultural heritage value or interest as set out:
(a) in the City of Kitchener's designating by-law or documentation supporting
such by-law for property designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;
(b) in a Minister's order made pursuant to Part IV of-the Ontario Heritage Act,
(c) in the City of Kitchener's designating by-law or Heritage Conservation District
Study or Plan for property designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage
Acf; or
(d) by Council upon consideration of the recommendation of a Heritage Planner
and any comments that may be provided by the property owner, where the
documents referred to in clauses a, b, and c above do not specifically list the
heritage property's features, attributes, or properties of significant cultural
heritage value or interest.
"Heritage Planner" shalt mean the Coordinator, Cultural Heritage Planning or a
Heritage Planner of the City of Kitchener.
2
"heritage property" shall mean any property in the City of Kitchener that
(a) has been designated under section 29 or 34.5 of the Ontario Heritage Act; or
(b) is a property of very high cultural heritage value or interest and is situated in a
heritage conservation district designated under Section 41 of the Ontario
Heritage Act.
"Ontario Heritage AcY' shall mean the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.O.18
as amended."
"property of very high cultural heritage value or interest" shall include:
(a) heritage property referred to as a Group `A' building or structure in either a
heritage conservation district study or plan; and
(b) heritage property located within a heritage conservation district and
determined by Council upon consideration of the recommendation of a
Heritage Planner and any comments that may be provided by the property
owner to be: a particularly fine example of an architectural style, exhibiting
unique qualities or details that make it a landmark, of an age that contributes
to its heritage value, associated with a significant known historic event or
person, or contributing to the streetscape because it is part of an unusual
sequence, grouping, or situated in a unique location.
"vacant heritage property" shall include heritage property that is or appears to be
vacant, partially vacant, or unoccupied for more than ninety (90) days.
2. Article 34 of Chapter 665 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Code is hereby
deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted therefor:
"Section 34.1
All work performed in accordance with the requirements of this Article must
comply with all other relevant by-laws and legislation including the Ontario
Heritage Act. Written consent from Council of the City of Kitchener or its
delegate shall be required before any work impacting the heritage attributes of a
property is performed, even when such work is ordered or required by the
provisions of this by-law.
Section 34.2
Every. owner and occupant of vacant heritage property shall, in addition to
complying with the other requirements of this Chapter, maintain and repair the
3
heritage property as necessary to protect and prevent deterioration of its heritage
attributes.
Section 34.3
In addition to meeting all other requirements of this Chapter, every owner of
vacant heritage property shall ensure that the following measures are taken with
respect to that building or structure:
(a) that in order to minimize the potential of deterioration of heritage attributes,
the building or structure shall be boarded up to prevent the entrance of
unauthorized persons, damage from natural elements, or the infestation of
pests. The boarding shall comply with the following requirements:
i) all boards used in the boarding shall be installed from the exterior and
shall be properly fitted in a watertight manner to fit within the side jambs,
head jamb and the exterior bottom sill of the door or window so that any
exterior trim remains uncovered by the boarding;
ii) all boards shall be at least 12.7mm (0.5 in.) weatherproofed sheet
plywood secured with nails or screws at least 50 millimetres (2 inches) in
length and spaced not mare than 150 millimetres (6 inches) on centre;
iii) all boards shall be painted or otherwise treated so that the colour blends
with the exterior of the building or structure; and
iv) all boards shall be installed and maintained in good repair;
(b) The exterior shall be maintained in order to prevent moisture penetration and
damage from the elements that may have an adverse impact on the heritage
attributes;
(c) appropriate utilities serving the building shall be connected and used to
provide, maintain, and monitor proper heating to facilitate conservation of the
heritage attributes through the prevention of negative effects associated with
freeze-thaw cycles;
(d) appropriate ventilation shall be provided to prevent damage to the heritage
attributes that may be caused by humidity; and
(e) in order to deter vandals and thus protect the building or structure containing
heritage attributes from vandalism or the setting of fires, appropriate security
lighting must be installed and maintained on the exterior of the building or
structure.
4
Section 34.4
Where an owner satisfies an Officer that a vacant heritage property is not
intended to remain vacant for a period exceeding six (6) months, the Officer may,
in his/her sole discretion, exempt an owner from complying with any of the
requirements of this Article or allow the owner to take alternative measures for
the protection of the heritage attributes in place of any of the requirements of this
Article.
Section 34.5
Where an Officer has granted an exemption or has approved alternative
measures for compliance with this Articles such exemption or approval may be
withdrawn at any time upon ten (10) days' notice to the owner if an Officer is of
the opinion that the vacant heritage property is likely to remain vacant for a
longer period than originally anticipated or if, in the sole discretion of an Officer,
the heritage attributes are not being adequately protected by the measures being
taken."
3. Section 665.2.1 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Code is hereby amended by
deleting the words "Article 35" and substituting the words "Article 33" therefor.
4. Section 665.4.3 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Code is hereby amended by
adding the words "Heritage Planner" after the words "Building/Plumbing
Inspector" thereto.
5. Section 665.21.3 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Code is hereby amended by
deleting the words "Article 34 of this Chapter" and substituting the words
"Chapter 694 -Vacant Buildings -Secured" therefor.
6. Section 665.23.5 of The City of Kitchener Municipal Code is hereby amended by
deleting the words "Article 34 of this Chapter" and substituting the words
"Chapter 694 -Vacant Buildings -Secured" therefor.
PASSED at the Council Chambers in the City of Kitchener this ~ ~ ~~ day
of , A.D. 2008.
Mayor
Clerk
APPENDIX `B'
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation forms completed on April 15, 2009
Cite of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~ aluation Form
address: 5# Benton Street Period: Recorder Name: LB/Iti«'
Description: Neo Gotluc
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: Apri115, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value RECORDER E~'~LLL~TION SIIBCOnIA~IITTEE
Style Is this a notable, rare or unique example of a N,:~: ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N,'A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
particular architeohu~al yt~ le or tope?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or early example 1V%A ^ L?nlurown ^ No Q Yea ^ N _A ^ Lhiluxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a particular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N :A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N, ~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
atrUCtlttY because Of the lllel'lt4 Of lta dealgll,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this struchue denxmstrnte a high degree N a ^ L?nlarown ^ No Q Yes ^ N'a ^ Unlilio~~,n ^ No ^ Yes ^
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Ilnish, ci.aftsmanahip N'A ^ Unlurown Q No ^ Yea ^ N :f: ^ Lhilaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail note~yorthy?
Notes -stained glass windows; large circular window abo~-e entr:~urce; gothic arch ~~~indo~a°a; tower; wood doors and h inges; stone work on enhvi ce; light f uture: bro~~~n
brick trefoil motifs: date stone 191q
Contextual Value RECORDER E~- ALL? ~TION SIIBCOnIAIITTEE
Continuity Does this strlichcre contribute to the continuity N ~L ^ Unluio~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q N, ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or character of the street,neighbourhood or area'?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N,'A ^ Unlilio~a°u ^ No ^ Yes Q N'A ^ Uukno~x-n ^ No ^ I"es ^
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it proeide a phi-sicah historicah fimotional N ~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No Q I"es ^ N,~: ^ Unluio~xn ^ No ^ I"es ^
or visual liiil. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a pmtieularly importmrt yiaual landmark ^ R N/ ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes Q N,~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yea ^
within the region, city or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate cJegree ofimportancel Q N
Completeness Does this ahltctnre have other original outbuildings, N` ~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No Q Y ea ^ N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
notable lmxlscaping or external features that
complete the site?
Notts -crest of hill
Integt•ity RECORDER E~ :~LIIATION SIIBCOItIA~IITTEE
Site Does the stnichire occupy` its original site'? N ~ ^ L?nkno~~n ^ No ^ I es Q NiA ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
dote: ifre7ocatec~ r. e. relocated on its
original site, moved fi~o~n another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N~ ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N~ ~ ^ L?nlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
alld de81g11 featUl'eS'~
Is this a notable strluhue due to a~mpathetic N,:a ^ LTnlaiown ^ No Q Yes ^ N ~~ ^ LTnlaiown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
alterations that have taken place Deer time?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N, ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q N, ~L ^ L?nlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Notes -addition 19~ 1 sympathetic -materials, stone, shape, design, stele, deta ils
Histot•ical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this propert~~ or strlicfire have strong associations ~xith ands or Unh~ro~xn ^ No ^ Yes Q
conh~ibute to the underst~mding of a belief, person, actieit~-, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique ~n~ithin the City?
Is the originate previous or elisting use signiLicmrt? N%~: ^ Unhiro~xn ^ No ^ Yes Q
Does this property meet the detmition of a si~rificvrt built herit~ige Uiilarown ^ No ^ I'es Q
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Prop incial Polio- Statement under the Onhirio Pluming pct?
.1 prope~~t~• or sd•ueture raZued for the inzpmtnnt eontribution it
nudres to our understmlding oftlre7zistoi~~ ofapZaee, nn Brent,
or n people?
EVALIIATION SIIBCOItIltIITTEE
Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unh~xnvn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlmo~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 90 Benton Street Period:
Description: Neo Gotluc
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
struchrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes -
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q I'es ^ N,:~ ^ Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 11 Courtland Avenue East Period:
Description: Ontario Gotluc Revival Cottage
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - ~~-ide; ~yindorvs in gable; gingerbread
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q I'es ^ N,:~ ^ Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchu-e NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -flower garden: horse setback
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es CSI
Notes - COlulllll4 lYplaced; 4ldlllg added
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlcchue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific:urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
jn~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnncling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes - once owned by J.bI. Staebler whose residence was Buena ~~ista
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 22-38 Courtland Avenue East Period:
Description: ~'einacular ~%ictoiian Gothic
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Name: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No Q Yes ^ N!A ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yea ^
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Iinish, ci:lftsmanship N a ^ Unluro~yn Q No ^ Yes ^ N _a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes -few eiamplea of row horses within the City; brick det<1i1; co rnice; vouasoirs; stained Mass; stone sills; configuration of p rgjecting bad s: interestin g chinme~
details
Contextual Value RECORDER E~'ALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
Contviuity Does this atruchue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or character of the str~eetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the ahuchire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes Q N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, functional N' a ^ Unlax~ssm ^ No ^ Yea Q N A ^ L?nkuown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 Sm70D11d1llgS~~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No ^ Y es Q N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this stricture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No Q Y es ^ N;:~ ^ L?nlaxnyn ^ No ^ Y"es ^
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -some garages in rear
Integl•ity RECORDER E~-ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
Site Does the strucfire occupy its original site? N :L ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in most of its original materials N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ Yea Q N :a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea ^
and design features'?
Is this a notable structure due to acmpathetic N,:A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^ N, ~-~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
alterations that base taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes Q N~ ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ 1"es ^
Notes -front steps m~e not original
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 25 Courtland A~-enue East Period:
Description: Italianate
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No Q Fes ^ N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ I"es ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
of technical or scientific achieyemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Ilnish, craftsmanship N ? ^ Unlsiown Q No ^ I'es ^ N _a ^ L?nh~iown ^ No ^ Fes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - Jacob B. Shantz; concrete block; hip roof; porch; roofline: brackets, ~yood~york; hood moulds; iron ~york; door with sidelight :md tr:msom
Contextual Value xEC'oxDEx
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N;.L ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee Q
notable landscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -gambrel roof garage ~yith nice garage doors and cinderblock construction
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N:~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N!A ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N; _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchire due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
Notes -paint peeling off concrete block; porch foundation in poor condition;
EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
Address: 101 David Street Period:
Description: Arts and Crafts
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No Q Yes ^ N! A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship N A ^ Unkuown Q No ^ Yes ^ N _a ^ L?nlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - gambrel roof; half timber and stucco sides; fiill width porch with colun ma; axiasoirs; A.C. Quic l~all
Contextual Value RECORDER E~ :~LLL~TION SIIBC'OItIl\IITTEE
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuitc N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N _A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unlilio~~,n ^ No ^ Yes Q N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or landscapurg noteworthy'
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ 1"es Q N,~a ^ L?nkno~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^ N;_a ^ Uularown ^ No ^ 1"es ^
within the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure hate other original outbuildings, N'A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^ N A ^ Lhilaio~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -association with ~- ictoria Park and ice house
Integrity RECORDER EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
Site Does the strucfire occup~~ its original site? N; _a ^ Unh~iown ^ No ^ Yes Q N'A ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Yes ^
Note: ifrelocatec~ i. e. reloeatedon its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'A ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q N;:a ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchire clue to s~`mpathetic N,:~ ^ L?nlaro~~m ^ No Q Yes ^ N,~~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes ^
altel'atlOlla that have taliell place Over tlllle~~
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N,A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yea ^
Notes -new windows
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 107 David Street Period:
Description: Georgian Re«~a1
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes - Cieorgi:m influences; cedar shingle roof
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchue NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ 1"es Q
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage may be original
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlrchue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - Collard
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 125 David Street Period:
Description: Arts and Crafts
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 15, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No Q Yes ^ N!A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
of technical or scientific achieyemenY?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Ilnish, craftsmanship N ? ^ Unkuo~yn Q No ^ Yes ^ N _a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - shingles in gable end; some original windows; gable dormers; atone foundation
Contextual Value xEC'oxDEx
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Yea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N _A ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchire due to sympathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
Notes -sympathetic alterations to porch
EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Yea ^
N: a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yea ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
L?nlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 133 David Street Period:
Description: Gothic Re~ical
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
struchrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes - hea~~ brick voussoirs; circle head rvindow in ft~ont gable; entrance fl:uilced by semi circulanyindows; brackets; original windo~ya; stained glass
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~-aluation Form
address: 71 Heins A~ enue Period: Recorder Name: LB/AI~i'
Description: Alts and Crafts
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj'le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes Q N, ~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yea ^
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship N a ^ Unkuown Q No ^ Yes ^ N _a ^ L?nlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - interesting cobblestone porch, foundation and chimney ;shin gles and st ucco on front an d side ga bles
Contextual Value RECORDER E~ :~LLL~TION SIIBC'OItIl\IITTEE
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuitc N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N _A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unlilio~~,n ^ No Q Yea ^ N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes ^
or landscaping noteworthy'
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^ N,~a ^ L?nkno~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:int aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^ N;_a ^ Uularown ^ No ^ 1"es ^
within the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure hate other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N 9 ^ Lhilaio~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage may be original
Integrity RECORDER EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
Site Does the strucfire occup~~ its original site? N; _a ^ Unh~iown ^ No ^ Yes Q N'A ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Yes ^
Note: ifrelocatec~ i. e. reloeatedon its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q N;:a ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchire clue to s~`mpathetic N,:~ ^ L?nlaro~~m ^ No Q Yes ^ N,~~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes ^
altel'atlOlls that have taliell place Over tlllle~~
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q N,A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
Notes - na« r oof
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlrctrue hate strong associations ~~ith and;'or
contribute to the underat<2nding of a belief, person, acti~,itc, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, precious or es~sting use significant?
Does this property- meet the definition of a si~rificturt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Proeincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
propert7• or sbucture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our understanding of fire history of c~ pk~ee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
L?nlaxnen ^ No Q I"es ^
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?rilaro«,n ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - architechiral st5.1e
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 15-17 Hilda Place Period:
Description: modified Picturesque Gothic
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No Q Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
of technical or scientific achieyemenY?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Iinish, ci:lftsmanship Ni a ^ Unkuo~yn Q No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - brick voussoirs; return eases; shingled gables; centre dormer shingled; original porch design with alterations
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Yea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy'
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N;.L ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOA~Il~~IITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
N A ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N _L ^ Unlaio~in ^ No ^ I'es ^
N'a ^ L?nlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N _A ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Integt•ity
RECORDER
EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Yea ^
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~Y ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
Notes -alterations to porch
N: a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yea ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 15 Joseph Street Period:
Description: Art Deco
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
struchrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fea Q N;~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes -material: yitrolite (~ ellow); painted yellow cement block; green trim; plate glass; art deco aluminum marquee
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<uticrdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N;:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or ahluture have sh~ong associations with and,'or Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the underst~2nding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or elisting uae significant? N%~ ^ Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
Doea this property meet the definition of a si~iific.uit built heritage Uiilaio~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamiing ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnluerl for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 5 1\&chael Street Period:
Description: Industrial ~"eiuacular
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of constriction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
stlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - Berlin ver7iacular industrial building design
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ I"es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I"es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N'a ^ Unluiown ^ No ^ Fey Q N%A ^ L?nh~iown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this stricture contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es CSI
or character of the at~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the stlicfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ 1"es Q
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<uticrdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(intricate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this stlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q I"es ^
notable landscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -living and working in close prolimit~; chimney -replacement brick on top
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N _A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ I"es ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the stlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreroccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable stuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es CSI
Notes - area ~yhere brick require repair and or replacement
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or ahluture have sh~ong associations with and,'or Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the underst~2nding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or elisting uae significant? N%~ ^ Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
Doea this property meet the definition of a si~iific.uit built heritage Uiilaio~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamiing ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnluerl for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~-aluation Form
address: ~ Park Street Period: Recorder Nmne: LB/A~I~i'
Description: Georgian
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architecfiral stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achieyemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes -rugged brick; refire eaves
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N'a ^ Unluiown Q No ^ Fes Q N't: ^ Unluiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrcfire NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrcfire have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or es-tenral feafires that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage appears to be original with same brick as horse
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es CSI
Notes - ne~y casement windows; chimneys altered
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~-aluation Form
address: ~ Park Street Period: Recorder Nmne: LB/A~I~i'
Description: Georgian
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architecfiral stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achieyemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes -rugged brick; refire eaves
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N'a ^ Unluiown Q No ^ Fes Q N't: ^ Unluiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrcfire NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrcfire have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or es-tenral feafires that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage appears to be original with same brick as horse
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es CSI
Notes - ne~y casement windows; chimneys altered
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~-aluation Form
address: 8 Parlc Street Period: Recorder Nmne: LB/A~I~i'
Description: Alts and Crafts
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
struchrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fea Q N;~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fea Q NrA ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes - verc wide eaves: rngged brick; original windo~ya :urd storms; tall headers: interesting windo~y at peak of gable
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N;:~ Q Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 5~ Benton Street Period:
Description: Neo Gotluc
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlarossn ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q I'es ^ N,:~ ^ Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Yes ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea ^
N%a ^ Unlax~~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Yes ^
Notes - at<iined glass ~yindows; large circular ~yindow above entr:uree; gothic arch ~yindows; toyer; wood doors :md hinges; stone~york on entrurce; light t"ilture; brown
brick; trefoil motifs; date stone 1914
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strlichue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the streetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes Q
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fimctional N a ^ Unlaro~xm ^ No Q I"es ^
Ol' ~"15Da1 hllli t0 lts Sm70D11d1llgS~~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No ^ Y es Q
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rtnportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlicture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -crest of hill
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N;A ^ Unlaiovn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N .~ ^ L?nkixnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the atrlicture occupy- its original site? N, ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Vote: ij relocated, i. e. relocated on its
original site, moved fi~o»r cn~other site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea Q
and desi~r feahues?
Is this a notable strlicfire due to s~-mpathetic N%~ ^ Uuh~iowu ^ No CSI Yes ^
alterations that have tiiken place over time?
Condition Is this building in good condition? NiA ^ Unlnxnyn ^ No ^ 1"es Q
Notes-addition 191 sympathetic-materials, stone, shape, design, st5.1e, details
E~ :~LLTATION SLTBCOAIItIITTEE
N _~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yea ^
N .~ ^ L?nlaiosvn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N`.L ^ Unlaiosan ^ No ^ I~es ^
Histor~icul or• Associative i~alue & Signifzcnnce
Does this property rn' strlrefire haae strong associations «ith and, or
contribute to the underat<urding of a belief, person, activitc, organization
or instihrtion that is significant or unique within the Cit5.7
Is the originate previous or esiating use significant?
Does this property meet the definition of a signific.urt built heritage
resource or cnlfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement under the Ontiirio Plamring acf?
1 ~n~opert7~ or steueture rnlued for the impor~tcmt eontr•ibutiof~ it
fnahes to our unders7anding of the hisxor~• of n pk~ee, an c~~c~it,
or n people?
RECORDER
L?nlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es Q
N ~ ^ L?nlaro«ar ^ No ^ I'es Q
LTiilaxn;n ^ No ^ I'es Q
Et"~LII~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
Unlaxnen ^ No ^ I~es ^
Unlaxmn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I~es ^
Notes -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 103 Queeu Street South Period:
Description: Queen Acme
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ I-es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No Q 1'es ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I~es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
N%a ^ Unlax~~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes -red brick; first :urd second floor yer:mdah: columns, shingle railing; stone sills and headers; tun~et; stained glass ~yindows: fomrdation: both fleldstone and
rnaticated block
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strlichue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the str~eetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fiurctional N a ^ Unlaro~xm ^ No Q I"es ^
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 Sm70D11d1llgS'~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No ^ Y es Q
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlicture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -impressive presence on street buret on corner
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N;A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
N .~ ^ L?nkixnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Irztegl•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strnchue occupy its original site? N%a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in moat of its original materials N:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"ea Q
and design features'?
Is this a notable strlichue due to sympathetic N,~~ ^ Unlaio~sn ^ No Q I"es ^
alterations that have taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ L?nkno~~n ^ No ^ I'es CSI
Notes - chinure~ lowereck ne~y window°a: new guard on second Iloor verandah
E~-ALL? ~TION SLTBCOI\IAIITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ ~'es ^
N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ I-ea ^
N' ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I~es ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 137 Queen Street South Period:
Description: Gothic Re~ical
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q N, ~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yea Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
of technical or scientific achieyemenY?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Ilnish, craftsmanship N ? ^ Unkuo~yn Q No ^ Yes ^ N _a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - stained glass ~yindows; steeple; brick work details; 1889 date stone; feature like buttresses
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Yes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unlilio~~,u ^ No ^ Yes Q
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:uticrdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N _A ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Yes ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchire due to sympathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Yes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~Y ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Notes -sympathetic addition on Queen Street South
EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Yea ^
N: a ^ L?nlax~~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Yes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Yea ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or ahluture have sh~ong associations with and,'or Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the underst~2nding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or elisting uae significant? N%~ ^ Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
Doea this property meet the definition of a si~iific.uit built heritage Uiilaio~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamiing ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnluerl for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 1~9 Queeu Street South Period:
Description: Queen Acme
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmee: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechual stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm>se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievenrenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No Q I'es ^ Nr.L ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ I~es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No Q 1'es ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I~es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
N%a ^ Unlaro~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes - ~~-ood ~yindo~ys and stones; decorati~ e chinme~; brackets; stained glass; brick youssoirs; original porch; shingle in gable end with bay ~yindow; crest at top of
gable "190d••
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strechue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the str~eetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrecfire N'A ^ Unkixnyn ^ No Q I"es ^
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fiurctional N a ^ Unlaro~xar ^ No ^ I'ea Q
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 Sm70D11d1llgS'~
Landmariz Is this a particularly inrportmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No Q I'ea ^
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlrcture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N;A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
N .~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Irztegl•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strnchue occupy its original site? N%a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in moat of its original materials N:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"ea Q
and design features'?
Is this a notable strlichrre due to sympathetic N,~~ ^ Unlaio~sn ^ No Q I-es ^
alterations that have taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ L?nkno~~n ^ No ^ I'es CSI
Notes -addition to left of entrance
E~-ALL? ~TION SLTBCOI\IAIITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ ~'es ^
N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ I-ea ^
N' ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I~es ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 189 Queen Street South Period:
Description: Queen A~uie
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No Q Fes ^ Nr.L ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes - gables in shingle; ~yindows in gable ends; porch colunms and details: wrap around porch but new guard; stained ~lasa: ~yindows: arched, semi-circular; brackets
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchu-e NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
Notes -windows and woodwork need restoration; building is in fair t o good co ndition
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlcctrue hate strong associations ~~ith and;'or
contribute to the underat<2nding of a belief, person, acti~,itc, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, precious or es~sting use significant?
Does this property- meet the definition of a si~rific:urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Proeincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
propert7• or sbucture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our understanding of fire history of c~ pk~ee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxi~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?rilaro«,n ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - associated ~~ith blavor Scluualz
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 226 Queen Street South Period:
Description: eclectic
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmme: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
struchrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strnchue demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes -porch; stonework dormer; chinurey; circular side wall; gambrel roof
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the strucfire N' a ^ Unlaio~xm ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage may not be original
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Notes -siding on side and ~~°itbin dormer; addition at rear aer~- interesting
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlcctrue hate strong associations ~~ith and;'or
contribute to the underat<2nding of a belief, person, acti~,itc, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, precious or es~sting use significant?
Does this property- meet the definition of a si~rific:urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Proeincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
propert7• or sbucture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our understanding of fire history of c~ pk~ee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxi~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?rilaro«,n ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - associated ~~ith blavor Scluualz
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 251 Queen Street South Period:
Description: Italianate
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 15, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this ahuchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No Q Fes ^ Nr.L ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes - buff brick; 2 stored hip roof; prominent front bad ~yindo~~ ;dentist Louis FanCamp; windows; youasoirs; bay window; iron work
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the aheet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchu-e NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable landscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -attractive conifers: located high above the cun~ent grade of Queen Sheet
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - dentist
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 279 Queen Street South Period:
Description: Itlodein
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this ah~uchrre demonyhate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes - stonework; f1S-over
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value RECORDER
Continuity Does this ahlicture contribute to the continuitc N' ~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No Q I"es ^
or character of the ah~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlichu-e N' a ^ Uuliliowu ^ No Q Fea ^
or landscapurg noteworthy?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N -~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liiil. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p<utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
within the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of rn~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this shlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes - ~ bat- garage
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the shlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or ahluture have sh~ong associations with and,'or Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the underst~2nding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or elisting uae significant? N%~ ^ Unlaio~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
Doea this property meet the definition of a si~iific.uit built heritage Uiilaio~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamiing ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnluerl for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - architecfiral firm
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 379 Queen Street South Period:
Description: Italianate
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Name: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ I~es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No Q 1'es ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I~es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
N%a ^ Unlax~~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes - central buret; brick ~york; stained glass; deeoratiye wood work in gable; Brackets; operational shutters; atone foundation; porch was ~yrap around -now
enclosed; front door
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strlichue contr7bute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the str~eetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fiurctional N a ^ Unlaro~xm ^ No Q I"es ^
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 Sm70D11d1llgS'~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No ^ Y es Q
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlicture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -coach house
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N;A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
N .~ ^ L?nkixnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Irztegl•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strnchue occupy its original site? N%a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in moat of its original materials N:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"ea Q
and design features'?
Is this a notable strlichue due to sympathetic N,~~ ^ Unlaio~sn ^ No Q I-es ^
alterations that have taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ Unkno~yn ^ No ^ I'es Q
E~-ALL? ~TION SLTBCOI\IAIITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ ~'es ^
N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ I-ea ^
N' ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I~es ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific:urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - associations with J.1~1. Staebler
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource E~-aluation Form
address: ~6~-~66 Queen Street South Period: Recorder Name: LB/A~I~i'
Description: Georgian
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade ® Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achieyemenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
Notes -
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fea Q N;~~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchue NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscaping noteworthy'?
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No ^ 1"es Q
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a particrdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes - prolimitc to creek; outbuildings but main- are not original to the site
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved.fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N;:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlrctrue hate strong associations ~~ith and;'or
contribute to the underat<2nding of a belief, person, acti~,itc, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, precious or es~sting use significant?
Does this property- meet the definition of a si~rificturt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Proeincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
propert7• or sbucture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our understanding of fire history of c~ pk~ee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
Unlaxi~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Yes Q
L?rilaro«,n ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~en ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts - associations with Joseph Schneider
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 33 Roland Street Period:
Description: Queen Acme
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No Q I'es ^ Nr.L ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ I~es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No Q 1'es ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I~es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
N%a ^ Unlax~~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes - ~~-ood~york; ahingle:'decoratiye gable; brackets; decorative brichyork on balcony ;brick details (e.g. youaaoirs, wood~york on top of gable pea.); original
winclo~ys
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strlichue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the str~eetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fiurctiona N a ^ Unlaro~xm ^ No ^ I'ea Q
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 Sm70D11d1llgS'~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No Q I'ea ^
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlicture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -coach house maybe original or at least an ear1~ addition to the site
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N;A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
N .~ ^ L?nkixnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Irztegl•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strnchue occupy its original site? N%a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in moat of its original materials N:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"ea Q
and design features'?
Is this a notable strlichue due to sympathetic N,~~ ^ Unlaio~sn ^ No Q I-es ^
alterations that have taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ Unkno~yn ^ No ^ I'es Q
E~-ALL? ~TION SLTBCOI\IAIITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ ~'es ^
N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ I-ea ^
N' ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I~es ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
L?nlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 37 Roland Street Period:
Description: Shingle
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmne: LB/Iti«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique eiample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ eimnple N ~-L ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No Q Fes ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Iinish, ci:lftsmanship Ni a ^ Uuluiown Q No ^ I'es ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - S.J. Williams, president of ~'illiama, Cn~eene and Rome; shin gles; shicco; windows; elpoaed rafters; port coche~
Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOA~Il~~IITTEE
N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N A ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _L ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
N'a ^ L?nlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No ^ I es Q
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N;.L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ 1"es Q
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es Q
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -garage shingled but likely not original
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N :~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strucfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Y"es CSI
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 93 ~Fater Street South Period:
Description: Italianate
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Design ot• Plrysical Value RECORDER E~"ALL?~TION SIIBCOA~II~~IITTEE
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q N ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes ^
pmticulm~ architechunl stj•le or t~-pe?
Construction Is this a notable, rare, unique or ear1~ elample N ~-~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No Q Fes ^ N!A ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ I"es ^
of a pmticular material or method of construction?
Design Is this a particularly attractive or unique N,:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes Q N%A ^ LJnlaxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
struchrre becar~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this strucfire demonstrate a high degree N%~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^ N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ I'es ^
of technical or scientific achiev emenf?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, Ilnish, craftsmanship N ? ^ Unluiown Q No ^ I'es ^ N _a ^ L?nh~iown ^ No ^ Fes ^
and'or detail noteworthy?
Notes - brackets; dentil mouldings; porch colunma; chimney`s; stained glass transom
Recorder Nmne: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Contextual Value
RECORDER
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the struchue NA ^ Unliliowu ^ No Q Fes ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a p:utierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this structure have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
NiA ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fea ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ Unl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integrity RECORDER E~'ALi?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
Site Does the struchu~e occupp its original site? N a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q N;A ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
Note: ifrelocatea; i. e. reloeatedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N::a ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q N'A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable struchue clue to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Fes ^ N,~~ ^ L?nlarown ^ No ^ Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^ N- ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes -brick way sandblasted; porch goards mad not be originate new windo~ya; chinme~~ in fair to good condition; b uilding requires some repair
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 109 «'ater Street South Period:
Description: Queen Acme
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atr~uchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, craftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No Q Fes ^ Nr.L ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No Q Fes ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N'_~ ^ Unlaio~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q Fes ^ N a ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
N%a ^ L?nlax,~yn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ Fes ^
Notes - ~~-ide; ~yindorvs and storms; shingle gable; decorative elements in gable; original porch: columns, brackets, trim
Contextual Value REC'oRDER
Continuity Does this structure contribute to the continuity N~~ ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
or character of the atr~eet,neighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the shlrchu-e NA ^ Unliliown ^ No Q Fes ^
or landscapurg noteworthy
Does it provide a phcsicah historicah functional N%-~ ^ Unknown ^ No Q Y"es ^
or visual liril. to its surroundings'?
Landmark Is this a partierdarl~ import:mt aisual landmark ^ R N A ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
~yithin the region, cite or neighbourhood? ^ C
(indicate degree of ~n~portance) Q N
Completeness Does this strlrctnre have other original outbuildings, N' a ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fee ^
notable l:mdscaping or es-tenral features that
complete the site'?
Notes -
Et :~LLL~TION SIIBCOItIAIITTEE
N A ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fea ^
NiA ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fea ^
N ~a ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Nr a ^ LTnl~rxnyn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N _~ ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ I-es ^
Integt•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strlrcfire occupp its original site? N: _a ^ Unlsrown ^ No ^ Fes Q
Note: ifreloccrtec~ i. e. reloecrtedon its
original site, moved•fi~om another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building retain most of its original materials N;'t: ^ Unlaiown ^ No ^ Fes Q
and deai~r features?
Is this a notable shuchue due to scmpathetic N,:~ ^ Unlarown ^ No Q Fes ^
alterations that have taken place Dyer time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes Q
EVALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
NiA ^ Unkno~x%n ^ No ^ Fes ^
N: a ^ L?nlaiown ^ No ^ Fes ^
N,~~ ^ Unlaro~yn ^ No ^ Fes ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ Fe5 ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance RECORDER
Does this property- or shluture have strong associations with and,'or Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^
conhibute to the understanding of a belief, person, acti~,it~, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or existing use significant? N; a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
Doea this property meet the detmition of a si~rific.urt built heritage Uiilaro~xm ^ No ^ I"es CSI
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cY?
~n~opert7• or sbueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
males to our• understanding of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
Notts -
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlarown ^ No ^ I"es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlarown ^ No ^ I'es ^
City of Kitchener
Cultural Heritage Resource Evaluation Form
address: 113 «'ater Street South Period:
Description: Queen Acme
Photographs: Front Facade ® Left Facade ® Right Facade
Recorder Nmue: LB/ItI«'
Rear Facade ® Details ® Setting ® Date: April 1~, 2009
Design ot• Physical Value
St}'le Is this a notable, rare or unique elample of a
pmtieulm~ architechunl stj le or t~ pe?
Construction Ia this a notable, rare, unique or em~1~ elample
of a pmticular material or method of conshliction?
Design Is this a particnlarl~ attractive or unique
shlichrre becm~se of the merits of its design,
composition, craftsmanship or details'?
Does this atruchrre demonstrate a high degree
of technical or scientific achievement?
Interior Is the interior arrangement, finish, ci:lftsmanship
and~or detail noteworthy?
RECORDER Et"ALL? ~TION SIIBCOAIAIITTEE
N :A ^ Unlaro~~n ^ No ^ I'es Q N'.~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No ^ I~es ^
N' ~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No Q 1'es ^ N A ^ Unlax~wn ^ No ^ I~es ^
N'_~ ^ Unlax~~vn ^ No ^ I'es Q N a ^ Unlaio~;n ^ No ^ 1'es ^
N'~ ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I"es ^ N a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I'ea ^
N%a ^ Unlax~~vn Q No ^ I'es ^ N;A ^ L?nlaxnin ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notes - decorative elements; interesting use of materials: stone front entrance, shingle roof on front entrance and porch, red brick turret ~yith finial; gingerbread in
gable; «rap around porch
Contextual Value RECORDER
Contviuity Does this strlichue contr7hute to the continuity N~:A ^ Lhilaiown ^ No ^ I"es Q
or character of the streetneighbourhood or area?
Setting Is the setting or orientation of the atrlicfire N'A ^ Unknown ^ No Q I'ea ^
or landscaping note~x-orthp?
Does it provide aphi-sisal, historical, fimctional N a ^ Unlaro~xm ^ No Q I"es ^
Ol' ~"1sDa1 hllli t0 lt5 SmrOD11d1llgS'~
Landmariz Is this a particularly importmrt visual landmark ^ R N ~L ^ Unlux~wn ^ No Q I'ea ^
within the region, city or neighbourhood'? ^ C
(indicate degree of rmportancel Q N
Completeness Does this shlicture have other original outbuildings, N;' a ^ Unlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
notable landscaping or eitenral features that
complete the site?
Notes -
E~'ALL?~TION SIIBCOIt~IDIITTEE
N a ^ Unliliown ^ No ^ Y ea ^
N _L ^ L?nlaioun ^ No ^ 1~es ^
N .~ ^ L?nkixnyn ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~L ^ Unknown ^ No ^ I'es ^
Ni.L ^ L hilaxnyn ^ No ^ 1'es ^
Irztegl•ity RECORDER
Site Does the strnchue occupy its original site? N%a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ Yes Q
Ivbte: if relocated, i.e. relocated on its
original site, moved from another site, etc.
Alterations Does this building ret<1in moat of its original materials N:a ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I"ea Q
and design features'?
Is this a notable strlichue due to sympathetic N,~~ ^ Unlaio~sn ^ No Q I-es ^
alterations that have taken place over time'?
Condition Is this building in good condition? N ~ ^ Unkno~yn ^ No ^ I'es Q
E~-ALL? ~TION SLTBCOI\IAIITTEE
N ~~ ^ Unlaxnyn ^ No ^ ~'es ^
N :~ ^ Unlnrown ^ No ^ I'es ^
N ~~ ^ Unlaio~yn ^ No ^ I-ea ^
N' ~ ^ Unlarown ^ No ^ I~es ^
Notes -
Historical or Associative Value & Significance
Does this property- or shlichue have strong associations ~~ ith and~'or
contribute to the understanding of a belief, person, activity, organization
or instifition that is significant or unique within the City
Is the original, previous or es~sting use significant?
Does this propert5r meet the definition of a si~rific.urt built heritage
resource or culfiral heritage landscape, as identified in the
Provincial Polio- Statement ender the Ontario Plamring ~cf?
~n~opert7• or sb•ueture nnlue~l for the imprn~tnnt eontribution it
nudes to our understnn~ling of tlae )zistory of n plaee, cm event,
or a people?
RECORDER
L?nlaxnvn ^ No Q I"es ^
N :a ^ Unlaro~an ^ No Q I'es ^
L?iilarown ^ No ^ I-es Q
EVALi? ~TION SIIBCOI\II\IITTEE
Unlaiown ^ No ^ I`es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Unlaro~vn ^ No ^ I'es ^
Notts -